Successful implantation and live birth of a healthy boy after triple biopsy and double vitrification of oocyte-embryo-blastocyst

Double vitrification and warming of blastocysts does not affect pregnancy, miscarriage or live birth rates

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does double blastocyst vitrification and warming affect pregnancy, miscarriage or live birth rates, or birth outcomes, from embryos that have undergone preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) testing?

DESIGN

This retrospective observational analysis of embryo transfers was performed at a single centre between January 2017 and August 2022. The double-vitrification group included frozen blastocysts that were vitrified after 5-7 days of culture, warmed, biopsied (either once or twice) and re-vitrified. The single vitrification (SV) group included fresh blastocysts that were biopsied at 5-7 days and then vitrified.

RESULTS

A comparison of the 84 double-vitrification blastocysts and 729 control single-vitrification blastocysts indicated that the double-vitrification embryos were frozen later in development and had expanded more than the single-vitrification embryos. Of the 813 embryo transfer procedures reported, 452 resulted in the successful delivery of healthy infants (56%). There were no significant differences between double-vitrification and single-vitrification embryos in the pregnancy, miscarriage or live birth rates achieved after single-embryo transfer (55% versus 56%). Logistic regression indicated that while reduced live birth rates were associated with increasing maternal age at oocyte collection, longer culture prior to freezing and lower embryo quality, double vitrification was not a significant predictor of live birth rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Blastocyst double vitrification was not shown to impact pregnancy, miscarriage or live birth rates. Although caution is necessary due to the study size, no effects of double vitrification on miscarriage rates, birthweight or gestation period were noted. These data offer reassurance given the absence of the influence of double vitrification on all outcomes after PGT-A.

The impact of a second embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M) with inconclusive results on pregnancy potential: results from a matched case-control study

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether a second biopsy, following a first diagnostic failure on blastocysts tested for preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M), allows to obtain genetic diagnosis and to what extent this procedure can influence clinical pregnancy and live birth rates compared to the PGT-M process with a successful genetic diagnosis from the first biopsy.

METHODS

Embryos from women who underwent PGT-M in an infertility centre and who had been transferred after two biopsies for genetic analysis (n = 27) were matched in a 1:1 ratio accordingly to women's age (± 1 year) and fertility status (fertile vs infertile), as well as with the study period, with embryos who were transferred after receiving a conclusive PGT result straight after the first biopsy (n = 27). The main evaluated outcome was clinical pregnancy rate following embryo transfers in which healthy embryos were transferred after only one biopsy and those in which an embryo was transferred after being re-biopsied. Live birth rate was the secondary outcome.

RESULTS

Clinical pregnancy rate was 52% (95% CI: 34-69) following the transfer of a single-biopsy blastocyst and 30% (95% CI: 16-48) following the transfer of a re-biopsied blastocyst. The likelihood to have a healthy baby was 33% (95% CI: 19-52) following the transfer of a blastocyst biopsied once and 22% (95% CI: 11-41) following the transfer of a re-biopsied blastocyst.

CONCLUSIONS

The re-biopsy intervention seems to considerably reduce the pregnancy potential of a blastocyst. However, a greater sample size is necessary to clarify this issue definitively.

Birth after low-level +20 Aneuploid Mosaic Embryo Transfer: A Case Report

OBJECTIVE

Recently, it has been discussed whether or not mosaic embryo transfers should be performed since they might result in viable pregnancies, although they often end up being discarded. We report a case of successful pregnancy, after a mosaic embryo transfer from an in vitro matured egg and frozen PESA sperm.

