The diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor (dt-TGCT) patient journey: a prospective multicenter study

Leveraging Patient Engagement Through Collaboration for Improved Global Health Outcomes in Sarcoma

In the dynamic landscape of oncology, collaborative efforts between the medical community and patient advocacy groups are pivotal in shaping standards of care and advancing research. Nowhere is this collaboration more evident than in sarcoma, a group of rare cancers posing unique challenges to diagnosis, management, and treatment, which profoundly affect patient outcomes. Here, we explore the vital role of patient-centric collaboration in improving global health outcomes in sarcoma, emphasizing the transformative power of collective action and shared expertise. Challenges in sarcoma care, including diagnostic complexities, disparities in access to care, and genomic tumor heterogeneity, underscore the urgent need for collaborative solutions. Initiatives like the Sarcoma European and Latin American Network (SELNET) and The Life Raft Group (LRG) exemplify successful models of collaborative research and patient advocacy, driving advancements in diagnosis, treatment, and disease understanding. Stakeholders across disciplines are uniting to improve sarcoma care and outcomes through the development of clinical practice guidelines, continuous medical education, patient registries, virtual tumor boards, and consortium-driven research endeavors, all of which foster the growth of global collaborative groups. The success of these collaborative efforts serves as a model for other rare diseases, highlighting the potential of collective action to drive progress and innovation in health care.

Keratin-Positive Giant Cell Tumor of Bone and Soft Tissue With HMGA2::NCOR2 Fusion in Children Under 10 With Response to Imatinib Therapy: A Case Series

HMGA2::NCOR2 keratin-positive giant cell tumors in children with response to imatinib in an infant.

Real-world drug utilization and treatment patterns in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumors in the USA

Aim: Real-world treatment patterns in tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) patients remain unknown. Pexidartinib is the only US FDA-approved treatment for TGCT associated with severe morbidity or functional limitations and not amenable to improvement with surgery. Objective: To characterize drug utilization and treatment patterns in TGCT patients. Methods: In a retrospective observational study using IQVIA's linked prescription and medical claims databases (2018-2021), TGCT patients were stratified by their earliest systemic therapy claim (pexidartinib [N = 82] or non-FDA-approved systemic therapy [N = 263]). Results: TGCT patients treated with pexidartinib versus non-FDA-approved systemic therapies were predominantly female (61 vs 50.6%) and their median age was 47 and 54 years, respectively. Pexidartinib-treated patients had the highest 12-month probability of remaining on treatment (54%); 34.1% of pexidartinib users had dose reduction after their first claim. Conclusion: This study provides new insights into the unmet need, utilization and treatment patterns of systemic therapies for the treatment of TGCT patients.

Active surveillance of diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumors: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor (D-TGCT) is a mono-articular, soft-tissue tumor. Although it can behave locally aggressively, D-TGCT is a non-malignant disease. This is the first study describing the natural course of D-TGCT and evaluating active surveillance as possible treatment strategy.

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study included therapy naïve patients with D-TGCT from eight sarcoma centers worldwide between 2000 and 2019. Patients initially managed by active surveillance following their first consultation were eligible. Data regarding the radiological and clinical course and subsequent treatments were collected.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients with primary D-TGCT were initially managed by active surveillance. Fifty-nine patients had an MRI performed around first consultation: D-TGCT was located intra-articular in most patients (n = 56; 95 %) and extra-articular in 14 cases (24 %). At baseline, osteoarthritis was observed in 13 patients (22 %) on MRI. Most of the patients' reported symptoms: pain (n = 43; 70 %), swelling (n = 33; 54 %). Eight patients (13 %) were asymptomatic. Follow-up data were available for 58 patients; the median follow-up was 28 months. Twenty-one patients (36 %) had radiological progression after 21 months (median). Eight of 45 patients (18 %) without osteoarthritis at baseline developed osteoarthritis during follow-up. Thirty-seven patients (64 %) did not clinically deteriorate during follow-up. Finally, eighteen patients (31 %) required a subsequent treatment.

CONCLUSION

Active surveillance can be considered adequate for selected therapy naïve D-TGCT patients. Although follow-up data was limited, almost two-thirds of the patients remained progression-free, and 69 % did not need treatment during the follow-up period. However, one-fifth of patients developed secondary osteoarthritis. Prospective studies on active surveillance are warranted.

Tenosynovial giant cell tumours: experience at an Australian tertiary referral centre for musculoskeletal tumours with minimum two-year follow-up

Aims

Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is a rare benign tumour of the musculoskeletal system. Surgical management is fraught with challenges due to high recurrence rates. The aim of this study was to describe surgical treatment and evaluate surgical outcomes of TGCT at an Australian tertiary referral centre for musculoskeletal tumours and to identify factors affecting recurrence rates.

