Sleep health and quality of life in the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors cohort

PURPOSE

Sleep disturbances represent a modifiable target to improve quality of life and longer-term outcomes in cancer survivors. However, the association between sleep health and overall quality of life in African American cancer survivors has been poorly assessed, a population at increased risk for morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Seven hundred and eighteen Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) cohort participants completed a supplemental sleep survey at the time of enrollment, which included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Linear and logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between sleep and mental health, while block regression models were used to estimate the contribution of clustered factors to Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL).

RESULTS

Nearly 60% of the cohort reported symptoms indicative of poor sleep quality on the PSQI, 15% reported excessive daytime sleepiness on the ESS, and 12% reported moderate to severe insomnia on the ISI. Survivors with elevated ISI scores reported FACT-G scores that were 17 points lower than those without symptoms of insomnia (95% CI: - 13.1, - 21.2). Poor sleep health accounted for the largest proportion of variability in FACT-G scores (R2 = 0.27) and change in R2 value (0.18) when compared to comorbidities, health behaviors, cancer-related factors, and demographics.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall sleep health was significantly associated with poorer HRQOL and variability in FACT-G scores. Additional studies investigating a causal relationship between sleep and HRQOL are needed to determine whether sleep quality could affect disparities in cancer outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Addressing sleep quality in cancer survivors may improve long-term health and HRQOL.

Surgical strategy and outcomes for atrial functional mitral regurgitation: All functional mitral regurgitation is not the same!

OBJECTIVE

Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is a cardiac pathology that causes the mitral valve to malfunction, leading to mitral regurgitation (MR). The optimal strategy for FMR remains unclear, and FMR outcomes are poor. All etiologies of FMR might not be the same, and subdividing patients with FMR caused by atrial (AFMR) versus ventricular FMR pathology might be important. Herein, we present outcomes of patients with AFMR to define this "new" population.

METHODS

Data of patients who underwent mitral valve repair for MR from 2000 to 2020 were reviewed. Patients with degenerative/myxomatous disease, ejection fraction <50% (ventricular FMR), and miscellaneous etiologies including endocarditis and rheumatic disease were excluded to isolate a population of "pure" AFMR patients. Descriptive characteristics and outcomes data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 123 total AFMR patients, mean preoperative left atrial dimensions were enlarged to 4.9 (95% CI, 4.7-5.0) cm, whereas mean preoperative left ventricular diastolic dimensions remained near normal at 5.0 (95% CI, 4.9-5.2) cm. Preoperative atrial fibrillation was noted in 61% (74/123). Echocardiogram was performed in 58% (71/123) of patients at a median of 569 (interquartile range, 75-1782) days after surgery. Of those, 72% (51/71) had trivial or no MR, 22% (16/71) mild, and only 6% (4/71) moderate or greater MR. Only 1.6% (2/123) required redo mitral valve reoperation. Estimated 5-year survival was 74%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with AFMR do well after mitral valve repair using an annuloplasty ring, with low rates of reoperation, mortality, and recurrence of MR. Mitral annuloplasty should be considered the surgical therapy of choice for AFMR.