Preliminary result of definitive radiotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have underlying idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: comparison between X-ray and proton therapy

Pathogenic mechanisms and latest therapeutic approaches for radiation-induced lung injury: a narrative review

The treatment of thoracic tumors with ionizing radiation can cause radiation-induced lung injury (RILI), which includes radiation pneumonitis and radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Preventing RILI is crucial for controlling tumor growth and improving quality of life. However, the serious adverse effects of traditional RILI treatment methods remain a major obstacle, necessitating the development of novel treatment options that are both safe and effective. This review summarizes the molecular mechanisms of RILI and explores novel treatment options, including natural compounds, gene therapy, nanomaterials, and mesenchymal stem cells. These recent experimental approaches show potential as effective prevention and treatment options for RILI in clinical practice.

Preliminary Results of Developing Imaging Complexity Biomarkers for the Incidence of Severe Radiation Pneumonitis Following Radiotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Underlying Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has the potential to cause fatal pulmonary toxicity after radiotherapy and can increase the morbidity and mortality of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. In this context, we aimed to develop imaging complexity biomarkers to predict the incidence of severe pulmonary toxicity in patients with NSCLC who have underlying IPF and are treated with radiotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 19 patients with NSCLC who had underlying IPF and were treated with radiotherapy at the Korea University Guro Hospital between March 2018 and December 2022. To quantify the morphometric complexity of the lung parenchyma, box-counting fractal dimensions and lacunarity analyses were performed on pre-radiotherapy simulation chest computed tomography scans. Results: Of the 19 patients, the incidence of grade 3 or higher radiation pneumonitis was observed in 8 (42.1%). After adjusting for age, sex, smoking status, histology, and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, eight patients with a lower fractal dimension showed a significantly higher hazard ratio of 7.755 (1.168-51.51) for grade 3 or higher pneumonitis than those with a higher fractal dimension. Patients with lower lacunarity exhibited significantly lower hazards in all models, both with and without adjustments. The lower-than-median lacunarity group also showed significantly lower incidence curves for all models built in this study. Conclusions: We devised a technique for quantifying morphometric complexity in NSCLC patients with IPF on radiotherapy and discovered lacunarity as a potential imaging biomarker for grade 3 or higher pneumonitis.

Risk factor analysis of the development of severe radiation pneumonitis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with curative radiotherapy, with focus on underlying pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

We aim to identify the multifaceted risk factors that can affect the development of severe radiation pneumonitis (RP) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with curative high-dose radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 175 patients with stage-I-III NSCLC treated with curative thoracic X-ray radiotherapy at the Korea University Guro Hospital between June 2019 and June 2022. Treatment-related complications were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03).

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 15 months (range: 3-47 months). Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) as an underlying lung disease (P < 0.001) and clinical stage, regarded as the concurrent use of chemotherapy (P = 0.009), were associated with a high rate of severe RP. In multivariate analyses adjusting confounding variables, the presence of IPF as an underlying disease was significantly associated with severe RP (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 48.4 [9.09-347]; P < 0.001). In a subgroup analysis of stage-I-II NSCLC, the incidence of severe RP in the control, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and IPF groups was 3.2%, 4.3%, and 42.9%, respectively (P < 0.001). The incidence of severe RP was 15.2%, 10.7%, and 75.0% in the control, COPD, and IPF groups, respectively (P < 0.001) in the stage-III NSCLC group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that IPF as an underlying lung disease and the concurrent use of chemotherapy are associated with a high rate of severe RP. In contrast, COPD did not increase the risk of pulmonary toxicity after receiving curative high-dose radiotherapy.

Proton versus photon radiation therapy: A clinical review

While proton radiation therapy offers substantially better dose distribution characteristics than photon radiation therapy in certain clinical applications, data demonstrating a quantifiable clinical advantage is still needed for many treatment sites. Unfortunately, the number of patients treated with proton radiation therapy is still comparatively small, in some part due to the lack of evidence of clear benefits over lower-cost photon-based treatments. This review is designed to present the comparative clinical outcomes between proton and photon therapies, and to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge regarding the effectiveness of proton radiation therapy.

Recombinant Endostatin as a Potential Radiosensitizer in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most prevalent type of lung cancer, which is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Over the past decades, tumour angiogenesis has been intensely studied in the treatment of NSCLC due to its fundamental role in cancer progression. Several anti-angiogenic drugs, such as recombinant endostatin (RE), have been evaluated in several preclinical and clinical trials, with mixed and often disappointing results. However, there is currently an emerging interest in RE due to its ability to create a vascular normalization window, which could further improve treatment efficacy of the standard NSCLC treatment. This review provides an overview of preclinical and clinical studies that combined RE and radiotherapy for NSCLC treatment. Furthermore, it highlights the ongoing challenges that have to be overcome in order to maximize the benefit; as well as the potential advantage of combinations with particle therapy and immunotherapy, which are rapidly gaining momentum in the treatment landscape of NSCLC. Different angiogenic and immunosuppressive effects are observed between particle therapy and conventional X-ray radiotherapy. The combination of RE, particle therapy and immunotherapy presents a promising future therapeutic triad for NSCLC.

