1
|
Ezawa ID, Robinson N, Hollon SD. Prevalence Increases as Treatments Improve: An Evolutionary Perspective on the Treatment-Prevalence Paradox in Depression. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2024; 20:201-228. [PMID: 38996078 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-080822-040442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/14/2024]
Abstract
Depression is an eminently treatable disorder that responds to psychotherapy or medications; the efficacy of each has been established in hundreds of controlled trials. Nonetheless, the prevalence of depression has increased in recent years despite the existence of efficacious treatments-a phenomenon known as the treatment-prevalence paradox. We consider several possible explanations for this paradox, which range from a misunderstanding of the very nature of depression, inflated efficacy of the established treatments, and a lack of access to efficacious delivery of treatments. We find support for each of these possible explanations but especially the notion that large segments of the population lack access to efficacious treatments that are implemented as intended. We conclude by describing the potential of using lay therapists and digital technologies to overcome this lack of access and to reach historically underserved populations and simultaneously guarantee the quality of the interventions delivered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iony D Ezawa
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA;
| | - Noah Robinson
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; ,
| | - Steven D Hollon
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; ,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dennis CL, Singla DR, Brown HK, Savel K, Clark CT, Grigoriadis S, Vigod SN. Postpartum Depression: A Clinical Review of Impact and Current Treatment Solutions. Drugs 2024; 84:645-659. [PMID: 38811474 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02038-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
Depression during the first year postpartum (postpartum depression) impacts millions of women and their families worldwide. In this narrative review, we provide a summary of postpartum depression, examining the etiology and consequences, pharmacological and psychological treatments, and potential mechanisms of change and current barriers to care. Psychological treatments are effective and preferred by many perinatal patients over medications, but they often remain inaccessible. Key potential mechanisms underlying their effectiveness include treatment variables (e.g., dosage and therapeutic alliance) and patient behaviors (e.g., activation and avoidance and emotional regulation). Among pharmacological treatments, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) sertraline is generally the first-line antidepressant medication recommended to women in the postpartum period due to its minimal passage into breastmilk and the corresponding decades of safety data. Importantly, most antidepressant drugs are considered compatible with breastfeeding. Neurosteroids are emerging as an effective treatment for postpartum depression, although currently this treatment is not widely available. Barriers to widespread access to treatment include those that are systematic (e.g., lack of specialist providers), provider-driven (e.g., lack of flexibility in treatment delivery), and patient-driven (e.g., stigma and lack of time for treatment engagement). We propose virtual care, task-sharing to non-specialist treatment providers, and collaborative care models as potential solutions to enhance the reach and scalability of effective treatments to address the growing burden of postpartum depression worldwide and its negative impact on families and society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy-Lee Dennis
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, Canada.
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Rm 280, Toronto, ON, M6J 1H4, Canada.
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Daisy R Singla
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hilary K Brown
- Department of Health and Society, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Katarina Savel
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - Crystal T Clark
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sophie Grigoriadis
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Simone N Vigod
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ng’oma M, Atif N, Meltzer-Brody S, Chirwa E, Stewart RC. Piloting a psychosocial intervention for perinatal depression, the Thinking Healthy Programme-Peer delivered (THPP), in a primary care setting in Lilongwe District, Malawi. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 4:e0002128. [PMID: 38691572 PMCID: PMC11062519 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
Despite the evidence for the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for perinatal depression, their uptake is low in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Reasons for this include the lack of contextually adapted interventions and mental health specialists to deliver them. This study aimed to test the acceptability and feasibility of a psychosocial intervention for perinatal depression, the Thinking Healthy Programme-Peer Delivered, adapted for use in rural Malawi. A multi-method evaluation of feasibility and acceptability of the intervention was conducted using a one-group pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design and an exploratory qualitative study. Pre-post intervention change in depression scores (paired t-test) and recruitment, retention and session adherence rates were calculated. Qualitative data were collected through 29 in-depth interviews (22 mothers and 7 peer volunteers) and 1 Focus Group Discussion (18 mothers). Thematic analysis approach was used to analyse qualitative data. Seven (7) out of 8 peer volunteers were successfully trained to deliver the intervention. A total of 31 pregnant women with Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score ≥12 were offered intervention, of whom 24 were enrolled (recruitment rate 77.4%). Out of these 24 women, 22 completed the intervention (retention rate 91.6%). Mean difference between pre- and post-test EPDS scores one week after 8th session was 7.59 (95% CI 4.98 to 10.19), p<0.001. Qualitative evaluation showed that the intervention was acceptable despite some challenges including stigma and issues around incentivization of peer volunteers. The Thinking Healthy Programme-Peer Delivered, adapted for use in Malawi, was feasible to deliver and acceptable to its target population. The intervention may be useful in management of perinatal depression in primary care settings in Malawi. However, definitive trials are needed to evaluate its effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mwawi Ng’oma
