1
|
Neill R, Zia N, Ashraf L, Khan Z, Pryor W, Bachani AM. Integration measurement and its applications in low- and middle-income country health systems: a scoping review. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:1876. [PMID: 37770887 PMCID: PMC10537146 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16724-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite growing interest in and commitment to integration, or integrated care, the concept is ill-defined and the resulting evidence base fragmented, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Underlying this challenge is a lack of coherent approaches to measure the extent of integration and how this influences desired outcomes. The aim of this scoping review is to identify measurement approaches for integration in LMICs and map them for future use. METHODS Arksey and O'Malley's framework for scoping reviews was followed. We conducted a systematic search of peer-reviewed literature measuring integration in LMICs across three databases and screened identified papers by predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A modified version of the Rainbow Model for Integrated Care guided charting and analysis of the data. RESULTS We included 99 studies. Studies were concentrated in the Africa region and most frequently focused on the integration of HIV care with other services. A range of definitions and methods were identified, with no single approach for the measurement of integration dominating the literature. Measurement of clinical integration was the most common, with indicators focused on measuring receipt of two or more services provided at a single point of time. Organizational and professional integration indicators were focused on inter- and intra-organizational communication, collaboration, coordination, and continuity of care, while functional integration measured common information systems or patient records. Gaps were identified in measuring systems and normative integration. Few tools were validated or publicly available for future use. CONCLUSION We identified a wide range of recent approaches used to measure integration in LMICs. Our findings underscore continued challenges with lack of conceptual cohesion and fragmentation which limits how integration is understood in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Neill
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins International Injury Research Unit, Health Systems Program, 615 N. Wolfe Street Suite E8527, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
| | - Nukhba Zia
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins International Injury Research Unit, Health Systems Program, 615 N. Wolfe Street Suite E8527, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Lamisa Ashraf
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins International Injury Research Unit, Health Systems Program, 615 N. Wolfe Street Suite E8527, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Zainab Khan
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins International Injury Research Unit, Health Systems Program, 615 N. Wolfe Street Suite E8527, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Wesley Pryor
- Nossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Australia
| | - Abdulgafoor M Bachani
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins International Injury Research Unit, Health Systems Program, 615 N. Wolfe Street Suite E8527, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pinchoff J, Regules R, Gomez-Ugarte AC, Abularrage TF, Bojorquez-Chapela I. Coping with climate change: The role of climate related stressors in affecting the mental health of young people in Mexico. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 3:e0002219. [PMID: 37756293 PMCID: PMC10530030 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
Young people today are predicted to experience more climate change related stressors and harms than the previous generation, yet they are often excluded from climate research, policy, and advocacy. Increasingly, this exposure is associated with experience of common mental health disorders (CMD). The VoCes-19 study collected surveys from 168,407 young people across Mexico (ages 15-24 years) through an innovative online platform, collecting information on various characteristics including CMD and experience of recent climate harms. Logistic regression models were fit to explore characteristics associated with CMD. Structural equation models were fit to explore pathways between exposure, feeling of concern about climate change, and a sense of agency (meaning the respondent felt they could help address the climate crisis) and how these relate to CMD. Of the respondents, 42% (n = 50,682) were categorized as experiencing CMD, higher among those who experienced a climate stressor (51%, n = 4,808) vs those not experiencing climate stressors (41%, n = 43,872). Adjusting for key demographic characteristics, exposure to any climate event increased the odds of CMD by 50% (Odd Ratio = 1.57; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.49, 1.64), highest for heatwaves. Specific climate impacts such as housing damage, loss of or inability to work, damage to family business, leaving school and physical health affected were adversely related to CMD, though for different climate hazards. More concern and less agency were related to CMD through different pathways, particularly for those exposed to recent events. Future research regarding the cumulative exposures to climate change, not just acute events but as an ongoing crisis, and various pathways that influence the mental health and well-being of young people must be clearly understood to develop programs and policies to protect the next generation.