Methods

A prospective database of all patients with TGCT surgically managed by two orthopaedic oncology surgeons was reviewed. All cases irrespective of previous treatment were included and patients without follow-up were excluded. Pertinent tumour characteristics and surgical outcomes were collected for analysis.

Results

There were 111 total cases included in the study; 71 (64%) were female, the mean age was 36 years (SD 13.6), and the knee (n = 64; 57.7%) was the most commonly affected joint. In all, 60 patients (54.1%) had diffuse-type (D-TGCT) disease, and 94 patients (84.7%) presented therapy-naïve as "primary cases" (PC). The overall recurrence rate was 46.8% for TGCT. There was a statistically significant difference in recurrence rates between D-TGCT and localized disease (75.0% vs 13.7%, relative risk (RR) 3.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.17 to 5.34; p < 0.001), and for those who were referred in the "revision cases" (RC) group compared to the PC group (82.4% vs 48.9%, RR 1.68, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.28; p = 0.011). Age, sex, tumour volume, and mean duration of symptoms were not associated with recurrence (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Recurrence rates remain high even at a tertiary referral hospital. Highest rates are seen in D-TGCT and "revision cases". Due to the risks of recurrence, the complexity of surgery, and the need for adjuvant therapy, this paper further supports the management of TGCT in a tertiary referral multi-disciplinary orthopaedic oncology service.

Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor between the suboccipital bone and posterior C1 arch: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) occurs most commonly in the appendicular skeleton and is only rarely found in the vertebral column. Lesions of the craniocervical junction are particularly rare, with only 4 cases reported in the literature. The authors describe the case of a diffuse-type TGCT at the craniocervical junction.

OBSERVATIONS

A patient presented with a 1-year history of right-sided neck pain and bilateral neurological symptoms in the distribution of the right occipital nerve. A 20-mm homogeneously contrast-enhancing mass in the suboccipital and posterior C1 region was discovered on magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine. The tumor was operated on via a posterior approach, and gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved. Immunohistochemical (IHC) examination revealed a diffuse-type TGCT. The patient had an uneventful recovery.

LESSONS

TGCT can arise at the craniocervical junction and is easily misdiagnosed because of its rare occurrence. IHC examination of a tumor specimen should be done to confirm the diagnosis. GTR is the objective when treating these tumors, especially when they are the diffuse type, as they have a high recurrence rate. Radiation and small-molecule therapies are viable postoperative therapies if GTR cannot be achieved or in cases of recurrence.

3D-printed Titanium Prosthetic Reconstruction of Unilateral Bone Deficiency After Surgical Resection of Tumor Lesions in the Upper Cervical Spine: Clinical Outcomes of Three Consecutive Cases and Narrative Review

MAIN POINTS

Operational excision of tumor lesions in the upper cervical spine remains a tremendous challenge to surgeons due to the local complex anatomic relationships. Meanwhile, no commercially available device has been specially designed to address bone deficiency after surgical resection. Here, we described the reconstruction of unilateral bone deficiency after surgical resection of a giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath originating from the lateral atlantoaxial joint with the employment of a 3D printing technique and reviewed the relevant literature. In our study, 3 patients with giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath in the upper cervical spine achieved complete tumor removal, and received unilateral bone reconstruction with one-armed 3D-printed titanium prosthesis. During the follow-up, these patients remained neurologically intact and got back to a normal life without wearing the braces. Images demonstrated the satisfactory placement of 3D-printed prosthesis with no failure of fixation and no subsidence. In addition, 6 articles describing the employment of 3D-printed prostheses or models for tumor surgery in the upper cervical spine were reviewed, and satisfactory clinical outcomes were reported in these studies. Hence, 3D-printed titanium prosthetic reconstruction of bone deficiency in the upper cervical spine was a safe and effective technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor Observational Platform Project (TOPP) Registry: A 2-Year Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Treatment Strategies

BACKGROUND

The Tenosynovial giant cell tumor Observational Platform Project (TOPP) registry is an international prospective study that -previously described the impact of diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumour (D-TGCT) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from a baseline snapshot. This analysis describes the impact of D-TGCT at 2-year follow-up based on treatment strategies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

TOPP was conducted at 12 sites (EU: 10; US: 2). Captured PRO measurements assessed at baseline, 1-year, and 2-year follow-ups were Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Pain Interference, BPI Pain Severity, Worst Pain, EQ-5D-5L, Worst Stiffness, and -Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Treatment interventions were no current/planned treatment (Off-Treatment) and systemic treatment/surgery (On-Treatment).

