Phase II study of temozolomide and thalidomide in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors

Diagnosis and Management of Parathyroid Carcinoma

Parathyroid carcinoma (PC) is a rare malignancy, often characterized by the unregulated secretion of parathyroid hormone. The sequelae of severe hypercalcemia together with direct complications from tumor dissemination in patients with advanced disease are usually fatal. Due to its rarity, formal studies to guide the diagnosis and management of parathyroid carcinoma are lacking. However, recent data from case reports, case series, and registry studies suggest the emergence of new and effective treatment approaches for this understudied disease. We reviewed existing literature on the diagnosis and management of parathyroid carcinoma. Our findings suggest that traditional approaches such as surgical resection for both localized and metastatic diseases continue to play an important role in patient management. For patients with unresectable disease, newer systemic treatment approaches, including the use of temozolomide and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, may offer clinical benefit.

Molecular Genetics of Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma

Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGL) are neuroendocrine tumors which secrete catecholamines, causing cardiovascular compromise. While isolated tumors and locoregional disease can be treated surgically, treatment options for metastatic disease are limited, and no targeted therapies exist. Approximately 25% of PPGL are causatively associated with germline pathogenic variants, which are known risk factors for multifocal and metastatic PPGL. Knowledge of somatic driver mutations continues to evolve. Molecular classification of PPGL has identified three genomic subtypes: Cluster 1 (pseudohypoxia), Cluster 2 (kinase signaling) and Cluster 3 (Wnt-altered). This review summaries recent studies characterizing the tumor microenvironment, genomic drivers of tumorigenesis and progression, and current research on molecular targets for novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in PPGL.

Pioglitazone enhances cisplatin's impact on triple-negative breast cancer: Role of PPARγ in cell apoptosis

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARγ) has been recently shown to play a role in many cancers. The breast tissue of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients were found to have a significantly lower expression of PPARγ than the other subtypes. Furthermore, PPARγ activation was found to exert anti-tumor effects by inhibiting cell proliferation, differentiation, cell growth, cell cycle, and inducing apoptosis. To start with, we performed a bioinformatic analysis of data from OncoDB, which showed a lower expression pattern of PPARγ in different cancer types. In addition, high expression of PPARγ was associated with better breast cancer patient survival. Therefore, we tested the impact of pioglitazone, a PPARγ ligand, on the cytotoxic activity of cisplatin in the TNBC cell line. MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with either cisplatin (40 μM) with or without pioglitazone (30 or 60 μM) for 72 h. The MTT results showed a significant dose-dependent decrease in cell viability as a result of using cisplatin and pioglitazone combination compared with cisplatin alone. In addition, the protein expression of Bcl-2, a known antiapoptotic marker, decreased in the cells treated with cisplatin and pioglitazone combination at doses of 40 and 30 μM, respectively. On the other hand, cleaved- poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) and -caspase-9, which are known as pro-apoptotic markers, were upregulated in the combination group compared with the solo treatments. Taken together, the addition of pioglitazone to cisplatin further reduced the viability of MDA-MB-231 cells and enhanced apoptosis compared with chemotherapy alone.

Systemic Therapy for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) account for approximately 2% of all pancreatic malignancies. Several systemic treatment options have been developed over the last four decades, ranging from cytotoxic chemotherapy and octreotide to newer targeted therapies like sunitinib, cabozantinib, and lenvatinib. Although surgery or liver-directed therapy remains cornerstone for management of metastatic PanNETs, however, they remain unfeasible in majority of cases. PanNETs behave differently than SI-NETs (small intestinal NET); the former is more aggressive and less responsive to somatostatin-based therapies. The optimal sequence of the systemic therapies for the advanced PanNETs depends mainly on the tumor burden, Ki-67 index, and the tempo of the disease. In the end, drawing from ENETS (European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society) and ESMO (European Society for Medical Oncology) guidelines, we propose a working algorithm for the management of advanced PanNETs, not amenable to surgery or liver-directed therapies.