CASE DESCRIPTION

Tests performed on a female aged 40 years and a male aged 37 years seeking fertility treatment found she had an adequate ovarian reserve and patent fallopian tubes. He had a history of cryptorchidism and inguinal hernia repair. The spermogram showed azoospermia, and testicular ultrasound showed an atrophic left testicle and a normal right testis. The vas deferens was palpated during physical examination. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection with percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) was indicated. Two cycles of IVF after controlled ovarian stimulation with follitropin delta was performed. In the first cycle, seven mature eggs were inseminated, two fertilized normally, resulting in one blastocyst biopsied and analyzed by NGS with complex aneuploid results. In the second cycle, frozen sperm from PESA was used. Three eggs were inseminated on the day of the procedure (resulting in 2 blastocysts), and three in vitro matured eggs were inseminated after 24 hours (resulting in 1 blastocyst). NGS analysis showed two complex aneuploid embryos and one 40% low-level trisomy 20 aneuploid mosaicism (+20) for the post 24-hour embryo. A mosaic embryo transfer was performed, resulting in clinical pregnancy and birth of a healthy baby girl with a normal blood karyotype.

DISCUSSION

Mosaic embryo transfer is a topic for discussion. Certain levels of mosaicism do not seem to pose risks to the development of the fetus.

Mitochondrial replacement by genome transfer in human oocytes: Efficacy, concerns, and legality

BACKGROUND

Pathogenic mitochondrial (mt)DNA mutations, which often cause life-threatening disorders, are maternally inherited via the cytoplasm of oocytes. Mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT) is expected to prevent second-generation transmission of mtDNA mutations. However, MRT may affect the function of respiratory chain complexes comprised of both nuclear and mitochondrial proteins.

METHODS

Based on the literature and current regulatory guidelines (especially in Japan), we analyzed and reviewed the recent developments in human models of MRT.

MAIN FINDINGS

MRT does not compromise pre-implantation development or stem cell isolation. Mitochondrial function in stem cells after MRT is also normal. Although mtDNA carryover is usually less than 0.5%, even low levels of heteroplasmy can affect the stability of the mtDNA genotype, and directional or stochastic mtDNA drift occurs in a subset of stem cell lines (mtDNA genetic drift). MRT could prevent serious genetic disorders from being passed on to the offspring. However, it should be noted that this technique currently poses significant risks for use in embryos designed for implantation.

CONCLUSION

The maternal genome is fundamentally compatible with different mitochondrial genotypes, and vertical inheritance is not required for normal mitochondrial function. Unresolved questions regarding mtDNA genetic drift can be addressed by basic research using MRT.

Vitrification of the human embryo: a more efficient and safer in vitro fertilization treatment

Cryopreservation has become a central pillar in assisted reproduction, reflected in the exponential increase of "freeze all" cycles in the past few years. Vitrification makes it possible to cool and warm human eggs and embryos with far less cryo-damage than 'slow-freeze' and allows nearly intact survival of embryos with very high survival rates for eggs as well. This has resulted in a complete transformation how we manage treatment for in vitro fertilization patients. Fresh transfers can be avoided without compromising outcomes, and in fact, cumulative pregnancy/delivery rates may be improved by performing sequential elective "frozen" single embryo transfers. Some recent evidence suggests that previously vitrified embryos give better perinatal outcomes than fresh embryo transfers. Frozen embryo transfer, especially when coupled with preimplantation genetic testing allows for highly efficient single embryo transfers that translate to more singleton and therefore safer pregnancies, as well as healthier babies. Additionally, vitrification has also opened new options for patients, most notably fertility preservation (through oocyte cryopreservation), and donor egg banking.

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy: A Review

Importance

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has undergone many technical developments over recent years, including changes in biopsy timings, methodology, and genetic analysis techniques. The evidence surrounding the efficaciousness of PGT-A is sporadic and inconsistent; as such, significant doubt and concern remain regarding its widespread implementation.

Objective

This review seeks to describe the historical development of PGT-A and to analyze and summarize the current published literature.

Conclusions

At times during its infancy, PGT-A failed to display conclusive improvements in results; with newer technologies, PGT-A appears to yield superior outcomes, including reductions in miscarriages and multiple gestations. Clinicians and patients should assess the use of PGT-A on a case-by-case basis, with laboratories encouraged to utilize blastocyst biopsy and next-generation sequencing when conducting PGT-A. Further studies providing cumulative live birth rates and time to live birth are required if PGT-A is to be proven as producing superior outcomes.

