Phase III, randomized, double-blind study of epoetin alfa compared with placebo in anemic patients receiving chemotherapy

Intravenous iron versus oral iron versus no iron with or without erythropoiesis- stimulating agents (ESA) for cancer patients with anaemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anaemia is common among cancer patients and they may require red blood cell transfusions. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and iron might help in reducing the need for red blood cell transfusions. However, it remains unclear whether the combination of both drugs is preferable compared to using one drug.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the effect of intravenous iron, oral iron or no iron in combination with or without ESAs to prevent or alleviate anaemia in cancer patients and to generate treatment rankings using network meta-analyses (NMAs).

SEARCH METHODS

We identified studies by searching bibliographic databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase; until June 2021). We also searched various registries, conference proceedings and reference lists of identified trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials comparing intravenous, oral or no iron, with or without ESAs for the prevention or alleviation of anaemia resulting from chemotherapy, radiotherapy, combination therapy or the underlying malignancy in cancer patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Outcomes were on-study mortality, number of patients receiving red blood cell transfusions, number of red blood cell units, haematological response, overall mortality and adverse events. We conducted NMAs and generated treatment rankings. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

Ninety-six trials (25,157 participants) fulfilled our inclusion criteria; 62 trials (24,603 participants) could be considered in the NMA (12 different treatment options). Here we present the comparisons of ESA with or without iron and iron alone versus no treatment. Further results and subgroup analyses are described in the full text. On-study mortality We estimated that 92 of 1000 participants without treatment for anaemia died up to 30 days after the active study period. Evidence from NMA (55 trials; 15,074 participants) suggests that treatment with ESA and intravenous iron (12 of 1000; risk ratio (RR) 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 2.29; low certainty) or oral iron (34 of 1000; RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.01 to 27.38; low certainty) may decrease or increase and ESA alone (103 of 1000; RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.35; moderate certainty) probably slightly increases on-study mortality. Additionally, treatment with intravenous iron alone (271 of 1000; RR 2.95, 95% CI 0.71 to 12.34; low certainty) may increase and oral iron alone (24 of 1000; RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.00 to 19.73; low certainty) may increase or decrease on-study mortality. Haematological response We estimated that 90 of 1000 participants without treatment for anaemia had a haematological response. Evidence from NMA (31 trials; 6985 participants) suggests that treatment with ESA and intravenous iron (604 of 1000; RR 6.71, 95% CI 4.93 to 9.14; moderate certainty), ESA and oral iron (527 of 1000; RR 5.85, 95% CI 4.06 to 8.42; moderate certainty), and ESA alone (467 of 1000; RR 5.19, 95% CI 4.02 to 6.71; moderate certainty) probably increases haematological response. Additionally, treatment with oral iron alone may increase haematological response (153 of 1000; RR 1.70, 95% CI 0.69 to 4.20; low certainty). Red blood cell transfusions We estimated that 360 of 1000 participants without treatment for anaemia needed at least one transfusion. Evidence from NMA (69 trials; 18,684 participants) suggests that treatment with ESA and intravenous iron (158 of 1000; RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.63; moderate certainty), ESA and oral iron (144 of 1000; RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.66; moderate certainty) and ESA alone (212 of 1000; RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.69; moderate certainty) probably decreases the need for transfusions. Additionally, treatment with intravenous iron alone (268 of 1000; RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.28; low certainty) and with oral iron alone (333 of 1000; RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.57; low certainty) may decrease or increase the need for transfusions. Overall mortality We estimated that 347 of 1000 participants without treatment for anaemia died overall. Low-certainty evidence from NMA (71 trials; 21,576 participants) suggests that treatment with ESA and intravenous iron (507 of 1000; RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.87 to 2.43) or oral iron (482 of 1000; RR 1.39, 95% CI 0.60 to 3.22) and intravenous iron alone (521 of 1000; RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.63 to 3.56) or oral iron alone (534 of 1000; RR 1.54, 95% CI 0.66 to 3.56) may decrease or increase overall mortality. Treatment with ESA alone may lead to little or no difference in overall mortality (357 of 1000; RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.10; low certainty). Thromboembolic events We estimated that 36 of 1000 participants without treatment for anaemia developed thromboembolic events. Evidence from NMA (50 trials; 15,408 participants) suggests that treatment with ESA and intravenous iron (66 of 1000; RR 1.82, 95% CI 0.98 to 3.41; moderate certainty) probably slightly increases and with ESA alone (66 of 1000; RR 1.82, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.47; high certainty) slightly increases the number of thromboembolic events. None of the trials reported results on the other comparisons. Thrombocytopenia or haemorrhage We estimated that 76 of 1000 participants without treatment for anaemia developed thrombocytopenia/haemorrhage. Evidence from NMA (13 trials, 2744 participants) suggests that treatment with ESA alone probably leads to little or no difference in thrombocytopenia/haemorrhage (76 of 1000; RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.48; moderate certainty). None of the trials reported results on other comparisons. Hypertension We estimated that 10 of 1000 participants without treatment for anaemia developed hypertension. Evidence from NMA (24 trials; 8383 participants) suggests that treatment with ESA alone probably increases the number of hypertensions (29 of 1000; RR 2.93, 95% CI 1.19 to 7.25; moderate certainty). None of the trials reported results on the other comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

When considering ESAs with iron as prevention for anaemia, one has to balance between efficacy and safety. Results suggest that treatment with ESA and iron probably decreases number of blood transfusions, but may increase mortality and the number of thromboembolic events. For most outcomes the different comparisons within the network were not fully connected, so ranking of all treatments together was not possible. More head-to-head comparisons including all evaluated treatment combinations are needed to fill the gaps and prove results of this review.

Recombinant human erythropoietin accelerated the proliferation of non-small cell lung cancer cell lines and reduced the expression of VEGF, HIF-1α, and PD-L1 under a simulated hypoxic environment in vitro

Background

As erythropoietin (EPO) has been used to treat anemia in cancer patients, negative controversy has continued. Unfortunately, its effects on non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cell lines are uncertain and the phenomenon of inducing immune escape of tumor cells remains to be explored. This study aimed to provide an important basis for the application of exogenous EPO in the treatment of tumor-associated anemia.

Methods

Cells were cultured in 1% O2, 5% CO2, and 94% N2 to simulate a hypoxic environment of the tumor. A549 cell line (lower expression EPOR) and NCI-H838 cell line (higher expression EPOR) were treated with 2 and 8 U/ml recombinant human EPO (rhEPO). CCK-8 method was used to determine the logarithmic growth phase of the cells and to detect cell proliferation. The expression levels of VEGF, HIF-1α, and PD-L1 were determined by western blot. One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis between groups, with p < 0.05 indicating a significant difference.

Results

Hypoxia itself could decrease the survival rate of NSCLC cells. Under the hypoxic condition, rhEPO induced tumor cells proliferation, especially in the NCI-H838 cell line, where 2 U/ml rhEPO increased the total number of surviving cells (Hypoxia + rhEPO 2 U/ml vs. Hypoxia, p < 0.05). Western blot analysis showed that hypoxia upregulated the expression of VEGF, HIF-1α, and PD-L1 in NSCLC cell lines (Normoxia vs. Hypoxia, p < 0.05), but may not be dependent on the expression levels of EPOR. RhEPO decreased the expression levels of VEGF and HIF-1α. In the A549 cell line, it depended on the concentration of rhEPO and was particularly obvious in HIF-1α (Hypoxia vs. Hypoxia + rhEPO 2 U/ml vs. Hypoxia + rhEPO 8 U/ml, p < 0.05). A low concentration of rhEPO may not reduce VEGF expression. In the NCI-H838 cell line, the effect of rhEPO on VEGF was more obvious, but it may be independent of rhEPO concentrations. The downregulation of PD-L1 expression by rhEPO was only presented in the A549 cell line and required higher rhEPO concentrations (Hypoxia + rhEPO 8 U/ml vs. Hypoxia&Hypoxia + rhEPO 2 U/ml, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The effect of prolonged high concentrations of rhEPO under hypoxic conditions resulted in accelerated cells proliferation of non-small-cell lung cancer and was independent of EPOR expression levels on the cell lines surface. Hypoxia resulted in increased expression of VEGF, HIF-1α, and PD-L1 on the NSCLC cell lines. Under normoxic conditions, rhEPO did not affect the expression of VEGF, HIF-1α, and PD-L1; but under hypoxic conditions, the application of rhEPO reduced the expression of VEGF, HIF-1α, and PD-L1, producing an impact on the biological behavior of tumor cells.

