Dose-dense therapy with weekly 1-hour paclitaxel infusions in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Novel insights into taxane pharmacology: An update on drug resistance mechanisms, immunomodulation and drug delivery strategies

Taxanes are effective in several solid tumors. Paclitaxel, the main clinically available taxane, was approved in the early nineties, for the treatment of ovarian cancer and later on, together with the analogs docetaxel and cabazitaxel, for other malignancies. By interfering with microtubule function and impairing the separation of sister cells at mitosis, taxanes act as antimitotic agents, thereby counteracting the high proliferation rate of cancer cells. The action of taxanes goes beyond their antimitotic function because their main cellular targets, the microtubules, participate in multiple processes such as intracellular transport and cell shape maintenance. The clinical efficacy of taxanes is limited by the development of multiple resistance mechanisms. Among these, extracellular vesicles have emerged as new players. In addition, taxane metronomic schedules shows an impact on the tumor microenvironment reflected by antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory effects, an aspect of growing interest considering their inclusion in treatment regimens with immunotherapeutics. Preclinical studies have paved the bases for synergistic combinations of taxanes both with conventional and targeted agents. A variety of drug delivery strategies have provided novel opportunities to increase the drug activity. The ability of taxanes to orchestrate different cellular effects amenable to modulation suggests novel options to improve cures in lethal malignancies.

Early taxane exposure and neurotoxicity in breast cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is the most diagnosed tumor and a leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide. Taxanes are the most used chemotherapeutic agents and are strictly connected to neurotoxicity. Taxane-induced neuropathy (TIN) significantly impacts patients' quality of life (QOL). Early identification and management of TIN could improve preventive strategies to preserve patients' QOL during and after breast cancer treatment.

OBJECTIVE

This prospective, observational study aimed to evaluate the taxane-induced neuropathy (TIN) in early breast cancer patients treated with weekly paclitaxel at an earlier stage and identify any correlation between TIN and QOL.

METHODS

Data from stage I-III breast cancer patients treated with taxane-based therapy between 2018 and 2022 were collected at the Medical Oncology Unit of the University Hospital of Cagliari. Peripheral neuropathy was evaluated using the NCI-CTCAE scale (National Cancer Institute, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) at every drug administration. In contrast, QOL was assessed using EORTC QLC-CIPN20 and FACT-Taxane questionnaire at baseline (T0), after 4 weeks (T1) and 12 (T2) weeks of treatment. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation between neurotoxicity and QOL.

RESULTS

Neurotoxicity incidence peaked at the third, fourth, and sixth week of treatment, with patients reporting grade 1 and 2 neurotoxicity. Simultaneously with increasing doses of paclitaxel, significant differences in QOL were observed in early treatment cycles relating to TIN presentation. Patients with higher neurotoxicity grades reported lower QOL scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the absence of effective treatments to prevent paclitaxel-induced neurotoxicity, symptoms are managed through dosage reduction, delay, or treatment interruption. Future research should focus on identifying neuroprotective measures to avoid an irreversible decline in the quality of life for breast cancer survivors.

Concept: A randomised multicentre trial of first line chemotherapy comparing three weekly cabazitaxel versus weekly paclitaxel in HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel is commonly used as first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. However, with response rates of 21.5-53.7% and significant risk of peripheral neuropathy, there is need for better chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This open-label phase II/III trial randomised HER2-negative MBC patients 1:1 to either 6 cycles of three-weekly cabazitaxel (25 mg/m²), or, weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m²) over 18 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), time to response (TTR), overall survival (OS), safety and tolerability and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

158 patients were recruited. Comparing cabazitaxel to paclitaxel, median PFS was 6.7 vs 5.8 months (HR 0.87; 80%CI 0.70-1.08, P = 0.4). There was no difference in median OS (20.6 vs 18.2 months, HR 1.00; 95%CI 0.69-1.45, P = 0.99), ORR (41.8% vs 36.7%) or TTR (HR 1.09; 95%CI 0.68-1.75, P = 0.7). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 41.8% on cabazitaxel and 46.8% on paclitaxel; the most common being neutropenia (16.5%) and febrile neutropenia (12.7%) cabazitaxel and neutropenia (8.9%) and lung infection (7.6%) paclitaxel. Peripheral neuropathy of any grade occurred in 54.5% paclitaxel vs 16.5% cabazitaxel. Mean EQ-5D-5L single index utility score (+0.05; 95%CI 0.004-0.09, P = 0.03) and visual analogue scale score (+7.7; 95%CI 3.1-12.3, P = 0.001) were higher in cabazitaxel vs paclitaxel.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-weekly cabazitaxel in HER2-negative MBC does not significantly improve PFS compared to weekly paclitaxel, although it has a lower risk of peripheral neuropathy with better patient reported QoL outcomes. It is well tolerated and requires fewer hospital visits.

Triple negative breast cancer: approved treatment options and their mechanisms of action

PURPOSE

Breast cancer, the most prevalent cancer worldwide, consists of 4 main subtypes, namely, Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-positive, and Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Triple-negative breast tumors, which do not express estrogen, progesterone, and HER2 receptors, account for approximately 15-20% of breast cancer cases. The lack of traditional receptor targets contributes to the heterogenous, aggressive, and refractory nature of these tumors, resulting in limited therapeutic strategies.

METHODS

Chemotherapeutics such as taxanes and anthracyclines have been the traditional go to treatment regimens for TNBC patients. Paclitaxel, docetaxel, doxorubicin, and epirubicin have been longstanding, Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapies against TNBC. Additionally, the FDA approved PARP inhibitors such as olaparib and atezolizumab to be used in combination with chemotherapies, primarily to improve their efficiency and reduce adverse patient outcomes. The immunotherapeutic Keytruda was the latest addition to the FDA-approved list of drugs used to treat TNBC.

RESULTS

The following review aims to elucidate current FDA-approved therapeutics and their mechanisms of action, shedding a light on the various strategies currently used to circumvent the treatment-resistant nature of TNBC cases.

CONCLUSION

The recent approval and use of therapies such as Trodelvy, olaparib and Keytruda has its roots in the development of an understanding of signaling pathways that drive tumour growth. In the future, the emergence of novel drug delivery methods may help increase the efficiency of these therapies whiel also reducing adverse side effects.

Isoalantolactone Enhances the Antitumor Activity of Doxorubicin by Inducing Reactive Oxygen Species and DNA Damage

Colon cancer is one of the most common cancer in the world. Doxorubicin (DOX) is a classical anti-tumor drug which widely used in treatment of cancers, however, high toxicity limited its further clinical application. Thus, it is urgent to find new drugs with low toxicity and high efficiency to treat colon cancer. Isoalantolactone (IATL), an isomeric sesquiterpene lactone isolated from the plant of inula helenium, has been reported to have anti-cancer activity against a variety of cancer cells. However, the function of IATL in colon cancer remains unclear. Here, we demonstrated that IATL inhibited colon cancer cell growth by increasing cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Further study showed that ROS accumulation contributed to DNA damage and JNK signaling pathway activation. In addition, we found that IATL markedly enhanced DOX-induced cell cytotoxicity in colon cancer cells. IATL in combination with DOX significantly increased the ROS production, induced DNA damage and activated JNK signaling pathway. Taken together, our data suggested that combined treatment with IATL and DOX may serve as a potential therapeutics for colon cancer.

