Chemotherapy as an adjunct to radiation in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of the Yale Mitomycin Randomized Trials

Improving therapeutic strategies for Head and Neck Cancer: Insights from 3D hypoxic cell culture models in treatment response evaluation

Hypoxia in the tumor core negatively affects the outcome of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Nevertheless, its role in predicting treatment response requires further exploration. Typically, reduced oxygen levels in the tumor core correlate with diminished efficacy of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, which are commonly used for HNSCC patients' treatment. Understanding the mechanistic underpinnings of these varied treatment responses in HNSCC is crucial for enhancing therapeutic outcomes and extending patients' overall survival (OS) rates. Standard monolayer cell culture conditions have major limitations in mimicking tumor physiological features and the complexity of the tumor microenvironment. Three-dimensional (3D) cell cultures enable the recreation of the in vivo tumor attributes, encompassing oxygen and nutrient gradients, cellular morphology, and intracellular connections. It is vital to use the 3D model in treatment response studies to mimic the tumor microenvironment, as evidenced by the decreased sensitivity of 3D structures to anticancer therapy. Accordingly, the aim of the study was to delineate the utility of the 3D models of hypoxic head and neck tumors in drug screening and treatment response studies.

Pegylated Liposomal Mitomycin C Lipidic Prodrug in Combination With External Beam Radiation Therapy in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Phase 1B Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate a formulation of pegylated liposomal mitomycin C lipidic prodrug (PL-MLP) in patients concomitantly undergoing external beam radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with metastatic disease or inoperable primary solid tumors requiring RT for disease control or symptom relief were treated with 2 courses of PL-MLP (1.25, 1.5, or 1.8 mg/kg) at 21-day intervals, along with 10 fractions of conventional RT or 5 stereotactic body RT fractions initiated 1 to 3 days after the first PL-MLP dose and completed within 2 weeks. Treatment safety was monitored for 6 weeks, and disease status was re-evaluated at 6-week intervals thereafter. MLP levels were analyzed 1 hour and 24 hours after each PL-MLP infusion.

RESULTS

Overall, 19 patients with metastatic (18) or inoperable (1) disease received combination treatment, with 18 completing the full protocol. Most patients (16) had diagnoses of advanced gastrointestinal tract cancer. One grade 4 neutropenia event possibly related to study treatment was reported; other adverse events were mild or moderate. Of the 18 evaluable patients, 16 were free of RT target lesion progression at first re-evaluation. Median survival of the entire patient population was 63.3 weeks. Serum MLP level correlated with dose increases and similar long circulating profiles were observed before and after RT.

CONCLUSIONS

PL-MLP up to 1.8 mg/kg in combination with RT treatment is safe, with a high rate of tumor control. Drug clearance is not affected by radiation. PL-MLP is potentially an attractive option for chemoradiation therapy that warrants further evaluation in randomized studies in the palliative and curative settings.

Chemoradiotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: 10-yr Follow-up of the Phase 3 Randomised Controlled BC2001 Trial

BACKGROUND

BC2001, the largest randomised trial of bladder-sparing treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), demonstrated improvement in locoregional control by adding fluorouracil and mitomycin C to radiotherapy (James ND, Hussain SA, Hall E, et al. Radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1477-88). There are limited data on long-term recurrence risk.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether benefit of adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy for MIBC is maintained in the long term.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A phase 3 randomised controlled 2 × 2 factorial trial was conducted. Between 2001 and 2008, 458 patients with T2-T4a N0M0 MIBC were enrolled; 360 were randomised to radiotherapy (178) or chemoradiotherapy (182), and 218 were randomised to standard whole-bladder radiotherapy (108) or reduced high-dose-volume radiotherapy (111). The median follow-up time was 9.9 yr. The trial is registered (ISRCTN68324339).

INTERVENTION

Radiotherapy: 55 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 wk or 64 Gy in 32 fractions over 6.5 wk; concurrent chemotherapy: 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Locoregional control (primary endpoint), invasive locoregional control, toxicity, rate of salvage cystectomy, disease-free survival (DFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), bladder cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival. Cox regression was used. The analysis of efficacy outcomes was by intention to treat.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Chemoradiotherapy improved locoregional control (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.43-0.86], p = 0.004) and invasive locoregional control (HR 0.55 [95% CI 0.36-0.84], p = 0.006). This benefit translated, albeit nonsignificantly, for disease-related outcomes: DFS (HR 0.78 [95% CI 0.60-1.02], p = 0.069), MFS (HR 0.78, [95% CI 0.58-1.05], p = 0.089), overall survival (HR = 0.88 [95% CI 0.69-1.13], p = 0.3), and BCSS (HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.59-1.06], p = 0.11). The 5-yr cystectomy rate was 14% (95% CI 9-21%) with chemoradiotherapy versus 22% (95% CI 16-31%) with radiotherapy alone (HR 0.54, [95% CI 0.31-0.95], p = 0.034). No differences were seen between standard and reduced high-dose-volume radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term findings confirm the benefit of adding concomitant 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C to radiotherapy for MIBC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We looked at long-term outcomes of a phase 3 clinical trial testing radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for patients with invasive bladder cancer. We concluded that the benefit of adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy was maintained over 10 yr.

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are the most common cancers arising in the head and neck. Treatment of oral cavity cancer is generally surgery followed by radiotherapy, whereas oropharyngeal cancers, which are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis, are managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Surgery for oral cancers can be disfiguring and both surgery and radiotherapy have significant functional side effects. The development of new chemotherapy agents, new combinations of agents and changes in the relative timing of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy treatments may potentially bring about increases in both survival and quality of life for this group of patients. This review updates one last published in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery for oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma results in improved overall survival, improved disease-free survival and/or improved locoregional control, when incorporated as either induction therapy given prior to locoregional treatment (i.e. radiotherapy or surgery), concurrent with radiotherapy or in the adjuvant (i.e. after locoregional treatment with radiotherapy or surgery) setting.

SEARCH METHODS

An information specialist searched 4 bibliographic databases up to 15 September 2021 and used additional search methods to identify published, unpublished and ongoing studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours in the oral cavity or oropharynx, and that evaluated the addition of chemotherapy to other treatments such as radiotherapy and/or surgery, or compared two or more chemotherapy regimens or modes of administration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For this update, we assessed the new included trials for their risk of bias and at least two authors extracted data from them. Our primary outcome was overall survival (time to death from any cause). Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (time to disease recurrence or death from any cause) and locoregional control (response to primary treatment). We contacted trial authors for additional information or clarification when necessary.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 100 studies with 18,813 participants. None of the included trials were at low risk of bias.  For induction chemotherapy, we reported the results for contemporary regimens that will be of interest to clinicians and people being treated for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Overall, there is insufficient evidence to clearly demonstrate a survival benefit from induction chemotherapy with platinum plus 5-fluorouracil prior to radiotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) for death 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 1.04, P = 0.11; 7427 participants, 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence), prior to surgery (HR for death 1.06, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.60, P = 0.77; 198 participants, 1 study; low-certainty evidence) or prior to concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) with cisplatin (HR for death 0.71, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.35, P = 0.30; 389 participants, 2 studies; low-certainty evidence). There is insufficient evidence to support the use of an induction chemotherapy regimen with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil plus docetaxel prior to CRT with cisplatin (HR for death 1.08, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.44, P = 0.63; 760 participants, 3 studies; low-certainty evidence).  There is insufficient evidence to support the use of adjuvant chemotherapy over observation only following surgery (HR for death 0.95, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.22, P = 0.67; 353 participants, 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Among studies that compared post-surgical adjuvant CRT, as compared to post-surgical RT, adjuvant CRT showed a survival benefit (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.98, P = 0.03; 1097 participants, 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Primary treatment with CRT, as compared to radiotherapy alone,  was associated with a reduction in the risk of death (HR for death 0.74, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.83, P < 0.00001; 2852 participants, 24 studies; moderate-certainty evidence).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review demonstrate that chemotherapy in the curative-intent treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers only seems to be of benefit when used in specific circumstances together with locoregional treatment. The  evidence does not show a clear survival benefit from the use of induction chemotherapy prior to radiotherapy, surgery or CRT. Adjuvant CRT reduces the risk of death by 16%, as compared to radiotherapy alone. Concurrent chemoradiation as compared to radiation alone is associated with a greater than 20% improvement in overall survival; however, additional research is required to inform how the specific chemotherapy regimen may influence this benefit.

