Acute visual loss after ipilimumab treatment for metastatic melanoma

Ocular side effects of oncological therapies: Review

With the advance of cancer therapy in recent years, the knowledge of the mechanisms involved in this disease has increased, which has meant an increase in the quality of life and survival of patients with tumor pathologies previously considered incurable or refractory to treatment. The number of drugs used has increased exponentially in number, and although the implicit toxicity is lower than that of conventional antineoplastic therapy, they lead to the appearance of new associated adverse effects that the ophthalmologist must recognize and manage.

Diagnosing and Managing Uveitis Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Review

This review aims to provide an understanding of the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of uveitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). In the wake of these molecules being increasingly employed as a treatment against different cancers, cases of uveitis post-ICI therapy have also been increasingly reported in the literature, warranting an extensive exploration of the clinical presentations, risk factors, and pathophysiological mechanisms of ICI-induced uveitis. This review further provides an understanding of the association between ICIs and uveitis, and assesses the efficacy of current diagnostic tools, underscoring the need for advanced techniques to enable early detection and accurate assessment. Further, it investigates the therapeutic strategies for ICI-related uveitis, weighing the benefits and limitations of existing treatment regimens, and discussing current challenges and emerging therapies in the context of their potential efficacy and side effects. Through an overview of the short-term and long-term outcomes, this article suggests recommendations and emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration between ophthalmologists and oncologists. Finally, the review highlights promising avenues for future research and development in the field, potentially informing transformative approaches in the ocular assessment of patients under immunotherapy and the management of uveitis following ICI therapy.

Pembrolizumab-induced optic neuropathy - a case report

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment has become important for treating various cancer types, including Hodgkin's lymphoma. However, ICI can overstimulate the immune system, leading to a broad range of immunological side effects, known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Here, we report a case of optic neuropathy caused by pembrolizumab.

Case presentation

A patient with Hodgkin's lymphoma received pembrolizumab every three weeks. Twelve days after the sixth cycle of pembrolizumab, the patient was admitted to the emergency department with blurred vision, visual field impairment and altered color perception affecting the right eye. The diagnosis of immune-related optic neuropathy was established. Pembrolizumab was stopped permanently and high-dose steroid treatment was immediately started. This emergency treatment led to a satisfactory binocular vision and an improvement of visual acuity testing results. After another 7 months, the left eye was affected with the same symptoms. At this time, only an extended immunosuppressive therapy consisting of high-dose steroid treatment, plasmapheresis, immunoglobulin treatment, retrobulbar injection of steroids and mycophenolate mofetil, successfully reduced the symptoms.

Conclusions

This case highlights the need for prompt recognition and treatment of rare irAEs, such as optic neuropathy. Urgent treatment with initial high-dose steroid treatment is required to avoid persistent loss of visual acuity. Options for further treatment are mainly based on small case series and case reports. In our case, a retrobulbar injection of steroids in combination with mycophenolate mofetil showed significant success in treating steroid-refractory optic neuropathy.

Ocular adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become an important part of the treatment of multiple cancers, especially for advanced melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. Some tumors are capable of escaping immunosurveillance by stimulating checkpoints on T-cells. ICIs prevent activation of these checkpoints and thereby stimulate the immune system and indirectly the anti-tumor response. However, the use of ICIs is associated with various adverse events. Ocular side effects are rare but may have a major impact on the quality of life of the patient.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of the medical databases Web of Science, Embase and PubMed was performed. Articles that provided a comprehensive description of a case report containing 1) cancer patient(s) treated with (a combination of) immune checkpoint inhibitors, and 2) assessed occurrence of ocular adverse events, were included. A total of 290 case reports were included.

RESULTS

Melanoma (n = 179; 61.7%) and lung cancer (n = 56; 19.3%) were the most frequent reported malignancies. The primary used ICIs were nivolumab (n = 123; 42.5%) and ipilimumab (n = 116; 40.0%). Uveitis was most the common adverse event (n = 134; 46.2%) and mainly related to melanoma. Neuro-ophthalmic disorders, including myasthenia gravis and cranial nerve disorders, were the second most common adverse events (n = 71; 24.5%), mainly related to lung cancer. Adverse events affecting the orbit and the cornea were reported in 33 (11.4%) and 30 cases (10.3%) respectively. Adverse events concerning the retina were reported in 26 cases (9.0%).

CONCLUSION

The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of all reported ocular adverse events related to the use of ICIs. The insights retrieved from this review might contribute to a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of these ocular adverse events. Particularly, the difference between actual immune-related adverse events and paraneoplastic syndromes might be relevant. These findings might be of great value in establishing guidelines on how to manage ocular adverse events related to ICIs.

Neurological Complications of Conventional and Novel Anticancer Treatments

Various neurological complications, affecting both the central and peripheral nervous system, can frequently be experienced by cancer survivors after exposure to conventional chemotherapy, but also to modern immunotherapy. In this review, we provide an overview of the most well-known adverse events related to chemotherapy, with a focus on chemotherapy induced peripheral neurotoxicity, but we also address some emerging novel clinical entities related to cancer treatment, including chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment and immune-mediated adverse events. Unfortunately, efficacious curative or preventive treatment for all these neurological complications is still lacking. We provide a description of the possible mechanisms involved to drive future drug discovery in this field, both for symptomatic treatment and neuroprotection.

Retrobulbar Optic Neuritis Induced by Pembrolizumab in a Patient with Lung Adenocarcinoma

Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody with anti-tumor effects. Only a few reports have previously described retrobulbar optic neuritis induced by pembrolizumab. We herein report the case of a 63-year-old man with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who received cisplatin, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab combination therapy for six months. Following treatment, a visual field test showed a left central scotoma. Imaging studies showed left optic neuritis without brain metastasis. Blood tests showed an elevated serum creatinine level. He was diagnosed with retrobulbar optic neuritis and pembrolizumab-induced renal failure. After receiving corticosteroid treatment, his renal function rapidly improved. The optic neuritis improved somewhat, but it was not adequately resolved.

Neuro-Ophthalmic Complications in Patients Treated With CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 Checkpoint Blockade

BACKGROUND

In recent years, CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors have proven to be effective and have become increasingly popular treatment options for metastatic melanoma and other cancers. These agents work by enhancing autologous antitumor immune responses. Immune-related ophthalmologic complications have been reported in association with checkpoint inhibitor use but remain incompletely characterized. This study seeks to investigate and further characterize the neuro-ophthalmic and ocular complications of immune checkpoint blockade treatment.