Safety and efficacy of stereotactic body proton therapy for high-risk lung tumors

Purpose

Stereotactic body proton therapy (SBPT) is an emerging treatment strategy for lung tumors that aims to combine the excellent local control benefits of ultra-hypofractionation with the physical advantages of protons, which reduce the integral dose to organs at risk (OARs) compared to photons. To date, however, very little data delivering SBPT in 5 or fewer fractions to lung tumors have been reported. Given that photon stereotactic body radiation therapy can struggle to deliver ablative doses to high-risk tumors (i.e., central/ultra-central location, prior in-field radiation, tumor size >5 cm, or the presence of severe pulmonary comorbidities) while adhering to OAR dose constraints, we hypothesized that SBPT would be an effective alternative for patients with high-risk tumors.

Methods and Materials

Twenty-seven high-risk patients with 29 lung tumors treated with SBPT at the New York Proton Center between December 2019 and November 2022 were retrospectively identified. Patients were divided into three major subgroups: early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), locally recurrent NSCLC, and metastatic cancer from lung cancer or other histologies. Patient characteristics were reported using descriptive statistics, actuarial methods were used to quantify disease control rates, and toxicities were scored using CTCAE v 5.0.

Results

The most common high-risk indications for SBPT were central/ultra-central tumor location (69.0%), severe COPD (48.1%), reirradiation (44.4%), significant pulmonary fibrosis (22.2%), and large tumor size > 5 cm (18.5%). In total, 96.6% of tumors were fully covered by the prescription dose without compromising target coverage. Three-year actuarial rates of local control for early-stage NSCLC, locally recurrent NSCLC, and metastatic patients were 89%, 100%, and 43%, respectively. Three-year actuarial rates of regional control were 89%, 67%, and 86%. Three-year actuarial rates of distant metastasis-free survival were 79%, 100%, and 0%. Two patients (7.4%), both of whom had clinically significant baseline interstitial lung disease and pre-treatment continuous oxygen demand, experienced grade ≥2 pulmonary toxicity (1 grade 3, 1 grade 5). There were no acute or late grade ≥2 toxicities related to esophagitis, cardiac injury, airway injury, pulmonary fibrosis, bronchopulmonary hemorrhage or brachial plexopathy.

Conclusions

In the largest study of proton SBRT reported to date, SBPT has a favorable toxicity profile while being an effective approach for treating most high-risk tumors without requiring dose de-escalation or compromising tumor coverage and warrants further investigation.

Changes in Nutritional Status of Cancer Patients Undergoing Proton Radiation Therapy Based on Real-World Data

Methods

Observational study on 47 adult hospitalized cancer patients including 27 males and 20 females who received proton beam radiotherapy during December 2021 and August 2022. Nutritional assessments, 24 h dietary survey, handgrip strength (HGS) test, anthropometrical measurements, and hematological parameters were conducted or collected at the beginning and the completion of treatment.

Results

The rate of nutritional risk and malnutrition among the total of 47 enrolled patients was 4.3% and 12.8% at the onset of proton radiation and raised up to 6.4% and 27.7% at the end of the treatment. 42.6% of patients experienced weight loss during the proton radiotherapy, and 1 of them had weight loss over 5%, and in general, the average body weight was stable over radiotherapy. The changes in patients' 24 h dietary intakes, HGS, and anthropometrical parameters, including triceps skinfold thickness (TSF), midupper arm circumference (MUAC), and midupper arm muscle circumference (MAMC), were statistically insignificant over the treatment (all p values > 0.05). The changes in patients' hematological parameters, including total protein (TP) and serum albumin (ALB), were not statistically significant over the treatment (all p values >0.05), and the level of hemoglobin (HGB) at the end of treatment was higher than that at the onset (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The results of this study demonstrated that proton radiotherapy might have a lighter effect on the nutritional status of cancer patients.

Stereotactic body proton therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical indications and recommendations

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a standard treatment approach for early-stage lung cancer and intrathoracic oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease. While local control is often excellent with this modality when delivered with photon therapy, toxicities for select patients can be significant. Proton therapy offers a unique opportunity to widen the therapeutic window when treating patients with thoracic malignancies requiring or benefitting from ultra-high doses per fraction. Thoracic proton SBRT may be particularly beneficial in cases requiring dose escalation, for tumors >5 cm, for central or ultra-central tumors, for reirradiation, in patients with interstitial lung diseases, and when combining radiation with immunotherapy. These clinical indications are detailed, along with supporting literature and clinical recommendations. Other considerations, future directions and potential benefits of proton SBRT, including sparing lymphocytes, when delivered as intensity-modulated proton therapy or as FLASH, and for the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer or in patients with homologous recombination repair deficiencies, are also discussed.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and lung cancer: future directions and challenges