RESULTS

A total of 176 patients (mean age: 43.5 years) were included in the full analysis set. For patients without active treatment strategy -(Off-Treatment) at baseline (n = 79), BPI Pain Interference (1.00 vs. 2.86) and BPI Pain Severity scores (1.50 vs. 3.00) were numerically favorable in patients remaining Off-Treatment compared with those who switched to an active treatment strategy at year 1. From 1-year to 2-year -follow-ups, patients who remained Off-Treatment had better BPI Pain Interference (0.57 vs. 2.57) and Worst Pain (2.0 vs. 4.5) scores compared with patients who switched to an alternative treatment strategy. In addition, EQ-5D VAS scores (80.0 vs. 65.0) were higher in patients who remained -Off-Treatment between 1-year and 2-year follow-ups compared with patients who changed treatment strategy. For patients receiving systemic treatment at baseline, numerically favorable scores were seen in patients remaining on systemic therapy at 1-year follow-up: BPI Pain Interference (2.79 vs. 5.93), BPI Pain Severity (3.63 vs. 6.38), Worst Pain (4.5 vs. 7.5), and Worst Stiffness (4.0 vs. 7.5). From 1-year to 2-year follow-up, EQ-5D VAS scores (77.5 vs. 65.0) were higher in patients who changed from systemic treatment to a different treatment strategy.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the impact D-TGCT has on patient quality of life, and how treatment strategies may be influenced by these outcome measures. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02948088).

Understanding the Effect of Osteoarthritis on Surgical Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs Among Patients With Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors

BACKGROUND

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) may be misdiagnosed as osteoarthritis (OA), or the chronic course of TGCT may lead to development of secondary OA. However, little is known about the effect of comorbid OA on long-term surgical patterns and costs among TGCT patients.

METHODS

This cohort study used claims data from the Merative MarketScan Research Databases. The study included adults diagnosed with TGCT from January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2019, who have at least 3 years of continuous enrollment before and after the first TGCT diagnosis (date of the first TGCT diagnosis = index date) and no other cancer diagnosis during the study period. Patients were stratified by the presence of an OA diagnosis relative to the index date. Outcomes included surgical procedure patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs in the 3-year pre- and postindex periods. Multivariable models were used to assess the effect of OA on the study outcomes, controlling for baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

The study included 2856 TGCT patients: 1153 (40%) had no OA before or after index (OA[-/-]), 207 (7%) had OA before index but not after (OA[+/-]), 644 (23%) had OA after index but not before (OA[-/+]), and 852 (30%) had OA before and after index (OA[+/+]). The mean age was 51.6 years, and 61.7% were female. During the postperiod, joint surgery was more common among OA(-/+) and OA(+/+) patients compared with OA(-/-) and OA(+/-) patients (55.7% vs 33.2%). The mean all-cause total costs in the 3-year postperiod were $19,476 per patient per year. Compared with OA(-/-) patients, OA(-/+) and OA(+/+) patients had a higher risk of undergoing recurrent surgery and higher total healthcare costs postindex.

DISCUSSION

Higher rates of surgery and increased healthcare cost observed in TGCT patients with postindex OA underscore the need for effective treatment options to reduce joint damage, especially among patients with comorbid OA.

Effectiveness of arthroscopic excision based on the distribution of the tenosynovial giant cell tumor around knee joint

BACKGROUND

The mainstay treatment for tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is open excision. However, open excision is associated with the risk of stiffness, infection, neurovascular injury, and prolonged hospital stay and rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopic excision of tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) of the knee joint, including the diffuse type of TGCT.

METHODS

Patients who underwent arthroscopic excision of TGCT between April 2014 and November 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. TGCT lesions were divided into 12 distributions (nine intra- and three extra-articular lesions). The distribution of TGCT lesions, portals used, degree of excision, recurrence, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were evaluated. The prevalence of intra-articular lesions in diffuse TGCT was also analyzed to validate the existence of a connection between intra- and extra-articular lesions.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were included in the study. Fifteen patients (52%) had localized TGCT, and 14 patients (48%) had diffuse TGCT. The recurrence rates for localized, and diffuse TGCT were 0%, and 7%, respectively. Intra-articular posteromedial (i-PM), intra-articular posterolateral (i-PL), and extra-articular posterolateral (e-PL) lesions were found in all patients with diffuse TGCT. The prevalence rates of i-PM and i-PL lesions among e-PL lesions were both 100% (p = 0.026 and p < 0.001, respectively). Diffuse TGCT lesions were managed with posterolateral capsulotomy and viewed from the trans-septal portal.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic excision of TGCT was effective in both localized and diffuse TGCT. However, diffuse TGCT was associated with posterior and extra-articular lesions. Therefore, technical modification such as posterior, trans-septal portal, and capsulotomy were required.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series; level Ⅳ.

