Intensive preoperative chemotherapy with colony-stimulating factor for resectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction

Management of gastroesophageal tumors

The incidence of adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction has increased in recent years. These tumors possess distinct pathophysiologic characteristics. Although the consensus is that an R0 resection (complete microscopic and macroscopic resection) is the goal when operating for curative intent, much controversy remains regarding other aspects of patient management. There is lack of consensus regarding the type of surgery to perform, the role and extent of lymphadenectomy, and the role of neoadjuvant therapy. Utilizing an evidence-based approach, this review article provides an overview of the management of gastroesophageal junction carcinomas with particular emphasis on current areas of controversy.

Alterations in p53 predict response to preoperative high dose chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer

AIMS

To evaluate the usefulness of molecular markers in predicting histopathological and clinical response to preoperative high dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

In a phase II trial, 25 patients with metastatic gastric cancer received preoperative tandem HDCT consisting of etoposide, cisplatin, and mitomycin, followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation to achieve surgical resectability. Samples before and after treatment, from normal and tumour tissue, were characterised histopathologically, and both p53 and BAX expression was analysed by immunohistochemistry. Pretreatment formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded samples from normal and tumour tissue were microdissected, and the extracted DNA was preamplified using improved primer extension preamplification polymerase chain reaction. Detection of microsatellite instability (MSI) or loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was performed using markers for p53, BAX, BAT25, BAT26, D2S123, D17S250, and APC. Exons 5-9 of the p53 gene were sequenced directly on ABI 373.

RESULTS

Four parameters were significantly associated with response to chemotherapy and prolonged overall survival: positive p53 immunostaining, positive p53 mutation status before chemotherapy, strong histological regression induced by preoperative HDCT, and surgical treatment. Patients's sex or age, tumour location or stage, lymph node status, Lauren classification, MSI, or LOH did not influence duration of survival significantly in this high risk population.

CONCLUSION

Positive p53 immunostaining and p53 mutation status in pretreatment tumour biopsies might be useful molecular predictors of response and prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated by preoperative HDCT.

Current status of neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus

Prospective studies dealing with preoperative therapy in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus alone are rare. The interpretation of the preferential phase II trials and a few phase III trials is complicated, as most studies include adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (i.e., Barrett's carcinoma), adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (including cardia carcinoma and subcardia carcinoma), or squamous cell carcinoma. Preoperative chemotherapy, generally well tolerated, cannot decrease the incidence of local failure beyond the level achieved with surgery alone, but it might delay systemic relapse. Preoperative radiotherapy can enhance local control, but it fails to improve overall survival. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation was demonstrated in only one randomized trail to have a survival benefit, but survival in the surgery-alone group was unusually low. Generally, survival was ameliorated in patients responding to neoadjuvant treatment. However, preoperative chemoradiation was often accompanied by a remarkable increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality. Nonresponding patients have, in this respect, a worse prognosis than responders after resection. The prediction of responding patients to neoadjuvant therapy as well as the early identification of patients who will not respond is of utmost clinical importance. Today, there is no absolute evidence that neoadjuvant treatment for patients with potentially resectable Barrett's cancer prolongs survival. In patients with locally advanced, presumably not completely resectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, preoperative treatment appears to increase the chance for a curative resection and enhance survival in responding patients. Neoadjuvant treatment of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, as a consequence, is currently not the standard treatment and should be performed only within controlled clinical trials.

Combined results from three phase II trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus

Adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus is a systemic disease at presentation in the majority of patients. This article analyses the impact of preoperative chemotherapy on a cohort of 68 patients. From 1990 to 1996, 68 patients with potentially operable adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus were entered into three sequential Phase II trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin/mitomycin C/ifosfamide, cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C/cisplatin/5-FU. Twenty-four (35%) patients had a radiological (4 complete; 20 partial) response to chemotherapy, and 52 (76%) went on to have the primary tumour resected. There was only one pathological complete responder. The overall median survival was 13 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 9-16). Survival for the 28 N(0) patients was 34 months (95% CI 14-60). The pattern of failure for resected patients was predominantly systemic (16/17). These results indicate that neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus achieves excellent local control. The dominance, however, of distant recurrence after surgery underlines the fact that, in the majority of patients, the only hope of improving results in the future is to develop better systemic therapies.