Recent Developments and Anticancer Therapeutics of Paclitaxel: An Update

Plants are a source of diverse classes of secondary metabolites with anticancer properties. Paclitaxel (Taxol) is an anticancer drug isolated from various Taxus species and is used as a chemotherapeutic agent against various cancers. The biosynthesis of paclitaxel is a complex pathway, making its total chemical synthesis commercially non-viable; hence, alternative novel sources - like plant cell culture and heterologous expression systems, are being investigated to overcome this issue. Advancements in the field of genetic engineering, microbial fermentation engineering, and recombinant techniques have significantly increased the achievable yields of paclitaxel. Indeed, paclitaxel selectively targets microtubules and causes cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase, inducing a cytotoxic effect in a concentration and time-dependent manner. Innovative drug delivery formulations, like the development of albumin-bound nanoparticles, nano-emulsions, nano-suspensions, liposomes, and polymeric micelles, have been applied to enhance the delivery of paclitaxel to tumor cells. This review focuses on the production, biosynthesis, mechanism of action, and anticancer effects of paclitaxel.

Bioactive nanotherapeutic trends to combat triple negative breast cancer

The management of aggressive breast cancer, particularly, triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains a formidable challenge, despite treatment advancement. Although newer therapies such as atezolizumab, olaparib, and sacituzumab can tackle the breast cancer prognosis and/or progression, but achieved limited survival benefit(s). The current research efforts are aimed to develop and implement strategies for improved bioavailability, targetability, reduce systemic toxicity, and enhance therapeutic outcome of FDA-approved treatment regimen. This review presents various nanoparticle technology mediated delivery of chemotherapeutic agent(s) for breast cancer treatment. This article also documents novel strategies to employ cellular and cell membrane cloaked (biomimetic) nanoparticles for effective clinical translation. These technologies offer a safe and active targeting nanomedicine for effective management of breast cancer, especially TNBC.

Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer patients: 15-year results of the Phase 3 Mammella InterGruppo (MIG)-1 study

Background

Adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care in high-risk early breast cancer patients. Dose-dense should be the preferred schedule of administration. However, its long-term benefit is unknown.

Methods

In the Italian multicentre Phase 3 randomised MIG-1 trial, node-positive and high-risk node- negative breast cancer patients were randomised to receive six cycles of adjuvant fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide regimen administered every 3 (FEC21) or 2 (FEC14) weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS).

Results

From 1992 to 1997, 1214 patients were included. Median follow-up was 15.8 years. In all, 15-year OS was 71% and 68% in the FEC14 and FEC21 groups, respectively (HR = 0.89; p = 0.25). In all, 15-year EFS was 47% and 43% in the FEC14 and FEC21 groups, respectively (HR = 0.87; p = 0.18). In a pre-planned subgroup analysis, among patients with hormone receptor-negative tumours, 15-year OS was 70% and 65% in the FEC14 and FEC21 groups, respectively (HR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.51–1.06); 15-year EFS was 58% and 43% in the FEC14 and FEC21 groups, respectively (HR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51–0.96).

Conclusions

Updated results from the MIG-1 study are numerically in favour of dose-dense chemotherapy, and suggest a long-term benefit of this approach in high-risk early breast cancer patients.

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial Evaluating Changes in Peripheral Neuropathy and Quality of Life by Using Low-Frequency Electrostimulation on Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Chemotherapy

Background: This study examined the effect of a portable low-frequency electrostimulation (ES) device on patients diagnosed with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) immediately after chemotherapy for breast cancer. Methods: A single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted. A total of 72 patients newly diagnosed with CIPN were enrolled and randomly placed into the ES (n = 36) or the sham ES group (SES; n = 36). Duloxetine or pregabalin was prescribed to all participants from the initial assessment. The devices for 14 days, at least twice a day, for at least 120 minutes. The primary outcomes were the overall intensities of the CIPN symptoms as assessed using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes included Total Neuropathy Score (TNS), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC-QLQ), Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20 (CIPN20), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B), and Instrument on Pattern Identification and Evaluation for CIPN (IPIE-CIPN). Results: No differences in NRS scores were found between the patients in the ES and the SES group (P = 0.267). Patients in both groups showed significantly reduced CIPN intensities (ES P < .001; SES P < .001). No significant differences between the groups were found in TNS, EORTC-QLQ, CIPN20, and FACT-B. The general symptoms of CIPN diagnosed as cold arthralgia showed significance only in the ES group (P = .006). Conclusion: Compared with a placebo, the effectiveness of the low-frequency ES device with pharmacological intervention was not significantly different, but a therapeutic effect was possible.

Paclitaxel's Mechanistic and Clinical Effects on Breast Cancer

Paclitaxel (PTX), the most widely used anticancer drug, is applied for the treatment of various types of malignant diseases. Mechanisms of PTX action represent several ways in which PTX affects cellular processes resulting in programmed cell death. PTX is frequently used as the first-line treatment drug in breast cancer (BC). Unfortunately, the resistance of BC to PTX treatment is a great obstacle in clinical applications and one of the major causes of death associated with treatment failure. Factors contributing to PTX resistance, such as ABC transporters, microRNAs (miRNAs), or mutations in certain genes, along with side effects of PTX including peripheral neuropathy or hypersensitivity associated with the vehicle used to overcome its poor solubility, are responsible for intensive research concerning the use of PTX in preclinical and clinical studies. Novelties such as albumin-bound PTX (nab-PTX) demonstrate a progressive approach leading to higher efficiency and decreased risk of side effects after drug administration. Moreover, PTX nanoparticles for targeted treatment of BC promise a stable and efficient therapeutic intervention. Here, we summarize current research focused on PTX, its evaluations in preclinical research and application clinical practice as well as the perspective of the drug for future implication in BC therapy.

Bayesian Inference Identifies Combination Therapeutic Targets in Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among US women; hence, identifying potential drug targets is an ever increasing need. In this paper, we integrate existing biological information with graphical models to deduce the significant nodes in the breast cancer signaling pathway.

METHODS

We make use of biological information from the literature to develop a Bayesian network. Using the relevant gene expression data we estimate the parameters of this network. Then, using a message passing algorithm, we infer the network. The inferred network is used to quantitatively rank different interventions for achieving a desired phenotypic outcome. The particular phenotype considered here is the induction of apoptosis.

RESULTS

Theoretical analysis pinpoints to the role of Cryptotanshinone, a compound found in traditional Chinese herbs, as a potent modulator for bringing about cell death in the treatment of cancer.

