Caregiver costs and financial burden in caregivers of African American cancer survivors

PURPOSE

People with cancer commonly rely on loved ones as informal caregivers during and after treatment. Costs related to caregiving and their association with caregiver financial burden are not well understood.

METHODS

Results include data from 964 caregivers of African American cancer survivors in the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) cohort. Caregiving costs include those related to medications, logistics (e.g., transportation), and medical bills. Financial burden measures included caregiver financial resources, strain, and difficulty paying caregiving costs. Prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of associations between costs and high financial burden were calculated using modified Poisson models controlling for caregiver characteristics.

RESULTS

Caregivers included spouses (36%), non-married partners (8%), family members (48%), and friends (9%). Nearly two-thirds (64%) of caregivers reported costs related to caregiving. Logistical costs were the most common (58%), followed by medication costs (35%) and medical bills (17%). High financial hardship was reported by 38% of caregivers. Prevalence of high financial hardship was 52% (95% CI: 24%, 86%) higher among caregivers who reported any versus no caregiver costs. Associations between caregiver costs and high financial burden were evident for costs related to medications (PR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.58), logistics (PR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.29, 1.92), and medical bills (PR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.28, 1.92).

CONCLUSIONS

Most caregivers experienced costs related to caregiving, and these costs were associated with higher prevalence of high caregiver financial burden.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Informal caregivers experience financial hardship related to cancer along with cancer survivors.

Sleep health and quality of life in the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors cohort

PURPOSE

Sleep disturbances represent a modifiable target to improve quality of life and longer-term outcomes in cancer survivors. However, the association between sleep health and overall quality of life in African American cancer survivors has been poorly assessed, a population at increased risk for morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Seven hundred and eighteen Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) cohort participants completed a supplemental sleep survey at the time of enrollment, which included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Linear and logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between sleep and mental health, while block regression models were used to estimate the contribution of clustered factors to Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL).

RESULTS

Nearly 60% of the cohort reported symptoms indicative of poor sleep quality on the PSQI, 15% reported excessive daytime sleepiness on the ESS, and 12% reported moderate to severe insomnia on the ISI. Survivors with elevated ISI scores reported FACT-G scores that were 17 points lower than those without symptoms of insomnia (95% CI: - 13.1, - 21.2). Poor sleep health accounted for the largest proportion of variability in FACT-G scores (R2 = 0.27) and change in R2 value (0.18) when compared to comorbidities, health behaviors, cancer-related factors, and demographics.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall sleep health was significantly associated with poorer HRQOL and variability in FACT-G scores. Additional studies investigating a causal relationship between sleep and HRQOL are needed to determine whether sleep quality could affect disparities in cancer outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Addressing sleep quality in cancer survivors may improve long-term health and HRQOL.

Age at diagnosis and social risks among Black cancer survivors: Results from the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors cohort

BACKGROUND

Social risks are common among cancer survivors who have the fewest financial resources; however, little is known about how prevalence differs by age at diagnosis, despite younger survivors' relatively low incomes and wealth.

METHODS

The authors used data from 3703 participants in the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) cohort of Black cancer survivors. Participants self-reported several forms of social risks, including food insecurity, housing instability, utility shut-offs, not getting care because of cost or lack of transportation, and feeling unsafe in their home neighborhood. Modified Poisson models were used to estimate prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of social risks by age at diagnosis, controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, and cancer-related factors.

RESULTS

Overall, 35% of participants reported at least one social risk, and 17% reported two or more risks. Social risk prevalence was highest among young adults aged 20-39 years (47%) followed by those aged 40-54 years (43%), 55-64 years (38%), and 65 years and older (24%; p for trend < .001). Compared with survivors who were aged 65 years and older at diagnosis, adjusted prevalence ratios for any social risk were 1.75 (95% CI, 1.42-2.16) for survivors aged 20-39 years, 1.76 (95% CI, 1.52-2.03) for survivors aged 40-54 years, and 1.41 (95% CI, 1.23-1.60) for survivors aged 55-64 years at diagnosis. Similar associations were observed for individual social risks and experiencing two or more risks.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population of Black cancer survivors, social risks were inversely associated with age at diagnosis. Diagnosis in young adulthood and middle age should be considered a risk factor for social risks and should be prioritized in work to reduce the financial effects of cancer on financially vulnerable cancer survivors.

Development and evaluation of the MiCheck® Prostate test for clinically significant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

There is a clinical need to identify patients with an elevated PSA who would benefit from prostate biopsy due to the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSCaP). We have previously reported the development of the MiCheck® Test for clinically significant prostate cancer. Here, we report MiCheck's further development and incorporation of the Roche Cobas standard clinical chemistry analyzer.

OBJECTIVES

To further develop and adapt the MiCheck® Prostate test so it can be performed using a standard clinical chemistry analyzer and characterize its performance using the MiCheck-01 clinical trial sample set.

DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS

About 358 patient samples from the MiCheck-01 US clinical trial were used for the development of the MiCheck® Prostate test. These consisted of 46 controls, 137 non-CaP, 62 non-CSCaP, and 113 CSCaP.

METHODS

Serum analyte concentrations for cellular growth factors were determined using custom-made Luminex-based R&D Systems multi-analyte kits. Analytes that can also be measured using standard chemistry analyzers were examined for their ability to contribute to an algorithm with high sensitivity for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Samples were then re-measured using a Roche Cobas analyzer for development of the final algorithm.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Logistic regression modeling with Monte Carlo cross-validation was used to identify Human Epidydimal Protein 4 (HE4) as an analyte able to significantly improve the algorithm specificity at 95% sensitivity. A final model was developed using analyte measurements from the Cobas analzyer.

RESULTS

The MiCheck® logistic regression model was developed and consisted of PSA, %free PSA, DRE, and HE4. The model differentiated clinically significant cancer from no cancer or not-clinically significant cancer with AUC of 0.85, sensitivity of 95%, and specificity of 50%. Applying the MiCheck® test to all evaluable 358 patients from the MiCheck-01 study demonstrated that up to 50% of unnecessary biopsies could be avoided while delaying diagnosis of only 5.3% of Gleason Score (GS) ≥3+4 cancers, 1.8% of GS≥4+3 cancers and no cancers of GS 8 to 10.

CONCLUSIONS

The MiCheck® Prostate test identifies clinically significant prostate cancer with high sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV). It can be performed in a clinical laboratory using a Roche Cobas clinical chemistry analyzer. The MiCheck® Prostate test could assist in reducing unnecessary prostate biopsies with a marginal number of patients experiencing a delayed diagnosis.

Use of electronic cigarettes among African American cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

The use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) is increasing rapidly in the United States, although the negative health outcomes associated with these products are still unknown. Emerging research has examined the use of e-cigarettes in the cancer survivor population as a whole, yet none has focused on e-cigarette use in the African American (AA) cancer survivor population.

METHODS

The authors used data from the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors cohort study, comprised of AA adult cancer survivors. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors potentially associated with e-cigarette ever use and current use.

RESULTS

Of 4443 cancer survivors who completed a baseline interview, 8.3% (n = 370) reported ever using e-cigarettes, and 16.5% (n = 61) of those reporting ever use also reported current use of e-cigarettes. Ever users and current users were on average younger than those who did not use e-cigarettes (57.5 vs. 61.2 years; p < .001). Current cigarette smokers were >20 times more likely (odds ratio, 20.75; 95% confidence interval, 12.84-33.55) and former smokers were almost 10 times more likely (odds ratio, 9.50; 95% confidence interval, 6.03-14.97) to have ever used e-cigarettes than never-smokers. Preliminary data suggested that ever use of e-cigarettes is associated with later stage at diagnosis for breast and colorectal cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

As the use of e-cigarettes increases in the general population, it is important to continue to monitor their use in cancer survivors and to gain more insight as it pertains to the AA cancer survivor population. Elucidation of the factors associated with e-cigarette use in this population may help inform comprehensive cancer survivorship recommendations and interventions.

Housing instability and psychological distress in African American cancer survivors: findings from the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors study

PURPOSE

As health care systems seek to screen for and address housing instability in patient populations, robust evidence linking unstable housing to patient-reported outcomes is needed. Housing instability may increase psychological distress in cancer survivors, potentially more so among African American cancer survivors who are also likely to experience disproportionate burden of housing instability. The purpose of this analysis was to estimate associations between housing instability and psychological distress in African Americans diagnosed with cancer.

METHODS

We included survey responses from 2875 African American cancer survivors in the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) study. We examined how housing instability at enrollment, using an item adapted from the Health Leads Screening Toolkit, related to psychological distress at enrollment, using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS) 4-item anxiety and depression short forms. Linear regression models adjusted for sociodemographic factors were used to estimate associations overall and stratified by stage at diagnosis.

RESULTS

Approximately 12% of participants reported being unstably housed. Housing instability was associated with significant differences in PROMIS scores for both anxiety (difference: 6.79; 95% CI: 5.57-8.01) and depression (difference: 6.16; 95% CI: 4.99-7.34). We did not find meaningful differences stratifying by disease stage.

CONCLUSION

Housing instability was experienced by over a tenth of this cohort of African American cancer survivors and was related to statistically and clinically meaningful differences in psychological distress even following adjustment for sociodemographics.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

These findings provide evidence supporting screening of housing instability in cancer survivors, especially those from medically underserved populations.

The impact of high intensity interval training in a diverse group of cancer survivors: CAPABLE, a pilot study

Purpose

Given the well-documented benefits of regular exercise to cancer survivors, current American Cancer Society guidelines recommend that patients engage in a minimum of 150 min per week of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity with a minimum of two days of strength training. However, few survivors meet this goal, particularly among minorities.

Methods

The CAPABLE study is a single-arm, pilot exercise intervention that introduced 48 cancer survivors to a high intensity interval and strength training program three days a week for 12 weeks. We evaluated the impact of this unique training method on bodyweight, % body fat, serum markers correlated with an adverse cardiometabolic profile and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Measures were summarized at baseline and program exit. Paired t-tests were used to assess change in each of these measures over time.

Results

We observed losses in weight, body mass index, and % body fat, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels over 12-weeks. There were also clinically meaningful improvements in reported overall HRQoL (FACTG total change +9.5 (95% CI, 4.6, 14.4)) and in each one of the individual domains (physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being).

Conclusions

We observed meaningful improvements in body composition, HbA1c and quality of life over 12 weeks among cancer survivors participating in a high-intensity interval training program. Future work will include a control arm for comparison and address barriers to participation and adherence which will be important in using this intervention and others like it to improve outcomes and reduce cancer health disparities.

The impact of preexisting comorbidities on receipt of cancer therapy among women with Stage I-III breast cancer in the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors cohort

PURPOSE

Pre-existing comorbidities play an important role in choice of cancer treatment. We retrospectively evaluated the relationship between pre-existing comorbidities and receipt of local and systemic therapy in a cohort of Black women with Stage I-III breast cancer.

METHODS

The study population for analysis included 1169 women with Stage I-III disease enrolled in the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) cohort. Information on comorbidities, socio-demographic, and clinical variables were obtained from self-reported questionnaires and the cancer registry. Comorbidities were analyzed individually, and comorbidity burden was categorized as low (0-1), moderate (2-3) or high (≥4). We used logistic regression analysis to evaluate factors associated with receipt of local treatment (surgery ± radiation; N = 1156), hormonal (N = 848), and chemotherapy (N = 680). Adjusted models included variables selected a priori that were significant predictors in univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Receipt of treatment was categorized into local (82.6%), hormonal (73.7%), and/or chemotherapy (79.9%). Prior history of arthritis and depression were both associated with a lower likelihood to receive local treatment, [odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.66, 0.47-0.93, and 0.53, 0.36-0.78], respectively. Obesity was associated with higher likelihood of receiving hormonal therapy (OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.19, 2.26), and heart failure a lower likelihood (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.90). Older age (Ptrend  <0.01) and increasing co-morbidity burden (Ptrend  = 0.02) were associated with lower likelihood of receiving chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

History of prior co-morbidities has a potentially detrimental influence on receipt of recommended cancer-directed treatment among women with Stage I-III breast cancer.

