1
|
Luna Pinzon A, Waterlander W, de Pooter N, Altenburg T, Dijkstra C, Emke H, van den Eynde E, Overman ML, Busch V, Renders CM, Halberstadt J, Nusselder W, den Hertog K, Chinapaw M, Verhoeff A, Stronks K. Development of an action programme tackling obesity-related behaviours in adolescents: a participatory system dynamics approach. Health Res Policy Syst 2024; 22:30. [PMID: 38429775 PMCID: PMC10908105 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01116-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
System dynamics approaches are increasingly addressing the complexity of public health problems such as childhood overweight and obesity. These approaches often use system mapping methods, such as the construction of causal loop diagrams, to gain an understanding of the system of interest. However, there is limited practical guidance on how such a system understanding can inform the development of an action programme that can facilitate systems changes. The Lifestyle Innovations Based on Youth Knowledge and Experience (LIKE) programme combines system dynamics and participatory action research to improve obesity-related behaviours, including diet, physical activity, sleep and sedentary behaviour, in 10-14-year-old adolescents in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. This paper illustrates how we used a previously obtained understanding of the system of obesity-related behaviours in adolescents to develop an action programme to facilitate systems changes. A team of evaluation researchers guided interdisciplinary action-groups throughout the process of identifying mechanisms, applying the Intervention Level Framework to identify leverage points and arriving at action ideas with aligning theories of change. The LIKE action programme consisted of 8 mechanisms, 9 leverage points and 14 action ideas which targeted the system's structure and function within multiple subsystems. This illustrates the feasibility of developing actions targeting higher system levels within the confines of a research project timeframe when sufficient and dedicated effort in this process is invested. Furthermore, the system dynamics action programme presented in this study contributes towards the development and implementation of public health programmes that aim to facilitate systems changes in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angie Luna Pinzon
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Health Behaviors and Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Wilma Waterlander
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Health Behaviors and Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Naomi de Pooter
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Health Behaviors and Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Teatske Altenburg
- Health Behaviors and Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Coosje Dijkstra
- Health Behaviors and Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Helga Emke
- Health Behaviors and Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma van den Eynde
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Meredith L Overman
- Department of Health Promotion, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, 6229ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent Busch
- Sarphati Amsterdam, Public Health Service (GGD), City of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 100, 1018WT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carry M Renders
- Health Behaviors and Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jutka Halberstadt
- Health Behaviors and Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilma Nusselder
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015CN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karen den Hertog
- Amsterdam Healthy Weight Approach, Public Health Service (GGD), City of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 100, 1018WT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mai Chinapaw
- Health Behaviors and Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arnoud Verhoeff
- Sarphati Amsterdam, Public Health Service (GGD), City of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 100, 1018WT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Sociology, University of Amsterdam, 1018WV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karien Stronks
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Health Behaviors and Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McAlister MM, Namakula P, Annis J, Mihelcic JR, Zhang Q. Rural Sanitation Sustainability Dynamics: Gaining Insight through Participatory and Simulation Modeling. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2024; 58:400-409. [PMID: 38113387 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c09101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
Improved sanitation provides many benefits to human health and well-being and is integral to achieving Sustainable Development Goal Six. However, many nations, including most of sub-Saharan Africa, are not on track to meeting sanitation targets. Recognizing the inherent complexity of environmental health, we used systems thinking to study sanitation sustainability in Uganda. Our study participants, 37 sanitation actors in three rural districts, were engaged in interviews, group model building workshops, and a survey. The resulting model was parametrized and calibrated using publicly available data and data collected through the Uganda Sanitation for Health Activity. Our simulations revealed slippage from improved sanitation in all study districts, a behavior reflected in real interventions. This implies that systemic changes-changes to the rules and relationships in the system-may be required to improve sanitation outcomes in this context. Adding reinforcing feedback targeting households' perceived value of sanitation yielded promising simulation results. We conclude with the following general recommendations for those designing sanitation policies or interventions: (1) conceptualize sanitation systems in terms of reinforcing and balancing feedback, (2) consider using participatory and simulation modeling to build confidence in these conceptual models, and (3) design many experiments (e.g., simulation scenarios) to test and improve understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha M McAlister
- Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Avenue, Tampa, Florida 33620, United States
| | - Patricia Namakula
- Tetra Tech, USAID Uganda Sanitation for Health Activity, Plot 12A, Farady Road, Tetra Tech, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Jonathan Annis
- Tetra Tech, USAID Uganda Sanitation for Health Activity, Plot 12A, Farady Road, Tetra Tech, Kampala, Uganda
| | - James R Mihelcic
- Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Avenue, Tampa, Florida 33620, United States
| | - Qiong Zhang
- Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Avenue, Tampa, Florida 33620, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Malakellis M, Wong Shee A, Murray M, Alston L, Versace VL, Allender S, Mc Namara K. A qualitative system model to describe the causes and drivers of frequent potentially avoidable presentations to the emergency department. Heliyon 2023; 9:e21304. [PMID: 38027925 PMCID: PMC10658286 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Frequent potentially avoidable presentations to Emergency Departments (EDs) represent a complex problem, driven by multiple interdependent and interacting factors that change over time and influence one another. We sought to describe and map the drivers of frequent potentially avoidable presentations to a regional ED, servicing regional and rural areas, and identify possible solutions from the perspectives of key stakeholders. This study used a qualitative, community-based systems dynamics approach utilising Group Model Building (GMB). Data were collected from two 3-h online workshops embedded with small-group discussions and conducted with stakeholder groups operating within a regional health system. Stakeholders were guided through a series of participatory tasks to develop a causal loop diagram (CLD) using Systems Thinking in Community Knowledge Exchange software (n=29, workshop one), identify potential action points and generate a prioritised action list to intervene in the system (n=21, workshop two). Data were collected through note taking, real-time system mapping, and recording the workshops. Each action was considered against the Public Health 12 framework describing twelve leverage points to intervene in a system. A CLD illustrating the complex and interrelated factors that drive frequent potentially avoidable ED presentations was developed and classified into four categories: (1) access to services; (2) coordination; (3) patient needs; and (4) knowledge and skills. Nine action areas were identified, with many relating to care and service coordination. Most actions aligned with lower-level system impact actions. This study provides an in-depth understanding of influencing factors and potential solutions for frequent potentially avoidable ED presentations across a regional health system. The CLD demonstrates frequent potentially avoidable ED presentations are a complex problem and identified that a prevention response should engage with system- and individual-level solutions. Further work is needed to prioritise actions to support the implementation of higher-level system impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Malakellis
- Deakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anna Wong Shee
- Deakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia
- Grampians Health, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
| | - Margaret Murray
- Deakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia
| | - Laura Alston
- Deakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia
- Colac Area Health Research Unit, Colac, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vincent L. Versace
- Deakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia
| | - Steven Allender
- Global Centre for Preventative Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kevin Mc Namara
- Deakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Patrick R, Noy S, Henderson-Wilson C, Hayward J, Allender S, Gunasiri H, Bruges N, Snell T, Capetola T. Minding our futures: Understanding climate-related mental wellbeing using systems science. Health Place 2023; 84:103134. [PMID: 37976915 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Climate change impacts mental wellbeing through complex pathways and young people are among the most vulnerable to climate-related anxiety. Minding our Futures used methods from systems science to explore this issue and identify actions to promote mental wellbeing for young Australians (18-24 years). METHODS This qualitative study used Group Model Building via three online facilitated workshops recruiting health, youth and climate practitioners and researchers engaged with young people around climate change and/or mental wellbeing (N = 14). Analysis created a systems map and rich description of the relationships between causal factors and their impact on young people. RESULTS Three themes emerged; "Government, Services and Structures" highlighted underlying structural issues including capitalism and political powerlessness; "Social Norms, Communication and Taking Action" reflected social media and misinformation; and "Personal Experience of Environmental Disasters" described the impact of climate-related disasters and importance of nature and place connection. Participants specified connections between the themes and mental health outcomes. CONCLUSION This novel applied translational research process supported key informants to design structural responses to a complex and critical public health issue. Their vision was a multi-faceted approach, co-led with young people, drawing on Indigenous knowledges and change-focused policy, community empowerment and nature-based interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Patrick
- School of Health & Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.
