Comparison of Radiation With or Without Concurrent Trastuzumab for HER2-Positive Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Resected by Lumpectomy: A Phase III Clinical Trial

Systematic assessment of HER2 status in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a perspective on the potential clinical relevance

In many countries, hormone receptor status assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is routinely performed, as hormone receptor-positive DCIS patients are eligible for adjuvant anti-hormonal treatment, aiming to reduce the ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer risk. Although HER2 gene amplification and its associated HER2 protein overexpression constitute a major prognostic and predictive marker in invasive breast carcinoma, its use in the diagnosis and treatment of DCIS is less straightforward. HER2 immunohistochemistry is not routinely performed yet, as the role of HER2-positivity in DCIS biology is unclear. Nonetheless, recent data challenge this practice. Here, we discuss the value of routine HER2 assessment for DCIS. HER2-positivity correlates strongly with DCIS grade: around four in five HER2-positive DCIS show high grade atypia. As morphological DCIS grading is prone to interobserver variability, HER2 immunohistochemistry could render grading more robust. Several studies showed an association between HER2-positive DCIS and ipsilateral recurrence risk, albeit currently unclear whether this is for overall, in situ or invasive recurrence. HER2-positive DCIS tends to be larger, with a higher risk of involved surgical margins. HER2-positive DCIS patients benefit more from adjuvant radiotherapy: it substantially decreases the local recurrence risk after lumpectomy, without impact on overall survival. HER2-positivity in pure biopsy-diagnosed DCIS is associated with increased upstaging to invasive carcinoma after surgery. HER2 immunohistochemistry on preoperative biopsies might therefore provide useful information to surgeons, favoring wider excisions. The time seems right to consider DCIS subtype-dependent treatment, comprising appropriate local treatment for HER2-positive DCIS patients and de-escalation for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative DCIS patients.

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: finding the balance between overtreatment and undertreatment

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) accounts for 15-25% of all breast cancer diagnoses. Its prognosis is excellent overall, the main risk being the occurrence of local breast events, as most cases of DCIS do not progress to invasive cancer. Systematic screening has greatly increased the incidence of this non-obligate precursor of invasion, lending urgency to the need to identify DCIS that is prone to invasive progression and distinguish it from non-invasion-prone DCIS, as the latter can be overdiagnosed and therefore overtreated. Treatment strategies, including surgery, radiotherapy, and optional endocrine therapy, decrease the risk of local events, but have no effect on survival outcomes. Active surveillance is being evaluated as a possible new option for low-risk DCIS. Considerable efforts to decipher the biology of DCIS have led to a better understanding of the factors that determine its variable natural history. Given this variability, shared decision making regarding optimal, personalised treatment strategies is the most appropriate course of action. Well designed, risk-based de-escalation studies remain a major need in this field.

Landscape of Endometrial Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Target Therapy

Endometrial cancer is one the most prevalent gynecological cancers and, unfortunately, has a poor prognosis due to low response rates to traditional treatments. However, the progress in molecular biology and understanding the genetic mechanisms involved in tumor processes offers valuable information that has led to the current classification that describes four molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of endometrial cancers, such as genetic mutations, defects in the DNA mismatch repair pathway, epigenetic changes, or dysregulation in angiogenic or hormonal signaling pathways. The preclinical genomic and molecular investigations presented allowed for the identification of some molecules that could be used as biomarkers to diagnose, predict, and monitor the progression of endometrial cancer. Besides the therapies known in clinical practice, targeted therapy is described as a new cancer treatment that involves identifying specific molecular targets in tumor cells. By selectively inhibiting these targets, key signaling pathways involved in cancer progression can be disrupted while normal cells are protected. The connection between molecular biomarkers and targeted therapy is vital in the fight against cancer. Ongoing research and clinical trials are exploring the use of standard therapy agents in combination with other treatment strategies like immunotherapy and anti-angiogenesis therapy to improve outcomes and personalize treatment for patients with endometrial cancer. This approach has the potential to transform the management of cancer patients. In conclusion, enhancing molecular tools is essential for stratifying the risk and guiding surgery, adjuvant therapy, and cancer treatment for women with endometrial cancer. In addition, the information from this review may have an essential value in the personalized therapy approach for endometrial cancer to improve the patient's life.

