Evidence of integrated primary-secondary health care in low-and middle-income countries: protocol for a scoping review

Effective policy research of county and township health sector integration in China: Empirical evidence from the difference-in-differences model

Medical service fragmentation is a common problem worldwide, and many countries have adopted integration to solve the difficulty. Contrary to developed countries, developing countries such as China must consider how to implement integration under a relatively weak medical foundation. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the "Compact Union of County and Township Health Sectors" policy on the medical service capacity of a typical integration model represented by Shanxi Province in China and determine the path the policy followed. By using Shanxi's county-level medical integration as a quasi-natural experiment, this study establishes a difference-in-differences model to investigate the effect of the policy using official data. A series of tests are conducted to verify the robustness of the result. Finally, the policy pathway is tested. The results show that the third-level surgeries and outpatient service utilization of leading hospitals and township institutions increased. Still, inpatient service utilization and fourth-level surgeries did not show a significant change in either type of institution. Moreover, the enhancement of leading hospitals' service capacity comes mainly through improving asset efficiency and personal income, while the improvement of township institutions' capacity comes primarily through increased personal income. Compact integration of county-level medical institutions can stimulate and improve service capacity by improving asset efficiency and personal income, even with a weak medical foundation. However, to achieve continuous service capacity improvement, the professional level of county-level institutions must be strengthened with a superior hospital's assistance, and personnel's enthusiasm for active innovation must be cultivated.

The Early Impact of the People-centred Integrated Care on the Hypertension Management in Shenzhen

Objective

To evaluate the impact of the integrated care in Luohu, China on the hypertension management.

Methods

Hypertensive patients aged 35-74 years were recruited by the cluster-randomized sampling method from Luohu district which adopted integrated care and another district that remained original routine care during October 2018~January 2020, with 1353 and 583 patients from integrated and routine care communities, respectively. Health information, knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) towards cardiovascular diseases, pharmaceutical expenditure on hypertension and its comorbidities, and healthcare-related satisfaction were collected by questionnaires, with the expenditure additionally verified by hospitals' billing records database. Continuous and categorical variables were compared by Wilcoxon test and Chi-square test, respectively. The age-standardized hypertension control rate was calculated by direct standardization.

Results

The standardized hypertension management rate in the integrated care communities (45.75%) was significantly higher than that in routine care communities (14.07%) (P < 0.0001), while the age-standardized hypertension control rates were similar (integrated care: 50.3%, routine care: 52.65%, P = 0.518). The pharmaceutical expenditure on hypertension and its comorbidities in the integrated care communities was Ұ264.23 ± 357.38/month/person, lower than that in the routine care communities (Ұ354.56 ± 430.59/month/person). Patients in the integrated care had higher KAP scores (73.48 ± 11.54), compared with routine care (68.89 ± 15.51) (P < 0.0001). Moreover, the integrated care communities had higher satisfaction rates towards the convenience of dual referral (90.15% vs. 77.99%) and service quality (95.18% vs. 87.81%) than routine care communities (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The practice of the integrated care in Luohu has substantially improved the hypertension management and the healthcare-related satisfaction while with relatively low pharmaceutical expenditure. The investigation of long-term impact of the integrated care on hypertension control and management is warranted.

Evaluation of the North West London Diabetes Foot Care Transformation Project: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation

Introduction

Diabetes foot ulceration (DFU) presents an enormous burden to those living with diabetes and to the local health systems and economies. There is an increasing interest in implementing integrated care models to enhance the quality of care for people living with diabetes and related complications and the value of co-production approaches to achieve sustainable change. This paper aims to describe the evaluation methodology for the North West London (NWL) Diabetes Foot Care Transformation project.

Description

A mixed methods design including: i) a quasi-experimental quantitative analysis assessing the impact of the implementation of the local secondary care multi-disciplinary diabetes foot team clinics on service utilisation and clinical outcomes (amputations and number of healed patients); ii) a phenomenological, qualitative study to explore patient and staff experience; and iii) a within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis (pre and post 2017) to evaluate the programme cost-effectiveness.

Discussion and Conclusion

Demonstrating the impact of multidisciplinary, integrated care models and the value of co-production approaches is important for health providers and commissioners trying to improve health outcome. Evaluation is also needed to identify strategies to overcome barriers which might have reduced the impact of the programme and key elements for improvement.

Integrated health service delivery during COVID-19: a scoping review of published evidence from low-income and lower-middle-income countries

BACKGROUND

Integrated health service delivery (IHSD) is a promising approach to improve health system resilience. However, there is a lack of evidence specific to the low/lower-middle-income country (L-LMIC) health systems on how IHSD is used during disease outbreaks. This scoping review aimed to synthesise the emerging evidence on IHSD approaches adopted in L-LMIC during the COVID-19 pandemic and systematically collate their operational features.

METHODS

A systematic scoping review of peer-reviewed literature, published in English between 1 December 2019 and 12 June 2020, from seven electronic databases was conducted to explore the evidence of IHSD implemented in L-LMICs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were systematically charted, and key features of IHSD systems were presented according to the postulated research questions of the review.

RESULTS

The literature search retrieved 1487 published articles from which 18 articles met the inclusion criteria and included in this review. Service delivery, health workforce, medicine and technologies were the three most frequently integrated health system building blocks during the COVID-19 pandemic. While responding to COVID-19, the L-LMICs principally implemented the IHSD system via systematic horizontal integration, led by specific policy measures. The government's stewardship, along with the decentralised decision-making capacity of local institutions and multisectoral collaboration, was the critical facilitator for IHSD. Simultaneously, fragmented service delivery structures, fragile supply chain, inadequate diagnostic capacity and insufficient workforce were key barriers towards integration.

CONCLUSION

A wide array of context-specific IHSD approaches were operationalised in L-LMICs during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Emerging recommendations emphasise the importance of coordination and integration across building blocks and levels of the health system, supported by a responsive governance structure and stakeholder engagement strategies. Future reviews can revisit this emerging evidence base at subsequent phases of COVID-19 response and recovery in L-LMICs to understand how the approaches highlighted here evolve.