1
|
Saxena J, Das S, Kumar A, Sharma A, Sharma L, Kaushik S, Kumar Srivastava V, Jamal Siddiqui A, Jyoti A. Biomarkers in sepsis. Clin Chim Acta 2024; 562:119891. [PMID: 39067500 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2024.119891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2024] [Revised: 07/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
Sepsis is a life-threatening condition characterized by dysregulated host response to infection leading to organ dysfunction. Despite advances in understanding its pathology, sepsis remains a global health concern and remains a major contributor to mortality. Timely identification is crucial for improving clinical outcomes, as delayed treatment significantly impacts survival. Accordingly, biomarkers play a pivotal role in diagnosis, risk stratification, and management. This review comprehensively discusses various biomarkers in sepsis and their potential application in antimicrobial stewardship and risk assessment. Biomarkers such as white blood cell count, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, presepsin, and procalcitonin have been extensively studied for their diagnostic and prognostic value as well as in guiding antimicrobial therapy. Furthermore, this review explores the role of biomarkers in risk stratification, emphasizing the importance of identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from specific therapeutic interventions. Moreover, the review discusses the emerging field of transcriptional diagnostics and metagenomic sequencing. Advances in sequencing have enabled the identification of host response signatures and microbial genomes, offering insight into disease pathology and aiding species identification. In conclusion, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the current understanding and future directions of biomarker-based approaches in sepsis diagnosis, management, and personalized therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juhi Saxena
- Department of Biotechnology, Parul Institute of Technology, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
| | - Sarvjeet Das
- Department of Life Science, Parul Institute of Applied Science, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
| | - Anshu Kumar
- Department of Life Science, Parul Institute of Applied Science, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
| | - Aditi Sharma
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shoolini University of Biotechnology,and Management Sciences, Solan 173229, Himachal Pradesh, India
| | - Lalit Sharma
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shoolini University of Biotechnology,and Management Sciences, Solan 173229, Himachal Pradesh, India
| | - Sanket Kaushik
- Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Rajasthan, Jaipur, India
| | | | - Arif Jamal Siddiqui
- Department of Biology, College of Science, University of Ha'il, P.O. Box 2440, Ha'il, Saudi Arabia
| | - Anupam Jyoti
- Department of Life Science, Parul Institute of Applied Science, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schena CA, Covino M, Laterza V, Quero G, La Greca A, Cina C, de'Angelis N, Marchegiani F, Sganga G, Gasbarrini A, Franceschi F, Longo F, Alfieri S, Rosa F. The role of procalcitonin as a risk stratification tool of severity, prognosis, and need for surgery in patients with acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis. Surgery 2024; 176:162-171. [PMID: 38594101 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.02.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Imaging-based classifications do not always reflect the clinical severity and prognosis of acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis. This study aims to investigate the role of an early procalcitonin assessment in the emergency department as a risk stratification tool for severity, prognosis, and need for surgery in patients with acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, all adult patients consecutively admitted from January 2015 to September 2020 for acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis and having a procalcitonin determination at admission were enrolled. The following data were collected: age, sex, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, level of urgency, clinical presentation, type of treatment, complications, and post-management outcomes. The association between the procalcitonin value at admission and the following endpoints was analyzed: type of treatment, classification of acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis, mortality, and type of surgery. RESULTS A total of 503 consecutive patients were enrolled. Procalcitonin >0.5 ng/mL emerged as an independent risk factor for complicated acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis (P = .007). Procalcitonin >0.5 ng/mL (P = .033), together with a history of complicated acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis (P < .001), abdominal pain (P = .04), bowel perforation (P < .001), and peritonitis (P < .001), was a significant risk factor for surgery. Procalcitonin >0.5 ng/mL (P = .007) and peritonitis (P = .03) emerged as independent risk factors for sigmoidectomy without colorectal anastomosis. Procalcitonin >0.5 ng/mL (P = .004), a higher level of urgency at admission (P = .005), Hartmann's procedure (P = .002), and the necessity of mechanical ventilation (P = .004) emerged as independent risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSION Procalcitonin >0.05 ng/mL at emergency department admission is a useful risk stratification tool for severity, prognosis, and need for surgical treatment in patients with acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Alberto Schena
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Marcello Covino
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Department of Emergency Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Vito Laterza
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital of Besançon, France.
| | - Giuseppe Quero
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy; School of Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio La Greca
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Caterina Cina
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola de'Angelis
- Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Francesco Marchegiani
- Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Gabriele Sganga
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Franceschi
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Department of Emergency Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Longo
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Sergio Alfieri
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy; School of Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Fausto Rosa
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cisco G, Meier AN, Senn N, Mueller Y, Kronenberg A, Locatelli I, Knüsli J, Lhopitallier L, Boillat-Blanco N, Marti J. Cost-effectiveness analysis of procalcitonin and lung ultrasonography guided antibiotic prescriptions in primary care. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024:10.1007/s10198-024-01694-y. [PMID: 38761244 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-024-01694-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance comes with high morbidity and mortality burden, and ultimately high impact on healthcare and social costs. Efficient strategies are needed to limit antibiotic overuse. This paper investigates the cost-effectiveness of testing patients with lower respiratory tract infection with procalcitonin, either at the point-of-care only or combined with lung ultrasonography. These diagnostic tools help detect the presence of bacterial pneumonia, guiding prescription decisions. The clinical responses of these strategies were studied in the primary care setting. Evidence is needed on their cost-effectiveness. We used data from a cluster-randomized bi-centric clinical trial conducted in Switzerland and estimated patient-level costs using data on resource use to which we applied Swiss tariffs. Combining the incremental costs of the two strategies and the reduction in the 28-days antibiotic prescription rate (APR) compared to usual care, we calculated Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICER). We also used the Cost-Effectiveness Acceptability Curve as an analytical decision-making tool. The robustness of the findings is ensured by Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis and scenario analysis. In the base case scenario, the ICER compared to usual care is $2.3 per percentage point (pp) reduction in APR for the procalcitonin group, and $4.4 for procalcitonin-ultrasound combined. Furthermore, we found that for a willingness to pay per patient of more than $2 per pp reduction in the APR, procalcitonin is the strategy with the highest probability to be cost-effective. Our findings suggest that testing patients with respiratory symptoms with procalcitonin to guide antibiotic prescription in the primary care setting represents good value for money.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Cisco
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Armando N Meier
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Senn
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Yolanda Mueller
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Kronenberg
- Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Isabella Locatelli
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - José Knüsli
- Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Noemie Boillat-Blanco
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Joachim Marti
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bartsch SM, Weatherwax C, Wasserman MR, Chin KL, Martinez MF, Velmurugan K, Singh RD, John DC, Heneghan JL, Gussin GM, Scannell SA, Tsintsifas AC, O'Shea KJ, Dibbs AM, Leff B, Huang SS, Lee BY. How the Timing of Annual COVID-19 Vaccination of Nursing Home Residents and Staff Affects Its Value. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2024; 25:639-646.e5. [PMID: 38432644 PMCID: PMC10990766 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the epidemiologic, clinical, and economic value of an annual nursing home (NH) COVID-19 vaccine campaign and the impact of when vaccination starts. DESIGN Agent-based model representing a typical NH. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS NH residents and staff. METHODS We used the model representing an NH with 100 residents, its staff, their interactions, COVID-19 spread, and its health and economic outcomes to evaluate the epidemiologic, clinical, and economic value of varying schedules of annual COVID-19 vaccine campaigns. RESULTS Across a range of scenarios with a 60% vaccine efficacy that wanes starting 4 months after protection onset, vaccination was cost saving or cost-effective when initiated in the late summer or early fall. Annual vaccination averted 102 to 105 COVID-19 cases when 30-day vaccination campaigns began between July and October (varying with vaccination start), decreasing to 97 and 85 cases when starting in November and December, respectively. Starting vaccination between July and December saved $3340 to $4363 and $64,375 to $77,548 from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and societal perspectives, respectively (varying with vaccination start). Vaccination's value did not change when varying the COVID-19 peak between December and February. The ideal vaccine campaign timing was not affected by reducing COVID-19 levels in the community, or varying transmission probability, preexisting immunity, or COVID-19 severity. However, if vaccine efficacy wanes more quickly (over 1 month), earlier vaccination in July resulted in more cases compared with vaccinating later in October. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Annual vaccination of NH staff and residents averted the most cases when initiated in the late summer through early fall, at least 2 months before the COVID-19 winter peak but remained cost saving or cost-effective when it starts in the same month as the peak. This supports tethering COVID vaccination to seasonal influenza campaigns (typically in September-October) for providing protection against SARS-CoV-2 winter surges in NHs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M Bartsch
