1
|
Ashcraft LE, Goodrich DE, Hero J, Phares A, Bachrach RL, Quinn DA, Qureshi N, Ernecoff NC, Lederer LG, Scheunemann LP, Rogal SS, Chinman MJ. A systematic review of experimentally tested implementation strategies across health and human service settings: evidence from 2010-2022. Implement Sci 2024; 19:43. [PMID: 38915102 PMCID: PMC11194895 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01369-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies of implementation strategies range in rigor, design, and evaluated outcomes, presenting interpretation challenges for practitioners and researchers. This systematic review aimed to describe the body of research evidence testing implementation strategies across diverse settings and domains, using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) taxonomy to classify strategies and the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to classify outcomes. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of studies examining implementation strategies from 2010-2022 and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021235592). We searched databases using terms "implementation strategy", "intervention", "bundle", "support", and their variants. We also solicited study recommendations from implementation science experts and mined existing systematic reviews. We included studies that quantitatively assessed the impact of at least one implementation strategy to improve health or health care using an outcome that could be mapped to the five evaluation dimensions of RE-AIM. Only studies meeting prespecified methodologic standards were included. We described the characteristics of studies and frequency of implementation strategy use across study arms. We also examined common strategy pairings and cooccurrence with significant outcomes. FINDINGS Our search resulted in 16,605 studies; 129 met inclusion criteria. Studies tested an average of 6.73 strategies (0-20 range). The most assessed outcomes were Effectiveness (n=82; 64%) and Implementation (n=73; 56%). The implementation strategies most frequently occurring in the experimental arm were Distribute Educational Materials (n=99), Conduct Educational Meetings (n=96), Audit and Provide Feedback (n=76), and External Facilitation (n=59). These strategies were often used in combination. Nineteen implementation strategies were frequently tested and associated with significantly improved outcomes. However, many strategies were not tested sufficiently to draw conclusions. CONCLUSION This review of 129 methodologically rigorous studies built upon prior implementation science data syntheses to identify implementation strategies that had been experimentally tested and summarized their impact on outcomes across diverse outcomes and clinical settings. We present recommendations for improving future similar efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Ellen Ashcraft
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - David E Goodrich
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Clinical & Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Angela Phares
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rachel L Bachrach
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Deirdre A Quinn
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Lisa G Lederer
- Clinical & Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Leslie Page Scheunemann
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Shari S Rogal
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Departments of Medicine and Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Matthew J Chinman
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Joseph ML, Williams M, Reinke K, Bair H, Chae S, Hanrahan K, St Marie B, Jenkins P, Albert NM, Gullatte MM, Rogers DM, Swan BA, Holden T, Woods E, DeGuzman PB, DeGennaro G, Marshall D, Hein M, Perkhounkova Y, Huber DL. Development and Testing of the Relational and Structural Components of Innovativeness Across Academia and Practice for Healthcare Progress Scale. J Nurs Adm 2024; 54:260-269. [PMID: 38630941 DOI: 10.1097/nna.0000000000001422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Using data from 5 academic-practice sites across the United States, researchers developed and validated a scale to measure conditions that enable healthcare innovations. BACKGROUND Academic-practice partnerships are a catalyst for innovation and healthcare development. However, limited theoretically grounded evidence exists to provide strategic direction for healthcare innovation across practice and academia. METHODS Phase 1 of the analytical strategy involved scale development using 16 subject matter experts. Phase 2 involved pilot testing the scale. RESULTS The final Innovativeness Across Academia and Practice for Healthcare Progress Scale (IA-APHPS) consisted of 7 domains: 3 relational domains, 2 structural domains, and 2 impact domains. The confirmatory factor analysis model fits well with a comparative fit index of 0.92 and a root-mean-square error of approximation of 0.06 (n = 477). CONCLUSION As the 1st validated scale of healthcare innovation, the IA-APHPS allows nurses to use a diagnostic tool to facilitate innovative processes and outputs across academic-practice partnerships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lindell Joseph
