Autologous Transplantation, Consolidation, and Maintenance Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Results of the BMT CTN 0702 Trial

Analysis of pharmacotherapeutic approaches for multiple myeloma and correlated renal and pulmonary impairments: a retrospective real-world registry study in the Greater Gulf Region (REPAIR Study)

Background

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy with significant unmet medical needs, particularly in the treatment of relapsed and refractory disease. This study aims to describe the disease characteristics, various treatment regimens, and outcomes among patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) in the Greater Gulf region.

Methods

A regional, retrospective study was conducted in Gulf countries to collect real-world data from the medical records of 148 patients with RRMM who relapsed 1-3 times in the past two years before the data collection period (July 2022 and February 2023).

Results

The mean age of the study population was 59.4 years, and 64.2% of the participants were male. The VRd regimen (Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone) was the most frequent first-line therapy among transplant-ineligible patients (40.2%) and the most common induction and consolidation regimen (43.9% and 66.7%, respectively) in transplant-eligible patients. Meanwhile, Rd (Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone) was the most common maintenance regimen (75%). DKd (Daratumumab, Carfilzomib, and Dexamethasone), KPd (Carfilzomib, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone), and PVd (Pomalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone) were the most widely used second, third, and fourth treatment lines, respectively (16.6%, 9.2%, and 12.5%). About 52.7% of patients were eligible for stem cell transplantation (SCT), and among them, a complete response (CR) was achieved in 47.7%. Furthermore, CR and very good partial remission rates decreased across all treatment lines. Renal impairment decreased across different treatment lines, from 23.6% in the first line to 6.3% in the fourth line. In contrast, respiratory complications demonstrated the highest incidence (>18%) in the 3rd and 4th treatment lines. Moreover, refractoriness to treatment increased from 1.3% in the first line to 34.6% in the fourth treatment line. Additionally, isatuximab was incorporated into 80%, 15%, and 5% of the regimens administered as second-, third-, and fourth-line treatments, respectively.

Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the real-world management and treatment choices for RRMM, including the utilization of SCT and novel therapies such as isatuximab.

Clinical benefit loss in myeloma patients declining autologous stem cell transplantation: a real-world study

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a recommended treatment for multiple myeloma (MM). Currently, with multiple treatment alternatives, patients' prognosis has improved significantly compared to the pre-proteasome inhibitor period. However, this has raised deliberations on the value and timing of ASCT. Compared with Western countries, the proportion of Chinese patients undergoing ASCT is relatively low. Nevertheless, this situation allows us to observe the treatment outcomes of transplant-eligible (TE) patients who haven't received ASCT and explore the role of ASCT in patients with distinct clinicopathological features. This real-world analysis encompassed 1059 newly diagnosed MM patients from 2012 to 2022, among whom 480 were TE. These patients were categorized into the TE-ASCT group (158 received ASCT) and the TE-no-ASCT group (322 did not receive ASCT). Disease progression and treatment response are evaluated based on the definition of IMWG. We found that the progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly prolonged in TE-ASCT group compared to TE-no-ASCT group, but there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS). Further exploratory analyses revealed that ASCT conspicuously augmented the PFS of patients aged ≤ 60 years, featuring ISS stage II/III, 1q gain/amplification, and positive minimal residual disease (MRD). Nevertheless, for patients aged > 60 years, presenting with ISS stage I, high-risk cytogenetics, renal insufficiency, and negative MRD, ASCT did not confer PFS benefits. Our investigation furnishes evidence of the clinical superiority of ASCT for MM patients with disparate clinicopathological characteristics in the contemporary treatment era, laying a groundwork for individualized ASCT selection.

Global, regional, and national multiple myeloma burden from 1990 to 2021: a systematic analysis for of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021

BACKGROUND

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common haematological malignancy worldwide. A comprehensive global analysis of MM based on diverse geographic locations and timeframes is lacking. This study aimed to provide the incidence, mortality rate, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) of MM, from 1990 to 2021, focusing on the age structure and temporal trends of the disease burden.

METHODS

This study analysed the most recent MM data (1990 to 2021) from 204 countries and territories obtained from the Global Burden of Disease database. MM incidence, age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR), and DALYs were stratified by age, sex, and region to accurately reflect epidemiological trends and disease burden. The correlation between age-standardised rates and social population index was evaluated. To explore the influencing factors of MM, the annual percentage change (APC) and average APC rate (AAPC), as well as their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (UIs), were calculated.

RESULTS

In 2021, there were approximately 35,000 cases of MM worldwide, with the highest numbers in China and Germany, with 47,003 and 32,010 cases, respectively. In 2021, Europe had the highest ASIR and ASPR, while North America had the highest ASMR and DALYs. Globally, age-standardized ASPR, ASMR, and DALYs all increased between 1990 and 2021. From 1990 to 2021, the number of cases, deaths, and disability-adjusted life-years due to MM were higher in males than in females. The higher the sociodemographic index, the higher the ASPR.

CONCLUSIONS

The global prevalence, ASIR, ASMR and DALYs of MM increased, showing significant regional disparities. These findings underscore the need for prevention in specific populations and emphasise the urgent need for new therapies to reduce ASIR and improve patient prognosis.

Single versus tandem autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Identifying patients who may benefit from autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma is crucial, especially in the era of effective induction and consolidation strategies. We analyzed data from 12763 patients enrolled in the German Registry for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cell Therapy (DRST), distinguishing those who underwent single (n = 8736) or tandem ASCT (n = 4027) from 1998 to 2021. Our findings show that the median age at first ASCT increased over time, while the use of tandem ASCT declined. The shift in treatment practices coincided with higher rates of complete response (CR) post-induction therapy. Significantly improved overall survival and event-free survival over time were observed across all age groups, especially in older patients, but not in patients under 40. Tandem ASCT showed benefits for patients who did not achieve CR after initial ASCT. However, patients with ISS III and renal impairment had poorer outcomes with tandem ASCT. In conclusion, while ASCT remains an important anti-myeloma tool, careful patient selection for tandem ASCT is essential, particularly avoiding its use in patients with ISS III and renal impairment, older age, and those already achieving CR after initial ASCT.

First Line Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Transplant Eligible Multiple Myeloma Recommendations From a Canadian Consensus Guideline Consortium

The availability of effective therapies for multiple myeloma (MM) has sparked debate on the role of first line autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), particularly in standard-risk patients. However, treatment for individuals with high-risk disease continues to display suboptimal outcomes. With novel therapies used earlier, practice is changing rapidly in the field of MM. Presently, quadruplet induction therapy incorporating an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody to a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory drug prior to ASCT followed by maintenance therapy stands as the foremost strategy for attaining deep and sustained responses in transplant eligible MM (TEMM). This Canadian Consensus Guideline Consortium (CGC) proposes consensus recommendations for the first line treatment of TEMM. To address the needs of physicians and people diagnosed with MM, this document focuses on ASCT eligibility, induction therapy, mobilization and collection, conditioning, consolidation, and maintenance therapy, as well as, high-risk populations, management of adverse events, assessment of treatment response, and monitoring for disease relapse. The CGC will periodically review the recommendations herein and update as necessary.