Two Cases of Distant Metastasis After Mastectomy for Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

While the prognosis for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is generally excellent, distant metastasis after appropriate local treatment is extremely rare. We experienced two cases of distant metastasis after mastectomy for breast ductal carcinoma in situ. In both cases, the surgical margins were negative, the sentinel nodes were negative for metastasis. The first case was a 67-year-old woman who developed lung metastases four years after mastectomy for high-grade DCIS. The second case was a 34-year-old woman with intermediate-grade DCIS who developed intraductal recurrence localized to the nipple two years after the initial nipple-sparing mastectomy and multiple lung and liver metastases six months later. Both cases developed distant metastases despite appropriate local treatment, without preceding or concurrent invasive local recurrence. Although the probability of distant recurrence is low, it is important to inform patients about the risk of recurrence.

Tools to Guide Radiation Oncologists in the Management of DCIS

Similar to invasive breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ is also going through a phase of changes not only from a technical but also a conceptual standpoint. From prescribing radiotherapy to everyone to personalized approaches, including radiotherapy omission, there is still a lack of a comprehensive framework to guide radiation oncologists in decision making. Many pieces of the puzzle are finding their place as high-quality data mature and are disseminated, but very often, the interpretation of risk factors and the perception of risk remain very highly subjective. Sharing the therapeutic choice with patients requires effective communication for an understanding of risks and benefits, facilitating an informed decision that does not increase anxiety and concerns about prognosis. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize the current state of knowledge to highlight the tools available to radiation oncologists for managing DCIS, with an outlook on future developments.

Progression from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: molecular features and clinical significance

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents pre-invasive breast carcinoma. In untreated cases, 25-60% DCIS progress to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). The challenge lies in distinguishing between non-progressive and progressive DCIS, often resulting in over- or under-treatment in many cases. With increasing screen-detected DCIS in these years, the nature of DCIS has aroused worldwide attention. A deeper understanding of the biological nature of DCIS and the molecular journey of the DCIS-IDC transition is crucial for more effective clinical management. Here, we reviewed the key signaling pathways in breast cancer that may contribute to DCIS initiation and progression. We also explored the molecular features of DCIS and IDC, shedding light on the progression of DCIS through both inherent changes within tumor cells and alterations in the tumor microenvironment. In addition, valuable research tools utilized in studying DCIS including preclinical models and newer advanced technologies such as single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics and artificial intelligence, have been systematically summarized. Further, we thoroughly discussed the clinical advancements in DCIS and IDC, including prognostic biomarkers and clinical managements, with the aim of facilitating more personalized treatment strategies in the future. Research on DCIS has already yielded significant insights into breast carcinogenesis and will continue to pave the way for practical clinical applications.

Combined trastuzumab and radiation therapy for HER2-positive uterine serous carcinoma: A case report

Overexpression of HER2 in endometrial cancer is associated with poor prognosis, aggressive disease, and resistance to standard therapies. Recent studies have shown that HER2-targeted therapies, such as trastuzumab, can be effective in treating HER2-positive endometrial cancer in combination with chemotherapy. Currently, the management of advanced-stage HER2-positive uterine serous carcinoma (USC) consists of adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy with concurrent trastuzumab followed by trastuzumab maintenance therapy until disease recurrence or prohibitive toxicity. In the setting of persistent pelvic disease following systemic therapy, consolidation with tumor-directed radiation therapy also offers an opportunity to eradicate residual disease. With the emergence of molecular tumor classifications and systemic therapies (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and target therapies), the landscape of adjuvant multi-modality therapy is ever changing and increasingly individualized. Currently, there is no prospective evidence to guide pelvic radiotherapy with concurrent trastuzumab in endometrial cancer, and as a result, no reported toxicity in endometrial cancer patients. In this case report, we present two patients with HER2-positive USC who received multi-agent chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by pelvic radiation therapy and concurrent trastuzumab. Both patients tolerated this multimodal treatment without significant or persistent moderate or severe adverse events. These two cases provide insight into the safety and feasibility of administering radiation therapy with trastuzumab in endometrial cancer in the maintenance phase. Our report suggests that trastuzumab-based therapy may be a promising treatment option for HER2-positive endometrial cancer patients who receive concurrent or adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

Clinical significance of microinvasive breast cancer across the different subtypes and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression levels

PURPOSE

The clinical behavior, prognosis, and management of microinvasive breast cancer (MiBC) is controversial. We aimed to clarify its significance across different subtypes and the role of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression in MiBC.

METHODS

We analyzed 1530 patients with T1mi (tumor size ≤ 0.1 cm), node-negative breast cancer who underwent breast conserving surgery or total mastectomy between 2001 and 2020 at the Asan Medical Center (AMC).

