The validity of neuropathy and neuropathic pain measures in patients with cancer receiving taxanes and platinums

CYP3A genetic variation and taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and candidate gene study

Background: Taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN) is an important cause of premature treatment cessation and dose-limitation in cancer therapy. It also reduces quality of life and survivorship in affected patients. Genetic polymorphisms in the CYP3A family have been investigated but the findings have been inconsistent and contradictory. Methods: A systematic review identified 12 pharmacogenetic studies investigating genetic variation in CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A5*3 and TIPN. In our candidate gene study, 288 eligible participants (211 taxane participants receiving docetaxel or paclitaxel, and 77 control participants receiving oxaliplatin) were successfully genotyped for CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A5*3. Genotyping data was transformed into a combined CYP3A metaboliser phenotype: Poor metabolisers, intermediate metabolisers and extensive metabolisers. Individual genotypes and combined CYP3A metaboliser phenotypes were assessed in relation to neurotoxicity, including by meta-analysis where possible. Results: In the systematic review, no significant association was found between CYP3A5*3 and TIPN in seven studies, with one study reporting a protective association. For CYP3A4*22, one study has reported an association with TIPN, while four other studies failed to show an association. Evaluation of our patient cohort showed that paclitaxel was found to be more neurotoxic than docetaxel (p < 0.001). Diabetes was also significantly associated with the development of TIPN. The candidate gene analysis showed no significant association between either SNP (CYP3A5*3 and CYP3A4*22) and the development of TIPN overall, or severe TIPN. Meta-analysis showed no association between these two variants and TIPN. Transformed into combined CYP3A metaboliser phenotypes, 30 taxane recipients were poor metabolisers, 159 were intermediate metabolisers, and 22 were extensive metabolisers. No significant association was observed between metaboliser status and case-control status. Summary: We have shown that the risk of peripheral neuropathy during taxane chemotherapy is greater in patients who have diabetes. CYP3A genotype or phenotype was not identified as a risk factor in either the candidate gene analysis or the systematic review/meta-analysis, although we cannot exclude the possibility of a minor contribution, which would require a larger sample size.

Vitamin B6 levels do not correlate with severity of neuropathy in chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy

Pyridoxine (vitamin B6) toxicity is known to cause a length-dependent, sensory predominant axonal polyneuropathy. There is debate regarding the threshold at which intake levels can cause neurological symptoms through pyridoxine toxicity. We asked if elevated plasma vitamin B6 levels were related to outcome measures in a well-characterized cohort of patients with chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP). We included 261 patients enrolled in the Peripheral Neuropathy Research Registry who had a complete dataset including a plasma vitamin B6 value. Patients with vitamin B6 deficiency (0-4.9 μg/L) were excluded. We performed a chi-square test for independence and analyzed the logistic relation of elevated plasma B6 level to nerve conduction studies (NCS), neurological examination findings, and patient-reported symptoms controlling for age and time elapsed since neuropathy symptom onset. Plasma B6 level was not related to neuropathy severity. There was no logistic relation of elevated plasma B6 level to NCS results, examination features including toe strength, vibration sense, and deep tendon reflexes, or patient-reported numbness or pain intensity. This study suggests that moderately elevated plasma B6 levels, even in the 100 to 200 μg/L range, are not associated with significantly worse neuropathy signs or symptoms. Although standard supplementation of B6 does not appear to have a major negative affect on CIAP, this study does not directly answer whether stopping supplementation will have a beneficial effect. Very few patients in the study had vitamin B6 levels >300 μg/L, suggesting that screening for vitamin B6 toxicity may be left to the discretion of the physician.

Measurement properties of brief neuropathy screening items in cancer patients receiving taxanes, platinums, or proteasome inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Timely detection of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is critical to effectively tailor chemotherapy dose levels and offer supportive care. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to determine the reliability and validity of the two Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE™) numbness and tingling severity and interference items to screen for CIPN in patients receiving taxanes, platinums, or proteasome inhibitors.

METHODS

Participants (N = 142) completed the two PRO-CTCAE items, a 0-10 numerical rating scale of worst CIPN pain intensity, and the Quality of Life Questionnaire-CIPN20 (QLQ-CIPN20) prior to three clinical visits (T1, T2, T3) during neurotoxic chemotherapy. Participants completed the two PRO-CTCAE items again following the T3 clinical visit (T4). In addition, study staff administered the modified Total Neuropathy Score-Clinical Version (TNSc©) at T3. We examined floor (i.e., no CIPN severity or interference) and ceiling effects, test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, longitudinal validity, construct validity of the response categories, and sensitivity and specificity of the two PRO-CTCAE items.