Efficacy and safety of temozolomide-based regimens in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in the management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) highlight the potential benefits of temozolomide, an alkylating agent, for these patients. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the outcome of temozolomide, alone or in combination with other anticancer medications in patients with advanced pNET.

METHODS

Online databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched systematically for clinical trials that reported the efficacy and safety of temozolomide in patients with advanced pNET. Random-effect model was utilized to estimate pooled rates of outcomes based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, biochemical response, and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies, providing details of 441 individuals with advanced pNET, were included. The quantitative analyses showed a pooled objective response rate (ORR) of 41.2% (95% confidence interval, CI, of 32.4%-50.6%), disease control rate (DCR) of 85.3% (95% CI of 74.9%-91.9%), and a more than 50% decrease from baseline chromogranin A levels of 44.9% (95% CI of 31.6%-49.0%). Regarding safety, the results showed that the pooled rates of nonserious AEs and serious AEs were 93.8% (95% CI of 88.3%-96.8%) and 23.7% (95% CI of 12.0%-41.5%), respectively. The main severe AEs encompassed hematological toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests that treatment with temozolomide, either as a monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer treatments might be an effective and relatively safe option for patients with advanced locally unresectable and metastatic pNET. However, additional clinical trials are required to further strengthen these findings. This study has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023409280).

Delayed and Long-Lasting Response to 177Lu-DOTATATE in a Head and Neck Paraganglioma: Case Report and Literature Review

Introduction

Malignant paragangliomas (M-PGL) are a group of neuroendocrine tumors that originate from chromaffin cells. The most common location for PGL is the head and neck, which comprise 65-70% of all PGL, and the M-PGL accounts for 0.6% of all head and neck cancers. It is a rare tumor, with an incidence of 2-8 per million. Diagnosing PGL can be challenging, and treatment for metastatic disease is usually not curative.

Case Presentation

A 66-year-old woman was diagnosed with left cervical pain and laterocervical mass in March 2015. Octreotide scintigraphy showed intense uptake in the cervical mass, two pulmonary micronodules of 4-5 mm, and another lesion in the lumbar region (L3-L4). The final diagnosis was malignant nonsecretory PGL with adjacent tissue involvement and distant metastases. After three different treatments with minimal symptomatic improvement, 177Lu-DOTATATE was requested off-label. With a dose of 7,400 MBq until January 2018, the patient showed remarkable symptomatic pain improvement and a decrease in tumor size.

Conclusion

We believe that our case report provides relevant information that can be considered in similar cases. First, the patient tripled the expected survival in such a clinical setting, and this benefit seems to rely on 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment. Second, we documented an early symptomatic response to this treatment but a long-term delayed volumetric radiographic response.

Randomized Study of Temozolomide or Temozolomide and Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (ECOG-ACRIN E2211)

PURPOSE

Patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have few treatment options that yield objective responses. Retrospective and small prospective studies suggest that capecitabine and temozolomide are associated with high response rates (RRs) and long progression-free survival (PFS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

E2211 was a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial comparing temozolomide versus capecitabine/temozolomide in patients with advanced low-grade or intermediate-grade pancreatic NETs. Key eligibility criteria included progression within the preceding 12 months and no prior temozolomide, dimethyl-triazeno-imidazole-carboxamide or dacarbazine, capecitabine or fluorouracil. The primary end point was PFS; secondary endpoints were overall survival, RR, safety, and methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) by immunohistochemistry and promoter methylation.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients were enrolled between April 2013 and March 2016 to temozolomide (n = 72) or capecitabine and temozolomide (n = 72); the primary analysis population included 133 eligible patients. At the scheduled interim analysis in January 2018, the median PFS was 14.4 months for temozolomide versus 22.7 months for capecitabine/temozolomide (hazard ratio = 0.58), which was sufficient to reject the null hypothesis for the primary end point (stratified log-rank P = .022). In the final analysis (May 2021), the median overall survival was 53.8 months for temozolomide and 58.7 months for capecitabine/temozolomide (hazard ratio = 0.82, P = .42). MGMT deficiency was associated with response.

