Recombinant human erythropoietin treatment in cisplatin-associated anemia: a randomized, double-blind trial with placebo

Cisplatin Nephrotoxicity: Novel Insights Into Mechanisms and Preventative Strategies

Cisplatin is a highly effective chemotherapeutic agent that has been used for more than 50 years for a variety of cancers; however, its use is limited by toxicity, including nephrotoxicity. In this in-depth review, we discuss the incidence of cisplatin-associated acute kidney injury, as well as common risk factors for its development. Cisplatin accumulates in the kidney tubules and causes AKI through various mechanisms, including DNA damage, oxidative stress, and apoptosis. We also discuss the spectrum of nephrotoxicity, including acute and chronic impairment of kidney function, electrolyte disturbances, and thrombotic microangiopathy. We discuss the limited options for the diagnosis, prevention, and management of these complications, along with factors that may impact future therapy with or without cisplatin. We conclude with directions for future research in this expanding and important area.

Intravenous iron versus oral iron versus no iron with or without erythropoiesis- stimulating agents (ESA) for cancer patients with anaemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anaemia is common among cancer patients and they may require red blood cell transfusions. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and iron might help in reducing the need for red blood cell transfusions. However, it remains unclear whether the combination of both drugs is preferable compared to using one drug.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the effect of intravenous iron, oral iron or no iron in combination with or without ESAs to prevent or alleviate anaemia in cancer patients and to generate treatment rankings using network meta-analyses (NMAs).

SEARCH METHODS

We identified studies by searching bibliographic databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase; until June 2021). We also searched various registries, conference proceedings and reference lists of identified trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials comparing intravenous, oral or no iron, with or without ESAs for the prevention or alleviation of anaemia resulting from chemotherapy, radiotherapy, combination therapy or the underlying malignancy in cancer patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Outcomes were on-study mortality, number of patients receiving red blood cell transfusions, number of red blood cell units, haematological response, overall mortality and adverse events. We conducted NMAs and generated treatment rankings. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

Ninety-six trials (25,157 participants) fulfilled our inclusion criteria; 62 trials (24,603 participants) could be considered in the NMA (12 different treatment options). Here we present the comparisons of ESA with or without iron and iron alone versus no treatment. Further results and subgroup analyses are described in the full text. On-study mortality We estimated that 92 of 1000 participants without treatment for anaemia died up to 30 days after the active study period. Evidence from NMA (55 trials; 15,074 participants) suggests that treatment with ESA and intravenous iron (12 of 1000; risk ratio (RR) 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 2.29; low certainty) or oral iron (34 of 1000; RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.01 to 27.38; low certainty) may decrease or increase and ESA alone (103 of 1000; RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.35; moderate certainty) probably slightly increases on-study mortality. Additionally, treatment with intravenous iron alone (271 of 1000; RR 2.95, 95% CI 0.71 to 12.34; low certainty) may increase and oral iron alone (24 of 1000; RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.00 to 19.73; low certainty) may increase or decrease on-study mortality. Haematological response We estimated that 90 of 1000 participants without treatment for anaemia had a haematological response. Evidence from NMA (31 trials; 6985 participants) suggests that treatment with ESA and intravenous iron (604 of 1000; RR 6.71, 95% CI 4.93 to 9.14; moderate certainty), ESA and oral iron (527 of 1000; RR 5.85, 95% CI 4.06 to 8.42; moderate certainty), and ESA alone (467 of 1000; RR 5.19, 95% CI 4.02 to 6.71; moderate certainty) probably increases haematological response. Additionally, treatment with oral iron alone may increase haematological response (153 of 1000; RR 1.70, 95% CI 0.69 to 4.20; low certainty). Red blood cell transfusions We estimated that 360 of 1000 participants without treatment for anaemia needed at least one transfusion. Evidence from NMA (69 trials; 18,684 participants) suggests that treatment with ESA and intravenous iron (158 of 1000; RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.63; moderate certainty), ESA and oral iron (144 of 1000; RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.66; moderate certainty) and ESA alone (212 of 1000; RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.69; moderate certainty) probably decreases the need for transfusions. Additionally, treatment with intravenous iron alone (268 of 1000; RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.28; low certainty) and with oral iron alone (333 of 1000; RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.57; low certainty) may decrease or increase the need for transfusions. Overall mortality We estimated that 347 of 1000 participants without treatment for anaemia died overall. Low-certainty evidence from NMA (71 trials; 21,576 participants) suggests that treatment with ESA and intravenous iron (507 of 1000; RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.87 to 2.43) or oral iron (482 of 1000; RR 1.39, 95% CI 0.60 to 3.22) and intravenous iron alone (521 of 1000; RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.63 to 3.56) or oral iron alone (534 of 1000; RR 1.54, 95% CI 0.66 to 3.56) may decrease or increase overall mortality. Treatment with ESA alone may lead to little or no difference in overall mortality (357 of 1000; RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.10; low certainty). Thromboembolic events We estimated that 36 of 1000 participants without treatment for anaemia developed thromboembolic events. Evidence from NMA (50 trials; 15,408 participants) suggests that treatment with ESA and intravenous iron (66 of 1000; RR 1.82, 95% CI 0.98 to 3.41; moderate certainty) probably slightly increases and with ESA alone (66 of 1000; RR 1.82, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.47; high certainty) slightly increases the number of thromboembolic events. None of the trials reported results on the other comparisons. Thrombocytopenia or haemorrhage We estimated that 76 of 1000 participants without treatment for anaemia developed thrombocytopenia/haemorrhage. Evidence from NMA (13 trials, 2744 participants) suggests that treatment with ESA alone probably leads to little or no difference in thrombocytopenia/haemorrhage (76 of 1000; RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.48; moderate certainty). None of the trials reported results on other comparisons. Hypertension We estimated that 10 of 1000 participants without treatment for anaemia developed hypertension. Evidence from NMA (24 trials; 8383 participants) suggests that treatment with ESA alone probably increases the number of hypertensions (29 of 1000; RR 2.93, 95% CI 1.19 to 7.25; moderate certainty). None of the trials reported results on the other comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

When considering ESAs with iron as prevention for anaemia, one has to balance between efficacy and safety. Results suggest that treatment with ESA and iron probably decreases number of blood transfusions, but may increase mortality and the number of thromboembolic events. For most outcomes the different comparisons within the network were not fully connected, so ranking of all treatments together was not possible. More head-to-head comparisons including all evaluated treatment combinations are needed to fill the gaps and prove results of this review.

Clinical Indications of Recombinant Human Erythropoietin in a Single Center: A 10-Year Retrospective Study

In the 1980s, recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) began to be used in clinical practice. In this study, the clinical application of rhEPO from single-center in recent ten years was reviewed, and the scope of indications and clinical efficacy were evaluated. The medical records of 35829 in-patients who were treated with rhEPO in the first Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital from 2009 to 2018 were collected. According to the scope of indications approved by CFDA (China Food and Drug Administration), curative effect and off-label of rhEPO were analyzed. Of the 35829 patients, 19013 (53.1%) were male and 16816 (46.9%) were female, with an average age of (52.1 ± 18.6) years. The usage of rhEPO is increasing year by year. The overall effective rate was 53.1%. The number of patients who met the indications accounted for 67.2%, and the effective rate patients with indications and Off-label were 48.8% and 50.7%. Among the patients with irregular use of rhEPO perioperative imperfect laboratory examination patients accounted for the highest proportion (7.1%). The volume of RBC(s) (red blood cell(s)) transfusion in patients with rhEPO was significantly less than that in patients without rhEPO (p<0.05). The use of rhEPO Off-label is very common and has a certain curative effect. It can be used as evidence support for the update of the scope of indications. In addition, There are still irregular use of rhEPO and transfusion in clinic. The unreasonable use of rhEPO and transfusion should be further standardized to ensure the safety and effectiveness.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Different Erythropoietin Usage Strategies

Aim

There is no comprehensive study that compares the different usage strategies of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) in platinum-induced anemia. In order to clarify this issue, we conducted a prospective clinical study.

