1
|
Fishman M, Wenzel K, Gauthier P, Borodovsky J, Murray O, Subramaniam G, Levy S, Fredyma E, McLeman B, Marsch LA. Engagement, initiation, and retention in medication treatment for opioid use disorder among young adults: A narrative review of challenges and opportunities. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE AND ADDICTION TREATMENT 2024; 166:209352. [PMID: 38494051 PMCID: PMC11392652 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) is a catastrophic public health problem for young adults (YAs) and their families. While medication for OUD (MOUD) is safe, effective, and recognized as the standard of care, its' uptake and success have been limited in YAs compared to older adults. METHODS This narrative review summarizes the existing literature and highlights select studies regarding barriers to YA MOUD, potential explanations for those barriers, and strategies to overcome them. RESULTS Barriers are prominent along the entire cascade of care, including: treatment engagement and entry, MOUD initiation, and MOUD retention. Hypothesized explanations for barriers include: developmental vulnerability, inadequate treatment system capacity, stigma against MOUD, among others. Interventions to address barriers include: promotion of family involvement, increasing provider capacity, integration of MOUD into primary care, assertive outreach, and others. CONCLUSIONS Integrating an adapted version of family coaching from the Community Reinforcement Approach and Family Training (CRAFT) and other models into YA MOUD treatment serves as an example of an emerging novel practice that holds promise for broadening the funnel of engagement in treatment and initiation of MOUD, and enhancing treatment outcomes. This and other developmentally-informed approaches should be evaluated as part of a high-priority clinical and research agenda for improving OUD treatment for YAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Fishman
- Maryland Treatment Centers, 3800 Frederick Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21229, USA; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Dept of Psychiatry, 3800 Frederick Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21229, USA.
| | - Kevin Wenzel
- Maryland Treatment Centers, 3800 Frederick Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21229, USA
| | - Phoebe Gauthier
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, 46 Centerra Parkway, Suite 315, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA
| | - Jacob Borodovsky
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, 46 Centerra Parkway, Suite 315, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA
| | - Owen Murray
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, 46 Centerra Parkway, Suite 315, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA
| | - Geetha Subramaniam
- Center for Clinical Trials Network, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Ave, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Sharon Levy
- Boston Children's Hospital, Division of Addiction Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Emma Fredyma
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, 46 Centerra Parkway, Suite 315, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA
| | - Bethany McLeman
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, 46 Centerra Parkway, Suite 315, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA
| | - Lisa A Marsch
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, 46 Centerra Parkway, Suite 315, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lynch V, Clemans-Cope L. Initiation and Receipt of Medication for Opioid Use Disorder Among Adolescents and Young Adults in 4 State Medicaid Programs in 2018: Improving Medicaid Quality Metrics. SUBSTANCE USE & ADDICTION JOURNAL 2024; 45:434-445. [PMID: 38294428 DOI: 10.1177/29767342241227791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in youth can reduce harms but many youths do not receive MOUD. Improving quality metrics of MOUD among youth can advance interventions for youth with opioid use disorder (OUD). METHODS We relied on 2018 Medicaid claims data from California, Colorado, Massachusetts, and New Mexico. We calculated the percentage of youth with OUD included in the quality metric for initiation, and the percentage who initiated by state. We also calculated the percentage excluded from the quality metric for initiation because they have an existing episode of OUD care and their MOUD receipt. We compared the characteristics of those who initiated/received MOUD to those who did not and compared state estimates after adjusting for age and health conditions. RESULTS Estimates of initiation exclude about half of the youth with OUD because they were in an existing episode of OUD care and could not be observed initiating. Among youth in a new episode of OUD care, only about 1 in 4 initiated and state estimates varied from 18.9% to 40.1%. Among youth with an existing episode of OUD care, more than half received MOUD and state estimates ranged from 35.2% to 71.3%. Youth who initiated MOUD or received MOUD with an existing OUD had more severe OUD but fewer co-occurring substance use disorders or mental or physical health diagnoses. After adjusting for age and health conditions, MOUD still varied substantially across states. CONCLUSIONS Most youth with a new OUD diagnosis do not initiate MOUD but more than half of the youth in an existing OUD diagnosis receive MOUD. MOUD quality metrics that are disaggregated, adjusted, and inclusive of youth in an existing episode of care provide additional insight into opportunities to better support youth who might choose MOUD. State differences should be further studied for insight into policies that may affect MOUD.
