1
|
Desponds C, Ducros C, Rochat C, Galassini L, Bodenmann P, Grazioli VS, Plys E, von Plessen C, Gouveia A, Selby K. Improving uptake of colorectal cancer screening by complex patients at an academic primary care practice: a feasibility study. BMJ Open Qual 2024; 13:e002844. [PMID: 39209342 PMCID: PMC11367402 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regular screening reduces mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). The Canton of Vaud, Switzerland, has a regional screening programme offering faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) or colonoscopy. Participation in the screening programme has been low, particularly among complex patients. Patient navigation has strong evidence for increasing the CRC screening rate. DESIGN AND OBJECTIVE This feasibility study tested patient navigation performed by medical assistants for complex patients at an academic primary care practice. BASELINE MEASUREMENTS A review of 328 patients' medical charts revealed that 51% were up-to-date with screening (16% within the programme), 24% were ineligible, 5% had a documented refusal and 20% were not up-to-date, of whom 58 (18%) were complex patients. INTERVENTION FEBRUARY 2023 TO MAY 2023: We tried to help complex patients participate in the screening programme using either in-person or telephone patient navigation. Each intervention was piloted by a physician-researcher and then performed by a medical assistant. Based on the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance framework, we collected: Intervention participation and refusal, screening acceptance and completion and both patients and medical assistant acceptability (ie, qualitative interviews). RESULTS Only 4/58 (7%) patients participated in the in-person patient navigation test phase due to scheduling problems. All four patients accepted a prescription and 2/4 (50%) completed their test. We piloted a telephone intervention to bypass scheduling issues but all patients refused a telephone discussion with the medical assistant. At two months after the last intervention, the proportion of patients up-to-date increased from 51% to 56%. CONCLUSION Our overall approach was resource-intensive and had little impact on the overall participation rate. It was likely not sustainable. New approaches and reimbursement for a specific patient navigator role are needed to increase CRC screening of complex patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Desponds
- University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
| | - Cyril Ducros
- University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
| | - Carine Rochat
- University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
| | - Laure Galassini
- University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Bodenmann
- University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
- Chair of medicine for vulnerable populations, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
| | - Veronique S Grazioli
- University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
- Chair of medicine for vulnerable populations, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
| | - Ekaterina Plys
- University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
| | - Christian von Plessen
- University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
| | - Alexandre Gouveia
- University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kevin Selby
- University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Masoud SJ, Seo JE, Singh E, Woody RL, Muhammed M, Webster W, Mantyh CR. Social Vulnerability Index and Survivorship after Colorectal Cancer Resection. J Am Coll Surg 2024; 238:693-706. [PMID: 38441160 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Race and socioeconomic status incompletely identify patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) at the highest risk for screening, treatment, and mortality disparities. Social vulnerability index (SVI) was designed to delineate neighborhoods requiring greater support after external health stressors, summarizing socioeconomic, household, and transportation barriers by census tract. SVI is implicated in lower cancer center use and increased complications after colectomy, but its influence on long-term prognosis is unknown. Herein, we characterized relationships between SVI and CRC survival. STUDY DESIGN Patients undergoing resection of stage I to IV CRC from January 2010 to May 2023 within an academic health system were identified. Clinicopathologic characteristics were abstracted using institutional National Cancer Database and NSQIP. Addresses from electronic health records were geocoded to SVI. Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods. RESULTS A total of 872 patients were identified, comprising 573 (66%) patients with colon tumor and 299 (34%) with rectal tumor. Patients in the top SVI quartile (32%) were more likely to be Black (41% vs 13%, p < 0.001), carry less private insurance (39% vs 48%, p = 0.02), and experience greater comorbidity (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status III: 86% vs 71%, p < 0.001), without significant differences by acuity, stage, or CRC therapy. In multivariable analysis, high SVI remained associated with higher all-cause (hazard ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.96, p < 0.01) and cancer-specific survival mortality (hazard ratio 1.71, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.67, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS High SVI was independently associated with poorer prognosis after CRC resection beyond the perioperative period. Acknowledging needs for multi-institutional evaluation and elaborating causal mechanisms, neighborhood-level vulnerability may inform targeted outreach in CRC care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabran J Masoud
- From the Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (Masoud, Mantyh)
| | - Jein E Seo
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (Seo, Singh)
| | - Eden Singh
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (Seo, Singh)
| | | | | | | | - Christopher R Mantyh
- From the Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (Masoud, Mantyh)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Coury J, Coronado G, Currier JJ, Kenzie ES, Petrik AF, Badicke B, Myers E, Davis MM. Methods for scaling up an outreach intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening rates in rural areas. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:6. [PMID: 38191536 PMCID: PMC10775579 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00540-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach and patient navigation are evidence-based practices shown to improve rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) and follow-up in various settings, yet these programs have not been broadly adopted by health systems and organizations that serve diverse populations. Reasons for low adoption rates are multifactorial, and little research explores approaches for scaling up a complex, multi-level CRC screening outreach intervention to advance equity in rural settings. METHODS SMARTER CRC, a National Cancer Institute Cancer Moonshot project, is a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a mailed FIT and patient navigation program involving 3 Medicaid health plans and 28 rural primary care practices in Oregon and Idaho followed by a national scale-up trial. The SMARTER CRC intervention combines mailed FIT outreach supported by clinics, health plans, and vendors and patient navigation for colonoscopy following an abnormal FIT result. We applied the framework from Perez and colleagues to identify the intervention's components (including functions and forms) and scale-up dissemination strategies and worked with a national advisory board to support scale-up to additional organizations. The team is recruiting health plans, primary care clinics, and regional and national organizations in the USA that serve a rural population. To teach organizations about the intervention, activities include Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) tele-mentoring learning collaboratives, a facilitation guide and other materials, a patient navigation workshop, webinars, and individualized technical assistance. Our primary outcome is program adoption (by component), measured 6 months after participation in an ECHO learning collaborative. We also assess engagement and adaptations (implemented and desired) to learn how the multicomponent intervention might be modified to best support broad scale-up. DISCUSSION Findings may inform approaches for adapting and scaling evidence-based approaches to promote CRC screening participation in underserved populations and settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04890054) and at the NCI's Clinical Trials Reporting Program (CTRP no.: NCI-2021-01032) on May 11, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Coury
