THE DIAGNOSIS OF DEPRESSIVE SYNDROMES AND THE PREDICTION OF E.C.T. RESPONSE

Peripheral inflammatory markers in melancholic versus non-melancholic depression

BACKGROUND

Peripheral inflammation has been associated with major depression, however there is a paucity of studies examining whether inflammatory profiles differ across depressive subtypes. The current study sought to compare peripheral inflammatory markers in patients with melancholic versus non-melancholic depression and with healthy controls.

METHOD

Eighty outpatients with a current major depressive episode (MDE) were assigned as having a melancholic or a non-melancholic depressive subtype based on clinician diagnosis and the Sydney Melancholic Prototypic Index (SMPI). Participants provided peripheral venous blood from which plasma levels of cytokines and other inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, plasma cytokines) were compared across the two patient groups and also to a group of 81 age-matched healthy controls.

RESULTS

Patients with melancholic and non-melancholic depression demonstrated increased CRP and decreased interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) levels compared to controls. Using clinician diagnosis of subtype, interleukin-12 (IL-12) and interleukin-10 (IL-10) levels were elevated in melancholic patients versus non-melancholic and control groups, with no differences found for the other measured markers of inflammation.

CONCLUSION

Study findings demonstrate shared inflammatory changes across certain inflammatory markers (CRP and IFN-γ) and increases in IL-12 and IL-10 levels specific to melancholic depression. While generally supportive of previous work, our peripheral inflammation findings in melancholic depression are relatively novel and suggest this subgroup may benefit from anti-inflammatory therapies. Further studies are required to replicate these findings.

Dynamics of Depressive and Psychomotor Symptoms During Electroconvulsive Therapy in Older Depressive Patients: A Case Series

OBJECTIVE

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for patients experiencing a major depressive episode, especially older ones. Identification of specific responses within early ECT sessions remains an issue of debate, however. Hence, this pilot study prospectively examined the outcome in terms of depressive signs, symptom by symptom, throughout a course of ECT, concentrating particularly on psychomotor retardation symptoms.

METHODS

Nine patients were clinically evaluated several times during the ECT course, before the first session and then weekly (over 3-6 weeks, according to their evolution), by completing the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Mini-Mental State Examination test, and the French Retardation Rating Scale for Depression for assessing the severity of psychomotor retardation.

RESULTS

Nonparametric Friedman tests showed significant positive changes in mood disorders during ECT in older depressive patients (mean, -27.3% of initial MADRS total score). Fast improvement in French Retardation Rating Scale for Depression score was observed at t1 (ie, after 3-4 ECT sessions), whereas a slightly delayed improvement in the MADRS scores was found at t2 (ie, after 5-6 ECT sessions). Moreover, the scores for items linked to the motor component of psychomotor retardation (eg, gait, postural control, fatigability) were the first to significantly decrease during the first 2 weeks of the ECT course compared with the cognitive component.

CONCLUSIONS

Interestingly, participants' concentration on daily functional activities, their interest and fatigability, and their reported state of sadness were the first to progress, representing possible precursor signs of positive patient outcomes after ECT.

Impact of dysfunctional parenting, affective temperaments, and stressful life events on the development of melancholic and non-melancholic depression: A path analysis study

BACKGROUND

The influence of psychosocial factors on differentiating between melancholic depression (MEL) and non-melancholic depression (NMEL) remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the interrelationship between dysfunctional parenting, personality traits, stressful life events, and the diagnosis of MEL and NMEL among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

METHODS

Ninety-eight patients with MDD completed the following self-administered questionnaires: the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) for dysfunctional parenting, the short version of the Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego-autoquestionnaire version (TEMPS-A) for affective temperaments, and the Life Experiences Survey (LES) for stressful life events. The data were analyzed using single and multiple regression analyses and path analysis.

RESULTS

Dysfunctional parenting did not have a significant direct effect on MEL. However, paternal care had a significant indirect effect on MEL through depressive temperament. The total indirect effect of paternal care on MEL was significant (indirect path coefficient = 0.161, p <0.05). In other words, low levels of paternal care were associated with the development of NMEL via increased depressive temperament. None of the paths from paternal care to MEL via negative change scores of the LES were significant.

LIMITATIONS

This study used cross-sectional data, so the possibility that current depressive status may affect the assessment of LES and TEMPS-A cannot be ruled out.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that low levels of paternal care did not directly affect the development of NMEL, but affected the development of NMEL through the mediation of depressive temperament rather than stressful life events.

Differentiating melancholic and non-melancholic depression via biological markers: A review

OBJECTIVES

Melancholia is a severe form of depression that is typified by greater genetic and biological influence, distinct symptomatology, and preferential response to physical treatment. This paper sought to broadly overview potential biomarkers of melancholia to benefit differential diagnosis, clinical responses and treatment outcomes. Given nuances in distinguishing melancholia as its own condition from other depressive disorder, we emphasised studies directly comparing melancholic to non-melancholic depression.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted. Key studies were identified and summarised qualitatively.

RESULTS

105 studies in total were identified. These studies covered a wide variety of biomarkers, and largely fell into three domains: endocrinological (especially cortisol levels, particularly in response to the dexamethasone suppression test), neurological, and immunological (particularly inflammatory markers). Less extensive evidence also exists for metabolic, genetic, and cardiovascular markers.

CONCLUSIONS

Definitive conclusions were predominantly limited due to substantial heterogeneity in how included studies defined melancholia. Furthermore, this heterogeneity could be responsible for the between- and within-group variability observed in the candidate biomarkers that were examined. Therefore, clarifying these definitional parameters may help identify underlying patterns in biomarker expression to improve diagnostic and therapeutic precision for the depressive disorders.

Affective Temperaments in Differentiation Between Melancholic and Nonmelancholic Depression: A Case-Control Study

ABSTRACT

The association between major depressive disorder (MDD) and personality traits has been extensively studied. However, differences in personality traits between patients with melancholic MDD (MEL) and nonmelancholic MDD (NMEL) remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine whether neuroticism, which has been associated with MDD, and the five affective temperament subtypes assessed by the Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego-autoquestionnaire version (TEMPS-A) can be used to distinguish MEL and NMEL. A total of 106 patients with MDD (MEL, n = 52; NMEL, n = 54) and 212 age- and sex-matched healthy controls answered the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-revised and the short version of TEMPS-A. In hierarchical logistic regression analysis, only depressive temperament scores were identified as a statistically significant feature distinguishing NMEL from MEL. Depressive temperament scores assessed by the short version of TEMPS-A were found to be significantly higher in NMEL patients than in MEL patients.

