1
|
İnce B, Phillips MD, Zenasni Z, Shearer J, Dalton B, Irish M, Mercado D, Webb H, McCombie C, Au K, Kern N, Clark-Stone S, Connan F, Johnston AL, Lazarova S, Zadeh E, Newell C, Pathan T, Wales J, Cashmore R, Marshall S, Arcelus J, Robinson P, Byford S, Landau S, Lawrence V, Himmerich H, Treasure J, Schmidt U. Autopsy of a failed trial part 2: Outcomes, challenges, and lessons learnt from the DAISIES trial. EUROPEAN EATING DISORDERS REVIEW 2024; 32:476-489. [PMID: 38109218 DOI: 10.1002/erv.3058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The relative merits of inpatient or day-treatment for adults with anorexia nervosa (AN) are unknown. The DAISIES trial aimed to establish the non-inferiority of a stepped-care day patient treatment (DPT) approach versus inpatient treatment as usual (IP-TAU) for improving body mass index (BMI) at 12 months in adults with AN. The trial was terminated due to poor recruitment. This paper presents outcomes and investigates the reasons behind the trial's failure. METHOD Fifteen patients with AN (of 53 approached) participated and were followed-up to 6 or 12 months. Summary statistics were calculated due to low sample size, and qualitative data concerning treatment experiences were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS At baseline, participants in both trial arms rated stepped-care DPT as more acceptable. At 12 months, participants' BMIs had increased in both trial arms. Qualitative analysis highlighted valued and challenging aspects of care across settings. Only 6/12 sites opened for recruitment. Among patients approached, the most common reason for declining participation was their treatment preference (n = 12/38). CONCLUSIONS No conclusions can be drawn concerning the effectiveness of IP-TAU and stepped-care DPT, but the latter was perceived more positively. Patient-related, service-related and systemic factors (COVID-19) contributed to the trial's failure. Lessons learnt can inform future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Başak İnce
- Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW), Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Matthew D Phillips
- Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW), Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Zohra Zenasni
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - James Shearer
- Department of Health Service & Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Bethan Dalton
- Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW), Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Madeleine Irish
- The Oxford Institute of Clinical Psychology Training and Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniela Mercado
- Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW), Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Hannah Webb
- Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW), Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Catherine McCombie
- Department of Health Service & Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Katie Au
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nikola Kern
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sam Clark-Stone
- Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, UK
| | - Frances Connan
- Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Ewa Zadeh
- South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Ciarán Newell
- Dorset HealthCare University NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK
| | - Tayeem Pathan
- Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leatherhead, UK
| | - Jackie Wales
- Leicestershire Adult Eating Disorders Service, Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Bennion Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Rebecca Cashmore
- Leicestershire Adult Eating Disorders Service, Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Bennion Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Sandra Marshall
- Leicestershire Adult Eating Disorders Service, Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Bennion Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - Jon Arcelus
- Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paul Robinson
- Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Byford
- Department of Health Service & Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sabine Landau
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Vanessa Lawrence
- Department of Health Service & Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Hubertus Himmerich
- Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW), Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Janet Treasure
- Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW), Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ulrike Schmidt
- Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW), Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dalton B, Davies MR, Flynn M, Hutchings-Hay C, Potterton R, Breen O'Byrne E, Kilonzo C, Belli SR, Gallop L, Gordon G, Keeler J, Minnock I, Phillips M, Robinson L, Snashall E, Toloza C, Walo L, Cole J, Schmidt U. Virtually delivered guided self-help for binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa: findings from a service evaluation. Behav Cogn Psychother 2024; 52:211-225. [PMID: 38263907 DOI: 10.1017/s1352465823000607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Timely intervention is beneficial to the effectiveness of eating disorder (ED) treatment, but limited capacity within ED services means that these disorders are often not treated with sufficient speed. This service evaluation extends previous research into guided self-help (GSH) for adults with bulimic spectrum EDs by assessing the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of virtually delivered GSH using videoconferencing. METHOD Patients with bulimia nervosa (BN), binge eating disorder (BED) and other specified feeding and eating disorders (OSFED) waiting for treatment in a large specialist adult ED out-patient service were offered virtually delivered GSH. The programme used an evidence-based cognitive behavioural self-help book. Individuals were supported by non-expert coaches, who delivered the eight-session programme via videoconferencing. RESULTS One hundred and thirty patients were allocated to a GSH coach between 1 September 2020 and 30 September 2022; 106 (82%) started treatment and 78 (60%) completed treatment. Amongst completers, there were large reductions in ED behaviours and attitudinal symptoms, measured by the ED-15. The largest effect sizes for change between pre- and post-treatment were seen for binge eating episode frequency (d = -0.89) and concerns around eating (d = -1.72). Patients from minoritised ethnic groups were over-represented in the non-completer group. CONCLUSIONS Virtually delivered GSH is feasible, acceptable and effective in reducing ED symptoms amongst those with bulimic spectrum disorders. Implementing virtually delivered GSH reduced waiting times, offering a potential solution for long waiting times for ED treatment. Further research is needed to compare GSH to other brief therapies and investigate barriers for patients from culturally diverse groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethan Dalton
