EV-101: A Phase I Study of Single-Agent Enfortumab Vedotin in Patients With Nectin-4-Positive Solid Tumors, Including Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Nectin-4-directed antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs): Spotlight on preclinical and clinical evidence

Nectin-4 (Nectin cell adhesion molecule 4), a type I transmembrane cell adhesion protein, was demonstrated to be overexpressed in a variety of tumors, making it an attractive antigen for targeted therapies such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Of great note, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approval of the first Nectin-4-directed ADC, enfortumab vedotin (EV), in urothelial cancer (UC) not only introduced Nectin-4 as a clinically validated and reliable target antigen but also confirmed the evolving role of Nectin-4-directed ADCs as novel and promising cancer therapeutics. In addition to EV, there have been or are currently being seven and eleven Nectin-4-directed ADCs, respectively, in various stages of clinical trials and preclinical development, offering a promising future for the treatment of Nectin-4-positive cancer patients. This study reviewed clinical- and preclinical-stage Nectin-4-directed ADCs.

Antibody-drug conjugates in solid tumors: a new frontier

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are designed to carry cytotoxic payloads and deliver them to specific molecular targets within tumor cells. Several ADCs are already approved with many more in development across several disease types. In this review, we will provide an overview of the ADCs currently approved and those under investigation in solid tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Currently there are dozens of ADCs under clinical study evaluation of a variety of solid tumors, and preliminary results are promising. Multiple ADCs have received regulatory approval in disease such as breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and bladder cancer. While some are approved in biomarker selected settings with disease specific indication (e.g. breast cancer), others have been approved irrespective of biomarker expression (urothelial carcinoma) and pan-cancer indications in biomarker selected patients (HER2 3+ expression).

SUMMARY

Cytotoxic chemotherapy has been the mainstay of systemic treatment for patients with various solid tumors. ADCs offer the advantage of carrying the cytotoxic payload onto a specific molecular receptor, thereby inducing a more selective response. Optimizing selection of target antigen, payload delivery and investigating biomarkers of response will be crucial for further expanding the therapeutic benefit of ADCs across solid tumors.

Current Landscape of Antibody-Drug Conjugate Development in Head and Neck Cancer

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are fusions of therapeutic drugs and antibodies conjugated by a linker, designed to deliver a therapeutic payload to cells expressing the target antigen. By delivering the highly cytotoxic agent directly to cancer cells, ADCs are designed to enhance safety and broaden the therapeutic window. Recently, ADCs have demonstrated promising efficacy in various solid tumors and are rapidly expanding their indications. The prognosis of patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains poor, with no new therapeutics since the advent of anti-PD-1 antibodies in 2016, highlighting a critical need for innovative therapies. Recent preliminary results suggest that ADCs could be promising treatment options for HNSCC as they explore a variety of target antigens, payloads, and linkers. However, for successful adaptation of ADCs in the treatment of HNSCC, addressing key challenges such as payload toxicities, antigen heterogeneity, and adaptive resistance will be essential. Current research focused on new ADC structures, including multispecific antibodies and noncytotoxic payloads, and diverse combination approaches, show promise for future advancements.

Antibody-drug conjugates in cancer therapy: mechanisms and clinical studies

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) consist of monoclonal antibodies that target tumor cells and cytotoxic drugs linked through linkers. By leveraging antibodies' targeting properties, ADCs deliver cytotoxic drugs into tumor cells via endocytosis after identifying the tumor antigen. This precise method aims to kill tumor cells selectively while minimizing harm to normal cells, offering safe and effective therapeutic benefits. Recent years have seen significant progress in antitumor treatment with ADC development, providing patients with new and potent treatment options. With over 300 ADCs explored for various tumor indications and some already approved for clinical use, challenges such as resistance due to factors like antigen expression, ADC processing, and payload have emerged. This review aims to outline the history of ADC development, their structure, mechanism of action, recent composition advancements, target selection, completed and ongoing clinical trials, resistance mechanisms, and intervention strategies. Additionally, it will delve into the potential of ADCs with novel markers, linkers, payloads, and innovative action mechanisms to enhance cancer treatment options. The evolution of ADCs has also led to the emergence of combination therapy as a new therapeutic approach to improve drug efficacy.

Therapeutic efficacy and safety of biweekly administration of enfortumab vedotin for urothelial carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an established pharmacotherapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC); however, its adverse events (AEs) cannot be overlooked. The study investigated the efficacy and safety of biweekly EV administration.

METHODS

Patients with mUC who received EV at our institution were included in the study. Eligible patients were classified into two groups as follows: those who received EV on a standard schedule (standard group) and those who received EV on a biweekly schedule (biweekly group); the treatment outcomes and AEs between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Nine and 19 patients were in the standard group and biweekly groups, respectively. The progression-free survival, overall survival, and overall response rate were not significantly different between the two groups. AEs following EV administration, such as decreased appetite (P < .01), pruritus (P < .01), rash maculopapular (P < .01), anemia (P = .04), and liver dysfunction (P = .04), were significantly more frequent in the standard group. Grade 3 or higher AEs, such as pruritus (P = .03) and rash maculopapular (P < .01), were significantly more frequent in the standard group. Furthermore, significantly more patients in the standard group had to be given a reduced dose due to adverse events (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Biweekly administration of EV may be safer without compromising therapeutic efficacy than the standard schedule.

Exploring the Role of Target Expression in Treatment Efficacy of Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) in Solid Cancers: A Comprehensive Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) offer a promising path for cancer therapy, leveraging the specificity of monoclonal antibodies and the cytotoxicity of linked drugs. The success of ADCs hinges on precise targeting of cancer cells based on protein expression levels. This review explores the relationship between target protein expression and ADC efficacy in solid tumours, focusing on results of clinical trials conducted between January 2019 and May 2023.

RECENT FINDINGS

We hereby highlight approved ADCs, revealing their effectiveness even in low-expressing target populations. Assessing target expression poses challenges, owing to variations in scoring systems and biopsy types. Emerging methods, like digital image analysis, aim to standardize assessment. The complexity of ADC pharmacokinetics, tumour dynamics, and off-target effects emphasises the need for a balanced approach. This review underscores the importance of understanding target protein dynamics and promoting standardized evaluation methods in shaping the future of ADC-based cancer therapies.

Unlocking the potential of bispecific ADCs for targeted cancer therapy

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are biologically targeted drugs composed of antibodies and cytotoxic drugs connected by linkers. These innovative compounds enable precise drug delivery to tumor cells, minimizing harm to normal tissues and offering excellent prospects for cancer treatment. However, monoclonal antibody-based ADCs still present challenges, especially in terms of balancing efficacy and safety. Bispecific antibodies are alternatives to monoclonal antibodies and exhibit superior internalization and selectivity, producing ADCs with increased safety and therapeutic efficacy. In this review, we present available evidence and future prospects regarding the use of bispecific ADCs for cancer treatment, including a comprehensive overview of bispecific ADCs that are currently in clinical trials. We offer insights into the future development of bispecific ADCs to provide novel strategies for cancer treatment.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Exposure-Response Analysis for the Antibody-Drug Conjugate Enfortumab Vedotin in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Enfortumab vedotin is a fully human monoclonal antibody directed to Nectin-4 and conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), approved for treatment of previously treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). This population analysis characterized pharmacokinetics of enfortumab vedotin and free (unconjugated) MMAE, identified covariates affecting pharmacokinetics, and evaluated weight-based dosing for enfortumab vedotin. Exposure-response analyses characterized relationships between enfortumab vedotin and free MMAE exposures and efficacy/safety endpoints. Data from 748 patients with locally advanced or mUC in 5 clinical studies were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Patients received enfortumab vedotin 0.50-1.25 mg/kg every 3 weeks or on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Relevant covariates retained in final models were evaluated for clinical relevance to enfortumab vedotin and free MMAE exposures. Although some covariates produced differences in exposure, the magnitude of changes was not clinically meaningful. Simulations indicated weight-based dosing yielded more consistent exposures across body weight groups vs. a hypothetical fixed-dose regimen of enfortumab vedotin 95 mg (calculated for median body weight, 75 kg). Exposure-response analysis showed average enfortumab vedotin concentrations were not a statistically significant predictor of overall survival (hazard ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.72-1.14; P = 0.41); all exposure quartiles had a greater median overall survival than chemotherapy (11.0-12.6 vs. 9.0 months). Enfortumab vedotin and free MMAE exposures were statistically significant predictors of grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (both P < 0.0001). This analysis supports enfortumab vedotin 1.25 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle.

