1
|
Mohamed M, Ahmed M, Williams AM, Gilmore N, Lin PJ, Yilmaz S, Jensen-Battaglia M, Mustian K, Janelsins M, Mohile S. A scoping review evaluating physical and cognitive functional outcomes in cancer survivors treated with chemotherapy: charting progress since the 2018 NCI think tank on cancer and aging phenotypes. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:1089-1130. [PMID: 38743185 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-024-01589-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The primary goal of this scoping review was to summarize the literature published after the 2018 National Cancer Institute think tank, "Measuring Aging and Identifying Aging Phenotypes in Cancer Survivors," on physical and cognitive functional outcomes among cancer survivors treated with chemotherapy. We focused on the influence of chemotherapy on aging-related outcomes (i.e., physical functional outcomes, cognitive functional outcomes, and frailty), given the known associations between chemotherapy and biologic mechanisms that affect aging-related physiologic processes. METHODS A search was conducted across electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, for manuscripts published between August 2018 and July 2023. Eligible studies: 1) included physical function, cognitive function, and/or frailty as outcomes; 2) included cancer survivors (as either the whole sample or a subgroup); 3) reported on physical or cognitive functional outcomes and/or frailty related to chemotherapy treatment (as either the whole sample or a subgroup); and 4) were observational in study design. RESULTS The search yielded 989 potentially relevant articles, of which 65 met the eligibility criteria. Of the 65 studies, 49 were longitudinal, and 16 were cross-sectional; 30 studies (46%) focused on breast cancer, 20 studies (31%) focused on the age group 60 + years, and 17 (26%) focused on childhood cancer survivors. With regards to outcomes, 82% of 23 studies reporting on physical function showed reduced physical function, 74% of 39 studies reporting on cognitive functional outcomes found reduced cognitive function, and 80% of 15 studies reporting on frailty found increasing frailty among cancer survivors treated with chemotherapy over time and/or compared to individuals not treated with chemotherapy. Fourteen studies (22%) evaluated biologic mechanisms and their relationship to aging-related outcomes. Inflammation was consistently associated with worsening physical and cognitive functional outcomes and epigenetic age increases. Further, DNA damage was consistently associated with worse aging-related outcomes. CONCLUSION Chemotherapy is associated with reduced physical function, reduced cognitive function, and an increase in frailty in cancer survivors; these associations were demonstrated in longitudinal and cross-sectional studies. Inflammation and epigenetic age acceleration are associated with worse physical and cognitive function; prospective observational studies with multiple time points are needed to confirm these findings. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS This scoping review highlights the need for interventions to prevent declines in physical and cognitive function in cancer survivors who have received chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mostafa Mohamed
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Mustafa Ahmed
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | - Nikesha Gilmore
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Po-Ju Lin
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Sule Yilmaz
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | - Karen Mustian
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | - Supriya Mohile
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
- Wilmot Cancer Institute, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 702, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ahles TA, Schofield E, Li Y, Ryan E, Orlow I, Patel SK, Traina T, Root JC. Cognitive function is mediated by deficit accumulation in older, long-term breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:1243-1251. [PMID: 36964293 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01365-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to examine whether cognitive function in older, long-term breast cancer survivors is both a direct effect of cancer and cancer treatments and an indirect effect mediated by deficit accumulation. PATIENTS AND METHODS Female breast cancer survivors who had been diagnosed and treated at age 60 or older and were 5-15-year survivors (N = 220) and age- and education-matched non-cancer controls (N = 123) were assessed at enrollment and at 8-, 16-, and 24-month follow-ups with standard neuropsychological tests and the comprehensive geriatric assessment which was used to calculate the deficit accumulation frailty index (DAFI). Blood or saliva samples for APOE genotyping were collected at enrollment. Participants were purposely recruited so that approximately 50% had a history of treatment with chemotherapy or and 50% were not exposed to chemotherapy. RESULTS Latent variable mediation analysis revealed that cognitive performance was mediated by deficit accumulation for all three domains. The direct effect of cancer diagnosis and treatment history was significant for the Language domain (p = 0.04), a trend for the learning and memory domain (p = 0.054), and non-significant for the attention, processing speed, executive function (APE) domain. Carrying the APOE ε4 allele had a significant negative direct effect on the APE domain (p = 0.05) but no indirect effect through deficit accumulation. CONCLUSION Cognitive function in older, long-term breast cancer survivors appears to be primarily mediated through deficit accumulation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS These findings have important clinical implications suggesting that the most effective intervention to prevent or slow cognitive aging in older cancer survivors may be through prevention or management of comorbidities and interventions that maintain functional capacity (exercise, physical therapy) and social and mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim A Ahles
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Elizabeth Schofield
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yuelin Li
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth Ryan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Irene Orlow
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Molecular Epidemiology Laboratory, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sunita K Patel
- Departments of Population Science and Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Tiffany Traina
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - James C Root
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Von Ah D, Rio CJ, Carter A, Perkins SM, Stevens E, Rosko A, Davenport A, Kalady M, Noonan AM, Crouch A, Storey S, Overcash J, Han CJ, Yang Y, Li H, Saligan LN. Association between Cognitive Function and Physical Function, Frailty, and Quality of Life in Older Breast Cancer Survivors. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2718. [PMID: 39123446 PMCID: PMC11311865 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16152718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older cancer survivors in general are at greater risk for cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI), yet few studies have explored its association with health outcomes. This study examined the association between subjective and objective measures of cognitive function and physical function, frailty, and quality of life (QoL) among older breast cancer survivors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Older breast cancer survivors who reported cognitive concerns completed surveys on patient-reported cognitive function, physical function, frailty, and QoL as well as objective tests of visuospatial working memory and sustained attention. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and separate linear regression models. RESULTS A total of 219 female breast cancer survivors completed the study. Perceived cognitive abilities were associated with better physical function, frailty, and QoL (p ≤ 0.001) while cognitive concerns were negatively related with these metrics (p ≤ 0.001). Poorer visuospatial working memory and sustained attention were linked to increased frailty (p ≤ 0.001-0.01), whereas poorer sustained attention was associated with poorer physical function (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Older breast cancer survivors with perceived cognitive impairment and poorer cognitive performance reported poorer physical functioning, increased frailty, and poorer QoL. These findings underscore the importance of assessing cognitive concerns and their associated outcomes in older breast cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane Von Ah
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, 394 Newton Hall, 1585 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA (C.J.H.)
| | - Carielle Joy Rio
- Symptoms Biology Unit, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, 3 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Allie Carter
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, IU School of Medicine, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Susan M. Perkins
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, IU School of Medicine, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Erin Stevens
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, 1581 Dodd Drive, 5th Floor North Columbus, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Ashley Rosko
- Division of Hematology, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, 1150C Lincoln Tower, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Ashley Davenport
- Division of Medical Oncology, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Mathew Kalady
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, The Ohio State University-James: Cancer Treatment and Research Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Anne M. Noonan
- GI Medical Oncology Selection, The Ohio State University-James: Cancer Treatment and Research Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Adele Crouch
- School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; (A.C.); (S.S.)
| | - Susan Storey
- School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; (A.C.); (S.S.)
| | - Janine Overcash
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, 394 Newton Hall, 1585 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA (C.J.H.)
| | - Claire J. Han
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, 394 Newton Hall, 1585 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA (C.J.H.)
| | - Yesol Yang
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, 394 Newton Hall, 1585 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA (C.J.H.)
| | - Haiying Li
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, 394 Newton Hall, 1585 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA (C.J.H.)
| | - Leorey N. Saligan
- Symptoms Biology Unit, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, 3 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rapp SR, Dressler EV, Brown WM, Wade JL, Le-Lindqwister N, King D, Rowland KM, Weaver KE, Klepin HD, Shaw EG, Lesser GJ. Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of Donepezil for Treatment of Cognitive Impairment in Breast Cancer Survivors After Adjuvant Chemotherapy (WF-97116). J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:2546-2557. [PMID: 38709986 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To test efficacy of donepezil, a cognitive enhancer, to improve memory in breast cancer survivors who report cancer-related cognitive impairment 1-5 years postchemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Adult female BCS exposed to ≥4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy 1-5 years before enrollment who reported cancer-related cognitive impairment were eligible. Participants, enrolled at sites affiliated with the Wake Forest NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) Research Base, were randomly assigned to receive 5 mg of donepezil once daily for 6 weeks titrated to 10 mg once daily for 18 weeks or placebo. Cognition and self-report cognitive functioning was assessed at baseline, 12, 24 (end of intervention), and 36 (washout) weeks postrandomization. Mixed-effects repeated measures analysis of covariance models were used to assess treatment differences in immediate recall (primary outcome) on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) and other cognitive domains (secondary outcomes) with covariates of treatment, time, time by treatment interaction, baseline outcome level, age stratification, and an unstructured covariance matrix to account for within participant correlation over time. RESULTS Two hundred seventy-six BCS from 87 NCORP practices (mean age, 57.1, standard deviation [SD], 10.5) who were at a mean of 29.6 months (SD, 14.2) postchemotherapy were randomly assigned to donepezil (n = 140) or placebo (n = 136). At 24 weeks, treatment groups did not differ on HVLT-R scores (donepezil mean = 25.98, placebo = 26.50, P = .32). There were no statistically significant differences between treatments at 12, 24, or 36 weeks for attention, executive function, verbal fluency, processing speed, or self-reported cognitive functioning. Endocrine therapy and menopausal status did not affect results. CONCLUSION BCS 1-5 years after completing chemotherapy with documented memory problems, randomly assigned to 24 weeks of 5-10 mg of donepezil once daily, did not perform differently at the end of treatment on tests of memory, other cognitive functions, or subjective functioning than those randomly assigned to placebo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen R Rapp
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Emily V Dressler
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - W Mark Brown
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - James L Wade
- Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Cancer Care Specialists of Illinois-Decatur, Decatur, IL
| | | | - David King
- Metro Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Unity Hospital, Minneapolis-St Paul, MN
| | - Kendrith M Rowland
- Carle Cancer Center NCORP, Cancer Center at Illinois, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL
| | - Kathryn E Weaver
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Heidi D Klepin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Edward G Shaw
- Department of Internal Medicine-Gerontology & Geriatrics Section, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Glenn J Lesser
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mandelblatt J, Dage JL, Zhou X, Small BJ, Ahles TA, Ahn J, Artese A, Bethea TN, Breen EC, Carroll JE, Cohen HJ, Extermann M, Graham D, Isaacs C, Jim HSL, Mcdonald BC, Nakamura ZM, Patel SK, Rebeck GW, Rentscher KE, Root JC, Russ KA, Tometich DB, Turner RS, Van Dyk K, Zhai W, Huang LW, Saykin AJ. Alzheimer's disease-related biomarkers and cancer-related cognitive decline: the thinking and living with cancer study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024:djae113. [PMID: 38788675 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated whether plasma Alzheimer's Disease (AD)-related biomarkers were associated with cancer-related cognitive decline (CRCD) among older breast cancer survivors. METHODS We included survivors 60-90 years with primary stage 0-III breast cancers (n = 236) and frequency-matched non-cancer controls (n = 154) who passed a cognitive screen and had banked plasma specimens. Participants were assessed at baseline (pre-systemic therapy) and annually for up to 60-months. Cognition was measured using tests of attention, processing speed and executive function (APE) and learning and memory (LM); perceived cognition was measured by the FACT-Cog PCI. Baseline plasma neurofilament light (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), beta-amyloid 42/40 (Aβ42/40) and phosphorylated tau (p-tau181) were assayed using single molecule arrays. Mixed models tested associations between cognition and baseline AD-biomarkers, time, group (survivor vs control) and their two- and three-way interactions, controlling for age, race, WRAT4 Word Reading score, comorbidity and BMI; two-sided 0.05 p-values were considered statistically significant. RESULTS There were no group differences in baseline AD-related biomarkers except survivors had higher baseline NfL levels than controls (p = .013). Survivors had lower adjusted longitudinal APE than controls starting from baseline and continuing over time (p = <0.002). However, baseline AD-related biomarker levels were not independently associated with adjusted cognition over time, except controls had lower APE scores with higher GFAP levels (p = .008). CONCLUSION The results do not support a relationship between baseline AD-related biomarkers and CRCD. Further investigation is warranted to confirm the findings, test effects of longitudinal changes in AD-related biomarkers and examine other mechanisms and factors affecting cognition pre-systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne Mandelblatt
- Georgetown Lombardi Institute for Cancer and Aging Research, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Dage
- Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Xingtao Zhou
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Brent J Small
- School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, and Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Tim A Ahles
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jaeil Ahn
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Ashley Artese
- Department of Exercise Science and Health Promotion, Charles E. Schmidt College of Science, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Traci N Bethea
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Elizabeth C Breen
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Judith E Carroll
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Harvey J Cohen
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Martine Extermann
- Senior Adult Oncology Program, Department of Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Deena Graham
- John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Heather S L Jim
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Brenna C Mcdonald
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Indiana Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Zev M Nakamura
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sunita K Patel
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - G William Rebeck
- Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Kelly E Rentscher
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - James C Root
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kristen A Russ
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics and National Centralized Repository for Alzheimer's and Related Dementias, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Danielle B Tometich
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - R Scott Turner
- Department of Neurology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Kathleen Van Dyk
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Wanting Zhai
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Li-Wen Huang
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, USA
| | - Andrew J Saykin
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Indiana Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hamilton S, Oxlad M, Sianis Y. Experiences of women with breast cancer disclosing cancer-related cognitive impairment symptoms to health professionals: a Systematic review and meta-synthesis. J Psychosoc Oncol 2024:1-21. [PMID: 38648500 DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2024.2342836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cancer-related cognitive impairment involves changes in cognitive domains among people diagnosed with cancer. This review aimed to explore and synthesize the experiences of women with breast cancer disclosing cancer-related cognitive impairment symptoms to health professionals. METHODS A systematic review and meta-synthesis was conducted to generate synthesized findings from existing literature. Six databases were searched from inception until mid-October 2022, with eligible studies appraised using the QualSyst Quality Assessment Checklist. RESULTS Three synthesized findings were generated from eight included studies. Findings highlight that women initiated conversations disclosing symptoms and frequently experienced dismissal or minimization from health professionals. Women rarely received information about cognitive impairment symptoms before treatment. Women reported that health professionals could be more involved in managing cognitive impairment symptoms. CONCLUSION This meta-synthesis highlights the importance of health professionals providing information before treatment and following up on cognitive impairment symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Hamilton
- School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Melissa Oxlad
- School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Yianni Sianis
- School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Derbes R, Hakun J, Elbich D, Master L, Berenbaum S, Huang X, Buxton OM, Chang AM, Truica CI, Sturgeon KM. Design and methods of the mobile assessment of cognition, environment, and sleep (MACES) feasibility study in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Sci Rep 2024; 14:8338. [PMID: 38594369 PMCID: PMC11004176 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58724-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Endocrine therapy (ET) for breast cancer treatment is associated with cognitive complaints, but their etiology is poorly understood. To address this, we developed and implemented an ambulatory assessment protocol consisting of wearable activity monitors, brief surveys of affect, context, and perceived impairments, and ultra-brief performance-based measures of cognition. Newly diagnosed, ER/PR+, stage 0-III, female breast cancer patients, were recruited. Ambulatory assessments were conducted on smart phones and wearable activity monitors were used to monitor sleep and physical activity. Participants were asked to complete five 7-day measurement bursts (one before starting ET and one each month for 4 consecutive months while on ET). We observed a consent rate of 36%, 27 women completed the study. Of the women that withdrew, 91% dropped prior to the midpoint of follow up. There were no significant differences in demographics, clinical breast cancer characteristics, sleep or physical activity patterns, or measures of cognition between women who completed versus withdrew. Women who did not complete the study provided fewer valid days of baseline data. In conclusion, while some women may be overwhelmed with their cancer diagnosis, we did not identify any predictive characteristics of women whom did not complete the study. This novel method enables the prospective study of psychological changes associated with cancer treatment, capturing a wide array of information about behavior, experience, and cognition, thus providing a picture of the lived experiences of cancer patients before and during exposure to ET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Derbes
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Jonathan Hakun
- Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, H5508, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA, H03717033, USA.
