1
|
Poulsen LK, Kirk JW, Raunsø N, Stamp ABM, Lyng KD, Clausen MB. Unravelling interacting barriers and facilitators to adherence and delivery of exercise-based care in the treatment of Subacromial Pain Syndrome - an exploratory qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2024:1-19. [PMID: 39180307 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2388867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Subacromial Pain Syndrome (SAPS) is a common persistent pain condition. Exercise-based care is first-line recommendation, but an insufficient exercise dose hampers effectiveness. This study explores individual and contextual barriers and facilitators for delivery of and adherence to exercise-based care in people with SAPS. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants in this exploratory qualitative study were involved in the management of SAPS in Denmark. Triangular interviews and analyses were conducted within 3 themes (delivery of recommended services, adherence to recommendations, and frames of the clinical pathways) using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Behavioural Change Wheel model (BCW) to map barriers and facilitators into the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) model. RESULTS From interviews with 10 persons with SAPS and 37 healthcare practitioners and double-deductive analyses, 30 subjects of target behaviour within 13 TDF domains emerged across perspectives and COM-B components. Central barriers to delivery and adherence were inconsistencies in diagnostic terminology, cross-professional disagreements, beliefs, and expectations towards pathway services. CONCLUSION We identified interrelated individual and contextual barriers to delivery and adherence across all aspects of the BCW, underpinning the complexity of the subject. Findings support that effectiveness of exercise-based care is linked to contextual barriers to delivery and adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lise Kronborg Poulsen
- Department of Midwifery, Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy and Psychomotor Therapy, Faculty of Health, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jeanette Wassar Kirk
- Department of Clinical Research, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
- Department of Health and Social Context, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Nanna Raunsø
- Department of Midwifery, Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy and Psychomotor Therapy, Faculty of Health, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anna-Birgitte Møller Stamp
- Department of Midwifery, Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy and Psychomotor Therapy, Faculty of Health, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kristian Damgaard Lyng
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Centre for General Practice at Aalborg University, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Bek Clausen
- Department of Midwifery, Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy and Psychomotor Therapy, Faculty of Health, University College Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kien C, Daxenbichler J, Titscher V, Baenziger J, Klingenstein P, Naef R, Klerings I, Clack L, Fila J, Sommer I. Effectiveness of de-implementation of low-value healthcare practices: an overview of systematic reviews. Implement Sci 2024; 19:56. [PMID: 39103927 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01384-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reducing low-value care (LVC) is crucial to improve the quality of patient care while increasing the efficient use of scarce healthcare resources. Recently, strategies to de-implement LVC have been mapped against the Expert Recommendation for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation of strategies. However, such strategies' effectiveness across different healthcare practices has not been addressed. This overview of systematic reviews aimed to investigate the effectiveness of de-implementation initiatives and specific ERIC strategy clusters. METHODS We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Epistemonikos.org and Scopus (Elsevier) from 1 January 2010 to 17 April 2023 and used additional search strategies to identify relevant systematic reviews (SRs). Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts against a priori-defined criteria, assessed the SR quality and extracted pre-specified data. We created harvest plots to display the results. RESULTS Of 46 included SRs, 27 focused on drug treatments, such as antibiotics or opioids, twelve on laboratory tests or diagnostic imaging and seven on other healthcare practices. In categorising de-implementation strategies, SR authors applied different techniques: creating self-developed strategies (n = 12), focussing on specific de-implementation strategies (n = 14) and using published taxonomies (n = 12). Overall, 15 SRs provided evidence for the effectiveness of de-implementation interventions to reduce antibiotic and opioid utilisation. Reduced utilisation, albeit inconsistently significant, was documented in the use of antipsychotics and benzodiazepines, as well as in laboratory tests and diagnostic imaging. Strategies within the adapt and tailor to context, develop stakeholder interrelationships, and change infrastructure and workflow ERIC clusters led to a consistent reduction in LVC practices. CONCLUSION De-implementation initiatives were effective in reducing medication usage, and inconsistent significant reductions were observed for LVC laboratory tests and imaging. Notably, de-implementation clusters such as change infrastructure and workflow and develop stakeholder interrelationships emerged as the most encouraging avenues. Additionally, we provided suggestions to enhance SR quality, emphasising adherence to guidelines for synthesising complex interventions, prioritising appropriateness of care outcomes, documenting the development process of de-implementation initiatives and ensuring consistent reporting of applied de-implementation strategies. REGISTRATION OSF Open Science Framework 5ruzw.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Kien
- Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Dr.-Karl-Dorrek Straße 30, 3500, Krems a.d. Donau, Austria.
