Barriers to using clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: systematic review

What is the current scope of research assessing patients' and clinicians' perspectives on clozapine treatment? A comprehensive scoping review

OBJECTIVES

Clozapine is continuously underused. The existing systematic reviews addressing barriers to clozapine prescribing primarily focus on clinical staff's attitudes and perceived barriers to prescribing. However, a preliminary literature search revealed additional literature on the subject not previously included in systematic reviews, including literature on patient perspectives. A scoping review is warranted to map the scope of primary studies on patients' and/or clinicians' perspectives on clozapine treatment and to identify gaps in research.

DESIGN

A scoping review was designed and reported in accordance with established guidelines for scoping reviews.

DATA SOURCES

The electronic databases Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar and two grey literature databases were searched. Furthermore, citation tracking of selected studies was undertaken.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included primary, empirical studies reporting clinicians' and/or patients' perspectives on clozapine treatment. No limitation was set for the year of publication or type of primary study.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two researchers independently screened for studies, extracted the data and coded the content. Findings were summarised visually and narratively.

RESULTS

146 studies were included. Most studies reported on patients' or clinicians' perspectives on active clozapine treatment or on clinicians' perspectives on barriers to clozapine initiation in general. Three gaps in research were identified: (1) clozapine-eligible, yet clozapine-naïve, patients' attitudes towards clozapine commencement, (2) clinicians' reasons for clozapine withholding and perceived facilitators of clozapine treatment in specific patient-cases and (3) patient and clinician perspectives on clozapine discontinuation, continuation and rechallenge in specific patient cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Research on clozapine perspectives tends to repeat itself. Future studies addressing the identified gaps in evidence could provide the insights needed to optimise clozapine utilisation.

Pharmacovigilance in Action: Utilizing VigiBase Data to Improve Clozapine Safety

Purpose

Clozapine is an antipsychotic which was approved in 1989 for treatment-resistant schizophrenia in the United States (US). There were few randomized trials before its approval and potentially lethal clozapine adverse drug reactions (ADRs), such as agranulocytosis and myocarditis were identified by pharmacovigilance. VigiBase, the WHO global database, is a cornerstone of international pharmacovigilance efforts for ADR identification during post-marketing surveillance. This systematic review of the literature explores additional contributions to the knowledge of clozapine ADRs from recent VigiBase studies.

Methods

Using the terms "clozapine AND VigiBase" we conducted an article search in PubMed on September 5, 2024. Of the 29 articles, 11 were excluded and 18 described in the Results section.

Results

All clozapine ADRs were described in two VigiBase studies. One on pregnancy indicated no increased risk with clozapine compared with other antipsychotics; the other reported 191,557 clozapine ADRs, including 22,956 fatal outcomes through January 15, 2023, and paid attention to the reporting style of the top 4 reporting countries (the US, the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia). Infections were described in three VigiBase studies where clozapine treatment was associated with infections, respiratory aspiration, and pneumonia. Rapid titration can lead to localized clozapine-induced inflammations including myocarditis, pericarditis or pancreatitis, or generalized inflammations such as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome. Clozapine-induced inflammation was described in four VigiBase studies, two focused on all ages (myocarditis and DRESS) and two on youth (myocarditis and another on pericarditis and pancreatitis). Other specific ADRs were described in nine VigiBase studies (hematological malignancies, rhabdomyolysis, sialorrhea, seizures, diabetes mellitus, drug-induced parkinsonism, withdrawal symptoms, and suicidal behaviors).

Conclusion

The spectrum of respiratory aspiration - aspiration pneumonia - pneumonia and other infections are significant causes of fatal outcomes in clozapine-treated patients. Clozapine had anti-suicidal effects versus other antipsychotics across all VigiBase labels of suicidal behavior.

Knowledge domain and trends in treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) research based on CiteSpace bibliometrics analysis

Background

Although the number of studies on treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) has been increasing, the global research hotspots and future research trends have not yet been established.

Objective

This study identify the hotspots of TRS research and predict future research trends using a bibliometric analysis.

Methods

The Web of Science Core Collection was searched using the keyword "TRS", econometric and co-occurrence analyses were conducted using CiteSpace and VOSviewer software, and the results were visualised. PRISMA reporting guidelines were used for this study.

Results

In total, 912 publications were included in the analysis. The number of publications on TRS has shown an increasing trend over the past 20 years. The United States and University of London were the countries and institutions with the highest total number of publications, respectively. Schizophrenia Research was the journal with the highest number of articles. American Journal of Psychiatry was the most cited journal. Based on the results of this analysis, cognitive impairment, clozapine-resistant schizophrenia, early-onset schizophrenia, and early recognition of TRS will be hotspots for future research in this field.

Conclusion

There has been an upward trend in the number of publications on TRS each year. However, issues such as how to use antipsychotics more efficiently to treat TRS and how to predict the emergence of TRS as early as possible are still in urgent need of research and are current challenges for clinicians. The results of this study not only predict and analyse future research hotspots but also help researchers identify appropriate research directions and partners.

Identifying clinically relevant agranulocytosis in people registered on the UK clozapine Central Non-Rechallenge Database: retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for treatment-resistant psychosis. However, clozapine is underutilised in part because of potential agranulocytosis. Accumulating evidence indicates that below-threshold haematological readings in isolation are not diagnostic of life-threatening clozapine-induced agranulocytosis (CIA).

AIMS

To examine the prevalence and timing of CIA using different diagnostic criteria and to explore demographic differences of CIA in patients registered on the UK Central Non-Rechallenge Database (CNRD).

METHOD

We analysed data of all patients registered on the UK Clozaril® Patient Monitoring Service Central Non-Rechallenge Database (at least one absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1.5 × 109/L and/or white blood cell count < 3.0 × 109/L) between May 2000 and February 2021. We calculated prevalence rates of agranulocytosis using threshold-based and pattern-based criteria, stratified by demographic factors (gender, age and ethnicity). Differences in epidemiology based on rechallenge status and clozapine indication were explored. The proportion of patients who recorded agranulocytosis from a normal ANC was explored.

RESULTS

Of the 3029 patients registered on the CNRD with 283 726 blood measurements, 593 (19.6%) were determined to have threshold-based agranulocytosis and 348 (11.4%) pattern-based agranulocytosis. In the total sample (75 533), the prevalence of threshold-based agranulocytosis and pattern-based agranulocytosis was 0.8% and 0.5%, respectively. The median time to threshold-based agranulocytosis was 32 weeks (IQR 184) and 15 (IQR 170) weeks for pattern-based agranulocytosis. Among age groups, the prevalence of pattern-based agranulocytosis and threshold-based agranulocytosis was highest in the >48 age group. Prevalence rates were greatest for White (18%) and male individuals (13%), and lowest for Black individuals (0.1%). The proportion of people who were determined to have pattern-based agranulocytosis without passing through neutropenia was 70%.

CONCLUSIONS

Threshold-based definition of agranulocytosis may over-diagnose CIA. Monitoring schemes should take into consideration neutrophil patterns to correctly identify clinically relevant CIA. In marked contrast to previous studies, CIA occurred least in Black individuals and most in White individuals.

Multi-level barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based antipsychotics in the treatment of early-phase schizophrenia

Introduction

Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic medications and clozapine are effective yet underutilized medical therapies in early intervention services. The purpose of this study was to conduct a pre-implementation evaluation of contextual determinants of early intervention programs to implement innovations optimizing LAI antipsychotic and clozapine use within a shared decision-making model.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews explored barriers and facilitators to implementing LAI antipsychotics and clozapine in early intervention services. Participants were: prescribers (n = 2), non-prescribing clinicians (n = 5), administrators (n = 3), clients (n = 3), and caregivers (n = 3). Interviews were structured and analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0).

Results

Participants were supportive of using LAI antipsychotics, despite barriers (e.g., transportation, insurance coverage), while most were unfamiliar with clozapine (Innovation). Critical incidents (e.g., COVID-19) did not interfere with implementation, while barriers included lack of performance measures; stigma affecting willingness to take medication; and clozapine considered to be a "last resort" (Outer Setting). Treatment culture was described as client-centered and collaborative, and most participants indicated LAI antipsychotic use was compatible with clinic workflows, but some were in need of resources (e.g., individuals trained to administer LAI antipsychotics; Inner Setting). Participants on the healthcare team expressed confidence in their roles. Family education and collaborative decision-making were recommended to improve client/family engagement (Individuals). Participants related the importance of tracking medication compliance, addressing client concerns, and providing prescribers with updated guidelines on evidence-based treatment (Implementation Process).

Discussion

Results may guide implementation strategy selection for future programs seeking to optimize the use of LAI antipsychotics and clozapine for early-phase schizophrenia, when appropriate.

The timing and severity of clozapine-associated neutropenia in the US: Is the risk overstated?

BACKGROUND

Concern about clozapine-associated neutropenia contributes to clozapine's underutilization and racial disparities in access. People with African ancestry are more likely to have lower normative absolute neutrophil counts (ANC), associated with the Duffy null genetic polymorphism. Recent data on clozapine-associated neutropenia in the US are lacking.