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Center for Advanced Technology and Communication in Health (CATCH), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Artificial Intelligence, Modeling, and Informatics, for Nutrition Guidance and Systems (AIMINGS) Center, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Colleen Weatherwax
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Center for Advanced Technology and Communication in Health (CATCH), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Artificial Intelligence, Modeling, and Informatics, for Nutrition Guidance and Systems (AIMINGS) Center, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA
| | | | - Kevin L Chin
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Center for Advanced Technology and Communication in Health (CATCH), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Artificial Intelligence, Modeling, and Informatics, for Nutrition Guidance and Systems (AIMINGS) Center, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Marie F Martinez
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Center for Advanced Technology and Communication in Health (CATCH), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Artificial Intelligence, Modeling, and Informatics, for Nutrition Guidance and Systems (AIMINGS) Center, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Kavya Velmurugan
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Center for Advanced Technology and Communication in Health (CATCH), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Artificial Intelligence, Modeling, and Informatics, for Nutrition Guidance and Systems (AIMINGS) Center, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Raveena D Singh
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Danielle C John
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Center for Advanced Technology and Communication in Health (CATCH), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Pandemic Response Institute, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Jessie L Heneghan
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Center for Advanced Technology and Communication in Health (CATCH), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Artificial Intelligence, Modeling, and Informatics, for Nutrition Guidance and Systems (AIMINGS) Center, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Gabrielle M Gussin
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Sheryl A Scannell
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Center for Advanced Technology and Communication in Health (CATCH), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Artificial Intelligence, Modeling, and Informatics, for Nutrition Guidance and Systems (AIMINGS) Center, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Alexandra C Tsintsifas
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Center for Advanced Technology and Communication in Health (CATCH), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Artificial Intelligence, Modeling, and Informatics, for Nutrition Guidance and Systems (AIMINGS) Center, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Kelly J O'Shea
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Center for Advanced Technology and Communication in Health (CATCH), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Artificial Intelligence, Modeling, and Informatics, for Nutrition Guidance and Systems (AIMINGS) Center, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Alexis M Dibbs
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Center for Advanced Technology and Communication in Health (CATCH), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Artificial Intelligence, Modeling, and Informatics, for Nutrition Guidance and Systems (AIMINGS) Center, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Bruce Leff
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Center for Transformative Geriatric Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Susan S Huang
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Bruce Y Lee
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Center for Advanced Technology and Communication in Health (CATCH), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Artificial Intelligence, Modeling, and Informatics, for Nutrition Guidance and Systems (AIMINGS) Center, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, NY, USA; Pandemic Response Institute, New York City, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kwa ALH, Aninda Sidharta BR, Son DN, Zirpe K, Periyasamy P, Plongla R, Swaminathan S, Loho T, Van Giap V, Apisarnthanarak A. Clinical utility of procalcitonin in implementation of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic stewardship in the South-East Asia and India: evidence and consensus-based recommendations. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2024; 22:45-58. [PMID: 38112181 DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2023.2296066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The South-East Asian (SEA) region and India are highly susceptible to antibiotic resistance, which is caused due to lack of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) knowledge, uncontrolled use of antibiotics, and poor infection control. Nonadherence to national/local guidelines, developed to combat antimicrobial resistance, is a major concern. A virtual advisory board was conducted to understand the current AMS standards and challenges in its implementation in these regions. AREAS COVERED Procalcitonin (PCT)-guided antibiotic use was discussed in various clinical conditions across initiation, management, and discontinuation stages. Most experts strongly recommended using PCT-driven antibiotic therapy among patients with lower respiratory tract infections, sepsis, and COVID-19. However, additional research is required to understand the optimal use of PCT in patients with organ transplantation and cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. Implementation of the solutions discussed in this review can help improve PCT utilization in guiding AMS in these regions and reducing challenges. EXPERT OPINION Experts strongly support the inclusion of PCT in AMS. They believe that PCT in combination with other clinical data to guide antibiotic therapy may result in more personalized and precise targeted antibiotic treatment. The future of PCT in antibiotic treatment is promising and may result in effective utilization of this biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Lay-Hoon Kwa
- Department of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital; Emerging Infectious Diseases Program, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Do Ngoc Son
- Center for Critical Care Medicine, Bach Mai Hospital; Hanoi Medical University; School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hanoi National University, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Kapil Zirpe
- Department of Neurocritical Care, Ruby Hall Clinic, Grant Medical Foundation, Pune, India
| | - Petrick Periyasamy
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Medical Department, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz UKM, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Rongpong Plongla
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine and Center of Excellence in Antimicrobial Resistance and Stewardship; Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Tonny Loho
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Medistra Hospital; Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitas Kristen Krida Wacana, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Vu Van Giap
- Training and Direction of Healthcare Activities Center; Internal Medicine Department, Hanoi Medical University; Vietnam Respiratory Society; Vietnam Society of Sleep Medicine; Respiratory Center, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Garnfeldt VM, Vincent JL, Gruson D, Garay OU, Vansieleghem S, Iniguez L, Lefevre A. The budget impact of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic stewardship compared to standard of care for patients with suspected sepsis admitted to the intensive care unit in Belgium. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0293544. [PMID: 37903106 PMCID: PMC10615283 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023] Open
Abstract
In Belgium, antibiotic resistance leads to approximately 530 deaths with a €24 million financial burden annually. This study estimated the impact of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic stewardship programs to reduce antibiotic consumption versus standard of care in patients with suspected sepsis. A decision analytic tree modelled health and budget outcomes of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic stewardship programs for patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). A literature search, a survey with local clinical experts, and national database searches were conducted to obtain model input parameters. The main outcomes were total budget impact per patient, reduction in number of antibiotic resistance cases, and cost per antibiotic day avoided. To evaluate the impact of parameter uncertainty on the source data, a deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed. A scenario analysis was conducted to investigate budget impact when including parameters for reduction in length of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation duration, in addition to base-case parameters. Based on model predictions, procalcitonin-guided antibiotic stewardship programs could reduce the number of antibiotic days by 66,868, resulting in €1.98 million savings towards antibiotic treatment in current clinical practice. Antibiotic resistance cases could decrease by 7.7% (6.1% vs 9.2%) in the procalcitonin-guided setting compared with standard of care. The base-case budget impact suggests an investment of €1.90 per patient. The sensitivity analysis showed uncertainty, as the main drivers can alter potential cost savings. The scenario analysis indicated a saving of €1,405 per patient, with a reduction of 1.5 days in the ICU (14.8 days vs 12.8 days), and a reduction of 22.7% (18.1-27.2%) in mechanical ventilation duration. The associated sensitivity analysis was shown to be robust in all parameters. Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic stewardship programs are associated with clinical benefits that positively influence antimicrobial resistance in Belgium. A small investment per patient to implement procalcitonin testing may lead to considerable cost savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Madeleine Garnfeldt
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Gistrup, Denmark
- Government, Access & Patient Affairs, Roche Diagnostics Belgium, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean-Louis Vincent
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasme, University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Damien Gruson
