1
|
Hasanzade A, Nejatollahi SMR, Mokhber Dezfouli M, Hazrati M, Sheikholeslami S, Imani M, Mohseni B, Ghorbani F. The Impact of Early Brain-Dead Donor Detection in the Emergency Department on the Organ Donation Process in Iran. Transpl Int 2024; 37:11903. [PMID: 39193259 PMCID: PMC11347348 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.11903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024]
Abstract
We aimed to assess the impact of hospital characteristics on the outcomes of detected possible brain-dead donors, in our organ procurement network in Iran. Data was collected through twice-daily calls with 57 hospitals' intensive care units and emergency departments over 1 year. The donation team got involved when there was suspicion of brain death before the hospital officially declared it. The data was categorized by hospital size, presence of neurosurgery/trauma departments, ownership, and referral site. Out of 813 possible donors, 315 were declared brain dead, and 203 were eligible for donation. After conducting family interviews (consent rate: 62.2%), 102 eligible donors became actual donors (conversion rate: 50.2%). While hospital ownership and the presence of trauma/neurosurgery care did not affect donation, early referral from the emergency department had a positive effect. Therefore, we strongly recommend prioritizing possible donor identification in emergency rooms and involving the organ donation team as early as possible. The use of twice-daily calls for donor identification likely contributed to the consistency in donation rates across hospitals, as this approach involves the donation team earlier and mitigates the impact of hospital characteristics. Early detection of possible donors from the emergency department is crucial in improving donation rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arman Hasanzade
- Lung Transplantation Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Mohammad Reza Nejatollahi
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Masih Daneshvari Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mojtaba Mokhber Dezfouli
- Lung Transplantation Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahdieh Hazrati
- Organ Transplantation and Donation Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Soheil Sheikholeslami
- Organ Transplantation and Donation Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Masoud Imani
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Bardia Mohseni
- Tracheal Diseases Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Alborz, Iran
| | - Fariba Ghorbani
- Tracheal Diseases Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Alborz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Clark NL, Coe D, Newell N, Jones MNA, Robb M, Reaich D, Wroe C. "I am in favour of organ donation, but I feel you should opt-in"-qualitative analysis of the #options 2020 survey free-text responses from NHS staff toward opt-out organ donation legislation in England. BMC Med Ethics 2024; 25:47. [PMID: 38643137 PMCID: PMC11031982 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01048-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In May 2020, England moved to an opt-out organ donation system, meaning adults are presumed to be an organ donor unless within an excluded group or have opted-out. This change aims to improve organ donation rates following brain or circulatory death. Healthcare staff in the UK are supportive of organ donation, however, both healthcare staff and the public have raised concerns and ethical issues regarding the change. The #options survey was completed by NHS organisations with the aim of understanding awareness and support of the change. This paper analyses the free-text responses from the survey. METHODS The #options survey was registered as a National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) portfolio trial [IRAS 275992] 14 February 2020, and was completed between July and December 2020 across NHS organisations in the North-East and North Cumbria, and North Thames. The survey contained 16 questions of which three were free-text, covering reasons against, additional information required and family discussions. The responses to these questions were thematically analysed. RESULTS The #options survey received 5789 responses from NHS staff with 1404 individuals leaving 1657 free-text responses for analysis. The family discussion question elicited the largest number of responses (66%), followed by those against the legislation (19%), and those requiring more information (15%). Analysis revealed six main themes with 22 sub-themes. CONCLUSIONS The overall #options survey indicated NHS staff are supportive of the legislative change. Analysis of the free-text responses indicates that the views of the NHS staff who are against the change reflect the reasons, misconceptions, and misunderstandings of the public. Additional concerns included the rationale for the change, informed decision making, easy access to information and information regarding organ donation processes. Educational materials and interventions need to be developed for NHS staff to address the concepts of autonomy and consent, organ donation processes, and promote family conversations. Wider public awareness campaigns should continue to promote the positives and refute the negatives thus reducing misconceptions and misunderstandings. TRIAL REGISTRATION National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) [IRAS 275992].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie L Clark
- South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, North Yorkshire, England, UK
| | - Dorothy Coe
- Newcastle-Upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, England, UK
| | - Natasha Newell
- Centre for Process Innovation, Sedgefield, County Durham, England, UK
| | | | | | - David Reaich
- South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, North Yorkshire, England, UK
| | - Caroline Wroe
- Newcastle-Upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, England, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Araji H, Ayoub J, Gebrael L, Fala H, Feghali EJ, Al Jardali M, Iskandar S, Said Y, Nakhoul M, Faour W, Bahous SA, Younan F, Stephan A. Outcome analysis of brain-death referral to NOD-Lb: A retrospective chart review of a single hospital experience over 3 years. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0295930. [PMID: 38349891 PMCID: PMC10863869 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Organ donation shortage and in particular organ procurement is an international concern as the gap between the number of donors and recipients is steadily growing. Organ procurement is a chain of steps with donor identification and referral (ID&R) as the very first link in this chain. Failure of this step hinders the progress in the organ transplantation program. OBJECTIVES Our study was conducted to evaluate and highlight the gap between the national system and the practice at the identification and referral (ID&R) step of the organ procurement chain in a single tertiary-care academic health center in Beirut: the Lebanese American University Medical Center-Rizk Hospital (LAUMC-RH), and to appraise the literature for challenges at this step and for possible interventions for improvement based on the international experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study was a descriptive case series of ICU and ED deceased patients at a single tertiary-care university hospital in Beirut. Patients' characteristics were collected from medical records for all patients who died between 2017 and 2019 while in the ICU or the ED and shared with the National Organization for Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation (NOD-Lb), for each subject separately, to decide on the donor status. All data collected from the patient cohort was analyzed using R version 3.6.1. Wilcoxon signed-rank test, chi-squared, and fisher-exact tests were used to compare differences in clinical characteristics in terms of donor status when appropriate. RESULTS This study served as 3 years audit of a single hospital experience, and it demonstrates failure to make any referrals to NOD-Lb and zero actual organ and tissue donations over the study period. The review of 295 deceased subjects' charts demonstrates 295 missed alerts to NOD-Lb and the overall missing of 5 organ and tissue donors and 24 cornea donors assuming the organ procurement chain of steps will continue uninterrupted after ID&R. CONCLUSION The data gathered suggests the presence of an inefficient identification and referral system that is translated into a complete failure of reporting to NOD-Lb from LAUMC-RH. A systematic evidence-based approach to evaluate for the most cost-effective intervention to increase identification and referral rates is needed with a serious effort to examine and account for any inefficient implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hachem Araji
- Gilbert & Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon
| | - Johnny Ayoub
- Gilbert & Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon
| | - Laudy Gebrael
- Gilbert & Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon
| | - Hiba Fala
- Gilbert & Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon
| | - Elio Junior Feghali
- Gilbert & Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon
| | - Marwa Al Jardali
- Gilbert & Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon
| | - Sleiman Iskandar
- Gilbert & Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon
| | - Yana Said
- Gilbert & Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon
| | - Maria Nakhoul
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Informatics and Analytics, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Wissam Faour
- Gilbert & Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon
| | - Sola Aoun Bahous
- Gilbert & Rose-Marie Chagoury School of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon
| | - Farida Younan
- National Organization for Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation (NOD-Lb), Baabda, Lebanon
| | - Antoine Stephan
- National Organization for Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation (NOD-Lb), Baabda, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Siminoff LA, Alolod GP, McGregor H, Hasz RD, Mulvania PA, Barker LK, Gardiner HM. Developing online communication training to request donation for vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA): improving performance to match new US organ donation targets. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 24:77. [PMID: 38254115 PMCID: PMC10802059 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05026-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approaching families of dying or newly deceased patients to donate organs requires specialized knowledge and a mastery of relational communication. As the transplantation field has progressed, Donation Professionals (DPs) are also leading conversations with family decision makers (FDMs) about the donation of uncommon anatomical gifts, such as face, hands, genitalia, referred to as Vascularized Composite Allotransplants (VCA) without much training or experience. To address the need for training, we adapted and beta tested an evidenced-based communication training program for donation discussions to VCA requests. The overarching goal of Communicating Effectively about Donation for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (CEaD-VCA) is to increase the number of VCA authorizations and to improve the socioemotional outcomes of FDMs. METHODS We developed CEaD-VCA, an online, on-demand training program based on the previously tested, evidenced-based communication skills training program designed to train DPs to have conversations about solid organ donation. The training was modified utilizing data from a national telephone survey with DPs and results of 6 focus groups conducted with members of the general public. The survey and focus groups assessed knowledge, attitudes, and barriers to VCA donation. The training was shaped by a partnership with a leading industry partner, the Gift of Life Institute.™ RESULTS: Using the results as a guide, the existing CEaD training program, consisting of interactive eLearning modules, was adapted to include technical information about VCA, foundational communication skills, and two interactive example VCA donation request scenarios to facilitate active learning. Forty-two DPs from two partner Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) participated in the beta test of CEaD-VCA. Pre- and post-test surveys assessed the impact of the training. CONCLUSIONS The training was scored highly by DPs in effectiveness and ease of use. This project created a standardized, accessible, and comprehensive training for DPs to communicate about VCA donation. CEaD-VCA is an example of how to develop a communication skills training for difficult conversations utilizing input from stakeholders, guided by communication theory. It also demonstrates how gaps in communication skills during medical education can be filled utilizing advanced online Learning Management Systems. The training specifically addresses new CMS rules concerning OPO performance metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Siminoff
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Gerard P Alolod
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hayley McGregor
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Laura K Barker
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Heather M Gardiner
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Givens RC. Racial disparities across multiple stages of the deceased organ donation process. Am J Transplant 2024:S1600-6135(24)00068-6. [PMID: 38211654 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.12.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
Pervasive structural violence causes higher organ failure rates among Black Americans and excess Black potential deceased organ donors. Underuse of Black donors would exacerbate organ shortages that disproportionately harm Black transplant candidates. This study investigates racial differences in transit between distinct donation steps among 132 968 potential donors across 557 hospitals and 6 Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) from 2015 through 2021. Multilevel multistate modeling with patient covariates and OPO random effects shows adjusted likelihoods (95% confidence interval [CI]) of non-Black versus Black patients transitioning from OPO referral to approach: odds ratio (OR) 1.23 (95% CI 1.18, 1.27), approach to authorization: OR 1.64 (95% CI 1.56, 1.72), authorization to procurement: OR 1.08 (95% CI 1.02, 1.14), and procurement to transplant: OR 0.99 (95% CI 0.93, 1.04). Overall organ utilization rates for Black, Latino, White, and other OPO referrals were 5.88%, 8.17%, 6.78%, and 5.24%, respectively. Adjusting for patient covariates and hospital and OPO random effects, multilevel logistic models estimated that compared with Black patients, Latino, White, and other patients had ORs of organ utilization of 1.82 (95% CI 1.61, 2.04), 3.19 (95% CI 2.91, 3.50), and 1.25 (95% CI 1.06, 1.47), respectively. Nationwide in 2022, donor conversion disparities likely lost more than 1800 donors-70% of whom would have been Black. Achieving racial equity for transplant candidates will require reducing racial disparities in organ donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond C Givens
- Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Long-Sutehall T, Zatorska A, Myall M, Faull C, Hurlow A, Mollart S, Rayment C, Short J, Wale J, Winstanley E, Bracher M. Eye donation in hospice and hospital palliative care settings: perceptions, practice, and service development needs - findings from a national survey. BMC Palliat Care 2023; 22:173. [PMID: 37936148 PMCID: PMC10631126 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01300-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES New routes for supply of eye tissue are needed in the UK to support transplant surgery and medical research. Hospice care (HC) and Hospital-based Palliative care (HPC) services represent potential supply routes. This paper reports findings from the survey arm of the Eye Donation from Palliative and Hospice Care-Investigating potential, practice preference and perceptions study (EDiPPPP), objectives of which were to: i) Investigate existing practice in relation to eye donation across HC and HPC settings; ii) identify perceptions of HCPs toward embedding eye donation into routine end of life care planning; iii) investigate the informational, training, or support needs of clinicians regarding eye donation. DESIGN Online survey of UK-based HC and HPC clinicians, distributed through professional organisations (Association of Palliative Medicine (UK); Hospice UK). PARTICIPANTS One hundred fifty-six participants completed (63% HC; 37% HPC-8% response rate, of n = 1894 approached). RESULTS Majority of participants (63%, n = 99) supported raising eye donation (ED) with patients and families and agreed that ED should be discussed routinely with eligible patients. However, 72%, (n = 95) indicated that staff within their clinical setting did not routinely discuss the option of ED in end-of-life care planning conversations with the majority of participants reporting that the option of ED was not 'routinely discussed in multi-disciplinary team or other meetings. CONCLUSIONS Despite significant support, ED is not part of routine practice. Attention to barriers to embedding ED and reducing knowledge deficits are urgently needed to increase the supply of eye tissue for use in transplant operations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna Zatorska
- York and Scarborough Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK
| | - Michelle Myall
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Adam Hurlow
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Sarah Mollart
- West Suffolk Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bury St Edmunds, UK
| | | | | | - Jane Wale
- Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Milton Keynes, UK
| | - Emma Winstanley
- National Health Service Blood and Transplant Services- Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation (NHS BT - OTDT), Speke, UK
| | - Mike Bracher
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Long-Sutehall T, Bracher M, Mollart S, Wale J. Eye donation from palliative and hospice care contexts: the EDiPPPP mixed-methods study. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2023; 11:1-159. [PMID: 37929829 DOI: 10.3310/kjwa6741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Over 2 million people in the United Kingdom are living with sight loss with costs to the United Kingdom economy reported as £4.34 billion annually. Conditions that lead to sight loss and impaired vision can be treated if eye tissue is available for corneal transplantation, reconstructive surgery and research into eye diseases. Supply of eye tissue (only available via eye donation) is currently insufficient to meet demand; therefore, new routes are needed. Hospice and hospital-based Palliative Care Services have been reported as potential donation sources of this tissue. Objectives To: (1) scope the size and clinical characteristics of the potential eye donation population from research sites; (2) map the donation climate of each research site; (3) identify factors that enable or challenge service providers to consider the option of eye donation from a local and national perspective; (4) identify service users' views regarding the option of eye donation and the propriety of discussing eye donation; and (5) develop and pilot an empirically based intervention designed to change behaviours in relation to eye donation. Design A 36-month mixed-methods, multicentre study undertaking three work packages. Settings Three hospice care and three hospital-based palliative care services situated in the North, Midlands and the South of England (one service of each type per region). Participants Work package 1 - 105 service providers. Work package 2 - 62 service users, and 156 service providers in the national survey. Work package 3 - 21 expert consultees (patient and public involvement, cross discipline). Data sources Scoping review, retrospective note review, qualitative interviews/focus groups, participant observation, secondary analysis of primary data, national survey, transparent expert consultation. Results Potential: The retrospective notes review demonstrated that of 1199 deceased patients' notes, 553 (46%) patients met the criteria for eye donation (56%, n = 337 in hospice care service settings and 36%, n = 216 in hospital palliative care service). Practice: Less than 4% of all cases agreed as eligible for donation had been approached or referred for eye donation. Eye donation is not currently an embedded practice at local and national levels. Perceptions: Service providers were motivated to discuss eye donation but lacked opportunity and capability. Service users were willing and able to hold conversations about eye donation but were not aware of the option and had not had the option discussed with them. Preferences: Service users wanted to be offered the option of eye donation, and service providers wanted bespoke education and training related to eye donation. Evaluation of the developed intervention STEPS - Support Toolkit for Eye donation in Palliative care Settings will follow implementation of the full intervention (expected to begin in October 2022). Limitations Due to the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical sites, partner organisations and national service providers, only two elements of the developed intervention have been pilot tested for proof of concept and the response rate to the national survey was low (8%). Conclusions Significant potential exists for eye donation from hospice care and hospital palliative care services; however, individual and organisational behaviour as well as information system-based changes are needed to maximise this potential. Future work Evaluation of the STEPS - Support Toolkit for Eye donation in Palliative care Settings; Research exploring the wider public knowledge and views regarding eye donation; research exploring the use of language by National Health Service Blood and Transplant-Tissue and Eye Services in their public-facing infographics, communications and campaigns (specifically the use of the term eye donation). Trial registration This trial is registered as ISRCTN14243635: Eye donation from palliative care and hospice care settings. Funding details This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (17/49/42) and will be published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 11, No. 20. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mike Bracher