RESULTS

When divided into four subtypes, hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2-, HR+ /HER2+ , HR-/HER2+ , and HR-/HER2-, HR-/HER2+ had the highest prevalence rate of 38.5% in MiBC patients. In a median follow-up period of 74 months (0-271 months), 103 (6.7%) patients had recurrent tumor, and 95 (6.2%) had local recurrence. Disease-free survival (DFS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) were worst in the HR-/HER2+ group. The five-year DFS for the HR-/HER2+ group was 92.2%, while it was 97.1% for the HR+/HER2- group (p = 0.024 The five-year LRFS for HER2- patients were better than that of HER2+ MiBC patients, which were 97.1 and 93.8%, respectively (p = 0.010). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that the HR-/HER2+ group had relatively higher risk of recurrence compared to the HR+/HER2- group (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.332, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.412-3.852, p = 0.001 unadjusted; HR = 3.346, 95% CI 1.408-7.953, p = 0.006 adjusted).

CONCLUSION

HER2 overexpression was significantly associated with adverse clinicopathologic parameters and increased local recurrence risk in MiBC. Therefore, more understanding of the clinical behavior of HER2 in MiBC will enable tailoring of adjuvant therapy for these patients.

Everybody needs good neighbours: the progressive DCIS microenvironment

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a pre-invasive form of breast cancer where neoplastic luminal cells are confined to the ductal tree. While as many as 70% of DCIS cases will remain indolent, most women are treated with surgery, often combined with endocrine and radiotherapies. Overtreatment is therefore a major issue, demanding new methods to stratify patients. Somewhat paradoxically, the neoplastic cells in DCIS are genetically comparable to those in invasive disease, suggesting the tumour microenvironment is the driving force for progression. Clinical and mechanistic studies highlight the complex DCIS microenvironment, with multiple cell types competing to regulate progression. Here, we examine recent studies detailing distinct aspects of the DCIS microenvironment and discuss how these may inform more effective care.

Major hurdles to the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in clinical prevention/interception studies: Do preclinical studies with EGFR inhibitors suggest approaches to overcome some of the limitations

There are major hurdles to the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and any other agents with significant toxicities (which means practically the preponderance of potential effective agents) in the context of prevention/anti-progression (interception) studies. We will discuss epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors as examples, both in a primary prevention setting, where agent(s) are administered to individuals with no cancer but who might be considered at higher risk due to a variety of factors, and in anti-progression/interception studies, where agent(s) are administered to persons with known preinvasive lesions (e.g., colon adenomas, lung nodules, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), or pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) lesions in the pancreas) in an attempt to reverse or inhibit progression of these lesions. Multiple potential hurdles will be examined, including: a) toxicity of agents, b) the likely range of subtypes of cancers affected by a given treatment (e.g., EGFR inhibitors against EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinomas), c) the availability of practical endpoints besides the blocking of cancer formation or pharmacokinetics related to the agents administered in a primary prevention study, and d) the interpretation of the regression or blockage of new preinvasive lesions in the anti-progression study. Such an anti-progression approach may help address some of the factors commented on regarding primary prevention (toxicity, potential target organ cancer subtypes) but still leaves major questions regarding interpretation of modulation of preinvasive endpoints when it may not be clear how frequently they progress to clinical cancer. Additionally, we address whether certain recent preclinical findings might be able to reduce the toxicities associated with these agents and perhaps even increase their potential efficacy. Antibodies and TKIs other than the EGFR inhibitors are not discussed because few if any had been tested as monotherapies in humans, making their efficacy harder to predict, and because a number have relatively rare but quite striking toxicities. Furthermore, most of the practical hurdles raised regarding the EGFR inhibitors are relevant to the other TKIs. Finally, we briefly discuss whether early detection employing blood or serum samples may allow identification of high-risk groups more amenable to agents with greater toxicity.

A Novel Biosignature Identifies Patients With DCIS With High Risk of Local Recurrence After Breast Conserving Surgery and Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

There is an unmet need to identify women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with a low risk of in-breast recurrence (IBR) after breast conserving surgery (BCS), which could omit radiation therapy (RT), and also to identify those with elevated IBR risk remaining after BCS plus RT. We evaluated a novel biosignature for a residual risk subtype (RRt) to help identify patients with elevated IBR risk after BCS plus RT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Women with DCIS treated with BCS with or without RT at centers in the US, Australia, and Sweden (n = 926) were evaluated. Patients were classified into 3 biosignature risk groups using the decision score (DS) and the RRt category: (1) Low Risk (DS ≤2.8 without RRt), (2) Elevated Risk (DS >2.8 without RRt), and (3) Residual Risk (DS >2.8 with RRt). Total and invasive IBR rates were assessed by risk group and treatment.