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Leonardo Iniguez
- Marketing and Medical Excellence, Roche Diagnostics Belgium, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alexander Lefevre
- Government, Access & Patient Affairs, Roche Diagnostics Belgium, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Papp M, Kiss N, Baka M, Trásy D, Zubek L, Fehérvári P, Harnos A, Turan C, Hegyi P, Molnár Z. Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy may shorten length of treatment and may improve survival-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2023; 27:394. [PMID: 37833778 PMCID: PMC10576288 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04677-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appropriate antibiotic (AB) therapy remains a challenge in the intensive care unit (ICU). Procalcitonin (PCT)-guided AB stewardship could help optimize AB treatment and decrease AB-related adverse effects, but firm evidence is still lacking. Our aim was to compare the effects of PCT-guided AB therapy with standard of care (SOC) in critically ill patients. METHODS We searched databases CENTRAL, Embase and Medline. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PCT-guided AB therapy (PCT group) with SOC reporting on length of AB therapy, mortality, recurrent and secondary infection, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS or healthcare costs. Due to recent changes in sepsis definitions, subgroup analyses were performed in studies applying the Sepsis-3 definition. In the statistical analysis, a random-effects model was used to pool effect sizes. RESULTS We included 26 RCTs (n = 9048 patients) in the quantitative analysis. In comparison with SOC, length of AB therapy was significantly shorter in the PCT group (MD - 1.79 days, 95% CI: -2.65, - 0.92) and was associated with a significantly lower 28-day mortality (OR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.95). In Sepsis-3 patients, mortality benefit was more pronounced (OR 0.46 95% CI: 0.27, 0.79). Odds of recurrent infection were significantly higher in the PCT group (OR 1.36, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.68), but there was no significant difference in the odds of secondary infection (OR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.54, 1.21), ICU and hospital length of stay (MD - 0.67 days 95% CI: - 1.76, 0.41 and MD - 1.23 days, 95% CI: - 3.13, 0.67, respectively). CONCLUSIONS PCT-guided AB therapy may be associated with reduced AB use, lower 28-day mortality but higher infection recurrence, with similar ICU and hospital length of stay. Our results render the need for better designed studies investigating the role of PCT-guided AB stewardship in critically ill patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Márton Papp
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői Út 26, 1082, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Saint John's Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Nikolett Kiss
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői Út 26, 1082, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Máté Baka
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői Út 26, 1082, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Domonkos Trásy
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői Út 26, 1082, Budapest, Hungary
| | - László Zubek
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői Út 26, 1082, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Fehérvári
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői Út 26, 1082, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Andrea Harnos
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői Út 26, 1082, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Caner Turan
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői Út 26, 1082, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Hegyi
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői Út 26, 1082, Budapest, Hungary
- Institute of Pancreatic Diseases, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Zsolt Molnár
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői Út 26, 1082, Budapest, Hungary.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Saura O, Luyt CE. Procalcitonin as a biomarker to guide treatments for patients with lower respiratory tract infections. Expert Rev Respir Med 2023; 17:651-661. [PMID: 37639716 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2023.2251394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lower respiratory tract infections are amongst the main causes for hospital/intensive care unit admissions and antimicrobial prescriptions. In order to reduce antimicrobial pressure, antibiotic administration could be optimized through procalcitonin-based algorithms. AREAS COVERED In this review, we discuss the performances of procalcitonin for the diagnosis and the management of community-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia. We provide up-to-date evidence and deliver clear messages regarding the purpose of procalcitonin to reduce unnecessary antimicrobial exposure. EXPERT OPINION Antimicrobial pressure and resulting antimicrobial resistances are a major public health issue as well as a daily struggle in the management of patients with severe infectious diseases, especially in intensive care units where antibiotic exposure is high. Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic administration has proven its efficacy in reducing unnecessary antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infections without excess in mortality, hospital length of stay or disease relapse. Procalcitonin-guided algorithms should be implemented in wards taking care of patients with severe infections. However, procalcitonin performances are different regarding the setting of the infection (community versus hospital-acquired infections) the antibiotic management (start or termination of antibiotic) as well as patient's condition (immunosuppressed or in shock) and we encourage the physicians to be aware of these limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ouriel Saura
- Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Charles-Edouard Luyt
- Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- INSERM, UMRS_1166, ICAN Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cost-effectiveness of a centrifugal-flow pump for patients with advanced heart failure in Argentina. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0271519. [PMID: 35913940 PMCID: PMC9342761 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Centrifugal-flow pumps are novel treatment options for patients with advanced heart failure (HF). This study estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of centrifugal-flow pumps for patients with advanced HF in Argentina.
Methods
Two Markov models were developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of a centrifugal-flow pump as destination therapy (DT) in patients with contraindication for heart transplantation, and as bridge-to-transplant (BTT), with a lifetime horizon using the third-party payer Social Security (SS) and Private Sector (PS) perspectives. Clinical, epidemiological, and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) parameters were retrieved from the literature. Direct medical costs were estimated through a micro-costing approach (exchange rate USD 1 = ARS 59.95).
Results
The centrifugal-flow pump as a DT increased the per patient QALYs by 3.5 and costs by ARS 8.1 million in both the SS and PS, with an ICER of ARS 2.3 million per QALY. Corresponding values for a centrifugal-flow pump as BTT were 0.74 QALYs and more than ARS 8 million, yielding ICERs of ARS 11 million per QALY (highly dependent on waiting times). For the 1, 3, and 5 GDP per QALY thresholds, the probability of a centrifugal-flow pump to be cost-effective for DT/BTT was around 2%/0%, 40%/0%, and 80%/1%, respectively.
Conclusion
The centrifugal-flow pump prolongs life and improves the quality of life at significantly higher costs. As in Argentina there is no current explicit cost-effectiveness threshold, the final decision on reimbursement will depend on the willingness to pay in each subsector. Nevertheless, the centrifugal-flow pump as a DT was more cost-effective than as a BTT.
Collapse
|
10
|
Lien F, Lin HS, Wu YT, Chiueh TS. Bacteremia detection from complete blood count and differential leukocyte count with machine learning: complementary and competitive with C-reactive protein and procalcitonin tests. BMC Infect Dis 2022; 22:287. [PMID: 35351003 PMCID: PMC8962279 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07223-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Biomarkers, such as leukocyte count, C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT), have been commonly used to predict the occurrence of life-threatening bacteremia and provide prognostic information, given the need for prompt intervention. However, such diagnosis methods require much time and money. Therefore, we propose a method with a high prediction capability using machine learning (ML) models based on complete blood count (CBC) and differential leukocyte count (DC) and compare its performance with traditional CRP or PCT biomarker methods and those of models incorporating CRP or PCT biomarkers. Methods We collected 366,586 daily blood culture (BC) results, of which 350,775 (93.2%), 308,803 (82.1%), and 23,912 (6.4%) cases were issued CBC/DC (CBC/DC group), CRP with CBC/DC (CRP&CBC/DC group), and PCT with CBC/DC (PCT&CBC/DC group), respectively. For the ML methods, conventional logistic regression and random forest models were selected, trained, applied, and validated for each group. Fivefold validation and prediction capability were also evaluated and reported. Results Overall, the ML methods, such as the random forest model, demonstrated promising performances. When trained with CBC/DC data, it achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.802, which is superior to the prediction conventionally made with CRP/PCT levels (0.699/0.731). Upon evaluating the performance enhanced by incorporating CRP or PCT biomarkers, it reported no substantial AUC increase with the addition of either CRP or PCT to CBC/DC data, which suggests the predicting power and applicability of using only CBC/DC data. Moreover, it showed competitive prognostic capability compared to the PCT test with similar all-cause in-hospital mortality (45.10% vs. 47.40%) and overall median survival time (27 vs. 25 days). Conclusions The ML models using only CBC/DC data yielded more accurate bacteremia predictions compared to those by methods using CRP and PCT data and reached similar prognostic performance as by PCT data. Thus, such models are potentially complementary and competitive with traditional CRP and PCT biomarkers for conducting and guiding antibiotic usage. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07223-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Lien
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Huang-Shen Lin
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - You-Ting Wu
- Department of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Tzong-Shi Chiueh
