A novel Cd8-cis-regulatory element preferentially directs expression in CD44hiCD62L+ CD8+ T cells and in CD8αα+ dendritic cells

Pathways and mechanisms of CD4+CD8αα+ intraepithelial T cell development

The mammalian small intestine epithelium harbors a peculiar population of CD4+CD8αα+ T cells that are derived from mature CD4+ T cells through reprogramming of lineage-specific transcription factors. CD4+CD8αα+ T cells occupy a unique niche in T cell biology because they exhibit mixed phenotypes and functional characteristics of both CD4+ helper and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells. The molecular pathways driving their generation are not fully mapped. However, recent studies demonstrate the unique role of the commensal gut microbiota as well as distinct cytokine and chemokine requirements in the differentiation and survival of these cells. We review the established and newly identified factors involved in the generation of CD4+CD8αα+ intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) and place them in the context of the molecular machinery that drives their phenotypic and functional differentiation.

CD4 Helper and CD8 Cytotoxic T Cell Differentiation

A fundamental question in developmental immunology is how bipotential thymocyte precursors generate both CD4⁺ helper and CD8⁺ cytotoxic T cell lineages. The MHC specificity of αβ T cell receptors (TCRs) on precursors is closely correlated with cell fate-determining processes, prompting studies to characterize how variations in TCR signaling are linked with genetic programs establishing lineage-specific gene expression signatures, such as exclusive CD4 or CD8 expression. The key transcription factors ThPOK and Runx3 have been identified as mediating development of helper and cytotoxic T cell lineages, respectively. Together with increasing knowledge of epigenetic regulators, these findings have advanced our understanding of the transcription factor network regulating the CD4/CD8 dichotomy. It has also become apparent that CD4⁺ T cells retain developmental plasticity, allowing them to acquire cytotoxic activity in the periphery. Despite such advances, further studies are necessary to identify the molecular links between TCR signaling and the nuclear machinery regulating expression of ThPOK and Runx3.

Differential Requirement of Cd8 Enhancers E8I and E8VI in Cytotoxic Lineage T Cells and in Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocytes

CD8 expression in T lymphocytes is tightly regulated by the activity of at least six Cd8 enhancers (E8_I-E8_VI), however their complex developmental stage-, subset-, and lineage-specific interplays are incompletely understood. Here we analyzed ATAC-seq data on the Immunological Genome Project database and identified a similar developmental regulation of chromatin accessibility of a subregion of E8_I, designated E8_I-core, and of E8_VI. Loss of E8_I-core led to a similar reduction in CD8 expression in naïve CD8⁺ T cells and in IELs as observed in E8 _I ^-/- mice, demonstrating that we identified the core enhancer region of E8_I. While E8 _VI ^-/- mice displayed a mild reduction in CD8 expression levels on CD8SP thymocytes and peripheral CD8⁺ T cells, CD8 levels were further reduced upon combined deletion of E8_I-core and E8_VI. Moreover, activated E8 _I -core^-/- E8 _VI ^-/- CD8⁺ T cells lost CD8 expression to a greater degree than E8 _I -core^-/- and E8 _VI ^-/- CD8⁺ T cells, suggesting that the combined activity of both enhancers is required for establishment and maintenance of CD8 expression before and after TCR activation. Finally, we observed a severe reduction of CD4 CTLs among the TCRβ⁺CD4⁺ IEL population in E8 _I -core^-/- but not E8 _VI ^-/- mice. Such a reduction was not observed in Cd8a ^-/- mice, indicating that E8_I-core controls the generation of CD4 CTLs independently of its role in Cd8a gene regulation. Further, the combined deletion of E8_I-core and E8_VI restored CD4 CTL subsets, suggesting an antagonistic function of E8_VI in the generation of CD4 CTLs. Together, our study demonstrates a complex utilization and interplay of E8_I-core and E8_VI in regulating CD8 expression in cytotoxic lineage T cells and in IELs. Moreover, we revealed a novel E8_I-mediated regulatory mechanism controlling the generation of intestinal CD4 CTLs.

Acetylation of the Cd8 Locus by KAT6A Determines Memory T Cell Diversity

How functionally diverse populations of pathogen-specific killer T cells are generated during an immune response remains unclear. Here, we propose that fine-tuning of CD8αβ co-receptor levels via histone acetylation plays a role in lineage fate. We show that lysine acetyltransferase 6A (KAT6A) is responsible for maintaining permissive Cd8 gene transcription and enabling robust effector responses during infection. KAT6A-deficient CD8(+) T cells downregulated surface CD8 co-receptor expression during clonal expansion, a finding linked to reduced Cd8α transcripts and histone-H3 lysine 9 acetylation of the Cd8 locus. Loss of CD8 expression in KAT6A-deficient T cells correlated with reduced TCR signaling intensity and accelerated contraction of the effector-like memory compartment, whereas the long-lived memory compartment appeared unaffected, a result phenocopied by the removal of the Cd8 E8I enhancer element. These findings suggest a direct role of CD8αβ co-receptor expression and histone acetylation in shaping functional diversity within the cytotoxic T cell pool.

Heritable Gene Regulation in the CD4:CD8 T Cell Lineage Choice

The adaptive immune system is dependent on functionally distinct lineages of T cell antigen receptor αβ-expressing T cells that differentiate from a common progenitor in the thymus. CD4⁺CD8⁺ progenitor thymocytes undergo selection following interaction with MHC class I and class II molecules bearing peptide self-antigens, giving rise to CD8⁺ cytotoxic and CD4⁺ helper or regulatory T cell lineages, respectively. The strict correspondence of CD4 and CD8 expression with distinct cellular phenotypes has made their genes useful surrogates for investigating molecular mechanisms of lineage commitment. Studies of Cd4 and Cd8 transcriptional regulation have uncovered cis-regulatory elements that are critical for mediating epigenetic modifications at distinct stages of development to establish heritable transcriptional programs. In this review, we examine the epigenetic mechanisms involved in Cd4 and Cd8 gene regulation during T cell lineage specification and highlight the features that make this an attractive system for uncovering molecular mechanisms of heritability.

Impaired Subset Progression and Polyfunctionality of T Cells in Mice Exposed to Methamphetamine during Chronic LCMV Infection

Methamphetamine (METH) is a widely used psychostimulant that severely impacts the host’s innate and adaptive immune systems and has profound immunological implications. T cells play a critical role in orchestrating immune responses. We have shown recently how chronic exposure to METH affects T cell activation using a murine model of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) infection. Using the TriCOM (trinary state combinations) feature of GemStone^™ to study the polyfunctionality of T cells, we have analyzed how METH affected the cytokine production pattern over the course of chronic LCMV infection. Furthermore, we have studied in detail the effects of METH on splenic T cell functions, such as cytokine production and degranulation, and how they regulate each other. We used the Probability State Modeling (PSM) program to visualize the differentiation of effector/memory T cell subsets during LCMV infection and analyze the effects of METH on T cell subset progression. We recently demonstrated that METH increased PD-1 expression on T cells during viral infection. In this study, we further analyzed the impact of PD-1 expression on T cell functional markers as well as its expression in the effector/memory subsets. Overall, our study indicates that analyzing polyfunctionality of T cells can provide additional insight into T cell effector functions. Analysis of T cell heterogeneity is important to highlight changes in the evolution of memory/effector functions during chronic viral infections. Our study also highlights the impact of METH on PD-1 expression and its consequences on T cell responses.