Material and methods

Seventy-seven patients were studied in three main groups. Group 1 (n = 17) consisted of cancer patients without anemia. These patients received rHuEPO starting from the first chemotherapy cycle. Group 2 (n = 26) consisted of patients whose hemoglobin (Hb) values decreased by at least 1 g/dL after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Group 3 (n = 34) consisted of patients whose Hb values dropped below 10.5 g/dL after the second chemotherapy cycle. Groups 2 and 3 were each divided into two subgroups. In groups 1, 2A and 3A rHuEPO (5000 U/day subcutaneously three times a week) treatment was continued until three weeks after the completion of chemotherapy. In groups 2B and 3B, rHuEPO was given for 12 weeks only.

Results

There were no prominent differences between the Hb values of these groups throughout the chemotherapy cycles. Transfusion rates and the number of patients who became anemic were also not different between groups.

Conclusion

No rHuEPO usage strategies are superior to others in terms of Hb levels and transfusion requirements. The decision as to when rHuEPO is to be added to platinum-containing therapy should be tailored to the health conditions of individual patients.

The Impact of Biosimilars in Supportive Care in Cancer

Collapse

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (epoetin and darbepoetin) for treating cancer treatment-induced anaemia (including review of technology appraisal no. 142): a systematic review and economic model

BACKGROUND

Anaemia is a common side effect of cancer treatments and can lead to a reduction in quality of life. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are licensed for use in conjunction with red blood cell transfusions to improve cancer treatment-induced anaemia (CIA).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ESAs in anaemia associated with cancer treatment (specifically chemotherapy).

DATA SOURCES

The following databases were searched from 2004 to 2013: The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, British Nursing Index, Health Management Information Consortium, Current Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov. The US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency websites were also searched. Bibliographies of included papers were scrutinised for further potentially includable studies.

REVIEW METHODS

The clinical effectiveness review followed principles published by the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), or systematic reviews of RCTs, of ESAs (epoetin or darbepoetin) for treating people with CIA were eligible for inclusion in the review. Comparators were best supportive care, placebo or other ESAs. Anaemia- and malignancy-related outcomes, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. When appropriate, data were pooled using meta-analysis. An empirical health economic model was developed comparing ESA treatment with no ESA treatment. The model comprised two components: one evaluating short-term costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (while patients are anaemic) and one evaluating long-term QALYs. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5% per annum. Probabilistic and univariate deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of 1457 titles and abstracts screened, 23 studies assessing ESAs within their licensed indication (based on start dose administered) were included in the review. None of the RCTs were completely aligned with current European Union licenses. The results suggest a clinical benefit from ESAs for anaemia-related outcomes and an improvement in HRQoL scores. The impact of ESAs on AEs and survival remains highly uncertain, although point estimates are lower, confidence intervals are wide and not statistically significant. Base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for ESA treatment compared with no ESA treatment ranged from £ 19,429 to £ 35,018 per QALY gained, but sensitivity and scenario analyses demonstrate considerable uncertainty in these ICERs, including the possibility of overall health disbenefit. All ICERs were sensitive to survival and cost.

LIMITATIONS

The relative effectiveness of ESAs was not addressed; all ESAs were assumed to have equivalent efficacy. No studies were completely aligned with their European labelling beyond the starting dose evaluated. There is questionable generalisability given that the included trials were published >20 years ago and there have been many changes to chemotherapy as well as to the quality of supportive treatment. Trial quality was moderate or poor and there was considerable unexplained heterogeneity for a number of outcomes, particularly survival, and evidence of publication bias. Adjustments were not made to account for multiple testing.

CONCLUSIONS

ESAs could be cost-effective when used closer to licence, but there is considerable uncertainty, mainly because of unknown impacts on overall survival.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013005812.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Factors and Predictors of Response with Epoetin Alfa for Chemotherapy-Related Anemia

Objective:

To describe the value of specific factors and predictors that influence the use of epoetin alfa for anemia in adults with cancer receiving chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy.

Data Sources:

Data search restricted to English-language literature on epoetin alfa identified by MEDLINE searches (1990-July 2000) and other pertinent literature was conducted.

Data Synthesis:

Anemia of chronic disease (ACD) is a common finding among cancer patients. Patients receiving repeated or multiple chemotherapy regimens alone or with radiation therapy may worsen ACD. Blood transfusion is the cornerstone of treatment. Risks associated with allogeneic blood transfusion are clearly established. This includes alteration of the immune system, acute allergic reactions, viral and bacterial infections, tumor reappearance, and reduced quality of life (QOL). As the demand for blood increased and periodic supply shortages occurred, healthcare centers began seeking alternatives to blood transfusion. Recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin alfa) is a prophylactic or treatment option that can reduce the need for blood transfusion with an improved QOL. Albeit clinically beneficial, epoetin alfa is expensive. Using predictors during early use with epoetin alfa, clinicians can identify patients most likely and least likely to benefit from further therapy, thus preventing costly outcomes. The change in hemoglobin (>0.5–1.0 g/dL) combined with either endogenous erythropoietin concentration (<100 mU/mL) or absolute reticulocyte count increase (>40,000 cells/uL) two to four weeks after starting therapy provided the most powerful prediction of response to epoetin alfa.

Conclusions:

Key factors and predictors with epoetin alfa can optimize therapy outcomes in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Response and prediction of response to recombinant human erythropoietin in patients with solid tumors and platinum-associated anemia

Objective. Anemia is commonly observed in tumor patients and may be worsened by the concomitant administration of chemotherapy with platinum. Recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) is able to improve the chemotherapy-associated anemia and the quality of life in patients with solid tumors. The most effective dose, route, and frequency of administration of rhEPO in anemic cancer patients has not yet been determined.

The purpose of this review is to describe the results obtained up to now concerning the response and prediction of response to rhEPO in anemic patients with solid tumors undergoing platinum-based chemotherapy. In particular, the renal function conditions in this patient group were examined.

Data sources. The literature was reviewed through a MEDLINE search covering 1987 to 1997. Relevant articles were additionally obtained by the systematic examination of article references. We searched the following terms: rhEPO, tumor, anemia, cisplatin, carboplatin, and renal failure.

Study Selection. The current literature was reviewed with regard to both the pathophysiology of platinum-induced anemia and the clinical use, indications, and dosage of rhEPO in anemic tumor patients undergoing platinum therapy. Particular attention was directed to the prediction criteria of this drug.

Conclusions. The rhEPO response rates in patients with solid tumors and platinum-associated anemia vary widely in the current literature and range from 36% to 82%. Unfortunately, no strong predictor of response can be recommended at the present time. Clinical studies support findings concerning a reduction in renal function parameters and a blunted erythropoietin response in patients with platinum-induced anemia. It is possible that a baseline serum erythropoietin concentration in conjunction with the serum creatinine concentration or the creatinine clearance value can serve as a prognostic indicator for rhEPO therapy response in this patient group.

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in the management of cancer patients with anemia: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are widely used in the management of anemia in cancer patients. Despite their apparent effectiveness, recent studies have suggested that ESAs could result in serious adverse events and even higher mortality. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the benefits and risks of ESAs in the management of cancer patients with anemia using a meta-analysis.

METHODS

The initial literature search covered Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials, and identified 1,569 articles. The final meta-analysis included eight randomized controlled trials (n=2,387) in cancer patients with <11 g/dL hemoglobin (Hb) at the baseline and target Hb (for stopping ESA treatment) at no more than 13 g/dL. The assessment measures included Hb response, blood transfusion rate and adverse events that included venous thromboemblism (VTE), hypertension, and on-study mortality. The results are expressed as pooled odds ratio (OR). Publication bias was assessed using funnel plot analysis.