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Molly R Davies
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Michaela Flynn
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Chloe Hutchings-Hay
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Rachel Potterton
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Eleanor Breen O'Byrne
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Charmaine Kilonzo
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Stefano R Belli
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Lucy Gallop
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Gemma Gordon
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Johanna Keeler
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Imelda Minnock
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Matthew Phillips
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Lauren Robinson
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Emma Snashall
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Cindy Toloza
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Luiza Walo
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Jason Cole
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Ulrike Schmidt
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Prosser A, Leslie F. Eating disorders: is there a correlation between severity of physical compromise and admission outcomes? BRITISH JOURNAL OF NURSING (MARK ALLEN PUBLISHING) 2024; 33:S10-S16. [PMID: 38639753 DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2024.33.8.s10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Medical Emergencies in Eating Disorders (MEED) report was first released by the Royal College of Psychiatrists in 2022 (updated 2023) to aid clinicians in recognising medical compromise due to an eating disorder and to provide guidance for management. AIMS This study looked at admissions over 5 years to explore whether there is a correlation between MEED medical compromise parameters and three outcomes: length of stay, detainment under the Mental Health Act 1983, and discharge destination. METHODS A retrospective study of 26 patients admitted to a large teaching hospital for an eating disorder between 2018 and 2023. The risk assessment from the MEED report was used to create a score for physical compromise and analysed to determine whether there was a correlation between the score and discharge destination, detainment under the Mental Health Act and length of stay. FINDINGS Demographic data were comparable with larger studies, with increasing numbers and 19.2% having autism spectrum disorder. There was no correlation between the scoring tool and detainment under the Act, discharge destination or length of stay. CONCLUSION Increasing numbers of patients are presenting with eating disorders. Physical compromise was not a predictor for admission outcomes, but this could be further explored in larger studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fiona Leslie
- Consultant in Gastroenterology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Honorary Senior Lecturer, University of Manchester
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Clark Bryan D, Rowlands K, Macdonald P, Cardi V, Ambwani S, Arcelus J, Landau S, Schmidt U, Treasure J. Transition support for patients admitted to intensive treatment for anorexia nervosa: qualitative study of patient and carer experiences of a hybrid online guided self-help intervention (ECHOMANTRA). BJPsych Open 2024; 10:e81. [PMID: 38623648 PMCID: PMC11060069 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2023.642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adults with anorexia nervosa experience high levels of relapse following in-patient treatment. ECHOMANTRA is a novel online aftercare intervention for patients and carers, which provides psychoeducation and support to augment usual care. AIMS To explore patient and carer experiences of receiving the ECHOMANTRA intervention. METHOD This is part of the process evaluation of the ECHOMANTRA intervention as delivered in the TRIANGLE trial (ISRCTN: 14644379). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 participants randomised to the ECHOMANTRA (ten patients and ten carers). Thematic analysis was used to analyse the interview transcripts. RESULTS Five major themes were identified: (1) Mixed experience of the intervention; (2) tailoring the intervention to the stage of recovery; (3) involvement of carers; (4) acceptability of remote support; and (5) impact of self-monitoring and accountability. CONCLUSIONS Participants were mostly positive about the support offered. The challenges of using remote and group support were counterbalanced with ease of access to information when needed. Components of the ECHOMANTRA intervention have the potential to improve care for people with eating disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Clark Bryan
- Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Katie Rowlands
- Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Pamela Macdonald
- Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Valentina Cardi
- Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; and Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Italy
| | - Suman Ambwani
- DIS Study Abroad in Scandinavia, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jon Arcelus
- Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, UK; and Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sabine Landau
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, King's College London, UK
| | - Ulrike Schmidt
- Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Janet Treasure
- Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Frances T, O'Neill K, Newman K. 'An extra fight I didn't ask for': A qualitative survey exploring the impact of calories on menus for people with experience of eating disorders. Br J Health Psychol 2024; 29:20-36. [PMID: 37518837 DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The UK government made it mandatory for large restaurants and cafes in England to display calorie labels on menus. Existing evidence identifies minimal potential for benefit, but significant potential for harm to those with eating disorders. To date, only one published study has directly explored the impact of this legislation on those with eating disorders. This study explores the impact of calorie labelling on menus on adults with experience of eating disorders in England. DESIGN A qualitative online survey was designed and distributed, and 399 adults with current or past experience/s of eating disorders completed the survey. METHODS Reflexive thematic analysis was used, informed by a critical realist approach. RESULTS Six themes were developed: (1) impacts on relationships, (2) exclusion and increased isolation, (3) restricted freedom, (4) dis/embodiment, (5) anger and frustration at the perpetuation of diet culture and (6) we are all responsible for ourselves. Most participants felt calorie labels on menus is detrimental to their eating disorder and/or recovery. People are navigating multiple opposing cultural narratives around health, bodies and eating disorder recovery that can put additional barriers in place to developing a relationship with food and body that they would like. CONCLUSIONS Calorie labelling on menus is likely to adversely impact those with eating disorders. Menus with calories should be available separately but should not be the first or only one provided. People with experience of eating disorders should be directly involved in the development of public health legislation and policy that is likely to affect them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kel O'Neill
- Independent Counselling and Psychotherapy Practice, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vuillier L, Greville-Harris M, Talbot CV, May L, Moseley RL. Early evaluation of a DBT-informed online intervention for people with eating disorders. J Eat Disord 2024; 12:9. [PMID: 38243262 PMCID: PMC10799469 DOI: 10.1186/s40337-024-00974-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/21/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Eating disorders (EDs) have a worldwide prevalence of 7.8%, with towering mortality rates and high healthcare costs. The current recommended treatment for EDs principally works by directly targeting ED thoughts and behaviours, but recovery rates are low. A multifaceted link between difficulties with emotions and EDs is now widely established, and newer third-wave therapies that aim to address these underlying emotion difficulties are promising. The current study piloted an online emotion self-help intervention which was co-developed with clinicians and people with lived experienced of EDs. The intervention aimed to specifically address difficulties with emotion identification and regulation, as well as unhelpful beliefs about emotions, which are believed to give rise to and maintain ED thoughts and behaviours. METHOD We recruited 39 people with self-reported EDs to test this intervention over a one-week period. Our participants were asked to complete a series of questionnaires measuring emotion processes and psychopathology on Day 1 (T1) before being given access to the intervention. Participants were then asked to practice the newly acquired skills for seven days, before taking the same questionnaires on Day 9 (T2). We also asked participants to qualitatively report on their experience of the intervention. RESULTS We found significant improvements in ED psychopathology (ED-15), depression (PHQ-9), and anxiety (GAD-7) pre- to post-intervention, with medium to large effect sizes. All our emotion variables namely alexithymia (TAS-20), difficulties regulating emotions (DERS-SF), and unhelpful beliefs about emotions (EBQ) also showed significant changes post-intervention with medium to large effect sizes. Most importantly, changes in emotion regulation processes were linked to improved eating psychopathology. The qualitative analysis corroborated this finding, highlighting how the intervention helped them form new beliefs about emotions, which helped them reduce ED behaviours. DISCUSSION Significant improvements in emotion processing and regulations, as well as psychopathology, along with positive qualitative feedback, suggest that the intervention effectively met its aims of increasing awareness of the link between emotions and eating psychopathology, providing help to identify and regulate emotions, and normalising emotional experiences. While our results are promising, further research is required to assess its effectiveness longer term and in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Vuillier
- Department of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK.
| | | | - C V Talbot
- Department of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK
| | - L May
- Southern Health University NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - R L Moseley
- Department of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jensen P, Madsen C, Hauge LJ, Gustavson K, Lund IO, Pettersen JH, Knudsen AKS, Reneflot A, Brandlistuen RE, Valdimarsdóttir UA, Ask H, Nesvåg R. Contact with primary care physicians among adults with pre-existing common mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: a registry-based study from Norway. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1085. [PMID: 37821874 PMCID: PMC10568894 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10108-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the COVID-19 pandemic, individuals with pre-existing mental health problems may have experienced additional stress, which could worsen symptoms or trigger relapse. Thus, this study aimed to investigate if the number of consultations with general practitioners (GPs) among individuals with a pre-existing common mental health problem during the pandemic differed from pre-pandemic years. METHODS Data on consultations with GPs among 18-65-year-olds registered with common mental health problems in 2017-2021 were retrieved from the Norwegian Control and Payment of Health Reimbursements Database. Based on data from the pre-pandemic years (2017-2019), we predicted the number of consultations per week for depression, anxiety disorder, phobia/obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and eating disorders during the pandemic (March 2020-December 2021) among individuals with pre-existing mental health problems. The forecasted and observed trends in GP consultations per week during the pandemic were stratified by diagnosis, gender, and age groups. RESULTS The observed number of consultations for anxiety disorder, PTSD, and eating disorders were significantly higher than forecasted during extended periods of the two pandemic years. The differences were largest for PTSD (on average 37% higher in men and 47% higher in women during the pandemic), and for eating disorders among women (on average 87% higher during the pandemic). There were only minor differences between the predicted and observed number of consultations for depression and phobia/OCD. CONCLUSIONS During the pandemic, individuals with a recent history of mental health problems were more likely to seek help for anxiety disorder, PTSD, and eating disorders, as compared to pre-pandemic years.