Evolving strategies in the management of transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma treatment has evolved significantly with the introduction of triplet and quadruplet regimens, notably incorporating anti-CD38 antibodies. While autologous stem cell transplantation remains a cornerstone of therapy, its role in the context of increasingly effective upfront treatments is debated. Current guidelines still recommend transplant for all eligible patients, especially those with high-risk features at diagnosis, despite concerns regarding the lack of overall survival benefits and the potential long-term toxicities associated with high-dose melphalan. Delaying transplantation until first relapse has been proposed, but this approach carries the risk of patients becoming ineligible for transplantation due to worsening health or disease progression. Consolidation therapy after transplant is not strongly endorsed in recent guidelines, and studies show mixed results regarding its efficacy. Some data suggests a progression-free survival advantage with post-ASCT consolidation; others found no significant differences in outcomes among various strategies. Nonetheless, tandem transplant may be beneficial for high-risk patients. Maintenance therapy, particularly with lenalidomide, has proven effective, offering substantial progression-free and overall survival benefits. While lenalidomide remains the standard, emerging data indicate that combinations with proteasome inhibitors or anti-CD38 antibodies could enhance outcomes, particularly in high-risk populations. As our understanding of myeloma biology deepens, tailoring treatment approaches based on risk profiles and response depth will be crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

Evidence-based Korean guidelines for the clinical management of multiple myeloma: addressing 12 key clinical questions

Multiple myeloma (MM), a hematological malignancy, is characterized by malignant plasma cell proliferation in the bone marrow. Recent treatment advances have significantly improved patient outcomes associated with MM. In this study, we aimed to develop comprehensive, evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of MM. We identified 12 key clinical questions essential for MM management, guiding the extensive literature review and meta-analysis of the study. Our guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations by integrating patient preferences with survey data. These recommendations include current and emerging diagnostic tools, therapeutic agents, and treatment strategies. By prioritizing a patient-centered approach and rigorous data analysis, these guidelines were developed to enhance MM management, both in Korea and globally.

Long-Term Survival with Multiple Myeloma: An Italian Experience

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Treatments for multiple myeloma (MM) have expanded in the last decade, and the overall survival (OS) of MM patients (pts) is in continuous improvement. With the availability of new treatments and the use of high-dose chemotherapy, followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT), the median OS of newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) pts is 6-8 years. To date, approximately 50% and 28% of MM patients are still alive at 5 years and 10 years. Few data are reported concerning the characteristics of the long-term survival MM pts.

METHODS

the aim of this observational multicenter study is to analyze the clinical profile of MM pts who have survived 10 years or longer, to identify possible predictors of long-term survival.

CONCLUSIONS

this is a real-life observation of a cohort of 344 long-term survivors with MM. The median age of the entire cohort was 59 years (range 27-83). The median years from diagnosis was 13.4 (range 11.3-16.3). Our analysis identified age more than 60 years, hypoalbuminemia at diagnosis, and a number of anti-myeloma therapies equal or more than 3 as significant independent prognostic factors for reduced OS. These finding underline the importance of designing prospective studies to identify clinical, biological, and molecular characteristics that could be used to better stratify newly diagnosed multiple myeloma pts in order to incorporate reproducible biomarkers and to identify tailored optimal target therapies.

Tandem Versus Single Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for High-Risk Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents: A Real-World Study of China

BACKGROUND

This study compares the efficacy and safety of single autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) versus tandem ASCT for multiple myeloma (MM) patients in the era of novel agents.

METHODS

A total of 112 high-risk MM patients were included (single ASCT, (n = 57) or tandem ASCT(n = 55) in this retrospective multicenter study. Responses and outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

At 100 days after ASCT1 and ASCT2, 36 (63.2%) versus 45 (81.8%) patients achieved sCR/CR, 16 (28.1%) versus 7 (12.7%) patients achieved VGPR, and 5 (8.8%) versus 1 (1.8%) patient achieved PR, respectively, in the single and tandem ASCT cohorts. The 3-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality and disease progression was 0% versus 7.3% (p = 0.083), and 45.8% versus 25.8% (p = 0.039), respectively, for the single and tandem ASCT cohort. The tandem ASCT cohort showed a trend of better 3-year probability of PFS (58.1% vs. 64.7%, p = 0.064) compared with the single ASCT cohort. In multivariate analysis, ultra high-risk and achieving

CONCLUSIONS

Tandem ASCT demonstrated improved outcomes compared to single ASCT in high-risk MM patients receiving triplet or quadruplet induction and maintenance therapy. However, patients with ultra high-risk cytogenetics may require innovative therapeutic approaches, as tendem ASCT does not overcome their adverse prognosis.

Collapse

Key Words

• autologous stem cell transplant
• multiple myeloma
• tandem

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Multiple Myeloma/therapy
• Multiple Myeloma/mortality
• Male
• Female
• Middle Aged
• Retrospective Studies
• Transplantation, Autologous
• Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods
• Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects
• China/epidemiology
• Adult
• Aged
• Treatment Outcome
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects

Collapse

Grants

• KJ2024CX045 Plan Project of Tongzhou Municipal Science and Technology
• 82170208 the National Natural Science Foundation of China
• 71003Y3035 Peking University Medicine Fund for world's leading discipline or discipline cluster development
• 2022YFC2502606 National Key Research and Development Program of China
• 82293630 Major Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
• 2020-2-4082 Capital Health Development Research Project
• The Natural Science Foundation of Beijing : Z230016

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Xuelin Dou Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Peking University, Beijing, China
Juan Ren Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Shanxi, China
Jiangtao Li Department of Hematology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
Xiaodan Liu Department of Hematology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Shandong, China
Li Bao Department of Hematology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Yuan Chen Department of Hematology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Peng Zhao Department of Hematology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guizhou, China
Yuping Zhong Department of Hematology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, China
Nan Peng Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Peking University, Beijing, China
Lei Wen Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Peking University, Beijing, China
Leqing Cao Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Peking University, Beijing, China
Yang Liu Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Peking University, Beijing, China
Daoxing Deng Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Peking University, Beijing, China
Fengrong Wang Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Peking University, Beijing, China
Liru Wang Department of Hematology, Fu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Hui Liu Department of Hematology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
Xiaojun Huang Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Peking University, Beijing, China
Xiaodong Mo Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Peking University, Beijing, China
Jin Lu Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Peking University, Beijing, China

Collapse

Collaborators Collapse

The Progress of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma (Review)

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant hematological disease originating from plasma cells that remains incurable. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is an important treatment method for MM. With the development of new drugs, the treatment of MM patients who meet the ASCT criteria has significantly improved, and the median survival time has increased by 8-10 years. The current treatment for MM patients who meet the ASCT criteria consists mainly of the following stages: induction therapy, stem cell collection, stem cell transplantation, and consolidation and maintenance therapy. Even today, long-term disease control remains the goal of MM treatment in clinical practice. In the era of new drugs, early ASCT still results in longer progression-free survival (PFS) and is currently the standard treatment method for young newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. Moreover, tandem transplantation can be considered for MM patients with high-risk cytogenetics. This review discusses mainly the role of ASCT in MM, the conditions for patient transplantation, the induction chemotherapy regimen before transplantation, the conditioning regimen, the timing of transplantation, and the effectiveness of tandem transplantation, including maintenance and salvage ASCT after transplantation.

