Risk of cardiovascular malformations after exposure to paroxetine in pregnancy: meta-analysis

Meta-Analysis of Risk Factors for Congenital Heart Disease: Part 2, Maternal Medication, Reproductive Technologies, and Familial and Fetal Factors

BACKGROUND

The quantitative effects of congenital heart disease (CHD) risk factors are not fully understood. We conducted a meta-analysis of all CHD risk factors. This report explores maternal medication, assisted reproductive technologies (ART), and familial and fetal factors.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified using a search strategy encompassing the concepts of CHD and prenatal risk factors with the following inclusion criteria: (1) peer-reviewed articles, (2) quantifying the effects of CHD risk factors, and (3) between 1989 and 2022. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effect model.

RESULTS

There were 131 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Associations were found between CHDs and extracardiac anomalies (OR, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.72-6.77), increased nuchal translucency (OR, 6.87; 95% CI, 2.42-19.53), family history of CHD (OR, 2.90; 95% CI, 2.25-3.75), maternal antidepressants (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.09-1.38), and antihypertensives (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.80-2.38). A positive association was observed between severe CHDs and lithium, but with a very wide CI encompassing the null effect. A positive association was observed between severe CHDs and ARTs (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.30-3.02). The data were insufficient for anomalies of the umbilical cord, anticonvulsants, and retinoid medication.

CONCLUSIONS

There were strong associations among CHDs and increased nuchal translucency, extracardiac anomalies, and family history of CHD. Effect sizes were modest for maternal medication and ART. Data were scarce and sometimes inconclusive for some risk factors commonly cited as being associated with CHD such as lithium, anomalies of the umbilical cord, anticonvulsants, and retinoid medication.

Consensus Panel Recommendations for the Pharmacological Management of Pregnant Women with Depressive Disorders

INTRODUCTION

The initiative of a consensus on the topic of antidepressant and anxiolytic drug use in pregnancy is developing in an area of clinical uncertainty. Although many studies have been published in recent years, there is still a paucity of authoritative evidence-based indications useful for guiding the prescription of these drugs during pregnancy, and the data from the literature are complex and require expert judgment to draw clear conclusions.

METHODS

For the elaboration of the consensus, we have involved the scientific societies of the sector, namely, the Italian Society of Toxicology, the Italian Society of Neuropsychopharmacology, the Italian Society of Psychiatry, the Italian Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Italian Society of Drug Addiction and the Italian Society of Addiction Pathology. An interdisciplinary team of experts from different medical specialties (toxicologists, pharmacologists, psychiatrists, gynecologists, neonatologists) was first established to identify the needs underlying the consensus. The team, in its definitive structure, includes all the representatives of the aforementioned scientific societies; the task of the team was the evaluation of the most accredited international literature as well as using the methodology of the "Nominal Group Technique" with the help of a systematic review of the literature and with various discussion meetings, to arrive at the drafting and final approval of the document.

RESULTS

The following five areas of investigation were identified: (1) The importance of management of anxiety and depressive disorders in pregnancy, identifying the risks associated with untreated maternal depression in pregnancy. (2) The assessment of the overall risk of malformations with the antidepressant and anxiolytic drugs used in pregnancy. (3) The evaluation of neonatal adaptation disorders in the offspring of pregnant antidepressant/anxiolytic-treated women. (4) The long-term outcome of infants' cognitive development or behavior after in utero exposure to antidepressant/anxiolytic medicines. (5) The evaluation of pharmacological treatment of opioid-abusing pregnant women with depressive disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the state of the art, it is therefore necessary in the first instance to frame the issue of pharmacological choices in pregnant women who need treatment with antidepressant and anxiolytic drugs on the basis of data currently available in the literature. Particular attention must be paid to the evaluation of the risk/benefit ratio, understood both in terms of therapeutic benefit with respect to the potential risks of the treatment on the pregnancy and on the fetal outcome, and of the comparative risk between the treatment and the absence of treatment; in the choice prescription, the specialist needs to be aware of both the potential risks of pharmacological treatment and the equally important risks of an untreated or undertreated disorder.