The role of area-level socioeconomic disadvantage in racial disparities in cancer incidence in metropolitan Detroit

BACKGROUND

Neighborhood deprivation is associated with both race and cancer incidence, but there is a need to better understand the effect of structural inequities on racial cancer disparities. The goal of this analysis was to evaluate the relationship between a comprehensive measure of neighborhood-level social disadvantage and cancer incidence within the racially diverse population of metropolitan Detroit.

METHODS

We estimated breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer incidence rates using Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System and US decennial census data. Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage was measured by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) using Census Bureau's American Community Survey data at the Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMA) level. Associations between ADI at time of diagnosis and cancer incidence were estimated using Poisson mixed-effects models adjusting for age and sex. Attenuation of race-incidence associations by ADI was quantified using the "mediation" package in R.

RESULTS

ADI was inversely associated with incidence of breast cancer for both non-Hispanic White (NHW) and non-Hispanic Black (NHB) women (NHW: per-quartile RR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.88-0.96; NHB: per-quartile RR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.98) and with prostate cancer incidence only for NHW men (per-quartile RR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.97). ADI was positively associated with incidence of lung cancer for NHWs and NHBs (NHW: per-quartile RR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.21; NHB: per-quartile RR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.25-1.51) and incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) only among NHBs (per-quartile RR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.21). ADI significantly attenuated the relationship between race and hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (proportion attenuated = 8.5%, 95% CI 4.1-16.6%) and CRC cancer (proportion attenuated = 7.3%, 95% CI 3.7 to 12.8%), and there was a significant interaction between race and ADI for lung (interaction RR = 1.22, p < 0.0001) and prostate cancer (interaction RR = 1.09, p = 0.00092).

CONCLUSIONS

Area-level socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with risk of common cancers in a racially diverse population and plays a role in racial differences in cancer incidence.

Association between major discrimination and deficit accumulation in African American cancer survivors: The Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors Study

BACKGROUND

Discrimination can adversely affect health and accelerate aging, but little is known about these relationships in cancer survivors. This study examines associations of discrimination and aging among self-identified African American survivors.

METHODS

A population-based sample of 2232 survivors 20-79 years old at diagnosis were enrolled within 5 years of breast (n = 787), colorectal (n = 227), lung (n = 223), or prostate (n = 995) cancer between 2017 and 2022. Surveys were completed post-active therapy. A deficit accumulation index measured aging-related disease and function (score range, 0-1, where <0.20 is robust, 0.20 to <0.35 is pre-frail, and 0.35+ is frail; 0.06 is a large clinically meaningful difference). The discrimination scale assessed ever experiencing major discrimination and seven types of events (score, 0-7). Linear regression tested the association of discrimination and deficit accumulation, controlling for age, time from diagnosis, cancer type, stage and therapy, and sociodemographic variables.

RESULTS

Survivors were an average of 62 years old (SD, 9.6), 63.2% reported ever experiencing major discrimination, with an average of 2.4 (SD, 1.7) types of discrimination events. Only 24.4% had deficit accumulation scores considered robust (mean score, 0.30 [SD, 0.13]). Among those who reported ever experiencing major discrimination, survivors with four to seven types of discrimination events (vs. 0-1) had a large, clinically meaningful increase in adjusted deficits (0.062, p < .001) and this pattern was consistent across cancer types.

CONCLUSION

African American cancer survivors have high deficit accumulated index scores, and experiences of major discrimination were positively associated with these deficits. Future studies are needed to understand the intersectionality between aging, discrimination, and cancer survivorship among diverse populations.

Quality of life in endometrial cancer survivors by grade of disease

BACKGROUND

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries, with overall incidence increasing, particularly high-grade disease. There is sparse information regarding quality of life (QOL) in EC survivors with a focus on grade of disease.

METHODS

A total of 259 women with EC diagnosed between 2016 and 2020 were identified via the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System and consented to enroll in the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors cohort study (if African American, n = 138) or completed the baseline interview (if non-Hispanic white, n = 121). Each respondent provided information about their health history, educational attainment, health behaviors, and demographics. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and Endometrial-specific (FACT-En) were used to assess QOL.

RESULTS

Women diagnosed with high-grade (n = 112) and low-grade (n = 147) EC participated in this study. EC survivors with high-grade disease reported significantly lower QOL compared to survivors with low-grade disease (85 vs. 91, respectively, p value = 0.025) as assessed by the FACT-G. This difference was driven by lower physical and functional subscales among women with high-grade disease compared to those with low-grade disease (p value = 0.016 and p = 0.028, respectively). Interestingly, EC-specific QOL measures, as assessed by the FACT-En, did not differ by grade.

CONCLUSION

Grade of disease impacts QOL in EC survivors, as well as socioeconomic, psychological, and physical factors. Most of these factors are amenable to interventions and should be assessed in patients after an EC diagnosis.

Concurrent Surgery for Locoregional Gynecologic Cancers and Pelvic Floor Disorders in a Population of Patients With Medicare Insurance

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the rate of concurrent surgery for locoregional gynecologic cancer and pelvic organ prolapse-urinary incontinence (POP-UI) and to assess the rate of surgery for POP-UI within 5 years for those who did not undergo concurrent surgery.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study. The SEER-Medicare data set was used to identify cases of local or regional endometrial, cervical, and ovarian cancer diagnosed from 2000 to 2017. Patients were followed up for 5 years from diagnosis. We used χ 2 tests to identify categorical variables associated with having a concurrent POP-UI procedure with hysterectomy or within 5 years of hysterectomy. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% CIs adjusted for variables statistically significant (α=.05) in the univariate analyses.

RESULTS

Of 30,862 patients with locoregional gynecologic cancer, only 5.5% underwent concurrent POP-UI surgery. Of those with a preexisting diagnosis related to POP-UI, however, 21.1% had concurrent surgery. Of the patients who had a diagnosis of POP-UI at the time of initial surgery for cancer and who did not undergo concurrent surgery, an additional 5.5% had a second surgery for POP-UI within 5 years. The rate of concurrent surgery remained constant over the time period (5.7% in 2000 and 2017) despite an increase in the frequency of POP-UI diagnosis in the same time frame.

CONCLUSION

The rate of concurrent surgery for patients with an early-stage gynecologic cancer and POP-UI-associated diagnosis in women older than age 65 years was 21.1%. Of women who did not undergo concurrent surgery but had a diagnosis of POP-UI, 1 in 18 underwent surgery for POP-UI within 5 years of their index cancer surgery. Dedicated efforts must be made to identify patients who would most benefit from concurrent cancer and POP-UI surgery in those with locoregional gynecologic cancers and pelvic floor disorders.

Area-level Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Cancer Survival in Metropolitan Detroit

BACKGROUND

Racial segregation is linked to poorer neighborhood quality and adverse health conditions among minorities, including worse cancer outcomes. We evaluated relationships between race, neighborhood social disadvantage, and cancer survival.

METHODS

We calculated overall and cancer-specific survival for 11,367 non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and 29,481 non-Hispanic White (NHW) individuals with breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer using data from the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System. The area deprivation index (ADI) was used to measure social disadvantage at the census block group level, where higher ADI is associated with poorer neighborhood factors. Associations between ADI and survival were estimated using Cox proportional hazards mixed-effects models accounting for geographic grouping and adjusting for demographic and clinical factors.

RESULTS

Increasing ADI quintile was associated with increased overall mortality for all four cancer sites in multivariable-adjusted models. Stratified by race, these associations remained among breast (NHW: HR = 1.16, P < 0.0001; NHB: HR = 1.20, P < 0.0001), colorectal (NHW: HR = 1.11, P < 0.0001; NHB: HR = 1.09, P = 0.00378), prostate (NHW: HR = 1.18, P < 0.0001; NHB: HR = 1.18, P < 0.0001), and lung cancers (NHW: HR = 1.06, P < 0.0001; NHB: HR = 1.07, P = 0.00177). Cancer-specific mortality estimates were similar to overall mortality. Adjustment for ADI substantially attenuated the effects of race on mortality for breast [overall proportion attenuated (OPA) = 47%, P < 0.0001; cancer-specific proportion attenuated (CSPA) = 37%, P < 0.0001] prostate cancer (OPA = 51%, P < 0.0001; CSPA = 56%, P < 0.0001), and colorectal cancer (OPA = 69%, P = 0.032; CSPA = 36%, P = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Area-level socioeconomic disadvantage is related to cancer mortality in a racially diverse population, impacting racial differences in cancer mortality.

IMPACT

Understanding the role of neighborhood quality in cancer survivorship could improve community-based intervention practices.

Politically related stress and low-birth-weight infants among Arab, Asian, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, and non-Hispanic White women in Michigan

BACKGROUND

Despite the high cost of low birth weight and the persistent challenge of racial inequities affecting the Arab American community, there has been limited research to identify and examine risk factors for these inequities with validated data on Arab American ethnicity and recent population stressors.

OBJECTIVES

This study examined whether the 2016 presidential election is associated with low birth weight among non-Hispanic White, Arab American, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic Black women.

DESIGN

This population-based study of singleton births in Michigan (2008-2017) used an algorithm to identify mothers who were of Arab descent.

METHODS

We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association between race/ethnicity and the odds of low birth weight. We examined whether these associations differed before and after the 2016 presidential election and according to maternal education.

RESULTS

There were 1,019,738 births, including 66,272 (6.5%) classified as low birth weight. The odds of having a low-birth-weight infant were higher among all minority women compared to non-Hispanic White women. The association was similar before and after the 2016 presidential election and stronger among women with higher levels of education.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to estimate low birth weight among Arab American women in the context of political events. There are opportunities for future studies to discuss this issue in depth.

Evaluation of health behaviors and overall quality of life in younger adult African American cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological studies of cancer survivors have predominantly focused on non-Hispanic White, elderly patients, despite the observation that African Americans have higher rates of mortality. Therefore, we characterized cancer survivorship in younger African American survivors using the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) study to assess health behaviors and quality of life.

METHODS

Five hundred and seventeen patients diagnosed with any cancer between the ages of 20-49 (mean age: 42 years; SD: 6.7 years) completed a survey to identify important clinical, behavioral, and sociodemographic characteristics, measures of health literacy, and experiences of discrimination. Quality of life outcomes were evaluated in patients using FACT-G, FACT-Cog, and PROMIS® Anxiety and Depression scales. Stepwise linear and logistic regression were used to assess the association between quality of life measures and participant characteristics.

RESULTS

The mean FACT-G score was 74.1 (SD: 21.3), while the FACT-Cog was 55.1 (SD: 17.1) (FACT-G range 0-108 with higher scores indicating better function; elderly cancer patient mean: 82.2; FACT-Cog 18-item range 0-72 points with higher scores indicating better perceived cognitive functioning; scores <54 indicating cognitive impairment). In addition, 27.1% and 21.6% of patients had a score indicative of moderate or severe anxiety and depression, respectively. Perceived discrimination and the number of discriminatory events were significantly associated with reductions in three of the four quality of life measures. Health literacy was positively associated with all four health measures, while total comorbidity count was negatively associated with three of the four measures.

CONCLUSION

Younger adult African American cancer survivors who report experiencing discrimination and suffer from multiple comorbid conditions have poorer mental and overall health. Understanding the unique clinical and socioeconomic stressors that influence this patient population is essential for reducing health disparities and improving long-term survivorship.

Germline Variants in DNA Damage Repair Genes and HOXB13 Among Black Patients With Early-Onset Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

Genetic studies of prostate cancer susceptibility have predominantly focused on non-Hispanic White men, despite the observation that Black men are more likely to develop prostate cancer and die from the disease. Therefore, we sought to identify genetic variants in Black patients diagnosed with early-onset prostate cancer.