METHODS

A survey was distributed through the secure electronic data collection tool REDCap to neuro-ophthalmology specialists in the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society listserv. The study received human subjects approval through the University of California at Los Angeles Institutional Review Board. The survey identified patients sent for neuro-ophthalmic consultation while receiving one or more of a PD-1 inhibitor (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or cemiplimab); PD-L1 inhibitor (atezolizumab, avelumab, or durvalumab); or the CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab. Thirty-one patients from 14 institutions were identified. Patient demographics, neuro-ophthalmic diagnosis, diagnostic testing, severity, treatment, clinical response, checkpoint inhibitor drug used, and cancer diagnosis was obtained.

RESULTS

The checkpoint inhibitors used in these patients included pembrolizumab (12/31), nivolumab (6/31), combined ipilimumab with nivolumab (7/31, one of whom also received pembrolizumab during their course of treatment), durvalumab (3/31), ipilimumab (2/31), and cemiplimab (1/31). Malignant melanoma (16/31) or nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (6/31) were the most common malignancies. The median time between first drug administration and the time of ophthalmological symptom onset was 14.5 weeks. Eleven patients had involvement of the optic nerve, 7 patients had inflammatory orbital or extraocular muscle involvement, 6 patients had ocular involvement from neuromuscular junction dysfunction, 4 patients had cranial nerve palsy, and 4 patients had non neuro-ophthalmic complications. Use of systemic corticosteroids with or without stopping the checkpoint inhibitor resulted in improvement of most patients with optic neuropathy, and variable improvement for the other ophthalmic conditions.

CONCLUSION

This study describes the variable neuro-ophthalmic adverse events associated with use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and contributes a more thorough understanding of their clinical presentations and treatment outcomes. We expect this will increase awareness of these drug complications and guide specialists in the care of these patients.

Severe Late-Onset Grade III-IV Adverse Events under Immunotherapy: A Retrospective Study of 79 Cases

Simple Summary

PD-1 inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab) and anti-CTLA-4 (CD152) (ipilimumab) are widely used in metastatic melanoma. Immunotherapy leads to prolonged lymphocyte effects, which explains the cytotoxicity underlying immune-reaction-based adverse events. Most adverse events (irAEs) occur in the first cycle of treatment at a median of 40 days, but some occur later, over 2 years after immunotherapy is initiated. IrAEs of any grade have been observed in 68.2% of patients and 10% of patients experienced severe grade III/IV irAEs. Data on late-onset irAEs are lacking. We aim to investigate late-onset grade III-IV irAEs and patient characteristics in the context of anti-PD-1 antibody treatment or combination therapy in real-life settings.

Abstract

Background: For several decades, PD-1 has been a target in malignant melanoma (MM). PD-1 inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab) and anti-CTLA-4 (CD152) (ipilimumab) have revolutionized cancer therapy. PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition leads to prolonged lymphocyte effects, which explains the cytotoxicity underlying immune-reaction-based adverse events (irAEs). Most irAEs occur in the first cycle of treatment at a median of 40 days. IrAEs of any grade have been observed in 68.2% of patients, with 10% of patients experiencing severe grade III/IV irAEs. Data on late-onset irAEs are lacking. Methods: Data on patients with advanced melanoma (N = 1862) from March 2016 to March 2021 were obtained from the RicMel database, a French national multicentric biobank dedicated to the follow-up of MM patients. Patients who received anti-PD-1 therapy or a combination therapy and experienced grade III-IV irAEs were selected and analyzed at 7 months, one year and two years after treatment was initiated. Results: Superficial spreading melanoma (SSM) and previous oncological drug administration before immunotherapy are significant risk factors for late-onset irAEs over 2 years after beginning immunotherapy in the univariate and multivariate analysis. The other parameters—sex, mutational status, association of immunotherapy (PD-1i and CTLA-4i) and overall response—were not significantly associated with late-onset irAEs. In our real-life data study, the median onset time of grade III-IV irAES was 128 days after the initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) therapy. Conclusions: Our study, using real-life data, suggests that patients with SSM and those who have received previous oncological treatments are more likely to experience late-onset grade III-IV irAES. Further multicentric studies with wider recruitment of patients should be performed to confirm our findings, potentially leading to changes in the recommended treatment for carefully monitored at-risk patients.

Ocular adverse events in PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors

Background

Programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors can cause unique immune-related adverse effects due to non-specific immunological activation. However, less is known about adverse effects of these drugs in the eye.

Methods

Two adverse event databases were retrospectively reviewed. The two databases consisted of a routine adverse event database and a serious adverse event database of expeditiously submitted reports. Patients with any malignancy who had ocular adverse events while on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment were included. Patients received nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab or durvalumab alone or in combination with other anticancer agents per each trial’s protocol. Databases were queried up to May 19, 2020.

Results

In the routine adverse event database, 272 adverse events from 213 patients were reported and in the serious adverse event reporting database, 59 ocular adverse events from 47 patients were reported. A lower estimate of the prevalance from the routine adverse event database showed 259/7727 patients on study treatment arms reporting ocular adverse events (3.3% prevalence). Excluding trials that do not report lower grade adverse events to the routine adverse event database results in a higher end estimate of 242/3255 patients on study treatment arms reporting ocular adverse events (7.4% prevalence). Ocular events occurred early after drug initiation (routine database: median 6 weeks, IQR 0–16, serious adverse events database: median 11 weeks, IQR 6–21). The median Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade was grade 1 (mild) (IQR 1–2) and grade 2 (moderate) (IQR 2–3) for the routine database and the serious adverse events database, respectively. In-depth analysis of the serious adverse event reports revealed varying degrees of clinical workup, with 30/47 patients (64%) receiving ophthalmological evaluation and 16/47 (34%) of patients having to delay or discontinue treatment. However, 16/47 (34%) patients experienced resolution and 14/47 (30%) patients experienced at least some improvement.

