Non-binary gender, vulnerable populations and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Data from the COVID-19 MEntal health inTernational for the general population (COMET-G) study

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought significant mental health challenges, particularly for vulnerable populations, including non-binary gender individuals. The COMET international study aimed to investigate specific risk factors for clinical depression or distress during the pandemic, also in these special populations.

METHODS

Chi-square tests were used for initial screening to select only those variables which would show an initial significance. Risk Ratios (RR) were calculated, and a Multiple Backward Stepwise Linear Regression Analysis (MBSLRA) was followed with those variables given significant results at screening and with the presence of distress or depression or the lack of both of them.

RESULTS

The most important risk factors for depression were female (RR = 1.59-5.49) and non-binary gender (RR = 1.56-7.41), unemployment (RR = 1.41-6.57), not working during lockdowns (RR = 1.43-5.79), bad general health (RR = 2.74-9.98), chronic somatic disorder (RR = 1.22-5.57), history of mental disorders (depression RR = 2.31-9.47; suicide attempt RR = 2.33-9.75; psychosis RR = 2.14-10.08; Bipolar disorder RR = 2.75-12.86), smoking status (RR = 1.15-5.31) and substance use (RR = 1.77-8.01). The risk factors for distress or depression that survived MBSLRA were younger age, being widowed, living alone, bad general health, being a carer, chronic somatic disorder, not working during lockdowns, being single, self-reported history of depression, bipolar disorder, self-harm, suicide attempts and of other mental disorders, smoking, alcohol, and substance use.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted preventive interventions are crucial to safeguard the mental health of vulnerable groups, emphasizing the importance of diverse samples in future research.

LIMITATIONS

Online data collection may have resulted in the underrepresentation of certain population groups.

Somatic multicomorbidity and disability in patients with psychiatric disorders in comparison to the general population: a quasi-epidemiological investigation in 54,826 subjects from 40 countries (COMET-G study)

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of medical illnesses is high among patients with psychiatric disorders. The current study aimed to investigate multi-comorbidity in patients with psychiatric disorders in comparison to the general population. Secondary aims were to investigate factors associated with metabolic syndrome and treatment appropriateness of mental disorders.

METHODS

The sample included 54,826 subjects (64.73% females; 34.15% males; 1.11% nonbinary gender) from 40 countries (COMET-G study). The analysis was based on the registration of previous history that could serve as a fair approximation for the lifetime prevalence of various medical conditions.

RESULTS

About 24.5% reported a history of somatic and 26.14% of mental disorders. Mental disorders were by far the most prevalent group of medical conditions. Comorbidity of any somatic with any mental disorder was reported by 8.21%. One-third to almost two-thirds of somatic patients were also suffering from a mental disorder depending on the severity and multicomorbidity. Bipolar and psychotic patients and to a lesser extent depressives, manifested an earlier (15-20 years) manifestation of somatic multicomorbidity, severe disability, and probably earlier death. The overwhelming majority of patients with mental disorders were not receiving treatment or were being treated in a way that was not recommended. Antipsychotics and antidepressants were not related to the development of metabolic syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

The finding that one-third to almost two-thirds of somatic patients also suffered from a mental disorder strongly suggests that psychiatry is the field with the most trans-specialty and interdisciplinary value and application points to the importance of teaching psychiatry and mental health in medical schools and also to the need for more technocratically oriented training of psychiatric residents.

Results of the COVID-19 mental health international for the health professionals (COMET-HP) study: depression, suicidal tendencies and conspiracism

INTRODUCTION

The current study aimed to investigate the rates of anxiety, clinical depression, and suicidality and their changes in health professionals during the COVID-19 outbreak.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data came from the larger COMET-G study. The study sample includes 12,792 health professionals from 40 countries (62.40% women aged 39.76 ± 11.70; 36.81% men aged 35.91 ± 11.00 and 0.78% non-binary gender aged 35.15 ± 13.03). Distress and clinical depression were identified with the use of a previously developed cut-off and algorithm, respectively.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Descriptive statistics were calculated. Chi-square tests, multiple forward stepwise linear regression analyses, and Factorial Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) tested relations among variables.