CONCLUSION

The combination of capecitabine/temozolomide was associated with a significant improvement in PFS compared with temozolomide alone in patients with advanced pancreatic NETs. The median PFS and RR observed with capecitabine/temozolomide are the highest reported in a randomized study for pancreatic NETs. MGMT deficiency was associated with response, and although routine MGMT testing is not recommended, it can be considered for select patients in need of objective response (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01824875).

Prospective Evaluation of MGMT-Promoter Methylation Status and Correlations with Outcomes to Temozolomide-Based Chemotherapy in Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors

Temozolomide (TEM) as a single agent or in combination with capecitabine (CAPTEM) is active in well-differentiated advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of gastro-entero-pancreatic and thoracic origin. The predictive role of MGMT-promoter methylation in this setting is controversial. We sought to prospectively evaluate the MGMT-promoter methylation status ability to predict outcomes to TEM-based chemotherapy in patients with NET. A single-center, prospective, observational study has been conducted at the ENETS Center-of-Excellence Outpatient Clinic of the IRCCS Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi in Bologna, Italy. Patients with advanced, gastro-entero-pancreatic or lung well-differentiated NETs candidate to TEM-based chemotherapy and with available tumor samples for MGMT-promoter methylation assessment were included. The MGMT-promoter methylation status was analyzed by using pyrosequencing. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by the MGMT-promoter methylation status. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Survival outcomes were compared by restricted mean survival time (RMST) difference. Of 26 screened patients, 22 were finally enrolled in the study. The most frequent NET primary sites were the pancreas (64%) and the lung (23%). MGMT promoter was methylated in five tumors (23%). At a median follow-up time of 47.2 months (95%CI 29.3-89.7), the median PFS was 32.8 months (95%CI 17.2-NA), while the median OS was not reached. Patients in the methylated MGMT group, when compared to those in the unmethylated MGMT group, had longer PFS (median not reached [95%CI NA-NA] vs. 30.2 months [95%CI 15.2-NA], respectively; RMST p = 0.005) and OS (median not reached [95%CI NA-NA] vs. not reached [40.1-NA], respectively; RMST p = 0.019). After adjusting for confounding factors, the MGMT-promoter methylation status was independently associated to the PFS. Numerically higher ORR (60% vs. 24%; p = 0.274) and DCR (100% vs. 88%; p = 1.00) were observed in the methylated vs. unmethylated MGMT group. TEM-based chemotherapy was well-tolerated (adverse events grade ≥3 < 10%). In this prospective study, MGMT-promoter methylation predicted better outcomes to TEM-based chemotherapy in patients with NET.

Chemotherapy in Well Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors (NET) G1, G2, and G3: A Narrative Review

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare neoplasms with a wide spectrum of clinical behavior, from the long survival of well-differentiated NETs to the dismal prognosis of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), being G3 NETs a recently recognized intermediate entity. While the role of chemotherapy is well established in NECs, data on NETs mostly derives from small studies, experts' opinions, and extrapolating results from small-cell lung cancer studies. This narrative review aims to summarize available evidence about the use of chemotherapy in the setting of G1-2 NETs and G3 NETs. We performed literature research in PubMed Library for all articles published up to September 2022 about the efficacy of chemotherapy in NETs. Treatment regimens with STZ-5FU, CAPTEM, and anti-metabolite-based treatment are the most active and tolerated in gastroenteropancreatic NETs (GEP-NETs) G1-G2, while platinum-based regimens (FOLFOX/XELOX) and TEM/CAPTEM showed the best activity in thoracic NETs. Solid evidence about chemotherapy efficacy in G3 NETs is still lacking. Literature data support the use of chemotherapy in low-intermediate grade NETs after the failure of other therapies or if tumor shrinkage is needed. Studies assessing G3 NETs independently from NECs are needed to better understand the role of chemotherapy in this setting.

S-1/temozolomide versus S-1/temozolomide plus thalidomide in advanced pancreatic and non-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (STEM): A randomised, open-label, multicentre phase 2 trial

Background

There are currently limited systemic treatment options for patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumours (NETS) and the efficacy of existing treatments is sub-optimal. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of Tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil/potassium capsules (S-1)/Temozolomide with or without thalidomide for the treatment of NETS (STEM trial).