METHODS

Whole-exome sequencing of germline DNA from a population-based cohort of Black men diagnosed with prostate cancer at age 62 years or younger was performed. Analysis was focused on a panel of DNA damage repair (DDR) genes and HOXB13. All discovered variants were ranked according to their pathogenic potential based upon REVEL score, evidence from existing literature, and prevalence in the cohort. Logistic regression was used to investigate associations between mutation status and relevant clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Among 743 Black prostate cancer patients, we identified 26 unique pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variants in 14 genes (including HOXB13, BRCA1/2, BRIP1, ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2) among 30 men, or approximately 4.0% of the patient population. We also identified 33 unique variants of unknown significance in 16 genes among 39 men. Because of the rarity of these variants in the population, most associations between clinical characteristics did not achieve statistical significance. However, our results suggest that carriers for P or LP (P/LP) variants were more likely to have a first-degree relative diagnosed with DDR gene-associated cancer, have a higher prostate-specific antigen at time of diagnosis, and be diagnosed with metastatic disease.

CONCLUSION

Variants in DDR genes and HOXB13 may be important cancer risk factors for Black men diagnosed with early-onset prostate cancer, and are more frequently observed in men with a family history of cancer.

Interaction of race and socioeconomic status as risk modulators of treatment delay and cancer-specific mortality in uterine cancer

5595

Background: The majority of studies of uterine cancer combine high and low-grade histologies and do not sample a diverse cohort of patients. In many studies race is treated as biologic construct, when it may be better thought of as a proxy for socioeconomic inequity and deprivation. Socioeconomic (SE) deprivation may play a significant role in the disease trajectory of women with uterine cancer. Methods: Data were drawn from the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System which covers a tri-county area of approximately 4 million people. We included non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and White (NHW) women diagnosed with uterine cancer between 2010 and 2018. Poorly differentiated and undifferentiated endometrioid, serous, clear cell, mixed, carcinosarcoma and mucinous histologies were considered high grade. Patients diagnosed by death certificate, or with unknown stage or histology were excluded. Socioeconomic status was assessed using the Yost Score, an area-level composite measure of socioeconomic deprivation derived from census-tract data at cancer diagnosis. Lower Yost quintile indicates higher deprivation. Competing risk analysis was used to determine risk of uterine cancer specific mortality (reported as subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR]) and to assess statistical interaction between race and Yost score. Results: A total of 4,840 patients were identified. Race conferred significant increased risk of cancer-specific mortality (SHR 2.11, p < 0.0001). Race and Yost score interacted to increase risk of cancer-specific mortality in NHB women in the lowest Yost quintile (SHR 2.23, p < 0.0001) compared to NHW and NHB women in the highest quintiles. The interaction between race and Yost score persisted only among women with low grade cancers (SHR 1.7, p = 0.04). Time from diagnosis to surgery increased as Yost score decreased. Women in the lowest Yost quintile had lower likelihood of receiving surgery within 6 weeks of diagnosis (OR 0.74, p = 0.001). This effect persisted among women with low grade cancer (NHB OR 0.75, p = 0.014; lowest Yost quintile OR 0.68, p < 0.0001). An association between race, Yost score and delays in time to surgery was not seen among women with high grade cancers. Conclusions: Race and Yost score, an area-based measure of socioeconomic deprivation, are associated with increased cancer-specific mortality risk among women with low grade cancer. NHB race and high socioeconomic deprivation are associated with delayed primary surgery. The interaction between race and socioeconomic deprivation may underlie known disparities in uterine cancer survival, particularly in low grade disease where there is the greatest opportunity for timely curative surgery.

Financial Hardship by Age at Diagnosis Including in Young Adulthood among African American Cancer Survivors

BACKGROUND

Financial hardship is most common among cancer survivors with the fewest financial resources at diagnosis; however, little is known about the financial outcomes of young adult (YA) survivors (ages 20-39 at diagnosis), despite their having fewer financial reserves than older adults.

METHODS

We utilized data from 3,888 participants in the population-based Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors cohort. Participants self-reported several forms of material and behavioral financial hardship (MFH and BFH, respectively). Psychological financial hardship (PFH) was measured using the Comprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) score. Modified Poisson models estimated prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for financial hardship by age at diagnosis controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, and cancer-related factors.

RESULTS

MFH prevalence was inversely associated with age such that 72% of YA survivors reported MFH, 62% ages 40 to 54, 49% ages 55 to 64, and 33% ages 65 to 79 (PRadjusted YA vs. 65+: 1.75; 95% CI, 1.49-2.04; Ptrend < 0.001). BFH was also more common among YA survivors (26%) than those ages 65 to 79 (20%; PRadjusted: 1.50; 95% CI, 1.08-2.08; Ptrend = 0.019). Age was positively associated with financial wellbeing. COST scores ranged from 20.7 (95% CI, 19.0-22.4) among YA survivors to 27.2 (95% CI, 26.1-28.2) among adults 65 to 79 years old (Ptrend < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this population of African American cancer survivors, MFH and BFH were more common, and PFH was more severe, in YA survivors compared with those diagnosed as older adults.

IMPACT

Young adulthood at diagnosis should be considered a risk factor for cancer-related financial hardship and addressed in work designed to reduce the adverse financial impacts of cancer.

Disparities in adjuvant treatment of high-grade endometrial cancer in the Medicare population

BACKGROUND

Black women experience worse survival effects with high-grade endometrial cancer. Differences in adjuvant treatment have been proposed to be major contributors to this disparity. However, little is known about the differences in type or timing of adjuvant treatment as it relates to race and ethnicity in the Medicare population.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine patterns of adjuvant therapy and survival for non-Hispanic Black women vs non-Hispanic White women and Hispanic women who have undergone surgery for high-grade endometrial cancer in the Medicare population.

STUDY DESIGN

We used the Medicare-linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to identify women who underwent surgery as a primary treatment for uterine grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma, carcinosarcoma, clear-cell carcinoma, or serous carcinoma between the years 2000 and 2015. Women who did not identify as White or Black race or Hispanic ethnicity were excluded. Multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for receiving a treatment delay or not receiving adjuvant treatment (compared with those who received adjuvant treatment within 12 weeks) adjusted for clinical and demographic characteristics. Overall survival was stratified by race and ethnicity, route of surgery, operative complications, and type and timing of adjuvant therapy, which were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio of death by race and ethnicity adjusted for known predictors and surgical outcomes and adjuvant therapy patterns.

RESULTS

A total of 12,201 women met the study inclusion criteria. Non-Hispanic Black patients had a significantly worse 5-year overall survival than Hispanic and non-Hispanic White patients (30.9 months vs 51.0 months vs 53.6 months, respectively). Approximately 632 of 7282 patients (8.6%) who received adjuvant treatment experienced a treatment delay. Delay in treatment of ≥12 weeks was significantly different by race and ethnicity (P=.034), with 12% of Hispanic, 9% of non-Hispanic Black, and 8% of non-Hispanic White women experiencing a delay. After adjustment for the number of complications, age, histology (endometrioid vs nonendometroid), International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, marital status, comorbidity count, surgical approach, lymph node dissection, and urban-rural code, Hispanic women had a 71% increased risk of treatment delay (odds ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.38) for all stages of disease. In the same model, non-Hispanic Black race was independently predictive of decreased use of adjuvant treatment for the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage II and higher (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.68). Non-Hispanic Black race, number of perioperative complications, and nonendometrioid histology were predictive of worse survival in univariate models. Treatment delay was not independently predictive of worse 1- or 5-year survival at any stage.

CONCLUSION

Non-Hispanic Black race was predictive of worse 5-year survival across all stages and was associated with omission of adjuvant treatment in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage II or higher high-grade endometrial cancer. In unadjusted analyses, patients who experience treatment omission or delay experienced poorer overall survival, but these factors were not independently associated in multivariate analyses. This study suggests that race and ethnicity are independently associated with the type and timing of adjuvant treatment in patients with high-grade endometrial cancer. Further efforts to identify specific causes of barriers to care and timely treatment are imperative.

Physician Influence on Variation in Receipt of Aggressive End-of-Life Care Among Women Dying of Ovarian Cancer

PURPOSE

End-of-life care for women with ovarian cancer is persistently aggressive, but factors associated with overuse are not well understood. We evaluated physician-level variation in receipt of aggressive end-of-life care and examined physician-level factors contributing to this variation in the SEER-Medicare data set.

METHODS

Medicare beneficiaries with ovarian cancer who died between 2000 and 2016 were included if they were diagnosed after age 66 years, had complete Medicare coverage between diagnosis and death, and had outpatient physician evaluation and management for their ovarian cancer. Using multilevel logistic regression, we examined physician variation in no hospice enrollment, late hospice enrollment (≤ 3 days), > 1 emergency department visit, an intensive care unit stay, terminal hospitalization, > 1 hospitalization, receiving a life-extending or invasive procedure, and chemotherapy (in the last 2 weeks).

RESULTS

In this sample of 6,288 women, 51% of women received at least one form of aggressive end-of-life care. Most common were no hospice enrollment (28.9%), an intensive care unit stay (18.6%), and receipt of an invasive procedure (20.7%). For not enrolling in hospice, 9.9% of variation was accounted for by physician clustering (P < .01). Chemotherapy had the highest physician variation (12.4%), with no meaningful portion of the variation explained by physician specialty, volume, region, or patient characteristics.

CONCLUSION

In this study, a meaningful amount of variation in aggressive end-of-life care among women dying of ovarian cancer was at the physician level, suggesting that efforts to improve the quality of this care should include interventions aimed at physician practices and decision making in end-of-life care.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on African American cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had profound effects on population health to date. African American cancer survivors are particularly vulnerable to developing severe consequences; therefore, understanding the impact of the virus on this patient population is critical.

METHODS

The Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors cohort is a unique effort to understand the determinants of poor outcomes in African American cancer survivors. To date, more than 4500 cancer survivors and nearly 950 primary caregivers have been enrolled; participation includes a survey and the collection of biospecimens, medical records, and tumor tissue. Beginning in the spring of 2020, a supplemental survey focusing on the impact of COVID-19 was offered to enrolled participants. The analysis included 890 survivors.

RESULTS

Nearly all survivors (>99%) reported changes in their daily activities in an effort to reduce the risk of infection. More than 40% of the survivors reported some disruption in their access to medical care. A substantial proportion of the survivors (>40%) reported feeling anxious, depressed, and/or isolated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Approximately 40% of the patients reported changes in health behaviors shown to negatively affect survivorship outcomes (physical inactivity, smoking, and alcohol use) as a result of the pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on African American cancer survivors is substantial: it has affected both their physical and mental health. Coupled with changes in health behaviors, these factors will likely affect outcomes in this high-risk patient population, and this makes further study and interventions necessary to mitigate the long-term impact of the pandemic on cancer outcomes.