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
- Programs Department, St John of God Hospitaller Services, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Najia Atif
- Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Samantha Meltzer-Brody
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Ellen Chirwa
- Department of Reproductive Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Robert C. Stewart
- Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Elias A, Seward N, Lund C. Predictors, moderators and mediators of psychological therapies for perinatal depression in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Glob Ment Health (Camb) 2024; 11:e10. [PMID: 38390251 PMCID: PMC10882179 DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2024.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Psychological interventions have demonstrated effectiveness in treating perinatal depression (PND), but understanding for whom, how and under what conditions they improve symptoms in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is largely unknown. This review aims to synthesise current knowledge about predictors, moderators and mediators of psychological therapies to treat PND in LMICs. Five databases were searched for studies quantitatively examining the effects of at least one mediator, moderator or predictor of therapies for PND in LMICs. The review sampled seven publications evaluating findings from randomised trials conducted in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. The small number of included studies limited generalisability of findings. Analyses of trials with acceptable quality suggest that patient activation in Pakistan and social support in both India and Pakistan may mediate psychotherapy effectiveness, higher baseline depression severity may moderate treatment response in South Africa, and shorter depression duration at baseline may moderate intervention response in India. This review highlights current gaps in evidence quality and the need for future trials exploring PND psychotherapy effectiveness in LMICs to follow reporting guidelines to facilitate appropriate predictor, moderator and mediator analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexa Elias
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, SE5 8AF London, UK
- Centre for Global Mental Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT London, UK
- Centre for Immunobiology, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark Street, E1 2AT London, UK
| | - Nadine Seward
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, SE5 8AF London, UK
- Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, 16 De Crespigny Park, SE5 8AF London, UK
| | - Crick Lund
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, SE5 8AF London, UK
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, University of Cape Town, 46 Sawkins Road, Rondebosch, 7700 Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hagaman AK, Bates LM, Atif N, Chung E, LeMasters K, Rahman A, Saqib K, Sikander S, Maselko J. Suicide Ideation within and outside the Perinatal Period: An Exploration of Interpersonal Factors from a Maternal Cohort in Rural Pakistan to Improve Intervention Targeting. Arch Suicide Res 2024; 28:231-249. [PMID: 36533657 PMCID: PMC10277318 DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2022.2154727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Suicide accounts for substantial mortality in low-resourced settings and contributes to nearly 20% of maternal deaths. In Asia, interpersonal conflict is a salient factor that contributes to suicidal thoughts and actions, yet limited research has been done to explore the type and timing of such conflicts and a woman's accompanying social support. Identifying such risk factors can inform improved efforts to identify who to target for psychosocial interventions. METHODS Using the Bachpan Cohort study of mothers in Pakistan (n = 1154), we examined the prevalence and interpersonal influences on SI within the past two weeks of pregnancy and then at 3, 6, and 24 months after birth. Using hierarchical mixed effects models, we explored the separate and combined associations of interpersonal factors [e.g., social support, interpersonal conflict, isolation, and past year intimate partner violence (IPV)] on SI at each timepoint. RESULTS SI prevalence was highest in pregnancy (12.2%) and dropped to 5% throughout two years postpartum. The interpersonal conflict was independently associated with increased odds of SI in pregnancy and 24 months postpartum. IPV was associated with increased SI in pregnancy and 24 months postpartum. Isolation was not associated with SI at any timepoint. Perceived social support remained a robust independent factor associated with reduced SI at all timepoints. CONCLUSION In addition to screening and deploying interventions for perinatal women with depression, targeting interventions for those who also experience interpersonal conflict, including intimate partner violence, may significantly reduce suicidal thoughts and related sequelae. Social support is a viable and potentially powerful target to reduce the burden of suicide among women.HIGHLIGHTSSuicidal ideation prevalence was higher in pregnancy compared to postpartum.Perceived social support was independently associated with reduced suicidal ideation.Interventions addressing suicide must attend to women's family and social context.