RESULTS

Clinical depression was detected in 13.16% with male doctors and 'non-binary genders' having the lowest rates (7.89 and 5.88% respectively) and 'non-binary gender' nurses and administrative staff had the highest (37.50%); distress was present in 15.19%. A significant percentage reported a deterioration in mental state, family dynamics, and everyday lifestyle. Persons with a history of mental disorders had higher rates of current depression (24.64% vs. 9.62%; p < 0.0001). Suicidal tendencies were at least doubled in terms of RASS scores. Approximately one-third of participants were accepting (at least to a moderate degree) a non-bizarre conspiracy. The highest Relative Risk (RR) to develop clinical depression was associated with a history of Bipolar disorder (RR = 4.23).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study reported findings in health care professionals similar in magnitude and quality to those reported earlier in the general population although rates of clinical depression, suicidal tendencies, and adherence to conspiracy theories were much lower. However, the general model of factors interplay seems to be the same and this could be of practical utility since many of these factors are modifiable.

Global child and adolescent mental health perspectives: bringing change locally, while thinking globally

Child and adolescent mental health (CAMH) are a global priority. Different countries across the globe face unique challenges in CAMH services that are specific to them. However, there are multiple issues that are also similar across countries. These issues have been presented in this commentary from the lens of early career CAMH professionals who are alumni of the Donald J Cohen Fellowship program of the IACAPAP. We also present recommendations that can be implemented locally, namely, how promoting mental health and development of children and adolescents can result in better awareness and interventions, the need to improve quality of care and access to care, use of technology to advance research and practices in CAMH, and how investing in research can secure and support CAMH professionals and benefit children and adolescents across the globe. As we continue to navigate significant uncertainty due to dynamic circumstances globally, bolstering collaborations by "bringing change locally, while thinking globally" are invaluable to advancing global CAMH research, clinical service provision, and advancement of the field.

The effect of different degrees of lockdown and self-identified gender on anxiety, depression and suicidality during the COVID-19 pandemic: Data from the international COMET-G study

INTRODUCTION

During the COVID-19 pandemic various degrees of lockdown were applied by countries around the world. It is considered that such measures have an adverse effect on mental health but the relationship of measure intensity with the mental health effect has not been thoroughly studied. Here we report data from the larger COMET-G study pertaining to this question.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

During the COVID-19 pandemic, data were gathered with an online questionnaire from 55,589 participants from 40 countries (64.85% females aged 35.80 ± 13.61; 34.05% males aged 34.90±13.29 and 1.10% other aged 31.64±13.15). Anxiety was measured with the STAI, depression with the CES-D and suicidality with the RASS. Distress and probable depression were identified with the use of a previously developed cut-off and algorithm respectively.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

It included the calculation of Relative Risk (RR), Factorial ANOVA and Multiple backwards stepwise linear regression analysis RESULTS: Approximately two-thirds were currently living under significant restrictions due to lockdown. For both males and females the risk to develop clinical depression correlated significantly with each and every level of increasing lockdown degree (RR 1.72 and 1.90 respectively). The combined lockdown and psychiatric history increased RR to 6.88 The overall relationship of lockdown with severity of depression, though significant was small.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study is the first which reports an almost linear relationship between lockdown degree and effect in mental health. Our findings, support previous suggestions concerning the need for a proactive targeted intervention to protect mental health more specifically in vulnerable groups.

Results of the COVID-19 mental health international for the general population (COMET-G) study

INTRODUCTION

There are few published empirical data on the effects of COVID-19 on mental health, and until now, there is no large international study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

During the COVID-19 pandemic, an online questionnaire gathered data from 55,589 participants from 40 countries (64.85% females aged 35.80 ± 13.61; 34.05% males aged 34.90±13.29 and 1.10% other aged 31.64±13.15). Distress and probable depression were identified with the use of a previously developed cut-off and algorithm respectively.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Descriptive statistics were calculated. Chi-square tests, multiple forward stepwise linear regression analyses and Factorial Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) tested relations among variables.

RESULTS

Probable depression was detected in 17.80% and distress in 16.71%. A significant percentage reported a deterioration in mental state, family dynamics and everyday lifestyle. Persons with a history of mental disorders had higher rates of current depression (31.82% vs. 13.07%). At least half of participants were accepting (at least to a moderate degree) a non-bizarre conspiracy. The highest Relative Risk (RR) to develop depression was associated with history of Bipolar disorder and self-harm/attempts (RR = 5.88). Suicidality was not increased in persons without a history of any mental disorder. Based on these results a model was developed.

CONCLUSIONS

The final model revealed multiple vulnerabilities and an interplay leading from simple anxiety to probable depression and suicidality through distress. This could be of practical utility since many of these factors are modifiable. Future research and interventions should specifically focus on them.