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyüan, Taiwan. .,New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, TuCheng, New Taipei, Taiwan. .,Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyüan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dagher H, Chaftari AM, Mulanovich P, Jiang Y, Hachem R, Malek AE, Borjan J, Viola GM, Raad I. Procalcitonin for antimicrobial stewardship among cancer patients admitted with COVID-19. eLife 2022; 11:81151. [PMID: 36541589 PMCID: PMC9788806 DOI: 10.7554/elife.81151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Procalcitonin (PCT) has been used to guide antibiotic therapy in bacterial infections. We aimed to determine the role of PCT in decreasing the duration of empiric antibiotic therapy among cancer patients admitted with COVID-19. Methods This retrospective study included cancer patients admitted to our institution for COVID-19 between March 1, 2020, and June 28, 2021, with a PCT test done within 72 hr after admission. Patients were divided into two groups: PCT <0.25 ng/ml and PCT ≥0.25 ng/ml. We assessed pertinent cultures, antibacterial use, and duration of empiric antibacterial therapy. Results The study included 530 patients (median age, 62 years [range, 13-91]). All the patients had ≥1 culture test within 7 days following admission. Patients with PCT <0.25 ng/ml were less likely to have a positive culture than were those with PCT ≥0.25 ng/ml (6% [20/358] vs. 17% [30/172]; p<0.0001). PCT <0.25 ng/ml had a high negative predictive value for bacteremia and 30 day mortality. Patients with PCT <0.25 ng/ml were less likely to receive intravenous (IV) antibiotics for >72 hr than were patients with PCT ≥0.25 ng/ml (45% [162/358] vs. 69% [119/172]; p<0.0001). Among patients with PCT <0.25 ng/ml and negative cultures, 30 day mortality was similar between those who received IV antibiotics for ≥72 hr and those who received IV antibiotics for shorter durations (2% [2/111] vs. 3% [5/176], p=0.71). Conclusions Among cancer patients with COVID-19, PCT level <0.25 ng/ml is associated with lower likelihood of bacterial co-infection and greater likelihood of a shorter antibiotic course. In patients with PCT level <0.25 ng/ml and negative cultures, an antibiotic course of >72 hr may not be necessary. PCT could be useful in enhancing antimicrobial stewardship in cancer patients with COVID-19. Funding This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute under award number P30CA016672, which supports MD Anderson Cancer Center's Clinical Trials Office.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiba Dagher
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUnited States
| | - Anne-Marie Chaftari
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUnited States
| | - Patricia Mulanovich
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUnited States
| | - Ying Jiang
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUnited States
| | - Ray Hachem
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUnited States
| | - Alexandre E Malek
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUnited States
| | - Jovan Borjan
- Pharmacy Clinical Programs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUnited States
| | - George M Viola
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUnited States
| | - Issam Raad
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rojas-Garcia P, van der Pol S, van Asselt ADI, Postma MJ, Rodríguez-Ibeas R, Juárez-Castelló CA, González M, Antoñanzas F. Diagnostic Testing for Sepsis: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021; 11:antibiotics11010027. [PMID: 35052904 PMCID: PMC8773030 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11010027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Sepsis is a serious and expensive healthcare problem, when caused by a multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria mortality and costs increase. A reduction in the time until the start of treatment improves clinical results. The objective is to perform a systematic review of economic evaluations to analyze the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic methods in sepsis and to draw lessons on the methods used to incorporate antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in these studies. Material and Methods: the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting standards (CHEERS) checklist was used to extract the information from the texts. Results: A total of 16 articles were found. A decision model was performed in 14. We found two ways to handle resistance while modelling: the test could identify infections caused by a resistant pathogen or resistance-related inputs, or outcomes were included (the incidence of AMR in sepsis patients, antibiotic use, and infection caused by resistant bacterial pathogens). Conclusion: Using a diagnostic technique to detect sepsis early on is more cost-effective than standard care. Setting a direct relationship between the implementation of a testing strategy and the reduction of AMR cases, we made several assumptions about the efficacy of antibiotics and the length-of-stay of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Rojas-Garcia
- Department of Economics and Business, University of La Rioja, 26004 Logroño, Spain; (R.R.-I.); (C.A.J.-C.); (M.G.); (F.A.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Simon van der Pol
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ, P.O. Box 30.001 Groningen, The Netherlands; (S.v.d.P.); (A.D.I.v.A.); (M.J.P.)
| | - Antoinette D. I. van Asselt
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ, P.O. Box 30.001 Groningen, The Netherlands; (S.v.d.P.); (A.D.I.v.A.); (M.J.P.)
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ, P.O. Box 30.001 Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten J. Postma
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ, P.O. Box 30.001 Groningen, The Netherlands; (S.v.d.P.); (A.D.I.v.A.); (M.J.P.)
- Department of Economics, Econometrics and Finance, University of Groningen, 9747 AE Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Roberto Rodríguez-Ibeas
- Department of Economics and Business, University of La Rioja, 26004 Logroño, Spain; (R.R.-I.); (C.A.J.-C.); (M.G.); (F.A.)
| | - Carmelo A. Juárez-Castelló
- Department of Economics and Business, University of La Rioja, 26004 Logroño, Spain; (R.R.-I.); (C.A.J.-C.); (M.G.); (F.A.)
| | - Marino González
- Department of Economics and Business, University of La Rioja, 26004 Logroño, Spain; (R.R.-I.); (C.A.J.-C.); (M.G.); (F.A.)
| | - Fernando Antoñanzas
- Department of Economics and Business, University of La Rioja, 26004 Logroño, Spain; (R.R.-I.); (C.A.J.-C.); (M.G.); (F.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. To examine the impact before and after adoption of a procalcitonin-based protocol to guide sepsis management has on antibiotic use, care costs, and outcomes of critically ill patients.
Collapse
|
14
|
Geraerds AJLM, van Herk W, Stocker M, El Helou S, Dutta S, Fontana MS, Schuerman FABA, van den Tooren-de Groot RK, Wieringa J, Janota J, van der Meer-Kappelle LH, Moonen R, Sie SD, de Vries E, Donker AE, Zimmerman U, Schlapbach LJ, de Mol AC, Hoffman-Haringsma A, Roy M, Tomaske M, Kornelisse RF, van Gijsel J, Visser EG, van Rossum AMC, Polinder S. Cost impact of procalcitonin-guided decision making on duration of antibiotic therapy for suspected early-onset sepsis in neonates. Crit Care 2021; 25:367. [PMID: 34670582 PMCID: PMC8529813 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03789-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS The large, international, randomized controlled NeoPInS trial showed that procalcitonin (PCT)-guided decision making was superior to standard care in reducing the duration of antibiotic therapy and hospitalization in neonates suspected of early-onset sepsis (EOS), without increased adverse events. This study aimed to perform a cost-minimization study of the NeoPInS trial, comparing health care costs of standard care and PCT-guided decision making based on the NeoPInS algorithm, and to analyze subgroups based on country, risk category and gestational age. METHODS Data from the NeoPInS trial in neonates born after 34 weeks of gestational age with suspected EOS in the first 72 h of life requiring antibiotic therapy were used. We performed a cost-minimization study of health care costs, comparing standard care to PCT-guided decision making. RESULTS In total, 1489 neonates were included in the study, of which 754 were treated according to PCT-guided decision making and 735 received standard care. Mean health care costs of PCT-guided decision making were not significantly different from costs of standard care (€3649 vs. €3616). Considering subgroups, we found a significant reduction in health care costs of PCT-guided decision making for risk category 'infection unlikely' and for gestational age ≥ 37 weeks in the Netherlands, Switzerland and the Czech Republic, and for gestational age < 37 weeks in the Czech Republic. CONCLUSIONS Health care costs of PCT-guided decision making of term and late-preterm neonates with suspected EOS are not significantly different from costs of standard care. Significant cost reduction was found for risk category 'infection unlikely,' and is affected by both the price of PCT-testing and (prolonged) hospitalization due to SAEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J L M Geraerds
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Wendy van Herk
- Division of Paediatric Infectious Diseases & Immunology, Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Stocker
- Department of Paediatrics, Neonatal and Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children's Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Salhab El Helou
- Division of Neonatology, McMaster University Children's Hospital, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Sourabh Dutta
- Division of Neonatology, McMaster University Children's Hospital, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Matteo S Fontana
- Department of Paediatrics, Neonatal and Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children's Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Frank A B A Schuerman
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Isala Women and Children's Centre, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jantien Wieringa
- Department of Paediatrics, Haaglanden Medical Center, 's Gravenhage, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Janota
- Neonatal Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Motol University Hospital, Second Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Institute of Pathological Physiology, First Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Rob Moonen
- Department of Neonatology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Sintha D Sie
- Department of Neonatology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther de Vries
- Department of Paediatrics, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Albertine E Donker
- Department of Paediatrics, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Urs Zimmerman
- Department of Paediatrics, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Luregn J Schlapbach
- Department of Paediatrics, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Paediatric Critical Care Research Group, Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Lady Cilento Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Amerik C de Mol
- Department of Neonatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Madan Roy
- Department of Neonatology, St. Josephs Healthcare, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Maren Tomaske
- Department of Paediatrics, Stadtspital Triemli, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - René F Kornelisse
- Division of Neonatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Juliette van Gijsel
- Julius Training General Practitioner, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eline G Visser
- Division of Paediatric Infectious Diseases & Immunology, Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie M C van Rossum