Collapse
|
3
|
Moloi H, Daniels K, Brooke-Sumner C, Cooper S, Odendaal WA, Thorne M, Akama E, Leon N. Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of primary healthcare integration: a scoping review of qualitative evidence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 7:CD013603. [PMID: 37466272 PMCID: PMC10355136 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013603.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary healthcare (PHC) integration has been promoted globally as a tool for health sector reform and universal health coverage (UHC), especially in low-resource settings. However, for a range of reasons, implementation and impact remain variable. PHC integration, at its simplest, can be considered a way of delivering PHC services together that sometimes have been delivered as a series of separate or 'vertical' health programmes. Healthcare workers are known to shape the success of implementing reform interventions. Understanding healthcare worker perceptions and experiences of PHC integration can therefore provide insights into the role healthcare workers play in shaping implementation efforts and the impact of PHC integration. However, the heterogeneity of the evidence base complicates our understanding of their role in shaping the implementation, delivery, and impact of PHC integration, and the role of contextual factors influencing their responses. OBJECTIVES To map the qualitative literature on healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of PHC integration to characterise the evidence base, with a view to better inform future syntheses on the topic. SEARCH METHODS We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 28 July 2020. We did not search for grey literature due to the many published records identified. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies with qualitative and mixed methods designs that reported on healthcare worker perceptions and experiences of PHC integration from any country. We excluded settings other than PHC and community-based health care, participants other than healthcare workers, and interventions broader than healthcare services. We used translation support from colleagues and Google Translate software to screen non-English records. Where translation was not feasible we categorised these records as studies awaiting classification. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS For data extraction, we used a customised data extraction form containing items developed using inductive and deductive approaches. We performed independent extraction in duplicate for a sample on 10% of studies allowed for sufficient agreement to be reached between review authors. We analysed extracted data quantitatively by counting the number of studies per indicator and converting these into proportions with additional qualitative descriptive information. Indicators included descriptions of study methods, country setting, intervention type, scope and strategies, implementing healthcare workers, and client target population. MAIN RESULTS The review included 184 studies for analysis based on 191 included papers. Most studies were published in the last 12 years, with a sharp increase in the last five years. Studies mostly employed methods with cross-sectional qualitative design (mainly interviews and focus group discussions), and few used longitudinal or ethnographic (or both) designs. Studies covered 37 countries, with close to an even split in the proportions of high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There were gaps in the geographical spread for both HICs and LMICs and some countries were more dominant, such as the USA for HICs, South Africa for middle-income countries, and Uganda for low-income countries. Methods were mainly cross-sectional observational studies with few longitudinal studies. A minority of studies used an analytical conceptual model to guide the design, implementation, and evaluation of the integration study. The main finding was the various levels of diversity found in the evidence base on PHC integration studies that examined healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences. The review identified six different configurations of health service streams that were being integrated and these were categorised as: mental and behavioural health; HIV, tuberculosis (TB) and sexual reproductive health; maternal, women, and child health; non-communicable diseases; and two broader categories, namely general PHC services, and allied and specialised services. Within the health streams, the review mapped the scope of the interventions as full or partial integration. The review mapped the use of three different integration strategies and categorised these as horizontal integration, service expansion, and service linkage strategies. The wide range of healthcare workers who participated in the implementation of integration interventions was mapped and these included policymakers, senior managers, middle and frontline managers, clinicians, allied healthcare professionals, lay healthcare workers, and health system support staff. We mapped the range of client target populations. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This scoping review provides a systematic, descriptive overview of the heterogeneity in qualitative literature on healthcare workers' perceptions and experience of PHC integration, pointing to diversity with regard to country settings; study types; client populations; healthcare worker populations; and intervention focus, scope, and strategies. It would be important for researchers and decision-makers to understand how the diversity in PHC integration intervention design, implementation, and context may influence how healthcare workers shape PHC integration impact. The classification of studies on the various dimensions (e.g. integration focus, scope, strategy, and type of healthcare workers and client populations) can help researchers to navigate the way the literature varies and for specifying potential questions for future qualitative evidence syntheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hlengiwe Moloi