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| | | | - Jessica J Currier
- Division of Oncological Sciences, Knight Cancer Institute, OHSU, Portland, USA
| | - Erin S Kenzie
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, OHSU, Portland, USA
| | | | - Brittany Badicke
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Emily Myers
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Melinda M Davis
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
- OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, OHSU, Portland, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, OHSU, Portland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ling S, Luque Fernandez MA, Quaresma M, Belot A, Rachet B. Inequalities in treatment among patients with colon and rectal cancer: a multistate survival model using data from England national cancer registry 2012-2016. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:88-98. [PMID: 37741899 PMCID: PMC10781675 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02440-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individual and tumour factors only explain part of observed inequalities in colorectal cancer survival in England. This study aims to investigate inequalities in treatment in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS All patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer in England between 2012 and 2016 were followed up from the date of diagnosis (state 1), to treatment (state 2), death (state 3) or censored at 1 year after the diagnosis. A multistate approach with flexible parametric model was used to investigate the effect of income deprivation on the probability of remaining alive and treated in colorectal cancer. RESULTS Compared to the least deprived quintile, the most deprived with stage I-IV colorectal cancer had a lower probability of being alive and treated at all the time during follow-up, and a higher probability of being untreated and of dying. The probability differences (most vs. least deprived) of being alive and treated at 6 months ranged between -2.4% (95% CI: -4.3, -1.1) and -7.4% (-9.4, -5.3) for colon; between -2.0% (-3.5, -0.4) and -6.2% (-8.9, -3.5) for rectal cancer. CONCLUSION Persistent inequalities in treatment were observed in patients with colorectal cancer at every stage, due to delayed access to treatment and premature death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suping Ling
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcome Network (ICON) group, Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Miguel-Angel Luque Fernandez
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcome Network (ICON) group, Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, United Kingdom
| | - Manuela Quaresma
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcome Network (ICON) group, Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, United Kingdom
| | - Aurelien Belot
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcome Network (ICON) group, Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bernard Rachet
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcome Network (ICON) group, Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hempel S, Ganz D, Saluja S, Bolshakova M, Kim T, Turvey C, Cordasco K, Basu A, Page T, Mahmood R, Motala A, Barnard J, Wong M, Fu N, Miake-Lye IM. Care coordination across healthcare systems: development of a research agenda, implications for practice, and recommendations for policy based on a modified Delphi panel. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e060232. [PMID: 37197809 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE For large, integrated healthcare delivery systems, coordinating patient care across delivery systems with providers external to the system presents challenges. We explored the domains and requirements for care coordination by professionals across healthcare systems and developed an agenda for research, practice and policy. DESIGN The modified Delphi approach convened a 2-day stakeholder panel with moderated virtual discussions, preceded and followed by online surveys. SETTING The work addresses care coordination across healthcare systems. We introduced common care scenarios and differentiated recommendations for a large (main) healthcare organisation and external healthcare professionals that contribute additional care. PARTICIPANTS The panel composition included health service providers, decision makers, patients and care community, and researchers. Discussions were informed by a rapid review of tested approaches to fostering collaboration, facilitating care coordination and improving communication across healthcare systems. OUTCOME MEASURES The study planned to formulate a research agenda, implications for practice and recommendations for policy. RESULTS For research recommendations, we found consensus for developing measures of shared care, exploring healthcare professionals' needs in different care scenarios and evaluating patient experiences. Agreed practice recommendations included educating external professionals about issues specific to the patients in the main healthcare system, educating professionals within the main healthcare system about the roles and responsibilities of all involved parties, and helping patients better understand the pros and cons of within-system and out-of-system care. Policy recommendations included supporting time for professionals with high overlap in patients to engage regularly and sustaining support for care coordination for high-need patients. CONCLUSIONS Recommendations from the stakeholder panel created an agenda to foster further research, practice and policy innovations in cross-system care coordination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Hempel
- Southern California Evidence Review Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - David Ganz
- Geriatrics Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Sonali Saluja
- Gehr Family Center for Health Systems Science and Innovation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Maria Bolshakova
- Southern California Evidence Review Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Timothy Kim
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Carolyn Turvey
- Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine at the University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
- Rural Health Resource Center, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Kristina Cordasco
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Aashna Basu
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Care in the Community Service, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Tonya Page
- Office of Community, Clinical Integration & Field Support, Veteran Affairs Central Office, Kentucky City, Kentucky, USA
| | - Reshma Mahmood
- Santa Maria and San Luis Obispo Community Outpatient Clinics, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Aneesa Motala