[G-CSF for prophylaxis of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia, anemia in cancer : Guidelines on supportive treatment part 1]

Infections in patients with neutropenia following chemotherapy are mostly manifested as fever (febrile neutropenia, FN). Some of the most important determinants of the risk of FN are the type of chemotherapy, the dose intensity and patient-specific factors. When the risk of FN is 20% or more granulopoiesis is prophylactically stimulated with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) after the treatment. Anemia should always be clarified and if necessary be treated according to the cause when symptomatic. If an absolute or functional iron deficiency is present, intravenous iron substitution is mostly necessary. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents can be used after chemotherapy with hemoglobin (Hb) levels less than 10 g/dl (6.2 mmol/l). In cases of chronic anemia and Hb levels less than 7-8 g/dl (<4.3-5.0 mmol/l) the indications for transfusion of erythrocyte concentrates should be assessed primarily based on the individual clinical symptoms.

Hematopoietic Growth Factors in the Management of Anemia and Febrile Neutropenia

Chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) in cancer patients correlates with poor performance status and decreased quality of life. Currently recommended causal therapies are erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (epoetins), iron substitution, or a combination of both. Guidelines recommend considering red blood cell (RBC) transfusions for symptomatic anemia at a hemoglobin (Hb) level of <8 g/dl. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is recommended if the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) following from the chosen chemotherapy protocol is ≥20%. If a chemotherapy is planned that induces a moderate FN risk (10-20%), the individual overall FN risk should be assessed prior to each chemotherapy cycle, taking into account patient- or tumor-related risk factors. G-CSF is required when risk factors such as age ≥ 65 years, advanced disease or relevant comorbidity, or previous neutropenia complications are present. Neutropenia that required a shift in chemotherapy is also an indication for G-CSF prophylaxis in subsequent cycles, in order to maintain the planned dose intensity. The use of G-CSF improves patient survival and reduces the rate of neutropenia complications.

Patterns of care in Jehovah's Witnesses patients with solid tumours and lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Supportive care of Jehovah's Witnesses (JWs) diagnosed with cancer can be challenging, as they do not accept red blood cell (RBC) transfusions.

AIM

The study was designed to determine treatment preferences and pattern of care offered to JWs diagnosed with cancer and its impact on cancer management.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective cohort study of JWs with solid malignancies or lymphoma in our institution between 2005 and 2015 was conducted. Survival statistics were estimated using Kaplan Meier survival curves and Cox proportional regression model. A total of 63 JWs were identified with a median age of 70 years. At diagnosis, 34% (n = 22) had anaemia. All 63 declined RBC transfusion, including 19 patients who later developed transfusion threshold during anti-cancer treatment. Forty-three percent (n = 27) JWs had advanced (stage 4) disease, and 76% (n = 48) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group of 0 to 1. JWs were willing to accept surgery and radiation rather than chemotherapy. Treatment was deemed to be suboptimal in 22% (n = 14) JWs due to early treatment discontinuation, administration of non-standard chemotherapy regimen, or dose reduction due to anaemia and denial of blood transfusion. Twenty-seven percent (n = 17) received hematopoietic growth factors (erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and pegfilgrastim). There was no mortality directly attributed to anaemia or refusal of blood transfusion in the entire cohort.

CONCLUSION

Jehovah's Witnesses declined RBC transfusion at diagnosis and during cancer therapy even if medically indicated. Management pathways need to be prospectively defined for this group of patients.

Pharmacologic interventions for fatigue in cancer and transplantation: a meta-analysis

Background

Our objective was to determine whether, compared with control interventions, pharmacologic interventions reduce the severity of fatigue in patients with cancer or recipients of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (hsct).

Methods

For a systematic review, we searched medline, embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, cinahl, and Psychinfo for randomized trials of systemic pharmacologic interventions for the management of fatigue in patients with cancer or recipients of hsct. Two authors independently identified studies and abstracted data. Methodologic quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The primary outcome was fatigue severity measured using various fatigue scales. Data were synthesized using random-effects models.

Results

In the 117 included trials (19,819 patients), the pharmacologic agents used were erythropoietins (n = 31), stimulants (n = 19), l-carnitine (n = 6), corticosteroids (n = 5), antidepressants (n = 5), appetite stimulants (n = 3), and other agents (n = 48). Fatigue was significantly reduced with erythropoietin [standardized mean difference (smd): -0.52; 95% confidence interval (ci): -0.89 to -0.14] and with methylphenidate (smd: -0.36; 95% ci: -0.56 to -0.15); modafinil (or armodafinil) and corticosteroids were not effective.

Conclusions

Erythropoietin and methylphenidate significantly reduced fatigue severity in patients with cancer and in recipients of hsct. Concerns about the safety of those agents might limit their usefulness. Future research should identify effective interventions for fatigue that have minimal adverse effects.

Statistical controversies in clinical research: Value of adverse events relatedness to study treatment: analyses of data from randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trials

Background

Collection and reporting of adverse events (AEs) and their relatedness to study treatment, known commonly as attribution, in clinical trials is mandated by regulatory agencies (the National Cancer Institute and the Food and Drug Administration). Attribution is assigned by the treating physician using judgment based on various factors including patient's baseline status, disease history, and comorbidity as well as knowledge about the safety profile of the study treatments. We evaluate the patterns of AE attribution (unrelated, unlikely, possibly, probably, and definitely related to the treatment) in treatment, symptom intervention (cancer patients) and cancer prevention (participants at high risk for cancer) setting.

Materials and methods

Nine multicenter placebo-controlled trials (two treatment, two symptom intervention, and five cancer prevention) were analysed separately (2155 patients). Frequency and severity of AEs were summarized by arm. Attribution and percentage of repeated AEs whose attribution changed overtime were summarized for the placebo arms. Percentage of physician over- or under-reporting of AE relatedness was calculated for the treatment arms using the placebo arm as the reference.

Results

Across all trials and settings, a very high proportion of AEs reported as related to treatment were classified as possibly related, a significant proportion of AEs in the placebo arm were incorrectly reported as related to treatment, and clinician-reported attribution over-estimated the rate of AEs related to treatment. Fatigue, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, and neurosensory were the common AEs that were over reported by clinician as related to treatment.

Conclusions

These analyses demonstrate that assigning causality to AE is a complex and difficult process that produces unreliable and subjective data. In randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials where data are available to objectively assess relatedness of AE to treatment, attribution assignment should be eliminated.

Treatment of individuals who cannot receive blood products for religious or other reasons

By virtue of their religious principles, Jehovah's Witnesses (JWs) generally object to receiving blood products, raising numerous ethical, legal, and medical challenges for providers who care for these patients, especially in the emergent setting. In this review, we discuss several areas relevant to the care of JWs, including the current literature on "bloodless" medical care in the setting of perioperative and intraoperative management, acute blood loss, trauma, pregnancy, and malignancy. We have found that medical and administrative efforts in the form of bloodless medicine and surgery programs can be instrumental in helping to reduce risks of morbidity and mortality in these patients. Planning prior to an anticipated event associated with blood loss or anemia (such as elective surgery, pregnancy, and chemotherapy) is critical. Specifically, bloodless medicine programs should prioritize vigilant early screening and management of anemias, early establishment of patient wishes regarding transfusion, and the incorporation of those wishes into multidisciplinary medical and surgical care. Although there are now a variety of human-based and nonhuman-based products available as transfusion alternatives, the degree and quality of evidence to support their use varies significantly between products and is also largely dependent on the clinical setting.