Conclusions

This is one of the largest analyses of ocular adverse events in patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the USA. We found ocular adverse events are rare complications of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy, can be severe enough to cause treatment discontinuation/delay, and may not always be appropriately evaluated by eye specialists. Standardized plans for ophthalmology evaluation and management of ocular toxicities are needed in studies of patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

Optic Perineuritis Associated with Nivolumab Treatment for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

We report the case of a 54-year-old man who was treated with nivolumab for recurrent squamous cell lung cancer. After 7 cycles of nivolumab treatment, the patient presented to our hospital with right eye vision loss. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showed enhancement around the optic nerve sheath. This finding and his symptoms led to the diagnosis of optic perineuritis (OPN). Steroid pulse therapy was administered twice although there was no remarkable improvement in his visual field defect. The relationship between OPN and nivolumab is unclear. However, immune-related adverse events caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors should be considered.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard of care for the treatment of several cancers. While these immunotherapies have improved patient outcomes in many clinical settings, they bring accompanying risks of toxicity, specifically immune-related adverse events (irAEs). There is a need for clear, effective guidelines for the management of irAEs during ICI treatment, motivating the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) to convene an expert panel to develop a clinical practice guideline. The panel discussed the recognition and management of single and combination ICI irAEs and ultimately developed evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to assist medical professionals in clinical decision-making and to improve outcomes for patients.

Retinal toxicities of systemic anticancer drugs

Newer anticancer drugs have revolutionized cancer treatment in the last decade, but conventional chemotherapy still occupies a central position in many cancers, with combination therapy and newer methods of delivery increasing their efficacy while minimizing toxicities. We discuss the retinal toxicities of anticancer drugs with an emphasis on the mechanism of toxicity. Uveitis is seen with the use of v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B editing anticancer inhibitors as well as immunotherapy. Most of the cases are mild with only anterior uveitis, but severe cases of posterior uveitis, panuveitis, and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada-like disease may also occur. In the retina, a transient neurosensory detachment is observed in almost all patients on mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors. Microvasculopathy is often seen with interferon α, but vascular occlusion is a more serious toxicity caused by interferon α and MEK inhibitors. Crystalline retinopathy with or without macular edema may occur with tamoxifen; however, even asymptomatic patients may develop cavitatory spaces seen on optical coherence tomography. A unique macular edema with angiographic silence is characteristic of taxanes. Delayed dark adaptation has been observed with fenretinide. Interestingly, this drug is finding potential application in Stargardt disease and age-related macular degeneration.

Antibody Format and Serum Disposition Govern Ocular Pharmacokinetics of Intravenously Administered Protein Therapeutics

Protein therapeutics have witnessed tremendous use and application in recent years in treatment of various diseases. Predicting efficacy and safety during drug discovery and translational development is a key factor for successful clinical development of these therapies. In general, drug related toxicities are predominantly driven by pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure at off-target sites. This work explores the ocular PK of intravenously administered protein therapeutics to understand impact of antibody format on off-site exposure. Species matched non-binding rabbit antibody proteins (rabFab and rabIgG) were intravenously administered to male New Zealand White rabbits at a single 1 mg bolus dose and exposure was measured up to 3 weeks. As anticipated based on absence of FcRn recycling, rabFab has relatively fast systemic PK (CL–943 mL/day and t_1/2–1.93 days) compared to rabIgG (CL–18.5 mL/day and t_1/2–8.93 days). Similarly, rabFab has lower absolute ocular exposure in ocular compartments (e.g., vitreous and aqueous humor) compared to rabIgG, despite higher relative exposures (measured as percent tissue partition in ocular tissues relative to serum, based on C_max and AUC). In general, percent tissue partition based on AUC (in aqueous and vitreous humor) relative to serum exposure were 10.4 and 8.62 for rabFab respectively and 1.11 and 0.64 for rabIgG respectively. This work emphasizes size and format based ocular exposure of intravenously administered protein therapeutics. Findings from this work enable prediction of format based ocular exposure for systemically administered antibody based therapeutics and aid in selection of molecule format for clinical candidate to minimize ocular exposure.

BILATERAL CHOROIDAL DETACHMENTS SECONDARY TO IPILIMUMAB AND PEMBROLIZUMAB USE

PURPOSE

To report the occurrence of bilateral choroidal detachments due to the use of ipilimumab and pembrolizumab immunochemotherapeutics to treat widely metastatic cutaneous melanoma and to raise awareness about this potentially vision-threatening adverse drug event.

METHODS

A 77 year-old man presented with acute onset, painless, and bilateral blurry vision. He had started ipilimumab and pembrolizumab 2 weeks prior for Stage IV metastatic cutaneous melanoma.

RESULTS

Clinical examination revealed bilateral choroidal detachments. After discussion with the patient's medical oncologist, the patient discontinued both medications and began oral prednisone to expedite visual recovery. The choroidal detachments subsequently resolved, and visual acuity improved 2 weeks later.

CONCLUSION

Ipilimumab and pembrolizumab have been reported both in monotherapy and in combination to cause a wide variety of ophthalmic adverse events. This is the first report of choroidal detachments as a complication.

Population-Based Frequency of Ophthalmic Adverse Events in Melanoma, Other Cancers, and After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment

PURPOSE

To examine the frequency of ophthalmic immune-related adverse events (OirAEs) in melanoma, other cancers, and after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment.

DESIGN

Retrospective clinical cohort study.

METHODS

This study identified patients diagnosed with OirAEs between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2018, in the Kaiser Permanente Southern California electronic health records. The primary exposures of interest were prior initiation of ICIs and underlying cancer diagnosis. Risk-adjusted prevalence of OirAEs was evaluated in patients with melanoma, with nonmelanoma cancer, and without cancer. The 1-year incidence of OirAEs and recurrence of prior ophthalmic disease were identified in ICI-receiving patients with melanoma and nonmelanoma.

RESULTS

Among 4,695,669 unique patients identified, 9.9% had a cancer diagnosis, of whom 2.8% had a diagnosis of melanoma. Overall prevalence for uveitis and selected neuro-ophthalmic diagnoses was 341.8/100,000 patient-years in patients with melanoma and 369.6/100,000 patient-years in patients with nonmelanoma cancer regardless of ICI treatment, compared with 142.2/100,000 patient-years in patients without cancer. A total of 2,911 unique patients received ICI therapy. Compared with patients with nonmelanoma cancer, patients with melanoma on any ICI had elevated 1-year incidence rates of uveitis (1.2% vs 0.2%; risk-adjusted odds ratio, 6.45). High 1-year recurrence rates for uveitis in ICI patients with a prior uveitis history were also observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of all OirAEs was substantially higher in patients with cancer, with ICI-related uveitis risk specifically increased in patients with melanoma compared with patients with nonmelanoma cancer. Evidence-based guidelines for ophthalmic monitoring of patients undergoing ICI treatment may require different risk stratifications based on underlying cancer diagnosis, specific ICI used, and prior history of uveitis.