Antibody-drug conjugates: A review of cutaneous adverse effects

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are an emerging class of anticancer agents that combine targeting antibodies with potent cytotoxic agents. Their molecular configuration allows for increased therapeutic efficacy and reduced adverse-effect profiles compared to monoclonal antibodies or cytotoxic chemotherapy alone. ADCs cause off-target toxicities through several mechanisms, including premature deconjugation of the cytotoxic agent in the serum and the presence of the targeted antigen on normal tissues. Given cutaneous adverse events comprise 31.3% of all-grade adverse events in clinical trials involving ADCs, dermatologists are increasingly called upon to manage the cutaneous toxicities caused by these drugs. In this review, we summarize known cutaneous toxicities of the ADCs that have been approved for use by the US Food and Drug Administration to date. Dermatologists can play a key role in recognizing cutaneous reactions associated with ADCs, contributing to guidelines for their management, and aiding during clinical trials to generate detailed morphologic and histopathologic descriptions of cutaneous toxicities caused by ADCs.

Organ-Specific Tumor Response to Enfortumab Vedotin for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the organ-specific therapeutic effect of enfortumab vedotin (EV) after chemotherapy and immunotherapy failed for advanced urothelial carcinoma.

MATERIALS METHODS

At 6 institutions between December 2021 and July 2023, we retrospectively analyzed patients with metastatic upper and lower urinary tract cancer who received EV monotherapy after platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Objective response rate (ORR) and organ-specific response rate (OSRR) were evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1.

RESULTS

This study analyzed 58 patients with 210 tumor lesions, of which 24% were females and 48% had upper urinary tract cancer. The ORR and disease control rate were 53.5% and 74.1%. Moreover, we found 15 target lesions in the primary site, 7 in local recurrence, 93 in the lymph nodes, 46 in the lung, 29 in the liver, and 20 in the bone, with OSRRs of 40%, 71.4%, 61.1%, 70.6%, 90.9%, and 18.2%, respectively. Over time from baseline, the reduction rate (median) in tumor burden was 50% or more in the lymph node, lung, and liver metastases.

CONCLUSION

The organ-specific tumor response to EV in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma was almost favorable. The antitumor activity of EV monotherapy may be less in bone metastasis than in other organ sites. Conversely, EV showed remarkably high efficacy against liver metastasis.

Development of a generalized pharmacokinetic model to characterize clinical pharmacokinetics of monomethyl auristatin E-based antibody-drug conjugates

AIMS

This study aims to develop a generalized pharmacokinetic (PK) model for monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE)-based antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) that can simultaneously capture the PK of multiple ADC analytes commonly measured in the clinic.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted to collect PK data on MMAE-based ADCs from clinical trials. From each study, PK profiles of total antibody, the ADC, conjugated MMAE, and unconjugated MMAE, were extracted. These data were pooled and dose-normalized to evaluate the generalizability of PK across various ADCs and dose levels. Upon confirming PK generalizability, a generalized PK model for MMAE-based ADCs was developed using the entire dataset. Furthermore, exposure metrics ( C max and AUC) reported across the range of doses were combined to establish linear relationships between dose and exposure metrics for MMAE-based ADCs.

RESULTS

A total of 109 PK profiles from 18 distinct MMAE-based ADCs were gathered. The dose-normalized PK profiles supported the generalizability of PK for MMAE-based ADCs. A generalized PK model was developed, which enabled capturing the PK data for 4 ADC analytes across all collected MMAE-based ADCs. A linear relationship between dose and PK exposure metrics was established, enabling the prediction of typical exposure values across different doses for MMAE-based ADCs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study comprehensively analysed clinical PK data from different valine-citrulline (vc)-MMAE-based ADCs. The generalized PK model developed here serves as an important tool for a priori prediction of the PK for multiple ADC analytes in clinical settings and lays the foundation for establishing generalized exposure-response and exposure-toxicity correlations for MMAE-based ADCs.

Myelodysplastic syndrome occurring after enfortumab vedotin treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma

Introduction

Enfortumab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting Nectin-4 for the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma in patients previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Common adverse events include rashes, peripheral neuropathy, and hyperglycemia. However, there are no reports on the development of myelodysplastic syndrome during enfortumab vedotin therapy in clinical settings.

Case presentation

A 72-year-old male patient experienced prolonged and severe thrombocytopenia 18 weeks after the start of enfortumab vedotin therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma, requiring daily platelet transfusions. Bone marrow examination and chromosomal analysis confirmed the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome. Treatment with eltrombopag proved to be effective.

Conclusion

This is the first report of the development of myelodysplastic syndrome during enfortumab vedotin therapy in a clinical setting. Although rare, myelodysplastic syndrome can occur during enfortumab vedotin therapy.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates as Novel Therapeutic Agents for Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma with or without Alterations in Oncogenic Drivers

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are an emerging class of therapeutics for lung cancer, and several are currently in development for this malignancy. The structure of these molecules is based on an antibody that targets a protein on the lung cancer cell surface and a cytotoxic payload attached by a linker. Many protein targets, including TROP2, c-MET, CEACAM5, HER2, and HER3 have been identified. In metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) without alterations in oncogenic drivers, platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD1/PDL1) interaction are the standard first-line treatments. In patients with EGFR-mutated or ALK-rearranged NSCLC, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are recommended. However, although the prognosis of patients with metastatic NSCLC differs between such with and without alterations in oncogenic drivers, most patients eventually experience disease progression. A novel therapeutic class is needed in routine practice to overcome the mechanisms of resistance to ICIs and EGFR/ALK TKIs. Several ADCs have already been approved for other cancers, such as breast cancer and urothelial carcinoma. This review summarizes the knowledge about the efficacy and tolerance profiles of ADCs targeting TROP2, HER2, HER3, CEACAM5 and c-MET in metastatic NSCLC with and without alterations in oncogenic drivers.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Urothelial Cancer: From Scientific Rationale to Clinical Development

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have been a significant advancement in cancer therapy, particularly for urothelial cancer (UC). These innovative treatments, originally developed for hematological malignancies, use target-specific monoclonal antibodies linked to potent cytotoxic agents. This rational drug design efficiently delivers cancer cell-killing agents to cells expressing specific surface proteins, which are abundant in UC owing to their high antigen expression. UC is an ideal candidate for ADC therapy, as it enhances on-target efficacy while mitigating systemic toxicity. In recent years, considerable progress has been made in understanding the biology and mechanisms of tumor progression in UC. However, despite the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors, advanced UC is characterized by rapid progression and poor survival rates. Targeted therapies that have been developed include the anti-nectin 4 ADC enfortumab vedotin and the fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor erdafitinib. Enfortumab vedotin has shown efficacy in prospective studies in patients with advanced UC, alone and in combination with pembrolizumab. The anti-Trop-2 ADC sacituzumab govitecan has also demonstrated effectiveness in single-armed studies. This review highlights the mechanism of action of ADCs, their application in mono- and combination therapies, primary mechanisms of resistance, and future perspectives for their clinical use in UC treatment. ADCs have proven to be an increasingly vital component of the therapeutic landscape for urothelial carcinoma, filling a gap in the treatment of this progressive disease.