- Author Affiliations: Clinical Professor and Distinguished Scholar in Nursing, and Director of DNP & MSN Health Systems: Administration/Executive Leadership Programs (Dr Joseph), College of Nursing, The University of Iowa; Henry B. Tippie Faculty Research Fellow in Entrepreneurship and Associate Professor of Management and Entrepreneurship (Dr Williams), Tippie College of Business; PhD Student (Reinke), Management and Entrepreneurship Department, Tippie College of Business; Associate Director and Associate Clinical Professor (Dr Bair); and DNP in Anesthesia Nursing Program and Assistant Professor (Dr Chae), College of Nursing, The University of Iowa; Director, Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice (Dr Hanrahan), University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics; and Associate Professor (Dr St. Marie), College of Nursing, The University of Iowa, Iowa City; Associate Dean for Academic Affairs (Dr Jenkins), University of Arizona, Tucson; Associate Chief Nursing Officer (Dr Albert), Research and Innovation, Zielony Nursing Institute; Clinical Nurse Specialist (Dr Albert), George M. and Linda H. Kaufman Center for Heart Failure Treatment and Recovery; and Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute and Consultive Staff (Dr Albert), Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio; Corporate Director (Dr Gullatte), Nursing Research and Evidence Based Practice, Emory Healthcare; Adjunct Faculty (Dr Gullatte), Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University; Nurse Scientist (Dr Rogers), DeKalb Operating Unit (DOU), Emory Healthcare; Senior Instructor (Dr Rogers), Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University; and Clinical Track Associate Professor, Dean and Vice President for Academic Practice Partnerships, Executive Director for the Emory Nursing Learning Center and Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, and Co-director of the Woodruff Health Sciences Center Interprofessional Education and Clinical Practice Office (Dr Swan), Emory University, Atlanta; Lead Advanced Practice Provider (Dr Holden), Emory Johns Creek Hospital, Johns Creek; and Magnet® Program Director for Emory Orthopedics and Spine Hospital, and Assistant Clinical Professor (Dr Woods), Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Nurse Scientist (Dr DeGuzman), University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville; Professor, Academic Director of Clinical Partnerships, and Assistant Department Chair of Acute and Specialty Care (Dr DeGennaro), University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville; Senior Vice President, Chief Nursing Executive, and James R. Klinenberg, MD, and Lynn Klinenberg Linkin Chair in Nursing in Honor of Linda Burnes Bolton (Dr Marshall), Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, California; and Data Manager (Hein) and Statistician Manager (Dr Perkhounkova), Office for Nursing Research and Scholarship, College of Nursing; and Tenured Full Professor Emeritus (Dr Huber), College of Nursing and College of Public Health, The University of Iowa, Iowa City
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
DeVore K, Schneider K, Laures E, Harmon A, Van Heukelom P. Improving Outcomes in Patients Sent to the Emergency Department from Outpatient Providers: A Receiver-Driven Handoff Process Improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2024; 50:363-370. [PMID: 38368190 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outpatient providers refer to emergency departments (EDs) due to findings requiring assessment beyond existing capabilities. However, poor communication surrounding these transitions may hinder safety and timeliness of emergency care. Receiver-driven handoff (RDH) is a process that helps ensure that all pertinent information is shared. This quality improvement project aimed to (1) improve knowledge of RDH, (2) increase satisfaction and perceptions surrounding RDH, (3) modify behaviors in relation to RDH, and (4) decrease referred patients leaving without being seen (LWBS). METHODS The Iowa Model and Implementation Framework guided this evidence-based quality improvement project. A multidisciplinary team developed and implemented a standardized RDH process consisting of screening to determine whether a patient was referred to the ED, review of electronic health record (EHR), and use of EHR documentation. Process measures were collected via questionnaire pre- and postimplementation and were analyzed quantitatively. Outcome measures were trended by a statistical process control p-chart, which was developed to demonstrate changes in the percentage of patients who were referred to the ED from the outpatient setting and LWBS. RESULTS The average response for the question "How satisfied are you with the handoff of patient information from referring clinic providers to the ED?" increased from 1.51 preintervention to 2.04 postintervention (p = 0.005). Respondents rated the information received during handoff higher postintervention (2.12 vs. 2.52, p = 0.04). Compliance with screening for referral to the ED was 84.0%. The proportion of patients LWBS after referral decreased by 6.2 percentage points (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Using RDH in conjunction with a standardized triage screening may improve quality of information shared during this vulnerable transition and may assist in reduction of referred patients LWBS. The RDH process should be adapted into everyday workflow to ensure sustainability and effectiveness.