METHODS

Patients prescribed clozapine in the Johns Hopkins Medicine electronic medical record (EMR) between 2013 and 2023 were identified. Duffy null Associated Neutrophil Count (DANC) was assigned if there were two ANC's < 2000 cells/μL, >30 days apart, before starting clozapine. Rates of neutropenia, timing of first neutropenia, and demographic differences were explored.

RESULTS

974 received clozapine and had ANC's available, with 63.9 % male, 51.1 % White, and 39 % Black. 287 were presumed to start clozapine during the study period, and were 62.4 % male, 46 % White, and 44.9 % Black. No patients developed severe neutropenia. 59 (6.1 %) developed mild or moderate neutropenia. 19 (6.6 %) new starts had presumed DANC, and none developed neutropenia. 11 of 16 presumed new starts who developed neutropenia did so within eight months. No demographic differences were found between groups for presumed new starts. For non-new starts, where DANC assignment was not possible, Black patients were more likely than White patients to develop neutropenia (OR 3.48, 95 % CI [1.65, 7.73]).

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first observational study of clozapine-associated neutropenia in the US in the past decade, and it includes a substantial proportion of Black patients. ANC monitoring requirements may be too strict, contributing to clozapine underutilization.

Development and initial evaluation of a clinical prediction model for risk of treatment resistance in first-episode psychosis: Schizophrenia Prediction of Resistance to Treatment (SPIRIT)

BACKGROUND

A clinical tool to estimate the risk of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) in people with first-episode psychosis (FEP) would inform early detection of TRS and overcome the delay of up to 5 years in starting TRS medication.

AIMS

To develop and evaluate a model that could predict the risk of TRS in routine clinical practice.

METHOD

We used data from two UK-based FEP cohorts (GAP and AESOP-10) to develop and internally validate a prognostic model that supports identification of patients at high-risk of TRS soon after FEP diagnosis. Using sociodemographic and clinical predictors, a model for predicting risk of TRS was developed based on penalised logistic regression, with missing data handled using multiple imputation. Internal validation was undertaken via bootstrapping, obtaining optimism-adjusted estimates of the model's performance. Interviews and focus groups with clinicians were conducted to establish clinically relevant risk thresholds and understand the acceptability and perceived utility of the model.

RESULTS

We included seven factors in the prediction model that are predominantly assessed in clinical practice in patients with FEP. The model predicted treatment resistance among the 1081 patients with reasonable accuracy; the model's C-statistic was 0.727 (95% CI 0.723-0.732) prior to shrinkage and 0.687 after adjustment for optimism. Calibration was good (expected/observed ratio: 0.999; calibration-in-the-large: 0.000584) after adjustment for optimism.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and internally validated a prediction model with reasonably good predictive metrics. Clinicians, patients and carers were involved in the development process. External validation of the tool is needed followed by co-design methodology to support implementation in early intervention services.

Overcoming the barriers to identifying and managing treatment-resistant schizophrenia and to improving access to clozapine: A narrative review and recommendation for clinical practice

Clozapine is the only approved antipsychotic for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Although a large body of evidence supports its efficacy and favorable risk-benefit ratio in individuals who have failed two or more antipsychotics, clozapine remains underused. However, variations in clozapine utilization across geographic and clinical settings suggest that it could be possible to improve its use. In this narrative review and expert opinion, we summarized information available in the literature on the mechanisms of action, effectiveness, and potential adverse events of clozapine. We identified barriers leading to discouragement in clozapine prescription internationally, and we proposed practical solutions to overcome each barrier. One of the main obstacles identified to the use of clozapine is the lack of appropriate training for physicians: we highlighted the need to develop specific professional programs to train clinicians, both practicing and in residency, on the relevance and efficacy of clozapine in TRS treatment, initiation, maintenance, and management of potential adverse events. This approach would facilitate physicians to identify eligible patients and offer clozapine as a treatment option in the early stage of the disease. We also noted that increasing awareness of the benefits of clozapine among healthcare professionals, people with TRS, and their caregivers can help promote the use of clozapine. Educational material, such as leaflets or videos, could be developed and distributed to achieve this goal. The information provided in this article may be useful to improve disease burden and support healthcare professionals, patients, and caregivers navigating the complex pathways to TRS management.

Medical, Psychiatric, and Sociodemographic Predictors of Clozapine Initiation at an Academic Medical Center

Background and Hypothesis

Clozapine is an effective yet underutilized treatment for treatment-resistant schizophrenia spectrum disorders. This study aimed to identify factors affecting clozapine prescribing patterns among patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder at an academic medical center.

Study Design

This retrospective combined cohort and case-control study examined demographic, socioeconomic, medical and psychiatric characteristics to determine predictors of clozapine initiation. Eligible patients had a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder with at least two prior antipsychotic trials and were admitted to a University of Utah inpatient psychiatric facility (1/2014-3/2021). Patients who did and did not receive clozapine during the index hospitalization were compared in cohort and case-control study arms.

Study Results

Twelve percent (59/477) of the cohort received clozapine during the index admission. Among the cohort (n = 477), Black patients were twice as likely to receive clozapine than White and Hispanic patients (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.20-3.97, p = 0.008). In the case-control analysis, patients with a greater number of previous psychiatric admissions (OR 1.14, p = 0.079) and antipsychotic trials (OR 1.40, p = 0.038) had greater odds of receiving clozapine. Homelessness was identified as a predictor against clozapine use (OR 2.77, p = 0.014).

Conclusions

This is the first study to identify homelessness as a predictor against clozapine use, which raises important clinical and ethical considerations. Our findings also add to the literature on clozapine prescribing discrepancies among ethnic-minority patients. Overall, clozapine remains underutilized as the gold-standard treatment for treatment-resistant schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, reinforcing a need to improve evidence-based prescribing.

Survey on barriers to psychiatrists' use of clozapine for young people in Scotland and suggestions for reducing these

INTRODUCTION

The Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland published a report into the death of a young person, with recommendations for the Royal College of Psychiatry in Scotland Child and Adolescent Faculty; to explore if there were barriers to the use of Clozapine in young people in Scotland.

METHODS

A mixed-methods study was performed using a cross-sectional survey of clinicians working in child and adolescent psychiatry across Scotland, to determine attitudes towards clozapine use and the perceived barriers and facilitators to clozapine treatment.

RESULTS

Results suggest that there may be a lack of clearly defined pathways within and between services, as well as a lack of resources provided for the necessary monitoring of a young person started on clozapine. Multiple respondents felt unskilled in clozapine initiation and had not accessed formal training. The most frequently mentioned themes for improving facilitation of clozapine prescription were that of increased resources and training.

DISCUSSION

National policymakers including the Mental Welfare Commission, NHS Education for Scotland, and NHS Scotland should consider these findings to address the potential underutilisation of clozapine for people aged under 18 in services across Scotland. A review of current service provision should take place, with consideration of whether the facilitators to clozapine prescription which our study has highlighted could be implemented more effectively. This may help reduce identified barriers and increase clozapine prescription to those who would benefit from it, potentially improving outcomes for young people with treatment-resistant psychosis.

Comparative effectiveness of clozapine and non-clozapine atypical antipsychotics provided by the Brazilian National Health System in adults with schizophrenia

Introduction

Currently, 21 million people live with the disease, mostly in low to middle-income countries. We aimed to assess the survival of patients with schizophrenia using clozapine compared with non-clozapine atypical antipsychotics provided by the Brazilian National Health System using real-world data.

Materials and methods

This is an open retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia to whom atypical antipsychotics were dispensed by the Brazilian National Health System between 2000 and 2015, based on deterministic-probabilistic pairing of administrative data records. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the cumulative probability of survival and the Cox proportional hazards model was adjusted to assess the risk factors for survival via the hazard ratio (HR).

Result

Participants were 375,352 adults with schizophrenia, with an overall survival rate of 76.0% (95%CI 75.0-76.0) at the end of the cohort. Multivariate analysis indicated a greater risk of death for men (HR=1.30; 95%CI 1.27-1.32), older adults (HR=17.05; 95%CI 16.52-17.60), and in the Southeast region of Brazil (HR=1.20; 95%CI 1.17-1.23). Patients who used non-clozapine atypical antipsychotics had a 21% greater risk of death when compared to those taking clozapine (HR=1.21; 95%CI 1.14-1.29). Additionally, a history of hospitalization for pneumonia (HR=2.17; 95%CI 2.11-2.23) was the main clinical variable associated with increased risk of death, followed by hospitalization for lung cancer (HR=1.82; 95%CI 1.58-2.08), cardiovascular diseases (HR=1.44; 95%CI 1.40-1.49) and any type of neoplasia (HR=1.29; 95%CI 1.19-1.40).

Discussion

This is the first published Brazilian cohort study that evaluated survival in people with schizophrenia, highlighting the impact of atypical antipsychotics. In this real-world analysis, the use of clozapine had a protective effect on survival when compared to olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, and ziprasidone.