Collapse
|
3
|
Monico LB, Fletcher JB, Ross T, Schwartz RP, Fishman MJ, Gryczynski J, Mitchell SG. Patient and provider medication preferences affect treatment outcomes among adolescents and young adults with opioid use disorder. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE AND ADDICTION TREATMENT 2024; 162:209334. [PMID: 38531508 PMCID: PMC11163270 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The opioid epidemic in the United States has not spared youth or young adults, as evidenced by a six-fold increase in opioid use disorder (OUD) diagnoses in the last two decades. Given this dramatic rise, a call for greater uptake and accessibility of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUDs) among youth and young adults has ensued, resulting in an increasing number of MOUD treatment pathways for this vulnerable population. METHODS This secondary data analysis seeks to characterize patient and provider preferences for MOUD treatment pathways, and test for associations between baseline MOUD treatment preferences and opioid use and treatment adherence outcomes. Participants included 288 youth and young adults (age 15-21 years), recruited from a residential treatment program in Maryland. The study assessed patient preferences at baseline (n = 253) and provider preferences at patient treatment discharge (n = 224). Mixed-effects negative binomial regression models were conducted for opioid use outcomes, and logistic regressions were conducted for treatment adherence outcomes. RESULTS Results indicate that congruence of treatment with patients' (Incidence Rate Ratio [IRR] = 0.65) and providers' (IRR = 0.66) preferences was significantly associated with reduced self-reported days of opioid use in the past 90 days, but only for patients receiving extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX). Results also indicated that patients were less likely to switch medication treatment pathways (e.g., from XR-NTX to buprenorphine, or vice versa) during follow-up if they received their preferred treatment at baseline, a finding which held true for both XR-NTX (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.32) and buprenorphine (OR = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS Receipt of MOUD congruent with patient and provider preferences was associated with reduced opioid use and greater treatment adherence in this sample of youth and young adults with OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura B Monico
- Friends Research Institute Inc, United States of America.
| | | | - Tyler Ross
- Memorial University of Newfoundland, United States of America
| | | | - Marc J Fishman
- Maryland Treatment Centers Inc, United States of America
| | - Jan Gryczynski
- Friends Research Institute Inc, United States of America
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
O'Reilly LM, Schwartz K, Brown SA, Dir A, Gillenwater L, Adams Z, Zapolski T, Hulvershorn LA, Aalsma M. Attitudes toward and training in medications for opioid use disorders: a descriptive analysis among employees in the youth legal system and community mental health centers. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2024; 19:32. [PMID: 38907286 PMCID: PMC11193280 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-024-00614-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research demonstrates gaps in medications for opioid use disorder uptake (MOUDs; methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone) especially among adolescents. These gaps may be partly attributable to attitudes about and training in MOUDs among youth-serving professionals. We extended prior research by conducting descriptive analyses of attitudes regarding effectiveness and acceptability of MOUDs, as well as training in MOUDs, among youth legal system (YLS) employees and community mental health center (CMHC) personnel who interface professionally with youth. METHODS Using survey data from participants (n = 181) recruited from eight Midwest counties, we examined: (1) differences in MOUD attitudes/training by MOUD type and (2) by respondent demographics, and (3) prediction of MOUD attitudes/training by participant-reported initiatives to implement evidence-based practices (EBPs), workplace culture around EBPs, and workplace stress. Attitudes and training were measured in reference to five MOUD types (methadone, oral buprenorphine, injectable buprenorphine, oral naltrexone, injectable naltrexone) on three subscales (effectiveness, acceptability, training). RESULTS Wilcoxon signed-rank tests demonstrated that most outcomes differed significantly by MOUD type (differences observed among 22 of 30 tests). Kruskal-Wallis tests suggested MOUD differences based on demographics. For methadone, CMHC providers endorsed greater perceived effectiveness than YLS providers and age explained significant differences in perceived effectiveness. For buprenorphine, CHMC providers viewed oral or injectable buprenorphine as more effective than YLS employees, respondents from more rural counties viewed oral buprenorphine as more effective than those from less rural counties, and age explained differences in perceived effectiveness. For naltrexone, perceived gender differed by gender. Hierarchical ordinal logistic regression analysis did not find an association between personal initiatives to implement EBPs, workplace culture supporting EBPs, or workplace stress and effectiveness or acceptability of MOUDs. However, personal initiatives to implement EBPs was associated with training in each MOUD. CONCLUSIONS These results highlight a few key findings: effectiveness/acceptability of and training in MOUDs largely differ by MOUD type; setting, rurality, age, gender, and education explain group differences in perceived effectiveness of and training in MOUDs; and implementing EBPs is associated with training in MOUDs. Future research would benefit from examining what predicts change in MOUD attitudes longitudinally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren M O'Reilly
