Low-flow CO2 removal in combination with renal replacement therapy effectively reduces ventilation requirements in hypercapnic patients: a pilot study

Evaluation of CO2 removal rate of ECCO2R for a renal replacement therapy platform in an experimental setting

BACKGROUND

A critical parameter of extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) applications is the CO2 removal rate (VCO2). Low-flow venovenous extracorporeal support with large-size membrane lung remains undefined. This study aimed to evaluate the VCO2 of a low-flow ECCO2R with large-size membrane lung using a renal replacement therapy platform in an experimental animal model.

METHODS

Twelve healthy pigs were placed under mechanical ventilation and connected to an ECCO2R-CRRT system (surface area = 1.8 m2; OMNIset®, BBraun, Germany). Respiratory settings were reduced to induce two degrees of hypercapnia. VCO2 was recorded under different combinations of PaCO2 (50-69 or 70-89 mm Hg), extracorporeal blood flow (ECBF; 200 or 350 mL/min), and gas flow (4, 6, or 10 L/min).

RESULTS

VCO2 increased with ECBF at all three gas flow rates. In severe hypercapnia, the increase in sweep gas flow from 4 to 10 L/min increased VCO2 from 86.38 ± 7.08 to 96.50 ± 8.71 mL/min at an ECBF of 350 mL/min, whereas at ECBF of 200 mL/min, any increase was less effective. But in mild hypercapnia, the increase in sweep gas flow result in significantly increased VCO2 at two ECBF. VCO2 increased with PaCO2 from 50-69 to 70-89 mm Hg at an ECBF of 350 mL/min, but not at ECBF of 200 mL/min. Post-membrane lung PCO2 levels were similar for different levels of premembrane lung PCO2 (p = 0.08), highlighting the gas exchange diffusion efficacy of the membrane lung in gas exchange diffusion. In severe hypercapnia, the reduction of PaCO2 elevated from 11.5% to 19.6% with ECBF increase only at a high gas flow of 10 L/min (p < 0.05) and increase of gas flow significantly reduced PaCO2 only at a high ECBF of 350 mL/min (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-flow venovenous extracorporeal ECCO2R-CRRT with large-size membrane lung is more efficient with the increase of ECBF, sweep gas flow rate, and the degree of hypercapnia. The influence of sweep gas flow on VCO2 depends on the ECBF and degree of hypercapnia. Higher ECBF and gas flow should be chosen to reverse severe hypercapnia.

Effects of extracorporeal CO2 removal on gas exchange and ventilator settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) on gas exchange and respiratory settings in critically ill adults with respiratory failure.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive database search, including observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from January 2000 to March 2022, targeting adult ICU patients undergoing ECCO2R. Primary outcomes were changes in gas exchange and ventilator settings 24 h after ECCO2R initiation, estimated as mean of differences, or proportions for adverse events (AEs); with subgroup analyses for disease indication and technology. Across RCTs, we assessed mortality, length of stay, ventilation days, and AEs as mean differences or odds ratios.

RESULTS

A total of 49 studies encompassing 1672 patients were included. ECCO2R was associated with a significant decrease in PaCO2, plateau pressure, and tidal volume and an increase in pH across all patient groups, at an overall 19% adverse event rate. In ARDS and lung transplant patients, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio increased significantly while ventilator settings were variable. "Higher extraction" systems reduced PaCO2 and respiratory rate more efficiently. The three available RCTs did not demonstrate an effect on mortality, but a significantly longer ICU and hospital stay associated with ECCO2R.

CONCLUSIONS

ECCO2R effectively reduces PaCO2 and acidosis allowing for less invasive ventilation. "Higher extraction" systems may be more efficient to achieve this goal. However, as RCTs have not shown a mortality benefit but increase AEs, ECCO2R's effects on clinical outcome remain unclear. Future studies should target patient groups that may benefit from ECCO2R. PROSPERO Registration No: CRD 42020154110 (on January 24, 2021).

Safety and Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Removal CO2RESET Device in Critically Ill Patients

BACKGROUND

In this retrospective study, we report the effectiveness and safety of a dedicated extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂R) device in critically ill patients.