- Southern California Evidence Review Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jenny Barnard
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Michelle Wong
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ning Fu
- Southern California Evidence Review Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- School of Public Administration and Emergency Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Isomi M Miake-Lye
- VA West Los Angeles Evidence-based Synthesis Program, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schindel D, Gebert P, Frick J, Letsch A, Grittner U, Schenk L. Associations among navigational support and health care utilization and costs in patients with advanced cancer: An analysis based on administrative health insurance data. Cancer Med 2023; 12:8662-8675. [PMID: 36622058 PMCID: PMC10134282 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fragmented and complex healthcare systems make it difficult to provide continuity of care for patients with advanced cancer near the end of life. Nurse-based cross-sectoral navigation support has the potential to increase patients' quality of life. The objective of this paper was to evaluate associations between navigation support and health care utilization, and the associated costs of care. METHODS The evaluation is based on claims data from 37 statutory health insurance funds. Non-randomized recruitment of the intervention group (IG) took place between 2018 and 2019 in four German hospitals. The comparison group (CG) was defined ex post. It comprises nonparticipating clients of the involved health insurance funds matched on age, gender, and diagnosis in a 1:4 ratio to the IG. Healthcare resource utilization was compared using incident rate ratios (IRRs) based on negative binomial regression models. Linear mixed models were performed to compare differences in lengths of hospital stays and costs between groups. RESULTS A total of 717 patients were included (IG: 149, CG: 568). IG patients showed shorter average lengths of hospital stays (IG: 11 days [95% CI: 10, 13] vs. CG: 15 days [95% CI: 14, 16], p < 0.001). In the IG, 21% fewer medications were prescribed and there were on average 15% fewer outpatient doctor contacts per month. Average billed costs in the IG were 23% lower than in the CG (IG: 6754 EUR [95% CI: 5702, 8000] vs. CG: 8816 EUR [95% CI: 8153, 9533], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The intervention was associated with decreased costs mainly as a result of a non-intended navigation effect. The social care nurses had navigated patients within the hospital early, needs-oriented and effectively but interpreted their function less cross-sectorally. Linkage of hospital-based navigators with the outpatient care sector needs further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Schindel
- Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pimrapat Gebert
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Frick
- Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne Letsch
- Department of Medicine II, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ulrike Grittner
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Liane Schenk
- Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Michallet A, Malartre S, Vignaud E, Bocquet A, Sontag P, Galvez C, Blay J, Heudel P, Vimont A, Blachier M, Ferrua M, Minvielle E, Mir O. The Ambulatory Medical Assistance (AMA) programme during active-phase treatment in patients with haematological malignancies: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13709. [PMID: 36168105 PMCID: PMC9786720 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The need for patient navigator is growing, and there is a lack of cost evaluation, especially during survivorship. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an Ambulatory Medical Assistance (AMA) programme in patients with haematological malignancies (HM). DESIGN A cost-effectiveness analysis of the AMA programme was performed compared to a simulated control arm. SETTING An interventional, single-arm and prospective study was conducted in a French reference haematology-oncology centre between 2016 and 2020. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients were enrolled with histologically documented malignant haematology, during their active therapy phase, and treated either by intravenous chemotherapy or oral therapy. METHODS An extrapolation of the effectiveness was derived from a similar nurse monitoring programme (CAPRI study). Cost effectiveness of the programme was evaluated through adverse events of Grade 3 or 4 avoided in different populations. RESULTS Included patient (n = 797) from the AMA programme were followed during 125 days (IQR: 0-181), and adverse events (Grade 3/4) were observed in 10.1% of patients versus 13.4% in the simulated control arm. The overall cost of AE avoided was estimated to €81,113, leading to an ICER of €864. CONCLUSION The AMA programme was shown to be cost-effective compared to a simulated control arm with no intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marie Ferrua
- Division of Interdisciplinary Patient Care Pathways (DIOPP)Gustave RoussyVillejuifFrance
| | - Etienne Minvielle
- Division of Interdisciplinary Patient Care Pathways (DIOPP)Gustave RoussyVillejuifFrance,I3‐CRG, Ecole polytechnique‐CNRSPalaiseauFrance
| | - Olivier Mir
- Department of Ambulatory Cancer CareGustave RoussyVillejuifFrance
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Arputhanathan H, Hyde J, Atilola T, Queen D, Elliott J, Sibbald RG. A patient navigation model to improve complex wound care outcomes. Nurs Manag (Harrow) 2022; 53:31-41. [PMID: 36040731 DOI: 10.1097/01.numa.0000855956.26020.1f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Arputhanathan
- At Home and Community Care Support Services in Waterloo, Wellington, Canada, Helen Arputhanathan , Jane Hyde , and Temidayo Atilola are RNs. Douglas Queen is a wound care business consultant and researcher for WoundPedia and ECHO Wound Program in Canada. James Elliott is a researcher and advocate for WoundPedia and ECHO Wound Program. R. Gary Sibbald is a professor of medicine and public health at the University of Toronto in Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To create a blended format model to navigate interprofessional team assessments of patients with complex wounds during COVID-19 as a quality improvement process. METHODS During clinical assessments, patients were interviewed in their homes with representation from their circle of care and primary nurse on site linked to a live virtual interprofessional blended remote team model (wound care nurse specialist, advanced wound care doctor). Eligible patients had completed a wound care clinical pathway without wound closure. Palliative patients with complex wounds and patients without precise/accurate diagnoses were also included. This process addressed the components of Wound Bed Preparation 2021: manage the cause, address patient-centered concerns, determine the ability to heal, optimize local wound care, and evaluate outcomes on an ongoing basis. RESULTS Since April 2020, 48 patients were referred to the Home and Community Care Support Services patient navigation interprofessional team. Patients' home-care services were initiated between 2012 and 2021. The team provided closure in 29% of patients and the wound surface area reduced in 66%. Pain was reduced in 73% of patients and appropriate infection management was implemented in 79%. In addition, nursing visits were reduced by 73% and there was a 77% decrease in supply usage. CONCLUSIONS This project validated the Wound Bed Preparation Paradigm 2021 as a process for assessing patients with complex wounds using a blended virtual and home-based assessment. Patient navigation with this blended model benefited patients and improved healthcare system utilization with projected cost savings.