Public Policy Responses to Address the Mental Health Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence From Chile

Objectives: This paper reviews the mental health policies that have been implemented in Chile in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the international context of countries' responses. Even before the start of the pandemic, there were significant barriers to access mental health services in Chile, coupled with a scenario of nationwide social unrest and protests that questioned the legitimacy of public institutions; now the rapidly worsening outbreaks of COVID-19 are exacerbating the pre-existing mental health crisis. Methods: We conducted a bibliometric and content analysis of the Chilean mental health public policies implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic and then compared these policies with international experiences and emerging scientific evidence on the mental health impact of pandemics. Results: Our analysis of the policies identifies five crucial points of action developed in Chile: (i) an established framework to address mental health in emergency and disaster situations; (ii) a timely COVID-19 Mental Health Action Plan; (iii) inclusion of mental health in the public health agenda; (iv) development of a presidential strategy during the pandemic for comprehensive mental health and well-being; and (v) emerging research assessing the mental health implications of COVID-19. Conclusions: In Chile, the public policy responses to address the mental health consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic has been characterized by the coordinated implementation of mental health plans, ranging from a health sectoral initiative to inter-agency and intersectoral efforts. However, it is imperative that increased funding is allocated to mental health, and efforts should be made to promote the participation of people with lived experiences and communities in the design and implementation of the proposed actions. This aspect could be of key importance to social peace and community recovery after the pandemic.

[Mental Health Global Action Programme (mhGAP) in Chile: Lessons Learned and Challenges for Latin America and the CaribbeanPrograma de ação mundial para reduzir as lacunas em saúde mental (mhGAP) no Chile: aprendizados e desafios para América Latina e Caribe]

Objetivos.

Presentar la metodología de evaluación integral de la implementación del Programa de Acción Mundial para Superar las Brechas en Salud Mental (mhGAP) en Chile y exponer sus resultados.

Métodos.

Estudio evaluativo de corte transversal basado en una encuesta a referentes clave del programa, desplegados en los 29 servicios públicos de salud del país, y entrevistas individuales y grupos focales con actores clave y expertos. El foco de la evaluación estuvo en la relevancia e impacto del mhGAP en la prestación de servicios de salud mental y en la implementación del programa.

Resultados.

Los participantes evaluaron positivamente la implementación progresiva del mhGAP en Chile, en particular: 1) manifestaron contar con mejores herramientas de detección, diagnóstico y tratamiento de trastornos frecuentes, y estrategias eficientes de derivación; 2) calificaron todos los módulos como importantes; los más relevantes fueron autolesión/suicidio (x¯ = 4,77) y trastornos mentales y conductuales del niño y el adolescente (x¯ = 4,58); 3) evaluaron favorablemente las Jornadas Nacionales y sus réplicas y su contribución al éxito de la implementación del mhGAP; 4) coincidieron en la necesidad de incorporar nuevos actores, fortalecer algunos aspectos y ampliar la información sobre el programa.

Conclusiones.

La implementación del mhGAP en Chile constituye un caso emblemático de aprendizaje, apoyado por el desarrollo de la salud mental comunitaria y la salud familiar, entre otros factores. Lo logrado abre una oportunidad única para continuar avanzando en la implementación de este programa en el país y transmitir esta experiencia a otros contextos de América Latina y el Caribe.

Debate: Mental health, social crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic in Chile

Mental health in Chile has been significantly challenged by the beginning of a social crisis in October of 2019 and the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020. Despite widening of shortage of services, both the burgeoning of Telepsychiatry and a Presidential Initiative to integrate mental health to policy making and services provided by all sectors of government have mitigated the effects of this crisis.

Evolving child and adolescent mental health and development programs in Chile

This analysis reviews the situation of child and adolescent mental health in Chile, organizational determinants, and the initiatives and interventions implemented to enhance child development despite the country's inequities. Progressive development of national mental health plans is covered, from the country's first plan in 2000, to growing the number of mental health professionals and the training they receive, such as MhGAP, to the implementation of "Chile Crece Contigo," whose preliminary evaluations are starting to show some effectiveness. However, the World Health Organization reports that progress in complying with the United Nations Convention of Children's Rights is insufficient. A set off legislative initiatives on behalf of children and adolescents have been passed, while others are being discussed in Parliament. There is much to be done in the nation as a whole and within its health system to ensure improved child and adolescent mental health and wellbeing. More research into child and adolescent mental health should be undertaken. Adequate funding and policymaking are also crucial to giving priority to child and adolescent mental health in Chile.