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Katherine Schwartz
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Steven A Brown
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, 401 W. 10th St, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Allyson Dir
- Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Logan Gillenwater
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Zachary Adams
- Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Tamika Zapolski
- Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Leslie A Hulvershorn
- Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Matthew Aalsma
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Buchholz C, Bell LA, Adatia S, Bagley SM, Wilens TE, Nurani A, Hadland SE. Medications for Opioid Use Disorder for Youth: Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perspectives. J Adolesc Health 2024; 74:320-326. [PMID: 37815763 PMCID: PMC10842045 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.08.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical trial data support use of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in adolescents and young adults ("youth"), but qualitative data are lacking on the acceptability and importance of MOUD to youth, caregivers, and clinicians. We assessed how these stakeholders viewed the role of MOUD in treatment and recovery. METHODS We recruited youth aged from 15 to 25 years with opioid use disorder who had received buprenorphine, naltrexone, or methadone and caregivers from a primary care-based youth addiction treatment program. We also recruited clinicians with addiction expertise from social work, nursing, pediatrics, internal medicine, and psychiatry. We conducted semistructured interviews assessing special considerations for MOUD use in youth. Three coders performed inductive and deductive thematic analysis of transcripts. RESULTS Among 37 participants, including 15 youth (age range, 17-25 years), nine caregivers, and 13 clinicians, we identified three themes. (1) Medications support recovery in the short term: Youth described MOUD as beneficial in managing withdrawal symptoms. Notably, some youth and caregivers preferred to limit MOUD duration. (2) Medication adherence is affected by type of medication, dosing regimen, and route of administration. Participants endorsed long-acting, injectable MOUD for ease of use and youth's ability to continue engagement in "normal activities" without daily medication. (3) Caregiver involvement can support medication decisions and adherence. Youth and some clinicians described the need to assess caregiver involvement before incorporating them into treatment; caregivers and other clinicians described caregivers as critical in supporting accountability. DISCUSSION MOUD is evidence-based, and its provision should be developmentally responsive and youth- and family-centered, incorporating caregivers when appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connor Buchholz
- Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Mass General for Children, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lauren A Bell
- Department of Pediatrics-Section of Adolescent Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Safina Adatia
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sarah M Bagley
- Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Timothy E Wilens
- Pediatric Psychopharmacology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alykhan Nurani
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Scott E Hadland
- Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Mass General for Children, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
McInerney K, Marchand K, Buckley J, Gao C, Kestler A, Mathias S, Argyle A, Barbic S. Informing youth-centred opioid agonist treatment: Findings from a retrospective chart review of youths' characteristics and patterns of opioid agonist treatment engagement in a novel integrated youth services program. Early Interv Psychiatry 2023; 17:1028-1037. [PMID: 37259685 DOI: 10.1111/eip.13446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
AIM Youth ages 12-24 account for approximately 20% of overdoses and yet are poorly reached by opioid agonist treatment (OAT), the most widely recommended treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). This study contributes to understanding this critical gap by describing youths' patterns of OAT engagement at a novel integrated youth-specific OAT program. METHODS A retrospective chart review was carried out on electronic medical records of n = 23 youth with OUD accessing a community-based integrated youth services (IYS) centre. Data abstraction focused on four domains: sociodemographic, social determinants of health, patterns of OAT engagement, and other services utilized. RESULTS Youths' mean age was 22.6 years (SD = 2.1), with a mean age of first opioid use of 17.4 (SD = 2.7). Youth reported extensive histories of adverse childhood experiences, concurrent mental and physical health complications, and poly-substance use. All youth were offered OAT and 83% initiated treatment with buprenorphine/naloxone, methadone, or slow-release oral morphine. Among those initiating OAT, 42.1% were considered stable on OAT. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first empirical study to describe youths' OAT engagement in an integrated youth-specific OAT program. Our findings demonstrated that a high proportion of youth with OUD initiated OAT in this novel program with varying degrees of OAT stability. These findings can be used to inform the development and implementation of youth-specific and integrated OAT. To account for the novelty of this area of study and small sample sizes, future collaborative efforts across IYS initiatives should be considered, including mixed method approaches to understand outcomes and experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly McInerney