- Division of Paediatric Infectious Diseases & Immunology, Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne Polinder
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Egi M, Ogura H, Yatabe T, Atagi K, Inoue S, Iba T, Kakihana Y, Kawasaki T, Kushimoto S, Kuroda Y, Kotani J, Shime N, Taniguchi T, Tsuruta R, Doi K, Doi M, Nakada TA, Nakane M, Fujishima S, Hosokawa N, Masuda Y, Matsushima A, Matsuda N, Yamakawa K, Hara Y, Sakuraya M, Ohshimo S, Aoki Y, Inada M, Umemura Y, Kawai Y, Kondo Y, Saito H, Taito S, Takeda C, Terayama T, Tohira H, Hashimoto H, Hayashida K, Hifumi T, Hirose T, Fukuda T, Fujii T, Miura S, Yasuda H, Abe T, Andoh K, Iida Y, Ishihara T, Ide K, Ito K, Ito Y, Inata Y, Utsunomiya A, Unoki T, Endo K, Ouchi A, Ozaki M, Ono S, Katsura M, Kawaguchi A, Kawamura Y, Kudo D, Kubo K, Kurahashi K, Sakuramoto H, Shimoyama A, Suzuki T, Sekine S, Sekino M, Takahashi N, Takahashi S, Takahashi H, Tagami T, Tajima G, Tatsumi H, Tani M, Tsuchiya A, Tsutsumi Y, Naito T, Nagae M, Nagasawa I, Nakamura K, Nishimura T, Nunomiya S, Norisue Y, Hashimoto S, Hasegawa D, Hatakeyama J, Hara N, Higashibeppu N, Furushima N, Furusono H, Matsuishi Y, Matsuyama T, Minematsu Y, Miyashita R, Miyatake Y, Moriyasu M, Yamada T, Yamada H, Yamamoto R, Yoshida T, Yoshida Y, Yoshimura J, Yotsumoto R, Yonekura H, Wada T, Watanabe E, Aoki M, Asai H, Abe T, Igarashi Y, Iguchi N, Ishikawa M, Ishimaru G, Isokawa S, Itakura R, Imahase H, Imura H, Irinoda T, Uehara K, Ushio N, Umegaki T, Egawa Y, Enomoto Y, Ota K, Ohchi Y, Ohno T, Ohbe H, Oka K, Okada N, Okada Y, Okano H, Okamoto J, Okuda H, Ogura T, Onodera Y, Oyama Y, Kainuma M, Kako E, Kashiura M, Kato H, Kanaya A, Kaneko T, Kanehata K, Kano KI, Kawano H, Kikutani K, Kikuchi H, Kido T, Kimura S, Koami H, Kobashi D, Saiki I, Sakai M, Sakamoto A, Sato T, Shiga Y, Shimoto M, Shimoyama S, Shoko T, Sugawara Y, Sugita A, Suzuki S, Suzuki Y, Suhara T, Sonota K, Takauji S, Takashima K, Takahashi S, Takahashi Y, Takeshita J, Tanaka Y, Tampo A, Tsunoyama T, Tetsuhara K, Tokunaga K, Tomioka Y, Tomita K, Tominaga N, Toyosaki M, Toyoda Y, Naito H, Nagata I, Nagato T, Nakamura Y, Nakamori Y, Nahara I, Naraba H, Narita C, Nishioka N, Nishimura T, Nishiyama K, Nomura T, Haga T, Hagiwara Y, Hashimoto K, Hatachi T, Hamasaki T, Hayashi T, Hayashi M, Hayamizu A, Haraguchi G, Hirano Y, Fujii R, Fujita M, Fujimura N, Funakoshi H, Horiguchi M, Maki J, Masunaga N, Matsumura Y, Mayumi T, Minami K, Miyazaki Y, Miyamoto K, Murata T, Yanai M, Yano T, Yamada K, Yamada N, Yamamoto T, Yoshihiro S, Tanaka H, Nishida O. The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020). J Intensive Care 2021; 9:53. [PMID: 34433491 PMCID: PMC8384927 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-021-00555-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020), a Japanese-specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created as revised from J-SSCG 2016 jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in September 2020 and published in February 2021. An English-language version of these guidelines was created based on the contents of the original Japanese-language version. The purpose of this guideline is to assist medical staff in making appropriate decisions to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing treatment for sepsis and septic shock. We aimed to provide high-quality guidelines that are easy to use and understand for specialists, general clinicians, and multidisciplinary medical professionals. J-SSCG 2016 took up new subjects that were not present in SSCG 2016 (e.g., ICU-acquired weakness [ICU-AW], post-intensive care syndrome [PICS], and body temperature management). The J-SSCG 2020 covered a total of 22 areas with four additional new areas (patient- and family-centered care, sepsis treatment system, neuro-intensive treatment, and stress ulcers). A total of 118 important clinical issues (clinical questions, CQs) were extracted regardless of the presence or absence of evidence. These CQs also include those that have been given particular focus within Japan. This is a large-scale guideline covering multiple fields; thus, in addition to the 25 committee members, we had the participation and support of a total of 226 members who are professionals (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists) and medical workers with a history of sepsis or critical illness. The GRADE method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members.As a result, 79 GRADE-based recommendations, 5 Good Practice Statements (GPS), 18 expert consensuses, 27 answers to background questions (BQs), and summaries of definitions and diagnosis of sepsis were created as responses to 118 CQs. We also incorporated visual information for each CQ according to the time course of treatment, and we will also distribute this as an app. The J-SSCG 2020 is expected to be widely used as a useful bedside guideline in the field of sepsis treatment both in Japan and overseas involving multiple disciplines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritoki Egi
- Department of Surgery Related, Division of Anesthesiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kusunoki-cho 7-5-2, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
| | - Hiroshi Ogura
- Department of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine, Osaka University Medical School, Yamadaoka 2-15, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Tomoaki Yatabe
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Kazuaki Atagi
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Nara Prefectural General Medical Center, Nara, Japan
| | - Shigeaki Inoue
- Department of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Iba
- Department of Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Kakihana
- Department of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Kawasaki
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care, Shizuoka Children's Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Shigeki Kushimoto
- Division of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Kuroda
- Department of Emergency, Disaster, and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Joji Kotani
- Department of Surgery Related, Division of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Shime
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Takumi Taniguchi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Tsuruta
- Acute and General Medicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan
| | - Kent Doi
- Department of Acute Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Matsuyuki Doi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Taka-Aki Nakada
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masaki Nakane
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Yamagata University Hospital, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Seitaro Fujishima
- Center for General Medicine Education, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoto Hosokawa
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Japan
| | - Yoshiki Masuda
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Asako Matsushima
- Department of Advancing Acute Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Matsuda
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kazuma Yamakawa
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Hara
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Masaaki Sakuraya
- Department of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, JA Hiroshima General Hospital, Hatsukaichi, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Ohshimo
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Aoki
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Mai Inada
- Member of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yutaka Umemura
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yusuke Kawai
- Department of Nursing, Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Yutaka Kondo
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Japan
| | - Hiroki Saito
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Yokohama City Seibu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Taito
- Division of Rehabilitation, Department of Clinical Support and Practice, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Chikashi Takeda
- Department of Anesthesia, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takero Terayama
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan
| | | | - Hideki Hashimoto
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine/Infectious Disease, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi, Japan
| | - Kei Hayashida
- The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Toru Hifumi
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoya Hirose
- Emergency and Critical Care Medical Center, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tatsuma Fukuda
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan
| | - Tomoko Fujii
- Intensive Care Unit, Jikei University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinya Miura
- The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Hideto Yasuda
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Toshikazu Abe
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tsukuba Memorial Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Kohkichi Andoh
- Division of Anesthesiology, Division of Intensive Care, Division of Emergency and Critical Care, Sendai City Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yuki Iida
- Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Sciences, Toyohashi Sozo University, Toyohashi, Japan
| | - Tadashi Ishihara
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Japan
| | - Kentaro Ide
- Critical Care Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenta Ito
- Department of General Pediatrics, Aichi Children's Health and Medical Center, Obu, Japan
| | - Yusuke Ito
- Department of Infectious Disease, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center, Amagasaki, Japan
| | - Yu Inata
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, Izumi, Japan
| | - Akemi Utsunomiya
- Human Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takeshi Unoki
- Department of Acute and Critical Care Nursing, School of Nursing, Sapporo City University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Koji Endo
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Akira Ouchi
- College of Nursing, Ibaraki Christian University, Hitachi, Japan
| | - Masayuki Ozaki
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Komaki City Hospital, Komaki, Japan
| | - Satoshi Ono
- Gastroenterological Center, Shinkuki General Hospital, Kuki, Japan
| | | | | | - Yusuke Kawamura
- Department of Rehabilitation, Showa General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daisuke Kudo
- Division of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kenji Kubo
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Infectious Diseases, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Kiyoyasu Kurahashi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare School of Medicine, Narita, Japan
| | | | - Akira Shimoyama
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takeshi Suzuki
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | - Shusuke Sekine
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Motohiro Sekino
- Division of Intensive Care, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Nozomi Takahashi
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Sei Takahashi
- Center for Innovative Research for Communities and Clinical Excellence (CiRC2LE), Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Takahashi
- Department of Cardiology, Steel Memorial Muroran Hospital, Muroran, Japan