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive disease of pulmonary scarring. New treatments slow disease progression and allow pulmonary fibrosis patients to live longer. Persistent pulmonary fibrosis increases a patient's risk of developing lung cancer. Lung cancer in patients with IPF differs from cancers that develop in the non-fibrotic lung. Peripherally located adenocarcinoma is the most frequent cell type in smokers who develop lung cancer, while squamous cell carcinoma is the most frequent in pulmonary fibrosis. Increased fibroblast foci in IPF are associated with more aggressive cancer behaviour and shorter doubling times. Treatment of lung cancer in fibrosis is challenging because of the risk of inducing an exacerbation of fibrosis. In order to improve patient outcomes, modifications of current lung cancer screening guidelines in patients with pulmonary fibrosis will be necessary to avoid delays in treatment. 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT) imaging can help identify cancer earlier and more reliably than CT alone. Increased use of wedge resections, proton therapy and immunotherapy may increase survival by decreasing the risk of exacerbation, but further research will be necessary.

Is Thoracic Radiotherapy an Absolute Contraindication for Treatment of Lung Cancer Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease? A Systematic Review

Thoracic radiotherapy decisions in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) are complex due to concerns about severe or even fatal radiation pneumonitis. This systematic review analysed the published evidence regarding the incidence of radiation pneumonitis and mortality after thoracic radiotherapy and investigated clinical and dosimetric predictors of radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients with ILD. A systematic search was carried out in PubMed, Medline, Embase and the Cochrane database for articles published between January 2000 and April 2021. Two authors independently screened eligible studies that met our predefined criteria. Studies were assessed for design and quality and a qualitative data synthesis was carried out. The search strategy resulted in 1750 articles. After two rounds of screening, 24 publications were included. The median overall incidence of grade ≥3 radiation pneumonitis was 19.7% (range 8-46%). The incidence was greater in conventional radical radiotherapy-treated patients (median 31.8%) compared with particle beam therapy- or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy-treated patients (median 12.5%). The median rate of grade 5 radiation pneumonitis was 11.9% (range 0-60%). The presence of ILD was an independent predictor of severe radiation pneumonitis. Severe radiation pneumonitis was more common in the presence of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern or idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) than non-UIP or non-IPF subtype. Several other clinical predictors were reported in the literature. V5, V10, V20 and mean lung dose were the most common dosimetric predictors for severe radiation pneumonitis, often with stricter dose constraints than conventionally used. Patients with lung cancer associated with ILD had a poorer overall survival compared with patients without ILD. In conclusion, patients with lung cancer associated with ILD have a poor prognosis. They are at high risk of severe and even fatal radiation pneumonitis. Careful patient selection is necessary, appropriate high-risk consenting and strict lung dose-volume constraints should be used, if these patients are to be treated with thoracic radiotherapy.

Management of Lung Cancer in the Patient with Interstitial Lung Disease

Patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), especially those with pulmonary fibrosis, are at increased risk of developing lung cancer. Management of lung cancer in patients with ILD is particularly challenging. Diagnosis can be complicated by difficulty differentiating lung nodules from areas of focal fibrosis, and percutaneous biopsy approaches confer an increased risk of complications in those with pulmonary fibrosis. Lung cancer treatment in these patients pose several specific considerations. The degree of lung function impairment may preclude lobectomy or surgical resection of any type. Surgical resection can trigger an acute exacerbation of the underlying ILD. The presence of ILD confers an increased risk of pneumonitis with radiotherapy, and many of the systemic therapies also carry an increased risk of pneumonitis in this population. The safety of immunotherapy in the setting of ILD remains to be fully elucidated and concerns remain as to triggering pneumonitis. The purpose of this review is to summarize the evidence regarding consideration for tissue diagnosis, chemotherapy and immunotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery, in this patient population and discuss emerging areas of research. We also propose a multidisciplinary approach and practical considerations for monitoring for ILD progression during lung cancer treatment.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Lung Cancer in the Setting of Interstitial Lung Disease

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis increases the risk of developing lung cancer. Diagnosing and staging lung cancer in patients with ILD is challenging and requires careful interpretation of computed tomography (CT) and fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT to distinguish nodules from areas of fibrosis. Minimally invasive tissue sampling is preferred but may be technically challenging given tumor location, coexistent fibrosis, and pneumothorax risk. Current treatment options include surgery, radiation therapy, percutaneous thermal ablation, and systemic therapy; however, ILD increases the risks associated with each treatment option, especially acute ILD exacerbation.