RESULTS

At T3, 29% of participants had PRO-CTCAE severity scores at the floor; 60.1% of participants reported interference item scores at the floor. Agreements between scores reported at T3 and T4 for PRO-CTCAE severity (ICC = 0.79) and interference (ICC = 0.73) were moderate to strong. The PRO-CTCAE severity and interference items correlated moderately-strongly with QLQ-CIPN20 sensory (Spearman's ρ-range = 0.53-0.72) and motor (Spearman's ρ-range = 0.50-0.58) subscale scores. The Cohen's d from T1 to T3 for the PRO-CTCAE items were small (severity: d = 0.32, interference: d = 0.40) and comparable to the effect sizes for change observed with the QLQ-CIPN20. The PRO-CTCAE severity (0-3) and interference (0-2) response categories distinguished respondents with significantly different levels of QLQ-CIPN20 sensory and motor subscale scores (p < 0.001 via Jonckheere-Terpstra tests). The sensitivity and specificity of the PRO-CTCAE severity item (cutoff > 0) to detect probable sensory peripheral neuropathy were 95.83% and 65.22%, while the sensitivity and specificity of the PRO-CTCAE™ interference item (cutoff > 0) were 51.39% and 73.91%.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary evidence supports the reliability and validity of the PRO-CTCAE numbness and tingling items for CIPN screening, although there may be floor effects and limitations in the capacity of the PRO-CTCAE items to identify the full range of CIPN sensory and motor features beyond numbness and tingling. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.Gov, NCT03514680. Registered 21 April 2018. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03514680.

Clinical and biochemical markers in CIPN: A reappraisal

The increased survival of cancer patients has raised growing public health concern on associated long-term consequences of antineoplastic treatment. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a primarily sensory polyneuropathy, which may be accompanied by pain, autonomic disturbances, and motor deficit. About 70% of treated cancer patients might develop CIPN during or after the completion of chemotherapy, and in most of them such complication persists after six months from the treatment. The definition of the potential risk of development and resolution of CIPN according to a clinical and biochemical profile would be certainly fundamental to tailor chemotherapy regimen and dosage on individual susceptibility. In recent years, patient-reported and clinician-related tools along with quality of life instruments have been featured as primary outcomes in clinical setting and randomized trials. New studies on metabolomics markers are further pursuing accurate and easily accessible indicators of peripheral nerve damage. The aim of this review is to outline the strengths and pitfalls of current knowledge on CIPN, and to provide a framework for future potential developments of standardized protocols involving clinical and biochemical markers for CIPN assessment and monitoring.

Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Nursing Implications

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is an unsolved and potentially life-compromising problem for most patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy. It manifests with numbness, tingling, and possibly neuropathic pain and motor and autonomic symptoms. This review aims to provide an evidence synthesis that prepares nurses to comprehensively assess, provide supportive care for, and critically evaluate the literature on CIPN. The prevalence, significance, characteristics, mechanisms, and risk factors of CIPN will be discussed, as well as nursing-relevant evidence on the assessment, prevention, and management of CIPN. The importance of critical literature evaluation before clinical implementation to reduce physical and financial harms to patients will also be highlighted.

Comparison of chemotherapy effects on mechanical sensitivity and food-maintained operant responding in male and female rats

Chemotherapies of varying classes often cause neuropathy and debilitating chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain sufficient to limit treatment and reduce quality of life for many patients battling cancer. There are currently no effective preventive or alleviative treatments for chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain. Preclinical models have been developed to test candidate chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain treatments; however, studies using these models rarely provide direct comparisons of effects of different chemotherapies or assess the degree to which chemotherapies produce clinically relevant signs of pain-depressed behavior. Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats received four injections of vehicle, paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, vincristine, or bortezomib on alternate days. Mechanical hypersensitivity, body weight, and food-maintained operant responding were evaluated before, during, and for up to 42 days after initiation of treatment. Morphine potency and effectiveness to reverse chemotherapy-induced effects were also evaluated. All four chemotherapies produced dose-dependent and sustained mechanical hypersensitivity in all rats. Vincristine and oxaliplatin produced transient weight loss and decreases in food-maintained operant responding in all rats, whereas paclitaxel and bortezomib produced lesser or no effect. At 4 weeks after treatment, operant responding was depressed only in paclitaxel-treated males. Morphine reversed mechanical hypersensitivity in all rats but failed to reverse paclitaxel-induced depression of operant responding in males. We conclude that chemotherapy treatments sufficient to produce sustained mechanical hypersensitivity failed to produce sustained or morphine-reversible behavioral depression in rats. Insofar as pain-related behavioral depression is a cardinal sign of chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain in humans, these results challenge the presumption that these chemotherapy-dosing regimens are sufficient to model clinically relevant chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain in rats.

Impact of Cryotherapy on Sensory, Motor, and Autonomic Neuropathy in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Paclitaxel: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Introduction: We conducted a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of cryotherapy in preventing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in patients with early breast cancer receiving neo/adjuvant weekly paclitaxel.

Methods: Patients were recruited from the National Cancer Centre Singapore and randomized (1:1) to receive either cryotherapy or usual care. Cryotherapy was applied as frozen gloves and socks on all extremities from 15 min before paclitaxel until 15 min post-infusion every cycle. Efficacy was measured by patient-reported outcomes (Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire [PNQ] and EORTC QLQ-CIPN20) and electrophysiological assessments. The primary endpoint was PNQ severity at 2 weeks after 12 cycles of weekly paclitaxel.

