1
|
Are C, Schissel M, Smith LM, Rao TS. Series on the Lancet Oncology Commission on Global Cancer Surgery: Introduction-Intent and Content. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4868-4872. [PMID: 38831196 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15554-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery plays a key role in the multi-disciplinary cancer care pathway. Nearly 80% of patients with solid tumors will require surgical intervention during the course of their disease. Unfortunately, the vast majority of these patients do not have access to safe, timely, high-quality, and affordable cancer surgical care. The first Lancet Oncology Commission on Global Cancer Surgery shone a light on this grave situation and outlined some strategies to address them. The second Lancet Oncology Commission on Global Cancer Surgery (TLO- II) was conceived to continue the work of its predecessor by developing a roadmap of practical solutions to propel improvements in cancer surgical care globally. METHODS The Commission was developed by involving approximately 50 cancer care leaders and experts from different parts of the world to ensure diversity of input and global applicability. RESULTS The Commission identified nine solutional domains that are considered essential to deliver safe, timely, high-quality, and affordable cancer surgical care. These nine domains were further refined to develop solutions specific to each of the six World Health Organization regions. Based on the above solutions, we developed eight action items that are intended to propel improvements in cancer surgical care on the global stage. CONCLUSIONS The second Lancet Oncology Commission on Global Cancer Surgery builds on the first Commission by developing a pragmatic roadmap of practical solutions that we hope will ensure access to safe, timely, high-quality, and affordable cancer surgical care for everyone regardless of their socioeconomic status or geographic location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chandrakanth Are
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
| | - Makayla Schissel
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Lynette M Smith
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - T S Rao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Basavtarakam Indo-American Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dee EC. Family and Caregiver Financial Toxicity Associated With Cancer-A Global, Inequitable, and Urgent Consideration. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2319317. [PMID: 37347488 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.19317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Christopher Dee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rubagumya F, Carson L, Mushonga M, Manirakiza A, Murenzi G, Abdihamid O, Athman A, Mungo C, Booth C, Hammad N. An analysis of the African cancer research ecosystem: tackling disparities. BMJ Glob Health 2023; 8:bmjgh-2022-011338. [PMID: 36792229 PMCID: PMC9933677 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Disparities in cancer research persist around the world. This is especially true in global health research, where high-income countries (HICs) continue to set global health priorities further creating several imbalances in how research is conducted in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Cancer research disparities in Africa can be attributed to a vicious cycle of challenges in the research ecosystem ranging from who funds research, where research is conducted, who conducts it, what type of research is conducted and where and how it is disseminated. For example, the funding chasm between HICs and LMICs contributes to inequities and parachutism in cancer research. Breaking the current cancer research model necessitates a thorough examination of why current practices and norms exist and the identification of actionable ways to improve them. The cancer research agenda in Africa should be appropriate for the African nations and continent. Empowering African researchers and ensuring local autonomy are two critical steps in moving cancer research towards this new paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fidel Rubagumya
- Oncology, Rwanda Military Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda .,Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,Research for Development (RD Rwanda), Kigali, Rwanda.,Oncology, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Laura Carson
- Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melinda Mushonga
- Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Gad Murenzi
- Oncology, Rwanda Military Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda,Research for Development (RD Rwanda), Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Omar Abdihamid
- Oncology, Garissa County Referral Hospital, Garissa, Kenya
| | - Abeid Athman
- Oncology, Coast General Teaching and Referral Hospital, Mombasa, Kenya
| | - Chemtai Mungo
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Nazik Hammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Istasy P, Lee WS, Iansavichene A, Upshur R, Gyawali B, Burkell J, Sadikovic B, Lazo-Langner A, Chin-Yee B. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Health Equity in Oncology: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e39748. [PMID: 36005841 PMCID: PMC9667381 DOI: 10.2196/39748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The field of oncology is at the forefront of advances in artificial intelligence (AI) in health care, providing an opportunity to examine the early integration of these technologies in clinical research and patient care. Hope that AI will revolutionize health care delivery and improve clinical outcomes has been accompanied by concerns about the impact of these technologies on health equity. OBJECTIVE We aimed to conduct a scoping review of the literature to address the question, "What are the current and potential impacts of AI technologies on health equity in oncology?" METHODS Following PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines for scoping reviews, we systematically searched MEDLINE and Embase electronic databases from January 2000 to August 2021 for records engaging with key concepts of AI, health equity, and oncology. We included all English-language articles that engaged with the 3 key concepts. Articles were analyzed qualitatively for themes pertaining to the influence of AI on health equity in oncology. RESULTS Of the 14,011 records, 133 (0.95%) identified from our review were included. We identified 3 general themes in the literature: the use of AI to reduce health care disparities (58/133, 43.6%), concerns surrounding AI technologies and bias (16/133, 12.1%), and the use of AI to examine biological and social determinants of health (55/133, 41.4%). A total of 3% (4/133) of articles focused on many of these themes. CONCLUSIONS Our scoping review revealed 3 main themes on the impact of AI on health equity in oncology, which relate to AI's ability to help address health disparities, its potential to mitigate or exacerbate bias, and its capability to help elucidate determinants of health. Gaps in the literature included a lack of discussion of ethical challenges with the application of AI technologies in low- and middle-income countries, lack of discussion of problems of bias in AI algorithms, and a lack of justification for the use of AI technologies over traditional statistical methods to address specific research questions in oncology. Our review highlights a need to address these gaps to ensure a more equitable integration of AI in cancer research and clinical practice. The limitations of our study include its exploratory nature, its focus on oncology as opposed to all health care sectors, and its analysis of solely English-language articles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Istasy
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Rotman Institute of Philosophy, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Wen Shen Lee
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | | | - Ross Upshur
- Division of Clinical Public Health, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bishal Gyawali
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Jacquelyn Burkell
- Faculty of Information and Media Studies, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Bekim Sadikovic
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Alejandro Lazo-Langner
- Division of Hematology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Benjamin Chin-Yee
- Rotman Institute of Philosophy, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Division of Hematology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|