Collapse
|
10
|
Willemse JL, Jadalla A, Conahan LJ, Sarff L, Brady M. GetFIT for CRC: Nurse Practitioner–Led Program to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening. J Nurse Pract 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2022.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
11
|
DeRosa AP, Grell Y, Razon D, Komsany A, Pinheiro LC, Martinez J, Phillips E. Decision-making support among racial and ethnic minorities diagnosed with breast or prostate cancer: A systematic review of the literature. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:1057-1065. [PMID: 34538465 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the types of decision-making support interventions offered to racial and ethnic minority adults diagnosed with breast or prostate cancer and to draw any associations between these interventions and patient-reported quality of life (QoL) outcomes. METHODS We conducted literature searches in five bibliographic databases. Studies were screened through independent review and assessed for quality. Results were analyzed using inductive qualitative methods to determine thematic commonalities and synthesized in narrative form. RESULTS Searches across five databases yielded 2496 records, which were screened by title/abstract and full-text to identify 10 studies meeting inclusion criteria. The use of decision aids (DAs), trained personnel, delivery models and frameworks, and educational materials were notable decision-making support interventions. Analysis revealed six thematic areas: 1) Personalized reports; 2) Effective communication; 3) Involvement in decision-making; 4) Health literacy; 5) Social support; and 6) Feasibility in clinical setting. CONCLUSION Evidence suggests decision-making support interventions are associated with positive outcomes of racial and ethnic minorities with patient-reported factors like improved patient engagement, less decisional regret, higher satisfaction, improved communication, awareness of health literacy and cultural competence. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Future decision-making interventions for racial and ethnic minority cancer patients should focus on social determinants of health, social support systems, and clinical outcomes like QoL and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio P DeRosa
- Samuel J. Wood Library & C.V. Starr Biomedical Information Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.
| | | | - Dominic Razon
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | - Alia Komsany
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | - Laura C Pinheiro
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | - Juana Martinez
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | - Erica Phillips
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rocque GB, Dionne-Odom JN, Stover AM, Daniel CL, Azuero A, Huang CHS, Ingram SA, Franks JA, Caston NE, Dent DAN, Basch EM, Jackson BE, Howell D, Weiner BJ, Pierce JY. Evaluating the implementation and impact of navigator-supported remote symptom monitoring and management: a protocol for a hybrid type 2 clinical trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:538. [PMID: 35459238 PMCID: PMC9027833 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07914-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Symptoms in patients with advanced cancer are often inadequately captured during encounters with the healthcare team. Emerging evidence demonstrates that weekly electronic home-based patient-reported symptom monitoring with automated alerts to clinicians reduces healthcare utilization, improves health-related quality of life, and lengthens survival. However, oncology practices have lagged in adopting remote symptom monitoring into routine practice, where specific patient populations may have unique barriers. One approach to overcoming barriers is utilizing resources from value-based payment models, such as patient navigators who are ideally positioned to assume a leadership role in remote symptom monitoring implementation. This implementation approach has not been tested in standard of care, and thus optimal implementation strategies are needed for large-scale roll-out. Methods This hybrid type 2 study design evaluates the implementation and effectiveness of remote symptom monitoring for all patients and for diverse populations in two Southern academic medical centers from 2021 to 2026. This study will utilize a pragmatic approach, evaluating real-world data collected during routine care for quantitative implementation and patient outcomes. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will be used to conduct a qualitative evaluation at key time points to assess barriers and facilitators, implementation strategies, fidelity to implementation strategies, and perceived utility of these strategies. We will use a mixed-methods approach for data interpretation to finalize a formal implementation blueprint. Discussion This pragmatic evaluation of real-world implementation of remote symptom monitoring will generate a blueprint for future efforts to scale interventions across health systems with diverse patient populations within value-based healthcare models. Trial registration NCT04809740; date of registration 3/22/2021. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07914-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabrielle B Rocque
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1824 6th Avenue South, 35924-3300 - WTI 240E, Birmingham, AL, USA. .,Department of Medicine, Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. .,O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | - J Nicholas Dionne-Odom
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.,University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Angela M Stover
- University of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Casey L Daniel
- Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andres Azuero
- University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Chao-Hui Sylvia Huang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Stacey A Ingram
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1824 6th Avenue South, 35924-3300 - WTI 240E, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Franks
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1824 6th Avenue South, 35924-3300 - WTI 240E, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Nicole E Caston
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1824 6th Avenue South, 35924-3300 - WTI 240E, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - D' Ambra N Dent
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1824 6th Avenue South, 35924-3300 - WTI 240E, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Ethan M Basch
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Bradford E Jackson
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Doris Howell
- Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bryan J Weiner