- Foundry North Shore, North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kirsten Marchand
- Foundry Central Office, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Chloe Gao
- Foundry Central Office, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Diamond Health Care Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andrew Kestler
- Centre for Health Evaluation Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Diamond Health Care Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Steve Mathias
- Foundry Central Office, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Providence Research, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, The Unviersity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Aubree Argyle
- School of Nursing and Human Physiology, Gonzaga University, Spokane, WA, USA
| | - Skye Barbic
- Foundry Central Office, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hogue A, Bobek M, MacLean A, Schumm JA, Wenzel K, Fishman M. Relationship-Oriented Recovery System for Youth (RORSY): Clinical Protocol for Transition-Age Youth with Opioid Use Disorders. HSOA JOURNAL OF ADDICTION & ADDICTIVE DISORDERS 2023; 10:144. [PMID: 38707487 PMCID: PMC11068080 DOI: 10.24966/aad-7276/100144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
This article introduces the Relationship-Oriented Recovery System for Youth (RORSY) protocol, which is designed to increase uptake of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) and related services among adolescents and young adults. Youth exhibit alarmingly poor rates of MOUD initiation and adherence, OUD services involvement and long-term recovery success. RORSY attends to three developmentally unique recovery needs of this age group: assess and bolster youth recovery capital, prioritize involvement of concerned significant others, and use digital direct-to-consumer recovery supports. RORSY contains five evidence-informed intervention modules that can be flexibly tailored to meet the individual and relationship needs of a given youth: Relational Orientation, Youth Recovery Management Planning, Relational Recovery Management Planning, Relationship Skills Building, and Digital Recovery Support Planning. The article concludes with practice and policy recommendations for making relationship-building a top clinical priority for addressing youth OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jeremiah A Schumm
- OneFifteen, Inc./Samaritan Behavioral Health, Inc., Wright
State University, Dayton, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lu W, Lopez-Castro T, Vu T. Population-based examination of substance use disorders and treatment use among US young adults in the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2011-2019. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE REPORTS 2023; 8:100181. [PMID: 37593411 PMCID: PMC10430156 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2023.100181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
Background Compared with adults of other age groups, young adults are more likely to have substance use disorders (SUDs) but less likely to receive treatment. Untreated SUDs can lead to lethal consequences, particularly deaths related to drug overdose. Objectives This study aimed to examine trends and sociodemographic differences in the prevalence and treatment use of SUDs among US young adults aged 18 to 25 in the National Survey on Drug Use and Health 2011-2019. Methods Bivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine annual changes in the prevalence and treatment use of SUDs, and multivariable logistic regression was used to examine sociodemographic differences in SUD prevalence and treatment use in the pooled sample of young adults from 2011 to 2019. Results From 2011 to 2019, the overall SUD prevalence increased significantly from 5.4% to 6.2%. Cannabis use disorder was the most common SUD annually. Groups with lower prevalence of SUDs included females, young adults aged 22-25, and Hispanic, Black, and Asian participants. Across the survey years, the prevalence of treatment use fluctuated insignificantly between 10.9% and 16.9% among young adults with SUDs, and most young adults received SUD treatment in self-help groups and residential and outpatient rehabilitation facilities. Compared to White participants, treatment use was lower in Hispanic, Black, Asian participants, as well as young adults of two or more races. Young adults covered by Medicaid/CHIP were more likely to use treatment. Conclusions This study revealed an alarming level of unmet treatment need and significant disparities in treatment use among young adults with SUDs. To reduce barriers to treatment utilization, more coordinated efforts that leverage policy and structural changes alongside innovations to engage young adults with SUD care are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenhua Lu
- Department of Community Health and Social Medicine, School of Medicine, The City University of New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Thinh Vu
- Center for Innovation in Mental Health, Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, The City University of New York, New York, USA