| | - Sue Noy
- School of Health & Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | - Claire Henderson-Wilson
- School of Health & Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | - Josh Hayward
- School of Health & Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia; Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Steven Allender
- School of Health & Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia; Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Hasini Gunasiri
- School of Health & Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | - Nicole Bruges
- School of Health & Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | - Tristan Snell
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | - Teresa Capetola
- School of Health & Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Williams AJ, Wyatt K, Stevens K, Price L. A complexity-informed in-depth case study into the sustainability and impact of a culture of health: The TR14ers community youth dance group. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0293274. [PMID: 37878601 PMCID: PMC10599586 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
There are calls for researchers to study existing community assets and activities that appear to improve health and have achieved longevity. The TR14ers Community Dance Charity Limited is a community youth dance group that has been running since 2005 providing free weekly sessions for children and adolescents in an economically disadvantaged town in the UK. An in-depth case study employing qualitative, quantitative and participatory methods was undertaken with the TR14ers (current participants and those who have left, co-ordinators and families) over 6 months with the aim of understanding the sustainable processes and impact of the Group. The 12 complex systems' leverage points described by Meadows and the five domains of adolescent wellbeing developed by the United Nations H6+ Technical Working Group on Adolescent Health and Well-Being were used as frameworks to recognise the complexity of community assets like the TR14ers. The quantitative and qualitative data indicated that being part of the TR14ers contributed to multiple health and wellbeing outcomes. The positive experiences of being a TR14er led members to actively recruit others through word of mouth and public performances. Central to the TR14ers is a commitment to children's rights, which is communicated formally and informally throughout the membership informing how and what the Group does, leading to the structure and delivery of the Group evolving over time. Members sought to ensure the sustainability of the Group after they had left and were keen to mentor younger members to develop and become the leaders. Based on the insights from this case study we suggest that efforts to develop cultures of health, like the TR14ers, should focus on the core values of the activity or intervention that underpin what it does and how within the local context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew James Williams
- Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom
| | - Katrina Wyatt
- Department of Community and Health Sciences, Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom
| | - Kelly Stevens
- Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa Price
- Department of Sports Science and Public Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Whelan J, Brimblecombe J, Christian M, Vargas C, Ferguson M, McMahon E, Lee A, Bell C, Boelsen-Robinson T, Blake MR, Lewis M, Alston L, Allender S. CO-Creation and Evaluation of Food Environments to Advance Community Health (COACH). AJPM FOCUS 2023; 2:100111. [PMID: 37790671 PMCID: PMC10546519 DOI: 10.1016/j.focus.2023.100111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Food environments are a key determinant of food intake and diet-related health. This paper describes the development of an iterative, adaptive, context-specific framework for health-enabling food environments embedded in cocreation theory. Methods A 3-stage multimethod framework for the coproduction and prototyping of public health interventions was followed in an iterative manner during the development of the framework. These 3 stages were (1) evidence review, including systematic review, consultation with experts, and observation of current work; (2) codesign of the framework prototype with multiple stakeholders; and (3) coproduction through refinement of the prototype through stakeholder workshops and expert reviews with incorporation of researcher notes and workshop evaluation. We use the term prototype during the development phase and the term framework to report on the final product. Results COACH (CO-creation and evaluation of food environments to Advance Community Health) is a process framework that describes what best practice application of cocreation in health-enabling food retail environments should involve. COACH consists of 10 interdependent factors within a 4-phase continuous quality improvement cycle. The 4 phases of the cycle are engagement and governance establishment, communication and policy alignment, codesign and implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. Conclusions Utilizing cocreation theory represents an innovative step in research and practice to improve the healthiness of food retail environments. COACH provides a specific, unique, and comprehensive guide to the utilization of cocreation to improve the healthiness of food environments in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jillian Whelan