Ocular Toxicity of Targeted Anticancer Agents

The proliferation of targeted anticancer agents over the last two decades has revolutionized cancer treatment and improved survival in many previously refractory malignancies. However, many agents are associated with characteristic ophthalmic adverse effects. It is important that ophthalmologists recognize and maintain a high index of suspicion for these side effects in patients on targeted therapy. Most ophthalmic adverse effects can be treated with specific ocular therapy without discontinuation of cancer treatment, although it is important to be aware of the life-threatening and vision-threatening circumstances that would require therapy cessation in conjunction with the patient's oncologist. This review aims to summarize the ophthalmic adverse effects of targeted and hormonal anticancer agents and briefly describe their management.

Neuro-ophthalmic Complications of Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the field of oncology by modulating the immune cell-cancer cell interaction and thereby promoting immune system disinhibition in order to target several types of malignancies. There are three classes of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs): anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), and anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1).It is not uncommon for physicians across all specialties to encounter a patient with a history of malignancy and ICI exposure, necessitating familiarity with their potential complications. In this review article, we discuss the most common immune-related adverse events (irAEs) pertaining to the central and peripheral nervous systems and their potential afferent and efferent neuro-ophthalmic manifestations. Early recognition and treatment of these irAEs, and discontinuation of the offending ICI are all critical steps to prevent morbidity and mortality.

Ocular side effects of checkpoint inhibitors

The incidence and impact of ocular side effects in patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors are not clearly defined. We reviewed prospective phase III clinical trials of checkpoint inhibitors applied in lung cancer, renal cell cancer, and melanoma. Case reports of the occurrence of ocular toxicities in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors were also included. Of the 35 articles corresponding to phase III clinical trials with checkpoint inhibitors, ocular toxicity was described in four. Forty-six clinical cases of ocular toxicity after therapy with checkpoint inhibitors have been reported. The most frequently described ocular toxicities are uveitis, inflammatory orbital disease, and alterations of the ocular surface. Ocular toxicity is underestimated in checkpoint inhibitors clinical trials. Early ophthalmic examination and treatment with corticosteroids may improve the visual prognosis in these patients.

Cranial Nerve Disorders Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

To describe the spectrum, treatment, and outcome of cranial nerve disorders associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (Cn-ICI).

METHODS

This nationwide retrospective cohort study on Cn-ICI (2015-2019) was conducted using the database of the French Refence Center. In addition, a systematic review of the literature (MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science) for records published between 2010 and 2019 was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using the search terms cranial nerve or neuropathy or palsy and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

RESULTS

Among 67 cases with ICI-related neurologic toxicities diagnosed in our reference center, 9 patients with Cn-ICI were identified (7 men, 78%, median age 62 years [range 26-82 years]). Patients were receiving a combination of anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 and anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/PD-1 ligand (n = 5, 56%) or anti-PD-1 antibodies alone (n = 4, 44%). Cn-ICI involved optic (n = 3), vestibulocochlear (n = 3), abducens (n = 2), facial (n = 2), and oculomotor (n = 1) nerves. Two patients had involvement of 2 different cranial nerves. Treatment comprised corticosteroids (n = 8, 89%), ICI permanent discontinuation (n = 7, 78%), plasma exchange (n = 2, 22%), and IV immunoglobulin (n = 1, 11%). Median follow-up was 11 months (range 1-41 months). In 3 cases (33%), neurologic deficit persisted/worsened despite treatment: 2 optic and 1 vestibulocochlear. Among cases from the literature and the present series combined (n = 39), the most commonly affected cranial nerves were facial (n = 13, 33%), vestibulocochlear (n = 8, 21%), optic (n = 7, 18%), and abducens (n = 4, 10%). Trigeminal, oculomotor, and glossopharyngeal nerves were less frequently affected (total n = 7).

CONCLUSION

Cranial nerve disorders can complicate treatment with ICIs. Approximately one-third of the patients had persisting deficits, most frequently involving hearing and vision loss.

Central Nervous System Demyelination Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Review of the Literature

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a novel class of antineoplastic treatment that enhances immunity against tumors. They are associated with immune adverse events, and several neurological syndromes have been described, including multiple sclerosis and atypical demyelination. We performed a systematic literature review of case reports with neurological immune adverse events that presented with central nervous system demyelination, up to December 2019. We found 23 cases: seven with myelitis, four isolated optic neuritis, one neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, five multiple sclerosis, and six with atypical demyelination. Ipilimumab was the most frequently used ICI (11/23). The median time to develop symptoms from the onset of ICI was 6.5 weeks [range 1.0–43.0], and from last ICI dose was 14 days [range 0–161]. Anatomopathological examination was performed in four cases, with the finding of a T-cell mediated immune response. Outcomes were generally favorable after immunosuppression: 18 patients had improvement or a full recovery, three patients did not respond to treatment, three patients died, and in one, treatment was not reported. We describe the patients' clinical presentation, treatment administered, and outcomes. We further speculate on possible pathophysiological mechanisms and discuss potential treatments that may be worth investigating.

Ophthalmic Immune-Related Adverse Events after Anti-CTLA-4 or PD-1 Therapy Recorded in the American Academy of Ophthalmology Intelligent Research in Sight Registry

PURPOSE

Detailed study of ophthalmic immune-related adverse events (AEs), including determination of incidence and recurrence rates, is of integral importance in cancer immunotherapy to inform management and treatment guidelines.

DESIGN

Retrospective registry study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients newly diagnosed with ophthalmic immune-related AEs between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2017, in the American Academy of Ophthalmology's Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS®) Registry.

METHODS

Data were collected from electronic health records of IRIS® Registry participating ophthalmology practices. Patients with select ophthalmic immune-related AEs were identified by International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes. The primary exposure of interest was prior initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of ophthalmic immune-related AEs within 1 year after initiation of ICI therapy was determined. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were derived by comparing incidence of ophthalmic immune-related AEs after ICIs versus rates of the same ocular complications in patients not taking ICIs in the entire registry population. Rates of ophthalmic immune-related AEs in patients with a past history of ocular inflammation or other specific ophthalmic condition before initiation of ICIs were examined further.