Results: A total of 46 patients were recruited, of which 8 dropped out before paclitaxel treatment, leaving 38 evaluable. There was no significant difference in PNQ severity between cryotherapy and usual care at 2 weeks after paclitaxel treatment (sensory: p = 0.721; motor: p = 1.000). A benefit was observed at 3 months post-paclitaxel based on PNQ (sensory: 14.3 vs. 41.2%, p = 0.078; motor: 0 vs. 29.4%, p = 0.012) and CIPN20 (sensory: β = −3.6, 95%CI = −10.5–3.4, p = 0.308; motor: β = −7.3, 95%CI = −14.6–0, p = 0.051). Additionally, cryotherapy subjects have lower CIPN20 autonomic score (β = −5.84, 95%CI = −11.15 to −0.524, p = 0.031) and higher sympathetic skin response hand amplitudes (β = 0.544, 95%CI = 0.108–0.98, p = 0.014), suggesting possible autonomic benefits from cryotherapy. Temporary interruption with cryotherapy occurred in 80.9% of the subjects due to cold intolerance.

Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence that cryotherapy prevents sensory neuropathy which may be due to the high rates of cryotherapy interruption in this study. The autonomic benefits of cryotherapy should be further investigated with appropriate outcome measures.

Clinical Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03429972.

Relation of exercise and pain in patients with idiopathic distal axonal polyneuropathies

Although exercise is associated with better outcomes in patients with some peripheral neuropathies, data in idiopathic peripheral neuropathies is lacking. This study was completed to do a comprehensive data analysis about the benefits of regular exercise in a well-characterized cohort of patients with idiopathic distal, symmetrical, axonal polyneuropathy enrolled in the Peripheral Neuropathy Research Registry (PNRR) at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. From the patient-reported exercise habits, metabolic equivalents (METs) were calculated and the patient information was grouped into four categories. The PNRR data set, including patient reported pain, numbness, and weakness, was analyzed using the METs categories to evaluate for the benefits of exercise. We controlled for the components of metabolic syndrome including Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP), high density lipids (HDL) and triglyceride level, and body mass index (BMI) as defined by the Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines. Lower METs were associated with neuropathic pain, but not with other peripheral neuropathy symptoms. Patients with IPN who exercised were less likely to have painful neuropathy independent of the average METs per week (P < .01). No significant differences were seen for patient reported numbness, weakness, or balance issues. The data suggests that patients with idiopathic neuropathy benefit from exercises even if performed on a low intensity level or less frequently, and patients are less likely to have severe pain symptoms when exercising on a regular basis.

Taxane and epothilone-induced peripheral neurotoxicity: From pathogenesis to treatment

Taxane-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (TIPN) is the most common non-hematological side effect of taxane-based chemotherapy, and may result in dose reductions and discontinuations, having as such a detrimental effect on patients' overall survival. Epothilones share similar mechanism of action with taxanes. The typical TIPN clinical presentation is mainly comprised of numbness and paresthesia, in a stocking-and-glove distribution and may progress more proximally over time, with paclitaxel being more neurotoxic than docetaxel. Motor and autonomic involvement is less common, whereas an acute taxane-induced acute pain syndrome is frequent. Patient reported outcomes questionnaires, clinical evaluation, and instrumental tools offer complementary information in TIPN. Its electrodiagnostic features include reduced/abolished sensory action potentials, and less prominent motor involvement, in keeping with a length-dependent, axonal dying back predominately sensory neuropathy. TIPN is dose-dependent and may be reversible within months after the end of chemotherapy. The single and cumulative delivered dose of taxanes is considered the main risk factor of TIPN development. Apart from the cumulative dose, other risk factors for TIPN include demographic, clinical, and pharmacogenetic features with several single-nucleotide polymorphisms potentially linked with increased susceptibility of TIPN. There are currently no neuroprotective strategies to reduce the risk of TIPN, and symptomatic treatments are very limited. This review critically examines the pathogenesis, incidence, risk factors (both clinical and pharmacogenetic), clinical phenotype and management of TIPN.

Overview and critical revision of clinical assessment tools in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) is a major toxicity of cancer treatment, leading to dose reduction and premature treatment cessation, potentially affecting patient function, and quality of life. The development of accurate and sensitive assessment tools for CIPN is essential to enable clinical monitoring during treatment, follow-up of long-term outcomes and measurement of toxicity in clinical trials. This review examines CIPN clinical assessment scales incorporating clinician-based, composite, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), providing a systematic review of their properties and an updated critical analysis of recommendations on current evidence for their use. This systematic review of CIPN assessment tools identified 50 papers containing 41 assessment tools, across 4 categories (common toxicity criteria; composite neurological scale; PROs; pain scale). The majority of these tools were PROs, underscoring the importance of patient-based assessment of symptoms. While there has been considerable work in the field over the past 10 years, this review highlights significant gaps, including a lack of evaluation of responsiveness and problematic neuropathic pain evaluation. There remains a need for consensus on the best available tool and the need to modify existing instruments to improve utility.

Psychometric Testing of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20-Item Scale Using Pooled Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Outcome Measures Standardization and Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology A151408 Study Data

BACKGROUND

No criterion-standard patient-reported outcome measure of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) exists.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to reevaluate the sensitivity, reliability, and validity of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-CIPN (QLQ-CIPN20) measure and suggest possible revisions that could strengthen it.

METHODS

Cross-sectional QLQ-CIPN20 data from 8 European countries (n = 271) were pooled with data from 4 North American multisite CIPN intervention trials (n = 884). The combined sample (N = 1155) included patients with varied cancer diagnoses who had received neurotoxic chemotherapy. Item score ranges, Cronbach's α, and exploratory factor analysis were used to evaluate sensitivity, internal consistency, and structural validity.

