Clinical and bacteriological profile of diabetic foot infections in a tertiary care

Commercial Silver-Based Dressings: In Vitro and Clinical Studies in Treatment of Chronic and Burn Wounds

Chronic wounds are a major health problem because of delayed healing, causing hardships for the patient. The infection present in these wounds plays a role in delayed wound healing. Silver wound dressings have been used for decades, beginning in the 1960s with silver sulfadiazine for infection prevention for burn wounds. Since that time, there has been a large number of commercial silver dressings that have obtained FDA clearance. In this review, we examine the literature involving in vitro and in vivo (both animal and human clinical) studies with commercial silver dressings and attempt to glean the important characteristics of these dressings in treating infected wounds. The primary presentation of the literature is in the form of detailed tables. The narrative part of the review focuses on the different types of silver dressings, including the supporting matrix, the release characteristics of the silver into the surroundings, and their toxicity. Though there are many clinical studies of chronic and burn wounds using silver dressings that we discuss, it is difficult to compare the performances of the dressings directly because of the differences in the study protocols. We conclude that silver dressings can assist in wound healing, although it is difficult to provide general treatment guidelines. From a wound dressing point of view, future studies will need to focus on new delivery systems for silver, as well as the type of matrix in which the silver is deposited. Clearly, adding other actives to enhance the antimicrobial activity, including the disruption of mature biofilms is of interest. From a clinical point of view, the focus needs to be on the wound healing characteristics, and thus randomized control trials will provide more confidence in the results. The application of different wound dressings for specific wounds needs to be clarified, along with the application protocols. It is most likely that no single silver-based dressing can be used for all wounds.

Anaerobes in diabetic foot infections: pathophysiology, epidemiology, virulence, and management

SUMMARYDiabetic foot infections (DFI) are a public health problem worldwide. DFI are polymicrobial, biofilm-associated infections involving complex bacterial communities organized in functional equivalent pathogroups, all including anaerobes. Indeed, multiple pathophysiological factors favor the growth of anaerobes in this context. However, the prevalence, role, and contribution of anaerobes in wound evolution remain poorly characterized due to their challenging detection. Studies based on culture reviewed herein showed a weighted average of 17% of patients with anaerobes. Comparatively, the weighted average of patients with anaerobes identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing was 83.8%. Culture largely underestimated not only the presence but also the diversity of anaerobes compared with cultivation-independent approaches but both methods showed that anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli and Gram-positive cocci were the most commonly identified in DFI. Anaerobes were more present in deeper lesions, and their detection was associated with fever, malodorous lesions, and ulcer depth and duration. More specifically, initial abundance of Peptoniphilus spp. was associated with ulcer-impaired healing, Fusobacterium spp. detection was significantly correlated with the duration of DFI, and the presence of Bacteroides spp. was significantly associated with amputation. Antimicrobial resistance of anaerobes in DFI remains slightly studied and warrants more consideration in the context of increasing resistance of the most frequently identified anaerobes in DFI. The high rate of patients with DFI-involving anaerobes, the increased knowledge on the species identified, their virulence factors, and their potential role in wound evolution support recommendations combining debridement and antibiotic therapy effective on anaerobes in moderate and severe DFI.

Microbiological Species and Antibiotic Resistance in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Lower Extremity Wounds: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

Severe lower extremity wounds have an increased risk of complications and limb loss. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the microbiological profile and antibiotic resistance of wounds in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. A cross-sectional comparative study was carried out at a public hospital including 111 patients with moderate to severe wound infections. Tissue samples were collected during a surgical procedure. One hundred and four patients (94%) had positive cultures and 88 (79%) had a Gram-negative microorganism. Among the 185 cultured microorganisms, 133 (72%) were Gram-negative species. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (23 cases) was the most isolated Gram-negative species, and Enterococcus faecalis (26 cases) was the most prevalent Gram-positive species. Among 185 isolated species, 45 (24%) were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers, 23 (12%) were carbapenem-resistant, and 5 (3%) were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Findings revealed that there was no significant difference in the microbiological profile and antibiotic resistance among patients with lower extremity wounds whether they were diabetic or nondiabetic.