CONCLUSION

Using a mathematical framework, we showed that the combination therapy of mTOR and STAT3 genes yields the best apoptosis in breast cancer.

SIGNIFICANCE

The computational results we arrived at are consistent with the experimental results that we obtained using Cryptotanshinone on MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines and also by the past results of others from the literature, thereby demonstrating the effectiveness of our model.

Combination Paclitaxel and Palbociclib: Results of a Phase I Trial in Advanced Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

The CDK 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib rapidly and reversibly inhibits the cell cycle. The goal of this study was to exploit the cell cycle through intermittent, alternating dosing with palbociclib/paclitaxel to enhance efficacy. We determined the combination dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in patients with Rb protein-expressing, advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This open-label, phase I trial (NCT01320592) enrolled patients to sequential cohorts of palbociclib orally dosed intermittently between days 1 and 19 of a 28-day cycle alternating with weekly paclitaxel. Dose escalation proceeded in a standard 3 + 3 design. Ten additional patients received the combination at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Those who reached response plateau ≥6 cycles could continue on palbociclib alone on a 3 week on/1 week off schedule at one dose level above their combination dose.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients enrolled. Although there was only 1 DLT (grade 3 alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase at 125 mg), neutropenia (NTP) requiring dose modification in cycle 1 (C1) resulted in an RP2D of 75 mg palbociclib/80 mg/m² paclitaxel. During C1, the most common adverse event was NTP, occurring in 15 patients (55.6%); grade 1 or 2 nausea and peripheral neuropathy were also observed in 8 patients each (29.6%). The clinical benefit rate was 55% at the RP2D; benefit was observed across all receptor subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Alternating sequential palbociclib/paclitaxel in patients with Rb⁺ advanced breast cancer is feasible and safe, without evidence of additive toxicity. This represents a new application for CDK 4/6 inhibitors in Rb⁺ breast cancer regardless of subtype; efficacy trials are warranted.

Alternating Magnetic Field-Triggered Switchable Nanofiber Mesh for Cancer Thermo-Chemotherapy

We have developed a smart anti-cancer fiber mesh that is able to control tumor-killing activity against lung adenocarcinoma precisely. The mesh is capable of carrying large loads of chemotherapeutic drug, paclitaxel (PTX), as well as magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs). The mesh generates heat when the loaded MNPs are activated in an alternating magnetic field (AMF). The mesh is thermo-responsive, so the heat generated can be also used to trigger PTX release from the mesh. An electrospinning method was employed to fabricate the mesh using a copolymer of N-isopropylacrylamide and N-hydroxymethylacrylamide, the phase transition temperature of which was adjusted to the mild-hyperthermia temperature range around 43 °C. In vitro anti-tumor studies demonstrated that both MNP- and PTX-loaded mesh killed about 66% of cells, whereas only PTX-loaded mesh killed about 43% of cells. In a mouse lung cancer model, the thermo-chemotherapy combo displayed enhanced anti-tumor activity and the systemic toxic effects on mice were eliminated due to local release of the chemotherapeutic agents. The proposed fiber system might provide a blueprint to guide the design of the next generation of local drug delivery systems for safe and effective cancer treatment.

A phase IIA trial of acupuncture to reduce chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy severity during neoadjuvant or adjuvant weekly paclitaxel chemotherapy in breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common and potentially dose-limiting side-effect of neurotoxic chemotherapy for cancer patients. We evaluated the preliminary efficacy of acupuncture in preventing worsening CIPN in patients receiving paclitaxel.

METHODS

In this phase IIA single-arm clinical trial, we screened stage I-III breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant/adjuvant weekly paclitaxel for development of CIPN. The primary objective was to assess acupuncture's efficacy in preventing the escalation of National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), version 4.0, grade II CIPN to higher grades. Acupuncture was deemed worthy of further study if 23 or more of the 27 enrolled patients did not develop grade III CIPN. Outcome measures (NCI-CTCAE CIPN grade, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity [FACT/GOG-Ntx], Neuropathic Pain Scale [NPS]) were obtained weekly during the intervention.

RESULTS

Of 104 patients screened, 37 developed grade II CIPN (36%), and 28 (27%) enrolled into the intervention phase; one was removed due to protocol violation. Of the 27 patients receiving acupuncture, 26 completed paclitaxel treatment without developing grade III CIPN, meeting our prespecified success criteria for declaring acupuncture worthy of further study. FACT/GOG-Ntx and NPS scores remained stable during the intervention while continuing weekly paclitaxel. Acupuncture treatment was well tolerated; 4 of 27 (15%) patients reported grade I bruising.

CONCLUSIONS

Acupuncture was safe and showed preliminary evidence of effectiveness in reducing the incidence of high grade CIPN during chemotherapy. A follow-up randomised controlled trial is needed to establish definitive efficacy in CIPN prevention for patients at risk.

Paclitaxel Administered Weekly in Patients with Docetaxel-Resistant Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Study

Aims and background

We evaluated retrospectively the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel in patients with docetaxel-resistant metastatic breast cancer.

Study design

Paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) was administered weekly to 44 patients who had previously received chemotherapy regimens for metastatic breast cancer. All patients had progressive disease in spite of having received docetaxel therapy.

Results

Treatment was repeated until there was evidence of disease progression. Objective responses were obtained in 14 of 44 assessable patients (31.8%; 95% confidence interval, 17.5–46.1). Fourteen patients had partial responses; none responded completely. Seven of 14 responders had primary resistance to docetaxel therapy. The median duration of response was 6.1 months (range, 2.1–12.7). The median time to progression was 5.0 months. Clinically severe adverse events (grade 3 or 4) included neutropenia (27.2%), leukopenia (25.0%), neuropathy-sensory (13.6%), febrile neutropenia (6.8%), anemia (2.2%), constipation (2.2%), and edema (2.2%). Treatment was generally well tolerated and could be continued on an out-patient basis.

Conclusions

Weekly paclitaxel is effective in patients with docetaxel-resistant metastatic breast cancer. This observation suggests partial cross-resistance between paclitaxel and docetaxel. There was no evidence for additive cumulative toxic effects of the two taxanes.

Weekly Paclitaxel in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: A Phase II Study

Aims and background

Paclitaxel, a microtubule inhibitor, is one of the most active drugs in metastatic breast cancer. A weekly schedule, at a median dose-intensity of 91 mg/m2, is effective and has less side effects than a 3-week schedule. In this phase II study, we evaluated the toxicity and the activity of weekly 1 hr paclitaxel infusions in metastatic breast cancer patients.

Study design

Between February 1999 and February 2001, 26 patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with weekly paclitaxel (60–90 mg/m2/1 hour iv infusion/weekly). The treatment was planned to continue until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity; in patients with responsive or stable disease, paclitaxel was stopped after 6 months of therapy.