Transplant in myeloma: who, when, and why?

High-dose melphalan supported by autologous transplantation has been the standard of care for eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma for nearly 30 years. Several randomized clinical trials have reaffirmed the strong position of transplant in the era of triplets combining proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and dexamethasone. Although quadruplets are becoming the standard in transplantation programs, no data are currently available on the need for a transplant with new regimens incorporating anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies. Outcomes remain heterogeneous, with different response depths and durations depending on the cytogenetics at diagnosis. The improvement of disease prognostication using sensitive and specific tools allows for adapting the strategy to initial and dynamic risks. This review examines which patients need a transplant, when transplantation is preferable, and why.

Tandem autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To evaluate whether patients with multiple myeloma (MM) could benefit from tandem autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT), PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched, and 10 eligible studies were included after data extraction and quality evaluation. Meta-analysis showed that compared to single autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, tandem auto-HSCT does not improve OS, EFS or efficacy in MM patients, and may even lead to higher treatment-related mortality (TRM). MM patients who received autologous tandem allogeneic HSCT did not achieve better response compared to tandem autologous HSCT. In summary, compared to single autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, tandem autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation cannot provide survival advantages for MM patients, and MM patients cannot benefit from autologous tandem allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Comparative analysis of single versus tandem autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma in Korea: the KMM2102 study

Tandem autologous stem cell transplantation can improve the prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma. However, the precise role of tandem transplantation remains debatable. We evaluated the clinical benefits of tandem transplantation retrospectively. Of the 655 included patients, 117 underwent tandem transplantation; the remaining were assigned to the control group. After a single transplantation, the tandem group achieved a complete remission (CR) rate of 24.8%, which increased to 46.2% after a second transplantation. The tandem group had a significantly longer median PFS than the control group in patients with International Staging System (ISS) III and high-risk cytogenetics (23.1 vs. 14.7 months, p = 0.007 for ISS III; 21.7 vs. 13.2 months, p = 0.042 for high-risk cytogenetics). The tandem group exhibited significantly superior PFS to the control group (20.3 vs. 12.6 months, p = 0.003) among patients who failed to achieve CR after a single transplantation. Tandem transplantation was associated with significantly improved PFS after adjusting for maintenance therapy in patients with ISS III, those with high-risk cytogenetics, and those who did not achieve CR after a single transplantation. Following propensity score matching, the tandem group exhibited significantly longer PFS than the control group (30.3 vs. 13.5 months, p = 0.028). Tandem transplantation should be considered in high-risk patients.

Modest survival benefits of autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma with renal impairment: a critical appraisal of the pre-antibody era

The benefit of high-dose melphalan followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HDM-ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM) patients with renal insufficiency (RI) is debated. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of HDM-ASCT in MM patients with RIs, and the findings were compared with real-world data. The study included 26 articles, 13 of which were pooled for meta-analysis. We compared three different types of MM patients with RI against MM patients with normal renal function (NRF). These patients were: MM patients with RI at the time of transplantation; MM patients with RI at the time of diagnosis; MM patients with RI at diagnosis but with NRF at transplantation. The meta-analysis indicated that MM patients with RIs conditioned with melphalan ≤ 140 mg/m2 followed by ASCT had transplant-related mortality rates comparable to those without RIs. The complete response rates post-ASCT were similar between MM patients with RIs and those with NRF. Although progression-free survival (PFS) was statistically similar between the groups, MM patients with RIs had significantly poorer overall survival (OS) than those with NRF. The real-world data supported these findings. With a reduced dose of melphalan, ASCT is safe and effective for MM patients with RI. MM patients with RI have similar complete response rates and PFS after ASCT compared to MM patients with NRF. The lower OS in MM patients with RI indicates the need for further research to improve OS in these patients.

Multiple myeloma: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Multiple myeloma accounts for approximately 10% of hematologic malignancies.

DIAGNOSIS

The diagnosis requires ≥10% clonal bone marrow plasma cells or a biopsy proven plasmacytoma plus evidence of one or more multiple myeloma defining events (MDE): CRAB (hypercalcemia, renal failure, anemia, or lytic bone lesions) attributable to the plasma cell disorder, bone marrow clonal plasmacytosis ≥60%, serum involved/uninvolved free light chain (FLC) ratio ≥100 (provided involved FLC is ≥100 mg/L and urine monoclonal protein is ≥200 mg/24 h), or >1 focal lesion on magnetic resonance imaging.

RISK STRATIFICATION

The presence of del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), gain 1q, del 1p, or p53 mutation is considered high-risk multiple myeloma. Presence of any two high risk factors is considered double-hit myeloma; three or more high risk factors is triple-hit myeloma.

RISK-ADAPTED INITIAL THERAPY

In patients who are candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation, induction therapy consists of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody plus bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (VRd) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Selected standard risk patients can delay transplant until first relapse. Frail patients who not candidates for transplant are treated with VRd for approximately 8-12 cycles followed by maintenance or alternatively with daratumumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (DRd) until progression.

MAINTENANCE THERAPY

Standard risk patients need lenalidomide maintenance, while bortezomib plus lenalidomide maintenance is needed for high-risk myeloma.

MANAGEMENT OF RELAPSED DISEASE

A triplet regimen is usually needed at relapse, with the choice of regimen varying with each successive relapse. Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy and bispecific antibodies are additional options.

Tandem Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Does Not Benefit High-Risk Myeloma Patients in the Maintenance Era: Real-World Results from The Canadian Myeloma Research Group Database

In patients with multiple myeloma (MM), the presence of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities is associated with worse disease control and survival. Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) does benefit these patients. Tandem transplantation has been explored as a means to deepen responses and further improve survival however, its role remains controversial. This is particularly true in the era of novel agent induction and post-transplant maintenance therapy. The aim of this study was to use the Canadian Myeloma Research Group database and examine a large cohort of real-world patients comparing the outcomes of tandem versus single ASCT specifically in high-risk patients receiving novel agent-based induction and post-transplant maintenance. The data for this study was derived retrospectively from a comprehensive national-level database of Canadian patients with MM. High-risk cytogenetics was defined as presence of del17p, t(4;14), or t(14;16). Those receiving allogeneic transplant were excluded. Tandem transplantation was defined as a second ASCT performed consecutively without interim relapse or progression after first ASCT. Those with relapse or progressive disease within 3 months of completing a first transplant were excluded. We compared response depth, progression-free, and overall survival (OS) based on single or tandem transplantation procedures. The impact of covariates of interest was also assessed. A total of 381 patients with high-risk cytogenetics were identified. A total of 242 received single and 139 patients received tandem transplants. All received post-transplant maintenance. The most common induction regimen for these patients was cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and steroids (CyBorD, 87%). Forty-one patients (10.8%) required reinduction prior to first ASCT. The best overall responses at any time were 98.3% (90.5% ≥ very good partial response [VGPR]) and 98.6% (89.9% ≥ VGPR) in the single and tandem ASCT groups, respectively. Survival outcomes were similar with the median progression-free survival for single or tandem ASCT of 35.2 and 35.3 months (P = .88) and the median OS were 92.6 and 88.9 months, respectively (P = .72). No statistically significant differences were seen based on type of cytogenetic abnormality or type of maintenance. This was confirmed on multivariate analysis. In the real-world setting, tandem ASCT does not improve outcomes for MM patients with high-risk cytogenetics. This may be driven by the use of effective pre- and post-ASCT therapies. The development of more potent induction and consolidation along with current nearly ubiquitous continuous maintenance therapies until disease progression does not support the use of a second high-dose procedure.