Optimizing Antibiotic Treatment for Diabetic Foot Infections: A Study From a Tertiary Public Healthcare Center in Puducherry, South India

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) represent a significant complication of diabetes mellitus, contributing to increased morbidity and mortality. Understanding antibiotic prescribing patterns and microbial susceptibility is crucial for effective management.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess antibiotic prescribing trends and microbial susceptibility patterns in DFIs in a tertiary care center in Puducherry.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted over two months, involving patients with DFIs attending surgery OPD and admitted inpatient wards. Data on demographics, comorbidities, ulcer characteristics, antibiotic prescriptions, and microbial culture results were collected. Descriptive statistics and appropriate statistical tests were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Of 110 patients included, most were males (80, 72.7%) aged 51-60 years (43, 39.1%). Common risk factors included poor glycemic control (85, 77.3%), barefoot walking (29, 26.4%), and a family history of diabetes (46, 41.8%). Gram-negative organisms (78, 70.9%) predominated, with Escherichia coli (17, 15.5%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12, 10.9%), and Staphylococcus aureus (10, 9.1%) being common isolates. Polypharmacy was observed, with (63) 57.3% receiving multiple antibiotics, mainly via the parenteral route (16, 64.5%). Ceftriaxone (31, 28.2%) and cefotaxime (21, 19.1%) were frequently prescribed. Antibiotic resistance varied among isolates.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the predominance of gram-negative organisms in DFIs and highlights the need for rational antibiotic prescribing. Cephalosporins were commonly used, emphasizing the importance of empirical therapy. Understanding local microbial patterns and susceptibility is crucial for guiding antibiotic selection and optimizing clinical outcomes. In addition, addressing modifiable risk factors is imperative for preventing DFIs and reducing associated complications. This study provides valuable insights for strengthening antimicrobial stewardship programs and improving patient care in diabetic foot management. Furthermore, the present study highlights the importance of essentially deprescribing the prescriptions both from the patient, their primary carer, and the treating physician/surgeon's perspective.

Prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in diabetic foot ulcers: A meta-analysis

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections have become increasingly common in recent years due to the increased prevalence of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). We carried out a meta-analysis aimed at investigating the prevalence of MDR bacteria isolated from DFUs and analysing the risk factors for MDR bacterial infection in patients with DFUs. The PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Ovid, Scopus, and ProQuest databases were searched for studies published up to November 2023 on the clinical outcomes of MDR bacteria in DFUs. The main outcome was the prevalence of MDR bacteria in DFUs. A total of 21 studies were included, representing 4885 patients from which 2633 MDR bacterial isolates were obtained. The prevalence of MDR bacteria in DFUs was 50.86% (95% confidence interval (CI): 41.92%-59.78%). The prevalence of MDR gram-positive bacteria (GPB) in DFUs was 19.81% (95% CI: 14.35%-25.91%), and the prevalence of MDR gram-negative bacteria (GNB) in DFUs was 32.84% (95% CI: 26.40%-39.62%). MDR Staphylococcus aureus (12.13% (95% CI: 8.79%-15.91%)) and MDR Enterococcus spp. (3.33% (95% CI: 1.92%-5.07%)) were the main MDR-GPB in DFUs. MDR Escherichia coli, MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa, MDR Enterobacter spp., MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae, and MDR Proteus mirabilis were the main MDR-GNB in DFUs. The prevalence rates were 6.93% (95% CI: 5.15%-8.95%), 6.01% (95% CI: 4.03%-8.33%), 3.59% (95% CI: 0.42%-9.30%), 3.50% (95% CI: 2.31%-4.91%), and 3.27% (95% CI: 1.74%-5.21%), respectively. The clinical variables of diabetic foot ulcer patients infected with MDR bacteria and non-MDR bacteria in the included studies were analysed. The results showed that peripheral vascular disease, peripheral neuropathy, nephropathy, osteomyelitis, Wagner's grade, previous hospitalization and previous use of antibacterial drugs were significantly different between the MDR bacterial group and the non-MDR bacterial group. We concluded that there is a high prevalence of MDR bacterial infections in DFUs. The prevalence of MDR-GNB was greater than that of MDR-GPB in DFUs. MDR S. aureus was the main MDR-GPB in DFUs, and MDR E. coli was the main MDR-GNB in DFUs. Our study also indicated that peripheral vascular disease, peripheral neuropathy, nephropathy, osteomyelitis, Wagner's grade, previous hospitalization, and previous use of antibacterial drugs were associated with MDR bacterial infections in patients with DFUs.