Methods

A randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 2 trial conducted at eight hospitals in China. Adults (≥18 years) with unresectable/metastatic, pancreatic or non-pancreatic NETS, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS of 0-1, and progression on ≤2 previous therapies were randomised (1:1, using hierarchical block randomization with block length 4, stratified by pancreatic/non-pancreatic disease to receive S-1 40-60 mg orally twice daily on days 1-14 plus temozolomide 200 mg orally daily on days 10-14 in a 21-day cycle OR S-1 and temozolomide plus thalidomide orally nightly (100 mg on days 1-7, 200 mg on days 8-14, and 300 mg from day 15), until disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of informed consent or at the investigator's discretion. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1 in an intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received treatment. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03204019 (pancreatic group) and NCT03204032 (non-pancreatic group).

Findings

Between March 23, 2017 and November 16, 2020, 187 patients were screened and 140 were randomly assigned to S-1/temozolomide plus thalidomide (n = 69) or S-1/temozolomide (n =71). After a median follow-up of 12·1 months (IQR: 8·4-16·6), the ORR was comparable in the S-1/temozolomide plus thalidomide and S-1/temozolomide groups 26·1% [95% CI 17·2-37·5] versus 25·4% [95% CI 16·7-36·6]; odds ratio: 1·03 [95% CI 0·48-2·22]; P = 0·9381). In the S-1/temozolomide plus thalidomide group, the most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event was fatigue (2/68, 3%), and in the control group were thrombocytopenia and diarrhea (both 1/71, 2%). There were no treatment-related deaths in either group.

Interpretation

S-1/temozolomide with or without thalidomide leads to a comparable treatment response in patients with advanced/metastatic NETS.

Funding

This work was supported by CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS,2021-I2M-1-066, 2017-I2M-4-002, 2021-I2M-1-019, 2017-I2M-1-001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81972311, 82141127, 31970794,), the State Key Project on Infection Diseases of China (2017ZX10201021-007-003), the Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2019PT310026), Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (SZSM202011010), and the State Key Laboratory Special fund from the Ministry of Science (2060204).

Targeted Therapies in Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma

Molecular targeted therapy plays an increasingly important role in the treatment of metastatic pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs), which are rare tumors but remain difficult to treat. This mini-review provides an overview of established molecular targeted therapies in present use, and perspectives on those currently under development and evaluation in clinical trials. Recently published research articles, guidelines, and expert views on molecular targeted therapies in PPGLs are systematically reviewed and summarized. Some tyrosine kinase inhibitors (sunitinib, cabozantinib) are already in clinical use with some promising results, but without formal approval for the treatment of PPGLs. Sunitinib is the only therapeutic option which has been investigated in a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. It is clinically used as a first-, second-, or third-line therapeutic option for the treatment of progressive metastatic PPGLs. Some other promising molecular targeted therapies (hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha [HIF2α] inhibitors, tumor vaccination together with checkpoint inhibitors, antiangiogenic therapies, kinase signaling inhibitors) are under evaluation in clinical trials. The HIF2α inhibitor belzutifan may prove to be particularly interesting for cluster 1B-/VHL/EPAS1-related PPGLs, whereas antiangiogenic therapies seem to be primarily effective in cluster 1A-/SDHx-related PPGLs. Some combination therapies currently being evaluated in clinical trials, such as temozolomide/olaparib, temozolomide/talazoparib, or cabozantinib/atezolizumab, will provide data for novel therapy for metastatic PPGLs. It is likely that advances in such molecular targeted therapies will play an essential role in the future treatment of these tumors, with more personalized therapy options paving the way towards improved therapeutic outcomes.