RESULTS

In patients at low risk, there was no significant difference in IBR rates with or without RT (total, P = .8; invasive IBR, P = .7), and there were low overall 10-year rates (total, 5.1%; invasive, 2.7%). In patients with elevated risk, IBR rates were decreased with RT (total: hazard ratio [HR], 0.25; P < .001; invasive: HR, 0.28; P = .005); 10-year rates were 20.6% versus 4.9% (total) and 10.9% versus 3.1% (invasive). In patients with residual risk, although IBR rates decreased with RT after BCS (total: HR, 0.21; P < .001; invasive: HR, 0.29; P = .028), IBR rates remained significantly higher after RT compared with patients with elevated risk (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2-5.4; P = .018), with 10-year rates of 42.1% versus 14.7% (total) and 18.3% versus 6.5% (invasive).

CONCLUSIONS

The novel biosignature identified patients with 3 distinct risk profiles: Low Risk patients with a low recurrence risk with or without adjuvant RT, Elevated Risk patients with excellent outcomes after BCS plus RT, and Residual Risk patients with an elevated recurrence risk remaining after BCS plus RT, warranting potential intensified or alternative treatment approaches.

Outcomes in patients with non‐invasive breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Non-invasive breast carcinoma is considered to be localized disease and is distinguished from invasive ductal and lobular carcinomas. The local recurrence of non-invasive carcinoma after surgery may lead to development of invasive carcinoma and promote distant metastasis, which worsens the prognosis for breast cancer mortality. The distant metastasis of non-invasive carcinoma may involve the ductal microvasculature without invasion. The outcomes of non-invasive breast carcinoma were examined in this retrospective cohort study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of 872 primary breast cancers diagnosed at a single center between May 2008 and March 2022, 93 (10.6%) were found to be non-invasive carcinomas and were examined in this study. The breast cancer recurrence and survival rates of patients with non-invasive carcinoma were analyzed retrospectively. The median follow-up period was 1891 (range, 5-4804) days. All patients underwent surgical treatment [mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and partial mastectomy with or without SLNB, tumorectomy, and microdochectomy]. Postoperatively, radiation therapy was administered to 73 (78.4%) of the patients and endocrine therapy was administered to 64 (81.0%) of 79 patients with hormone-receptor positivity. Of 26 patients who underwent partial mastectomy with SLNB, 24 (92.3%) showed isolated tumor cells in the SLNs on one-step nucleic acid amplification. Local recurrence was observed in three (0.3%) patients; no distant metastasis was observed. One patient died of a noncancerous disease. The overall survival rate was 98.0% and the breast cancer-specific survival rate was 100.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-invasive breast carcinoma, like invasive breast carcinoma, causes local recurrence, but has a good prognosis without distant metastasis. The clinical significance of isolated tumor cells in the SLNs as a systemic component of non-invasive breast carcinoma remains to be elucidated.

The clinical significance of HER2 expression in DCIS

HER2 is an established prognostic and predictive marker for patients with invasive breast cancer. The clinical and biological significance of HER2 overexpression in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains poorly defined. DCIS is a heterogeneous disease and some patients with DCIS will not progress to invasive breast cancer. However, clinically significant recurrence rates have been reported after breast-conserving surgery for DCIS and approximately half of these cases will be life-threatening invasive recurrences. Since the incidence of DCIS is rising due to the widespread use of screening mammography, there is robust interest in selecting high-risk DCIS patients that may benefit from adjuvant therapies. Molecular prognostic and predictive models in early invasive breast cancer help clinicians identify patients that will benefit from chemotherapy. Molecular subtyping and profiling could also be useful in treating DCIS patients. According to current practice guidelines, HER2 testing is not recommended in DCIS patients. Nevertheless, evidence suggests that HER2-positive DCIS cases may be associated with adverse clinicopathological parameters and increased recurrence rates. This review summarizes the existing body of evidence linking HER2 expression and ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence in DCIS. HER2, as well as its correlation with other clinicopathological markers might be a useful prognostic and predictive marker, helping clinical decision-making in DCIS patients.

An insight into the invasion of breast ductal carcinoma in situ based on clinical, pathological and hematological data

Background

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has become a non-negligible part of breast cancers owing to the greatly increased incidence. While its natural history was not fully elucidated, which is the reason for current controversies in clinical treatment. Exploration of this issue from a clinical perspective is meaningful.