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition (GLOBE), Institute of Health Transformation, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Julie Brimblecombe
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Meaghan Christian
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Carmen Vargas
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition (GLOBE), Institute of Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Megan Ferguson
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Disease Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, Australia
| | - Emma McMahon
- Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Disease Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, Australia
| | - Amanda Lee
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Colin Bell
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition (GLOBE), Institute of Health Transformation, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Tara Boelsen-Robinson
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition (GLOBE), Institute of Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Miranda R. Blake
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition (GLOBE), Institute of Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Meron Lewis
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Laura Alston
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition (GLOBE), Institute of Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Deakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Australia
| | - Steven Allender
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition (GLOBE), Institute of Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Whelan J, Fraser P, Bolton KA, Love P, Strugnell C, Boelsen-Robinson T, Blake MR, Martin E, Allender S, Bell C. Combining systems thinking approaches and implementation science constructs within community-based prevention: a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:85. [PMID: 37641151 PMCID: PMC10463953 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01023-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systems science offers methods for designing population health interventions while implementation science provides specific guidance for successful implementation. Integrating systems and implementation science may strengthen implementation and enhance and sustain systemic change to achieve system-level outcomes. Little is known about the extent to which these two approaches have been integrated to date. This review aimed to identify and synthesise the peer-reviewed literature that has reported the combined use of systems thinking approaches and implementation science constructs (within the same study), to deliver population health interventions. METHODS A systematic literature search of peer-reviewed original research was conducted across six databases from 2009 to 2021. Journal manuscripts were included if they: (1) reported on a population health study conducted in a community, (2) reported the use of a systems method in the design of the intervention, and (3) used an implementation science theory, framework or model in the delivery of the intervention. Data extracted related to the specific systems methods and definitions and implementation science constructs used. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to assess study quality. RESULTS Of the 9086 manuscripts returned, 320 manuscripts were included for full-text review. Of these, 17 manuscripts that reported on 14 studies were included in the final extraction. The most frequently reported systems methods were a 'whole of community systems approach' (n = 4/14) and 'community-based system dynamics' (n = 2/14). Nineteen different implementation science theories, frameworks and models were used for intervention delivery, with RE-AIM being the only framework used in more than one study. CONCLUSION There are few published peer-reviewed studies using systems thinking and implementation science for designing and delivering population health interventions. An exploration of synergies is worthwhile to operationalise alignment and improve implementation of systems thinking approaches. Review protocol registration PROSPERO CRD42021250419.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jillian Whelan
- School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
- Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, Australia.
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Geelong, Australia.