Collapse
Grants
- #324620 Norges Forskningsråd
- #324620 Norges Forskningsråd
- #324620 Norges Forskningsråd
- #324620 Norges Forskningsråd
- #324620 Norges Forskningsråd
- #324620 Norges Forskningsråd
- #324620 Norges Forskningsråd
- #324620 Norges Forskningsråd
- #105668, #138929, #156298 NordForsk
- #105668, #138929, #156298 NordForsk
- #105668, #138929, #156298 NordForsk
- #105668, #138929, #156298 NordForsk
- #105668, #138929, #156298 NordForsk
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health (FHI)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pia Jensen
- Department of Mental Disorders, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Christian Madsen
- Department of Disease Burden, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway
| | - Lars Johan Hauge
- Department of Mental Health and Suicide, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristin Gustavson
- Department of Mental Disorders, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ingunn Olea Lund
- Department of Mental Disorders, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Johanne Hagen Pettersen
- Department of Mental Disorders, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Anne Reneflot
- Department of Mental Health and Suicide, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Unnur Anna Valdimarsdóttir
- Centre of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
- Unit of Integrative Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Helga Ask
- Department of Mental Disorders, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnar Nesvåg
- Department of Mental Disorders, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Phillips M, İnce B, Webb H, Dalton B, McCombie C, Irish M, Mercado D, Peachey G, Zenasni Z, Himmerich H, Robinson P, Arcelus J, Byford S, Treasure J, Landau S, Lawrence V, Schmidt U. Autopsy of a failed trial part 1: A qualitative investigation of clinician's views on and experiences of the implementation of the DAISIES trial in UK-based intensive eating disorder services. EUROPEAN EATING DISORDERS REVIEW 2023; 31:489-504. [PMID: 36952308 PMCID: PMC10946575 DOI: 10.1002/erv.2975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The DAISIES trial, comparing inpatient and stepped-care day patient treatment for adults with severe anorexia nervosa was prematurely terminated in March 2022 due to poor recruitment. This qualitative study seeks to understand the difficulties faced during the trial by investigating stakeholders' views on and experiences of its implementation. METHOD Semi-structured interview and focus group transcripts, and trial management and oversight group meeting minutes from May 2020-June 2022 were analysed using thematic analysis. Participants were 47 clinicians and co-investigators involved with the DAISIES trial. The Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework was applied to the interpretive themes to classify barriers and facilitators to implementation. RESULTS Five themes were identified: incompatible participation interests; changing standard practice; concerns around clinical management; systemic capacity and capability issues; and Covid-19 disrupting implementation. Applying the NASSS framework indicated the greatest implementation challenges to arise with the adopters (e.g. patients, clinicians), the organisational systems (e.g. service capacity), and the wider socio-political context (e.g. Covid-19 closing services). CONCLUSIONS Our findings emphasise the top-down impact of systemic-level research implementation challenges. The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic accentuated pre-existing organisational barriers to trial implementation within intensive eating disorder services, further limiting the capacity for research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Phillips
- Section of Eating DisordersDepartment of Psychological MedicineInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Başak İnce
- Section of Eating DisordersDepartment of Psychological MedicineInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Hannah Webb
- Section of Eating DisordersDepartment of Psychological MedicineInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Bethan Dalton
- Section of Eating DisordersDepartment of Psychological MedicineInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Catherine McCombie
- Department of Health Service and Population ResearchInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Madeleine Irish
- Section of Eating DisordersDepartment of Psychological MedicineInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Daniela Mercado
- Section of Eating DisordersDepartment of Psychological MedicineInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Gemma Peachey
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustMaudsley HospitalLondonUK
| | - Zohra Zenasni
- Department of Biostatistics and Health InformaticsInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Hubertus Himmerich
- Section of Eating DisordersDepartment of Psychological MedicineInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustMaudsley HospitalLondonUK
| | - Paul Robinson
- Division of MedicineUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Jon Arcelus
- Institute of Mental HealthUniversity of NottinghamJubilee CampusNottinghamUK
| | - Sarah Byford
- Department of Health Service and Population ResearchInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Janet Treasure
- Section of Eating DisordersDepartment of Psychological MedicineInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustMaudsley HospitalLondonUK
| | - Sabine Landau
- Department of Biostatistics and Health InformaticsInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Vanessa Lawrence
- Department of Health Service and Population ResearchInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Ulrike Schmidt
- Section of Eating DisordersDepartment of Psychological MedicineInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustMaudsley HospitalLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ahmed N, Barnett P, Greenburgh A, Pemovska T, Stefanidou T, Lyons N, Ikhtabi S, Talwar S, Francis ER, Harris SM, Shah P, Machin K, Jeffreys S, Mitchell L, Lynch C, Foye U, Schlief M, Appleton R, Saunders KRK, Baldwin H, Allan SM, Sheridan-Rains L, Kharboutly O, Kular A, Goldblatt P, Stewart R, Kirkbride JB, Lloyd-Evans B, Johnson S. Mental health in Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry 2023; 10:537-556. [PMID: 37321240 PMCID: PMC10259832 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(23)00113-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic caused immediate and far-reaching disruption to society, the economy, and health-care services. We synthesised evidence on the effect of the pandemic on mental health and mental health care in high-income European countries. We included 177 longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional studies comparing prevalence or incidence of mental health problems, mental health symptom severity in people with pre-existing mental health conditions, or mental health service use before versus during the pandemic, or between different timepoints of the pandemic. We found that epidemiological studies reported higher prevalence of some mental health problems during the pandemic compared with before it, but that in most cases this increase reduced over time. Conversely, studies of health records showed reduced incidence of new diagnoses at the start of the pandemic, which further declined during 2020. Mental health service use also declined at the onset of the pandemic but increased later in 2020 and through 2021, although rates of use did not return to pre-pandemic levels for some services. We found mixed patterns of effects of the pandemic on mental health and social outcome for adults already living with mental health conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nafiso Ahmed