- Department of Community Health and Social Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, The City University of New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ramey OL, Bonny AE, Silva Almodóvar A, Nahata MC. Retention in Office-Based Opioid Treatment and Impact on Emergency Department Use in Adolescents and Young Adults With Opioid Use Disorder. J Adolesc Health 2023; 73:148-154. [PMID: 37032210 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Longer retention in medication treatment (MT) of addiction is associated with improved health outcomes among adults with opioid use disorder. MT remains underutilized among adolescents and young adults (AYA); factors associated with MT retention are not well-defined and effect of retention on treatment outcomes is unknown. This study examined patient characteristics associated with retention in an office-based opioid treatment program for AYA patients and determined the impact of retention time on emergency department (ED) utilization. METHODS This was a retrospective study of AYA patients from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2020. Retention time was the difference between first and last appointment, analyzing follow-up periods of one and two years. Linear regression assessed factors associated with retention. Negative binomial regression showed effect of retention on ED utilization. RESULTS A total of 407 patients were included. Factors positively associated with retention were diagnosis of anxiety, depression, and nicotine use disorder, White race, private insurance, and Medicaid insurance; however, stimulant/cocaine use disorder was negatively associated (one-year follow-up, p ≤ .028; two-year follow-up, p ≤ .017). Longer retention was associated with reduced risk of ED utilization at one-year (incident rate ratio = 0.84, 95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.99; p = .03) and two-year follow-ups (incident rate ratio = 0.86 95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.96; p = .008). DISCUSSION Diagnosis of anxiety, depression, nicotine use disorder, and stimulant/cocaine use disorder, and insurance and race can influence retention in MT. Longer retention in MT was associated with lower ED visits, decreasing health care utilization. MT programs should evaluate various interventions to optimize opportunities for increasing retention among their patient cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia L Ramey
- Institute of Therapeutic Innovations and Outcomes (ITIO), Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Andrea E Bonny
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; Division of Adolescent Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Armando Silva Almodóvar
- Institute of Therapeutic Innovations and Outcomes (ITIO), Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Milap C Nahata
- Institute of Therapeutic Innovations and Outcomes (ITIO), Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy, Columbus, Ohio; The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Welsh JW, Sitar SI, Hunter BD, Godley MD, Dennis ML. Substance use severity as a predictor for receiving medication for opioid use disorder among adolescents: An analysis of the 2019 TEDS. Drug Alcohol Depend 2023; 246:109850. [PMID: 36989708 PMCID: PMC10121859 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is vastly underutilized in adolescents. Existing treatment guidelines for OUD largely focus on adults, providing limited guidance for pediatric populations. Limited information is known about use of MOUD in adolescents based on substance use severity. METHODS This secondary data analysis examined how patient-level variables influenced the receipt of MOUD in adolescents aged 12-17 (n = 1866) using the Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS) 2019 Discharge data set. A crosstabulation and chi-square statistic evaluated the relationship between a proxy for clinical need based on high-risk opioid use (either reporting daily opioid use within the past 30 days and/or history of injection opioid use) for MOUD in states with and without adolescents receiving MOUD (n = 1071). A two-step logistic regression analysis in states with any adolescents receiving MOUD examined the explanatory power of demographic, treatment intake, and substance use characteristics. RESULTS Completion of 12th grade, a GED, or beyond, decreased the likelihood of receiving MOUD (odds ratio [OR]= 0.38, p = 0.017), as did being female (OR = 0.47, p = .006). None of the remaining clinical criteria were significantly associated with MOUD, although a history of one or more arrests increased the likelihood of MOUD (OR = 6.98, p = 0.06). Only 13% of individuals who met criteria for clinical need received MOUD. CONCLUSIONS Lower education could serve as a proxy for substance use severity. Guidelines and best practices are needed to ensure the proper distribution of MOUD to adolescents based on clinical need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine W Welsh
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1821 Clifton Road, NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
| | - Siara I Sitar
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1821 Clifton Road, NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
| | - Brooke D Hunter
- Chestnut Health Systems, 448 Wylie Drive, Normal, IL 61761, USA
| | - Mark D Godley
- Chestnut Health Systems, 448 Wylie Drive, Normal, IL 61761, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Giang K, Charlesworth R, Thulien M, Mulholland A, Barker B, Brar R, Pauly B, Fast D. Risk mitigation guidance and safer supply prescribing among young people who use drugs in the context of COVID-19 and overdose emergencies. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2023; 115:104023. [PMID: 37059025 PMCID: PMC10067449 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