A retrospective open-label uncontrolled study of Epoetin zeta on the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia in solid tumors

PURPOSE

This is a single-center uncontrolled retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the biosimilar epoetin zeta after approval in chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA).

METHODS

Patients screened were >18 years old suffering from solid malignancies and CIA with Hg ≤10 or <11 g/dl if symptomatic anemia. Patients had measurable disease by TNM and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). Patients were treated for at least 12 weeks and the primary endpoint was to determine the incidence of blood transfusions, and secondarily, the overall safety and efficacy defined as ≥1 g/dl rise in Hb concentration or ≥40,000 cells/μl rise in reticulocyte count. Quality of life was assessed with ECOG performance status (PS) and functional assessment of cancer therapy-anemia (FACT-An) score.

RESULTS

1287 patients with median Hb 9.3 g/dl (range 8.3-10.6) were enrolled and included in the evaluation. Median age was 63 years (range 33-78). 74% of patients were stage III/IV. Patients received epoetin zeta subcutaneously at fixed 40,000-IU once weekly. Blood transfusions were given in 178 patients (13.8%; 95% CI 11.9-15.6%). Appropriate response was observed in 79% patients by week 4, 87% by week 8, and 91% by week 12. A mean Hb increase of 2.5 g/dl was observed by week 12 which correlated with an improvement in PS and Fact-An score. Thrombotic events occurred in 5.2% (95% CI 3.4-7.1%) of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Epoetin zeta is effective in palliation and treatment of CIA in patients with solid tumors. Overall, it is well tolerated and safe even in patients with increased disease burden.

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (epoetin and darbepoetin) for treating cancer treatment-induced anaemia (including review of technology appraisal no. 142): a systematic review and economic model

BACKGROUND

Anaemia is a common side effect of cancer treatments and can lead to a reduction in quality of life. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are licensed for use in conjunction with red blood cell transfusions to improve cancer treatment-induced anaemia (CIA).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ESAs in anaemia associated with cancer treatment (specifically chemotherapy).

DATA SOURCES

The following databases were searched from 2004 to 2013: The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, British Nursing Index, Health Management Information Consortium, Current Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov. The US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency websites were also searched. Bibliographies of included papers were scrutinised for further potentially includable studies.

REVIEW METHODS

The clinical effectiveness review followed principles published by the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), or systematic reviews of RCTs, of ESAs (epoetin or darbepoetin) for treating people with CIA were eligible for inclusion in the review. Comparators were best supportive care, placebo or other ESAs. Anaemia- and malignancy-related outcomes, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. When appropriate, data were pooled using meta-analysis. An empirical health economic model was developed comparing ESA treatment with no ESA treatment. The model comprised two components: one evaluating short-term costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (while patients are anaemic) and one evaluating long-term QALYs. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5% per annum. Probabilistic and univariate deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of 1457 titles and abstracts screened, 23 studies assessing ESAs within their licensed indication (based on start dose administered) were included in the review. None of the RCTs were completely aligned with current European Union licenses. The results suggest a clinical benefit from ESAs for anaemia-related outcomes and an improvement in HRQoL scores. The impact of ESAs on AEs and survival remains highly uncertain, although point estimates are lower, confidence intervals are wide and not statistically significant. Base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for ESA treatment compared with no ESA treatment ranged from £ 19,429 to £ 35,018 per QALY gained, but sensitivity and scenario analyses demonstrate considerable uncertainty in these ICERs, including the possibility of overall health disbenefit. All ICERs were sensitive to survival and cost.

LIMITATIONS

The relative effectiveness of ESAs was not addressed; all ESAs were assumed to have equivalent efficacy. No studies were completely aligned with their European labelling beyond the starting dose evaluated. There is questionable generalisability given that the included trials were published >20 years ago and there have been many changes to chemotherapy as well as to the quality of supportive treatment. Trial quality was moderate or poor and there was considerable unexplained heterogeneity for a number of outcomes, particularly survival, and evidence of publication bias. Adjustments were not made to account for multiple testing.

CONCLUSIONS

ESAs could be cost-effective when used closer to licence, but there is considerable uncertainty, mainly because of unknown impacts on overall survival.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013005812.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Review of hematological indices of cancer patients receiving combined chemotherapy & radiotherapy or receiving radiotherapy alone

We observed the outcomes of chemotherapy with radiotherapy (CR) or radiotherapy (RT) alone for cancer patients of larynx, breast, blood and brain origins through complete blood count (CBC). Following were more depressed in CR patients: mean corpuscular hemoglobin-MCH & lymphocytes-LYM, hematocrit, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration-MCHC, hemoglobin-HB and red blood cells-RBC. In RT patients, following were more depressed: LYM, MCH and MCHC. Overall, in all cancer patients, the lymphocytes were depressed 52%. There existed a significant difference between white blood cells and RBC in both CR and RT patients. A significant moderate negative correlation is found in HB with the dose range 30-78 (Gray) given to the CR cancer patients. More number of CBC parameters affected in patients treated with CR and RT; but in less percentage as compared to patients who treated with RT alone. The cancer patients suffered from anemia along with immune modulations from the treatments.

A randomized comparison of once weekly epoetin alfa to extended schedule epoetin or darbepoetin in chemotherapy-associated anemia

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) epoetin alfa (EA) and darbepoetin alfa (DA) increase hemoglobin (Hb) levels and reduce red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements in patients with cancer chemotherapy-associated anemia (CAA). Extended-interval ESA dosing (administration less than once weekly) is common with DA, but previous studies suggested that EA might also be administered less often than weekly. In this multicenter prospective trial, 239 CAA patients with Hb <10.5 g/dL were randomized to receive EA 40,000 U subcutaneously once weekly ("40K" arm), EA 80,000 U every 3 weeks ("80K"), EA 120,000 U every 3 weeks ("120K" arm), or DA 500 mcg every 3 weeks ("DA"), for 15 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving Hb ≥ 11.5 g/dL or increment of Hb > 2.0 g/dL from baseline without transfusion. Secondary endpoints included transfusion requirements, adverse events (AEs), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). There were no significant differences between treatment arms in the proportion of patients achieving Hb response (68.9% for 40K, 61.7% for 80K, 65.5% for 120K, and 66.7% for DA; P > 0.41 for all comparisons) or requiring RBC transfusion, but the median Hb increment from baseline was higher in the 40K and DA arms compared to the two extended dosing EA arms, and Hb response was achieved soonest in the weekly EA arm. There were no differences in PROs or AEs. The FDA-approved schedules tested-weekly EA 40,000 U, and every 3 week DA 500 mcg-are reasonable standards for CAA therapy.

Functional EpoR pathway utilization is not detected in primary tumor cells isolated from human breast, non-small cell lung, colorectal, and ovarian tumor tissues

Several clinical trials in oncology have reported increased mortality or disease progression associated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. One hypothesis proposes that erythropoiesis-stimulating agents directly stimulate tumor proliferation and/or survival through cell-surface receptors. To test this hypothesis and examine if human tumors utilize the erythropoietin receptor pathway, the response of tumor cells to human recombinant erythropoietin was investigated in disaggregated tumor cells obtained from 186 patients with colorectal, breast, lung, ovarian, head and neck, and other tumors. A cocktail of well characterized tumor growth factors (EGF, HGF, and IGF-1) were analyzed in parallel as a positive control to determine whether freshly-isolated tumor cells were able to respond to growth factor activation ex vivo. Exposing tumor cells to the growth factor cocktail resulted in stimulation of survival and proliferation pathways as measured by an increase in phosphorylation of the downstream signaling proteins AKT and ERK. In contrast, no activation by human recombinant erythropoietin was observed in isolated tumor cells. Though tumor samples exhibited a broad range of cell-surface expression of EGFR, c-Met, and IGF-1R, no cell-surface erythropoietin receptor was detected in tumor cells from the 186 tumors examined (by flow cytometry or Western blot). Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents did not act directly upon isolated tumor cells to stimulate pathways known to promote proliferation or survival of human tumor cells isolated from primary and metastatic tumor tissues.