Understanding clozapine-related blood dyscrasias. Developments, genetics, ethnicity and disparity: it's a CIN

Clozapine remains the gold standard intervention for treatment-resistant schizophrenia; however, it remains underused, especially for some minority groups. A significant impediment is concern about propensity to neutropenia. The aim of this article is to provide an update on current knowledge relating to: the pattern and incidence of severe blood dyscrasias; the effectiveness of current monitoring regimes in reducing harm; the mechanisms of and the distinctions between clozapine-induced neutropenia and agranulocytosis; benign ethnic neutropenia; and changes to the monitoring thresholds in the USA and other international variations. These all have implications for the practical use of clozapine; specifically, how barriers to initiating, maintaining and restarting clozapine can be understood and in many cases overcome, especially for patients from minority groups, potentially with simpler approaches than the use of lithium or G-CSF.

The Therapeutic Role of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

Schizophrenia affects approximately 1% of the population worldwide. Multifactorial reasons, ranging from drug resistance to adverse effects of medications, have necessitated exploring further therapeutic options. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a novel high-frequency form of transcranial magnetic stimulation, a safe procedure with minor adverse effects with faster and longer-lasting poststimulation effects with a potential role in treating symptoms; however, the exact target brain regions and symptoms are still controversial. Therefore, we aimed to systematically investigate the current literature regarding the therapeutic utilities of iTBS using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Twelve studies were included among which 9 found iTBS effective to some degree. These studies targeted the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the midline cerebellum. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis on studies that compared the effects of iTBS on schizophrenia symptoms measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) to sham treatment. Our results showed no significant difference between iTBS and sham in PANSS positive and negative scores, but a trend-level difference in PANSS general scores ( k = 6, P = 0.07), and a significant difference in PANSS total scores ( k = 6, P = 0.03). Analysis of the studies targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex showed improvement in PANSS negative scores ( k = 5, standardized mean difference = -0.83, P = 0.049), but not in PANSS positive scores. Moderators (intensity, pulse, quality, sessions) did not affect the results. However, considering the small number of studies included in this meta-analysis, future works are required to further explore the effects of these factors and also find optimum target regions for positive symptoms.

Risk of clozapine-associated agranulocytosis and mandatory white blood cell monitoring: Can the regulations be relaxed?

After the introduction of clozapine eight Finnish patients died after developing agranulocytosis. Clozapine was withdrawn from the market and only reintroduced with strict mandatory white blood cell monitoring as long as treatment lasts and thresholds at which clozapine must be discontinued definitively. The fear of agranulocytosis and the need for intensive blood monitoring is the single most important barrier for prescribers and patients alike and leads to underprescription of the only effective and approved medication for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. We summarize evidence that the risk of agranulocytosis is smaller than perceived at the time of reintroduction, is concentrated in the first 18 weeks of treatment, is not greater than with other antipsychotics thereafter and that frequent blood monitoring has not demonstrably decreased the rate of agranulocytosis. Therefore we propose 1) mandatory monitoring of the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) exclusively during the first 18 weeks of clozapine treatment, 2) that thereafter the prescriber and the well-informed patient decide together about further monitoring frequency, 3) that clozapine treatment must be stopped if the ANC falls below 1.0 × 109/L. Continuation of clozapine or a rechallenge are possible if prescriber and patient determine that the benefits outweigh the risks. 4) National registries which control the haematologic monitoring are unnecessary and do not help to reduce clozapine-induced agranulocytosis. They should at least be restricted to the first 18 weeks of clozapine use.

Impact of patient-specific factors on clozapine metabolism in individuals with treatment-resistant schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder

BACKGROUND

There is high inter-individual variability in clozapine metabolism due to genetic and non-genetic differences. Patient-specific factors such as smoking, inflammation indicated by elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), and certain concurrent medications have a significant influence on clozapine metabolism.

AIM

To assess which patient-specific factors best explain variability in clozapine metabolism estimated by clozapine concentration to dose (C/D) ratios.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis using electronic medical data was conducted on 172 inpatients at the BC Psychosis Program. Patients with normal renal and liver function were included if they were on clozapine and had at least one steady-state plasma concentration. The degree of influence of each factor on the variability of clozapine metabolism in the entire cohort and subgroups stratified by fluvoxamine use was evaluated using multiple linear regression analysis of C/D ratios.

RESULTS

Model fit testing showed that the entire cohort model accounts for 52.7% of C/D ratio variability, while the no fluvoxamine and fluvoxamine models accounted for 40.8% and 43.8%. In the entire cohort (n = 172), fluvoxamine use explained the highest variance, and C/D ratios were higher by 30.6% on average. The second strongest predictor was elevated CRP > 10 mg/L, and C/D ratios were higher by 22.9% on average. Subsequently, obesity, nonsmoker status, and female sex explained a significant but modest proportion of variance. Among participants on fluvoxamine (n = 58), only fluvoxamine dose was associated with an increase, and for every 25 mg increase in dose, C/D ratios increased by 5% on average.

CONCLUSION

In a clinical population, this study replicated the relationship between reduced rate of clozapine metabolism and the use of fluvoxamine, elevated CRP, obesity, nonsmoking status, and female sex; and the magnitude of the effects were large enough to be clinically relevant.

A qualitative study of clinicians' perspectives on reasons for delays in clozapine initiation

OBJECTIVES

To elicit mental health clinicians' views on the reasons for delayed initiation of clozapine treatment.

METHOD

Thematic analysis of transcripts from a semi-structured interview of 15 mental health clinicians.

RESULTS

Four major themes emerged from data analysis: Patient and Carer Factors, Medication factors, Protocol factors, and Prescriber factors. Patient and carer anxiety over side effects and experience of stigma, difficulties in implementing the monitoring protocol, problems with community managing of treatment, prescriber preferences and practices, and gaps in mental health services were some of the reasons identified.

CONCLUSION

Education and support to patients and carers, a modified monitoring protocol, establishing clozapine clinics, improved early intervention services, and upskilling of clinicians can promote early clozapine initiation.

Clozapine-Induced Severe Toxicity: Exploring the Pharmacokinetic Profile of Clozapine and Its Significance in Hemodynamic Instability - A Case Report

Hemodynamic instability in patients with clozapine intoxication can indirectly reflect the serum concentration of clozapine.We have described a case of a 32-year-old pregnant woman who developed life-threatening clozapine toxicity at 28 weeks of gestation. The levels of clozapine and norclozapine in the serum were high. We initiated hemoperfusion(HP) and other detoxification therapies to remove the drug. The patient had severely dilated peripheral blood vessels, which led to cardiac symptoms such as fatal hypotension and uncontrollable tachycardia, resulting in very high cardiac output and elevated Central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2). Pharmacological intervention significantly improved the hemodynamics.In light of our observations in the ongoing case, we posit that evaluating hemodynamic parameters before and after blood detoxification could serve as a valuable means to gauge effectiveness and provide guidance for treatment.

Gene expression imputation provides clinical and biological insights into treatment-resistant schizophrenia polygenic risk

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have revealed the polygenic nature of treatment-resistant schizophrenia TRS. Gene expression imputation allowed the translation of GWAS results into regulatory mechanisms and the construction of gene expression (GReX) risk scores (GReX-RS).  In the present study we computed GReX-RS from the largest GWAS of TRS to assess its association with clinical features. We perform transcriptome imputation in the largest GWAS of TRS to find GReX associated with TRS using brain tissues. Then, for each tissue, we constructed a GReX-RS of the identified genes in a sample of 254 genotyped first episode of psychosis (FEP) patients to test its association with clinical phenotypes, including clinical symptomatology, global functioning and cognitive performance. Our analysis provides evidence that the polygenic basis of TRS includes genetic variants that modulate the expression of certain genes in certain brain areas (substantia nigra, hippocampus, amygdala and frontal cortex), which at the same time are related to clinical features in FEP patients, mainly persistence of negative symptoms and cognitive alterations in sustained attention, which have also been suggested as clinical predictors of TRS. Our results provide a clinical explanation of the polygenic architecture of TRS and give more insight into the biological mechanisms underlying TRS.

Evaluating Monitoring Guidelines of Clozapine-Induced Adverse Effects: a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Despite the evidence that no other antipsychotic is effective as clozapine for the treatment of resistant schizophrenia, it is associated with various metabolic, neuroendocrine, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal adverse effects. Guidelines aiming to address the monitoring of clozapine's (serious) adverse effects can be helpful to prevent and treat these effects. However, many of these guidelines seem to lack one or more important monitoring recommendations. We aimed to systematically review the content and quality of existing monitoring guidelines/recommendations for clozapine-induced adverse effects.