A prospective randomized study comparing concurrent chemoradiation with weekly and 3 weekly cisplatin in locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The chemotherapy schedules with cytotoxic dose or weekly regimes are still challenging, weighing the benefits versus toxicities. This prospective randomized study is an attempt to assess the efficacy of two schedules of cisplatin in management of locally advanced HNSCC.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study was to evaluate tolerance, tumour response and toxicities of concurrent chemoradiation with cisplatin in weekly and three weekly regimes.

METHODS

Locally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients fit for concurrent chemoradiation with cisplatin 40 mg/m2 (weekly) and 100 mg/m2 (3 weekly) were randomized to Arm A and B concurrently with radiotherapy of 70Gy/35frs/7 weeks.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Chi-square/ Fisher Exact test has been used to find the significance of study parameters on categorical scale between the groups. The statistical software SPSS 15.0 was used.

RESULTS

Between December 2010 and January 2013, 60 patients were enrolled. The median cycles of cisplatin in Arm-A was 5 and 2 in Arm-B. The complete response of 80.9% vs 75% and partial response of 14.3% vs 12.5% was observed in both arms respectively. There was no statistical difference in acute radiation and hematological toxicities between the two groups. With median follow up of 28 months, the 2 and 5 years overall survival was 55% and 58%; 41.6% and 32.3% in arms A and B respectively.

CONCLUSION

In our study of locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma treated with radical radiotherapy comparing concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin weekly vs 3 weekly had no significant difference in overall response, complete response and acute toxicities.

Bladder Sparing Approaches for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancers

Organ preservation has been increasingly utilised in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Multiple bladder preservation options exist, although the approach of maximal TURBT performed along with chemoradiation is the most favoured. Phase III trials have shown superiority of chemoradiotherapy compared to radiotherapy alone. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy gives local control outcomes comparable to those of radical surgery, but seemingly more superior when considering quality of life. Bladder-preserving techniques represent an alternative for patients who are unfit for cystectomy or decline major surgical intervention; however, these patients will need lifelong rigorous surveillance. It is important to emphasise to the patients opting for organ preservation the need for lifelong bladder surveillance as risk of recurrence remains even years after radical chemoradiotherapy treatment. No randomised control trials have yet directly compared radical cystectomy with bladder-preserving chemoradiation, leaving the age-old question of superiority of one modality over another unanswered. Radical cystectomy and chemoradiation, however, must be seen as complimentary treatments rather than competing treatments. Meticulous patient selection is vital in treatment modality selection with the success of recent trials within the field of bladder preservation only being possible through this application of meticulous selection criteria compared to previous decades. A multidisciplinary approach with radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, and urologists is needed to closely monitor patients who undergo bladder preservation in order to optimise outcomes.

Hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy (HART) of 70.6 Gy with concurrent 5-FU/Mitomycin C is superior to HART of 77.6 Gy alone in locally advanced head and neck cancer: long-term results of the ARO 95-06 randomized phase III trial

PURPOSE

To report the long-term results of the ARO 95-06 randomized trial comparing hyperfractionated accelerated chemoradiation with mitomycin C/5-fluorouracil (C-HART) with hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy (HART) alone in locally advanced head and neck cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The primary endpoint was locoregional control (LRC). Three hundred eighty-four patients with stage III (6%) and IV (94%) oropharyngeal (59.4%), hypopharyngeal (32.3%), and oral cavity (8.3%) cancer were randomly assigned to 30 Gy/2 Gy daily followed by twice-daily 1.4 Gy to a total of 70.6 Gy concurrently with mitomycin C/5-FU (C-HART) or 16 Gy/2 Gy daily followed by twice-daily 1.4 Gy to a total dose of 77.6 Gy alone (HART). Statistical analyses were done with the log-rank test and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 8.7 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.8-9.7 years). At 10 years, the LRC rates were 38.0% (C-HART) versus 26.0% (HART, P=.002). The cancer-specific survival and overall survival rates were 39% and 10% (C-HART) versus 30.0% and 9% (HART, P=.042 and P=.049), respectively. According to multivariate Cox regression analysis, the combined treatment was associated with improved LRC (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.6 [95% CI: 0.5-0.8; P=.002]). The association between combined treatment arm and increased LRC appeared to be limited to oropharyngeal cancer (P=.003) as compared with hypopharyngeal or oral cavity cancer (P=.264).

CONCLUSIONS

C-HART remains superior to HART in terms of LRC. However, this effect may be limited to oropharyngeal cancer patients.

Can radiobiological parameters derived from squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck be used to predict local control in anal cancer treated with chemoradiation?

OBJECTIVES

Parameters have been derived in head and neck cancer to account for the additional biological effective dose provided by synchronous chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to establish whether such parameters could be used to predict local control differences in anal cancer.

METHODS

In anal cancer two randomised trials of radiotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy and two trials randomising between different synchronous chemotherapy regimens were identified. To predict differences in local control between the arms of the first two studies, a global value of 9.3 Gy for the chemotherapy biologically effective dose was employed. For the last two trials, values specific to differing chemotherapy schedules were derived. These values were added to the calculated biological effective dose for the radiotherapy component in order to predict local control outcomes in anal cancer trials.

RESULTS

The predicted difference in local control using the global value of 9.3 Gy for the addition of synchronous chemotherapy in the trials of radiotherapy vs radiotherapy and synchronous chemotherapy was 24.6% compared with the observed difference of 21.4%. Using schedule-specific values for the contribution of chemotherapy, the predicted differences in local control in the two trials of differing synchronous chemotherapy schedules were 7.2% and 12% compared with the observed 18% and 0%.

CONCLUSION

The methods initially proposed require modification to result in adequate prediction. If the decreased cisplatin dose intensity employed in anal cancer is modelled, more satisfactory predictions for such trials can be achieved.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This revised modelling may be hypothesis generating.

Concurrent radiochemotherapy in locally-regionally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: analysis of treatment results and prognostic factors

BACKGROUND

Concurrent radiochemotherapy is a recommended treatment option for patients with locally advanced squamous cell head and neck carcinomas with recent data showing the most significant absolute overall and event-free survival benefit achieved in patients with oropharyngeal tumours. The aim of this study was to analyse the results of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy given with concomitant weekly cisplatin in patients with advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma and to identify prognostic factors influencing outcomes of this patients category.