RESULTS

A total of 3123 patients who received anti-CTLA-4 or anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) therapy were identified, 112 of whom demonstrated an ophthalmic immune-related AE. Incidence rates for anterior uveitis, the most common ophthalmic immune-related AE, were 8209 per 100 000 for ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4), 2542 per 100 000 for nivolumab (anti-PD-1), 2451 per 100 000 for pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1), 5556 per 100 000 for ipilimumab plus nivolumab, and 3740 per 100 000 among all ICIs. Rates of ophthalmic immune-related AEs among patients receiving ICI therapy were higher compared with baseline rates in the general registry population (anterior uveitis IRR, 13.9; other uveitis IRR, 43.0; papilledema IRR, 38.3). Patients with a history of uveitis or other ocular inflammatory condition demonstrated high recurrence rates of ophthalmic immune-related AEs after initiating ICIs (up to 51.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients initiating ICI therapy, early coordination with ophthalmic subspecialist care is important because rates of ophthalmic immune-related AEs are elevated compared with ocular complication rates in the entire registry population and patients with a history of prior autoimmune ocular disease are at high risk of recurrence of ocular complications.

Neuro-ophthalmic Complications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are novel cancer therapies that may be associated with immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) and come to the attention of neuro-ophthalmologists. This systematic review aims to synthesize the reported ICI-associated IRAEs relevant to neuro-ophthalmologists to help in the diagnosis and management of these conditions.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature indexed by MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases was searched from inception to May 2020. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Primary studies on ICIs and neuro-ophthalmic complications were included. Outcomes included number of cases and incidence of neuro-ophthalmic IRAEs.

RESULTS

Neuro-ophthalmic complications of ICIs occurred in 0.46% of patients undergoing ICI and may affect the afferent and efferent visual systems. Afferent complications include optic neuritis (12.8%), neuroretinitis (0.9%), and giant cell arteritis (3.7%). Efferent complications include myasthenia gravis (MG) (45.0%), thyroid-like eye disease (11.9%), orbital myositis (13.8%), general myositis with ptosis (7.3%), internuclear ophthalmoplegia (0.9%), opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome (0.9%), and oculomotor nerve palsy (0.9%). Pembrolizumab was the most common causative agent for neuro-ophthalmic complications (32.1%). Mortality was highest for MG (19.8%). Most patients (79.8%) experienced improvement or complete resolution of neuro-ophthalmic symptoms due to cessation of ICI and immunosuppression with systemic corticosteroids.

CONCLUSION

While incidence of neuro-ophthalmic IRAEs is low, clinicians involved in the care of cancer patients must be aware of their presentation to facilitate prompt recognition and management. Collaboration between oncology and neuro-ophthalmology teams is required to effectively manage patients and reduce morbidity and mortality.

Isolated optic neuritis after pembrolizumab administration for non-small-cell lung carcinoma

PURPOSE

To report a case of isolated optic neuritis associated with pembrolizumab immunotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 76-year-old man, with a history of metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma, presented with vision loss in his left eye for the past week. He had been treated with pembrolizumab for the underlying disease for 2 months. On presentation, best corrected visual acuity was 20/30 in the right eye and 20/200 in the left eye. Fundoscopy revealed optic nerve edema in the left eye. Visual fields examination in right eye revealed an enlarged blind spot and an extended defect in the inferior nasal quadrant. In the left eye a partial superior arcuate defect and an extended defect in the inferior hemisphere was observed. The mean deviation was -12.15 dB in the right eye and -13.70 dB in left eye. Pembrolizumab was withheld and corticosteroids were administered for a total of nine weeks, first intravenously and then slowly tapered orally, resulting in resolution of optic neuritis, restoration of visual acuity and in relative improvement in the visual field defects after 3 months. Calculated Naranjo Nomogram score was 7, indicating a 'highly probable' correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

Optic neuritis is a relatively rare immune-related adverse event after exposure to checkpoint inhibitors cancer immunotherapy. Prompt discontinuation of the offending agent and early initiation of corticosteroid therapy is the mainstay of the treatment.

Ocular Complications of Checkpoint Inhibitors and Immunotherapeutic Agents: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Ophthalmologists have a role in assessing immune-related adverse events (IRAE) in oncology patients on immunotherapy. We assessed the utility of a hospital-wide toxicity team in referring patients with new ocular symptoms for examination. We also identified new immunotherapy agents causing ocular side-effects.

DESIGN

A cohort study of eight consecutive patients on immunotherapy, who developed ocular IRAE from November 1, 2017 to June 30, 2019. All were seen at the Ocular Immunology Division of the Wilmer Eye Institute and referred by the Johns Hopkins Toxicity Team.

RESULTS

All eight patients on had IRAEs; were treated with corticosteroid drops or observation with clinical resolution. Two new agents, epocadostat and daratumumab, were associated with the development of uveitis.

CONCLUSION

Ophthalmologists play an important role in a hospital-wide toxicity team and need to include IRAEs in their differential diagnosis. Given new drug development, ophthalmologists may be the first to identify IRAEs.

Safety profile of immune checkpoint inhibitors: An analysis of the Italian spontaneous reporting system database

AIMS

To provide an overview of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) safety profile using the Italian spontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting system.

METHODS

We selected all ADR reports attributed to ipilimumab (CTLA-4 inhibitor), nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors) from the Italian spontaneous reporting system (2011-2018). Descriptive analyses of reports for ICIs have been conducted. Time to onset of adverse effects was stratified by system organ class. Reporting odds ratio was used as measure of ADR reporting disproportionality. ICI-related ADR reports were compared with 2 reference groups, i.e. all other suspected drugs or all other antineoplastic agents.