Minimal Residual Disease Status in Multiple Myeloma 1 Year After Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Lenalidomide Maintenance Are Associated With Long-Term Overall Survival

PURPOSE

Prognostic Immunophenotyping in Myeloma Response (PRIMeR) is an ancillary study of minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment for multiple myeloma by next-generation multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC). Patients were enrolled on a three-arm randomized control trial (Blood and Marrow Transplants Clinical Trials Network 0702 Stem Cell Transplant for Myeloma in Combination of Novel Agents [STaMINA]; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01109004).

METHODS

Four hundred and thirty-five patients consented to the MRD panel, which included 10 monoclonal antibodies measured via six-color MFC. MRD was measured at baseline/preautologous hematopoietic cell transplant (BL/preAutoHCT), premaintenance (PM), and 1 year (Y1) after AutoHCT with a sensitivity of 10-5 to 10-6. The primary objective was to assess MRD-negative (MRDneg) at 1 year after AutoHCT and progression-free survival and overall survival (PFS/OS).

RESULTS

Similar to the STaMINA results, at a median follow-up of 70 months, there was no significant difference in PFS/OS by treatment arm in the PRIMeR patients. MRDneg at all three time points was associated with significantly improved PFS, and MRDneg at Y1 had significantly longer OS. Multivariate analysis of PFS, adjusting for disease risk and treatment arm, demonstrated hazard ratios (HRs) in MRD-positive patients compared with MRDneg patients at BL, PM, and Y1 of 1.55 (P = .0074), 1.83 (P = .0007), and 3.61 (P < .0001), respectively. Corresponding HRs for OS were 1.19 (P = .48), 0.88 (P = .68), and 3.36 (P < .001). Patients with sustained MRDneg or who converted to MRDneg by Y1 had similar PFS/OS.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this first, prospective US cooperative group, multicenter study demonstrates that MRDneg at Y1 after AutoHCT with lenalidomide maintenance is prognostic for improved 6-year PFS and OS. Serial MRD measurements may direct trials to test how further therapy may improve long-term PFS and OS.

High-risk multiple myeloma: Redefining genetic, clinical, and functional high-risk disease in the era of molecular medicine and immunotherapy

Multiple myeloma (MM) exhibits significant heterogeneity in its presentation, genetics, and treatment response. Despite therapeutic advances, some patients continue to relapse early (ER, <18-months) and rapidly cycle through therapies. Myriad prognostic factors have been identified and incorporated into risk stratification models; however, these produce discordant, often three-tiered outputs that fail to identify many patients destined for ER. Treatment strategies are increasingly focused on disease biology and trials enriched for high-risk (HR)MM, but consensus on the minimum required testing and a succinct, specific, and clinically meaningful definition for HRMM remains elusive. We review the risk-factors, definitions, and future directions for HRMM.

Impact of Visceral Obesity on Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life for Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Secondary Data Analysis of STaMINA (BMT CTN 0702) Trial

Obesity is a common health problem in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) that has been linked to poor clinical outcomes and quality of life (QoL). We conducted a secondary analysis of the BMT CTN 0702, a randomized, controlled trial comparing outcomes of 3 treatment interventions after a single hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) (n = 758), to investigate the impact of visceral obesity, as measured by waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), on clinical outcomes and QoL in MM patients. A total of 549 MM patients, median age 55.5 years, were enrolled in the study. The majority of patients received triple-drug antimyeloma initial therapy before enrollment, and 29% had high-risk disease according to cytogenetic assessment. The median duration of follow-up was 6 years. There was no significant association between WHR and progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) in MM patients undergoing HCT. Similarly, body mass index (BMI) did not significantly predict PFS or OS. Furthermore, there was no significant correlation between WHR and QoL measures. This study suggests that visceral obesity, as measured by WHR, might not have a significant impact on clinical outcomes in MM patients undergoing HCT. These findings add to the existing literature on the topic and provide valuable information for healthcare professionals and MM patients. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and to investigate other potential factors that may affect clinical outcomes and QoL in this patient population using modern imaging technologies to assess visceral obesity.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Phase 3 Clinical Trials for Blood Cancers: A Systematic Review

Importance

Published research suggests that patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are neither commonly collected nor reported in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for solid tumors. Little is known about these practices in RCTs for hematological malignant neoplasms.

Objective

To evaluate the prevalence of PROs as prespecified end points in RCTs of hematological malignant neoplasms, and to assess reporting of PROs in associated trial publications.

Evidence Review

All issues of 8 journals known for publishing high-impact RCTs (NEJM, Lancet, Lancet Hematology, Lancet Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Blood, JAMA, and JAMA Oncology) between January 1, 2018, and December 13, 2022, were searched for primary publications of therapeutic phase 3 trials for adults with hematological malignant neoplasms. Studies that evaluated pretransplant conditioning regimens, graft-vs-host disease treatment, or radiotherapy as experimental treatment were excluded. Data regarding trial characteristics and PROs were extracted from manuscripts and trial protocols. Univariable analyses assessed associations between trial characteristics and PRO collection or reporting.

Findings

Ninety RCTs were eligible for analysis. PROs were an end point in 66 (73%) trials: in 1 trial (1%) as a primary end point, in 50 (56%) as a secondary end point, and in 15 (17%) as an exploratory end point. PRO data were reported in 26 of 66 primary publications (39%): outcomes were unchanged in 18 and improved in 8, with none reporting worse PROs with experimental treatment. Trials sponsored by for-profit entities were more likely to include PROs as an end point (49 of 55 [89%] vs 17 of 35 [49%]; P < .001) but were not significantly more likely to report PRO data (20 of 49 [41%] vs 6 of 17 [35%]; P = .69). Compared with trials involving lymphoma (18 of 29 [62%]) or leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (18 of 28 [64%]), those involving plasma cell disorders or multiple myeloma (27 of 30 [90%]) or myeloproliferative neoplasms (3 of 3 [100%]) were more likely to include PROs as an end point (P = .03). Similarly, compared with trials involving lymphoma (3 of 18 [17%]) or leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (5 of 18 [28%]), those involving plasma cell disorders or multiple myeloma (16 of 27 [59%]) or myeloproliferative neoplasms (2 of 3 [67%]) were more likely to report PROs in the primary publication (P = .01).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this systematic review, almost 3 of every 4 therapeutic RCTs for blood cancers collected PRO data; however, only 1 RCT included PROs as a primary end point. Moreover, most did not report resulting PRO data in the primary publication and when reported, PROs were either better or unchanged, raising concern for publication bias. This analysis suggests a critical gap in dissemination of data on the lived experiences of patients enrolled in RCTs for hematological malignant neoplasms.