Results

At a median follow-up of 18.7 months (range, 6.8–30.8), all patients are assessable for response and toxicity. We obtained 8 partial responses (30.8%), 8 stable disease (30.8%) and 10 disease progression (38.4.%). The overall response was 30.8% (95% CI, 13.1–48.5). The median duration of response was 7.6 months (range, 1.8–12.4); median time to progression was 4.86 months (range, 1.4–12.4); median overall survival was 9.9 months (range, 1.7–29.2+). Treatment was well tolerated. Hematological toxicity was mild and only one patient developed grade 3 anemia. Two patients experienced grade 3 cardiovascular toxicity; both had received anthracycline-based regimens.

Conclusions

In our experience, weekly administration of paclitaxel shows a substantial degree of activity even in pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients. The toxicity profile is favorable.

The impact of paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy on the autonomous nervous system of patients with ovarian cancer

Background

Paclitaxel-based regimens are frequently associated with the development of peripheral neuropathy. The autonomous nervous system (ANS) effects, however, of this chemotherapeutic agent remain unexplored.

Methods

We investigated a group of 31 female patients with ovarian cancer receiving treatment with paclitaxel and carboplatin, as well as a group of 16 healthy age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers. All study participants completed a questionnaire and were assessed neurophysiologically at three time points (baseline, 3–4 months and 6–8 months following the onset of chemotherapy). The evaluation of the ANS included assessment of the adrenergic cardiovascular function (orthostatic hypotension-OH), parasympathetic heart innervation (30/15 ratio) and sympathetic skin response (SSR).

Results

At the 3–4 months ANS assessment, 19.2 % of the patients had systolic OH and the same percentage had diastolic OH, but at the 6–8 months evaluation no patient had systolic OH and only 13.8 % had diastolic OH. The values of the 30/15 ratio were significantly reduced at both time points, whereas the SSR was not affected.

Conclusions

Combined paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy is associated with significant effects on the parasympathetic heart innervation and occasionally with effects on the adrenergic cardiovascular reaction. The SSR remained unaffected. Physicians should be alert to the possibility of these treatment-emergent side effects, so as to monitor ANS parameters and introduce treatment modifications accordingly. Our findings however, should be validated in larger cohorts.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12883-016-0710-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Phase 1b/2a study of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), paclitaxel, and pertuzumab in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

Background

In pre-clinical studies, the anti-tumor activity of T-DM1 was enhanced when combined with taxanes or pertuzumab. This phase 1b/2a study evaluated the safety/tolerability of T-DM1 + paclitaxel ± pertuzumab in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.

Methods

In phase 1b (n = 60), a 3 + 3 dose-escalation approach was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of T-DM1 + paclitaxel ± pertuzumab. The primary objective of phase 2a was feasibility, with 44 patients randomized to T-DM1 + paclitaxel ± pertuzumab at the MTD identified in phase 1b.

Results

The MTD was T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg every three weeks (q3w) or 2.4 mg/kg weekly + paclitaxel 80 mg/m² weekly ± pertuzumab 840 mg loading dose followed by 420 mg q3w. Phase 2a patients had received a median of 5.0 (range: 0–10) prior therapies for advanced cancer. In phase 2a, 51.2 % received ≥12 paclitaxel doses within 15 weeks, and 14.0 % received 12 paclitaxel doses by week 12. Common all-grade adverse events (AEs) were peripheral neuropathy (90.9 %) and fatigue (79.5 %). A total of 77.3 % experienced grade ≥3 AEs, most commonly neutropenia (25.0 %) and peripheral neuropathy (18.2 %). Among the 42 phase 2a patients with measurable disease, the objective response rate (ORR) was 50.0 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 34.6–65.4); the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 56.8 % (95 % CI 41.6–71.0). No pharmacokinetic interactions were observed between T-DM1 and paclitaxel.

Conclusions

This regimen showed clinical activity. Although there is potential for paclitaxel to be added to T-DM1 ± pertuzumab, peripheral neuropathy was common in this heavily pretreated population.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00951665. Registered August 3, 2009.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-016-0691-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Pharmacokinetics of Weekly Paclitaxel and Feasibility of Dexamethasone Taper in Japanese Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Weekly paclitaxel combined with a platinum-based agent has been advocated as an alternative regimen for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Limited studies exist on the tolerability of weekly paclitaxel in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC. Furthermore, the feasibility of dexamethasone taper in the premedication regimen for weekly paclitaxel has not been examined in these patients. To address this issue, we assessed the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of weekly paclitaxel in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC in a dose-escalation Phase I trial and examined the feasibility of dexamethasone taper in these patients.

METHODS

Weekly 1-hour infusions of paclitaxel were administered at doses of 80 to 120 mg/m(2) (dose escalation of 20 mg/m(2)). The 7-week treatment cycle consisted of 6 infusions followed by a 2-week treatment interval. Pharmacokinetics were assessed during the first cycle. Dexamethasone was commenced at 16 mg and doses were successively halved if hypersensitivity reactions were absent.

FINDINGS

A total of 15 patients with either Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were enrolled. Although no dose-limiting toxicity was observed at 120 mg/m(2), 4 of 6 patients with peripheral neuropathy required discontinuation of treatment. The maximum accepted dose and the recommended dose were 120 and 100 mg/m(2), respectively. No grade ≥3 adverse events were observed at 100 mg/m(2). The maximum drug concentration and AUC correlated with dose escalation. The pharmacokinetic parameters after the first and sixth infusions were similar, indicating that repeated administration of paclitaxel did not result in drug accumulation or affect its pharmacokinetic profile. Partial response was observed in 3 of 15 patients. Plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol levels decreased during treatment but approached baseline levels after a dexamethasone-free interval.

IMPLICATIONS

Weekly paclitaxel at 100 mg/m(2) given as a 1-hour infusion for 6 weeks followed by a 2-week treatment interval was well tolerated by Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC. Dexamethasone taper was feasible in these patients, and no clear trend in plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone or cortisol levels was observed.

Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Shortening the Time Interval for a Better Therapeutic Index

Despite the advancement of targeted therapies in metastatic breast cancer, chemotherapy is still of pivotal importance. The concept of dose density is known to increase the efficacy of chemotherapy. In metastatic disease, preservation of the quality of life is equally important. Because of this, weekly regimens are a cornerstone in metastatic disease. Taxanes like paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel as well as antracyclines are often used in palliative treatment. Further advances to increase dose density have led to the concept of daily metronomic schedules with oral chemotherapeutic drugs like cyclophosphamide, capecitabine, or vinorelbine. Metronomic chemotherapy affects tumor angiogenesis and also weakens immunosuppressive regulatory T cells, promoting better control of tumor progression. Weekly or daily dose-dense regimens are a reasonable compromise between efficacy and toxicity to improve the therapeutic index. This is most important for the treatment of chronic disease where palliation and preservation of quality of life are vital.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel Once Per Week Compared With Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Nab-Paclitaxel Once Per Week or Ixabepilone With Bevacizumab As First-Line Chemotherapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer: CALGB 40502/NCCTG N063H (Alliance)

PURPOSE

We compared nab-paclitaxel or ixabepilone once per week to paclitaxel with bevacizumab as first-line therapy for patients with advanced breast cancer (BC) to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) for nab-paclitaxel or ixabepilone versus paclitaxel.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were age ≥ 18 years with chemotherapy-naive advanced BC. Patients were randomly assigned to bevacizumab with paclitaxel 90 mg/m(2) (arm A), nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m(2) (arm B), or ixabepilone 16 mg/m(2) (arm C), once per week for 3 of 4 weeks. Planned enrollment was 900 patients, which would give 88% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.73.