SDHx mutations and temozolomide in malignant pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma

Malignant pheochromocytomas (PHEOs)/paragangliomas (PGLs) are rare tumors for which clinical outcomes remain poorly defined and therapeutic options are limited. Approximately 27% carry pathogenic germline succinate dehydrogenase (SDHx) mutations; the presence of such mutations has been correlated with response to temozolomide (TMZ). We aimed to investigate the association between germline mutations in SDHx and response to TMZ. We retrospectively identified patients with metastatic malignant PHEO/PGLs treated with TMZ- based chemotherapy at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 2003 and 2020. The correlation between response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) and the presence of SDHx mutations in the germline and tumor was evaluated. Nineteen patients received TMZ. Seventeen underwent germline assessment: 9 (53%) carried a pathogenic SDHx germline mutation. Fifteen patients were evaluable for response by RECIST 1.1: 6 (40%) partial response, 4 (27%) stable disease, and 5 (33%) progressive disease. Overall median progression-free survival was 2.2 years. Three-year overall survival (OS) was 58%. Median PFS was 1.3 years and 5.5 years for carriers and non-carriers, respectively and OS was 1.5 years and not estimable for carriers and non-carriers, respectively. The response by PERCIST criteria in nine patients correlated with the RECIST 1.1 assessment. Our series represents one of the largest analyses of patients with malignant PHEOs/PGLs treated with TMZ who have available germline data. The incidence of pathogenic germline SDHx mutations was similar to what has been previously published, though our analysis suggests that there may be a limited association between response to TMZ and pathogenic germline SDHx mutations.

Neuroendocrine Tumors: a Relevant Clinical Update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The field of neuroendocrine oncology has changed much since the time of Oberndorfer first described and coined the term carcinoid. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent findings and highlight clinically relevant updates in the management of NENs, particularly those that are practice changing.

RECENT FINDINGS

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have replaced carcinoid tumor, for the most part. The classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) improved, and the epidemiological understanding of this disease group also expanded with global collaborations and maturation of large tumor registries. Clarity in the utility of some NET biomarkers continues to be evolving. Knowledge of molecular drivers of tumorigenesis increases, and scientific/technological advancements lead the way to multiple drug approvals for the treatment of advanced NETs. The incidence and prevalence of NENs continue to increase, and patients are living longer. Better understanding of molecular drivers and further understanding of the role of immunotherapy in NENs will further elevate the level of care and transform care for all patients with NENs.

Genetics of Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas Determine the Therapeutical Approach

Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas are the most heritable endocrine tumors. In addition to the inherited mutation other driver mutations have also been identified in tumor tissues. All these genetic alterations are clustered in distinct groups which determine the pathomechanisms. Most of these tumors are benign and their surgical removal will resolve patient management. However, 5–15% of them are malignant and therapeutical possibilities for them are limited. This review provides a brief insight about the tumorigenesis associated with pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas in order to present them as potential therapeutical targets.

Efficacy of Capecitabine and Temozolomide in Small Bowel (Midgut) Neuroendocrine Tumors

The capecitabine/temozolomide regimen has significant activity in pancreatic NETs; however, data are limited in NETs of the small bowel (midgut). A retrospective study of all patients with metastatic midgut NETs seen at Moffitt Cancer Center between January 2008 and June 2019 treated with CAPTEM was conducted. 32 patients with proven or suspected well-differentiated primary small bowel NETs (excluding duodenum) were identified. 6 patients were found to have a radiographic response (19%), 5 of whom had high-grade disease. Only one patient among 23 with low/intermediate-grade disease responded (4%), whereas the response rate for patients with high-grade disease was 56%. Among patients with low/intermediate-grade disease, 44% discontinued due to poor tolerability. The CAPTEM regimen appears to have an activity in patients with high-grade small bowel NETs and is largely inactive in patients with low/intermediate-grade tumors.

Chemotherapy in Neuroendocrine Tumors

The role for cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) remains debated. Compared to patients with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) where chemotherapy is utilized ubiquitously, chemotherapy may play a more select role in patients with certain types of NETs (e.g., pancreatic tumors, higher grade tumors, and tumors possessing DNA damage repair defects). The primary types of chemotherapy that have been tested in patients with NETs include alkylating agent- and platinum agent-based combinations. Across regimens, chemotherapy appears to elicit greater antitumor activity in patients with pancreatic or grade 3 NETs. The role for chemotherapy in lower grade extra-pancreatic NETs remains undefined. Furthermore, while chemotherapy has demonstrated clinically meaningful benefit for patients in the systemic setting, its role in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting is as-of-yet undetermined. Finally, efforts to combine chemotherapy with targeted therapy and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy are ongoing, in hopes of improving the cytoreductive treatment options for patients with NETs.