Collapse
|
4
|
Purtle J, Stadnick NA, Wynecoop M, Walker SC, Bruns EJ, Aarons GA. Acceptability and feasibility of policy implementation strategies for taxes earmarked for behavioral health services. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2024; 4:1304049. [PMID: 38638608 PMCID: PMC11025354 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1304049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
Background This study's aims are to: (1) Compare the acceptability and feasibility of five types of implementation strategies that could be deployed to increase the reach of evidence-based practices (EBPs) with revenue from policies that earmark taxes for behavioral health services, and (2) Illustrate how definitions of implementation strategies and measures of acceptability and feasibility can be used in policy-focused implementation science research. Methods Web-based surveys of public agency and community organization professionals involved with earmarked tax policy implementation were completed in 2022-2023 (N = 211, response rate = 24.9%). Respondents rated the acceptability and feasibility of five types of implementation strategies (dissemination, implementation process, integration, capacity-building, and scale-up). Aggregate acceptability and feasibility scores were calculated for each type of strategy (scoring range 4-20). Analyses of variance compared scores across strategies and between organizational actor types. Findings For acceptability, capacity-building strategies had the highest rating (M = 16.3, SD = 3.0), significantly higher than each of the four other strategies, p ≤ . 004), and scale-up strategies had the lowest rating (M = 15.6). For feasibility, dissemination strategies had the highest rating (M = 15.3, significantly higher than three of the other strategies, p ≤ .002) and scale-up strategies had the lowest rating (M = 14.4). Conclusions Capacity-building and dissemination strategies may be well-received and readily deployed by policy implementers to support EBPs implementation with revenue from taxes earmarked for behavioral health services. Adapting definitions of implementation strategies for policy-focused topics, and applying established measures of acceptability and feasibility to these strategies, demonstrates utility as an approach to advance research on policy-focused implementation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Purtle
- Department of Public Health Policy & Management, Global Center for Implementation Science, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Nicole A. Stadnick
- Department of Psychiatry, Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute Dissemination and Implementation Science Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Megan Wynecoop
- Department of Public Health Policy & Management, Global Center for Implementation Science, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Sarah C. Walker
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Eric J. Bruns
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Gregory A. Aarons
- Department of Psychiatry, Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute Dissemination and Implementation Science Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
DeGuzman PB, Abooali S, Sadatsafavi H, Bohac G, Sochor M. Back to basics: Practical strategies to reduce sensory overstimulation in the emergency department identified by adults and caregivers of children with autism spectrum disorder. Int Emerg Nurs 2024; 72:101384. [PMID: 37988775 DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2023.101384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sensory overstimulation of autistic patients of all ages during an ED visit can ultimately lead to care escalation, but few studies have evaluated patient perspectives on improving the ED sensory experience across the age continuum. The purpose of this study was to explore patient-centered perspectives on reducing adult and pediatric autistic patients' sensory stimulation during an ED visit. METHODS We used a qualitative descriptive design to explore how autistic patients experience sensory disruption and recommendations to improve care. Data were analyzed inductively using an overall categorization of 6 senses (visual, auditory, touch, smell, taste, and proprioception). RESULTS Fourteen adults and 30 caregivers of children provided written responses to open-ended interview questions (n = 44). Participants suggested strategies to minimize the sensory disruption they experienced; however, an overarching recommendation was for clinicians to ask about their or their child's preferences before delivering care or services. CONCLUSION Because people with autism are more likely to visit an ED than their neurotypical counterparts, ED clinicians should be proficient in "sensory-friendly care." A variety of evidence-based practical strategies and design approaches exist that can be leveraged to reduce the risk of care escalation; however, the most basic may be to prioritize asking patients and their caregivers about their preferences prior to providing care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela B DeGuzman
- Schoool of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
| | - Setareh Abooali
- Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, United States
| | | | - Genevieve Bohac
- School of Education and Human Development, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Mark Sochor
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
King O, West E, Alston L, Beks H, Callisaya M, Huggins CE, Murray M, Mc Namara K, Pang M, Payne W, Peeters A, Pithie M, Sayner AM, Wong Shee A. Models and approaches for building knowledge translation capacity and capability in health services: a scoping review. Implement Sci 2024; 19:7. [PMID: 38287351 PMCID: PMC10823722 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01336-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Building healthcare service and health professionals' capacity and capability to rapidly translate research evidence into health practice is critical to the effectiveness and sustainability of healthcare systems. This review scoped the literature describing programmes to build knowledge translation capacity and capability in health professionals and healthcare services, and the evidence supporting these. METHODS This scoping review was undertaken using the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. Four research databases (Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycInfo) were searched using a pre-determined strategy. Eligible studies described a programme implemented in healthcare settings to build health professional or healthcare service knowledge translation capacity and capability. Abstracts and full texts considered for inclusion were screened by two researchers. Data from included papers were extracted using a bespoke tool informed by the scoping review questions. RESULTS Database searches yielded 10,509 unique citations, of which 136 full texts were reviewed. Thirty-four papers were included, with three additional papers identified on citation searching, resulting in 37 papers describing 34 knowledge translation capability building programmes. Programmes were often multifaceted, comprising a combination of two or more strategies including education, dedicated implementation support roles, strategic research-practice partnerships and collaborations, co-designed knowledge translation capability building programmes, and dedicated funding for knowledge translation. Many programmes utilised experiential and collaborative learning, and targeted either individual, team, organisational, or system levels of impact. Twenty-seven programmes were evaluated formally using one or more data collection methods. Outcomes measured varied significantly and included participant self-reported outcomes, perceived barriers and enablers of knowledge translation, milestone achievement and behaviour change. All papers reported that programme objectives were achieved to varying degrees. CONCLUSIONS Knowledge translation capacity and capability building programmes in healthcare settings are multifaceted, often include education to facilitate experiential and collaborative learning, and target individual, team, organisational, or supra-organisational levels of impact. Although measured differently across the programmes, the outcomes were positive. The sustainability of programmes and outcomes may be undermined by the lack of long-term funding and inconsistent evaluation. Future research is required to develop evidence-informed frameworks to guide methods and outcome measures for short-, medium- and longer-term programme evaluation at the different structural levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia King
- Western Alliance, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia.
- Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia.
- Monash University, Monash Centre for Scholarship in Health Education, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
| | - Emma West
- Western Alliance, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
- Deakin University, Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Laura Alston
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
- Research Unit, Colac Area Health, Colac, VIC, Australia
| | - Hannah Beks
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
| | - Michele Callisaya
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Catherine E Huggins
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Deakin University, Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Margaret Murray
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
| | - Kevin Mc Namara
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | - Anna Peeters
- Western Alliance, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
- Deakin University, Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Mia Pithie
- Grampians Health, Ballarat, VIC, Australia
| | - Alesha M Sayner
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
- Grampians Health, Ballarat, VIC, Australia
| | - Anna Wong Shee
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
- Grampians Health, Ballarat, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Blackburn AM, Katz BW, Oesterle DW, Orchowski LM. Preventing sexual violence in sexual orientation and gender diverse communities: A call to action. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2024; 15:2297544. [PMID: 38197295 PMCID: PMC10783832 DOI: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2297544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual orientation and gender diverse (SOGD) communities are at disproportionately higher risk for sexual violence compared to cisgender heterosexual people. Despite this elevated risk, relatively few sexual violence prevention efforts effectively reduce these victimization disparities based on sexual orientation or gender identity.Objective: This narrative review provides an overview of the prevalence of sexual violence in the SOGD communities, delineates risk factors for sexual victimization among SOGD community members, and reviews and evaluates existing prevention efforts for the SOGD communities. We outline specific recommendations for ensuring that prevention efforts meet the needs of the SOGD communities.Method: Drawing on ecological systems theory and public health approaches to sexual violence prevention, we outline current approaches and opportunities for preventionists and scholars to push the field forward.Results: There have been promising prevention programmes designed to be implemented within SOGD communities specifically; however, it is important that general primary prevention programmes endeavour to specifically address sexual violence perpetrated against SOGD people. While many packaged programmes that endeavour to prevent sexual violence across all gender identities and sexual orientations are inclusive of SOGD participants, more programming is needed that integrates anti-oppression training to target social norms that perpetuate SOGD-specific rape myths and normalize sexual violence against SOGD community members.Conclusion: Ecological prevention strategies in line with a public health approach for primary prevention may be particularly valuable for reducing victimization disparities based on SOGD status and identity. Comprehensive sexual education and anti-discrimination policies should be considered front-line prevention programming. To assess if these strategies are effective, the implementation of large-scale surveillance surveys that use comprehensive assessments of sexual orientation, gender identity, and sexual violence are needed. Using theoretically grounded implementation strategies for prevention programmes can ensure effective programme delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allyson M. Blackburn
- Department of Psychology, Division of Clinical-Community Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA
| | - Benjamin W. Katz
- Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Daniel W. Oesterle
- Department of Psychological Sciences, College of Health & Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Lindsay M. Orchowski
- Department of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ziam S, Lanoue S, McSween-Cadieux E, Gervais MJ, Lane J, Gaid D, Chouinard LJ, Dagenais C, Ridde V, Jean E, Fleury FC, Hong QN, Prigent O. A scoping review of theories, models and frameworks used or proposed to evaluate knowledge mobilization strategies. Health Res Policy Syst 2024; 22:8. [PMID: 38200612 PMCID: PMC10777658 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01090-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evaluating knowledge mobilization strategies (KMb) presents challenges for organizations seeking to understand their impact to improve KMb effectiveness. Moreover, the large number of theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) available can be confusing for users. Therefore, the purpose of this scoping review was to identify and describe the characteristics of TMFs that have been used or proposed in the literature to evaluate KMb strategies. METHODS A scoping review methodology was used. Articles were identified through searches in electronic databases, previous reviews and reference lists of included articles. Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened in duplicate. Data were charted using a piloted data charting form. Data extracted included study characteristics, KMb characteristics, and TMFs used or proposed for KMb evaluation. An adapted version of Nilsen (Implement Sci 10:53, 2015) taxonomy and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) taxonomy (Powell et al. in Implement Sci 10:21, 2015) guided data synthesis. RESULTS Of the 4763 search results, 505 were retrieved, and 88 articles were eligible for review. These consisted of 40 theoretical articles (45.5%), 44 empirical studies (50.0%) and four protocols (4.5%). The majority were published after 2010 (n = 70, 79.5%) and were health related (n = 71, 80.7%). Half of the studied KMb strategies were implemented in only four countries: Canada, Australia, the United States and the United Kingdom (n = 42, 47.7%). One-third used existing TMFs (n = 28, 31.8%). According to the adapted Nilsen taxonomy, process models (n = 34, 38.6%) and evaluation frameworks (n = 28, 31.8%) were the two most frequent types of TMFs used or proposed to evaluate KMb. According to the ERIC taxonomy, activities to "train and educate stakeholders" (n = 46, 52.3%) were the most common, followed by activities to "develop stakeholder interrelationships" (n = 23, 26.1%). Analysis of the TMFs identified revealed relevant factors of interest for the evaluation of KMb strategies, classified into four dimensions: context, process, effects and impacts. CONCLUSIONS This scoping review provides an overview of the many KMb TMFs used or proposed. The results provide insight into potential dimensions and components to be considered when assessing KMb strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saliha Ziam
- School of Business Administration, Université TÉLUQ, Montreal, Canada.
| | - Sèverine Lanoue
- Department of School and Social Adaptation Studies, Faculty of Education, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Esther McSween-Cadieux
- Department of School and Social Adaptation Studies, Faculty of Education, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | | | - Julie Lane
- Department of School and Social Adaptation Studies, Faculty of Education, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
- Centre RBC d'expertise Universitaire en Santé Mentale, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Dina Gaid
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | | | - Valéry Ridde
- Université Paris Cité, IRD (Institute for Research on Sustainable Development, CEPED, Paris, France
- Institute of Health and Development (ISED), Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Emmanuelle Jean
- Public Health Intelligence and Knowledge Translation Division, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Canada
| | - France Charles Fleury
- Coordinator of the Interregional Consortium of Knowledge in Health and Social Services (InterS4), Rimouski, Canada
| | - Quan Nha Hong
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Ollivier Prigent
- Department of School and Social Adaptation Studies, Faculty of Education, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rochette C, Mériade L, Cassière F. A grounded theory-based qualitative approach for examining local implementation of public health policies during crises. MethodsX 2023; 11:102439. [PMID: 38023318 PMCID: PMC10630630 DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background COVID-19's emergence questions the agility of health policy deployment in a context of urgency. This exceptional pandemic offers a unique Implementation Science study opportunity. It reveals how actors adapt, coordinate, and mitigate an unknown global threat to safeguard populations from an initially mysterious virus. Limited research has explored how involved players act and adapt their practices to fulfil health protection missions during a global health crisis. Bridging the gap between public policy expectations and achievements requires a methodology for stakeholder identification and implementation practice description. Objective Focusing on COVID-19 management in France's second-largest region, we investigate ministerial recommendation implementation and the emergence of new links, coordination modes, and practices. Methods Due to the novel subject, we adopted grounded theory. Initial documentary data collection identifies stakeholders for subsequent interviews. Open-ended coding of collected discourse enables content analysis. Results Findings reveal a crisis-driven re-evaluation of stakeholder relationships. This research identifies three levels of implementation of health policies at the local level (administrative, organizational and operational) and reveals different types of coordination specific to each of these levels. Our results provide insights on how to better coordinate and implement healthcare policies in a period of crisis. Recommendations include real-life simulations of large-scale crises. Conclusion Our work establishes a methodological foundation for analysing coordination dynamics. Future research could compare these findings with other unpredictable health emergencies, such as episiotomic veterinary health crises.•The first step of the method is to analyse the guidelines of health policy implementation during the Covid-19 crisis and to identify the main stakeholders in charge of the local health policy implementation.•The second step consists of interviewing these stakeholders using a co-constructed sample and structural coding of their speech to reveal the forms of coordination between stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corinne Rochette
- IAE Clermont Auvergne – ClerMa, Research Chair "Santé et Territoires" University Clermont Auvergne, 11 Boulevard Charles de Gaulle, Clermont-Ferrand 63 000, France
| | - Laurent Mériade