Environmental Risk Factors and Congenital Heart Disease: An Umbrella Review of 165 Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses With More Than 120 Million Participants

Background: The etiology of congenital heart disease (CHD) has been extensively studied in the past decades. Therefore, it is critical to clarify clear hierarchies of evidence between types of environmental factors and CHD. Methods: Electronic searches in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane database were conducted from inception to April 20, 2020 for meta-analyses investigating the aforementioned topic. Results: Overall, 41 studies including a total of 165 meta-analyses of different environmental factors and CHD were examined, covering a wide range of risk factors. The summary random effects estimates were significant at P < 0.05 in 63 meta-analyses (38%), and 15 associations (9%) were significant at P < 10^-6. Of these meta-analyses, eventually one risk factor (severe obesity; relative risk: 1.38, 95% confidence interval: 1.30-1.47) had significant summary associations at P < 10^-6, included more than 1,000 cases, had 95% prediction intervals excluding the null value, and were not suggestive of large heterogeneity (I ² < 50%), small-study effects (P-value for Egger's test > 0.10), or excess significance (P > 0.10). Eight associations (5%) (including maternal lithium exposure, maternal obesity, maternal alcohol consumption, and maternal fever) had results that were significant at P < 10^-6, included more than 1,000 cases, and had 95% prediction intervals excluding the null value (highly suggestive). Conclusion: This umbrella review shows that many environmental factors have substantial evidence in relation to the risk of developing CHD. More and better-designed studies are needed to establish robust evidence between environmental factors and CHD. Systematic Review Registration: [PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42020193381].

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and the risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review of current meta-analyses

Objective: A review of current meta-analyses examining the relationship between maternal use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) during pregnancy and congenital anomalies. Methods: PubMed was searched for meta-analyses published in English language between January 2010 and April 2020 by using the following combinations of key words: meta-analysis, pregnancy, antidepressant, SSRI, citalopram, escitalopram, fuloxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, fluvoxamine, neonatal outcome, birth outcome, congenital malformation, congenital anomaly, birth defect, cardiac malformation and heart defect. Results: A total of 15 meta-analyses met the search criteria. These meta-analyses consistently suggested a significant positive association between the use of SSRIs in general and paroxetine and fluoxetine in particular and the risk of major congenital anomalies. The data also showed a consistency in increased cardiovascular defects in infants due to maternal use of paroxetine. The risk of cardiovascular defects in infants of women using SSRIs in general and fluoxetine and sertraline in particular was controversial. Conclusion: Further large-scale prospective observational studies and meta-analyses on the effects of individual SSRIs other than paroxetine, especially escitalopram and fluvoxamine, are required to reach definitive conclusions.

Addressing Crises in Teenage Pregnancy

Background:

Adolescent pregnancy is a major public health concern with medical, psychiatric, and social implications. Within this population, there is an elevated rate of co-occurring psychiatric conditions including mood disorders, anxiety disorders, suicidality, and substance use. However, little is known about the assessment and treatment of adolescent pregnancy within the context of these co-occurring psychiatric conditions, particularly in an emergency situation.

Objective:

This article utilizes a case report to illustrate the challenges faced in consultative psychiatry in the assessment and treatment of a pregnant suicidal youth with a complex psychosocial history. Topics addressed include: 1) The role of childhood trauma and suicidality in adolescent pregnancy 2) A consideration of the risks and benefits of treating adolescents with psychotropics during pregnancy.

Method:

A literature search was performed with the key words of adolescent, pregnancy, child sexual abuse and psychiatric illness. In addition, expert opinions of a reproductive psychiatrist and a psychiatrist who had specialized in addiction and adolescents were enlisted on key aspects of the case formulation and treatment.

Results:

Several studies were found that focused on depression, substance abuse and trauma in adolescent pregnancy. There were more studies that looked at psychopharmacological treatment in adult pregnant women and a few that focused on adolescents.