RESULTS

Overall, 2217 (0.7%) reports were related to ICIs (nivolumab: 72.2% of those reports; ipilimumab: 14.3%; pembrolizumab: 10.3%; and atezolizumab: 3.5%). ICI-related ADR reports mostly involved males (65%) and median age was 67 (interquartile range 59-73) years. Serious reports accounted for 48.8%. Frequencies of endocrine, general, hepatobiliary, metabolism, musculoskeletal, respiratory disorders, infections and neoplasms were significantly higher for ICIs than for all other drugs (P < .001). Except for infections, similar results emerged through comparison with other anticancer drugs. Colitis, hypophysitis and skin disorders were more frequently reported for anti-CTLA-4 drugs than PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs, and the opposite for musculoskeletal effects, pneumonia, and thyroid dysfunctions. ICIs were disproportionally associated also with less known risks, e.g. ischaemic heart disease, cardiac failure and optic nerve disorders.

CONCLUSION

The most frequently reported safety issues were probably immune-related adverse events including general, gastrointestinal and respiratory disorders. Potentially emerging safety signals, such as ischaemic heart disease and cardiac failure, requiring further investigation were detected.

Factors associated with ocular adverse event after immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment

Ocular adverse events (OAEs) including vision-threatening intraocular inflammation after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment have been increasingly reported; however, the risk factors associated with OAEs remain elusive. Here, we determined the factors associated with OAEs after ICI treatment. We analyzed 40 consecutive patients who experienced OAEs after ICI treatments. The OAEs included anterior uveitis, chorioretinitis, papillitis, foveal interdigitation zone thickening/serous retinal detachment (IZT/SRD), retinal vascular occlusion, and strabismus and ptosis. Of 40 patients, 18 (45%) were treated with atezolizumab, 13 (33%) with pembrolizumab, 7 (18%) with nivolumab, 1 (3%) with ipilimumab/nivolumab, and the other 1 (3%) with durvalumab/tremelimumab. BRAF/MEK inhibitors were concurrently used in 19 (48%) patients. Occurrence of intraocular inflammation was significantly associated with previous ocular surgery and trauma history (P = 0.015) and pembrolizumab use (P = 0.031). Neuro-ophthalmic complications and IZT/SRD were associated with brain metastasis (P = 0.005) and treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitor (P < 0.001), respectively. In extensive literature review for clinical cases, we identified seven cases with intraocular inflammation, which were not observed with ipilimumab treatment, that occurred after a change of the drug to pembrolizumab. Collectively, these findings provide better understandings of OAEs after ICI treatment.

Development and clinical applications of cancer immunotherapy against PD-1 signaling pathway

Dramatic advances in immune therapy have emerged as a promising strategy in cancer therapeutics. In addition to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, inhibitors targeting immune-checkpoint molecules such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) demonstrate impressive clinical benefits in clinical trials. In this review, we present background information about therapies involving PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and provide an overview of current clinical trials. Furthermore, we present recent advances involving predictive biomarkers associated with positive therapeutic outcomes in cancer immunotherapy.

Neurologic Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibition

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights the spectrum of neurologic adverse events seen with use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), their potential mechanisms, the treatments undertaken, and the clinical outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

The advent of ICIs has revolutionized cancer therapy. Neurologic adverse events (NAEs) are rare but clinically significant complication of ICIs. They can involve both the central and peripheral nervous system. Examples include myositis, neuropathy, encephalopathy, and myasthenia gravis. Treatment consists of holding the ICI, administration of corticosteroids, and other immunomodulatory agents as needed. The outcomes are generally favorable; however, rarely severe events can lead to significant morbidity and even mortality. Identifying and treating the range of neurologic adverse events that may potentially arise with ICIs is very important as the oncologic indications for their use continues to expand.

Vision loss with pembrolizumab treatment: A report of two cases

BACKGROUND

Vision loss and other ocular toxicities are rare, but detrimental, side effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Herein, we report two patients who developed vision loss while on pembrolizumab treatment.

CASES PRESENTATION

Case 1 - A 58-year-old man was started on pembrolizumab for advanced melanoma. He was tolerating the treatment well. After receiving 14 cycles of pembrolizumab, he developed acute bilateral vision loss and occipital headaches. An emergent ophthalmologic evaluation revealed bilateral shallow choroidal effusion with bilateral focal exudative retinal detachment. After excluding other possible etiologies, inflammatory process secondary to pembrolizumab was suspected. Pembrolizumab was stopped, and the patient was started on a course of systemic and topical steroids. His vision improved within days and he recovered completely within two months. Calculated Naranjo Nomogram score was 7 indicating a "probable" correlation; Case 2 - A 57-year-old man with stage IIIC melanoma was started on adjuvant pembrolizumab. After a few weeks of treatments, he reported minor bilateral vision changes that progressively worsened over a period of six months. An ophthalmologic evaluation revealed bilateral posterior uveitis with right optic disc edema. Pembrolizumab-related inflammatory changes were suspected, and he was started on systemic and topical steroids. His symptoms improved within a few weeks and steroids were tapered. He was re-challenged with pembrolizumab and his symptoms quickly re-occurred. Pembrolizumab was stopped indefinitely and the patient again treated with systemic and topical steroids. His symptoms resolved and his vision returned to baseline within two months. The Naranjo Nomogram score was 9 indicating a "definite" correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

Vision loss is a serious complication that may occur at any point during treatment with PD-1 inhibitors. Vision loss is very distressing to the patients and their families. It is prudent for practitioners to recognize early vision abnormalities in patients receiving PD-1 antagonists to prevent permanent vision loss.

Checkpoint Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Treatment with checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD-1), anti-PD-ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1), and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (anti-CTLA-4) antibodies can prolong the survival of cancer patients, but it also induces autoimmune side effects in 86-96% of patients by activating the immune system. In 17-59% of patients, these are severe or even life-threatening.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent articles retrieved by a search in PubMed and on an evaluation of a side-effect registry.

RESULTS

Checkpoint-inhibitor-induced autoimmune side effects manifest themselves in all organ systems, most commonly as skin lesions (46-62%), autoimmune colitis (22-48%), autoimmune hepatitis (7-33%), and endocrinopathies (thyroiditis, hypophysitis, adrenalitis, diabetes mellitus; 12-34%). Rarer side effects include pneumonitis (3-8%), nephritis (1-7%), cardiac side effects including cardiomyositis (5%), and neurological side effects (1-5%). Severe (sometimes lethal) side effects arise in 17-21%, 20-28%, and 59% of patients undergoing anti-PD-1 and anti- CTLA-4 antibody treatment and the approved combination therapy, respectively. With proper monitoring, however, these side effects can be recognized early and, usually, treated with success. Endocrine side effects generally require long-term hormone substitution. Patients who have stopped taking checkpoint inhibitors because of side effects do not show a poorer response of their melanoma or shorter survival in comparison to patients who continue to take checkpoint inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

The complex management of checkpoint-inhibitor-induced side effects should be coordinated in experienced centers. The creation of an interdisciplinary "tox team" with designated experts for organ-specific side effects has proven useful. Prospective registry studies based on structured documentation of side effects in routine clinical practice are currently lacking and urgently needed.