A prospective cohort study on the impact of darbepoetin alfa on quality of life in daily practice following anemia treatment guideline revisions

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of darbepoetin alfa (DA) on hemoglobin (Hb) levels and quality of life (QoL) in cancer patients with anemia in current daily practice following several revisions of anemia treatment guidelines.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multi-center, observational study across Germany in non-myeloid cancer outpatients with chemotherapy-induced anemia treated with DA. Age, sex, cancer type, stage, and therapy, performance status, anemia status and treatment, and Hb concentrations were recorded for up to 18 weeks in a web-based registry. Optional QoL assessments were collected at baseline and at the end of DA treatment.

MAIN RESULTS

Of 984 eligible patients, 978 had complete anemia data, 492 also had complete QoL data. In the 978 patients, mean age was 64 (standard deviation, SD 12) years, 62% of patients were women. Breast (26%) and gastrointestinal (22%) cancer were most prevalent. Therapy was palliative in 44% of patients and initiated with curative intent in 29%. Mean baseline Hb was 9.5 (SD 0.9) g/dL, which increased by an average of 1.2 g/dL. In 67% of patients Hb increased either to 10-12 g/dL or by ≥2 g/dL; no Hb response was seen in 219 patients (22%); increases of 0 to 1, >1 to 2, and >2 g/dl were seen in 216 (22%), 265 (27%), and 278 (28%) patients, respectively. Anemia treatment did not result in any significant differences of performance status. However, QoL improvements were significantly greater in Hb responders, although a linear relationship with Hb increments was lacking. None of 47 fatal cases was considered related to treatment with DA.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with DA in routine clinical practice had increases in Hb and reported improvement in QoL. Due to the uncontrolled design, no conclusions can be made regarding causality to treatment and the clinical relevance of the improvement.

Effects of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on fatigue- and anaemia-related symptoms in cancer patients: systematic review and meta-analyses of published and unpublished data

BACKGROUND

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) reduce the need for red blood cell transfusions; however, they increase the risk of thromboembolic events and mortality. The impact of ESAs on quality of life (QoL) is controversial and led to different recommendations of medical societies and authorities in the USA and Europe. We aimed to critically evaluate and quantify the effects of ESAs on QoL in cancer patients.

METHODS

We included data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of ESAs on QoL in cancer patients. Randomised controlled trials were identified by searching electronic data bases and other sources up to January 2011. To reduce publication and outcome reporting biases, we included unreported results from clinical study reports. We conducted meta-analyses on fatigue- and anaemia-related symptoms measured with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) and FACT-Anaemia (FACT-An) subscales (primary outcomes) or other validated instruments.

RESULTS

We identified 58 eligible RCTs. Clinical study reports were available for 27% (4 out of 15) of the investigator-initiated trials and 95% (41 out of 43) of the industry-initiated trials. We excluded 21 RTCs as we could not use their QoL data for meta-analyses, either because of incomplete reporting (17 RCTs) or because of premature closure of the trial (4 RCTs). We included 37 RCTs with 10581 patients; 21 RCTs were placebo controlled. Chemotherapy was given in 27 of the 37 RCTs. The median baseline haemoglobin (Hb) level was 10.1 g dl(-1); in 8 studies ESAs were stopped at Hb levels below 13 g dl(-1) and in 27 above 13 g dl(-1). For FACT-F, the mean difference (MD) was 2.41 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.39-3.43; P<0.0001; 23 studies, n=6108) in all cancer patients and 2.81 (95% CI 1.73-3.90; P<0.0001; 19 RCTs, n=4697) in patients receiving chemotherapy, which was below the threshold (≥ 3) for a clinically important difference (CID). Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents had a positive effect on anaemia-related symptoms (MD 4.09; 95% CI 2.37-5.80; P=0.001; 14 studies, n=2765) in all cancer patients and 4.50 (95% CI 2.55-6.45; P<0.0001; 11 RCTs, n=2436) in patients receiving chemotherapy, which was above the threshold (≥ 4) for a CID. Of note, this effect persisted when we restricted the analysis to placebo-controlled RCTs in patients receiving chemotherapy. There was some evidence that the MDs for FACT-F were above the threshold for a CID in RCTs including cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with Hb levels below 12 g dl(-1) at baseline and in RCTs stopping ESAs at Hb levels above 13 g dl(-1). However, these findings for FACT-F were not confirmed when we restricted the analysis to placebo-controlled RCTs in patients receiving chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In cancer patients, particularly those receiving chemotherapy, we found that ESAs provide a small but clinically important improvement in anaemia-related symptoms (FACT-An). For fatigue-related symptoms (FACT-F), the overall effect did not reach the threshold for a CID.

Impact of Cancer Supportive Care Pathways Compliance on Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor pathway compliance was associated with a significant decrease in the rate of neutropenia-related emergency department visits/hospitalizations and resulting costs.

Questionnaire-based survey on chemotherapy-induced anemia

A questionnaire-based survey on chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) in cancer patients was conducted between September and November 2010. The number of patients treated with chemotherapy, rate of blood transfusion, volume of blood transfused, severity of anemia, and factors affecting blood transfusion were analyzed according to the type of cancer, in an attempt to clarify the current status of CIA in Japan. During the survey period, among the eight types of cancer analyzed (breast, lung, stomach, colorectal, liver, gynecologic cancer, urologic cancer, and malignant lymphoma), chemotherapy was given to 5.4-13.6 % (mean 9.2 %) of patients, among whom 1.6-24.0 % (mean 7.5 %) required blood transfusion. The number of units of red blood cells transfused was 3.9-7.3 units (mean 5.9 units) per patient. According to a nationwide patient survey conducted by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, it is estimated that approximately 146,000 units of red blood cells, which account for 2.2 % of the annual total supply of red blood cell products, are transfused to cancer patients with CIA yearly. In addition, it is estimated that annually approximately 172,000 cancer patients with CIA, accounting for 40 % of patients receiving chemotherapy, have hemoglobin (Hb) levels below 10 g/dL. Possible factors affecting blood transfusion include a history of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, as well as the use of platinum agents. In patients who received red blood cell transfusions, the average Hb level prior to chemotherapy was 9.5 g/dL, and the average lowest Hb level after starting chemotherapy was 6.9 g/dL. By contrast, in patients who did not receive transfusion, these values were 11.6 and 10.4 g/dL, respectively. Furthermore, in all cancer types, almost no red blood cell transfusion was performed in patients with an Hb level of 8.0 g/dL or higher, but also many patients with an Hb level of 6.9 g/dL or lower did not receive red blood cell transfusions. There was no significant difference in the ratio of adverse events following blood transfusion in this survey compared with that in the nationwide survey. The present results demonstrate the strict restriction of red blood cell transfusion to cancer patients with CIA. Therefore, there is a need to consider the use of alternative therapies to allogeneic blood transfusion, such as erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, to increase Hb levels, and consequently improve the quality of life in cancer patients with CIA.

Erythropoietin is a JAK2 and ERK1/2 effector that can promote renal tumor cell proliferation under hypoxic conditions

Background

Erythropoietin (EPO) provides an alternative to transfusion for increasing red blood cell mass and treating anemia in cancer patients. However, recent studies have reported increased adverse events and/or reduced survival in patients receiving both EPO and chemotherapy, potentially related to EPO-induced cancer progression. Additional preclinical studies that elucidate the possible mechanism underlying EPO cellular growth stimulation are needed.

Methods

Using commercial tissue microarray (TMA) of a variety of cancers and benign tissues, EPO and EPO receptor immunohistochemical staining was performed. Furthermore using a panel of human renal cells (Caki-1, 786-O, 769-P, RPTEC), in vitro and in vivo experiments were performed with the addition of EPO in normoxic and hypoxic states to note phenotypic and genotypic changes.