Abstract PO-087: Diagnosis in young adulthood as a risk factor for unmet social needs among African American cancer survivors

Background: Increasing attention is being paid to understanding and addressing the financial consequences of cancer and cancer treatment; however, in addition to the direct and indirect costs of cancer care, survivors with few financial resources also face social needs such as food insecurity and housing instability. On average, young adults have fewer financial resources than older adults, placing them at risk for adverse financial outcomes due to cancer, including unmet social needs. The purpose of this study is to estimate associations between young adult age at diagnosis and prevalence of social needs among African American cancer survivors. Methods: We utilized data from 3,241 participants in the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) cohort. African American adults were invited to participate if they were between the ages of 20-79 at diagnosis with breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer since January 1, 2013; or diagnosed with endometrial cancer (ages 20-79) or any other cancer (ages 20-49) since January 1, 2016. Cases were identified through the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System, a population-based cancer registry. Participants self-reported several forms of unmet social needs, including food insecurity, recent utility shut-offs, housing instability, inability to get medical care due to lack of transportation, and whether they generally felt safe in their neighborhood. Modified Poisson models estimated prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for social needs by age at diagnosis (20-39 vs. 65+) and tests for trend by 4-level age (20-39, 40-54, 55-64, 65+), controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, and cancer-related factors. Results: Overall, 32% of ROCS participants reported experiencing social needs, and prevalence was inversely associated with age at diagnosis such that 48% of survivors diagnosed as young adults reported any social needs compared with 22% of those diagnosed as older adults (PRadjusted: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.8-2.9; ptrend&lt;0.001). Associations between young adult age at diagnosis and social needs were particularly high for utility shutoffs (PRadjusted: 4.7, 95% CI: 2.8-7.8) and food insecurity (PRadjusted: 3.4, 95% CI: 2.3-4.9) compared with those diagnosed as older adults. Young adults also reported substantially higher prevalence of not feeling safe in their neighborhood (PRadjusted: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.7, 4.6), housing instability (PRadjusted: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.7-4.5), and going without medical care due to lack of transportation (PRadjusted: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.2-3.3). There was an inverse association with age and all social needs examined (all ptrend&lt;0.001). Conclusions: Each unmet social need considered was at least twice as common among African American cancer survivors diagnosed as young adults compared with those diagnosed when they were 65 or older. Young adults often have fewer financial resources compared older adults and should be prioritized in the development of interventions aimed at improving financial outcomes among cancer survivors.

Citation Format: Theresa A. Hastert, Julie J Ruterbusch, Jean A. McDougall, Jamaica R.M. Robinson, Shaila M. Strayhorn, Andrew Abdallah, Gowri Chandrashekar, Ann G. Schwartz. Diagnosis in young adulthood as a risk factor for unmet social needs among African American cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: 14th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2021 Oct 6-8. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-087.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in African American cancer survivors: Risk factors and quality of life outcomes

Background

Epidemiological studies of chemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) have predominantly focused on non‐Hispanic White patients, despite the observation that African Americans are more likely to experience CIPN. To address this health disparities gap, we sought to identify non‐genetic risk factors and comorbidities associated with CIPN in African American cancer survivors using the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors study.

Methods

Logistic regression was used to evaluate relationships between presence of self‐reported CIPN and relevant clinical characteristics in 1045 chemotherapy‐treated African American cancer survivors. Linear regression was used to evaluate risk factors for CIPN and quality of life outcomes that reflect physical, social, emotional, and functional domains of health.

Results

Patients with CIPN were more likely to report hypertension (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.98–1.67, p = 0.07), hypercholesterolemia (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.001–1.73, p = 0.05), history of depression (OR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.18–2.25, p = 0.003), and diabetes (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 0.98–1.82, p = 0.06) after adjustment for age at diagnosis, sex, and cancer site. BMI (OR = 1.02 kg/m², 95% CI: 1.006–1.04 kg/m², p = 0.008) was also positively associated with CIPN. In addition, CIPN status was significantly associated with quality of life (FACT‐G total: β = −8.60, 95% CI: −10.88, −6.32) p < 0.0001) and mood (PROMIS^® Anxiety: β = 4.18, 95% CI: 2.92–5.45, p < 0.0001; PROMIS^® Depression: β = 2.69, 95% CI: 1.53–3.84, p < 0.0001) after adjustment for age at diagnosis, sex, cancer site, and comorbidities. Neither alcohol consumption (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.68–1.14, p = 0.32) nor tobacco use (ever smoked: OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.80–1.35, p = 0.76; currently smoke: OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.90–1.82, p = 0.18) was associated with increased CIPN risk.

Conclusion

Risk factor profiles in African Americans are not entirely consistent with those previously reported for non‐Hispanic White patients. Neglecting to understand the correlates of common chemotherapy‐induced toxicities for this patient population may further contribute to the health disparities these individuals face in receiving adequate healthcare.

Association between utilization patterns and racial disparities in hospice enrollment among women dying of ovarian cancer

142

Background: Goals of care conversations are associated with less aggressive end of life care and may be most effective in an outpatient setting. Yet, the relationship between initial utilization of care and subsequent hospice enrollment is unknown. We evaluated whether inpatient, outpatient and emergency department (ED) evaluation and management (E/M) visits differed by patient race/ethnicity, and whether less outpatient management was associated with failure to enroll in hospice in a sample of women dying of ovarian cancer. Methods: Women diagnosed with first and only ovarian cancer who died between 2000 and 2016 and had ≥ one inpatient and outpatient ovarian cancer E/M encounter between diagnosis and the last two months of life in SEER-Medicare were included (N = 8,806). Women whose proportion of outpatient E/M encounters fell below the median were classified as having low outpatient management (vs. high). Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression was used to estimate the association of: (1) race/ethnicity with outpatient management, and (2) outpatient management with hospice enrollment, stratified by race/ethnicity. Models were adjusted for stage at diagnosis, histology, survival time, age, Charlson score, geographic region, and year. Results: In this sample, 29.2% of ovarian cancer E/M took place in an inpatient setting, 66.4% outpatient, and 4.4% in the ED. Non-Hispanic Black women had 53.9% of their E/M occur in an outpatient setting, compared to 67.6% in non-Hispanic White women, 60.7% in Hispanic women, and 64.2% in women of other races (p <.001). Black women had 78% greater odds of low outpatient management when compared to non-Hispanic White women (adjusted OR 1.78, 95%CI: 1.46-2.18). Women with low (vs. high) outpatient management had 33% greater odds of not enrolling in hospice (adjusted OR 1.33, 95%CI: 1.20-1.48). The association of low outpatient management with not enrolling in hospice was most pronounced among Black women (Black adjusted OR: 1.54, 95%CI: 1.02-2.32 vs. Non-Hispanic White adjusted OR: 1.32, 95%CI: 1.18-1.48). Conclusions: Although most ovarian cancer care takes place in an outpatient setting, Black women have the lowest proportion of outpatient care, and low outpatient management was associated with not enrolling in hospice. When deploying interventions to improve goals of care conversations for women with ovarian cancer, racial/ethnic disparities in care settings must be considered.

Neighborhood walkability and body mass index in African American cancer survivors: The Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors study

BACKGROUND

Extant evidence links neighborhood walkability with obesity-related health in the general population. This association likely exists in cancer survivors, but research is limited. Furthermore, a disproportionate obesity burden in African American cancer survivors warrants subgroup-specific analyses.

METHODS

This study analyzed data from 2089 African American cancer survivors participating in the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) cohort. On the basis of built environment data summarized within 1-km radial buffers around census block centroids, a multidimensional neighborhood walkability index (NWI) was constructed. Survivors' residential addresses at Detroit ROCS enrollment were geocoded, and addresses were linked to NWI scores via the census block of residence. At study enrollment, survivors reported height and weight; these data were used to calculate their body mass index (BMI). Associations between NWI quartiles and BMI overall and by cancer type, biological sex, and physical activity engagement were evaluated.

RESULTS

BMI was found to be inversely associated with increasing NWI quartile (P for trend < .01). This inverse relationship was observed in men (P for trend < .01) and in survivors reporting any regular physical activity (P for trend < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study's findings suggest that among African American cancer survivors, higher neighborhood walkability is associated with lower BMI. As health care systems in the United States increasingly consider the role of the neighborhood environment in their patients' health, these findings provide additional evidence supporting health systems' incorporation of neighborhood walkability as an obesity-related health indicator for this cancer survivor subgroup and potentially for cancer survivors from other vulnerable populations.

Caregiving burden among informal caregivers of African American cancer survivors

PURPOSE

Relatively little is known about caregivers of African American cancer survivors. Our goal was to identify the extent of burden among this group of caregivers.

METHODS

Responses from 560 informal caregivers of African American participants of the Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) study in Detroit, MI, were analyzed including demographics, assistance provided including activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), time spent in caregiving, and caregiver burden (CGB). We assessed relationships between CGB and demographic variables, ADLs/IADLs, and level of care. Multivariable logistic regression determined which ADLs and IADLs were associated with high CGB.

RESULTS

Over 75% of caregivers were female and 97% identified as African American. Mean age was 52.6 years. Fifty-six percent were employed outside the home, and 90% were related to the survivor. Caregivers averaged 35.7 h/week providing care, assisting with on average 2.8 ADLs and 5.0 IADLs. Despite the many hours and activities reported, no caregivers rated CGB as severe; only 4% rated it moderate to severe. ADLs associated with the top quartile of CGB were feeding and toileting; IADLs were finances, telephoning, housework, and medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Caregivers for African American cancer survivors provide many hours of care, yet most describe their CGB as low. Although ADL assistance is often available through the healthcare system, assistance with IADLs presents an opportunity to lessen the burden for these caregivers and their care recipients.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

African American cancer survivors receive much care from informal family caregivers, who assist with multiple ADLs and IADLs. Formal IADL assistance programs, similar to those available for ADLs, would benefit both survivors and caregivers.

The impact of race, comorbid conditions and obesity on survival endpoints in women with high grade endometrial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To estimate overall survival, disease-specific survival, and progression-free survival among high grade endometrial carcinoma cases and to determine factors impacting survival for non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black women.

METHODS

We identified high grade endometrial carcinoma cases among non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black women from ongoing institutional studies, and determined eligibility through medical record and pathologic review. We estimated effects of demographic and clinical variables on survival outcomes using Kaplan Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards modelling.

RESULTS

Non-Hispanic Black women with BMI <25.0 had poorest overall survival compared to non-Hispanic white women with BMI <25.0 (HR 3.03; 95% CI [1.35, 6.81]), followed by non-Hispanic black women with BMI 25.0+ (HR 2.43; 95% CI [1.28, 4.60]). A similar pattern emerged for disease-specific survival. Non-Hispanic black women also had poorer progression-free survival than non-Hispanic white women (HR 1.40; 95% CI [1.01, 1.93]). Other significant factors impacting survival outcomes included receipt of National Cancer Center Network (NCCN) guideline-concordant treatment (GCT), earlier stage at diagnosis, and fewer comorbid conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

BMI and race interact and modify the association with high grade endometrial carcinoma survival. Other potentially modifiable factors, such as reducing comorbidities and increasing access to GCT will potentially improve survival after diagnosis of high grade endometrial carcinomas. A better understanding of the molecular drivers of these high grade carcinomas may lead to targeted therapies that reduce morbidity and mortality associated with these aggressive tumors.