Commonly associated aerobic microbial pathogens and their antibiotic susceptibility profile in diabetic foot ulcers in tertiary care centre in Western Maharashtra

PURPOSE

Diabetes mellitus (DM-II) is a metabolic disorder either due to reduced insulin production or reduced insulin sensitivity. Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the most devastating complications of DM-II. This study was performed to assess commonly isolated micro-organisms and their anti-microbial sensitivity pattern in diabetic foot ulcers in a tertiary care centre in Western Maharashtra.

METHODS

Adult patients with a known case of DM-II with foot lesions, suspected to be a Diabetic Foot Infections (DFIs) at the tertiary care hospital from Aug 2022 to Sept 2022 were included in the study. After obtaining informed written consent, pus sample was collected with sterile swab from lesion's base and submitted to Microbiology Laboratory for aerobic culture and sensitivity.

RESULTS

Out of 56 enrolled patients, 47 (83.9%) patients tested positive for bacteriological growth and there was 'no growth' in 9 (16.07%) patients at the end of 48 h of aerobic incubation. There was male preponderance and patients were in age group of 35-85 years. The most commonly isolated micro-organisms were P. aeruginosa (17.8%), followed by S. aureus (14.2%), K. pneumonia and P. mirabilis (12.5% each). The resistance markers observed was ESBL producer, AmpC producer, MBL producer, Methicillin resistance and Inducible Clindamycin Resistance (ICR).

CONCLUSION

Due to the injudicious use of antibiotics, antibiotic resistance has been increased in all types of soft tissue infections. The empirical formula for the treatment of DFIs should be decided for given geographical reasons according to antimicrobial susceptibility profile from particular geographical area or health care institute.

Parenteral Vancomycin in the Treatment of MRSA-Associated Diabetic Foot Infections: An Unnecessary Risk

Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) are a common and costly complication of diabetes. Soft tissue and bone infections in DFIs frequently lead to amputation and/or sepsis which can be costly for both the patient and the healthcare system. Staphylococcus aureus is the most commonly identified causative agent in DFIs, and people with diabetes may have an increased risk of infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). In addition to increased susceptibility to severe infection, MRSA in DFIs is associated with high rates of treatment failure, morbidity, and hospitalization costs meaning appropriate treatment is a high priority. While hospitalized patients are usually treated with intravenous (IV) vancomycin, this can be costly in terms of inpatient stays, staffing costs, and adverse events. For example, vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury not only delays hospital discharge and increases costs but is also a particular concern for patients with diabetes who already have an increased risk of kidney problems. Vancomycin-resistant strains of S. aureus have also been identified, which means that alternative treatment options may need to be explored. Treatment alternatives to IV vancomycin, including oral antibiotics, have been shown to provide similar efficacy, with reduced costs, outpatient or home-based administration, and with fewer serious adverse effects. Although infectious disease specialists often use IV vancomycin alone, or in combination, as a first-line therapeutic option, they are increasingly seeing the value of outpatient or at-home oral antibiotics as an alternative. This manuscript reviews the evidence for true costs of vancomycin therapy for MRSA-associated DFIs and examines the alternatives.