METHODS

Adult patients on mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or decompensated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (dCOPD), who were treated with a dedicated ECCO₂R device (CO2RESET, Eurosets, Medolla, Italy) in case of hypercapnic acidemia, were included. Repeated measurements of CO₂ removal (VCO₂) at baseline and 1, 12, and 24 h after the initiation of therapy were recorded.

RESULTS

Over a three-year period, 11 patients received ECCO₂R (median age 60 [43-72] years) 3 (2-39) days after ICU admission; nine patients had ARDS and two had dCOPD. Median baseline pH and PaCO₂ levels were 7.27 (7.12-7.33) and 65 (50-84) mmHg, respectively. With a median ECCO₂R blood flow of 800 (500-800) mL/min and maximum gas flow of 6 (2-14) L/min, the VCO₂ at 12 h after ECCO₂R initiation was 157 (58-183) mL/min. Tidal volume, respiratory rate, and driving pressure were significantly reduced over time. Few side effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, a dedicated ECCO₂R device provided a high VCO₂ with a favorable risk profile.

Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal: From Pathophysiology to Clinical Applications; Focus on Combined Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

Lung-protective ventilation (LPV) with low tidal volumes can significantly increase the survival of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by limiting ventilator-induced lung injuries. However, one of the main concerns regarding the use of LPV is the risk of developing hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis, which may limit the clinical application of this strategy. This is the reason why different extracorporeal CO₂ removal (ECCO₂R) techniques and devices have been developed. They include low-flow or high-flow systems that may be performed with dedicated platforms or, alternatively, combined with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). ECCO₂R has demonstrated effectiveness in controlling PaCO₂ levels, thus allowing LPV in patients with ARDS from different causes, including those affected by Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Similarly, the suitability and safety of combined ECCO₂R and CRRT (ECCO₂R-CRRT), which provides CO₂ removal and kidney support simultaneously, have been reported in both retrospective and prospective studies. However, due to the complexity of ARDS patients and the limitations of current evidence, the actual impact of ECCO₂R on patient outcome still remains to be defined. In this review, we discuss the main principles of ECCO₂R and its clinical application in ARDS patients, in particular looking at clinical experiences of combined ECCO₂R-CRRT treatments.

Extracorporeal CO 2 Removal During Renal Replacement Therapy to Allow Lung-Protective Ventilation in Patients With COVID-19-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

The aim of this retrospective multicenter observational study is to test the feasibility and safety of a combined extracorporeal CO 2 removal (ECCO 2 R) plus renal replacement therapy (RRT) system to use an ultraprotective ventilator setting while maintaining (1) an effective support of renal function and (2) values of pH within the physiologic limits in a cohort of coronavirus infectious disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Among COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit of 9 participating hospitals, 27 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation undergoing ECCO 2 R-plus-RRT treatment were included in the analysis. The treatment allowed to reduce V T from 6.0 ± 0.6 mL/kg at baseline to 4.8 ± 0.8, 4.6 ± 1.0, and 4.3 ± 0.3 mL/kg, driving pressure (ΔP) from 19.8 ± 2.5 cm H 2 O to 14.8 ± 3.6, 14.38 ± 4.1 and 10.2 ± 1.6 cm H 2 O after 24 hours, 48 hours, and at discontinuation of ECCO 2 R-plus-RRT (T3), respectively ( p < 0.001). PaCO 2 and pH remained stable. Plasma creatinine decreased over the study period from 3.30 ± 1.27 to 1.90 ± 1.30 and 1.27 ± 0.90 mg/dL after 24 and 48 hours of treatment, respectively ( p < 0.01). No patient-related events associated with the extracorporeal system were reported. These data show that in patients with COVID-19-induced ARDS and AKI, ECCO 2 R-plus-RRT is effective in allowing ultraprotective ventilator settings while maintaining an effective support of renal function and values of pH within physiologic limits.

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a systematic review, Bayesian meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Purpose:

To assess the safety and efficacy of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R)versusstandard care in patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF).

Methods:

MEDLINE, Embase and clinical trial registries were searched from 1994 to 31 December 2021. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Pairs of reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included ventilator-free days, length of stay, safety and adverse events and physiological changes. As a primary analysis, we performed a meta-analysis of mortality until day 30 using a Bayesian random effects model. We then performed a trial sequential analysis of RCTs.