Germline mutations in DNA damage repair genes and HOXB13 among African American men diagnosed with early-onset prostate cancer

10505

Background: Inherited defects in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes (e.g. ATM, BRCA1/2) and the tumor suppresser gene HOXB13 are rare in the general population, but have been observed at a higher rate among men with early-onset and advanced prostate cancer. However, most studies include few, if any, African American men, highlighting the need to understand the contribution of mutations in these genes in this high-risk population. Methods: A population-based cohort of 757 African American men diagnosed with prostate cancer at age 62 years or younger were identified and enrolled through the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System (MDCSS), one of NCI’s founding members of the SEER program. Participants completed a short survey to collect information on family history, medical history (including cancer-related treatment), surveillance, and health behaviors. Each participant submitted a saliva or blood sample for genetic analyses and consent for tumor tissue if available. All clinical data were collected through linkage with the MDCSS registry. Full exome sequencing was performed and herein, we report the mutation patterns observed in a panel of DNA repair genes and HOXB13. All variants were ranked according to frequency (MAF < 1%); REVEL, SIFT and PolyPhen scores for pathogenic potential; evidence from existing literature; and prevalence in the cohort. Results: Among the 744 African American prostate cancer cases with adequate DNA for sequencing and thus included in this analysis, the mean age at diagnosis was 55.6 years, 29% reported a family history of prostate cancer in a first degree family member, and 40% were initially diagnosed with intermediate- to high-risk disease (stage T3/T4 and/or Gleason 4+3 and higher at diagnosis). We identified 20 variants that were either known or predicted to be pathogenic in 11 candidate genes ( ATM, ATR, BRCA1/2, BRIP1, CHEK2, FANCA, HOXB13, MSH2, PALB2, and PMS2). These particular variants were more common among men diagnosed before age 55 and in men with high grade cancer in this cohort. Conclusions: Our results suggest that mutations in DDR genes and HOXB13 may be important cancer risk factors for African American men diagnosed with early-onset and intermediate- to high-risk disease. Further study is necessary to describe the spectrum and prevalence of genetic mutations in this population including the characterization of variants of unknown significance.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on African American cancer survivors living in metropolitan Detroit

12129

Background: COVID-19 has had profound direct and indirect effects on population health to date and long-term effects are anticipated. Vulnerabilities to the most serious consequences of infection include older age, obesity, African American race and the presence of comorbid conditions. African American cancer survivors represent a particularly high-risk group, therefore understanding the impact of the virus and our strategies to prevent its spread on this patient population is important. Methods: The Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) cohort is a unique effort to understand the determinants of poor outcomes in African American cancer survivors. Eligible participants were diagnosed with breast, prostate, colorectal, or lung cancer on or after 1/1/2013, or with endometrial or any other cancer before age 50 on or after 01/01/2016 and were identified through the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System cancer registry. To date, we have enrolled 4173 survivors. Full participation includes completion of a baseline survey, and collection of biospecimens, medical records and tumor tissue, if available. Participants are also followed annually for outcomes and changes in history. A supplemental survey focused on the impact of COVID-19 was offered to enrolled participants beginning in the spring of 2020. The results presented here include data from 890 survivors who also completed the ROCS COVID survey. Results: Nearly all ( > 99%) survivors reported some change in their daily activities in an effort to reduce the risk of infection. At the time of survey, just over 1/3 of participants reported being tested for the virus and among those, 12% reported positive results. More than 40% of survivors reported some disruption in their access to medical care. A substantial ( > 40%) proportion of survivors reported feeling anxious, depressed and/or isolated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Approximately 40% of patients reported changes in health behaviors as a direct result of the pandemic that are known to negatively affect survivorship outcomes (physical inactivity, smoking, alcohol use). Notably, 30% of survivors reported declines in physical activity and these declines were significantly associated with increased anxiety (p = 0.008), depression (p = 0.005) and poorer health-related quality of life (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on African American cancer survivors has been substantial, affecting both their physical and mental health and access to needed medical care. Coupled with changes in health behaviors as a direct result of the pandemic, these factors will likely affect outcomes in this high-risk patient population making further study and interventions necessary to mitigate the long-term impact of the pandemic on cancer outcomes.

Prevalence and predictors of peripheral neuropathy after chemotherapy: Outcomes from the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivorship (ROCS) cohort

12069

Background: Increased life expectancy for cancer survivors following advances in treatment has led to a greater likelihood of developing long-term complications. Among them is chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), which adversely impacts the functional capacity of survivors. We assessed prevalence and predictors of CIPN in a cohort of African-American (AA) cancer survivors. Methods: The study population included 633 breast, colorectal, prostate and lung cancer survivors who received chemotherapy and participated in the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivorship (ROCS) study. Presence of CIPN was based on self-reported pain, numbness or tingling in the hands or feet, occurring either for the first time or worsening after chemotherapy. If participants reported continued CIPN at the time of survey, their symptoms were reported as persistent. CIPN severity was self-reported as mild, moderate or severe. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate socio-demographic and clinical factors (including 12 common comorbid conditions) associated with CIPN prevalence, persistence and severity. Results: Overall, 67% of the cohort reported CIPN at a mean time of 25.3 months (range 2-74 months) after cancer diagnosis, and 51% reported persistent CIPN. The distribution of CIPN severity consisted of 32.2% with mild, 30.8% with moderate, and 36.9% with moderate to severe symptoms. Diagnosis of primary breast (OR 3.99, 95% CI 1.52-10.46) or colorectal cancers (OR 5.24, 95% CI 2.17-12.69) conferred greater CIPN prevalence relative to a diagnosis of prostate cancer. The presence of each additional comorbid condition among those outlined in the survey also conferred a 20% greater prevalence of CIPN (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.03-1.39). Similar trends were seen among those who reported persistent CIPN. Using age > 65 at diagnosis as the reference group, age < 50 (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.43-4.88) and age 51-64 (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.14-3.35) resulted in an increased risk of moderate or severe compared to mild CIPN. Conclusions: In the Detroit ROCS cohort, CIPN was reported in two-thirds of cancer survivors receiving chemotherapy. Out of them, more than one-third reported moderate to severe symptoms, more commonly seen among those age < 65. Consideration of CIPN as a prominent long-term complication of cancer treatment should play a role in treatment decisions and development of new chemotherapy regimens.

Disparities in adjuvant treatment of high-grade endometrial cancer

e17572

Background: To examine surgical outcomes, patterns of adjuvant therapy, and survival for non-Hispanic Black (NHB) women compared to non-Hispanic White (NHW) and Hispanic (HS) women who have undergone surgery for high grade endometrial cancer in the Medicare population. Methods: We utilized the SEER-Medicare linked database to identify women who underwent surgery as a primary treatment for uterine grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma, carcinosarcoma, clear cell carcinoma, or serous carcinoma between the years 2000 and 2015. Multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for receiving a treatment delay or not receiving adjuvant treatment (compared to those who received adjuvant treatment within 12 weeks) adjusted for clinical and demographic characteristics. Overall survival (OS) stratified by race/ethnicity, route of surgery, operative complications, and type and timing of adjuvant therapy were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox Proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard of death by race/ethnicity adjusted for known predictors, as well as surgical outcomes and adjuvant therapy patterns. Results: 12, 201 women met study inclusion criteria. NHB patients had a significantly worse five-year overall survival (OS) than HS and NHW patients (30.9 months vs 51.0 months vs 53.6 months, respectively). Approximately 8.6% of patients who received adjuvant treatment experienced a treatment delay (632/7, 282). Delay in treatment of greater than or equal to 12 weeks was significantly different by race/ethnicity (p=0.034), with 12% of HS, 9% of NHB, and 8% of NHW women experiencing a delay. After adjustment for number of complications, age, histology (endometrioid v. non-endometroid), FIGO stage, marital status, comorbidity count, surgical approach, lymph node dissection, and urban-rural code, HS had a 71% increased risk of treatment delay (OR 1.71, CI 1.23-2.38) for all stages of disease. In the same model, NHB race was independently predictive of decreased use of adjuvant treatment for FIGO stage II and higher (OR 1.32, CI 1.04-1.68). NHB race, number of perioperative complications, and non-endometrioid histology were predictive of worse OS in univariate models. Treatment delay was not independently predictive of worse 1- or 5-year survival at any stage. Conclusions: NHB race is predictive of worse 5-year survival across all stages and is also associated with omission of adjuvant treatment in ≥FIGO Stage II high grade endometrial cancers. HS ethnicity was associated with treatment delay across all stages. In unadjusted analyses, patients who experience treatment omission or delay experienced poorer OS, but these factors were not independently associated in multivariate analyses.

Comorbidities at time of diagnosis as a predictor of more or less aggressive treatment modalities in early-invasive breast cancer

e12591

Background: Comorbidities and advanced age have been shown to play important roles in breast cancer treatment and outcomes. Reduced doses of chemotherapy, worse treatment-related side-effects, poor performance status in patients with significant comorbidities, and the biological interplay between other diseases and cancer may also play roles. We evaluated the relationship between age and pre-existing comorbidities and receipt of local and systemic therapy in a cohort of African American (AA) women with early invasive breast cancer. Methods: The study population included 1,169 AJCC stage I-III invasive breast cancer survivors from the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) study, a large cohort of AA cancer survivors. Comorbidities (both individual diseases and a combined count that was categorized as low/medium/high comorbidity burden), age at diagnosis, and other demographic variables were obtained from self-reported standardized questionnaires. Cancer-related variables including treatment were obtained from the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System registry. Recommended treatment was subdivided into localized (surgery ± radiation; N = 1,156), hormonal (N = 848) and chemotherapy (N = 680). Logistic regression estimated the associations between age and pre-existing comorbid conditions and the receipt of recommended treatments. Adjusted models included variables that were selected a priori and were significant predictors in univariate analysis. Results: Most women received recommended localized treatment (82.6%), hormone treatment (73.7%), and chemotherapy (79.9%). There were no differences in receipt of localized treatment based on age or comorbidity burden in adjusted analyses. However, arthritis and depression were significantly associated with not receiving recommended localized treatment (Odds ratio (OR): 0.66, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.93 and OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.36, 0.78, respectively). Women with a history of obesity (BMI ≥30) were more likely to receive recommended hormone therapy (OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.19, 2.26), while women with congestive heart failure were less likely (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.90). Receipt of recommended chemotherapy was less likely for those with increasing age (Ptrend< 0.01) and increasing comorbidity burden (Ptrend= 0.02). Those with a history of arthritis (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.99) and hypercholesterolemia (OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.95) were also less likely to receive recommended chemotherapy. Conclusions: Advanced age and presence of pre-existing co-morbid medical conditions appears to influence the receipt of chemotherapy, while individual conditions were associated with receipt of local treatment or hormone therapy in a cohort of AA survivors, suggesting the importance of providing comprehensive medical care for all women with early invasive breast cancer.

Continuity of care and receipt of aggressive end of life care among women dying of ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between post-diagnosis continuity of care and receipt of aggressive end of life care among women dying of ovarian cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective claims analysis included 6680 Medicare beneficiaries over age 66 with ovarian cancer who survived at least one year after diagnosis, had at least 4 outpatient evaluation and management visits and died between 2000 and 2016. We calculated the Bice-Boxerman Continuity of Care Index (COC) for each woman, and split COC into tertiles (high, medium, low). We compared late or no hospice use, >1 emergency department (ED) visit, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, >1 hospitalization, terminal hospitalization, chemotherapy, and invasive and/or life extending procedures among women with high or medium vs. low COC using multivariable adjusted logistic regression.

RESULTS

In this sample, 49.8% of women received aggressive care in the last month of life. Compared to women with low COC, women with high COC had 66% higher odds of chemotherapy (adjusted OR 1.66 CI 1.23-2.24) in the last two weeks of life. Women with high COC also had 16% greater odds of not enrolling in hospice compared to women with low COC (adjusted OR 1.16 CI 1.01-1.33). COC was not associated with late enrollment in hospice, hospital utilization, or aggressive procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

COC at the end of life is complicated and may pose unique challenges in providing quality end of life care. Future work exploring the specific facets of continuity associated with quality end of life care is needed.

Financial and Employment Impacts of Cancer and COVID-19 Among African American Cancer Survivors

Purpose: Financial hardship due to cancer is more common among African American than White survivors. The COVID-19 pandemic and its economic fallout have also disproportionately affected African Americans. The purpose of this study is to describe the financial and employment impacts of COVID-19 in a population of African American cancer survivors and to compare those impacts with those experienced after a cancer diagnosis. Methods: Results include survey data from 593 participants in the population-based Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) cohort who completed the ROCS enrollment survey and a supplemental questionnaire related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their financial wellbeing and employment. Most participants (96%) were not diagnosed with COVID-19 by the time they completed the supplement and reflect the societal impact of the pandemic rather than a personal COVID-19 diagnosis. Analyses compare reports of financial hardship (using assets, borrowing money, experiencing debt, decreases in income) and employment impacts (changes to work schedules, duties, hours, employment status) due to cancer and due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: A similar proportion of ROCS participants reported financial hardship (41% vs. 42%) and borrowing money (5% vs. 6%) related to the COVID pandemic and their cancer diagnosis, respectively. Fewer survivors reported borrowing money (9% vs. 17%; p&lt;0.001) or experiencing a decrease in income due to COVID than cancer (20% vs. 28%; p = 0.001); however; more reported debt associated with COVID (30% vs. 17%; p&lt;0.001). Changes to work schedules (44% vs. 36%) and hours worked (44% vs. 28%) related to the COVID pandemic and cancer were common, and not statistically different from one another. More survivors changed their work duties due to the COVID pandemic (20%) than cancer (12%; p = 0.048). Prevalence of changes to employment status were similar for cancer (6%) and COVID (11%). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with similar levels of overall financial hardship, and higher prevalence of debt and some work changes, than individual cancer experiences. These additional burdens on a financially vulnerable population could exacerbate existing cancer-related inequities.

