Learning from biomedical linked data to suggest valid pharmacogenes

Genetic diversity of variants involved in drug response among Tunisian and Italian populations toward personalized medicine

Adverse drug reactions (ADR) represent a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality, imposing a substantial financial burden. Genetic ancestry plays a crucial role in drug response. The aim of this study is to characterize the genetic variability of selected pharmacogenes involved with ADR in Tunisians and Italians, with a comparative analysis against global populations. A cohort of 135 healthy Tunisians and 737 Italians were genotyped using a SNP array. Variants located in 25 Very Important Pharmacogenes implicated in ADR were extracted from the genotyping data. Distribution analysis of common variants in Tunisian and Italian populations in comparison to 24 publicly available worldwide populations was performed using PLINK and R software. Results from Principle Component and ADMIXTURE analyses showed a high genetic similarity among Mediterranean populations, distinguishing them from Sub-Saharan African and Asian populations. The Fst comparative analysis identified 27 variants exhibiting significant differentiation between the studied populations. Among these variants, four SNPs rs622342, rs3846662, rs7294, rs5215 located in SLC22A1, HMGCR, VKORC1 and KCNJ11 genes respectively, are reported to be associated with ethnic variability in drug responses. In conclusion, correlating the frequencies of genotype risk variants with their associated ADRs would enhance drug outcomes and the implementation of personalized medicine in the studied populations.

Investigating ADR mechanisms with Explainable AI: a feasibility study with knowledge graph mining

BACKGROUND

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are statistically characterized within randomized clinical trials and postmarketing pharmacovigilance, but their molecular mechanism remains unknown in most cases. This is true even for hepatic or skin toxicities, which are classically monitored during drug design. Aside from clinical trials, many elements of knowledge about drug ingredients are available in open-access knowledge graphs, such as their properties, interactions, or involvements in pathways. In addition, drug classifications that label drugs as either causative or not for several ADRs, have been established.

METHODS

We propose in this paper to mine knowledge graphs for identifying biomolecular features that may enable automatically reproducing expert classifications that distinguish drugs causative or not for a given type of ADR. In an Explainable AI perspective, we explore simple classification techniques such as Decision Trees and Classification Rules because they provide human-readable models, which explain the classification itself, but may also provide elements of explanation for molecular mechanisms behind ADRs. In summary, (1) we mine a knowledge graph for features; (2) we train classifiers at distinguishing, on the basis of extracted features, drugs associated or not with two commonly monitored ADRs: drug-induced liver injuries (DILI) and severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR); (3) we isolate features that are both efficient in reproducing expert classifications and interpretable by experts (i.e., Gene Ontology terms, drug targets, or pathway names); and (4) we manually evaluate in a mini-study how they may be explanatory.

RESULTS

Extracted features reproduce with a good fidelity classifications of drugs causative or not for DILI and SCAR (Accuracy = 0.74 and 0.81, respectively). Experts fully agreed that 73% and 38% of the most discriminative features are possibly explanatory for DILI and SCAR, respectively; and partially agreed (2/3) for 90% and 77% of them.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge graphs provide sufficiently diverse features to enable simple and explainable models to distinguish between drugs that are causative or not for ADRs. In addition to explaining classifications, most discriminative features appear to be good candidates for investigating ADR mechanisms further.

Building a Pharmacogenomics Knowledge Model Toward Precision Medicine: Case Study in Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Many drugs do not work the same way for everyone owing to distinctions in their genes. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) aims to understand how genetic variants influence drug efficacy and toxicity. It is often considered one of the most actionable areas of the personalized medicine paradigm. However, little prior work has included in-depth explorations and descriptions of drug usage, dosage adjustment, and so on.

OBJECTIVE

We present a pharmacogenomics knowledge model to discover the hidden relationships between PGx entities such as drugs, genes, and diseases, especially details in precise medication.

METHODS

PGx open data such as DrugBank and RxNorm were integrated in this study, as well as drug labels published by the US Food and Drug Administration. We annotated 190 drug labels manually for entities and relationships. Based on the annotation results, we trained 3 different natural language processing models to complete entity recognition. Finally, the pharmacogenomics knowledge model was described in detail.

RESULTS

In entity recognition tasks, the Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers-conditional random field model achieved better performance with micro-F1 score of 85.12%. The pharmacogenomics knowledge model in our study included 5 semantic types: drug, gene, disease, precise medication (population, daily dose, dose form, frequency, etc), and adverse reaction. Meanwhile, 26 semantic relationships were defined in detail. Taking melanoma caused by a BRAF gene mutation into consideration, the pharmacogenomics knowledge model covered 7 related drugs and 4846 triples were established in this case. All the corpora, relationship definitions, and triples were made publically available.

CONCLUSIONS

We highlighted the pharmacogenomics knowledge model as a scalable framework for clinicians and clinical pharmacists to adjust drug dosage according to patient-specific genetic variation, and for pharmaceutical researchers to develop new drugs. In the future, a series of other antitumor drugs and automatic relation extractions will be taken into consideration to further enhance our framework with more PGx linked data.