Association between response to enfortumab vedotin and peripheral neuropathy in urothelial carcinoma patients: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Enfortumab vedotin (EV) was approved for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who progressed after anticancer therapy on September 2021 in Japan. The association between the occurrence of EV-related side effects and clinical outcome remains to be elucidated.

METHODS

We identified 97 mUC patients treated with EV therapy at our five institutions from the date of approval to March 2023. The median follow-up period was 7.0 months. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of EV.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 71 years old, 39% had PS of 1 or more, and 56.7% had primary tumor in upper urinary tract. Overall response rate (ORR) to EV therapy, median progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 43.3%, 7.52 months, and 12.78 months, respectively. Any grade of treatment-related skin disorder, dysgeusia, peripheral neuropathy, gastrointestinal disorder, and hyperglycemia occurred in 61 (62.9%), 36 (37.1%), 34 (35.1%), 29 (29.9%), and 18 (18.6%) patients, respectively. The patients with EV-associated peripheral neuropathy had significantly higher ORR (58.8% vs. 34.9%, P = .032) and longer median PFS (8.05 vs. 6.31 months, P = .017) and OS (not reached vs. 11.57 months, P = .008, respectively) than those without. The occurrence of peripheral neuropathy after EV treatment and the presence of peritoneal dissemination were factors independently associated with PFS (hazard ratio = 0.46, P = .008 and hazard raito = 3.83, P = .004, respectively) and OS (hazard ratio = 0.30, P = .005 and hazard raito = 4.53, P = .002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of EV-related peripheral neuropathy might be associated with the efficacy of EV therapy in mUC patients.

Trophoblast cell surface antigen-2: a promising new biomarker and potential therapeutic target in penile squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential utility of antibody-drug conjugates targeting trophoblast cell surface antigen-2 (TROP-2) in patients with primary penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC), patients with recurrence (REC cohort), and patient-matched distant metastases (MET cohort), and to assess the potential use of TROP-2 as a predictive non-invasive biomarker in PSCC.

METHODS

A cohort comprising a PRIM (n = 37), REC (n = 5) and MET subcohort (n = 7), with MET including lymph node and lung metastases, was analysed using quantitative real-time PCR, ELISA and immunohistochemical staining with evaluation of H-score.

RESULTS

TROP-2 mRNA and serum protein levels were significantly increased in primary and recurrent PSCC compared to cancer-free controls (both P < 0.001). Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that most of the PRIM cohort (n = 34/37, median H-score 260, interquartile range [IQR] 210-300), as well as all patients in the REC (median [IQR] H-score 200 [165-290]) and MET cohorts (median [IQR] H-score 280 [260-300]) exhibited moderate to strong membranous TROP-2 expression. Additionally, The H-score (membranous TROP-2 expression) was positively correlated with TROP-2 mRNA (ρ = 0.69, P < 0.0001, R2 = 0.70) and protein levels (ρ = 0.86, P < 0.0001, R2 = 0.59), indicating its potential as a non-invasive biomarker in PSCC.

CONCLUSION

In summary, our results support further studies on TROP-2 as a diagnostic and therapeutic target in primary, recurrent and metastatic PSCC.

Enfortumab vedotin-related cutaneous toxicity correlates with overall survival in patients with urothelial cancer: a retrospective experience

Introduction

Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody drug conjugate approved for advanced urothelial cancer, consisting of a monomethyl auristatin E payload linked to a human monoclonal antibody targeting nectin-4. No validated biomarker predictive of or correlated with response exists for EV. Cutaneous toxicity is among the most common EV-related toxicities and typically emerges in early cycles. This retrospective experience of patients with urothelial cancer treated with EV monotherapy evaluated whether EV-related cutaneous toxicity correlated with improved outcomes including progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival and overall response rate (ORR).

Patients and methods

Patients treated with EV monotherapy at Johns Hopkins were identified, and baseline characteristics, treatment, and toxicity details were extracted through chart review. Univariable Cox hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for assessing the effect of baseline patient characteristics and cutaneous toxicity in PFS and OS. Based on the univariable analysis and known risk factors, all subsequent analyses were adjusted for: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, visceral metastases at baseline, gender as well as EV dose, and weight to account for dosing differences. Multivariable Cox proportional HRs were used for comparing PFS and OS between patients with and without cutaneous toxicity, assessing toxicity and EV dose as a time-dependent variables. Adjusted p-values were calculated to compare ORR and disease control rate (DCR) between groups using the Poisson regression model.

Results

Of the 78 patients analyzed, 42 (53.8%) experienced EV-related cutaneous toxicity that appeared early during treatment (median time to occurrence 0.5 months from EV initiation). Cutaneous toxicity correlated with significantly improved OS [HR, 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.25, 0.9; P = 0.0235], ORR (68.3% vs. 20.7%, P = 0.0033) and DCR (82.9% vs. 48.3%, P = 0.0122). Median PFS was numerically longer in the cutaneous toxicity group (6.3 vs. 1.7 months), although no significance was achieved in the multivariable analysis (HR, 0.62; 95% CI: 0.35, 0.108; P = 0.0925).

Conclusion

In this retrospective study, EV-related cutaneous toxicity was associated with improved patient outcomes. Confirming this observation and understanding its mechanism could lead to discovery of a new clinical biomarker of EV response that can emerge in the first cycle.

Efficacy and safety of antibody-drug conjugates in the treatment of urothelial cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials

Introduction: Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a refractory disease for which achieving satisfactory outcomes remains challenging with current surgical interventions. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a novel class of targeted therapeutics that have demonstrated encouraging results for UC. Although there is a limited number of high-quality randomized control trials (RCTs) examining the use of ADCs in patients with UC, some prospective non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSIs) provide valuable insights and pertinent information. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of ADCs in patients with UC, particularly those with locally advanced and metastatic diseases. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to identify pertinent studies. Outcomes, such as the overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse events (AEs), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), were extracted for further analyses. Results: Twelve studies involving 1,311 patients were included in this meta-analysis. In terms of tumor responses, the pooled ORR and DCR were 40% and 74%, respectively. Regarding survival analysis, the pooled median PFS and OS were 5.66 months and 12.63 months, respectively. The pooled 6-month PFS and OS were 47% and 80%, while the pooled 1-year PFS and OS were 22% and 55%, respectively. The most common TRAEs of the ADCs were alopecia (all grades: 45%, grades ≥ III: 0%), decreased appetite (all grades: 34%, grades ≥ III: 3%), dysgeusia (all grades: 40%, grades ≥ III: 0%), fatigue (all grades: 39%, grades ≥ III: 5%), nausea (all grades: 45%, grades ≥ III: 2%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (all grades: 37%, grades ≥ III: 2%), and pruritus (all grades: 32%, grades ≥ III: 1%). Conclusion: The meta-analysis in this study demonstrates that ADCs have promising efficacies and safety for patients with advanced or metastatic UC. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42023460232.

Progress in second-line antibody therapies for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The prognosis of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is poor. Although cytotoxic drugs have been widely used in advanced ESCC, several antibody agents have recently been reported to be effective.

AREAS COVERED

Nivolumab and pembrolizumab are anti-PD-1 antibodies that improve immunosuppression by binding to programmed death-1 (PD-1), leading to an antitumor effect. Randomized phase III trials have found these immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to be effective as second-line treatment. ATTRACTION-3, which compared nivolumab monotherapy with taxane monotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced ESCC, reported prolonged overall survival in the nivolumab group. KEYNOTE-181 found that overall survival was longer in patients with PD-L1-positive ESCC who received second-line treatment with pembrolizumab than in those who received chemotherapy. Sym004 and amivantamab are antibodies that target the epidermal growth factor receptor and have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of other tumors in recent phase I studies. Furthermore, clinical trials on antibody-drug conjugates such as enfortumab vedotin and DS-7300 for solid tumors are currently ongoing.

