The diagnostic benefit of antibodies against ribosomal proteins in systemic lupus erythematosus

Neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Molecules Involved in Its Imunopathogenesis, Clinical Features, and Treatment

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an idiopathic chronic autoimmune disease that can affect any organ in the body, including the neurological system. Multiple factors, such as environmental (infections), genetic (many HLA alleles including DR2 and DR3, and genes including C4), and immunological influences on self-antigens, such as nuclear antigens, lead to the formation of multiple autoantibodies that cause deleterious damage to bodily tissues and organs. The production of autoantibodies, such as anti-dsDNA, anti-SS(A), anti-SS(B), anti-Smith, and anti-neuronal DNA are characteristic features of this disease. This autoimmune disease results from a failure of the mechanisms responsible for maintaining self-tolerance in T cells, B cells, or both. Immune complexes, circulating antibodies, cytokines, and autoreactive T lymphocytes are responsible for tissue injury in this autoimmune disease. The diagnosis of SLE is a rheumatological challenge despite the availability of clinical criteria. NPSLE was previously referred to as lupus cerebritis or lupus sclerosis. However, these terms are no longer recommended because there is no definitive pathological cause for the neuropsychiatric manifestations of SLE. Currently, the treatment options are primarily based on symptomatic presentations. These include the use of antipsychotics, antidepressants, and anxiolytic medications for the treatment of psychiatric and mood disorders. Antiepileptic drugs to treat seizures, and immunosuppressants (e.g., corticosteroids, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil), are directed against inflammatory responses along with non-pharmacological interventions.

Construction of molecular subgroups in childhood systemic lupus erythematosus using bioinformatics

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disorder. In patients with childhood SLE (cSLE), the onset of the disease occurs before 18 years of age and accounts for a high proportion of childhood autoimmune diseases. Adult SLE and cSLE differ in terms of clinical manifestations, gene expression profiles, and treatment. Because current diagnostic methods do not meet clinical requirements, researchers currently use transcriptome analysis to investigate the characteristics of the cSLE genome. In the present study, we used bioinformatics methods to genotype cSLE and identify potential therapeutic targets.

METHODS

The transcriptomes of 952 patients with cSLE and 94 normal controls were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus using unsupervised class learning to determine the genotypes in the microarray dataset, and the clinical characteristics, differentially expressed genes, and biological characteristics of the subtypes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients with cSLE were accordingly classified into three subgroups. Subgroup I was associated with lupus nephritis, female patients, and a high SLE disease activity index, and the disease in this subgroup was more severe than that in other subgroups. The SLE disease activity index in subgroup II was low; this subgroup may be related to lupus vasculitis. Subgroup III mostly included male patients and was associated with neuropsychiatric manifestations of lupus.

CONCLUSION

We divided patients with cSLE into three subgroups with different characteristics based on transcriptome data. Our findings provide molecular evidence for future diagnosis and individualized treatment of cSLE.

Immune Response to Enterococcus gallinarum in Lupus Patients Is Associated With a Subset of Lupus-Associated Autoantibodies

Interactions between gut microbes and the immune system influence autoimmune disorders like systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Recently, Enterococcus gallinarum, a gram-positive commensal gut bacterium, was implicated as a candidate pathobiont in SLE. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the influence of E. gallinarum exposure on clinical parameters of SLE. Since circulating IgG antibodies to whole bacteria have been established as a surrogate marker for bacterial exposure, anti-E. gallinarum IgG antibodies were measured in banked serum samples from SLE patients and healthy controls in the Oklahoma Cohort for Rheumatic Diseases. The associations between anti-E. gallinarum antibody titers and clinical indicators of lupus were studied. Antibodies to human RNA were studied in a subset of patients. Our results show that sera from both patients and healthy controls had IgG and IgA antibodies reactive with E. gallinarum. The antibody titers between the two groups were not different. However, SLE patients with Ribosomal P autoantibodies had higher anti-E. gallinarum IgG titers compared to healthy controls. In addition to anti-Ribosomal P, higher anti-E. gallinarum titers were also significantly associated with the presence of anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm autoantibodies. In the subset of patients with anti-Ribosomal P and anti-dsDNA, the anti-E. gallinarum titers correlated significantly with antibodies to human RNA. Our data show that both healthy individuals and SLE patients were sero-reactive to E. gallinarum. In SLE patients, the immune response to E. gallinarum was associated with antibody response to a specific subset of lupus autoantigens. These findings provide additional evidence that E. gallinarum may be a pathobiont for SLE in susceptible individuals.