RESULTS

ESAs significantly increased the Hb concentration [OR 7.85, 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.85 to 10.53, P<0.001] and reduced the red blood cell (RBC) transfusion rate (OR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.65, P<0.001). ESAs did not increase the accumulated adverse events (OR 0.95, P=0.82), or the on-study mortality (OR 1.09, P=0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

ESAs are not associated with increased frequency of severe adverse events in anemic cancer patients when the target Hb value is no more than 13 g/dL.

Chemotherapy-induced anemia: the story of darbepoetin alfa

BACKGROUND

Prior to the approval of the first erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) in the early 1990s, red blood cell transfusions were the primary means of treating severe chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA), with little recourse for those with more mild forms of the condition. The introduction of the ESAs allowed treatment of mild-to-moderate CIA in patients with cancer. It has been a decade since darbepoetin alfa (DA), a second-generation ESA with a longer half-life, became available to patients with CIA.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

We present a review of studies on DA in CIA, from its development through to the present day. Medline was searched for randomized clinical trials on DA. Additional trials and meta-analyses on ESAs were incorporated into this review when relevant.

RESULTS

The first publications on DA generally focused on optimal dosing, efficacy and tolerability. In these, it was shown that DA is an effective and well tolerated treatment option to achieve hematopoietic response, regardless of dosing interval. Subsequently, the focus shifted towards meta-analyses on survival data of all ESAs. These reported conflicting results regarding mortality and/or disease progression. However, guidelines for ESA use were updated and, when followed, these make ESAs a well tolerated and effective tool for managing CIA.

CONCLUSIONS

As the past decade has broadened our knowledge on the benefits and risks of CIA management, continued high-quality studies will help to optimize treatment with ESAs in order to maximize quality of life for these patients. The limitation of a literature review of this nature is the complete reliance on previously published research and the availability of these studies using the methodology outlined above.

Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Anaemia associated with cancer and cancer therapy is an important clinical factor in the treatment of malignant diseases. Therapeutic alternatives are recombinant human erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) and red blood cell transfusions.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of ESAs to either prevent or treat anaemia in cancer patients.

SEARCH METHODS

This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004. We searched the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE and other databases. Searches were done for the periods 01/1985 to 12/2001 for the first review, 1/2002 to 04/2005 for the first update and to November 2011 for the current update. We also contacted experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials on managing anaemia in cancer patients receiving or not receiving anti-cancer therapy that compared the use of ESAs (plus transfusion if needed).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Several review authors assessed trial quality and extracted data. One review author assessed quality assessment and extracted data, a second review author checked for correctness.

MAIN RESULTS

This update of the systematic review includes a total of 91 trials with 20,102 participants. Use of ESAs significantly reduced the relative risk of red blood cell transfusions (risk ratio (RR) 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 0.68, 70 trials, N = 16,093). On average, participants in the ESAs group received one unit of blood less than the control group (mean difference (MD) -0.98; 95% CI -1.17 to -0.78, 19 trials, N = 4,715). Haematological response was observed more often in participants receiving ESAs (RR 3.93; 95% CI 3.10 to 3.71, 31 trials, N = 6,413). There was suggestive evidence that ESAs may improve Quality of Life (QoL). There was strong evidence that ESAs increase mortality during active study period (hazard ratio (HR) 1.17; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.29, 70 trials, N = 15,935) and some evidence that ESAs decrease overall survival (HR 1.05; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11, 78 trials, N = 19,003). The risk ratio for thromboembolic complications was increased in patients receiving ESAs compared to controls (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.74; 57 trials, N = 15,498). ESAs may also increase the risk for hypertension (fixed-effect model: RR 1.30; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.56; random-effects model: RR 1.12; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.33, 31 trials, N = 7,228) and thrombocytopenia/haemorrhage (RR 1.21; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.42; 21 trials, N = 4,507). There was insufficient evidence to support an effect of ESA on tumour response (fixed-effect RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.06, 15 trials, N = 5,012).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

ESAs reduce the need for red blood cell transfusions but increase the risk for thromboembolic events and deaths. There is suggestive evidence that ESAs may improve QoL. Whether and how ESAs affects tumour control remains uncertain. The increased risk of death and thromboembolic events should be balanced against the potential benefits of ESA treatment taking into account each patient's clinical circumstances and preferences. More data are needed for the effect of these drugs on quality of life and tumour progression. Further research is needed to clarify cellular and molecular mechanisms and pathways of the effects of ESAs on thrombogenesis and their potential effects on tumour growth.

Darbepoetin alfa in the treatment of anemia in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy

For years, the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) consisted of red blood cell transfusions. Major disadvantages of transfusions are their temporary effect and limitation to treatment of severe anemia. In an extensive clinical trial program in patients with CIA, darbepoetin alfa (DA) - a long-acting recombinant human erythropoietin - was proven to be very effective in reducing transfusion needs in patients developing CIA. The administration is suitable with most chemotherapy schemes. Caution is needed in patients with a history of thrombo-embolic events, as a slightly higher incidence of these events is noted in patients treated with darbepoetin alfa or erythropoietin substitution agents (ESAs) in general. In recent years, concerns have been raised about a potential negative influence of these agents on survival. In this respect, it is important to make the distinction between studies on the treatment of existing CIA versus treatment with ESAs outside this indication. On the other hand, it has always been assumed that transfusions were a completely safe treatment, but concerns about a potential negative effect on survival have been raised for transfusions as well. The safety concerns with DA and ESAs in general led to a pharmacovigilance program and an adaptation of the guidelines for treatment of CIA, focusing on treatment of moderate CIA but no longer on mild CIA. Now that the most recent safety data of the pharmacovigilance program of ESAs is almost completed, the clinical impact of the shift to the treatment of only moderate anemia is discussed in this review, which provides a critical view on the indications of DA and the benefit-risk assessment, in order to provide good supportive care without harm to the patient.

Flexible dosing with Darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia

Anemia is frequent in cancer patients with chemotherapy, and has an important negative effect on health-related quality of life (QoL). Darbepoetin alfa belongs to a new class of erythropoietic proteins with a unique molecular structure and interesting properties compared with classic recombinant human erythropoietin. Darbepoetin alfa is effective for chemotherapy-induced anemia when administered once weekly at a dose of 2.25 mug/kg, as shown in two large phase III placebo-controlled trials in patients with solid tumors and hematological malignancies. Furthermore, it was safe and well tolerated. More recently attention has been focused on optimizing Darbepoetin alfa therapy. Front-loaded dosing was explored to accelerate the hemoglobin (Hb) response and effect on QoL, but this idea could not be confirmed in a large phase III study. Based on the prolonged half-life of Darbepoetin alfa, administration every 3 weeks was appealing. In a large phase III trial, noninferiority of administration of 500 mug every 3 weeks compared with the weekly dosing could be confirmed, both in terms of reduction of red blood cell transfusion, Hb parameters, and QoL. This schedule is very convenient for patients and caregivers as it allows synchronization of erythropoietic therapy and common chemotherapy schedules. Questions for future study are the optimal iron supplementation strategy and the effect of Darbepoetin alfa on outcome. This article reviews the clinical development of Darbepoetin alfa with emphasis on recent data.

A prospective, observational study describing the haematological response in patients undergoing chemotherapy treated by tri-weekly darbepoetin alfa for anaemia

OBJECTIVE

This prospective, observational study investigated the haematological response to darbepoetin alfa (DA) administered every three weeks for the treatment of anaemia. Response was also assessed according to baseline characteristics including iron, folate and vitamin B12 status.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Anaemic adult patients with malignant non-myeloid cancer, starting or having already undergone chemotherapy received DA on day of inclusionand were followed up for up to 24 weeks. Concentration of haemoglobin (Hb), as well as iron, vitamin B12 and folate status where available, were recorded at inclusion, after a treatment period of 9 weeks and up to a maximum of 24 weeks or cessation of DA treatment, whichever was sooner.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measure assessed in this study was the percentage of patients reaching a Hb concentration of at least 11 g/dL at least once at any time during the study.