| | - Takashi Tagami
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Goro Tajima
- Nagasaki University Hospital Acute and Critical Care Center, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Hiroomi Tatsumi
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Masanori Tani
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Asuka Tsuchiya
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, National Hospital Organization Mito Medical Center, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Yusuke Tsutsumi
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, National Hospital Organization Mito Medical Center, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Takaki Naito
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Masaharu Nagae
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | | | - Kensuke Nakamura
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi, Japan
| | - Tetsuro Nishimura
- Department of Traumatology and Critical Care Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shin Nunomiya
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Division of Intensive Care, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Norisue
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center, Urayasu, Japan
| | - Satoru Hashimoto
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Daisuke Hasegawa
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Junji Hatakeyama
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Hara
- Department of Pharmacy, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Naoki Higashibeppu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Nutrition Support Team, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe City Hospital Organization, Kobe, Japan
| | - Nana Furushima
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Hirotaka Furusono
- Department of Rehabilitation, University of Tsukuba Hospital/Exult Co., Ltd., Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Yujiro Matsuishi
- Doctoral program in Clinical Sciences. Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Tasuku Matsuyama
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yusuke Minematsu
- Department of Clinical Engineering, Osaka University Hospital, Suita, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Miyashita
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuji Miyatake
- Department of Clinical Engineering, Kakogawa Central City Hospital, Kakogawa, Japan
| | - Megumi Moriyasu
- Division of Respiratory Care and Rapid Response System, Intensive Care Center, Kitasato University Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Toru Yamada
- Department of Nursing, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Yamada
- Department of Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ryo Yamamoto
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Yoshida
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| | - Yuhei Yoshida
- Nursing Department, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Jumpei Yoshimura
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Hiroshi Yonekura
- Department of Clinical Anesthesiology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Japan
| | - Takeshi Wada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Acute and Critical Care Medicine, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Eizo Watanabe
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Japan
| | - Makoto Aoki
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Hideki Asai
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Takakuni Abe
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Oita University Hospital, Yufu, Japan
| | - Yutaka Igarashi
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoya Iguchi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Masami Ishikawa
- Department of Anesthesiology, Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kure Kyosai Hospital, Kure, Japan
| | - Go Ishimaru
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Soka Municipal Hospital, Soka, Japan
| | - Shutaro Isokawa
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryuta Itakura
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hisashi Imahase
- Department of Biomedical Ethics, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Haruki Imura
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Health Informatics, School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Kenji Uehara
- Department of Anesthesiology, National Hospital Organization Iwakuni Clinical Center, Iwakuni, Japan
| | - Noritaka Ushio
- Advanced Medical Emergency Department and Critical Care Center, Japan Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Takeshi Umegaki
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan
| | - Yuko Egawa
- Advanced Emergency and Critical Care Center, Saitama Red Cross Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yuki Enomoto
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Kohei Ota
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Ohchi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Oita University Hospital, Yufu, Japan
| | - Takanori Ohno
- Department of Emergency and Critical Medicine, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ohbe
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Nobunaga Okada
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yohei Okada
- Department of Primary care and Emergency medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiromu Okano
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Okamoto
- Department of ER, Hashimoto Municipal Hospital, Hashimoto, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Okuda
- Department of Community Medical Supports, Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
| | - Takayuki Ogura
- Tochigi prefectural Emergency and Critical Care Center, Imperial Gift Foundation Saiseikai, Utsunomiya Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan
| | - Yu Onodera
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Yuhta Oyama
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dialysis Center, Kichijoji Asahi Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Motoshi Kainuma
- Anesthesiology, Emergency Medicine, and Intensive Care Division, Inazawa Municipal Hospital, Inazawa, Japan
| | - Eisuke Kako
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Nagoya-City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masahiro Kashiura
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hiromi Kato
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Akihiro Kanaya
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan
| | - Tadashi Kaneko
- Emergency and Critical Care Center, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Japan
| | - Keita Kanehata
- Advanced Medical Emergency Department and Critical Care Center, Japan Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Ken-Ichi Kano
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Kawano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Onga Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kazuya Kikutani
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Kikuchi
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kido
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Sho Kimura
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Koami
- Center for Translational Injury Research, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA
| | - Daisuke Kobashi
- Advanced Medical Emergency Department and Critical Care Center, Japan Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Iwao Saiki
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahito Sakai
- Department of General Medicine Shintakeo Hospital, Takeo, Japan
| | - Ayaka Sakamoto
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Sato
- Tohoku University Hospital Emergency Center, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Shiga
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Advanced Joint Function and Reconstructive Spine Surgery, Graduate school of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Manabu Shimoto
- Department of Primary care and Emergency medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinya Shimoyama
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care, Gunma Children's Medical Center, Shibukawa, Japan
| | - Tomohisa Shoko
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoh Sugawara
- Department of Anesthesiology, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Atsunori Sugita
- Department of Acute Medicine, Division of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Suzuki
- Department of Intensive Care, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yuji Suzuki
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Suhara
- Department of Anesthesiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenji Sonota
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Miyagi Children's Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - Shuhei Takauji
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan
| | - Kohei Takashima
- Critical Care Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sho Takahashi
- Department of Cardiology, Fukuyama City Hospital, Fukuyama, Japan
| | - Yoko Takahashi
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Koga General Hospital, Koga, Japan
| | - Jun Takeshita
- Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, Izumi, Japan
| | - Yuuki Tanaka
- Fukuoka Prefectural Psychiatric Center, Dazaifu Hospital, Dazaifu, Japan
| | - Akihito Tampo
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan
| | - Taichiro Tsunoyama
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenichi Tetsuhara
- Emergency and Critical Care Center, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kentaro Tokunaga
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Tomioka
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Todachuo General Hospital, Toda, Japan
| | - Kentaro Tomita
- Department of Pediatrics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Tominaga
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsunobu Toyosaki
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yukitoshi Toyoda
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Naito
- Department of Emergency, Critical Care, and Disaster Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Isao Nagata
- Intensive Care Unit, Yokohama City Minato Red Cross Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Tadashi Nagato
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Yamate Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshimi Nakamura
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daini Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuki Nakamori
- Department of Clinical Anesthesiology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Japan
| | - Isao Nahara
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hiromu Naraba
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi, Japan
| | - Chihiro Narita
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Norihiro Nishioka
- Department of Preventive Services, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tomoya Nishimura
- Advanced Medical Emergency Department and Critical Care Center, Japan Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Kei Nishiyama
- Division of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Science, Niigata, Japan
| | - Tomohisa Nomura
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Juntendo University Nerima Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taiki Haga
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Hagiwara
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan
| | - Katsuhiko Hashimoto