Schizophrenia: Impact on Family Dynamics

In many societies, family members are now the primary caregivers of mental health patients, taking on responsibilities traditionally under the purview of hospitals and medical professionals. The impact of this shift on the family is high, having both an emotional and economic toll. The aim of this paper is to review the main changes that occur in family dynamics for patients with schizophrenia. The article addresses three central themes: (i) changes in the family at the onset of the disorder, (ii) consequences for family members because of their caregiver role, and (iii) family interventions aimed at improving the complex dynamics within the family. After analyzing and discussing these themes, it is observed that despite advances in the field, the viability of taking care of a patient with schizophrenia by the family remains a challenge. Improving care will require commitments from the family, the mental health service system, and local and national governments for greater investments to improve the quality of life of society in general and individuals with schizophrenia in particular.

Objective and subjective burden in relatives of patients with schizophrenia and its influence on care relationships in Chile

This study examined the burden on family members of patients with schizophrenia in a Chilean community. Sixty-five caregivers underwent the Subjective and Objective Family Burden Interview. The results showed moderate to high levels of subjective burden and low levels of support from others in providing care. Burden and containment of disturbed behaviour were correlated with worse relationships between patients and caregivers, with the latter spending less time working outside the home. The assessed sample showed a similar pattern of burden to that of caregivers from developed countries; however, the extent of the burden tended to be higher in Chilean caregivers.

An expert system for monitor alarm integration

OBJECTIVE

Intensive care and operating room monitors generate data that are not fully utilized. False alarms are so frequent that attending personnel tends to disconnect them. We developed an expert system that could select and validate alarms by integration of seven vital signs monitored on-line from cardiac surgical patients.

METHODS

The system uses fuzzy logic and is able to work under incomplete or noisy information conditions. Patient status is inferred every 2 seconds from the analysis and integration of the variables and a unified alarm message is displayed on the screen. The proposed structure was implemented on a personal computer for simultaneous automatic surveillance of up to 9 patients. The system was compared with standard monitors (SpaceLabs PC2), using their default alarm settings. Twenty patients undergoing cardiac surgery were studied, while we ran our system and the standard monitor simultaneously. The number of alarms triggered by each system and their accuracy and relevance were compared. Two expert observers (one physician, one engineer) ascertained each alarm reported by each system as true or false.

RESULTS

Seventy-five percent of the alarms reported by the standard monitors were false, while less than 1% of those reported by the expert system were false. Sensitivity of the standard monitors was 79% and sensitivity of the expert system was 92%. Positive predictive value was 31% for the standard monitors and 97% for the expert system.

CONCLUSIONS

Integration of information from several sources improved the reliability of alarms and markedly decreased the frequency of false alarms. Fuzzy logic may become a powerful tool for integration of physiological data.

Renal protection in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass with preoperative abnormal renal function

We prospectively studied the effects of renal protection intervention in 17 patients with preoperative abnormal renal function (plasma creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL) scheduled for elective coronary surgery. Patients were randomized to either dopamine 2.0 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 (Group 1, n = 10) or perfusion pressure > 70 mm Hg during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (Group 2, n = 7). Glomerular filtration rate and effective renal plasma flow were measured with inulin and 125I-hippuran clearances before the induction of anesthesia, after sternotomy and before CPB, during hypo- and normothermic CPB, after sternal closure, and 1 h postoperatively. Plasma and urine electrolytes were measured, and free water, osmolar, and creatinine clearances, as well as fractional excretion of sodium and potassium, were calculated before and after surgery. Significant differences between groups were found before CPB for glomerular filtration rate (higher in Group 1), urine output (2.0 vs 0.29 mL/min in Group 1 versus Group 2), urinary creatinine (66 vs 175 mg/dL), urinary osmolarity (370 vs 627 mOsm/L), osmolar clearance (2.1 vs 0.7 mL/min), and urinary potassium (33 vs 71 mEq/L). There were no differences between groups during hypo- and normothermic CPB. After CPB, the only difference was a slightly higher urinary creatinine in Group 2. Renal plasma flow was lower than normal in all patients before the induction of anesthesia. A nonsignificant trend toward increased flow was seen during hypothermic CPB. Filtration fraction was high before CPB, which suggests efferent arteriolar vasoconstriction, descending toward normal during and after CPB. The same pattern of changes was present in both groups. In conclusion, there were no clinically relevant differences between the two treatment modalities during and after CPB. However, significant differences were observed before CPB, when dopamine seemed to partially revert renal vasoconstriction.