Proton Beam Therapy versus Photon Radiotherapy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SABR) is accepted as a standard of care for patients who are not candidates for surgery in stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). SABR has shown encouraging disease control and acceptable toxicity in peripherally located stage I NSCLC. However, for centrally located tumors around the proximal bronchial tree or for tumors located close to the chest wall, toxicities by SABR are not negligible. Therefore, proton beam therapy (PBT), which provides better organ at risk (OAR) sparing than photon radiotherapy by the Bragg peak, was tested and investigated to reduce radiation-induced toxicities in stage I NSCLC. Here, we compared 112 and 117 stage I NSCLC patients who underwent PBT and photon radiotherapy, respectively. PBT showed significantly lower lung and heart radiation exposure than photon radiotherapy without worsening disease control. PBT could be an effective treatment to reduce long-term toxicities of the lung and heart.

Abstract

Proton beam therapy (PBT) and photon radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were compared in terms of clinical outcomes and dosimetry. Data were obtained from patients who underwent PBT or photon radiotherapy at two institutions—the only two facilities where PBT is available in the Republic of Korea. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score-matched analyses were used to compare local progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Survival and radiation exposure to the lungs were compared in the matched population. Of 289 patients included in the analyses, 112 and 177 underwent PBT and photon radiotherapy, respectively. With a median follow-up duration of 27 months, the 2-year local PFS and OS rates were 94.0% and 83.0%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, a biologically effective dose (BED₁₀, using α/β = 10 Gy) of ≥125 cobalt gray equivalents was significantly associated with improved local PFS and OS. In the matched analyses, the local PFS and OS did not differ between groups. However, PBT showed significantly lower lung and heart radiation exposure in the mean dose, V5, and V10 than photon radiotherapy. PBT significantly reduced radiation exposure to the heart and lungs without worsening disease control in stage I NSCLC patients.

Comorbidity and life expectancy in shared decision making for lung cancer screening

Shared decision making (SDM) is an important part of lung cancer screening (LCS) that includes discussing the risks and benefits of screening, potential outcomes, patient eligibility and willingness to participate, tobacco cessation, and tailoring a strategy to an individual patient. More than other cancer screening tests, eligibility for LCS is nuanced, incorporating the patient's age as well as tobacco use history and overall health status. Since comorbidities and multimorbidity (ie, 2 or more comorbidities) impact the risks and benefits of LCS, these topics are a fundamental part of decision-making. However, there is currently little evidence available to guide clinicians in addressing comorbidities and an individual's "appropriateness" for LCS during SDM visits. Therefore, this literature review investigates the impact of comorbidities and multimorbidity among patients undergoing LCS. Based on available evidence and guideline recommendations, we identify comorbidities that should be considered during SDM conversations and review best practices for navigating SDM conversations in the context of LCS. Three conditions are highlighted since they concomitantly portend higher risk of developing lung cancer, potentially increase risk of screening-related evaluation and treatment complications and can be associated with limited life expectancy: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Treatment outcomes of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer and interstitial lung diseases receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy: A single-center experience of 85 cases

OBJECTIVES

Whether curative-intent radiotherapy could be safely applied to lung cancer patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILD) remains unclear. We aim to evaluate radiation induced lung toxicities (RILTs) and the efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in these patients. ILD is characterized by inflammation or fibrosis in the interstitial tissue of the lung.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and ILD patients treated with curative-intent IMRT between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Pre-radiation computed tomography (CT) was scored according to a thin-section CT scoring system for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

RESULTS

A total of 85 of 1261 stage III NSCLC patients were found with ILD. Seventeen (20%) of them developed G3+ (greater than or equal to grade 3) RILTs. The incidence abruptly dropped to 11.1%, 3.8%, and 0% for patients with honeycombing score ≤1, V20 <20%, or both, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that honeycombing score >1 and V20 ≥20% were independently associated with higher risk of G3+ RILTs. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 14.0 months and 7.4 months in the whole group, whereas 26.5 months and 10.6 months in the low-risk group (patients with honeycombing score <1 and V20 <20%). In the univariate analysis for overall survival, G3+ RILTs were evaluated as risk factors (p = 0.026) and low-risk group as the only protective factor (p = 0.063). In the multivariate analysis, G3+ RILTs were the only independent risk factor for OS.

CONCLUSION

Honeycombing score >1 and V20 ≥20% were associated with high incidence of RILTs. However, patients with low risk might benefit from IMRT with acceptable toxicities and durable OS.

Prospective Study of Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer Patients with Poor Lung Function or Pulmonary Fibrosis

PBT has a unique depth–dose curve with a Bragg peak that enables one to reduce the dose to normal lung tissue. We prospectively enrolled 54 patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with definitive PBT. The inclusion criteria were forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) ≤ 1.0 L or FEV1 ≤ 50% of predicted or diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLco) ≤ 50%, or pulmonary fibrosis. The primary endpoint was grade ≥ 3 pulmonary toxicity, and secondary endpoints were changes in pulmonary function and quality of life. The median age was 71.5 years (range, 57–87). Fifteen (27.8%) and fourteen (25.9%) patients had IPF and combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema, respectively. The median predicted forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1, and DLco were 77% (range, 42–104%), 66% (range, 31–117%), and 46% (range, 23–94%), respectively. During the follow-up (median, 14.7 months), seven (13.0%) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 pulmonary toxicity. Seven months after the completion of PBT, patients with IPF or non-IPF interstitial lung disease (ILD) experienced a decrease in the FVC but the decrease in DLco was not significant. Under careful monitoring by pulmonologists, PBT could be a useful treatment modality for lung cancer patients with poor lung function or pulmonary fibrosis.