Across North America, overlapping overdose and COVID-19 emergencies have had a substantial impact on young people who use drugs (YPWUD). New risk mitigation guidance (RMG) prescribing practices were introduced in British Columbia, Canada, in 2020 to allow people to decrease risk of overdose and withdrawal and better self-isolate. We examined how the prescribing of hydromorphone tablets specifically impacted YPWUD's substance use and care trajectories. Between April 2020 and July 2021, we conducted virtual interviews with 30 YPWUD who had accessed an RMG prescription of hydromorphone in the previous six months and 10 addiction medicine physicians working in Vancouver. A thematic analysis was conducted. YPWUD participants highlighted a disjuncture between risk mitigation prescriptions and the safe supply of unadulterated substances such as fentanyl, underscoring that having access to the latter is critical to reducing their reliance on street-based drug markets and overdose-related risks. They described re-appropriating these prescriptions to meet their needs, stockpiling hydromorphone so that it could be used as an “emergency backup” when they were unable to procure unregulated, illicit opioids. In the context of entrenched poverty, hydromorphone was also used to generate income for the purchase of drugs and various necessities. For some YPWUD, hydromorphone prescriptions could be used alongside opioid agonist therapy (OAT) to reduce withdrawal and cravings and improve adherence to OAT. However, some physicians were wary of prescribing hydromorphone due to the lack of evidence for this new approach. Our findings underscore the importance of providing YPWUD with a safe supply of the substances they are actively using alongside a continuum of substance use treatment and care, and the need for both medical and community-based safe and safer supply models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Giang
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, 317-2914 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Reith Charlesworth
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada
| | - Madison Thulien
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada
| | - Alanna Mulholland
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada; Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, 520 West 6(th) Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1A1, Canada
| | - Brittany Barker
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada; Canadian Institute of Substance Use Research, 2300 McKenzie Avenue, Victoria, BC V8N 5M8, Canada
| | - Rupinder Brar
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, 317-2914 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada; Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, 520 West 6(th) Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1A1, Canada
| | - Bernie Pauly
- Canadian Institute of Substance Use Research, 2300 McKenzie Avenue, Victoria, BC V8N 5M8, Canada; School of Nursing, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
| | - Danya Fast
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada; Department of Medicine (Division of Social Medicine), 317-2914 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Appiah L, John D, Owoade DR, Mendenhall J, Appiah D. Factors Influencing Racial and Ethnic Differences in Prescription Opioid Misuse Among Young Adolescents in the USA, 2009-2019. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2023; 10:32-42. [PMID: 34845676 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-021-01194-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prescription opioid misuse (POM) is an important public health concern. Not many studies have evaluated factors influencing racial and ethnic differences in POM exclusively in young adolescents. We evaluated factors influencing the racial and ethnic differences in POM in a nationally representative sample of 8th- and 10th-grade (12-15 years old) US adolescents. METHODS Data were from 107,786 adolescents who participated in the 2009-2019 Monitoring the Future survey. Logistic regression and mediation analysis were used to identify risk factors for POM and evaluate mediators of the association of race and ethnicity on the frequency of POM in the past year. RESULTS From 2009 to 2019, the prevalence of POM in the past year decreased from 3.2% to 1.8% (p = 0.032), with significant differences in POM trends by race and ethnicity. Overall, the prevalence was higher among non-Hispanic White adolescents (3.2%) than Hispanic (2.5%) and non-Hispanic Black adolescents (1.6%), p < 0.001. After adjustment for demographic, substance use, lifestyle, and family-related factors, the odds of POM were lower among Black (odds ratio (OR) = 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.98) and Hispanic adolescents (OR = 0.64, CI: 0.55-0.74) compared to White adolescents. Illicit drug use and misuse of other prescription drugs together explained 77.2% and 47.3% of the racial and ethnic disparities in POM among Black and Hispanic adolescents, respectively. CONCLUSION In this study, significant racial and ethnic differences in the trends of POM were observed. Illicit drug use and misuse of other prescription drugs substantially explained the racial and ethnic disparities in POM among young adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Appiah
- College of Education, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA
| | - Dijo John
- Department of Public Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 3601 4th Street STOP 9430, Lubbock, TX, 79430, USA
| | - Damilola R Owoade
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Janet Mendenhall
- Department of Public Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Abilene, TX, USA
| | - Duke Appiah
- Department of Public Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 3601 4th Street STOP 9430, Lubbock, TX, 79430, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hogue A, Bobek M, Porter N, MacLean A, Wenzel K, Fishman M, Coatsworth JD, Langer DA. Launching Relationship-Oriented Behavioral Services for Youth Opioid Use Disorder: Innovations in Medication Decision-Making and Adherence Planning. CHILD & FAMILY BEHAVIOR THERAPY 2023; 45:199-225. [PMID: 37767113 PMCID: PMC10531035 DOI: 10.1080/07317107.2023.2172704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