IMPLICATIONS

Two protective interventions were compared in patients undergoing heart surgery to prevent deterioration of renal function; these were dopamine infusion throughout the operation and phenylephrine infusion during cardiopulmonary bypass. We found clinically relevant differences only during surgery before cardiopulmonary bypass.

Arterial pressure-flow relationship in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass

We determined the arterial pressure-flow relationship experimentally by means of step changes of blood flow in 30 adult patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Anesthesia technique was uniform. CPB was nonpulsatile; hypothermia to 25-28 degrees C, and hemodilution to 18%-25% hematocrit were used. During stable bypass, mean arterial pressure was recorded first with blood flow 2.2 L.min-1.m-2. Flow was then increased to 2.9 L.min-1.m-2 for 10 s and reverted to baseline for 1 min. Then it was decreased to 1.45 L.min-1.m-2 for 10 s, and reverted to baseline for 1 min. Subsequently, it was decreased to 0.73 L.min-1.m-2 for 10 s and then reverted to baseline. Similar sets of measurements were repeated after 0.25 mg of phenylephrine and once the patient was rewarmed. The pressure-flow function was individually determined by regression, and the critical pressure estimated by extrapolation to zero flow. All patients had zero-flow critical pressure during hypothermia, with a mean value of 21.8 +/- 6.4 mm Hg (range 8.8-38.9). It increased after 0.25 mg phenylephrine to 25.4 +/- 7.2 mm Hg (range 12.2-43.9, P < 0.001). During normothermia, critical pressure was 21.2 +/- 5 mm Hg (range 13.4-30.9), not significantly different from hypothermia. During hypothermia, the slope of the pressure-flow function (i.e., resistance) was 14.9 +/- 3.5 mm Hg.L-1.min-1.m-2 (range 7.6-22.1). It increased significantly (P < 0.001) after phenylephrine, to 19.7 +/- 6.2 mm Hg.L-1.min-1.m-2 (range 11.4-40.5), and returned to 15.4 +/- 3.4 mm Hg.L-1.min-1.m-2 (range 10.1-24.2) during normothermic bypass. Systemic vascular resistance appeared to vary reciprocally with blood flow, although this finding may represent a mathematical artifact, which can be avoided by using zero-flow critical pressure in the vascular resistance equation.

Comparison of isoflurane, halothane and fentanyl in patients with decreased ejection fraction undergoing coronary surgery

The aim of the study was to compare three anaesthetic agents in patients with ejection fraction below 0.40 subjected to coronary revascularization surgery. Twenty five elective coronary surgical patients with ejection fraction below 0.40 were prospectively studied. Premedication was pethidine 1 mg/kg and induction was fentanyl 0.03 mg/kg and pancuronium 0.1 mg/kg. The patients were randomized to one of three maintenance techniques (fentanyl, isoflurane or halothane). Radial arterial pressure, heart rate, right atrial pressure, pulmonary arterial and occluded pressures, and thermodilution cardiac output were measured, and cardiac index and resistance calculated, at the following times: before induction; 5 min after intubation; 2 min after sternotomy; immediately after discontinuation of bypass; 15 min afterwards; immediately after sternal closure; during suture of the skin; 5 min after arrival in the postoperative care unit; and 60 min postoperatively. Mean arterial pressure decreased significantly in the isoflurane group and nonsignificantly in the halothane group after induction. Cardiac index decreased significantly in the isoflurane group and nonsignificantly in the halothane group after induction and after sternotomy. Neither pressure nor flow decreased in patients receiving fentanyl. Following weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass, systemic vascular resistance decreased significantly in all groups. Cardiac index, however, did not increase above control values and arterial pressure consequently decreased; there was no significant difference between groups.