- Department of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
- Center for Healthy Aging, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
- College of Medicine, Translational Brain Research Center, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
| | - Daniel Elbich
- Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, H5508, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA, H03717033, USA
- College of Medicine, Translational Brain Research Center, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA
| | - Lindsay Master
- Department of Biobehavioral Health, College of Health and Human Development, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Sheri Berenbaum
- Department of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Xuemei Huang
- Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Department of Neurology, H5508, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA, H03717033, USA
- College of Medicine, Translational Brain Research Center, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA
| | - Orfeu M Buxton
- Center for Healthy Aging, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA
- Department of Biobehavioral Health, College of Health and Human Development, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Anne-Marie Chang
- Department of Biobehavioral Health, College of Health and Human Development, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Cristina I Truica
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Kathleen M Sturgeon
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ahles TA, Orlow I, Schofield E, Li Y, Ryan E, Root JC, Patel SK, McNeal K, Gaynor A, Tan H, Katheria V, Vazquez J, Corrales-Guerrero S, Sadeghi K, Traina T, Hurria A. The impact of APOE and smoking history on cognitive function in older, long-term breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:575-585. [PMID: 36279076 PMCID: PMC10123173 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01267-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to determine whether older breast cancer survivors score lower on neuropsychological tests compared to matched non-cancer controls and to test the hypotheses that survivors who were APOE ε4 carriers would have the lowest cognitive performance but that smoking history would decrease the negative effect of ε4 on cognition. METHODS Female breast cancer survivors who had been diagnosed and treated at age 60 or older and were 5-15-year survivors (N = 328) and age and education matched non-cancer controls (N = 162) were assessed at enrollment and at 8-, 16-, and 24-month follow-ups with standard neuropsychological and psychological assessments. Blood for APOE genotyping was collected, and smoking history was assessed at enrollment. Participants were purposely recruited so that approximately 50% had a history of treatment with chemotherapy or no chemotherapy and approximately 50% had a smoking history. RESULTS After adjusting for age, cognitive reserve, depression, and fatigue, breast cancer survivors scored significantly lower on all domains of cognitive function. A significant two-way interaction demonstrated that the negative effect of ε4 on cognitive performance was stronger among survivors. A significant three-way interaction supported the hypothesis that smoking history had a protective effect on cognitive function in ε4 carriers that was more pronounced in the controls than the survivors. CONCLUSIONS The results support the long-term cognitive impact of breast cancer diagnosis and treatments on older, disease-free survivors, particularly for ε4 carriers. The results also emphasize the importance of assessing smoking history when examining APOE and cognition and are an example of the complex interactions of age, genetics, health behaviors, and disease history in determining cognitive function. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS These results help explain why only a subset of breast cancer survivors appear to be vulnerable to cognitive problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim A Ahles
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Irene Orlow
- Molecular Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth Schofield
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yuelin Li
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth Ryan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - James C Root
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sunita K Patel
- Departments of Population Science and Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Katrazyna McNeal
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexandra Gaynor
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Heidi Tan
- Departments of Population Science and Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Vani Katheria
- Departments of Population Science and Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Jessica Vazquez
- Departments of Population Science and Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Sergio Corrales-Guerrero
- Molecular Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Keimya Sadeghi
- Molecular Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tiffany Traina
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arti Hurria
- Center for Cancer and Ageing, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tometich DB, Welniak T, Gudenkauf L, Maconi ML, Fulton HJ, Martinez Tyson D, Zambrano K, Hasan S, Rodriguez Y, Bryant C, Li X, Reed DR, Oswald LB, Galligan A, Small BJ, Jim HSL. "I couldn't connect the wires in my brain." Young adult cancer survivors' experience with cognitive functioning. Psychooncology 2024; 33:e6309. [PMID: 38420860 PMCID: PMC11249037 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is a dearth of literature describing young adult (YA) cancer survivors' experiences with cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). We aimed to elucidate CRCI among YA cancer survivors and identify potentially modifiable risk factors. METHODS We conducted individual qualitative interviews with YA cancer survivors aged 18-30 years at study enrollment and used applied thematic analysis to identify themes across three topics (i.e., affected cognitive abilities, risk and protective factors influencing the impact of CRCI, and strategies for coping with CRCI). RESULTS YA cancer survivors (N = 20) were, on average, 23 years old at diagnosis and 26 years old when interviewed. Diverse cancer types and treatments were represented; most participants (85%) had completed cancer treatment. Participants described experiences across three qualitative topics: (1) affected cognitive abilities (i.e., concentration and attention, prospective memory, and long-term memory), (2) Risk factors (i.e., fatigue, sleep problems, mood, stress/distractions, and social isolation) and protective factors (i.e., social support), and (3) coping strategies, including practical strategies that helped build self-efficacy (e.g., writing things down, reducing distractions), beneficial emotion-focused coping strategies (e.g., focus on health, faith/religion), strategies with mixed effects (i.e., apps/games, medications/supplements, and yoga), and "powering through" strategies that exacerbated stress. CONCLUSIONS YA cancer survivors experience enduring cognitive difficulties after treatment. Specific concerns highlight the importance of attention and executive functioning impairments, long-term memory recall, and sensitivity to distractions. Future work is needed to improve assessment and treatment of CRCI among YA cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle B Tometich
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
- University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Syed Hasan
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | | | | - Xiaoyin Li
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
McDeed AP, Van Dyk K, Zhou X, Zhai W, Ahles TA, Bethea TN, Carroll JE, Cohen HJ, Nakamura ZM, Rentscher KE, Saykin AJ, Small BJ, Root JC, Jim H, Patel SK, Mcdonald BC, Mandelblatt JS, Ahn J. Prediction of cognitive decline in older breast cancer survivors: the Thinking and Living with Cancer study. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2024; 8:pkae019. [PMID: 38556480 PMCID: PMC11031271 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkae019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer survivors commonly report cognitive declines after cancer therapy. Due to the complex etiology of cancer-related cognitive decline (CRCD), predicting who will be at risk of CRCD remains a clinical challenge. We developed a model to predict breast cancer survivors who would experience CRCD after systematic treatment. METHODS We used the Thinking and Living with Cancer study, a large ongoing multisite prospective study of older breast cancer survivors with complete assessments pre-systemic therapy, 12 months and 24 months after initiation of systemic therapy. Cognition was measured using neuropsychological testing of attention, processing speed, and executive function (APE). CRCD was defined as a 0.25 SD (of observed changes from baseline to 12 months in matched controls) decline or greater in APE score from baseline to 12 months (transient) or persistent as a decline 0.25 SD or greater sustained to 24 months. We used machine learning approaches to predict CRCD using baseline demographics, tumor characteristics and treatment, genotypes, comorbidity, and self-reported physical, psychosocial, and cognitive function. RESULTS Thirty-two percent of survivors had transient cognitive decline, and 41% of these women experienced persistent decline. Prediction of CRCD was good: yielding an area under the curve of 0.75 and 0.79 for transient and persistent decline, respectively. Variables most informative in predicting CRCD included apolipoprotein E4 positivity, tumor HER2 positivity, obesity, cardiovascular comorbidities, more prescription medications, and higher baseline APE score. CONCLUSIONS Our proof-of-concept tool demonstrates our prediction models are potentially useful to predict risk of CRCD. Future research is needed to validate this approach for predicting CRCD in routine practice settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Patrick McDeed
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Kathleen Van Dyk
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Xingtao Zhou
- Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Department of Oncology and Georgetown Lombardi Institute for Cancer and Aging Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Wanting Zhai
- Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Department of Oncology and Georgetown Lombardi Institute for Cancer and Aging Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Tim A Ahles
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Traci N Bethea
- Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Department of Oncology and Georgetown Lombardi Institute for Cancer and Aging Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Judith E Carroll
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Harvey Jay Cohen
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Zev M Nakamura
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kelly E Rentscher
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Andrew J Saykin
- Center for Neuroimaging and Indiana Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and the Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Brent J Small
- School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, and Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - James C Root
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Heather Jim
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sunita K Patel
- Outcomes Division, Population Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Brenna C Mcdonald
- Center for Neuroimaging and Indiana Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and the Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Jeanne S Mandelblatt
- Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Department of Oncology and Georgetown Lombardi Institute for Cancer and Aging Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jaeil Ahn
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cui JW, Li Y, Yang Y, Yang HK, Dong JM, Xiao ZH, He X, Guo JH, Wang RQ, Dai B, Zhou ZL. Tumor immunotherapy resistance: Revealing the mechanism of PD-1 / PD-L1-mediated tumor immune escape. Biomed Pharmacother 2024; 171:116203. [PMID: 38280330 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 01/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Tumor immunotherapy, an innovative anti-cancer therapy, has showcased encouraging outcomes across diverse tumor types. Among these, the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway is a well-known immunological checkpoint, which is significant in the regulation of immune evasion by tumors. Nevertheless, a considerable number of patients develop resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy, rendering it ineffective in the long run. This research focuses on exploring the factors of PD-1/PD-L1-mediated resistance in tumor immunotherapy. Initially, the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is characterized by its role in facilitating tumor immune evasion, emphasizing its role in autoimmune homeostasis. Next, the primary mechanisms of resistance to PD-1/PD-L1-based immunotherapy are analyzed, including tumor antigen deletion, T cell dysfunction, increased immunosuppressive cells, and alterations in the expression of PD-L1 within tumor cells. The possible ramifications of altered metabolism, microbiota, and DNA methylation on resistance is also described. Finally, possible resolution strategies for dealing with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy resistance are discussed, placing particular emphasis on personalized therapeutic approaches and the exploration of more potent immunotherapy regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Wen Cui
- Department of Pharmacy, Zhuhai People's Hospital (Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University), Zhuhai, China; College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yao Li
- College of Pharmacy, Macau University of Science and Technology (MUST), China
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Pharmacy, Zhuhai People's Hospital (Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University), Zhuhai, China; College of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau SAR, China
| | - Hai-Kui Yang
- Department of Pharmacy, Zhuhai People's Hospital (Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University), Zhuhai, China
| | - Jia-Mei Dong
- Department of Pharmacy, Zhuhai People's Hospital (Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University), Zhuhai, China
| | - Zhi-Hua Xiao
- Department of Pharmacy, Zhuhai People's Hospital (Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University), Zhuhai, China; College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xin He
- Department of Pharmacy, Zhuhai People's Hospital (Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University), Zhuhai, China
| | - Jia-Hao Guo
- Department of Pharmacy, Zhuhai People's Hospital (Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University), Zhuhai, China; College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rui-Qi Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, Zhuhai People's Hospital (Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University), Zhuhai, China.
| | - Bo Dai
- Department of Cardiology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Foshan City 528200, Guangdong Province, China.