METHODS

A comprehensive and systematic literature search, using the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases, was conducted for guidelines/recommendations on the monitoring of clozapine-induced adverse events, published between January 2004 and April 2023 (last search 16 April 2023). Only peer-reviewed published guidelines reporting on the comprehensive monitoring of all major clozapine-induced adverse effects and including evidence-based recommendations, developed after the year 2004, were included. Studies reporting on the monitoring of adverse effects of clozapine without being a formal guideline, guidelines reporting on the monitoring of one or a limited number of adverse effects of clozapine, guidelines that were not peer reviewed or published, expert opinion papers without formal consensus guideline development, or guidelines developed before the year 2004, were excluded. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE-II) tool was used to evaluate the guidelines/recommendations' quality.

RESULTS

Only one guideline met the inclusion criteria. This consensus statement made recommendations for hematological monitoring, and the monitoring of metabolic, cardiac, and three other adverse effects. Highest scores for the qualitative assessment were found for the domains "scope and purpose" (66.7%), "clarity of presentation" (44.4%), and "editorial independence" (66.7%). Lowest scores were found for "rigor of development" (14.6%) and "applicability" (0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Future guidelines should develop more comprehensive recommendations about specific clozapine-induced adverse effects, including constipation, myocarditis, tachycardia, and seizures, as well as include a rechallenge policy. There is an urgent need for well-developed, methodologically stringent, guidelines.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number, CRD42023402480.

Capillary blood sampling for the determination of clozapine concentrations: analytical validation and patient experience

Patients may be reluctant to start clozapine (CLZ) because of the frequent blood sampling needed for white blood cell monitoring, but also therapeutic drug monitoring of CLZ. Finger prick, instead of venepuncture, might lower the threshold to CLZ use. The aim of this study was to determine whether CLZ concentrations are the same in capillary and venous blood samples. Capillary blood was drawn by finger prick and collected in the Hem-Col tube. Paired capillary and venous blood samples were collected from inpatients and outpatients of a mental health institute. Patients were asked to rate pain, experience, and preference for blood sampling method. Passing-Bablok analysis of 40 paired samples showed that CLZ concentrations were statistically equal in capillary and venous samples {slope 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88-1.04], intercept -6.86 (95% CI: -30.75 to 24.13)}. Venepuncture was the preferred method based on the experience ( P  = 0.009) and preference ( P  = 0.043) items. In conclusion, CLZ concentrations were similar in venous and capillary blood samples. Venepuncture appeared to be preferred to finger prick for blood sampling. Our results emphasize the importance of consulting patients' individual preference for blood sampling method.

Non-prescribing of clozapine for outpatients with schizophrenia in real-world settings: The clinicians' perspectives

Clozapine is the gold standard for treating treatment-resistant schizophrenia although continuously underutilized. Previous surveys of clinicians have found that some of the most frequently cited barriers to clozapine prescribing are related to the blood-monitoring requirements. However, these surveys tend to explore general perspectives and may not reflect the true impact of different barriers in real-world outpatient settings. This study aimed to explore this issue. First, by surveying the clinicians responsible for the treatment of 39 clozapine-eligible, yet clozapine-naive, outpatients with schizophrenia. Then, based on the survey results, explanatory interviews with the participating psychiatrists were conducted and analyzed thematically. The most frequently cited reason for non-prescribing of clozapine was the expected non-compliance with blood-monitoring requirements; however, overall stability and/or severe mental illness was chosen as the most important reason in most patient-cases. The qualitative analysis highlighted the combined impact of standard clinical practice, personal experiences, and organizational constraints on clozapine utility.

Comprehensive dissection of prevalence rates, sex differences, and blood level-dependencies of clozapine-associated adverse drug reactions

Clozapine is often underused due to concerns about adverse drug reactions (ADRs) but studies into their prevalences are inconclusive. We therefore comprehensively examined prevalences of clozapine-associated ADRs in individuals with schizophrenia and demographic and clinical factors associated with their occurrence. Data from a multi-center study (n = 698 participants) were collected. The mean number of ADRs during clozapine treatment was 4.8, with 2.4 % of participants reporting no ADRs. The most common ADRs were hypersalivation (74.6 %), weight gain (69.3 %), and increased sleep necessity (65.9 %), all of which were more common in younger participants. Participants with lower BMI prior to treatment were more likely to experience significant weight gain (>10 %). Constipation occurred more frequently with higher clozapine blood levels and doses. There were no differences in ADR prevalence rates between participants receiving clozapine monotherapy and polytherapy. These findings emphasize the high prevalence of clozapine-associated ADRs and highlight several demographic and clinical factors contributing to their occurrence. By understanding these factors, clinicians can better anticipate and manage clozapine-associated ADRs, leading to improved treatment outcomes and patient well-being.

Schizophrenia Patients Discharged on Clozapine Plus Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics From a Public Psychiatric Hospital in Taiwan, 2006-2021

BACKGROUND

Some schizophrenia patients treated with clozapine experience an inadequate response and adherence problems. The purpose of this study was to compare time to rehospitalization within 6 months in schizophrenia patients discharged on 3 clozapine regimens. Additionally, the temporal trend of prescription rate in each group was also explored.

METHODS

Schizophrenia patients discharged from the study hospital from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2021, (n = 3271) were included in the analysis. The type of clozapine prescribed at discharge was divided into 3 groups: clozapine plus long-acting injectable antipsychotics (clozapine + LAIs), clozapine plus other oral antipsychotics (clozapine + OAPs), and clozapine monotherapy. Survival analysis was used to compare time to rehospitalization within 6 months after discharge among the 3 groups. The temporal trend in the prescription rate of each group was analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage Trend test.

RESULTS

Patients discharged on clozapine + LAIs had a significantly longer time to rehospitalization than those on clozapine + OAPs or clozapine monotherapy. The prescription rates of clozapine + LAIs and clozapine + OAPs significantly increased over time, whereas the prescription rates of clozapine monotherapy significantly decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the clozapine + OAPs group, the clozapine + LAIs group had a lower risk of rehospitalization and a lower dose of clozapine prescribed. Therefore, if a second antipsychotic is required for patients who are taking clozapine alone, LAIs should be considered earlier.

Analytical Performance Evaluation of Three Point-of-Care CBC Analyzers for Management of Clozapine Therapy in Ambulatory Psychiatry Clinics

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is a first-line therapy and the only FDA-approved drug for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). However, frequent measurement of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) is required to monitor for potential adverse severe neutropenia from clozapine therapy. We evaluated 3 point-of-care (POC) instruments that perform the complete blood count (CBC) with differential to assess their analytical performance and potential to meet the clinical need for clozapine therapy management.

METHODS

A CBC with differential was performed on 104 residual whole blood specimens using 3 CBC analyzers (Sight OLO, PixCell HemoScreen, and Sysmex pocH-100i) to assess analytical precision, linearity, and accuracy vs the ADVIA 2120i and manual differential reference methods. Clinical concordance of ANC between POC devices and manual differential at medical decision points for mild, moderate, or severe neutropenia, and the threshold for clozapine therapy discontinuation (1.0 × 109/L) were determined.

RESULTS

For CBC parameters, a CV ≤ 6.4% was observed on the OLO, CV ≤ 6.2% for the HemoScreen, and CV ≤ 5.1% with the pocH-100i. Each device accurately identified ANC with the greatest mean bias ±0.42 × 109/L using the pocH-100i vs manual differential. For results near the medical decision points (ANC <1.5 × 109/L), clinical concordance of ANC results was 55.6% for the OLO, 89.5% for the HemoScreen, and 82.4% for the pocH-100i.

CONCLUSIONS

The HemoScreen device demonstrated the best clinical concordance in ANC values at medical decision thresholds for clozapine therapy management.

Unraveling ethnic disparities in antipsychotic prescribing among patients with psychosis: A retrospective cohort study based on electronic clinical records

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown mixed evidence on ethnic disparities in antipsychotic prescribing among patients with psychosis in the UK, partly due to small sample sizes. This study aimed to examine the current state of antipsychotic prescription with respect to patient ethnicity among the entire population known to a large UK mental health trust with non-affective psychosis, adjusting for multiple potential risk factors.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all patients (N = 19,291) who were aged 18 years or over at their first diagnoses of non-affective psychosis (identified with the ICD-10 codes of F20-F29) recorded in electronic health records (EHRs) at the South London and Maudsley NHS Trust until March 2021. The most recently recorded antipsychotic treatments and patient attributes were extracted from EHRs, including both structured fields and free-text fields processed using natural language processing applications. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to calculate the odds ratios (OR) for antipsychotic prescription according to patient ethnicity, adjusted for multiple potential contributing factors, including demographic (age and gender), clinical (diagnoses, duration of illness, service use and history of cannabis use), socioeconomic factors (level of deprivation and own-group ethnic density in the area of residence) and temporal changes in clinical guidelines (date of prescription).