| | - Penny Fraser
- School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, Australia
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Geelong, Australia
| | - Kristy A Bolton
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, Australia
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Geelong, Australia
| | - Penelope Love
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Geelong, Australia
| | - Claudia Strugnell
- School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Geelong, Australia
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Geelong, Australia
| | - Tara Boelsen-Robinson
- School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, Australia
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Geelong, Australia
| | - Miranda R Blake
- School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, Australia
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Geelong, Australia
| | - Erik Martin
- School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Steven Allender
- School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, Australia
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Geelong, Australia
| | - Colin Bell
- School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, Australia
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Baugh Littlejohns L, Near E, McKee G, Rasali D, Naiman D, Faulkner G. A scoping review of complex systems methods used in population physical activity research: do they align with attributes of a whole system approach? Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:18. [PMID: 36864409 PMCID: PMC9979563 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-00961-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complex systems approaches are increasingly used in health promotion and noncommunicable disease prevention research, policy and practice. Questions emerge as to the best ways to take a complex systems approach, specifically with respect to population physical activity (PA). Using an Attributes Model is one way to understand complex systems. We aimed to examine the types of complex systems methods used in current PA research and identify what methods align with a whole system approach as reflected by an Attributes Model. METHODS A scoping review was conducted and two databases were searched. Twenty-five articles were selected and data analysis was based upon the following: the complex systems research methods used, research aims, if participatory methods were used and evidence of discussion regarding attributes of systems. RESULTS There were three groups of methods used: system mapping, simulation modelling and network analysis. System mapping methods appeared to align best with a whole system approach to PA promotion because they largely aimed to understand complex systems, examined interactions and feedback among variables, and used participatory methods. Most of these articles focused on PA (as opposed to integrated studies). Simulation modelling methods were largely focused on examining complex problems and identifying interventions. These methods did not generally focus on PA or use participatory methods. While network analysis articles focused on examining complex systems and identifying interventions, they did not focus on PA nor use participatory methods. All attributes were discussed in some way in the articles. Attributes were explicitly reported on in terms of findings or were part of discussion and conclusion sections. System mapping methods appear to be well aligned with a whole system approach because these methods addressed all attributes in some way. We did not find this pattern with other methods. CONCLUSIONS Future research using complex systems methods may benefit from applying the Attributes Model in conjunction with system mapping methods. Simulation modelling and network analysis methods are seen as complementary and could be used when system mapping methods identify priorities for further investigation (e.g. what interventions to implement or how densely connected relationships are in systems).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lori Baugh Littlejohns
- BC Centre for Disease Control, 655 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada. .,School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, 210-6081 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada.
| | - Erin Near
- grid.34429.380000 0004 1936 8198Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Stewart Building, Building #45, Rm 2509, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1 Canada
| | - Geoff McKee
- grid.418246.d0000 0001 0352 641XBC Centre for Disease Control, 655 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4R4 Canada ,grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 E Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3 Canada
| | - Drona Rasali
- grid.418246.d0000 0001 0352 641XBC Centre for Disease Control, 655 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4R4 Canada ,grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 E Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3 Canada
| | - Daniel Naiman
- grid.453059.e0000000107220098BC Ministry of Health, Stn Prov Govt, PO Box 9646, Victoria, BC V8W 9P1 Canada
| | - Guy Faulkner
- grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, 210-6081 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rod MH, Rod NH, Russo F, Klinker CD, Reis R, Stronks K. Promoting the health of vulnerable populations: Three steps towards a systems-based re-orientation of public health intervention research. Health Place 2023; 80:102984. [PMID: 36773380 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.102984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
This paper proposes a novel framework for the development of interventions in vulnerable populations. The framework combines a complex systems lens with syndemic theory. Whereas funding bodies, research organizations and reporting guidelines tend to encourage intervention research that (i) focuses on singular and predefined health outcomes, (ii) searches for generalizable cause-effect relationships, and (iii) aims to identify universally effective interventions, the paper suggests that a different direction is needed for addressing health inequities: We need to (i) start with exploratory analysis of population-level data, and (ii) invest in contextualized in-depth knowledge of the complex dynamics that produce health inequities in specific populations and settings, while we (iii) work with stakeholders at multiple levels to create change within systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morten Hulvej Rod
- Health Promotion Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark; National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark; Institute for Advanced Study, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Naja Hulvej Rod
- Institute for Advanced Study, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Section of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark
| | - Federica Russo
- Institute for Advanced Study, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Philosophy & ILLC, Amsterdam University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Charlotte Demant Klinker
- Health Promotion Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Ria Reis
- Department of Public Health & Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Karien Stronks
- Institute for Advanced Study, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nau T, Perry S, Giles-Corti B, Bellew W, Bauman A, Smith BJ. Mapping and analysis of laws influencing built environments for walking and cycling in Australia. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:108. [PMID: 36647061 PMCID: PMC9841659 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14897-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physical inactivity is a significant public health concern, with limited signs of improvement despite a global commitment to achieving the World Health Organization's target of 15% reduction by 2030. A systems approach is required to tackle this issue, involving the creation of environments that are conducive to physical activity. Laws represent an important tool for regulating the built environment for physical activity, are a mechanism for systems change, and have the capacity to reorient the goals and rules of a system. However, they are understudied and potentially underutilised for physical activity. Scientific legal mapping is a first step towards understanding how laws could impact the built environment to facilitate greater population physical activity. METHOD We conducted a legal assessment of state and territory laws in Australia, to systematically characterise how they address built environment considerations with specific relevance to walking and cycling. An interdisciplinary team of researchers with public health, law and urban planning expertise was formed to complete the multistage process. Key steps included a systematic search of laws using a combination of original legal research, consultation of secondary sources, and review and verification by an urban planning expert; development of a coding scheme; and completion of coding and quality control procedures. RESULTS Most jurisdictions in Australia do not currently embed objectives in primary legislation that would promote physical activity and support an integrated approach to land use and transport planning that encourages active and sustainable lifestyles. Only two jurisdictions addressed the large majority of evidence-based standards that promote active living. Of the standards addressed in law, few fully met evidence-based recommendations. While most jurisdictions legislated responsibility for enforcement of planning law, few legislated obligations for monitoring implementation. CONCLUSION Increasing physical activity is a systems issue, requiring actions across multiple sectors. An in-depth examination of the legal environment is an important step towards understanding and influencing the existing physical activity system, why it may not be generating desired outcomes, and potential opportunities for improvement. Our findings reveal opportunities where laws could be strengthened to promote more active environments. Updating this dataset periodically will generate longitudinal data that could be used to evaluate the impact of these laws on the built environment and physical activity behaviours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy Nau
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XPrevention Research Collaboration, Charles Perkins Centre, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia ,grid.507593.dThe Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Sean Perry
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XThe University of Sydney Law School, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Billie Giles-Corti
- grid.507593.dThe Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sydney, NSW Australia ,grid.1017.70000 0001 2163 3550Healthy Liveable Cities Lab, RMIT University, Centre for Urban Research, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - William Bellew
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XPrevention Research Collaboration, Charles Perkins Centre, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia ,grid.507593.dThe Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Adrian Bauman
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XPrevention Research Collaboration, Charles Perkins Centre, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia ,grid.507593.dThe Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Ben J. Smith
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XPrevention Research Collaboration, Charles Perkins Centre, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia ,grid.507593.dThe Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sydney, NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pronk NP, Mabry PL, Bond S, Arena R, Faghy MA. Systems science approaches to cardiovascular disease prevention and management in the era of COVID-19: A Humpty-Dumpty dilemma? Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2023; 76:69-75. [PMID: 36563922 PMCID: PMC9764826 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2022.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic necessitated the implementation and prioritizing of strict public health strategies to mitigate COVID-19 transmission and infection over all else. As we enter a 'recovery' phase in which the impact of the virus recedes (but does not relent), we ask, "How do we develop a game plan that considers prevention over management of public health threats of a more chronic nature, including cardiovascular disease?" We frame this choice point as a "Humpty-Dumpty" moment for public health with enduring and potentially irreversible consequences. Citing clear examples of other public health successes and failures, we outline in detail how sustaining cardiovascular population health under complex post-pandemic conditions will necessitate decision-making to be informed with a systems science approach, in which interventions, goals, outcomes and features of complex systems are carefully aligned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolaas P Pronk
- HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Healthy Living for Pandemic Event Protection (HL-PIVOT) Network, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | | | - Sam Bond
- Department of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA; Healthy Living for Pandemic Event Protection (HL-PIVOT) Network, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ross Arena
- Healthy Living for Pandemic Event Protection (HL-PIVOT) Network, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA
| | - Mark A Faghy
- Healthy Living for Pandemic Event Protection (HL-PIVOT) Network, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA; Biomedical Research Theme, School of Human Sciences, University of Derby, UK
| |
Collapse
|