| | - Julia Daxenbichler
- Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Dr.-Karl-Dorrek Straße 30, 3500, Krems a.d. Donau, Austria
| | - Viktoria Titscher
- Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Dr.-Karl-Dorrek Straße 30, 3500, Krems a.d. Donau, Austria
| | - Julia Baenziger
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Universitätstrasse 84, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pauline Klingenstein
- Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Dr.-Karl-Dorrek Straße 30, 3500, Krems a.d. Donau, Austria
| | - Rahel Naef
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Universitätstrasse 84, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland
- Centre of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Irma Klerings
- Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Dr.-Karl-Dorrek Straße 30, 3500, Krems a.d. Donau, Austria
| | - Lauren Clack
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Universitätstrasse 84, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland
| | - Julian Fila
- Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Dr.-Karl-Dorrek Straße 30, 3500, Krems a.d. Donau, Austria
| | - Isolde Sommer
- Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Dr.-Karl-Dorrek Straße 30, 3500, Krems a.d. Donau, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kirby E, MacMillan A, Liew BXW, Brinkley A, Bateman A. Characterising the interventions designed to affect the reporting of musculoskeletal imaging: a scoping review protocol using the COM-B model. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072150. [PMID: 38011964 PMCID: PMC10685969 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Attributing musculoskeletal (MSK) pain to normal and commonly occurring imaging findings, such as tendon, cartilage and spinal disc degeneration, has been shown to increase people's fear of movement, reduce their optimism about recovery and increase healthcare costs. Interventions seeking to reduce the negative effects of MSK imaging reporting have had little effect. To understand the ineffectiveness of these interventions, this study seeks to scope their behavioural targets, intended mechanisms of action and theoretical underpinnings. This information alongside known barriers to helpful reporting can enable researchers to refine or create new more targeted interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Search terms will be devised by the research team. Searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED and PsycINFO from inception to current day will be performed. The review will include studies, which have developed or evaluated interventions targeting the reporting of MSK imaging. Studies targeting the diagnosis of serious causes of MSK pain will be excluded. Two independent authors will extract study participant data using predefined extraction templates and intervention details using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist. Interventions will be coded and mapped to the technique, mechanism of action and behavioural target according to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model categories. Any explicit models or theories used to inform the selection of interventions will be extracted and coded. The study characteristics, behaviour change techniques identified, behavioural targets according to the COM-B and context specific theories within the studies will be presented in narrative and table form. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The information from this review will be used to inform an intervention design process seeking to improve the communication of imaging results. The results will also be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and stakeholder events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Kirby
- MSK Physiotherapy Dept, Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Wickford, UK
| | - Andrew MacMillan
- Research department, University College of Osteopathy, London, UK
| | - Bernard X W Liew
- School of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
| | - Andrew Brinkley
- School of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
| | - Andrew Bateman
- School of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alrushud AS, Alamam DM, Almurdi MM, Almutairi SK, Alzahrani RO, Alanazi MS, Dhahi WM, Alshaiqy DM. Primary Investigation of Low Back Pain among Saudi Arabians: A Cross-Sectional Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:12854. [PMID: 36232153 PMCID: PMC9565200 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent disease that affects all ages and is a symptom that induces immobility. Patients' beliefs may influence LBP management, and adjusting detrimental beliefs is required to improve treatment outcomes. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence of LBP within the Saudi population and beliefs regarding LBP, physical activity, rest, imaging, and medication. People with LBP were targeted with a questionnaire containing sections on demographic information and the validated Back Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ), in addition to questions regarding imaging, physical activity, rest and medication. A total of 651 responses were received, 559 of them (86%) experienced LBP. The most common age group was those aged 18-21 (n = 221), 80% from females. The average BBQ score was 27.8 (SD = 5.58). The majority of the respondents held the following beliefs, which are contrary to the best available evidence: back pain must be rested (77.1%) and X-rays or scans are required to gain the best medical care for LBP (73.2%). The Saudi population holds unhelpful beliefs that may affect their quality of life. Healthcare professionals working with patients with LBP have an important role in changing detrimental beliefs and behaviors about the condition.
