Allogeneic marrow transplantation during untreated first relapse of acute myeloid leukemia

Intensive Reinduction Chemotherapy Followed by Early Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Relapsed/Refractory High-Grade Myeloid Neoplasms

Outcomes for adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) high-grade myeloid neoplasms remain poor, with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) the sole therapy likely to result in cure. We conducted the present study to determine the feasibility of early HCT-within 60 days of beginning reinduction chemotherapy-to see whether getting patients to HCT in an expeditious manner would expand the number of patients being offered this curative option. In this proof-of-principle feasibility study, we included adults age 18 to 75 years with R/R myeloid malignancies with ≥10% blood/marrow blasts at diagnosis who were eligible for a reduced-intensity HCT. Subjects received reinduction chemotherapy with cladribine, cytarabine, mitoxantrone, and filgrastim (CLAG-M) and proceeded to HCT with reduced-intensity conditioning (fludarabine/ melphalan). We enrolled 30 subjects, all of whom received CLAG-M reinduction, although only 9 underwent HCT within 60 days (<15, the predetermined threshold for feasibility "success"), with a median time to HCT of 48 days (range, 42 to 60 days). Eleven additional subjects received HCT beyond the target 60 days (off-study), with a median time to transplantation of 83 days (range, 53 to 367 days). Barriers to early HCT included infection, physician preference, lack of an HLA-matched donor, logistical delays, and disease progression, all of which may limit the real-world uptake of such early-to-transplantation protocols.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for older patients with AML with active disease. A study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

Older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) refractory to initial or reinduction chemotherapy have a dismal prognosis if they do not undergo hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HCT). However, data assessing HCT outcomes from different donors are scarce. We evaluated results from a retrospective analysis on patients aged ≥70 years, with AML not in remission who received an allogeneic HCT from HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD), HLA-10/10 matched unrelated donor (MUD), or T-cell replete haploidentical (Haplo) donor, from 2010 to 2021, reported to the ALWP-EBMT database. A total of 360 patients (median age 72 years, range 70-79) were included in the analysis. Median follow-up for the entire population was 35.5 months. Donors were MSD (n = 58), 10/10 HLA-MUD (n = 228), and Haplo (n = 74). A total of 213 (59.2%) patients were primary induction failures, while 147 (40.8%) were in first or subsequent relapse. Graft source was peripheral blood in 92% of the patients. Patients transplanted from Haplo donors more frequently received marrow grafts (p < 0.01) and presented the combination female donor to male recipient (p < 0.01). The overall 2-year rates of overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were: 62.4% (95% CI 47.2-74.3) and 47.6% (95% CI 33.1-60.8) for MSD, 43% (95% CI 35.8-49.9), and 37.5% (95% CI 30.7-44.4) for MUD, and 25.9% (95% CI 15.8-37.2), and 26.5% (95% CI 16.3-37.8) for recipients of Haplo transplants. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) was slightly lower for Haplo recipients at 29.6% (95% CI 19-40.9), for MUD it was 30.2% (95% CI 23.9-36.7), and for MSD 34.9% (95% CI 22-48.2); counterbalanced by a higher incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) of 43.9% (95% CI 31.6-55.6) for Haplo recipients, 32.2% (95% CI 26-33.1) for MUD and 17.5% (95% CI 8.4-29.3) for MSD. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 35.3% (95% CI 22.3-48.5) for MSD, 29.6% (95% CI 23.2-36.2) for MUD, and 19.2% (95% CI 10.7-29.6) for Haplo patients. In the multivariate model, compared to the referent group of MSD recipients, the risk of NRM was higher among patients transplanted from Haplo donors ([hazard ratio] HR 5.1, 95% CI 2.23-11.61, p < 0.001) and MUD (HR 3.21, 95% CI 1.48-0.6.94, p = 0.003). Furthermore, both Haplo and MUD were associated with inferior OS, (HR 3.6, 95% CI 1.98-0.6.56, p < 0.001, and HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.37-0.3.88, p = 0.002, respectively), and LFS (HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.31-0.3.84, p = 0.003, and HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.04-0.2.60, p = 0.034, respectively). Patients transplanted from Haplo donors were also associated with worse GFRS (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.07-2.77, p:0.025) compared with MSD patients. Older adult AML patients with active disease transplanted from MSD experienced prolonged OS and LFS compared to 10/10 MUD and Haplo due to lower NRM. Prospective clinical trials are warranted.

Oncology stewardship in acute myeloid leukemia

In recent years, an explosion of novel agents has shifted the treatment paradigm for patients with acute myeloid leukemia. The optimal place in therapy for many of these novel agents remains unknown due to limited guidance from national guidelines and the way these agents were studied prior to entering the market. A critical evaluation of the literature and incorporation of oncology stewardship principles can be helpful in determining an optimal place for these agents while being mindful of the overall cost that is associated with therapies. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the efficacy and safety data for five controversial agents and provide examples of the use of stewardship practices in determining their place in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.

Fludarabine-treosulfan compared to thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine or FLAMSA as conditioning regimen for patients with primary refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: a study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

Background

Limited data is available to guide the choice of the conditioning regimen for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing transplant with persistent disease.

Methods

We retrospectively compared outcome of fludarabine-treosulfan (FT), thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine (TBF), and sequential fludarabine, intermediate dose Ara-C, amsacrine, total body irradiation/busulfan, cyclophosphamide (FLAMSA) conditioning in patients with refractory or relapsed AML.

Results

Complete remission rates at day 100 were 92%, 80%, and 88% for FT, TBF, and FLAMSA, respectively (p = 0.13). Non-relapse mortality, incidence of relapse, acute (a) and chronic (c) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) rates did not differ between the three groups. Overall survival at 2 years was 37% for FT, 24% for TBF, and 34% for FLAMSA (p = 0.10). Independent prognostic factors for survival were Karnofsky performance score and patient CMV serology (p = 0.01; p = 0.02), while survival was not affected by age at transplant. The use of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) was associated with reduced risk of grade III–IV aGVHD (p = 0.02) and cGVHD (p = 0.006), with no influence on relapse.