- National Institute of Health and Care Research Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Phoebe Barnett
- National Institute of Health and Care Research Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK; Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, University College London, London, UK; National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK
| | - Anna Greenburgh
- National Institute of Health and Care Research Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tamara Pemovska
- National Institute of Health and Care Research Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Theodora Stefanidou
- National Institute of Health and Care Research Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Natasha Lyons
- National Institute of Health and Care Research Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Ikhtabi
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Shivangi Talwar
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Emma R Francis
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Samantha M Harris
- Department of Health Promotion and Development, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Prisha Shah
- Lived Experience Working Group, University College London, London, UK
| | - Karen Machin
- Lived Experience Working Group, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen Jeffreys
- Lived Experience Working Group, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lizzie Mitchell
- Lived Experience Working Group, University College London, London, UK
| | - Chris Lynch
- Lived Experience Working Group, University College London, London, UK
| | - Una Foye
- National Institute of Health and Care Research Mental Health Policy Research Unit, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Merle Schlief
- National Institute of Health and Care Research Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rebecca Appleton
- National Institute of Health and Care Research Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Katherine R K Saunders
- National Institute of Health and Care Research Mental Health Policy Research Unit, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Helen Baldwin
- National Institute of Health and Care Research Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sophie M Allan
- Cambridgeshire and Peterborough National Health Service Foundation Trust, South London and Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Luke Sheridan-Rains
- National Institute of Health and Care Research Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Ariana Kular
- National Institute of Health and Care Research Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Peter Goldblatt
- Institute of Health Equity, University College London, London, UK
| | - Robert Stewart
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; South London and Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
- National Institute of Health and Care Research Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sonia Johnson
- National Institute of Health and Care Research Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK; Camden and Islington National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Davey E, Bennett SD, Bryant-Waugh R, Micali N, Takeda A, Alexandrou A, Shafran R. Low intensity psychological interventions for the treatment of feeding and eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eat Disord 2023; 11:56. [PMID: 37016447 PMCID: PMC10072817 DOI: 10.1186/s40337-023-00775-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Feeding and eating disorders are associated with significant illness burden and costs, yet access to evidence-based care is limited. Low intensity psychological interventions have the potential to increase such access. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on the use of low intensity psychological interventions for the treatment of feeding and eating disorders. Studies comparing low intensity psychological interventions against high intensity therapies and non-eating disorder specific psychological interventions were included, as well as those with waiting list control arms. There were three primary outcomes: eating disorder psychopathology, diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM) severity specifier-related outcomes and rates of remission/recovery. RESULTS Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 3665 participants, and 30 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to high intensity therapies, low intensity psychological interventions were equivalent on reducing eating disorder psychopathology (g = - 0.13), more effective at improving DSM severity specifier-related outcomes (g = - 0.15), but less likely to achieve remission/recovery (risk ratio (RR) = 0.70). Low intensity psychological interventions were superior to non-eating disorder specific psychological interventions and waiting list controls across all three primary outcomes. CONCLUSION Overall, findings suggest that low intensity psychological interventions can successfully treat eating disorder symptoms. Few potential moderators had a statistically significant effect on outcome. The number of studies for many comparisons was low and the methodological quality of the studies was poor, therefore results should be interpreted with caution. More research is needed to establish the effectiveness of low intensity psychological interventions for children and young people, as well as for individuals with anorexia nervosa, avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, pica and rumination disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Davey
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
| | - Sophie D Bennett
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| | - Rachel Bryant-Waugh
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- Maudsley Centre for Child and Adolescent Eating Disorders, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nadia Micali
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Mental Health Services of the Capital Region of Denmark, Eating Disorders Research Unit, Ballerup Psychiatric Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | - Roz Shafran
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fixsen A, Ridge D, Ponsford O, Holder M, Saran G. Battles over 'unruly bodies': Practitioners' interpretations of eating disorders and the utility of psychiatric labelling. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2023; 45:560-579. [PMID: 36583376 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Our article offers a critical appraisal of psychiatric medical constructions of eating disorders (EDs) by highlighting the complexity of professional discourses, power plays, claims and counterclaims in ongoing struggles over 'unruly bodies.' Inductive thematic analysis of data from five studies was undertaken, covering thirty semi-structured interviews with UK health-care professionals working in the ED field. Professionals engaged in various struggles over eating disorders, which were compounded by the labelling process itself. Although person-centredness was valued, encounters with ED patients were frequently framed as outstandingly problematic in terms of treatment resistance, with clients' unruliness spurred on by ED competitiveness on social media and in-hospital rivalries. Paradoxically, the labelling of eating disorders created further expectations in terms of achieving specific weight levels and diagnostic labels, reportedly resulting in lay competition over who was sickest, which was mirrored by treatment priorities within an overstretched public health system. Narratives also highlighted interesting tensions between professionals rationalising their work with patients and acknowledging themselves as potentially vulnerable to societal pressures promoting EDs. Arguably, while lay narratives around EDs continue to be framed by authorities as unruly behaviours in deviant individuals, the gap between officially sanctioned and illicit ED discourses will only grow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Fixsen