METHODS

Sixty-five patients with stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx who underwent concurrent radiochemotherapy between January 2005 and December 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received radiotherapy to 70 Gy/35 fractions/2 Gy per fraction/5 fractions per week. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of weekly cisplatin (30 mg/m(2)) started at the first day of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Median age was 57 years (range, 36 to 69 years) and 59 (90.8%) patients were male. Complete composite response was achieved in 47 patients (72.3%). Local and/or regional recurrence was the most frequent treatment failure present in 19 out of 25 patients (76.0%). At a median follow-up of 14 months (range, 5 to 72 months), 2-year local relapse-free, regional relapse-free, locoregional relapse-free, disease-free, and overall survival rates were 48.8%, 57.8%, 41.7%, 33.2% and 49.7%, respectively.On multivariate analysis the only significant factor for inferior regional relapse-free survival was the advanced N stage (p = 0.048). Higher overall stage was independent prognostic factor for poorer local relapse-free survival, locoregional relapse-free survival and disease-free survival (p = 0.022, p = 0.003 and p = 0.003, respectively). Pre-treatment haemoglobin concentration was an independent prognostic factor for local relapse-free survival, regional relapse-free survival, locoregional relapse-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival (p = 0.002, p = 0.021, p = 0.001, p = 0.002 and p = 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Poor treatments results of this study suggested that introduction of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, use of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent radiochemotherapy, accelerated radiotherapy regimens, and molecular targeted therapies could positively influence treatment outcomes. The incorporation of reversal of anaemia should be also expected to provide further improvement in locoregional control and survival in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx.

Postoperative therapy in head and neck cancer: state of the art, risk subset, prognosis and unsolved questions

Head and neck cancer may be easily controlled at early stages, but resectable locally advanced disease often relapses at T and N sites. Therefore, adequate adjuvant treatment is of crucial importance for improving local control and/or survival. Unfortunately, little data are available on the adjuvant setting. Adjuvant radiotherapy is regarded as a standard approach for patients with locally advanced radically resected head and neck cancer, while postoperative chemotherapy alone cannot be considered outside of clinical trials. However, chemoradiotherapy is widely considered superior to radiotherapy in patients at a high risk of relapse and may be considered the standard treatment in this population. In this respect, in the last few decades, there has been a growing interest due to the emerging data on both tumor biology and clinical trials. Several pathological and molecular factors, affecting behavior and head and neck cancer prognosis, could allow for a better selection of postoperative treatment. More recently, new prognostic and predictive factors were identified, including biomolecular aspects, human papillomavirus infection and lifestyle. The integration of these new factors deserves dedicated clinical studies, but the available knowledge already allows some deductive hypotheses. We performed a review of the literature to analyze the role of therapy in the postoperative setting and to discuss both the possibility of a different approach to each class of risk and the unsolved question for which randomized trials are warranted.

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are frequently described as part of a group of oral cancers or head and neck cancer. Treatment of oral cavity cancer is generally surgery followed by radiotherapy, whereas oropharyngeal cancers, which are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis, are managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Surgery for oral cancers can be disfiguring and both surgery and radiotherapy have significant functional side effects, notably impaired ability to eat, drink and talk. The development of new chemotherapy agents, new combinations of agents and changes in the relative timing of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy treatments may potentially bring about increases in both survival and quality of life for this group of patients.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer results in improved survival, disease free survival, progression free survival, locoregional control and reduced recurrence of disease. To determine which regimen and time of administration (induction, concomitant or adjuvant) is associated with better outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED were undertaken on 1st December 2010. Reference lists of recent reviews and included studies were also searched to identify further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours in the oral cavity or oropharynx, and which compared the addition of chemotherapy to other treatments such as radiotherapy and/or surgery, or compared two or more chemotherapy regimens or modes of administration, were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Eighty-nine trials which met the inclusion criteria were assessed for risk of bias and data were extracted by two or more review authors. The primary outcome was total mortality. Trial authors were contacted for additional information or for clarification.

MAIN RESULTS

There is evidence of a small increase in overall survival associated with induction chemotherapy compared to locoregional treatment alone (25 trials), hazard ratio (HR) of mortality 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.00, P = 0.06). Post-surgery adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival compared to surgery ± radiotherapy alone (10 trials), HR of mortality 0.88 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.99, P = 0.03), and there is some evidence that this improvement may be greater with concomitant adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (4 trials), HR of mortality 0.84 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.98, P = 0.03). In patients with unresectable tumours, there is evidence that concomitant or alternating chemoradiotherapy is associated with improved survival compared to radiotherapy alone (26 trials), HR of mortality 0.78 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.83, P < 0.00001). These findings are confirmed by sensitivity analyses based on studies assessed at low risk of bias. There is insufficient evidence to identify which agent(s) and/or regimen(s) are the most effective. The additional toxicity attributable to chemotherapy in the combined regimens remains unquantified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and surgery, is associated with improved overall survival in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Induction chemotherapy may prolong survival by 8 to 20% and adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy may prolong survival by up to 16%. In patients with unresectable tumours, concomitant or alternating chemoradiotherapy may prolong survival by 10 to 22%. There is insufficient evidence as to which agent or regimen is most effective and the additional toxicity associated with chemotherapy given in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery cannot be quantified.

Hyaluronan-grafted particle clusters loaded with Mitomycin C as selective nanovectors for primary head and neck cancers

CD44, a well-documented cell surface receptor, is involved in cell proliferation, migration, signaling, adhesion, differentiation and angiogenesis, which are important properties for normal and cancerous cell function. We recently developed particle clusters coated with hyaluronan (termed gagomers; GAG), and showed that they can deliver the insoluble drug paclitaxel directly into CD44-over-expressing tumors in a mouse tumor model. Here, we tested primary head and neck cancers (HNC) and normal cells taken from the same patient, and found that although CD44 expression in both types of cells was high, GAGs bind only to the cancerous cells in a selective manner. We next formulated the anti cancer agent mitomycin C (MMC) in the GAGs. MMC-based chemoradiation is a potential treatment for HNC, however, due to patient's toxicity, MMC is not part of the standard treatment of HNC. MMC encapsulation efficiency was about 70% with a half-life drug efflux of 1.2 ± 0.3 days. The Ex vivo study of the targeted MMC-GAG showed significant increase in the therapeutic effect on HNC cells (compared to free MMC), while it had no effect on normal cells taken from the same patient. These results demonstrate the specificity of the nanovectors towards head and neck cancers, which might be applicable as future therapy to many CD44-expressing tumors.

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy using low-dose weekly gemcitabine versus low-dose weekly paclitaxel in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a phase III study

The objective of this study was to compare concomitant chemoradiotherapy based on weekly low-dose gemcitabine versus weekly low-dose paclitaxel in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Previously, untreated patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were randomly assigned to one of the two concomitant chemoradiation regimens: (1) weekly gemcitabine at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) over 30 min 1-2 h before radiotherapy and (2) weekly paclitaxal at a dose of 20 mg/m(2) over 60 min 4-6 h before radiotherapy. The planned radiotherapy dose was 65 Gy over 6.5 weeks in 32 settings. Two hundred and sixteen patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: group A (110 patients) and group B (106 patients) who received concomitant weekly low-dose gemcitabine and low-dose paclitaxal, respectively, with the radiotherapy protocol. The hematological toxicity was generally mild. On the contrary, non-hematologic toxicities were severe. Grade III mucositis occurred in 36% in group A and in 24% in group B (P = 0.04). Moreover, grade III dermatitis were encountered in 24% in group A and 13% in group B (P = 0.049). Thirty-two (29%) of group A and 18(17%) of group B patients required enteral or parenteral feeding (P = 0.01). Sixteen (15%) of group A and 6 (6%) of group B required enteral or parenteral feeding that lasted for 6 months (P = 0.03). Regarding the late effect on swallowing, 8% of patients in group A and 2% of patients in group B required enteral or parenteral feeding for more than 6 months (P = 0.035). Response rates were 78 and 89% in groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.038). The 2-year progression-free survival figures were 54 and 64% of groups A and B, respectively; however, the 2-year overall survival figures were 56 and 67%, respectively. On the other hand, the 3-year progression-free survival figures were 39 and 48% for groups A and B, respectively, while the 3-year overall survival figures were 45 and 49%, respectively (P = 0.05). Both concomitant chemoradiotherapy regimens were easily given in the outpatient clinic. The regimen based on paclitaxel was significantly more tolerable and effective; however, the difference was not enormous.