Toxicity of Proton Therapy versus Photon Therapy on Salvage Re-Irradiation for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

This study evaluated the toxicity associated with radiation techniques on curative re-irradiation (re-RT) in patients with thoracic recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). From 2011 to 2019, we retrospectively reviewed the data of 63 patients with salvage re-RT for in-field or marginal recurrence of NSCLC at two independent institutions. Re-RT techniques using X-ray beams and proton beam therapy (PBT) were also included. Re-RT had a 2-year overall survival (OS) and local progression-free survival of 48.0% and 52.0%, respectively. Fifteen patients experienced grade 3 or higher toxicity after re-RT. The complication rates were 18.2% (4/22) and 26.8% (11/41) in PBT patients and X-ray patients, respectively. Airway or esophageal fistulas occurred in seven patients (11.1%). Fistulas or severe airway obstruction occurred in patients with tumors adjacent to the proximal bronchial tree and esophagus, who underwent hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemotherapy, and with a higher dose exposure to the esophagus. In conclusion, salvage re-RT was feasible even in patients with local recurrence within the previous RT field. PBT showed similar survival outcomes and toxicity to those of other techniques. However, thoracic re-RT should be performed carefully considering tumor location and RT regimens such as the fraction size and concurrent chemotherapy.

Dosimetry, Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness of Proton Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common malignancy which requires radiotherapy (RT) as an important part of its multimodality treatment. With the advent of the novel irradiation technique, the clinical outcome of NSCLC patients who receive RT has been dramatically improved. The emergence of proton therapy, which allows for a sharper dose of build-up and drop-off compared to photon therapy, has potentially improved clinical outcomes of NSCLC. Dosimetry studies have indicated that proton therapy can significantly reduce the doses for normal organs, especially the lung, heart, and esophagus while maintaining similar robust target volume coverage in both early and advanced NSCLC compared with photon therapy. However, to date, most studies have been single-arm and concluded no significant changes in the efficacy for early-stage NSCLC by proton therapy over stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The results of proton therapy for advanced NSCLC in these studies were promising, with improved clinical outcomes and reduced toxicities compared with historical photon therapy data. However, these studies were also mainly single-arm and lacked a direct comparison between the two therapies. Currently, there is much emerging evidence focusing on dosimetry, efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of proton therapy for NSCLC that has been published, however, a comprehensive review comparing these therapies is, to date, lacking. Thus, this review focuses on these aspects of proton therapy for NSCLC.

Validation of proton dose calculation on scatter corrected 4D cone beam computed tomography using a porcine lung phantom

Proton therapy treatment for lungs remains challenging as images enabling the detection of inter- and intra-fractional motion, which could be used for proton dose adaptation, are not readily available. 4D computed tomography (4DCT) provides high image quality but is rarely available in-room, while in-room 4D cone beam computed tomography (4DCBCT) suffers from image quality limitations stemming mostly from scatter detection. This study investigated the feasibility of using virtual 4D computed tomography (4DvCT) as a prior for a phase-per-phase scatter correction algorithm yielding a 4D scatter corrected cone beam computed tomography image (4DCBCT_cor), which can be used for proton dose calculation. 4DCT and 4DCBCT scans of a porcine lung phantom, which generated reproducible ventilation, were acquired with matching breathing patterns. Diffeomorphic Morphons, a deformable image registration algorithm, was used to register the mid-position 4DCT to the mid-position 4DCBCT and yield a 4DvCT. The 4DCBCT was reconstructed using motion-aware reconstruction based on spatial and temporal regularization (MA-ROOSTER). Successively for each phase, digitally reconstructed radiographs of the 4DvCT, simulated without scatter, were exploited to correct scatter in the corresponding CBCT projections. The 4DCBCT_corwas then reconstructed with MA-ROOSTER using the corrected CBCT projections and the same settings and deformation vector fields as those already used for reconstructing the 4DCBCT. The 4DCBCT_corand the 4DvCT were evaluated phase-by-phase, performing proton dose calculations and comparison to those of a ground truth 4DCT by means of dose-volume-histograms (DVH) and gamma pass-rates (PR). For accumulated doses, DVH parameters deviated by at most 1.7% in the 4DvCT and 2.0% in the 4DCBCT_corcase. The gamma PR for a (2%, 2 mm) criterion with 10% threshold were at least 93.2% (4DvCT) and 94.2% (4DCBCT_cor), respectively. The 4DCBCT_cortechnique enabled accurate proton dose calculation, which indicates the potential for applicability to clinical 4DCBCT scans.