Pineal Abnormalities in Psychosis and Mood Disorders: A Systematic Review

The pineal gland (PG) is a small interhemispheric brain structure that influences human physiology in many ways, most importantly via secretion of the hormone melatonin which is known to regulate sleep and wakefulness. Here, we systematically reviewed existing neuroimaging studies of PG structure, and/or melatonin release (MLT) in psychosis and mood disorders. Medline, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched (on 3 February 2023), yielding 36 studies (8 PG volume, 24 MLT). The findings showed smaller-than-normal PG volume in people with schizophrenia, regardless of symptom severity and illness stage; and smaller-than-normal PG volume in major depression, with some indication of this being present only in certain subgroups, or in those with high scores on the 'loss of interest' symptom. There was considerable evidence of lower-than-normal MLT as well as aberrant MLT secretion pattern in schizophrenia. A similar picture, though less consistent than that seen in schizophrenia, emerged in major depression and bipolar disorder, with some evidence of a transient lowering of MLT following the initiation of certain antidepressants in drug-withdrawn patients. Overall, PG and MLT aberrations appear to represent transdiagnostic biomarkers for psychosis and mood disorders, but further work is needed to establish their clinical correlates and treatment implications.

Cortisol and the Dexamethasone Suppression Test as a Biomarker for Melancholic Depression: A Narrative Review

The dexamethasone suppression test (DST) assesses the functionality of the HPA axis and can be regarded as the first potential biomarker in psychiatry. In 1981, a group of researchers at the University of Michigan published a groundbreaking paper regarding its use for diagnosing melancholic depression, reporting a diagnostic sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 95%. While this study generated much enthusiasm and high expectations in the field of biological psychiatry, subsequent studies produced equivocal results, leading to the test being rejected by the American Psychiatric Association. The scientific reasons leading to the rise and fall of the DST are assessed in this review, suggestions are provided as to how the original test can be improved, and its potential applications in clinical psychiatry are discussed. An improved, standardized, and validated version of the DST would be a biologically meaningful and useful biomarker in psychiatry, providing a tool for clinicians caring for depressed patients in the areas of diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis, and predicting the risk of suicide. Additionally, such a test could be a crucial part in the generation of biologically homogenous patient cohorts, necessary for the successful development of new psychotropic medications.

Neurocognitive function of patients with melancholic and non-melancholic major depressive episodes: An exploratory study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this exploratory study was to compare the neurocognitive performance of patients undergoing melancholic and non-melancholic major depressive episodes. Considering potential limitations of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.) specifier, we employed an additional tool that has proven useful in identifying melancholia (the Sydney Melancholia Prototype Index).

METHODS

One hundred forty-one depressed inpatients were classified as melancholic or non-melancholic according to the Sydney Melancholia Prototype Index and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.) criteria and compared on a neurocognitive battery selected to assess attention and processing speed, verbal memory, working memory and executive functions. Results were controlled for several potential confounders.

RESULTS

Patients diagnosed as melancholic by the two diagnostic systems displayed lower scores in executive measures, semantic verbal fluency and phonological verbal fluency. On attention and processing speed, patients with melancholia underperformed those with non-melancholic depression only when diagnosed by the Sydney Melancholia Prototype Index. After controlling for confounders, associations between melancholic status and executive dysfunction remained significant for the Sydney Melancholia Prototype Index but not for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.) diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

In this study, melancholia diagnosed by the Sydney Melancholia Prototype Index (but not by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [5th ed.] criteria) was characterized by a greater compromise of tests assessing executive functions than non-melancholic depressions, even after controlling for depressive severity. These preliminary results might contribute to generating hypotheses about differences in the cognitive profile and pathophysiological substrate between melancholic and non-melancholic depressions. Likewise, the pattern of findings supports the hypothesis that the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.) melancholia specifier might identify more severe forms of depressive episodes rather than a qualitatively different subtype.

Robert Kendell: his career and contribution to psychiatric diagnosis

This paper reviews the career of Robert Kendell with emphasis on his contribution to diagnosis in psychiatry. His studies on the classification of depression showed that symptoms were distributed on a continuum and that division of depression into sub-types was not justified. Similarly he showed there was no clear-cut distinction between symptoms of schizophrenia and affective psychoses. He examined Scadding's definition of disease as it applied to psychiatry and questioned whether some conditions such as neuroses and personality disorders would qualify as illnesses. He concluded that available evidence supported a dimensional rather than a categorical approach to diagnosis.

At the Core of Depression: A Diagnostic Interview of the Core Features of Depression

INTRODUCTION

Valid and reliable methods for diagnosing depression are essential. The present study aimed to test the performance of a new diagnostic interview for depression focusing on the core symptoms of depression.

METHOD

We developed a diagnostic interview for depression: the CORE Diagnostic Interview, CORE-DI, which assesses each of the core features of depression on the four dimensions: quality, reactivity, globality, and fluctuations over time. The diagnostic performance of this interview was tested in a clinical study including 83 individuals presenting with various depressive symptoms, who were interviewed independently (1) by means of the CORE-DI and the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.), and (2) by highly skilled specialists in depression representing gold standard diagnoses.

RESULTS

We compared the outcome of the CORE-DI, the M.I.N.I., and the diagnosis made by clinicians, respectively, versus the gold standard diagnosis, using diagnostic efficiency statistics. The CORE-DI diagnosed depression with a high specificity (0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.97, for International Classification of Diseases [ICD]-10 criteria and 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81-0.95, for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [DSM-5] criteria) compared to both M.I.N.I (specificity 0.44, 95% CI: 0.33-0.55) and clinical diagnoses (specificity 0.76, 95% CI: 0.67-0.85). The sensitivity of the CORE-DI was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.55-0.72) for ICD-10 criteria and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.57-0.77) for DSM-5 criteria.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

The CORE-DI increased the specificity of the depression diagnosis substantially compared to clinical diagnoses and the diagnoses obtained by M.I.N.I. The results point to the usefulness of an elaborated and systematic assessment of the core symptoms in the examination of patients with depressive symptoms and thereby indicate a way for further development of specific diagnostic tools for depression in both clinical and research settings. However, it should be noted that the sensitivity of the CORE-DI was modest, and the psychometric properties of the CORE-DI might be different in other settings with higher or lower prevalence or severity of depressive symptoms.