Perioperative radiotherapy for cancer of the esophagus

Carcinomas of the esophagus represent on average about 1% to 2% of all malignant tumors. The incidence shows extreme regional differences, reflecting the established environmental and acquired risk factors for cancer of the esophagus. There has been a major shift in tumor location and histology over the last decades, with the lower third/gastroesophageal junction becoming the most common location and adenocarcinoma the most common histology in white males. There has been a striking improvement in surgical resection rates and operative mortality; however, the curative potential of surgery is likely to be highest in early-stage disease. The poor prognosis for locally advanced tumors motivated the search for multimodal approaches to improve results. While neither perioperative radiotherapy nor perioperative chemotherapy alone have significantly improved survival rates, combined radiochemotherapy, used as neoadjuvant or definitive therapy, appears more promising. For patients with advanced tumors or extensive nodal involvement, first principles and extrapolation from other tumors of the gastrointestinal tract suggest that a combination of chemotherapy and radiation is likely to be of benefit, as compared to surgery alone. As this treatment is difficult to tolerate in the postoperative setting, neoadjuvant approaches have been emphasized. Although there are promising data, and preoperative chemoradiation is widely utilized, we do not consider the benefit of this approach to have been proven unequivocally. Future progress in the treatment of esophageal cancer may require that systemic therapy be improved to the point where occult metastatic disease can be controlled, enabling the local control provided by surgery and radiation to lead to improved survival.

Phase II clinical trial of 13-cis-retinoic acid and interferon-alpha-2a in patients with advanced esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Interferon in combination with 5-fluorouracil has been shown to be active in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) of the esophagus. 13-cis-retinoic acid (CRA) has chemopreventive activity in SCC of the head and neck, and, in combination with interferon, has antitumor activity in SCC of the skin and cervix.

METHODS

The activity and toxicity of CRA and interferon-alpha-2a (IFN) in patients with advanced esophageal carcinoma was evaluated in a Phase II single institution trial. Patients had unresectable or metastatic AC or SCC of the esophagus. One prior chemotherapy regimen was allowed. IFN was given by daily subcutaneous injection at a dose of 3 million U and CRA was taken orally at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day in 2 divided doses. Treatment was given in cycles of 4 weeks and continued until documented disease progression.

RESULTS

Of the 19 patients entered, 15 were evaluable for response and toxicity. One patient was evaluable for response only and one patient was evaluable for toxicity only. Evaluable patients were predominantly male (15 patients), and had AC (13 patients). All had AJCC Stage IV disease and 12 were pretreated. Patients completed an average of two cycles of therapy (range, one to six cycles) prior to progression of disease. National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3/4 toxicity was notable for nausea (25%) and fatigue (31%). No major objective responses were recorded. Eleven patients with AC and 3 patients with SCC had rapid progression of disease. One patient with AC was found to have a minor response for 22 weeks and 1 patient with AC had stable disease for 45 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen had no significant activity in patients with advanced AC of the esophagus. Further evaluation of IFN plus CRA, using this dose and schedule, is not recommended. In comparison with prior trials of this therapy, a surprising amount of severe nausea and fatigue was observed in this trial.

High dose chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: results of a phase II study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

To assess the toxicity, local response, and survival associated with multimodality therapy in a cooperative group setting, patients with biopsy-proven clinical Stage I or II adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (staged according to 1983 American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria) or gastroesophageal junction were treated with concomitant radiation and chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy.

