1
|
Chen D, Liu Q, Zhang L, Qian H. Effectiveness of Dyadic Psychoeducational Intervention on Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Cancer Nurs 2023:00002820-990000000-00197. [PMID: 38011076 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dyadic psychoeducational intervention targets the dyads of cancer patients and caregivers as active participants in partnership, which can potentially address the needs and challenges faced by patients with cancer and their caregivers. However, there is insufficient evidence on the effectiveness of the intervention on psychological health and illness-related outcomes among the dyads. OBJECTIVE To systematically examine the dyadic psychoeducational intervention of cancer patients and their caregivers on psychological health and illness-related outcomes. METHODS Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, and 4 Chinese databases were searched from inception to May 29, 2022. Two investigators independently extracted data and evaluated methodological quality. RevMan 5.4 was used for meta-analysis; heterogeneity was evaluated using Higgins' I2 (%). Standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the effects. RESULTS Eight randomized controlled trials that involved 1234 dyads were collected. Meta-analysis showed that the intervention was effective in reducing the dyadic depression (patients' SMD, -0.41 [95% CI, -0.78 to -0.04; P = .03]; caregivers' SMD, -0.70 [95% CI, -1.31 to -0.09; P = .03]). It also improved caregivers' quality of life (SMD, -0.29 [95% CI, -0.56 to -0.03; P = .03]), whereas no significant effect was found on patients' quality of life. Dyadic results including anxiety, self-efficacy, disease communication, and appraisals of illness/caregiving were observed. CONCLUSION Dyadic psychoeducational intervention reduced the dyadic depression. It also improved caregivers' quality of life. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Nurses can apply dyadic psychoeducational intervention in clinical practice. More studies are needed to draw higher-quality conclusions and investigate the effects on psychological health and illness-related outcomes in cancer patients and caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daoming Chen
- Author Affiliations: Department of Operating Room, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University (Ms Chen), Xuzhou; and School of Nursing, Medical College, Soochow University (Ms Liu and Dr Zhang); and Department of Respiratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Ms Qian), Suzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Carmen SG, José LM, Adriana RS, Eugenia GG. A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Effectiveness of a Psychoeducational Intervention on the Management of Musculoskeletal Chronic Noncancer Pain. Pain Manag Nurs 2023; 24:427-435. [PMID: 36944558 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2023.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To investigate the effectiveness of a psychoeducational intervention on pain intensity management in musculoskeletal chronic noncancer pain and to identify relevant variables and preliminary data to allow the design of a randomized controlled trial. DESIGN Two arms parallel randomized pilot study. SUBJECTS AND SETTING ADULT PATIENTS WITH MUSCULOSKELETAL CHRONIC NONCANCER PAIN WITH MODERATE-SEVERE INTENSITY TREATED AT PRIMARY HEALTH CENTERS. METHODS Participants were randomly assigned to a psychoeducational intervention or a control group without intervention. Pain intensity, quality of life, and opioid use were assessed at baseline and at a 1-month follow-up. RESULTS The sample consisted of 37 adult patients (intervention group: 19; control group: 18). A significant reduction in pain intensity measured by the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (p = .02, Cohen's d = 0.57) and improvement in quality of life measured by EuroQol-5D questionnaire (p = .04) were observed in the intervention group compared to the control. This improvement on pain intensity was greater in patients without strong opioid treatment (p = .01, Cohen's d = 1.36). Eighty percent of the strong opioids users in the intervention group reduced their consumption, without changes in the control group. CONCLUSIONS These findings provide promising support for the beneficial effects of psychoeducation on the intensity of noncancer chronic musculoskeletal pain. Based on the results, future randomized controlled trials are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sánchez-Gutiérrez Carmen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Virgen del Rocío Universitary Hospital, Seville, Spain; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, San Juan de Dios del Aljarafe Hospital, Avda, San Juan de Dios S/N. Seville, Spain.
| | - López-Millán José
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Virgen Macarena Universitary Hospital, Seville, Spain.