Identifying Subjective Symptoms Associated with Psychomotor Disturbance in Melancholia: A Multiple Regression Analysis Study

PURPOSE

Melancholia has recently been re-evaluated, because patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) were found to be heterogeneous. However, the DSM-5 criteria for melancholia (DSM-MEL) have been criticized, because of the difficulty in clearly distinguishing between melancholic and non-melancholic depression using DSM-MEL. Psychomotor disturbance (PMD) is one of the most important, as well as one of the only measurable symptoms of melancholia. Parker et al developed the CORE measure, which assesses PMD as a behavioral characteristic. The aim of our study was to objectively identify the subjective symptoms of melancholia by analyzing the symptoms associated with PMD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 106 participants with MDD were examined by psychiatrists. Multiple regression analysis was performed in which the total CORE score was the dependent variable, and items of the DSM-MEL and historically suggested melancholic features were independent variables.

RESULTS

The following five independent variables were able to predict the total CORE score: 1) feelings of having lost feeling, 2) depressive delusions, 3) perplexity, 4) indecisiveness, and 5) no aggression against others. These five variables were more strongly associated with the total CORE score than the DSM-MEL.

LIMITATION

The major limitation of this study was that when choosing non-DSM melancholic signs and symptoms, we did not comprehensively evaluate and select the symptoms but chose items that are clinically important.

CONCLUSION

We identified five subjective symptoms that were associated with PMD. These five symptoms may be clinically useful as diagnostic criteria for melancholia.

Melancholia defined with the precision of a machine

BACKGROUND

The status of melancholia as a categorical or dimensional condition remains unclear, and no measure of melancholia has achieved definitive status. This study aimed to use a machine learning approach to assess whether a pre-established cut-off score on the Sydney Melancholia Prototype Index (SMPI) provided clear differentiation of melancholic/non-melancholic depression, and to identify the items making the most distinct contribution.

METHODS

We analysed amalgamated data sets of 1513 clinically depressed patients assessed via the clinician-rated version of the SMPI (SMPI-CR). We also evaluated the self-report version of the SMPI (SMPI-SR) in a combined clinical/community sample of 2025 depressed patients and senior high school students. Rule ensembles were derived in which the outcome measure was the presence/absence of melancholia (defined as scoring at or above a SMPI cut-off score that had been established in previous studies) and the predictive variables were the individual SMPI items.

RESULTS

The pre-established SMPI cut-off score was confirmed as differentiating melancholic/non-melancholic with near perfect accuracy for the SMPI-CR, and with very high accuracy for the SMPI-SR. The relative importance of all SMPI items was quantified.

LIMITATIONS

It is difficult to validate SMPI-assigned diagnoses due to the lack of any similar measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The SMPI-CR was confirmed to be a highly precise instrument for differentiating melancholic and non-melancholic depression. Its use will advance clinical decision making and studies evaluating causes, mechanisms and treatments for the two depressive sub-types, as well as assist clarification as to whether melancholia is categorically or dimensionally distinct from non-melancholic depression.

Personality Disturbances in Melancholic and Nonmelancholic Unipolar Major Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Although melancholic depression has been associated with a more adequate premorbid personality style, the empirical evidence supporting this statement is inconclusive. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyzed studies comparing the presence of personality disturbances in melancholic and nonmelancholic subtypes of major depressive disorder (MDD). We defined a) a continuous outcome, defining personality traits as a dimensional construct, and b) a dichotomous outcome, defined as the presence/absence of personality disorders (PD). We also evaluated the role of potential moderators. Our results showed significantly higher levels of neuroticism and interpersonal sensitivity, and a higher likelihood of presenting a PD in nonmelancholic depression. No significant differences were found for extraversion. The scarcity of studies and high heterogeneity were among our limitations. In conclusion, personality disturbances seem to be overrepresented in nonmelancholic MDD. The assessment of personality disturbances can be useful in clinical practice and in the study of MDD heterogeneity.

Are adult stressful life events associated with psychotic relapse? A systematic review of 23 studies

Relapse rates among individuals with psychotic disorders are high. In addition to the financial burden placed on clinical services, relapse is associated with worse long-term prognosis and poorer quality of life. Robust evidence indicates that stressful life events commonly precede the onset of the first psychotic episode; however, the extent to which they are associated with relapse remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize available research investigating the association between recent stressful life events and psychotic relapse or relapse of bipolar disorder if the diagnosis included psychotic symptoms. PsycINFO, Medline and EMBASE were searched for cross-sectional, retrospective and prospective studies published between 01/01/1970 and 08/01/2020 that investigated the association between adult stressful life events and relapse of psychosis. Study quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project guidelines. Twenty-three studies met eligibility criteria (prospective studies: 14; retrospective studies: 6; cross-sectional: 3) providing data on 2046 participants in total (sample size range: 14-240 participants). Relapse was defined as a return of psychotic symptoms (n = 20), a return of symptoms requiring hospitalization (n = 2) and a return of symptoms or hospitalization (n = 1). Adult stressful life events were defined as life events occurring after the onset of psychosis. Stressful life events included but were not limited to adult trauma, bereavement, financial problems and conflict. Eighteen studies found a significant positive association between adult stressful life events and psychotic relapse and five studies found a non-significant association. We conclude that adult stressful life events, occurring after psychosis onset, appear to be associated with psychotic relapse.

Dimensions de la dépression : modèles statistiques pour l’évaluation des troubles affectifs

Dans cette étude, les dimensions de la dépression ont été analysées par rapport aux états dépressifs non bipolaires. Les états d’anxiété dans ce domaine ont été considérés comme des formes peu sévères de dépression au niveau phénoménologique. La dimension de l’anhédonie a été considérée comme liée aux troubles schizoaffectifs.

Le concept clinique de la mélancolie a été utilisé pour inclure ces états unipolaires de la dépression. Ce concept comprend et la dimension de sévérité et les types diagnostiques de la dépression. Le principe d’organisation des désordres mentaux utilisé dans le manuel du DSM III implique que la «phénoménologie partagée» précède l’étiologie psychologique dans le cadre des désordres affectifs.