- IAE Clermont Auvergne – ClerMa, Research Chair "Santé et Territoires" University Clermont Auvergne, 11 Boulevard Charles de Gaulle, Clermont-Ferrand 63 000, France
| | - François Cassière
- IAE Clermont Auvergne – ClerMa, Research Chair "Santé et Territoires" University Clermont Auvergne, 11 Boulevard Charles de Gaulle, Clermont-Ferrand 63 000, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aloisio LD, Graham N, Grinspun D, Naik S, Coughlin M, Medeiros C, McConnell H, Sales A, McNeill S, Santos WJ, Squires JE. Indicators to measure implementation and sustainability of nursing best practice guidelines: A mixed methods analysis. Heliyon 2023; 9:e19983. [PMID: 37809679 PMCID: PMC10559663 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The use of best practice guidelines (BPGs) has the potential to decrease the gap between best evidence and nursing and healthcare practices. We conducted an exploratory mixed method study to identify strategies, processes, and indicators relevant to the implementation and sustainability of two Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO) BPGs at Best Practice Spotlight Organizations® (BPSOs). Methods Our study had four phases. In Phase 1, we triangulated two qualitative studies: a) secondary analysis of 126 narrative reports detailing implementation progress from 21 BPSOs spanning four sectors to identify strategies and processes used to support the implementation and sustainability of BPGs and b) interviews with 25 guideline implementers to identify additional strategies and processes. In Phase 2, we evaluated correlations between strategies and processes identified from the narrative reports and one process and one outcome indicator for each of the guideline. In Phase 3, the results from Phases 1 and 2 informed indicator development, led by an expert panel. In Phase 4, the indicators were assessed internally by RNAO staff and externally by Ontario Health Teams. A survey was used to validate proposed indicators to determine relevance, feasibility, readability, and usability with knowledge users and BPSO leaders. Results Triangulation of the two qualitative studies revealed 46 codes of implementation and sustainability of BPGs, classified into eight overarching themes: Stakeholder Engagement, Practice Interventions, Capacity Building, Evidence-Based Culture, Leadership, Evaluation & Monitoring, Communication, and Governance. A total of 28 structure, process, or outcome indicators were developed. End users and BPSO leaders were agreeable with the indicators according to the validation survey. Conclusions Many processes and strategies can influence the implementation and sustainability of BPGs at BPSOs. We have developed indicators that can help BPSOs promote evidence-informed practice implementation of BPGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura D. Aloisio
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Nicole Graham
- University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Doris Grinspun
- Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shanoja Naik
- Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mary Coughlin
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Christina Medeiros
- Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Anne Sales
- Sinclair School of Nursing and Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
- Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Susan McNeill
- Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Wilmer J. Santos
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Janet E. Squires
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhang Y, Cook C, Fallon L, Corbin C, Ehrhart M, Brown E, Locke J, Lyon A. The Interaction Between General and Strategic Leadership and Climate on Their Multilevel Associations with Implementer Attitudes Toward Universal Prevention Programs for Youth Mental Health: A Cross-Sectional Study. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2023; 50:427-449. [PMID: 36585557 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-022-01248-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Emerging literature has highlighted the importance of discerning general and strategic organizational context (OC) factors (e.g., leadership and climate) and their interaction effect on individual implementation behaviors (e.g., attitudes toward evidence-based practices; EBPs) in youth mental healthcare. This study aimed to examine how leadership and climate (general and strategic) are associated with implementer attitudes toward EBPs across the individual and organizational levels and their interaction effect in schools. A series of multilevel models (MLMs) were fitted on a diverse sample of schools actively implementing universal prevention programs for youth mental health (441 implementers from 52 schools). The organization-level aggregates and individual educators' perceptions of general and strategic leadership and climate, and their interaction terms, were entered as level-2 and level-1 predictors of four attitudinal dimensions (Requirement, Openness, Appeal, and Divergence) based on their level of measurement. At the organizational level, higher levels of strategic leadership and climate, but not their general counterparts, were consistently associated with more favorable attitudes in all four dimensions. At the individual/within-school level, higher levels of perceived general and strategic leadership and climate were associated with more favorable attitudes of Requirement and Openness. At the organizational/between-school level, general climate moderated the positive effect of strategic climate on implementers' perception of appeal and divergence of EBPs. Our findings indicate that leaders should make data-based decisions to allocate resources on strategic and/or general leadership and climate to foster favorable staff attitudes toward EBPs based on the level of measurement, implementation-specificity, and attitudinal dimensions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanchen Zhang