The tumor microenvironment and DNA repair

Genetic instability is one of the hallmarks of cancer cells. As tumors grow, they progressively acquire mutations that ultimately allow them to invade normal tissues and metastasize to distant sites. This increased propensity for mutation also leads to cancers that are resistant to therapeutic intervention. Recent evidence has shown that the tumor microenvironment plays a major role in the etiology of this phenomenon; as tumors are exposed to repeated cycles of hypoxia and reoxygenation, they downregulate a number of DNA repair pathways, thus leading to genetic instability. Understanding the mechanisms involved in this process may provide insights into the development of novel treatment strategies.

Potent radiosensitizing agents: 5-methylselenyl- and 5-phenylselenyl-methyl-2'-deoxyuridine

This Letter describes the novel radiosensitizing agents based on nucleoside base modification. In addition to the known 5-phenylselenide derivative, 5-methylselenide modified thymidine, which has a van der Waals radius smaller than the phenyl group, was newly synthesized. The similar monomer activity of 5-methylselenide derivative under oxidation condition was confirmed by NMR experiments. The cytotoxicity tests and radiosensitizing experiments of both compounds were carried out using the H460 lung cancer cell line. Both the 5-phenylselenide and the 5-methylselenide derivatives showed a relatively low toxicity to the cells. However, in combination with γ-radiolysis, both exerted good radiosensitizing effects to the lung cancer cell lines in vitro. This result confirms that 5-methylselenide modified thymidine could be a useful candidate as a potential radiosensitizing agent in vivo.

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are frequently described as part of a group of oral cancers or head and neck cancer. Treatment of oral cavity cancer is generally surgery followed by radiotherapy, whereas oropharyngeal cancers, which are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis, are managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Surgery for oral cancers can be disfiguring and both surgery and radiotherapy have significant functional side effects, notably impaired ability to eat, drink and talk. The development of new chemotherapy agents, new combinations of agents and changes in the relative timing of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy treatments may potentially bring about increases in both survival and quality of life for this group of patients.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer results in improved survival, disease free survival, progression free survival, locoregional control and reduced recurrence of disease. To determine which regimen and time of administration (induction, concomitant or adjuvant) is associated with better outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED were undertaken on 28th July 2010. Reference lists of recent reviews and included studies were also searched to identify further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours in the oral cavity or oropharynx, and which compared the addition of chemotherapy to other treatments such as radiotherapy and/or surgery, or compared two or more chemotherapy regimens or modes of administration, were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trials which met the inclusion criteria were assessed for risk of bias using six domains: sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, completeness of outcome data, selective reporting and other possible sources of bias. Data were extracted using a specially designed form and entered into the characteristics of included studies table and the analysis sections of the review. The proportion of participants in each trial with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are recorded in Additional Table 1.

MAIN RESULTS

There was no statistically significant improvement in overall survival associated with induction chemotherapy compared to locoregional treatment alone in 25 trials (hazard ratio (HR) of mortality 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.00). Post-surgery adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival compared to surgery +/- radiotherapy alone in 10 trials (HR of mortality 0.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.99), and there was an additional benefit of adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy compared to radiotherapy in 4 of these trials (HR of mortality 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.98). Concomitant chemoradiotherapy resulted in improved survival compared to radiotherapy alone in patients whose tumours were considered unresectable in 25 trials (HR of mortality 0.79, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.84). However, the additional toxicity attributable to chemotherapy in the combined regimens remains unquantified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and surgery, is associated with improved overall survival in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Induction chemotherapy is associated with a 9% increase in survival and adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy is associated with a 16% increase in overall survival following surgery. In patients with unresectable tumours, concomitant chemoradiotherapy showed a 22% benefit in overall survival compared with radiotherapy alone.

Oral mucositis in morning vs. evening irradiated patients: a randomised prospective study

PURPOSE

Patients of head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy develop oral mucositis. The severity of mucositis may also depend on the time of administration of radiation apart from patient-related factors. The most radiosensitive phase of the cell cycle (G2-M) occurs in the late afternoon and evening in human oral mucosa; therefore, it is more vulnerable to radiation injury in the evening. The present study evaluated prospectively the severity of acute oral mucositis in head and neck carcinoma patients irradiated in the morning (08:00-11:00 h) versus late afternoon/evening (15:00-18:00 h).

METHOD

A total of 212 patients of head and neck carcinoma were randomised to morning (08:00-11:00 h) and evening (15:00-18:00 h) groups. The grades of oral mucosa ulceration were compared in the two groups.

RESULTS

The grades of mucositis were marginally higher in the evening-irradiated group than in the morning-irradiated group 38% vs. 26% (p = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

The observed incidence of grade III/IV mucositis in morning vs. evening irradiated patients may be because of the existence of circadian rhythm in the cell cycle of normal mucosa. This knowledge may provide a possibility of treating the patients with decreased toxicity to oral mucosa.

Concomitant vinorelbine and radiation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in vitro

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy has been used for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) particularily with cisplatin, 5-FU, methotrexate, bleomycin and taxanes. Vinorelbine is a semisynthetic vinca alcaloid, which causes a block in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle. HNSCC cell lines have previously been reported to be sensitive to vinorelbine in nanomolar concentrations. In the current study the effect of vinorelbine as a radiosensitizer in vitro was studied and eight recently established head and neck SCC cell lines of the UT-SCC-series were tested. Vinorelbine concentrations of 0.4-1.6 nM were used, corresponding to the IC70, IC50 and IC30 values of each cell line, resulting in 30%, 50% and 70% inhibition in clonogenic survival. The desired concentrations of vinorelbine were added to the medium and the cells were plated in 96-well culture plates in this solution. The plated cells were irradiated 24 h later with 4MeV photons generated by a linear accelerator and incubated at 37 degrees C with 5% CO2 for 4 weeks. Thereafter, the number of wells containing coherent, living colonies, consisting of 32 cells or more, was counted. The plating efficiency was calculated and the fraction survival data were fitted to the linear quadratic model [F = exp[-(alphaD + betaD2)]]. An additive effect of combining vinorelbine and irradiation could be demonstrated. The dose-dependent decrease in survival was seen at vinorelbine doses of 0.4-1.6 nM in all cell lines tested.

Mucositis versus tumor control: the therapeutic index of adding chemotherapy to irradiation of head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

To determine whether the addition of concurrent chemotherapy to radiation for head and neck cancer (HNSCC) improves the therapeutic ratio regarding tumor control vs. mucositis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data were taken from 14 randomized trials of radiation with or without concurrent chemotherapy for HNSCC. Mucositis-bioequivalent dose (mBED) was computed for each study using mBED = D [1 + d/(alpha/beta)] - 0.693(T - Tk)/Tp. An "S-value," relating the increase in the rate of Grade 3 (confluent) mucositis to the increase in mBED with radiation alone, was determined using data from trials of radiation alone with altered fractionation. We then determined the difference in the rate of mucositis and used the S-value to estimate the apparent difference in mBED in the chemoradiation and radiation alone arms for each trial. After accounting for differences in the radiation schedules, we estimated the mBED attributable to adding chemotherapy and compared it with previously published estimates of increases in tumor BED.