Clinical Outcomes of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Propensity Score Analysis

This study compared the efficacy and safety of pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBSPT) versus intensity-modulated (photon) radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We retrospectively reviewed 219 patients with stage III NSCLC who received definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy between November 2016 and December 2018. Twenty-five patients (11.4%) underwent PBSPT (23 with single-field optimization) and 194 patients (88.6%) underwent IMRT. Rates of locoregional control (LRC), overall survival, and acute/late toxicities were compared between the groups using propensity score-adjusted analyses. Patients treated with PBSPT were older (median: 67 vs. 62 years) and had worse pulmonary function at baseline (both FEV1 and DLCO) compared to those treated with IMRT. With comparable target coverage, PBSPT exhibited superior sparing of the lung, heart, and spinal cord to radiation exposure compared to IMRT. At a median follow-up of 21.7 (interquartile range: 16.8-26.8) months, the 2-year LRC rates were 72.1% and 84.1% in the IMRT and PBSPT groups, respectively (p = 0.287). The rates of grade ≥ 3 esophagitis were 8.2% and 20.0% after IMRT and PBSPT (p = 0.073), respectively, while corresponding rates of grade ≥ 2 radiation pneumonitis were 28.9% and 16.0%, respectively (p = 0.263). PBSPT appears to be an effective and safe treatment technique even for patients with poor lung function, and it does not jeopardize LRC.

Who Will Benefit from Charged-Particle Therapy?

Charged-particle therapy (CPT) such as proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) exhibit substantial physical and biological advantages compared to conventional photon radiotherapy. As it can reduce the amount of radiation irradiated in the normal organ, CPT has been mainly applied to pediatric cancer and radioresistent tumors in the eloquent area. Although there is a possibility of greater benefits, high set-up cost and dearth of high level of clinical evidence hinder wide applications of CPT. This review aims to present recent clinical results of PBT and CIRT in selected diseases focusing on possible indications of CPT. We also discussed how clinical studies are conducted to increase the number of patients who can benefit from CPT despite its high cost.

The Risk Factors for Radiation Pneumonitis After Single-Fraction Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer or Metastasis

Simple Summary

There was no reports about the risk factors of high dose single-fraction carbon-ion radiotherapy. Although there were only small number of patients with symptomatic radiation pneumonitis after this treatment, we showed that the risk factors of radiation pneumonitis include the dose–volume parameter.

Abstract

There are no studies on the risk factors of radiation pneumonitis (RP) after carbon-ion radiotherapy at a dose of 50 Gy (relative biological effectiveness (RBE)) in a single fraction. The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with RP after radiotherapy, including dose–volume parameters. Ninety-eight patients without a history of thoracic radiotherapy who underwent treatment for solitary lung tumors between July 2013 and April 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment was planned using Xio-N. The median follow-up duration was 53 months, and the median clinical target volume was 32.3 mL. Three patients developed grade 2 RP, and one patient developed grade 3 interstitial pneumonitis. None of the patients developed grade 4 or 5 RP. The dose-volume parameters of the normal lung irradiated at least with 5–30 Gy (RBE), and the mean lung dose was significantly lower in patients with grade 0–1 RP than in those with grade 2–3 RP. Pretreatment with higher SP-D and interstitial pneumonitis were significant factors for the occurrence of symptomatic RP. The present study showed a certain standard for single-fraction carbon-ion radiotherapy that does not increase the risk of RP; however, further validation studies are needed.

Risk factors for radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients with subclinical interstitial lung disease after thoracic radiation therapy

Background

Previous studies have found that patients with subclinical interstitial lung disease (ILD) are highly susceptible to developing radiation pneumonitis (RP) after thoracic radiation therapy. In the present study we aimed to evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for RP after thoracic intensity-modulated radiation therapy in lung cancer patients with subclinical ILD.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from lung cancer patients with subclinical ILD who were treated with thoracic intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a prescribed dose of ≥ 50 Gy in our institution between January 2016 and December 2017.

Results

Eighty-seven consecutive lung cancer patients with subclinical ILD were selected for the study. The median follow-up period was 14.0 months. The cumulative incidence of grades ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 RP at one year was 51.0% and 20.9%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, a mean lung dose ≥ 12 Gy was a significant risk factor for grade ≥ 2 RP (p = 0.049). Chemotherapy with gemcitabine in the past, V5 ≥ 50%, and subclinical ILD involving ≥ 25% of the lung volume were significantly associated with grade ≥ 3 RP (p = 0.046, p = 0.040, and p = 0.024, respectively).