Certains auteurs soutiennent que le moyen le plus efficace de tester la «phénoménologie partagée» est de démontrer l’existence d’une relation additive entre indices et symptômes. Le modèle de Rasch consiste en une théorie générale de la relation statistique entre les dimensions cliniques et les échelles d’évaluation de la dépression.

Moyennant l’usage des analyses de Rasch, on a démontré que notre échelle de la mélancolie mesure une dimension de la sévérité de la dépression. De plus, notre échelle diagnostique de la mélancolie, qui a été élaborée à partir des 2 échelles de Newcastle (pour la dépression endogène versus la dépression réactionnelle (névrotique), mesure ces deux dimensions diagnostiques. Des résultats préliminaires obtenus avec l’échelle de diagnostic de la mélancolie ont démontré que chez des patients classifiés comme ayant une dépression endogène «pure» la courbe d’amélioration dans le temps est plus importante que chez des patients classifiés comme ayant une dépression réactive «pure» ou une association de dépression endogène et de dépression réactionnelle.

French diagnostic criteria for depression

The traditional French nosology of mood disorders is based upon the classical endogenous vs psychogenic dichotomy. The French Classification of Mental Disorders, established by the National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale or INSERM) refers, however, to a different terminology: psychotic is used instead of endogenous and non-psychotic instead of psychogenic.

The present report is an attempt to provide operational definitions for the major categories of depression in French nosology. It is based upon an empirical investigation. Fifty French clinicians selected 5 cases among patients who had been diagnosed as presenting either a psychotic depression, a non-psychotic depression or a schizophrenia with mood disorder. For each patient, the participants evaluated the presence or absence of 100 criteria presented in a list, the List of Integrated Criteria for the Evaluation of Taxonomy in Depressive Disorders (LICET-D 100). The list assembles all diagnostic criteria which have been proposed for a diagnosis of depression in 7 recent classification systems.

The data were analyzed in 2 steps. The aim of the first step was to define a basic depressive syndrome, termed “unspecific depressive syndrome”, present in all the depressive disorders, independently of their subtypes. The aim of the second step was to elicit a diagnostic index for distinguishing between psychotic and non-psychotic depression. The operational definitions presented in this report are “empirical” in as much as they have been derived from the evaluation of actual patients. They are “French” in as much as they are based upon data obtained from a representative sample of French psychiatrists. They have a high face validity in that they correspond to and in fact simply translate French diagnostic practices in this field. They finally have a satisfactory discriminative validity in that they “correctly” reclassify 82% of the patients, i.e. achieve agreement with clinical diagnosis in more than 8 cases ont of 10.

The present report does not provide and in fact was not designed to elicit information on the predictive or construct validities of French diagnostic practices in the field of depressive disorders.

Critères diagnostiques, échelles et questionnaires utilisés au cours des dépressions

Les principaux instruments standardisés d’évaluation clinique de la dépression et de l’anxiété comprennent les critères diagnostiques, des échelles d’appréciation et des tests mentaux, principalement des questionnaires. L’utilisation systématique de critères diagnostiques rigoureux se révèle utile pour pouvoir constituer des groupes de Patients suffisamment homogènes pour les recherches cliniques. L'approche polydiagnostique représente, dans cette optique, une voie intéressante de recherche, permettant de ne pas être limité par un système de référence nosographique unique. Les systèmes permettant à ce jour la meilleure homogénéité des groupes de malades sont les critères du DSM III d’un épisode dépressif majeur, les critères de St-Louis de dépression primaire (Feighner, 1972), et les critères de dépression endogène (échelles de Newcastle; Roth, 1983), utilisés conjointement.

Certaines échelles de dépression ont fait l’objet de développements récents en Europe comme la MADRS, l’échelle de ralentissement dépressif de Widlocher, l’échelle d évaluation de la dépression de Pichot et l’échelle manie-dépression du système AMDP. Il en est de même pour certains questionnaires ou check-lists comme le questionnaire HAD, la HSCL, les échelles visuelles analogiques de Norris ou la CHESS, check-list d’évaluation des symptômes somatiques. La sensibilité au changement de ces divers instruments en fait leur principal intérêt pratique.

Dépression, modèle unitaire ou binaire ?

La découverte de la folie à double forme a conduit à la supposition que la dépression exprime une maladie. L’observation d’états dépressifs en relation plausible avec des expériences traumatisantes a suggéré l’existence de 2 groupes de troubles dépressifs à étiologie différente, l’un déterminé biologiquement, l’autre psychologiquement. Dans le domaine des dépressions sans origine organique démontrable, cette hypothèse a conduit à la dichotomie : dépression endogène-réactive/névrotique.

On a tenté de différencier ces 2 groupes à l’aide de détails de la symptomatologie, de la personnalité prémorbide, et des circonstances de leur apparition et de leur évolution. Cette séparation catégorielle traditionnelle a souventété mise en question en se basant sur le fait que la plupart des analyses statistiques n’ont pas démontré une distribution bimodale des états dépressifs. La possibilité que des artefacts méthodologiques puissent, soit produire une fausse, soit obscurcir une réelle bimodalité, anime toujours encore les controverses scientifiques. Ainsi, les uns prônent que les dépressions de type endogène et réactive/névrotique ne représentent que différents degrés de sévérité situés sur un même continuum passant sans interruption à la normalité. Ce point de vue, également soutenu par le DSM III-R et le projet de la CIM-IO, a souvent recours à un modèle de vulnérabilité analogue à celui fréquemment mis en avant pour la schizophrénie. Les autres défendent l’approche catégorielle et soulignent que la sévérité n’importe pas dans la séparation des 2 groupes. Parmi le deuxième groupe de chercheurs, certains soutiennent leur opinion à l’appui d’analyses statistiques qui, bien qu’elles ne parviennent pas à identifier un facteur réactif/névrotique distinct, révèlent d’une façon assez convaincante l’existence d’un «profil d’items dépressifs endogènes». D’autres sont de l’avis que la symptomatologie n’est pas souhaitable pour établir des distinctions catégorielles. A ces fins, ils recourent à des marqueurs biologiques, notamment des modifications de biorythmes ou aux particularités du cours de la maladie. L’état actuel de ces discussions est exposé.