EXPERT OPINION

The standard first-line treatments for patients with advanced ESCC contain ICIs. Therefore, drugs with different mechanisms of action that can overcome resistance to ICIs are needed as second-line or later-line treatments to improve clinical outcomes in these patients.

Unlocking the Potential: Biomarkers of Response to Antibody-Drug Conjugates

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have reshaped the cancer treatment landscape across a variety of different tumor types. ADCs' peculiar pharmacologic design combines the cytotoxic properties of chemotherapeutic agents with the selectivity of targeted therapies. At present, the approval of many ADCs used in clinical practice has not always been biomarker-driven. Indeed, predicting ADCs' activity and toxicity through the demonstration of specific biomarkers is still a great unmet need, and the identification of patients who can derive significant benefit from treatment with ADCs may often be uncertain. With the lack of robust predictive biomarkers to anticipate primary, intrinsic resistance to ADCs and no consolidated biomarkers to aid in the early identification of treatment resistance (ie, acquired resistance), the determination of precise biologic mechanisms of ADC activity and safety becomes priority in the quest for better patient-centric outcomes. Of great relevance, whether the target antigen expression is a determinant of ADCs' primary activity is still to be clarified, and available data remain quite controversial. Antigen expression assessment is typically performed on tissue biopsy, hence only providing information on a specific tumor site, therefore unable to capture heterogeneous patterns of tumor antigen expression. Quantifying the expression of the target antigen across all tumor sites would help better understand tumor heterogeneity, whereas molecularly characterizing tumor-intrinsic features over time might provide information on resistance mechanisms. In addition, toxicity can represent a critical concern, since most ADCs have a safety profile that resembles that of chemotherapies, with often unique adverse events requiring special management, possibly because of the differential in pharmacokinetics between the small-molecule agent versus payload of a similar class (eg, deruxtecan conjugate-related interstitial lung disease). As such, the identification of robust predictive biomarkers of safety and activity of ADCs has the potential to improve patient selection and enrich the population of patients most likely to derive a substantial clinical benefit, especially in those disease settings where different ADCs happen to be approved in competing clinical indications, with undefined biomarkers to make precise decision making and unclear data on how to sequence ADCs. At this point, the identification of clinically actionable biomarkers in the space of ADCs remains a top research priority.

Side effects of drug-antibody conjugates enfortumab-vedotin and sacituzumab-govitecan in targeted therapy in cancer

OBJECTIVE

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), enfortumab-vedotin (EV) and sacituzumab-govitecan are new drugs in the treatment of urologic tumors, whose safety profile has not been fully investigated. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate adverse events related to both agents reported to VigiBase, the World Health Organization's global pharmacovigilance database.

METHODS

We employed Bayesian disproportionality analysis based on the information component (IC) to explore the safety profile associated with both therapies. Additionally, we used the proportional reporting ratio approach to examine the safety profile further.

RESULTS

We identified 41,752 reports connected to ADC therapy (EV: n=5359; SG: n=36,393). In the EV subgroup, most reports were associated with dermatologic (38.6%), neurologic adverse events (16.5%), or adverse laboratory assessments (19.4%). In contrast, reports in the SG subgroup were mainly associated with gastrointestinal adverse events (24.2%) and adverse laboratory assessments (39.0%). Adverse laboratory assessments in both cohorts were often based on haematotoxic adverse events.

CONCLUSION

We could provide a comprehensive real-world safety profile of EV and SG using a global pharmacovigilance database. Based on the safety signals explored in this study, further research regarding the impact of these side effects on patient outcomes is justified.

The evolving treatment landscape of metastatic urothelial cancer

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is currently the first-line standard of care for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC); however, up to 50% of patients are ineligible for cisplatin, necessitating alternative treatment options. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to be effective in cisplatin-ineligible patients. However, despite advances in the first-line setting, the prognosis remains poor, and challenges persist in selecting optimal therapies, treatment sequences and combination regimens. Maintenance therapy with avelumab revealed improved overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with best supportive care alone in patients with platinum-responsive mUC. Antibody-drug conjugates and targeted therapy with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors have shown promise in selected patients, particularly in patients with metastatic disease that has progressed despite platinum-based chemotherapy. At the European Society of Medical Oncology Congress in 2023, groundbreaking results were presented from two phase III trials, EV-302/KEYNOTE-A39 and CheckMate 901, focusing on previously untreated mUC. In the former, the combination of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab showed significant improvements in OS, PFS and overall response rate compared with chemotherapy alone; the combination of nivolumab with gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy demonstrated a significant extension in median OS, PFS and overall response rate compared with chemotherapy alone. In addition, erdafitinib therapy resulted in significantly longer OS than chemotherapy among patients with mUC and FGFR alterations after previous treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. This comprehensive summary of the current treatment landscape for mUC incorporates clinical trial evidence and discussion of agents that are currently under investigation to provide support for clinical decision making and understanding of future therapeutic approaches.

Peripheral neuropathy and nerve electrophysiological changes with enfortumab vedotin in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: a prospective multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Enfortumab vedotin is a novel antibody-drug conjugate used as a third-line therapy for the treatment of urothelial cancer. We aimed to elucidate the effect of enfortumab vedotin-related peripheral neuropathy on its efficacy and whether enfortumab vedotin-induced early electrophysiological changes could be associated with peripheral neuropathy onset.

METHODS

Our prospective multicenter cohort study enrolled 34 patients with prior platinum-containing chemotherapy and programmed cell death protein 1/ligand 1 inhibitor-resistant advanced urothelial carcinoma and received enfortumab vedotin. The best overall response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety were assessed. Nerve conduction studies were also performed in 11 patients.

RESULTS

The confirmed overall response rate and disease control rate were 52.9% and 73.5%, respectively. The median overall progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.9 and 13.5 months, respectively, during a median follow-up of 8.6 months. The patients with disease control had significantly longer treatment continuation and overall survival than did those with uncontrolled disease. Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 12.5% of the patients. The overall response and disease control rates were 83.3% and 100%, respectively: higher than those in patients without peripheral neuropathy (p = 0.028 and p = 0.029, respectively). Nerve conduction studies indicated that enfortumab vedotin reduced nerve conduction velocity more markedly in sensory nerves than in motor nerves and the lower limbs than in the upper limbs, with the sural nerve being the most affected in the patients who developed peripheral neuropathy (p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated the importance of focusing on enfortumab vedotin-induced neuropathy of the sural nerve to maximize efficacy and improve safety.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates in the Treatment of Genitourinary Cancers: An Updated Review of Data

The treatment landscape of genitourinary cancers has significantly evolved over the past few years. Renal cell carcinoma, bladder cancer, and prostate cancer are the most common genitourinary malignancies. Recent advancements have produced new targeted therapies, particularly antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), due to a better understanding of the underlying oncogenic factors and molecular mechanisms involved. ADCs function as a 'drug delivery into the tumor' system. They are composed of an antigen-directed antibody linked to a cytotoxic drug that releases cytotoxic components after binding to the tumor cell's surface antigen. ADCs have been proven to be extremely promising in the treatment of several cancer types. For GU cancers, this novel treatment has only benefited patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). The rest of the GU cancer paradigm does not have any FDA-approved ADC treatment options available yet. In this study, we have thoroughly completed a narrative review of the current literature and summarized preclinical studies and clinical trials that evaluated the utility, activity, and toxicity of ADCs in GU cancers, the prospects of ADC development, and the ongoing clinical trials. Prospective clinical trials, retrospective studies, case reports, and scoping reviews were included.