Results

EPO expression score was significantly elevated in lung cancer and lymphoma (compared to benign tissues), while EPOR expression score was significantly elevated in lymphoma, thyroid, uterine, lung and prostate cancers (compared to benign tissues). EPO and EPOR expression scores in RCC and benign renal tissue were not significantly different. Experimentally, we show that exposure of human renal cells to recombinant EPO (rhEPO) induces cellular proliferation, which we report for the first time, is further enhanced in a hypoxic state. Mechanistic investigations revealed that EPO stimulates the expression of cyclin D1 while inhibiting the expression of p21^cip1 and p27^kip1 through the phosphorylation of JAK2 and ERK1/2, leading to a more rapid progression through the cell cycle. We also demonstrate an increase in the growth of renal cell carcinoma xenograft tumors when systemic rhEPO is administered.

Conclusions

In summary, we elucidated a previously unidentified mechanism by which EPO administration regulates progression through the cell cycle, and show that EPO effects are significantly enhanced under hypoxic conditions.

Budget impact analysis on erythropoiesis-stimulating agents use for the management of chemotherapy-induced anaemia in Greece

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced anaemia is a common and significant complication of chemotherapy treatment. Blood transfusion and administration of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) either alone or in combination with iron are the most widely used therapeutic options. In Greece, ESAs are among the top ten therapeutic groups with the highest pharmaceutical expenditure, since they are fully reimbursed by social security funds. The objective of the study is to determine potential cost savings related with the use of biosimilar over originator ESAs for the management of the newly diagnosed chemotherapy-induced anemic patients.

METHODS

A budget impact analysis has been carried through the elaboration of national epidemiological, clinical and economic data. Epidemiological data derived from WHO (GLOBOCAN) and the European Cancer Anaemia Survey. Clinical data reflect oncology patients' disease management. ESAs consumption was based on data from the biggest social security fund (IKA). The administration of ESAs under different dosing schemes and time periods has been estimated by separating them in originators and biosimilars as well as by classifying anaemic patients in responders and non-responders. Cost analysis is based on newly diagnosed patients' alternative treatment scenarios. Treatment costs and prices are used in 2012 values. The Social Security Funds's perspective was undertaken.

RESULTS

Based on the annual incidence rates, 2.551 newly diagnosed chemotherapy-induced anemic patients are expected to be treated with ESAs. Average cost of treatment on originators ESAs for responders is €2.887 for the 15-week ESAs treatment and €5.019 for non-responders, while on biosimilars €2.623 and €4.009 respectively. Treatment cost on biosimilars is 10.1% lower than originators for responders and 25.2% for non-responders. Budget impact estimates show that treating anemic patients with originator ESAs was estimated at €10.084.800 compared to €8.460.119 when biosimilar ESAs were used, leading to an overall 19,20% cost reduction favoring biosimilars.

CONCLUSION

In Greece, the treatment on biosimilar ESAs seems to be a cost saving option over originators for the newly diagnosed chemotherapy-induced anemic patients, since it corresponds to 5% of the annual overall consumption and expands patients' access to ESAs treatment. Health care decision making should rely on evidence based treatments in order to achieve social funds' sustainability in an era of economic recession.

Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Anaemia associated with cancer and cancer therapy is an important clinical factor in the treatment of malignant diseases. Therapeutic alternatives are recombinant human erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) and red blood cell transfusions.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of ESAs to either prevent or treat anaemia in cancer patients.

SEARCH METHODS

This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004. We searched the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE and other databases. Searches were done for the periods 01/1985 to 12/2001 for the first review, 1/2002 to 04/2005 for the first update and to November 2011 for the current update. We also contacted experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials on managing anaemia in cancer patients receiving or not receiving anti-cancer therapy that compared the use of ESAs (plus transfusion if needed).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Several review authors assessed trial quality and extracted data. One review author assessed quality assessment and extracted data, a second review author checked for correctness.

MAIN RESULTS

This update of the systematic review includes a total of 91 trials with 20,102 participants. Use of ESAs significantly reduced the relative risk of red blood cell transfusions (risk ratio (RR) 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 0.68, 70 trials, N = 16,093). On average, participants in the ESAs group received one unit of blood less than the control group (mean difference (MD) -0.98; 95% CI -1.17 to -0.78, 19 trials, N = 4,715). Haematological response was observed more often in participants receiving ESAs (RR 3.93; 95% CI 3.10 to 3.71, 31 trials, N = 6,413). There was suggestive evidence that ESAs may improve Quality of Life (QoL). There was strong evidence that ESAs increase mortality during active study period (hazard ratio (HR) 1.17; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.29, 70 trials, N = 15,935) and some evidence that ESAs decrease overall survival (HR 1.05; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11, 78 trials, N = 19,003). The risk ratio for thromboembolic complications was increased in patients receiving ESAs compared to controls (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.74; 57 trials, N = 15,498). ESAs may also increase the risk for hypertension (fixed-effect model: RR 1.30; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.56; random-effects model: RR 1.12; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.33, 31 trials, N = 7,228) and thrombocytopenia/haemorrhage (RR 1.21; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.42; 21 trials, N = 4,507). There was insufficient evidence to support an effect of ESA on tumour response (fixed-effect RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.06, 15 trials, N = 5,012).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

ESAs reduce the need for red blood cell transfusions but increase the risk for thromboembolic events and deaths. There is suggestive evidence that ESAs may improve QoL. Whether and how ESAs affects tumour control remains uncertain. The increased risk of death and thromboembolic events should be balanced against the potential benefits of ESA treatment taking into account each patient's clinical circumstances and preferences. More data are needed for the effect of these drugs on quality of life and tumour progression. Further research is needed to clarify cellular and molecular mechanisms and pathways of the effects of ESAs on thrombogenesis and their potential effects on tumour growth.

Darbepoetin alfa in the treatment of anemia in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy

For years, the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) consisted of red blood cell transfusions. Major disadvantages of transfusions are their temporary effect and limitation to treatment of severe anemia. In an extensive clinical trial program in patients with CIA, darbepoetin alfa (DA) - a long-acting recombinant human erythropoietin - was proven to be very effective in reducing transfusion needs in patients developing CIA. The administration is suitable with most chemotherapy schemes. Caution is needed in patients with a history of thrombo-embolic events, as a slightly higher incidence of these events is noted in patients treated with darbepoetin alfa or erythropoietin substitution agents (ESAs) in general. In recent years, concerns have been raised about a potential negative influence of these agents on survival. In this respect, it is important to make the distinction between studies on the treatment of existing CIA versus treatment with ESAs outside this indication. On the other hand, it has always been assumed that transfusions were a completely safe treatment, but concerns about a potential negative effect on survival have been raised for transfusions as well. The safety concerns with DA and ESAs in general led to a pharmacovigilance program and an adaptation of the guidelines for treatment of CIA, focusing on treatment of moderate CIA but no longer on mild CIA. Now that the most recent safety data of the pharmacovigilance program of ESAs is almost completed, the clinical impact of the shift to the treatment of only moderate anemia is discussed in this review, which provides a critical view on the indications of DA and the benefit-risk assessment, in order to provide good supportive care without harm to the patient.

Erythropoietin: the swinging pendulum

Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) have been used widely for anemic patients, especially those on dialysis and with cancer. However, reports have suggested shorter survival in erythropoietin (EPO)-treated cancer patients. The purpose of this review is to summarize and evaluate critically the current information about ESA treatment and its possible association with mortality in cancer patients. The pendulum that initially swung in the direction of widespread ESA treatment, and then in the direction of no treatment, is swinging back toward a stable position. This review also provides tools to decide how and when to use ESAs safely, according to accepted guidelines.