Results:

21 studies met inclusion criteria: three RCTs, enrolling 531 patients, and 18 observational studies. In a pooled analysis of RCTs, the posterior probability of increased mortality with the use of ECCO2R was 73% (relative risk 1.19, 95% credible interval 0.70–2.29). There was substantial heterogeneity in the reporting of safety and adverse events. However, the incidence of extra and intracranial haemorrhage was higher (relative risk 3.00, 95% credible interval 0.41–20.51) among those randomised to ECCO2R. Current trials have accumulated 80.8% of the diversity-adjusted required information size and the lack of effect reaches futility for a 10% absolute risk reduction in mortality.

Conclusions:

The use of ECCO2R in patients with AHRF is not associated with improvements in clinical outcomes. Furthermore, it is likely that further trials of ECCO2R aiming to achieve an absolute risk reduction in mortality of ≥10% are futile.

Novel hybrid total artificial heart with integrated oxygenator

There continues to be an unmet therapeutic need for an alternative treatment strategy for respiratory distress and lung disease. We are developing a portable cardiopulmonary support system that integrates an implantable oxygenator with a hybrid, dual-support, continuous-flow total artificial heart (TAH). The TAH has a centrifugal flow pump that is rotating about an axial flow pump. By attaching the hollow fiber bundle of the oxygenator to the base of the TAH, we establish a new cardiopulmonary support technology that permits a patient to be ambulatory during usage. In this study, we investigated the design and improvement of the blood flow pathway from the inflow-to-outflow of four oxygenators using a mathematical model and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Pressure loss and gas transport through diffusion were examined to assess oxygenator design. The oxygenator designs led to a resistance-driven pressure loss range of less than 35 mmHg for flow rates of 1-7 L/min. All of the designs met requirements. The configuration having an outside-to-inside blood flow direction was found to have higher oxygen transport. Based on this advantageous flow direction, two designs (Model 1 and 3) were then integrated with the axial-flow impeller of the TAH for simulation. Flow rates of 1-7 L/min and speeds of 10,000-16,000 RPM were analyzed. Blood damage studies were performed, and Model 1 demonstrated the lowest potential for hemolysis. Future work will focus on developing and testing a physical prototype for integration into the new cardiopulmonary assist system.

Utilization and outcomes of extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2 R): Systematic review and meta-analysis of arterio-venous and veno-venous ECCO2 R approaches

INTRODUCTION

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂ R) provides respiratory support to patients suffering from hypercapnic respiratory failure by utilizing an extracorporeal shunt and gas exchange membrane to remove CO₂ from either the venous (VV-ECCO₂ R) or arterial (AV-ECCO₂ R) system before return into the venous site. AV-ECCO₂ R relies on the patient's native cardiac function to generate pressures needed to deliver blood through the extracorporeal circuit. VV-ECCO₂ R utilizes a mechanical pump and can be used to treat patients with inadequate native cardiac function. We sought to evaluate the existing evidence comparing the subgroups of patients supported on VV and AV-ECCO₂ R devices.

METHODS

A literature search was performed to identify all relevant studies published between 2000 and 2019. Demographic information, medical indications, perioperative variables, and clinical outcomes were extracted for systematic review and meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies including 826 patients were reviewed. 60% of patients (497/826) were supported on VV-ECCO₂ R. The most frequent indications were acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [69%, (95%CI: 53%-82%)] and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [49%, (95%CI: 37%-60%)]. ICU length of stay was significantly shorter in patients supported on VV-ECCO₂ R compared to AV-ECCO₂ R [15 (95%CI: 7-23) vs. 42 (95%CI: 17-67) days, p = 0.05]. In-hospital mortality was not significantly different [27% (95%CI: 18%-38%) vs. 36% (95%CI: 24%-51%), p = 0.26].

CONCLUSION

Both VV and AV-ECCO₂ R provided clinically meaningful CO₂ removal with comparable mortality.