One-Stage Synovectomies Result in Improved Short-Term Outcomes Compared to Two-Stage Synovectomies of Diffuse-Type Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (D-TGCT) of the Knee: A Multicenter, Retrospective, Cohort Study

Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumors' (D-TGCTs) intra- and extra-articular expansion about the knee often necessitates an anterior and posterior surgical approach to facilitate an extensive synovectomy. There is no consensus on whether two-sided synovectomies should be performed in one or two stages. This retrospective study included 191 D-TGCT patients from nine sarcoma centers worldwide to compare the postoperative short-term outcomes between both treatments. Secondary outcomes were rates of radiological progression and subsequent treatments. Between 2000 and 2020, 117 patients underwent one-stage and 74 patients underwent two-stage synovectomies. The maximum range of motion achieved within one year postoperatively was similar (flexion 123-120°, p = 0.109; extension 0°, p = 0.093). Patients undergoing two-stage synovectomies stayed longer in the hospital (6 vs. 4 days, p < 0.0001). Complications occurred more often after two-stage synovectomies, although this was not statistically different (36% vs. 24%, p = 0.095). Patients treated with two-stage synovectomies exhibited more radiological progression and required subsequent treatments more often than patients treated with one-stage synovectomies (52% vs. 37%, p = 0.036) (54% vs. 34%, p = 0.007). In conclusion, D-TGCT of the knee requiring two-side synovectomies should be treated by one-stage synovectomies if feasible, since patients achieve a similar range of motion, do not have more complications, but stay for a shorter time in the hospital.

Best clinical management of tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT): A consensus paper from the community of experts

Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is a rare, locally aggressive, mesenchymal tumor arising from the joints, bursa and tendon sheaths. TGCT comprises a nodular- and a diffuse-type, with the former exhibiting mostly indolent course and the latter a locally aggressive behavior. Although usually not life-threatening, TGCT may cause chronic pain and adversely impact function and quality of life (QoL). CSFR1 inhibitors are effective with benefit on symptoms and QoL but are not available in most countries. The degree of uncertainty in selecting the most appropriate therapy and the lack of guidelines on the clinical management of TGCT make the adoption of new treatments inconsistent across the world, with suboptimal outcomes for patients. A global consensus meeting was organized in June 2022, involving experts from several disciplines and patient representatives from SPAGN to define the best evidence-based practice for the optimal approach to TGCT and generate the recommendations presented herein.

Novel CSF1R-positive tenosynovial giant cell tumor cell lines and their pexidartinib (PLX3397) and sotuletinib (BLZ945)-induced apoptosis

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a mesenchymal tumor derived from the synovium of the tendon sheath and joints, most frequently in the large joints. The standard of care for TGCTs is surgical resection. A new targeting approach for treating TGCTs has emerged from studies on the role of the CSF1/CSF1 receptor (CSF1R) in controlling cell survival and proliferation during the pathogenesis of TGCTs. We established four novel cell lines isolated from the primary tumor tissues of patients with TGCTs. The cell lines were designated Si-TGCT-1, Si-TGCT-2, Si-TGCT-3, and Si-TGCT-4, and the TGCT cells were characterized by CSF1R and CD68. These TGCT cells were then checked for cell proliferation using an MTT assay and three-dimensional spheroid. The responses to pexidartinib (PLX3397) and sotuletinib (BLZ945) were evaluated by two-dimensional MTT assays. All cells were positive for α‑smooth muscle actin (α‑SMA), fibroblast activation protein (FAP), CSF1R, and CD68. Except for Si-TGCT-4, all TGCT cells had high CSF1R expressions. The cells exhibited continuous growth as three-dimensional spheroids formed. Treatment with pexidartinib and sotuletinib inhibited TGCT cell growth and induced cell apoptosis correlated with the CSF1R level. Only Si-TGCT-4 cells demonstrated resistance to the drugs. In addition, the BAX/BCL-2 ratio increased in cells treated with pexidartinib and sotuletinib. With the four novel TGCT cell lines, we have an excellent model for further in vitro and in vivo studies.