Effects of erythropoietin receptors and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on disease progression in cancer

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) increase red blood cell (RBC) production in bone marrow by activating the erythropoietin receptor (EpoR) on erythrocytic-progenitor cells. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are approved in the United States and Europe for treating anaemia in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy based on randomised, placebo-controlled trials showing that ESAs reduce RBC transfusions. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-safety issues include thromboembolic events and concerns regarding whether ESAs increase disease progression and/or mortality in cancer patients. Several trials have reported an association between ESA use and increased disease progression and/or mortality, whereas other trials in the same tumour types have not provided similar findings. This review thoroughly examines available evidence regarding whether ESAs affect disease progression. Both clinical-trial data on ESAs and disease progression, and preclinical data on how ESAs could affect tumour growth are summarised. Preclinical topics include (i) whether tumour cells express EpoR and could be directly stimulated to grow by ESA exposure and (ii) whether endothelial cells express EpoR and could be stimulated by ESA exposure to undergo angiogenesis and indirectly promote tumour growth. Although assessment and definition of disease progression vary across studies, the current clinical data suggest that ESAs may have little effect on disease progression in chemotherapy patients, and preclinical data indicate a direct or indirect effect of ESAs on tumour growth is not strongly supported.

Utilization and cost comparison of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in inpatient and outpatient hospital settings

OBJECTIVE

To compare utilization and associated costs of epoetin alfa (EPO) and darbepoetin alfa (DARB), two erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy and patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not on dialysis in inpatient and outpatient hospital settings.

METHODS

An analysis of medical claims recorded between January 2006 and December 2009 was conducted using the Premier Perspective Comparative Hospital database. Patients included were ≥18 years old with cancer and chemotherapy or with pre-dialysis CKD and with ≥1 claim for EPO or DARB during a hospital inpatient or outpatient treatment episode. Patients treated with both ESAs or who were receiving dialysis were excluded. Mean cumulative drug costs and dose ratios (units EPO: mcg DARB) were calculated using cumulative dose and April 2010 wholesale acquisition costs.

RESULTS

Cancer chemotherapy: 13,832 inpatient stays (EPO: 10,454; DARB: 3378) and 5590 outpatient treatment episodes (EPO: 2856; DARB: 2734) were identified. The inpatient and outpatient populations reported ESA dose ratios of 230:1 and 238:1 with DARB cost premiums of 42% (EPO: $948; DARB: $1348) and 38% (EPO: $3358; DARB: $4627), respectively. CKD: 148,746 hospital stays (EPO: 116,017; DARB: 32,729) and 11,012 outpatient treatment episodes (EPO: 6921; DARB 4091) were identified. The inpatient and outpatient populations reported ESA dose ratios of 251:1 and 257:1 with DARB cost premiums of 30% (EPO: $566; DARB: $738) and 27% (EPO: $2077; DARB: $2642), respectively.

LIMITATIONS

The lack of randomization may have led to confounding by indication. In addition, statistical significance must be interpreted with caution in studies involving large samples.

CONCLUSIONS

This study of 19,422 patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and 159,758 patients with pre-dialysis CKD reported ESA dose ratios ranging from 230:1-257:1 (units EPO: mcg DARB) and associated cost premiums of 27-42% for DARB.

Hematologic outcomes and blood utilization in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) pre- and post-national coverage determination (NCD): results from a multicenter chart review

PURPOSE

In July 2007, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) limited coverage of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) through a National Coverage Determination (NCD). The primary objective of this study was to compare transfusion rates in patients with CIA with lung, breast, or colorectal cancer before and after the NCD.

METHODS

Adult Medicare patients with CIA treated at 49 community oncology clinics were selected from two time periods based on clinics' NCD implementation date. Chart data were abstracted for 12 weeks post-CIA episode start, defined as hemoglobin (Hb) level <11 g/dL while receiving chemotherapy or within 60 days of the last chemotherapy dose. Multivariate analyses were used to calculate the odds of transfusion and to assess the units of blood transfused, controlling for differences in demographics, clinical history, and chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Eight hundred pre-NCD and 994 post-NCD patients from 49 sites were selected. Of the patients, 56% used ESAs post-NCD vs. 88% pre-NCD (p < 0.0001). The duration of ESA use decreased in the post-NCD (32.1 days) vs. pre-NCD (48.4 days, p < 0.0001) group. The post-NCD group reported significantly lower Hb levels, higher odds of receiving a transfusion (odds ratio: 1.41, 95% CI 1.05-1.89, p = 0.0238) and increased blood utilization of 53% (units transfused: OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.15-2.04, p = 0.0034).

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased frequency and duration of ESA administration were reported in the post-NCD vs. pre-NCD period. Findings were accompanied by a modest but statistically significant increase in transfusions and a decrease in Hb values.

A pilot study to evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes of once-weekly epoetin alfa 80,000 u in anemic patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Epoetin alfa is indicated for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia at doses of 150 U/kg 3 times weekly or 40,000 U once weekly. Higher starting doses may lead to higher hematologic response rates (RRs), earlier hematologic responses, and earlier identification of nonresponders. The hematologic response and safety of epoetin alfa at a starting dose of 80,000 U once weekly in anemic patients (hemoglobin [Hb] </= 11 g/dL) with nonmyeloid malignancies receiving chemotherapy were evaluated in this open-label, multicenter pilot study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Epoetin alfa was initiated at 80,000 U once weekly and reduced if Hb increased to > 13 g/dL or increased > 1.3 g/dL in a 2-week period during the 12-week study. The primary efficacy endpoint was major hematologic response (Hb increase >/= 2 g/dL or Hb >/=12 g/dL, independent of transfusion). Secondary endpoints were minor hematologic response (Hb increase >/= 1 g/dL but > 2 g/dL) and incidence of transfusions.

RESULTS

Of 69 patients enrolled, 47 (68%) completed the study. A majority of patients (72%) exhibited a major hematologic response with epoetin alfa 80,000 U once weekly. Mean Hb levels increased by 2.2 g/dL from baseline after 12 weeks of therapy. Six patients (8.8%) received packed red blood cell transfusions during the study. The dose of epoetin alfa was reduced, or held then reduced, per protocol in 48 patients (69.6%). Ten patients (14.5%) in the safety population experienced a total of 11 clinically relevant thrombotic vascular events.

CONCLUSION

Epoetin alfa at a starting dose of 80,000 U once weekly (with appropriate dose reductions) increased Hb level, was associated with a packed red blood cell transfusion rate > 5% after 4 weeks of therapy, and was safe and generally well tolerated in anemic patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. The hematologic RR, however, was not markedly improved compared with previous trials with 40,000-60,000 U once weekly, perhaps partly because of the high frequency of dose reductions.

An open-label pilot study to evaluate a flexible dosing regimen of epoetin alfa for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia: 60,000 units weekly followed by 60,000 units every 2 weeks

PURPOSE

This open-label, single-arm pilot study assessed the safety and efficacy of administering an Initials epoetin alfa dose of 60,000 U subcutaneously once weekly (Initials dosing phase [IDP]) followed by an extended dose regimen of 60,000 U subcutaneously every 2 weeks (extended dosing phase [EDP]).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who had a hematologic response, defined as hemoglobin (Hb) level increase >/= 1 g/dL from week 1 baseline at any time during the 4-week IDP (the primary efficacy endpoint), were eligible to enter the EDP at week 5 and receive every-other-week treatment for up to 12 additional weeks. Patients who did not exhibit this increase in the IDP were withdrawn.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were enrolled; the mean baseline Hb level was 10.1 g/dL +/- 0.79 g/dL. Thirty-three patients (64.7%) met the primary efficacy endpoint of Hb increase >/= 1 g/dL during the IDP; 29 patients (56.9%) proceeded to the EDP. Mean Hb level at entry to the EDP was 12.4 g/dL +/- 0.99 g/dL. Further Hb increase in the EDP (average Hb level >/= week 5 Hb value) was achieved in 12 of 29 patients (41.4%). Final Hb value for patients in the EDP was 11.7 g/dL +/- 1.28 g/dL. Four patients received a total of 5 red blood cell transfusions during the study. Epoetin alfa was well tolerated and had a safety profile similar to that observed with labeled dosing. Two patients experienced a clinically relevant thrombotic vascular event.

CONCLUSION

RESULTS from this pilot study suggest that higher Initials weekly dosing of epoetin alfa followed by extended dosing is safe and effective for treating chemotherapy-induced anemia.