| | - Zhi-Ling Zhou
- Department of Pharmacy, Zhuhai People's Hospital (Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University), Zhuhai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhou X, Zhang X, Zhong T, Zhou M, Gao L, Chen L. Prevalence and associated factors of chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment in older breast cancer survivors. J Adv Nurs 2024; 80:484-499. [PMID: 37675947 DOI: 10.1111/jan.15842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To examine the prevalence and associated factors of chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) in older breast cancer survivors (BCS). DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES We searched EMBASE, PubMed, PsychInfo, CINAHL, Cochrance Library, Web of Science, CNKI and SinoMed, without language restrictions, for studies published from the establishment of the database to September 2022. REVIEW METHODS Two researchers independently examined the full texts, data extraction and quality assessment, and any discrepancies were resolved through discussion with a third reviewer. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Scale. RESULTS The seven included studies showed that the estimated prevalence of CRCI in older BCS ranged from 18.6% to 27% on objective neuropsychological tests and from 7.6% to 49% on subjective cognitive assessments. The areas most affected were attention, memory, executive functioning and processing speed. CRCI was associated with 10 factors in six categories, including sociodemographic (e.g. age, education level), physiological (e.g. sleep disorders, fatigue and comorbidities), psychological (e.g. anxiety, depression), treatment modalities (e.g. chemotherapy cycles, chemotherapy regimens), genetic (e.g. APOE2, APOE4) and lifestyle factor (e.g. physical inactivity). CONCLUSION CRCI is multifactorial and has a relatively high prevalence. However, the results of subjective and objective cognitive examinations were inconsistent, possibly due to variations in tools used to evaluate different definitions of CRCI. Nevertheless, as there are few published studies of older BCS, this conclusion still require verification by well-designed studies in the future. IMPACT We found that the prevalence of CRCI in older adults is relatively high and multifactorial, providing evidence for further health care for this population. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION There was no patient or public involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuan Zhou
- Jilin University School of Nursing, Changchun, China
| | - Xueyan Zhang
- Jilin University School of Nursing, Changchun, China
| | | | - Meng Zhou
- Jilin University School of Nursing, Changchun, China
| | - Lan Gao
- The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Li Chen
- Jilin University School of Nursing, Changchun, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Daniel E, Deng F, Patel SK, Sedrak MS, Kim H, Razavi M, Sun C, Root JC, Ahles TA, Dale W, Chen BT. Brain white matter microstructural changes in chemotherapy-treated older long-term breast cancer survivors. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6881. [PMID: 38152038 PMCID: PMC10807556 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess white matter microstructural changes in older long-term breast cancer survivors 5-15 years post-chemotherapy treatment. METHODS Breast cancer survivors aged 65 years or older who underwent chemotherapy (C+) and who did not undergo chemotherapy (C-) and age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC) were enrolled at time point 1 (TP1) and followed for 2 years for time point 2 (TP2). All participants underwent brain MRI with diffusion tensor images and neuropsychological (NP) testing with the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery. Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) analysis was performed on the diffusion tensor images to assess white matter microstructural changes with the fractional anisotropy (FA) parameter. RESULTS There were significant longitudinal alterations in FA within the C+ group over time. The C+ group showed diminished FA in the body and genu of corpus callosum, anterior corona radiate, and external capsule on both the whole brain and region of interest (ROI) based analyses after p < 0.05 family-wise error (FWE) correction. However, there were no significant group differences between the groups at TP1. Additionally, at TP1, a positive correlation (R = 0.58, p = 0.04) was observed between the FA value of the anterior corona radiata and the crystallized composite score in the C+ group. CONCLUSIONS Brain white matter microstructural alterations may be the underlying neural correlates of cognitive changes in older breast cancer survivors who had chemotherapy treatment years ago.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ebenezer Daniel
- Department of Diagnostic RadiologyCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCAUSA
| | - Frank Deng
- Department of Diagnostic RadiologyCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCAUSA
| | - Sunita K. Patel
- Department of Population ScienceCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCAUSA
| | - Mina S. Sedrak
- Department of Medical OncologyCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCAUSA
| | - Heeyoung Kim
- Center for Cancer and AgingCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCAUSA
| | - Marianne Razavi
- Department of Supportive Care MedicineCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCAUSA
| | - Can‐Lan Sun
- Center for Cancer and AgingCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCAUSA
| | - James C. Root
- Neurocognitive Research LabMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Tim A. Ahles
- Neurocognitive Research LabMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNYUSA
| | - William Dale
- Center for Cancer and AgingCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCAUSA
- Department of Supportive Care MedicineCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCAUSA
| | - Bihong T. Chen
- Department of Diagnostic RadiologyCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCAUSA
- Center for Cancer and AgingCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCAUSA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Demby T, Gross PS, Mandelblatt J, Huang JK, Rebeck GW. The chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin induces brain senescence, with modulation by APOE genotype. Exp Neurol 2024; 371:114609. [PMID: 37944881 PMCID: PMC11302516 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2023.114609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Many cancer patients experience serious cognitive problems related to their treatment, which can greatly affect their quality of life. The molecular mechanisms of this cancer chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment (CICI) are unknown, thus slowing the development of preventative approaches. We hypothesized that cancer chemotherapies could induce cellular senescence in the brain, creating a pro-inflammatory environment and damaging normal brain communication. We tested this hypothesis using the common chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin in two independent mouse models. In the first model, we used mice that express tdTomato under the pdkn2a (p16) promoter; p16 is a regulator of cellular senescence, and its upregulation is denoted by the presence of fluorescently tagged cells. Two weeks after exposure to three doses of 5 mg/kg doxorubicin, the number of tdTomato positive cells were increased nearly three-fold in both the cerebral cortex and the hippocampus. tdTomato staining co-localized with neurons, microglia, oligodendrocyte precursor cells, and endothelial cells, but not astrocytes. In the second model, we used APOE knock-in mice, since the APOE4 allele is a risk factor for CICI in humans and mouse models. We isolated RNA from the cerebral cortex of APOE3 and APOE4 mice from one to 21 days after a single dose of 10 mg/kg doxorubicin. Using NanoString analysis of over 700 genes related to neuroinflammation and RT-qPCR analysis of cerebral cortex transcripts, we found two-fold induction of four senescence-related genes at three weeks in the APOE4 mice compared to the APOE3 control mice: p21(cdkn1a), p16, Gadd45a, and Egr1. We conclude that doxorubicin promotes cellular senescence pathways in the brain, supporting the hypothesis that drugs to eliminate senescent cells could be useful in preventing CICI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamar Demby
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Phillip S Gross
- Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Jeanne Mandelblatt
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and Georgetown Lombardi Institute for Cancer and Aging Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey K Huang
- Department of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - G William Rebeck
- Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chadha M, White J, Swain SM, Rakovitch E, Jagsi R, Whelan T, Sparano JA. Optimal adjuvant therapy in older (≥70 years of age) women with low-risk early-stage breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2023; 9:99. [PMID: 38097623 PMCID: PMC10721824 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-023-00591-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Older women are under-represented in breast cancer (BC) clinical trials, and treatment guidelines are primarily based on BC studies in younger women. Studies uniformly report an increased incidence of local relapse with omission of breast radiation therapy. Review of the available literature suggests very low rates of distant relapse in women ≥70 years of age. The incremental benefit of endocrine therapy in decreasing rate of distant relapse and improving disease-free survival in older patients with low-risk BC remains unclear. Integration of molecular genomic assays in diagnosis and treatment of estrogen receptor positive BC presents an opportunity for optimizing risk-tailored adjuvant therapies in ways that may permit treatment de-escalation among older women with early-stage BC. The prevailing knowledge gap and lack of risk-specific adjuvant therapy guidelines suggests a compelling need for prospective trials to inform selection of optimal adjuvant therapy, including omission of adjuvant endocrine therapy in older women with low risk BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Chadha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| | - J White
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - S M Swain
- Department of Medicine, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, USA
| | - E Rakovitch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - R Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - T Whelan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, McMaster University and Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - J A Sparano
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Torre M, Bukhari H, Nithianandam V, Zanella CA, Mata DA, Feany MB. A Drosophila model relevant to chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment. Sci Rep 2023; 13:19290. [PMID: 37935827 PMCID: PMC10630312 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46616-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a common adverse effect of treatment and is characterized by deficits involving multiple cognitive domains including memory. Despite the significant morbidity of CRCI and the expected increase in cancer survivors over the coming decades, the pathophysiology of CRCI remains incompletely understood, highlighting the need for new model systems to study CRCI. Given the powerful array of genetic approaches and facile high throughput screening ability in Drosophila, our goal was to validate a Drosophila model relevant to CRCI. We administered the chemotherapeutic agents cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin to adult Drosophila. Neurologic deficits were observed with all tested chemotherapies, with doxorubicin and in particular cisplatin also resulting in memory deficits. We then performed histologic and immunohistochemical analysis of cisplatin-treated Drosophila tissue, demonstrating neuropathologic evidence of increased neurodegeneration, DNA damage, and oxidative stress. Thus, our Drosophila model relevant to CRCI recapitulates clinical, radiologic, and histologic alterations reported in chemotherapy patients. Our new Drosophila model can be used for mechanistic dissection of pathways contributing to CRCI (and chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity more generally) and pharmacologic screens to identify disease-modifying therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Torre
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Hassan Bukhari
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Vanitha Nithianandam
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Camila A Zanella
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | | | - Mel B Feany
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nakamura ZM, Small BJ, Zhai W, Ahles TA, Ahn J, Artese AL, Bethea TN, Breen EC, Cohen HJ, Extermann M, Graham D, Irwin MR, Isaacs C, Jim HSL, Kuhlman KR, McDonald BC, Patel SK, Rentscher KE, Root JC, Saykin AJ, Tometich DB, Van Dyk K, Zhou X, Mandelblatt JS, Carroll JE. Depressive symptom trajectories in older breast cancer survivors: the Thinking and Living with Cancer Study. J Cancer Surviv 2023:10.1007/s11764-023-01490-2. [PMID: 37924476 PMCID: PMC11068856 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01490-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify trajectories of depressive symptoms in older breast cancer survivors and demographic, psychosocial, physical health, and cancer-related predictors of these trajectories. METHODS Recently diagnosed nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors (n = 272), ages 60-98 years, were evaluated for depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, CES-D; scores ≥16 suggestive of clinically significant depressive symptoms). CES-D scores were analyzed in growth-mixture models to determine depression trajectories from baseline (post-surgery, pre-systemic therapy) through 3-year annual follow-up. Multivariable, multinomial logistic regression was used to identify baseline predictors of depression trajectories. RESULTS Survivors had three distinct trajectories: stable (84.6%), emerging depressive symptoms (10.3%), and recovery from high depressive symptoms at baseline that improved slowly over time (5.1%). Compared to stable survivors, those in the emerging (OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.08-1.23) or recovery (OR = 1.26; 95% CI = 1.15-1.38) groups reported greater baseline anxiety. Greater baseline deficit accumulation (frailty composite measure) was associated with emerging depressive symptoms (OR = 3.71; 95% CI = 1.90-7.26). Less social support at baseline (OR = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.15-0.99), but greater improvement in emotional (F = 4.13; p = 0.0006) and tangible (F = 2.86; p = 0.01) social support over time, was associated with recovery from depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Fifteen percent of older breast cancer survivors experienced emerging or recovery depressive symptom trajectories. Baseline anxiety, deficit accumulation, and lower social support were associated with worse outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Our results emphasize the importance of depression screening throughout the course of cancer care to facilitate early intervention. Factors associated with depressive symptoms, including lower levels of social support proximal to diagnosis, could serve as intervention levers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zev M Nakamura
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 101 Manning Drive, Campus Box #7160, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
| | - Brent J Small
- School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, and Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Wanting Zhai
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
- Georgetown Lombardi Institute for Cancer and Aging Research, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Tim A Ahles
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jaeil Ahn
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
- Georgetown Lombardi Institute for Cancer and Aging Research, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Ashley L Artese
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Traci N Bethea
- Georgetown Lombardi Institute for Cancer and Aging Research, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Elizabeth C Breen
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Harvey J Cohen
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Martine Extermann
- Department of Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Deena Graham
- John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Michael R Irwin
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Georgetown Lombardi Institute for Cancer and Aging Research, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Heather S L Jim
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kate R Kuhlman
- Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
- Institute for Interdisciplinary Salivary Bioscience Research, School of Social Ecology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Brenna C McDonald
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Indiana Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Sunita K Patel
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Kelly E Rentscher
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, MCW Cancer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - James C Root
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Saykin
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Indiana Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Danielle B Tometich
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kathleen Van Dyk
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Xingtao Zhou
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
- Georgetown Lombardi Institute for Cancer and Aging Research, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jeanne S Mandelblatt
- Georgetown Lombardi Institute for Cancer and Aging Research, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Judith E Carroll
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Westrick AC, Langa KM, Eastman M, Ospina-Romero M, Mullins MA, Kobayashi LC. Functional aging trajectories of older cancer survivors: a latent growth analysis of the US Health and Retirement Study. J Cancer Surviv 2023; 17:1499-1509. [PMID: 35218520 PMCID: PMC9411262 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01185-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to identify prototypical functional aging trajectories of US cancer survivors aged 50 and older, overall and stratified by sociodemographic and health-related characteristics. METHODS Data were from 2986 survivors of a first incident cancer diagnosis (except non-melanoma skin cancer) after age 50 in the population representative U.S. Health and Retirement Study from 1998-2016. Cancer diagnoses, episodic memory function, and activity of daily living (ADL) limitations were assessed at biennial study interviews. Using time of cancer diagnosis as the baseline, we used group-based trajectory modeling to identify trajectories of memory function and ADL limitations following diagnosis. RESULTS We identified five memory loss trajectories (high: 8.4%; medium-high: 18.3%; medium-low: 21.5%; low: 25.5%; and, very low: 26.2%), and four ADL limitation trajectories (high/increasing limitations: 18.7%; medium limitations: 18.7%; low limitations: 8.14%; no limitations: 60.0). The high memory loss and high/increasing ADL limitation trajectories were both characterized by older age, being female (52% for memory, 58.9% for ADL), having lower pre-cancer memory scores, and a higher prevalence of pre-cancer comorbidities including stroke (30.9% for memory and 29.7% for ADL), hypertension (64.7% for memory and 69.8 for ADL), and depressive symptoms. In joint analyses, we found that generally those with higher memory were more likely to have fewer ADL limitations and vice versa. CONCLUSION Older cancer survivors experience heterogeneous trajectories of functional aging that are largely characterized by comorbidities prior to diagnosis. IMPLICATION FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Results can help identify older cancer survivors at increased risk for accelerated functional decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashly C Westrick
- Center for Social Epidemiology and Population Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| | - Kenneth M Langa
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovations, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Marisa Eastman
- Center for Social Epidemiology and Population Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Monica Ospina-Romero
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Megan A Mullins
- Center for Improving Patient and Population Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Lindsay C Kobayashi
- Center for Social Epidemiology and Population Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Franco-Rocha OY, Lewis KA, Longoria KD, De La Torre Schutz A, Wright ML, Kesler SR. Cancer-related cognitive impairment in racial and ethnic minority groups: a scoping review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:12561-12587. [PMID: 37432455 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05088-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Disparities in cognitive function among racial and ethnic groups have been reported in non-cancer conditions, but cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) in racial and ethnic minority groups is poorly understood. We aimed to synthesize and characterize the available literature about CRCI in racial and ethnic minority populations. METHODS We conducted a scoping review in the PubMed, PsycInfo, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases. Articles were included if they were published in English or Spanish, reported cognitive functioning in adults diagnosed with cancer, and characterized the race or ethnicity of the participants. Literature reviews, commentaries, letters to the editor, and gray literature were excluded. RESULTS Seventy-four articles met the inclusion criteria, but only 33.8% differentiated the CRCI findings by racial or ethnic subgroups. There were associations between cognitive outcomes and the participants' race or ethnicity. Additionally, some studies found that Black and non-white individuals with cancer were more likely to experience CRCI than their white counterparts. Biological, sociocultural, and instrumentation factors were associated with CRCI differences between racial and ethnic groups. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that racial and ethnic minoritized individuals may be disparately affected by CRCI. Future research should use standardized guidelines for measuring and reporting the self-identified racial and ethnic composition of the sample; differentiate CRCI findings by racial and ethnic subgroups; consider the influence of structural racism in health outcomes; and develop strategies to promote the participation of members of racial and ethnic minority groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar Y Franco-Rocha
- School of Nursing, University of Texas at Austin, 1710 Red River St, Austin, TX, USA.