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Early Medical Students' Experiences as System Navigators: Results of a Qualitative Study. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:1155-1160. [PMID: 34642860 PMCID: PMC8971219 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07168-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore how early meaningful experiential learning in community settings impacted medical students' application of systems thinking, their perceptions of systems navigation, and their professional identity as health system change agents. METHODS Following an immersive Health Systems Science course, first-year medical students partnered with veterans or newly arrived refugee families and served as health system patient navigators embedded within primary care teams for a year. Across two cohorts, fifty-six students participated in the elective. Three voluntary focus groups were conducted each year for a total of six groups with 50 patient navigator students. Inductive content analysis of focus group transcripts was conducted. RESULTS Qualitative analysis produced three major themes: program impact on students, student impact on patients, and student perceptions of the role of healthcare providers. Students reported a rich understanding of social determinants of health. By improving patient awareness of health and well-being, building capacity to understand medical issues, and increasing medication adherence through teaching, students recognized their impact on patient care. The importance of interprofessional collaboration with social workers also emerged and helped shape students' understanding of how they as physicians are part of a coordinated team working toward better patient care. CONCLUSION The Case Western Reserve University WR2 curriculum teaches students how to address complex determinants of health and how to consider their role in dynamic health systems. This study highlights rich themes that emerged from students as they recognized the context that creates health for both individuals and communities. It underscores the role of such experiences in reinforcing systems thinking and development of change agency, both contributing to their professional identity formation as physicians.
Collapse
|
14
|
Masum S, Hopgood A, Stefan S, Flashman K, Khan J. Data analytics and artificial intelligence in predicting length of stay, readmission, and mortality: a population-based study of surgical management of colorectal cancer. Discov Oncol 2022; 13:11. [PMID: 35226196 PMCID: PMC8885960 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-022-00472-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Data analytics and artificial intelligence (AI) have been used to predict patient outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. A prospectively maintained colorectal cancer database was used, covering 4336 patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery between 2003 and 2019. The 47 patient parameters included demographics, peri- and post-operative outcomes, surgical approaches, complications, and mortality. Data analytics were used to compare the importance of each variable and AI prediction models were built for length of stay (LOS), readmission, and mortality. Accuracies of at least 80% have been achieved. The significant predictors of LOS were age, ASA grade, operative time, presence or absence of a stoma, robotic or laparoscopic approach to surgery, and complications. The model with support vector regression (SVR) algorithms predicted the LOS with an accuracy of 83% and mean absolute error (MAE) of 9.69 days. The significant predictors of readmission were age, laparoscopic procedure, stoma performed, preoperative nodal (N) stage, operation time, operation mode, previous surgery type, LOS, and the specific procedure. A BI-LSTM model predicted readmission with 87.5% accuracy, 84% sensitivity, and 90% specificity. The significant predictors of mortality were age, ASA grade, BMI, the formation of a stoma, preoperative TNM staging, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, curative resection, and LOS. Classification predictive modelling predicted three different colorectal cancer mortality measures (overall mortality, and 31- and 91-days mortality) with 80-96% accuracy, 84-93% sensitivity, and 75-100% specificity. A model using all variables performed only slightly better than one that used just the most significant ones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shamsul Masum
- Faculty of Technology, University of Portsmouth, Portland Building, Portland Street, Portsmouth, PO1 3AH UK
| | - Adrian Hopgood
- Faculty of Technology, University of Portsmouth, Portland Building, Portland Street, Portsmouth, PO1 3AH UK
| | - Samuel Stefan
- Colorectal Department, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Southwick Hill Road, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY UK
| | - Karen Flashman
- Colorectal Department, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Southwick Hill Road, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY UK
| | - Jim Khan
- Colorectal Department, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Southwick Hill Road, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY UK
- Faculty of Science & Health, University of Portsmouth, St Michael’s Building, White Swan Road, Portsmouth, PO1 2DT UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pratt-Chapman ML, Silber R, Tang J, Le PTD. Implementation factors for patient navigation program success: a qualitative study. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:141. [PMID: 34930503 PMCID: PMC8685795 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00248-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient navigation (PN) is an evidence-based practice that involves assessing and addressing individual barriers to care for patients. While PN has shown effectiveness in numerous studies, designing successful, sustainable PN programs has remained challenging for many healthcare organizations. The purpose of the present study was to examine implementation factors for successful PN programs to optimize the sustainability of PN services across cancer care settings in the USA. METHODS Data were collected via semi-structured interviews with PN stakeholders (n=17) from diverse cancer care settings. Thematic content analysis was conducted by deductively coding major themes based on constructs from the Exploration-Preparation-Implementation-Sustainability framework and by inductively coding emergent themes. RESULTS Facilitators in the outer context included payer guidelines, accreditation requirements, community partnerships, and demonstrated need and demand for services. Inner context factors such as alignment with organizational and leadership priorities, appropriate staff support and workloads, and relative advantage were important to program success. Innovation characteristics such as the presence of innovation champions, clear role and scope of practice, clear protocols, strong communication channels, and innovation fit were facilitators of program success. Community-Academic partnerships and funding stability also emerged as facilitators for program sustainability. CONCLUSION Our qualitative analysis from a diverse sample of PN stakeholders and programs across the USA supports intentional use of implementation theory to design PN programs to optimize implementation success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandi L Pratt-Chapman