Molecular Characterization and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Bacterial Strains Isolated From Wound of Patients With Diabetes

BACKGROUND

 Diabetic wound infections are susceptible to various pathogens, particularly bacteria, due to the immunocompromised state of diabetic patients. Staphylococcus aureus is frequently implicated in diabetic wounds. To ascertain the presence of multiple antibiotic resistance in bacterial pathogens derived from diabetic wound infections, a comprehensive analysis is required.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present cross-sectional investigation was carried out at a tertiary care facility. The samples were collected in aseptic conditions from the Endocrinology unit, specifically from local in-hospital patients (n=140). These samples were then assessed for their susceptibility to the commonly used antibacterial medications within the study area. The specimens were obtained from the lesions of individuals diagnosed with diabetes. The subjects were subjected to inoculation using various media and cultures.

RESULTS

The findings of this study revealed that a collective sum of 122 bacterial isolates was acquired. The conclusions of the antibiotic susceptibility analysis revealed that the gram-positive isolates had a higher level of resistance to penicillin G (93.18%). However, they demonstrated sensitivity to vancomycin (100%) and linezolid (LZD) (95%). The gram-negative isolates exhibited complete resistance, at a rate of 100%, to penicillin, specifically amoxicillin (AMC), as well as to sulfonamides, such as sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SXT), which belong to the antibiotic classes mentioned.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, there has been a notable rise in antibiotic resistance.

Relative Abundance and Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Chronic Wound Infections Globally

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a difficult-to-treat pathogen that is frequently involved with chronic wound infections. Here, we conducted a literature search of world-wide studies published between 2005 and 2022 that described the microbiological profiles of chronic wound infections. For each continent, a hierarchy of pathogens was created to define the organisms that were most frequently isolated in each region. Except for South America, P. aeruginosa was the second most common organism in each major continent, with Staphylococcus aureus being the most abundant pathogen overall. When individual countries were evaluated, P. aeruginosa was the most frequently isolated organism in several Southeast Asia nations including India and Malaysia. P. aeruginosa was less commonly isolated from diabetic foot infections in North America, Europe, and Africa in comparison to other types of chronic wound infections. Additionally, the Levine wound swab technique may be a quick and painless way to isolate P. aeruginosa from wound infections, but the isolation of P. aeruginosa does not seem to be an informative predictor of the patient's clinical course. A multivariate risk assessment that accounts for the regional frequency of P. aeruginosa isolation may be an appropriate way to guide empiric management of chronic wound infections.

Distribution of Causative Microorganisms in Diabetic Foot Infections: A Ten-Year Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central Malaysia

Diabetes mellitus is a global pandemic, especially in Southeast Asia. Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is a common complication of this condition and causes significant morbidity and mortality in those affected. There is a lack of locally published data on the types of microorganisms and empirical antibiotics being prescribed. This paper highlights the importance of local microorganism culture and antibiotic prescription trends among diabetic foot patients in a tertiary care hospital in central Malaysia. This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study of data taken from January 2010 to December 2019 among 434 patients admitted with diabetic foot infections (DFIs) using the Wagner classification. Patients between the ages of 58 and 68 years old had the highest rate of infection. Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Proteus spp., and Proteus mirabilis appeared to be the most isolated Gram-negative microorganisms, and Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, and MRSA appeared to be the most common Gram-positive microorganisms. The most common empirical antibiotics prescribed were ampicillin/sulbactam, followed by ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime, and the most common therapeutic antibiotics prescribed were ampicillin/sulbactam, ciprofloxacin, and cefuroxime. This study could be immensely pertinent in facilitating future empirical therapy guidelines for treating diabetic foot infections.

Culture and sensitivity pattern of aerobic bacterial isolates in diabetic foot infections during 2018-2022 in Asian countries: a literature review study

The most prevalent consequence of diabetes mellitus is diabetic foot infections (DFIs). Prior to the final treatment established by the culture findings, the early identification of infections may be used as a prescription for an empirical therapy. This study examines the microbiological profile and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of the bacteria that cause DFI.

Methods

This research aims to determine the culture and sensitivity trend of aerobic bacterial isolates of DFI in Asian nations over a 5-year period. The article was searched using PubMed and Google Scholar with the keywords 'Diabetic Foot Infections', 'Antibiotic', 'Microbiological Profile', and their combinations. The author uses publications from 2018 to 2022 in Indonesian and English to select the appropriate journal.