METHODS

Radiotherapy was administered in daily 2-gray (Gy) fractions 5 days a week until a total of 60 Gy was reached. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was infused continuously at a dose of 1000 mg/m2/day for 96 hours on Days 2-5 and 28-31. On Day 2, a 10 mg/m2 bolus of mitomycin was injected intravenously. Esophagectomy was performed 4-8 weeks following completion of the radiotherapy.

RESULTS

During the 18-month study period (August 1991 through January 1993), 46 eligible patients were accrued from 21 institutions. Eight patients were Stage I and 38 Stage II. Eighty-seven percent of patients (40 of 46) received 6000 centigray (cGy), and all received >5000 cGy. Seventy-eight percent of patients (36 of 46) received >90% of the planned 5-FU dose. Follow-up ranged from 11 to 36 months (median, 22 months). There were eight treatment-related deaths; two were preoperative (from adult respiratory distress syndrome) and six were postoperative. Complete or partial response prior to esophagectomy was observed in 63% of cases, stable disease in 15%, and progression in 20%. Thirty-three patients underwent esophagectomy (transhiatal, n=14; Ivor Lewis, n=16; other, n=3). No tumor was found in the specimens resected from 8 of these 33 patients; this represented a pathologic complete response rate of 17% overall and 24% for those who underwent esophagectomy. Overall median survival was 16.6 months, 1-year survival 57%, and 2-year survival 27%. Survival was significantly worse for patients with circumferential cancers (median, 18.1 months vs. 8.3 months; P <0.05).

CONCLUSION

High dose radiation therapy with concurrent 5-FU and mitomycin may be administered to patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma with acceptable morbidity. However, in a cooperative group setting, esophagogastrectomy following intensive chemoradiotherapy is associated with excessive morbidity and mortality. Circumferential tumor growth is a significant adverse prognostic factor.

Intensive weekly chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer using 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, epidoxorubicin, 6S-leucovorin, glutathione and filgrastim: a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD)

Local extension prevents curative resection in more than two-thirds of gastric cancer patients. Unfortunately, resectability is one of the main prognostic factors in these patients, and survival is longer when tumours are completely removed. Preoperative chemotherapy is an attractive concept for obtaining curative resection. Thirty-two locally advanced unresectable gastric cancer patients were enrolled in five Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD) centres. For 16 patients, surgical unresectability was based on computerized tomography scan evaluation of tumour size (four patients) and invasion of adjacent structures (12 patients), whereas in another 16 patients locally advanced disease was confirmed by laparotomy. They received weekly administration of cisplatin 40 mg m(-2), 5-fluorouracil 500 mg m(-2), epidoxorubicin 35 mg m(-2), 6S-stereoisomer of leucovorin 250 mg m(-2) and glutathione 1.5 g m(-2). From the day after to the day before each chemotherapy administration, filgrastim was administered by subcutaneous injection at a dose of 5 microg kg(-1). One cycle of therapy consisted of eight weekly treatments. Fifteen of 32 patients (47%) responded to chemotherapy, whereas 13 (41 %) had stable disease and four (12%) progressed on therapy. Of the 15 responding patients, 13 were completely resected after chemotherapy and two of them had a complete pathological response. Two clinically responding patients were found unresectable at operation because of peritoneal seeding. At a median follow-up from the start of treatment of 24 months (range 11-39 months), 10 of 13 resected patients are alive and eight are relapse free. Three patients died after 11, 12, and 14 months respectively. Toxicity was acceptable: side-effects consisted mainly of grade II National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria (NCICTC) leucopenia and thrombocytopenia in ten patients. Neither treatment-related death nor surgical complications in patients undergoing surgery were observed. This weekly intensive regimen enabled resection in half of previously inoperable tumours with a moderate toxicity. It can be offered to patients with locally advanced unresectable gastric cancer to obtain curative resection.