Spectrum of immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced endocrinopathies in cancer patients: a scoping review of case reports

BACKGROUND

Since 2011 six immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been approved to treat patients with many advanced solid tumor and hematological malignancies to improve their prognosis. Case reports of their endocrine immune-related adverse events [irAEs]) are increasingly published as more real-world patients with these malignancies are treated with these drugs. They alert physicians of a drug's AEs (which may change during a drug's life cycle) and contribute to post-marketing safety surveillance. Using a modified framework of Arksey and O'Malley, we conducted a scoping review of the spectrum and characteristics of ICI-induced endocrinopathies case reports before and after ICIs are marketed.

METHODS

In July 2017, we searched, without date and language restrictions, 4 citation databases for ICI-induced endocrinopathies. We also hand-searched articles' references, contents of relevant journals, and ran supplemental searches to capture recent reports through January 2018. For this study, a case should have information on type of cancer, type of ICI, clinical presentation, biochemical tests, treatment plus temporal association of ICI initiation with endocrinopathies. Two endocrinologists independently extracted the data which were then summarized and categorized.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy nine articles reported 451 cases of ICI-induced endocrinopathies - 222 hypopituitarism, 152 thyroid disorders, 66 diabetes mellitus, 6 primary adrenal insufficiencies, 1 ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome, 1 hypoparathyroidism and 3 diabetes insipidus cases. Their clinical presentations reflect hormone excess or deficiency. Some were asymptomatic and others life-threatening. One or more endocrine glands could be affected. Polyglandular endocrinopathies could present simultaneously or in sequence. Many occur within 5 months of therapy initiation; a few occurred after ICI was stopped. Mostly irreversible, they required long-term hormone replacement. High dose steroids were used when non-endocrine AEs coexisted or as therapy in adrenal insufficiency. There was variability of information in the case reports but all met the study criteria to make a diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The spectrum of ICI-induced endocrinopathies is wide (5 glands affected) and their presentation varied (12 endocrinopathies). Clinical reasoning integrating clinical, biochemical and treatment information is needed to properly diagnose and manage them. Physicians should be vigilant for their occurrence and be able to diagnose, investigate and manage them appropriately at onset and follow-up.

Neurological complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors: what happens when you 'take the brakes off' the immune system

Patients with advanced malignancies treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors are at increased risk for developing immune-related neurological complications. It is a phenomenon of immunological twist when immunotherapy against co-stimulatory molecules activates previously normal T cells to kill tumor cells but, in so doing, the T cells become unrestrained, triggering other autoimmune diseases for which conventional immunotherapy is needed. The most common autoimmune neurological diseases, usually occurring within 2-12 weeks after immune checkpoint inhibitor initiation, include: inflammatory myopathies, myasthenia gravis, acute and chronic demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathies, vasculitic neuropathies, isolated cranial neuropathies, aseptic meningitis, autoimmune encephalitis, multiple sclerosis and hypophysitis. The neurological events can evolve rapidly, necessitating the need for vigilance at all stages of treatment, even after completion, because early immunotherapeutic interventions are effective. The review addresses these complications and the applied therapies, discusses immune pathomechanisms including triggering preexisting autoimmunity, highlights the distinction between paraneoplastic and autoimmune etiologies, and identifies uncertainties regarding risk factors, use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with known immune diseases or restarting therapy after a neurological event. Although the autoimmune neurological complications are not very common, their incidence will likely increase as the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic cancer is growing rapidly.

Optic Neuritis Possibly Induced by Anti-PD-L1 Antibody Treatment in a Patient with Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Background

Recent immune therapy with checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) has demonstrated remarkable antitumor effects on specific tumors, such as malignant lymphoma and non-small cell lung carcinoma. By contrast, CPIs cause an imbalance in the immune system, triggering a wide range of immunological side effects termed immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). Here, we report a rare case of optic neuritis and hypopituitarism during anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody treatment.

Case Presentation

A patient with non-small cell lung carcinoma received anti-PD-L1 antibody treatment every 3 weeks; however, the patient started experiencing headaches, general fatigue, anorexia, and diarrhea approximately 1 year after the initiation of the treatment. Moreover, sudden visual loss of the right eye occurred 1 week after the interruption of the anti-PD-L1 antibody treatment. MRI findings showed gadolinium enhancement in the left optic nerve, but no enlargement of the pituitary gland and stalk. Laboratory data showed decreased serum adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol, and free T₄ levels, and a hormone tolerance test indicated hypopituitarism, hypothyroidism, and hypoadrenocorticism. The central scotoma caused by optic neuritis completely disappeared immediately after a course of steroid pulse therapy, and no recurrence occurred up to 2 years after initiation of the steroid pulse therapy while replacement therapy for hypothyroidism and hypoadrenocorticism was continued.

Conclusions

The patient presented with optic neuritis and hypopituitarism, possibly due to irAEs of the anti-PD-L1 antibody treatment. Steroid pulse therapy was effective for optic neuritis, suggesting underlying immunological mechanisms. Neurological complications including optic neuritis should be considered when examining patients with cancer undergoing CPI treatment.

CHECKPOINT INHIBITOR IMMUNE THERAPY: Systemic Indications and Ophthalmic Side Effects

PURPOSE

To review immune checkpoint inhibitor indications and ophthalmic side effects.

METHODS

A literature review was performed using a PubMed search for publications between 1990 and 2017.