- Research Associate of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Takeshi Hatachi
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, Izumi, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Hamasaki
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Society Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Takuya Hayashi
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Minoru Hayashi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | - Atsuki Hayamizu
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Saitama Saiseikai Kurihashi Hospital, Kuki, Japan
| | - Go Haraguchi
- Division of Intensive Care Unit, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yohei Hirano
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Japan
| | - Ryo Fujii
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, Tochigi Prefectural Emergency and Critical Care Center, Imperial Foundation Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan
| | - Motoki Fujita
- Acute and General Medicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Fujimura
- Department of Anesthesiology, St. Mary's Hospital, Our Lady of the Snow Social Medical Corporation, Kurume, Japan
| | - Hiraku Funakoshi
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center, Urayasu, Japan
| | - Masahito Horiguchi
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Jun Maki
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Naohisa Masunaga
- Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yosuke Matsumura
- Department of Intensive Care, Chiba Emergency Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takuya Mayumi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kanazawa Municipal Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Keisuke Minami
- Ishikawa Prefectual Central Hospital Emergency and Critical Care Center, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Yuya Miyazaki
- Department of Emergency and General Internal Medicine, Saiseikai Kawaguchi General Hospital, Kawaguchi, Japan
| | - Kazuyuki Miyamoto
- Department of Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Teppei Murata
- Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Machi Yanai
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Takao Yano
- Department of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine, Miyazaki Prefectural Nobeoka Hospital, Nobeoka, Japan
| | - Kohei Yamada
- Department of Traumatology and Critical Care Medicine, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan
| | - Naoki Yamada
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Fukui Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | - Tomonori Yamamoto
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Nara Prefectural General Medical Center, Nara, Japan
| | - Shodai Yoshihiro
- Pharmaceutical Department, JA Hiroshima General Hospital, Hatsukaichi, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tanaka
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Japan
| | - Osamu Nishida
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lau VI, Xie F, Basmaji J, Cook DJ, Fowler R, Kiflen M, Sirotich E, Iansavichene A, Bagshaw SM, Wilcox ME, Lamontagne F, Ferguson N, Rochwerg B. Health-Related Quality-of-Life and Cost Utility Analyses in Critical Care: A Systematic Review. Crit Care Med 2021; 49:575-588. [PMID: 33591013 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cost utility analyses compare the costs and health outcome of interventions, with a denominator of quality-adjusted life year, a generic health utility measure combining both quality and quantity of life. Cost utility analyses are difficult to compare when methods are not standardized. It is unclear how cost utility analyses are measured/reported in critical care and what methodologic challenges cost utility analyses pose in this setting. This may lead to differences precluding cost utility analyses comparisons. Therefore, we performed a systematic review of cost utility analyses conducted in critical care. Our objectives were to understand: 1) methodologic characteristics, 2) how health-related quality-of-life was measured/reported, and 3) what costs were reported/measured. DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES We systematically searched for cost utility analyses in critical care in MEDLINE, Embase, American College of Physicians Journal Club, CENTRAL, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews' selected subset of archived versions of UK National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and American Economic Association electronic databases from inception to April 30, 2020. SETTING Adult ICUs. PATIENTS Adult critically ill patients. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Of 8,926 citations, 80 cost utility analyse studies were eligible. The time horizon most commonly reported was lifetime (59%). For health utility reporting, health-related quality-of-life was infrequently measured (29% reported), with only 5% of studies reporting baseline health-related quality-of-life. Indirect utility measures (generic, preference-based health utility measurement tools) were reported in 85% of studies (majority Euro-quality-of-life-5 Domains, 52%). Methods of estimating health-related quality-of-life were seldom used when the patient was incapacitated: imputation (19%), assigning fixed utilities for incapacitation (19%), and surrogates reporting on behalf of incapacitated patients (5%). For cost utility reporting transparency, separate incremental costs and quality-adjusted life years were both reported in only 76% of studies. Disaggregated quality-adjusted life years (reporting separate health utility and life years) were described in only 34% of studies. CONCLUSIONS We identified deficiencies which warrant recommendations (standardized measurement/reporting of resource use/unit costs/health-related quality-of-life/methodological preferences) for improved design, conduct, and reporting of future cost utility analyses in critical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent I Lau
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Feng Xie
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - John Basmaji
- Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Deborah J Cook
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Robert Fowler
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Ontario, ON, Canada
| | - Michel Kiflen
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Emily Sirotich
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Sean M Bagshaw
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - M Elizabeth Wilcox
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Ontario, ON, Canada
| | - François Lamontagne
- Centre de Recherche du CHU de Sherbrooke, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Niall Ferguson
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Ontario, ON, Canada
| | - Bram Rochwerg
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Egi M, Ogura H, Yatabe T, Atagi K, Inoue S, Iba T, Kakihana Y, Kawasaki T, Kushimoto S, Kuroda Y, Kotani J, Shime N, Taniguchi T, Tsuruta R, Doi K, Doi M, Nakada T, Nakane M, Fujishima S, Hosokawa N, Masuda Y, Matsushima A, Matsuda N, Yamakawa K, Hara Y, Sakuraya M, Ohshimo S, Aoki Y, Inada M, Umemura Y, Kawai Y, Kondo Y, Saito H, Taito S, Takeda C, Terayama T, Tohira H, Hashimoto H, Hayashida K, Hifumi T, Hirose T, Fukuda T, Fujii T, Miura S, Yasuda H, Abe T, Andoh K, Iida Y, Ishihara T, Ide K, Ito K, Ito Y, Inata Y, Utsunomiya A, Unoki T, Endo K, Ouchi A, Ozaki M, Ono S, Katsura M, Kawaguchi A, Kawamura Y, Kudo D, Kubo K, Kurahashi K, Sakuramoto H, Shimoyama A, Suzuki T, Sekine S, Sekino M, Takahashi N, Takahashi S, Takahashi H, Tagami T, Tajima G, Tatsumi H, Tani M, Tsuchiya A, Tsutsumi Y, Naito T, Nagae M, Nagasawa I, Nakamura K, Nishimura T, Nunomiya S, Norisue Y, Hashimoto S, Hasegawa D, Hatakeyama J, Hara N, Higashibeppu N, Furushima N, Furusono H, Matsuishi Y, Matsuyama T, Minematsu Y, Miyashita R, Miyatake Y, Moriyasu M, Yamada T, Yamada H, Yamamoto R, Yoshida T, Yoshida Y, Yoshimura J, Yotsumoto R, Yonekura H, Wada T, Watanabe E, Aoki M, Asai H, Abe T, Igarashi Y, Iguchi N, Ishikawa M, Ishimaru G, Isokawa S, Itakura R, Imahase H, Imura H, Irinoda T, Uehara K, Ushio N, Umegaki T, Egawa Y, Enomoto Y, Ota K, Ohchi Y, Ohno T, Ohbe H, Oka K, Okada N, Okada Y, Okano H, Okamoto J, Okuda H, Ogura T, Onodera Y, Oyama Y, Kainuma M, Kako E, Kashiura M, Kato H, Kanaya A, Kaneko T, Kanehata K, Kano K, Kawano H, Kikutani K, Kikuchi H, Kido T, Kimura S, Koami H, Kobashi D, Saiki I, Sakai M, Sakamoto A, Sato T, Shiga Y, Shimoto M, Shimoyama S, Shoko T, Sugawara Y, Sugita A, Suzuki S, Suzuki Y, Suhara T, Sonota K, Takauji S, Takashima K, Takahashi S, Takahashi Y, Takeshita J, Tanaka Y, Tampo A, Tsunoyama T, Tetsuhara K, Tokunaga K, Tomioka Y, Tomita K, Tominaga N, Toyosaki M, Toyoda Y, Naito H, Nagata I, Nagato T, Nakamura Y, Nakamori Y, Nahara I, Naraba H, Narita C, Nishioka N, Nishimura T, Nishiyama K, Nomura T, Haga T, Hagiwara Y, Hashimoto K, Hatachi T, Hamasaki T, Hayashi T, Hayashi M, Hayamizu A, Haraguchi G, Hirano Y, Fujii R, Fujita M, Fujimura N, Funakoshi H, Horiguchi M, Maki J, Masunaga N, Matsumura Y, Mayumi T, Minami K, Miyazaki Y, Miyamoto K, Murata T, Yanai M, Yano T, Yamada K, Yamada N, Yamamoto T, Yoshihiro S, Tanaka H, Nishida O. The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020). Acute Med Surg 2021; 8:e659. [PMID: 34484801 PMCID: PMC8390911 DOI: 10.1002/ams2.659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020), a Japanese-specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created as revised from J-SSCG 2016 jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in September 2020 and published in February 2021. An English-language version of these guidelines was created based on the contents of the original Japanese-language version. The purpose of this guideline is to assist medical staff in making appropriate decisions to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing treatment for sepsis and septic shock. We aimed to provide high-quality guidelines that are easy to use and understand for specialists, general clinicians, and multidisciplinary medical professionals. J-SSCG 2016 took up new subjects that were not present in SSCG 2016 (e.g., ICU-acquired weakness [ICU-AW], post-intensive care syndrome [PICS], and body temperature management). The J-SSCG 2020 covered a total of 22 areas with four additional new areas (patient- and family-centered care, sepsis treatment system, neuro-intensive treatment, and stress ulcers). A total of 118 important clinical issues (clinical questions, CQs) were extracted regardless of the presence or absence of evidence. These CQs also include those that have been given particular focus within Japan. This is a large-scale guideline covering multiple fields; thus, in addition to the 25 committee members, we had the participation and support of a total of 226 members who are professionals (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists) and medical workers with a history of sepsis or critical illness. The GRADE method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members. As a result, 79 GRADE-based recommendations, 5 Good Practice Statements (GPS), 18 expert consensuses, 27 answers to background questions (BQs), and summaries of definitions and diagnosis of sepsis were created as responses to 118 CQs. We also incorporated visual information for each CQ according to the time course of treatment, and we will also distribute this as an app. The J-SSCG 2020 is expected to be widely used as a useful bedside guideline in the field of sepsis treatment both in Japan and overseas involving multiple disciplines.