RESULTS

Computed S-values ranged from 0.4 to 1.7. For S = 1, the mean increase in mBED attributable to chemotherapy was 8.3 Gy(10) (SD = 6.4). The average difference between tumor-BED and mBED was 2.8 Gy(10) (SD = 6.0). Increasing the S-value decreases the estimated increase in mBED due to chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent chemotherapy improves the therapeutic index for radiation of HNSCC. Further refinements are needed in quantifying the therapeutic gain attributable to specific radiosensitizing agents in clinical trials, notably better and more consistent reporting of treatment sequelae.

New developments in radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: intensity-modulated radiation therapy and hypoxia targeting

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has revolutionized radiation treatment for head and neck cancers (HNCs). When compared to the traditional techniques, IMRT has the unique ability to minimize the dose delivered to normal tissues without compromising tumor coverage. As a result, side effects from high-dose radiation have decreased and patient quality of life has improved. In addition to toxicity reduction, excellent clinical outcomes have been reported for IMRT. The first part of this review will focus on clinical results of IMRT for HNC. Tumor hypoxia, or the condition of low oxygen, is a key factor for tumor progression and treatment resistance. Hypoxia develops in solid tumors due to aberrant blood vessel formation, fluctuation in blood flow, and increasing oxygen demands for tumor growth. Because hypoxic tumor cells are more resistant to ionizing radiation, hypoxia has been a focus of clinical research in radiation therapy for half a decade. Interest for targeting tumor hypoxia has waxed and waned as promising treatments emerged from the laboratory, only to fail in the clinics. However, with the development of new technologies, the prospect of targeting tumor hypoxia is more tangible. The second half of the review will focus on approaches for assessing tumor hypoxia and on the strategies for targeting this important microenvironmental factor in HNC.

New developments in radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: intensity-modulated radiation therapy and hypoxia targeting

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has revolutionized radiation treatment for head and neck cancers (HNCs). When compared to the traditional techniques, IMRT has the unique ability to minimize the dose delivered to normal tissues without compromising tumor coverage. As a result, side effects from high-dose radiation have decreased and patient quality of life has improved. In addition to toxicity reduction, excellent clinical outcomes have been reported for IMRT. The first part of this review will focus on clinical results of IMRT for HNC. Tumor hypoxia, or the condition of low oxygen, is a key factor for tumor progression and treatment resistance. Hypoxia develops in solid tumors due to aberrant blood vessel formation, fluctuation in blood flow, and increasing oxygen demands for tumor growth. Because hypoxic tumor cells are more resistant to ionizing radiation, hypoxia has been a focus of clinical research in radiation therapy for half a decade. Interest for targeting tumor hypoxia has waxed and waned as promising treatments emerged from the laboratory, only to fail in the clinics. However, with the development of new technologies, the prospect of targeting tumor hypoxia is more tangible. The second half of the review will focus on approaches for assessing tumor hypoxia and on the strategies for targeting this important microenvironmental factor in HNC.

concomitant chemoradiotherapy with mitomycin C and cisplatin in advanced unresectable carcinoma of the head and neck: phase I-II clinical study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of concomitant chemoradiotherapy with mitomycin C and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Treatment consisted of conventional radiotherapy (70 Gy in 35 fractions), mitomycin C 15 mg/m(2) IV, applied after the delivery of 10 Gy, and cisplatin at an initial dose of 10 mg/m(2)/d IV, applied during the last 10 fractions of irradiation ("chemoboost"). The cisplatin dose was escalated with respect to the toxic side effects by 2 mg/m(2)/d up to the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or at the most 14 mg/m(2)/d (Phase I study), which was tested in the subsequent Phase II study.

RESULTS

All 36 patients had Stage T4 and/or N3 disease, and the majority had oropharyngeal (50%) or hypopharyngeal (39%) primary tumors. Six patients were treated at each of the three cisplatin dose levels tested (Phase I study). Dose-limiting toxicity was not reached even at 14 mg/m(2)/d of cisplatin, which was determined as the MTD and tested in an additional 18 patients (Phase II study). After a median follow-up time of 48 months, 4-year locoregional control, failure-free, and overall survival rates were 30%, 14%, and 20%, respectively. In 24 patients treated at the cisplatin dose level of 14 mg/m(2)/d, the corresponding rates were 40%, 20%, and 22%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy with mitomycin C and cisplatin "chemoboost" at 14 mg/m(2)/d is feasible, with encouraging survival results if the extremely poor disease profile of the treated patients is considered.

How much radiation is the chemotherapy worth in advanced head and neck cancer?

PURPOSE

To estimate the radiotherapeutic dose equivalence of chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

METHODS

The biologic equivalent dose (BED) of radiotherapy in nine trials of standard and five trials of modified fractionated radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy was calculated using the linear-quadratic formulation. Data from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) study 90-03 were used to calculate the relationship (S) between increase in locoregional control (LRC) and increase in BED with modified vs. standard fractionated radiotherapy. The increase in LRC with chemoradiotherapy vs. radiotherapy alone, the BED of the radiotherapy-alone arms, and the "S" value were used to calculate the BED contribution from chemotherapy and the total BED of chemoradiotherapy from each study.

RESULTS

From RTOG 90-03, a 1% increase in BED yields a 1.1% increase in LRC. The mean BED of standard fractioned radiotherapy was 60.2 Gy(10) and 66 Gy(10) for modified fractionation. The mean BED of standard fractionated chemoradiotherapy was 71 Gy(10) (10.8 Gy(10) contributed by chemotherapy). The mean BED of modified fractionated chemoradiotherapy was 76 Gy(10) (10.4 Gy(10) contributed by chemotherapy).

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy increases BED by approximately 10 Gy(10) in standard and modified fractionated radiotherapy, equivalent to a dose escalation of 12 Gy in 2 Gy daily or 1.2 Gy twice daily. Such an escalation could not be safely achieved by increasing radiation dose alone.

Review: implications of in vitro research on the effect of radiotherapy and chemotherapy under hypoxic conditions

As it is now well established that human solid tumors frequently contain a substantial fraction of cells that are hypoxic, more and more in vitro research is focusing on the impact of hypoxia on the outcome of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Indeed, the efficacy of irradiation and many cytotoxic drugs relies on an adequate oxygen supply. Consequently, hypoxic regions in solid tumors often contain viable cells that are intrinsically more resistant to treatment with radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Moreover, efforts have been made to exploit hypoxia as a potential difference between malignant and normal tissues.Nowadays, a body of evidence indicates that oxygen deficiency clearly influences some major intracellular pathways such as those involved in cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, apoptosis, cell adhesion, and others. Obviously, when investigating the effects of radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both combined under hypoxic conditions, it is essential to consider the influences of hypoxia itself on the cell. In this review, we first focus on the effects of hypoxia per se on some critical biological pathways. Next, we sketch an overview of preclinical and clinical research on radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and chemoradiation under hypoxic conditions.

Advantage of combining NLCQ-1 (NSC 709257) with radiation in treatment of human head and neck xenografts

NLCQ-1 (NSC 709257), a hypoxia-selective cytotoxin that targets DNA through weak intercalation, was investigated for efficacy in combination with single or fractionated radiotherapy of human head and neck xenografts. A staged tumor experiment was performed in tumor-bearing female athymic nude mice that were locally irradiated with or without NLCQ-1. Tumor hypoxia was assessed by immunohistochemistry for pimonidazole adducts in tumors of varying weight. Fractionated radiation, depending on the dose, was administered either once daily for 4 days or once daily for 4 days followed by a 7-day rest and repeat. NLCQ-1 was administered i.p. at 15 mg/kg alone or 45 min before each radiation dose. Hypoxia (1-52%) was detected in all tumors and was positively correlated with tumor size. NLCQ-1 alone resulted in about 10 days of tumor growth delay, measured at sixfold the tumor's original size, without causing toxicity. All combination treatments with NLCQ-1 were more effective than treatments with radiation alone. Radiation at 1 Gy given once daily for 4 days on days 20 and 30 caused 3.5 days of tumor growth delay, whereas in combination with NLCQ-1 it caused 14.5 days of growth delay. Radiation at 5 Gy given in two doses 10 days apart resulted in 3.5 days of tumor growth delay, whereas more than 20 additional days of delay were observed in combination with NLCQ-1. Radiation given as a single dose of 10 Gy resulted in about 7 days of tumor growth delay, whereas in combination with NLCQ-1 about 30 additional days of delay were seen. These results suggest a significant advantage in combining radiation with NLCQ-1 in treatment of human head and neck tumors, which are known to have hypoxic areas.