Collapse
|
6
|
Coutts JJ, Hayes AF. Questions of value, questions of magnitude: An exploration and application of methods for comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 2023; 55:3772-3785. [PMID: 36253595 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01988-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Mediation analysis is widely used to test and inform theory and debate about the mechanism(s) by which causal effects operate, quantitatively operationalized as an indirect effect in a mediation model. Most effects operate through multiple mechanisms simultaneously, and a mediation model is likely to be more realistic when it is specified to capture multiple mechanisms at the same time with the inclusion of more than one mediator in the model. This also allows an investigator to compare indirect effects to each other. After an overview of the mechanics of mediation analysis, we advocate formally comparing indirect effects in models that include more than one mediator, focusing on the important distinction between questions and claims about value (i.e., are two indirect effects the same number?) versus magnitude (i.e., are two indirect effects equidistant from zero or the same in strength?). After discussing the shortcomings of the conventional method for comparing two indirect effects in a multiple mediator model-which only answers a question about magnitude in some circumstances-we introduce several methods that, unlike the conventional approach, always answer questions about difference in magnitude. We illustrate the use of these methods and provide code that implements them in popular software. We end by summarizing simulation findings and recommending which method(s) to prefer when comparing like- and opposite-signed indirect effects.
Collapse
|
7
|
Rahman A, Malik A, Atif N, Nazir H, Zaidi A, Nisar A, Waqas A, Sharif M, Chen T, Wang D, Sikander S. Technology-assisted cognitive-behavior therapy delivered by peers versus standard cognitive behavior therapy delivered by community health workers for perinatal depression: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Trials 2023; 24:555. [PMID: 37626428 PMCID: PMC10463295 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07581-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The lack of trained mental health professionals is a key barrier to scale-up of evidence-based psychological interventions in low and middle-income countries. We have developed an app that allows a peer with no prior experience of health-care delivery to deliver the cognitive therapy-based intervention for perinatal depression, the Thinking Healthy Programme (THP). This trial aims to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of this Technology-assisted peer-delivered THP versus standard face-to-face Thinking Healthy Programme delivered by trained health workers. METHODS We will employ a non-inferiority stratified cluster randomized controlled trial design comparing the two formats of intervention delivery. A total of 980 women in the second or third trimester of pregnancy with a diagnosis of Major Depressive Episode, evaluated with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V Disorders (SCID), will be recruited into the trial. The unit of randomization will be 70 village clusters randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention and control arms. The primary outcome is defined as remission from major depressive episode at 3 months postnatal measured with the SCID. Data will also be collected on symptoms of anxiety, disability, quality of life, service use and costs, and infant-related outcomes such as exclusive breastfeeding and immunization rates. Data will be collected on the primary outcome and selected secondary outcomes (depression and anxiety scores, exclusive breastfeeding) at 6 months postnatal to evaluate if the improvements are sustained in the longer-term. We are especially interested in sustained improvement (recovery) from major depressive episode. DISCUSSION This trial will evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a technology-assisted peer-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy-based intervention in rural Pakistan. If shown to be effective, the novel delivery format could play a role in reducing the treatment gap for perinatal depression and other common mental disorders in LMIC. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05353491) on 29 April 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atif Rahman
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building, Block B First Floor, 1-5 Dover Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
| | - Abid Malik
- Health Services Academy, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Najia Atif
- Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Huma Nazir
- Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Ahmed Zaidi
- Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Anum Nisar
- Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Ahmed Waqas
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building, Block B First Floor, 1-5 Dover Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK
| | - Maria Sharif
- Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | | | - Duolao Wang
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Siham Sikander
