1
|
Li X, Tang X, Lu W. Tracking biomedical articles along the translational continuum: a measure based on biomedical knowledge representation. Scientometrics 2023; 128:1295-1319. [PMID: 36570779 PMCID: PMC9758472 DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04607-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Keeping track of translational research is essential to evaluating the performance of programs on translational medicine. Despite several indicators in previous studies, a consensus measure is still needed to represent the translational features of biomedical research at the article level. In this study, we first trained semantic representations of biomedical entities and documents (i.e., bio-entity2vec and bio-doc2vec) based on over 30 million PubMed articles. With these vectors, we then developed a new measure called Translational Progression (TP) for tracking biomedical articles along the translational continuum. We validated the effectiveness of TP from two perspectives (Clinical trial phase identification and ACH classification), which showed excellent consistency between TP and other indicators. Meanwhile, TP has several advantages. First, it can track the degree of translation of biomedical research dynamically and in real-time. Second, it is straightforward to interpret and operationalize. Third, it doesn't require labor-intensive MeSH labeling and it is suitable for big scholarly data as well as papers that are not indexed in PubMed. In addition, we examined the translational progressions of biomedical research from three dimensions (including overall distribution, time, and research topic), which revealed three significant findings. The proposed measure in this study could be used by policymakers to monitor biomedical research with high translational potential in real-time and make better decisions. It can also be adopted and improved for other domains, such as physics or computer science, to assess the application value of scientific discoveries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Li
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030 Hubei China
| | - Xuli Tang
- School of Information Management, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079 Hubei China
| | - Wei Lu
- School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072 Hubei China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Faupel‐Badger JM, Vogel AL, Austin CP, Rutter JL. Advancing translational science education. Clin Transl Sci 2022; 15:2555-2566. [PMID: 36045637 PMCID: PMC9652430 DOI: 10.1111/cts.13390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
In this communication, the authors offer considerations for how the scientific community can capitalize on decades of translational science advances and experiential knowledge to develop new education opportunities for a diverse and highly skilled translational science workforce. Continued advancement of the field of translational science will require new education approaches that distill key concepts in translational science from past and ongoing research initiatives and teach this foundational knowledge to current and future translational scientists. These key concepts include generalizable scientific and operational principles to guide translational science, as well as evidence-informed practices. Inspired by this approach, the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) has developed an initial set of guiding principles for translational science generated via case studies of multiple highly successful translational science initiatives, and is now teaching them via new education activities that aim to reach a broad scientific audience interested in translational science. Our goal with this review is to prompt continued conversation with the translational science community regarding capitalizing on our collective translational science knowledge to advance core content for translational science education and disseminating this content to a broad range of scientific audiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica M. Faupel‐Badger
- National Institutes of HealthNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesBethesdaMarylandUSA
| | - Amanda L. Vogel
- National Institutes of HealthNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesBethesdaMarylandUSA
| | | | - Joni L. Rutter
- National Institutes of HealthNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesBethesdaMarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Evaluation of an Online Case Study-Based Course in Translational Science for a Broad Scientific Audience: Impacts on Students’ Knowledge, Attitudes, Planned Scientific Activities, and Career Goals. J Clin Transl Sci 2022; 6:e82. [PMID: 35949657 PMCID: PMC9305082 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2022.415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: There is a need for education activities in translational science (TS) that focus on teaching key principles, concepts, and approaches to effectively overcome common scientific and operational bottlenecks in the translational process. Delivering this content to the broad range of individuals interested in advancing translation will help to both expand and develop the TS workforce. Rigorous evaluations will build the evidence base for effective educational approaches for varied audiences. Methods: In 2020, the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences offered an online case study-based course in TS for students across education and career stages. The course evaluation used baseline and endpoint student surveys to assess satisfaction with the course and impacts of participation on knowledge and attitudes relevant to TS and professional goals. Results: Of 112 students, 100 completed baseline and/or endpoint surveys, with 66 completing both. Most found the online format (n = 59, 83%) and case study approach (n = 62, 87%) moderately or very effective. There were statistically significant increases in TS knowledge (P < .001) and positive attitudes about team science in translational research (TR) (P < .001). Students reported the course increased their skills and knowledge in cross-disciplinary team science, the process of preclinical and clinical TR, and how their work fits into the translational spectrum, and increased their interest in scientific approaches used in the case study and careers in TS, TR, or team science. Conclusions: This online case study-based course effectively conveyed TS concepts to students from a range of backgrounds and enhanced their professional interests related to course content.