Induction chemotherapy, surgery, and concomitant chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of the esophagus: a long-term analysis

PURPOSE

To define the activity and toxicity of preoperative chemotherapy and postoperative concomitant chemoradiotherapy in patients with carcinoma of the esophagus, and to determine the effect on survival in patients treated with this approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were treated with two 21-day cycles of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 800 mg/m2/day continuous infusion on days 1-5, and leucovorin 100 mg/m2 every four hours on days 1-5. Surgical resection was performed if feasible (and could also be performed prior to chemotherapy). Patients then received radiotherapy (50 to 60 Gy) every other week x five to six weeks, concomitantly with 5-FU 800 mg/m2 continuous infusion daily and hydroxyurea 1 g twice daily x five days.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were treated. With a minimum follow-up of 58 months, the median survival for the entire group was 16 months; the median survivals for patients with squamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma were 29 months and 12 months, respectively. Toxicities of induction chemotherapy were severe neutropenia and mucositis; there was one toxic death. Toxicities of concomitant chemoradiotherapy were neutropenia, mucositis and esophagitis. There were five cases of radiation pneumonitis, one fatal.

CONCLUSION

Induction chemotherapy and postoperative concomitant chemoradiotherapy can be added to surgical resection for carcinoma of the esophagus. Combined modality therapy, as reported here, produces long-term survival benefit, particularly in patients with squamous carcinoma. However, similar outcome results have been reported with less toxic and shorter treatment regimens as tested in randomized studies.

FEP regimen (epidoxorubicin, etoposide and cisplatin) in advanced gastric cancer, with or without low-dose GM-CSF: an Italian Trial in Medical Oncology (ITMO) study

The new regimens developed over the last few years have led to an improvement in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, and our previous experience confirmed the fact that the combination of etoposide, doxorubicin and cisplatin (EAP regimen) is an active treatment that leads to interesting complete remission rates. The primary end point of the present multicentre, randomized, parallel-group phase II study was to determine the activity of the simplified 2-day EAP schedule in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, and to verify whether the addition of low doses of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) made it possible to increase dose intensity. Of the 62 enrolled patients, 30 were randomized to receive epirubicin 35 mg m(-2), etoposide 120 mg m(-2) and cisplatin 45 mg m(-2) (FEP) on days 1 and 2 every 28 days and 32 to receive the same schedule plus subcutaneous GM-CSF (molgramostin) 150 microg day(-1) on days 5-14 every 21 days. The patients were stratified by age and the number of disease sites. The characteristics of the patients were well balanced between the two groups. The objective response rate of the patients as a whole was 34% (21 out of 62; 95% confidence interval 22-46), with only one complete remission. The median response duration was 4.5 months (range 1-24 months). The median time to treatment failure was 5 months (range 1-14 months), without any difference between the two groups. The median survival of the patients as a whole was 9 months. Full doses were administered in 92% and 94% of the cycles in the control and GM-CSF arms respectively. The average dose intensity calculated for all drugs was 0.96% in the control and 1.27% in the GM-CSF group. CTC-NCI grade 3-4 neutropenia was reported in 39% vs 45% of patients, thrombocytopenia in 11% vs 35% (P = 0.020) and anaemia in 7% vs 35% (P = 0.014). The FEP combination is as active (OR: 34%) in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer as the EAP regimen, although it leads to fewer complete remissions. The patients randomized to receive low-dose GM-CSF achieved a significantly higher dose intensity than controls (P = 0.0001).

Biology of esophageal cancer and the role of combined modality therapy

1. The biology of esophageal cancer involves multifactorial environmental and genetic events. 2. The understanding of the clinical significance of molecular markers is rapidly evolving. 3. Combined-modality approaches should still include surgery in good performance status (ECOG scale < or = 2) patients. 4. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is probably better than surgical resection alone for patients with potentially curable disease, but only validation of this approach by CALGB-9781 can justify this as a new "proven" standard-of-care in the United States. 5. A pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant therapy is the strongest predictor of long-term survival. 6. 5-FU, by either short course or protracted continuous infusion, comprises the backbone of combination chemotherapy in combined-modality design. 7. Radiation therapy should be given at standard 1.8 to 2 Gy/fraction without a scheduled break. 8. Only by enrolling sufficient numbers of patients in prospective clinical trials will clinicians be able to further define the optimal sequencing and actual necessity of each individual component of combined-modality therapy.