Conclusions

In conclusion, FT, TBF, and FLAMSA regimens provided similar outcome in patients undergoing transplant with active AML. Survival was determined by patient characteristics as Karnofsky performance score and CMV serology, however was not affected by age at transplant. ATG appears able to reduce the incidence of acute and chronic GVHD without influencing relapse risk.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13045-019-0727-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Treatment of relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukaemia in adults

The prognosis of relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is poor and treatment is challenging. While the most potent treatment modality for patients who achieve a complete remission after relapse is still allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), both transplant-related mortality and relapse rates are high and many patients are not candidates for this approach. After a few decades of relative stasis in this field, a large number of novel approaches have become available to tackle this highly fatal disease. This is mostly due to our improved understanding of disease pathogenesis (including targetable mutations) and the anti-leukaemia potential of the immune system. Several small-molecule inhibitors and immunotherapeutic options are being explored in clinical trials and many more are in pre-clinical phase. Future studies will focus on novel and mechanistically driven combinations, sequential treatments, and low-toxicity maintenance strategies. While cure of relapsed/refractory AML without allo-HCT is currently unlikely, treatments are becoming less toxic and remissions are lasting longer.

Allogeneic transplantation for advanced acute myeloid leukemia: The value of complete remission

BACKGROUND

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) without complete remission (CR) or in first relapse (Rel1) can have extended leukemia control and survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). For patients in Rel1 or primary induction failure (PIF), transplantation versus treatment to achieve a second CR (CR2) and subsequent HCT might yield similar outcomes, but available comparative data are scarce.

METHODS

Survival was analyzed in 4682 HCT recipients according to disease status: PIF (N = 1440), Rel1 (failing ≥1 reinduction; N = 1256), and CR2 (N = 1986).

RESULTS

Patient, disease, and transplantation characteristics were similar, except that patients in CR2 more often had performance scores of 90% to 100%, de novo AML, and longer CR1 duration. Adverse cytogenetics were more common in patients who experienced PIF. The 5-year survival rate adjusted for performance score, cytogenetic risk, and donor type for CR2 was 39% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37%-41%) compared with 18% (95% CI, 16%-20%) for HCT in Rel1 and 21% (95% CI, 19%-23%) in PIF (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although survival is superior for patients who undergo HCT in CR2, transplantation for selected patients in Rel1 or PIF may still be valuable. These data can guide decision making about additional salvage therapy versus prompt HCT for patients not in CR, but they also highlight that AML is intrinsically more treatable in patients who have favorable-risk cytogenetics, those with longer CR1 duration, and younger patients with better performance status. Cancer 2017;123:2025-2034. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

[Current indications of allogeneic stem cell transplant in adults with acute myeloid leukemia]

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is an increasingly important therapeutic option for the treatment of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Here we review the current indications of SCT in this disease. While patients with favorable cytogenetics should receive consolidation chemotherapy, patients with unfavorable karyotype are prime candidates for SCT or new approaches to SCT (which should be done in first complete remission). Patients with intermediate prognoses should also receive SCT in first complete remission. In the absence of a suitable matched related donor, most patients will be able to find an alternative donor to proceed to a potentially curative allogeneic transplantation. The use of reduced-intensity conditioning regimens before SCT has allowed patients in the sixth or seventh decades of life to be routinely transplanted. Despite major differences among transplant centers in the intensity and composition of the conditioning regimen and immunosuppression, choice of graft source, postgraft immune-modulation, and supportive care, there has been a dramatic improvement in terms of tolerance. Although it is presumed to be a curative strategy, major complications of SCT remain graft-versus-host disease, delayed immune recovery, multiple comorbidities, and relapse after transplant.

Indications for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in the genomic era

Few choices in medical oncology are as stark as the decision of whether or not to proceed with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Recent advances provide more information to inform the decision, including molecular studies of leukemia that predict tumor responsiveness, assays of minimal residual disease that measure early treatment outcome, and comorbidity indices that predict nonrelapse mortality. Although large prospective studies incorporating all of these factors are lacking, literature reviews and consensus statements exist that can help the clinician in this difficult choice. Allogeneic HCT should be considered for all patients younger than age 65, with an available donor, an acceptable comorbidity index, and whose had initial induction therapy has failed. Similarly, allogeneic HCT is appropriate therapy for all patients with AML in second remission younger than age 75, with an appropriate donor, and a comorbidity index of 5 or less. For patients younger than age 60 with AML in first complete remission (CR), there is little evidence that HCT benefits those with favorable-risk disease who achieve CR with one cycle of induction and have no evidence of minimal residual disease. Allogeneic HCT is indicated for essentially all other categories of patients. For those age 60 and older, few prospective studies are available on which to base recommendations, but, as in younger patients, the benefit of allogeneic HCT is questionable for patients with favorable-risk AML. For patients with higher-risk disease, allogeneic HCT is a reasonable option with the caution that the risk of HCT increases dramatically in those with a comorbidity index of 3 or higher.

The prevalent predicament of relapsed acute myeloid leukemia

A majority of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) will relapse after achieving complete remission. At relapse, patients should be risk stratified and a decision made about the appropriateness of intensive therapy and whether a potentially curative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is possible. Risk factors include duration of first complete remission and adverse cytogenetics, as well as age and FLT3 mutation status. Available therapies are steadily increasing, but for the most part should be regarded as either best palliation or as a bridge to allo-SCT. Simple symptomatic therapies for patients with extreme age or the worst prognosis should also be considered. Newer therapeutic options include novel cytotoxic chemotherapies including clofarabine, immunomodulatory agents, targeted therapies against FLT3 and mTOR, and immunoconjugates. All patients with relapsed AML should be considered for an appropriate clinical trial.