- Department of Psychological & Quantitative Foundations, The University of Iowa, 361 Lindquist Center, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
| | - Clay Cook
- Department of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, 341 Education Sciences Building, 56 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Lindsay Fallon
- Department of Counseling and School Psychology, University of Massachusetts-Boston, 100 William T. Morrissey Blvd., Boston, MA, 02125, USA
| | - Catherine Corbin
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 110, Box 354920, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA
| | - Mark Ehrhart
- Department of Industrial/Organizational Psychology, University of Central Florida, 4111 Pictor Lane, Orlando, FL, 32816, USA
| | - Eric Brown
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, 33124, USA
| | - Jill Locke
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 110, Box 354920, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA
| | - Aaron Lyon
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 110, Box 354920, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
McNett M, Gorsuch PF, Gallagher-Ford L, Thomas B, Mazurek Melnyk B, Tucker S. Development and Evaluation of the Fuld Institute Evidence-based Implementation and Sustainability Toolkit for Health Care Settings. Nurs Adm Q 2023; 47:161-172. [PMID: 36649578 DOI: 10.1097/naq.0000000000000569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Routine implementation and sustainability of evidence-based practices (EBPs) into health care is often the most difficult stage in the change process. Despite major advances in implementation science and quality improvement, a persistent 13- to 15-year research-to-practice gap remains. Nurse leaders may benefit from tools to support implementation that are based on scientific evidence and can be readily integrated into complex health care settings. This article describes development and evaluation of an evidence-based implementation and sustainability toolkit used by health care clinicians seeking to implement EBPs. For this project, implementation science and EBP experts created initial iterations of the toolkit based on Rogers' change theory, the Advancing Research through Close Collaboration (ARCC) model, and phases and strategies from implementation science. Face validity and end-user feedback were obtained after piloting the tool with health care clinicians participating in immersive EBP sessions. The toolkit was then modified, with subsequent content validity and usability evaluations conducted among implementation science experts and health care clinicians. This article presents the newly updated Fuld Institute Evidence-based Implementation and Sustainability Toolkit for health care settings. Nurse leaders seeking to implement EBPs may benefit from an evidence-based toolkit to provide a science-informed approach to implementation and sustainability of practice changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly McNett
- Helene Fuld Health Trust National Institute for Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare (Drs McNett, Gorsuch, Gallagher-Ford, Mazurek Melnyk, and Tucker and Ms Thomas), College of Nursing (Drs McNett, Mazurek Melnyk, and Tucker), and College of Medicine (Dr Mazurek Melnyk), The Ohio State University, Columbus; and Summa Health System, Akron, Ohio (Dr Gorsuch)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Implementation of Peer Messengers to Deliver Feedback: An Observational Study to Promote Professionalism in Nursing. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2023; 49:14-25. [PMID: 36400699 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2022.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Co-Worker Observation System (CORS) is a tool and a process to address disrespectful behavior through feedback from trained peer messengers. First used by physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs), CORS has been shown to decrease instances of unprofessional behaviors among physicians and APPs. The research team assessed the feasibility and fidelity of implementing CORS for staff nurses. METHODS CORS was implemented at three academic medical centers using a project bundle with 10 essential implementation elements. Reports of unprofessional behavior among staff nurses that were submitted through the institution's electronic reporting system were screened through natural language processing software, coded by trained CORS coders using the Martinez taxonomy, and referred to a trained peer messenger to share the observations with the nurse. A mixed methods, observational design assessed feasibility and fidelity. RESULTS A total of 590 reports from three sites were identified by the Center for Patient and Professional Advocacy from September 1, 2019, through August 31, 2021. Most reports included more than one problematic behavior, each of which was coded. Of the peer messages, 76.5% were successfully documented using the debriefing survey as complete, 2.2% as awaiting messenger feedback, and 0.2% as awaiting messenger assignments (total of 78.9 % considered delivered). A total of 21.1% were not shared; 4.7% of reports were intentionally not shared because the issue stemmed from a new system or policy implementation (4.0%) or because of known factors affecting the nurse (0.7%). CONCLUSION CORS can be implemented with staff nurses efficiently when nursing infrastructure is adequate.