Chemotherapy in NEN: still has a role?

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) comprise a broad spectrum of tumors with widely variable biological and clinical behavior. Primary tumor site, extent of disease, tumor differentiation and expression of so matostatin receptors, proliferation and growth rates are the major prognostic factors that determine the therapeutic strategy. Treatment options for advanced disease have considerably expanded in recent years, particularly for well differentiated tumors (NETs). Novel drugs approved over the past decade in this context include somatostatin analogues and 177Lu-oxodotreotide for somatostatin-receptor-positive gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NETs, sunitinib for pancreatic NETs (P-NETs), and everolimus for P-NETs and non-functioning lung or gastrointestinal NETs. Nevertheless, chemotherapy remains an essential component of the treatment armamentarium of patients with NENs, particularly of patients with P-NETs or those with bulky, symptomatic or rapidly progressive tumors (generally G3 or high-G2 NENs). In this manuscript we will comprehensively review available evidence related to the use of chemotherapy in lung and GEP NENs and will critically discuss its role in the treatment algorithm of this family of neoplasms.

Familial SDHB gene mutation in disseminated non-hypoxia-related malignant paraganglioma treated with [90Y]Y/[177Lu]Lu- DOTATATE

Familial paraganglioma may be related to mutations in succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) enzyme complex genes. Among patients with hereditary paraganglioma, SDH subunit B (SDHB) gene mutations are associated with the highest morbidity and mortality related to a higher malignancy rate. We report a family with the c.689G>A (p.Arg230His) mutation in the SDHB gene identified in two family members, a father and his daughter. While the 14-year-old daughter had no evidence of clinical disease, recurrent and later disseminated [¹³¹I]metaiodobenzylguanidine uptake-negative head and neck paraganglioma with multiple bone metastases developed in the father who underwent peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [⁹⁰Y]Y/[¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-dodecane tetraacetic acid octreotate (DOTATATE) at the time of the genetic diagnosis. This treatment was repeated 6 years later due to disease progression and the patient, who is currently 49 years old, remains alive and in good overall clinical condition at 8 years of follow-up after the original presentation at our unit. The growing armamentarium of imaging methods available for such patients may inform decision making regarding choice of the optimal treatment approach, potentially contributing to improved outcomes.

Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Tumors, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Gland Tumors focus on the diagnosis, treatment, and management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), adrenal tumors, pheochromocytomas, paragangliomas, and multiple endocrine neoplasia. NETs are generally subclassified by site of origin, stage, and histologic characteristics. Appropriate diagnosis and treatment of NETs often involves collaboration between specialists in multiple disciplines, using specific biochemical, radiologic, and surgical methods. Specialists include pathologists, endocrinologists, radiologists (including nuclear medicine specialists), and medical, radiation, and surgical oncologists. These guidelines discuss the diagnosis and management of both sporadic and hereditary neuroendocrine and adrenal tumors and are intended to assist with clinical decision-making. This article is focused on the 2021 NCCN Guidelines principles of genetic risk assessment and counseling and recommendations for well-differentiated grade 3 NETs, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, adrenal tumors, pheochromocytomas, and paragangliomas.

Herpes Zoster Risk in Immunocompromised Adults in the United States: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The primary reported risk factors for herpes zoster (HZ) include increasing age and immunodeficiency, yet estimates of HZ risk by immunocompromising condition have not been well characterized. We undertook a systematic literature review to estimate the HZ risk in immunocompromised patients.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed studies that examined the risk of HZ and associated complications in adult patients with hematopoietic cell transplants (HCT), cancer, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and solid organ transplant (SOT). We identified studies in PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov that presented original data from the United States and were published after 1992. We assessed the risk of bias with Cochrane or Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methods.