RESULTS

Individual item mean scores ranged from 1.21 to 2.34 (SD range, 0.55-1.17). All item scores encompassed the entire 1 to 4 range. We recommend that 4 items be removed because of low item-item score correlations (r < 0.30). On the basis of the remaining 16 items, 88% of the variance was explained by 2 factors whose Cronbach's α coefficients were .90 and .85. However, items lacked conceptual alignment with previously published factor structures.

CONCLUSION

Using a large, diverse sample of European and North American participants, the reduced 16-item QLQ-CIPN20 is sensitive and internally consistent. However, factor analysis results revealed an unstable factor structure.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The use of a reliable, valid, and sensitive criterion-standard QLQ-CIPN20 variant in clinical practice settings could improve function, quality of life, and CIPN symptom control by facilitating patient reporting and thereby clinician awareness of this underrecognized consequence of cancer therapy.

Characterizing patient-clinician chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy assessment and management communication approaches

OBJECTIVE

To describe the frequency and characteristics of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) assessment and management communication approaches between patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy and clinicians.

METHODS

The data used in this analysis originated from a randomized controlled trial in which adults with cancer self-reported treatment-related symptoms using web-based symptom assessment technology. Three-to-six weeks after study initiation, each participant's outpatient visit was audio-recorded. Audio recordings and associated clinician notes for 159 participants who received platinum and/or taxane-based chemotherapy were coded for the presence of several CIPN assessment and management communication characteristics.

RESULTS

Participants received low cumulative neurotoxic chemotherapy doses (75%) at the time of audio recording. CIPN was discussed and documented in 44% and 46% of participant-clinician encounters. In symptomatic participants, clinicians asked an average of 0.7 open-ended questions, appropriately managed 70% of cases, and asked upper and lower extremity CIPN questions in 25% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians infrequently discussed and documented CIPN in participants with low CIPN severity, however appropriately managed mild CIPN. Development of interventions to translate existing recommended CIPN communication approaches into practice are required.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Effective participant-clinician communication is required at each clinic visit during chemotherapy treatment to identify initial signs of CIPN and offer appropriate treatment.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in breast cancer survivors: a comparison of patient-reported outcomes and quantitative sensory testing

PURPOSE

CIPN is a common, debilitating, and dose-limiting side effect of chemotherapy. Here, we describe characteristics of patients with CIPN using both patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and quantitative sensory testing (QST).

METHODS

Breast cancer survivors with persistent moderate to severe CIPN defined by a rating of 4 or greater on a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from two ongoing clinical trials were included. PROs included the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Gynecologic Oncology Group/Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx). QST included tactile and vibration detection threshold measurements. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Spearman correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

49 female patients with a mean age of 61 years were assessed; 63% were Caucasian. Mean NRS scores were 4.2, 5.7, and 4.3 on 0-10 scale for pain, numbness, and tingling, respectively. Mean NPS score was 41.0 on a 0-100 scale, and the mean FACT/GOG-Ntx score was 25.8 on a 0-44 scale. QST showed mild to moderate impairments in tactile and vibration perception. The FACT/GOG-Ntx subscale for numbness was negatively correlated with tactile and vibration thresholds in both hands and feet (both p < 0.05). NPS was positively correlated with tactile thresholds in the hands and feet (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with moderate to severe CIPN report moderate pain, numbness, and tingling, and exhibit reduced tactile and vibration perception on QST. Weak to moderate correlations were observed between PRO and QST. These data suggest that QST outcomes are associated with CIPN symptoms and may be useful in helping monitor and manage CIPN treatment.

Quantification of Small Fiber Neuropathy in Chemotherapy-Treated Patients

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major, dose-limiting side effect of treatment with neurotoxic cancer treatments which can result in long-term impairment. Deficits often reflect a large fiber polyneuropathy, however small fiber involvement resulting in neuropathic pain and autonomic dysfunction can occur. Quantification of both CIPN and small fiber neuropathy (SFN) remains a challenge. Accordingly, the prevalence and pathophysiology of small fiber neuropathy amongst cancer survivors remains poorly understood. This review will provide an overview of the clinical features of SFN associated with neurotoxic cancer treatments as well as a summary of current assessment tools for evaluating small fiber function, and their use in patients treated with neurotoxic chemotherapies. The continued development and utilization of novel measures quantifying small fiber involvement will help elucidate the pathophysiology underlying symptoms of CIPN and assist in informing treatment approaches. Accurately identifying subgroups of patients with neuropathic symptoms which may respond to existing pain medication may reduce the impact of CIPN and improve long-term quality of life as well as provide better categorization of patients for future clinical trials of neuroprotective and treatment strategies for CIPN. PERSPECTIVE: This review provides a critical analysis of SFN associated with neurotoxic cancer treatments and the assessment tools for evaluating small fiber dysfunction in cancer patients. Quantification of small fiber involvement in CIPN will assist in identifying subgroups of patients with neuropathic symptoms which may respond to existing pain medications.

Mechanisms, Predictors, and Challenges in Assessing and Managing Painful Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

OBJECTIVE

To describe the known predictors and pathophysiological mechanisms of chronic painful chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in cancer survivors and the challenges in assessing and managing it.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed/Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, and PsycINFO.

CONCLUSION

The research on chronic painful CIPN is limited. Additional research is needed to identify the predictors and pathophysiological mechanisms of chronic painful CIPN to inform the development of assessment tools and management options for this painful and possibly debilitating condition.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Recognition of the predictors of chronic painful CIPN and proactive CIPN assessment and palliative management are important steps in reducing its impact on physical function and quality of life.