Transplants for leukemia in relapse: when is the best time?

Transplantation of hematopoietic cells to treat acute leukemia can offer disease control and extended survival for a sizeable fraction of patients, but because alternative approaches may also be effective, the decision about transplant timing remains uncertain. For those transplanted in first complete remission (CR1), outcomes are the best, but some fraction of those might have had extended leukemia-free survival in the absence of a transplant. In later remission, outcomes are variable but promising-and markedly better than any nontransplant approach. Risks of relapse may differ based on the depth of remission, measurable minimal residual disease (MRD), or patient's performance status.

Who is fit for allogeneic transplantation?

The use of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has expanded progressively, facilitated by the increasing availability of unrelated donors and cord blood, and the inclusion of older patients as transplantation candidates. Indications remain diagnosis-dependent. As novel nontransplantation modalities have been developed concurrently, many patients come to HCT only when no longer responding to such therapy. However, patients with refractory or advanced disease frequently relapse after HCT, even with high-dose conditioning, and more so with reduced-intensity regimens as used for patients of older age or with comorbid conditions. Thus, patients with high-risk malignancies who have substantial comorbidities or are of advanced age are at high risk of both relapse and nonrelapse mortality and should probably not be transplanted. Being in remission or at least having shown responsiveness to pre-HCT therapy is generally associated with increased transplantation success. In addition, to handle the stress associated with HCT, patients need a good social support system and a secure financial net. They must be well informed, not only about the transplantation process, but also about expected or potential post-HCT events, including graft-versus-host disease and delayed effects that may become manifest only years after HCT.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute leukemia in first relapse or second remission

Background

The role of pre-transplant salvage chemotherapy has been controversial in relapsed acute leukemia.

Methods

We investigated post-transplant outcomes in 65 patients with acute leukemia treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) during first relapse or second remission.

Results

The 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 52.3%. Multivariate analysis for CIR revealed that patients with unfavorable cytogenetics and those not in remission at the time of HCT had a significantly high CIR (P = 0.031 and P = 0.031, respectively). Allogeneic HCT was performed in 14 patients after first relapse without salvage chemotherapy ("untreated relapse" group), 15 patients failed chemotherapy for reinduction of remission before HCT ("refractory relapse" group), and 36 patients attained second remission with salvage chemotherapy before HCT ("second remission" group). The 5-year CIR for patients in the untreated relapse group (57.1%) was higher than that for those in the second remission group (42.3%), but it was lower than that for patients in the refractory relapse group (66.7%). Among patients who underwent allogeneic HCT in relapse, those with bone marrow (BM) blasts ≤30% had a lower 5-year CIR than those in florid relapse (BM blasts >30%) (57.7% vs. 70.6%).

Conclusion

Our results do not support the role of salvage chemotherapy aimed at re-induction of remission before allogeneic HCT in patients with acute leukemia after first relapse. Patients with early relapse do not appear to benefit from salvage chemotherapy before HCT.

How I treat acute myeloid leukemia

More than one quarter of a million adults throughout the world are diagnosed annually with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Despite considerable progress during the past 3 decades in the therapy of AML, two-thirds of young adults and 90% of older adults still die of their disease. The reported median age has increased over the past few decades, mostly because of a greater willingness of physicians to diagnose and treat older patients, and now is 72 years. The greatest challenge is in this age group. However, much improvement in therapy is needed for all adults with AML. Recent advances in allogeneic transplantation, a better understanding of prognostic factors, and development of targeted agents have only modestly improved overall outcome when large populations of patients are considered. Although an explosion in knowledge about the molecular pathogenesis of AML has outpaced treatment advances, such insights hold promise for the development of new therapies directed at specific molecular abnormalities that perturb malignant cell survival pathways. The current approach in 2010 to the management of this disease is presented through a discussion of illustrative cases.

A clinical review of breast involvement in acute leukemia

The breast continues to be reported as a site of resistant leukemia despite current curative protocols. To characterize disease behavior and potential for lengthy survival after breast relapse, a study was undertaken of 153 cases reported between 1969 and 2005. Authors were contacted for follow-up. There were 105 AML and 48 ALL cases identified. Ninety percent of female patients were younger than 50 and leukemia was temporally related to pregnancy in 13. Eight cases were males. Remissions were typically of short duration, principally due to further extramedullary relapses, in 3 main sites in both AML and ALL: contralateral breast, gynecologic organs, and CNS. However, there are cases of disease-free survival up to 26+ years after intensive treatment. Leukemia growing in the breast may follow a distinctive pattern, and prompt initiation of intensive multi-cycle treatment, assuming occult site involvement, with consideration of CSF prophylaxis, should increase the potential for disease eradication.

Indications for hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute leukemia

Based on available data, all adults with AML under age 60 years with matched siblings should be considered for allogeneic transplantation in first remission, except for those with favorable risk cytogenetics and possibly those whose disease has normal cytogenetics and is FLT3/ITD negative and NPM1 positive. Patients with matched siblings not transplanted in first remission should be followed closely so that transplantation in early first relapse can be considered. Those without matched siblings should receive a MUD transplant in first CR if they have higher risk disease. All others should receive standard chemotherapy and consider a matched unrelated transplant or autologous transplant, should they relapse. RIC allogeneic transplantation using either a matched family member or a MUD can be considered for patients age 60 years or greater with AML in second or subsequent remission, or AML in first remission with intermediate or high risk disease.

Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation provides the most powerful antileukemic effect in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Due to its significant morbidity and mortality, it should be used in first remission patients whose relapse risk is substantial. Reduced intensity transplantation is safer and extends the application of early transplantation to older patients and those with comorbidities. In patients with advanced disease, allotransplantation provides a lower chance for cure, but is often the only curative treatment available. Advances in histocompatibility typing and supportive care have improved results of allogeneic transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia.

Modified donor lymphocyte infusion after HLA-mismatched/haploidentical T cell-replete hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for prophylaxis of relapse of leukemia in patients with advanced leukemia

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor priming and short-term immunosuppressive agents for prophylaxis of relapse in patients with advanced leukemia after human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched T cell-replete hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Twenty-nine patients received prophylactic DLI at a median 75 (33-120) days after HCT. Acute graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) grades 3-4 occurred in six patients, and all cases were controlled. Eleven patients were alive and relapse-free with a probability of leukemia-free survival (LFS) of 37.3 +/- 9.6% at 3 years. Chronic GVHD was associated with a lower relapse rate and higher probability of LFS. Prophylactic-modified DLI is feasible in patients with advanced leukemia to prevent relapse after HLA-mismatched HCT.

Long-term follow-up of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for de novo acute myelogenous leukemia with a conditioning regimen of total body irradiation and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-combined high-dose cytarabine

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of total body irradiation (TBI) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-combined high-dose cytarabine as a conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with de novo acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). The conditioning regimen consisted of 12 Gy of TBI followed by high-dose cytarabine (3 g/m(2)) every 12 hours for 4 days in combination with the continuous administration of G-CSF. Stem cell sources included bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical siblings (n = 24), or bone marrow from HLA serologically matched unrelated donors (n = 26). Fifty patients (median age, 38 years) were evaluated. At HSCT, 35 patients were in the first or second complete remission (CR1/2), and 15 patients were not in remission (n = 14) or in the third CR (n = 1). Thirty-six of 50 patients are currently alive, with a median follow-up period of 5.6 years (range: 1.1-12.1 years). The 5-year estimated overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 85.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.7%-97.3%) and 82.1% (95% CI, 69.0%-95.2%) in patients with AML in the first or second CR, 46.7% (95% CI, 21.4%-72.0%), and 40.0% (95% CI, 15.3%-64.7%) in patients with AML in other stages. The 2-year cumulative incidence of treatment-related mortality (TRM) of all patients was 10.4% (95% CI, 1.8%-18.6%). The only factors affecting the OS and DFS were disease status at transplant and cytogenetics by multivariate analysis. These results suggest that G-CSF-combined high-dose cytarabine could be a promising component of the conditioning regimen for allogeneic HSCT for AML, providing a high DFS and low TRM.

Allogeneic SCT in refractory or relapsed adult ALL is effective without prior reinduction chemotherapy

We present 60 patients with refractory (n=8) or relapsed (n=52) adult ALL who received allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) with (n=41) or without (n=19) prior reinduction chemotherapy. In our center, omission of reinduction is recommended if a suitable donor is promptly available, tumor burden is moderate and disease features suggest a highly aggressive course. Overall survival (OS) of the whole cohort at 1, 2 and 5 years was 42, 33 and 28%, respectively. Leukemia-free survival at 1, 2 and 5 years was 37, 33 and 24%. Deaths were due to relapse (n=25), acute or chronic GVHD (n=7), infections (n=8) or toxicity (n=4). Interestingly, patients who did not receive reinduction before HSCT had better outcomes than patients who received reinduction with OS at 1, 2 and 5 years being 58 vs 34%, 47 vs 25% and 47 vs 18%, respectively (P=0.039). Importantly, even achievement of a second CR after reinduction was not associated with improved survival compared to patients directly proceeding to HSCT. We conclude that patients who undergo HSCT for refractory or relapsed ALL can achieve long-term survival. In selected patients, reinduction chemotherapy can be omitted if immediate HSCT is feasible.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adults with acute myeloid leukemia

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an integral part of the treatment of many patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Despite extensive study, the appropriate role and timing of allogeneic and autologous transplantation in AML are poorly defined. This review critically analyzes the extensive literature, focusing on the recent advances, and provides practical recommendations for the use of HSCT in AML.

The role of cytotoxic therapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the therapy of acute myelogenous leukemia in adults: an evidence-based review

Clinical research examining the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in the therapy of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in adults is presented and critically evaluated in this systematic evidence-based review. Specific criteria were used for searching the published literature and for grading the quality and strength of the evidence and the strength of the treatment recommendations. Treatment recommendations based on the evidence are presented in Table 3, entitled Summary of Treatment Recommendations Made by the Expert Panel for Adult Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, and were reached unanimously by a panel of AML experts. The identified priority areas of needed future research in adult AML include: (1) What is the role of HSCT in treating patients with specific molecular markers (eg, FLT3, NPM1, CEBPA, BAALC, MLL, NRAS, etc.) especially in patients with normal cytogenetics? (2) What is the benefit of using HSCT to treat different cytogenetic subgroups? (3) What is the impact on survival outcomes of reduced intensity or nonmyeloablative versus conventional conditioning in older (>60 years) and intermediate (40-60 years) aged adults? (4) What is the impact on survival outcomes of unrelated donor HSCT vesus chemotherapy in younger (<40 years) adults with high risk disease?