Biomarkers for Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Solid Tumors

The clinical development and then the progressive entry in clinical practice of antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) have marked a transformative advancement in the overall cancer treatment. ADCs have been extensively tested for a large number of tumors, reporting heterogeneous clinical efficacy and safety results. In some diseases, the advent of ADCs has yielded significant changes in the prognostic trajectory, portending an improvement of the survival and/or quality of life. ADCs are targeted agents, capable of delivering highly cytotoxic payloads selectively to antigen-expressing cancer cells. As such, they have been intended as perfect "bullets" to enable the promise of precision medicine, toward high-efficacy and limited-toxicity treatment options. However, only some approved ADCs are intended for the use in biomarker-selected patient populations, restricting potentially the opportunity to be more precise. Yet, key characteristics of modern ADCs might allow the activity of ADCs in tumors with heterogeneous or low expression of cancer antigens, resulting in a clinical activity that could sublimate the classic paradigm of a drug-to-target perfect match. In our review, we portrayed the current landscape of approved ADCs, reporting data of activity as related to the expression of the cancer antigens, and elucidating possible determinants of the safety and efficacy, including when used in a therapeutic sequence.

Associations of TACSTD2/TROP2 and NECTIN-4/NECTIN-4 with molecular subtypes, PD-L1 expression, and FGFR3 mutational status in two advanced urothelial bladder cancer cohorts

AIMS

Treatment options for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) rapidly evolved: besides immunomodulative therapeutic options and inhibitors targeting Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alterations, two new antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), sacituzumab govitecan (SG) and enfortumab vedotin (EV), have been approved. However, little is known about the associations of specific aUC properties and the surface target expression of TROP2 and NECTIN-4. Our aim was to characterize associations of TACSTD2/TROP2 and NECTIN-4/NECTIN-4 protein and gene expression with morphomolecular and clinicopathological characteristics of aUC in two large independent cohorts.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The TCGA BLCA (n = 405) and the CCC-EMN (n = 247) cohorts were retrospectively analysed. TROP2/TACSTD2 and NECTIN-4/NECTIN-4 are highly expressed at the protein and transcript level in aUC, and their expression status did not correlate with patient survival in both cohorts. NECTIN-4/NECTIN-4 expression was higher in luminal tumours and reduced in squamous aUCs. NECTIN-4 was negative in 10.6% of samples, and 18.4% of samples had low expression (H-score <15). The TROP2 negativity rate amounted to 6.5%. TACSTD2 and NECTIN-4 expression was reduced in neuroendocrine-like and/or protein-based double-negative tumours. TROP2- and NECTIN-4-negative tumours included one sarcomatoid and four neuroendocrine aUC. FGFR3 alterations and PD-L1 expression on tumour and immune cells did not associate with TROP2 or NECTIN-4 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

TACSTD2/TROP2 and NECTIN-4/NECTIN-4 are widely expressed in aUC, independent of FGFR3 alterations or PD-L1 expression, thus representing a suitable target for ADC treatment in the majority of aUC. The expression loss was associated with aggressive morphomolecular aUC subtypes, i.e. neuroendocrine(-like) and sarcomatoid aUC.

Clinical Pharmacology of the Antibody-Drug Conjugate Enfortumab Vedotin in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma and Other Malignant Solid Tumors

Enfortumab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate comprised of a human monoclonal antibody directed to Nectin-4 and monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), a microtubule-disrupting agent. The objectives of this review are to summarize the clinical pharmacology of enfortumab vedotin monotherapy and demonstrate that the appropriate dose has been selected for clinical use. Pharmacokinetics (PK) of enfortumab vedotin (antibody-drug conjugate and total antibody) and free MMAE were evaluated in five clinical trials of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (n = 748). Intravenous enfortumab vedotin 0.5-1.25 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle showed linear, dose-proportional PK. No significant differences in exposure or safety of enfortumab vedotin and free MMAE were observed in mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment versus normal renal function. Patients with mildly impaired versus normal hepatic function had a 37% increase in area under the concentration-time curve (0-28 days), a 31% increase in maximum concentration of free MMAE, and a similar adverse event profile. No clinically significant PK differences were observed based on race/ethnicity with weight-based dosing, and no clinically meaningful QT prolongation was observed. Concomitant use with dual P-glycoprotein and strong cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors may increase MMAE exposure and the risk of adverse events. Approximately 3% of patients developed antitherapeutic antibodies against enfortumab vedotin 1.25 mg/kg. These findings support enfortumab vedotin 1.25 mg/kg monotherapy on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. No dose adjustments are required for patients with renal impairment or mild hepatic impairment, or by race/ethnicity.

PET/Computed Tomography Transformation of Oncology: Kidney and Urinary Tract Cancers

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and urothelial carcinoma (UC) are two of the most common genitourinary malignancies. 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose (18F-FDG) can play an important role in the evaluation of patients with RCC and UC. In addition to the clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET to evaluate for metastatic RCC or UC, the shift in molecular imaging to focus on specific ligand-receptor interactions should provide novel diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities in genitourinary malignancies. In combination with the rise of artificial intelligence, our ability to derive imaging biomarkers that are associated with treatment selection, response assessment, and overall patient prognostication will only improve.

Therapeutic prospects of nectin-4 in cancer: applications and value

Nectin-4 is a Ca2+-independent immunoglobulin-like protein that exhibits significantly elevated expression in malignant tumors while maintaining extremely low levels in healthy adult tissues. In recent years, overexpression of Nectin-4 has been implicated in tumor occurrence and development of various cancers, including breast cancer, urothelial cancer, and lung cancer. In 2019, the Food and Drug Administration approved enfortumab vedotin, the first antibody-drug conjugate targeting Nectin-4, for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma. This has emphasized the value of Nectin-4 in tumor targeted therapy and promoted the implementation of more clinical trials of enfortumab vedotin. In addition, many new drugs targeting Nectin-4 for the treatment of malignant tumors have entered clinical trials, with the aim of exploring potential new indications. However, the exact mechanisms by which Nectin-4 affects tumorigenesis and progression are still unclear, and the emergence of drug resistance and treatment-related adverse reactions poses challenges. This article reviews the diagnostic potential, prognostic significance, and molecular role of Nectin-4 in tumors, with a focus on clinical trials in the field of Nectin-4-related tumor treatment and the development of new drugs targeting Nectin-4.

A review of the clinical efficacy of FDA-approved antibody‒drug conjugates in human cancers

While strategies such as chemotherapy and immunotherapy have become the first-line standard therapies for patients with advanced or metastatic cancer, acquired resistance is still inevitable in most cases. The introduction of antibody‒drug conjugates (ADCs) provides a novel alternative. ADCs are a new class of anticancer drugs comprising the coupling of antitumor mAbs with cytotoxic drugs. Compared with chemotherapeutic drugs, ADCs have the advantages of good tolerance, accurate target recognition, and small effects on noncancerous cells. ADCs occupy an increasingly important position in the therapeutic field. Currently, there are 13 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)‒approved ADCs and more than 100 ADC drugs at different stages of clinical trials. This review briefly describes the efficacy and safety of FDA-approved ADCs, and discusses the related problems and challenges to provide a reference for clinical work.