Targeting arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients using extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal

BACKGROUND

A retrospective analysis of SUPERNOVA trial data showed that reductions in tidal volume to ultraprotective levels without significant increases in arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO₂ ) for critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) depends on the rate of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂ R).

METHODS

We used a whole-body mathematical model of acid-base balance to quantify the effect of altering carbon dioxide (CO₂ ) removal rates using different ECCO₂ R devices to achieve target PaCO₂ levels in ARDS patients. Specifically, we predicted the effect of using a new, larger surface area PrismaLung+ device instead of the original PrismaLung device on the results from two multicenter clinical studies in critically ill, mechanically ventilated ARDS patients.

RESULTS

After calibrating model parameters to the clinical study data using the PrismaLung device, model predictions determined optimal extracorporeal blood flow rates for the PrismaLung+ and mechanical ventilation frequencies to obtain target PaCO₂ levels of 45 and 50 mm Hg in mild and moderate ARDS patients treated at a tidal volume of 3.98 ml/kg predicted body weight (PW). Comparable model predictions showed that reductions in tidal volumes below 6 ml/kg PBW may be difficult for acidotic highly severe ARDS patients with acute kidney injury and high CO₂ production rates using a PrismaLung+ device in-series with a continuous venovenous hemofiltration device.

CONCLUSIONS

The described model provides guidance on achieving target PaCO₂ levels in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients using protective and ultraprotective tidal volumes when increasing CO₂ removal rates from ECCO₂ R devices.

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide Removal (ECCO2 R) with the Advanced Organ Support (ADVOS) system in critically ill COVID-19 patients

Disturbed oxygenation is foremost the leading clinical presentation in COVID‐19 patients. However, a small proportion also develop carbon dioxide removal problems. The Advanced Organ Support (ADVOS) therapy (ADVITOS GmbH, Munich, Germany) uses a less invasive approach by combining extracorporeal CO₂‐removal and multiple organ support for the liver and the kidneys in a single hemodialysis device. The aim of our study is to evaluate the ADVOS system as treatment option in‐COVID‐19 patients with multi‐organ failure and carbon dioxide removal problems. COVID‐19 patients suffering from severe respiratory insufficiency, receiving at least two treatments with the ADVOS multi system (ADVITOS GmbH, Munich, Germany), were eligible for study inclusion. Briefly, these included patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) according to KDIGO guidelines, and moderate or severe ARDS according to the Berlin definition, who were on invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 72 hours. In total, nine COVID‐19 patients (137 ADVOS treatment sessions with a median of 10 treatments per patient) with moderate to severe ARDS and carbon dioxide removal problems were analyzed. During the ADVOS treatments, a rapid correction of acid‐base balance and a continuous CO₂ removal could be observed. We observed a median continuous CO₂ removal of 49.2 mL/min (IQR: 26.9‐72.3 mL/min) with some treatments achieving up to 160 mL/min. The CO₂ removal significantly correlated with blood flow (Pearson 0.421; P < .001), PaCO₂ (0.341, P < .001) and HCO3‐ levels (0.568, P < .001) at the start of the treatment. The continuous treatment led to a significant reduction in PaCO₂ from baseline to the last ADVOS treatment. In conclusion, it was feasible to remove CO₂ using the ADVOS system in our cohort of COVID‐19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiorgan failure. This efficient removal of CO₂ was achieved at blood flows up to 300 mL/min using a conventional hemodialysis catheter and without a membrane lung or a gas phase.

Modeling acid-base balance for in-series extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal and continuous venovenous hemofiltration devices

Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute kidney injury (AKI) treated by kidney replacement therapy may also require treatment with extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂ R) devices to permit protective or ultraprotective mechanical ventilation. We developed a mathematical model of acid-base balance during extracorporeal therapy using ECCO₂ R and continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) devices applied in series for the treatment of mechanically ventilated AKI patients. Published data from clinical studies of mechanically ventilated AKI patients treated by CVVH at known infusion rates of substitution fluid without ECCO₂ R were used to adjust the model parameters to fit plasma levels of arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO₂ ), arterial plasma bicarbonate concentration ([HCO₃ ]), and plasma pH (as well as certain other unmeasured physiological variables). The effects of applying ECCO₂ R at an unchanged and a reduced tidal volume on PaCO₂ , [HCO₃ ] and plasma pH were then simulated assuming carbon dioxide removal rates from the ECCO₂ R device measured in the clinical studies. Agreement of such model predictions with clinical data was good whether the ECCO₂ R device was positioned proximal or distal to the CVVH device in the extracorporeal circuit. Although carbon dioxide removal rates from the ECCO₂ R device measured in one previous clinical study were higher when it was placed proximal to the CVVH device, suggesting that such in-series positioning was optimal, the current mathematical model demonstrates that proximal positioning of the ECCO₂ R device also results in lower bicarbonate (and, therefore, total carbon dioxide) removal from the distal CVVH device. Thus, the removal of total carbon dioxide by such extracorporeal circuits is relatively independent of the position of the in-series devices. It is concluded that the described mathematical model has quantitative accuracy; these results suggest that the overall acid-base balance when using ECCO₂ R and CVVH devices in a single extracorporeal circuit will be similar, independent of their in-series position.

Extracorporeal CO2 removal and renal replacement therapy in acute severe respiratory failure in COVID-19 pneumonia: Case report

The COVID‐19 pandemic significates an enormous number of patients with pneumonia that get complicated with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), some of them with refractory hypercapnia and hypoxemia that need mechanical ventilation (MV). Those patients who are not candidate to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), the extracorporeal removal of CO₂ (ECCO₂R) can allow ultra protective MV to limit the transpulmonary pressures and avoid ventilatory induced lung injury (VILI).

We report a first case of prolonged ECCO₂R support in 38 year male with severe COVID‐19 pneumonia refractory to conventional support. He was admitted tachypneic and oxygen saturation 71% without supplementary oxygen. The patient's clinical condition worsens with severe respiratory failure, increasing the oxygen requirement and initiating MV in the prone position. After 21 days of protective MV, PaCO₂ rise to 96.8 mmHg, making it necessary to connect to an ECCO₂R system coupled continuous veno‐venous hemodialysis (CVVHD). However, due to the lack of availability of equipment in the context of the pandemic, a pediatric gas exchange membrane adapted to CVVHD allowed to maintain the removal of CO₂ until completing 27 days, being finally disconnected from the system without complications and with a satisfactory evolution.

Continuous renal replacement therapy in patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life‐saving therapy utilized for patients with severe life‐threatening cardiorespiratory failure. Patients treated with ECMO are among the most severely ill encountered in critical care and are at high‐risk of developing multiple organ dysfunction, including acute kidney injury (AKI) and fluid overload. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is increasingly utilized inpatients on ECMO to manage AKI and treat fluid overload. The indications for renal replacement therapy for patients on ECMO are similar to those of other critically ill populations; however, there is wide practice variation in how renal supportive therapies are utilized during ECMO. For patients requiring both CRRT and ECMO, CRRT may be connected directly to the ECMO circuit, or CRRT and ECMO may be performed independently. This review will summarize current knowledge of the epidemiology of AKI, indications and timing of CRRT, delivery of CRRT, and the outcomes of patients requiring CRRT with ECMO.

The use of extracorporeal CO2 removal in acute respiratory failure

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation and protective mechanical ventilation of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients induce hypercapnic respiratory acidosis.

Main text

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂R) aims to eliminate blood CO₂ to fight against the adverse effects of hypercapnia and related acidosis. Hypercapnia has deleterious extrapulmonary consequences, particularly for the brain. In addition, in the lung, hypercapnia leads to: lower pH, pulmonary vasoconstriction, increases in right ventricular afterload, acute cor pulmonale. Moreover, hypercapnic acidosis may further damage the lungs by increasing both nitric oxide production and inflammation and altering alveolar epithelial cells. During an exacerbation of COPD, relieving the native lungs of at least a portion of the CO₂ could potentially reduce the patient's respiratory work, Instead of mechanically increasing alveolar ventilation with MV in an already hyperinflated lung to increase CO₂ removal, the use of ECCO₂R may allow a decrease in respiratory volume and respiratory rate, resulting in improvement of lung mechanic. Thus, the use of ECCO₂R may prevent noninvasive ventilation failure and allow intubated patients to be weaned off mechanical ventilation. In ARDS patients, ECCO₂R may be used to promote an ultraprotective ventilation in allowing to lower tidal volume, plateau (Pplat) and driving pressures, parameters that have identified as a major risk factors for mortality. However, although ECCO₂R appears to be effective in improving gas exchange and possibly in reducing the rate of endotracheal intubation and allowing more protective ventilation, its use may have pulmonary and hemodynamic consequences and may be associated with complications.