RESULTS

We identified and screened 3765 records and synthesized 34 studies with low or moderate risks of bias. Most studies that were included (32/34) reported at least 1 estimate of the HZ cumulative incidence (range, 0-41%). There were 12 studies that reported HZ incidences that varied widely within and between immunocompromised populations. Incidence estimates ranged from 9 to 92 HZ cases/1000 patient-years and were highest in HCT, followed by hematologic malignancies, SOT, and solid tumor malignancies, and were lowest in people living with HIV. Among 17 HCT studies, the absence of or use of antiviral prophylaxis at <1 year post-transplant was associated with a higher HZ incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

HZ was common among all immunocompromised populations studied, exceeding the expected HZ incidence among immunocompetent adults aged ≥60 years. Better evidence of the incidence of HZ complications and their severity in immunocompromised populations is needed to inform economic and HZ vaccine policies.

The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Guidelines for Surveillance and Management of Metastatic and/or Unresectable Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma

ABSTRACT

This manuscript is the result of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society consensus conference on the medical management and surveillance of metastatic and unresectable pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma held on October 2 and 3, 2019. The panelists consisted of endocrinologists, medical oncologists, surgeons, radiologists/nuclear medicine physicians, nephrologists, pathologists, and radiation oncologists. The panelists performed a literature review on a series of questions regarding the medical management of metastatic and unresectable pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma as well as questions regarding surveillance after resection. The panelists voted on controversial topics, and final recommendations were sent to all panel members for final approval.

Management and outcome of metastatic pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas: an overview

BACKGROUND

Metastatic pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) occur in about 5-26% of cases and are characterized by a heterogeneous prognosis. Metastases can be synchronous at the initial diagnosis, but they can occur also many years after surgery for the primary tumor. To date, the treatment of patients affected by metastatic PPGLs represents a clinical challenge because of the lack of guidelines.

AIM

The aim of this article is to review the available management options and their impact on the outcomes of patients with metastatic PPGLs.

RESULTS

Generally, treatments are not curative. Surgery, when possible, can be used to reduce hormonal symptoms and cardiovascular morbidity. Chemotherapy plays a role in patients with high burden tumor and rapid disease progression. Tyrosine kinases inhibitors (TKIs) might be considered for their ability to block the angiogenesis and cell growth. Radiation therapy and interventional radiology techniques can help in the management of local metastases to control symptoms and avoid tumor progression. On the other hand, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), using ⁹⁰Y or ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE, could be a promising therapy. In addition, high specific ¹³¹I-MIBG was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the US for the treatment of patients affected by metastatic and unresectable ¹³¹I-MIBG positive PPGLs. Considering the different pathways involved in the pathogenesis of PPGLs, several target therapies have been proposed and are under evaluation in clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of the appropriate treatment should be based on multidisciplinary and personalized approach taking into account the rarity and the variability of these tumors.

Temozolomide Alone or Combined with Capecitabine for the Treatment of Metastatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasia: A "Real-World" Data Analysis

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine neoplasias (NENs) are a rare group of tumors with different prognosis and response to therapy. Their heterogeneity is dependent on the site of origin, morphology, and Ki67. Temozolomide (TEM) appears to be active in metastatic NENs (mNENs) but there is limited evidence about its efficacy in gastrointestinal NENs. We analyzed "real-world" data on the use of TEM alone or in association with capecitabine (CAPTEM) in patients with mNENs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients with advanced NENs treated with TEM or CAPTEM between 2009 and 2019 were included. A pretreatment tumor growth rate (TGR0) was calculated. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tolerance, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were analyzed. A propensity score analysis and inverse probability of treatment weights for Cox regression models were used.