The phenomenology of depression

While some investigators believe that the concept of depression is a continuum with mild and severe forms reflecting essentially the same entity, most suspect that the concept is instead heterogeneous and consists of a group of discrete subtypes. If this is so, identifying subtypes is a major priority. Ultimately such subtypes must be understood in terms of their underlying neural and even molecular mechanisms. Yet in order to search for such mechanisms, we still must begin with clinical phenomenology.

Two major subtypes of serious depressions have been proposed. Endogenous or melancholic depression is one, while bipolar depression is another. Thinking about both these subtypes tends to assume an underlying biogenic mechanism that is relatively autonomous, although not necessarily free of environmental influences.

This paper examines a series of attempts to identify discrete subtypes of depression. One approach, used in a series of investigations, involves the use of mathematical techniques such as cluster analysis in order to identify phenomenologically similar subgroups within the depressive spectrum. This approach has consistently identified a melancholic or endogenous syndrome. Our attempts to validate the concept of endogenous depression through examining external correlates, such as family history, have been less successful.

An alternate method for subtyping depression stresses that the bipolar subtype represents a discrete form of severe endogenously caused depression. We bave examined the phenomenology of bipolar versus unipolar depression and found it to differ significantly in a number of respects. Thus, endogenous depression and bipolar depression may represent different phenontena.

Comparison of short-term (saliva) and long-term (hair) cortisol levels in out-patients with melancholic and non-melancholic major depression

BACKGROUND

Major depressive episodes (MDEs) show diverse cortisol level alterations. Heterogeneity in symptom profiles, symptom severity and cortisol specimens may explain these heterogeneous results. Less severely ill out-patients with a non-melancholic MDE (NM-MDE) may have a variation in the rhythm of cortisol secretion rather than in its concentration.

METHOD

Cortisol measures were taken (a) over a short-term period (12 h) by measuring daily salivary output using the area under the curve with respect to the ground (AUCg) and (b) over a long-term period (3 months) in hair. Additionally, cortisol reactivity measures in saliva - the cortisol awakening response and the 30 min delta cortisol secretion after awakening (DELTA) - were investigated in 19 patients with a melancholic MDE (M-MDE) and 52 with a NM-MDE, and in 40 matched controls who were recruited from the UK and Chile. Depression severity scores were correlated with different cortisol measures.

RESULTS

The NM-MDE group showed a decreased AUCg in comparison with controls (P = 0.02), but normal cortisol reactivity and long-term cortisol levels. The M-MDE group did not exhibit any significant cortisol alterations nor an association with depression severity scores. Higher Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score was linked with decreased hair cortisol concentration (HCC, P = 0.05) and higher DELTA (P = 0.04) in NM-MDEs, whereas decreased HCC was the sole alteration associated with out-patients with severe M-MDEs.

CONCLUSIONS

The contrasting short- and long-term cortisol output results are compatible with an alteration in the rhythm of cortisol secretion in NM-MDEs. This alteration may consist of large and/or intense episodes of hypercortisolaemia in moderate NM-MDEs and frequent, but brief and sharp early-morning DELTAs in its severe form. These changes may reflect the effects of environmental factors or episodes of nocturnal hypercortisolaemia that were not measured by the short-term samples used in this study.

Lists of integrated criteria for the evaluation of taxonomy

The systems or lists that make up diagnostic criteria proposed by both classical and modern authors, as well as the usual national or international classifications constitute diagnostic instruments which allow: 1), classification of patients into the most homogeneous groups possible, according to absent-present criteria; 2), research on the propensity for certain criteria to appear, and on their stability; 3), a polydiagnostic approach, not limited to any one reference diagnostic system; 4), a group of psychiatrists to establish the capacity to construct empirical criteria for diagnosis and diagnostic-differential criteria of one or several nosological entities. If this group of psychiatrists is notably representative of a certain country or set of countries, these criteria allow for means of validation of the very empirical criteria established, as well as of the systems and classifications that integrate the instrument used, with their points of agreement and disagreement; 5), the establishment of a correspondence between empirical criteria and conceptual criteria, with predictions as to the application and way of using a new classification or of proposed projects, from the overall perspective of an empirical-conceptual relationship.

Tianeptine: clinical properties

Tianeptine has been shown to be an effective antidepressant versus reference drugs and to be better tolerated than amitriptyline, without the latter's anticholinergic side-effects. Its good acceptability has been confirmed in long-term use (1 year) in large patient groups. In an open pilot trial in endogenous melancholia, tianeptine showed the same activity as would be expected of a conventional antidepressant. This is being verified in a double-blind trial versus maprotiline. In a separate open study, it has demonstrated a potential to prevent relapse and recurrence in depressed patients treated for 1 year. These results are currently being tested versus placebo.

Predictability of dropout in unipolar depressed outpatients

In a three phase sequential treatment strategy study involving 119 depressed outpatients, a total of 31 patients (26.7%) stopped treatment prematurely due to side-effects (21/31), aggravation of symptoms (3/31), non-compliance (4/31), and non-treatment related events (3/31). At baseline, no significant differences were found on sociodemographic and psychiatric data between patients who did or did not drop out. As predictors of dropout eight domains of data concerning psychiatric history, premorbid history, symptomatology, personality, and social adjustment were used. Using a logistic linear regression analysis, only three variables were related to dropout. Patients with a history of alcohol use or poor social functioning according to axis V of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-III-R had a higher chance to drop out, while patients with a sleep disturbance according to the Symptom Checklist (SCL)-90 had a smaller chance to drop out.

Antidepressive effects of the selective MAO-inhibitor brofaromine:an open trial

In an open prospective study, the antidepressive effects of the selective and reversible MAO-A inhibitor, brofaromine, were investigated in nine endogenous depressed patients, who had failed to respond to cyclic antidepressants. In three patients a clinically relevant improvement was observed, although for the total group, no statistically significant treatment effect could be demonstrated. In two subjects, postural hypotension and sleep disturbances occurred temporarily.