Results

The author identified 11 relevant articles with microbiological profiles and sensitivity patterns in DFI. A total of 3097 isolates were found in 2498 patients with DFI. Gram-negative bacteria were the leading source of infection (n=1737; 56%). Totally, 1148 (or 37%) of all isolates were aerobic Gram-positive cocci. Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly isolated aerobe (n=608, 20%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=451, 15%). Gram-positive bacteria showed good susceptibility to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, doxycycline, vancomycin, and linezolid. Gram-negative bacteria displayed excellent susceptibility to aminoglycosides, piperacillin-tazobactam, and carbapenems.

Conclusions

Gram-negative microorganisms were the most prevalent cause of DFI. This study's findings will facilitate the development of future empirical therapeutic guidelines for the treatment of DFI.

Functional outcomes of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using a hindfoot arthrodesis nail in treating Charcot's arthropathy deformity

Background

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis or hindfoot fusion is a salvage surgical option used to treat symptomatic or severe deformity as a result of Charcot's arthropathy. It is an internal fixation that utilizes nails to stabilize the hindfoot after surgical correction of the deformity. This study intends to measure the change in functional outcomes of patients with Charcot's arthropathy using this technique and the time taken to achieve fusion.

Method

This study presents a series of 40 cases of Charcot's arthropathy where hindfoot fusion was done using a hindfoot arthrodesis nail. A retrospective analysis was done where these patients' functional scores had been evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively (serially) with the Short-Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), and Foot Function Index (FFI). Along with its complication, the length of time required for the fusion is also reported.

Results

This study consists of 40 patients (13 men, 27 women; mean age 60.5 years; age range 52-68 years) with a mean follow-up of 64 months (range 24-108 months). The mean time taken for fusion was 5.1 months. All patients showed improvement in functional scoring (SF-36, AOFAS, FFI, and FAOS) postoperatively. We establish that the improvements were gradual over 2 years. Approximately 37.5% of patients had a minor complication and 2.5% had a major complication.

Conclusion

Hindfoot fusion using a hindfoot arthrodesis nail results in improved functional outcome with an acceptable fusion time and acceptable complication rate.

Level of evidence

Level III.

New Paradigm in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Grafting Techniques Using 3D-Bioprinted Autologous Minimally Manipulated Homologous Adipose Tissue (3D-AMHAT) with Fibrin Gel Acting as a Biodegradable Scaffold

Adipose tissue is an abundant source of extracellular substances that support the tissue repair process. This pilot study was carried out to determine the efficacy of 3D-bioprinted autologous adipose tissue grafts on diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), with fibrin gel used to stabilise the graft. This was a single-arm pilot study in a tertiary hospital that provides diabetic wound care services. A total of 10 patients with a DFU were enrolled, and the primary endpoint was complete healing within 12 weeks. The secondary endpoints were wound size reduction, time to healing, and adverse events. Seven out of ten patients showed complete healing of their DFU within 12 weeks (at 2, 4, 5, 10, and 12 weeks, respectively). The wound size reduction rate was significantly and progressively reduced over time. According to our data, autologous adipose tissue grafting using a 3D bioprinter, with the addition of fibrin gel that acts as a scaffold, promotes wound healing with high-quality skin reconstruction. Throughout this study period, no adverse events were observed.

Diabetic Foot Infection Characteristics and Antibiotics Susceptibility Patterns in a Regional Hospital in Libya

Introduction Diabetes is a major global health problem, among the top causes of death worldwide. Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is associated with an increased risk of amputation by 155 times and a mortality rate of 57% at 5 years. This study aims to characterize DFI epidemiology in a local hospital and analyze local microbiological patterns and antibiotic susceptibility testing.

Patients and Methods This is a retrospective review of Al Jala hospital Benghazi/Libya medical records. Eligible patients were included, if they had DFI with confirmed tissue/pus samples collections was submitted to the hospital laboratory for microbiology and Antibiotics susceptibility analysis.