In Search of a Gold Standard Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Use in Chemotherapy- Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Clinical Trials

Purpose:

To test a reduced version—CIPN15—of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy scale (QLQ-CIPN20) to establish a possible gold-standard patient-reported outcome measure for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN).

Methods:

Using a prospective, longitudinal, case–control design, patients (n = 121) receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy completed the CIPN15 at baseline and 12 weeks and underwent objective neurological assessment using the 5-item Total Neuropathy Score-Clinical (TNSc). Healthy controls (n = 30) completed the CIPN15 once. Structural validity was evaluated using factor analysis. Because a stable factor structure was not found, a sum score was used to evaluate measures of the CIPN15’s psychometric properties—reliability, validity, sensitivity, and responsiveness—as follows: internal consistency via Cronbach’s α and item–item correlations; test–retest reliability via correlation between 2 CIPN15 scores from each patient; concurrent validity via correlation between CIPN15 and 5-item TNSc scores; contrasting group validity via comparison of CIPN15 scores from patients and healthy controls; sensitivity via descriptive statistics (means, standard deviation, ranges); and responsiveness via Cohen’s d effect size.

Results:

Most patients received single agent oxaliplatin (33.7%), paclitaxel (21.2%), or more than 1 neurotoxic drug concurrently (29.8%). Factor analysis revealed no stable factor structure. Cronbach’s α for the CIPN15 sum score was 0.91 (confidence interval [CI] = 0.89-0.93). Test–retest reliability was demonstrated based on strong correlations between the 2 scores obtained at the 12-week time point (r = 0.86; CI = 0.80-0.90). The CIPN15 and 5-item TNSc items reflecting symptoms (not signs) were moderately correlated (r range 0.57-0.72): concurrent validity. Statistically significant differences were found between patient and healthy control CIPN15 mean scores (P < .0001): contrasting group validity. All items encompassed the full score range but the CIPN15 linearly converted sum score did not: sensitivity. The CIPN15 was responsive based on a Cohen’s d of 0.52 (CI = 0.25-0.79).

Conclusion:

The sum-scored CIPN15 is reliable, valid, sensitive, and responsive when used to assess taxane- and platinum-induced CIPN.

Potential mediators of improvement in painful chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy via a web-based cognitive behavioural intervention

Purpose

Preliminary evidence suggests that a self-guided cognitive and behaviourally-based pain management intervention (PROSPECT) is effective for chronic painful chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), but its mechanism of action is unknown. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to explore if changes in anxiety, depression, sleep-related impairment, or fatigue mediated improvements in worst pain following PROSPECT in individuals with chronic painful CIPN.

Methods

Sixty participants were randomized to receive self-guided cognitive behavioural pain management (access for eight weeks) or treatment as usual. A seven-day worst CIPN pain diary and the PROMIS measures of anxiety, depression, fatigue, and sleep-related impairment were administered pre/posttest (eight-weeks). Causal mediation analysis was used to quantify mediators of worst pain improvement.

Results

None of the hypothesized mediators had a statistically significant effect on worst pain (n=38).

Implications

Further research is needed to identify potential mediators of pain intensity that can be targeted by specific cognitive behavioural strategies to improve painful CIPN severity.

CYP3A5 genotype and its impact on vincristine pharmacokinetics and development of neuropathy in Kenyan children with cancer

BACKGROUND

Vincristine (VCR) is a critical part of treatment in pediatric malignancies and is associated with dose-dependent peripheral neuropathy (vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy [VIPN]). Our previous findings show VCR metabolism is regulated by the CYP3A5 gene. Individuals who are low CYP3A5 expressers metabolize VCR slower and experience more severe VIPN as compared to high expressers. Preliminary observations suggest that Caucasians experience more severe VIPN as compared to nonCaucasians.

PROCEDURE

Kenyan children with cancer who were undergoing treatment including VCR were recruited for a prospective cohort study. Patients received IV VCR 2 mg/m² /dose with a maximum dose of 2.5 mg as part of standard treatment protocols. VCR pharmacokinetics (PK) sampling was collected via dried blood spot cards and genotyping was conducted for common functional variants in CYP3A5, multi-drug resistance 1 (MDR1), and microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT). VIPN was assessed using five neuropathy tools.

RESULTS

The majority of subjects (91%) were CYP3A5 high-expresser genotype. CYP3A5 low-expresser genotype subjects had a significantly higher dose and body surface area normalized area under the curve than CYP3A5 high-expresser genotype subjects (0.28 ± 0.15 hr·m² /l vs. 0.15 ± 0.011 hr·m² /l, P = 0.027). Regardless of which assessment tool was utilized, minimal neuropathy was detected in this cohort. There was no difference in the presence or severity of neuropathy assessed between CYP3A5 high- and low-expresser genotype groups.

CONCLUSION

Genetic factors are associated with VCR PK. Due to the minimal neuropathy observed in this cohort, there was no demonstrable association between genetic factors or VCR PK with development of VIPN. Further studies are needed to determine the role of genetic factors in optimizing dosing of VCR for maximal benefit.