Conclusion

In selected patients, ECCO₂R may be a promising adjunctive therapeutic strategy for the management of patients with severe COPD exacerbation and for the establishment of protective or ultraprotective ventilation in patients with ARDS without prognosis-threatening hypoxemia.

Modeling acid-base balance during continuous kidney replacement therapy

Clinical studies have suggested that use of bicarbonate-containing substitution and dialysis fluids during continuous kidney replacement therapy may result in excessive increases in the carbon dioxide concentration of blood; however, the technical parameters governing such changes are unclear. The current work used a mathematical model of acid-base chemistry of blood to predict its composition within and exiting the extracorporeal circuit during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) and continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). Model predictions showed that a total substitution fluid infusion rate of 2 L/h (33% predilution) with a bicarbonate concentration of 32 mEq/L during CVVH at a blood flow rate of 200 mL/min resulted in only modest increases in plasma bicarbonate concentration by 2.0 mEq/L and partial pressure of dissolved carbon dioxide by 4.4 mmHg in blood exiting the extracorporeal circuit. The relative increase in bicarbonate concentration (9.7%) was similar to that in partial pressure of dissolved carbon dioxide (8.2%), resulting in no significant change in plasma pH in the blood exiting the CVVH circuit. The changes in plasma acid-base levels were larger with a higher infusion rate of substitution fluid but smaller with a higher blood flow rate or use of substitution fluid with a lower bicarbonate concentration (22 mEq/L). Under comparable flow conditions and substitution fluid composition, model predicted changes in acid-base levels during CVVHDF were similar, but smaller, than those during CVVH. The described mathematical model can predict the effect of operating conditions on acid-base balance within and exiting the extracorporeal circuit during continuous kidney replacement therapy.

Technology Innovations in Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy: The Clinician's Perspective

Continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) has improved remarkably since its first implementation as continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration in the 1970s. However, when looking at the latest generation of CKRT machines, one could argue that clinical deployment of breakthrough innovations by device manufacturers has slowed in the last decade. Simultaneously, there has been a steady accumulation of clinical knowledge using CKRT as well as a multitude of therapeutic and diagnostic innovations in the dialysis and broader intensive care unit technology fields adaptable to CKRT. These include multiple different anticlotting measures; cloud-computing for optimized treatment prescribing and delivered therapy data collection and analysis; novel blood purification techniques aimed at improving the severe multiorgan dysfunction syndrome; and real-time sensing of blood and/or filter effluent composition. The authors present a view of how CKRT devices and programs could be reimagined incorporating these innovations to achieve specific measurable clinical outcomes with personalized care and improved simplicity, safety, and efficacy of CKRT therapy.

How To Prescribe And Troubleshoot Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Case-Based Review

Continuous RRT (CRRT) is the preferred dialysis modality for solute management, acid-base stability, and volume control in patients who are critically ill with AKI in the intensive care unit (ICU). CRRT offers multiple advantages over conventional hemodialysis in the critically ill population, such as greater hemodynamic stability, better fluid management, greater solute control, lower bleeding risk, and a more continuous (physiologic) approach of kidney support. Despite its frequent use, several aspects of CRRT delivery are still not fully standardized, or do not have solid evidence-based foundations. In this study, we provide a case-based review and recommendations of common scenarios and interventions encountered during the provision of CRRT to patients who are critically ill. Specific focus is on initial prescription, CRRT dosing, and adjustments related to severe hyponatremia management, concomitant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, dialysis catheter placement, use of regional citrate anticoagulation, and antibiotic dosing. This case-driven simulation is made as the clinical status of the patient evolves, and is on the basis of step-wise decisions made during the care of this patient, according to the specific patient's needs and the logistics available at the corresponding institution.