- School of Social Sciences, College of Liberal Arts & Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK
| | - Damien Ridge
- School of Social Sciences, College of Liberal Arts & Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK
| | - Olivia Ponsford
- School of Social Sciences, College of Liberal Arts & Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK
| | - Mesha Holder
- School of Social Sciences, College of Liberal Arts & Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK
| | - Gurjeet Saran
- School of Social Sciences, College of Liberal Arts & Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vyver E, Han AX, Dimitropoulos G, Patten SB, Devoe DJ, Marcoux-Louie G, Katzman DK. The COVID-19 Pandemic and Canadian Pediatric Tertiary Care Hospitalizations for Anorexia Nervosa. J Adolesc Health 2023; 72:344-351. [PMID: 36202680 PMCID: PMC9529357 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Global studies show an increase in hospitalizations for pediatric eating disorders (EDs). No published Canadian studies have confirmed these findings in pediatric ED programs for one-year post onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary objective was to examine health administrative data from two pediatric tertiary care ED programs: Alberta Children's Hospital (ACH) and Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids) to determine the number of pediatric hospitalizations with the most responsible discharge diagnosis of anorexia nervosa (AN). METHODS This hospital-based design explored monthly pediatric hospitalizations in seven-year-olds to 18-year-olds between March 11, 2014 and March 11, 2021 using the Discharge Abstract databases. The analysis used negative binomial regression with robust standard errors to compare hospitalization counts in the months preceding and following the World Health Organization pandemic declaration (March 11, 2020). RESULTS Hospitalizations due to pediatric AN increased by 63% and 132% at SickKids (p < .001) and ACH (p < .001), respectively, in the first year of the pandemic compared to the previous six years. The total number of non-ED hospitalizations decreased by 29.3% and 2.4% at SickKids and ACH, respectively. DISCUSSION This is the first Canadian study to show a rise in pediatric hospitalizations over one year due to AN in two tertiary care hospitals following the onset of the pandemic, confirming the impact that the pandemic has had on children and adolescents with AN in Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellie Vyver
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Adolescent Medicine, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Calgary Eating Disorder Program, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Angela X. Han
- Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gina Dimitropoulos
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,Calgary Eating Disorder Program, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research & Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Scott B. Patten
- Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, Cuthbertson and Fischer Chair in Pediatric Mental Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research & Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Daniel J. Devoe
- Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research & Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,Department of Psychology, Mount Royal University, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gisele Marcoux-Louie
- Calgary Eating Disorder Program, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Debra K. Katzman
- Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Downs J, Ayton A, Collins L, Baker S, Missen H, Ibrahim A. Untreatable or unable to treat? Creating more effective and accessible treatment for long-standing and severe eating disorders. Lancet Psychiatry 2023; 10:146-154. [PMID: 36697122 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(22)00400-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The evidence base for the treatment of severe eating disorders is limited. In addition to improving access to early intervention, there is a need to develop more effective treatments for complex presentations of eating disorders. For patients with long-standing and severe illnesses, particular difficulties might exist with their engagement with treatment and achieving treatment outcomes. Alarmingly, there is an emerging international discourse about a concept labelled as terminal anorexia and about the withdrawal of treatment for people with severe eating disorders, resulting in the death of patients, as a legitimate option. This concept has arisen in the context of vastly overstretched specialist services and insufficient research and funding for new treatments. This Personal View combines multiple perspectives from carers, patients, and mental health professionals based in the UK, highlighting how the risks of current service provision are best alleviated by increasing resources, capacity, and training, and not by a narrowing of the criteria according to which patients with eating disorders are offered the care and support they need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Downs
- Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK; Faculty of Wellbeing, Education, and Language Studies, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
| | - Agnes Ayton
- Department of Psychiatry, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Martini M, Longo P, Delsedime N, Abbate-Daga G, Panero M. Increased General, Eating, and Body-Related Psychopathology in Inpatients in a Specialized Eating Disorders Unit after the Beginning of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Comparison with the Pre-Pandemic Period. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12020573. [PMID: 36675502 PMCID: PMC9866300 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12020573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The study of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals who attended mental health services is needed to identify the specific vulnerabilities associated to this challenging period. Despite several analyses reporting the worsening of eating disorders symptomatology after the beginning of the pandemic, characterizations of adult inpatients with eating disorders are still lacking. We conducted a retrospective analysis to assess whether adult individuals who underwent hospitalization in a specialized eating disorders unit in the two years after the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic differed in clinical presentation, psychopathological measures, and treatment outcomes from inpatients hospitalized in the two years before. In the comparison between the two groups, the individuals who began treatment after the start of the pandemic presented with more physical hyperactivity and more severe psychopathological scores in most of the areas investigated, with differences in eating symptoms still evident at discharge. Notably, body-related symptoms (i.e., body shape concerns, body checking, body avoidance) were associated with the pandemic, and also for inpatients with extreme anorexia nervosa. This retrospective analysis does not allow us to separate the impact of COVID-19 from other potentially relevant co-occurring factors; however, these findings help in understanding how the pandemic could have affected individuals that needed specialized intensive treatment.
