Maternal nutritional supplement delivery in developing countries: a scoping review

Implications of the availability and distribution of birth weight on addressing neonatal mortality: population-based assessment from Bihar state of India

OBJECTIVE

A large proportion of neonatal deaths in India are attributable to low birth weight (LBW). We report population-based distribution and determinants of birth weight in Bihar state, and on the perceptions about birth weight among carers.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional household survey in a state representative sample of 6007 live births born in 2018-2019. Mothers provided detailed interviews on sociodemographic characteristics and birth weight, and their perceptions on LBW (birth weight <2500 g). We report on birth weight availability, LBW prevalence, neonatal mortality rate (NMR) by birth weight and perceptions of mothers on LBW implications.

SETTING

Bihar state, India.

PARTICIPANTS

Women with live birth between October 2018 and September 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 5021 (83.5%) live births participated, and 3939 (78.4%) were weighed at birth. LBW prevalence among those with available birth weight was 18.4% (95% CI 17.1 to 19.7). Majority (87.5%) of the live births born at home were not weighed at birth. LBW prevalence decreased and birth weight ≥2500 g increased significantly with increasing wealth index quartile. NMR was significantly higher in live births weighing <1500 g (11.3%; 95% CI 5.1 to 23.1) and 1500-1999 g (8.0%; 95% CI 4.6 to 13.6) than those weighing ≥2500 g (1.3%, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.7). Assuming proportional correspondence of LBW and NMR in live births with and without birth weight, the estimated LBW among those without birth weight was 35.5% (95% CI 33.0 to 38.0) and among all live births irrespective of birth weight availability was 23.0% (95% CI 21.9 to 24.2). 70% of mothers considered LBW to be a sign of sickness, 59.5% perceived it as a risk of developing other illnesses and 8.6% as having an increased probability of death.

CONCLUSIONS

Missing birth weight is substantially compromising the planning of interventions to address LBW at the population-level. Variations of LBW by place of delivery and sociodemographic indicators, and the perceptions of carers about LBW can facilitate appropriate actions to address LBW and the associated neonatal mortality.

Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application

Scoping reviews are an increasingly common approach to evidence synthesis with a growing suite of methodological guidance and resources to assist review authors with their planning, conduct and reporting. The latest guidance for scoping reviews includes the JBI methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Extension for Scoping Reviews. This paper provides readers with a brief update regarding ongoing work to enhance and improve the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews as well as information regarding the future steps in scoping review methods development. The purpose of this paper is to provide readers with a concise source of information regarding the difference between scoping reviews and other review types, the reasons for undertaking scoping reviews, and an update on methodological guidance for the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews.Despite available guidance, some publications use the term 'scoping review' without clear consideration of available reporting and methodological tools. Selection of the most appropriate review type for the stated research objectives or questions, standardised use of methodological approaches and terminology in scoping reviews, clarity and consistency of reporting and ensuring that the reporting and presentation of the results clearly addresses the review's objective(s) and question(s) are critical components for improving the rigour of scoping reviews.Rigourous, high-quality scoping reviews should clearly follow up to date methodological guidance and reporting criteria. Stakeholder engagement is one area where further work could occur to enhance integration of consultation with the results of evidence syntheses and to support effective knowledge translation. Scoping review methodology is evolving as a policy and decision-making tool. Ensuring the integrity of scoping reviews by adherence to up-to-date reporting standards is integral to supporting well-informed decision-making.

Prevalence and associated factors of undernutrition among pregnant Sudanese women

BACKGROUND

Maternal undernutrition is a global health challenge, and it is associated with significant maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and the factors associated with undernutrition among pregnant women in Sudan.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out in Saad Abuelela Hospital in Khartoum, Sudan, from June to December 2019. Sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics were collected through a questionnaire. Mid-upper arm circumference was measured. Undernutrition was defined as a mid-upper arm circumference of <23 cm. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the factors associated with maternal undernutrition.

RESULTS

Of 1801 pregnant women, 226 (12.5%) were undernourished. Multivariable analysis revealed that ≤2 antenatal care clinic visits (adjusted OR [AOR]=3.06, 95% CI 1.68 to 5.58) was associated with undernutrition. Age (AOR=0.90, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.94) and haemoglobin levels (AOR=0.81, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.97) were negatively associated with undernutrition. There was no association between parity, education, interpregnancy interval, occupation and maternal undernutrition.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicated that 12.5% of the pregnant women in Khartoum were undernourished. More effort and action are need to improve the counselling and future inclusion of a supplemental food supply for undernourished pregnant women.