Extracorporeal support to achieve lung-protective and diaphragm-protective ventilation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Extracorporeal support allows ultraprotective controlled and assisted ventilation, which can prevent lung and diaphragm injury. We focused on most recent findings in the application of extracorporeal support to achieve lung protection and diaphragm- protection, as well as on relevant monitoring.

RECENT FINDINGS

A recent randomized trial comparing the efficacy of extracorporeal support as a rescue therapy to conventional protective mechanical ventilation was stopped for futility but post hoc analyses suggested that extracorporeal support is beneficial for patients with very severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, the optimal ventilation settings during extracorporeal support are still debated. It is conceivable that they should enable the highest amount of CO2 removal with lowest mechanical power.Extracorporeal CO2 removal can minimize acidosis and enable the use of ultra-protective lung ventilation strategies when hypoxemia is not a major issue. Moreover, it can protect lung and diaphragm function during assisted ventilation through control of the respiratory effort.Lung mechanics, gas exchange, diaphragm electrical activity, ultrasound, electrical impedance tomography could be integrated into clinical management to define lung and diaphragm protection and guide personalized ventilation settings.

SUMMARY

Technological improvement and the latest evidence indicate that extracorporeal support may be an effective tool for lung and diaphragm protection.

Options in extracorporeal support of multiple organ failure

Multiorgan failure is among the most frequent reasons of death in critically ill patients. Based on extensive and long-term use of renal replacement therapy, extracorporeal organ support became available for other organ failures. Initially, most of these techniques (e.g. extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, extracorporeal CO₂ removal [ECCO2R] and extracorporeal liver support) were used as stand-alone single organ support systems. Considering multiple interactions between native organs (“crosstalk”), combined or integrated extracorporeal organ support (ECOS) devices are intriguing. The concept of multiple organ support therapy (MOST) providing simultaneous and combined support for different failing organs was described more than 15 years ago by Ronco and Bellomo. This concept also implicates overcoming the “compartmentalized” approach provided by different single organ specialized professionals by a multidisciplinary and multiprofessional strategy. The idea of MOST is supported by the failure of several recent studies on single organ support including liver and lung support. Improvement of outcome by ECOS necessarily depends on optimized patient selection, integrated organ support and limitation of its side effects. This implicates challenges for engineers, industry and healthcare professionals. From a technical viewpoint, modular combination of pre-existing technologies such as renal replacement, albumin-dialysis, ECCO2R and potentially cytokine elimination can be considered as a first step. While this allows for stepwise and individual combination of standard organ support facilities, it carries the disadvantage of large extracorporeal blood volume and surfaces as well as additive costs. The more intriguing next step is an integrated platform providing the capacity of multiple organ support within one device. (This article is freely available.)

Low-flow assessment of current ECMO/ECCO2R rotary blood pumps and the potential effect on hemocompatibility

Background

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂R) uses an extracorporeal circuit to directly remove carbon dioxide from the blood either in lieu of mechanical ventilation or in combination with it. While the potential benefits of the technology are leading to increasing use, there are very real risks associated with it. Several studies demonstrated major bleeding and clotting complications, often associated with hemolysis and poorer outcomes in patients receiving ECCO₂R. A better understanding of the risks originating specifically from the rotary blood pump component of the circuit is urgently needed.

Methods

High-resolution computational fluid dynamics was used to calculate the hemodynamics and hemocompatibility of three current rotary blood pumps for various pump flow rates.

Results

The hydraulic efficiency dramatically decreases to 5–10% if operating at blood flow rates below 1 L/min, the pump internal flow recirculation rate increases 6–12-fold in these flow ranges, and adverse effects are increased due to multiple exposures to high shear stress. The deleterious consequences include a steep increase in hemolysis and destruction of platelets.

Conclusions

The role of blood pumps in contributing to adverse effects at the lower blood flow rates used during ECCO₂R is shown here to be significant. Current rotary blood pumps should be used with caution if operated at blood flow rates below 2 L/min, because of significant and high recirculation, shear stress, and hemolysis. There is a clear and urgent need to design dedicated blood pumps which are optimized for blood flow rates in the range of 0.5–1.5 L/min.