Collapse
|
15
|
Schreyer CC, Vanzhula IA, Guarda AS. Evaluating the impact of COVID-19 on severity at admission and response to inpatient treatment for adult and adolescent patients with eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord 2023; 56:182-191. [PMID: 36394170 DOI: 10.1002/eat.23855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with increased hospitalization rates and worsened symptom severity in patients with eating disorders (ED), but most studies focused exclusively on adolescents. Further, research evaluating the impact of COVID-19 on response to inpatient treatment for ED is limited. This study aimed to compare demographic characteristics, symptom severity at admission, and discharge outcomes for adult and adolescent inpatients with EDs admitted before and after onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. We expected the post-COVID cohort would report elevated symptomatology and poorer response to treatment compared to the pre-COVID cohort and that this effect would be amplified for adolescents. METHOD Patients were consecutively hospitalized adults and adolescents treated in a specialized behavioral integrated inpatient-partial hospitalization program for eating disorders between March 2018 and March 2022 (N = 261). RESULTS The effect of COVID-19 on symptomatology was moderated by age group such that adolescents in the post-COVID cohort, but not adults, reported higher levels of eating disorder and depressive symptoms compared to the pre-COVID cohort. No group differences were observed for discharge outcomes (rate of weight gain, length of stay, or percent target weight). DISCUSSION Findings with respect to elevated symptomatology in adolescents but not adults may reflect the particularly negative impact of social isolation on adolescents. Future research is needed to assess the impact of COVID-19 on long-term treatment outcomes including relapse at 1-year, as well as the potential impact of COVID-19 on treatment availability for chronically ill adults or those with public insurance. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE Patients with eating disorders (ED) admitted to a specialty inpatient program after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic were younger and more likely to be male than those admitted pre-pandemic. Adolescents admitted post-COVID, but not adults, reported elevated ED and depressive symptoms compared to the pre-COVID cohort. Group differences were not observed for treatment response. Future research should evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on relapse risk in EDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Irina A Vanzhula
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Angela S Guarda
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Herpertz-Dahlmann B, Schmidt U. We need your ideas-How to deliver developmentally informed treatment and care for emerging adults with eating disorders? A special European Eating Disorder Research issue about age transitions in eating disorders. EUROPEAN EATING DISORDERS REVIEW 2023; 31:3-8. [PMID: 36258647 DOI: 10.1002/erv.2951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Schmidt
- Section of Eating Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK.,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
McLean CP, Utpala R, Sharp G. The impacts of COVID-19 on eating disorders and disordered eating: A mixed studies systematic review and implications. Front Psychol 2022; 13:926709. [PMID: 36148134 PMCID: PMC9487416 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.926709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The unique constraints to everyday life brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic have been suggested to negatively impact those with pre-existing mental health issues such as eating disorders. While individuals with eating disorders or disordered eating behaviors likely represent a vulnerable group to the COVID-19 pandemic, the impact of the pandemic is yet to be fully established. Methods We systematically examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on eating disorders and disordered eating behaviors. We searched electronic databases MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and EMBASE for literature published until October 2021. Eligible studies were required to report on individuals with or without a diagnosed eating disorder or disordered eating behaviors who were exposed to the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings Seventy-two studies met eligibility criteria with the majority reporting an increase in eating disorder or disordered eating behaviors associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, it appears children and adolescents and individuals with a diagnosed eating disorder may present vulnerable groups to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Discussion This mixed systematic review provides a timely insight into COVID-19 eating disorder literature and will assist in understanding possible future long-term impacts of the pandemic on eating disorder behaviors. It appears that the role of stress in the development and maintenance of eating disorders may have been intensified to cope with the uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research is needed among understudied and minority groups and to examine the long-term implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on eating disorders and disordered eating behaviors. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=284749, PROSPERO [CRD42021284749].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney P. McLean
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- *Correspondence: Courtney P. McLean
| | | | - Gemma Sharp
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Reay M, Holliday J, Stewart J, Adams J. Creating a care pathway for patients with longstanding, complex eating disorders. J Eat Disord 2022; 10:128. [PMID: 36038898 PMCID: PMC9421634 DOI: 10.1186/s40337-022-00648-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recovery rates for people with eating disorders are low; fewer than half recover and approximately 20% develop a longstanding eating disorder. Patients with longstanding eating disorders are often referred to as "SEED" (severe and enduing eating disorders) although this remains controversial and is not acknowledged in the British treatment guidance. This project aimed to generate recommendations for a longstanding eating disorder care pathway by identifying what proportion of patients have longstanding eating disorders and how to best identify and support them. METHODS Initially, a literature review was completed, followed by interviews with service-users who consider themselves to have longstanding eating disorders, and focus groups with staff members. The results were combined to create a definition of a longstanding eating disorder which was used to establish how many service-users could benefit from the pathway. The qualitative data was used to produce recommendations for a tailored pathway for those with longstanding eating disorders. RESULTS The results highlighted that, although "SEED" is often used, participants preferred to be referred to as "longstanding" or having no label. Qualitative analysis identified four themes in relation to supporting this population group which described how to structure the service and individualise care, as well as patients' relationship to the service, and how to build a life after eating disorder services. CONCLUSIONS Recommendations included promoting a hopeful message, focusing on quality of life and introducing peer support. Crucially, accessing the pathway should not result in being labelled "SEED", nor should it prevent access to recovery focused interventions including weight restoration. The full list of recommendations are included as well as the implications of the project and limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Reay
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
| | | | | | - Joanna Adams
- The Oxford Institute for Clinical Psychology Training and Research, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Effects of the COVID-19 Restrictions on Eating Behaviour and Eating Disorder Symptomology in Female Adolescents. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19148480. [PMID: 35886334 PMCID: PMC9325224 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
Confinement due to the COVID-19 pandemic imposes a burden on adolescents worldwide and may seriously impact patients with an eating disorder (ED). The current FRanconian Anorexia Nervosa during COVID-19 (FRANCO) study explored (1) perceived change of depressive and ED symptomology during lockdown, (2) the role of social media, and (3) coping strategies of anorexia nervosa (AN) patients and clinical as well as healthy comparison groups. From June 2021 to September 2021, 222 female adolescents (19 with AN, 20 with depression, 45 with a self-reported psychiatric disorder (SRPD), and 138 controls) aged 11.2 to 18.9 years completed a one-time anonymous survey retrospectively reporting back on ED and depressive symptomology before and during the pandemic, the impact of social media, and coping strategies. A reduced quality of life (QoL) due to confinement was observed in almost half of female adolescents. All groups reported a significant perceived increase of disordered eating, overeating, anxiety, and depressive symptoms and emotion-regulation problems. In AN patients, significantly higher percentual deterioration of disordered eating and anxiety and depressive symptoms was found. For controls, a younger age and higher susceptibility of the sociocultural body image significantly correlated with increased disordered eating. Large-scale media literacy interventions are recommended.