Pexidartinib Provides Modest Pain Relief in Patients With Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor: Results From ENLIVEN

BACKGROUND

The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of orally administered PLX3397 in patients with pigmented villonodular synovitis or giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath (ENLIVEN) showed that pexidartinib provides a robust objective tumor response in adults with tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCT) not amenable to improvement with surgery. Based on these results, in 2019, pexidartinib received accelerated approval in the United States in this population as a breakthrough therapy under an orphan drug designation. However, the ability of pexidartinib to relieve pain in ENLIVEN was not fully detailed, and the relationship between pain relief and objective tumor response was not described.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What level of pain relief was achieved by pexidartinib treatment in ENLIVEN? (2) How was pain relief related to objective tumor responses? (3) How durable was pain relief?

METHODS

The current study included planned primary and exploratory assessments of patient-assessed worst pain at the site of the tumor in the ENLIVEN trial. ENLIVEN was a phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial in which adults with TGCT not amenable to improvement with surgery received pexidartinib or placebo for 24 weeks, after which eligible patients could receive open-label pexidartinib. Of 174 patients assessed for eligibility, 121 were randomized (50% [60] to placebo, 50% [61] to pexidartinib), and 120 were given either placebo or pexidartinib (59 received placebo and 61 received pexidartinib) and were included in an intent-to-treat analysis. Fifty-nine percent (71 of 120) of the overall treated population was female, and 88% (106 of 120) were White. Mean age was 45 ± 13 years. Tumors were mostly in the lower extremities (92% [110 of 120]), most commonly in the knee (61% [73 of 120]) and ankle (18% [21 of 120]). As a secondary outcome, patients scored worst pain at the site of the tumor in the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). The primary definition of a pain response was a decrease of at least 30% in the weekly mean worst-pain NRS score and increase of less than 30% in narcotic analgesic use between baseline and week 25. Planned exploratory assessments of pain included the frequency of a pain response using alternative thresholds, including a decrease in worst-pain NRS score of 50% or more and a decrease of at least 2 points (minimum clinically important difference [MCID]), the magnitude of pain reduction between baseline and week 25, correlation between worst-pain NRS score and tumor shrinkage by RECIST 1.1 criteria, and the durability of the pain response during the open-label extension. Pain responses during the randomized portion of the trial were compared according to intention-to-treat analysis, with a one-sided threshold of p < 0.025 to reduce the risk of false-positive results. Pain assessment was complete for 59% (35 of 59) of patients in the placebo group and 54% (33 of 61) of patients in the pexidartinib group. Demographic and disease characteristics did not differ between the two treatment groups.

RESULTS

A difference in the primary assessment of a pain response was not detected between pexidartinib and placebo (response percentage 31% [19 of 61] [95% CI 21% to 44%] versus 15% [9 of 59] [95% CI 8% to 27%]; one-sided p = 0.03). In the exploratory analyses, pexidartinib provided a modest improvement in pain (response percentage 26% [16 of 61] [95% CI 17% to 38%] versus 10% [6 of 59] [95% CI 5% to 20%]; one-sided p = 0.02 using the 50% threshold and 31% [19 of 61] [95% CI 21% to 44%] versus 14% [8 of 59] [95% CI 7% to 25%]; one-sided p = 0.02 using the MCID threshold). The least-squares mean change in the weekly mean worst-pain NRS score between baseline and week 25 was larger in patients treated with pexidartinib than placebo (-2.5 [95% CI -3.0 to -1.9] versus -0.3 [95% CI -0.9 to 0.3]; p < 0.001), although the mean difference between the two groups (-2.2 [95% CI -3.0 to -1.4]) was just over the MCID. Improvement in the weekly mean worst-pain NRS score correlated with the reduction in tumor size (r = 0.44; p < 0.001) and tumor volume score (r = 0.61; p < 0.001). For patients in the open-label extension, the change in the worst-pain NRS score from baseline was similar to the change at the end of the randomized portion and just above the MCID (mean -2.7 ± 2.2 after 25 weeks and -3.3 ± 1.7 after 50 weeks of receiving pexidartinib).

CONCLUSION

Based on the current study, a modest reduction in pain, just larger than the MCID, may be an added benefit of pexidartinib in these patients, although the findings are insufficient to justify the routine use of pexidartinib for pain relief.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study.

A prospective real-world study of the diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor patient journey: A 2-year observational analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Diffuse-tenosynovial giant cell tumor (D-TGCT) is a rare, locally aggressive, typically benign neoplasm affecting mainly large joints, representing a wide clinical spectrum. We provide a picture of the treatment journey of D-TGCT patients as a 2-year observational follow-up.