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building, Block B First Floor, 1-5 Dover Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fuhr DC, Sikander S, Vanobberghen F, Weobong B, Rahman A, Weiss HA. Predictors of spontaneous remission and recovery among women with untreated perinatal depression in India and Pakistan. Glob Ment Health (Camb) 2023; 10:e34. [PMID: 37854406 PMCID: PMC10579649 DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2023.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Mothers with perinatal depression can show different symptom trajectories and may spontaneously remit from depression, however, the latter is poorly understood. This is the first study which sought to investigate predictors of spontaneous remission and longer-term recovery among untreated women with perinatal depression. Methods We analysed data from two randomised controlled trials in women with perinatal depression in India and Pakistan. Analyses were restricted to women in the control groups who did not receive active treatment. Generalised estimating equations and logistic regressions were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for within-person correlation. Results In multivariable analyses, remission was associated with a husband who is not working (adjusted OR, aOR = 2.04, 95% CI 1.02-4.11), lower Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score at baseline (aOR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.90 for score of ≥20 vs. 10-14) and better social support at baseline (aOR = 2.37, 95% CI 1.32-4.27 for high vs. low social support). Conclusions Women with low baseline severity may remit from perinatal depression with adequate social support from family and friends. These factors are important contributors to the management of perinatal depression and the prevention of clinical worsening, and should be considered when designing low-threshold psychological interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela C. Fuhr
- Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute of Prevention Research and Epidemiology, Bremen, Germany
- Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
- Department of Health Services and Policy Research, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Siham Sikander
- Human Development Research Foundation, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Fiona Vanobberghen
- Department of Medicine, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- MRC International Statistics and Epidemiology Group, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Benedict Weobong
- Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
| | - Atif Rahman
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Helen A. Weiss
- MRC International Statistics and Epidemiology Group, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pettman D, O'Mahen H, Blomberg O, Svanberg AS, von Essen L, Woodford J. Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy-based interventions for maternal perinatal depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23:208. [PMID: 36991389 PMCID: PMC10052839 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-04547-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression during the perinatal period (during pregnancy and the year after childbirth) is common and associated with a range of negative effects for mothers, infants, family members, and wider society. Although existing evidence suggests cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) based interventions are effective for perinatal depression, less is known about the effect of CBT-based interventions on important secondary outcomes, and a number of potential clinical and methodological moderators have not been examined. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis primarily examined the effectiveness of CBT-based interventions for perinatal depression on symptoms of depression. Secondary aims examined the effectiveness of CBT-based interventions for perinatal depression on symptoms of anxiety, stress, parenting, perceived social support, and perceived parental competence; and explored clinical and methodological moderators potentially associated with effectiveness. A systematic search of electronic databases and other sources was performed up to November 2021. We included randomized controlled trials comparing CBT-based interventions for perinatal depression with control conditions allowing for the isolation of the effects of CBT. RESULTS In total, 31 studies (5291 participants) were included in the systematic review and 26 studies (4658 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall effect size was medium (hedges g = - 0.53 [95% CI - 0.65 to - 0.40]); with high heterogeneity. Significant effects were also found for anxiety, individual stress, and perceived social support, however few studies examined secondary outcomes. Subgroup analysis identified type of control, type of CBT, and type of health professional as significant moderators of the main effect (symptoms of depression). Some concerns of risk of bias were present in the majority of studies and one study had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS CBT-based interventions for depression during the perinatal period appear effective, however results should be interpreted with caution given high levels of heterogeneity and low quality of included studies. There is a need to further investigate possibly important clinical moderators of effect, including the type of health professional delivering interventions. Further, results indicate a need to establish a minimum core data set to improve the consistency of secondary outcome collection across trials and to design and conduct trials with longer-term follow-up periods. TRIAL REGISTRATION CRD42020152254 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danelle Pettman
- Healthcare Sciences and e-Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Heather O'Mahen
- Mood Disorders Centre, Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Oscar Blomberg
- Healthcare Sciences and e-Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Agneta Skoog Svanberg
- Reproductive Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Louise von Essen
- Healthcare Sciences and e-Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Joanne Woodford