This article presents behavioral interventions designed to enhance uptake and retention on medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) among transition-age youth (16-25 years) enrolled in treatment services. The article describes three relationship-oriented interventions designed to address barriers to MOUD uptake, enhance MOUD adherence planning, and strengthen OUD recovery among youth: Relational Orientation; Medication Education and Decision-making Support, and Family Leadership and Ownership of Adherence to Treatment. These interventions are inter-connected can be delivered flexibly. The article concludes with three case examples that illustrate how these modular interventions can be tailored to meet the needs of diverse client profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Hogue
- Family & Adolescent Clinical Technology & Science, Partnership to End Addiction, New York, USA
| | - Molly Bobek
- Family & Adolescent Clinical Technology & Science, Partnership to End Addiction, New York, USA
| | - Nicole Porter
- Family & Adolescent Clinical Technology & Science, Partnership to End Addiction, New York, USA
| | - Alexandra MacLean
- Family & Adolescent Clinical Technology & Science, Partnership to End Addiction, New York, USA
| | - Kevin Wenzel
- Department of Psychiatry, Maryland Treatment Centers, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Marc Fishman
- Department of Psychiatry, Maryland Treatment Centers, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - J. Douglas Coatsworth
- Knoxville Boyd Center for Business and Economic Research, Social Work, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| | - David. A. Langer
- Department of Psychology, Suffolk University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Krausz M, Westenberg JN, Tsang V, Suen J, Ignaszewski MJ, Mathew N, Azar P, Cabanis M, Elsner J, Vogel M, Spijkerman R, Orsolini L, Vo D, Moore E, Moe J, Strasser J, Köck P, Marian C, Dürsteler KM, Backmund M, Röhrig J, Post M, Haltmayer H, Wladika W, Trabi T, Muller C, Rechberger G, Teesson M, Farrell M, Christie G, Merry S, Mamdouh M, Alinsky R, Levy S, Fishman M, Rosenthal R, Jang K, Choi F. Towards an International Consensus on the Prevention, Treatment, and Management of High-Risk Substance Use and Overdose among Youth. Medicina (B Aires) 2022; 58:medicina58040539. [PMID: 35454376 PMCID: PMC9028633 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58040539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Now more than ever, there is an obvious need to reduce the overall burden of disease and risk of premature mortality that are associated with mental health and substance use disorders among young people. However, the current state of research and evidence-based clinical care for high-risk substance use among youth is fragmented and scarce. The objective of the study is to establish consensus for the prevention, treatment, and management of high-risk substance use and overdose among youth (10 to 24 years old). Materials and Methods: A modified Delphi technique was used based on the combination of scientific evidence and clinical experience of a group of 31 experts representing 10 countries. A semi-structured questionnaire with five domains (clinical risks, target populations, intervention goals, intervention strategies, and settings/expertise) was shared with the panelists. Based on their responses, statements were developed, which were subsequently revised and finalized through three iterations of feedback. Results: Among the five major domains, 60 statements reached consensus. Importantly, experts agreed that screening in primary care and other clinical settings is recommended for all youth, and that the objectives of treating youth with high-risk substance use are to reduce harm and mortality while promoting resilience and healthy development. For all substance use disorders, evidence-based interventions should be available and should be used according to the needs and preferences of the patient. Involuntary admission was the only topic that did not reach consensus, mainly due to its ethical implications and resulting lack of comparable evidence. Conclusions: High-risk substance use and overdoses among youth have become a major challenge. The system’s response has been insufficient and needs substantial change. Internationally devised consensus statements provide a first step in system improvement and reform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Krausz
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2A1, Canada; (M.K.); (V.T.); (J.S.); (M.J.I.); (N.M.); (P.A.); (M.M.); (K.J.); (F.C.)
| | - Jean N. Westenberg
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2A1, Canada; (M.K.); (V.T.); (J.S.); (M.J.I.); (N.M.); (P.A.); (M.M.); (K.J.); (F.C.)
- Center for Mental Health, Clinic for Addiction Medicine and Addictive Behavior, Klinikum Stuttgart, 70374 Stuttgart, Germany; (M.C.); (J.R.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-604-827-4381
| | - Vivian Tsang
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2A1, Canada; (M.K.); (V.T.); (J.S.); (M.J.I.); (N.M.); (P.A.); (M.M.); (K.J.); (F.C.)
| | - Janet Suen
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2A1, Canada; (M.K.); (V.T.); (J.S.); (M.J.I.); (N.M.); (P.A.); (M.M.); (K.J.); (F.C.)
| | - Martha J. Ignaszewski
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2A1, Canada; (M.K.); (V.T.); (J.S.); (M.J.I.); (N.M.); (P.A.); (M.M.); (K.J.); (F.C.)
- Complex Pain and Addiction Service, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
- BC Children’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada;
| | - Nickie Mathew
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2A1, Canada; (M.K.); (V.T.); (J.S.); (M.J.I.); (N.M.); (P.A.); (M.M.); (K.J.); (F.C.)
- Complex Pain and Addiction Service, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
- BC Mental Health & Substance Use Services, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, BC V5Z 3L7, Canada
| | - Pouya Azar
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2A1, Canada; (M.K.); (V.T.); (J.S.); (M.J.I.); (N.M.); (P.A.); (M.M.); (K.J.); (F.C.)