Collapse
|
18
|
Lee BY, Bartsch SM, Ferguson MC, Wedlock PT, O’Shea KJ, Siegmund SS, Cox SN, McKinnell JA. The value of decreasing the duration of the infectious period of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. PLoS Comput Biol 2021; 17:e1008470. [PMID: 33411742 PMCID: PMC7790237 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Finding medications or vaccines that may decrease the infectious period of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) could potentially reduce transmission in the broader population. We developed a computational model of the U.S. simulating the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and the potential clinical and economic impact of reducing the infectious period duration. Simulation experiments found that reducing the average infectious period duration could avert a median of 442,852 [treating 25% of symptomatic cases, reducing by 0.5 days, reproductive number (R0) 3.5, and starting treatment when 15% of the population has been exposed] to 44.4 million SARS-CoV-2 cases (treating 75% of all infected cases, reducing by 3.5 days, R0 2.0). With R0 2.5, reducing the average infectious period duration by 0.5 days for 25% of symptomatic cases averted 1.4 million cases and 99,398 hospitalizations; increasing to 75% of symptomatic cases averted 2.8 million cases. At $500/person, treating 25% of symptomatic cases saved $209.5 billion (societal perspective). Further reducing the average infectious period duration by 3.5 days averted 7.4 million cases (treating 25% of symptomatic cases). Expanding treatment to 75% of all infected cases, including asymptomatic infections (R0 2.5), averted 35.9 million cases and 4 million hospitalizations, saving $48.8 billion (societal perspective and starting treatment after 5% of the population has been exposed). Our study quantifies the potential effects of reducing the SARS-CoV-2 infectious period duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce Y. Lee
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York, United States of America
| | - Sarah M. Bartsch
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York, United States of America
| | - Marie C. Ferguson
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York, United States of America
| | - Patrick T. Wedlock
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York, United States of America
| | - Kelly J. O’Shea
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York, United States of America
| | - Sheryl S. Siegmund
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York, United States of America
| | - Sarah N. Cox
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York, United States of America
| | - James A. McKinnell
- Infectious Disease Clinical Outcomes Research Unit (ID-CORE), Lundquist Institute, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, United States of America
- Torrance Memorial Medical Center, Torrance, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Relevance of Biomarkers Currently in Use or Research for Practical Diagnosis Approach of Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis. CHILDREN-BASEL 2020; 7:children7120309. [PMID: 33419284 PMCID: PMC7767026 DOI: 10.3390/children7120309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) is defined as an invasive infection that occurs in the first 72 h of life. The incidence of EOS varies from 0.5–2% live births in developed countries, up to 9.8% live births in low resource settings, generating a high mortality rate, especially in extremely low birth weight neonates. Clinical signs are nonspecific, leading to a late diagnosis and high mortality. Currently, there are several markers used for sepsis evaluation, such as hematological indices, acute phase reactants, cytokines, which by themselves do not show acceptable sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of EOS in neonates. Newer and more selective markers have surfaced recently, such as presepsin and endocan, but they are currently only in the experimental research stages. This comprehensive review article is based on the role of biomarkers currently in use or in the research phase from a basic, translational, and clinical viewpoint that helps us to improve the quality of neonatal early-onset sepsis diagnosis and management.
Collapse
|
20
|
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Universal Cystoscopy at the Time of Benign Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020; 28:1470-1483. [PMID: 33310171 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To estimate the rate of lower urinary tract injury (LUTI) and percentage of LUTI needing to be recognized intraoperatively to make universal cystoscopy cost-effective and cost-saving during laparoscopic hysterectomy. DESIGN A decision tree model was used to estimate the costs and quality-adjusted life years associated with delayed or intraoperative recognition of LUTI at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy. Probabilities and utilities were estimated from published literature. Costs were estimated from Medicare national reimbursement schedules. Threshold analyses estimated the LUTI rate and cystoscopy sensitivity that would make universal cystoscopy cost-effective or cost-saving. Monte Carlo simulations were performed. SETTING US healthcare system. PATIENTS Individuals undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications. INTERVENTIONS Theoretic implementation of a universal cystoscopy policy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The total direct medical costs of laparoscopic hysterectomy under usual care were $8831 to $9149 and under universal cystoscopy were $8944 to $9068. When low LUTI rates (0.44%; estimated using sample-weighted estimates of retrospective and prospective data) were assumed, universal cystoscopy was only cost-effective in 17.1% of the simulations; the incremental cost was estimated to be $111 to $131. With median LUTI rates (2.3%) or high LUTI rates (4.0%; estimated using only prospective data with universal screening), the universal cystoscopy strategy was cost-effective in 93.9% and 99.6% of the simulations, respectively, and potentially cost-saving if the sensitivity of intraoperative cystoscopy for ureteral injury exceeded 65% or 31%, respectively. The estimated potential savings were $18 to $95 per hysterectomy. In threshold analysis assuming the average cystoscopy sensitivity rate, universal cystoscopy is estimated to be cost-effective when the LUTI rate exceeds 0.80%. CONCLUSION In our model, universal cystoscopy is the preferred approach for laparoscopic hysterectomy and is estimated to be cost-effective in contemporary clinical settings where the LUTI rate is estimated to be 1.8% and potentially cost-saving among higher-risk populations, including those with endometriosis or pelvic organ prolapse. If the LUTI rates are less than 0.75%, the estimated incremental costs are modest-up to $131 per case. Administrators and providers should consider the local LUTI rates and practice patterns when planning implementation of a universal cystoscopy policy.
Collapse
|
21
|
Chen RX, Wu ZQ, Li ZY, Wang HZ, Ji JF. Health economic evaluation of patients with sepsis after gastrointestinal tumor surgery-a cost consequences analysis in China. J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 11:894-898. [PMID: 33209485 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the health economics of patients with sepsis after gastrointestinal tumor operation in ICU. Methods This case-control study used 1:1 propensity-score (PS) matched method and patients were matched according to tumor type, age and gender. The study group was composed of 181 patients with sepsis after operation of gastrointestinal tumor in ICU, while the control group was composed of 181 patients without sepsis after operation of gastrointestinal tumor. The medical expenses and length of stay in the hospital of these patients were analyzed. Results The median of the total hospitalization cost for the study group was $26,038, which was 1.7 times of the control group (P<0.001). The costs of drugs, laboratory test, examination, treatment, operation, anesthesia, materials, ward and other costs in the study group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.001). The median length of stay in the hospital in the study group was 26 days, which were 12 days longer than that of the control group (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in daily average cost between the two groups (P=0.103). Conclusions In ICU, patients with sepsis after operation of gastrointestinal tumor increased the cost of hospitalization and prolonged the length of stay in the hospital than those without sepsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ren-Xiong Chen
- ICU, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.,Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Zhou-Qiao Wu
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Zi-Yu Li
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Hong-Zhi Wang
- ICU, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Jia-Fu Ji
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Azzini AM, Dorizzi RM, Sette P, Vecchi M, Coledan I, Righi E, Tacconelli E. A 2020 review on the role of procalcitonin in different clinical settings: an update conducted with the tools of the Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:610. [PMID: 32566636 PMCID: PMC7290560 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-1855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Biomarkers to guide antibiotic treatment decisions have been proposed as an effective way to enhancing a more appropriate use of antibiotics. As a biomarker, procalcitonin (PCT) has been found to have good specificity to distinguish bacterial from non-bacterial inflammations. Decisions regarding antibiotic use in an individual patient are complex and should be based on the pre-test probability for bacterial infection, the severity of presentation and the results of PCT serum concentration. In the context of a high pre-test probability for bacterial infections and/or a high-risk patient with sepsis, monitoring of PCT over time helps to track the resolution of infection and decisions regarding early stop of antibiotic treatment. As outlined by the Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine (EBLM), not only the pre-test probability but also the positive likelihood ratio influence the performance of a test do be really diagnostic. This aspect should be taken into account in the interpretation of the results of clinical trials evaluating the performance of PCT in guiding antibiotic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Maria Azzini
- Section of Infectious Disease, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Romolo Marco Dorizzi
- Clinical Pathology Unit, Department of Pathology, Transfusion and Laboratory Medicine, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Piersandro Sette
- Hospital Management and Organization Department, Hospital of San Bonifacio, San Bonifacio, VR, Italy
| | - Marta Vecchi
- Section of Infectious Disease, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Ilaria Coledan
- Section of Infectious Disease, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Elda Righi
- Section of Infectious Disease, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Evelina Tacconelli
- Section of Infectious Disease, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.,Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|