Risk prediction and impaired tactile sensory perception among cancer patients during chemotherapy

Objectives:

to estimate the prevalence of impaired tactile sensory perception, identify risk factors, and establish a risk prediction model among adult patients receiving antineoplastic chemotherapy.

Method:

historical cohort study based on information obtained from the medical files of 127 patients cared for in the cancer unit of a private hospital in a city in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Data were analyzed using descriptive and bivariate statistics, with survival and multivariate analysis by Cox regression.

Results:

57% of the 127 patients included in the study developed impaired tactile sensory perception. The independent variables that caused significant impact, together with time elapsed from the beginning of treatment up to the onset of the condition, were: bone, hepatic and regional lymph node metastases; alcoholism; palliative chemotherapy; and discomfort in lower limbs.

Conclusion:

impaired tactile sensory perception was common among adult patients during chemotherapy, indicating the need to implement interventions designed for early identification and treatment of this condition.

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy Assessment Tool for Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Taxane Chemotherapy

Objective:

The aim was to evaluate the reliability and the validity of the Turkish version of the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy assessment tool (CIPNAT) in cancer patients using taxane.

Methods:

This methodological study was carried out to evaluate the validity and the reliability of the CIPNAT. The sample cohort comprised 430 breast cancer patients who were administered taxane, a chemotherapeutic agent, between April and December 2017. Data were collected by the CIPNAT and by a demographic data form. The CIPNAT content reliability was checked after completing it in Turkish. Validity was tested after the translation as well. Cronbach's alpha and test–retest reliability were utilized for reliability analyses.

Results:

Cronbach's alpha value was 0.87 in this study. The test–retest reliability ranged between 0.90 and 0.96 for all items. No difference existed between the means of test and retest scores of the CIPNAT. A statistically significant positive relationship materialized between the item's test and retest scores. There were statistically significant positive relationships among all levels of the CIPNAT. Factor analysis resulted in a size value higher than 1 and explained 66% of total variation. These results show that the Turkish version of the CIPNAT is a valid and reliable scale in Turkish society.

Conclusions:

This study showed that the CIPNAT in Turkey is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate taxane chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Pain in Platin-Induced Neuropathies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Platin-induced peripheral neuropathy (PIPN) is a common cause of PN in cancer patients. The aim of this paper is to systematically review the current literature regarding PIPN, with a particular focus on epidemiological and clinical characteristics of painful PIPN, and to discuss relevant management strategies.

Methods

A systematic computer-based literature search was conducted on the PubMed database.

Results

This search strategy resulted in the identification of 353 articles. After the eligibility assessment, 282 articles were excluded. An additional 24 papers were identified by scanning the reference lists. In total, 95 papers met the inclusion criteria and were used for this review. The prevalence of neuropathic symptoms due to acute toxicity of oxaliplatin was estimated at 84.6%, whereas PN established after chemotherapy with platins was estimated at 74.9%. Specifically regarding pain, the reported prevalence of pain due to acute toxicity of oxaliplatin was estimated at 55.6%, whereas the reported prevalence of chronic peripheral neuropathic pain in PIPN was estimated at 49.2%.

Conclusion

Peripheral neuropathy is a common complication in patients receiving platins and can be particularly painful. There is significant heterogeneity among studies regarding the method for diagnosing peripheral neuropathy. Nerve conduction studies are the gold standard and should be performed in patients receiving platins and complaining of neuropathic symptoms post-treatment.

Optimal clinical assessment strategies for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN): a systematic review and Delphi survey

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a prominent side effect of the treatment of cancer. Despite this frequent complication, there has been no comprehensive review and quality appraisal of CIPN assessments. The purpose of this study is to provide a definitive quality appraisal of CIPN assessment strategies for clinical use.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified through database searches of Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane. CIPN assessment strategies from included articles were extracted and initially rated by an oncologist and neurophysiologist according to criteria related to assessment depth, comprehensiveness, appropriateness, and reliability. The six highest scoring assessment strategies were the focus of a two-round Delphi survey of a working party of 32 physicians, nurses, and consumers to achieve consensus on the highest rated assessments for each criterion.

RESULTS

The database search yielded 117 distinct CIPN assessments that were extracted from 2373 articles. Three patient-reported outcome surveys and three clinician-based assessments were included in the Delphi survey. No consensus was generated regarding the best overall CIPN assessment, although good (≥70%) consensus was achieved regarding the best assessment within each criterion. The Participant Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ) was rated the highest overall and patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment, while the Total Neuropathy Score clinical version (TNSc) was the highest rated clinician-based assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

A diverse range of CIPN assessments currently exists. While several assessments assess CIPN symptoms with adequate comprehensiveness, depth, language, and feasibility, the consensus 'gold standard' clinical assessment remains to be established.

Translation and transcultural adaptation of Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS) to Brazilian version

INTRODUCTION

Most cancer patients are treated with chemotherapy, and peripheral neuropathy is a serious and common clinical problem affecting patients undergoing cancer treatment. However, the symptoms are subjective and underdiagnosed by health professionals. Thus, it becomes necessary to develop self-report instruments to overcome this limitation and improve the patient's perception about his medical condition or treatment.

OBJECTIVE

Translate and culturally adapt the Brazilian version of the Pain Quality Assessment Scale, constituting a useful tool for assessing the quality of neuropathic pain in cancer patients.