- GW Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
| | - Rachel Silber
- GW Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jeffrey Tang
- Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, New York University, New York, USA
| | - Phuong Thao D Le
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hyams T, Mueller N, Curbow B, King-Marshall E, Sultan S. Screening for colorectal cancer in people ages 45-49: research gaps, challenges and future directions for research and practice. Transl Behav Med 2021; 12:198-202. [PMID: 34184736 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Travis Hyams
- National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Office of the Director, Rockville, MD, USA.,Department of Behavioral and Community Health, University of Maryland, College Park, School of Public Health, College Park, MD USA
| | - Nora Mueller
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Barbara Curbow
- Department of Behavioral and Community Health, University of Maryland, College Park, School of Public Health, College Park, MD USA
| | - Evelyn King-Marshall
- Department of Behavioral and Community Health, University of Maryland, College Park, School of Public Health, College Park, MD USA
| | - Shahnaz Sultan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Shulman LN, Sheldon LK, Benz EJ. The Future of Cancer Care in the United States-Overcoming Workforce Capacity Limitations. JAMA Oncol 2020; 6:327-328. [PMID: 31971546 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.5358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lisa Kennedy Sheldon
- Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,The Cancer Center, St Joseph Hospital, Nashua, New Hampshire
| | - Edward J Benz
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Departments of Medical Oncology, Medicine, Pediatrics, and Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abuelo C, Ashburner JM, Atlas SJ, Knudsen A, Morrill J, Corona P, Shtasel D, Percac-Lima S. Colorectal Cancer Screening Patient Navigation for Patients with Mental Illness and/or Substance Use Disorder: Pilot Randomized Control Trial. J Dual Diagn 2020; 16:438-446. [PMID: 32762637 DOI: 10.1080/15504263.2020.1802542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the US. Screening has decreased CRC mortality. However, disadvantaged patients, particularly those with mental illness or substance use disorder (SUD), are less likely to be screened. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the impact of a patient navigation program on CRC screening in patients with mental illness and/or SUD. METHODS A pilot randomized nonblinded controlled trial was conducted from January to June 2017 in an urban community health center serving a low-income population. We randomized 251 patients aged 50-74 years with mental illness and/or SUD diagnosis overdue for CRC screening to intervention (n = 126) or usual care (n = 125) stratified by mental illness, SUD, or dual diagnosis. Intervention group patients received a letter followed by a phone call from patient navigators. Navigators helped patients overcome their individual barriers to CRC screening including: education, scheduling, explanation of bowel preparation, lack of transportation or accompaniment to appointments. If patient refused colonoscopy, navigators offered fecal occult blood testing. The main measure was proportion of patients completing CRC screening in intervention and usual care groups. RESULTS Navigators contacted 85 patients (67%) in the intervention group and 26 declined to participate. In intention-to treat analysis, more patients in the intervention group received CRC screening than in the usual care group, 19% versus 10.4% (p = .04). Among 56 intervention patients who received navigation, 19 completed screening (33.9% versus 10.4% in the control group, p = .001). In the subgroup of patients with SUD, 20% in the intervention group were screened compared to none in the usual care group (p = .05). CONCLUSIONS A patient navigation program improved CRC screening rates in patients with mental illness and/or SUD. Larger studies in diverse care settings are needed to demonstrate generalizability and explore which modality of CRC screening is most acceptable and which navigator activities are most effective for this vulnerable population. TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER 2016P001322.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Abuelo
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Division of General Internal Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Ashburner
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Division of General Internal Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Steven J Atlas
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Division of General Internal Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amy Knudsen
- Massachusetts General Hospital Institute for Technology Assessment, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James Morrill
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Division of General Internal Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Derri Shtasel
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Division of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sanja Percac-Lima
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Division of General Internal Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Senanayake S, Graves N, Healy H, Baboolal K, Kularatna S. Cost-utility analysis in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing kidney transplant; what pays? A systematic review. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2020; 18:18. [PMID: 32477010 PMCID: PMC7236510 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-020-00213-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Health systems are under pressure to deliver more effective care without expansion of resources. This is particularly pertinent to diseases like chronic kidney disease (CKD) that are exacting substantial financial burden to many health systems. The aim of this study is to systematically review the Cost Utility Analysis (CUA) evidence generated across interventions for CKD patients undergoing kidney transplant (KT). Methods A systemic review of CUA on the interventions for CKD patients undergoing KT was carried out using a search of the MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and NHS-EED. The CHEERS checklist was used as a set of good practice criteria in determining the reporting quality of the economic evaluation. Quality of the data used to inform model parameters was determined using the modified hierarchies of data sources. Results A total of 330 articles identified, 16 met the inclusion criteria. Almost all (n = 15) the studies were from high income countries. Out of the 24 characteristics assessed in the CHEERS checklist, more than 80% of the selected studies reported 14 of the characteristics. Reporting of the CUA were characterized by lack of transparency of model assumptions, narrow economic perspective and incomplete assessment of the effect of uncertainty in the model parameters on the results. The data used for the economic model were satisfactory quality. The authors of 13 studies reported the intervention as cost saving and improving quality of life, whereas three studies were cost increasing and improving quality of life. In addition to the baseline analysis, sensitivity analysis was performed in all the evaluations except one. Transplanting certain high-risk donor kidneys (high risk of HIV and Hepatitis-C infected kidneys, HLA mismatched kidneys, high Kidney Donor Profile Index) and a payment to living donors, were found to be cost-effective. Conclusions The quality of economic evaluations reviewed in this paper were assessed to be satisfactory. Implementation of these strategies will significantly impact current systems of KT and require a systematic implementation plan and coordinated efforts from relevant stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameera Senanayake
- 1Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation, School of Public Health, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Ave, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD 4059 Australia
| | - Nicholas Graves
- 1Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation, School of Public Health, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Ave, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD 4059 Australia
| | - Helen Healy
- 2Royal Brisbane Hospital for Women, Brisbane, Australia.,3School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Keshwar Baboolal
- 2Royal Brisbane Hospital for Women, Brisbane, Australia.,3School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sanjeewa Kularatna
- 1Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation, School of Public Health, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Ave, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD 4059 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Use of Patient Navigators to Reduce Barriers in Living Donation and Living Donor Transplantation. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-020-00280-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
21
|
Phillips S, Raskin S, Zhang Y, Pratt-Chapman M. Perspectives from oncology patient navigation programs on information management practices and needs: a descriptive study. Support Care Cancer 2020; 28:515-524. [PMID: 31073852 PMCID: PMC6954125 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04837-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purposes of this study are to describe oncology patient navigation (PN) program perspectives on: (1) use of information systems and processes, (2) uses of program data, and (3) desired information system characteristics. METHODS We conducted multi-phase data collection to inform development of the Patient Navigation Barriers and Outcomes Tool™ (PN-BOT™), a new information management and reporting tool for oncology PN programs. Phase I was a national online survey of PN staff (n = 343) about data practices. Phase II was a pilot test of a PN-BOT™ prototype with nine PN programs. Survey results were tabulated. Qualitative analysis identified emergent themes from open-response fields from the Phase I survey and open-response survey and interview data from Phase II pilot testers. RESULTS PN program information management practices and systems were diverse and often leveraged a patchwork of untailored platforms. Navigators used data to inform navigation tasks, service improvement, research, and reporting. Respondents desired a streamlined, integrated, affordable data system able to minimize data entry burden, meet needs of diverse stakeholders, facilitate navigation work, readily generate reports, and share information among healthcare team members. CONCLUSIONS Although oncology navigation programs explore diverse solutions, programs struggle to find health information technologies that sufficiently meet their needs. Information systems designed for oncology PN programs should perform a wide range of functions: be customizable, affordable, interoperable, and have low data entry burden. Organizations exploring solutions should invite PN input in decisions. PN-BOT™ was developed as a free Excel-based tool for PN programs responsive to reported needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Phillips
- Institute for Patient-Centered Initiatives and Health Equity, The George Washington University Cancer Center, 2600 Virginia Avenue NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20037, USA
| | - Sarah Raskin
- L. Douglas Wilder School of Government and Public Affairs, Virginia Commonwealth University, 923 W. Franklin Street, Richmond, VA, 23284, USA
| | - Yuqing Zhang
- Institute for Patient-Centered Initiatives and Health Equity, The George Washington University Cancer Center, 2600 Virginia Avenue NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20037, USA
| | - Mandi Pratt-Chapman
- Institute for Patient-Centered Initiatives and Health Equity, The George Washington University Cancer Center, 2600 Virginia Avenue NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kline RM, Rocque GB, Rohan EA, Blackley KA, Cantril CA, Pratt-Chapman ML, Burris HA, Shulman LN. Patient Navigation in Cancer: The Business Case to Support Clinical Needs. J Oncol Pract 2019; 15:585-590. [PMID: 31509483 PMCID: PMC8790714 DOI: 10.1200/jop.19.00230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient navigation (PN) is an increasingly recognized element of high-quality, patient-centered cancer care, yet PN in many cancer programs is absent or limited, often because of concerns of extra cost without tangible financial benefits. METHODS Five real-world examples of PN programs are used to demonstrate that in the pure fee-for-service and the alternative payment model worlds of reimbursement, strong cases can be made to support the benefits of PN. RESULTS In three large programs, PN resulted in increased patient retention and increased physician loyalty within the cancer programs, leading to increased revenue. In addition, in two programs, PN was associated with a reduction in unnecessary resource utilization, such as emergency department visits and hospitalizations. PN also reduces burdens on oncology providers, potentially reducing burnout, errors, and costly staff turnover. CONCLUSION PN has resulted in improved patient outcomes and patient satisfaction and has important financial benefits for cancer programs in the fee-for-service and the alternative payment model worlds, lending support for more robust staffing of PN programs.