Antibody-drug conjugates in urothelial carcinoma: scientometric analysis and clinical trials analysis

In 2020, bladder cancer, which commonly presents as urothelial carcinoma, became the 10th most common malignancy. For patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma, the standard first-line treatment remains platinum-based chemotherapy, with immunotherapy serving as an alternative in cases of programmed death ligand 1 expression. However, treatment options become limited upon resistance to platinum and programmed death 1 or programmed death ligand 1 agents. Since the FDA's approval of Enfortumab Vedotin and Sacituzumab Govitecan, the therapeutic landscape has expanded, heralding a shift towards antibody-drug conjugates as potential first-line therapies. Our review employed a robust scientometric approach to assess 475 publications on antibody-drug conjugates in urothelial carcinoma, revealing a surge in related studies since 2018, predominantly led by U.S. institutions. Moreover, 89 clinical trials were examined, with 36 in Phase II and 13 in Phase III, exploring antibody-drug conjugates as both monotherapies and in combination with other agents. Promisingly, novel targets like HER-2 and EpCAM exhibit substantial therapeutic potential. These findings affirm the increasing significance of antibody-drug conjugates in urothelial carcinoma treatment, transitioning them from posterior-line to frontline therapies. Future research is poised to focus on new therapeutic targets, combination therapy optimization, treatment personalization, exploration of double antibody-coupled drugs, and strategies to overcome drug resistance.

Efficacy of Antibody Drug Conjugates Alone and in Combination with other Agents in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Scoping Review

INTRODUCTION

Antibody drug conjugates represent a promising class of antineoplastic agents comprised of a monoclonal antibody linked to a potent cytotoxic payload for targeted delivery of chemotherapy to tumors. Various antibody drug conjugates have demonstrated impressive efficacy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma in clinical trials, leading to two FDA approved therapies and several other agents and combinations in clinical development.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive systematic review was undertaken utilizing the principles of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Queried databases included Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Web of Science Core Collection and Cochrane CENTRAL Trials. The search sought to identify prospective therapeutic clinical trials in humans with metastatic urothelial carcinoma with a single-arm or randomized controlled trial design investigating antibody drug conjugate-containing regimens.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 4,929 non-duplicated articles, of which 30 manuscripts and conference abstracts were included, which derived from 15 clinical trials including 19 separate cohorts with efficacy outcome results. Eleven trials investigated ADC monotherapy, while two investigated combination regimens, and the remaining two studies were mixed. Five unique ADC targets were represented including Nectin-4, Trop-2, HER2, Tissue Factor, and SLITRK6. Twelve clinical trial cohorts required prior treatment (63%). Objective response rate was reported for all studies and ranged from 27-52% for ADC monotherapies and 34-75% for ADC plus anti-PD-1 agents. Time to event outcome reporting was highly variable.

CONCLUSION

In addition to enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan, various HER2-targeted antibody drug conjugates and ADC-anti-PD-1 combination regimens have demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials and are poised for clinical advancement.

Biomarkers of Response to Anti-NECTIN4 Antibody-Drug Conjugate Enfortumab Vedotin in Urothelial Cancer

Initial studies indicated that NECTIN4 expression is widespread in metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC), which led to approval of the anti-NECTIN4 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) enfortumab vedotin (EV) for unselected patients with mUC. However, the recent literature suggests that there has been overestimation of membranous NECTIN4 expression in UC, which is a prerequisite for EV binding. It is well established from the development of Her2-targeting ADCs that treatment response is strongly dependent on membranous expression level of the relevant target antigen. In this context, it has been demonstrated that membranous NECTIN4 expression correlates with EV responses and outcomes. Another promising biomarker could be NECTIN4 copy number alteration, a genomic alteration that occurs in approximately 25% of mUC cases, which is associated with strong membranous NECTIN4 expression. Patients with NECTIN4 amplification exhibit an objective response rate of >90% to EV monotherapy and long-term survival. Given the heterogeneous expression of NECTIN4 in UC, future biomarker research is essential for the development of biomarker-driven mUC treatment strategies to further improve outcomes for patients with mUC. PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed current evidence on biomarkers for predicting response to enfortumab vedotin (EV) treatment for metastatic urinary tract cancer (mUC). Studies to date have shown that patients with high levels of the protein NECTIN4 on their cancer cells respond well to EV. This information has the potential to guide future treatment strategies for mUC.

Predictive and prognostic biomarkers in urological tumours

Advancements in cutting-edge molecular profiling techniques, such as next-generation sequencing and bioinformatic analytic tools, have allowed researchers to examine tumour biology in detail and stratify patients based on factors linked with clinical outcome and response to therapy. This manuscript highlights the most relevant prognostic and predictive biomarkers in kidney, bladder, prostate and testicular cancers with recognised impact in clinical practice. In bladder and prostate cancer, new genetic acquisitions concerning the biology of tumours have modified the therapeutic scenario and led to the approval of target directed therapies, increasing the quality of patient care. Thus, it has become of paramount importance to choose adequate molecular tests, i.e., FGFR screening for urothelial cancer and BRCA1-2 alterations for prostate cancer, to guide the treatment plan for patients. While no tissue or blood-based biomarkers are currently used in routine clinical practice for renal cell carcinoma and testicular cancers, the field is quickly expanding. In kidney tumours, gene expression signatures might be the key to identify patients who will respond better to immunotherapy or anti-angiogenic drugs. In testicular germ cell tumours, the use of microRNA has outperformed conventional serum biomarkers in the diagnosis of primary tumours, prediction of chemoresistance, follow-up monitoring, and relapse prediction.

Summary of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma 2023 by the Japanese Urological Association

This article is an English translation of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (2nd edition) published in June 2023. The Japanese Urological Association's (JUA) Guidelines Committee on Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) created a 2023 update guideline to support clinicians' current evidence-based management of UTUC and to incorporate its recommendations into clinical practice. The new guideline adhered as closely as possible to the Minds Manual for Guideline Development 2020 ver. 3.0. Findings related to epidemiological, pathological, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up were reviewed. In addition, seven clinical questions (CQs) were set to determine the grade of recommendation and level of evidence. Preconceptions and biases were removed from the preparation process, the overall evidence was evaluated appropriately, and recommendations were made after fully considering the balance between benefits and harms. Although the evidence is still insufficient to be taken up as a CQ, the latest important information is described in seven columns, and clinical issues that should be resolved in the future related to the CQ are described as recommendations for tomorrow. We hope that these guidelines will help medical professionals, patients, and their families involved in the treatment of UTUC in their decision-making, and hope that a critical review of these guidelines will lead to further refinements in the next edition.

Case report: Enfortumab vedotin induced refractory DKA and multi organ failure - a rare fatal adverse event

There are very few therapeutic options to treat patients with locally advanced or metastatic Urothelial Cancer (UC). Enfortumab vedotin (EV) was recently approved by the FDA and has become a new therapeutic option for patients previously managed with conventional treatments. Despite its efficacy, EV carries the potential for infrequent yet severe adverse effects. In this report, we present a case of a patient undergoing EV treatment for urothelial carcinoma who developed refractory diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) unresponsive to escalating insulin doses and necessitating continuous renal replacement therapy. While DKA was resolved, the patient eventually succumbed to progressive maculopapular skin rash, liver failure, and respiratory failure. Additionally, the study delves into a review of cases of EV-induced refractory DKA in the literature, shedding light on the similarities in patient profiles, timelines of adverse effects and the treatment strategies employed to manage the ensuing complications.

An iodine‑labelled Antibody-drug conjugate PET probe for noninvasive monitoring of Nectin-4 expression in urothelial carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Some kinds of antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) with high affinity to Nectin-4 have demonstrated breakthrough progress in the third-line setting for bladder cancer. However, many patients are still difficult to benefit from treatment based on the heterogeneity of tumour. As the most advanced auxiliary treatment technology, treatment visualization can most intuitively predict the effectiveness of drug treatment, and timely detect the occurrence of drug resistance. Among them, nuclear medicine molecular probes play an important role in this field.

METHODS

124/125I-EV was prepared by labelling Enfortumad Vedetin (EV), an ADC drugs widely used in clinic targeted Nectin-4, with Na124/125I using N-bromine succinimide as oxidant. The radiochemical purity was analyzed via radio-TLC and bioactivity was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Cell uptake assay and small-animal PET imaging were performed to verified the specificity and targeting.