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Carrie Brooke-Sumner
- Alcohol Tobacco and Other Drug Research Unit, The South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Sara Cooper
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
- Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
- Social & Behavioural Sciences Division, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Willem A Odendaal
- HIV and Other Infectious Diseases Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
- Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Eliud Akama
- Center for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Natalie Leon
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moloi H, Daniels K, Brooke-Sumner C, Cooper S, Odendaal WA, Thorne M, Akama E, Leon N. Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of primary healthcare integration: a scoping review of qualitative evidence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 7:CD013603. [PMID: 37434293 PMCID: PMC10335778 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013603.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary healthcare (PHC) integration has been promoted globally as a tool for health sector reform and universal health coverage (UHC), especially in low-resource settings. However, for a range of reasons, implementation and impact remain variable. PHC integration, at its simplest, can be considered a way of delivering PHC services together that sometimes have been delivered as a series of separate or 'vertical' health programmes. Healthcare workers are known to shape the success of implementing reform interventions. Understanding healthcare worker perceptions and experiences of PHC integration can therefore provide insights into the role healthcare workers play in shaping implementation efforts and the impact of PHC integration. However, the heterogeneity of the evidence base complicates our understanding of their role in shaping the implementation, delivery, and impact of PHC integration, and the role of contextual factors influencing their responses. OBJECTIVES To map the qualitative literature on healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of PHC integration to characterise the evidence base, with a view to better inform future syntheses on the topic. SEARCH METHODS We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 28 July 2020. We did not search for grey literature due to the many published records identified. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies with qualitative and mixed methods designs that reported on healthcare worker perceptions and experiences of PHC integration from any country. We excluded settings other than PHC and community-based health care, participants other than healthcare workers, and interventions broader than healthcare services. We used translation support from colleagues and Google Translate software to screen non-English records. Where translation was not feasible we categorised these records as studies awaiting classification. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS For data extraction, we used a customised data extraction form containing items developed using inductive and deductive approaches. We performed independent extraction in duplicate for a sample on 10% of studies allowed for sufficient agreement to be reached between review authors. We analysed extracted data quantitatively by counting the number of studies per indicator and converting these into proportions with additional qualitative descriptive information. Indicators included descriptions of study methods, country setting, intervention type, scope and strategies, implementing healthcare workers, and client target population. MAIN RESULTS The review included 184 studies for analysis based on 191 included papers. Most studies were published in the last 12 years, with a sharp increase in the last five years. Studies mostly employed methods with cross-sectional qualitative design (mainly interviews and focus group discussions), and few used longitudinal or ethnographic (or both) designs. Studies covered 37 countries, with close to an even split in the proportions of high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There were gaps in the geographical spread for both HICs and LMICs and some countries were more dominant, such as the USA for HICs, South Africa for middle-income countries, and Uganda for low-income countries. Methods were mainly cross-sectional observational studies with few longitudinal studies. A minority of studies used an analytical conceptual model to guide the design, implementation, and evaluation of the integration study. The main finding was the various levels of diversity found in the evidence base on PHC integration studies that examined healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences. The review identified six different configurations of health service streams that were being integrated and these were categorised as: mental and behavioural health; HIV, tuberculosis (TB) and sexual reproductive health; maternal, women, and child health; non-communicable diseases; and two broader categories, namely general PHC services, and allied and specialised services. Within the health streams, the review mapped the scope of the interventions as full or partial integration. The review mapped the use of three different integration strategies and categorised these as horizontal integration, service expansion, and service linkage strategies. The wide range of healthcare workers who participated in the implementation of integration interventions was mapped and these included policymakers, senior managers, middle and frontline managers, clinicians, allied healthcare professionals, lay healthcare workers, and health system support staff. We mapped the range of client target populations. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This scoping review provides a systematic, descriptive overview of the heterogeneity in qualitative literature on healthcare workers' perceptions and experience of PHC integration, pointing to diversity with regard to country settings; study types; client populations; healthcare worker populations; and intervention focus, scope, and strategies. It would be important for researchers and decision-makers to understand how the diversity in PHC integration intervention design, implementation, and context may influence how healthcare workers shape PHC integration impact. The classification of studies on the various dimensions (e.g. integration focus, scope, strategy, and type of healthcare workers and client populations) can help researchers to navigate the way the literature varies and for specifying potential questions for future qualitative evidence syntheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hlengiwe Moloi
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Carrie Brooke-Sumner
- Alcohol Tobacco and Other Drug Research Unit, The South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Sara Cooper
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
- Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
- Social & Behavioural Sciences Division, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Willem A Odendaal
- HIV and Other Infectious Diseases Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
- Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Eliud Akama
- Center for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Natalie Leon
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Breneol S, Curran JA, Marten R, Minocha K, Johnson C, Wong H, Langlois EV, Wozney L, Vélez CM, Cassidy C, Juvekar S, Rothfus M, Aziato L, Keeping-Burke L, Adjorlolo S, Patiño-Lugo DF. Strategies to adapt and implement health system guidelines and recommendations: a scoping review. Health Res Policy Syst 2022; 20:64. [PMID: 35706039 PMCID: PMC9202131 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00865-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based health system guidelines are pivotal tools to help outline the important financial, policy and service components recommended to achieve a sustainable and resilient health system. However, not all guidelines are readily translatable into practice and/or policy without effective and tailored implementation and adaptation techniques. This scoping review mapped the evidence related to the adaptation and implementation of health system guidelines in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS We conducted a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. A search strategy was implemented in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, CINAHL, LILACS (VHL Regional Portal), and Web of Science databases in late August 2020. We also searched sources of grey literature and reference lists of potentially relevant reviews. All findings were reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. RESULTS A total of 41 studies were included in the final set of papers. Common strategies were identified for adapting and implementing health system guidelines, related barriers and enablers, and indicators of success. The most common types of implementation strategies included education, clinical supervision, training and the formation of advisory groups. A paucity of reported information was also identified related to adaptation initiatives. Barriers to and enablers of implementation and adaptation were reported across studies, including the need for financial sustainability. Common approaches to evaluation were identified and included outcomes of interest at both the patient and health system level. CONCLUSIONS The findings from this review suggest several themes in the literature and identify a need for future research to strengthen the evidence base for improving the implementation and adaptation of health system guidelines in low- and middle-income countries. The findings can serve as a future resource for researchers seeking to evaluate implementation and adaptation of health system guidelines. Our findings also suggest that more effort may be required across research, policy and practice sectors to support the adaptation and implementation of health system guidelines to local contexts and health system arrangements in low- and middle-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sydney Breneol
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
- Strengthening Transitions in Care Lab, IWK Health Centre, 8th Floor Children's Site, 5850/5980 University Ave, Halifax, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada
| | - Janet A Curran
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
- Strengthening Transitions in Care Lab, IWK Health Centre, 8th Floor Children's Site, 5850/5980 University Ave, Halifax, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada.