| | - Kimberly A Lewis
- School of Nursing, University of Texas at Austin, 1710 Red River St, Austin, TX, USA
- Department of Physiological Nursing, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kayla D Longoria
- School of Nursing, University of Texas at Austin, 1710 Red River St, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Alexa De La Torre Schutz
- Brain Health Neuroscience Lab, School of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, 1710 Red River St, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Michelle L Wright
- School of Nursing, University of Texas at Austin, 1710 Red River St, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Shelli R Kesler
- School of Nursing, University of Texas at Austin, 1710 Red River St, Austin, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ferguson RJ, Terhorst L, Gibbons B, Posluszny DM, Chang H, Bovbjerg DH, McDonald BC. Using Single-Case Experimental Design and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Evaluate the Treatment of Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment in Clinical Practice. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4643. [PMID: 37760621 PMCID: PMC10526413 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) affects a large proportion of cancer survivors and has significant negative effects on survivor function and quality of life (QOL). Treatments for CRCI are being developed and evaluated. Memory and attention adaptation training (MAAT) is a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) demonstrated to improve CRCI symptoms and QOL in previous research. The aim of this article is to describe a single-case experimental design (SCED) approach to evaluate interventions for CRCI in clinical practice with patient-reported outcome measures (PROs). We illustrate the use of contemporary SCED methods as a means of evaluating MAAT, or any CRCI treatment, once clinically deployed. With the anticipated growth of cancer survivorship and concurrent growth in the number of survivors with CRCI, the treatment implementation and evaluation methods described here can be one way to assess and continually improve CRCI rehabilitative services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J. Ferguson
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA; (D.M.P.); (H.C.)
| | - Lauren Terhorst
- Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA;
| | - Benjamin Gibbons
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA;
| | - Donna M. Posluszny
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA; (D.M.P.); (H.C.)
| | - Hsuan Chang
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA; (D.M.P.); (H.C.)
| | - Dana H. Bovbjerg
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Department of Psychiatry, Biobehavioral Cancer Control Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA;
| | - Brenna C. McDonald
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rentscher KE, Bethea TN, Zhai W, Small BJ, Zhou X, Ahles TA, Ahn J, Breen EC, Cohen HJ, Extermann M, Graham DM, Jim HS, McDonald BC, Nakamura ZM, Patel SK, Root JC, Saykin AJ, Van Dyk K, Mandelblatt JS, Carroll JE. Epigenetic aging in older breast cancer survivors and noncancer controls: preliminary findings from the Thinking and Living with Cancer Study. Cancer 2023; 129:2741-2753. [PMID: 37259669 PMCID: PMC10659047 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer and its treatments may accelerate aging in survivors; however, research has not examined epigenetic markers of aging in longer term breast cancer survivors. This study examined whether older breast cancer survivors showed greater epigenetic aging than noncancer controls and whether epigenetic aging related to functional outcomes. METHODS Nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors (n = 89) enrolled prior to systemic therapy and frequency-matched controls (n = 101) ages 62 to 84 years provided two blood samples to derive epigenetic aging measures (Horvath, Extrinsic Epigenetic Age [EEA], PhenoAge, GrimAge, Dunedin Pace of Aging) and completed cognitive (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function) and physical (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12) function assessments at approximately 24 to 36 and 60 months after enrollment. Mixed-effects models tested survivor-control differences in epigenetic aging, adjusting for age and comorbidities; models for functional outcomes also adjusted for racial group, site, and cognitive reserve. RESULTS Survivors were 1.04 to 2.22 years biologically older than controls on Horvath, EEA, GrimAge, and DunedinPACE measures (p = .001-.04) at approximately 24 to 36 months after enrollment. Survivors exposed to chemotherapy were 1.97 to 2.71 years older (p = .001-.04), and among this group, an older EEA related to worse self-reported cognition (p = .047) relative to controls. An older epigenetic age related to worse physical function in all women (p < .001-.01). Survivors and controls showed similar epigenetic aging over time, but Black survivors showed accelerated aging over time relative to non-Hispanic White survivors. CONCLUSION Older breast cancer survivors, particularly those exposed to chemotherapy, showed greater epigenetic aging than controls that may relate to worse outcomes. If replicated, measurement of biological aging could complement geriatric assessments to guide cancer care for older women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly E. Rentscher
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee WI
- Norman Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Traci N. Bethea
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Wanting Zhai
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Brent J. Small
- School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Xingtao Zhou
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Tim A. Ahles
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jaeil Ahn
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Elizabeth C. Breen
- Norman Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Harvey Jay Cohen
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | | | - Deena M.A. Graham
- John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ
| | | | - Brenna C. McDonald
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine and Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Zev M. Nakamura
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - James C. Root
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andrew J. Saykin
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine and Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Kathleen Van Dyk
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Judith E. Carroll
- Norman Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mandelblatt JS, Small BJ, Zhou X, Nakamura ZM, Cohen HJ, Ahles TA, Ahn J, Bethea TN, Extermann M, Graham D, Isaacs C, Jacobsen PB, Jim HSL, McDonald BC, Patel SK, Rentscher KE, Root JC, Saykin AJ, Tometich DB, Van Dyk K, Zhai W, Breen EC, Carroll JE. Plasma levels of interleukin-6 mediate neurocognitive performance in older breast cancer survivors: The Thinking and Living With Cancer study. Cancer 2023; 129:2409-2421. [PMID: 37096888 PMCID: PMC10750797 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune activation/inflammation markers (immune markers) were tested to explain differences in neurocognition among older breast cancer survivors versus noncancer controls. METHODS Women >60 years old with primary breast cancer (stages 0-III) (n = 400) were assessed before systemic therapy with frequency-matched controls (n = 329) and followed annually to 60 months; blood was collected during annual assessments from 2016 to 2020. Neurocognition was measured by tests of attention, processing speed, and executive function (APE). Plasma levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), and interferon γ were determined using multiplex testing. Mixed linear models were used to compare results of immune marker levels by survivor/control group by time and by controlling for age, racial/ethnic group, cognitive reserve, and study site. Covariate-adjusted multilevel mediation analyses tested whether survivor/control group effects on cognition were explained by immune markers; secondary analyses examined the impact of additional covariates (e.g., comorbidity and obesity) on mediation effects. RESULTS Participants were aged 60-90 years (mean, 67.7 years). Most survivors had stage I (60.9%) estrogen receptor-positive tumors (87.6%). Survivors had significantly higher IL-6 levels than controls before systemic therapy and at 12, 24, and 60 months (p ≤ .001-.014) but there were no differences for other markers. Survivors had lower adjusted APE scores than controls (p < .05). Levels of IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α were related to APE, with IL-6 explaining part of the relationship between survivor/control group and APE (p = .01). The magnitude of this mediation effect decreased but remained significant (p = .047) after the consideration of additional covariates. CONCLUSIONS Older breast cancer survivors had worse long-term neurocognitive performance than controls, and this relationship was explained in part by elevated IL-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne S Mandelblatt
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
- Georgetown Lombardi Institute for Cancer and Aging Research, Georgetown University's Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown University's Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Brent J Small
- School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Xingtao Zhou
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Department of Oncology and Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Zev M Nakamura
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Harvey J Cohen
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Tim A Ahles
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jaeil Ahn
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Department of Oncology and Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Traci N Bethea
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
- Georgetown Lombardi Institute for Cancer and Aging Research, Georgetown University's Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown University's Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Martine Extermann
- Department of Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Deena Graham
- John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey, USA
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Paul B Jacobsen
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Heather S L Jim
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, H. Lee Moffitt Comprehensive Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Brenna C McDonald
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Indiana Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Sunita K Patel
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kelly E Rentscher
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - James C Root
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrew J Saykin
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Indiana Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Danielle B Tometich
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, H. Lee Moffitt Comprehensive Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Kathleen Van Dyk
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Wanting Zhai
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Department of Oncology and Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Elizabeth C Breen
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Judith E Carroll
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Yang LG, March ZM, Stephenson RA, Narayan PS. Apolipoprotein E in lipid metabolism and neurodegenerative disease. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2023; 34:430-445. [PMID: 37357100 PMCID: PMC10365028 DOI: 10.1016/j.tem.2023.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
Dysregulation of lipid metabolism has emerged as a central component of many neurodegenerative diseases. Variants of the lipid transport protein, apolipoprotein E (APOE), modulate risk and resilience in several neurodegenerative diseases including late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD). Allelic variants of the gene, APOE, alter the lipid metabolism of cells and tissues and have been broadly associated with several other cellular and systemic phenotypes. Targeting APOE-associated metabolic pathways may offer opportunities to alter disease-related phenotypes and consequently, attenuate disease risk and impart resilience to multiple neurodegenerative diseases. We review the molecular, cellular, and tissue-level alterations to lipid metabolism that arise from different APOE isoforms. These changes in lipid metabolism could help to elucidate disease mechanisms and tune neurodegenerative disease risk and resilience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda G Yang
- Genetics and Biochemistry Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Zachary M March
- Genetics and Biochemistry Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Roxan A Stephenson
- Genetics and Biochemistry Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Priyanka S Narayan
- Genetics and Biochemistry Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; Center for Alzheimer's and Related Dementias (CARD), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wennberg A, Ding M, Feychting M, Modig K. Risk of All-Cause Dementia, Alzheimer Disease, and Vascular Dementia in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Longitudinal Register-Based Study. Neurol Clin Pract 2023; 13:e200173. [PMID: 37188244 PMCID: PMC10176959 DOI: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000200173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives Now more than two-thirds of cancer survivors are aged 65 years or older, but evidence about their long-term health is thin. Cancer and its treatments have been linked to accelerated aging, so there is a concern that aging cancer survivors have an increased risk of age-related diseases, including dementia. Methods We examined the risk of dementia among 5-year breast cancer survivors using a matched cohort study design. We included breast cancer survivors aged 50 years and older at diagnosis (n = 26,741) and cancer-free comparison participants (n = 249,540). Women eligible for inclusion in the study were those born 1935-1975 and registered in the Swedish Total Population Register between January 1, 1991, and December 31, 2015. We defined breast cancer survivors as women with an initial breast cancer diagnosis between 1991 and 2005 who survived 5 or more years after their first diagnosis. We assessed all-cause dementia, Alzheimer disease (AD), and vascular dementia (VaD) using International Classification of Diseases codes. Survival analyses were conducted using age-adjusted subdistribution hazard models accounting for competing risk of death. Results We did not observe an association between breast cancer survivorship and risk of all-cause dementia, AD, or VaD. However, in models stratified by age at cancer diagnosis, women diagnosed with cancer after age 65 years had a higher risk of all-cause dementia (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 1.30, 95% CI 1.07-1.58), AD (SHR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.05-1.75), and VaD (SHR = 1.64, 95% CI 1.11-2.43) in models adjusted for age, education, and country of origin. Discussion Older breast cancer survivors who survive cancer have a higher risk for dementia than their peers without a cancer diagnosis, in contrast to earlier studies showing that prevalent or incident cancer is associated with a lower risk of dementia. With the older adult population growing rapidly and because cancer and dementia are 2 of the most common and debilitating diseases among older adults, it is critical that we understand the link between the 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Wennberg