RESULTS

In all, 799 patients were enrolled, and 783 received treatment (97% received bevacizumab). Arm C was closed for futility at the first interim analysis (n = 241), and arm A (n = 267) and arm B (n = 275) were closed for futility at the second interim analysis. Median PFS for paclitaxel was 11 months, ixabepilone was inferior to paclitaxel (PFS, 7.4 months; hazard ratio, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.93; P < .001), and nab-paclitaxel was not superior to paclitaxel (PFS, 9.3 months; hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.45; P = .054). Results were concordant with overall survival; time to treatment failure was significantly shorter in both experimental arms v paclitaxel. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity, including peripheral neuropathy, was increased with nab-paclitaxel, with more frequent and earlier dose reductions.

CONCLUSION

In patients with chemotherapy-naive advanced BC, ixabepilone once per week was inferior to paclitaxel, and nab-paclitaxel was not superior with a trend toward inferiority. Toxicity was increased in the experimental arms, particularly for nab-paclitaxel. Paclitaxel once per week remains the preferred palliative chemotherapy in this setting.

SU2C phase Ib study of paclitaxel and MK-2206 in advanced solid tumors and metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

There is preclinical synergism between taxanes and MK-2206. We aim to determine the maximum tolerated dose, safety, and activity of combining MK-2206 and paclitaxel in metastatic cancer.

METHODS

Patients received weekly doses of paclitaxel at 80mg/m2 on day 1, followed by MK-2206 orally on day 2 escalated at 90mg, 135mg, and 200mg. Treatment continued until progression, excessive toxicity, or patient request. Blood and tissue were collected for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics markers. A cycle consisted of three weeks of therapy. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as unacceptable toxicity during the first cycle. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were treated, nine in dose escalation and 13 in dose expansion. Median age was 55 years. Median number of cycles was four. Dose escalation was completed with no DLT. CTCAE Grade 3 or higher adverse events were fatigue (n = 2), rash (n = 2), hyperglycemia (n = 1), and neutropenia (n = 7). Four patients in the expansion phase required MK-2206 dose reduction. Phase II recommended dose was established as paclitaxel 80mg/m2 weekly on day 1, and MK-2206 135mg weekly on day 2. Paclitaxel systemic exposure was similar in the presence or absence of MK-2206. Plasma MK-2206 concentrations were similar to data from previous phase I monotherapy. There was a statistically significant decrease in expression of pAKT S473 (P = .01) and pAKT T308 (P = .002) after therapy. PI3K/AKT/mTOR downregulation in tumor tissues and circulating markers did not correlate with tumor response or clinical benefit. There were five objective responses, and nine patients had stable disease.

CONCLUSION

MK-2206 was well tolerated with paclitaxel. Preliminary antitumor activity was documented.

Feasibility of two schedules of weekly paclitaxel in HER2-negative early breast cancer in a Brazilian community setting

BACKGROUND

Weekly paclitaxel has been shown more effective and less toxic than the conventional three-weekly administration. The GEICAM 9906 demonstrated effectiveness and safety of a dose-dense schedule of 100 mg/m(2) of paclitaxel given over 8 weeks (w). This schedule has been adopted at our institution in 2009 for HER2-negative disease, and herein, we present the first off-trial experience and compare its safety profile with that of a historical cohort of patients treated with the conventional 80 mg/m(2) over 12 w schedule.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center chart review of patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with (neo)adjuvant paclitaxel-based therapy from 2008 to 2012 with (1) 80 mg/m(2) for 12 w or (2) 100 mg/m(2) for 8 w. Adverse events were graded according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) 4.0.

RESULTS

A total of 326 patients were analyzed. Median age was 52 (±10.9). Seventy and 256 patients received schedule (1) and (2), respectively. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of grade (G) 3/4 toxicity: pneumonitis (2.8 vs 0.3 % p = 0.097); neuropathy (2.8 vs 0.7 % p = 0.303); hand-foot syndrome (1.4 vs 0.3 % p = 0.538); anemia (0 vs 0.6 % p = 0.624); and neutropenia (5.7 vs 6.2 % p = 0.408). Also, no significant difference was seen when comparing all grades toxicity. Schedule (2) had higher dose intensity: 97.72 vs 77.07 mg/m(2) per week (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly paclitaxel given according to GEICAM 9906 is pragmatic and well tolerated, with safety profile consistent with the conventional schedule. In addition to being convenient to patients, it may also be cost-effective because of a lower number of clinic visits and infusions.

Model-based meta-analysis for quantifying Paclitaxel dose response in cancer patients

Model-based meta-analysis of dose response is a sophisticated method to guide dose and regimen selection. In this report, the effects of paclitaxel dose and regimen (weekly or every 3 weeks) on the efficacy and safety in cancer patients were quantified by model-based meta-analysis of 29 monotherapy trials. Logistic regression models were developed to assess the relationship between dose and objective response rate or neutropenia rate. Survival models were developed to assess the relationship between dose and overall survival or progression-free survival. Paclitaxel efficacy (e.g., objective response rate, median overall survival, and progression-free survival) is correlated with average dose per week (mg/m²/week), whereas safety (e.g., neutropenia rate) is correlated with dose per administration (mg/m²). Weekly paclitaxel regimen at 65–80 mg/m² is supported to have comparable to better efficacy and lower neutropenia incidence than an every-3-week regimen at 175 mg/m².

Treatment of advanced ovarian carcinoma coexistent with peritoneal tuberculosis

Primary ovarian carcinoma is often chemosensitive. Therefore, aggressive treatment is recommended for patients with ovarian carcinoma. Peritoneal tuberculosis is rare and may present with symptoms similar to those of advanced ovarian carcinoma. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a case of primary advanced ovarian carcinoma coexistent with peritoneal tuberculosis. The patient had undergone three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with tri-weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC), followed by total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. The postoperative pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of ovarian serous papillary adenocarcinoma coexistent with peritoneal tuberculosis. The patient was started on antituberculous chemotherapy, followed 2 weeks later by four courses of antitumor chemotherapy with weekly TC. The plasma concentration of paclitaxel was measured after the first administration of TC. We considered that rifampicin may enhance the metabolism of paclitaxel, causing the plasma concentration of paclitaxel to decrease. Therefore, rifampicin administration was discontinued on days 1, 8 and 15. The patient completed the antitumor and antituberculous chemotherapy and has remained alive and recurrence-free for 5-years. Although rifampicin may enhance the metabolism of paclitaxel, we suggest that it may be possible to administer concurrent antituberculous and antitumor chemotherapy under close observation.