Results Out of 126 patients, 77 (61.1%) were men, and 49 (38.9%) were women. The mean age was 55.4 years. Incision drainage with debridement was the most common surgical procedure (77.1%). 38.88% of growth was polymicrobial. Gram-negative rods were isolated in 70.9%, and gram-positive cocci in 27.4%. The most commonly isolated bacteria were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15.9%) and Proteus sps. (14.2%), Staphylococcus aureus (11.3%), and Escherichia coli (10.2%). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) constitutes 30% of isolated S. aureus. The most common effective antibiotic for P. aeruginosa was imipenem (90%), for S. aureus was linezolid (100%), and for MRSA was linezolid, vancomycin (100%), and ciprofloxacin 88.8%. Sixty-four percent of total bacterial isolates were MDROs (gram-positive isolates 65.3%, gram-negative isolates 63.6%).

Conclusions The emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria is a global health concern. This study attempts to evaluate the local microbiology and antimicrobial susceptibility to tailor the treatment choice for better patient outcomes.

Changing Bacterial Etiology and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles as Prognostic Determinants of Diabetic Foot Infections: A Ten-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: In this single-center study, we analyzed a retrospective cohort of patients with diabetic foot infections (DFIs) between 2011 and 2020. Patients and Methods: The first and second five-year periods were compared. A poor prognosis was defined as a primary composite end point including re-infection, major amputation, or mortality at six months. Results: A total of 484 patients were enrolled. Overall, 269 patients had the primary composite end point. A substantial decrease was detected in the second five-year period in terms of re-infection (n = 132, 66.0% vs. n = 68, 23.9%; p < 0.001) and mortality (n = 22, 11.0% vs. n = 7, 2.5%; p < 0.001). A total of 798 micro-organisms were isolated from 484 patients. A substantial increase was detected in polymicrobial infections (48.5% vs. 65.1%; p = 0.001) as well as Streptococcus spp. (2.5% vs. 9.2%; p = 0.003), Corynebacterium spp. (9.5% vs. 22.9%; p < 0.001), and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing Escherichia coli (3.0% vs. 12.7%; p < 0.001) in the second five-year period, whereas the prevalence of multi-drug-resistanct (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17.0% vs. 10.2%; p = 0.029) and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (7.5% vs. 2.8%; p = 0.017) decreased. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa (odds ratio [OR], 1.917; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.074-3.420; p = 0.028) and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (OR, 3.069; 95% CI, 1.114-8.453; p = 0.030) were independent predictors for poor prognosis. Conclusions: This 10-year cohort study provides reassuring information about the changing epidemiology of DFIs and the prognostic determinants in patients with DFIs.

Skeletal infections: microbial pathogenesis, immunity and clinical management

Osteomyelitis remains one of the greatest risks in orthopaedic surgery. Although many organisms are linked to skeletal infections, Staphylococcus aureus remains the most prevalent and devastating causative pathogen. Important discoveries have uncovered novel mechanisms of S. aureus pathogenesis and persistence within bone tissue, including implant-associated biofilms, abscesses and invasion of the osteocyte lacuno-canalicular network. However, little clinical progress has been made in the prevention and eradication of skeletal infection as treatment algorithms and outcomes have only incrementally changed over the past half century. In this Review, we discuss the mechanisms of persistence and immune evasion in S. aureus infection of the skeletal system as well as features of other osteomyelitis-causing pathogens in implant-associated and native bone infections. We also describe how the host fails to eradicate bacterial bone infections, and how this new information may lead to the development of novel interventions. Finally, we discuss the clinical management of skeletal infection, including osteomyelitis classification and strategies to treat skeletal infections with emerging technologies that could translate to the clinic in the future.

Bacteriological Profile and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Diabetic Foot Infection in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Lampung, Indonesia

Background

Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is a serious complication of diabetes mellitus and identification of the causative bacteria is an essential step in selecting the appropriate antibiotic therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the bacterial pattern and antibiotic susceptibility of the bacteria causing DFI in Lampung Province in Indonesia.