A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled studies suggest that a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy improves the survival of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. We conducted a prospective, randomized trial comparing surgery alone with combined chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery.

METHODS

Patients assigned to multimodal therapy received two courses of chemotherapy in weeks 1 and 6 (fluorouracil, 15 mg per kilogram of body weight daily for five days, and cisplatin, 75 mg per square meter of body-surface area on day 7) and a course of radiotherapy (40 Gy, administered in 15 fractions over a three-week period, beginning concurrently with the first course of chemotherapy), followed by surgery. The patients assigned to surgery had no preoperative therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 58 patients assigned to multimodal therapy and the 55 assigned to surgery, 10 and 1, respectively, were withdrawn for protocol violations. At the time of surgery, 23 of 55 patients (42 percent) treated with preoperative multimodal therapy who could be evaluated had positive nodes or metastases, as compared with 45 of the 55 patients (82 percent) who underwent surgery alone (P<0.001). Thirteen of the 52 patients (25 percent) who underwent surgery after multimodal therapy had complete responses as determined pathologically. The median survival of patients assigned to multimodal therapy was 16 months, as compared with 11 months for those assigned to surgery alone (P=0.01). At one, two, and three years, 52, 37, and 32 percent, respectively, of patients assigned to multimodal therapy were alive, as compared with 44, 26, and 6 percent of those assigned to surgery, with the survival advantage favoring multimodal therapy reaching significance at three years (P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodal treatment is superior to surgery alone for patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

Neoadjuvant treatment in oesophageal cancer: the needs for future trials. The Rotterdam Esophageal Tumor Study Group

In view of the poor survival after surgery alone for oesophageal cancer, combination with chemotherapy seems rational. A concept of upfront chemotherapy is discussed and seems especially useful for these tumours. The published randomized trials, studying the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy do, however, not (yet) show an improved overall survival, apart from one study with a significant median survival benefit at an interim evaluation. The responding patients have in all trials a far better survival than the non-responders. The numbers of patients are small and results of other ongoing and future trials should be awaited. New trials testing high-dose chemotherapy with bone marrow support should be initiated.

The role of radiation therapy in treating patients with potentially resectable carcinoma of the esophagus

Radiotherapy (RT) in conjunction with surgery may have a number of roles in the treatment of patients with potentially resectable esophageal carcinoma. The use of RT alone either preoperatively or postoperatively can be expected to improve resectability rates only modestly. The risk of locoregional failure, a common problem in esophageal carcinoma, has been substantially reduced with preoperative or postoperative RT in trials with a duration of follow-up of 3 or more years, although this effect has not been seen in trials with shorter follow-up. Because of the high risk of distant failure associated with these tumors and perhaps because of the inadequate doses used, most trials of RT have not shown notable improvements in overall survival rates. The risk of severe complications following preoperative or postoperative RT is small, provided that very high doses or fraction sizes are avoided. Concurrent chemotherapy and RT administration have been shown to be superior to RT alone in patients who have medically or surgically inoperable conditions; randomized trials using this combined modality in patients with resectable disease have only recently begun. In addition to evaluating the efficacy of this approach, investigators hope to establish the optimal sequencing and timing of administration of these modalities with regard to each other and to surgery.

Intensive multimodality therapy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction

BACKGROUND

We designed a trial of intensive multimodality therapy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction to assess tumor response and operability after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to determine the impact of trimodality therapy on longterm survival.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with resectable (clinical stage IIa, n = 17; IIb, n = 1; III, n = 14) squamous cell cancer (n = 15) or adenocarcinoma (n = 17) were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, leukovorin), resection, and postoperative chemoradiotherapy (hydroxyurea, 5-fluorouracil; 50-66 Gy).