The Efficacy and Safety of Tandem Transplant Versus Single Stem Cell Transplant for Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

While high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remain integral to the primary treatment of newly diagnosed transplant-elble multiple myeloma (MM) patients, the challenge of disease progression persists. The primary objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tandem ASCT compared to single ASCT. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing tandem ASCT with single ASCT in patients with newly diagnosed MM. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trials databases for studies published up to January 2024. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CRR), and treatment-related mortality (TRM). We used a random-effects model to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Twelve studies involving 5057 patients met the inclusion criteria. Tandem ASCT was associated with a significantly higher CRR compared to single ASCT (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.03-1.71, I2 = 15%), but no significant differences were observed in PFS (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.42-1.34, I2 = 14%), OS (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.33-1.10, I2 = 27%), or the ORR (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.59-1.08, I2 = 33%). However, tandem ASCT was associated with a significantly higher risk of TRM (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.00-3.18, I2 = 0%). Tandem ASCT improves the CRR but does not provide significant benefits in terms of PFS, OS, or ORR compared to single ASCT in patients with newly diagnosed MM. Moreover, tandem ASCT is associated with a higher risk of TRM. The decision to pursue tandem ASCT should be made on an individual basis, carefully weighing the potential benefits and risks in light of each patient's unique clinical situation. Future research should focus on identifying patient subgroups most likely to benefit from tandem ASCT and exploring strategies to optimize the efficacy and safety of this approach in the context of novel agent-based therapies.

[Chinese expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of high risk multiple myeloma (2024)]

High-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) refers to patients with multiple myeloma whose overall survival time is less than 2-3 years under current standardized diagnosis and treatment. By combining various static and dynamic prognostic factors, risk stratification is performed to identify HRMM patients early and treat patients with personalized strategies, with the aim of significantly improving adverse survival outcomes in HRMM patients. Although the clinical value of HRMM has reached a consensus domestically in recent years, there still exist confusions and ambiguities in the definition, high-risk factors, risk stratification, and treatment of HRMM, necessitating standardization. In order to enhance the diagnostic and treatment capabilities of Chinese physicians in HRMM, the Professional Committee of Hematologic Malignancies of the Chinese Anti-Cancer Association (CACA) and the Multiple Myeloma Expert Committee of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) have organized relevant experts to develop this consensus. This consensus aims to clarify the definition of HRMM, high-risk factors, and risk stratification system, and provide treatment recommendations for HRMM, thereby improving the quality of life and prognosis of Chinese HRMM patients.

Historical Perspective of High-Dose Therapy Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND

High-dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has become part of standard of care (SOC) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. In this review, we provide a historical perspective on ASCT since its introduction in the 1990s.

SUMMARY

Overall survival (OS) benefit for HDT followed by ASCT was demonstrated in studies comparing HDT with ASCT to standard-dose therapy (SDT) before the era of novel agents. Conditioning is done with melphalan 200 mg/m2. Lower doses (MEL140, MEL150) for older patients with comorbidities are safe and have comparable results. The addition of busulfan to melphalan improves progression-free survival (PFS) but not OS. HDT with ASCT after induction with novel agents prolongs PFS but not OS compared to SDT alone. The benefit is more evident in patients with high-risk cytogenetics. Mobilization can be achieved with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone, but is improved with the addition of chemotherapy. Plerixafor reduces mobilization failure and enables sufficient stem cell collection after induction with novel agents. ASCT is safe with a low rate of mortality (1%), and selected patients can be managed as outpatients.

KEY MESSAGES

HDT followed by ASCT remains part of SOC due to its PFS benefit and relatively low toxicity.

Comparison of two autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies in patients with multiple myeloma: CE plus G-CSF versus G-CSF only: A single-center retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite recent advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma, high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains an essential therapeutic keystone. As for the stem cell mobilization procedure, different regimens have been established, usually consisting of a cycle of chemotherapy followed by application of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), although febrile neutropenia is a common complication. Following national guidelines, our institution decided to primarily use G-CSF only mobilization during the COVID-19 pandemic to minimize the patients' risk of infection and to reduce the burden on the health system.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In this retrospective single-center analysis, the efficacy and safety of G-CSF only mobilization was evaluated and compared to a historic control cohort undergoing chemotherapy-based mobilization by cyclophosphamide and etoposide (CE) plus G-CSF.

RESULTS

Although G-CSF only was associated with a higher need for plerixafor administration (p < .0001) and a higher number of apheresis sessions per patient (p = .0002), we were able to collect the target dose of hematopoietic stem cells in the majority of our patients. CE mobilization achieved higher hematopoietic stem cell yields (p = .0015) and shorter apheresis sessions (p < .0001) yet was accompanied by an increased risk of febrile neutropenia (p < .0001). There was no difference in engraftment after ASCT.

DISCUSSION

G-CSF only mobilization is a useful option in selected patients with comorbidities and an increased risk of serious infections, especially in the wintertime or in future pandemics.

Is There Still a Role for Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma?

No therapy in multiple myeloma has been as extensively investigated as stem cell transplantation following high-dose chemotherapy. A search of the national library of medicine in February 2023 revealed over 27,000 publications covering stem cell transplantation. No other treatment for multiple myeloma has been so vigorously investigated. However, given the rapid advances seen in the treatment of multiple myeloma, it is legitimate to ask whether the technique first introduced in 1983 by Thomas McIlwain still has relevance. In 1984,Barlogie introduced infusional vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone and in 1986 published a first series on high-dose therapy with autologous marrow-derived stem cells. At this point, the only available therapies were melphalan, prednisone, other intensive steroids such as methylprednisolone, and interferon. Cyclophosphamide was used both orally and parenterally. VBMCP was introduced as a combination therapy at Memorial Hospital subsequently shown not to be superior to melphalan and prednisone.

Symptom clusters and their impact on quality of life in multiple myeloma survivors: Secondary analysis of BMT CTN 0702 trial

Autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT) and continuous post-transplant maintenance therapy are the standard of care in transplant-eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. We sought to describe symptom burden and identify symptom clusters occurring in MM patients after autoHCT using data from the BMT CTN 0702 randomized controlled trial comparing the outcomes of three treatment interventions after an autoHCT in 758 MM patients. We analysed individual transplant-related symptoms assessed via the FACT-BMT questionnaire at enrolment and annually for 4-year post-autoHCT. We also described the effect the individual symptoms and symptom clusters have on quality of life (QoL). We identified three stable symptom clusters: malaise symptom cluster (lack of energy, feeling ill, having pain, experiencing nausea, loss of appetite), physical symptom cluster (having skin problems, tremors, worsening eyesight, change in taste, shortness of breath, frequent colds) and emotional symptom cluster (feeling sad, being nervous, experiencing sleep problems). Malaise and emotional symptom clusters have a greater impact on QoL than the physical symptoms cluster. Identifying these symptoms warrant additional support in terms of psychosocial support, in addition to treatment of the physical symptoms themselves.