| | | | - Gil-García Eugenia
- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guerra-Martín MD, Casado-Espinosa MDR, Gavira-López Y, Holgado-Castro C, López-Latorre I, Borrallo-Riego Á. Quality of Life in Caregivers of Cancer Patients: A Literature Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:1570. [PMID: 36674325 PMCID: PMC9863368 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20021570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
(1) Background: Cancer constitutes one of the principal causes of morbi-mortality in the world and generates an important loss of patients' self-sufficiency. People who are their caregivers usually become the main care providers, which impacts their quality of life; (2) Aim: Analyze the different problems (physical, emotional, social, and financial) faced by people who are caregivers of adults with cancer and describe the strategies required to improve their quality of life; (3) Method: A literature review was conducted on the following database: PubMed, Cinahl, PsycINFO, and Scopus. The following eligibility criteria were specified: (a) research studies of quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods, (b) consistent with objective, and (c) published in the English language or Spanish during the last five years; (4) Results: 36 studies were selected from those found in the literature. Regarding the problems mentioned: eight studies described physical issues, 26 emotional effects, 10 social implications, and seven financial strains. Twenty-eight studies described strategies to improve the quality of life of caregivers; (5) Conclusions: Caregivers are usually women around the age of 50. Problems faced are mostly emotional in nature, followed by social, physical, and financial ones. In order to cope with this burden, there are some strategies that can be developed to help to build skills to manage both the disease and the impact derived from it, therefore improving their quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Dolores Guerra-Martín
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain
| | | | - Yelena Gavira-López
- Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain
| | | | | | - Álvaro Borrallo-Riego
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Harris-Gersten ML, Davagnino JM, Alcorn ER, Hastings SN. Usability and Acceptability of Social Robot Pets Among Community-Dwelling Veterans Living With Dementia and Their Caregivers. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 2023; 38:15333175231200973. [PMID: 37688378 PMCID: PMC10624055 DOI: 10.1177/15333175231200973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
Social robot pets promote engagement and psychosocial well-being among older adults, yet little is known about their use among community-dwelling Veterans living with dementia. This programmatic evaluation used a within subjects, pre-post design to examine the usability (frequency of use, frequency of caregiver reminders) and acceptability (benefit, satisfaction) of social robot pets among Veterans with dementia (N = 20). An intervention usability and acceptability tool was completed by telephone with family caregivers 3 months after delivery of the pet to the home. Overall, 80% of Veterans used the pet often or daily, while 7 caregivers provided reminders for the Veteran to use the pet. Caregivers indicated that Veterans experienced benefit with the pet, as well themselves. Regarding satisfaction, 89% reported they would recommend a social robot pet to others. Research is needed to expand generalizability, evaluate effects on outcomes, and enhance implementation of social robot pets among Veteran families with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa L. Harris-Gersten
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
- School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute’s National Clinician Scholars Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Judith M. Davagnino
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center-Caring for Older Adults and Caregivers at Home Program, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Edwin R. Alcorn
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center-Caring for Older Adults and Caregivers at Home Program, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - S. Nicole Hastings
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
- School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Leung T, Van Houtven C, Hastings S. Development of a Home-Based Stress Management Toolkit for Dementia Caring Dyads: Protocol for a Pilot Intervention Development and Feasibility Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e43098. [PMID: 36399169 PMCID: PMC9798268 DOI: 10.2196/43098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People living with dementia (PLWD) and their care partners (dementia caring dyads) are at a heightened risk of experiencing stress-related symptoms and conditions. Yet, many dyadic stress management interventions have had limited uptake by health care systems and in the community. An intervention that combines simple, safe, easy-to-use, nonpharmacologic tools (eg, animatronic social pets, weighted blankets and garments, aromatherapy and bright light therapy devices, acupressure, and massage tools) that can be used in the home may be a promising approach to promote stress management among dementia caring dyads. OBJECTIVE The proposed study aims to develop and user test a dyadic toolkit intervention composed of simple, tangible stress management tools for community-dwelling PLWD and their care partners. This study will also explore the feasibility of collecting several stress-related outcome measures to inform measurement selection for future studies. METHODS A human-centered design (HCD) approach will be used to increase the likelihood of developing an intervention that will be translatable to real-world settings. This study consists of 2 phases. The first phase will address the discover, define, and design stages of HCD using qualitative focus groups with dementia caring dyads (N=12-16 dyads). Dyadic focus groups (3-4 groups anticipated) will be convened to understand participants' stress experiences and to co-design a stress management toolkit prototype. Rapid qualitative analysis will be used to analyze focus group data. In phase 2, the toolkit prototype will be user tested for 2 weeks in a new sample to address the validation step of HCD. A within-subjects (n=10 dyads), pre-post design will be used with measures of usability (frequency of toolkit use), feasibility (enrollment and withdrawal rates, adverse events/injuries), and acceptability (satisfaction, benefit) collected via questionnaires (at the end of weeks 1 and 2 of user testing) and focus groups (n=3-4 dyads/group at the end of week 2). The feasibility of collecting participant-reported, stress-related outcomes (neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia, caregiver stress, dyadic relationship strain) and salivary cortisol as a physiologic measure of stress will be assessed at baseline and after user testing. RESULTS This study will yield a working prototype of a stress management toolkit for dementia caring dyads, as well as preliminary data to support the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. User testing will elucidate areas to refine the prototype and provide data to inform preliminary testing of the intervention. As of September 2022, this study has received institutional ethics board approval with phase 1 recruitment anticipated to begin January 2023. CONCLUSIONS Few interventions have focused on combining simple, safe, low burden tools to promote stress management among community-dwelling dementia caring dyads. By involving families and exploring feasibility and acceptability at the onset of development, this intervention will have greater potential to be implemented and sustained in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05465551; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05465551. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/43098.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Courtney Van Houtven