Collapse
|
5
|
Patey AM, Fontaine G, Francis JJ, McCleary N, Presseau J, Grimshaw JM. Healthcare professional behaviour: health impact, prevalence of evidence-based behaviours, correlates and interventions. Psychol Health 2022; 38:766-794. [PMID: 35839082 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2022.2100887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Healthcare professional (HCP) behaviours are actions performed by individuals and teams for varying and often complex patient needs. However, gaps exist between evidence-informed care behaviours and the care provided. Implementation science seeks to develop generalizable principles and approaches to investigate and address care gaps, supporting HCP behaviour change while building a cumulative science. We highlight theory-informed approaches for defining HCP behaviour and investigating the prevalence of evidence-based care and known correlates and interventions to change professional practice. Behavioural sciences can be applied to develop implementation strategies to support HCP behaviour change and provide valid, reliable tools to evaluate these strategies. There are thousands of different behaviours performed by different HCPs across many contexts, requiring different implementation approaches. HCP behaviours can include activities related to promoting health and preventing illness, assessing and diagnosing illnesses, providing treatments, managing health conditions, managing the healthcare system and building therapeutic alliances. The key challenge is optimising behaviour change interventions that address barriers to and enablers of recommended practice. HCP behaviours may be determined by, but not limited to, Knowledge, Social influences, Intention, Emotions and Goals. Understanding HCP behaviour change is a critical to ensuring advances in health psychology are applied to maximize population health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea M. Patey
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute - General Campus, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Guillaume Fontaine
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute - General Campus, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jillian J. Francis
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute - General Campus, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicola McCleary
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute - General Campus, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Justin Presseau
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute - General Campus, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeremy M. Grimshaw
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute - General Campus, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pike A, Patey A, Lawrence R, Aubrey-Bassler K, Grimshaw J, Mortazhejri S, Dowling S, Jasaui Y, Hall A. Barriers to following imaging guidelines for the treatment and management of patients with low-back pain in primary care: a qualitative assessment guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2022; 23:143. [PMID: 35659251 PMCID: PMC9164352 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01751-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Background Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability and is among the top five reasons that patients visit their family doctors. Over-imaging for non-specific low back pain remains a problem in primary care. To inform a larger study to develop and evaluate a theory-based intervention to reduce inappropriate imaging, we completed an assessment of the barriers and facilitators to reducing unnecessary imaging for NSLBP among family doctors in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL). Methods This was an exploratory, qualitative study describing family doctors’ experiences and practices related to diagnostic imaging for non-specific LBP in NL, guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Data were collected using in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were analyzed deductively (assigning text to one or more domains) and inductively (generating themes at each of the domains) before the results were examined to determine which domains should be targeted to reduce imaging. Results Nine family doctors (four males; five females) working in community (n = 4) and academic (n = 5) clinics in both rural (n = 6) and urban (n = 3) settings participated in this study. We found five barriers to reducing imaging for patients with NSLBP: 1) negative consequences, 2) patient demand 3) health system organization, 4) time, and 5) access to resources. These were related to the following domains: 1) beliefs about consequences, 2) beliefs about capabilities, 3) emotion, 4) reinforcement, 5) environmental context and resources, 6) social influences, and 7) behavioural regulation. Conclusions Family physicians a) fear that if they do not image they may miss something serious, b) face significant patient demand for imaging, c) are working in a system that encourages unnecessary imaging, d) don’t have enough time to counsel patients about why they don’t need imaging, and e) lack access to appropriate practitioners, community programs, and treatment modalities to prescribe to their patients. These barriers were related to seven TDF domains. Successfully reducing inappropriate imaging requires a comprehensive intervention that addresses these barriers using established behaviour change techniques. These techniques should be matched directly to relevant TDF domains. The results of our study represent the important first step of this process – identifying the contextual barriers and the domains to which they are related. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01751-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Pike
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University, Rm 421, Janeway Hostel, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada.
| | - Andrea Patey
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ontario Health Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Rebecca Lawrence
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University, Rm 421, Janeway Hostel, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Kris Aubrey-Bassler
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University, Rm 421, Janeway Hostel, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Jeremy Grimshaw
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ontario Health Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Sameh Mortazhejri
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ontario Health Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Amanda Hall
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University, Rm 421, Janeway Hostel, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|