Taxane chemotherapy treatment for metastatic breast cancer

SUMMARY The taxanes, paclitaxel, docetaxel and nab-paclitaxel, are among the most active cytotoxic agents for treatment of breast cancer. Significant progress has been made in addressing taxane dose and schedule in both early-stage and metastatic disease. Several studies have clarified the role of retreatment with taxanes in recurrent breast cancer patients previously treated with taxane-containing regimens. In addition, the advent of nab-paclitaxel, designed to reduce allergic reactions and enhance drug delivery to tumor cells, has provided additional therapeutic options. This article summarizes the uses of taxanes in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Angiogenic factors in relation to clinical effect in a phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel

BACKGROUND

Several anticancer agents including paclitaxel have an inhibitory effect on angiogenesis.

AIMS

To compare the overall response rate and time to progression with changes in circulating angiogenic factors during palliative treatment with weekly paclitaxel.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic BC, ECOG 0-2, received weekly paclitaxel, concomitant with trastuzumab if HER2+ BC (n = 7). Circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) were determined at base-line and before start of new course.

RESULTS

Fifty-five of 63 included patients were evaluable. The overall response rate including stable disease ≥24 weeks (CR + PD + SD) was obtained in 25 of the evaluable patients (45%). The median time to progression (TTP) was 5.3 months and overall survival (OS) 16.7 months. Patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) showed a trend towards higher base-line VEGF compared with hormone receptor positive or HER2+ tumours and had shorter TTP. Significant differences in VEGF and bFGF levels at 12 weeks were found between patients with longer versus shorter TTP (VEGF: p = 0.046, bFGF: p = 0.005) and between patients gaining versus lacking clinical benefit (VEGF: p = 0.05, bFGF: p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical utility of circulating VEGF may be a useful tool for monitoring treatment efficacy.

Ixabepilone administered weekly or every three weeks in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients; a randomized non-comparative phase II trial

To explore the activity and safety of two schedules of ixabepilone, as first line chemotherapy, in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, a randomized non-comparative phase II study was conducted. From November 2008 until December 2010, 64 patients were treated with either ixabepilone 40 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks (Group A, 32 patients) or ixabepilone 20 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks (Group B, 32 patients). Overall response rate (the primary end point) was 47% in Group A and 50% in Group B. The most frequent severe adverse events were neutropenia (32% vs. 23%), metabolic disturbances (29% vs. 27%) and sensory neuropathy (12% vs. 27%). Two patients in Group A and 3 in Group B developed febrile neutropenia. After a median follow-up of 22.7 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9 months in Group A and 12 months in Group B. Median survival was 26 months in Group A, whereas it was not reached in Group B. Multiple genetic and molecular markers were examined in tumor and peripheral blood DNA, but none of them was associated with ORR or drug toxicity. Favorable prognostic markers included: the T-variants of ABCB1 SNPs c.2677G/A/T, c.1236C/T and c.3435C/T, as well as high MAPT mRNA and Tau protein expression, which were all associated with the ER/PgR-positive phenotype; absence of TopoIIa; and, an interaction between low TUBB3 mRNA expression and Group B. Upon multivariate analysis, tumor ER-positivity was a favorable (p = 0.0092) and TopoIIa an unfavorable (p = 0.002) prognostic factor for PFS; PgR-positivity was favorable (p = 0.028) for survival. In conclusion, ixabepilone had a manageable safety profile in both the 3-weekly and weekly schedules. A number of markers identified in the present trial appear to deserve further evaluation for their prognostic and/or predictive value in larger multi-arm studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 00790894.

Defining risks of taxane neuropathy: insights from randomized clinical trials

Sensory neuropathy is a common but difficult to quantify complication encountered during treatment of various cancers with taxane-containing regimens. Docetaxel, paclitaxel, and its nanoparticle albumin-bound formulation have been extensively studied in randomized clinical trials comparing various dose and schedules for the treatment of breast, lung, and ovarian cancers. This review highlights differences in extent of severe neuropathies encountered in such randomized trials and seeks to draw conclusions in terms of known pharmacologic factors that may lead to neuropathy. This basic knowledge provides an essential background for exploring pharmacogenomic differences among patients in relation to their susceptibility of developing severe manifestations. In addition, the differences highlighted may lead to greater insight into drug and basic host factors (such as age, sex, and ethnicity) contributing to axonal injury from taxanes.

Crosstalk between HER2 signaling and angiogenesis in breast cancer: molecular basis, clinical applications and challenges

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Angiogenesis is an essential hallmark of cancer. Targeting angiogenesis has proven its efficacy in the modern therapeutic paradigm. HER2 positive breast cancer, in particular, is a challenging disease in which resistance to standard therapy has been attributed to parallel and downstream signaling cascades including angiogenesis. This review explores the molecular mechanisms underlying crosstalk between HER2 signaling and angiogenesis. It highlights the role of angiogenesis in the emerging resistance to anti-HER2 therapy. It surveys the current repertoire of clinical trials involving use of combination of anti-HER2 and antiangiogenic therapies. Finally, it entertains the hopes and challenges posed by this novel therapeutic approach.

RECENT FINDINGS

HER2 signaling upregulates angiogenesis at different levels and by different mechanisms. A large number of clinical trials were conducted in attempt to exploit the potential benefit of the combination. Results of early phase trials were promising. However, in the late phase clinical trials, the AVEREL trial did not demonstrate a consistent benefit for bevacizumab in the HER2 positive breast cancer patient population. The BETH trial is ongoing and recruiting patients. Safety issues regarding cardiovascular toxicity of the combination have been already raised. Negative experience of dual EGFR and VEGF targeting in colon cancer cannot be overlooked.

SUMMARY

Angiogenesis and HER2 signaling are closely related at the molecular level. Appraisal of efficacy of antiangiogenic therapies requires revisit of the current literature as well as following the results of ongoing trials.

A comparative analysis on the efficacy and safety of intaxel® and taxol® in advanced metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Among the presently available cytotoxic drugs, paclitaxel, in combination with doxorubicin and carboplatin, come under the highly active therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Between the two brands of paclitaxel (Intaxel, which is marketed by Fresenius Kabi and Taxol, the original paclitaxel which is manufactured by BMS) the similarity has not been evaluated in clinical trial settings till date. This prospective, controlled, randomized, multicentre, open-label phase IV study was planned to compare the safety and efficacy of Intaxel with Taxol, when they were used in combination with carboplatin or doxorubicin, as a second line treatment for metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

Fourty nine eligible patients were randomized to receive Intaxel or Taxol with either doxorubicin or carboplatin. The patients who had received a prior anthracycline based chemotherapy were randomized to the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm. The patients were evaluated in three phases i.e. at baseline, during the treatment and at follow up for the tumour response, the time period till the disease progression and the toxicity. The time till the disease progression was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The continuous and categorical variables were assessed by using the ANOVA test and Fisher's exact test, respectively.