RESULTS

A total of 2912 patients were included. The mean Hb concentration increased from 10.0 g/dL at inclusion to 11.4 g/dL at 9 weeks and 11.8 g/dL at 24 weeks. In 74.6% of patients the target Hb level of 11.0 g/dL or above was reached. After initiation of DA treatment, 9.5% of patients required a blood transfusion by week 9, and 5.6% thereafter. Vitamin B12 and folate status were unknown for 80.3% of patients and the iron status for 73.2% of patients. Compared with patients who remained untreated for vitamin B12 or folate deficiency, a higher percentage of patients with vitamin status within normal limits achieved the target Hb concentration. However, achievement of target Hb level appeared not to be affected by iron status.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the mean Hb level increased in anaemic cancer patients treated with DA and the majority of patients achieved the target Hb level. In contrast to the recommendations of guidelines (EORTC) encouraging the measurement of iron and vitamin levels, the present study demonstrated that data were not routinely collected for these factors.

Roles of Intravenous Iron Therapy in Various Patient Settings

Objective:

To provide clinical information on intravenous iron products and their role in chronic kidney disease (CKD), dialysis, oncology, critical illness, and heart failure.

Data Sources:

Intravenous iron products information, national clinical practice guidelines, and the latest primary literature available were reviewed. PubMed and MEDLINE databases were searched from January 2000-December 2009.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

All FDA-approved intravenous iron products information, available national clinical practice guidelines, and primary literature were included.

Data Synthesis:

Iron deficiency is common in patients with CKD, dialysis, oncology, critical illness, and heart failure. Routine supplementation with intravenous iron therapy is indicated in patients with CKD, including those receiving dialysis; however, its role in oncology, critical illness, and heart failure is not clearly defined. Assessing patients for iron deficiency, evaluating their status, and knowing the risks of adverse events are important in determining the roles of intravenous iron therapy in each setting. If patients are initiated on intravenous iron, they must be closely monitored for signs and symptoms of adverse drug reactions, as well as clinical worsening. Additionally, intravenous iron must be discontinued upon resolution of iron deficiency.

Conclusions:

The importance of intravenous iron therapy is well established in patients with CKD, including those receiving dialysis, who have iron deficiency. Its roles in oncology, critical illness, and heart failure should be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

Randomized phase 2 dose-finding study of weekly administration of darbepoetin alpha in anemic patients with lung or ovarian cancer receiving multicycle platinum-containing chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

This is the first clinical trial for Japanese to evaluate the dose-response and determine the clinically effective dose of darbepoetin alpha by weekly subcutaneously administration in anemic patients with lung cancer or ovarian cancer receiving chemotherapy.

METHODS

Eligible patients were required to have anemia (hemoglobin level of <or=11.0 g/dl). Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive darbepoetin alpha (1.0, 2.25 or 4.5 microg/kg) subcutaneously once a week for up to 12 weeks. The study drug was withheld from patients who had a hemoglobin level >15.0 g/dl (for men) or 14.0 g/dl (for women), and reinstated at 50% of the previous weekly dose when the hemoglobin level decreased to <or=13.0 g/dl. Quality-of-life assessments were conducted using the Japanese version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-anemia (FACT-an) questionnaire.

RESULTS

Hemoglobin response rate was 31.6%, 55.6% and 70.3% in 1.0, 2.25 and 4.5 microg/kg groups, respectively. The dosages of 2.25 and 4.5 microg/kg thus met the clinically effective dose criterion of at least 50% of patients achieving a hemoglobin response. The FACT-fatigue subscale had a high internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha score. Although no improvement in FACT-fatigue subscale score from baseline to the end of the treatment phase was confirmed for any dose group, there was a correlation between FACT-fatigue subscale score and hemoglobin concentration. Darbepoetin alpha appears to be well tolerated in this setting and no dose-dependent adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Darbepoetin alpha alleviated anemia caused by platinum-based chemotherapy, and the dosage of 2.25 microg/kg was the lowest dose that met the clinically effective dose criteria when administered once weekly.

Epoetin Alfa in Patients With Advanced-Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Results of the Randomized Placebo-Controlled GHSG HD15EPO Trial

Purpose

To determine whether epoetin alfa reduces anemia-related fatigue, improves other aspects of health-related patient-recorded outcomes (PROs), reduces the number of RBC transfusions, and has an impact on freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL).

Patients and Methods

The prospectively randomized HD15EPO study performed by the German Hodgkin Study Group investigated epoetin alfa administered at doses of 40,000 U weekly during and after chemotherapy (six to eight cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone [BEACOPP]) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled setting. The study accrued 1,379 patients, of whom 1,328 were assessable for safety, 1,303 were assessable for clinical outcome, and 930 were assessable for PROs.

Results

PROs were not different in patients receiving placebo or epoetin alfa, both after the end of chemotherapy and 6 months thereafter. There was no difference between patients treated with epoetin alfa or placebo with respect to FFTF and OS. There were also no differences in the numbers of deaths, progressions, relapses, and thromboembolic events. The median number of RBC transfusions was reduced from four per patient in the placebo group to two per patient in the epoetin alfa group (P < .001), with 27.4% of patients needing no RBC transfusion in the placebo group compared with 36.7% of patients in the epoetin alfa group (P < .001).

Conclusion

Epoetin alfa administered at 40,000 U weekly parallel to BEACOPP chemotherapy was safe in patients with advanced-stage HL and reduced the number of RBC transfusions but had no impact on fatigue and other PRO domains.

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in oncology: a study-level meta-analysis of survival and other safety outcomes

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients often develop the potentially debilitating condition of anaemia. Numerous controlled studies indicate that erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) can raise haemoglobin levels and reduce transfusion requirements in anaemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. To evaluate recent safety concerns regarding ESAs, we carried out a meta-analysis of controlled ESA oncology trials to examine whether ESA use affects survival, disease progression and risk of venous-thromboembolic events.

METHODS: This meta-analysis included studies from the 2006 Cochrane meta-analysis, studies published/updated since the 2006 Cochrane report, and unpublished trial data from Amgen and Centocor Ortho Biotech. The 60 studies analysed (15 323 patients) were conducted in the settings of chemotherapy/radiochemotherapy, radiotherapy only treatment or anaemia of cancer. Data were summarised using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS: Results indicated that ESA use did not significantly affect mortality (60 studies: OR=1.06; 95% CI: 0.97–1.15) or disease progression (26 studies: OR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.90–1.14), but increased the risk for venous-thromoboembolic events (44 studies: OR=1.48; 95% CI: 1.28–1.72).

CONCLUSION: Though this meta-analysis showed no significant effect of ESAs on survival or disease progression, prospectively designed, future randomised clinical trials will further examine the safety and efficacy of ESAs when used according to the revised labelling information.

Dose reduction of epoetin-alpha in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced anaemia

INTRODUCTION

Anaemia during chemotherapy is often left untreated. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are frequently used to treat overt anaemia. Their prophylactic use, however, remains controversial and raises concerns about cost-effectiveness. Therefore, we assessed the efficacy of a dose-reduction schedule in anaemia prophylaxis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included patients with untreated solid tumours about to receive platinum-based chemotherapy and had haemoglobin (Hb) levels ≥11 g/dL. Epoetin-α was administered at a dose level of 3 × 10,000 U weekly as soon as Hb descended to < 13 g/dL. Dose reductions to 3 × 4,000 U and 3 × 2,000 U weekly were planned in 4-week intervals if Hb stabilised in the range of 11-13 g/dL. Upon ascending to ≥13 g/dL, epoetin was discontinued. Iron supplements of 100 mg intravenous doses were given weekly. Of 37 patients who enrolled, 33 could be evaluated.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Their median Hb level was 13.7 (10.9-16.2) g/dL at baseline and descended to 11.0 (7.4-13.8) g/dL by the end of chemotherapy. Anaemia (Hb < 10 g/dL) was prevented in 24 patients (73%). The mean dose requirement for epoetin-α was 3 × 5,866 U per week per patient, representing a dose reduction of 41%. Treatment failed in nine patients (27%), in part due to epoetin-α resistance in four (12%) and blood transfusion in three (9%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Dose reduction was as effective as fixed doses in anaemia prophylaxis but reduced the amount of prescribed epoetin substantially.