The chemoradiation paradigm in head and neck cancer

In this article, we use the example of head and neck cancer to show how concurrent chemoradiotherapy is used to treat a cancer where locoregional control is central for treatment success. The advent of concurrent chemoradiation has significantly contributed to the curability of head and neck cancer, including locoregionally advanced disease. Preserving organ function and reducing toxic effects are increasingly the focus of clinical trials. We review the available chemoradiotherapy platforms used for head and neck cancer, with initial discussions focused on single-agent cytotoxic-based regimens. We then assess the literature on multiagent-based regimens and include a discussion of the integration of novel agents, such as EGFR inhibitors, and antiangiogenic drugs into treatment platforms. Although single-agent cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy is still widely used as a standard therapy, we propose that evidence increasingly shows that multiagent-based chemoradiotherapy, and EGFR-inhibitor-based treatments, offer distinct advantages. We provide guidance for clinicians based on current clinical trial evidence on how to choose appropriate treatment platforms for their patients.

Patterns of failure in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated postoperatively with irradiation or concomitant irradiation with Mitomycin C and Bleomycin

PURPOSE

The long term results and patterns of failure in patients with squamous cell head and neck carcinoma (SCHNC) treated in a prospective randomized trial in which concomitant postoperative radiochemotherapy with Mitomycin C and Bleomycin (CRT) was compared with radiotherapy only (RT), were analyzed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between March 1997 and December 2001, 114 eligible patients with Stage III or IV SCHNC were randomized. Primary surgical treatment was performed with curative intent in all patients. Patients in both groups were postoperatively irradiated to the total dose of 56-70 Gy. Chemotherapy included Mitomycin C 15 mg/m2 after 10 Gy and 5 mg of Bleomycin twice weekly during irradiation. Median follow-up was 76 months (48-103 months).

RESULTS

At 5 years in the RT and CRT arms, the locoregional control was 65% and 88% (p = 0.026), disease-free survival 33% and 53% (p = 0.035), and overall survival 37% and 55% (p = 0.091) respectively. Patients who benefited from chemotherapy were those with high-risk factors. The probability of distant metastases was 22% in RT and 20% in CRT arm (p = 0.913), of grade III or higher late toxicity 19% in RT and 26% in CRT arm (p = 0.52) and of thyroid dysfunction 36% in RT and 56% in CRT arm (p = 0.24). The probability to develop a second primary malignancy (SPM) was 34% in the RT and 8% in the CRT arm (p = 0.023). One third of deaths were due to infection, but there was no difference between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

With concomitant radiochemotherapy, locoregional control and disease free survival were significantly improved. Second primary malignancies in the CRT arm compared to RT arm were significantly less frequent. The high probability of post treatment hypothyroidism in both arms warrants regular laboratory evaluation.

Advances in the treatment of locally advanced non-nasopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region

Over the past decade important advances have been made in the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Traditionally, chemotherapy has been incorporated in the treatment of SCCHN either before local treatment as induction, concomitantly with radiation, or following local treatment as adjuvant therapy. A number of randomized trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated that induction chemotherapy (usually based on the combination of cisplatin and 5-d continuous infusion of fluorouracil) followed by local treatment or concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) each prolongs survival and results in organ preservation in a significant number of patients. Survival rates appear to be higher when CCRT with cisplatin is used. Furthermore, accelerated fractionation radiation regimens have shown improved local control rates in randomized trials. Recently, new therapeutic strategies such as induction chemotherapy followed by CCRT or the incorporation of newer agents such as taxanes are under intense investigation and preliminary results are promising. Advances in molecular biology have led to the elucidation of molecular mechanisms that initiate and maintain the malignant phenotype in SCCHN. The identification of molecular targets has revolutionized our approach to cancer therapy and resulted in the introduction of novel targeted therapies. Cyclin-dependent kinases, the tumor suppressor p53 gene, and epidermal growth factor receptor are some of the molecular targets of such therapies in patients with SCCHN.

A meta-analysis of hyperfractionated and accelerated radiotherapy and combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy regimens in unresected locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Background

Former meta-analyses have shown a survival benefit for the addition of chemotherapy (CHX) to radiotherapy (RT) and to some extent also for the use of hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) and accelerated radiation therapy (AFRT) in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck. However, the publication of new studies and the fact that many older studies that were included in these former meta-analyses used obsolete radiation doses, CHX schedules or study designs prompted us to carry out a new analysis using strict inclusion criteria.

Methods

Randomised trials testing curatively intended RT (≥60 Gy in >4 weeks/>50 Gy in <4 weeks) on SCC of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx published as full paper or in abstract form between 1975 and 2003 were eligible. Trials comparing RT alone with concurrent or alternating chemoradiation (5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cisplatin, carboplatin, mitomycin C) were analyzed according to the employed radiation schedule and the used CHX regimen. Studies comparing conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) with either HFRT or AFRT without CHX were separately examined. End point of the meta-analysis was overall survival.

Results

Thirty-two trials with a total of 10 225 patients were included into the meta-analysis. An overall survival benefit of 12.0 months was observed for the addition of simultaneous CHX to either CFRT or HFRT/AFRT (p < 0.001). Separate analyses by cytostatic drug indicate a prolongation of survival of 24.0 months, 16.8 months, 6.7 months, and 4.0 months, respectively, for the simultaneous administration of 5-FU, cisplatin-based, carboplatin-based, and mitomycin C-based CHX to RT (each p < 0.01). Whereas no significant gain in overall survival was observed for AFRT in comparison to CFRT, a substantial prolongation of median survival (14.2 months, p < 0.001) was seen for HFRT compared to CFRT (both without CHX).

Conclusion

RT combined with simultaneous 5-FU, cisplatin, carboplatin, and mitomycin C as single drug or combinations of 5-FU with one of the other drugs results in a large survival advantage irrespective the employed radiation schedule. If radiation therapy is used as single modality, hyperfractionation leads to a significant improvement of overall survival. Accelerated radiation therapy alone, especially when given as split course radiation schedule or extremely accelerated treatments with decreased total dose, does not increase overall survival.