METHODS

The TGCT Observational Platform Project registry was a multinational, multicenter, prospective observational study at tertiary sarcoma centers spanning seven European countries and two US sites. Histologically confirmed D-TGCT patients were categorized as either those who remained on initial treatment strategy (determined at baseline visit) or those who changed treatment strategy with specific changes documented (e.g., systemic treatment to surgery) at the 1-year and/or 2-year follow-up visits.

RESULTS

A total of 176 patients were assessed, mean diagnosis age was 38.4 (SD ± 14.6) years; most patients had a knee tumor (120/176, 68.2%). For the 2-year observation period, most patients (75.5%) remained on the baseline treatment strategy throughout, 54/79 patients (68.4%) remained no treatment, 30/45 patients (66.7%) remained systemic treatment, 39/39 patients (100%) remained surgery. Those who changed treatment strategy utilized multimodal treatment options.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first prospectively collected analysis to describe D-TGCT patient treatments over an extended follow-up and demonstrates the need for multidisciplinary teams to determine an optimal treatment strategy.

Expanding the molecular spectrum of tenosynovial giant cell tumors

Background

While great advances in clinical and pathological description of tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCT) have been made, TGCT molecular heterogeneity represents an ongoing challenge. The canonical oncogenic fusion CSF1::COL6A3 is not systematically observed, suggesting that other oncogenic mechanisms are involved in tumorigenesis. This study aims to explore by RNA sequencing a retrospective series of tumors diagnosed as TGCT, in order to provide a better description of their molecular landscape and to correlate molecular features with clinical data.

Methods

We analyzed clinicopathological data and performed whole-exome RNA sequencing on 41 TGCT samples.

Results

RNAseq analysis showed significant higher CSF1 and CSF1-R expression than a control panel of 2642 solid tumors. RNA sequencing revealed fusion transcripts in 14 patients including 6 not involving CSF1 and some previously unreported fusions. Unsupervised clustering on the expression profiles issued from this series suggested two distinct subgroups: one composed of various molecular subtypes including CSF1 and FN1 rearranged samples and one composed of four tumors harboring an HMGA2::NCOR2 fusion, suggesting distinct tumor entities. Overall, 15 patients received at least one systemic anti-CSF1R treatment and clinical improvement was observed in 11 patients, including patients from both clusters.

Discussion

This study reported molecular heterogeneity in TGCT, contrasting with the clinical and pathological homogeneity and the ubiquitous high CSF1 and CSF1R expression levels. Whether molecular diversity may impact the efficacy of systemic treatments needs to be further investigated.

Surgical management of 144 diffuse-type TGCT patients in a single institution: A 20-year cohort study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCTs). However, achieving a cure through surgery alone remains challenging, especially for the diffuse-type (D-TGCT).

METHODS

Our goal was to describe the surgical management of patients with D-TGCT related to large joints, treated between 2000 and 2020. We analyzed the effect of (in)complete resections and the presence of postoperative tumor (POT) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on radiological and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients underwent open surgery for D-TGCT, of which 58 (40%) had treatment before. The median follow-up was 65 months. One hundred twenty-five patients underwent isolated open surgeries, in which 25 (20%) patients' D-TGCT was intentionally removed incompletely. POT presence on the first postoperative MRI was observed in 64%. Both incomplete resections and POT presence were associated with higher rates of radiological progression (73% vs. 44%; Kaplan-Meier [KM] analysis p = 0.021) and 59% versus 7%; KM analysis p < 0.001), respectively. Furthermore, patients with POT presence clinically worsened more often than patients without having POT (49% vs. 24%; KM analysis p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

D-TGCT is often resected incompletely and tumor presence is commonly observed on the first postoperative MRI, resulting in worse radiological and clinical outcomes. Therefore, surgeons should try to remove D-TGCT in toto and consider other multimodal therapeutic strategies.

Randomized placebo-controlled double-blind phase II study of zaltoprofen for patients with diffuse-type and unresectable localized tenosynovial giant cell tumors: The REALIZE study

Background

A tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a locally aggressive benign neoplasm arising from intra- or extra-articular tissue, categorized as localized (L-TGCT, solitary lesion) and diffuse (D-TGCT, multiple lesions) TGCT. Surgical excision is the mainstay of the treatment, and a high local recurrence rate of approximately 50% has been reported. We focused on zaltoprofen, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that can activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) and inhibit the proliferation of TGCT stromal cells. Therefore, we conducted a randomized trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of zaltoprofen in patients with D-TGCTs or unresectable L-TGCTs.