Collapse
|
20
|
Whiteside A. Collateral damage in a reductionist strategy: the effect of calorie labelling on those with eating disorders. BMJ 2022; 377:o1402. [PMID: 35697360 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.o1402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
21
|
Gardner L, Tillier K, Marshall-Tyson K, Trueman H, Hunt DF. Improving mealtimes for patients and staff within an eating disorder unit: the next chapter. BMJ Open Qual 2022; 11:bmjoq-2022-001955. [PMID: 35768172 PMCID: PMC9244718 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Mealtimes are an integral part of treatment for patients in an eating disorder inpatient unit. However, they are often distressing and anxiety provoking for both patients and staff. A consequence of patients’ distress is an increase in eating disorder behaviours specific to mealtimes. This is the second paper detailing a quality improvement project following on from an initial paper outlining the first test of change. The aim of this quality improvement project was to decrease the number of eating disorder behaviours at mealtimes in the dining room through the implementation of interventions identified through diagnostic work. Methods/design The Model for Improvement was used as the systematic approach for this project. Baseline assessment included observations in the dining room, gathering of qualitative feedback from staff and patients and the development of a form which identifies eating disorder behaviours completed by staff. Interventions in the form of three change ideas have so far been introduced including (1) a host role in the dining room, (2) a guide to the dining room for new staff along with competencies and (3) a dining goals group. The impact of the three interventions is assessed. Results The introduction of the interventions has overall reduced the average number of eating disorder behaviours per patient in the dining room by 33%. Conclusions This paper reports the challenges and successes of continuing a QI project through the COVID-19 pandemic and the need for multiple tests of change to improve a complex problem. The results demonstrate a consistent reduction in eating disorder behaviours over a period of nearly 2 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Gardner
- Cotswold House Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Kirstie Tillier
- Cotswold House Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Kayda Marshall-Tyson
- Cotswold House Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Hayley Trueman
- Mental Health Improvement, Oxford Academic Health Science Network, Oxford, UK
| | - David Francis Hunt
- Oxford Healthcare Improvement, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Webb H, Dalton B, Irish M, Mercado D, McCombie C, Peachey G, Arcelus J, Au K, Himmerich H, Louise Johnston A, Lazarova S, Pathan T, Robinson P, Treasure J, Schmidt U, Lawrence V. Clinicians' perspectives on supporting individuals with severe anorexia nervosa in specialist eating disorder intensive treatment settings. J Eat Disord 2022; 10:3. [PMID: 34991715 PMCID: PMC8733908 DOI: 10.1186/s40337-021-00528-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Admissions to intensive treatment (i.e., inpatient [IP] and/or day patient [DP]) for individuals with severe anorexia nervosa (AN) are common. Growing literature indicates potential risks and benefits of each intensive treatment approach; however, existing research has focused on patient and carer perspectives of these treatments. Also, there is scant empirical evidence available for guiding the parameters of intensive treatments for AN. We therefore explored clinicians' perspectives and experience of supporting adults with severe AN in intensive settings. METHODS We conducted twenty one semi-structured interviews with clinicians who deliver intensive treatments (i.e., IP and/or DP) for individuals with severe AN across four specialist Eating Disorder Services in the United Kingdom between May 2020 and June 2021. We asked clinicians about their views and experiences of supporting individuals with severe AN in intensive treatment settings and the challenges and opportunities associated with IP and DP treatment. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis supported by NVivo software. RESULTS Five broad and interrelated themes were identified: (1) Intensive Support; (2) The Severity of Patients' Illnesses; (3) Hope and Recovery; (4) Which Treatment When; (5) Limited Resources; and (6) Carer Burden. We identified various similarities between the two intensive treatment approaches, including the value of intensive and multidisciplinary support and carer involvement, and the challenge of managing complex and unique needs in resource-limited intensive settings. We also found differences in the relationship of treatment to patients' home environments, the necessity of patient motivation, and the management of risk. CONCLUSIONS Both intensive treatment settings are valued by clinicians; however, there are unique challenges and opportunities for supporting individuals with severe AN within each. Our findings suggest DP treatment may be used as an alternative to IP treatment for individuals with severe AN. However, clear questions remain over which intensive treatment setting is best suited to which patient when and should be the focus of future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Webb
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Bethan Dalton
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Madeleine Irish
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Daniela Mercado
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Catherine McCombie
- Department of Health Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Gemma Peachey
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AZ, UK
| | - Jon Arcelus
- Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Jubilee Campus, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
| | - Katie Au
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AZ, UK
| | - Hubertus Himmerich
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, SE5 8AF, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AZ, UK
| | | | | | - Tayeem Pathan
- Surrey and Boarder Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK
| | - Paul Robinson
- Division of Medicine, University College London, 5 University Street, London, WC1E 6JF, UK
| | - Janet Treasure
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, SE5 8AF, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AZ, UK
| | - Ulrike Schmidt
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AZ, UK.
| | - Vanessa Lawrence
- Department of Health Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|