| | - Robert Marten
- Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Kirti Minocha
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Catie Johnson
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
- Strengthening Transitions in Care Lab, IWK Health Centre, 8th Floor Children's Site, 5850/5980 University Ave, Halifax, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada
| | - Helen Wong
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
- Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Etienne V Langlois
- Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health (PMNCH), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Lori Wozney
- Nova Scotia Health Authority Policy and Planning, Dartmouth, Canada
| | - C Marcela Vélez
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
| | - Christine Cassidy
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
- Strengthening Transitions in Care Lab, IWK Health Centre, 8th Floor Children's Site, 5850/5980 University Ave, Halifax, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada
| | - Sanjay Juvekar
- Vadu Rural Health Program, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India
| | - Melissa Rothfus
- W.K. Kellogg Health Science Library, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Lydia Aziato
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana
| | - Lisa Keeping-Burke
- Department of Nursing & Health Sciences, University of New Brunswick, St. John, Canada
| | - Samuel Adjorlolo
- Department of Mental Health Nursing, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
What factors influence engagement with primary mental health care services? A qualitative study of service user perspectives in rural communities of Mexico. SSM - MENTAL HEALTH 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2022.100125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
7
|
Keynejad R, Spagnolo J, Thornicroft G. WHO mental health gap action programme (mhGAP) intervention guide: updated systematic review on evidence and impact. EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH 2021; 24:ebmental-2021-300254. [PMID: 33903119 PMCID: PMC8311089 DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2021-300254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
QUESTION There is a large worldwide gap between the service need and provision for mental, neurological and substance use disorders. WHO's Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) intervention guide (IG), provides evidence-based guidance and tools for assessment and integrated management of priority disorders. Our 2017 systematic review identified 33 peer-reviewed studies describing mhGAP-IG implementation in low-income and middle-income countries. STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, CINAHL, LILACS, ScieELO, Cochrane, PubMed databases, 3ie, Google Scholar and citations of our review, on 24 November 2020. We sought evidence, experience and evaluations of the mhGAP-IG, app or mhGAP Humanitarian IG, from any country, in any language. We extracted data from included papers, but heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis. FINDINGS Of 2621 results, 162 new papers reported applications of the mhGAP-IG. They described mhGAP training courses (59 references), clinical applications (n=49), research uses (n=27), contextual adaptations (n=13), economic studies (n=7) and other educational applications (n=7). Most were conducted in the African region (40%) and South-East Asia (25%). Studies demonstrated improved knowledge, attitudes and confidence post-training and improved symptoms and engagement with care, post-implementation. Research studies compared mhGAP-IG-enhanced usual care with task-shared psychological interventions and adaptation studies optimised mhGAP-IG implementation for different contexts. Economic studies calculated human resource requirements of scaling up mhGAP-IG implementation and other educational studies explored its potential for repurposing. CONCLUSIONS The diverse, expanding global mhGAP-IG literature demonstrates substantial impact on training, patient care, research and practice. Priorities for future research should be less-studied regions, severe mental illness and contextual adaptation of brief psychological interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne Keynejad
- Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jessica Spagnolo
- Département des Sciences de la Santé Communautaire, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne - Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean sur les innovations en santé, Campus de Longueuil, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Graham Thornicroft
- Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sapag JC, Álvarez Huenchulaf C, Campos Á, Corona F, Pereira M, Véliz V, Soto-Brandt G, Irarrazaval M, Gómez M, Abaakouk Z. [Mental Health Global Action Programme (mhGAP) in Chile: Lessons Learned and Challenges for Latin America and the CaribbeanPrograma de ação mundial para reduzir as lacunas em saúde mental (mhGAP) no Chile: aprendizados e desafios para América Latina e Caribe]. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2021; 45:e32. [PMID: 33833786 PMCID: PMC8021207 DOI: 10.26633/rpsp.2021.32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objetivos. Presentar la metodología de evaluación integral de la implementación del Programa de Acción Mundial para Superar las Brechas en Salud Mental (mhGAP) en Chile y exponer sus resultados. Métodos. Estudio evaluativo de corte transversal basado en una encuesta a referentes clave del programa, desplegados en los 29 servicios públicos de salud del país, y entrevistas individuales y grupos focales con actores clave y expertos. El foco de la evaluación estuvo en la relevancia e impacto del mhGAP en la prestación de servicios de salud mental y en la implementación del programa. Resultados. Los participantes evaluaron positivamente la implementación progresiva del mhGAP en Chile, en particular: 1) manifestaron contar con mejores herramientas de detección, diagnóstico y tratamiento de trastornos frecuentes, y estrategias eficientes de derivación; 2) calificaron todos los módulos como importantes; los más relevantes fueron autolesión/suicidio (x¯ = 4,77) y trastornos mentales y conductuales del niño y el adolescente (x¯ = 4,58); 3) evaluaron favorablemente las Jornadas Nacionales y sus réplicas y su contribución al éxito de la implementación del mhGAP; 4) coincidieron en la necesidad de incorporar nuevos actores, fortalecer algunos aspectos y ampliar la información sobre el programa. Conclusiones. La implementación del mhGAP en Chile constituye un caso emblemático de aprendizaje, apoyado por el desarrollo de la salud mental comunitaria y la salud familiar, entre otros factores. Lo logrado abre una oportunidad única para continuar avanzando en la implementación de este programa en el país y transmitir esta experiencia a otros contextos de América Latina y el Caribe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime C Sapag
- Departamentos de Salud Pública y Medicina Familiar, Escuela de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago Chile Departamentos de Salud Pública y Medicina Familiar, Escuela de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Cinthia Álvarez Huenchulaf
- Departamentos de Salud Pública y Medicina Familiar, Escuela de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago Chile Departamentos de Salud Pública y Medicina Familiar, Escuela de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Álvaro Campos
- Departamento de Gestión del Cuidado, División de Atención Primaria, Subsecretaría de Redes Asistenciales, Ministerio de Salud Santiago Chile Departamento de Gestión del Cuidado, División de Atención Primaria, Subsecretaría de Redes Asistenciales, Ministerio de Salud, Santiago, Chile
| | - Francisca Corona
- Representación de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud / Organización Mundial de la Salud Santiago Chile Representación de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud / Organización Mundial de la Salud, Santiago, Chile
| | - Milena Pereira
- Departamento de Gestión del Cuidado, División de Atención Primaria, Subsecretaría de Redes Asistenciales, Ministerio de Salud Santiago Chile Departamento de Gestión del Cuidado, División de Atención Primaria, Subsecretaría de Redes Asistenciales, Ministerio de Salud, Santiago, Chile
| | - Verónica Véliz
- Departamento de Gestión del Cuidado, División de Atención Primaria, Subsecretaría de Redes Asistenciales, Ministerio de Salud Santiago Chile Departamento de Gestión del Cuidado, División de Atención Primaria, Subsecretaría de Redes Asistenciales, Ministerio de Salud, Santiago, Chile
| | - Gonzalo Soto-Brandt
- Departamento de Gestión del Cuidado, División de Atención Primaria, Subsecretaría de Redes Asistenciales, Ministerio de Salud Santiago Chile Departamento de Gestión del Cuidado, División de Atención Primaria, Subsecretaría de Redes Asistenciales, Ministerio de Salud, Santiago, Chile
| | - Matias Irarrazaval
- Departamento de Salud Mental, Subsecretaría de Salud Pública, Ministerio de Salud Santiago Chile Departamento de Salud Mental, Subsecretaría de Salud Pública, Ministerio de Salud, Santiago, Chile
| | - Mauricio Gómez
- Departamento de Salud Mental, Subsecretaría de Salud Pública, Ministerio de Salud Santiago Chile Departamento de Salud Mental, Subsecretaría de Salud Pública, Ministerio de Salud, Santiago, Chile
| | - Zohra Abaakouk
- Representación de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud / Organización Mundial de la Salud Santiago Chile Representación de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud / Organización Mundial de la Salud, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Eaton J, Akande Y, Onukogu U, Nwefoh E, Sheikh TL, Ekpe EE, Gureje O. Protocol for process evaluation of integration of mental health into primary healthcare in two states in Nigeria: the mhSUN programme. BJPsych Open 2021; 7:e54. [PMID: 33583485 PMCID: PMC8058900 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2021.7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current international recommendations to address the large treatment gap for mental healthcare in low- and middle-income