- Complex Pain and Addiction Service, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Maurice Cabanis
- Center for Mental Health, Clinic for Addiction Medicine and Addictive Behavior, Klinikum Stuttgart, 70374 Stuttgart, Germany; (M.C.); (J.R.)
| | - Julie Elsner
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Clinics Basel, University of Basel, 4002 Basel, Switzerland; (J.E.); (M.V.); (J.S.); (P.K.); (C.M.); (K.M.D.)
| | - Marc Vogel
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Clinics Basel, University of Basel, 4002 Basel, Switzerland; (J.E.); (M.V.); (J.S.); (P.K.); (C.M.); (K.M.D.)
- Psychiatric Services of Thurgovia, Division of Substance Use Disorders, 8596 Münsterlingen, Switzerland
| | - Renske Spijkerman
- Parnassia Addiction Research Centre (PARC), Brijder Addiction Treatment, Parnassia Group, 2512 The Hague, The Netherlands; (R.S.); (M.P.)
| | - Laura Orsolini
- Unit of Clinical Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences/DIMSC, School of Medicine and Surgery, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy;
- Psychopharmacology, Drug Misuse and Novel Psychoactive Substances Research Unit, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9EU, UK
| | - Dzung Vo
- BC Children’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada;
- Division of Adolescent Health and Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada;
| | - Eva Moore
- Division of Adolescent Health and Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada;
| | - Jessica Moe
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada;
- BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4R4, Canada
| | - Johannes Strasser
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Clinics Basel, University of Basel, 4002 Basel, Switzerland; (J.E.); (M.V.); (J.S.); (P.K.); (C.M.); (K.M.D.)
| | - Patrick Köck
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Clinics Basel, University of Basel, 4002 Basel, Switzerland; (J.E.); (M.V.); (J.S.); (P.K.); (C.M.); (K.M.D.)
| | - Calin Marian
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Clinics Basel, University of Basel, 4002 Basel, Switzerland; (J.E.); (M.V.); (J.S.); (P.K.); (C.M.); (K.M.D.)
| | - Kenneth M. Dürsteler
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Clinics Basel, University of Basel, 4002 Basel, Switzerland; (J.E.); (M.V.); (J.S.); (P.K.); (C.M.); (K.M.D.)
| | - Markus Backmund
- Praxiszentrum im Tal, 80331 Munich, Germany;
- Ludwig-Maximilians-University, 80539 Munich, Germany
| | - Jeanette Röhrig
- Center for Mental Health, Clinic for Addiction Medicine and Addictive Behavior, Klinikum Stuttgart, 70374 Stuttgart, Germany; (M.C.); (J.R.)
| | - Marianne Post
- Parnassia Addiction Research Centre (PARC), Brijder Addiction Treatment, Parnassia Group, 2512 The Hague, The Netherlands; (R.S.); (M.P.)
| | | | - Wolfgang Wladika
- Department of Neurology and Psychiatry of Childhood and Adolescence, Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria;
| | - Thomas Trabi
- Department for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Pschotherapy, LKH Graz II, 8053 Graz, Austria;
| | - Christian Muller
- Department of Child & Youth Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Psychosocial Service Burgenland GmbH, 7000 Eisenstadt, Austria;
| | - Gerhard Rechberger
- Verein Dialog, Integrative Suchtberatung Gudrunstraße, 1100 Wien, Austria;
| | - Maree Teesson
- The Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia;
| | - Michael Farrell
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia;
| | - Grant Christie
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand; (G.C.); (S.M.)
| | - Sally Merry
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand; (G.C.); (S.M.)
| | - Mostafa Mamdouh
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2A1, Canada; (M.K.); (V.T.); (J.S.); (M.J.I.); (N.M.); (P.A.); (M.M.); (K.J.); (F.C.)
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
| | - Rachel Alinsky
- Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA;
| | - Sharon Levy
- Adolescent Substance Use and Addiction Program, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA;
| | - Marc Fishman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA;
- Mountain Manor Treatment Center, Baltimore, MD 21229, USA
| | - Richard Rosenthal
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Stony Brook University, New York, NY 11794, USA;
| | - Kerry Jang
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2A1, Canada; (M.K.); (V.T.); (J.S.); (M.J.I.); (N.M.); (P.A.); (M.M.); (K.J.); (F.C.)
| | - Fiona Choi
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2A1, Canada; (M.K.); (V.T.); (J.S.); (M.J.I.); (N.M.); (P.A.); (M.M.); (K.J.); (F.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Saxon AJ, Edelman EJ. Introduction to the Special Series: National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network and the Opioid Use Disorder Care Continuum-20 years of research informing practice. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2022; 17:7. [PMID: 35109940 PMCID: PMC8809224 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-022-00291-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Saxon
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine and Center of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S. Columbian Wy., Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
| | - E Jennifer Edelman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|