- Unit of Epidemiology (AW, MD, MF, KM), Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mozhu Ding
- Unit of Epidemiology (AW, MD, MF, KM), Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maria Feychting
- Unit of Epidemiology (AW, MD, MF, KM), Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Karin Modig
- Unit of Epidemiology (AW, MD, MF, KM), Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lustberg MB, Kuderer NM, Desai A, Bergerot C, Lyman GH. Mitigating long-term and delayed adverse events associated with cancer treatment: implications for survivorship. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2023; 20:527-542. [PMID: 37231127 PMCID: PMC10211308 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00776-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Despite the importance of chemotherapy-associated adverse events in oncology practice and the broad range of interventions available to mitigate them, limited systematic efforts have been made to identify, critically appraise and summarize the totality of evidence on the effectiveness of these interventions. Herein, we review the most common long-term (continued beyond treatment) and late or delayed (following treatment) adverse events associated with chemotherapy and other anticancer treatments that pose major threats in terms of survival, quality of life and continuation of optimal therapy. These adverse effects often emerge during and continue beyond the course of therapy or arise among survivors in the months and years following treatment. For each of these adverse effects, we discuss and critically evaluate their underlying biological mechanisms, the most commonly used pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment strategies, and evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for their appropriate management. Furthermore, we discuss risk factors and validated risk-assessment tools for identifying patients most likely to be harmed by chemotherapy and potentially benefit from effective interventions. Finally, we highlight promising emerging supportive-care opportunities for the ever-increasing number of cancer survivors at continuing risk of adverse treatment effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam B Lustberg
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Aakash Desai
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Cristiane Bergerot
- Centro de Câncer de Brasília, Instituto Unity de Ensino e Pesquisa, Brasilia, Brazil
| | - Gary H Lyman
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Henneghan AM, Van Dyk K, Zhou X, Moore RC, Root JC, Ahles TA, Nakamura ZM, Mandeblatt J, Ganz PA. Validating the PROMIS cognitive function short form in cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 201:139-145. [PMID: 37330430 PMCID: PMC10729147 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06968-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Cognitive Function Short Form 8a (PROMIS Cog) could provide a shorter, useful alternative to the often used Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Cognition (FACT-Cog) in research and clinical care. This study aimed to determine the convergent validity and internal reliability of the PROMIS Cog in 3 separate samples of breast cancer survivors and to explore clinical cut points. METHODS Data from three samples of breast cancer survivors were used for this secondary analysis. Convergent validity was determined by evaluating correlation strength among the derived PROMIS Cog and measures of depression, anxiety, stress, fatigue, sleep, loneliness, the FACT-Cog . Clinical cut-points for the PROMIS Cog were determined by plotting the receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS 3 samples of breast cancer survivors (N = 471, N = 132, N = 90) were included. Absolute values of correlations demonstrating convergent validity ranged from 0.21 to 0.82, p's < 0.001, and were comparable to correlations with the full FACT-Cog 18 item perceived cognitive impairments (PCI) scale. ROC curve plots indicated a clinical cut off < 34 for the combined sample. CONCLUSION The 8-item PROMIS Cog demonstrated good convergent validity and internal reliability in breast cancer survivors, comparable to the 18-item FACT-Cog PCI. The PROMIS Cog 8a is a brief self-report measure that can be easily incorporated into cancer-related cognitive impairment research designs or used in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kathleen Van Dyk
- Semel Institute of Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Xingtao Zhou
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Raeanne C Moore
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - James C Root
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tim A Ahles
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zev M Nakamura
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jeanne Mandeblatt
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Patricia A Ganz
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wennberg AM, Matthews A, Talbäck M, Ebeling M, Ek S, Feychting M, Modig K. Frailty Among Breast Cancer Survivors: Evidence From Swedish Population Data. Am J Epidemiol 2023; 192:1128-1136. [PMID: 36883906 PMCID: PMC10326604 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwad048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Incidence and survival of breast cancer, the most common cancer among women, have been increasing, leaving survivors at risk of aging-related health conditions. In this matched cohort study, we examined frailty risk with the Hospital Frailty Risk Score among breast cancer survivors (n = 34,900) and age-matched comparison subjects (n = 290,063). Women born in 1935-1975, registered in the Swedish Total Population Register (1991-2015), were eligible for inclusion. Survivors had a first breast cancer diagnosis in 1991-2005 and survived ≥5 years after initial diagnosis. Death date was determined by linkage to the National Cause of Death Registry (through 2015). Cancer survivorship was weakly associated with frailty (subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) = 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00, 1.07). In age-stratified models, those diagnosed at younger ages (<50 years) had higher risk of frailty (SHR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.24) than those diagnosed at ages 50-65 (SHR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.07) or >65 (SHR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.17) years. Additionally, there was increased risk of frailty for diagnoses in 2000 or later (SHR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.21) compared with before 2000 (SHR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.93, 1.17). This supports work from smaller samples showing that breast cancer survivors have increased frailty risk, particularly when diagnosed at younger ages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra M Wennberg
- Correspondence to Dr. Alexandra Wennberg, Unit of Epidemiology, Institutet of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, PO Box 210, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden (e-mail: )
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Root JC, Li Y, Schofield E, Orlow I, Ryan E, Traina T, Patel SK, Ahles TA. Cognitive Aging in Older Breast Cancer Survivors. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3208. [PMID: 37370818 PMCID: PMC10296698 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15123208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer and cancer treatments may affect aging processes, altering the trajectory of cognitive aging, but the extant studies are limited in their intervals of assessment (two-five years). We studied the cognitive performance of a cohort of survivors and controls aged from 60 to 89 years utilizing cross-sectional cognitive performance data as an indicator of potential aging trajectories and contrasted these trends with longitudinal data collected over two years. METHODS Female breast cancer survivors who had been diagnosed and treated at age 60 or older and were 5- to 15-year survivors (N = 328) and non-cancer controls (N = 158) were assessed at enrollment and at 8, 16, and 24 months with standard neuropsychological tests and comprehensive geriatric assessment. RESULTS A cross-sectional baseline analysis found the expected inverse association of age with cognition in both groups, with survivors performing lower overall than controls in learning and memory (LM). Younger survivors, i.e., those under 75 years of age, exhibited lower performance in both LM and attention, and processing speed and executive function (APE), compared to controls, with no differences being observed between older survivors and controls, which tracked with deficit accumulation trends. CONCLUSION Cognitive differences between the survivors and controls for the LM and APE domains were prominent in younger survivors, as was deficit accumulation, suggesting a mediating effect on cognition. Deficit accumulation may represent a modifiable risk factor in cancer survivorship that may be targeted for prevention and intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James C. Root
- Neurocognitive Research Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (Y.L.); (E.S.); (E.R.); (T.A.A.)
| | - Yuelin Li
- Neurocognitive Research Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (Y.L.); (E.S.); (E.R.); (T.A.A.)
| | - Elizabeth Schofield
- Neurocognitive Research Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (Y.L.); (E.S.); (E.R.); (T.A.A.)
| | - Irene Orlow
- Molecular Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Elizabeth Ryan
- Neurocognitive Research Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (Y.L.); (E.S.); (E.R.); (T.A.A.)
| | - Tiffany Traina
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Sunita K. Patel
- Departments of Population Science and Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA;
| | - Tim A. Ahles
- Neurocognitive Research Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (Y.L.); (E.S.); (E.R.); (T.A.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Fletcher JA, Logan B, Reid N, Gordon EH, Ladwa R, Hubbard RE. How frail is frail in oncology studies? A scoping review. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:498. [PMID: 37268891 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10933-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS The frailty index (FI) is one way in which frailty can be quantified. While it is measured as a continuous variable, various cut-off points have been used to categorise older adults as frail or non-frail, and these have largely been validated in the acute care or community settings for older adults without cancer. This review aimed to explore which FI categories have been applied to older adults with cancer and to determine why these categories were selected by study authors. METHODS This scoping review searched Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases for studies which measured and categorised an FI in adults with cancer. Of the 1994 screened, 41 were eligible for inclusion. Data including oncological setting, FI categories, and the references or rationale for categorisation were extracted and analysed. RESULTS The FI score used to categorise participants as frail ranged from 0.06 to 0.35, with 0.35 being the most frequently used, followed by 0.25 and 0.20. The rationale for FI categories was provided in most studies but was not always relevant. Three of the included studies using an FI > 0.35 to define frailty were frequently referenced as the rationale for subsequent studies, however, the original rationale for this categorisation was unclear. Few studies sought to determine or validate optimum FI categorises in this population. CONCLUSION There is significant variability in how studies have categorised the FI in older adults with cancer. An FI ≥ 0.35 to categorise frailty was used most frequently, however an FI in this range has often represented at least moderate to severe frailty in other highly-cited studies. These findings contrast with a scoping review of highly-cited studies categorising FI in older adults without cancer, where an FI ≥ 0.25 was most common. Maintaining the FI as a continuous variable is likely to be beneficial until further validation studies determine optimum FI categories in this population. Differences in how the FI has been categorised, and indeed how older adults have been labelled as 'frail', limits our ability to synthesise results and to understand the impact of frailty in cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James A Fletcher
- Division of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.
| | - Benignus Logan
- Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Natasha Reid
- Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Emily H Gordon
- Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Rahul Ladwa
- Division of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Ruth E Hubbard
- Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ospina-Romero M, Brenowitz WD, Glymour MM, Westrick A, Graff RE, Hayes-Larson E, Mayeda ER, Ackley SF, Kobayashi LC. Education, incident cancer, and rate of memory decline in a national sample of US adults in mid-to-later-life. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101530. [PMID: 37210786 PMCID: PMC10332197 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Middle-aged and older adults who develop cancer experience memory loss following diagnosis, but memory decline in the years before and after cancer diagnosis is slower compared to their cancer-free counterparts. Educational attainment strongly predicts memory function during aging, but it is unclear whether education protects against memory loss related to cancer incidence or modifies long-term memory trajectories in middle-aged and older cancer survivors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were from 14,449 adults (3,248 with incident cancer, excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) aged 50+ in the population-based US Health and Retirement Study from 1998 to 2016. Memory was assessed every two years as a composite of immediate and delayed word recall tests and proxy assessments for impaired individuals. Memory scores all time points were standardized at to the baseline distribution. Using multivariate-adjusted linear mixed-effects models, we estimated rates of memory decline in the years before cancer diagnosis, shortly after diagnosis, and in the years after diagnosis. We compared rates of memory decline between incident cancer cases and age-matched cancer-free adults, overall and according to level of education (<12 years, "low"; 12 to <16 years, "intermediate"; ≥16 years, "high"). RESULTS Incident cancer diagnoses were followed by short-term declines in memory averaging 0.06 standard deviation (SD) units (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.084, -0.036). Those with low education experienced the strongest magnitude of short-term decline in memory after diagnosis (-0.10 SD units, 95% CI: -0.15, -0.05), but this estimate was not statistically significantly different from the short-term decline in memory experienced by those with high education (-0.04 SD units, 95% CI: -0.08, 0.01; p-value for education as an effect modifier = 0.15). In the years prior to and following an incident cancer diagnosis, higher educational attainment was associated with better memory, but it did not modify the difference in rate of long-term memory decline between cancer survivors and those who remained cancer-free. DISCUSSION Education was associated with better memory function over time among both cancer survivors and cancer-free adults aged 50 and over. Low education may be associated with a stronger short-term decline in memory after a cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Ospina-Romero
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, United States of America; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin, United States of America.