Conclusion

Mean lung dose is a significant risk factor for grade ≥ 2 RP. Lung cancer patients who have received chemotherapy with gemcitabine in the past, V5 ≥ 50%, and those with subclinical ILD involving ≥ 25% of lung volume have an increased risk of grade ≥ 3 RP in lung cancer patients with subclinical ILD.

Scarred Lung. An Update on Radiation-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis

Radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis is a common severe long-time complication of radiation therapy for tumors of the thorax. Current therapeutic options used in the clinic include only supportive managements strategies, such as anti-inflammatory treatment using steroids, their efficacy, however, is far from being satisfactory. Recent studies have demonstrated that the development of lung fibrosis is a dynamic and complex process, involving the release of reactive oxygen species, activation of Toll-like receptors, recruitment of inflammatory cells, excessive production of nitric oxide and production of collagen by activated myofibroblasts. In this review we summarized the current state of knowledge on the pathophysiological processes leading to the development of lung fibrosis and we also discussed the possible treatment options.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Current knowledge, future perspectives and its importance in radiation oncology

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive, fibrotic lung disease with an unknown cause. Uncertainties still remain regarding the pathogenesis of IPF, and the prognosis of this disease is poor despite some recent improvements in treatment. Radiation induced lung injury (RILI) is a common complication and a dose-limiting toxicity of thoracic radiotherapy. Importantly, IPF is a crucial risk factor for pulmonary toxicity after thoracic radiotherapy. Although IPF is not universally accepted as a definite contraindication for thoracic radiotherapy at present, it has been shown that IPF can increase the risk of severe and fatal complications after thoracic radiotherapy. Proton beam therapy has shown promising results in reducing the incidence of thoracic radiotherapy related life-threatening complications in IPF patients, but the current evidence is not sufficient to recommend the standard use of it. Many similarities are noticeable between IPF and RILI in terms of pathogenesis and underlying mechanisms. Better understanding of the mechanisms of IPF and RILI may enable clinicians to provide safer and more effective thoracic radiotherapy treatments in cancer patients with IPF. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of IPF, present the importance of IPF in radiation oncology practice, and highlight the similarities and relationship between IPF and RILI.

Nationwide survey of radiation therapy in Japan for lung cancer complicated with interstitial lung disease

The purpose of this study was to clarify the opinions of radiation oncologists in Japan regarding treatment for lung cancer complicated with interstitial lung disease (ILD) by a questionnaire survey, and the risk of acute exacerbation (AE) after radiotherapy. Questionnaires were sent to all of the facilities in which radiation therapy is performed for lung cancer in Japan by using the mailing list of the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO). The questionnaire survey was conducted to clarify who judges the existence of ILD, the indications for radiation therapy in cases of ILD-combined lung cancer, and the ratio of ILD-combined lung cancer in lung cancer patients treated with radiation therapy. Patients with ILD-combined lung cancer who received radiotherapy during the period from April 2014 to March 2015 were retrospectively analysed. Any cases of AE without any other obvious cause were included. ILD confirmation was performed by central radiologists using computed tomography images. A total of 47 facilities responded to the questionnaire. Radiation therapy was an option in cases of ILD-combined lung cancer in 39 (83%) of the facilities. The indication for radiation therapy was based on image findings in 35 (90%) of the 39 facilities in which radiation therapy was acceptable or was a choice in some cases of ILD. The final indication was based on the opinion of the pulmonologist in 29 (74%) of those 39 facilities. In fiscal year 2014, a total of 2128 patients in 38 facilities received chest irradiation. Seventy-eight (3.7%) of those 2128 patients had ILD-combined lung cancer. Sixty-seven patients were included in patient analysis. AE occurred in 5 patients (7.5%), and one of those 5 patients (20.0%) died from radiation-induced AE. The median period from radiotherapy to AE was 4 months (range, 2-7 months). The following four independent risk factors for AE were identified in univariate analysis: non-advanced age (<75 years), increased C-reactive protein level (≥0.3 mg/dl), adjuvant chemotherapy and ≥ Grade 2 radiation pneumonitis. Radiotherapy was an option for lung cancer even in cases with ILD in 83% (39/47) of the facilities in Japan. Seventy-eight (3.7%) of 2128 patients who received radiation therapy for lung cancer had ILD. Radiotherapy for ILD-combined lung cancer may induce AE at a substantial rate and AE can be life-threatening. Minimizing the risk of radiation pneumonitis might enable the risk of AE to be reduced.