Methods

Medical records of 389 patients diagnosed with DCIS or DCIS with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) were reviewed. All of them received appropriate medical care in our center. All 324 patients in training cohort were divided into invasion and non-invasion groups based on pathology. Differences in DCIS immunohistochemical markers and hematological indicators between them were analyzed. In the invasion group, differences between DCIS and matched IDC were compared to explore changes in the tumor heterogeneity during invasion. Conclusions are validated in the validation cohort of 65 patients.

Results

Patients in invasion and non-invasion groups were balanced in baseline characteristics and no statistically significant differences were noticed for DCIS immunohistochemical markers. For hematological indicators, high expression of platelet >291.50) (odds ratio, 2.46; CI [1.35-4.46]; p = 0.003) and SII (>347.20) (odds ratio, 2.54; CI [1.56-4.12]; p < 0.001) were established as independent predictors for invasion by logistic analysis and were validated in the validation cohort. Ki-67 of IDC was significantly higher than that of matched DCIS (p < 0.001). HER2 expression and histological grade of DCIS were separately linearly related to those of IDC.

Conclusion

The change in hematological indicators is an independent predictor for invasion and can be incorporated into the treatment decision-making process for DCIS. Invasion tumor cells exhibit a stronger proliferative capacity compared with the in-situ ones. There are linear relationships in HER2 expression and histological grades between DCIS and matched IDC. DCIS subclones with different histological grades will develop into invasive carcinomas separately.

Breast Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The therapeutic options for patients with noninvasive or invasive breast cancer are complex and varied. These NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer include recommendations for clinical management of patients with carcinoma in situ, invasive breast cancer, Paget disease, phyllodes tumor, inflammatory breast cancer, and management of breast cancer during pregnancy. The content featured in this issue focuses on the recommendations for overall management of ductal carcinoma in situ and the workup and locoregional management of early stage invasive breast cancer. For the full version of the NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer, visit NCCN.org.

Molecular subtypes predict second breast events of ductal carcinoma in situ after breast‐conserving surgery

Purpose

Currently, the prognostic value of molecular subtypes in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains unclear. In this study, we explored whether molecular subtypes could predict second breast events (SBEs) in patients after breast‐conserving surgery (BCS).

Methods

From January 2008 to December 2016, 291 DCIS patients treated with BCS were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified into four molecular subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression, and triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC). The SBE incidence was calculated by the competing risk model and compared by Gray's test. The disease‐free survival rates were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by the log‐rank test. Prognostic factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate COX proportional hazards regression model.

Results

With a median follow‐up of 66 months, 12 SBEs were identified. The 5‐year overall SBE incidence of luminal A, luminal B, HER2 overexpression, and TNBC was 2.18%, 4.25%, 15.15%, and 0.00%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, the HER2 overexpression subtype was the predictor of overall (p = 0.005), in situ (p = 0.004), and ipsilateral SBEs (p = 0.008). Patients with endocrine therapy were less likely to develop in situ SBEs (p = 0.039). Additionally, patients with closed (<2 mm) or involved margins were related to a higher risk of contralateral SBEs (p = 0.029). In the multivariate analysis, the HER2 overexpression subtype remained of prognostic values for overall (p = 0.006), in situ (p = 0.029), and ipsilateral SBEs (p = 0.012).

Conclusions

The molecular subtype, especially the HER2 overexpression subtype, was the independent prognostic factor for DCIS patients who underwent BCS.

Updates on treating ductal carcinoma in situ: what's to know in 2021

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a noninvasive stage of disease but understood to be a nonobligate precursor to invasive breast cancer. As such, women with DCIS are routinely recommended for standard breast cancer treatment to prevent progression to invasive disease. DCIS, however, represents a heterogeneous group of lesions that differs in its biologic behavior and risk of progression. Thus, optimal treatment is unclear. This review presents the clinical trials evaluating the de-escalation of therapy, attempts at risk stratification, and future directions in the management of this disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

The de-escalation of therapy for patients with DCIS is being actively explored. Although no group of patients based on clinicopathologic features has yet been identified as suitable for omission of therapy, molecular tests appear better able to stratify patients at low risk for whom omission of radiation may be considered. Trials considering omission of surgery are ongoing, and the use of Herceptin and vaccine therapy are also being explored.

SUMMARY

The current review provides a centralized summary enabling the clinician to better understand the complexity of DCIS and the controversies over the optimal management of this disease. It highlights the need for better risk stratification to individualize patient care.

VIDEO ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/COOG/A77.

Should Everyone With Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Receive Adjuvant Radiation?

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.