Post-stroke patients in rehabilitation. The relationship between biological impairment (CT scanning), physical disability and clinical depression

A study of 128 consecutive patients with thromboembolic stroke in a rehabilitation hospital from July 1988 to September 1990 found a prevalence of major depression of 17%. The patient population was described according to the principles of the World Health Organization's (WHO) International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH) according to biological impairment, measured by computerized tomography (CT) scanning of the brain and side of hemiparesis and physical disability, measured by functional movement and activities of daily living. Handicap, referring to the interaction between disability and the environmental situation, often defined as the subjective disadvantage of being ill, was not measured in this study. A stroke index with four items was generated from the parameters describing biological impairment and physical disability. The psychiatric rating scales (the 17-item Hamilton Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Melancholia Scale [MES]and the Newcastle Diagnostic Depression Scale), and the new stroke-index showed adequate coefficients of Cronbach's alpha and Loevinger, suggesting that these scales have both adequate item correlation and homogeneity (adequate hierarchical structure). The impairment disability index of stroke thus seems to be a meaningful measurement of the specific factors of this disease. There was no correlation between the stroke-index and the psychiatric rating scales measuring the emotional dimension of disability caused by the disease expressed as depression. The results suggest that the depression found among stroke patients is not a simple reaction to the physical disability of the stroke.

Characterological depression in patients with narcissistic personality disorder

Background: Depressive symptoms often occur in patients with personality disorders. Along the lines of the precious concepts of reactive and melancholic forms of depression, two different patterns of depressive symptoms can be identified. Reactive forms of depression is considered to be related to dysfunction of emotional regulation and social functioning, and to personality disorders. This study aimed at exploring the pattern of depressive symptoms in patients with Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) compared to a group of depressed patients without Personality Disorder (PD). The Newcastle Diagnostic Depression Scale (NDDS) is a clinical instrument designed to differentiate reactive depression from melancholic depression. Method: The study investigated patterns of depressive symptoms in 117 out-patients, divided into two groups. One group containing 56 patients with depressive symptoms by no PD and the other group comprised of 61 patients with depressive symptoms and NPD. The participants were interviewed using the Newcastle Diagnostic Depression Scale. Results: There was a significant difference between the groups, as the NPD group suffered from reactive forms of depression. The NPD group showed a pattern of depressive symptoms characterized by fluctuation of the depressive state, without time demarcation of depressive episode, ruminations preoccupied with hostility and accusatory feelings towards other, but not self-accusatory feelings, fluctuation suicidal ideation triggered by external events accompanied by parasuicidal behavior, lack of neuro-vegetative symptoms such as insomnia with early wakening, loss of appetite and weight loss. The No PD group showed the opposite pattern. Conclusion: Based on these results NDDS is considered to be an applicable instrument for identifying personality pathology in patients with depressive symptoms, by recognizing the specific pattern. This is thought to be important for adequate treatment planning.

Alterations of neural network organisation during rapid eye movement sleep and slow-wave sleep in major depression: Implications for diagnosis, classification, and treatment

The aim of this study was to empirically investigate the network organisation during rapid eye movement sleep (REMS) and slow-wave sleep (SWS) using the effective connectivity measured using the Granger causality to identify new potential biomarkers for the diagnosis, classification, and potential favourable response to treatment in major depression. Polysomnographic data were analysed from 24 healthy individuals and 16 major depressed individuals recruited prospectively. To obtain the 19×19 connectivity matrix of all possible pairwise combinations of electrodes by the Granger causality method from our electroencephalographic data, we used the Toolbox MVGC multivariate Granger causality. The computation of network measures was realised by importing these connectivity matrices into the EEGNET Toolbox. Major depressed individuals (versus healthy individuals) and those with endogenous depression (versus those with neurotic depression) present alterations of small-world network organisation during REMS, whereas major depressed individuals with potential favourable response to electroconvulsive therapy (versus those with potential unfavourable response) have a less efficient small-world network organisation during SWS. Thus, alterations in network organisation during REMS could be biomarkers for the diagnosis and classification of major depressive episodes, whereas alterations of network organisation during SWS could be a biomarker to predict potential favourable response to treatment by electroconvulsive therapy.

Melancholia: An Attempt at Definition Based on a Review of Empirical Data

We sought to identify clinical features that best discriminate melancholia from nonmelancholic depressive conditions. An extensive review of studies using latent factor models that identified a melancholic depression dimension/factor was undertaken. Clinical variables extracted from these studies were analyzed in terms of their contribution to a diagnosis of melancholia and their consistency across studies. Psychomotor retardation and mood nonreactivity were the most relevant clinical features for the identification of melancholic depressions. Other clinical features commonly described as weighted to melancholia, such as anhedonia, psychomotor agitation, late insomnia, or appetite/weight loss, seemed less useful in distinguishing these subtypes of depression. Study results are considered in relation to the potential limitations of current operational definitions of melancholia, and how symptom sets could be modified.

Modelling mood disorders: An ACE solution?

OBJECTIVES

The treatment of mood disorders remains sub-optimal. A major reason for this is our lack of understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of depression and bipolar disorder. A core problem is the lack of specificity of our current diagnoses. This paper discusses the history of this problem and posits a solution in the form of a more sophisticated model.

METHOD

The authors review the notable historical works that laid the foundations of mood disorder nosology; discuss the more recent influences that shaped modern diagnoses; and examine the evidence that mood disorders are characterised by multidimensional and longitudinal symptom profiles.

RESULTS

The ACE model considers mood disorders as a combination of symptoms across three domains: Activity, Cognition, and Emotion; that vary over time. This multidimensional and longitudinal perspective is consistent with the prevalence of complex clinical presentations, such as mixed states, and highlights the importance of recurrence in mood disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACE model encourages researchers to characterise patients from a number of equally important perspectives and, by doing so, add specificity to the treatment of mood disorders.

A quantitative review on outcome-to-antidepressants in melancholic unipolar depression

The aim of this study was to explore outcome to antidepressants profile in melancholic unipolar depression. We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials comparing: 1) outcome to antidepressants and placebo between melancholic and non-melancholic depression; 2) outcome to different antidepressant classes in melancholic depression. Two outcomes were considered: clinical remission and response. Significant lower odds of remission to antidepressants in melancholic than in non-melancholic depressions were found. Although no significant differences were observed in the response to antidepressants between both subtypes of depression, those with melancholic features had lower odds of response to placebo. Finally, treatment of melancholic depression with serotonin reuptake inhibitors was associated with lower odds of remission compared with tricyclic antidepressants, and similar outcome compared with venlafaxine. Melancholia seems to show a differential pattern of outcome to antidepressants, which could be clinically valuable for a better implementation of personalized medicine of depression. Due to several limitations, further research is needed to support these preliminary findings.