Flexible dosing with Darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia

Anemia is frequent in cancer patients with chemotherapy, and has an important negative effect on health-related quality of life (QoL). Darbepoetin alfa belongs to a new class of erythropoietic proteins with a unique molecular structure and interesting properties compared with classic recombinant human erythropoietin. Darbepoetin alfa is effective for chemotherapy-induced anemia when administered once weekly at a dose of 2.25 mug/kg, as shown in two large phase III placebo-controlled trials in patients with solid tumors and hematological malignancies. Furthermore, it was safe and well tolerated. More recently attention has been focused on optimizing Darbepoetin alfa therapy. Front-loaded dosing was explored to accelerate the hemoglobin (Hb) response and effect on QoL, but this idea could not be confirmed in a large phase III study. Based on the prolonged half-life of Darbepoetin alfa, administration every 3 weeks was appealing. In a large phase III trial, noninferiority of administration of 500 mug every 3 weeks compared with the weekly dosing could be confirmed, both in terms of reduction of red blood cell transfusion, Hb parameters, and QoL. This schedule is very convenient for patients and caregivers as it allows synchronization of erythropoietic therapy and common chemotherapy schedules. Questions for future study are the optimal iron supplementation strategy and the effect of Darbepoetin alfa on outcome. This article reviews the clinical development of Darbepoetin alfa with emphasis on recent data.

Darbepoetin alpha in the treatment of cancer chemotherapy-induced anemia

Anemia is a common, but underestimated and undertreated, complication of patients with cancer receiving chemo- or radiotherapy, and negatively affects their quality of life (QoL). Erythropoietic proteins (EPS) offer an effective treatment of cancer anemia and ameliorate QoL, although their use requires the correct targeting of hemoglobin increase to avoid thromboembolic complications. Currently the effort is focused on offering patients this effective treatment with reduced frequency of administration. Higher weekly single doses of recombinant human Epo (rHuEpo) either alpha or beta, instead of three times per week, have been proposed for the treatment. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the hyperglycosylated protein darbepoetin alpha permit even longer inter vals between administrations. Every other week or every three weeks schedules have shown results (erythropoietic response, reduction of transfusion requirements, and improvement of QoL) comparable with those of weekly rHuEpo.

Epoetin alfa treatment for patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia

Anemia (hemoglobin [Hb] < 12 g/dL) is a frequent and debilitating complication in the treatment of cancer. The negative effects of anemia include impairment of organ systems, disruption of important aspects of patient quality of life, and potential interference with completion and outcomes of cancer chemotherapy. Guidelines issued by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American Society of Hematology/American Society of Clinical Oncology jointly suggest that anemia in patients with cancer be managed by restoring Hb levels to approximately 12 g/dL, thereby minimizing transfusion requirements and resolving clinical symptoms associated with anemia. Recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin alfa) administered 150 U/kg 3 times weekly or 40,000 U once weekly has been shown in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials and large, open-label, nonrandomized, community-based studies to effectively and safely correct anemia in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Several clinical trials support that treatment with epoetin alfa results in quality of life benefits that significantly correlate with Hb increases. Areas currently being investigated with epoetin alfa in the chemotherapy setting include the following: extended dosing regimens beyond the Food and Drug Administration-approved 3-times-weekly and once-weekly dosing regimens, early intervention for mild anemia, effects on treatment outcomes and survival, and optimal administration of concurrent iron supplementation.

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anemic patients with cancer

Anemia in cancer patients is common and often associated with decreased survival and quality-of-life scores. The introduction of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) for the treatment of anemia in patients with solid tumors and nonmyeloid malignancies in the 1990s has proved an important alternative to red blood cell transfusions. ESAs have been consistently shown to increase hemoglobin levels and reduce transfusion requirements in anemic cancer patients whilst also being associated with improvements in quality of life. Several recent studies, however, have raised concerns about the safety of ESAs with regards to an increased number of thrombo-embolic events, decreased on-study survival and possible effects of ESAs on tumor progression. This has led to a reappraisal of the role of ESAs in the treatment of anemic cancer patients. It remains generally accepted that, if used within current guidelines and labeling recommendations, ESAs can still be considered safe in patients receiving chemotherapy once individual risks are balanced against possible benefits.

Characterization of haematological parameters with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone versus melphalan-prednisone in newly diagnosed myeloma, with evaluation of long-term outcomes and risk of thromboembolic events with use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents: analysis of the VISTA trial

Although haematological toxicities, such as anaemia, are common in multiple myeloma (MM), no clear consensus exists on the use and impact of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) on outcomes in MM. This analysis characterizes haematological toxicities and associated interventions in the phase III VISTA (Velcade(®) as Initial Standard Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Assessment with Melphalan and Prednisone) study of bortezomib plus melphalan/prednisone (VMP, n = 344) versus MP (n = 338) in previously untreated MM patients ineligible for high-dose therapy, and evaluates the impact of ESA use or red-blood-cell (RBC) transfusions on outcomes and thromboembolic risk. Incidence of haematological toxicities was similar with VMP and MP; similar rates of interventions and associated complications (e.g. bleeding, febrile neutropenia) were observed. Two hundred thirty three patients received ESA; 204 had RBC transfusions. Frequency of thromboembolic events was low and not affected by ESA use. Median time-to progression (TTP) was similar between ESA/non-ESA [hazard ratio: 1·03 (95% confidence interval 0·76-1·39); P = 0·8478] in both arms (VMP: 19·9/not reached; MP: 15·0/17·5 months). Three-year overall survival (OS) rates were similar between ESA/non-ESA in each arm. Patients receiving RBC transfusions had significantly shorter OS (P < 0·0001) versus non-RBC-transfusion patients. In conclusion, bortezomib did not add to melphalan haematological toxicity. Concomitant ESA use with VMP/MP in previously untreated MM patients did not adversely affect TTP or OS, or increase thromboembolic risk. However, RBC transfusion was associated with significantly shorter survival.

Outcomes of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia

Purpose

To assess the clinical and economic outcomes among patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) treated with United States Food and Drug Administration-approved fixed dosing regimens of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA).

Methods

Data were employed from the Dosing and Outcomes Study of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Therapies (DOSE) registry to evaluate CIA patients who were initiated on either epoetin alfa (EPO) 40,000 Units (U) or darbepoetin alfa (DARB) 500 micrograms (mcg) between January 1, 2006 and May 8, 2009. Study measurements included ESA treatment dose and dose ratio, changes in hemoglobin (Hb) levels from baseline, and cumulative ESA costs.

Results

Five hundred forty patients treated in 44 clinical centers were evaluated, of which 420 were initiated on EPO 40,000 U and 120 were initiated on DARB 500 mcg. Both cohorts had similar baseline characteristics, although EPO patients were less likely than DARB patients to have received iron supplementation before ESA initiation (11.4% EPO vs. 20.0% DARB, p = 0.015). The EPO-to-DARB dose ratio based on cumulative ESA dose was 169:1 (U EPO: mcg DARB). EPO patients showed statistically greater Hb improvement compared to DARB patients, and compared to EPO patients, a greater proportion of DARB patients required a blood transfusion (13.9% EPO vs. 22.5% DARB, p = 0.026). Mean cumulative ESA cost was significantly lower for EPO patients than DARB patients ($4,261 EPO vs. $8,643 DARB, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

These findings reported that patients with CIA achieved more favorable clinical and economic outcomes if initiated with EPO 40,000 U vs. DARB 500 mcg.