Collapse
|
14
|
Cullen L, Laures E, Hanrahan K, Edmonds S. The Coat Hook Analogy and the Precision Implementation Approach® Solution. J Perianesth Nurs 2022; 37:732-736. [PMID: 36182248 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2022.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Cullen
- Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Nursing Services and Patient Care, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA.
| | - Elyse Laures
- Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Nursing Services and Patient Care, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA
| | - Kirsten Hanrahan
- Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Nursing Services and Patient Care, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA
| | - Stephanie Edmonds
- Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Nursing Services and Patient Care, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Evidence Into Practice: Journal Clubs as an Implementation Strategy. J Perianesth Nurs 2022; 37:411-415. [PMID: 35667816 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2021.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
16
|
Song Y, MacEachern L, Doupe MB, Ginsburg L, Chamberlain SA, Cranley L, Easterbrook A, Hoben M, Knopp-Sihota J, Reid RC, Wagg A, Estabrooks CA, Keefe JM, Rappon T, Berta WB. Influences of post-implementation factors on the sustainability, sustainment, and intra-organizational spread of complex interventions. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:666. [PMID: 35581651 PMCID: PMC9116057 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08026-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Complex interventions are increasingly applied to healthcare problems. Understanding of post-implementation sustainment, sustainability, and spread of interventions is limited. We examine these phenomena for a complex quality improvement initiative led by care aides in 7 care homes (long-term care homes) in Manitoba, Canada. We report on factors influencing these phenomena two years after implementation. Methods Data were collected in 2019 via small group interviews with unit- and care home-level managers (n = 11) from 6 of the 7 homes using the intervention. Interview participants discussed post-implementation factors that influenced continuing or abandoning core intervention elements (processes, behaviors) and key intervention benefits (outcomes, impact). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed with thematic analysis. Results Sustainment of core elements and sustainability of key benefits were observed in 5 of the 6 participating care homes. Intra-unit intervention spread occurred in 3 of 6 homes. Factors influencing sustainment, sustainability, and spread related to intervention teams, unit and care home, and the long-term care system. Conclusions Our findings contribute understanding on the importance of micro-, meso-, and macro-level factors to sustainability of key benefits and sustainment of some core processes. Inter-unit spread relates exclusively to meso-level factors of observability and practice change institutionalization. Interventions should be developed with post-implementation sustainability in mind and measures taken to protect against influences such as workforce instability and competing internal and external demands. Design should anticipate need to adapt interventions to strengthen post-implementation traction. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08026-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuting Song
- School of Nursing, Qingdao University, 308 Ningxia Road, Qingdao, 266071, Shandong Province, China. .,Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 5-305, 11405 87 Ave, AB, T6G 1C9, Edmonton, Canada.
| | - Lauren MacEachern
- Management & Evaluation, Institute for Health Policy, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 425, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada
| | - Malcolm B Doupe
- Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, 408-727 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 3P5, Canada
| | - Liane Ginsburg
- School of Health Policy & Management, York University, Stong College 353, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada
| | - Stephanie A Chamberlain
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, 6-50 University Terrace, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2T4, Canada
| | - Lisa Cranley
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College Street Suite 130, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada
| | - Adam Easterbrook
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul's Hospital, 588 - 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, B.C., V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Matthias Hoben
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 5-305, 11405 87 Ave, AB, T6G 1C9, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Jennifer Knopp-Sihota
- Faculty of Health Disciplines, Athabasca University, 1 University Drive, Athabasca, AB, T9S 3A3, Canada
| | - R Colin Reid
- School of Health and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia - Okanagan campus, 1147 Research Road, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada
| | - Adrian Wagg
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, 1-198 Clinical Sciences building, 11350 - 83Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P4, Canada
| | - Carole A Estabrooks
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 5-305, 11405 87 Ave, AB, T6G 1C9, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Janice M Keefe
- Nova Scotia Centre On Aging, Mount Saint Vincent University, McCain 201F, 166 Bedford Hwy, Halifax, NS, B3M 2J6, Canada
| | - Tim Rappon
- Management & Evaluation, Institute for Health Policy, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 425, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada
| | - Whitney B Berta
- Management & Evaluation, Institute for Health Policy, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 425, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Using an implementation science framework to advance the science of nursing education. J Prof Nurs 2022; 39:139-145. [DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|