DRAGON-Data: a platform and protocol for integrating genomic and phenotypic data across large psychiatric cohorts

Assessing the validity of a self-reported clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia

The increasing availability of biobanks is changing the way individuals are identified for genomic research. This study assesses the validity of a self-reported clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia. The study included 1744 clinically-ascertained participants with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder depressed-type (SA-D) diagnosed by self-report and/or research interview and 1453 UK Biobank participants with self-reported and/or medical record diagnosis of schizophrenia or SA-D. Unaffected controls included a total of 501,837 participants. We assessed the positive predictive values (PPV) of self-reported clinical diagnoses against research interview and medical record diagnoses. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) and phenotypes relating to demographics, education and employment were compared across diagnostic groups. The variance explained (r2) in schizophrenia PRS for each diagnostic group was compared to samples in the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC). In the clinically-ascertained participants, the PPV of self-reported schizophrenia for a research diagnosis of schizophrenia was 0.70, which increased to 0.81 after expanding the research diagnosis to schizophrenia or SA-D. In UK Biobank, the PPV of self-reported schizophrenia for a medical record diagnosis was 0.74. Compared to participants who self-reported, participants with a clinically-ascertained research diagnosis were younger and more likely to have a high school qualification. Participants with a medical record diagnosis in UK Biobank were less likely to be employed or have a high school qualification than those who self-reported. Schizophrenia PRS did not differ between participants that had a diagnosis from self-report, research diagnosis or medical records. Polygenic liability r2, for all diagnosis definitions, fell within the distribution of PGC schizophrenia cohorts. Self-reported measures of schizophrenia are justified in genomic research to maximise sample size and reduce the burden of in-depth interviews on participants, although within sample validation of diagnoses is recommended.

SLC39A8.p.(Ala391Thr) is associated with poorer cognitive ability: a cross-sectional study of schizophrenia and the general UK population

The missense SNP NC_000004.12:g.102267552C>T (SLC39A8.p.(Ala391Thr), rs13107325) in SLC39A8, which encodes a zinc transporter, has been linked to schizophrenia and is the likely causal variant for one of the genome-wide association loci associated with the disorder. We tested whether the schizophrenia-risk allele at p.(Ala391Thr) was associated with schizophrenia-related phenotypes, including positive, negative, and disorganised symptoms, cognitive ability, educational attainment, and age of psychosis onset, within three schizophrenia cohorts (combined N=1,232) and, with equivalent phenotypes, in a sample of population controls (UK Biobank, N=355,069). We used regression analyses controlling for age, sex, and population stratification. Within the schizophrenia cohorts, after correction for multiple testing, p.(Ala391Thr) was not significantly associated with any schizophrenia-related phenotypes. In the unaffected participants from the UK Biobank, the schizophrenia-risk allele at p.(Ala391Thr) was associated with significantly poorer cognitive ability and fluid intelligence, a lower probability of obtaining GCSEs or a degree-level qualification, and fewer years in education. There was no association between p.(Ala391Thr) and self-reported psychotic experiences in this cohort. The schizophrenia-risk allele was associated with poorer cognitive ability, but not psychotic experiences, in a volunteer sample drawn from of the general population. To determine whether p.(Ala391Thr) is associated with cognitive phenotypes in people with schizophrenia, and to understand the role of p.(Ala391Thr) in the aetiology of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia, larger independent samples are required.

Genetic and Phenotypic Features of Schizophrenia in the UK Biobank

Importance

Large-scale biobanks provide important opportunities for mental health research, but selection biases raise questions regarding the comparability of individuals with those in clinical research settings.

Objective

To compare the genetic liability to psychiatric disorders in individuals with schizophrenia in the UK Biobank with individuals in the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) and to compare genetic liability and phenotypic features with participants recruited from clinical settings.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study included participants from the population-based UK Biobank and schizophrenia samples recruited from clinical settings (CLOZUK, CardiffCOGS, Cardiff F-Series, and Cardiff Affected Sib-Pairs). Data were collected between January 1993 and July 2021. Data analysis was conducted between July 2021 and June 2023.

Main Outcomes and Measures

A genome-wide association study of UK Biobank schizophrenia case-control status was conducted, and the results were compared with those from the PGC via genetic correlations. To test for differences with the clinical samples, polygenic risk scores (PRS) were calculated for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, and intelligence using PRS-CS. PRS and phenotypic comparisons were conducted using pairwise logistic regressions. The proportions of individuals with copy number variants associated with schizophrenia were compared using Firth logistic regression.

Results

The sample of 517 375 participants included 1438 UK Biobank participants with schizophrenia (550 [38.2%] female; mean [SD] age, 54.7 [8.3] years), 499 475 UK Biobank controls (271 884 [54.4%] female; mean [SD] age, 56.5 [8.1] years), and 4 schizophrenia research samples (4758 [28.9%] female; mean [SD] age, 38.2 [21.0] years). Liability to schizophrenia in UK Biobank was highly correlated with the latest genome-wide association study from the PGC (genetic correlation, 0.98; SE, 0.18) and showed the expected patterns of correlations with other psychiatric disorders. The schizophrenia PRS explained 6.8% of the variance in liability for schizophrenia case status in UK Biobank. UK Biobank participants with schizophrenia had significantly lower schizophrenia PRS than 3 of the clinically ascertained samples and significantly lower rates of schizophrenia-associated copy number variants than the CLOZUK sample. UK Biobank participants with schizophrenia had higher educational attainment and employment rates than the clinically ascertained schizophrenia samples, lower rates of smoking, and a later age of onset of psychosis.

Conclusions and Relevance

Individuals with schizophrenia in the UK Biobank, and likely other volunteer-based biobanks, represent those less severely affected. Their inclusion in wider studies should enhance the representation of the full spectrum of illness severity.

Assessing the validity of a self-reported clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia

Background

Diagnoses in psychiatric research can be derived from various sources. This study assesses the validity of a self-reported clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia.

Methods

The study included 3,029 clinically ascertained participants with schizophrenia or psychotic disorders diagnosed by self-report and/or research interview and 1,453 UK Biobank participants with self-report and/or medical record diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder depressed-type (SA-D). We assessed positive predictive values (PPV) of self-reported clinical diagnoses against research interview and medical record diagnoses. We compared polygenic risk scores (PRS) and phenotypes across diagnostic groups, and compared the variance explained by schizophrenia PRS to samples in the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC).

Results

In the clinically ascertained sample, the PPV of self-reported schizophrenia to a research diagnosis of schizophrenia was 0.70, which increased to 0.81 when benchmarked against schizophrenia or SA-D. In UK Biobank, the PPV of self-reported schizophrenia to a medical record diagnosis was 0.74. Compared to self-report participants, those with a research diagnosis were younger and more likely to have a high school qualification (clinically ascertained sample) and those with a medical record diagnosis were less likely to be employed or have a high school qualification (UK Biobank). Schizophrenia PRS did not differ between participants that had a diagnosis from self-report, research diagnosis or medical record diagnosis. Polygenic liability r2, for all diagnosis definitions, fell within the distribution of PGC schizophrenia cohorts.

Conclusions

Self-report measures of schizophrenia are justified in research to maximise sample size and representativeness, although within sample validation of diagnoses is recommended.