Trends and racial disparities in aggressive end-of-life care for a national sample of women with ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

The clinical landscape has moved toward less aggressive end-of-life care for women with ovarian cancer. However, whether there has been a decline in the use of aggressive end-of-life services is unknown. The authors evaluated current national trends and racial disparities in end-of-life care among women with ovarian cancer using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare-linked data set.

METHODS

In total, 7756 Medicare beneficiaries aged >66 years with ovarian cancer who died between 2007 and 2016 were identified. The authors examined trends and racial disparities in late hospice or no hospice use, >1 emergency department (ED) visit, intensive care unit admission, >1 hospitalization, terminal hospitalization, chemotherapy, and invasive and/or life-extending procedures using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

The median hospice length of stay did not change over time; however, women were increasingly admitted to the intensive care unit and had multiple ED visits in the last month of life (P < .001). Not enrolling in hospice at the end of life and terminal hospitalizations decreased over time (P < .001). Non-White women were more likely to receive aggressive end-of-life care, particularly for hospital-related utilization and life-extending procedures, whereas non-Hispanic Black women were more likely to have >1 ED visit (odds ratio, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.57-2.64) or life-extending procedures (odds ratio, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.45-2.48) compared with non-Hispanic White women.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite clinical guidelines and increasing emphasis on reducing aggressive end-of-life care, the use of aggressive end-of-life care for women with ovarian cancer persists, and care is most aggressive for non-White women.

Cardiometabolic risk factors and survival after cancer in the Women's Health Initiative

BACKGROUND

Cardiometabolic abnormalities are a leading cause of death among women, including women with cancer.

METHODS

This study examined the association between prediagnosis cardiovascular health and total and cause-specific mortality among 12,076 postmenopausal women who developed local- or regional-stage invasive cancer in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI). Cardiovascular risk factors included waist circumference, hypertension, high cholesterol, and type 2 diabetes. Obesity-related cancers included breast cancer, colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer, kidney cancer, pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer, stomach cancer, liver cancer, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for important predictors of survival.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 10.0 years from the date of the cancer diagnosis, there were 3607 total deaths, with 1546 (43%) due to cancer. Most participants (62.9%) had 1 or 2 cardiometabolic risk factors, and 8.1% had 3 or 4. In adjusted models, women with 3 to 4 risk factors (vs none) had a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.73-2.30), death due to cardiovascular disease (CVD) (HR, 4.01; 95% CI, 2.88-5.57), cancer-specific mortality (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.1-1.72), and other-cause mortality (HR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.70-2.69). A higher waist circumference was associated with greater all-cause mortality (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06-1.30) and cancer-specific mortality (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.04-1.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Among postmenopausal women diagnosed with cancer in the WHI, cardiometabolic risk factors before the cancer diagnosis were associated with greater all-cause, CVD, cancer-specific, and other-cause mortality. These results raise hypotheses regarding potential clinical intervention strategies targeting cardiometabolic abnormalities that require future prospective studies for confirmation.

LAY SUMMARY

This study uses information from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) to find out whether cardiac risk factors are related to a greater risk of dying among older women with cancer. The WHI is the largest study of medical problems faced by older women in this country. The results show that women who have 3 or 4 risk factors are more likely to die of any cause, heart disease, or cancer in comparison with women with no risk factors. It is concluded that interventions to help to lower the burden of cardiac risk factors can have an important impact on survivorship among women with cancer.

Abstract PO-207: Cancer diagnosis in young adulthood as a risk factor for financial hardship among African American cancer survivors

Background: Financial hardship is common among cancer survivors, particularly those with fewer financial resources at the time of diagnosis. Previous work suggests that working age adults (usually &lt;65 at diagnosis) have worse financial outcomes than older adults (ages 65+); however, little is known about the financial outcomes of young adult (ages 20-39) relative to middle aged and older cancer survivors, despite their often-limited financial resources. The purpose of this study is to estimate associations between young adult age at diagnosis and material, behavioral, and psychological financial hardship among African American cancer survivors. Methods: We utilized data from 3,348 participants in the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) cohort. African American adults were invited to participate if they were between the ages of 20-79 at diagnosis with breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer since January 1, 2013; or diagnosed with endometrial cancer (ages 20-79) or any other cancer diagnosed at age 20-49 since January 1, 2016 and identified through the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System. Participants self-reported several forms of material and behavioral financial hardship (MFH and BFH, respectively). Psychological financial hardship was measured using the COST score. Modified Poisson models estimated prevalence ratios (PR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for financial hardship outcomes and age at diagnosis (20-39, 40-54, 55-64, 65+) controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, and cancer-related factors. Results: Overall, 44% of ROCS participants reported MFH, and prevalence was inversely associated with age at diagnosis such that 72% of young adults (ages 20-39) reported MFH compared with 31% of adults ages 65+ (PRadjusted: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.62-2.39; ptrend&lt;0.001). Results were similar for individual forms of MFH, including decreased income, using assets to pay for care, current cancer debt, and borrowing from friends or family to pay for cancer care (all PRs &gt;2.0 with 95% CIs excluding 1.0). BFH was reported by 24% of survivors and was also more common among young adults than those 65+ (29% vs. 21%; PRadjusted: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.14-2.43; ptrend=0.015); however, younger age was not associated with prevalence of specific forms of BFH. COST scores (calculated so that lower scores reflect greater financial distress) were also inversely related to age. Mean COST score was 24.3 overall and ranged from 19.3 (95% CI: 17.4, 21.1) among young adults to 26.8 (95% CI: 26.2, 27.4) among adults 65+ at diagnosis (ptrend&lt;0.001). Conclusions: MFH is much more common, and psychological financial hardship is much more severe, in African American cancer survivors diagnosed between the ages of 20-39 compared with those diagnosed as older adults. Young age at diagnosis should be considered a risk factor for cancer-related financial hardship and addressed in work designed to reduce the adverse financial impacts of cancer.

Citation Format: Theresa A. Hastert, Julie J. Ruterbusch, Mrudula Nair, Angie S. Wenzlaff, Jennifer L. Beebe-Dimmer, Stephanie S. Pandolfi, Ann G. Schwartz. Cancer diagnosis in young adulthood as a risk factor for financial hardship among African American cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: Thirteenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2020 Oct 2-4. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(12 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-207.

Abstract PR20: Work outcomes, financial distress, and health-related quality of life among African American cancer survivors

Background: Many employed cancer survivors have difficulty maintaining employment during and after cancer treatment, potentially contributing to financial hardship related to cancer and lower health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The objective of this study is to estimate associations between work changes and decreased work participation and financial distress and HRQOL among employed African American cancer survivors. Methods: We utilized data from 910 employed participants in the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) cohort. African American survivors diagnosed with primary invasive female breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer since January 1, 2013 and identified through the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System were eligible to participate. Participants self-reported employment status; decreases in employment participation (going from full time to part time employment or from being employed to unemployed or on disability after diagnosis); taking paid and unpaid leave; making changes to their hours, schedules, or duties related to cancer; financial distress using the COST measure; and HRQOL using the FACT-G. Linear regression models controlled for demographic, socioeconomic, and cancer-related factors. Results: Mean FACT-G score was 83.1 and mean COST score was 24.6. In adjusted models, FACT-G scores were 13.8 (95% CI: 10.7, 17.2) points lower among survivors who decreased work participation, 5.7 (95% CI: 3.0, 8.4) points lower among those who changed their hours, duties, status, or schedules, 4.6 (95% CI: 1.9, 7.2) points lower among those who took unpaid time off, and 3.4 (95% CI: 0.4, 6.4) points lower among survivors who took extended paid time off. Similarly, COST scores were 9.4 (95% CI: 7.5, 11.2) points lower (reflecting higher financial distress) among survivors who decreased work participation, 5.5 (95% CI: 4.0, 7.0) points lower among those making work changes, 6.5 (95% CI: 5.0, 7.9) points lower among those taking unpaid leave, and 1.8 (95% CI: 0.1, 3.5) points lower among those taking extended paid time off. Work changes were not associated with changes in FACT-G scores between ROCS enrollment and first year follow-up. Work changes and paid and unpaid leave were not associated with differences in COST scores between ROCS enrollment and first year follow-up; however, among survivors who decreased work participation between diagnosis and ROCS enrollment COST scores increased by 3.2 (95% CI: 1.4, 5.0) points between ROCS enrollment and first year follow-up. Conclusions: Employment changes after cancer, particularly decreased work participation and changing hours, duties, employment status, and schedules were associated with lower HRQOL among cancer survivors, but not with differences in HRQOL over time. Survivors who experienced employment changes due to cancer also reported higher financial distress, although this distress lessened over time among survivors who decreased work participation.

Citation Format: Theresa A. Hastert, Jaclyn M. Kyko, Julie J. Ruterbusch, Angie S. Wenzlaff, Mrudula Nair, Jennifer L. Beebe-Dimmer, Stephanie S. Pandolfi, Ann G. Schwartz. Work outcomes, financial distress, and health-related quality of life among African American cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: Thirteenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2020 Oct 2-4. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(12 Suppl):Abstract nr PR20.

Patterns of cancer family history and genetic counseling eligibility among African Americans with breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal cancers: A Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors cohort study

BACKGROUND

Family history (FH) remains one of the strongest risk factors for many common cancers and is used to determine cancer genetic counseling (CGC) eligibility, but the understanding of familial cancer patterns in African Americans is limited.

METHODS

This study evaluated cancer FH among African Americans with invasive breast cancer, prostate cancer, lung cancer, or colorectal cancer (CRC) in the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) cohort. Associations between participant cancer type, site-specific FH, and meeting national guidelines for CGC were evaluated via logistic regression. Cancer FH patterns were evaluating via hierarchical clustering.

RESULTS

Among 1500 ROCS participants, 71% reported at least 1 first-degree relative or grandparent with cancer. FHs of breast cancer, CRC, lung cancer, and prostate cancer were most common among participants with the same diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] for breast cancer, 1.14; P < .001; OR for CRC, 1.08; P = .003; OR for lung cancer, 1.09; P = .008; OR for prostate cancer, 1.14; P < .001). Nearly half of the participants (47%) met national CGC guidelines, and 24.4% of these participants met CGC criteria on the basis of their cancer FH alone. FH was particularly important in determining CGC eligibility for participants with prostate cancer versus breast cancer (OR for FH vs personal history alone, 2.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.94-4.35; P < .001). In clustering analyses, breast and prostate cancer FH-defined clusters were common across all participants. Clustering of CRC and breast cancer FHs was also observed.

CONCLUSIONS

ROCS participants reported high rates of cancer FH. The high rate of eligibility for CGC among ROCS participants supports the need for interventions to increase referrals and uptake of CGC among African Americans.

The costs of treating and not treating patients with chronic myeloid leukemia with tyrosine kinase inhibitors among Medicare patients in the United States

BACKGROUND

Patients with high cost-sharing of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) experience delays in treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). To the authors' knowledge, the clinical outcomes among and costs for patients not receiving TKIs are not well defined.