Modified donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) for the prophylaxis of leukemia relapse after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with advanced leukemia--feasibility and safety study

PURPOSE

We retrospectively evaluated the feasibility and safety of a modified prophylactic donor lymphocytes infusion (DLI) approach in advanced leukemia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-three patients with advanced leukemia received modified prophylactic DLI; that is, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-primed peripheral blood progenitor cells instead of steady-donor lymphocyte harvests were used, and a short-term immunosuppressive agent (cyclosporine A or methotrexate 10 mg once per week for 2 to 4 weeks) was used for prevention of DLI-associated graft versus host disease (GVHD) after human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine infusions were performed in 33 patients. The mononuclear cells and median CD3+ cells infused for DLI were 1-2 x 10(8) and 0.93 x 10(6) per kilogram, respectively. Six patients experienced II-IV-grade acute GVHD. Twenty patients developed chronic GVHD. No GVHD-related death or transfusion-related pancytopenia was observed. With an 18-month median follow-up, 16 patients were in disease-free survival, and overall survival at 1 and 1.5 years was 69.0% and 50.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The modified prophylactic DLI strategy might represent a step forward in the treatment of advanced leukemia.

Elevated lactate dehydrogenase is an adverse predictor of outcome in HLA-matched sibling bone marrow transplant for acute myelogenous leukemia

Prognostic factors for survival following allogeneic BMT for AML include age, disease status and cytogenetic risk classification. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels have not been studied as a potential risk factor. We reviewed our experience with BMT for AML and included LDH at the time of admission in an analysis of prognostic factors for survival. We found that LDH >330 U/l (1.5 times the upper limit of normal at our institution), older age, active disease, peripheral stem cell graft and male-to-male transplant were significant adverse predictors of survival. After accounting for LDH, other factors such as disease status and cytogenetics were not significantly associated with the outcome of BMT. All but one patient with an LDH >330 U/l had active disease. However, when patients in CR were excluded, LDH >330 U/l remained a significant adverse predictor of overall survival (hazard ratio 2.70, 95% confidence interval 1.41-5.16, P=0.003). We conclude that LDH is an important adverse risk factor for survival and should be included in future studies of risk performed on larger patient cohorts.

Risk assessment in haemotopoietic stem cell transplantation: disease and disease stage

This chapter addresses the impact of the disease and disease status on the outcome of stem-cell transplantation. In consideration of the other topics addressed within this volume we have elected to focus on allogeneic rather than autologous transplantation. Furthermore we have not tried to be comprehensive and discuss the role of disease status in all conditions amenable to allografting, but rather to review the evidence that exists for selected haematological malignancies. Where possible we have made some clear recommendations, but where evidence is less clear we have indicated the ongoing controversies.

Extramedullary sites of leukemia relapse after transplant

Recurrent or residual leukemia found in extramedullary sites after intensive treatments adversely affects prognosis. To summarize the sites and outcomes when extramedullary relapses have been reported after stem cell transplants, and to elucidate when long survival has been achieved, 207 cases were analysed. Authors were contacted for follow-up information. The most commonly reported sites are soft tissue in acute leukemias and bone in CML. Extramedullary relapse occurred typically within 2 years in ALL, but later in one-third of myeloid leukemias. Most testicular relapses reported in AML followed non-TBI conditioning. Marrow relapse was not inevitable if aggressive treatment was begun early. Local therapy alone was generally inadequate. Intensive therapy has produced lengthy remissions in cases of acute leukemias involving various sites, whereas CML cases, particularly involving bone, were most resistant to treatment. Heightened awareness and aggressive treatment should improve the prospect for cure after extramedullary relapse.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation in first complete remission versus early relapse

Although data from a number of clinical trials can help guide the choice, the decision of whether patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) should undergo transplantation while in first remission or should have transplantation withheld until relapse is a particularly difficult one. Current data suggest that patients with AML and unfavorable cytogenetics should undergo allogeneic transplantation while in first remission if at all possible. Patients with AML and good risk cytogenetics can probably forgo transplantation until after first relapse. For patients with intermediate risk disease, the decision of transplantation during first remission versus waiting until first relapse is particularly difficult and should be made only after considering additional individual risk factors. If the decision is made to delay transplantation until first relapse, there are additional steps that physicians should take to ensure that salvage transplantation is possible, including identifying the source of hematopoietic stem cells in advance of relapse and developing a careful monitoring plan for the patient while in first remission.

Fludarabine and cytosine are less effective than standard ADE chemotherapy in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia, and addition of G-CSF and ATRA are not beneficial: results of the MRC AML-HR randomized trial

The optimum chemotherapy schedule for reinduction of patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (relapsed, resistant/refractory, or adverse genetic disease) is uncertain. The MRC AML (Medical Research Council Acute Myeloid Leukemia) Working Group designed a trial comparing fludarabine and high-dose cytosine (FLA) with standard chemotherapy comprising cytosine arabinoside, daunorubicin, and etoposide (ADE). Patients were also randomly assigned to receive filgrastim (G-CSF) from day 0 until neutrophil count was greater than 0.5 x 10(9)/L (or for a maximum of 28 days) and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) for 90 days. Between 1998 and 2003, 405 patients were entered: 250 were randomly assigned between FLA and ADE; 356 to G-CSF versus no G-CSF; 362 to ATRA versus no ATRA. The complete remission rate was 61% with 4-year disease-free survival of 29%. There were no significant differences in the CR rate, deaths in CR, relapse rate, or DFS between ADE and FLA, although survival at 4 years was worse with FLA (16% versus 27%, P = .05). Neither the addition of ATRA nor G-CSF demonstrated any differences in the CR rate, relapse rate, DFS, or overall survival between the groups. In conclusion these findings indicate that FLA may be inferior to standard chemotherapy in high-risk AML and that the outcome is not improved with the addition of either G-CSF or ATRA.