Paclitaxel, cisplatin, leucovorin, and continuous infusion fluorouracil followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Phase II Study

The primary objective of this phase II study was to access the complete response (CR) rate to a new innovative induction regimen in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (LA-HNC). From October 2000 until October 2003 a total of 38 eligible patients (33 men and 5 women) entered the study. The large majority of them presented with a performance status of 0-1 and with clinical stage IV disease. Treatment consisted of three cycles of induction chemotherapy (IC) with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 in a 3-h infusion on d 1, leucovorin (LV) 200 mg/m2 over 20 min immediately followed by FU 400 mg/m2 bolus and then 600 mg/m2 as a 24-h continuous infusion on d 1 and 2 and a cisplatin 75 mg/m2 over 1-h infusion on d 2 every 3 wk. This was then followed by radiation (70 Gy) and weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2. After the completion of IC, 6/38 (16%) patients had CR. The CR rate was increased to 66% post-concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Neutropenia (37.5%), pain (62%), nausea/vomiting (21%), and alopecia (79%) were the most frequent side effects during IC. The most pronounced toxicities during chemoradiotherapy were stomatitis (62.5%) and xerostomia (53%). Median time to progression was 11.0 mo and median survival 16.7 mo. One- and 2-yr survival rates were 73% and 38%, respectively. In conclusion, this novel induction regimen is active, is well tolerated, and can be successfully followed by CCRT with weekly cisplatin. CCRT should remain standard treatment for patients with LA-HNC. Novel induction combinations, such as that reported in the present study, should be evaluated in combination with CCRT only in the context of clinical trials.

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic review evaluates the use of postoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced (stage III or IV) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck at a high risk of recurrence.

METHODS

The literature was systematically searched for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

RESULTS

Of 4 RCTs identified, 3 reported improvements in locoregional control, 3 reported improved disease-free or progression-free survival, and 3 reported improved overall survival with chemoradiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone. Pooling trials confirmed the benefit for chemoradiotherapy in locoregional recurrence (relative risk [RR] = 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.47-0.75; p < .00001) and overall survival (RR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.71-0.90; p = .0002). More frequent and severe acute mucosal toxicity was reported with combined treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone. Because chemoradiotherapy is associated with significantly increased toxicity, further investigations to identify patients most likely to benefit or toxicity reduction strategies are warranted.

Mitomycin and fluorouracil in combination with concomitant radiotherapy: a potentially curable approach for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of radiotherapy and concurrent mitomycin-C (MC) plus 5-fluorouracil (5FU) infusion in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients with SCCHN (6 Stage III and 63 Stage IV patients) were treated with external beam radiotherapy (70 Gy) and simultaneous intravenous chemotherapy with 5FU (600 mg/m(2)/day, Days 1-5) and MC (10 mg/m(2), Days 5 and 36).

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 28.5 months, 59.4% of patients were alive without disease. Complete response was seen in 76.8% of patients. The 3 years overall survival, locoregional relapse-free survival and disease-free survival was 62.3, 63.1[corrected] and 49.5%, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated (Grade III mucositis in 43.5% and Grade II leukopenia in 5.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

This concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimen offers a curative option for our patients where primary and nodal disease is fairly large resulting in hypoxic radioresistant tumors.

A new concurrent chemotherapy with vinorelbine and mitomycin C in combination with radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of concurrent chemotherapy with vinorelbine and mitomycin C in combination with accelerated radiotherapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced cancer of the head and neck.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2003 and March 2004, 15 patients with T4/N2-3 squamous cell carcinoma (12/15) and with N3 cervical lymph node metastases of carcinoma of unknown primary (3/15) were treated with chemotherapy and simultaneous accelerated RT.

RESULTS

11 patients completed therapy without interruption or dose reduction. Grade 3-4 acute mucosal toxicity was observed in 9/15 patients, grade 4 hematologic toxicity in 6/15 patients. At a median follow-up of 7.5 months, 2 patients have died of intercurrent disease, 2 patients have experienced local relapse; 5 patients are alive with no evidence of disease at the primary tumor site.

DISCUSSION

The described regimen is highly effective, but led to remarkable side effects.

Phase I study of continuous mitomycin-C infusion in concomitant radiochemotherapy of primary inoperable advanced head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

A phase I trial to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of continuous mitomycin-C infusion in radiochemotherapy of inoperable HNSCC.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients were treated with 70 Gy (2 Gy/day) and simultaneous chemotherapy (5-FU 600 mg/m2/day and MMC, both as continuous infusion on days 1-5 and 36-40. The MMC dose was dependent on dose escalation levels I-IV: 2/2.6/3.2/4 mg/m2/day.

RESULTS

Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade 3 mucositis and/or dysphagia) occurred at dose level IV (MMC 4 mg/m2/day). Accordingly, dose escalation level III (MMC 3.2 mg/m2/day) was set as the MTD. One and 2-year survival rate: 66.7 and 29.5%, disease free survival: 47.6 and 22.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that continuous infusion of 5-FU/MMC can be safely administered at a MMC dose of 3.21 mg/m2/day on days 1-5 and 36-40 in concomitant radiochemotherapy. A phase II study should be initiated to establish the role of this regimen in the treatment of head and neck cancer.

Anemia, tumor hypoxemia, and the cancer patient

PURPOSE

To review the impact of anemia/tumor hypoxemia on the quality of life and survival in cancer patients, and to assess the problems associated with the correction of this difficulty.

METHODS

MEDLINE searches were performed to find relevant literature regarding anemia and/or tumor hypoxia in cancer patients. Articles were evaluated in order to assess the epidemiology, adverse patient effects, anemia correction guidelines, and mechanisms of hypoxia-induced cancer cell growth and/or therapeutic resistance. Past and current clinical studies of radiosensitization via tumor oxygenation/hypoxic cell sensitization were reviewed. All clinical studies using multi-variate analysis were analyzed to show whether or not anemia and/or tumor hypoxemia affected tumor control and patient survival. Articles dealing with the correction of anemia via transfusion and/or erythropoietin were reviewed in order to show the impact of the rectification on the quality of life and survival of cancer patients.

RESULTS

Approximately 40-64% of patients presenting for cancer therapy are anemic. The rate of anemia rises with the use of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormonal therapy for prostate cancer. Anemia is associated with reductions both in quality of life and survival. Tumor hypoxemia has been hypothesized to lead to tumor growth and resistance to therapy because it leads to angiogenesis, genetic mutations, resistance to apoptosis, and a resistance to free radicals from chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Nineteen clinical studies of anemia and eight clinical studies of tumor hypoxemia were found that used multi-variate analysis to determine the effect of these conditions on the local control and/or survival of cancer patients. Despite differing definitions of anemia and hypoxemia, all studies have shown a correlation between low hemoglobin levels and/or higher amounts of tumor hypoxia with poorer prognosis. Radiosensitization through improvements in tumor oxygenation/hypoxic cell sensitization has met with limited success via the use of hyperbaric oxygen, electron-affinic radiosensitizers, and mitomycin. Improvements in tumor oxygenation via the use of carbogen and nicotinamide, RSR13, and tirapazamine have shown promising clinical results and are all currently being tested in Phase III trials. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend transfusion or erythropoietin for symptomatic patients with a hemoglobin of 10-11 g/dl and state that erythropoietin should strongly be considered if hemoglobin falls to less than 10 g/dl. These recommendations were based on studies that revealed an improvement in the quality of life of cancer patients, but not patient survival with anemia correction. Phase III studies evaluating the correction of anemia via erythropoietin have shown mixed results with some studies reporting a decrease in patient survival despite an improvement in hemoglobin levels. Diverse functions of erythropoietin are reviewed, including its potential to inhibit apoptosis via the JAK2/STAT5/BCL-X pathway. Correction of anemia by the use of blood transfusions has also shown a decrement in patient survival, possibly through inflammatory and/or immunosuppressive pathways.

CONCLUSIONS

Anemia is a prevalent condition associated with cancer and its therapies. Proper Phase III trials are necessary to find the best way to correct anemia for specific patients. Future studies of erythropoietin must evaluate the possible anti-apoptotic effects by directly assessing the tumor for erythropoietin receptors or the presence of the JAK2/STAT5/BCL-X pathway. Due to the ability of transfusions to cause immunosuppression, most probably through inflammatory pathways, it may be best to study the effects of transfusion with the prolonged use of anti-inflammatory medications.