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Sarah Mollart
- West Suffolk Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Suffolk, UK
| | - Jane Wale
- Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Eaglestone, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alshammari A, Brown M. Attitudes That Might Impact upon Donation after Brain Death in Intensive Care Unit Settings: A Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:1857. [PMID: 37444690 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11131857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Organ donation and transplantation can save or improve the quality of life of people worldwide. However, there are many challenges associated with organ donation, as the demand for organs greatly outstrips supply. Additionally, there are brain-dead patients who could be potential organ donors. It is thus important to determine the attitudes affecting organ donation and transplantation in intensive care unit settings. AIM this study aimed to identify attitudes that might affect organ donation and transplantation in intensive care unit settings. METHODOLOGY Five electronic databases (CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus, and EMBASE) were searched systematically. A systematic search strategy was formulated. The quality of each study was assessed using the MMAT quality appraisal tool. RESULTS A total of seven studies were included. The findings of this systematic review demonstrate that education, policy, and continuing professional development could help to address barriers to donation. CONCLUSIONS therefore, to influence organ donation and transplantation positively, the main themes evaluated in this systematic review provide an opportunity to influence organ donation and transplantation attitudes in intensive care unit settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Areej Alshammari
- Northern Area Armed Forces Hospital, Hafar Albatin, King Khaild Military City 39748, Saudi Arabia
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK
| | - Michael Brown
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gibson JE, Campbell T, Gibson K, Kottemann K, Krause MA, Pack L. Collaborative Approach to Organ Donation in a Level II Trauma Center. AACN Adv Crit Care 2023; 34:88-94. [PMID: 37289629 DOI: 10.4037/aacnacc2023552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although a shortage of organ donors is a continuing global problem in health care, obtaining authorization for donation after an individual experiences a traumatic nonsurvivable event can be difficult. OBJECTIVE To improve organ donation practices at a level II trauma center. METHODS After reviewing trauma mortality cases and performance improvement metrics with their organ procurement organization's hospital liaison, leaders at the trauma center implemented a multidisciplinary performance improvement initiative to engage the facility's donation advisory committee, provide education for staff members, and increase program visibility to create a more donation-friendly culture for the facility. RESULTS The initiative led to an improved donation conversion rate and a greater number of organs procured. Continued education increased staff and provider awareness of organ donation, contributing to the positive outcomes. CONCLUSION A multidisciplinary initiative that includes continuing staff education can improve organ donation practices and program visibility, ultimately benefiting patients in need of organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse E Gibson
- Jesse E. Gibson is Trauma Program Director, Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville, Georgia
| | - Teisha Campbell
- Teisha Campbell is Hospital Development Liaison II, LifeLink of Georgia, Norcross, Georgia
| | - Kyle Gibson
- Kyle Gibson is Nurse Practitioner, Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville, Georgia
| | - Kim Kottemann
- Kim Kottemann is Director of Professional Programs and Transplant Center Relations, LifeLink of Georgia, Norcross, Georgia
| | - Morgan A Krause
- Morgan A. Krause is Trauma Research Coordinator, Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville, Georgia
| | - Leigh Pack
- Leigh Pack is Trauma Research Coordinator, Northeast Georgia Medical Center, 743 Spring St NE, Gainesville, GA 30501
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Urquhart R, Kureshi N, Dirk J, Weiss M, Beed S. Nurse knowledge and attitudes towards organ donation and deemed consent: the Human Organ and Tissue Donation Act in Nova Scotia. Can J Anaesth 2023; 70:245-252. [PMID: 36456763 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-022-02372-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In April 2019, the Human Organ and Tissue Donation Act (HOTDA) in Nova Scotia was modified to incorporate a deemed consent model. In this study, we sought to understand intensive care unit (ICU) and emergency department (ED) nurses' knowledge of and confidence around organ donation and transplantation, experiences with organ donors and recipients, attitudes toward organ donation and deemed consent, and perceived opportunities and barriers to a deemed consent approach in view of the legislative change. METHODS We sent an electronic, self-administered survey to all ICU and ED nurses in Nova Scotia. The survey queried respondents on their knowledge of, experience with, and attitudes around organ donation and HOTDA, and opportunities and barriers to the implementation of HOTDA in clinical practice. Survey results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS One-hundred and ninety-four nurses responded to the survey. Nearly all (98%) supported organ donation, with 86% having signed an organ donor card to donate organs and/or tissues after death. A considerable majority (89%) also supported the new legislation. Nevertheless, a minority of respondents (13%) believed that deemed consent legislation would be considered a violation of the general principles of freedom and autonomy. The three most identified topics for ongoing training were coordination of the donation process (70%), clinical management of donors (70%), and family issues in decision-making (70%). CONCLUSION Intensive care unit and ED nurses had positive attitudes toward organ donation, including deemed consent model. The findings should inform educational initiatives in Nova Scotia and beyond to optimize organ donation processes and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Urquhart
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Room 413, Centre for Clinical Research, 5790 University Avenue, Halifax, NS, B3H 1V7, Canada.