KEY RESULTS

124/125I-EV was prepared with high labeling yield and radiochemical purity. ELISA assays demonstrated that 124I-EV maintained the same high bioactivity as EV with significantly higher uptake in SW780 cells (Nectin-4 positive, 4.05 ± 0.32 %IA/5 × 105 cells at 8 h) than that in T24 cells (Nectin-4 negative, 1.34 ± 0.18 %IA/5 × 105 cells, p < 0.001). In PET imaging, 124I-EV had a significantly higher accumulation in SW780 tumour than that in T24 tumour and the uptake in SW780 tumour could be specifically blocked when co-injected with cold EV. The signal-to-noise ratio at the tumour site gradually increased with time, and peaked at 72 h.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

124I-EV was successfully prepared with high specificity and binding affinity of Nectin-4. This radioactive probe completely simulates the internal circulation of ADC drugs and tumour uptake and retention, which will greatly improve the clinical application of ADC therapy.

First experience in treating advanced urothelial cancer with enfortumab vedotin. Single-centre retrospective study of patients qualified for a rescue access procedure

Introduction

Urothelial carcinoma is the most common type of urinary tract malignancy. Current treatment options, including platinum-based chemotherapy or immunotherapy, present significant challenges, ranging from limited efficacy to severe toxicities. Recent developments in antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), such as enfortumab vedotin (EV), promise to significantly improve overall survival. The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of EV. In addition, we highlight the observed benefits of next-line treatment after progression.

Material and methods

This retrospective study involved 16 patients with advanced urothelial cancer treated with EV at the Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Maria Skłodowska- Curie National Research Institute of Oncology between November 2022 and November 2023. The study evaluated patients' medical history, response to EV treatment, and side effects. Notably, the study included patients who had already exhausted standard treatment options and who were treated with EV through a rescue access procedure.

Results

Partial response was observed in 4 out of 9 (44%) patients with available imaging. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (AE) grade 3 and 4 were observed in 3 out of 16 patients, which subsequently required dose reduction.

Conclusions

Enfortumab vedotin demonstrates effectiveness in real-world settings in treating advanced urothelial cancer. Proper management of AE in experienced centres may further prolong survival. Personalized treatment and the development of new ADC represent the future for improved patient outcomes.

Estrogen receptor beta suppresses the androgen receptor oncogenic effects in triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive type of breast cancer associated with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. The androgen receptor (AR) has emerged as a potential therapeutic target for luminal androgen receptor (LAR) TNBC. However, multiple studies have claimed that anti-androgen therapy for AR-positive TNBC only has limited clinical benefits. This study aimed to investigate the role of AR in TNBC and its detailed mechanism.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry and TNBC tissue sections were applied to investigate AR and nectin cell adhesion molecule 4 (NECTIN4) expression in TNBC tissues. Then, in vitro and in vivo assays were used to explore the function of AR and estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) in TNBC. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq), co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP), molecular docking method, and luciferase reporter assay were performed to identify key molecules that affect the function of AR.

RESULTS

Based on the TNBC tissue array analysis, we revealed that ERβ and AR were positive in 21.92% (32/146) and 24.66% (36/146) of 146 TNBC samples, respectively, and about 13.70% (20/146) of TNBC patients were ERβ positive and AR positive. We further demonstrated the pro-tumoral effects of AR on TNBC cells, however, the oncogenic biology was significantly suppressed when ERβ transfection in LAR TNBC cell lines but not in AR-negative TNBC. Mechanistically, we identified that NECTIN4 promoter -42 bp to -28 bp was an AR response element, and that ERβ interacted with AR thus impeding the AR-mediated NECTIN4 transcription which promoted epithelial-mesenchymal transition in tumor progression.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that ERβ functions as a suppressor mediating the effect of AR in TNBC prognosis and cell proliferation. Therefore, our current research facilitates a better understanding of the role and mechanisms of AR in TNBC carcinogenesis.

Phase II trial of afatinib in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma with genetic alterations in ERBB1-3 (LUX-Bladder 1)

BACKGROUND

Preclinical and early clinical data suggest that the irreversible ErbB family blocker afatinib may be effective in urothelial cancers harbouring ERBB mutations.

METHODS

This open-label, phase II, single-arm trial (LUX-Bladder 1, NCT02780687) assessed the efficacy and safety of second-line afatinib 40 mg/d in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma with ERBB1-3 alterations. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival rate (PFS6) (cohort A); other endpoints included ORR, PFS, OS, DCR and safety (cohorts A and B). Cohort A was planned to have two stages: stage 2 enrolment was based on observed antitumour activity.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were enroled into cohort A and eight into cohort B. In cohorts A/B, PFS6 was 11.8%/12.5%, ORR was 5.9%/12.5%, DCR was 50.0%/25.0%, median PFS was 9.8/7.8 weeks and median OS was 30.1/29.6 weeks. Three patients (two ERBB2-amplified [cohort A]; one EGFR-amplified [cohort B]) achieved partial responses. Stage 2 for cohort A did not proceed. All patients experienced adverse events (AEs), most commonly (any/grade 3) diarrhoea (76.2%/9.5%). Two patients (4.8%) discontinued due to AEs and one fatal AE was observed (acute coronary syndrome; not considered treatment-related).

CONCLUSIONS

An exploratory biomarker analysis suggested that basal-squamous tumours and ERBB2 amplification were associated with superior response to afatinib.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02780687.

Real-World Insights into Efficacy and Safety of Enfortumab Vedotin in Japanese Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Findings, Considerations, and Future Directions

This study presents the enfortumab vedotin (EV) treatment analysis at our institution. We retrospectively analyzed patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) treated with EV between January 2021 and October 2023. EV was administered at 1.25 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 in a 28-day cycle. Whole-body computed tomography scans were performed to assess the treatment response. Patient characteristics, treatment histories, response rates, progression-free survival, and adverse events were evaluated. Response rates were determined, and adverse events were recorded. Among the 20 patients, 70% were male and 65% had bladder tumors. Most patients had lung (65%) or lymph node (65%) metastases. The median follow-up was 11.2 months, with 45% of the patients succumbing to the disease. The overall response rate was 55%. The median progression-free and median overall survivals were 10.5 and 12.9 months, respectively. Severe adverse events occurred in 35% of patients. In this real-world study, EV demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable safety profiles in Japanese patients with mUC. The study's results were consistent with previous clinical trials, although a longer follow-up was required. Our findings support EV use as a treatment option for patients with mUC who exhibit disease progression after platinum-based chemotherapy and immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of AGS15E Monotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Effective treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) remains an unmet need. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) providing targeted drug delivery have shown antitumor activity in this setting. AGS15E is an investigational ADC that delivers the cytotoxic drug monomethyl auristatin E to cells expressing SLITRK6, a UC-associated antigen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, single-arm, phase I dose-escalation and expansion trial of AGS15E in patients with mUC (NCT01963052). During dose escalation, AGS15E was administered intravenously at six levels (0.10, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 1.25 mg/kg), employing a continual reassessment method to determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for the dose-expansion cohort. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of AGS15E in patients with and without prior chemotherapy and with prior checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy. Best overall response was also examined.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients were recruited, including 33 patients previously treated with CPI. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were fatigue (54.8%), nausea (37.6%), and decreased appetite (35.5%). Peripheral neuropathy and ocular toxicities occurred at doses of ≥0.75 mg/kg. AGS15E increased in a dose-proportional manner after single- and multiple-dose administration; accumulation was low. Five DLT occurred from 0.50 to 1.25 mg/kg. The RP2D was assessed at 1.00 mg/kg; the objective response rate (ORR) was 35.7% at this dose level. The ORR in the total population and CPI-exposed subgroup were 18.3% and 27.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

DLT with AGS15E were observed at 0.75, 1.00, and 1.25 mg/kg, with an RP2D of 1.00 mg/kg being determined.