RESULTS

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are designed to treat system malignancies by targeting one of three ligands, leading to T-cell activation for attack against malignant cells. These ligands (and targeted drug) include cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4, ipilimumab), programmed death protein 1 (PD-1, pembrolizumab, nivolumab), and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1, atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab). These medications upregulate the immune system and cause autoimmune-like side effects. Ophthalmic side effects most frequently manifest as uveitis (1%) and dry eye (1-24%). Other side effects include myasthenia gravis (n = 19 reports), inflammatory orbitopathy (n = 11), keratitis (n = 3), cranial nerve palsy (n = 3), optic neuropathy (n = 2), serous retinal detachment (n = 2), extraocular muscle myopathy (n = 1), atypical chorioretinal lesions (n = 1), immune retinopathy (n = 1), and neuroretinitis (n = 1). Most inflammatory side effects are managed with topical or periocular corticosteroids, but advanced cases require systemic corticosteroids and cessation of checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

CONCLUSION

Checkpoint inhibitors enhance the immune system by releasing inhibition on T cells, with risk of autoimmune-like side effects. Ophthalmologists should include immune-related adverse events in their differential when examining cancer patients with new ocular symptoms.

Ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis involving the optic tracts and tuber cinereum evaluated using 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery

Ipilimumab, a human monoclonal antibody against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4, was approved by the U.S. FDA (Food and Drug Administration) in 2011 for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic malignant melanoma. Occurrence of hypophysitis, an immune-related adverse event due to ipilimumab use, has been frequently reported. We report a case of ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis involving the optic tracts and tuber cinereum, identified using 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery.

Inflammatory CNS disease caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors: status and perspectives

Cancer treatment strategies based on immune stimulation have recently entered the clinical arena, with unprecedented success. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) work by indiscriminately promoting immune responses, which target tumour-associated antigens or tumour-specific mutations. However, the augmented immune response, most notably the T cell response, can cause either direct neurotoxicity or, more commonly, indirect neurotoxic effects through systemic or local inflammatory mechanisms or autoimmune mechanisms. Consequently, patients treated with ICIs are susceptible to CNS disease, including paraneoplastic neurological syndromes, encephalitis, multiple sclerosis and hypophysitis. In this Opinion article, we introduce the mechanisms of action of ICIs and review their adverse effects on the CNS. We highlight the importance of early detection of these neurotoxic effects, which should be distinguished from brain metastasis, and the need for early detection of neurotoxicity. It is crucial that physicians are well informed of these neurological adverse effects, given the anticipated increase in the use of immunotherapies to treat cancer.

Neuro-ophthalmic side effects of molecularly targeted cancer drugs

The past two decades has been an amazing time in the advancement of cancer treatment. Molecularly targeted therapy is a concept in which specific cellular molecules (overexpressed, mutationally activated, or selectively expressed proteins) are manipulated in an advantageous manner to decrease the transformation, proliferation, and/or survival of cancer cells. In addition, increased knowledge of the role of the immune system in carcinogenesis has led to the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors to restore and enhance cellular-mediated antitumor immunity. The United States Food and Drug Administration approval of the chimeric monoclonal antibody (mAb) rituximab in 1997 for the treatment of B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma ushered in a new era of targeted therapy for cancer. A year later, trastuzumab, a humanized mAb, was approved for patients with breast cancer. In 2001, imatinib was the first small-molecule kinase inhibitor approved. The approval of ipilimumab-the first in class immune checkpoint inhibitor-in 2011 serves as a landmark period of time in the resurgence of immunotherapy for cancer. Despite the notion that increased tumor specificity results in decreased complications, toxicity remains a major hurdle in the development and implementation of many of the targeted anticancer drugs. This article will provide an overview of the current cellular and immunological understanding of cancer pathogenesis-the foundation upon which molecularly targeted therapies were developed-and a description of the ocular and neuro-ophthalmic toxicity profile of mAbs, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and small-molecule kinase inhibitors.

Obstruction of BRAFV600E transcription by complementary PNA oligomers as a means to inhibit BRAF-mutant melanoma growth

Peptide nucleic acid (PNA) oligomers are DNA mimics, which are capable of binding gene sequences 1000-fold more avidly than complementary native DNA by strand invasion and effectively obstruct transcription. Irreversibly obstructing the transcription or replication of a gene sequence, such as BRAF^V600E, offers a potential route to specifically target the cancer cell itself. We have employed PNA oligomers to target BRAF^V600E in a sequence-specific complementary manner. These PNAs have been modified by appending configurationally stabilizing cationic peptides in order to improve their cellular delivery and target avidity. Our results indicate that exposure of the melanoma cell lines to a modified PNA-peptide conjugate complementary to BRAF^V600E mutation sequence results in a concentration-dependent and time-dependent inhibition of cell growth that is specific for the BRAF^V600E-mutant melanoma cell lines with inhibition of mRNA and protein expression. Xenograft mouse trials show increased tumor growth delay and necrosis with the BRAF^V600E-complementary PNA-peptide conjugates as compared with the saline and scrambled PNA sequence controls. Similarly, quantitative measurement shows a 2.5-fold decrease in Ki67 and a 3-fold increase in terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling expression with this approach. PNA-delivery peptide conjugates represent a novel way to target BRAF^V600E and represent a new approach in targeting selective oncogenes that induce tumor growth.

Toxicity profiles of immunotherapy

Immunotherapies are changing the landscape of advanced solid tumor treatment. These therapies have different mechanisms of action and include oncolytic viruses, checkpoint inhibitors, such as CTLA-4 or PD1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies, and CSF-1R antibodies. Given the growing therapeutic impact of these agents in oncology, it is important to better understand their properties. Immunotherapies generate new toxicity profiles that are called immune-related adverse events and require specific management. This review focuses on the mechanisms of action of such side effects, as well as their description and their general management.

Releasing the brake: safety profile of immune check-point inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Immune check-point inhibitors are now employed as single-agents in current practice for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while combinations of different inhibitors are being evaluated in clinical trials. Although the safety profile of these compounds, with particular reference to drugs targeting programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1), is generally considered manageable, peculiar, immune-related toxicities may onset. Areas covered: This review focuses on the immune-related adverse events (irAEs) observed during immune check-point blockade in NSCLC and their management. The authors report the incidence of irAEs based on the currently available data involving NSCLC and provide recommendations on the general approach to irAEs, as well as indications for the most relevant site-specific events. Expert opinion: Since irAEs may involve a wide range of organs and systems and are potentially reversible if promptly treated, early diagnosis should always be achieved; this might be particularly challenging when other potential causes of toxicity are suspected, such as infections or concurrent treatments. Finally, drugs active on the PD-1/PD-L1 axis appear to be generally manageable even when they are administered to patients with relevant comorbidities, provided that adequate clinical monitoring is performed.