Renal function and cardiopulmonary bypass: effect of perfusion pressure

Controversy continues as to whether hypotension during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) impairs intraoperative and postoperative renal function. Therefore, 21 patients with normal renal function (plasma creatinine less than 1.2 mg/dL, creatinine clearance greater than 70 mL/min), aged 50 to 70 years, without associated pathology, scheduled for elective coronary surgery were studied prospectively. Patients were randomized into two groups: group 1 included 14 patients whose arterial blood pressure during CPB was left untreated, and group 2 consisted of 7 patients who received phenylephrine to maintain their arterial pressure above 70 mmHg. Plasma and urine creatinine, sodium, potassium, and osmolality were measured preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively. Creatinine, osmolal and free water clearances, and excreted sodium fraction were calculated. Plasma creatinine remained normal throughout the study in all patients. Creatinine clearances were similar preoperatively (101.9 +/- 36.7 in group 1 and 120.6 +/- 50.7 mL/min in group 2). In group 1, creatinine clearance decreased during CPB to 88.7 +/- 39.7 mL/min, whereas in group 2 it increased to 157.6 +/- 79.5 mL/min; the difference between groups was significant. Early postoperatively, there was no difference: 136.2 +/- 86.6 mL/min in group 1 and 100 +/- 21.4 mL/min in group 2. One week postoperatively, values were 100.5 +/- 37.9 and 101.9 +/- 18.4, respectively. There was a significant correlation between the creatinine clearance and perfusion pressure intraoperatively, but not postoperatively. Osmolal clearance also correlated with perfusion pressure intraoperatively, but it was significantly lower in the phenylephrine group postoperatively. Postoperative renal function was normal in all patients; no deleterious effect of a low arterial pressure during bypass could be identified.

Preoperative estimation of risk in cardiac surgery

In order to determine the usefulness of the preoperative subjective estimation of risk and compare it with preoperative estimation of risk based upon objective data, two groups of patients subjected to open heart surgery at the Catholic University of Chile Hospital were studied prospectively. Group I comprised 227 consecutive patients operated on in 1975 and group II comprised 181 consecutive patients operated on in 1979. There were several important differences in management and techniques between the two groups, which resulted in different factors perioperative mortality. Mortality in group I was related to extreme age subsets (p less than 0.01) and to duration an anoxic arrest (p less than 0.001); mortality in group II correlated only to preoperative functional class (NYHA) (p less than 0.02). Despite these differences, subjective risk estimation as preoperatively recorded by the anesthesiologist was accurate in both groups (r = 0.969, p less than 0.05 in group I and r = 0.998, p less than 0.01 in group II). It was concluded that in the absence of a universally valid objective risk index, subjective risk estimation provides a clinical index as useful as reliance upon presently available objective data.

Bloodless cardiac surgery utilizing a new low-prime oxygenator

One hundred consecutive patients undergoing open-heart surgery were subjected to a prospective protocol designed for reduction of homologous blood utilization. The main points of this protocol were careful surgical hemostasis, normovolemic hemodilution, and retransfusion of blood lost to the operating field. It included use of the new Bentley BOS-10 Spiraflo oxygenator (Bentley Laboratories, Inc., Irvine, California, U.S.A.). The patients' ages ranged from 6 to 68 years and their weights from 18 to 84 kg. Fifty-four patients were subjected to valvular surgery, 30 to coronary revascularization, 13 to congenital defects repair, and 3 to resection of atrial myxomas. All patients could be weaned from bypass without receiving any blood. Eighty patients completed their surgery, and 60 were discharged from the intensive care unit without receiving any homologous blood or its derivatives. Total blood usage for the series throughout the entire stay in hospital was 1.32 units/patient, which included six reoperations for excessive bleeding. This reduction in blood utilization was achieved without excessive hemodilution and did not produce significant complications.

Atherosclerosis of the left main coronary artery: 5 years results of surgical treatment

Three hundred consecutive patients received coronary arterial bypass grafts as treatment for stenosis of the left main coronary artery. Ostial stenosis was more prevalent among women (P less than 0.001). Operative (hospital) mortality was 4 percent (12 of 300). Among 148 survivors who underwent recatheterization after a mean interval of 16.5 months, the graft patency rate was 88 percent. After a minimal follow-up period of 49 months and a mean interval of 69 months, 75 percent of the survivors were asymptomatic and 94 percent were employed or fully active. The actuarial 5 year survival rate was 88.2 percent. The presence of right coronary artery disease, abnormal preoperative ventricular function and incomplete revascularization adversely affected survival, but the differences did not reach statistical significance. Comparison of this long-term follow-up study with controlled and noncontrolled studies of nonsurgical treatment of obstructions of the left main coronary artery indicates that myocardial revascularization alleviates cardiac symptoms and increases life expectancy in patients with severe atherosclerosis of this artery.