Relevance

PGT-A has the potential ability to impact in vitro fertilization success rates, and as it is increasingly adopted worldwide, it is crucial that clinicians are aware of the evidence for its continued use.

The effect of repeated biopsy on pre-implantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M) treatment outcome

PURPOSE

To study the outcome of repeated biopsy for pre-implantation genetic testing in case of failed genetic diagnosis in the first biopsy.

METHODS

The study group included 81 cycles where embryos underwent re-biopsy because there were no transferable embryos after the first biopsy: in 55 cycles, the first procedure was polar body biopsy (PBs) and the second cleavage-stage (BB); in 26 cycles, the first was BB and the second trophectoderm (BLAST) biopsy. The control group included 77 cycles where embryos underwent successful genetic diagnosis following the first biopsy, matched by maternal age, egg number, genetic inheritance type, and embryonic stage at the first biopsy. We measured genetic diagnosis rate, clinical pregnancy rates (PRs), live-birth rates (LBRs), gestational age, and birth weight.

RESULTS

For repeated biopsy, genetic diagnosis was received in 67/81 cycles (82.7%); at a higher rate in PB + BB than in BB + BLAST (49/55, 89.1% and 18/26, 69.2% respectively, p = 0.055). Transferable embryos were found in 47 and 68 cycles in the study and the control groups. PRs/ET were 20/47 (42.6%) and 36/68 (52.9%) (p = 0.27), 16/36 (44.4%) following PB + BB, and 4/11 (36.4%) following BB + BLAST (p = 0.74). LBRs/ET were 13/47 (27.7%) in study group, and 28/68 (41.2%) in the controls (p = 0.14), 10/36 (27.8%) following PB + BB group, and 3/11 (27.3%) following BB + BLAST (p > 0.99). Gestational age and birth weight were similar in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Re-biopsy of embryos when no genetic diagnosis could be reached following the first biopsy, achieved high rates of genetic diagnosis, pregnancies, and live births.

Risks in Surrogacy Considering the Embryo: From the Preimplantation to the Gestational and Neonatal Period

Surrogacy is an assisted reproduction-based approach in which the intended parents assign the gestation and birth to another woman called the surrogate mother. The drivers of surrogacy refer largely to infertility, medical conditions, same-sex couples' parenting, and cases of diversity regarding sexual identity and orientation. Surrogacy consists of a valid option for a variety of conditions or circumstances ranging from medical to social reasons. However, surrogacy may be associated with risks during the preimplantation, prenatal, and neonatal period. It became obvious during the exhaustive literature research that data on surrogacy and its association with factors specific to the IVF practice and the options available were not fully represented. Could it be that surrogacy management adds another level of complexity to the process from the ovarian stimulation, the subsequent IVF cycle, and the techniques employed within the IVF and the Genetic Laboratory to the fetal, perinatal, and neonatal period? This work emphasizes the risks associated with surrogacy with respect to the preimplantation embryo, the fetus, and the infant. Moreover, it further calls for larger studies reporting on surrogacy and comparing the surrogate management to that of the routine IVF patient in order to avoid suboptimal management of a surrogate cycle. This is of particular importance in light of the fact that the surrogate cycle may include not only the surrogate but also the egg donor, sperm donor, and the commissioning couple or single person.

Cleavage-stage embryo micromanipulation in the clinical setting

Embryo micromanipulation was developed after introduction of microinjection to overcome infertility. Embryo micromanipulation may be performed at any embryo stage from pronuclear to blastocyst. The technique started out as basic and turned out to be increasingly more complex. Embryo micromanipulation at the cleavage-stage includes a wide range of techniques, from opening the zona pellucida in order to improve the chance of implantation, to removing detrimental components from the embryo to enhance embryo development or blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and embryo splitting. Evaluating the impact(s) of different micromanipulation techniques on epigenetics of the embryo and considering quality control during these techniques are important issues in this regard. This review aims to discuss the micromanipulation of cleavage-stage embryos in clinical assisted reproductive technology (ART).