Role of Consolidation and Maintenance

Consolidation therapy consists of short-term therapy after stem cell transplant in multiple myeloma. Key consolidation trials have shown mixed results on whether consolidation should be included after transplant, leading to varied clinical practice. Maintenance therapy consists of long-term, typically fixed-duration or indefinite, therapy. Standard-risk patients typically receive single-agent therapy, whereas high-risk may benefit from doublet therapy and beyond. Adverse events and quality of life concerns should be considered, as optimal duration of maintenance therapy continues to be studied.

Perspectives on the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma

The treatment of multiple myeloma has evolved significantly over the past few decades with the development of novel therapeutics. The introduction of proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, monoclonal antibodies, and high-dose chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has led to improved response rates and survival outcomes. The use of bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is currently under study, and early results are showing promise. Although outcomes for patients with MM have improved with the development of new treatments, there remains a subset of patients with high-risk disease who have a particularly poor prognosis. Therefore, it is critical that future clinical trials focus on developing new therapies specifically for high-risk multiple myeloma. Here we review the literature and provide guidance on treating patients with multiple myeloma for practicing oncologists.

Impact of Daratumumab on Stem Cell Mobilization and Transplant in Patient with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Real Word Single-Centre Study

Not applicable.

Optimizing high dose melphalan

Melphalan, has been a major component of myeloma therapy since the 1950s. In the context of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), high dose melphalan (HDM) is the most common conditioning regimen used due to its potent anti-myeloma effects and manageable toxicities. Common toxicities associated with HDM include myelosuppression, gastrointestinal issues, and mucositis. Established approaches to reduce these toxicities encompass dose modification, nausea prophylaxis with 5HT3 receptor antagonists, cryotherapy, amifostine use, and growth factors. Optimization of melphalan exposure through personalized dosing and its combination with other agents like busulfan, or bendamustine show promise. Propylene glycol-free melphalan (Evomela) represents a novel formulation aiming to enhance drug stability and reduce adverse effects. This review explores strategies to enhance the efficacy and mitigate the toxicity of HDM in multiple myeloma. Future directions involve exploring these strategies in clinical trials to improve the safety and efficacy of HDM, thereby enhancing outcomes for multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous HCT.

Comparison of Vital Status, Cause of Death, and Follow-Up after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Linked Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research and California Cancer Registry Data, 1991 to 2018

Assessing outcomes following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) poses challenges due to the necessity for systematic and often prolonged patient follow-up. Linking the HCT database of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) with cancer registry data may improve long-term outcome ascertainment, but the reliability of mortality data in death certificates from cancer registries among HCT recipients remains unknown. We compared the classification of vital status and primary cause of death (COD), as well as the length of follow-up between the CIBMTR and California Cancer Registry (CCR) to assess the possibility of supplementing the CIBMTR with cancer registry data. This retrospective study leveraged a linked CIBMTR-CCR dataset. We included patients who were California residents at the time of HCT and received a first allogeneic (allo) or autologous (auto) HCT for a hematologic malignancy diagnosed during 1991-2016. Follow-up was through 2018. We analyzed 18,450 patients (alloHCT, n = 8232; autoHCT, n = 10,218). The Vital status agreement was 97.7% for alloHCT and 97.2% for autoHCT. Unknown COD was higher in CIBMTR (12.9%) than in CCR (1.6%). After excluding patients with unknown COD information, the overall agreement of primary COD (cancer versus noncancer) was 53.7% for alloHCT and 83.2% for autoHCT. This agreement was lower within the first 100 days post-HCT (alloHCT, 31.0%; autoHCT, 54.6%). Compared with CIBMTR, deaths due to cancer were higher in CCR (alloHCT, 90.0%; autoHCT, 90.1% versus alloHCT, 47.3%; autoHCT, 82.5% in CIBMTR). CIBMTR reports more frequently noncancer-related deaths, including graft-versus-host disease and infections. The cumulative incidence of cancer-specific mortality at 20 years differed, particularly for alloHCT (CCR, 53.7%; CIBMTR, 27.6%). The median follow-up among alive patients was longer in CCR (alloHCT, 6.0 years; autoHCT, 4.7 years) than in CIBMTR (alloHCT, 5.0 years; autoHCT, 3.8 years). Our findings highlight the completeness of vital status data in CIBMTR but reveal substantial disagreement in primary COD. Consequently, caution is required when interpreting HCT studies that use only death certificates to estimate cause-specific mortality outcomes. Improving the accuracy of COD registration and follow-up completeness by developing communication pathways between cancer registries and hospital-based cohorts may enhance our understanding of late effects and long-term outcomes among HCT survivors.

Contribution of post-transplantation therapy to sustained MRD negativity in multiple myeloma: a retrospective analysis

Post-transplantation therapy is commonly performed in patients with myeloma and can prolong progression-free survival (PFS). However, whether post-transplantation therapy contributes to achieving and continuing MRD-negativity remains controversial. This retrospective analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of post-transplantation therapy, including tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), in myeloma patients. The subjects were 79 patients (median age: 62 years) who received induction therapy, including bortezomib and/or lenalidomide, of whom 58 underwent post-transplantation therapy. At the median follow-up time of 50 months, the 4-year PFS rate was significantly higher in patients who underwent post-transplantation therapy than those who did not (60.6% vs. 28.6%, P = 0.012). Multivariate analysis revealed post-transplantation therapy to be a significant prognostic factor for long PFS. Tandem ASCT followed by consolidation and/or maintenance therapies improved PFS and OS. The minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative rate was significantly higher in patients who underwent post-transplantation therapy than those who did not (50.9% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.006). Post-transplantation therapy contributed to sustained MRD-negativity, which predicted long PFS and overall survival. Patients frequently discontinued post-transplantation therapy due to adverse events within 4 months. In conclusion, post-transplantation therapy improved PFS and contributed to sustained MRD-negativity in myeloma patients.

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Hodgkin's and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma, and AL Amyloidosis

Human body cells are stem cell (SC) derivatives originating from bone marrow. Their special characteristics include their capacity to support the formation and self-repair of the cells. Cancer cells multiply uncontrollably and invade healthy tissues, making stem cell transplants a viable option for cancer patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). When chemotherapy is used at very high doses to eradicate all cancer cells from aggressive tumors, blood-forming cells and leukocytes are either completely or partially destroyed. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is necessary for patients in those circumstances. The patients who undergo autologous transplants receive their own stem cells (SCs). The transplanted stem cells first come into contact with the bone marrow and then undergo engraftment, before differentiating into blood cells. ASCT is one of the most significant and innovative strategies for treating diseases. Here we focus on the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and AL amyloidosis, using ASCT. This review provides a comprehensive picture of the effectiveness and the safety of ASCT as a therapeutic approach for these diseases, based on the currently available evidence.