| | - Nelofar Kureshi
- Division of Neurosurgery, QEII Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Jade Dirk
- Department of Research & Innovation, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Matthew Weiss
- Transplant Québec, Montréal, QC, Canada.,Mère Enfant Soleil du CHU de Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Stephen Beed
- Department of Critical Care, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Faherty G, Williams L, Noyes J, Mc Laughlin L, Bostock J, Mays N. Analysis of content and online public responses to media articles that raise awareness of the opt-out system of consent to organ donation in England. Front Public Health 2022; 10:1067635. [PMID: 36530724 PMCID: PMC9751921 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1067635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Preceded by a national media campaign, in May 2020, England switched to a soft opt-out system of organ donation which rests on the assumption that individuals meeting specific criteria have consented to organ donation unless they have expressed otherwise. We aimed to learn more about how the changes were communicated, how people responded and any discrepancies between key messages and how they were interpreted by the public. Methods Summative content analysis of 286 stories and related reader-generated comments in leading UK online news sources (April 2019 to May 2021). Further detailed thematic analysis of 21 articles with reader-generated content, complemented by thematic content analysis coding of all 286 stories. Results Most media coverage on both organ donation and the law change was positive, with little variation over time or between publications. The importance of organ donation, benefits of the law change, and emotive stories (often involving children) of those who had donated an organ described as "superheroes" or those who had received organs as benefiting from a "miracle" were frequently cited. In contrast, reader-generated comments were markedly more negative, for example, focusing on loss of individual freedom and lack of trust in the organ donation system. Commentators wished to be able to choose who their organs were donated to, were dismissive and blaming towards minority ethnic groups, including undermining legitimate worries about the compatibility of organ donation with religious beliefs and end of life cultural norms, understanding and acceptance of brain-stem death and systemic racism. Misinformation including use of inflammatory language was common. Conclusion The portrayal of donors and recipients as extraordinary is unlikely to help to normalise organ donation. Undermining legitimate concerns, in particular those from ethnic minorities, can alienate and encourage harmful misinformation in underrepresented groups. The discrepancies between the tone of the articles and the readers comments suggests a lack of trust across the public, health, policy and media outlets. Easily accessible, ongoing and tailored sources are needed to mitigate misinformation and disinformation and ensure key messages are better understood and accepted in order to realise the ambitions of soft opt-out organ donation policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia Faherty
- Policy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit (PIRU), Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lorraine Williams
- Policy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit (PIRU), Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jane Noyes
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
| | - Leah Mc Laughlin
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer Bostock
- Policy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit (PIRU), Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas Mays
- Policy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit (PIRU), Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom,*Correspondence: Nicholas Mays
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Leland B, Wocial L. Exploring Ethical Dimensions of Physician Involvement in Requests for Organ Donation in Pediatric Brain Death. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2022; 45:101031. [PMID: 37003625 DOI: 10.1016/j.spen.2022.101031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Pediatric organ transplantation remains a life-saving therapy, with donated organs being absolutely scarce resources. Efforts to both increase pediatric organ donation authorization by families of children declared dead by neurologic criteria and mitigate perception of conflicts of interest have resulted in frequent exclusion of physicians from this process. This article provides of focused review of pediatric organ donation in the setting of brain death, explores the breadth of consequences of physician exclusion in donation authorization requests, and provides an ethical framework defending physician involvement in the organ donation process for this patient population.
Collapse
|
13
|
Araujo CAS, Siqueira MM, Pires A. Brazilian Health Care Professionals` Attitudes and Knowledge Regarding Organ Donation and Transplantation: A Systematic Review. Transplant Proc 2022; 54:2069-2074. [PMID: 36116947 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic literature review synthesizes evidence on Brazilian health care professionals' attitudes and knowledge regarding organ donation transplantation. METHOD This search included 5 databases-EBSCO, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Virtual Health Library. Search terms were conceptualized into 4 groups-organ transplantation/donation, health care professionals, attitude/knowledge, and Brazil. The eligibility criteria included academic articles that applied quantitative methods to examine the attitudes and/or knowledge of health care professionals toward organ donation-transplantation (ODT). After a critical appraisal of the citations initially retrieved, 13 studies were included in this review. RESULTS Although most studies pointed to an overall positive attitude of participants toward ODT, insufficient knowledge level among participants was also observed in most studies, especially knowledge gaps regarding aspects such as legal requirements and the functioning of the ODT processes in Brazil. In convergence with the broader ODT literature, education was highlighted as a central point in ODT processes. CONCLUSION The results reveal the scarcity of studies on the subject in Brazil and indicate an opportunity for educational efforts to improve the knowledge of health care professionals regarding the ODT process. This study enriches the academic literature and encourages new investigations on the issue, especially in the North and Northeast of Brazil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia A S Araujo
- The Coppead Graduate School of Business, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil; Fundação Getulio Vargas's Sao Paulo School of Business Administration -FGV/EAESP, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
| | | | - Andressa Pires
- The Coppead Graduate School of Business, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Short Report: Evaluating the Effects of Automated Donor Referral Technology on Deceased Donor Referrals. Transplant Direct 2022; 8:e1330. [PMID: 37077729 PMCID: PMC10109458 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Automation of deceased donor referrals with standardized clinical triggers allows organ procurement organizations to be rapidly aware of medically eligible potential donors without the need for manual reporting and subjective decision-making of otherwise very busy hospital staff. In October 2018, 3 Texas hospitals (pilot hospitals) began using an automated referral system; our goal was to evaluate the impact of this system on eligible donor referral. Methods We studied ventilated referrals (n = 28 034) in a single organ procurement organization from January 2015 to March 2021. We estimated the change in referral rate in the 3 pilot hospitals due to the automated referral system using a difference-in-differences analysis with Poisson regression. Results Ventilated referrals from the pilot hospitals increased from mean 11.7 per month pre-October 2018 to 26.7 per month post-October 2018. The difference-in-differences analysis estimated that automated referral was associated with a 45% increase in referrals (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] = 1.30 1.45 1.62), an 83% increase in approaches for authorization (aIRR = 1.34 1.83 2.48), a 73% increase in authorizations (aIRR = 1.18 1.73 2.55), and a 92% increase in organ donors (aIRR = 1.13 1.92 3.09). Conclusions Following deployment of an automated referral system that did not require any actions by the referring hospital, referrals, authorizations, and organ donors increased substantially in the 3 pilot hospitals. Broader deployment of automated referral systems may lead to increases in the deceased donor pool.