- Healthcare Sciences and e-Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Waqas A, Zafar SW, Akhtar P, Naveed S, Rahman A. Optimizing cognitive and behavioral approaches for perinatal depression: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Glob Ment Health (Camb) 2023; 10:e22. [PMID: 37854411 PMCID: PMC10579678 DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2023.8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT) have been demonstrated efficacious in treating perinatal depression (PND). This has been demonstrated in several meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies. However, there is a need for up-to-date meta-analytical evidence providing reliable estimates for CBT's effectiveness in treating and preventing PND. Furthermore, with the world moving toward precision medicine, approaches require a critical synthesis of psychotherapies, especially to unpack their mechanisms of action and to understand what approaches work best for whom. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-regression analyses aim to answer these research questions. We searched six academic databases through February 2022 and identified 56 studies for an in-depth review. Using pretested data extraction sheets, we extracted patient-level and intervention-level characteristics and effect size data from each study. Random-effects meta-analyses and mixed-effect subgroup analyses were run to delineate the effectiveness and moderators of CBT interventions for PND, respectively. CBT-based interventions yielded a strong effect size (SMD = -0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.91 to -0.56, n = 9,722) in alleviating depressive symptoms. These interventions were effective across different delivery formats (individual, group, and electronic) and could be delivered effectively by specialists and nonspecialists. Longer duration CBT interventions may not necessarily be more effective than shorter ones. Moreover, CBT-based interventions should consider including various behavioral ingredients to maximize intervention benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Waqas
- Department of Primary Care & Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Syeda Wajeeha Zafar
- Global Institute of Human Development, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Parveen Akhtar
- Department of Psychology, Capital University of Science and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Sadiq Naveed
- Department of Psychiatry, Eastern Connecticut Health Network, Manchester, CT, USA
| | - Atif Rahman
- Department of Primary Care & Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Seward N, Vansteelandt S, Moreno-Agostino D, Patel V, Araya R. Understanding the effects of a complex psychological intervention on symptoms of depression in Goa, India: findings from a causal mediation analysis. Br J Psychiatry 2023; 222:67-73. [PMID: 36004665 PMCID: PMC10895505 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2022.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding how and under what circumstances a highly effective psychological intervention, improved symptoms of depression is important to maximise its clinical effectiveness. AIMS To address this complexity, we estimate the indirect effects of potentially important mediators to improve symptoms of depression (measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)) in the Healthy Activity Program trial. METHOD Interventional in(direct) effects were used to decompose the total effect of the intervention on PHQ-9 scores into the direct and indirect effects. The following indirect effects were considered: characteristics of sessions, represented by the number of sessions and homework completed; behavioural activation, according to an adapted version of the Behavioural Activation for Depression Scale - Short Form; and extra sessions offered to participants who did not respond to the intervention. RESULTS Of the total effect of the intervention measured through the difference in PHQ-9 scores between treatment arms (mean difference: -2.1, bias-corrected 95% CI -3.2 to -1.5), 34% was mediated through improved levels of behavioural activation (mean difference: -0.7, bias-corrected 95% CI -1.2 to -0.4). There was no evidence to support the mediating role of characteristics of the sessions nor the extra sessions offered to participants who did not respond to the treatment. CONCLUSIONS Findings from our robust mediation analyses confirmed the importance of targeting behavioural activation. Contrary to published literature, our findings suggest that neither the number of sessions nor proportion of homework completed improved outcomes. Moreover, in this context, alternative treatments other than extra sessions should be considered for patients who do not respond to the intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Seward
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; and Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Stijn Vansteelandt
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Belgium; and Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
| | - Darío Moreno-Agostino
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; and Centre for Longitudinal Studies, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, UK
| | - Vikram Patel
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ricardo Araya
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Davies T, Lund C, Schneider M. Implementation of a task-shared psychosocial intervention for perinatal depression in South Africa: A grounded theory process evaluation. SSM. MENTAL HEALTH 2022; 2:100056. [PMID: 36776724 PMCID: PMC9912697 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2021.100056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Perinatal depression carries significant levels of disability for both women and their infants, but there is a large treatment gap for this condition in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). To address this gap, task-sharing using community health workers (CHWs) to provide psychosocial interventions for perinatal depression is increasingly common. Many of these interventions have shown significant positive effects on maternal mood, however not all have done so. This study used data from a task-shared psychosocial intervention for perinatal depression in Cape Town, South Africa, the 'Africa Focus on Intervention Research for Mental Health' (AFFIRM-SA) randomised controlled trial (RCT). It aimed to examine the processes that occurred within the delivery of the counselling intervention, and to use these findings to provide recommendations for psychosocial task sharing in LMICs. A grounded theory analysis was conducted of 234 counselling session transcripts from 39 randomly selected participants from the RCT. This revealed that the effectiveness of the intervention was compromised by the negative influence of participants' socio-economic context, and by counselling strategies that did not align with what was intended in the counselling manual. Despite this, participants provided spontaneous accounts of improvement in mood and cognition, and reasons for these improvements, interpreted as elements that were therapeutically effective for them. Most of these elements aligned with previously identified 'common elements' of therapy. Recommendations for future research and practice include conducting participatory formative research, using an iterative and responsive research design informed by implementation science, incorporating contextually appropriate strategies in interventions such as addressing social determinants of mental health, conducting intensive training and supervision, adopting a staged approach to managing depression, and using common elements of therapy as the basis for psychosocial interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thandi Davies