Conclusion:

Addressing the crisis of psychiatric illness in adolescent pregnancy requires a thorough approach in understanding the severity of the illness and the contribution of child abuse and suicidality. Psychotherapeutic interventions are most certainly always necessary and beneficial when dealing with this population. Deciding when to start and maintain medication during pregnancy should be individualized, with considerations of the risks of untreated illness and of medication exposure.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use during early pregnancy and congenital malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies of more than 9 million births

BACKGROUND

In 2005, the FDA cautioned that exposure to paroxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), during the first trimester of pregnancy may increase the risk of cardiac malformations. Since then, the association between maternal use of SSRIs during pregnancy and congenital malformations in infants has been the subject of much discussion and controversy. The aim of this study is to systematically review the associations between SSRIs use during early pregnancy and the risk of congenital malformations, with particular attention to the potential confounding by indication.

METHODS

The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018088358). Cohort studies on congenital malformations in infants born to mothers with first-trimester exposure to SSRIs were identified via PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases through 17 January 2018. Random-effects models were used to calculate summary relative risks (RRs).

RESULTS

Twenty-nine cohort studies including 9,085,954 births were identified. Overall, use of SSRIs was associated with an increased risk of overall major congenital anomalies (MCAs, RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.19) and congenital heart defects (CHD, RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.37). No significantly increased risk was observed when restricted to women with a psychiatric diagnosis (MCAs, RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.13; CHD, RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.26). Similar significant associations were observed using maternal citalopram exposure (MCAs, RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.31; CHD, RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.51), fluoxetine (MCAs, RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.28; CHD, 1.30, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.53), and paroxetine (MCAs, RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.32; CHD, RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.41) and analyses restricted to using women with a psychiatric diagnosis were not statistically significant. Sertraline was associated with septal defects (RR 2.69, 95% CI 1.76 to 4.10), atrial septal defects (RR 2.07, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.39), and respiratory system defects (RR 2.65, 95% CI 1.32 to 5.32).

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence suggests a generally small risk of congenital malformations and argues against a substantial teratogenic effect of SSRIs. Caution is advisable in making decisions about whether to continue or stop treatment with SSRIs during pregnancy.

Use of Antidepressants During Pregnancy?: What to Consider when Weighing Treatment with Antidepressants Against Untreated Depression

Introduction Mood disorders impact many pregnant women, particularly those who have experienced symptoms prior to conception, and there are significant barriers, including stigma and access, to seeking and receiving appropriate treatments. Antidepressants are a helpful option in treating perinatal depression, but research on risks and benefits of antidepressant use in pregnancy is difficult given lack of "gold standard" comparative trials. Methods This paper summarizes current state of knowledge on the safety of antidepressants during pregnancy by providing a summary of the literature published in the past 3 years (January 2013-October 2015). We identified 21 reviews and meta-analyses that were included in this summary report. This report is meant to provide a user-friendly, yet comprehensive guide summarizing the abundant, and in part contradicting, literature on risks and benefits of antidepressants during pregnancy, in order to assist busy primary care prescribers in educating their patients. Our goal is also to contrast the risks/benefits of untreated depression in pregnancy versus treatment with antidepressant medication in pregnancy, and in such support prescribers in their decision-making. Results The past 3 years have yielded an abundance of publications on the topic, in part, with conflicting findings adding to confusion and concern among providers, patients, and their families. Many reported studies have methodological problems limiting their impact. Data on adverse effects of medications on pregnancy and fetal outcomes have to be weighed against the impact of untreated illness and poor health habits associated with untreated illness on the same outcomes. Discussion Medical-decision making is often complex and seldom free of risks. Obviously, as providers we cannot guarantee that fetal exposure to antidepressants is totally free of risk, yet this is true for any medicine taken in pregnancy. However, to date, perinatal psychiatry has collected enough evidence to suggest that, if the clinical picture warrants it, the use of many antidepressants, especially the SSRIs, is favorable compared to exposing mother and child to untreated depressive illness.