Collapse
|
15
|
Akbulut S, Demyati K, Toman I, Gaygili Z, Kaya S, Akpolat VR, Cing A, Keles TY, Saritas H, Unsal S, Ozer A. Medical students' knowledge, attitudes and awareness toward organ donation. Transpl Immunol 2022; 73:101634. [PMID: 35623595 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2022.101634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This survey study aimed to evaluate medical students' attitudes, knowledge, and awareness toward organ donation. METHODS For this questionnaire-based cross-sectional study, 1000 medical students were interviewed, out of which 950 students agreed to participate in the study and were enrolled. A questionnaire form consisting of 29 questions was used to determine the students' socio-demographic characteristics and rate their knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors about organ donation. RESULTS While 95.5% (n = 907) of the students stated that they had not donated organs, 41.1% stated that they had not yet decided to donate organs, and 59.7% stated that they had no specific reason for them not donating organs. Out of the participants, 68.1% stated that organ donation complies with the Islamic rules; 40.7% stated that the Directorate of Religious Affairs issued a fatwa on organ donation, and 39.4% stated that there are legal regulations on organ donation in the country. While 22.1% of the students stated that a person with brain death could come back to life, 19.7% stated that they did not know about this issue. The students who had donated organs and who did not show significant differences regarding the answers given to the questions about whether organ donation complies with religious rules (p < 0.001), where one must apply to donate organs (p = 0.032), the will to donate the organs of a relative with brain death (p = 0.004), and whether preaching in mosques and foundations is needed to increase organ donation rates (p = 0.042). Although there was a correlation between the students' grade and their attitude and knowledge about organ donation, this correlation was weak and showed no parallelism with increasing grades. CONCLUSION This study indicates that medical students have inadequate knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors about organ donation. In our opinion, it is of paramount importance to provide physician candidates, who should set an example for society, with periodic training on organ donation throughout their academic life in shaping the national organ donation policy in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sami Akbulut
- Department of Surgery and Liver Transplant Institute, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, 44280 Malatya, Turkey.
| | - Khaled Demyati
- Department of Surgery, An-Najah National University Hospital, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Irem Toman
- Medical Students, Inonu University, Faculty of Medicine, 44280 Malatya, Turkey
| | - Zeynep Gaygili
- Medical Students, Inonu University, Faculty of Medicine, 44280 Malatya, Turkey
| | - Semih Kaya
- Medical Students, Inonu University, Faculty of Medicine, 44280 Malatya, Turkey
| | - Vildan Rana Akpolat
- Medical Students, Inonu University, Faculty of Medicine, 44280 Malatya, Turkey
| | - Ayla Cing
- Medical Students, Inonu University, Faculty of Medicine, 44280 Malatya, Turkey
| | - Taha Yasin Keles
- Medical Students, Inonu University, Faculty of Medicine, 44280 Malatya, Turkey
| | - Hasan Saritas
- Department of Surgical Nursing, Inonu University Faculty of Nursing, 44280 Malatya, Turkey
| | - Selver Unsal
- Department of Nursing Service, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, 44280 Malatya, Turkey
| | - Ali Ozer
- Department of Public Health, Inonu University, Faculty of Medicine, 44280 Malatya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Potter JE, Elliott RM, Kelly MA, Perry L. Education and training methods for healthcare professionals to lead conversations concerning deceased organ donation: An integrative review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:2650-2660. [PMID: 33775500 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine which training methods positively influenced healthcare professionals' communication skills and families' deceased organ donation decision-making. METHODS An integrative review using systematic methods and narrative synthesis for data analysis. Electronic databases of PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (EBSCO), Embase (OVID) and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, were searched between August 1997 and March 2020, retrieving 1019 papers. Included papers (n = 14) were appraised using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. RESULTS Training programmes offered theory, experiential learning, feedback and debriefing including self-reflection, the opportunity to role-play and interact with simulated participants within realistic case scenarios. Programmes reported observed and self-rated improvements in communication learning and confidence. The methodological quality score averaged 13, (72% of maximum); few studies used an experimental design, examined behavioural change or families' perspectives. Weak evidence suggested training could increase organ donation authorisation/consent rates. CONCLUSIONS Multiple training strategies are effective in improving interprofessional healthcare professionals' confidence and learning of specialised communication. Methodological limitations restricted the ability to present definitive recommendations and further research is warranted, inclusive of family decision-making experiences. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Learning of specialised communication skills is enhanced by using multiple training strategies, including role-play and debriefing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie E Potter
- University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Health, Ultimo, Australia; Royal North Shore Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, St Leonards, Australia.
| | - Rosalind M Elliott
- University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Health, Ultimo, Australia; Royal North Shore Hospital, Department of Intensive Care, St Leonards, Australia; Northern Sydney Local Health District, Nursing and Midwifery Directorate, St Leonards, Australia.
| | - Michelle A Kelly
- University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Health, Ultimo, Australia; Curtin University, Curtin School of Nursing, Bentley, Australia.