Identification of early stage recurrence endometrial cancer biomarkers using bioinformatics tools

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the sixth most common cancer in women worldwide. Early diagnosis is critical in recurrent EC management. The present study aimed to identify biomarkers of EC early recurrence using a workflow that combined text and data mining databases (DisGeNET, Gene Expression Omnibus), a prioritization algorithm to select a set of putative candidates (ToppGene), protein-protein interaction network analyses (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes, cytoHubba), association analysis of selected genes with clinicopathological parameters, and survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard ratio analyses) using a The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort. A total of 10 genes were identified, among which the targeting protein for Xklp2 (TPX2) was the most promising independent prognostic biomarker in stage I EC. TPX2 expression (mRNA and protein) was higher (P<0.0001 and P<0.001, respectively) in ETS variant transcription factor 5-overexpressing Hec1a and Ishikawa cells, a previously reported cell model of aggressive stage I EC. In EC biopsies, TPX2 mRNA expression levels were higher (P<0.05) in high grade tumors (grade 3) compared with grade 1–2 tumors (P<0.05), in tumors with deep myometrial invasion (>50% compared with <50%; P<0.01), and in intermediate-high recurrence risk tumors compared with low-risk tumors (P<0.05). Further validation studies in larger and independent EC cohorts will contribute to confirm the prognostic value of TPX2.

PGxO and PGxLOD: a reconciliation of pharmacogenomic knowledge of various provenances, enabling further comparison

Background

Pharmacogenomics (PGx) studies how genomic variations impact variations in drug response phenotypes. Knowledge in pharmacogenomics is typically composed of units that have the form of ternary relationships gene variant – drug – adverse event. Such a relationship states that an adverse event may occur for patients having the specified gene variant and being exposed to the specified drug. State-of-the-art knowledge in PGx is mainly available in reference databases such as PharmGKB and reported in scientific biomedical literature. But, PGx knowledge can also be discovered from clinical data, such as Electronic Health Records (EHRs), and in this case, may either correspond to new knowledge or confirm state-of-the-art knowledge that lacks “clinical counterpart” or validation. For this reason, there is a need for automatic comparison of knowledge units from distinct sources.

Results

In this article, we propose an approach, based on Semantic Web technologies, to represent and compare PGx knowledge units. To this end, we developed PGxO, a simple ontology that represents PGx knowledge units and their components. Combined with PROV-O, an ontology developed by the W3C to represent provenance information, PGxO enables encoding and associating provenance information to PGx relationships. Additionally, we introduce a set of rules to reconcile PGx knowledge, i.e. to identify when two relationships, potentially expressed using different vocabularies and levels of granularity, refer to the same, or to different knowledge units. We evaluated our ontology and rules by populating PGxO with knowledge units extracted from PharmGKB (2701), the literature (65,720) and from discoveries reported in EHR analysis studies (only 10, manually extracted); and by testing their similarity. We called PGxLOD (PGx Linked Open Data) the resulting knowledge base that represents and reconciles knowledge units of those various origins.

Conclusions

The proposed ontology and reconciliation rules constitute a first step toward a more complete framework for knowledge comparison in PGx. In this direction, the experimental instantiation of PGxO, named PGxLOD, illustrates the ability and difficulties of reconciling various existing knowledge sources.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-019-2693-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Text Mining for Drug Discovery

Recent advances in technology have led to the exponential growth of scientific literature in biomedical sciences. This rapid increase in information has surpassed the threshold for manual curation efforts, necessitating the use of text mining approaches in the field of life sciences. One such application of text mining is in fostering in silico drug discovery such as drug target screening, pharmacogenomics, adverse drug event detection, etc. This chapter serves as an introduction to the applications of various text mining approaches in drug discovery. It is divided into two parts with the first half as an overview of text mining in the biosciences. The second half of the chapter reviews strategies and methods for four unique applications of text mining in drug discovery.

Using predicate and provenance information from a knowledge graph for drug efficacy screening

Background

Biomedical knowledge graphs have become important tools to computationally analyse the comprehensive body of biomedical knowledge. They represent knowledge as subject-predicate-object triples, in which the predicate indicates the relationship between subject and object. A triple can also contain provenance information, which consists of references to the sources of the triple (e.g. scientific publications or database entries). Knowledge graphs have been used to classify drug-disease pairs for drug efficacy screening, but existing computational methods have often ignored predicate and provenance information. Using this information, we aimed to develop a supervised machine learning classifier and determine the added value of predicate and provenance information for drug efficacy screening. To ensure the biological plausibility of our method we performed our research on the protein level, where drugs are represented by their drug target proteins, and diseases by their disease proteins.

Results

Using random forests with repeated 10-fold cross-validation, our method achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 78.1% and 74.3% for two reference sets. We benchmarked against a state-of-the-art knowledge-graph technique that does not use predicate and provenance information, obtaining AUCs of 65.6% and 64.6%, respectively. Classifiers that only used predicate information performed superior to classifiers that only used provenance information, but using both performed best.

Conclusion

We conclude that both predicate and provenance information provide added value for drug efficacy screening.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13326-018-0189-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.