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States.,School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Susan Hastings
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States.,School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Otto AK, Ketcher D, Reblin M, Terrill AL. Positive Psychology Approaches to Interventions for Cancer Dyads: A Scoping Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:13561. [PMID: 36294142 PMCID: PMC9602591 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Positive psychology approaches (PPAs) to interventions focus on developing positive cognitions, emotions, and behavior. Benefits of these interventions may be compounded when delivered to interdependent dyads. However, dyadic interventions involving PPAs are relatively new in the cancer context. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of the available research evidence for use of dyadic PPA-based interventions in cancer and identify gaps in this literature. METHODS Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a scoping review of intervention studies that included PPAs delivered to both members of an adult dyad including a cancer patient and support person (e.g., family caregiver, intimate partner). RESULTS Forty-eight studies, including 39 primary analyses and 28 unique interventions, were included. Most often (53.8%), the support person in the dyad was broadly defined as a "caregiver"; the most frequent specifically-defined role was spouse (41.0%). PPAs (e.g., meaning making) were often paired with other intervention components (e.g., education). Outcomes were mostly individual well-being or dyadic coping/adjustment. CONCLUSIONS Wide variability exists in PPA type/function and their targeted outcomes. More work is needed to refine the definition/terminology and understand specific mechanisms of positive psychology approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy K. Otto
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth Campus, Duluth, MN 55812, USA
| | - Dana Ketcher
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth Campus, Duluth, MN 55812, USA
| | - Maija Reblin
- College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
| | - Alexandra L. Terrill
- Department of Occupational & Recreational Therapies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dyadic psychosocial interventions for patients with cancer and their caregivers: an update. Curr Opin Oncol 2022; 34:304-312. [PMID: 35730497 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Cancer causes significant impacts on patients and their caregivers. Cancer is also associated with multiple physical and emotional challenges for the patient-caregiver dyad. This patient-caregiver dyad should be considered as a unit of care by healthcare providers and supported through dedicated psychological interventions. RECENT FINDINGS Twelve studies that tested dyadic interventions aiming to support patient-caregiver dyads were identified from the period April 2020 to December 2021. Studies were predominantly randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and single-arm pilot studies. Half of the interventions were online. Interventions were mostly focused on dyadic adjustment and appeared to be acceptable, feasible and globally effective. However, effects were evident predominantly on individual rather than dyadic outcomes. The interventions targeted either individual psychological outcomes, such as depression and anxiety, and are reported to be effective or various individual outcomes and also appeared to be effective. However, there was a large heterogeneity in quality and sample sizes across all intervention types. SUMMARY Dyadic psychological interventions may be an effective support for patient-caregiver dyads dealing with multiple physical and emotional challenges. Online interventions and the variability of intervention types may respond to dyads specific needs, but though need to be rigorously evaluated through powered RCTs.
Collapse
|
8
|
Harris ML, Titler MG. Feasibility and Acceptability of a Remotely Delivered Weighted Blanket Intervention for People Living With Dementia and Their Family Caregivers. J Appl Gerontol 2022; 41:2316-2328. [PMID: 35750505 DOI: 10.1177/07334648221111123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic amplified the need for interventions to support community-dwelling families living with dementia. This study examined the feasibility and acceptability of a remotely delivered weighted blanket intervention for people living with dementia, and the feasibility of collecting outcome measures specific to people with dementia and caregivers. A prospective, within subjects, pre-post design was used; 21 people with dementia and their caregivers participated. Measures of feasibility (days blanket was used for the recommended duration, injuries/adverse events, enrollment, and withdrawal rate, time to recruit sample) and acceptability (tolerability, satisfaction, and benefit perceived by participants with dementia and caregivers) were examined. Feasibility of collecting measures was examined through missing data. Results indicated high feasibility and acceptability. Collecting caregiver completed outcome measures was feasible, but measures completed by self-report by people with dementia was not. Weighted blankets are a promising tool for this population that warrant further examination to determine efficacy.
Collapse
|
9
|
Chen HL, Annie Kao TS, Reuille KM, Northouse L. FOCUS Program: Treating Patients With Cancer and Family Caregivers as a Unit of Care. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2021; 25:E17-E25. [PMID: 34019018 DOI: 10.1188/21.cjon.e17-e25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies indicate that patients' and caregivers' responses to illness are interdependent; each person affects the other. Existing evidence reinforces the need to recognize family caregivers as equal recipients of care and support. OBJECTIVES This evidence-based pilot study evaluated the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the nurse-guided, psychoeducational, family-based FOCUS program intervention at a local oncology outpatient clinic. METHODS 30 patient-caregiver dyads were recruited from a local oncology clinic. Intervention delivery occurred using home visits and telephone calls. Self-administered questionnaires were used to assess participants' self-efficacy, quality of life (QOL), and coping pre- and postintervention, and intervention satisfaction postintervention. Three tailored psychosocial education sessions were held during a 6- to 9-week period. FINDINGS Significant changes in outcomes were found, including increased self-efficacy in both patients and caregivers, higher QOL in caregivers, and decreased use of substances for coping in patients. There was a trend for patients' emotional well-being to improve over time; other aspects of QOL showed little change. There were no significant changes in caregivers' coping.
Collapse
|