High Disease Burden Is Associated with Poor Outcomes for Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Not in Remission Who Undergo Unrelated Donor Cell Transplantation

Results were analyzed for 48 consecutive patients with acute myeloid leukemia not in remission who underwent unrelated donor bone marrow or stem cell transplantation between 1991 and February 2003 at 2 transplant centers. Forty-six were adults with a median age of 32 years (range, 4-58 years). Forty-two were HLA-A, -B, and -DR matched with their respective donors, and 6 were mismatched at 1 of these loci. The conditioning regimen was myeloablative in all cases: busulfan/cyclophosphamide/etoposide in 34 patients, busulfan/cyclophosphamide in 10 patients, and total body irradiation based in 4 patients. Median follow-up for survivors was 540 days (range, 145-2716 days). Only patients with <5000 peripheral blood blasts per microliter at the time of transplantation survived 2 years (18% versus 0%; P = .003). Similarly, patients with <20% blasts in the marrow at the time of transplantation had superior 2-year survival compared with those who had > or =20% (33% versus 5%; P = .04). Patients with <20% blasts who had > or =3 prior therapies also fared poorly. Cause of death was more commonly treatment related rather than relapse related. This study confirms that patients with acute myeloid leukemia not in remission can achieve prolonged survival with myeloablative conditioning and unrelated donor cell transplantation. However, sustained survival occurs only in patients with a low disease burden at the time of unrelated donor stem cell transplantation, and patients with a high disease burden may benefit from added counseling regarding the high risk of death due to both treatment-related toxicities and disease relapse.

Biology and management of relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia

Disease relapse remains the major cause of treatment failure in adults with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). This reflects both the failure of current salvage regimens and the absence of effective strategies to secure long-term disease-free survival in those patients who achieve a second remission. Recent progress in understanding the pathogenesis of relapsed disease has enabled the identification of a variety of dysregulated molecular pathways and these now provide a rational basis for the design of novel targeted therapies. At the same time, advances in allogeneic stem-cell transplantation have permitted the extension of the curative potential of allografting to patients in whom it was previously contraindicated. As a result, a range of novel drug and transplant therapies has become available in patients with relapsed AML, and it is realistic to anticipate that a co-ordinated assessment of their clinical and biological impact will provide the basis for the design of future, more effective treatments in relapsed disease.

Effects of race on survival after stem cell transplantation

Effects of race or ethnicity on survival after high-dose chemoradiation followed by stem cell transplantation (SCT) have not been thoroughly evaluated. We analyzed survival according to racial/ethnic categories for 3587 consecutive patients who had SCT at a single US institution between July 1992 and December 2000. Among 1366 patients who received autologous SCT, race or ethnicity was not significantly associated with survival. In contrast, among 2221 patients who received allogeneic SCT from HLA-matched unrelated or sibling donors, blacks had a significantly greater mortality than whites (unadjusted hazard ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-2.25). Mortality among other racial or ethnic groups was not significantly different from that among whites. The greater mortality hazard among blacks persisted after controlling for donor type, pretransplantation risk category, patient age, donor/patient sex, and cytomegalovirus exposure (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-2.34). SCT from both HLA-matched unrelated and HLA-identical sibling donors was associated with more severe acute graft-versus-host disease and higher nonrelapse mortality among blacks compared with whites. Furthermore, blacks who received SCT for chronic myeloid leukemia had longer diagnosis-to-transplantation intervals than whites. A matched-cohort analysis showed that the higher mortality among blacks could not be explained by obvious socioeconomic differences. The higher incidence of severe graft-versus-host disease among blacks compared with whites, both with HLA-identical sibling donors, might be related to yet-unidentified "immune-enhancing" genetic polymorphisms. We cannot exclude the possibility that the increased mortality risk among blacks after discharge from the transplant center might in part be related to unidentified sociocultural differences that influence medical care.

Impact of disease burden at time of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in adults with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes

The impact of disease burden on the outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) has not been well defined. Data from several retrospective series suggest that overt leukemia at the time of transplant increases the risk of relapse. We reviewed the outcomes of 68 consecutive adults with AML (n=60) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) (n=8) who received an allogeneic SCT at the University of Chicago between May 1986 and October 2002 to confirm the importance of currently recognized risk factors for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). In addition, we wanted to determine whether quantification of residual disease by blast percentage or cytogenetic abnormalities at the time of SCT was correlated with outcome. AML subtypes based on the FAB classification were as follows: M0=9, M1=9, M2=16, M3=2, M4=16, M5=3, M6=5. Cytogenetic analysis was available from 52 patients. Using standard morphologic criteria, 34 patients were in complete remission (CR) and 34 had visible leukemia present. The majority of donors were HLA-identical siblings (n=55). In all, 56 patients received myeloablative conditioning regimens and 12 received a reduced-intensity, fludarabine-based conditioning regimen. OS and PFS times were 7.1 months (95% CI, 4.8-10.4) and 5.1 months (95% CI, 3.2-7.8), respectively. Median follow-up from SCT was 4.6 years (range, 0.6-17.0) for survivors. In multivariate analysis, the following factors were found to be associated with worse survival: (1) increased percentage of blasts in the bone marrow at the time of SCT, (2) presence of acute graft-versus-host disease, (3) mismatched donor, (4) Zubrod performance score of >/=2, and (5) age >/=45 years. We also found a trend towards improved outcome among patients in cytogenetic remission as compared to those who had residual cytogenetic abnormalities and those in overt relapse. These data support an association between pre-transplant disease burden and poor outcome after SCT.

Outcome of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for children with advanced acute myeloid leukemia

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) may offer the only chance of cure for children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in second complete remission (CR2) or with relapsed disease, but the outcome of these patients has not been clearly defined. We conducted a retrospective study of 58 children, median age 7.4 years (range 0.8-17.3), who received matched related or unrelated BMT at our institution for AML in CR2 (n = 12), in untreated first relapse (n = 11) or with refractory disease (n = 35), to identify risk factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS). Life threatening to fatal regimen-related toxicity was observed in 22% of patients. Estimates of DFS at 5 years (95% confidence interval) for patients in CR2, with untreated first relapse and refractory disease were 58% (27-80%), 36% (11-63%) and 9% (2-21%), respectively. Non-relapse mortality estimates were 0%, 27% (0-54%) and 17% (5-30%), and relapse estimates were 42% (14-70%), 36% (8-65%) and 74% (60-89%), respectively. Advanced disease phase and cytogenetic abnormalities at the time of transplantation were each associated with decreased DFS and increased relapse in multivariable regression models. Survival for children transplanted in CR2 or untreated first relapse is higher than that previously reported, but relapse remains the major cause of treatment failure regardless of disease stage.