METHOD

The procedure followed the steps of translation, back translation, analysis of Portuguese and English versions by a committee of judges, and pretest. Pretest was conducted with 30 cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy following internationally recommended standards, and the final versions were compared and evaluated by a committee of researchers from Brazil and MAPI Research Trust, the scale's creators.

RESULTS

Versions one and two showed 100% semantic equivalence with the original version. Back-translation showed difference between the linguistic translation and the original version. After evaluation by the committee of judges, a flaw was found in the empirical equivalence and idiomatic equivalence. In pretest, two people did not understand the item 12 of the scale, without interfering in the final elaboration.

CONCLUSION

The translated and culturally adapted instrument is now presented in this publication, and currently it is in the process of clinical validation in Brazil.

Measuring Therapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Preliminary Development and Validation of the Treatment-Induced Neuropathy Assessment Scale

Various sensory and motor effects are associated with cancer treatment-induced peripheral neuropathy. The current method for capturing the multifaceted nature of neuropathy includes a combination of objective tests, clinician evaluation, and subjective patient report, an approach that is often not logistically feasible, especially for multisite trials. We report the performance of a brief yet comprehensive, easily administered measure, the Treatment-Induced Neuropathy Assessment Scale (TNAS), for assessing the severity and course of neuropathy across various cancer treatments. Data were derived from 4 longitudinal or cross-sectional patient cohorts (N = 573). Patients with multiple myeloma treated primarily with bortezomib and patients with colorectal cancer receiving oxaliplatin evaluated candidate items. Cognitive debriefing showed that all items were easy to understand, and this preliminary TNAS demonstrated reliability, validity, and sensitivity. Numbness/tingling was the most severe item, regardless of therapeutic agent. Although numbness and general pain were moderately correlated, patients perceived them as distinct. Most TNAS items were more severe at follow-up, demonstrating the sensitivity of the instrument to accumulating dose. The TNAS will be refined with further patient input, with final psychometric evaluation conducted in a new patient sample receiving treatments known to be associated with peripheral neuropathy. The nonpainful component of neuropathy may be more disabling than the pain component.

PERSPECTIVE

Our data suggest that the nonpainful components of neuropathy may be more disabling than the pain component during cancer treatment. Here we report data on sensory and motor symptoms reported by patients receiving neurotoxic cancer therapy, and we detail the development of a neuropathy assessment scale that follows regulatory guidance for patient-reported outcomes.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN): what we need and what we know

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) is one of the most frequent and severe long-term side effects of cancer chemotherapy. Preclinical and clinical studies have extensively investigated CIPN searching for effective strategies to limit its severity or to treat CIPN-related impairment, but the results have been disappointing. Among the reasons for this failure are methodological flaws in both preclinical and clinical investigations. Their successful resolution might provide a brighter perspective for future studies. Among the several neurotoxic chemotherapy drugs, oxaliplatin may offer a clear example of a methodological approach eventually leading to successful clinical trials. However, the same considerations apply to the other neurotoxic agents and, although frequently neglected, also to the new "targeted" agents.

Measuring vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

Vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN) is difficult to quantify in children.

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to examine the reliability, validity, and clinical feasibility of several VIPN measures for use in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

INTERVENTIONS/METHODS

Children (n = 65) aged 1 to 18 years receiving vincristine at 4 academic centers participated in the study. Baseline and pre-vincristine administration VIPN assessments were obtained using the Total Neuropathy Score-Pediatric Vincristine (TNS©-PV), the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, the Balis grading scale, and the FACES Pain Scale. The TNS-PV scores (n = 806) were obtained over 15 weeks. Blood was obtained at several time points to quantify pharmacokinetic parameters.

RESULTS

Cronbach's α for a reduced TNS-PV scale was .84. The TNS-PV scores correlated with cumulative vincristine dosage (r = 0.53, P = 0.01), pharmacokinetic parameters (r = 0.41, P = 0.05), and grading scale scores (r range = 0.46-0.52, P = .01). FACES scores correlated with the TNS-PV neuropathic pain item (r = 0.48; P = .01) and were attainable in all ages. A 2-item V-Rex score (vibration and reflex items) was the most responsive to change (effect size = 0.65, P < 0.001). The TNS-PV scores were attainable in 95% of children 6 years or older.

CONCLUSIONS

The TNS-PV is reliable and valid for measuring VIPN. It is sensitive to change over time (15 weeks) and feasible for use in children 6 years or older.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The TNS-PV may be a useful tool for assessing vincristine toxicity in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Evaluation of the Semmes-Weinstein filaments and a questionnaire to assess chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the use of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments (SWMs) and of the Chemotherapy-Induced Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (CINQ) in the detection of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN).

METHOD

It is a comparative and cross-sectional study performed in a philanthropic general hospital, located in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. One hundred seventeen individuals have participated in this study; they were divided into two groups: patients (n = 87) treated with oxaliplatin, paclitaxel, or docetaxel and controls (n = 30) without malignant disease.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences between groups for all symptoms assessed by means of the CINQ. Lower limbs were more severely affected. Patients had increased frequency and severity of changes in all points assessed with SWM compared with controls. In the analyses of concordance between CINQ and SWM, kappa = 0.320 (p < 0.001) was obtained, and there was a moderate and positive correlation (ρ = 0.357; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CINQ and SWM may be valid tools for diagnosing CIPN in oncology practice. SWM may identify subclinical CIPN.