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 43.10 % White, 8.31 % Asian, 40.80 % Black, 2.64 % Mixed, and 5.14 % of patients from Other ethnicity. Among them, 92.62 % had recorded antipsychotic receipt, where 24.05 % for depot antipsychotics and 81.72 % for second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) medications. Most ethnic minority groups were not significantly different from White patients in receiving any antipsychotic. Among those receiving antipsychotic prescribing, Black patients were more likely to be prescribed depot (adjusted OR 1.29, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.14-1.47), but less likely to receive SGA (adjusted OR 0.85, 95 % CI 0.74-0.97), olanzapine (OR 0.82, 95 % CI 0.73-0.92) and clozapine (adjusted OR 0.71, 95 % CI 0.6-0.85) than White patients. All the ethnic minority groups were less likely to be prescribed olanzapine than the White group.

CONCLUSIONS

Black patients with psychosis had a distinct pattern in antipsychotic prescription, with less use of SGA, including olanzapine and clozapine, but more use of depot antipsychotics, even when adjusting for the effects of multiple demographic, clinical and socioeconomic factors. Further research is required to understand the sources of these ethnic disparities and eliminate care inequalities.

Characterization of antipsychotic utilization before clozapine initiation for individuals with schizophrenia: an innovative visualization of trajectories using French National Health Insurance data

AIMS

Despite recommendations to initiate clozapine after two unsuccessful trials of antipsychotics, clozapine is underprescribed and initiated too late. The aim of this study was to describe different antipsychotic treatment sequences in the 36 months before the initiation of clozapine and to characterize clusters of treatment trajectories.

METHODS

Using the French National Health Insurance database, a historical cohort study of the population in an area in western France was performed. The data from all new users of clozapine with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in the period of 2017-2018 were evaluated. All outpatient reimbursements for antipsychotics during the 36 months before clozapine initiation were analysed. Successive reimbursements for identical treatments were grouped into treatment trials (TTs), and different trajectories were clustered using a state sequence analysis.

RESULTS

The results showed 1191 TTs for 287 individuals. The mean number of TTs per individual was 3.2. Risperidone, aripiprazole and haloperidol were the main treatments delivered. The frequencies of antipsychotics used differed between monotherapies and combination therapies. A three-cluster typology was identified: one cluster (n = 133) of 'less treated' younger individuals with fewer TTs and shorter TT durations; a second cluster (n = 53) of 'more treated' individuals with higher numbers of TTs and combinations of antipsychotics; and a third cluster (n = 103) of 'treatment-stable' older individuals with longer TT durations.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that the median number of TTs during the 36 months before clozapine prescription was higher than the two recommended. The different trajectories were associated with individual characteristics and treatment differences, suggesting that additional studies of clinical parameters are needed to understand barriers to clozapine prescription.

[Safety aspects during treatment with clozapine: : Adverse effects, titration, and therapeutic drug monitoring - a narrative review]

BACKGROUND

According to current guidelines, clozapine should be used as a third step in treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS). In everyday clinical practice, however, it is frequently used at a much later stage, which leads to a significant deterioration of prognosis. The first part of this narrative overview focuses on the most frequent side effects of clozapine, on the relevance of slow titration, and on specific aspects of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Medline, the Guideline for the use of clozapine 2013 of the Netherlands Clozapine Collaboration Group, and the S3 Guideline for Schizophrenia of the German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics were searched for relevant literature, the last query dating from April 28th, 2023.

RESULTS

Despite its unique efficacy clozapine is underused in clinical practice and prescription varies between and within countries. Next to hematological, metabolic, and vegetative side effects, clozapine induced inflammation manifesting in the form of pneumonia or myocarditis, which is mainly associated with rapid titration, represents a major clinical challenge with CRP monitoring being of particular relevance. In this context, it also has to be noted that sex, smoking behavior, and ethnic origin impact clozapine metabolism, thus requiring personalized dosing.

CONCLUSION

Slow titration when possible, TDM, and CYP diagnostics when appropriate increase patient safety during treatment with clozapine and thus the likelihood of early prescription of this compound in TRS.

Monitoring the Effectiveness of Treatment in Women with Schizophrenia: New Specialized Cooperative Approaches

Women with schizophrenia have specific health needs that differ from those of men and that change through successive life stages. We aimed to review the biopsychosocial literature on schizophrenia that addresses clinically important questions related to the treatment of women, including somatic morbi-mortality, hyperprolactinemia, comorbid substance use disorders, social risk factors, and medication effectiveness/safety. Data search terms were as follows: (Morbidity AND mortality) OR hyperprolactinemia OR ("substance use disorders" OR addictions) OR ("social risk factors") OR ("drug safety" OR prescription) AND women AND schizophrenia. A secondary aim was to describe a method of monitoring and interdisciplinary staff strategies. Schizophrenia patients show an increased risk of premature death from cardiovascular/respiratory disease and cancer compared to the general population. The literature suggests that close liaisons with primary care and the introduction of physical exercise groups reduce comorbidity. Various strategies for lowering prolactin levels diminish the negative long-term effects of hyperprolactinemia. Abstinence programs reduce the risk of victimization and trauma in women. Stigma associated with women who have serious psychiatric illness is often linked to reproductive functions. The safety and effectiveness of antipsychotic drug choice and dose differ between men and women and change over a woman's life cycle. Monitoring needs to be multidisciplinary, knowledgeable, and regular.

Examining racial disparity in psychotic disorders related ambulatory care visits: an observational study using national ambulatory medical care survey 2010-2015

BACKGROUND

One of the most consistent research findings related to race and mental health diseases is the disproportionately high rate of psychotic disorder diagnoses among people of color, specifically people of African descent. It is important to examine if a similar pattern exists among specific psychotic disorders. We aimed to examine the racial/ethnic differences in ambulatory care visits diagnosed with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (SSDs).

METHODS

We analyzed data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) 2010-2015. The study sample included physician office-based visits by individuals diagnosed with SSDs, including schizophrenia, schizoaffective, and unspecified psychotic disorder (n = 1155). We used descriptive and bivariate analysis by race/ethnicity and three multinomial logistic regression models to test the association between the SSDs and race/ethnicity, adjusting for age, gender, insurance, disposition, medication Rx, and co-morbidity, considering the design and weight.

RESULT

Of the 1155 visits for SSDs, 44.8% had schizophrenia, 37.4% had schizoaffective disorder diagnosis, and 19.0% had unspecified psychosis disorder. We found significant racial disparities in the diagnosis of SSDs. Black patients were overrepresented in all three categories: schizophrenia (24%), schizoaffective disorder (17%), and unspecified psychosis disorder (26%). Also, a notable percentage of Black patients (20%) were referred to another physician in cases of schizophrenia compared to other ethnoracial groups (p < 0.0001). Moreover, we found a significant disparity in insurance coverage for schizoaffective disorder, with a higher percentage of Black patients (48%) having Medicaid insurance compared to patients from other ethnoracial groups (p < 0.0001). Black patients had nearly twice the odds of receiving a diagnosis of schizophrenia compared to White patients [AOR = 1.94; 95% CI: 1.28-2.95; P = 0.001]. However, they had significantly lower odds of being diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder [AOR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.26-0.68; P = 0.003]. Race/ethnicity was not associated with receiving an unspecified psychosis disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that SSDs, more specifically schizophrenia, continue to burden the mental health of Black individuals. Validation of our findings requires rigorous research at the population level that reveals the epidemiological difference of SSDs diagnoses in different race/ethnicity groups. Also, advancing our understanding of the nature of disparity in SSDs diagnoses among the Black population requires disentangling etiologic and systemic factors in play. This could include psychological stress, the pathway to care, services use, provider diagnostic practice, and experiencing discrimination and institutional and structural racism.

Rates and Reasons for Clozapine Treatment Interruptions: Impact of the Frequency of Hematologic Monitoring and Cardiac Adverse Events

BACKGROUND

Differing rates and reasons for interruptions of clozapine treatment have been reported globally. This article evaluated the rates and reasons for clozapine therapy interruptions in Australia and explored the impact of the frequency of hematological monitoring on these parameters.

METHODS

Data of the patients who were newly commenced on clozapine at three metropolitan public mental health services in Western Australia over 11 years were retrospectively collated. The rate and reasons for clozapine therapy interruptions and their association with the frequency of hematological monitoring, age, sex, and treatment site were analyzed using parametric, nonparametric, and correlational analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 457 patients whose data were collected, 69.6% had an interruption of treatment with 41.2% of those occurring during the period of mandatory weekly hematological monitoring in the first 18 weeks. Nonadherence (57.4%) and adverse effects (28.8%) were the 2 main reasons for the treatment interruptions. Cardiac issues accounted for the majority of the interruptions (61.8%) due to specified adverse effects, and these occurred significantly more commonly within the first 18 weeks. Location, age, and sex did not predict the possibility of treatment interruptions.

CONCLUSIONS

The high rates of clozapine treatment interruption observed during the period of weekly monitoring point toward the need to address the burden of frequent hematological monitoring for patients. Disproportionately higher rates of interruption due to cardiac adverse effects observed in this study compared with research from non-Australian settings raise the possibility of geographical differences in the adverse effects leading to treatment discontinuation.