Collapse
|
23
|
Lopez D, Pratt-Chapman ML, Rohan EA, Sheldon LK, Basen-Engquist K, Kline R, Shulman LN, Flores EJ. Establishing effective patient navigation programs in oncology. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27:1985-1996. [PMID: 30887125 PMCID: PMC8811719 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04739-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recent advances in cancer treatment have resulted in greatly improved survival, and yet many patients in the USA have not benefited due to poor access to healthcare and difficulty accessing timely care across the cancer care continuum. Recognizing these issues and the need to facilitate discussions on how to improve navigation services for patients with cancer, the National Cancer Policy Forum of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) held a workshop entitled, "Establishing Effective Patient Navigation Programs in Oncology. The purpose of this manuscript is to disseminate the conclusions of this workshop while providing a clinically relevant review of patient navigation in oncology. DESIGN Narrative literature review and summary of workshop discussions RESULTS: Patient navigation has been shown to be effective at improving outcomes throughout the spectrum of cancer care. Work remains to develop consensus on scope of practice and evaluation criteria and to align payment incentives and policy. CONCLUSION Patient navigation plays an essential role in overcoming patient- and system-level barriers to improve access to cancer care and outcomes for those most in need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Ron Kline
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lawrence N Shulman
- University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Efren J Flores
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bernardo BM, Zhang X, Beverly Hery CM, Meadows RJ, Paskett ED. The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of patient navigation programs across the cancer continuum: A systematic review. Cancer 2019; 125:2747-2761. [PMID: 31034604 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Revised: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Published studies regarding patient navigation (PN) and cancer were reviewed to assess quality, determine gaps, and identify avenues for future research. The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for studies investigating the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of PN across the cancer continuum. Each included article was scored independently by 2 separate reviewers with the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. The current review identified 113 published articles that assessed PN and cancer care, between August 1, 2010, and February 1, 2018, 14 of which reported on the cost-effectiveness of PN programs. Most publications focused on the effectiveness of PN in screening (50%) and diagnosis (27%) along the continuum of cancer care. Many described the effectiveness of PN for breast cancer (52%) or colorectal cancer outcomes (51%). Most studies reported favorable outcomes for PN programs, including increased uptake of and adherence to cancer screenings, timely diagnostic resolution and follow-up, higher completion rates for cancer therapy, and higher rates of attending medical appointments. Cost-effectiveness studies showed that PN programs yielded financial benefits. Quality assessment showed that 75 of the 113 included articles (65%) had 2 or more weak components. In conclusion, this review indicates numerous gaps within the PN and cancer literature where improvement is needed. For example, more research is needed at other points along the continuum of cancer care outside of screening and diagnosis. In addition, future research into the effectiveness of PN for understudied cancers outside of breast and colorectal cancer is necessary along with an assessment of cost-effectiveness and more rigorous reporting of study designs and results in published articles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany M Bernardo
- Division of Population Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Xiaochen Zhang
- Division of Population Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Chloe M Beverly Hery
- Division of Population Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Rachel J Meadows
- Division of Population Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.,Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Electra D Paskett
- Division of Population Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.,Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.,Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio.,Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Shusted CS, Barta JA, Lake M, Brawer R, Ruane B, Giamboy TE, Sundaram B, Evans NR, Myers RE, Kane GC. The Case for Patient Navigation in Lung Cancer Screening in Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review. Popul Health Manag 2018; 22:347-361. [PMID: 30407102 PMCID: PMC6685525 DOI: 10.1089/pop.2018.0128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient navigation has been proposed to combat cancer disparities in vulnerable populations. Vulnerable populations often have poorer cancer outcomes and lower levels of screening, adherence, and treatment. Navigation has been studied in various cancers, but few studies have assessed navigation in lung cancer. Additionally, there is a lack of consistency in metrics to assess the quality of navigation programs. The authors conducted a systematic review of published cancer screening studies to identify quality metrics used in navigation programs, as well as to recommend standardized metrics to define excellence in lung cancer navigation. The authors included 26 studies evaluating navigation metrics in breast, cervical, colorectal, prostate, and lung cancer. After reviewing the literature, the authors propose the following navigation metrics for lung cancer screening programs: (1) screening rate, (2) compliance with follow-up, (3) time to treatment initiation, (4) patient satisfaction, (5) quality of life, (6) biopsy complications, and (7) cultural competency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine S Shusted
- 1Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Julie A Barta
- 2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, The Jane and Leonard Korman Respiratory Institute, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael Lake
- 2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, The Jane and Leonard Korman Respiratory Institute, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Rickie Brawer
- 3Department of Family & Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Center for Urban Health, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Brooke Ruane
- 4Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, The Jane and Leonard Korman Respiratory Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Teresa E Giamboy
- 5Tobacco Dependence Program, Jefferson Health - Northeast, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Baskaran Sundaram
- 6Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nathaniel R Evans
- 7Division of Thoracic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ronald E Myers
- 8Division of Population Science and Center for Health Decisions, Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Gregory C Kane
- 9Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, The Jane and Leonard Korman Respiratory Institute, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|