Elevated fingernail cortisol levels in major depressive episodes

BACKGROUND

The extent to which cortisol levels are elevated in major depressive episodes (MDE), and hence could act as a biomarker of illness, remains unclear. Although patient characteristics may explain some of this variation - for example elevated cortisol being more often found in patients with severe, psychotic or melancholic depression - problems with the methods used to measure cortisol may also have contributed to the inconsistent findings. Fingernails are a novel sample that can be used to assess aggregate cortisol concentrations over a 15-day period, and may provide a more accurate reflection of longer term cortisol level changes in MDE and help clarify this issue. This methodology has not yet been utilised in MDE.

METHODS

Cortisol levels reflecting a period of 15days were measured using fingernails in a group of 26 subjects experiencing a major depressive episode (MDE) and in an age and gender matched group of 45 healthy controls.

RESULTS

Depressed subjects showed significantly higher mean cortisol levels measured in fingernails when compared with control subjects. Higher levels of cortisol were associated with higher depression severity scores, a diagnosis of non-reactive depression, and more prominent melancholic symptoms. Conversely, fatigue was negatively correlated with cortisol levels.

CONCLUSION

There is elevated cortisol in MDE when assessed using an aggregate measure over two weeks.Alterations in fingernail cortisol correlate with key clinical symptoms and subtypes of depression.

Targeting and transforming major depression

OBJECTIVE

To detail limitations to the construct of 'major depression', argue for repositioning it as a proxy for 'clinical depression' and then operationalize it and its principal constituent depressive subtypes, while preserving the DSM criteria-based format.

METHOD

We summarize limitations to major depression being viewed as a diagnostic entity. Data from 391 clinically depressed patients were analysed to identify high-prevalence non-specific depressive symptoms to define 'clinical depression' as well as the features showing specificity to a melancholic depressive subtype.

RESULTS

We identified a set of high-prevalence and generalized symptoms for defining clinical depression and with many being current criteria for major depression. We also developed a refined set of melancholic features and with their underlying distributions generating two classes that correlated strongly with clinical diagnoses of a melancholic or non-melancholic depression, thus validating its capacity to so differentiate. We append criteria sets for diagnosing clinical depression and its principal diagnostic subtypes (psychotic, melancholic and non-melancholic).

CONCLUSION

This heuristic study reframes and modifies major depression's criteria set to define a domain of clinical depression with additional criteria and then allowing the delineation of three diagnostic subtypes. If this paradigm shift is accepted and further refined, greater precision in diagnosis, treatment and research would be anticipated.

Diagnosing melancholic depression: some personal observations

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to offer some personal observations as to how melancholia can be diagnosed and differentiated from the non-melancholic depressive conditions.

METHODS

Personal clinical and research-based observations are presented following a critique of common current strategies.

RESULTS

The paper offers views on the most differentiating clinical features, argues for adding illness course variables to symptoms and provides details of the Sydney Melancholic Prototypic Index, a measure with a high overall classification rate in differentiating melancholic and non-melancholic depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater precision in differentiating melancholic from non-melancholic depression is advanced by weighting signs and symptoms of psychomotor disturbance, as well as including illness correlates and family history in the diagnostic process.

Neuropsychological changes in melancholic and atypical depression: A systematic review

There is not a consensus as to whether neuropsychological profiling can distinguish depressive subtypes. We aimed to systematically review and critically analyse the literature on cognitive function in patients with melancholic and atypical depression. We searched in databases PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Knowledge and PsycInfo for papers comparing the neuropsychological performance of melancholic patients (MEL) to non-melancholic depressive patients (NMEL), including atypical depressives, and healthy controls (HC). All studies were scrutinised to determine the main methodological characteristics and particularly possible sources of bias influencing the results reported, using the STROBE statement checklist. We also provide effect size of the results reported for contrasts between MEL; patients and NMEL patients. Seventeen studies were included; most of them demonstrated higher neuropsychological impairments of MEL patients compared to both NMEL patients and HC on tasks requiring memory, executive function, attention and reaction time. Detailed analysis of the methodologies used in the studies revealed significant variability especially regarding the participants' sociodemographic characteristics, clinical characteristics of patients and differences in neuropsychological assessment. These findings suggest that MEL may have a distinct and impaired cognitive performance compared to NMEL depressive patients on tasks involving verbal and visual memory, executive function, sustained attention and span, as well as psychomotor speed, this last especially when cognitive load is increased. Additional studies with adequate control of potentially confounding variables will help to clarify further differences in the neuropsychological functioning of depressive subtypes.

The properties and utility of the CORE measure of melancholia

BACKGROUND

The CORE measure was designed to assess a central feature of melancholia - signs of psychomotor disturbance (PMD) - and so provide an alternate non-symptom based measure of melancholia or of its probability. This review evaluates development and application studies undertaken over the last 25 years to consider how well it has met its original objectives.

METHODS

All studies published using the CORE measure as either the only or an adjunctive measure of melancholia were obtained and are considered in this review.

RESULTS

Findings suggest high reliability in quantifying CORE scores can be achieved and that it has construct validity as a measure of PMD. A number of application studies assessing socio-demographic factors, cognitive and motor impairment, dexamethasone suppression and thyrotropin-releasing hormone, response to psychotherapy and to electroconvulsive therapy support its validity as a measure of melancholia, while functional brain imaging studies suggest that the measure identifies regions of decreased connectivity.

LIMITATIONS

Use of the CORE benefits from rater training and for subjects to be assessed at or near nadir of their depressive episode. There have been insufficient studies evaluating genetic factors, and the treatment response of CORE-defined melancholic patients to antidepressant drugs of differing classes.

CONCLUSIONS

The CORE, either as a proxy or direct measure of melancholia, provides a strategy for assigning depressed subjects a diagnosis or melancholic or non-melancholic depression or for estimating the probability of melancholia.

Diagnostic Conversion to Bipolar Disorder in Unipolar Depressed Patients Participating in Trials on Antidepressants

Objective

In unipolar depressed patients participating in trials on antidepressants, we investigated if illness characteristics at baseline could predict conversion to bipolar disorder.