Erythropoietin or Darbepoetin for patients with cancer--meta-analysis based on individual patient data

BACKGROUND

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) reduce anemia in cancer patients and may improve quality of life, but there are concerns that ESAs might increase mortality.

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to examine the effect of ESAs and identify factors that modify the effects of ESAs on overall survival, progression free survival, thromboembolic and cardiovascular events as well as need for transfusions and other important safety and efficacy outcomes in cancer patients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase and conference proceedings for eligible trials. Manufacturers of ESAs were contacted to identify additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials comparing epoetin or darbepoetin plus red blood cell transfusions (as necessary) versus red blood cell transfusions (as necessary) alone, to prevent or treat anemia in adult or pediatric cancer patients with or without concurrent antineoplastic therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing epoetin alpha, epoetin beta or darbepoetin alpha plus red blood cell transfusions versus transfusion alone, for prophylaxis or therapy of anemia while or after receiving anti-cancer treatment. Patient-level data were obtained and analyzed by independent statisticians at two academic departments, using fixed-effects and random-effects meta-analysis. Analyses were according to the intention-to-treat principle. Primary endpoints were on study mortality and overall survival during the longest available follow-up, regardless of anticancer treatment, and in patients receiving chemotherapy. Tests for interactions were used to identify differences in effects of ESAs on mortality across pre-specified subgroups. The present review reports only the results for the primary endpoint.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 13933 cancer patients from 53 trials were analyzed, 1530 patients died on-study and 4993 overall. ESAs increased on study mortality (combined hazard ratio [cHR] 1.17; 95% CI 1.06-1.30) and worsened overall survival (cHR 1.06; 95% CI 1.00-1.12), with little heterogeneity between trials (I(2) 0%, p=0.87 and I(2) 7.1%, p=0.33, respectively). Thirty-eight trials enrolled 10441 patients receiving chemotherapy. The cHR for on study mortality was 1.10 (95% CI 0.98-1.24) and 1.04; 95% CI 0.97-1.11) for overall survival. There was little evidence for a difference between trials of patients receiving different cancer treatments (P for interaction=0.42).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

ESA treatment in cancer patients increased on study mortality and worsened overall survival. For patients undergoing chemotherapy the increase was less pronounced, but an adverse effect could not be excluded.

Darbepoetin alfa in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anaemia

BACKGROUND

Darbepoetin alfa is an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), with a longer half-life than previous recombinant human erythropoietins. After its initial development for anaemia due to renal insufficiency, an extensive clinical trial program has defined its role in cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE/METHODS

Review of the initial registration studies, further development and recent progress, guidelines for use in clinical practice (EORTC, ASCO/ASH), and specific focus on recent safety concerns.

RESULTS

Darbepoetin alfa significantly decreases the number of red blood cell transfusions in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia, and has been shown to improve health-related quality of life in several studies. The prolonged half-life allows a prolonged dosing interval. Administration every three weeks, a suitable schedule to synchronise with day 1 of many chemotherapy regimens, is as efficient as the initially registered weekly administration. Recent data strongly suggest that the addition of intravenous iron improves haemoglobin response rates. The use of these agents in clinical practice has to be according to the guidelines. Recent safety data reported a negative effect on survival when ESAs were used to treat anaemia that was either not chemotherapy related, or when used to maintain high levels of haemoglobin and prevent anaemia. All of these studies were not in accordance with existing guidelines, while safety data from clinical trials using ESAs according to the guidelines remain reassuring.

CONCLUSION

Darbepoetin alfa has a well defined place in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anaemia, and is safe when used in line with existing guidelines. Recent safety signals on cancer outcomes in studies not in accordance with these guidelines illustrate the need for further research into the complex interaction between anaemia and tumour hypoxia in cancer patients.

Benefits and harms of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anemia related to cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are used to treat anemia in patients with cancer. However, their safety and effectiveness is controversial. We did a systematic review of the clinical efficacy and harms of these agents in adults with anemia related to cancer or chemotherapy.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of published and unpublished randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using accepted methods for literature searches, article selection, data extraction and quality assessment. We included RCTs involving anemic adults with cancer. We compared the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents with nonuse and assessed clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events and hypertension, health-related quality of life, blood transfusions and tumour response) and harms (serious adverse events) between groups.

RESULTS

We identified 52 trials (n = 12 006) that met our selection criteria. The pooled all-cause mortality during treatment was significantly higher in the group receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating therapy than in the control group (relative risk [RR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03 to 1.29). Compared with no treatment, use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents led to clinically detectable improvements in disease-specific measures of quality of life. It also reduced the use of blood transfusions (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.73). However, it led to an increased risk of thrombotic events (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.24) and serious adverse events (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.25).

INTERPRETATION

Use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients with cancer-related anemia improved some disease-specific measures of quality of life and decreased the use of blood transfusions. However, it increased the risk of death and serious adverse events. Our findings suggest that such therapy not be used routinely as an alternative to blood transfusion in patients with anemia related to cancer.

Recombinant human erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and mortality in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis of randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents reduce anaemia in patients with cancer and could improve their quality of life, but these drugs might increase mortality. We therefore did a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials in which these drugs plus red blood cell transfusions were compared with transfusion alone for prophylaxis or treatment of anaemia in patients with cancer.

METHODS

Data for patients treated with epoetin alfa, epoetin beta, or darbepoetin alfa were obtained and analysed by independent statisticians using fixed-effects and random-effects meta-analysis. Analyses were by intention to treat. Primary endpoints were mortality during the active study period and overall survival during the longest available follow-up, irrespective of anticancer treatment, and in patients given chemotherapy. Tests for interactions were used to identify differences in effects of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on mortality across prespecified subgroups.

FINDINGS

Data from a total of 13 933 patients with cancer in 53 trials were analysed. 1530 patients died during the active study period and 4993 overall. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents increased mortality during the active study period (combined hazard ratio [cHR] 1.17, 95% CI 1.06-1.30) and worsened overall survival (1.06, 1.00-1.12), with little heterogeneity between trials (I(2) 0%, p=0.87 for mortality during the active study period, and I(2) 7.1%, p=0.33 for overall survival). 10 441 patients on chemotherapy were enrolled in 38 trials. The cHR for mortality during the active study period was 1.10 (0.98-1.24), and 1.04 (0.97-1.11) for overall survival. There was little evidence for a difference between trials of patients given different anticancer treatments (p for interaction=0.42).

INTERPRETATION

Treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients with cancer increased mortality during active study periods and worsened overall survival. The increased risk of death associated with treatment with these drugs should be balanced against their benefits.

FUNDING

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Medical Faculty of University of Cologne, and Oncosuisse (Switzerland).

Venous thromboembolic events and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents: an update

Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) are frequent in cancer patients because of the effects of malignant disease, its treatment, and comorbidities. The higher risk for VTEs associated with the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) appears to be a class effect but may be particularly pronounced when these agents are used in patients who are not anemic at baseline and/or to achieve hemoglobin targets higher than those recommended in current labeling. Particular attention should be taken to assess the balance of risks and benefits in patients with a history of thromboembolism. If the goal of treatment of patients with chemotherapy-associated anemia is aimed to raise the hemoglobin level to 12 g/dl, and is confined to that, ESA-induced VTEs should rarely be a problem.