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, the authors evaluated differences in TKI initiation, health care use, cost, and survival among patients with CML with continuous Medicare Parts A and B and Part D coverage who were diagnosed between 2007 and 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 941 patients were included. Approximately 29% of all patients did not initiate treatment with TKIs within 6 months (non-TKI users), and had lower rates of BCR-ABL testing and more hospitalizations compared with TKI users. Approximately 21% were not found to have any TKI claims at any time. TKI initiation rates within 6 months of diagnosis increased for all patients over time (61% to 85%), with greater improvements observed in patients receiving subsidies (55% to 90%). Total Medicare costs were greater in patients treated with TKIs, with approximately 50% because of TKI costs. Non-TKI users had more inpatient costs compared with TKI users. Trends in cost remained significant when adjusting for age and comorbidities. The median overall survival was 40 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 34-48 months) compared with 86 months (95% CI, 73 months to not reached), respectively, for non-TKI users versus TKI users, a finding that remained consistent when adjusting for age, comorbidities, and subsidy status (hazard ratio, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.77-2.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 21% of all patients with CML did not receive TKIs at any time. Cost-sharing subsidies consistently are found to be associated with higher initiation rates. Non-TKI users had higher inpatient costs and poorer survival outcomes. Interventions to lower TKI costs for all patients are desirable.

Inflammation markers on benign breast biopsy are associated with risk of invasive breast cancer in African American women

PURPOSE

Markers of inflammation, including crown-like structures of the breast (CLS-B) and infiltrating lymphocytes (IL), have been identified in breast tissue and associated with increased risk of breast cancer (BrCa), however most of this work has been performed in primarily non-Hispanic white women. Here, we examined whether CLS-B and IL are associated with invasive BrCa in African American (AA) women.

METHODS

We assessed breast biopsies from three 5-year age-matched groups: BrCa-free AA women (50 Volunteer) from the Komen Normal Tissue Bank (KTB) and AA women with a clinically-indicated biopsy diagnosed with benign breast disease (BBD) from our Detroit cohort who developed BrCa (55 BBD-cancer) or did not develop BrCa (47 BBD only, year of biopsy matched to BBD-cancer). Mean adipocyte diameter and total adipose area were estimated from digital images using the Adiposoft plugin from ImageJ. Associations between CLS-B, IL, and BrCa among KTB and Detroit biopsies were assessed using multivariable multinomial and conditional logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Among all biopsies, Volunteer and BBD only biopsies did not harbor CLS-B or IL at significantly different rates after adjusting for logarithm of adipocyte area, adipocyte diameter, and BMI. Among clinically-indicated BBD biopsies, BBD-cancer biopsies were more likely to exhibit CLS-B (odds ratio (OR) = 3.36, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.33-8.48) or IL (OR = 4.95, 95% CI 1.76-13.9) than BBD only biopsies after adjusting for total adipocyte area, adipocyte diameter, proliferative disease, and BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

CLS-B and IL may serve as histological markers of BrCa risk in benign breast biopsies from AA women.

Continued smoking in African American cancer survivors: The Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors Cohort

Tobacco cessation among those recently diagnosed with cancer is important to improve their prognosis, yet, many cancer survivors continue to smoke. The epidemiology of tobacco use differs by race and ethnicity, and limited cessation research has been conducted in African American (AA) populations. Here, we assess demographic and clinical variables associated with continued smoking in AAs after a cancer diagnosis. The Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors study is a cohort comprised of AA cancer survivors with breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal cancers. Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors data were utilized from survivors who completed their baseline survey within 18 months of cancer diagnosis (n = 1145); 18% (n = 356) reported smoking at the time of cancer diagnosis, and 57% of these (n = 203) continued to smoke after their diagnosis. Logistic regression models were used to assess factors associated with continued smoking. Living with a smoker (odds ratio [OR] = 2.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.64, 4.70), higher cumulative years of smoking (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.05, for each year), and a prostate cancer diagnosis (OR = 7.35, 95% CI: 3.89, 13.89) were all associated with increased odds of continued smoking. Survivors with higher social well-being scores (measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, a quality of life assessment) were more likely to quit smoking after diagnosis (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93, 1.00). These findings highlight the continued need for personalized cessation strategies to be incorporated into treatment plans for cancer survivors.

Abstract C120: High-grade endometrial cancers: Persistent racial differences in survival

Introduction: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic cancer diagnosed in the United States, and high-grade cancers account for approximately 1/5 of the ECs diagnosed in non-Hispanic white (NHW) women, Hispanic women, and Asian women, but nearly 1/3 of those diagnosed in African American (AA) women. These high-grade cancers are associated with poorer outcomes, and AAs are consistently at highest risk of mortality in studies that fail to adjust adequately for potentially important treatment or comorbidity variables. Here we present survival analyses from a study of AA and NHW women with high grade EC at two academic hospitals.

Methods: High-grade cancers were identified through registries at each hospital and representative slides were re-reviewed by a single gynecologic pathologist to confirm high-grade disease and subtype. The following subtypes were included: clear cell, endometrioid, mixed, and serous. We identified 258 women (n=86 NHW, n=169 AA) who were diagnosed with high-grade cancers between 1998 and 2010. Utilizing medical records and the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry, the following data were abstracted: height, weight, comorbid conditions, type of radiation, dose and fractions, type(s) of chemotherapy, number of cycles, recurrence, and vital status. Descriptive analyses utilized chi-square and t-tests to determine differences in clinical characteristics between AA and NHW women. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was performed to test for differences by race and subtype. To compare survival while considering competing risks of death, cause-specific hazard and cumulative incidence functions were compared using Gray's test.

Results: The majority of the women had ECs classified as serous carcinomas (46.1%), followed by endometrioid (39.5%), clear cell carcinomas (9.7%) and mixed cell types (4.7%). AA women with endometrial cancer had slightly higher mean body mass index (BMI) compared to NHW women (34.6 and 32.2, respectively, p-value=0.06). NHW survived significantly longer after diagnosis compared to AA women (173 months versus 87 months, respectively, log-rank p-value=0.006). This difference remained after stratification by subtype, with similar findings for endometrioid cancers (log-rank p-value=0.06) and serous cancers (log-rank p-value=0.03). When examining survival considering competing risks (death due to EC versus other causes), AA women had a greater risk of death (HR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.10-3.03) compared to their NHW counterparts; however, no difference was seen by race for other causes of death (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.71-2.32). Further analyses, showing survival differences persist despite adjustments for BMI, comorbidities, and detailed treatment, will be presented.

Conclusions: AA women continue to experience greater mortality from high-grade EC despite adjustments for demographic, clinical and treatment data, warranting continued efforts to identify molecular and social factors associated with poorer survival.

Citation Format: Michele L. Cote, Julie J. Ruterbusch, Tara Rangarajan, Remonda Khalil, Mohamed Elshaikh, Rouba Ali-Fehmi. High-grade endometrial cancers: Persistent racial differences in survival [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2018 Nov 2-5; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl):Abstract nr C120.

Abstract C089: Racial/ethnic differences in smoking-related cancers in metropolitan Detroit

Metropolitan Detroit has a unique population structure, home to one of the highest concentrations of Arab Americans. Due to differences in prevalence of smoking between ethnic groups, we calculated incidence of smoking-related cancers among Arab Americans, Hispanics, non-Hispanic Whites and non-Hispanic Blacks in the metropolitan Detroit area. All first primary lung/bronchus, urinary bladder, and head and neck cancer cases diagnosed 2004-2015 were obtained from the Detroit Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program from 2004-2015. Arab/Chaldean surname cases were identified using a validated name algorithm resulting in five different racial/ethnic categories: non-Arab non-Hispanic Whites (NANHW), non-Arab non-Hispanic Blacks (NANHB), Arab American (ArA), Hispanics, and Other Ethnicities. Frequency tables were created to analyze distribution of stage, cancer site, age group, and sex between ethnic groups. Using Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS), population estimates for the 11-year period were generated for each ethnic group. Age-standardized incidence rates were calculated using the 2000 US Standard Million for each group of cancer sites (lung/bronchus, head/neck [HNC], and bladder) for each ethnic group. Rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using International Association for Research on Cancer (IARC) Statistical methods for registries and NANHW as the reference group. From 2004-2015, there were 60,366 cases of smoking-related cancer reported to SEER, 1,346 of which were diagnosed in ArA. Among males, NANHB were more likely to be diagnosed with lung cancer over this time period (NANHB vs NANHW RR=1.23 95% CI (1.17, 1.30)). ArA and Hispanic males had significantly lower rates than NANHW (RR=0.81 95% CI (0.72, 0.90) and 0.66 (0.58, 0.76), respectively). NANHW, NANHB, and Hispanic males had similar HNC rates (Hispanic RR=0.84 95% CI (0.63, 1.12) and NANHB RR=1.15 (1.03, 1.29) vs NANHW). Arab males had a significantly lower rate of HNC compared to NANHW (RR=0.67 95% CI (0.53, 0.83)). NANHW and Arab males had similar rates of bladder cancer (RR=1.13 95% CI (0.98, 1.31)). NANHB and Hispanic males had significantly lower rates of bladder cancer compared to NANHW (RR=0.49 95% CI (0.45, 0.52) and 0.51 (0.43, 0.61), respectively). Similar patterns emerged among females for both lung and bladder cancers. Females also had similar rates of HNC comparing NANHW and NANHB (RR=1.09 95% CI (0.89, 1.32)), but in contrast to males, Arab women had a marginally lower rate of HNC (RR=0.75 CI (0.49, 1.17)), and Hispanic women had a significantly lower rate of HNC (RR=0.55 95% CI (0.35, 0.86)). We report previously observed differences in lung and bladder cancer and identify novel differences in HNC among subgroups in metropolitan Detroit. Our future analyses will expand to other registries in the US with significant ArA populations. Analyses should be attentive to ArA as a population subgroup, which will define research questions specific to this unique population.

Citation Format: Juliana E. Fucinari, Julie J. Ruterbusch, Katie M. Zarins, Laura S. Rozek, Kendra L. Schwartz. Racial/ethnic differences in smoking-related cancers in metropolitan Detroit [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2018 Nov 2-5; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl):Abstract nr C089.

Abstract C042: Family history of cancer among African Americans with breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal cancers in the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors cohort

Individuals with familial cancers are at increased risk of second primary cancers, and there are clear clinical guidelines for treatment and follow-up. However, the literature on the patterns of cancer family history (FH) in African Americans (AAs) is sparse. Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) is a population-based cohort study of AAs residing in metropolitan Detroit diagnosed with a primary invasive cancer of the breast, colon/rectum, lung or prostate after January 1, 2013. ROCS participants complete baseline and yearly follow-up questionnaires that include assessment of participants’ family history of cancer. We examined the distribution of breast, prostate, colorectal, lung, kidney, liver, ovarian, pancreatic cancers among first degree relatives and grandparents of Detroit ROCS participants (i.e, probands). We also estimated the distribution of cancers involved in known hereditary cancer syndromes (hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), Lynch, Peutz-Jeghers, Cowden, Li-Fraumeni) within these families. Associations between probands’ age of onset and cancer family history were evaluated using logistic regression. Among the first 1,500 ROCS participants recruited into the cohort (674 breast, 138 colorectal, 174 lung, 514 prostate), 71% reported at least one relative with a cancer of any type, which did not vary substantially by proband cancer site. FH of breast (p&lt;0.001), colorectal (p=0.010), lung (p=0.022), prostate (p&lt;0.001), and ovarian (p=0.044) cancers significantly varied by proband cancer site, where probands were most likely to report a FH of their index cancer site (breast: 30%, colorectal: 17%, lung: 25%, prostate: 28%). When restricted to older family members (parents + grandparents), a FH of cancer matching the probands’ cancer site increased the odds of being diagnosed under the age of 50 (Breast: Odds ratio (OR)=1.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-2.96; colorectal: OR=3.71, 95% CI 0.71-19.41; prostate: OR=1.86, 95% CI 0.91-3.79). FH of HBOC cancers was most common among probands with breast (47%) and prostate (43%) cancer compared to other sites (28-34%, p&lt;0.001), while FH of Li-Fraumeni cancers was most common among probands with breast cancers (31% vs. 17-22%, p&lt;0.001). Probands with breast and colorectal cancers were more likely to report FH of Cowden cancers (36-38% vs. 24-25%, p&lt;0.001). FH of Lynch and Peutz-Jeghers cancers were less commonly reported among probands with lung (23% vs. 32-38%, p=0.004) and prostate (39% vs. 48-53%, p&lt;0.001) cancers, respectively. AAs with breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal cancers frequently report FH of cancer, and patterns of FH differ by index cancer site. A better understanding of cancer family history among AAs could provide insights into cancer etiology in this population.