| | - Lin Perry
- University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Health, Ultimo, Australia; Prince of Wales Hospital, Department of Endocrinology, Randwick, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Milross L, O'Donnell T, Bucknall T, Pilcher D, Poole A, Reddi B, Ihle J. Perceptions held by healthcare professionals concerning organ donation after circulatory death in an Australian intensive care unit without a local thoracic transplant service: A descriptive exploratory study. Aust Crit Care 2021; 35:430-437. [PMID: 34334277 DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Organ donation rates continue to be low in Australia compared with demand. Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has been an important strategy to increase donation rates, facilitated by advances in cardiopulmonary support in intensive care units (ICUs). However, DCD may harbour greater logistical challenges and unfavourable perceptions amongst some ICU healthcare professionals. The aim of this study was to evaluate and understand DCD perceptions at an Australian tertiary hospital. METHODS This descriptive exploratory study was conducted at an Australian tertiary hospital. Participants were recruited voluntarily for interview via email and word-of-mouth through the hospital's ICU network. The study used a mixed-methods approach; five close-ended questions were included in the form of Likert scales followed by a semistructured interview with open-ended questions designed to understand participants' perceptions of DCD. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analysed. RESULTS Sixteen participants were interviewed including eight intensive care doctors, four donation specialist nursing coordinators (DSNCs), and four bedside nurses. Likert responses demonstrated clinicians' support for both DCD and donation after brain death (DBD). Thematic analysis of the transcripts yielded three overarching themes including 'Contextual and environmental influences on DCD decision-making', 'Personal difficulties faced by clinicians in DCD decision-making', and 'Family influences on DCD decision-making'. Significant geographical separation between donation and organ retrieval teams, incurring significant resource utilisation, impacted the donation team's decision-making around DCD, as did a perceived disruption of ICU care to facilitate donation especially for cases where successful DCD was identified to be unlikely. CONCLUSIONS Overall, DCD was as acceptable to participants as DBD. However, the geographical separation of this centre meant that logistical barriers potentially impacted the DCD process. Open lines of communication with transplant centres, local resourcing, and a culture of education, experience, and leadership may facilitate the DCD programs where distant retrieval is commonplace.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke Milross
- Department of Intensive Care, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Thomas O'Donnell
- Department of Intensive Care, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Tracey Bucknall
- Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia; The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David Pilcher
- Department of Intensive Care, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; DonateLife Victoria, DonateLife, Melbourne
| | - Alexis Poole
- DonateLife South Australia, DonateLife, Adelaide, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Benjamin Reddi
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Joshua Ihle
- Department of Intensive Care, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; DonateLife Victoria, DonateLife, Melbourne
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Castillo-Angeles M, Li G, Bain PA, Stinebring J, Salim A, Adler JT. Systematic review of hospital-level metrics and interventions to increase deceased organ donation. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2021; 35:100613. [PMID: 33744820 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2021.100613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efforts to ameliorate the organ shortage have predominantly focused on improving processes and interventions at multiple levels in the organ donation process, but no comprehensive review of hospital-level features contributing to organ donation exists. We undertook a systematic review of the literature to better understand current knowledge and knowledge gaps about hospital-level metrics and interventions associated with successful organ donation. METHODS We searched six electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Health Business Elite, and Google scholar) and conference abstracts for articles on hospital-level features associated with the final outcome of organ donation (PROSPERO CRD42020187080). Editorials, letters to the editor, and reviews without original data were excluded. Our main outcomes were conversion rate, donation rate, number of organs recovered, number of donors, and authorization rate. RESULTS Our search yielded 2177 studies, and after a thorough assessment, 72 articles were included in this systematic review. Studies were thematically categorized into 1) Hospital-level interventions associated with metrics of organ donation; these included patient- and family-centric measures (i.e. standardized interviews, collaborative requesting and decoupling, and dedicated in-house coordinators), and donor management goals that significantly increased conversion rates by up to 64%; 2) Hospital-level multi-stage programs/policies; which increased authorization rates between 30 and 50%; and 3) Hospital characteristics and qualities; being an academic center, trauma center and larger hospital correlated with higher authorization and conversion rates. Most studies had considerable risk of bias and were of low quality. CONCLUSIONS There is a lack of well-designed studies on hospital-level metrics and interventions associated with organ donation. The use of thoughtful, patient- and family-centric approaches to authorization generally is associated with more organ donors. Future work can build on what is known about the hospital role in organ donation to improve the entire organ donation process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Castillo-Angeles
- Division of Trauma, Burn, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - George Li
- Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, United States of America
| | - Paul A Bain
- Countway Library, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Jill Stinebring
- New England Donor Services, Waltham, MA, United States of America
| | - Ali Salim
- Division of Trauma, Burn, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Joel T Adler
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Reese PP, Glanz K, Shah A, Mussell A, Levsky S, Shuda L, Shults J, Kessler JB. A Randomized Trial of Theory-Informed Appeals for Organ Donor Registration Using Internet Advertisements. Kidney Int Rep 2020; 5:2238-2245. [PMID: 33305117 PMCID: PMC7710840 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Many people do not register as organ donors. We developed 5 different brief appeals for organ donation that were disseminated online. The content was informed by theories of behavior change and studies of the specific cognitive barriers to organ donor registration. Methods One message was a persuasive narrative about a transplant recipient. Another message promoted the idea that organ donor registration is a social norm. The knowledge-based message communicated that 1 donor could improve the lives of 50 people. The message on reciprocity offered a free organ donation wristband, whether or not the participant registered as a donor. The message on control simply encouraged organ donation. Using Google AdWords, the messages were deployed randomly as banners of different sizes on diverse online sites and carried a link to an organ donor registration site. We measured clicks, page visits, and organ donor registrations. Results There were 5,156,048 impressions and 25,001 total clicks, a click-through rate of 0.49%. The messages on control and reciprocity both had the highest click-through rates of 0.51%. A total of 152 unique individuals requested wristbands and there were 52 total organ donor registration events. The message on reciprocity had the highest number of organ donor registrations (n = 18). Conclusion Online organ donation messages rapidly generated substantial attention through clicks, but no message led to a meaningful number of organ donor registrations. Future research may focus on effectively capturing the attention of viewers through social networks or other convenient online venues with less competition for attention than Internet banners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter P. Reese