What are the barriers and facilitators of clozapine use in early psychosis? A survey of UK early intervention clinicians

Clozapine is the most effective medication for treatment-resistant psychosis, but evidence points to substantial underuse, especially within early intervention psychosis (EIP) services. We explored clinicians' views on perceived barriers and facilitators to offering patients clozapine within EIP services. A cross-sectional survey was distributed electronically to clinicians practising in EIP services across England. A mixed methods approach was used to assess barriers to clozapine, and attitudes and opinions concerning clozapine underutilisation. Based on the barriers identified in the literature, clinicians were asked to rate each one (scale:1-7) based on importance, with a higher score indicating higher importance. Clinicians were also asked open-ended questions on barriers to clozapine and how access can be improved in EIP services. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, and qualitative responses were analysed thematically. One hundred and nineteen EIP clinicians from 35 services in England completed the survey. In total, 37% (n = 45) of clinicians perceived that clozapine was under-prescribed in their EIP service. The most important barrier to utilising clozapine were patient concerns with side effects, followed by monitoring requirements and clinician concerns with side effects. Thematic analysis identified 17 perceived barriers, which were grouped into three major themes: administrative (5 subthemes), clinician-related (6 subthemes), and patient-related (6 subthemes). Perceived facilitators to improving clozapine use were greater training, improved resources, and optimised monitoring. The main barriers to clozapine in EIP services, as identified by clinicians, are patient concerns regarding side effects and monitoring requirements. Identified facilitators for improved clozapine use include clinician training, improved resources, guidelines, and point-of-care testing.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics of clozapine in an ancestrally diverse sample: a longitudinal analysis and genome-wide association study using UK clinical monitoring data

BACKGROUND

The antipsychotic, clozapine, is the only licensed drug against the treatment-resistant symptoms that affect 20-30% of people with schizophrenia. Clozapine is markedly underprescribed, partly because of concerns about its narrow therapeutic range and adverse drug reaction profile. Both concerns are linked to drug metabolism, which varies across populations globally and is partly genetically determined. Our study aimed to use a cross-ancestry genome-wide association study (GWAS) design to investigate variations in clozapine metabolism within and between genetically inferred ancestral backgrounds, to discover genomic associations to clozapine plasma concentrations, and to assess the effects of pharmacogenomic predictors across different ancestries.

METHODS

In this GWAS, we analysed data from the UK Zaponex Treatment Access System clozapine monitoring service as part of the CLOZUK study. We included all available individuals with clozapine pharmacokinetic assays requested by their clinicians. We excluded people younger than 18 years, or whose records contained clerical errors, or with blood drawn 6-24 h after dose, a clozapine or norclozapine concentration less than 50 ng/mL, a clozapine concentration of more than 2000 ng/mL, a clozapine-to-norclozapine ratio outside of the 0·5-3·0 interval, or a clozapine dose of more than 900 mg/day. Using genomic information, we identified five biogeographical ancestries: European, sub-Saharan African, north African, southwest Asian, and east Asian. We did pharmacokinetic modelling, a GWAS, and a polygenic risk score association analysis using longitudinal regression analysis with three primary outcome variables: two metabolite plasma concentrations (clozapine and norclozapine) and the clozapine-to-norclozapine ratio.

FINDINGS

19 096 pharmacokinetic assays were available for 4760 individuals in the CLOZUK study. After data quality control, 4495 individuals (3268 [72·7%] male and 1227 [27·3%] female; mean age 42·19 years [range 18-85]) linked to 16 068 assays were included in this study. We found a faster average clozapine metabolism in people of sub-Saharan African ancestry than in those of European ancestry. By contrast, individuals with east Asian or southwest Asian ancestry were more likely to be slow clozapine metabolisers than those with European ancestry. Eight pharmacogenomic loci were identified in the GWAS, seven with significant effects in non-European groups. Polygenic scores generated from these loci were associated with clozapine outcome variables in the whole sample and within individual ancestries; the maximum variance explained was 7·26% for the metabolic ratio.

INTERPRETATION

Longitudinal cross-ancestry GWAS can discover pharmacogenomic markers of clozapine metabolism that, individually or as polygenic scores, have consistent effects across ancestries. Our findings suggest that ancestral differences in clozapine metabolism could be considered for optimising clozapine prescription protocols for diverse populations.

FUNDING

UK Academy of Medical Sciences, UK Medical Research Council, and European Commission.

Cariprazine - an Alternative Treatment for Clozapine-resistant Schizophrenia?

Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) poses a significant therapeutic challenge in psychiatric practice. Clozapine is recognized as a treatment of choice in TRS but is not always effective in alleviating patients' symptoms. Additionally, clozapine therapy is associated with multiple side effects and monitoring requirements that often limit its use and negatively affect patients' compliance with the treatment. Although clozapine augmentation options are available, there is currently no alternative monotherapy proven to be effective in TRS. We present a case of a young man with TRS who failed to respond to appropriate trials of risperidone, aripiprazole and also clozapine, and who experienced impairing adverse effects of clozapine that made further clozapine treatment not only futile but also detrimental to his health. He was successfully treated with cariprazine monotherapy, which culminated in the remission of his both positive and negative symptoms of psychosis as well as in the marked improvement in social functioning. Cariprazine, a newer atypical antipsychotic endowed with a D3-preferring mode of action, may offer a better tolerated and more acceptable treatment option for patients with difficult-to-treat psychotic symptoms.

Polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia and treatment resistance: New data, systematic review and meta-analysis

Although treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) is an important and frequent problem with a specific treatment, clozapine, its biological determinants are poorly understood. At the genetic level, most studies of association between schizophrenia polygenic risk score (SCZ PRS) and TRS did not reach statistical significance. However, no systematic review or meta-analysis of this type of study has been conducted. In this work, we first performed an association study between SCZ PRS and TRS in a sample of 427 patients with schizophrenia. Then, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of all available data. PubMed was searched for articles reporting association between SCZ PRS and TRS, defined as use of clozapine or failure of two sequentially prescribed antipsychotics. The association in our sample was not statistically significant. Five studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 7309 patients, 2386 (33 %) with TRS. Fixed effect model meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant association with TRS status (OR = 1.090, 95 % CI = 1.030–1.154; P = 0.0027; I2 = 0.00 %). The robustness of the result was demonstrated by maintaining a statistically significant association in all sensitivity analyses, such as a leave-one-out approach or use of a random effects model. Therefore, at least part of the genetic susceptibility to TRS is shared with that of schizophrenia. However, our results did not support the clinical utility of the SCZ PRS in its current stage due to the small effect size. Improvements in PRS estimation and combination with other predictors may lead to future use in stratification of patients.

Antipsychotic prescribing practices for outpatients with schizophrenia and reasons for non-clozapine treatment - Data from a Danish quality assessment audit

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is the gold standard for treating treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) although widely underutilised. Both organisational, patient- and clinician related reasons for the underutilisation have been reported, however, the clinical impact of either in real-world settings is not fully elucidated.

AIM

This audit aimed to evaluate the local antipsychotic (AP) prescribing practices for outpatients with schizophrenia and to assess the spectrum and prevalence of journalised reasons for non-clozapine treatment amongst eligible outpatients.

METHODS

Data on demographics, current and former AP treatments, as well as documented reasons for non-clozapine treatment, was extracted through chart audit.

RESULTS

Of the 668 affiliated outpatients with schizophrenia, 43% were treated with AP polytherapy (APP) and 19.6% with clozapine. The most prevalent reason for clozapine discontinuation was related to side effects whereas the most prevalent reason for refusal or omission of clozapine treatment was related to the associated monitoring regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

This audit showed that APP prescribing is a highly prevalent practice in our services when treating outpatients with schizophrenia and that clozapine is underutilised in a 'last resort' manner. The blood-monitoring regimen associated with clozapine treatment was found to be an important factor in the underutilisation. It seemed, however, that the monitoring constituted a barrier for different reasons, requiring different approaches to remedy. Future studies, directly involving both patients and clinicians in the identification and management of the most clinically relevant barriers and their corresponding facilitators, are warranted.

Clozapine use at a specialised psychiatric hospital in Johannesburg

Background

Clozapine is the gold standard medication for treatment-resistant psychosis, with robust evidence supporting its efficacy in multiple symptom domains. However, clozapine's side effect profile contributes to its underutilisation and discontinuation.

Aim

This study aimed to explore the magnitude of clozapine use and describe factors that impact on its effective use among in-patients.

Setting

Tara Hospital, a specialised psychiatric hospital in Johannesburg.

Methods

This was a retrospective, cross-sectional file review of clozapine-treated patients admitted over the 2-year study period. Data variables included: demographics, clinical information, discharge prescription, clozapine-related side effects and details of clozapine discontinuation, where applicable.

Results

A cohort of 33.2% of patients from Tara's biological wards received a trial of clozapine. Participants experienced anti-cholinergic clozapine-related side effects that included weight gain (79.5%), tachycardia (35.2%) and constipation (35.2%). Clozapine was discontinued in 13.7% of participants, and no life-threatening side effects or deaths occurred. Significantly more use of flupenthixol decanoate (64.3% vs. 30.7%; p = 0.0322) and anticholinergics (35.7% vs. 11.4%; p = 0.0474) occurred in the clozapine-discontinued group. Polypharmacy rates were high for psychiatric and non-psychiatric medications.