Randomized phase 2 study of subcutaneous amifostine versus epoetin-alpha given 3 times weekly during concurrent chemotherapy and hyperfractionated radiotherapy for limited-disease small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the role of amifostine and epoetin-alpha in reducing severe toxicities during concurrent chemo-hyperfractionated radiotherapy (CCRT) for limited disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC).

METHODS

Seventy-six patients with LD-SCLC were enrolled. The treatment schedule was consisted of two 28-day cycles of cisplatin at a dose of 30 mg/m2 (Days 1 and 8) and irinotecan at a dose of 60 mg/m2 (Days 1, 8, and 15) followed by two 21-day cycles of cisplatin at a dose of 60 mg/m2 (Day 1) and etoposide at a dose of 100 mg/m2 (Days 1-3) with concurrent twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy for a total of 45 grays. Patients were randomly assigned at registration to either amifostine at a dose of 500 mg or epoetin-alpha at a dose of 10,000 IU subcutaneously 3 times weekly (n = 36 patients and 40 patients, respectively). Fifteen of 36 patients assigned to the amifostine arm did not receive amifostine because of a lack of supply.

RESULTS

Amifostine treatment was associated with higher febrile neutropenia (P = .003) and grade 2 or 3 nausea (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [version 3.0]) (P = .03). It also demonstrated a trend toward higher grade 4 leukopenia (P = .05). Grade 3 esophagitis was reported in 30% of patients treated with amifostine and 9% of patients treated with epoetin-alpha (P = .059). Epoetin-alpha treatment was associated with less grade 2 or 3 anemia (P = .031) and lower decreases in hemoglobin level during CCRT (P = .016). The median survival times for both treatment arms were comparable (22.6 months in the amifostine arm vs 25.6 months in the epoetin-alpha arm; P = .447).

CONCLUSIONS

Although amifostine administered 3 times weekly during CCRT did not significantly reduce severe toxicities, epoetin-alpha was effective in preventing severe anemia during CCRT in patients with LD-SCLC. Other radioprotective strategies to minimize severe toxicities should be investigated.

Parenteral iron with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for chemotherapy-induced anemia

Purpose. To discuss the clinical issues we addressed in the development of our institutional guidelines regarding the assessment of iron stores for cancer- and treatment-related anemia and the administration of parenteral iron with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs).

Data sources. Studies published from January 1995 to August 2007 were identified by computer searches of Medline and hand searching of bibliographies of the articles identified via the computer searches. The current clinical practice guidelines were identified by computer searches of the web sites for national professional organizations that represent health care professionals who treat patients with cancer.

Results of data analysis. Hematopoietic responses demonstrate that epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa provide similar outcomes for patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA); however, up to 50% of patients receiving these agents fail to adequately respond. Functional iron deficiency defined as a state of iron-restricted erythropoiesis is likely the primary contributor to the lack of response. Hematopoietic responses following ESA therapy with parenteral iron are substantially higher compared to response with no or oral iron.

Conclusions. Iron stores should be assessed in all patients with cancer- or treatment-related anemia and parenteral iron should be administered to patients receiving ESA therapy to improve hematopoietic response. A unique algorithm that summarizes our institutional guidelines to assess iron stores and administer parenteral iron with ESA therapy in patients with CIA is included. J Oncol Pharm Practice (2008) 14: 5—22.

Erythropoietin pharmacology

Anaemia is a frequent complication in cancer patients and may be multifactorial in origin. Treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) is an alternative to red blood cell transfusion. The evidence from clinical trials has established that patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia with a haemoglobin concentration below 10 g/dl benefit from epoetin therapy. The native glycoprotein hormone consists of 165 amino acids with three N-glycosylation and one O-glycosylation sites. Epoetin and darbepoetin bind to the EPO receptor to induce intracellular signalling by the same intracellular molecules as native EPO. There are some differences in the glycosylation pattern which lead to variations in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics profiles. Pharmacokinetic and therapeutic studies have examined the use of rHuEPO administered intravenously and subcutaneously and there is accumulating evidence that the latter route has several advantages in cancer patients. After subcutaneous administration, the bioavailability of epoetin is about 20-30% and has a plasma half-life of >24 h. Darbepoetin has a longer half-life after subcutaneous administration of 48 h. The general recommendations are based on evidence from trials in which epoetin was administered 150 U/kg thrice weekly. The recommended initial dose for darbepoetin alpha is 2.25 mug/kg per week. The most serious adverse effects are hypertension, bleeding and increased risk of thrombotic complications. Caution is advised when used in patients who are at high risk for thromboembolic events. In the management of anaemic cancer patients, physicians should closely follow the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines.

Darbepoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anemia: evolution to extended dosing intervals

Anemia is a frequent problem in cancer patients, especially in those treated with chemotherapy, and has an important negative impact on quality of life. Red blood cell transfusions provide clear but rather temporary comfort. The development of erythropoietic stimulating agents (ESAs) led to a more durable anemia treatment. Darbepoetin alpha is a unique ESA with a long plasma half life, thereby suitable for administration with different dosing intervals. Apart from administration every week, darbepoetin alpha also proved to be efficient in reducing red blood cell transfusion rates and in improving health-related quality of life when administered at a dose of 500 microg once every 3 weeks. This is a convenient therapy schedule because it can be synchronized with the chemotherapy cycle in many patients. Recently, concerns have been raised about the long-term safety of ESAs, more specifically about their effect on survival. Available data must be interpreted with caution, but at present there is no clear evidence to support a negative effect on outcome with darbepoetin alpha therapy when used according to the guidelines for treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia. Further studies focusing on survival as the primary end point are ongoing.

Erythropoietic growth factors for children with cancer: a systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To review evidence on the use of erythropoietic stimulating agents (erythropoietin or darbepoetin) in children with cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review of the published literature was performed using MEDLINE (1966-July 2007) and references from a Cochrane systematic review (focusing mainly on adults) published in 2006.

RESULTS

The review identified 12 studies, comprising five randomized trials, six case control studies and one open-label, dose-escalation study. All the studies that used adequate doses of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) (usually 150 IU/kg three times per week) demonstrated benefits for rhEPO except for one study in which rhEPO was added to G-CSF in children with high-risk neuroblastoma. Despite the heterogeneity of the populations studied, in terms of age, tumour type and chemotherapy regimen, rhEPO use was associated with consistent benefits in terms of reduced transfusion requirements and improved haematological parameters. Only one case of darbepoietin use was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

While more studies are required, it appears that rhEPO is safe in this vulnerable patient group and can benefit children with cancer by preventing or ameliorating anaemia.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of pediatric patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy often develop anemia, which can increase the risk for transfusions and fatigue. The recombinant erythropoiesis-stimulating agent darbepoetin alfa can effectively treat chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) in adults, but limited data are available regarding its use in pediatric cancer patients. The goals of this phase 1, open-label, uncontrolled study were to assess the pharmacokinetic profile and safety of darbepoetin alfa in pediatric patients with CIA.

PROCEDURE

Pediatric patients with nonmyeloid malignancies and CIA received up to six doses of darbepoetin alfa 2.25 mcg/kg subcutaneously. After the first dose, the pharmacokinetic properties of darbepoetin alfa were assessed during a 14-day sampling period. All subsequent doses were given weekly with predose blood samples collected before study drug administration.

RESULTS

After a single dose of darbepoetin alfa, the mean (SD) peak serum concentration was 10.5 (3) ng/ml, and the median time to peak concentration was 71.4 hr. Darbepoetin alfa exhibited a mean (SD) terminal half-life of 49.4 (32) hr. Upon repeated weekly administration, no evidence of darbepoetin alfa accumulation was observed though there was high intra- and inter-individual variability. In addition, darbepoetin alfa was well tolerated; some study patients experienced increases in hemoglobin.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetic profile of darbepoetin alfa indicated that it was slowly absorbed and exhibited a long terminal half-life in these pediatric study patients with CIA.