| | - Willa D Brenowitz
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, United States of America; Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, United States of America
| | - M Maria Glymour
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, United States of America
| | - Ashly Westrick
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, United States of America
| | - Rebecca E Graff
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, United States of America
| | - Eleanor Hayes-Larson
- Department of Epidemiology, Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth Rose Mayeda
- Department of Epidemiology, Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, United States of America
| | - Sarah F Ackley
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, United States of America
| | - Lindsay C Kobayashi
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Nudelman K, Nho K, Zhang M, McDonald BC, Zhai W, Small BJ, Wegel CE, Jacobsen PB, Jim HSL, Patel SK, Graham DMA, Ahles TA, Root JC, Foroud T, Breen EC, Carroll JE, Mandelblatt JS, Saykin AJ. Genetic Variants Associated with Longitudinal Cognitive Performance in Older Breast Cancer Patients and Controls. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2877. [PMID: 37296840 PMCID: PMC10252108 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15112877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Revised: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: There have been no published genome-wide studies of the genetics of cancer- and treatment-related cognitive decline (CRCD); the purpose of this study is to identify genetic variants associated with CRCD in older female breast cancer survivors. Methods: Analyses included white non-Hispanic women with non-metastatic breast cancer aged 60+ (N = 325) and age-, racial/ethnic group-, and education-matched controls (N = 340) with pre-systemic treatment and one-year follow-up cognitive assessment. CRCD was evaluated using longitudinal domain scores on cognitive tests of attention, processing speed, and executive function (APE), and learning and memory (LM). Linear regression models of one-year cognition included an interaction term for SNP or gene SNP enrichment*cancer case/control status, controlling for demographic variables and baseline cognition. Results: Cancer patients carrying minor alleles for two SNPs, rs76859653 (chromosome 1) in the hemicentin 1 (HMCN1) gene (p = 1.624 × 10-8), and rs78786199 (chromosome 2, p = 1.925 × 10-8) in an intergenic region had lower one-year APE scores than non-carriers and controls. Gene-level analyses showed the POC5 centriolar protein gene was enriched for SNPs associated with differences in longitudinal LM performance between patients and controls. Conclusions: The SNPs associated with cognition in survivors, but not controls, were members of the cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase family, that play important roles in cell signaling, cancer risk, and neurodegeneration. These findings provide preliminary evidence that novel genetic loci may contribute to susceptibility to CRCD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Nudelman
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
- Indiana Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
- Indiana University Genetics Biobank, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
- Center for Neuroimaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Kwangsik Nho
- Indiana Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
- Center for Neuroimaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Michael Zhang
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
- Indiana University Genetics Biobank, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Brenna C. McDonald
- Indiana Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
- Center for Neuroimaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
- Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Wanting Zhai
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA
| | - Brent J. Small
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
- School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
| | - Claire E. Wegel
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
- Indiana University Genetics Biobank, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Paul B. Jacobsen
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Studies, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Heather S. L. Jim
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Sunita K. Patel
- Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Deena M. A. Graham
- John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ 07601, USA
| | - Tim A. Ahles
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - James C. Root
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Tatiana Foroud
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
- Indiana Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
- Indiana University Genetics Biobank, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Elizabeth C. Breen
- Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Judith E. Carroll
- Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Jeanne S. Mandelblatt
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA
| | - Andrew J. Saykin
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
- Indiana Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
- Center for Neuroimaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
- Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mandelblatt JS, Ruterbusch JJ, Thompson HS, Zhou X, Bethea TN, Adams-Campbell L, Purrington K, Schwartz AG. Association between major discrimination and deficit accumulation in African American cancer survivors: The Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors Study. Cancer 2023; 129:1557-1568. [PMID: 36935617 PMCID: PMC10568940 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Revised: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 03/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Discrimination can adversely affect health and accelerate aging, but little is known about these relationships in cancer survivors. This study examines associations of discrimination and aging among self-identified African American survivors. METHODS A population-based sample of 2232 survivors 20-79 years old at diagnosis were enrolled within 5 years of breast (n = 787), colorectal (n = 227), lung (n = 223), or prostate (n = 995) cancer between 2017 and 2022. Surveys were completed post-active therapy. A deficit accumulation index measured aging-related disease and function (score range, 0-1, where <0.20 is robust, 0.20 to <0.35 is pre-frail, and 0.35+ is frail; 0.06 is a large clinically meaningful difference). The discrimination scale assessed ever experiencing major discrimination and seven types of events (score, 0-7). Linear regression tested the association of discrimination and deficit accumulation, controlling for age, time from diagnosis, cancer type, stage and therapy, and sociodemographic variables. RESULTS Survivors were an average of 62 years old (SD, 9.6), 63.2% reported ever experiencing major discrimination, with an average of 2.4 (SD, 1.7) types of discrimination events. Only 24.4% had deficit accumulation scores considered robust (mean score, 0.30 [SD, 0.13]). Among those who reported ever experiencing major discrimination, survivors with four to seven types of discrimination events (vs. 0-1) had a large, clinically meaningful increase in adjusted deficits (0.062, p < .001) and this pattern was consistent across cancer types. CONCLUSION African American cancer survivors have high deficit accumulated index scores, and experiences of major discrimination were positively associated with these deficits. Future studies are needed to understand the intersectionality between aging, discrimination, and cancer survivorship among diverse populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Georgetown Lombardi Institute for Cancer and Aging Research, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Julie J. Ruterbusch
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Hayley S. Thompson
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Xingtao Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Office of Minority Health and Health Disparities Research, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Traci N. Bethea
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Lucile Adams-Campbell
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Kristen Purrington
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Ann G. Schwartz
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Yang S, Tan M, Gao F, Xu X. Cognitive Problems in Older Breast Cancer Survivors. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:2297-2298. [PMID: 36780587 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shijie Yang
- Shijie Yang, MD, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China, Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Meijuan Tan, MBBS, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Feng Gao, MBBS, Department of General Surgery, Hebei Petrochina Central Hospital, Langfang, Hebei, China; and Xiequn Xu, MD, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Meijuan Tan
- Shijie Yang, MD, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China, Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Meijuan Tan, MBBS, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Feng Gao, MBBS, Department of General Surgery, Hebei Petrochina Central Hospital, Langfang, Hebei, China; and Xiequn Xu, MD, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Gao
- Shijie Yang, MD, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China, Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Meijuan Tan, MBBS, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Feng Gao, MBBS, Department of General Surgery, Hebei Petrochina Central Hospital, Langfang, Hebei, China; and Xiequn Xu, MD, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiequn Xu
- Shijie Yang, MD, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China, Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Meijuan Tan, MBBS, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Feng Gao, MBBS, Department of General Surgery, Hebei Petrochina Central Hospital, Langfang, Hebei, China; and Xiequn Xu, MD, Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Fardell JE, Irwin CM, Vardy JL, Bell ML. Anxiety, depression, and concentration in cancer survivors: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey results. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:272. [PMID: 37060376 PMCID: PMC10105664 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07710-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We report on prevalence of anxiety, depression, and concentration difficulties and their associations in survivors of cancer in a nationally representative sample up to 25 years after diagnosis. METHODS Using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2015 to 2018, participants between the ages of 18 and 79 self-reported on cancer history, symptoms of anxiety, depression, and difficulties with concentration. RESULTS Of 10,337 participants, 691 (6.7%) reported a previous diagnosis of cancer; the median time since diagnosis was 8 years. Prevalence was similar between those with and without cancer for anxiety (45.8% versus 46.9%) and depression (19.7% versus 20.0%). Concentration difficulties were more common (11.3% versus 9.0%) for those with a history of cancer compared to those without (adjusted OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.00-1.90). Prevalence of mental health symptoms was not related to time since diagnosis. Anxiety and depression were highly correlated (r = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.74-0.86) and moderately correlated with difficulty with concentration (r = 0.52, 95%CI: 0.40-0.64 and r = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.53-0.74 respectively). CONCLUSIONS Difficulty with concentration was more commonly reported by participants with than without a cancer history. Report of anxiety and depression was no different between participants with and without a history of cancer. Anxiety, depression, and difficulties with concentration were strongly related. Further research is needed to explore if there is a causal association, and if so, the direction of these correlations, so that interventions may be appropriately targeted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna E Fardell
- Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- UNSW Medicine & Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia.
- Western Sydney Youth Cancer Service, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Level 1 South, Randwick, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Chase M Irwin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| | - Janette L Vardy
- Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Concord Cancer Centre, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Melanie L Bell
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Tometich DB, Mosher CE, Cyders M, McDonald BC, Saykin AJ, Small BJ, Zhai W, Zhou X, Jim HSL, Jacobsen P, Ahles TA, Root JC, Graham D, Patel SK, Mandelblatt J. An Examination of the Longitudinal Relationship Between Cognitive Function and Physical Activity Among Older Breast Cancer Survivors in the Thinking and Living With Cancer Study. Ann Behav Med 2023; 57:237-248. [PMID: 36356044 PMCID: PMC10074030 DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaac048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older cancer survivors are at risk for cognitive decline. Physical activity can improve cognition, and better cognitive function may facilitate greater physical activity. PURPOSE We examined the potential bidirectional relationship between cognitive function and physical activity in older breast cancer survivors and controls. METHODS The sample included women with newly diagnosed, nonmetastatic breast cancer (n = 395) and women without cancer (n = 374) ages 60-98. Participants were recruited as part of a larger multisite study, assessed prior to systemic therapy, and followed yearly for 36 months. Attention, processing speed, and executive function was measured using six neuropsychological tests, self-reported cognitive function using the Perceived Cognitive Impairments subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function , and physical activity using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form. Separate random intercepts cross-lagged panel models were used to examine the between- and within-person effects for survivors and controls, controlling for age, education, and study site. RESULTS Survivors reported significantly less physical activity than controls at baseline (1,284.92 vs. 2,085.98 MET min/week, p < .05). When survivors reported higher activity, they simultaneously had better objective cognition at 12 months (β = 0.24, p = .04) and reported better perceived cognition at 12 and 24 months (β = 0.25, p = .03), but this relationship was not seen in controls. Cognition did not predict subsequent physical activity or vice versa in either group. CONCLUSIONS Cognition and physical activity are cross-sectionally associated in survivors, but the expected prospective relationships were not found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle B Tometich
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Catherine E Mosher
- Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Melissa Cyders
- Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Brenna C McDonald
- Department of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Andrew J Saykin
- Department of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Brent J Small
- College of Behavioral and Community Sciences, School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Wanting Zhai
- Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Xingtao Zhou
- Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Heather S L Jim
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Paul Jacobsen
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Tim A Ahles
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - James C Root
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Deena Graham
- Department of Oncology, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Sunita K Patel
- Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Jeanne Mandelblatt
- Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
A Systematic Review on the Potential Acceleration of Neurocognitive Aging in Older Cancer Survivors. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041215. [PMID: 36831557 PMCID: PMC9954467 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
As survival rates increase, more emphasis has gone to possible cognitive sequelae in older cancer patients, which could be explained by accelerated brain aging. In this review, we provide a complete overview of studies investigating neuroimaging, neurocognitive, and neurodegenerative disorders in older cancer survivors (>65 years), based on three databases (Pubmed, Web of Science and Medline). Ninety-six studies were included. Evidence was found for functional and structural brain changes (frontal regions, basal ganglia, gray and white matter), compared to healthy controls. Cognitive decline was mainly found in memory functioning. Anti-hormonal treatments were repeatedly associated with cognitive decline (tamoxifen) and sometimes with an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease (androgen deprivation therapy). Chemotherapy was inconsistently associated with later development of cognitive changes or dementia. Radiotherapy was not associated with cognition in patients with non-central nervous system cancer but can play a role in patients with central nervous system cancer, while neurosurgery seemed to improve their cognition in the short-term. Individual risk factors included cancer subtypes (e.g., brain cancer, hormone-related cancers), treatment (e.g., anti-hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, cranial radiation), genetic predisposition (e.g., APOE, COMT, BDNF), age, comorbidities (e.g., frailty, cognitive reserve), and psychological (e.g., depression, (post-traumatic) distress, sleep, fatigue) and social factors (e.g., loneliness, limited caregiver support, low SES). More research on accelerated aging is required to guide intervention studies.
Collapse
|
37
|
Root JC, Gaynor AM, Ahsan A, Jung D, Schofield E, Ryan E, Li Y, Ahles TA. Remote, Computerised Cognitive Assessment for Breast Cancer- and Treatment-Related Cognitive Dysfunction: Psychometric Characteristics of the Cogsuite Neurocognitive Battery. ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF NEUROPSYCHOLOGISTS 2023:6991200. [PMID: 36655820 PMCID: PMC10369363 DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acac111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cancer-related cognitive dysfunction (CRCD) is a significant concern for breast cancer survivors. The Cogsuite battery was developed to improve sensitivity to CRCD with the use of cognitive experimental measures, clarify specific cognitive processes impacted and to be capable of being administered either in-office or remotely. METHODS In sum, 357 breast cancer survivors and non-cancer controls completed the Cogsuite Battery in-office (n = 76) or remotely (n = 281). Measure validity, sensitivity to demographic factors, correlations with standard neuropsychological measures and intercorrelations of Cogsuite variables were assessed. Test-retest reliability was evaluated in-office (n = 24) and remotely (n = 80). RESULTS Test-retest reliability for most variables assessed was adequate to strong. Internal validity, as indicated by the confirmation of expected condition effects within each measure, was established for all measures. Assessment of external validity found age, but not education, was a significant predictor in the majority of measures. Assessment of criterion validity found that Cogsuite variables were correlated with standard measures in psychomotor speed, working memory and executive function, but not associated with self-reported cognition or mood. CONCLUSIONS Cogsuite is reliable and valid, and is sensitive to the effects of increasing age on cognition. The addition of the Cogsuite battery to standard assessment may improve sensitivity to CRCD and identify underlying processes that may be affected. Remote use of the Cogsuite battery in appropriate settings will lessen the burden for providers, researchers and survivors in research and clinical contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James C Root
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Alexandra M Gaynor
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.,Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.,Cognitive Neuroscience Division, Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Anam Ahsan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | - Elizabeth Schofield
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Elizabeth Ryan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Yuelin Li