Final adult height of patients who received hematopoietic cell transplantation in childhood

Growth impairment and growth hormone (GH) deficiency are complications after total body irradiation (TBI) and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). To determine the impact of GH therapy on growth, the final heights of 90 GH-deficient children who underwent fractionated TBI and HCT for malignancy were evaluated. Changes in height standard deviation (SD) from the diagnosis of GH deficiency to the achievement of final height were compared among 42 who did and 48 who did not receive GH therapy. At HCT, GH-treated patients were younger (P = .001), more likely to have undergone central nervous system irradiation (P = .007), and shorter (P = .005) than patients who did not receive GH therapy. After HCT, GH deficiency was diagnosed at 1.5 years (range, 0.8-9.5 years) for GH-treated and 1.2 years (range, 0.9-8.8 years) for nontreated patients. GH therapy was associated with significantly improved final height in children younger than 10 years at HCT (P = .0001), but GH therapy did not impact the growth of older children. Girls (P = .0001) and children diagnosed with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) (compared with acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL] or non-Hodgkin lymphoma [NHL]; P = .02) also showed more rapid growth than their counterparts. These data demonstrate that GH therapy improves the final height of young children after fractionated TBI.

The current status of hematopoietic cell transplantation

Hematopoietic cell transplantation is the preferred therapy for a substantial proportion of patients with life-threatening diseases of the lymphohematopoietic system. Recent advances in donor identification, disease eradication, and supportive care measures have broadened the application of transplantation and improved outcomes. This article provides a brief review of the major clinical principles of transplantation and results achieved to date.

Rapid hematopoietic engraftment following fractionated TBI conditioning and transplantation with CD34(+) enriched hematopoietic progenitor cells from partially mismatched related donors

Nineteen adult patients with poor-risk hematologic malignancy received T cell-depleted (TCD) hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplant from partially mismatched related donors (PMRD). The preparative regimen (FITFA) included fractionated TBI, thiotepa, fludarabine, and horse (n = 3) or rabbit (n = 16) anti-thymocyte anti-sera (ATG). GVHD prophylaxis consisted of TCD by positive/negative selection using the Isolex 300i system and pre-transplant ATG with no post-transplant immunosuppression. The mean number (+/-s.d.) of transplanted CD34(+) and CD3(+) cells were 8.9 x 10(6)/kg +/-4.3 (range 2.6-19.3) and 1.4 x 10(4)/kg +/-1.2 (range 0.3-4.6) respectively. Seventeen patients evaluable for neutrophil engraftment achieved an ANC >0.5 x 10(9)/l at a median of 12 days (range 9-27), with evidence of full donor chimerism. Thirteen patients died of the following causes: relapse (n = 6), infections (n = 5), interstitial pneumonia (n = 1), and unknown causes (n = 1) None of the recipients of rabbit ATG required therapy for acute or chronic GVHD. Five patients are alive and disease-free at a median time of 303 days post transplant (range 100-660). The FITFA preparative regimen using fractionated TBI is well tolerated and is sufficiently immunosuppressive to allow rapid and stable donor origin hematopoietic engraftment without 'mega' doses of CD34(+) cells. Combination of stringent ex vivo TCD and pre-transplant ATG is effective GVHD prophylaxis.

Treatment of refractory and relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia

Refractory and relapsed disease occurs in most acute myelogenous leukemia patients. Salvage chemotherapy offers a 30-70% chance of a second complete remission. Unfortunately, this second remission is usually short lived and salvage chemotherapy is rarely curative. Allogeneic bone marrow transplant, either human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-sibling matched or matched unrelated donor, is the only treatment to offer long-term disease-free survival and possible cure. Many patients will be ineligible for allogeneic bone marrow transplant. A conjugated antiCD33 monoclonal antibody, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, has recently been approved for use in relapsed and refractory acute myelogenous leukemia patients. New and novel agents are also undergoing trials in an attempt to improve on the overall poor outcomes.

Age and cytogenetics as predictors of event free survival in patients with acute non-lymphocytic leukemia receiving high dose cytosine arabinoside and daunorubicin as consolidation chemotherapy

Between 1991 and 1999, 67 patients with acute non-lymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) in complete remission received high dose cytarabine (HiDAC) 3 gm/m2 q12h x 12 doses followed by daunorubicin 45 mg/m2/day x 3 days as consolidation therapy. Five year actuarial event free survival (EFS) was 34% +/- 6%. Age was significantly associated with EFS. EFS was 60% +/- 15% in patients age 20 to 29, 48% +/- 16% in patients age 30 to 39, 23% +/- 10% in patients age 40 to 49, 31% +/- 11% in patients age 50 to 59, and 0% in patients age > or = 60. Contrary to other reports which have used different HiDAC regimens, we found no relationship between cytogenetics and EFS. Cytogenetics were defined as favorable risk: t(8;21), inv (16), and del (16); neutral risk: normal or t(15;17); and unfavorable risk: any abnormality not included in favorable risk or neutral risk. EFS was 29% +/- 17% in patients with favorable cytogenetics, 37% +/- 14% in patients with neutral cytogenetics, and 31% +/- 12% in patients with unfavorable cytogenetics. These differences were not statistically significant. Because of the successful use of allogeneic transplantation at relapse in patients with matched related donors, five year actuarial survival (S) in this series was 40% +/- 6%. Five year actuarial survival was 57% +/- 9% for patients age < or = 44 and 25% +/- 8% for patients age > or = 45. This difference is statistically significant, p < .025. Clinicians should be cautious about making clinical decisions regarding consolidation therapy of ANLL on the basis of the presence or absence of cytogenetic abnormalities as the importance of cytogenetics may depend on the specific therapy which is employed.