RESULTS

Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy yielded the following results: a measurable clinical response in 22 patients, stable disease in eight patients, disease progression in one patient, and death in one patient. Thirty-one patients underwent resection, with the following results: two operative deaths (6.5%) and nonfatal morbidity in 17 (59%); the median hospital stay was 13 days. Pathologic staging was stage 0, n = 1; I, n = 2; IIa, n = 11; IIb, n = 5; III, n = 7; and IV, n = 5. Postoperative chemoradiotherapy was completed in 23 patients with one death, for an overall treatment-related mortality rate of 12.5% (four of 32). At a mean follow-up of 22.5 months, median survival is 19.7 months and 14 patients are alive and disease free.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant therapy for cancer of the esophagus and cardia results in good tumor response. Esophagectomy in this setting can be accomplished with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Results of an interim analysis of survival are encouraging and suggest that further investigation of this regimen is warranted.

Feasibility of five courses of pre-operative chemotherapy in patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or gastrooesophageal junction

The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of administering all chemotherapy pre-operatively to patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or gastrooesophageal junction. 32 patients with potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or gastrooesophageal junction were studied in a stepwise fashion in which combination chemotherapy with cisplatin, high-dose arabinoside and 5-fluorouracil was administered. In the first part, 15 patients were to receive three chemotherapy courses pre-operatively and two chemotherapy courses postoperatively. In the second part, the next 15 patients were to receive all five chemotherapy courses pre-operatively, provided there was an objective response after three courses. Endoscopic ultrasonography was also performed, when feasible, prior to chemotherapy and surgery, and in some patients sequentially between chemotherapy courses. All of the 14 assessable patients in the first group tolerated all three courses of pre-operative chemotherapy, and 86% of patients in this group completed all protocol chemotherapy. In the second group, 9 of 18 (50%) assessable patients tolerated all five courses of preoperative chemotherapy, and 100% of patients in this group received all protocol chemotherapy. The median number of chemotherapy courses for the entire group (32 patients) was five (range one to five). Forty-one per cent (13/32) of patients had a major response to chemotherapy. Sixty-nine per cent (or 76% of 29 patients taken to surgery) had a curative resection. One patient had a pathological complete response. The median survival time of 32 patients was 17 months (range 2-36+ months). 14 patients (37%) remain alive at a median follow-up time of 26+ months. There was a correlation between endoscopic ultrasonographic tumour and nodal stage and pathological tumour and nodal stages in 16 patients. The tumour stage correlation was higher (75%) than the nodal stage correlation (62%). Our data suggest that it is feasible to administer five courses of cisplatin-based chemotherapy to patients with potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or gastrooesophageal junction. More effective chemotherapy regimens that might result in higher pathological complete response rates and acceptable toxic effects are needed.

Etoposide, doxorubicin and cisplatin (EAP) treatment in advanced gastric carcinoma: a multicentre study of the Italian Trials in Medical Oncology (I.T.M.O.) Group

Various reports have documented the efficacy of the combination of etoposide, doxorubicin and cisplatin (EAP) in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, although other studies have not confirmed such results. This multicentre phase II study was designed to try to define the efficacy and tolerability of the original EAP regimen. From January 1990 to May 1992, 96 patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer were treated every 3 weeks with etoposide (120 mg/m2) on days 4, 5 and 6, doxorubicin (20 mg/m2) on days 1 and 7, and cisplatin (40 mg/m2) on days 2 and 8. All of the patients had measurable lesions, and were to receive a maximum of six cycles. A total of 416 courses was given (median four/patient), 27% with a delay of > or = 2 weeks. Objective responses were achieved in 34 of the 91 evaluable patients (37%: confidence interval 27-47%), with complete response (CR) in 11 (12%) and partial response (PR) in 23 (25%). The median duration of response was 6 months (range 1-19), and the median survival of the 96 eligible patients was 9 months. Side-effects (WHO grade 3-4) were leucopenia (30%), thrombocytopenia (9%) and mucositis (10%). We conclude that the EAP regimen is active in inducing major objective responses (12% of CR), and that treatment is feasible in patients with good performance status.