Clinical benefits and risks associated with epoetin and darbepoetin in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Erythropoiesis-stimulating proteins (ESPs) are indicated for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). Evidence-based guidelines and systematic reviews of the management of CIA do not yet include all currently approved ESPs or all of the clinically relevant benefits and risks of ESPs.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this work were to provide up-to-date assessments of the clinical efficacy and effectiveness (ie, transfusions and quality-of-life [QoL] benefits) and safety (ie, risk of venous thromboembolism [VTE] and all-cause or treatment-associated death) of epoetin-alfa, epoetin-beta, and darbepoetin-alfa for the treatment of CIA in cancer patients with hemoglobin<11 g/dL. We also considered the impact of differences in study design, patients, and treatments on the results.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify and analyze English-language studies (controlled trials and prospective uncontrolled studies with >or=300 patients) published between 1980 and July 2005. The databases searched were MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library. Relevant abstracts from the last 2 annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, and European Society for Medical Oncology were also included. Studies were selected, using predefined eligibility criteria. Two reviewers had to agree on all included and excluded studies, and on all data extracted from each accepted study before they were entered into a relational database. Meta-analyses were performed to quantify benefit and risk outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 40 studies including 21,378 patients were eligible for analysis. Each ESP was found to have efficacy relative to standard care or placebo. The odds ratio (OR) for transfusions in studies of epoetin versus controls was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.35-0.55) and of darbepoetin versus controls was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.31-0.55). Patients receiving ESPs experienced a significant improvement in QoL; the mean difference in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue score for ESPs versus controls was 0.23 (95% CI, 0.10-0.36; P=0.001). The frequency of VTE and death was not significantly different between ESPs and control (VTE OR, 1.41 [95% CI, 0.81-2.47]; all-cause mortality OR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.69-1.44]).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of key clinical benefits and risks of epoetin and darbepoetin in the treatment of CIA found no clinically relevant differences between these drugs.

Cancer-related anaemia management in the 21st century

Anaemia has a high prevalence and incidence in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and is associated with a range of symptoms, including fatigue, drowsiness, depression, dyspnoea, tachycardia and dizziness. Fatigue, in particular, exerts a considerable impact on patient quality of life, affecting 80-100% of patients receiving chemotherapy and, potentially, delaying treatment. Until recently, red blood cell transfusions were the mainstay of treatment for cancer-related anaemia. While effective in ameliorating symptoms, transfusions are associated with short-lived benefits and a risk of infections and disease transmission. The development of the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO), resulted in a 50% reduction in the number of transfusions required in anaemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. The subsequently introduced rHuEPO analogue, darbepoetin alfa, stimulates erythropoiesis by the same mechanism as rHuEPO but is associated with a prolonged serum half-life, allowing extended dosing intervals and less frequent administration. With the introduction of a number of ESAs and a growing wealth of data concerning their indications, dosing regimens and safety, European cancer organizations have recently developed guidelines for their effective use in clinical practice.

Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Anaemia associated with cancer and cancer therapy is an important clinical factor in the treatment of malignant diseases. Therapeutic alternatives are recombinant human erythropoietin (Epo), darbepoetin (Darbepo) and red blood cell transfusions.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effects of Epo or Darbepo to either prevent or treat anaemia in cancer patients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE and other data bases. Searches were done for the periods 01/1985 to 12/2001 for the first review and 1/2002 to 04/2005 for the update. We also contacted experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials on managing anaemia in cancer patients that compared the use of Epo/Darbepo (plus transfusion if needed) with observation until red blood cell transfusion was required.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Several reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

This update of the systematic review included a total of 57 trials with 9,353 patients. Of these, 27 trials with 3,287 adults were also included in the first Cochrane Review. Thirty trials with 6,066 patients were added during the update process. Use of Epo/Darbepo significantly reduced the relative risk of red blood cell transfusions (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.68, 42 trials, n = 6,510). On average participants in the Epo/Darbepo group received one unit of blood less than the control group (WMD -1.05; 95% CI -1.32 to -0.78, 14 trials, n = 2,353). For participants with baseline haemoglobin below 12 g/dL haematological response was observed more often in participants receiving Epo/Darbepo (RR 3.43; 95% CI 3.07 to 3.84, 22 trials, n = 4,307). There was suggestive evidence that Epo/Darbepo may improve Quality of Life (QoL). The relative risk for thrombo embolic complications was increased in patients receiving Epo/Darbepo compared to controls (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.06; 35 trials, n = 6,769). Uncertainties remain whether and how Epo/Darbepo effects tumour response (fixed effect RR 1.12; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.23, 13 trials, n = 2,833; random effects: RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.26) or overall survival (unadjusted and adjusted data: HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.18; 42 trials, n = 8,167).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is consistent evidence that administration of Epo/Darbepo reduces the relative risk for blood transfusions and the number of units transfused in cancer patients. For patients with baseline haemoglobin below 12 g/dL (mild anaemia) there is strong evidence that Epo/Darbepo improves haematological response. There is suggestive evidence that Epo/Darbepo may improve QoL. However, there is strong evidence that Epo/Darbepo increases the relative risk for thrombo embolic complications. Whether and how Epo/Darbepo effects tumour response and overall survival remains uncertain.

Clinical and economic impact of epoetin in adjuvant-chemotherapy for breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Anaemia is a common toxicity in cancer patients and epoetins (EPOs) are now an established treatment. The economic profile of EPO treatment was assessed in patients with breast cancer treated by adjuvant-chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two strategies were compared: without treatment by EPO and with the possible use of treatment by EPO (epoetin alfa) when required. The clinical effectiveness criterion was time adjusted to quality of life and economic data included only direct medical costs.

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred ninety-two patients were included. In the group with the strategy containing the possible use of EPO, 45.5% of patients effectively received EPO. A significant difference in the haemoglobin level profile over time was observed which provided a significant overall benefit of 0.0052 (p<10(-4)) quality-adjusted life year (QALY) associated with an extra cost of <euro>1,615 (p<10(-4)). In the base case analysis, the cost per added QALY was estimated as <euro>310,577 with the strategy containing the possible use of EPO.

CONCLUSION

This robust result seems to be unacceptable, but the only relevant point of discussion might be the level of acceptable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for a patient.

Recombinant human erythropoietins and cancer patients: updated meta-analysis of 57 studies including 9353 patients

This is an updated systematic review of 57 trials and 9353 cancer patients from articles, abstracts, and reports published between January 1, 1985, and April 30, 2005, on the effects of epoetin alfa and beta (i.e., epoetin) and darbepoetin alfa (i.e., darbepoetin). We included randomized controlled trials comparing epoetin or darbepoetin plus red blood cell transfusion with red blood cell transfusion alone for prophylaxis or treatment of anemia in cancer patients with or without concurrent antineoplastic therapy. The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and conference proceedings were searched. Effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with fixed-effects models. Treatment with epoetin or darbepoetin statistically significantly reduced the risk for red blood cell transfusions (relative risk [RR] = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.68; 42 trials and 6510 patients) and improved hematologic response (RR = 3.43, 95% CI = 3.07 to 3.84; 22 trials and 4307 patients). Treatment with epoetin or darbepoetin increased the risk of thrombo-embolic events (RR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.35 to 2.06; 35 trials and 6769 patients). Uncertainties remain as to whether and how epoetin or darbepoetin affects overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.99 to 1.18; 42 trials and 8167 patients). Caution is advised when using epoetin or darbepoetin in combination with thrombogenic chemotherapeutic agents or for cancer patients who are at high risk for thrombo-embolic events.