Synthetic unmethylated cytosine-phosphate-guanosine oligodeoxynucleotides are potent stimulators of antileukemia responses in naive and bone marrow transplant recipients

Immunostimulatory cytosine-phophate-guanosine (CpG)--containing motifs in bacterial DNA are potent immune system activators. Depending on the bases flanking the CpG motif and on the DNA backbone, CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) can induce relatively more B-cell activation or relatively more natural killer (NK)--cell activation. To evaluate their antitumor activities, an NK-optimized ODN (1585) and 2 B-cell--optimized ODNs (1826 and 2006) were compared for their ability to protect naive mice against a lethal acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) challenge. CpG 2006, but not CpG 1585, administered 2 days before the AML challenge, allowed mice to survive more than 100 times a lethal tumor dose. Cell depletion studies showed that protection did not require T or B cells but depended on NK cells and also on an NK-independent mechanism. CpG 2006 protected against AML challenge in both syngeneic and allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients at both early and late time points after transplantation. Although CpG 1585 had no protective effect on its own, it showed a striking synergy with CpG 2006 to induce prolonged survival to AML challenge in allogeneic recipients of T-cell-depleted marrow grafts, exceeding the survival benefit of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). When combined with DLI, a synergistic effect was observed in recipients of CpG2006 or 2006 + 1585 with 88% of mice surviving long-term. These data are the first to indicate that the systemic administration of CpG ODNs is a potent means of inducing therapeutic anti-AML innate immune responses in naive and BMT recipients. (Blood. 2001;98:1217-1225)

Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia: Management with High-Dose Cytosine Arabinoside, Daunorubicin and Marrow Transplantation; Malignancy; Current Clinical Practice

Combination high-dose cytosine arabinoside (ARA-C) and daunorubicin (DNR) for primary remission induction of patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) was evaluated in a single institution study. Patients aged 55 or less with an HLA-sibling received an allogeneic bone marrow transplant (alloBMT) in first remission; other responders were offered autologous BMT (autoBMT). For remission induction 93 patients aged less than 60 received DNR 45 mg/m(2) BSA x 3 and ARA-C 2 gm/m(2) BSA every 12 hours for 12 doses; 53 aged 60 or older DNR 25 mg/m(2) daily x 3 and ARA-C 1.5-2.0 gm/m(2) BSA every 12 hours for 12 doses. Consolidation doses of DNR were the same but ARA-C 100 mg/m(2) BSA/day x 5 was given by continuous intravenous infusion. The complete remission rate for patients less than 60 years was 69.9% (95% CI: 59.5-79.0%) and 47.2% (95% CI: 33.3-61.4%) for the older patients. The median duration of first remission for the younger patients was 13.0 months and of overall survival 17.9 months; for patients over 60 years 5.6 and 10.0 months respectively. Disease-free survival and overall survival of the 19 patients receiving alloBMT and the 13 patients undergoing autoBMT aged less than 55 years and in first or second complete remission were significantly increased compared with 22 patients in remission but not having BMT (p < 0.001 and p < 0.013). The results support the effectiveness of high-dose ARA-C for remission induction, a need for intensive consolidation therapy and a role for BMT in the management of AML.

Radiobiological modelling of the treatment of leukaemia by total body irradiation

PURPOSE

Total body irradiation (TBI) has been used as part of the conditioning regimen before bone marrow transplantation or stem cell re-infusion for more than 30 years. A wide variety of regimens have been used, and no single one has emerged as the best. Experimental evidence suggests a diversity of radiosensitivities of leukaemia cells in culture, which may correlate with a significant variation of leukaemic cell radiosensitivities between patients. The purpose of this project was to compute leukaemic cell killing by different schedules and determine whether a "best treatment" could be devised for individual patients.

METHODS

We have developed a mathematical model for leukaemic cell killing by alternative TBI schedules, applied to a patient population with diverse leukaemic radiosensitivities. We considered 13 schedules in clinical use, and 14 theoretical schedules calculated (by the linear-quadratic model) to be iso-effective for risk of radiation pneumonitis. When each schedule of treatment is applied to the patient population, a distribution of leukaemic cell kills (log cell kill values) can be obtained for that schedule. The leukaemic kill distribution was also computed for optimized individual scheduling, each individual being treated by the schedule that was most effective for that patient. Using available data on the clinically observed dose response relationship for acute myeloid leukaemia, the model was extended to provide leukaemia cure probabilities for each of the schedules and for the individualized strategy.

RESULTS

The computer simulations show that each schedule, applied to the treatment of a radiobiologically diverse patient population, results in a broad distribution of leukaemic log kill values, with a mean of 3-5 for most schedules (i.e. 10(-3)-10(-5) surviving fraction of leukaemic cells), and a broad variation (1-10 log kill) amongst patients. The distributions generated by the various schedules were found to be overlapping, implying that many of the schedules would be difficult to distinguish reliably in clinical trials. Individualized optimum treatment is possible if radiobiological parameters are known for each patient and would improve the leukaemic log kill distribution by about 1 log on average, corresponding to an increase of leukaemia cure probability of several percent overall. For some individual patients, however, optimal scheduling could make a large difference to treatment outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of many different clinical treatment schedules may be continuing because outcomes are similar when these diverse schedules are applied to unselected patient populations. The measurement of individual leukaemic cell radiosensitivity would allow individualized scheduling, which could result in modest increases in overall curability, but substantial improvements in survival or duration of remission for individual patients.