Nectin-4 has emerged as a compelling target for breast cancer

The incidence of breast cancer in women has increased year by year, becoming one of the most common malignant tumors in females worldwide. Most patients can be treated with surgery and endocrine drugs, but there are still some patients who lack effective treatment, such as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Nectin-4, a protein encoded by poliovirus receptor-associated protein 4, is a Ca2+-independent immunoglobulin-like protein. It is mainly involved in the adhesion between cells. In recent years, studies have found that Nectin-4 is overexpressed in breast cancer and several other malignancies. Otherwise, several monoclonal antibodies and inhibitors targeting Nectin-4 have shown prosperous outcomes, so Nectin-4 has great potential to be a therapeutic target for breast cancer. The present review systematically describes the significance of Nectin-4 in each aspect of breast cancer, as well as the molecular mechanisms of these aspects mediated by Nectin-4. We further highlight ongoing or proposed therapeutic strategies for breast cancer specific to Nectin-4.

Metastatic Bladder Cancer Expression and Subcellular Localization of Nectin-4 and Trop-2 in Variant Histology: A Rapid Autopsy Study

BACKGROUND

Nectin-4 and Trop-2 are transmembrane targets of FDA-approved antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) Enfortumab-vedotin (EV) and Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), respectively, for the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). The expression and role of Nectin-4 and Trop-2 in mUC variant histology is poorly described.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluate membranous and cytoplasmic protein expression, and mRNA levels of Nectin-4 and Trop-2 within matched primary and metastatic mUC samples to determine heterogeneity of ADC targets in mUC variants.

RESULTS

Patients with mUC were consented for rapid autopsy immediately after death. Tissues from matched primary and metastatic lesions were collected. A total of 67 specimens from 20 patients were analyzed: 27 were UC, 17 plasmacytoid (PUC), 18 UC with squamous differentiation (UCSD), and 5 neuroendocrine (NE); 10 from primary and 57 from metastatic sites. All histology except NE expressed moderate-high levels of Nectin-4 and Trop-2 by both immunohistochemistry and RNAseq. Nectin-4 demonstrated prominent cytoplasmic staining in metastatic PUC and UCSD. Trop-2 demonstrated strong cytoplasmic and membrane staining in primary and metastatic tumors. Interestingly, Nectin-4 and Trop-2 expression are positively correlated at both mRNA and protein levels.

CONCLUSION

UC and non-NE variants express notable level of Nectin-4 and Trop-2 in both primary and metastatic lesions. Membrane staining of Nectin-4 and Trop-2 is present but cytoplasmic staining is a more common event in both mUC and mUC variant histology. These findings support evaluation of EV and SG in heavily treated variant histology BC and urge attention on the clinical relevance of cytoplasmic localization of ADC targets.

Enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab as monotherapies and combination treatment in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A narrative review

Background

Bladder cancer is the 10th most common cancer globally. The majority of bladder cancers are urothelial carcinomas (UCs), which, if locally advanced or metastatic, carry poor long-term prognosis. Cancer cells can evade the immune system by expressing the programmed cell death ligand 1 protein (PD-L1). Programmed cell death ligand 1 protein binds to programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) on T cells, inhibiting their antitumor action. Bladder tumor cells also overexpress nectin-4, a cell adhesion polypeptide that contributes to metastasis, worsening prognosis. Current platinum-based chemotherapy treatments are suboptimal. This review aimed to assess novel treatments for locally advanced or metastatic UC that specifically target PD-L1 or nectin-4, namely, the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab and the anti-nectin-4 antibody-drug conjugate enfortumab vedotin (EV).

Materials and methods

Relevant English-language peer-reviewed articles and conference abstracts from the last 5 years were identified through MEDLINE and EMBASE database searches. A narrative review was performed, with key results outlined below.

Results

Pembrolizumab was demonstrated to be superior to chemotherapy as a second-line treatment for platinum-unresponsive participants in the KEYNOTE-045 trial, resulting in its Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Enfortumab vedotin therapy resulted in superior outcomes compared with chemotherapy in the EV-301 trial, resulting in FDA approval for its use for patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC who had previously undergone treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Positive preliminary results for pembrolizumab and EV combination therapy have led to FDA approval in patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC who are not eligible for platinum chemotherapy.

Conclusions

Pembrolizumab and EV represent novel treatment options for patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC with documented superior outcomes and tolerability as compared with standard chemotherapy.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of RC48-ADC alone or in combination with PD-1 inhibitors for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter, retrospective clinical study

INTRODUCTION

Previous RC48 (Disitamab Vedotin) studies established that the safety and efficacy of RC48-antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), either alone or combined with toripalimab, for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients exhibiting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive or even HER2-negative status after standard chemotherapy failure.

METHODS

With locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC), patients who received RC48-ADC monotherapy or a combination with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors between August 2021 and October 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective observational study to evaluate the real-world antitumor effectiveness and safety.

RESULTS

Among the 38 enrolled patients (29 males; median age 67.5 years [38-93]), 8 received RC48-ADC monotherapy, while 30 received combination therapy. Initially, 63.2% (24/38) of the patients had received ≥1 line of prior treatment, and 63.2% (24/38) had visceral metastasis. UC of the bladder represented the majority type in 68.4% (26/38) of cases. By the data cutoff in March 2023, the overall objective response rate (ORR) was 63.2% (95% CI, 47.1%-79.2%), with a disease control rate (DCR) of 89.5% (95% CI, 79.3%-99.7%). Median follow-up time was 10.6 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.9-10.5), with a 6-month PFS rate of 63.2% and a 12-month PFS rate of 34.1%. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached, with a 12-month OS rate of 76.7%. The median duration of response was 7.3 months (95% CI, 4.6-10.0) among 24 patients evaluated as partial response (PR). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included anemia (71.1%), anorexia (57.9%), asthenia (52.6%), hypoesthesia (52.6%), bone marrow suppression (47.4%), alopecia (47.4%), nausea (44.7%), proteinuria (36.8%), vomiting (34.2%), and hypoalbuminemia (31.6%). No patient experienced TRAEs of Grade ≥3. One patient had an immune-related adverse event (irAE) of rash related to toripalimab.

CONCLUSIONS

Both as monotherapy and in combination with PD-1 inhibitors, RC48-ADC exhibits promising effectiveness and manageable safety profile for mUC patients in real-world settings.

Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Acute Kidney Injury Associated With Enfortumab Vedotin for Urothelial Carcinoma: A Case Report

Enfortumab vedotin is a novel breakthrough therapy that received accelerated US Food and Drug Administration approval in 2019 for the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma in patients who have failed other lines of treatment. The characteristics of its adverse effects are not well understood. Diabetic ketoacidosis has been reported in 2 postmarketing reports presented as abstracts at the 2020 American Thoracic Society Conference and the 2021 American Society of Nephrology Conference. Both cases progressed rapidly and expired in <3 days. We present a similar case of a man in his late 50s with no history of diabetes who was diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma 2 years prior. Despite several lines of treatment, including platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, he developed metastasis and was started on enfortumab vedotin. After his second dose of enfortumab vedotin, he was admitted to the intensive care unit for diabetic ketoacidosis with an initial A1C level of 7.7%. He was intubated for airway protection, started on pressors, and developed oliguric acute kidney injury requiring continuous venovenous hemodialysis. Despite aggressive treatment, the patient died on hospital day 2. The lethality of this aggressive diabetic ketoacidosis despite therapy suggests some other effect of enfortumab vedotin on glucose metabolism in addition to insulin resistance and the need for prior diabetes screening.