Prevention and management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in survivors of adult cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based guidance on the optimum prevention and treatment approaches in the management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathies (CIPN) in adult cancer survivors.

METHODS

A systematic literature search identified relevant, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for the treatment of CIPN. Primary outcomes included incidence and severity of neuropathy as measured by neurophysiologic changes, patient-reported outcomes, and quality of life.

RESULTS

A total of 48 RCTs met eligibility criteria and comprise the evidentiary basis for the recommendations. Trials tended to be small and heterogeneous, many with insufficient sample sizes to detect clinically important differences in outcomes. Primary outcomes varied across the trials, and in most cases, studies were not directly comparable because of different outcomes, measurements, and instruments used at different time points. The strength of the recommendations is based on the quality, amount, and consistency of the evidence and the balance between benefits and harms.

RECOMMENDATIONS

On the basis of the paucity of high-quality, consistent evidence, there are no agents recommended for the prevention of CIPN. With regard to the treatment of existing CIPN, the best available data support a moderate recommendation for treatment with duloxetine. Although the CIPN trials are inconclusive regarding tricyclic antidepressants (such as nortriptyline), gabapentin, and a compounded topical gel containing baclofen, amitriptyline HCL, and ketamine, these agents may be offered on the basis of data supporting their utility in other neuropathic pain conditions given the limited other CIPN treatment options. Further research on these agents is warranted.

Current methods for the assessment and management of taxane-related neuropathy

Taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN) affects a number of patients with breast cancer. To properly manage these patients, nurses must be able to identify and assess TIPN, as well as educate patients on TIPN as a side effect of taxane therapy. This article provides practical suggestions regarding how nurses can incorporate clinically feasible measurement approaches into practice and includes examples of grading TIPN that illustrate the limitations of the current tools and techniques for assessment. For example, a shortened and revised version of the Total Neuropathy Score and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity subscale should be considered for future use. In addition, neuropathy-related results from numerous phase III trials in breast cancer are discussed, and the latest evidence regarding pharmacologic interventions for TIPN is briefly summarized.

Comparison of two chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy measurement approaches in children

PURPOSE

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect of cancer treatment in children; however, measurement of CIPN has been hampered by limitations in available tools, which may impact prevalence estimates. The purpose of this study was to assess the relative ability of the Common Terminology Criteria (CTCAE) rating process to detect sensory and motor neuropathy as compared to administration of the pediatric modified Total Neuropathy Score (peds-mTNS).

METHODS

The ped-mTNS was administered to 60 children/adolescents ages 5-18 undergoing treatment for acute lymphocytic leukemia, lymphoma, or non-CNS solid tumors. CTCAE v3.0 scores for the same time point were abstracted from the medical record by a separate trained rater. Comparisons were made between scores using descriptive statistics, correlations, and specificity and sensitivity calculations.

RESULTS

The median ped-mTNS score was 9 (32 possible), while the median sensory and motor CTCAE ratings were 0 and 2, respectively (4 and 5 possible, respectively). There was no correlation between ped-mTNS and combined sensory and motor CTCAE scores. The only ped-mTNS item with significant correlation to CTCAE scoring was strength testing. Medical record abstraction of CTCAE scores failed to identify sensory neuropathy in 40 % and significant motor neuropathy (manual muscle test grade 3 or worse) in 15 % of subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Prospective measures of CIPN using the ped-mTNS identified a far greater proportion of subjects with peripheral neurotoxicity as compared to CTCAE v3.0 sensory and motor neuropathy ratings, and thus we recommend the use of a specific measure of CIPN such as the ped-mTNS.

Effect of duloxetine on pain, function, and quality of life among patients with chemotherapy-induced painful peripheral neuropathy: a randomized clinical trial

IMPORTANCE

There are no known effective treatments for painful chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of duloxetine, 60 mg daily, on average pain severity.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial at 8 National Cancer Institute (NCI)-funded cooperative research networks that enrolled 231 patients who were 25 years or older being treated at community and academic settings between April 2008 and March 2011. Study follow-up was completed July 2012. Stratified by chemotherapeutic drug and comorbid pain risk, patients were randomized to receive either duloxetine followed by placebo or placebo followed by duloxetine. Eligibility required that patients have grade 1 or higher sensory neuropathy according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and at least 4 on a scale of 0 to 10, representing average chemotherapy-induced pain, after paclitaxel, other taxane, or oxaliplatin treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

The initial treatment consisted of taking 1 capsule daily of either 30 mg of duloxetine or placebo for the first week and 2 capsules of either 30 mg of duloxetine or placebo daily for 4 additional weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary hypothesis was that duloxetine would be more effective than placebo in decreasing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathic pain. Pain severity was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form "average pain" item with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing as bad as can be imagined.

RESULTS

Individuals receiving duloxetine as their initial 5-week treatment reported a mean decrease in average pain of 1.06 (95% CI, 0.72-1.40) vs 0.34 (95% CI, 0.01-0.66) among those who received placebo (P = .003; effect size, 0.513). The observed mean difference in the average pain score between duloxetine and placebo was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.26-1.20). Fifty-nine percent of those initially receiving duloxetine vs 38% of those initially receiving placebo reported decreased pain of any amount.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with painful chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, the use of duloxetine compared with placebo for 5 weeks resulted in a greater reduction in pain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00489411.