Integrated analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating bortezomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone or bortezomib + thalidomide + dexamethasone induction in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Objective

Providing the most efficacious frontline treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) is critical for patient outcomes. No direct comparisons have been made between bortezomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone (VRD) and bortezomib + thalidomide + dexamethasone (VTD) induction regimens in transplant-eligible NDMM.

Methods

An integrated analysis was performed using patient data from four trials meeting prespecified eligibility criteria: two using VRD (PETHEMA GEM2012 and IFM 2009) and two using VTD (PETHEMA GEM2005 and IFM 2013-04).

Results

The primary endpoint was met, with VRD demonstrating a noninferior rate of at least very good partial response (≥ VGPR) after induction vs VTD. GEM comparison demonstrated improvement in the ≥ VGPR rate after induction for VRD vs VTD (66.3% vs 51.2%; P = .00281) that increased after transplant (74.4% vs 53.5%). Undetectable minimal residual disease rates post induction (46.7% vs 34.9%) and post transplant (62.4% vs 47.3%) support the benefit of VRD vs VTD. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to study and/or treatment discontinuation were less frequent with VRD (3%, GEM2012; 6%, IFM 2009) vs VTD (11%, IFM 2013-04).

Conclusion

These results supported the benefit of VRD over VTD for induction in transplant-eligible patients with NDMM. The trials included are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01916252, NCT01191060, NCT00461747, and NCT01971658).

Adverse impact of delay of platelet recovery after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND AIMS

The prognostic impact of platelet recovery after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) on clinical outcomes remains to be elucidated. We aimed to clarify the impact of platelet recovery on clinical outcomes, risk factors of delayed platelet recovery and the necessary dose of CD34+ cells for prompt platelet recovery in each patient.

METHODS

Using a nationwide Japanese registry database, we retrospectively analyzed clinical outcomes of 5222 patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or multiple myeloma (MM).

RESULTS

At a landmark of 28 days after AHCT, a delay of platelet recovery was observed in 1102 patients (21.1%). Prompt platelet recovery was significantly associated with superior overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.32, P < 0.001), progression-free survival (HR 0.48, P < 0.001) and decreased risks of disease progression (HR 0.66, P < 0.001) and non-relapse/non-progression mortality (HR 0.19, P < 0.001). The adverse impacts of a delay of platelet recovery seemed to be more apparent in NHL. In addition to the dose of CD34+ cells/kg, disease status, performance status and the hematopoietic cell transplant-specific comorbidity index in both diseases were associated with platelet recovery. We then stratified the patients into three risk groups according to these factors. For the purpose of achieving 70% platelet recovery by 28 days in NHL, the low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups needed more than 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg, respectively. In MM, the low-risk group needed approximately 1.5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg, whereas the intermediate- and high-risk groups required 2.0 and 2.5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg to achieve about 80% platelet recovery by 28 days.

CONCLUSIONS

A delay of platelet recovery after AHCT was associated with inferior survival outcomes.

Aiming for the cure in myeloma: Putting our best foot forward

Frontline therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) is evolving to include novel combinations that can achieve unprecedented deep response rates. Several treatment strategies exist, varying in induction regimen composition, use of transplant and or consolidation and maintenance. In this sea of different treatment permutations, the overarching theme is the powerful prognostic factors of disease risk and achievement of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. MM has significant inter-patient variability that requires treatment to be individualized. Risk-adapted and response-adapted strategies which are increasingly being explored to define the extent and duration of therapy, and eventually aim for functional curability. In addition, with T-cell redirection therapies rapidly revolutionizing myeloma treatments, the current standard of care for myeloma will change. This review analyzes the current relevant literature in upfront therapy for fit myeloma patients and provides suggestions for treatment approach while novel clinical trials are maturing.

Predictors of lenalidomide maintenance duration after autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

For patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who have undergone autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT), the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide is a first-line option for maintenance therapy. Because longer durations of lenalidomide maintenance are associated with improved survival, identifying strategies to avoid premature cessation of maintenance is an important priority in the post-transplant setting.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this analysis was to identify specific clinical predictors of lenalidomide treatment duration that could guide optimal medication management. Key secondary objectives included predictors of intolerable toxicity, rationale for lenalidomide dose reduction/discontinuation, and characterization of dose adjustments.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective, multi-center cohort study included adults with MM who underwent auto-SCT and initiated maintenance lenalidomide between 01/01/2012 and 02/28/2021. Variables assessed as potential predictors of maintenance duration or intolerable toxicity included age, body mass index (BMI), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status at time of auto-SCT, renal function, initial lenalidomide dose, use of combination maintenance therapy, and cytogenetic risk category.

RESULTS

Among 299 patients included, the median age at time of auto-SCT was 62 years (range 30-77). The majority of patients had standard-risk cytogenetics (64%) and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 (72%). In the overall population, the median duration of maintenance was 1.3 years (range 0.3-8.6 years). The median initial dose of lenalidomide was 10 mg daily (range 2.5-25 mg). During the study period, 35% of patients had a dose reduction due to toxicity, 21% stopped lenalidomide due to disease progression, and 19% stopped due to toxicity. Multivariate linear regression analyses did not identify any significant predictors of lenalidomide duration or discontinuation due to intolerable toxicity. The most frequently reported toxicities leading to discontinuation were cytopenias, rash, and fatigue.

CONCLUSION

This analysis did not identify any significant risk factors to predict the duration of lenalidomide maintenance or discontinuation for toxicity following auto-SCT in patients with MM. While limited by the retrospective design and relatively small sample size, our findings suggest that a priori lenalidomide dose reductions based on patient co-morbidities or performance status may not substantially affect the duration of lenalidomide maintenance.

Trends in utilization of stored cryopreserved autologous peripheral hematopoietic cells intended for a second (or beyond) autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: a single center experience

Due to the advent of effective novel therapies for multiple myeloma (MM), the use of cryopreserved autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic cells (APBHC) for a salvage autologous transplant (auto-HCT) is in decline. We evaluated utilization trends and costs associated with cryopreserved APBHC in patients with MM. We retrospectively evaluated the clinicopathologic data from 440 patients with MM who underwent APBHC mobilization and collection at Mayo Clinic Florida between 2010 and 2019. Based on institution-specific charges as of May 2021, the cost of 1 session of APBHC collection/apheresis was $4,680 and the cost of 1 year of APBHC cryopreservation was $4,790 per patient. Out of 347 patients who had APBHC in cryopreservation, 5 (1.4%) underwent a salvage auto-HCT and 61% of patients had ≥1 excess collection sessions for APBHC that ultimately went unused. The median cost of excess collection sessions was $4,680 per patient (range, $4,680-$32,760) and the median total cost for excess collection sessions plus costs for storage was $23,840 per patient (range, $4,680-$85,450). The sum of costs of excess collection sessions was $2,077,920 and the sum of costs of cryopreservation was $5,812,665. Institutional policies regarding universal APBHC collection and long-term storage should be reevaluated in the era of novel therapeutics.