RESULTS

After 3 cycles, an objective response rate of 55.56% (CR = 3, PR = 7) was noted in the Intaxel group and that of 59.09% (CR = 1, PR = 12) was noted in the Taxol group. After 6 cycles, an objective response rate of 50% was noted in both the groups. No significant difference was observed in the response rate of the two groups after 3 cycles (p > 0.05) and at the end of the treatment (p > 0.05). The patients who received Intaxel had a lower incidence of thrombocytopaenia (p = 0.0146) and neurosensory loss (p = 0.008) as compared to those who received Taxol.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study demonstrated that the safety and efficacy of Intaxel and Taxol are equivalent when they are used in combination with other cytotoxic agents as the second line of treatment for metastatic stage IV breast cancer.

Metronomic chemotherapy for cancer treatment: a decade of clinical studies

PURPOSE

Over the past few years, more and more new selective molecules directed against specific cellular targets have become available for cancer therapy, leading to impressive improvements. In this evolving scenario, a new way of delivering older cytotoxic drugs has also been developing. Many studies demonstrated that several cytotoxic drugs have antiangiogenic properties if administered frequently and at lower doses compared with standard schedules containing maximal tolerated doses (MTD). Such a new strategy, named metronomic chemotherapy, focuses on a different target: the slowly proliferating tumour endothelial cells. About 10 years ago, metronomic chemotherapy was firstly enunciated and hereafter many clinical experiences were published related to almost any cancer disease. This review analyses available studies dealing with metronomic chemotherapy and its combination with several targeted agents in solid tumours.

METHODS

A computerized literature search of MEDLINE was performed using the following search terms: metronomic OR "continuous low dose" AND chemotherapy AND cancer OR solid tumours.

RESULTS

Satisfactory results have been achieved in diverse tumour types, such as breast and prostate cancer or paediatric sarcomas. Moreover, many studies have reported that metronomic chemotherapy determined minimal toxicity compared to MTD chemotherapy. Overall, published series on metronomic schedules are very heterogeneous often reporting on retrospective data, while only very few studies were randomized trials. These limitations still prevent to draw definitive conclusions in diverse tumour types.

CONCLUSIONS

Large well-designed studies are eagerly awaited for confirming the promises of metronomic schedules and their combinations with targeted molecules.

Different administration strategies with paclitaxel induce distinct phenotypes of multidrug resistance in breast cancer cells

Both dose-dense and dose-escalation chemotherapy are administered in clinic. By approximately imitating the schedules of dose-dense and dose-escalation administration with paclitaxel, two novel multidrug resistant (MDR) cell lines Bads-200 and Bats-72 were successfully developed from drug-sensitive breast cancer cell line BCap37, respectively. Different from Bads-200, Bats-72 exhibited stable MDR and significantly enhanced migratory and invasive properties, indicating that they represented two different MDR phenotypes. Our results showed that distinct phenotypes of MDR could be induced by altered administration strategies with a same drug. Administrating paclitaxel in conventional dose-escalation schedule might induce recrudescent tumor cells with stable MDR and increased metastatic capacity.

The prognostic and predictive value of mRNA expression of vascular endothelial growth factor family members in breast cancer: a study in primary tumors of high-risk early breast cancer patients participating in a randomized Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group trial

INTRODUCTION

The main prognostic variables in early breast cancer are tumor size, histological grade, estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor (ER/PgR) status, number of positive nodes and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status. The present study evaluated the prognostic and/or predictive value of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family members in high-risk early breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemo-hormonotherapy.

METHODS

RNA was isolated from 308 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary tumor samples from breast cancer patients enrolled in the HE10/97 trial, evaluating adjuvant dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil (CMF) with or without paclitaxel (E-T-CMF versus E-CMF). A fully automated method based on magnetic beads was applied for RNA extraction, followed by one-step quantitative RT-PCR for mRNA analysis of VEGF-A, -B, -C and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) 1, 2, 3.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 8 years, 109 patients (35%) developed a relapse and 80 patients (26%) died. In high VEGF-C and VEGFR1 mRNA expressing tumors, ER/PgR-negative tumors (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.001 and P = 0.021, respectively) and HER2-positive tumors (P <0.001 and P = 0.028, respectively) were more frequent than in low VEGF-C and VEGFR1 expressing tumors, respectively. From the VEGF family members evaluated, high VEGFR1 mRNA expression (above the 75th percentile) emerged as a significant negative prognostic factor for overall survival (OS; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01 to 2.55, Wald's P = 0.047) and disease-free survival (DFS; HR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.48, P = 0.010), when adjusting for treatment group. High VEGF-C mRNA expression was predictive for benefit from adjuvant treatment with paclitaxel (E-T-CMF arm) for OS (test for interaction, Wald's P = 0.038), while in multivariate analysis the interaction of VEGF-C with taxane treatment was significant for both OS (Wald's P = 0.019) and DFS (P = 0.041) and continuous VEGF-B mRNA expression values for OS (P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study reports, for the first time, that VEGF-C mRNA overexpression, as assessed by qRT-PCR, has a strong predictive value in high-risk early breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant paclitaxel-containing treatment. Further studies are warranted to validate the prognostic and/or predictive value of VEGF-B, VEGF-C and VEGFR1 in patients treated with adjuvant therapies and to reveal which members of the VEGF family could possibly be useful markers in identifying patients who will benefit most from anti-VEGF strategies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12611000506998.

Phase I/II trial of non-cytotoxic suramin in combination with weekly paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer treated with prior taxanes

PURPOSE

Suramin, a polysulfonated naphthylurea, inhibits the actions of polypeptide growth factors including acidic and basic fibroblast growth factors (aFGF and bFGF), which confer broad spectrum chemotherapy resistance. We hypothesized that suramin at non-cytotoxic doses in combination with weekly paclitaxel would be well tolerated and demonstrate anti-tumor activity.

METHODS

Women with metastatic breast cancer who had been previously treated with a taxane in the adjuvant or metastatic setting were eligible. The primary objective of the phase I was to determine the dose of intravenous (IV) weekly suramin that resulted in plasma concentrations between 10 and 50 umol/l over 8-48 h (or the target range) in combination with IV 80 mg/m(2) of weekly paclitaxel. The primary objective of the phase II trial was to determine the anti-tumor activity of the dosing regimen defined in phase I. Therapy was continued until disease progression or development of unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were enrolled (9: phase I; 22: phase II). In phase I, no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Pharmacokinetics during the first cycle showed suramin concentrations within the target range for 21 of 24 weekly treatments (88 %). In phase II, the objective response rate (ORR) was 23 % (95 % CI 8-45 %), the median progression-free survival was 3.4 months (95 % CI 2.1-4.9 months), and the median overall survival was 11.2 months (95 % CI 6.6-16.0 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-cytotoxic doses of suramin in combination with weekly paclitaxel were well tolerated. The efficacy was below the pre-specified criteria required to justify further investigation.