Anemia, fatigue and aging

Aging is associated with increased incidence and prevalence of both cancer and anemia. Cancer and aging may conspire in making anemia more frequent and more severe. This article reviews the causes and the consequences of anemia in the older individual. The most common causes include chronic inflammation that is a typical manifestation of aging, iron deficiency that may be due to chronic hemorrhage, malabsorption and Helicobacter pylori infection, cobalamin deficiency from malabsorption and renal insufficiency. Other causes of anemia whose prevalence is not well established include myelodysplasia, copper deficiency, hypothyroidism, and sarcopenia. Anemia is associated with increased risk of mortality, functional dependence, dementia, falls, and chemotherapy-related toxicity. When correcting the anemia of older cancer patients one should remember that the erythropoietic stimulating agents (ESA) may stimulate cancer growth and cause thrombosis. These products may be safe when given exclusively to patients receiving chemotherapy and when the hemoglobin levels are maintained below 12 g/dL.

The use of recombinant erythropoietin for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia in patients with ovarian cancer does not affect progression-free or overall survival

BACKGROUND

Studies have suggested that erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) may affect progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in a variety of cancer types. Because this finding had not been explored previously in ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma, the authors of this report analyzed their ovarian cancer population to determine whether ESA treatment for chemotherapy-induced anemia affected PFS or OS.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of women who were treated for ovarian cancer at the corresponding author's institution over a 10-year period (from January 1994 to May 2004). Treatment groups were formed based on the use of an ESA. Two analyses of survival were conducted to determine the effect of ESA therapy on PFS and OS. Disease status was modeled as a function of treatment group using a logistic regression model. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to compare the groups, and a Cox proportional hazards model was fit to the data.

RESULTS

In total, 343 women were identified. The median age was 57 (interquartile range, 48-68 years). The majority of women were Caucasian (n = 255; 74%) and were diagnosed with stage III (n = 210; 61%), epithelial (n = 268; 78%) ovarian cancer. Although the disease stage at diagnosis and surgical staging significantly affected the rates of disease recurrence and OS, the receipt of an ESA had no effect on PFS (P = .9) or OS (P = .25).

CONCLUSIONS

The current results indicated that there was no difference in cancer-related PFS or OS with use of ESA in this cohort of women treated for ovarian cancer.

Comparison of provider-assessed and patient-reported outcome measures of acute skin toxicity during a Phase III trial of mometasone cream versus placebo during breast radiotherapy: the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (N06C4)

PURPOSE

Considerable interobserver variability exists among providers and between providers and patients when measuring subjective symptoms. In the recently published Phase III N06C4 trial of mometasone cream vs. placebo to prevent radiation dermatitis, the primary provider-assessed (PA) endpoint, using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), was negative. However, prospectively planned secondary analyses of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), using the Skindex-16 and Skin Toxicity Assessment Tool (STAT), were positive. This study assesses the relationship between PA outcomes and PROs.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to compare the three tools. Statistical correlations were defined as follows: <0.5, mild; 0.5-0.7, moderate; and >0.7, strong.

RESULTS

CTCAE dermatitis moderately correlated with STAT erythema, and CTCAE pruritus strongly correlated with STAT itching. CTCAE pruritus had a moderate correlation with Skindex-16 itching. Comparing the 2 PRO tools, Skindex-16 itching correlated moderately with STAT itching. Skindex-16 burning, hurting, irritation, and persistence all showed the strongest correlation with STAT burning; they showed moderate correlations with STAT itching and tenderness.

CONCLUSIONS

The PRO Skindex-16 correlated well with the PRO portions of STAT, but neither tool correlated well with CTCAE. PROs delineated a wider spectrum of toxicity than PA measures and provided more information on rash, redness, pruritus, and annoyance measures compared with CTCAE findings of rash and pruritus. PROs may provide a more complete measure of patient experience than single-symptom, PA endpoints in clinical trials assessing radiation skin toxicity.

Epoetin alfa improves anemia and anemia-related, patient-reported outcomes in patients with breast cancer receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy: results of a European, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of epoetin alfa on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with breast cancer receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Women with hemoglobin concentrations ≤ 12.0 g/dl and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score of 0-3 were randomized 1:1 to receive epoetin alfa (10,000 IU 3 times weekly) or best standard care (BSC) during chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the total anemia subscale assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) questionnaire after 12 weeks of treatment. The fatigue and nonfatigue subscales from the FACT-An, the Cancer Linear Analog Scale (CLAS), hemoglobin changes, ECOG PS score, tumor response, overall survival, and safety also were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 223 patients randomized, 216 constituted the modified intent-to-treat population. Percentage changes in the total anemia subscale of the FACT-An were significantly different between epoetin alfa treatment (14.2%) and BSC (-0.5%; p = .002), favoring epoetin alfa; so were changes in the FACT-An fatigue subscale (epoetin alfa, 17.5%; BSC, -0.9%; p = .003) and nonfatigue subscale (epoetin alfa, 8.8%; BSC, 0.2%; p = .008). Similar results were observed with the CLAS. Hemoglobin concentrations > 12 g/dl were more common with epoetin alfa (62.0%) than with BSC (27.6%). Tumor response, ECOG PS score, 12-month survival rate, and the incidence of serious treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Early intervention with epoetin alfa was well tolerated and improved anemia-related PROs in patients with breast cancer receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy.

Economic evaluation of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anemia related to cancer

BACKGROUND

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) administered to cancer patients with anemia reduce the need for blood transfusions and improve quality-of-life (QOL). Concerns about toxicity have led to more restrictive recommendations for ESA use; however, the incremental costs and benefits of such a strategy are unknown.

METHODS

The authors created a decision model to examine the costs and consequences of ESA use in patients with anemia and cancer from the perspective of the Canadian public healthcare system. Model inputs were informed by a recent systematic review. Extensive sensitivity analyses and scenario analysis rigorously assessed QOL benefits and more conservative ESA administration practices (initial hemoglobin [Hb] <10 g/dL, target Hb < or =12 g/dL, and chemotherapy induced anemia only).

RESULTS

Compared with supportive transfusions only, conventional ESA treatment was associated with an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained of $267,000 during a 15-week time frame. During a 1.3-year time horizon, ESA was associated with higher costs and worse clinical outcomes. In scenarios where multiple assumptions regarding QOL all favored ESA, the lowest incremental cost per QALY gained was $126,000. Analyses simulating the use of ESA in accordance with recently issued guidelines resulted in incremental cost per QALY gained of > $100,000 or ESA being dominated (greater costs with lower benefit) in the majority of the scenarios, although greater variability in the cost-utility ratio was present.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of ESA for anemia related to cancer is associated with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios that are not economically attractive, even when used in a conservative fashion recommended by current guidelines.

Drug therapy for the management of cancer-related fatigue

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in issue 1 2008 (Minton 2008). Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is common, under-recognised and difficult to treat. There have been studies looking at drug interventions to improve CRF but results have been conflicting depending on the population studied and outcome measures used. No previous reviews of this topic have been exhaustive or have synthesised all available data.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of drugs for the management of CRF.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (from Issue 2 2007) MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 2007 to October 2009 and a selection of cancer journals. We searched references of identified articles and contacted authors to obtain unreported data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were included in the review if they 1) assessed drug therapy for the management of CRF compared to placebo, usual care or a non-pharmacological intervention in 2) randomised controlled trials (RCT) of 3) adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Meta-analyses were performed on different drug classes using continuous variable data.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty studies met the inclusion criteria. Six additional studies were identified since the original review. Only 31 of these studies involving 7104 participants were judged to have used a sufficiently robust measure of fatigue and thus were deemed suitable for detailed analysis. The drugs were still analysed by class (psychostimulants; haemopoietic growth factors; antidepressants and progestational steroids). Methylphenidate showed a small but significant improvement in fatigue over placebo (Z = 2.83; P = 0.005). Since the publication of the original review increased safety concerns have been raised regarding erythropoietin and this cannot now be recommended in practice.There was a very high degree of statistical and clinical heterogeneity in the trials and the reasons for this are discussed.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is increasing evidence that psychostimulant trials provide evidence for improvement in CRF at a clinically meaningful level. There is still a requirement for a large scale RCT of methylphenidate to confirm the preliminary results from this review. There is new safety data which indicates that the haemopoietic growth factors are associated with increased adverse outcomes. These drugs can no longer be recommended in the treatment of CRF. Readers of the first review should re-read the document in full.