Prospective Comparative Study of Etoposide plus G-CSF versus G-CSF Alone, Followed by Risk-Adapted Plerixafor for Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: CAtholic REsearch Network for Multiple Myeloma Study (CAREMM-2001)

To explore the optimal mobilization for multiple myeloma (MM) patients, we conducted a prospective trial comparing single-dose etoposide (375 mg/m2 for one day) plus G-CSF versus G-CSF alone, followed by risk-adapted plerixafor. After randomization, 27 patients in the etoposide group and 29 patients in the G-CSF alone group received mobilizations. Six (22.2%) patients in the etoposide group and 15 (51.7%) patients in the G-CSF alone group received plerixafor based on a peripheral blood CD34+ cell count of < 15/mm3 (p = 0.045). The median count of CD34+ cells collected was significantly higher in the etoposide group (9.5 × 106/kg vs. 7.9 × 106/kg; p = 0.018), but the optimal collection rate (CD34+ cells ≥ 6 × 106/kg) was not significantly different between the two groups (96.3% vs. 82.8%; p = 0.195). The rate of CD34+ cells collected of ≥ 8.0 × 106/kg was significantly higher in the etoposide group (77.8% vs. 44.8%; p = 0.025). Although the rates of grade II-IV thrombocytopenia (63.0% vs. 31.0%; p = 0.031) and grade I-IV nausea (14.8% vs. 0%; p = 0.048) were significantly higher in the etoposide group, the rates of adverse events were low in both groups, with no neutropenic fever or septic shock. Thus, both single-dose etoposide plus G-CSF and G-CSF alone with risk-adapted plerixafor were effective and safe, but the former may be the better option for patients who are expected to receive two or more transplantations.

Impact of Visceral Obesity on Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life for Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Secondary Data Analysis of STaMINA (BMT CTN 0702) Trial

Obesity is a common health problem among multiple myeloma (MM) patients, and it has been linked to poor clinical outcomes and quality of life (QOL). We conducted a secondary analysis of the BMT CTN 0702, a randomized, controlled trial comparing outcomes of three treatment interventions after a single hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), to investigate the impact of visceral obesity, as measured by waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), on clinical outcomes and QOL in MM patients. 549 MM patients, median age 55.5 years, were enrolled in the study. The majority of patients received triple-drug antimyeloma initial therapy before enrollment, and 29% had high-risk disease according to cytogenetic assessment. The median follow-up time was six years. There was no significant association between WHR and progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) in MM patients undergoing HCT. Similarly, body mass index (BMI) did not significantly predict PFS or OS. Furthermore, there was no significant correlation between WHR and QOL measures. In conclusion, this study suggests that visceral obesity, as measured by WHR, may not significantly impact clinical outcomes in MM patients undergoing HCT. Further studies utilizing imaging technologies to assess the impact of visceral obesity distribution are warranted.

An early post-transplant relapse prediction score in multiple myeloma: a large cohort study from the chronic malignancies working party of EBMT

Early relapse (ER) following Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (AHCT) confers a poor prognosis. We therefore developed a novel scoring system to predict ER. A total of 14,367 AHCT-1 patients were transplanted between 2014 and 2019, and were conditioned with Melphalan 200 mg/m2 (Mel200) (n = 7228; 2014-2017) (training cohort); Mel200 (n = 5616; 2018-2019) or Mel140 (n = 1523; 2018-2019) (validation cohorts). PFS-12 and the Cumulative Incidence of Relapse at 12 months were 84.1% and 14.7% (training Mel200), 87.2% and 11.6% (validation Mel200), and 80.3% and 16.9% (validation Mel140), respectively. The points in the risk score were: 0, 1,2 for ISS stages I, II, and III; Disease status: 0 (CR/VGPR); 1 (PR); 2 (SD/MR); 4 (Relapse/Progression); and 1 for Karnofsky ≤ 70. The distribution of scores: 0 (24%), 1 (33.9%), 2 (29.6 %), 3 (9.5%), and ≥4 (2.7%). The score separated PFS-12, with the lowest risk group (n = 1752) having a PFS-12 of 91.7% and the highest risk group (n = 195) 57.1%. This also applied in cytogenetically high-risk patients. If the pre-score baseline risks are 15% (standard risk) and 25% (high-risk), a score of ≥4 confers calculated risks of 38% and 54%, respectively. This novel EBMT ER score, therefore, allows for the identification of five discrete prognostic groups.

Breaking through Multiple Myeloma: A Paradigm for a Comprehensive Tumor Ecosystem Targeting

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a cancerous condition characterized by the proliferation of plasma cells within the hematopoietic marrow, resulting in multiple osteolytic lesions. MM patients typically experience bone pain, kidney damage, fatigue due to anemia, and infections. Historically, MM was an incurable disease with a life expectancy of around three years after diagnosis. However, over the past two decades, the development of novel therapeutics has significantly improved patient outcomes, including response to treatment, remission duration, quality of life, and overall survival. These advancements include thalidomide and its derivatives, lenalidomide and pomalidomide, which exhibit diverse mechanisms of action against the plasma cell clone. Additionally, proteasome inhibitors such as bortezomib, ixazomib, and carfilzomib disrupt protein degradation, proving specifically toxic to cancerous plasma cells. Recent advancements also involve monoclonal antibodies targeting surface antigens, such as elotuzumab (anti-CS1) and daratumumab (anti-CD38), bispecific t-cell engagers such as teclistamab (anti-BCMA/CD3) and Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T)-based strategies, with a growing focus on drugs that exhibit increasingly targeted action against neoplastic plasma cells and relevant effects on the tumor microenvironment.

[Multiple Myeloma Treatment Guidelines by the Portuguese Group of Multiple Myeloma]

The treatment of multiple myeloma has profoundly changed with the introduction of several innovative therapies. The optimization of therapeutic sequencing through the combined use of the various drugs developed in recent years and the attention given to the characteristics of patients have allowed the reduction of toxicities and increased survival and quality of life of patients with multiple myeloma. These treatment recommendations from the Portuguese Multiple Myeloma Group offer guidance for first-line treatment and progression/relapse situations. These recommendations are given highlighting the data that justify each choice and referring to the respective levels of evidence that support these options. Whenever possible, the respective national regulatory framework is presented. These recommendations constitute an advance towards the best treatment of multiple myeloma in Portugal.

First-line treatment of multiple myeloma in both transplant and non-transplant candidates

INTRODUCTION

The last decade's progress in the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma has relied on the synergistic combination of agents with different mechanisms of action, basically proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, and monoclonal antibodies, in order to achieve the deepest possible response early in the course of treatment. Following induction, several therapeutic strategies aim to improve and maintain response.

AREAS COVERED

The manuscript reviews available data for the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients with a focus on most recent induction and maintenance combinations and the still important role of autologous stem transplantation. Future perspectives in the light of initial results from ongoing clinical trials are also addressed.

EXPERT OPINION

Remarkable progress has been made in myeloma treatment due to the integration of immunomodulators, proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and high dose therapy in the frontline setting. Upfront therapy may be further improved intensifying induction combinations, adapting high dose therapy and consolidation strategies to the patient's profile, improving maintenance in high-risk individuals, or limiting maintenance duration in those with a better prognosis. Evidence needs to be reviewed, taking into account the therapeutic objectives at each treatment stage and patient specific risk factors.