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Correspondence: P.P. Reese, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, 917 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
| | - Karen Glanz
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ankur Shah
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Adam Mussell
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Simona Levsky
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lester Shuda
- Philly Marketing Labs, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Justine Shults
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Judd B. Kessler
- The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mc Laughlin L, Neukirchinger B, Monks J, Duncalf S, Noyes J. Seeking consent for organ donation: Process evaluation of implementing a new Specialist Requester nursing role. J Adv Nurs 2020; 77:845-868. [PMID: 33169894 DOI: 10.1111/jan.14601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Revised: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
AIM To explain the differences in organ donation consent outcomes of a new nursing role (Specialist Requesters) derived from the United States (US) compared with the existing nursing role (Specialist Nurses in Organ Donation). DESIGN Thirty-month observational qualitative process evaluation: Implementation theory-informed analysis. METHODS Qualitative content analysis of free text describing challenges, processes and practice from 996 bespoke routinely collected potential organ donor 'approach forms' from two regions: one where there was no difference, and one with an observed difference in consent outcomes. RESULTS Region A consent rate: Specialist Requester 75.8%, Specialist Nurse in Organ Donation71.8%. Region B consent rate: Specialist Requester 71.4%, Specialist Nurse in Organ Donation 82%. Region A Specialist Requesters turned the family position from no or uncertain to support organ donation in 73% of cases, compared with 27.4% in Region B. Two Specialist Requesters in Region A were highly effective. Region B experienced problems with intervention fidelity and implementation. CONCLUSIONS The benefits of the Specialist Requester role remain unclear. Positive differences in consent rates achieved by Specialist Requesters in the originator region reduced over time and have yet to be successfully replicated in other regions. IMPACT The impact of Specialist Requesters on consent outcomes varied across regions and it was not known why. Specialist Requesters in Region A were better at getting family member(s) to support organ donation. In Region B, Specialist Nurse in Organ Donation consent rates were higher and problems with intervention fidelity were identified (recruitment, staffing, less experience). Policy makers need to understand it is not just a matter of waiting for the Specialist Requester intervention to work. Ongoing training and recruiting the right people with the right skills need to be addressed and consistently reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah Mc Laughlin
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.,Wales Kidney Research Unit, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Barbara Neukirchinger
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.,Wales Kidney Research Unit, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | | | | | - Jane Noyes
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.,Wales Kidney Research Unit, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Siminoff LA, Gardiner HM, Alolod GP, Wilson-Genderson M. Using Online Communication Skills Training to Increase Organ Donation Authorization. Prog Transplant 2020; 30:212-219. [DOI: 10.1177/1526924820933846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Family denial of organ donation from deceased donor-eligible patients is a major contributor to the deficit of transplantable organs in the United States. Research Question: Does an evidence-based communication intervention improve deceased organ donor authorization rates from family decision-makers? Design: This implementation and dissemination study used Communicating Effectively about Donation on Organ Procurement Organization professionals responsible for discussing donation and obtaining authorization from family decision-makers. A 14-month, nationwide social marketing campaign generated a sample of 682 requesters, yielding a final analyzable sample of 253 participants. Serving as their own controls, participants spent the first 3 months in a preintervention period, completed the web-based intervention, and progressed to a 3-month postintervention period. Participants completed brief online weekly surveys to assess the intervention’s impact on their communication skills. Results: Authorization rates did not improve overall between the pre- and postintervention periods. A differential effect of the intervention on 3 distinct groups of requesters was found: one group exhibited high and stable authorization rates pre–post (78%-74%); a second group had low initial authorization rates that increased after exposure to the intervention (46%-73%); the third had low and variable rates of authorization that failed to improve after the intervention (45%-36%). Conclusion: This study underscores the value of evidence-based communication training. Training targeted to requesters’ skill levels is needed to realize overall improvements in individual performance, the quality of donation discussions, and rates of family decision-maker authorization to solid organ donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A. Siminoff
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, PA, USA
| | - Heather M. Gardiner
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, PA, USA
| | - Gerard P. Alolod
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, PA, USA
| | - Maureen Wilson-Genderson
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Murakami M, Fukuma S, Ikezoe M, Izawa S, Watanabe H, Yamaguchi H, Kitazawa A, Takahashi K, Natsukawa S, Fukuhara S. Knowledge Does Not Correlate with Behavior toward Deceased Organ Donation: A Cross-Sectional Study in Japan. Ann Transplant 2020; 25:e918936. [PMID: 31896742 PMCID: PMC6977621 DOI: 10.12659/aot.918936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although knowledge is an important factor that influences decisions regarding deceased organ donation, the associations of knowledge with attitude and behavior regarding organ donation remain uncertain in countries with low organ donation rates like Japan. Material/Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey of hospital medical and non-medical staff in 15 Japanese medical facilities. The questionnaire included items on knowledge, attitude, and behavior toward deceased organ donation and transplantation. Participants were divided into 3 groups according to the tertile of knowledge score. Modified Poisson regression models were used for associations of knowledge score with organ donor registration and willingness to become an organ donor after death. Results Of the 1967 staff, 1275 returned the questionnaires (response rate, 64.8%). There were 1190 study subjects with complete data for analysis. For the lowest (n=512), middle (n=428), and highest (n=250) tertile knowledge groups, the proportions of participants who registered and expressed willingness to donate organs were 20.1%, 23.4%, and 28.4% and 31.1%, 38.3%, and 44.0%, respectively. The adjusted proportion ratios for organ donor registration were 0.90 (95% CI, 0.73–1.10) for the middle and 1.00 (0.80–1.26) for the highest tertile of knowledge, compared with the lowest tertile. However, participants with the highest tertile of knowledge score expressed higher willingness for organ donation than the lowest tertile (adjusted proportion ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.13–1.66). Conclusions For hospital staff in Japanese medical facilities, high knowledge about organ donation and transplantation was not associated with donor registration, but was associated with willingness to become an organ donor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minoru Murakami
- Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health in The Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Nephrology, Saku Central Hospital, Nagano, Japan
| | - Shingo Fukuma
- Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masaya Ikezoe
- Department of Nephrology, Saku Central Hospital, Nagano, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | - Katsusada Takahashi
- Saku Central Hospital Health Services Facility for The Elderly, Nagano, Japan
| | | | - Shunichi Fukuhara
- Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health in The Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Center for Innovative Research for Communities and Clinical Excellence (CIRC2LE), Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|