The use of darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anaemia

Chemotherapy-induced anaemia, with its important consequences on quality of life and social function of cancer patients, can be improved with erythropoietic therapy. Darbepoetin alfa is the first of a novel generation of erythropoietic proteins with a unique molecular structure and a circulating half-life that is threefold longer than that of the previous recombinant human erythropoietin. The efficacy and safety of weekly administration have been confirmed in different Phase II and III randomised trials. In order to optimise the efficacy profile of darbepoetin alfa, extended dosing intervals and front-loading regimens are evaluated, as well the optimal haemoglobin level to initiate therapy. Across all trials, darbepoetin alfa was shown to be a well-tolerated and safe therapy. The possible favourable effect on the outcome of cancer patients needs to be further elucidated.

Management of cancer-related anemia with erythropoietic agents: doubts, certainties, and concerns

The management of cancer-related anemia with erythropoietic agents presents many unresolved issues. We reviewed the literature relating to epoetin alfa (Eprex)/Epypo); Ortho Biotech/Janssen-Cilag, High Wycombe, United Kingdom, http://www.orthobiotech.co.uk; Procrit); Ortho Biotech Products, L.P., Bridgewater, NJ, http://www.orthobiotech.com), epoetin beta (NeoRecormon); Hoffman-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland, http://www.roche.com), and darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp); Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, http://www.amgen.com) highlighting the results of published clinical trials, safety, and cost-effectiveness. Studies were identified through MEDLINE and the bibliographies of relevant articles. Epoetin alfa, epoetin beta, and darbepoetin alfa have differing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. They are all effective at reducing transfusion requirements and improving health-related quality-of-life parameters, irrespective of tumor response. A direct comparison between epoetin alfa and darbe poetin alfa is based on limited evidence, which does not allow definitive conclusions about relative efficacy and cost-effectiveness. No predictive factors for response to erythropoietic agents have been validated in prospective trials. The most consistent adverse events are thrombotic and may occur irrespective of an increase in hemoglobin. Recent research indicates that the erythropoietin receptor is expressed in several cancer cell lines, raising the concern of possible stimulation of tumor cell growth by these drugs. Studies on the cost-effectiveness of erythropoietins, particularly compared with transfusion therapy, have been challenging to conduct and analyze and have generated ambiguous results. The use of erythropoietins needs to be optimized in terms of cost-effectiveness, and issues surrounding safety need to be clarified. A stronger methodology for clinical studies and the design of new, randomized, clinical trials is a major priority.

Recombinant human erythropoietin in oncology: current status and further developments

Anaemia effects up to 90% of cancer patients, with more than 60% requiring blood transfusion during or after treatment. With the advent of recombinant human erythropoietins (rHuEPO), an alternative to red blood cell transfusion has become available. So far, three drugs have been approved for the treatment of anaemia in patients with malignancies (epoetin alfa, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa). New concepts for the use of erythropoietin in cancer patients include 3- and 4-weekly dosing, as well as loading-dose concepts. Important factors helping to judge the impact of erythropoietin in cancer treatment include pharmacoeconomics and better predictive factors. Lately, the influence of erythropoietin therapy on survival in cancer patients has been discussed very intensively, because conflicting data have emerged. Studies aimed at correcting anaemia in cancer patients had indicated a possible survival advantage of those patients receiving erythropoietin. In contrast, two recent trials aimed at correction of haemoglobin levels beyond anaemia reported a poorer survival of patients receiving erythropoietin. This might grossly be attributed to a higher risk of thrombosis in these patients. The largest systematic review on the use of erythropoietin in cancer patients undergoing treatment indicates a suggestive but not significant survival advantage of erythropoietin-treated patients. In addition, very recent results of a Food and Drug Administration meeting on safety and survival of patients treated with erythropoietin are presented.

Recombinant Human Erythropoietin and Overall Survival in Cancer Patients: Results of a Comprehensive Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anemia associated with cancer and cancer therapy is an important clinical and economic factor in the treatment of malignant diseases.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review to assess the efficacy of erythropoietin to prevent or treat anemia in cancer patients with regard to red blood cell transfusions, hematologic response, adverse events, and overall survival. We searched the Cochrane Library, Medline, EMBASE, and other databases for relevant articles published from January 1985 to December 2001. We included all randomized controlled trials that compared the use of recombinant human erythropoietin (plus transfusion, if needed) with no erythropoietin treatment (plus transfusion, if needed). Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated under a fixed-effects model. Clinical and statistical heterogeneity were examined with sensitivity analyses and meta-regression. Statistical tests for effect estimates were two-sided.

RESULTS

We identified 27 trials involving 3287 adult patients. Patients treated with erythropoietin had a lower relative risk of having a blood transfusion than untreated patients (RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.73). Erythropoietin-treated patients with baseline hemoglobin levels lower than 10 g/dL were more likely to have a hematologic response than untreated patients (RR = 3.60, 95% CI = 3.07 to 4.23). The relative risk for thromboembolic complications after erythropoietin treatment was not statistically significantly increased (RR = 1.58, 95% CI = 0.94 to 2.66) compared with that of untreated patients. There is suggestive but inconclusive evidence that erythropoietin may improve overall survival (adjusted data: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.99; unadjusted data: HR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.69 to 1.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Erythropoietin treatment may reduce the risk for blood transfusions and improve hematologic response in cancer patients. However, our favorable survival outcome is in contrast to two large (N = 351 and 939) recently published randomized controlled trials in which erythropoietin-treated patients had statistically significantly worse survival than untreated patients. Possible reasons for the disparity with our results include differences in study population and design, higher target hemoglobin levels and higher risk of thromboembolic complications, and concerns that erythropoietin may stimulate tumor growth.

Pharmacotherapy of chemotherapy-induced anaemia

Anaemia in cancer patients is multifactorial. Anaemia of chronic disease due to the effects of cancer, as well as side effects of cancer treatment, are important factors. The impact of anaemia on the quality of life and social function of cancer patients has recently become more acknowledged. The traditional treatment for chemotherapy-induced anaemia (CIA) has been the use of red blood cell transfusions, with only short-lived effects and all their inherent risks. The finding of deficiency in erythropoietin, the endogenous hormone responsible for the production and maintenance of red blood cells in these patients, was the basis for the therapeutic development of erythropoietic proteins. With the introduction of epoetins (recombinant forms of human erythropoietin) in oncology and more recently, the novel long-acting darbepoetin alpha, physicians gained new pharmacotherapeutic approaches to treat CIA. Several forms of erythropoietic proteins are available in various regions of the world. Their characteristics, clinical evidence for use, guidelines for clinical administration and their safety are described in this review.

[Treatment of anemia and bone metastasis in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. A French survey]

Use of erythropoietin (EPO) for chemotherapy-induced anemia and biphosphonates (BP) for bone metastasis has increased steadily. However, there are no guidelines on their use in many situations such as non small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), which frequently alters quality of life markedly. Therefore, a multicentric survey was designed to assess the treatment of anemia and bone metastasis in chemotherapy-treated patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Nine representative centers of the oncology working party of the French respiratory society (Groupe d'Oncologie de la Société de Pneumologie de Langue Française) participated. Inclusion criteria were stage IV NSCLC and at least one course of chemotherapy in the last 3 months. A total of 148 and 50 patients (pts) were included in the anemia and bone metastasis surveys, respectively. Anemia was present in 60.8% of patients, and was not treated in 75%; 15 patients received EPO (10.1%). Independent predictors of EPO use were presence of anemia-related symptoms, hemoglobin level, age and center: the rate of prescription in patients with anemia varied from 13 to 73% between centers. BP were administered in 38% of patients with bone metastasis. Independent predictors of BP use were calcium serum level, pain, and center with a rate of prescription ranging from 0 to 80% between centers. This study reveals that, in France, most patients with anemia are not treated, EPO being seldom prescribed. The use of both EPO and BP is highly variable between centers. Guidelines on the use of these supportive treatments could help improve the care for lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.