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Tim A Ahles
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Nakamura ZM, Deal AM, Park EM, Stanton KE, Lopez YE, Quillen LJ, O'Hare Kelly E, Heiling HM, Nyrop KA, Ray EM, Dees EC, Reeder-Hayes KE, Jolly TA, Carey LA, Abdou Y, Olajide OA, Rauch JK, Joseph R, Copeland A, McNamara MA, Ahles TA, Muss HB. A phase II single-arm trial of memantine for prevention of cognitive decline during chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer: Feasibility, tolerability, acceptability, and preliminary effects. Cancer Med 2023; 12:8172-8183. [PMID: 36645168 PMCID: PMC10134315 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive difficulties have been described after chemotherapy for breast cancer, but there is no standard of care to improve cognitive outcomes in these patients. This trial examined the feasibility, tolerability, acceptability, and preliminary effects of memantine to prevent cognitive decline during chemotherapy for breast cancer. METHODS Patients with stage I-III breast cancer, scheduled for neo/adjuvant chemotherapy, completed a cognitive battery prior to and 4 weeks after completing chemotherapy. Memantine (10 mg BID) was administered concurrent with chemotherapy. Our primary cognitive outcome was visual working memory assessed by the Delayed Matching to Sample test. We used the Brief Medication Questionnaire to assess acceptability. RESULTS Of 126 patients approached, 56 (44%) enrolled. Forty-five (80%) received ≥1 dose of memantine and completed pre-post assessments. Seventy-six percent reported taking ≥90% of scheduled doses. Participants were mean age of 56, 77% White, and 57% had stage I disease. Sixty-four percent had stable or improved Delayed Matching to Sample test scores. Stable or improved cognition was observed in 87%-91% across objective cognitive domain composite measures. Sixty-six percent self-reported stable or improved cognitive symptoms. There were seven greater than or equal to grade 3 adverse events; two were possibly related to memantine. Only 5% reported that taking memantine was a disruption to their lives. CONCLUSIONS Memantine was well-tolerated and consistently taken by a large majority of patients receiving breast cancer chemotherapy. The majority demonstrated stable or improved cognition from pre- to post-assessment. Randomized trials are needed to determine memantine's efficacy to ameliorate cognitive loss. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04033419.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zev M Nakamura
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Allison M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Eliza M Park
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kate E Stanton
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Yesy E Lopez
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Laura J Quillen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Erin O'Hare Kelly
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hillary M Heiling
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kirsten A Nyrop
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Emily M Ray
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - E Claire Dees
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Katherine E Reeder-Hayes
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Trevor A Jolly
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lisa A Carey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Yara Abdou
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Julia K Rauch
- Rex Hematology Oncology Associates, Rex Cancer Care, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ranjit Joseph
- Rex Hematology Oncology Associates, Rex Cancer Care, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anureet Copeland
- Rex Hematology Oncology Associates, Rex Cancer Care, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Megan A McNamara
- Rex Hematology Oncology Associates, Rex Cancer Care, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Tim A Ahles
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Hyman B Muss
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Carroll JE, Nakamura ZM, Small BJ, Zhou X, Cohen HJ, Ahles TA, Ahn J, Bethea TN, Extermann M, Graham D, Isaacs C, Jim HS, Jacobsen PB, McDonald BC, Patel SK, Rentscher K, Root J, Saykin AJ, Tometich DB, Van Dyk K, Zhai W, Breen EC, Mandelblatt JS. Elevated C-Reactive Protein and Subsequent Patient-Reported Cognitive Problems in Older Breast Cancer Survivors: The Thinking and Living With Cancer Study. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:295-306. [PMID: 36179271 PMCID: PMC9839283 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine longitudinal relationships between levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and cognition in older breast cancer survivors and noncancer controls. METHODS English-speaking women age ≥ 60 years, newly diagnosed with primary breast cancer (stage 0-III), and frequency-matched controls were enrolled from September 2010 to March 2020; women with dementia, neurologic disorders, and other cancers were excluded. Assessments occurred presystemic therapy/enrollment and at annual visits up to 60 months. Cognition was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function and neuropsychological testing. Mixed linear effect models tested for survivor-control differences in natural log (ln)-transformed CRP at each visit. Random effect-lagged fluctuation models tested directional effects of ln-CRP on subsequent cognition. All models controlled for age, race, study site, cognitive reserve, obesity, and comorbidities; secondary analyses evaluated if depression or anxiety affected results. RESULTS There were 400 survivors and 329 controls with CRP specimens and follow-up data (average age of 67.7 years; range, 60-90 years). The majority of survivors had stage I (60.9%), estrogen receptor-positive (87.6%) tumors. Survivors had significantly higher adjusted mean ln-CRP than controls at baseline and 12-, 24-, and 60-month visits (all P < .05). Higher adjusted ln-CRP predicted lower participant-reported cognition on subsequent visits among survivors, but not controls (P interaction = .008); effects were unchanged by depression or anxiety. Overall, survivors had adjusted Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function scores that were 9.5 and 14.2 points lower than controls at CRP levels of 3.0 and 10.0 mg/L. Survivors had poorer neuropsychological test performance (v controls), with significant interactions with CRP only for the Trails B test. CONCLUSION Longitudinal relationships between CRP and cognition in older breast cancer survivors suggest that chronic inflammation may play a role in development of cognitive problems. CRP testing could be clinically useful in survivorship care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith E. Carroll
- Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Zev M. Nakamura
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Brent J. Small
- School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Xingtao Zhou
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Harvey J. Cohen
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Tim A. Ahles
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jaeil Ahn
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Traci N. Bethea
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Martine Extermann
- Department of Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Deena Graham
- John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | | | - Paul B. Jacobsen
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Brenna C. McDonald
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Indiana Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | - Kelly Rentscher
- Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - James Root
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andrew J. Saykin
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Indiana Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | - Kathleen Van Dyk
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Wanting Zhai
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Elizabeth C. Breen
- Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jeanne S. Mandelblatt
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ng CAS, Biran LP, Galvano E, Mandelblatt J, Vicini S, Rebeck GW. Chemotherapy promotes astrocytic response to Aβ deposition, but not Aβ levels, in a mouse model of amyloid and APOE. Neurobiol Dis 2022; 175:105915. [PMID: 36336241 PMCID: PMC9794416 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Many cancer survivors experience cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI), which is characterized by problems of attention, working memory, and executive function following chemotherapy and/or hormonal treatment. APOE4, the strongest genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's Disease (AD), is also a risk factor for CRCI, especially among survivors exposed to chemotherapy. We explored whether the effects of APOE genotype to chemotherapy were associated with an increase in AD pathological processes, using a mouse model of amyloid (5XFAD) along with the E3 or E4 alleles of human APOE (E3FAD and E4FAD). Six-month-old female E3FAD mice (control n = 5, treated n = 5) and E4FAD (control n = 6, treated n = 6) were treated with two doses of doxorubicin (total 10 mg/kg) or DMSO vehicle. After six weeks, mice were euthanized and brains were analyzed by immunohistochemistry and biochemical assays. Doxorubicin-treated mice had the same level of Aβ in the brain as control mice, as measured by 6E10 immunohistochemistry, Aβ40 and Aβ42 ELISAs, and plaque morphologies. Doxorubicin significantly increased the level of the astrocytic response to Aβ deposits, which was independent of APOE genotype; no effects of doxorubicin were observed on the microglial responses. These data are consistent with a model in which the effects of doxorubicin on risk of CRCI are unrelated amyloid accumulation, but possibly related to glial responses to damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christi Anne S. Ng
- Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Lucas P. Biran
- Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Elena Galvano
- Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Jeanne Mandelblatt
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program and Georgetown Lombardi Institute for Cancer and Aging Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Stefano Vicini
- Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America,Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - G. William Rebeck
- Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America,Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America,Corresponding author at: 3970 Reservoir Rd, NW, Washington, DC 20007, United States of America. (G.W. Rebeck)
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
García-Sánchez J, Mafla-España MA, Torregrosa MD, Cauli O. Adjuvant aromatase inhibitor treatment worsens depressive symptoms and sleep quality in postmenopausal women with localized breast cancer: A one-year follow-up study. Breast 2022; 66:310-316. [PMID: 36462308 PMCID: PMC9712768 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
First-line treatment in postmenopausal women with estrogen- and/or progesterone-positive breast cancer consists of aromatase inhibitors (AROi). The ability of AROi to promote or worsen cognitive function, depressive symptoms, sleep quality and performance in basic activities of daily life as primary and concomitant outcomes in long longitudinal studies in post-menopausal women has been seldom investigated. This study is a cohort trial which aimed to determine if there were differences in cognitive function assessment, depressive symptoms, and sleep quality after 1 year under AROi treatment and to determine the interrelations between these symptoms. METHODS A prospective 1-year longitudinal study was performed in a representative sample of tertiary hospital. Women with localized breast cancer newly treated with AROi therapy were evaluated for cognitive functions, depressive symptoms, sleep problems and ability to perform basic activities of the daily life at baseline and after 6 months and 12 months under adjuvant AROi treatment. RESULTS Analysis of cognitive functions by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores did not show significantly worsening under AROi treatment after 6 months and 12 months of treatment compared to the baseline. Analysis of depressive symptoms with the Geriatric Depression Scale and sleep quality with the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) scores showed significant (p < 0.05) changes after 6 and 12 months of treatment with AROi, with women describing more depressive symptoms and more sleep disturbances. CONCLUSIONS Our study found impairments in sleep quality and an increase in depressive symptoms, which has important implications for clinicians as they impair quality of life and adherence to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier García-Sánchez
- Medical Oncology Department, Doctor Peset University Hospital, Valencia, Spain,Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Center of Wallonie Picarde, Tournai, Belgium
| | - Mayra Alejandra Mafla-España
- Frailty Research Organized Group, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain,Department of Nursing, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Omar Cauli
- Frailty Research Organized Group, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain,Department of Nursing, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain,Corresponding author. Frailty Research Organized Group, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Van Dyk K, Ahn J, Zhou X, Zhai W, Ahles TA, Bethea TN, Carroll JE, Cohen HJ, Dilawari AA, Graham D, Jacobsen PB, Jim H, McDonald BC, Nakamura ZM, Patel SK, Rentscher KE, Saykin AJ, Small BJ, Mandelblatt JS, Root JC. Associating persistent self-reported cognitive decline with neurocognitive decline in older breast cancer survivors using machine learning: The Thinking and Living with Cancer study. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:1132-1140. [PMID: 36030173 PMCID: PMC10016202 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Revised: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many cancer survivors report cognitive problems following diagnosis and treatment. However, the clinical significance of patient-reported cognitive symptoms early in survivorship can be unclear. We used a machine learning approach to determine the association of persistent self-reported cognitive symptoms two years after diagnosis and neurocognitive test performance in a prospective cohort of older breast cancer survivors. MATERIALS AND METHODS We enrolled breast cancer survivors with non-metastatic disease (n = 435) and age- and education-matched non-cancer controls (n = 441) between August 2010 and December 2017 and followed until January 2020; we excluded women with neurological disease and all women passed a cognitive screen at enrollment. Women completed the FACT-Cog Perceived Cognitive Impairment (PCI) scale and neurocognitive tests of attention, processing speed, executive function, learning, memory and visuospatial ability, and timed activities of daily living assessments at enrollment (pre-systemic treatment) and annually to 24 months, for a total of 59 individual neurocognitive measures. We defined persistent self-reported cognitive decline as clinically meaningful decline (3.7+ points) on the PCI scale from enrollment to twelve months with persistence to 24 months. Analysis used four machine learning models based on data for change scores (baseline to twelve months) on the 59 neurocognitive measures and measures of depression, anxiety, and fatigue to determine a set of variables that distinguished the 24-month persistent cognitive decline group from non-cancer controls or from survivors without decline. RESULTS The sample of survivors and controls ranged in age from were ages 60-89. Thirty-three percent of survivors had self-reported cognitive decline at twelve months and two-thirds continued to have persistent decline to 24 months (n = 60). Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) models distinguished survivors with persistent self-reported declines from controls (AUC = 0.736) and survivors without decline (n = 147; AUC = 0.744). The variables that separated groups were predominantly neurocognitive test performance change scores, including declines in list learning, verbal fluency, and attention measures. DISCUSSION Machine learning may be useful to further our understanding of cancer-related cognitive decline. Our results suggest that persistent self-reported cognitive problems among older women with breast cancer are associated with a constellation of mild neurocognitive changes warranting clinical attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen Van Dyk
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
| | - Jaeil Ahn
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Xingtao Zhou
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Wanting Zhai
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Tim A Ahles
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Traci N Bethea
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Judith E Carroll
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America; Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Harvey Jay Cohen
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Asma A Dilawari
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Deena Graham
- John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, United States of America
| | - Paul B Jacobsen
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Heather Jim
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Brenna C McDonald
- Center for Neuroimaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and the Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Zev M Nakamura
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Sunita K Patel
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Kelly E Rentscher
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America; Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Andrew J Saykin
- Center for Neuroimaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and the Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Brent J Small
- University of South Florida, Health Outcome and Behavior Program and Biostatistics Resource Core, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Research Institute at the University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States of America
| | - Jeanne S Mandelblatt
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - James C Root
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Yin F, Wang S, Hou C, Zhang Y, Yang Z, Wang X. Development and validation of nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer specific survival in locally advanced breast cancer patients: A SEER population-based study. Front Public Health 2022; 10:969030. [PMID: 36203704 PMCID: PMC9530359 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.969030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background For patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), conventional TNM staging is not accurate in predicting survival outcomes. The aim of this study was to develop two accurate survival prediction models to guide clinical decision making. Methods A retrospective analysis of 22,842 LABC patients was performed from 2010 to 2015 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. An additional cohort of 200 patients from the Binzhou Medical University Hospital (BMUH) was analyzed. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to screen for variables. The identified variables were used to build a survival prediction model. The performance of the nomogram models was assessed based on the concordance index (C-index), calibration plot, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results The LASSO analysis identified 9 variables in patients with LABC, including age, marital status, Grade, histological type, T-stage, N-stage, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. In the training cohort, the C-index of the nomogram in predicting the overall survival (OS) was 0.767 [95% confidence intervals (95% CI): 0.751-0.775], cancer specific survival (CSS) was 0.765 (95% CI: 0.756-0.774). In the external validation cohort, the C-index of the nomogram in predicting the OS was 0.858 (95% CI: 0.812-0.904), the CSS was 0.866 (95% CI: 0.817-0.915). In the training cohort, the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) values of the nomogram in prediction of the 1, 3, and 5-year OS were 0.836 (95% CI: 0.821-0.851), 0.769 (95% CI: 0.759-0.780), and 0.750 (95% CI: 0.738-0.762), respectively. The AUC values for prediction of the 1, 3, and 5-year CSS were 0.829 (95% CI: 0.811-0.847), 0.769 (95% CI: 0.757-0.780), and 0.745 (95% CI: 0.732-0.758), respectively. Results of the C-index, ROC curve, and DCA demonstrated that the nomogram was more accurate in predicting the OS and CSS of patients compared with conventional TNM staging. Conclusion Two prediction models were developed and validated in this study which provided more accurate prediction of the OS and CSS in LABC patients than the TNM staging. The constructed models can be used for predicting survival outcomes and guide treatment plans for LABC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangxu Yin
- Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou, China
| | - Song Wang
- Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou, China
| | - Chong Hou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, China
| | - Yiyuan Zhang
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Affiliated Reproductive Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Zhenlin Yang
- Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou, China,*Correspondence: Zhenlin Yang
| | - Xiaohong Wang
- Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou, China,Xiaohong Wang
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Nakamura ZM, Vohra SN, Jensen CE, Nyrop KA, Deal AM, Heiling HM, Mangieri NJ, Grant SJ, Lichtman EI, Rubinstein SM, Wood WA, Muss HB, Tuchman SA. Prevalence and clinical correlates of cognitive impairment in adults with plasma cell disorders. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:987-996. [PMID: 35484067 PMCID: PMC10024927 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Older adults with plasma cell disorders (PCDs) experience cognitive dysfunction that may be attributable to the disease and associated therapies. Yet, this has seldom been reported in the literature. Our objectives were to describe cognitive function (objective and patient-reported) in adults with PCDs and to explore clinical correlates of cognitive impairment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants completed a geriatric assessment between March 2018 and February 2020. Cognitive function was evaluated using two objective measures - Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA, cutpoint <26) and Blessed Orientation Memory Concentration Test (BOMC, cutpoint >4) - and two patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures - Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Cognitive Function (PROMIS-CF, cutpoint <45) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Cognitive Functioning subscale (EORTC-CF, cutpoint <75). Spearman correlations examined relationships among these measures and log binomial regression was used to examine characteristics associated with cognitive impairment, as defined by the MoCA and PROMIS-CF measures. RESULTS Among 86 participants with a mean age of 69 (range: 46-91), the prevalence of cognitive dysfunction was between 20% (BOMC) and 63% (MoCA). There was moderate correlation among objective measures (r = 0.51, p < 0.0001), moderate to high correlation among PRO measures (r = 0.69, p < 0.0001), but no correlation between objective and PRO measures. Factors associated with objective impairment included ≤ high school education (RR 1.46, p = 0.009), living alone (RR 1.42, p = 0.02), relapsed/refractory disease (RR 1.39, p = 0.04), empirically de-intensified induction therapy (RR 1.62, p = 0.008), frailty (RR 1.49, p = 0.04), and peripheral vascular disease (RR 1.54, p = 0.002). Factors associated with PRO impairment included social isolation (RR 3.43, p = 0.003), depression (RR 3.30, p = 0.004) and anxiety (RR 4.43, p = 0.0002), frailty (RR 3.60, p = 0.02), falls in the previous 6 months (RR 2.53, p = 0.02), and deficits in physical function (RR 4.44, p = 0.01). Older age was not associated with either objective or PRO impairment. DISCUSSION Cognitive impairment, using objective and PRO screening measures, was relatively common in adults with PCDs. Cancer-related factors and medical comorbidities were associated with objective cognitive impairment whereas psychosocial and functional factors were associated with PRO impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zev M Nakamura
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Sanah N Vohra
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Christopher E Jensen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kirsten A Nyrop
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Allison M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Hillary M Heiling
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Nicholas J Mangieri
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Shakira J Grant
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Eben I Lichtman
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Samuel M Rubinstein
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - William A Wood
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Hyman B Muss
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sascha A Tuchman
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Karanth SD, Katsumata Y, Nelson PT, Fardo DW, McDowell JK, Schmitt FA, Kryscio RJ, Browning SR, Braithwaite D, Arnold SM, Abner EL. Cancer diagnosis is associated with a lower burden of dementia and less Alzheimer's-type neuropathology. Brain 2022; 145:2518-2527. [PMID: 35094057 PMCID: PMC9612796 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awac035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer and Alzheimer's disease are common diseases in ageing populations. Previous research has reported a lower incidence of Alzheimer's disease-type (amnestic) dementia among individuals with a diagnosis of cancer. Both cancer and amnestic dementia are prevalent and potentially lethal clinical syndromes. The current study was conducted to investigate the association of cancer diagnosis with neuropathological and cognitive features of dementia. Data were analysed from longitudinally evaluated participants in a community-based cohort study of brain ageing who came to autopsy at the University of Kentucky Alzheimer's Disease Research Center. These data were linked to the Kentucky Cancer Registry, a population-based state cancer surveillance system, to obtain cancer-related data. We examined the relationship between cancer diagnosis, clinical dementia diagnosis, Mini-Mental State Examination scores and neuropathological features using inverse probability weighting to address bias due to confounding and missing data. To address bias due to inclusion of participants with dementia at cohort baseline, we repeated all analyses restricted to the participants who were cognitively normal at baseline. Included participants (n = 785) had a mean ± standard deviation age of death of 83.8 ± 8.6 years; 60.1% were female. Cancer diagnosis was determined in 190 (24.2%) participants, and a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or dementia was determined in 539 (68.7%). APOE ɛ4 allele dosage was lower among participants with cancer diagnosis compared to cancer-free participants overall (P = 0.0072); however, this association was not observed among those who were cognitively normal at baseline. Participants with cancer diagnosis had lower odds of mild cognitive impairment or dementia, and higher cognitive test scores (e.g. Mini-Mental State Examination scores evaluated 6 and ≤2 years ante-mortem, P < 0.001 for both comparisons). Cancer diagnosis also associated with lower odds of higher Braak neurofibrillary tangle stages (III/IV) or (V/VI), moderate/frequent neuritic plaques, moderate/frequent diffuse plaques and moderate/severe cerebral amyloid angiopathy (all P < 0.05). By contrast, TDP-43, α-synuclein and cerebrovascular pathologies were not associated with cancer diagnosis. Cancer diagnosis was associated with a lower burden of Alzheimer's disease pathology and less cognitive impairment. These findings from a community-based cohort with neuropathological confirmation of substrates support the hypothesis that there is an inverse relationship between cancer and Alzheimer's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shama D Karanth
- Aging and Geriatric Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Yuriko Katsumata
- Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Peter T Nelson
- Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - David W Fardo
- Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Jaclyn K McDowell
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
- Markey Cancer Control Program, Kentucky Cancer Registry, Lexington, KY 40504, USA
| | - Frederick A Schmitt
- Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Richard J Kryscio
- Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
- Department of Statistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Steven R Browning
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Dejana Braithwaite
- Aging and Geriatric Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
- Department of Population Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Susanne M Arnold
- Markey Cancer Control Program, Kentucky Cancer Registry, Lexington, KY 40504, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Erin L Abner
- Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
McDonald BC, Van Dyk K, Deardorff RL, Bailey JN, Zhai W, Carroll JE, Root JC, Ahles TA, Mandelblatt JS, Saykin AJ. Multimodal MRI examination of structural and functional brain changes in older women with breast cancer in the first year of antiestrogen hormonal therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 194:113-126. [PMID: 35476252 PMCID: PMC9255382 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06597-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer patients are concerned about treatment-related cognitive problems. We examined effects of antiestrogen hormonal therapy on brain imaging metrics in older women with breast cancer. METHODS Women aged 60 + treated with hormonal therapy only and matched non-cancer controls (n = 29/group) completed MRI and objective and self-reported cognitive assessment at pre-treatment/enrollment and 12 months later. Gray matter was examined using voxel-based morphometry (VBM), FreeSurfer, and brain age calculations. Functional MRI (fMRI) assessed working memory-related activation. Analyses examined cross-sectional and longitudinal differences and tested associations between brain metrics, cognition, and days on hormonal therapy. RESULTS The cancer group showed regional reductions over 12 months in frontal, temporal, and parietal gray matter on VBM, reduced FreeSurfer cortical thickness in prefrontal, parietal, and insular regions, and increased working memory-related fMRI activation in frontal, cingulate, and visual association cortex. Controls showed only reductions in fusiform gyrus on VBM and FreeSurfer temporal and parietal cortex thickness. Women with breast cancer showed higher estimated brain age and lower regional gray matter volume than controls at both time points. The cancer group showed a trend toward lower performance in attention, processing speed, and executive function at follow-up. There were no significant associations between brain imaging metrics and cognition or days on hormonal therapy. CONCLUSION Older women with breast cancer showed brain changes in the first year of hormonal therapy. Increased brain activation during working memory processing may be a sign of functional compensation for treatment-related structural changes. This hypothesis should be tested in larger samples over longer time periods. CLINICALTRIALS GOV IDENTIFIER NCT03451383.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenna C McDonald
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine and Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Kathleen Van Dyk
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine and UCLA Jonnson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Rachael L Deardorff
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine and Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Jessica N Bailey
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine and Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Wanting Zhai
- Georgetown University and Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Judith E Carroll
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine and UCLA Jonnson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - James C Root
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tim A Ahles
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeanne S Mandelblatt
- Georgetown University and Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Andrew J Saykin
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine and Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Root JC, Zhou X, Ahn J, Small BJ, Zhai W, Bethea T, Carroll JE, Cohen HJ, Dilawari A, Extermann M, Graham D, Isaacs C, Jacobsen PB, Jim H, McDonald BC, Nakamura ZM, Patel SK, Rentscher K, Saykin AJ, Van Dyk K, Mandelblatt JS, Ahles TA. Association of markers of tumor aggressivity and cognition in women with breast cancer before adjuvant treatment: The Thinking and Living with Cancer Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 194:413-422. [PMID: 35587324 PMCID: PMC9392482 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06623-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Tumor features associated with aggressive cancers may affect cognition prior to systemic therapy. We evaluated associations of cognition prior to adjuvant therapy and tumor aggressivity in older breast cancer patients. METHODS Women diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer (n = 705) ages 60-98 were enrolled from August 2010-March 2020. Cognition was measured post-surgery, pre-systemic therapy using self-reported (FACT-Cog Perceived Cognitive Impairment [PCI]) and objective tests of attention, processing speed, and executive function (APE domain) and learning and memory [LM domain]. Linear regression tested associations of pre-treatment tumor features and cognition, adjusting for age, race, and study site. HER2 positivity and higher stage (II/III vs. 0/I) were a priori predictors of cognition; in secondary analyses we explored associations of other tumor features and cognitive impairment (i.e., PCI score < 54 or having 2 tests < 1.5 SD or 1 test < 2 SD from the mean APE or LM domain score). RESULTS HER2 positivity and the hormone receptor negative/HER2 + molecular subtype were associated with lower adjusted mean self-reported cognition scores and higher impairment rates (p values < .05). Higher stage of disease was associated with lower objective performance in APE. Other tumor features were associated with cognition in unadjusted and adjusted models, including larger tumor size and lower PCI scores (p = 0.02). Tumor features were not related to LM. CONCLUSIONS Pre-adjuvant therapy cognition was associated with HER2 positivity and higher stage of disease and other features of aggressive tumors. Additional research is needed to confirm these results and assess potential mechanisms and clinical management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James C Root
- Neurocognitive Research Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, USA.
- Departments of Psychiatry and Anesthesiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Xingtao Zhou
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jaeil Ahn
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Brent J Small
- School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, and Senior Member, Health Outcome and Behavior Program and Biostatistics Resource Core, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute at the University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Wanting Zhai
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Traci Bethea
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Judith E Carroll
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human BehaviorJonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Harvey Jay Cohen
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Asma Dilawari
- MedStar Washington Hospital Center, MedStar Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, USA
| | - Martine Extermann
- Department of Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Claudine Isaacs
- Departments of Oncology and Medicine, Breast Cancer Program, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Paul B Jacobsen
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Heather Jim
- Department of Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Brenna C McDonald
- Center for Neuroimaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and the Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Zev M Nakamura
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sunita K Patel
- Departments of Population Sciences and Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Kelly Rentscher
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human BehaviorJonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andrew J Saykin
- Center for Neuroimaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and the Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Kathleen Van Dyk
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human BehaviorJonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jeanne S Mandelblatt
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Tim A Ahles
- Neurocognitive Research Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Exercise in cancer prevention and anticancer therapy: Efficacy, molecular mechanisms and clinical information. Cancer Lett 2022; 544:215814. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2022.215814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
49
|
Change in Patients' Perceived Cognition Following Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Lymphoma. Transplant Cell Ther 2022; 28:401.e1-401.e7. [PMID: 35580732 PMCID: PMC9339228 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy can lead to durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) are common and may place patients at risk for longer-term cognitive impairment. This study examined changes in cognition in the first year after CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy for lymphoma, as well as CAR T-cell therapy-specific risk-factors (e.g., ICANS, CRS) and nonspecific risk factors (e.g., baseline quality of life, frailty) for worsening cognition. Patients' perceived cognition was assessed at baseline and at days 90 and 360. Clinical variables were abstracted from medical records. Piecewise mixed models were used to examine acute change (i.e., within 90 days) and longer-term change (i.e., from 90 days to 360 days) in cognition, as well as to explore risk factors for worsening cognition. Among 118 participants (mean age 61, 59% male), mean levels of perceived cognition did not change from baseline to day 90 (P> .05) but worsened from day 90 to day 360 in global cognition and in the domains of memory, language, organization, and divided attention (P< .05). Although statistically significant, changes were small (d values 0.15-0.28). Greater baseline fatigue, anxiety, and depression were associated with worse global cognition at day 90 (P< .01). Patients with more severe ICANS post-CART reported worse global cognition at day 360 (P< .05), although there were no differences in perceived cognition by severity of CRS (P> .05). Other putative risk factors were not associated with acute or longer-term changes in perceived cognition (P> .05). CAR T-cell therapy recipients reported delayed deterioration in several cognitive domains, although changes were small. These findings may be useful when educating future patients on what to expect when receiving CAR T-cell therapy.
Collapse
|
50
|
Battisti NML, Smith IE. Preventing late recurrence in hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer: a review. Eur J Cancer 2022; 172:53-64. [PMID: 35753212 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Late recurrences are a key challenge for patients with early-stage oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, with the risk of disease relapse continuing steadily from 5 to more than 20 years after diagnosis. Five years of adjuvant endocrine therapy with tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor was shown many years ago to improve survival. More recently, the trials of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy for more than 5 years have shown a further small gain, but with an associated small risk of increased long-term toxicity including bone loss, cardiovascular impairment and impaired quality of life. This review describes the efficacy and safety of extended endocrine therapy, the optimal selection criteria for patient benefit and the potential for novel agents to improve long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti
- Breast Unit - Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 203 Fulham Rd, Chelsea, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom; Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London SM2 5NG, United Kingdom.
| | - Ian E Smith
- Breast Unit - Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 203 Fulham Rd, Chelsea, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|