A novel Approach for Non-Invasive Lung Imaging and Targeting Lung Immune Cells

Despite developments in pulmonary radiotherapy, radiation-induced lung toxicity remains a problem. More sensitive lung imaging able to increase the accuracy of diagnosis and radiotherapy may help reduce this problem. Super-paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles are used in imaging, but without further modification can cause unwanted toxicity and inflammation. Complex carbohydrate and polymer-based coatings have been used, but simpler compounds may provide additional benefits. Herein, we designed and generated super-paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles coated with the neutral natural dietary amino acid glycine (GSPIONs), to support non-invasive lung imaging and determined particle biodistribution, as well as understanding the impact of the interaction of these nanoparticles with lung immune cells. These GSPIONs were characterized to be crystalline, colloidally stable, with a size of 12 ± 5 nm and a hydrodynamic diameter of 84.19 ± 18 nm. Carbon, Hydrogen, Nitrogen (CHN) elemental analysis estimated approximately 20.2 × 10³ glycine molecules present per nanoparticle. We demonstrated that it is possible to determine the biodistribution of the GSPIONs in the lung using three-dimensional (3D) ultra-short echo time magnetic resonance imaging. The GSPIONs were found to be taken up selectively by alveolar macrophages and neutrophils in the lung. In addition, the GSPIONs did not cause changes to airway resistance or induce inflammatory cytokines. Alveolar macrophages and neutrophils are critical regulators of pulmonary inflammatory diseases, including allergies, infections, asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Therefore, pulmonary Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging and preferential targeting of these lung resident cells by our nanoparticles offer precise imaging tools, which can be utilized to develop precision targeted radiotherapy as well as diagnostic tools for lung cancer, thereby having the potential to reduce the pulmonary complications of radiation.

Salvage stereotactic body radiotherapy for post-operative oligo-recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer: A single-institution analysis of 59 patients

A standard treatment for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who undergo surgery, and subsequently develop local failure or intrathoracic oligo-recurrence, has not yet been established. The present study aimed to assess the feasibility of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for this subgroup of patients. Consequently, a retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with NSCLC recurrence who were treated with SBRT, and previously underwent curative surgical resection between October 2011 and October 2016. Post-SBRT survival [overall survival (OS); progression-free survival (PFS); and local control (LC)] and toxicity were analyzed. Prognostic factors for OS were identified using univariate and multivariate analysis. A total of 52 patients and 59 tumors were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 25 months (35 months for surviving patients), and median OS following salvage SBRT was 32 months. The 1- and 3-year OS rates were 84.4 and 67.8%, respectively. 1- and 3-year PFS rates were 80.8 and 58.7%, respectively. Only 4 patients (7.7%) developed local failure. Median LC was 71 months and 1- and 3-year LC rate were 97.9 and 94.9%, respectively. A total of 4 patients experienced grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) and two experienced grade 5 AEs (pneumonitis and hemoptysis). Central tumor location and the possibility of re-operation were independent prognostic factors for OS. The present study indicated that post-operative salvage SBRT is a promising therapeutic option for patients with NSCLC with locoregional or intrathoracic oligo-recurrence. We regard toxicity was also acceptable. However, further research is required on the appropriate selection of subjects, and stratification of the analysis by certain risk factors would increase the accuracy of the conclusions.

Is there any benefit to particles over photon radiotherapy?

Particle, essentially, proton radiotherapy (RT) could provide some benefits over photon RT, especially in reducing the side effects of RT. We performed a systematic review to identify the performed randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and ongoing RCTs comparing particle RT with photon therapy. So far, there are no results available from phase 3 RCTs comparing particle RT with photon therapy. Furthermore, the results on side effects comparing proton and carbon ion beam RT with photon RT do vary. The introduction of new techniques in photon RT, such as image-guided RT (IGRT), intensity-modulated RT (IMRT), volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) and stereotactic body RT (SBRT) was already effective in reducing side effects. At present, the lack of evidence limits the indications for proton and carbon ion beam RTs and makes the particle RT still experimental.

New frontiers in proton therapy: applications in cancers

Proton therapy offers dominant advantages over photon therapy due to the unique depth-dose characteristics of proton, which can cause a dramatic reduction in normal tissue doses both distal and proximal to the tumor target volume. In turn, this feature may allow dose escalation to the tumor target volume while sparing the tumor-neighboring susceptible organs at risk, which has the potential to reduce treatment toxicity and improve local control rate, quality of life and survival. Some dosimetric studies in various cancers have demonstrated the advantages over photon therapy in dose distributions. Further, it has been observed that proton therapy confers to substantial clinical advantage over photon therapy in head and neck, breast, hepatocellular, and non-small cell lung cancers. As such, proton therapy is regarded as the standard modality of radiotherapy in many pediatric cancers from the technical point of view. However, due to the limited clinical evidence, there have been concerns about the high cost of proton therapy from an economic point of view. Considering the treatment expenses for late radiation-induced toxicities, cost-effective analysis in many studies have shown that proton therapy is the most cost-effective option for brain, head and neck and selected breast cancers. Additional studies are warranted to better unveil the cost-effective values of proton therapy and to develop newer ways for better protection of normal tissues. This review aims at reviewing the recent studies on proton therapy to explore its benefits and cost-effectiveness in cancers. We strongly believe that proton therapy will be a common radiotherapy modality for most types of solid cancers in the future.