countries are to scale up integration of mental health into primary care. There are good outcome studies to support this, but less robust evidence for effectively carrying out integration and scale-up of such services, or for understanding how to address contextual issues that routinely arise. AIMS This protocol is for a process evaluation of a programme called Mental Health Scale Up Nigeria. The study aims are to determine the extent to which the intervention was carried out according to the plans developed (fidelity), to examine the effect of postulated moderating factors and local context, and the perception of the programme by primary care staff and implementers. METHOD We use a theoretical framework for process evaluation based on the Medical Research Council's Guidelines on Process Evaluation. A Theory of Change workshop was carried out in programme development, to highlight relevant factors influencing the process, ensure good adaptation of global normative guidelines and gain buy-in from local stakeholders. We will use mixed methods to examine programme implementation and outcomes, and influence of moderating factors. RESULTS Data sources will include the routine health information system, facility records (for staff, medication and infrastructure), log books of intervention activities, supervision records, patient questionnaires and qualitative interviews. CONCLUSIONS Evidence from this process evaluation will help guide implementers aiming to scale up mental health services in primary care in low- and middle-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Eaton
- Centre for Global Mental Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
| | - Yusuf Akande
- Research Unit, Department of Clinical Services, Federal Neuropsychiatric Hospital Kaduna, Nigeria
| | - Uchechi Onukogu
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Federal Neuropsychiatric Hospital Calabar, Nigeria
| | - Emeka Nwefoh
- Mental Health Department, CBM Country Office, Nigeria
| | - Taiwo Lateef Sheikh
- Department of Psychiatry, Ahmadu Bello University College of Medical Sciences, Nigeria
| | - Ekpe Essien Ekpe
- Department of Clinical Services, Federal Neuropsychiatric Hospital Calabar, Nigeria
| | - Oye Gureje
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Ibadan College of Medicine, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Coleman SF, Mukasakindi H, Rose AL, Galea JT, Nyirandagijimana B, Hakizimana J, Bienvenue R, Kundu P, Uwimana E, Uwamwezi A, Contreras C, Rodriguez-Cuevas FG, Maza J, Ruderman T, Connolly E, Chalamanda M, Kayira W, Kazoole K, Kelly KK, Wilson JH, Houde AA, Magill EB, Raviola GJ, Smith SL. Adapting Problem Management Plus for Implementation: Lessons Learned from Public Sector Settings Across Rwanda, Peru, Mexico and Malawi. INTERVENTION (AMSTELVEEN, NETHERLANDS) 2021; 19:58-66. [PMID: 34642580 PMCID: PMC8503941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Problem Management Plus (PM+) is a low-intensity psychological intervention developed by the World Health Organization that can be delivered by nonspecialists to address common mental health conditions in people affected by adversity. Emerging evidence demonstrates the efficacy of PM+ across a range of settings. However, the published literature rarely documents the adaptation processes for psychological interventions to context or culture, including curriculum or implementation adaptations. Practical guidance for adapting PM+ to context while maintaining fidelity to core psychological elements is essential for mental health implementers to enable replication and scale. This paper describes the process of contextually adapting PM+ for implementation in Rwanda, Peru, Mexico and Malawi undertaken by the international nongovernmental organization Partners In Health. To our knowledge, this initiative is among the first to adapt PM+ for routine delivery across multiple public sector primary care and community settings in partnership with Ministries of Health. Lessons learned contribute to a broader understanding of effective processes for adapting low-intensity psychological interventions to real-world contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jerome T. Galea
- School of Social Work and College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA; Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | | | | | | | - Priya Kundu
- Partners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, Rwanda
| | | | | | - Carmen Contreras
- Partners In Health/Socios En Salud, Peru, Harvard Global Health Institute, Boston, USA
| | | | - Jimena Maza
- Partners In Health/Compañeros En Salud, Mexico
| | | | - Emilia Connolly
- Partners In Health/Abwenzi Pa Za Umoyo, Malawi; Division of Pediatrics and Division of Hospital Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Giuseppe J. Raviola
- Partners In Health, Boston, USA,Partners In Health, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; The Chester M. Pierce, MD Division of Global Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Stephanie L. Smith
- Partners In Health, Boston, MA; Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|