Weekly paclitaxel plus trastuzumab in metastatic breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines--a phase II multipractice study

Background

The 3-weekly combination of trastuzumab and paclitaxel has been approved for the treatment of advanced breast cancer based on a large pivotal study. However, mono and combination chemotherapy trials suggest that weekly paclitaxel has a better therapeutic index, especially in the palliative setting. The present trial examined the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel over a limited duration combined with continued trastuzumab in HER2+ patients.

Methods

Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer overexpressing HER2 were eligible if pretreated with anthracycline in either the adjuvant or palliative setting. Treatment consisted of weekly trastuzumab (2 mg/kg/week for up to one year after a loading dose of 4 mg/kg in week 1) and paclitaxel (90 mg/m², administered in weeks 1–6 and 8–13).

Results

Twenty-seven German centers enrolled 121 patients. The median number of metastatic sites was two (range 1–5); 38% of patients had received chemotherapy for advanced disease. After a median 42 weeks of trastuzumab treatment, limited by disease progression in roughly half the patients, a best objective response rate (complete response + partial response) of 76% was achieved, including complete remissions in 29%. 74% of patients lived without tumor progression at six months. Median progression-free and overall survival were 9.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.1–11.3) and 22 months (95% CI: 17–46). After alopecia, Common Toxicity Criteria grade ≥2 toxicity was predominantly hematological (leukopenia [31%] and anemia [41%]); however, thrombocytopenia occurred in only 5%. Neurotoxicity was remarkably low. Two cardiac events (grades 2 and 3) were presumed treatment-related.

Conclusions

Weekly paclitaxel plus trastuzumab allows an increased dose density and offers an attractive and effective alternative to the conventional schedule. Limiting the duration of cytotoxic therapy to 3 months seems to be an option to reduce neurotoxicity without impairing long-term outcome.

Weekly Paclitaxel plus Capecitabine versus Docetaxel Every 3 Weeks plus Capecitabine in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Background. We performed a randomized phase II study comparing efficacy and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) (Weetax) with three weekly docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) (Threetax), both in combination with oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily for 2 weeks followed by a 1-week break. Patients. Thirty-seven women with confirmed metastatic breast cancer were randomized. Results. Median TTF was 174 (Weetax) versus 147 days (Threetax) (P=0.472). Median OS was 933 (Weetax) versus 464 days (Threetax) (P=0.191). Reasons for TTF were PD 8/18 (Weetax), 9/19 (Threetax); and toxicity: 8/18 (Weetax), 8/19 (Threetax). ORR was 72% (Weetax) versus 26% (Threetax) (P = 0.01). The Threetax-combination resulted in a higher incidence of leuco-/neutropenia compared to Weetax. Grade II anemia was more pronounced in the Weetax group. No difference was found in quality of life. Conclusion. Taxanes in combination with capecitabine resulted in a high level of toxicity. Taxanes and capecitabine should be considered given sequentially and not in combination.

The choice of test in phase II cancer trials assessing continuous tumour shrinkage when complete responses are expected

Traditionally, phase II cancer trials test a binary endpoint formed from a dichotomisation of the continuous change in tumour size. Directly testing the continuous endpoint provides considerable gains in power, although also results in several statistical issues. One such issue is when complete responses, i.e. complete tumour removal, are observed in multiple patients; this is a problem when normality is assumed. Using simulated data and a recently published phase II trial, we investigate how the choice of test affects the operating characteristics of the trial. We propose using parametric tests based on the censored normal distribution, comparing them to the t-test and Wilcoxon non-parametric test. The censored normal distribution fits the real dataset well, but simulations indicate its type-I error rate is inflated, and its power is only slightly higher than the t-test. The Wilcoxon test has deflated type I error. For two-arm designs, the differences are much smaller. We conclude that the t-test is suitable for use when complete responses are present, although positively skewed data can result in the non-parametric test having higher power.

A literature-based meta-analysis taxane-based doublet versus single-agent taxane chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE

Clinical trials have reported conflicting results as to whether taxane-based doublet improves outcome over single-agent taxane in patients with advanced breast cancer.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis comparing primary and secondary end points of taxane-based doublet with single-agent taxane chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer and prior anthracycline treatment. The event-based relative risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) was derived, and a test of heterogeneity was applied.

RESULTS

Four eligible trials (2,343 patients) were selected from 488 studies that initially were identified. A significant difference in favoring taxane-based doublet over single-agent taxane was observed in progression-free survival (PFS) (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.02-1.75; P = 0.039) and partial response (PR) (RR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.10-1.86; P = 0.008). The ORR was higher for patients receiving taxane-based doublet, although not statistically significant (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.91-1.50; P = 0.220). Whereas there was no difference in 1-year survival rate (1-year SR) (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.94-1.17; P = 0.422), clinical benefit (CB) (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95-1.09; P = 0.642), and complete response (CR) (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.31-1.79; P = 0.512). Toxicities did not differ significantly except stomatitis and diarrhea.

CONCLUSION

Taxane-based doublet appeared to improve PFS and PR compared with single-agent taxane in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer. Further prospective, randomized, controlled trials will be necessary.

Profound and persistent painful paclitaxel peripheral neuropathy in a premenopausal patient

The authors herein report the case of a 35-year-old woman undergoing adjuvant therapy for node positive breast cancer, who presented with short and rapidly progressive history of bilateral lower limb symptoms of peripheral neuropathy following therapy with paclitaxel. MRI of her neural axis revealed no leptomeningeal enhancement or focal metastatic lesions. Neurophysiological tests favoured toxic sensory axonal polyneuropathy. She remains symptomatic following discontinuation of therapy 20 months ago, and is under review with pain management.

Eradication of breast cancer cells in patients with distant metastasis: the finishing touches?

Cytotoxic agents are significantly active in breast cancer cells, but their usefulness has been limited in treating metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This has facilitated the development of an approach using molecular-targeted agents. Intrinsic subtypes including luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-enriched, basal-like, and claudin-low tumors exhibit original drug responsiveness and clinical prognosis. Anti-HER2 treatments, trastuzumab or lapatinib, have demonstrated clinically significant efficacy. Poly ADP-ribose polymerase-1 inhibitors act against BRCA1-disabled breast cancer. Cancer stem cells could be the major obstacle to achieving a cure in systemic treatment. Extensive investigations are underway to develop novel agents that act on the genes or signaling of Hedgehog, Wnt, and Notch, which regulate cancer stem cells. Cancer cells undergo epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and acquire invasive properties. Breast cancer cells alter their phenotype in blood and bone marrow, e.g., circulating tumor cells or disseminated tumor cells. Cancer stem cells, like normal stem cells, may exist at niches in bone marrow. To achieve a cure for MBC, it is necessary to disrupt cancer stem cell-niche interactions or eradicate cancer stem cells. Traditional treatments with cytotoxic or endocrine agents require development in relation to intrinsic subtypes, stem cells, or EMT.