- Alan J. Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, 46 Sawkins Road, Rondebosch, Cape Town, 7700, South Africa,Corresponding author: (T. Davies)
| | - Crick Lund
- Alan J. Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, 46 Sawkins Road, Rondebosch, Cape Town, 7700, South Africa,King’s Global Health Institute, Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
| | - Marguerite Schneider
- Alan J. Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, 46 Sawkins Road, Rondebosch, Cape Town, 7700, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Singla DR, Hossain S, Ravitz P, Schiller CE, Andrejek N, Kim J, La Porte L, Meltzer-Brody SE, Silver R, Vigod SN, Jung JW, Dimidjian S. Adapting behavioral activation for perinatal depression and anxiety in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and racial injustice. J Affect Disord 2022; 299:180-187. [PMID: 34875282 PMCID: PMC8645290 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2021] [Revised: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We examined the implementation of a brief, behavioural activation (BA) model, via telemedicine, for perinatal populations during a confluence of significant global events in 2020. We conducted a rigorous qualitative study to identify relevant barriers and facilitators from the perspectives of both perinatal participants and treatment providers. We also present two case studies where BA was used and adapted to provide patient-centered care. METHODS Within the ongoing SUMMIT non-inferiority randomized controlled trial in Canada and USA, we interviewed a random selection of perinatal participants (n = 23) and all treatment providers (n = 28). A content analysis framework was developed to identify relevant barriers and facilitators and frequencies were calculated for each emergent theme within and across respondent groups. RESULTS Key facilitators reported by participants receiving BA were that BA helped with support and social connection (73.9%), creative problem solving (26.1%) and attending to pandemic-related symptoms (21.7%). Key facilitators endorsed by providers delivering BA were the use of telemedicine (35.7%) and loosening of government restrictions (21.4%). Both participant groups reported similar barriers to BA during the pandemic such as a lack of privacy and limited activities due to pandemic restrictions. However, providers were more likely to endorse pandemic-related life stressors as a barrier to treatment delivery compared to participants (64.3% vs. 34.8%). Both participant groups experienced explicit discussion of race and the racial justice movements during sessions as beneficial and reported harms of not doing so to the therapeutic alliance. CONCLUSIONS BA offers a person-centered model to facilitate social connection through creative problem-solving for women with perinatal depressive and anxiety symptoms within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Explicit discussion of race and racial injustice during sessions is an important and helpful aspect in psychological treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisy R. Singla
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Center of Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada,Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada,Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Canada,Corresponding author at: 60 White Squirrel Way, Rm313, Toronto, ON M6J 1H4, Canada
| | | | - Paula Ravitz
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada,Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Canada,Department of Psychiatry, Sinai Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - Crystal E. Schiller
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States
| | | | - Jo Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Laura La Porte
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Samantha E. Meltzer-Brody
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States
| | - Richard Silver
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Simone N. Vigod
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada,Department of Psychiatry, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - James W. Jung
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Sona Dimidjian
- Renee Crown Wellness Institute and Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hagaman A, LeMasters K, Zivich PN, Sikander S, Bates LM, Bhalotra S, Chung EO, Zaidi A, Maselko J. Longitudinal effects of perinatal social support on maternal depression: a marginal structural modelling approach. J Epidemiol Community Health 2021; 75:936-943. [PMID: 33712512 PMCID: PMC8434957 DOI: 10.1136/jech-2020-215836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression in the perinatal period, during pregnancy or within 1 year of childbirth, imposes a high burden on women with rippling effects through her and her child's life course. Social support may be an important protective factor, but the complex bidirectional relationship with depression, alongside a paucity of longitudinal explorations, leaves much unknown about critical windows of social support exposure across the perinatal period and causal impacts on future depressive episodes. METHODS This study leverages marginal structural models to evaluate associations between longitudinal patterns of perinatal social support and subsequent maternal depression at 6 and 12 months postpartum. In a cohort of women in rural Pakistan (n=780), recruited in the third trimester of pregnancy and followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months postpartum, we assessed social support using two well-validated measures: the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) and the Maternal Social Support Index (MSSI). Major depressive disorder was assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV). RESULTS High and sustained scores on the MSPSS through the perinatal period were associated with a decreased risk of depression at 12 months postpartum (0.35, 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.63). Evidence suggests the recency of support also matters, but estimates are imprecise. We did not find evidence of a protective effect for support based on the MSSI. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the protective effect of sustained social support, particularly emotional support, on perinatal depression. Interventions targeting, leveraging and maintaining this type of support may be particularly important for reducing postpartum depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Hagaman
- Social Behavioral Sciences, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Center for Methods in Implementation and Prevention Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Katherine LeMasters
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Carolina Population Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Paul N Zivich
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Carolina Population Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Siham Sikander
- Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan
- Global Health Department, Health Services Academy, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Lisa M Bates
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sonia Bhalotra
- Department of Economics, University of Warwick, UK, Coventry, Warwickshire, UK
| | - Esther O Chung
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Carolina Population Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ahmed Zaidi
- Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Joanna Maselko
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Carolina Population Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Singla DR, Meltzer-Brody SE, Silver RK, Vigod SN, Kim JJ, La Porte LM, Ravitz P, Schiller CE, Schoueri-Mychasiw N, Hollon SD, Kiss A, Clark D, Dalfen AK, Dimidjian S, Gaynes BN, Katz SR, Lawson A, Leszcz M, Maunder RG, Mulsant BH, Murphy KE, Naslund JA, Reyes-Rodríguez ML, Stuebe AM, Dennis CL, Patel V. Scaling Up Maternal Mental healthcare by Increasing access to Treatment (SUMMIT) through non-specialist providers and telemedicine: a study protocol for a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Trials 2021; 22:186. [PMID: 33673867 PMCID: PMC7933917 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05075-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression and anxiety impact up to 1 in 5 pregnant and postpartum women worldwide. Yet, as few as 20% of these women are treated with frontline interventions such as evidence-based psychological treatments. Major barriers to uptake are the limited number of specialized mental health treatment providers in most settings, and problems with accessing in-person care, such as childcare or transportation. Task sharing of treatment to non-specialist providers with delivery on telemedicine platforms could address such barriers. However, the equivalence of these strategies to specialist and in-person models remains unproven. METHODS This study protocol outlines the Scaling Up Maternal Mental healthcare by Increasing access to Treatment (SUMMIT) randomized trial. SUMMIT is a pragmatic, non-inferiority test of the comparable effectiveness of two types of providers (specialist vs. non-specialist) and delivery modes (telemedicine vs. in-person) of a brief, behavioral activation (BA) treatment for perinatal depressive and anxiety symptoms. Specialists (psychologists, psychiatrists, and social workers with ≥ 5 years of therapy experience) and non-specialists (nurses and midwives with no formal training in mental health care) were trained in the BA protocol, with the latter supervised by a BA expert during treatment delivery. Consenting pregnant and postpartum women with Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score of ≥ 10 (N = 1368) will be randomized to one of four arms (telemedicine specialist, telemedicine non-specialist, in-person specialist, in-person non-specialist), stratified by pregnancy status (antenatal/postnatal) and study site. The primary outcome is participant-reported depressive symptoms (EPDS) at 3 months post-randomization. Secondary outcomes are maternal symptoms of anxiety and trauma symptoms, perceived social support, activation levels and quality of life at 3-, 6-, and 12-month post-randomization, and depressive symptoms at 6- and 12-month post-randomization. Primary analyses are per-protocol and intent-to-treat. The study has successfully continued despite the COVID-19 pandemic, with needed adaptations, including temporary suspension of the in-person arms and ongoing randomization to telemedicine arms. DISCUSSION The SUMMIT trial is expected to generate evidence on the non-inferiority of BA delivered by a non-specialist provider compared to specialist and telemedicine compared to in-person. If confirmed, results could pave the way to a dramatic increase in access to treatment for perinatal depression and anxiety. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04153864 . Registered on November 6, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D R Singla
- Department of Psychiatry, Sinai Health and Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - S E Meltzer-Brody
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - R K Silver
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - S N Vigod
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Women's College Hospital and Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - J J Kim