Conclusion

One-third of patients received clozapine trials, most of whom continued at discharge. Although side effects occurred frequently, life-threatening side effects did not. Clozapine monitoring protocols, side effect rating scales, pre-emptive management of side effects, lifestyle interventions and clinician education may improve outcomes of clozapine use. The use of plasma clozapine levels may be beneficial.

Contribution

This study expands our limited knowledge regarding current clozapine prescribing trends in South Africa.

Exploration of the Barriers to Clozapine Prescribing in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: A Qualitative Study

Treatment-resistance schizophrenia (TRS) is one of the psychiatric challenges. While clozapine is an effective treatment for patients with TRS, there are some barriers to clozapine prescribing in these patients. The study aims to explore the barriers from Iranian psychiatrists' points of view. The study was conducted by a qualitative approach using content analysis. The Participants included 12 psychiatrists who were selected purposefully. Data were collected using a semi-structured interview from May to December 2020. All interviews were recorded and transcribed and analyzed qualitatively using constant comparisons. Three main categories emerged concerning barriers to the use of clozapine: drug-related barriers, psychiatrist and health system-related barriers, and patient and family-related barriers. Additionally, specific subcategories within each main category were documented. The present study showed that there are three main groups of barriers to the use of clozapine in patients with TRS. Psychiatrist and health system-related barriers may influence the other two groups of barriers. Further research to investigate the effective strategies to overcome the barriers is recommended.

Clozapine is the approved option in treatment-resistant schizophrenia and requires careful management

Clozapine is the only agent approved for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but is underprescribed. Its adverse drug event (ADE) profile and patient monitoring requirements can discourage its use, but the benefits of clozapine generally outweigh its risks, as most ADEs are manageable. Careful patient assessment, gradual titration, minimum effective dosages, therapeutic drug monitoring and checks of neutrophils, cardiac enzymes and ADE symptoms are recommended. Neutropenia is common but does not necessarily warrant permanent clozapine cessation.

Clozapine haematological monitoring for neutropenia: a global perspective

AIMS

Clozapine is licensed for treatment-resistant psychosis and remains underutilised. This may berelated to the stringent haematological monitoring requirements that are mandatory in most countries. We aimed to compare guidelines internationally and develop a novel Stringency Index. We hypothesised that the most stringent countries would have increased healthcare costs and reduced prescription rates.

METHOD

We conducted a literature review and survey of guidelines internationally. Guideline identification involved a literature review and consultation with clinical academics. We focused on the haematological monitoring parameters, frequency and thresholds for discontinuation and rechallenge after suspected clozapine-induced neutropenia. In addition, indicators reflecting monitoring guideline stringency were scored and visualised using a choropleth map. We developed a Stringency Index with an international panel of clozapine experts, through a modified-Delphi-survey. The Stringency Index was compared to health expenditure per-capita and clozapine prescription per 100 000 persons.

RESULTS

One hundred twocountries were included, from Europe (n = 35), Asia (n = 24), Africa (n = 20), South America (n = 11), North America (n = 7) and Oceania and Australia (n = 5). Guidelines differed in frequency of haematological monitoring and discontinuation thresholds. Overall, 5% of included countries had explicit guidelines for clozapine-rechallenge and 40% explicitly prohibited clozapine-rechallenge. Furthermore, 7% of included countries had modified discontinuation thresholds for benign ethnic neutropenia. None of the guidelines specified how long haematological monitoring should continue. The most stringent guidelines were in Europe, and the least stringent were in Africa and South America. There was a positive association (r = 0.43, p < 0.001) between a country's Stringency Index and healthcare expenditure per capita.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommendations on how haematological function should be monitored in patients treated with clozapine vary considerably between countries. It would be useful to standardise guidelines on haematological monitoring worldwide.

miR143-3p-Mediated NRG-1-Dependent Mitochondrial Dysfunction Contributes to Olanzapine Resistance in Refractory Schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Olanzapine is an effective antipsychotic medication for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS); however, the therapeutic effectiveness of olanzapine has been found to vary in individual patients. It is imperative to unravel its resistance mechanisms and find reliable targets to develop novel precise therapeutic strategies.

METHODS

Unbiased RNA sequencing analysis was performed using homogeneous populations of neural stem cells derived from induced pluripotent stem cells in 3 olanzapine responder (reduction of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale score ≥25%) and 4 nonresponder (reduction of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale score <25%) inpatients with TRS. We also used a genotyping study from patients with TRS to assess the candidate genes associated with the olanzapine response. CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)/Cas9-mediated genome editing, neurologic behavioral tests, RNA silencing, and microRNA sequencing were used to investigate the phenotypic mechanisms of an olanzapine resistance gene in patients with TRS.

RESULTS

Neuregulin-1 (NRG-1) deficiency-induced mitochondrial dysfunction is associated with olanzapine treatment outcomes in TRS. NRG-1 knockout mice showed schizophrenia-relevant behavioral deficits and yielded olanzapine resistance. Notably, miR143-3p is a critical NRG-1 target related to mitochondrial dysfunction, and miR143-3p levels in neural stem cells associate with severity to olanzapine resistance in TRS. Meanwhile, olanzapine resistance in NRG-1 knockout mice could be rescued by treatment with miR143-3p agomir via intracerebral injection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide direct evidence of olanzapine resistance resulting from NRG-1 deficiency-induced mitochondrial dysfunction, and they link olanzapine resistance and NRG-1 deficiency-induced mitochondrial dysfunction to an NRG-1/miR143-3p axis, which constitutes a novel biomarker and target for TRS.

Ethnic disparities in clozapine prescription for service-users with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: a systematic review

Clozapine is the only licenced medication for treating treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Previous studies have suggested unequal rates of clozapine treatment by ethnicity among individuals with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. One previous review has investigated this topic but was restricted to studies from the USA. This current review aims to synthesise the international literature regarding ethnic disparities in clozapine prescription amongst individuals with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. We searched CINAHL, PubMed, Medline, Embase, APA PsycINFO and Open Grey and reviewed studies reporting on the proportion of service-users prescribed clozapine separately for different ethnic groups, in individuals with a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia or any schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. A narrative synthesis was conducted to integrate information from included studies. The review was registered in PROSPERO (Number: CRD42020221731). From 24 studies, there is strong, consistent evidence that Black and Hispanic service-users in the UK and the USA are significantly less likely to receive clozapine than White/Caucasian service-users after controlling for multiple demographic and clinical potential confounders. In New Zealand, Māori service-users were reported to be more likely to receive clozapine than those of White/European ethnicity. There is mixed evidence regarding Asian service-users in the UK. The mentioned disparities were observed in studies with TRS and non-TRS cohorts. The results imply that access to clozapine treatment varies among ethnic groups. These findings raise an ethical concern as they suggest a compromise of the standards of care in schizophrenia treatment practices. Interventions are needed to reduce clozapine prescribing disparities among ethnic communities.

Iranian psychiatrists' attitude towards clozapine use for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a nationwide survey

BACKGROUND

Clozapine has the greatest efficacy for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), even though its underutilization is not uncommon across different countries. This study aimed to investigate the knowledge and attitude of Iranian psychiatrists toward clozapine use.

METHOD

In this cross-sectional study, a questionnaire was distributed among psychiatrists registered with the Iranian Psychiatrists Association (including its provincial branches) to assess their knowledge and attitude towards clozapine use. A total of 282 psychiatrists completed the questionnaire. Descriptive analysis was used to describe demographic information, and Chi-square tests were conducted to determine if there is an association between academic position and work experience. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS® version 25.0 for Windows, and a significance level of 0.05 was used.

RESULTS

Most respondents (93%) acknowledged that they prescribed clozapine for their patients, and 74% believed that clozapine was more effective than other antipsychotic drugs. However, 43.3% of the respondents said they did not believe in the safety of clozapine. Difficulty initiating and having no firsthand experience in the superiority of clozapine were reported by 81.2 and 80% of the respondents, respectively. Our results also showed an association between having an academic position and access to appropriate facilities for the control and management of patients treated with clozapine and believing in the safety of clozapine (p < 0.05). Longer work experience (more than 15 years) was associated with a higher prescription of clozapine, belief in greater effectiveness of clozapine, and its safety (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Iranian psychiatrists had a good self-perception of knowledge about the efficacy of clozapine for patients with TRS, but concerns about serious side effects are common. Psychiatrists with longer work experience and academic positions were more optimistic towards clozapine use than the younger ones with no academic position. Considering the results in planning the strategies to decrease concerns about clozapine use is recommended.