Adjuvant treatment of locally-advanced head and neck tumours

Every year about 40,000 new patients are diagnosed as having squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) and nearly 60% of this population present with locally-advanced, but non-metastatic, disease. For many years, radiation therapy (RT) alone has been the standard non-surgical treatment for locally-advanced disease. Nevertheless, even the most effective RT regimens (the once-daily, hyperfractionation, or accelerated fractionation) show an improvement in local control rates of 50%-70% and disease-free survival rates of 30%-40%. These modest results have stimulated the search for novel strategies combining RT and chemotherapy. Several chemotherapeutic agents have been tested in combination with RT and cisplatin appears to be the most powerful agent in the treatment of locally-advanced head and neck tumours; as has been demonstrated in a large meta-analysis and, recently, in two multi-centred randomised trials. Based on these results, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy may be considered the standard adjuvant treatment for locally-advanced head and neck tumours.

Final report of a pilot trial of accelerated radiotherapy plus concurrent 96-hour infusional paclitaxel for locally advanced head and neck cancer

Recent data show that accelerated radiotherapy (XRT) improves local-regional control (LRC) over standard-fractionation XRT. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy improves LRC and survival over XRT alone. This study assesses the feasibility, toxicity, and preliminary efficacy of concurrent 96-hour paclitaxel infusion with accelerated XRT. Eligible patients had stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, exclusive of nasopharynx cancer. Tumor had to be considered technically unresectable after evaluation by our multidisciplinary head/neck tumor board. XRT was given continuous course using an accelerated regimen with twice a day fractionation for the cone down (70-72 Gy/6 weeks). Chemotherapy consisted of 2 cycles of paclitaxel via 96-hour infusion during weeks 1 and 5 of XRT. The first 10 patients received doses of 40-120 mg/m2/cycle, and the subsequent 13 patients received 100 mg/m2/cycle. Twenty-three patients were studied. Median follow-up was 20.4 months (44.4 months for the 10 long-term survivors). Most (19/23) patients had reversible grade 3 acute mucositis. Median treatment time was 44 days, and all but 1 patient received both cycles of paclitaxel at their planned dose. The 3- and 4-year actuarial survival was 37%. Three- and 4-year LRC was 50%. Four patients (18%) developed distant metastases. Two patients (9%) developed severe esophageal strictures requiring permanent gastrostomy/tracheostomy, and 2 patients developed other late grade 3+ toxicities. Accelerated XRT plus concurrent 96-hour infusional paclitaxel as given in this study has intense but acceptable toxicity and is feasible. LRC and survival compare favorably with other aggressive regimens for this poor-prognosis population. Further study of accelerated XRT with concurrent chemotherapy is indicated.

Hyperfractionated accelerated chemoradiation with concurrent fluorouracil-mitomycin is more effective than dose-escalated hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy alone in locally advanced head and neck cancer: final results of the radiotherapy cooperative clinical trials group of the German Cancer Society 95-06 Prospective Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

To report the results and corresponding acute and late reactions of a prospective, randomized, clinical study in locally advanced head and neck cancer comparing concurrent fluorouracil (FU) and mitomycin (MMC) chemotherapy and hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy (C-HART; 70.6 Gy) to hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy alone (HART; 77.6 Gy).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred eighty-four stage III (6%) and IV (94%) oropharyngeal (59.4%), hypopharyngeal (32.3%), and oral cavity (8.3%) cancer patients were randomly assigned to receive either 30 Gy (2 Gy every day) followed by 1.4 Gy bid to a total of 70.6 Gy concurrently with FU (600 mg/m(2), 120 hours continuous infusion) days 1 through 5 and MMC (10 mg/m(2)) on days 5 and 36 (C-HART) or 14 Gy (2 Gy every day) followed by 1.4 Gy bid to a total dose of 77.6 Gy (HART). The data were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

At 5 years, the locoregional control and overall survival rates were 49.9% and 28.6% for C-HART versus 37.4% and 23.7% for HART, respectively (P = .001 and P = .023, respectively). Progression-free and freedom from metastases rates were 29.3% and 51.9% for C-HART versus 26.6% and 54.7% for HART, respectively (P = .009 and P = .575, respectively). For C-HART, maximum acute reactions of mucositis, moist desquamation, and erythema were lower than with HART, whereas no differences in late reactions and overall rates of secondary neoplasms were observed.

CONCLUSION

C-HART (70.6 Gy) is superior to dose-escalated HART (77.6 Gy) with comparable or less acute reactions and equivalent late reactions, indicating an improvement of the therapeutic ratio.

Concomitant boost radiation and concurrent cisplatin for advanced head and neck carcinomas. Preliminary results of a phase II, single-institutional trial

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to asses the effectiveness and toxicity of boost radiotherapy concomitant and concurrent cisplatin for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

There were 30 patients included in a prospective, phase II single-institution trial and of whom, 29 were at AJCC stage IV and 1 at stage III. Treatment consisted of radiotherapy acceleration fractionation with concomitant boost, 72 Gy, and 2 cycles of concomitant cisplatin (20 mg/m2/day continuous infusion; days 1-5 and 29-33). Amifostine, (i.v. 200 mg/m2) was administered to 26 prior to the first fraction of radiotherapy. Endpoints of the study were quality-of-life (QL), overall survival, and local control of disease.

RESULTS

Complete response (CR) was achieved in 23 patients (77%), 2 patients had partial response (PR) (7%), 4 had no response (13%), and 1 was not evaluated for response. The 2-year overall survival and loco-regional control were 60% and 56%, respectively. Main toxicity was grade 3 or 4 mucositis in 93% of the patients. QL scores (questionnaire QLQC30; version 3.0) and the HN cancer module QLQ-HN35) showed a worsening in areas related to the treatment e.g. dry mouth, problems stretching the mouth, and sticky saliva.

CONCLUSIONS

this combination modality is active, but toxic, in the treatment for LAHNC. Concomitant boost radiotherapy is probably, not the best radiotherapy schema for combining with chemotherapy in LAHNC.

Supradose Intra-Arterial Cisplatin and Concurrent Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Stage IV Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Is Feasible and Efficacious in a Multi-Institutional Setting: Results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 9615

Purpose

To determine the feasibility of high-dose intra-arterial (IA) cisplatin and concurrent radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the multi-institutional setting (Multi-RADPLAT).

Patients and Methods

Eligibility included T4 squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx. Patients received cisplatin (150 mg/m2 IA with sodium thiosulfate 9 g/m2 intravenous [IV], followed by 12 g/m2 IV over 6 hours, weekly for 4 weeks) and concurrent RT (70 Gy, 2.0 Gy/fraction, daily for 5 days over 7 weeks). Between May 1997 and December 1999, 67 patients from three experienced and eight inexperienced centers were enrolled, of whom 61 were eligible for analysis.

Results

Multi-RADPLAT was feasible (ie, three or four infusions of IA cisplatin and full dose of RT) in 53 patients (87%). The complete response (CR) rate was 85% at the primary site and 88% at nodal regions, and the overall CR rate was 80%. At a median follow-up of 3.9 years for alive patients (range, 0.9 to 6.1 years), the estimated 1-year and 2-year locoregional tumor control rates are 66% and 57%, respectively. The estimated 1-year and 2-year survival rates are 72% and 63%, respectively. The estimated 1-year and 2-year disease-free survival rates are 62% and 46%, respectively. The rates of grade 4 and 5 toxicities at the experienced and the inexperienced institutions were 14% and 0% v 47% and 4%, respectively.

Conclusion

This intensive treatment regimen for head and neck cancer is feasible and effective in a multi-institutional setting.