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, USA
| | - L M La Porte
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - P Ravitz
- Department of Psychiatry, Sinai Health and Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - C E Schiller
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - N Schoueri-Mychasiw
- Department of Psychiatry, Sinai Health and Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - S D Hollon
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - A Kiss
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - D Clark
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - A K Dalfen
- Department of Psychiatry, Sinai Health and Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - S Dimidjian
- Renee Crown Wellness Institute and Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - B N Gaynes
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - S R Katz
- Department of Psychiatry, Sinai Health and Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - A Lawson
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, USA
| | - M Leszcz
- Department of Psychiatry, Sinai Health and Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - R G Maunder
- Department of Psychiatry, Sinai Health and Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - B H Mulsant
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sinai Health and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - K E Murphy
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - J A Naslund
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M L Reyes-Rodríguez
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - A M Stuebe
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - C-L Dennis
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - V Patel
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Singla DR, Ratjen C, Krishna RN, Fuhr DC, Patel V. Peer supervision for assuring the quality of non-specialist provider delivered psychological intervention: Lessons from a trial for perinatal depression in Goa, India. Behav Res Ther 2020; 130:103533. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.103533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2019] [Revised: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 12/13/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
17
|
Vanobberghen F, Weiss HA, Fuhr DC, Sikander S, Afonso E, Ahmad I, Atif N, Bibi A, Bibi T, Bilal S, De Sa A, D'Souza E, Joshi A, Korgaonkar P, Krishna R, Lazarus A, Liaqat R, Sharif M, Weobong B, Zaidi A, Zuliqar S, Patel V, Rahman A. Effectiveness of the Thinking Healthy Programme for perinatal depression delivered through peers: Pooled analysis of two randomized controlled trials in India and Pakistan. J Affect Disord 2020; 265:660-668. [PMID: 32090783 PMCID: PMC7042347 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2019] [Revised: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Thinking Healthy Programme (THP) is recommended to treat perinatal depression in resource-limited settings, but scale-up is hampered by a paucity of community health workers. THP was adapted for peer-delivery (THPP) and evaluated in two randomized controlled trials in India and Pakistan. Our aim was to estimate the effectiveness of THPP on maternal outcomes across these two settings, and evaluate effect-modification by country and other pre-defined covariates. METHODS Participants were pregnant women aged≥18 years with depression (Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) score≥10), randomized to THPP plus enhanced usual care (EUC) or EUC-only. Primary outcomes were symptom severity and remission (PHQ-9 score<5) 6 months post-childbirth. Secondary outcomes included further measures of depression, disability and social support at 3 and 6 months post-childbirth. RESULTS Among 850 women (280 India; 570 Pakistan), 704 (83%) attended 6-month follow-up. Participants in the intervention arm had lower symptom severity (PHQ-9 score adjusted mean difference -0.78 (95% confidence interval -1.47,-0.09)) and higher odds of remission (adjusted odds ratio 1.35 (1.02,1.78)) versus EUC-only. There was a greater intervention effect on remission among women with short chronicity of depression, and those primiparous. There were beneficial intervention effects across multiple secondary outcomes. LIMITATIONS The trials were not powered to assess effect-modifications. 10-20% of participants were missing outcome data. CONCLUSIONS This pooled analysis demonstrates the effectiveness, acceptability and feasibility of THPP, which can be scaled-up within a stepped-care approach by engaging with the existing health care systems and the communities to address the treatment gap for perinatal depression in resource-limited settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Vanobberghen
- MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Helen A Weiss
- MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Daniela C Fuhr
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
| | - Siham Sikander
- Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan; Health Services Academy, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Ejma Afonso
- Sangath Centre, Socorro Village, Bardez-Goa, Goa, India
| | - Ikhlaq Ahmad
- Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Najia Atif
- Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Amina Bibi
- Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Tayyaba Bibi
- Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Samina Bilal
- Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Aveena De Sa
- Sangath Centre, Socorro Village, Bardez-Goa, Goa, India
| | - Ethel D'Souza
- Sangath Centre, Socorro Village, Bardez-Goa, Goa, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Maria Sharif
- Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Benedict Weobong
- Sangath Centre, Socorro Village, Bardez-Goa, Goa, India; Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
| | - Ahmed Zaidi
- Human Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | | | - Vikram Patel
- Sangath Centre, Socorro Village, Bardez-Goa, Goa, India; Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Atif Rahman
- Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|