Citation Format: Kristen S Purrington, Julie J Ruterbusch, Mark Manning, Michael S Simon, Jennifer Beebe-Dimmer, Ann G Schwartz. Family history of cancer among African Americans with breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal cancers in the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2019 Sep 20-23; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl_2):Abstract nr C042.

Abstract PR04: Engaging in physical activity after a cancer diagnosis: A Detroit ROCS study

Background: The benefit of regular exercise in improving cancer outcomes is well established. In 2012, the American Cancer Society (ACS) released a recommendation statement that cancer survivors should engage in regular physical activity (PA) as soon as possible after a cancer diagnosis with the goal of engaging in at least 150 minutes per week of moderate to vigorous PA (1). However, few cancer survivors report meeting this recommendation (2). Using data from the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) study, we examined the patterns of PA and its association with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in a cohort of African American cancer survivors.

Methods: Detroit ROCS participants complete baseline and yearly follow-up surveys to update their health and provide information on health behaviors including PA, using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-short form. We assessed the number of survivors who reported participating in regular PA and those who reported ≥150 minutes of moderate to vigorous PA per week by select characteristics and reported HRQOL measured using the Functional Assessment in Cancer Therapy (FACT) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments.

Results: Among the first 1,000 ROCS participants, 58% reported participating in regular PA with just 22% reporting engaging in ≥150 minutes of PA per week. While there were no differences by sex, prostate cancer survivors were the most likely to report participating in regular PA while lung cancer survivors were the least likely (p=0.009). There was a positive relationship between self-reported education and area-level affluence based on US census data with PA (p&lt;0.001 and p=0.019, respectively). Survivors who reported participating in regular PA also reported higher HRQOL (p&lt;0.001) and lower depression (p=0.036). The same patterns were observed among those reporting ≥150 minutes of PA per week, and additionally we found lower reported anxiety among survivors who report meeting ACS guidelines (PROMIS-Cancer anxiety score, p&lt;0.001). Among survivors who completed their first follow-up survey (N=389), a higher proportion of survivors reported participating in regular PA (71%, p&lt;0.001) and getting ≥150 minutes of PA per week (32%, p&lt;0.001).

Conclusions: Fewer than 25% of African American cancer survivors reported meeting the ACS guidelines for PA at baseline recruitment; however, it was encouraging to see significant increases in PA engagement over time. Given the established benefits associated with regular exercise and cancer outcomes, and the positive correlation on HRQOL and inverse relationship with depression observed in this study, identifying, understanding, and eliminating barriers to regular moderate to vigorous PA among African American cancer survivors is critical. Future study of ROCS subjects will attempt to establish the temporality of these relationships.

This abstract is also being presented as Poster C048.

Citation Format: Julie J. Ruterbusch, Ann G. Schwartz, Terrance Albrecht, Tara Baird, Dave Finlay, Felicity Harper, Stephanie Pandolfi, Julia Mantey, Andrew G. Rundle, Jennifer L. Beebe-Dimmer. Engaging in physical activity after a cancer diagnosis: A Detroit ROCS study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2018 Nov 2-5; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl):Abstract nr PR04.

Abstract C039: Investigation of a prostate cancer genetic susceptibility candidate region on chromosome 5 in African Americans

There are well documented, marked racial disparities in prostate cancer (PCa) incidence and mortality in the United States between African American (AA) and European American (EA) men. These disparities cannot be fully explained by differences in screening or treatment differences by race, and other environmental and biological risk factors have not been well characterized. We hypothesize that racial differences in the distribution of genetic risk factors may contribute to the observed disparities. We previously identified a region on chromosome 5q35 via admixture mapping that is associated with PCa in AA men (Bock 2009). Preliminary analyses in this region suggested two loci involved in chromatin regulation, and several genes including COL23A1, TSPAN17, and GRM6. These are genes that have not been well characterized in the literature, however hints of their role in PCa can be found within previous expression studies. Here, we examine the region on chromosome 5q35 in greater depth to first confirm the observed admixture and to leverage the admixture signal within that region to identify novel variants associated with risk of prostate cancer in African Americans. To achieve the first goal, we estimated genome-wide and local ancestry across chromosome 5 in African American subjects from the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) and an independent case control study from the Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute (KCI). Our results validated the significance of the admixture (p=7.87*10-6). However, the ancestry odds ratio from the MEC study was in the opposite direction in comparison to our original discovery analysis. Despite this difference, after combining studies via meta-analysis, we still retained a significant admixture peak on the distal portion of the chromosome 5q (p=5.47*10-4), which stretched from 152-180Mb. Overall, this effect showed that increasing European ancestry at this locus was associated with increased risk of prostate cancer. Additionally, our admixture meta-analysis uncovered a secondary peak (p=3.66*10-4) from 64-96Mb, where increased risk of prostate cancer was again associated with increasing European ancestry at this locus. We also performed association testing using the MIXSCORE approach, which is a combined test of genotype and local ancestry association. Our most significant association results were located within our primary admixture association peak, and they clustered around a locus at 173 Mb. The lead single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) within this region was rs6885032 (MIXSCORE p=7.83*10-4). Interestingly, this SNP was identified in a genome-wide association analysis as associated with height, and a recent meta-analysis of studies from the literature confirmed an association between height and prostate cancer risk. Furthermore, this SNP was also identified as an expression quantitative trait locus (p=3.30*10-9) in the Genotype-Tissue Expression project. This convergence of findings suggests a possible mechanism for this variant on prostate cancer risk.

Citation Format: Albert M Levin, Gregory Dyson, Julie L Boerner, Julie J Ruterbusch, Cathryn H Bock. Investigation of a prostate cancer genetic susceptibility candidate region on chromosome 5 in African Americans [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2019 Sep 20-23; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl_2):Abstract nr C039.

The impact of high intensity interval training on functional performance, body composition and quality of life in a diverse group of cancer survivors

12057

Background: Given the well-documented benefits of regular exercise to cancer survivors, in 2012, an expert panel assembled by the American Cancer Society recommended that patients engage in at least 150 minutes per week of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. However, few patients meet this goal. We have also observed racial differences in reported participation in regular exercise among cancer survivors living in Metropolitan Detroit, Michigan. Methods: The CAPABLE study is a 12- week pilot exercise intervention that introduces cancer survivors to the sport of CrossFit. We evaluated the impact of this unique, high-intensity interval training method on functional performance, cardiovascular endurance, body composition and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) instrument. All measures were summarized at baseline and program exit. Paired signed rank tests were used to assess change in each of these measures over time. Results: Of the 48 participants enrolled in the pilot, 37 (77%) were considered adherent to the program (attending at least 75% of sessions over the 12-week period). The mean age of participants was 58.5 years, 73% identified as African American and the majority of participants were breast cancer survivors (N = 20). The mean body mass index (BMI) at baseline was 32.8 kg/m2 decreasing to a mean of 31.7 kg/m2 at exit (BMI change -1.1, p < 0.001). Similar changes were observed in % body fat measured by bioelectrical impedance. There were significant improvements in all measures of functional performance over 12-weeks (all p < 0.001). We observed significant and meaningful improvements in reported HRQOL measured by the FACT survey, overall (FACTG total change +9.5 (p < 0.001)) and in each one of the individual domains (physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being). Conclusions: We observed significant improvements in performance, body composition and quality of life among cancer survivors introduced to a high-intensity interval training program. Understanding and eliminating barriers to programs like these are critical to improving outcomes and reducing cancer health disparities. Clinical trial information: NCT03750981 .

A comparison of prostate health index, total PSA, %free PSA, and proPSA in a contemporary US population-The MiCheck-01 prospective trial

BACKGROUND

Increasing numbers of patients are presenting with aggressive prostate cancer (CaP); therefore, there exists a need to optimally identify these patients pre-biopsy.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the accuracy of total prostate specific antigen (PSA), %free PSA, and prostate health index (PHI) to differentiate between patients without CaP, with non-aggressive (Gleason 3 + 3, non-AgCaP) and with aggressive (Gleason ≥ 3 + 4, AgCaP) in a contemporary US population.

DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS

Serum samples were collected from 332 US patients scheduled for biopsy due to an elevated age-adjusted PSA. Site and Central biopsy pathologic assessment were performed.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Testing of PSA, free PSA, proPSA, and PHI was performed along with central pathology review. Test performance using logistic regression analysis for differentiating CaP from non-CaP as well as non-AgCaP from AgCaP was evaluated.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Central pathology review resulted in 32 upgrades including 14 Gleason 3 + 3 scores being upgraded to AgCaP with final distribution of 148 no-CaP, 64 non-AgCaP, and 120 AgCaP patients. Receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis of the different tests showed that PHI performed best at differentiating CaP from no-CaP subjects (area under the receiver operator curve 0.79). In contrast, the different tests were essentially equivalent in differentiating AgCaP vs. non-AgCaP.

CONCLUSIONS

In this recent US study of prebiopsy patients we observed a high proportion of AgCaP patients consistent with previous studies in contemporary US populations. Central Gleason review is recommended for multi-institutional studies comparing biomarkers. PHI was superior to PSA, free PSA, %free PSA, and proPSA in detecting CaP in this population but was not superior at differentiating AgCaP from non-AgCaP.

Development and evaluation of the MiCheck test for aggressive prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

A clinical need exists for a biomarker test to accurately delineate aggressive prostate cancer (AgCaP), and thus better assist clinicians and patients decision-making on whether to proceed to prostate biopsy.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a blood test for AgCaP and compare to PSA, %free PSA, proPSA, and prostate health index (PHI) tests.

DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

Patient samples from the MiCheck-01 trial were used for development of the MiCheck test.

METHODS

Serum analyte concentrations for cellular growth factors were determined using a custom-made Luminex-based R&D Systems multianalyte kit.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Bayesian model averaging and random forest approaches were used to identify clinical factors and growth factors able to distinguish between men with AgCaP (Gleason Score [GS] ≥3+4) from those with non-AgCaP (GS 3+3). Logistic regression and Monte Carlo cross-validation identified variable combinations in order to able to maximize differentiation of AgCaP from non-AgCaP.

RESULTS

The MiCheck logistic regression model was developed and comprises the following variables: serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), patient age, Digital Rectal Exam (DRE) status, Leptin, IL-7, vascular endothelial growth factor, and Glypican-1. The model differentiated AgCaP from non-AgCaP with an area under the curve of 0.83 and was superior to PSA, %free PSA and PHI in all patient groups, regardless of PSA range. Applying the MiCheck test to all evaluable biopsy patients from the MiCheck-01 study demonstrated that up to 30% of biopsies could be avoided while delaying diagnosis of only 6.8% of GS ≥3+4 cancers, 5% of GS ≥4+3 cancers and no cancers of GS 8 or higher.

CONCLUSIONS

The MiCheck test outperforms PSA, %free PSA and PHI tests in differentiating AgCaP vs. non-AgCaP patients. The MiCheck test could result in a significant number of biopsies being avoided with a low number of patients experiencing a delayed diagnosis.