Methods

This study is a retrospective study reviewing the medical records of DFI patients admitted to the Dr Hi Abdul Moeloek Regional General Hospital in 2017–2019. DFI patients with complete medical record data were included in this study. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, wound culture and antibiotic susceptibility data were collected from the medical records using a short structural chart. The data obtained then reviewed.

Results

In this study, 131 DFI patients met the study criteria and were included. Based on the wound culture results, Gram-negative bacteria were obtained in 112 (85.5%) subjects with Enterobacter spp. as the predominant bacteria. Gram-positive bacteria were found in 19 (14.5%) subjects with Staphylococcus spp. as the predominant bacteria. Gram-negative bacteria found in this study showed high susceptibility to amikacin, meropenem and sulbactam/cefoperazone. Meanwhile, the Gram-positive bacteria showed high susceptibility to meropenem, sulbactam/cefoperazone and amikacin.

Conclusion

The findings of the study revealed Enterobacter spp. as the most predominant bacteria causing DFI in the studied population. The highest antibiotic susceptibility was seen for amikacin, meropenem and sulbactam/cefoperazone.

Antimicrobial silver dressings: a review of emerging issues for modern wound care

Skin is an important barrier to pathogenic microorganisms and plays a critical role in a ctivation of innate immune responses. When the skin barrier is breached following wounding or burn injury, pathogens can invade and complicate healing with infection resulting in delayed healing and symptomatic scarring. Wound infection is a significant problem after burn injury and in patients with chronic wounds. Antimicrobial silver has had a significant role in wound antisepsis throughout history and, given the rise in community acquired antibiotic resistance, silver dressings are now commonly used to combat wound infection. The multi-modal mechanism of action, low potential for toxicity and formation of microbial resistance makes silver dressings suitable tools against a wide array of clinically important microbes. There are, however, a number of issues with silver dressings including a conflicting evidence base, the important environmental consideration of nanoparticle manufacture, and the significant cost of these products. One solution may be to adopt an 'opened-but-unused' means of wound care whereby bulk dressing materials are used piecemeal and stored in between dressing changes to increase the cost-effectiveness and reduced wastage. There is, however, little literature on this topic and so in vitro and clinical research must be performed to consider the efficacy of active ingredient dressings in wound care including silver dressings once opened and stored.

Diabetic Foot Infection with Bacteroides pyogenes

>Diabetic foot infections are the most common serious diabetes-related complication posing significant socioeconomic burden on the health-care system. Diabetic foot microbiota consists of polymicrobial flora with predominance of Gram-negative aerobes and anaerobes. Here, we report a rare case of diabetic foot infection by Bacteroides pyogenes, an obligate Gram-negative anaerobic bacillus which is commonly encountered in polymicrobial animal bite wound infections.

Diabetic Foot Infections: Bacterial Isolates From the Centers and Hospitals of Latin American Countries

Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) are one of the most important reasons for lower limb amputations. An adequate approach to the management of DFI implies control of infection using strategies of tissue debridement and empirical antibiotic treatment based on local microbiology. The aim of this study was to determine the bacterial isolates profile and antibiotic susceptibility patterns in samples from DFI from Latin American centers, on the premise that microbiology of this region differs from that of other continents and influences antimicrobial election. Three hundred and eighty-two samples from soft tissue and bone were studied from 17 centers of 4 countries. Three hundred and seven (80.4%; 95% confidence interval = 75.9-84.2) were positive. Gram negatives (GN) were isolated in 43.8% of all samples, not only in severe but also in mild infections, 51% in bone samples, more frequently in presence of ischemia (47% vs 38%; P = .07) and in wounds with longer duration of the lesion (30-20 days; P < .01). Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequent single germ (19.9%). Gram positives were isolated more frequently in patients without ischemia (53% vs 40%; P = .01). Enterococcus faecalis was the most frequent germ in bone samples (16.8%). Ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were the oral antimicrobials most effective against GN. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and rifampicin were the oral antimicrobials most effective against Staphylococcus. Because of GN high antibiotic resistance patterns, patients treated in an ambulatory setting have to be controlled early after starting empiric treatment to assess response to therapy and hospitalize for parenteral antibiotics if oral treatment fails.