ABBREVIATIONS

ART: assisted reproductive technology; ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF: in vitro fertilization; PGD: preimplantation genetic diagnosis; PZD: partial zona dissection; ZP: zona pellucida; SUZI: subzonal insemination; PVS: perivitelline space; AH: assisted hatching; LAH: laserassisted hatching; ZT: zona thinning; UV: ultraviolet; IR: infrared; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; FISH: fluorescent in situ hybridization; NGS: next generation sequencing; QC: quality control; QA: quality assurance.

Genetic diagnosis of β-thalassemia preimplantation using short tandem repeats in human cryopreserved blastocysts

This study aimed to evaluate the application of short tandem repeats (STRs) for the preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of β-thalassemia. This was a prospective study performed at the Liuzhou Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital. From May to December 2016, eight couples formed of two β-thalassemia carriers underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures and PGD. All couples and four family members/couple underwent blood testing. Whole genome amplification of trophectoderm cells was performed. PCR products were used for linkage analysis of 15 STR loci. From the eight couples, 147 embryos were obtained and 86 blastocysts were formed. The DNA from 82 blastocysts was successfully amplified (amplification efficiency of 95.4%). Eighty blastocysts obtained a definite diagnosis. Among them, 24 blastocysts were diagnosed as normal, 38 blastocysts were diagnosed as heterozygous for β-thalassemia, and 18 blastocysts were homozygous or compound heterozygous. Two patients received a thawed embryo and both had a clinical pregnancy. These results indicated that in the setting of PGD for β-thalassemia, after multiple displacement amplifications, reverse dot hybridization combined with STRs could be an effective, accurate, and practical clinical strategy to improve the detection of β-thalassemia in at-risk couples undergoing embryo transfer. These results have to be validated in a larger cohort.

The accumulation of vitrified oocytes is a strategy to increase the number of euploid available blastocysts for transfer after preimplantation genetic testing

PURPOSE

In a preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy (PGD-A) program, the more embryos available for biopsy, consequently increases the chances of obtaining euploid embryos to transfer. The aim was to increase the number of viable euploid blastocysts in patients undergoing PGD-A using fresh oocytes together with previously accumulated vitrified oocytes.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients with normal ovarian reserve underwent PGD-A for repeated implantation failure or recurrent pregnancy loss indication. After several cycles of ovarian stimulation, 591 accumulated vitrified oocytes and 463 fresh oocytes were micro-injected with the same partner's semen sample. PGD-A was completed on 134 blastocysts from vitrified/warmed oocytes and 130 blastocysts from fresh oocytes.

RESULTS

A mean of 9.6% euploid blastocyst per micro-injected vitrified/warmed oocytes and 11.4% euploid blastocyst per micro-injected fresh oocyte were obtained (p > 0.05). The euploidy and aneuploidy rates were comparable in blastocysts obtained from micro-injected vitrified/warmed oocytes and fresh oocytes (42.5 versus 40.8% and 57.5 versus 59.2%, p > 0.05). Implantation rates of euploid blastocysts were comparable between the two sources of oocytes (56.0% from vitrified/warmed oocytes versus 60.9% from fresh oocytes, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Oocyte vitrification and warming do not generate aneuploidy in blastocysts. The number of viable euploid embryos for transfer can be increased by using accumulated vitrified oocytes together with fresh oocytes in ICSI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02820415 ClinicalTrials.gov.

Recent advances in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening (PGD/PGS) aims to help couples lower the risks of transmitting genetic defects to their offspring, implantation failure, and/or miscarriage during in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. However, it is still being debated with regard to the practicality and diagnostic accuracy of PGD/PGS due to the concern of invasive biopsy and the potential mosaicism of embryos. Recently, several non-invasive and high-throughput assays have been developed to help overcome the challenges encountered in the conventional invasive biopsy and low-throughput analysis in PGD/PGS. In this mini-review, we will summarize the recent progresses of these new methods for PGD/PGS and discuss their potential applications in IVF clinics.