Methods

This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of zaltoprofen. In the treatment group, zaltoprofen (480 mg/day) was administered for 48 weeks; the placebo group received similar dosages without zaltoprofen. The primary outcome was progression-free rate (PFR) 48 weeks after treatment administration. Disease progression was defined as the following conditions requiring surgical intervention: 1) repetitive joint swelling due to hemorrhage, 2) joint range of motion limitation, 3) invasion of the adjacent cartilage or bone, 4) severe joint space narrowing, and 5) increased tumor size (target lesion).

Results

Forty-one patients were allocated to the zaltoprofen (n=21) or placebo (n=20) groups. The PFR was not significant between the zaltoprofen group and the placebo group at 48 weeks (84.0% and 90.0%, respectively; p=0.619). The mean Japanese Orthopedic Association knee score significantly improved from baseline to week 48 in the zaltoprofen group (85.38 versus 93.75, p=0.027). There was a significant difference between the values at 48 weeks of placebo and zaltoprofen group (p=0.014). One severe adverse event (grade 3 hypertension) was observed in the zaltoprofen group.

Discussion

This is the first study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zaltoprofen in patients with TGCT. No significant differences in PFR were observed between the groups at 48 weeks. Physical function significantly improved after zaltoprofen treatment. The safety profile of zaltoprofen was acceptable. This less invasive and safer treatment with zaltoprofen, compared to surgical removal, could be justified as a novel approach to treating TGCT. Further analysis of long-term administration of zaltoprofen should be considered in future studies.

Clinical Trial Registration

University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, identifier (UMIN000025901).

Long-term follow-up of nilotinib in patients with advanced tenosynovial giant cell tumours: Long-term follow-up of nilotinib in TGCT

BACKGROUND

Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumour (D-TGCT) is a non-malignant but locally aggressive tumour driven by overexpression of colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF1). CSF1R inhibitors are potential therapeutic strategies for patients not amenable to surgery. We report here the long-term outcome of nilotinib in patients with advanced D-TGCT treated within a phase II prospective international study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01261429).

METHODS

Patients were enrolled between December 2010-September 2012 at 11 cancer centres. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed D-TGCT, not amenable to surgery. Patients received nilotinib until evidence of progression, toxicity or a maximum of one year. Long-term data were retrospectively collected after the completion of the phase II trial. Patients with nilotinib treatment ≥12 weeks and follow-up ≥12 months were included for long-term analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-eight of 56 enrolled patients were included. Median treatment duration was 11 months; 31 (65%) patients completed the treatment protocol. After 102 months of follow-up (median; range 12-129), 25 patients (52%) had progression. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 77 months. The five-year PFS rate was 53%. Fifteen patients (n = 15/46; 33%) experienced clinical worsening after 11 months (median). Twenty-seven patients (58%) received additional treatment, after which eleven patients (n = 11/27; 41%) had a second relapse. Nine patients required a subsequent treatment, primarily other CSF1R inhibitors (n = 6/9; 67%). No unfavourable long-term effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

This long-term analysis of nilotinib for advanced D-TGCT showed that about half of the patients had progression and underwent additional treatment after 8.5 years follow-up. Contrarily, several patients had ongoing disease control after limited treatment duration, demonstrating the mixed effect of nilotinib.

Treatment updates on tenosynovial giant cell tumor

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor (dt-TGCT) is a benign clonal neoplastic proliferation arising from the synovium. Patients are often symptomatic, require multiple surgical procedures during their lifetime, and have reduced quality of life (QoL). Surgery is the main treatment with relapse rates ranging from 14 to 55%. The treatment strategy for patients with dt-TGCT is evolving. The purpose of this review is to describe current treatment options, and to highlight recent developments in the knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of dt-TGCT as well as related therapeutic implications.

RECENT FINDINGS

TGCT cells overexpress colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1), resulting in recruitment of CSF1 receptor (CSF1R)-bearing macrophages that are polyclonal and make up the bulk of the tumor, has led to clinical trials with CSF1R inhibitors. These inhibitors include small molecules such as pexidatinib, imatinib, nilotinib, DCC-3014 (vimseltinib), and the monoclonal antibody RG7155 (emactuzumab).

SUMMARY

In conclusion, D-TGCT impairs patients' QoL. The evidence that the pathogenetic loop of D-TGCT can be inhibited has changed the therapeutic armamentarium for this condition. Clinical trials of agents that target CSF1R are currently ongoing. All this new evidence should be taken into consideration within multidisciplinary management.

Tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCT): molecular biology, drug targets and non-surgical pharmacological approaches

INTRODUCTION

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a mono-articular, benign or locally aggressive and often debilitating neoplasm. Systemic therapies are becoming part of the multimodal armamentarium when surgery alone will not confer improvements. Since TGCT is characterized by colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF1) rearrangements, the most studied molecular pathway is the CSF1 and CSF1 receptor (CSF1R) axis. Inhibiting CSF1-CSF1R interaction often yields considerable radiological and clinical responses; however, adverse events may cause treatment discontinuation because of an unfavorable risk-benefit ratio in benign disease. Only Pexidartinib is approved by the US FDA; however, the European Medicines Agency has not approved it due to uncertainties on the risk-benefit ratio. Thus, there is a need for safer and effective therapies.

AREAS COVERED

Light is shed on disease mechanisms and potential drug targets. The safety and efficacy of different systemic therapies are evaluated.

EXPERT OPINION

The CSF1-CSF1R axis is the principal drug target; however, the effect of CSF1R inhibition on angiogenesis and the role of macrophages, which are essential in the postoperative course, needs further elucidation. Systemic therapies have a promising role in treating mainly diffuse-type, TGCT patients who are not expected to clinically improve from surgery. Future drug development should focus on targeting neoplastic TGCT cells.

Hip Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor without Recurrence in a 9-Year Follow-Up

Background. Tenosynovial giant cell tumors are a benign but rare condition with potentially aggressive tumor-like traits which should be considered in young patients with monoarticular joint involvement. Case Presentation. This report presents a 31-year-old otherwise healthy woman with a right hip pain. Clinical and histopathological investigations revealed the diagnosis of diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor of the hip (the diffuse intra-articular form of PVNS). Open synovectomy and tumor resection and surgical dislocation of the hip were performed. She was free of symptoms and recurrence within a 9-year-follow-up period. Conclusion. Open synovectomy and tumor resection through surgical dislocation of the hip without adjutant radiotherapy could be a reliable choice for the localization of the hip.

Pexidartinib in the Management of Advanced Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor: Focus on Patient Selection and Special Considerations

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a neoplasm of the joint synovium that can have severe impacts on joint mobility, function, and quality of life. Traditionally, treatment modalities included partial or complete surgical synovectomy, radiotherapy (typically as an adjunct to surgery), and watchful monitoring (no medical or surgical intervention). However, these approaches have been met with varying degrees of success and high recurrence rates, as well as onerous complications and clinical sequelae. Pexidartinib, a colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) inhibitor, presents a promising molecular approach that targets a neoplastic driver of TGCT. While the introduction of pexidartinib allows clinicians to avoid the significant morbidity associated with traditional treatment options, there are also defined risks associated with pexidartinib treatment. Therefore, patient selection is critical in optimizing treatment modalities in TGCT. The purpose of this literature review is to identify the TGCT patient population that would derive maximal benefit with minimal risk from pexidartinib, and to determine the specific indications and contraindications for selecting pexidartinib over other therapeutic approaches. Specifically, this paper compares the efficacy and safety profile of pexidartinib across clinical and preclinical studies to that of surgery, radiotherapy, and watchful monitoring. Rates of improvement in joint mobility, pain, and recurrence-free survival across studies of pexidartinib have been encouraging. The most common adverse events are mild (hypopigmentation of the hair) or reversible (transient aminotransferase elevation). Severe or permanent adverse events (notably cholestatic hepatotoxicity) are rare. While the optimal treatment strategy remains highly dependent on a patient's clinical circumstances and treatment goals, pexidartinib has surfaced as a promising therapeutic in cases where the morbidity of surgery or radiotherapy outweighs the benefits.

Role of colony-stimulating factor 1 in the neoplastic process of tenosynovial giant cell tumor

Tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCTs) are rare, locally aggressive, mesenchymal neoplasms, most often arising from the synovium of joints, bursae, or tendon sheaths. Surgical resection is the first-line treatment, but recurrence is common, with resulting impairments in patients' mobility and quality of life. Developing and optimizing the role of systemic pharmacologic therapies in TGCT management requires an understanding of the underlying disease mechanisms. The colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) has emerged as having an important role in the neoplastic processes underlying TGCT. Lesions appear to contain CSF1-expressing neoplastic cells derived from the synovial lining surrounded by non-neoplastic macrophages that express the CSF1R, with lesion growth stimulated by both autocrine effects causing proliferation of the neoplastic cells themselves and by paracrine effects resulting in recruitment of CSF1 R-bearing macrophages. Other signaling pathways with evidence for involvement in TGCT pathogenesis include programmed death ligand-1, matrix metalloproteinases, and the Casitas B-cell lymphoma family of ubiquitin ligases. While growing understanding of the pathways leading to TGCT has resulted in the development of both regulatory approved and investigational therapies, more detail on underlying disease mechanisms still needs to be elucidated in order to improve the choice of individualized therapies and to enhance treatment outcomes.