Relaxation of the criteria for entry to the UK Clozapine Central Non-Rechallenge Database: a modelling study

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is uniquely effective in treatment-resistant psychosis. In the UK, patients must discontinue clozapine indefinitely if they are placed on the Central Non-Rechallenge Database (CNRD) after their haematological parameters fall below particular thresholds. Under exceptional circumstances, patients can be rechallenged on clozapine under an off-licence agreement. In the USA in 2015, restrictive practice was discontinued to allow greater flexibility for clozapine maintenance. The absolute neutrophil count leading to treatment interruption was lowered from less than 1·5 × 10⁹/L to less than 1·0 × 10⁹/L and platelet and white cell count monitoring were ceased. We aimed to investigate the implications of a similar policy change on clozapine use in the UK.

METHODS

This was a modelling study of all patients registered on the UK CNRD. First, we determined the proportion of patients placed on the database in the UK who would have had to discontinue clozapine treatment under the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criteria. Second, we compared the haematological characteristics of patients who did or did not meet FDA criteria for discontinuing clozapine, including the time to registration from clozapine initiation and the proportion of cases of severe neutropenia at registration. Third, we investigated the success rates of clozapine re-challenge for patients that had been placed on the CNRD. Successful rechallenge was defined as no recurrence of CNRD registration.

FINDINGS

Between May 2, 2002 and March 1, 2021, 3731 patients were placed on the CNRD, with a mean age of 47 years (SD 15), including 1420 (38%) women and 2311 (62%) men, of whom 3089 (83%) were White, 360 (10%) were Black, 190 (5%) were Asian, and 92 (2%) were classified as other. 566 (15%) of 3731 patients met the equivalent criteria for clozapine discontinuation under the FDA guidelines. The median time to CNRD registration from clozapine initiation was 1·6 years (IQR 0·2-4·9). Data for 519 rechallenged patients were examined; 419 (81%) were successful. Clozapine rechallenge success rates were broadly similar between individuals who did not meet the US CNRD registration criteria (36 [78%] of 46) and those who did meet the criteria (383 [81%] of 473).

INTERPRETATION

Implementing the revised FDA monitoring criteria in the UK would substantially reduce clozapine discontinuation for haematological reasons, which would greatly improve the mental health outcomes of these patients without having a major effect on their physical health.

FUNDING

None.

A Guideline and Checklist for Initiating and Managing Clozapine Treatment in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia

Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) will affect about one in three patients with schizophrenia. Clozapine is the only treatment approved for TRS, and patients should be treated as soon as possible to improve their chances of achieving remission. Despite its effectiveness, concern over side effects, monitoring requirements, and inexperience with prescribing often result in long delays that can expose patients to unnecessary risks and compromise their chances of achieving favorable long-term outcomes. We critically reviewed the literature on clozapine use in TRS, focusing on guidelines, systematic reviews, and algorithms to identify strategies for improving clozapine safety and tolerability. Based on this, we have provided an overview of strategies to support early initiation of clozapine in patients with TRS based on the latest evidence and our clinical experience, and have summarized the key elements in a practical, evidence-based checklist for identifying and managing patients with TRS, with the aim of increasing confidence in prescribing and monitoring clozapine therapy.

Ethnic inequalities in clozapine use among people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a retrospective cohort study using data from electronic clinical records

PURPOSE

Clozapine is the most effective intervention for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Several studies report ethnic disparities in clozapine treatment. However, few studies restrict analyses to TRS cohorts alone or address confounding by benign ethnic neutropenia. This study investigates ethnic equity in access to clozapine treatment for people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia spectrum disorder.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study, using information from 11 years of clinical records (2007-2017) from the South London and Maudsley NHS Trust. We identified a cohort of service-users with TRS using a validated algorithm. We investigated associations between ethnicity and clozapine treatment, adjusting for sociodemographic factors, psychiatric multi-morbidity, substance misuse, neutropenia, and service-use.

RESULTS

Among 2239 cases of TRS, Black service-users were less likely to be receive clozapine compared with White British service-users after adjusting for confounders (Black African aOR = 0.49, 95% CI [0.33, 0.74], p = 0.001; Black Caribbean aOR = 0.64, 95% CI [0.43, 0.93], p = 0.019; Black British aOR = 0.61, 95% CI [0.41, 0.91], p = 0.016). It was additionally observed that neutropenia was not related to treatment with clozapine. Also, a detention under the Mental Health Act was negatively associated clozapine receipt, suggesting people with TRS who were detained are less likely to be treated with clozapine.

CONCLUSION

Black service-users with TRS were less likely to receive clozapine than White British service-users. Considering the protective effect of treatment with clozapine, these inequities may place Black service-users at higher risk for hospital admissions and mortality.

Dopaminergic dysfunction and excitatory/inhibitory imbalance in treatment-resistant schizophrenia and novel neuromodulatory treatment

Antipsychotic drugs are the mainstay in the treatment of schizophrenia. However, one-third of patients do not show adequate improvement in positive symptoms with non-clozapine antipsychotics. Additionally, approximately half of them show poor response to clozapine, electroconvulsive therapy, or other augmentation strategies. However, the development of novel treatment for these conditions is difficult due to the complex and heterogenous pathophysiology of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Therefore, this review provides key findings, potential treatments, and a roadmap for future research in this area. First, we review the neurobiological pathophysiology of TRS, particularly the dopaminergic, glutamatergic, and GABAergic pathways. Next, the limitations of existing and promising treatments are presented. Specifically, this article focuses on the therapeutic potential of neuromodulation, including electroconvulsive therapy, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, and deep brain stimulation. Finally, we propose multivariate analyses that integrate various perspectives of the pathogenesis, such as dopaminergic dysfunction and excitatory/inhibitory imbalance, thereby elucidating the heterogeneity of TRS that could not be obtained by conventional statistics. These analyses can in turn lead to a precision medicine approach with closed-loop neuromodulation targeting the detected pathophysiology of TRS.

Clozapine Treatment Is Associated With Higher Prescription Rate of Antipsychotic Monotherapy and Lower Prescription Rate of Other Concomitant Psychotropics: A Real-World Nationwide Study

BACKGROUND

Although clozapine is effective for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), the rate of clozapine prescription is still low. Whereas antipsychotic monotherapy is recommended in clinical practice guidelines, the rate of antipsychotic polypharmacy is still high. There is little evidence on whether a clozapine prescription influences changes in the rate of monotherapy and polypharmacy, including antipsychotics and other psychotropics. We therefore hypothesized that the rate of antipsychotic monotherapy in patients with TRS who were prescribed clozapine would be higher than that in patients with schizophrenia who were not prescribed clozapine.

METHODS

We assessed 8306 patients with schizophrenia nationwide from 178 institutions in Japan from 2016 to 2019. We analyzed the psychotropic prescription data at discharge in patients diagnosed with TRS and with no description of TRS (ND-TRS) based on the diagnosis listed in the discharge summary.

RESULTS

The rate of antipsychotic monotherapy in the TRS with clozapine group (91.3%) was significantly higher than that in the TRS without clozapine group (45.9%; P &lt; 2.0 × 10-16) and the ND-TRS without clozapine group (54.7%; P &lt; 2.0 × 10-16). The rate of antipsychotic monotherapy without any other concomitant psychotropics in the TRS with clozapine group (26.5%) was significantly higher than that in the TRS without clozapine group (12.6%; P = 1.1 × 10-6) and the ND-TRS without clozapine group (17.0%; P = 5.9 × 10-6).

CONCLUSIONS

Clozapine prescription could be associated with a high rate of antipsychotic monotherapy. Patients will benefit from the correct diagnosis of TRS and thus from proper clozapine prescription.

Comparative effectiveness of antipsychotic monotherapy and polypharmacy in schizophrenia patients with clozapine treatment: A nationwide, health insurance data-based study

Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). However, it remains uncertain whether antipsychotic augmentation to clozapine has the superior effectiveness over clozapine alone and the effect size of clozapine compared to other antipsychotic drugs in TRS. Therefore, we examined the comparative effectiveness of antipsychotic monotherapy and polypharmacy on the risk of psychiatric admission and treatment discontinuation in TRS. Data were collected from the Health Insurance Review Agency database between January 2010 and December 2019 in South Korea. Among prevalent patients with schizophrenia, we defined 22,327 patients with TRS as those who had been prescribed with clozapine at least once during the entire observation period. Stratified Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed using data on all antipsychotic prescriptions of patients with TRS to investigate the risk of psychiatric hospitalization and treatment discontinuation associated with antipsychotic treatment. In individual comparisons, clozapine monotherapy was the most effective for the risk of psychiatric hospitalization compared to no use (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.22-0.25). In group comparisons, clozapine with long-acting injectable (LAI) second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) was superior to clozapine monotherapy for the risk of psychiatric hospitalization (HR = 0.60, 95%CI = 0.41-0.88). Clozapine monotherapy was associated with the lowest risk of treatment discontinuation in the individual and group comparisons. This retrospective observational population-based study reports that clozapine with LAI SGA is more effective in lowering the risk of psychiatric hospitalization in antipsychotic group comparison with the reference of clozapine monotherapy.