Collapse
|
4
|
A New American University Model for Training the Future MCH Workforce Through a Translational Research Team. Matern Child Health J 2022; 26:10-19. [PMID: 35060070 PMCID: PMC8775150 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-021-03349-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To describe the process of developing and implementing experiential learning through translational research teams that engage diverse undergraduate and graduate students. Methods After a college redesign, translational research teams were developed to foster multidisciplinary research and better integrate students with faculty research, community, and clinical activities. Three primary approaches were used to engage undergraduate and graduate students in the maternal and child health translational research team (MCH TrT). These included an undergraduate experiential learning course; participation in translational research team meetings and events; and mentorship activities including graduate student theses and supplementary projects. Results Since 2019, a total of 56 students have engaged with the MCH translational research team. The majority (64%) of students engaging in translational research were undergraduates. Racial and ethnic diversity was evident with 16% Latinx, 14% Black/African American, 12% Asian, 10% two or more races, and 4% Native American or Native Hawaiian. A large proportion (42%) of students indicated that they were first-generation college students, while 24% indicated they had a disability. Five themes emerged from student feedback about their involvement in the experiential learning course: the value of translational research, development of research skills, collaboration, practice development, and value for community partners. Conclusions for Practice Through an MCH translational research team, we have established a pathway to enhance diversity among the MCH workforce which will increase recruitment and retention of underrepresented groups, and ultimately improve MCH research and practice.
Collapse
|
5
|
Sancheznieto F, Sorkness CA, Attia J, Buettner K, Edelman D, Hobbs S, McIntosh S, McManus LM, Sandberg K, Schnaper HW, Scholl L, Umans JG, Weavers K, Windebank A, McCormack WT. Clinical and translational science award T32/TL1 training programs: program goals and mentorship practices. J Clin Transl Sci 2021; 6:e13. [PMID: 35211339 PMCID: PMC8826009 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2021.884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A national survey characterized training and career development for translational researchers through Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) T32/TL1 programs. This report summarizes program goals, trainee characteristics, and mentorship practices. METHODS A web link to a voluntary survey was emailed to 51 active TL1 program directors and administrators. Descriptive analyses were performed on aggregate data. Qualitative data analysis used open coding of text followed by an axial coding strategy based on the grounded theory approach. RESULTS Fifty out of 51 (98%) invited CTSA hubs responded. Training program goals were aligned with the CTSA mission. The trainee population consisted of predoctoral students (50%), postdoctoral fellows (30%), and health professional students in short-term (11%) or year-out (9%) research training. Forty percent of TL1 programs support both predoctoral and postdoctoral trainees. Trainees are diverse by academic affiliation, mostly from medicine, engineering, public health, non-health sciences, pharmacy, and nursing. Mentor training is offered by most programs, but mandatory at less than one-third of them. Most mentoring teams consist of two or more mentors. CONCLUSIONS CTSA TL1 programs are distinct from other NIH-funded training programs in their focus on clinical and translational research, cross-disciplinary approaches, emphasis on team science, and integration of multiple trainee types. Trainees in nearly all TL1 programs were engaged in all phases of translational research (preclinical, clinical, implementation, public health), suggesting that the CTSA TL1 program is meeting the mandate of NCATS to provide training to develop the clinical and translational research workforce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fátima Sancheznieto
- University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Christine A. Sorkness
- University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jacqueline Attia
- Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Kathryn Buettner
- Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - David Edelman
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Stuart Hobbs
- The Ohio State University, Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Scott McIntosh
- Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | - Kathryn Sandberg
- Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Washington, DC, USA
| | - H. William Schnaper
- Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Jason G. Umans
- Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | - Wayne T. McCormack
- Clinical & Translational Science Institute, Department of Pathology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vogel AL, Knebel AR, Faupel-Badger JM, Portilla LM, Simeonov A. A systems approach to enable effective team science from the internal research program of the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. J Clin Transl Sci 2021; 5:e163. [PMID: 34527302 PMCID: PMC8427549 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2021.811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The internal research program of the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) at the National Institutes of Health aims to fundamentally transform the preclinical translational research process to get more treatments to more people more quickly. The program develops and implements innovative scientific and operational approaches that accelerate and enhance translation across many diverse projects. Cross-disciplinary team science is a defining feature of our organization, with scientists at all levels engaged in multiple research teams. Here, we share our systems approach to nurturing cross-disciplinary team science, which leverages organizational policies, structures, and processes. Policies including the organizational mission statement, principles for ethical conduct of research, performance review criteria, and training program objectives and approaches reinforce the value of team science to achieve the program's scientific goals. Structures including an organizational structure designed around solving translational problems, co-location of employees in a single state-of-the-art scientific facility, and shared-use laboratories, expertise and instrumentation facilitate collaboration. Processes including fluid team assembly, specialized project management, cross-agency partnerships, and decision making based on clear screening criteria and milestones enable effective team assembly and functioning. We share evidence of the impact of these approaches on the science and commercialization of findings and discuss pathways to broad adoption of similar approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda L. Vogel
- National Institutes of Health (NIH); National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS); Office of Policy, Communications and Education; Education Branch; Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ann R. Knebel
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), Division of Preclinical Innovation (DPI), Office of the Scientific Director, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Jessica M. Faupel-Badger
- National Institutes of Health (NIH); National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS); Office of Policy, Communications and Education; Education Branch; Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lili M. Portilla
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), Office of Strategic Alliances (OSA), Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Anton Simeonov
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), Division of Preclinical Innovation (DPI), Office of the Scientific Director, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|