Method

A long-term register-based follow-up study of 290 unipolar depressed patients with a mean age of 50.8 years (SD = 11.9) participating in three randomized trials on antidepressants conducted in the period 1985–1994. The independent effects of explanatory variables were examined by applying Cox regression analyses.

Results

The overall risk of conversion was 20.7%, with a mean follow-up time of 15.2 years per patient. The risk of conversion was associated with an increasing number of previous depressive episodes at baseline, [HR 1.18, 95% CI (1.10–1.26)]. No association with gender, age, age at first depressive episode, duration of baseline episode, subtype of depression or any of the investigated HAM-D subscales included was found.

Limitations

The patients were followed-up through the Danish Psychiatric Central Research Register, which resulted in inherent limitations such as possible misclassification of outcome.

Conclusion

In a sample of middle-aged hospitalized unipolar depressed patients participating in trials on antidepressants, the risk of conversion was associated with the number of previous depressive episodes. Therefore, this study emphasizes that unipolar depressed patients experiencing a relatively high number of recurrences should be followed more closely, or at least be informed about the possible increased risk of conversion.

The CORE system for sub-typing melancholic depression: Adaptation and psychometric properties of the Spanish version

We report the development procedure for a Spanish version of the CORE measure for subtyping melancholic depression and its psychometric properties. The sample comprised two subsets of depressive patients: 117 in-patients clinically assessed after admission and before discharge; and 34 in- and out-patients who were video-recorded, with each recording being rated by independent raters and re-rated six months later. The internal consistency of the Spanish version of the CORE was high, with Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.93 for the total CORE score. High intra-class correlation coefficient for the total score (0.96) and the three subscales (around 0.8) indicate high inter-rater reliability. Baseline and six-month ratings of video-recordings showed high test-retest reliability. Regarding construct validity, the correlation between the CORE and the Newcastle endogeneity scale scores was 0.64. A ROC curve generated an optimal cut-off of 10 to predict the definition of endogeneity/melancholia based on the Newcastle score >=6 and the DSM-IV-TR definition of melancholia. The comparison between the CORE scores at admission and at discharge revealed large differences, indicating demonstrable sensitivity to change. The Spanish version of the CORE system is a reliable and valid instrument for sub-typing depression in terms of melancholic versus non-melancholic sub-types.

The utility of a classificatory decision tree approach to assist clinical differentiation of melancholic and non-melancholic depression

BACKGROUND

Studies suggest that differentiating melancholic from non-melancholic depressive disorders is advanced by use of illness course as well as symptom variables but, in practice, potentially differentiating variables are generally positioned as having equal value. Judging that differentiating features are more likely to vary in their signal intensity, we sought to determine the number of features required to effect differentiation and their hierarchical order.

METHODS

The 24-item clinician-rated Sydney Melancholia Prototype Index (SMPI-CR) was completed for 364 unipolar depressed patients. The sample was divided into two cohorts according to the recruitment period. An RPART classification tree analysis identified the most discriminating SMPI items in the development sample of 197 patients, and examined the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic decisions, then sought to replicate findings in a validation sample of 169 patients.

RESULTS

Independent analyses of putative SMPI items identified only seven items as required to discriminate those with clinically-diagnosed melancholic or non-melancholic depression when the conditions were examined separately. An RPART analysis considering differentiation of melancholic and non-melancholic depression in the total samples retained five of those items in the classification tree, three of which were non-symptom items, and with 92% sensitivity and 80% specificity in the development sample. This reduced item set showed 93% sensitivity and 82% specificity in the validation sample.

LIMITATIONS

Our clinical judgment of melancholic or non-melancholic depression may not correspond with the clinical logic employed by other clinicians.

CONCLUSION

Only five SMPI items were required to derive a succinct and efficient decision tree, comprising high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating melancholic and non-melancholic depression. Current study findings provide an empirical model that could enrich clinicians׳ approach to differentiating melancholic and non-melancholic depression.

Cleaving depressive diseases from depressive disorders and non-clinical states

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether putative depressive diseases could be differentiated categorically from clinical depressive disorders and non-clinical mood states.

METHOD

We interviewed volunteers who reported or denied any lifetime depressive mood state and analyzed data from the former group reporting on their 'most severe' depressive episode. We employed latent class analysis (LCA) to determine whether a two-class solution was supported and the contribution of individual variables to class allocations.

RESULTS

All variables were significant predictors of class allocation. LCA-assigned Class I participants reported more depressive symptoms, had more distressing episodes and more lasting consequences, were more likely to view their depression as 'like a disease', and as being both disproportionately more severe and persistent in relation to any antecedent stressor. Validation involved comparison of LCA assignment with DSM-IV diagnosis for their most severe depressive episode. Of those assigned to Class I, 89% had a DSM diagnosis of melancholic, psychotic or bipolar depression. Class II had all those failing to meet criteria for a depressive episode and the majority of those with a non-melancholic depressive condition.

CONCLUSION

Despite not including individual depressive symptoms, study variables strongly differentiated putative depressive diseases from a composite of clinical depressive conditions and subclinical depressive states.

Analysis on evolution and research focus in psychiatry field

BACKGROUND

With the dramatic rise in mental disorders and mental illnesses, psychiatry has become one of the fastest growing clinical medical disciplines. This has led to a rise in the number of scientific research papers being published in this field.

METHODS

We selected research papers in ten psychiatric journals that were published during 1983 to 2012. These ten journals were those with the top Impact Factor (IF) as indicated by the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-Expanded). We utilized information visualization software (CiteSpace) to conduct co-citation and Hierarchal clustering analysis to map knowledge domains to determine the evolution and the foci of research in this field.

RESULTS

In the evolution of the field of psychiatry, there were four stages identified. The result of hierarchal clustering analysis revealed that the research foci in the psychiatric field were primarily studies of child and adolescent psychiatry, diagnostic and classification criteria, brain imaging and molecular genetics.

CONCLUSION

The results provide information about the evolution and the foci of the research in the field of psychiatry. This information can help researchers determine the direction of the research in the field of psychiatry; Moreover, this research provides reasonable suggestions to guide research in psychiatry field and provide scientific evidence to aid in the effective prevention and treatment of mental disorders.