RESULTS

TEM-based therapy was administered to 95 patients (26.3% CAPTEM and 83.7% TEM) with a median age of 59 years (range 26-85) years. ECOG performance status was 0-2. Carcinoid syndrome was reported in 12 (12.6%) patients. Twenty (21.1%) patients with grade (G) 3 neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and 9 (9.4%) with G3 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) were included in the analysis. Median PFS of the entire group was 10.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.0-11.5). In multivariate analysis, a higher risk of progression was observed for NEC G3 patients (hazard ratio [HR] 2.70, 95% CI: 1.25-5.84) and for a TGR ≥19.55 (HR: 2.53, 95% CI: 1.45-4.40). Median OS was 23.4 months (95% CI: 17.0-29.0) and was similar in both treatment groups (23.9 vs. 20.5 months for TEM and CAPTEM, respectively, p = 0.585). In multivariate analysis, TGR ≥19.55 was associated with a higher risk of death (HR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.16-4.11) than TGR <19.55, as was NEC G3 (HR: 2.42, 95% CI: 1.04-5.59) with respect to NETs. No differences in terms of mPFS or mOS were seen in relation to the primary site of disease. In the 86 patients evaluable for response, ORR was 44.1% and the DCR was 70.9%. Mild adverse events (grade I-II) included anemia, neutropenia, and headache. Rare cases of G 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

TEM-based regimens are associated with a high DCR and a relatively tolerable toxicity profile in NENs of pancreatic, intestinal, and lung origin. Further investigation of these specific NETs is warranted in prospective clinical trials.

Comparative safety review of the current therapies for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Introduction: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) comprise a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, whose management requires complex and individualized clinical decisions. Over the last decades the advent of novel medications and advanced diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, alongside our deeper understanding of the disease, revolutionized the landscape of their management, significantly improving both prognosis and quality of life of patients.Area covered: Treatment-related adverse events and safety concerns as demonstrated in clinical trials, as well as in real-world clinical practice.Expert opinion: The only true curative option for NENs remains surgery, whereas high-grade advanced neuroendocrine carcinomas should be primarily managed with platinum-based chemotherapy. For the remaining cases, that comprise the vast majority, the current armamentarium includes somatostatin analogs, interferon, telotristat ethyl, molecular targeted therapies, chemotherapy, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and locoregional treatment. The use of the aforementioned therapeutic options is associated with several and not uncommonly severe treatment-related adverse events. However, the benefits offered inclusive of improved prognosis, amelioration of symptoms, and better quality of life amidst others, by far outweighs any adverse event.

O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase and glucose transporter 2 in foregut and hindgut gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms

Background

Streptozocin (STZ) is used for treating both pancreatic (PanNET) and gastrointestinal (GI-NET) neuroendocrine tumors but its therapeutic efficacy is relatively low in GI-NETs. Therefore, it has become pivotal to select GI-NET patients who could benefit from STZ treatment. STZ is transported via the glucose transporter 2 (GLUT2) into the cells and the loss of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) also increases its therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, GLUT2 high and MGMT low status could be the surrogate markers of STZ.

Methods

In this study, we examined the MGMT and GLUT2 status in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN). We studied 84 NEN cases: 33 foregut and 37 hindgut GI-NETs and 14 gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinomas (GI-NECs).

Results

In GI-NETs, MGMT scores of ≥2 and ≥ 3 were 77% (54/70) and 56% (39/70), respectively, and GLUT2 scores of ≥4 and ≥ 6 were 30% (21/70) and 4.3% (3/70), respectively. Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction revealed that MGMT promoter methylation was detected only in 2/14 GI-NECs but none of the included GI-NETs. GLUT2 (GLUT2 score) and MGMT immunoreactivity (MGMT and H-scores) were both significantly correlated with Ki-67 labeling index (GLUT2 score: P = 0.0045, ρ = − 0.4570; MGMT score: P = 0.0064, ρ = − 0.4399; H-score: P = 0.0110, ρ = − 0.4135) and MGMT immunoreactivity were significantly correlated with GLUT2 immunoreactivity (MGMT score: P = 0.0198; H-score, P = 0.0004, ρ = 0.5483) in hindgut NETs, but not in foregut NETs. However, discrepancies from the above correlation between GLUT2 and MGMT immunoreactivity were detected in several GI-NET cases which could be potential candidates for STZ therapy.

Conclusion

The evaluation of MGMT and GLUT2 status could provide an important information in planning STZ therapy in GI-NET patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-020-07579-6.

Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors: Adjuvant and Systemic Treatments

OPINION STATEMENT

Bronchial carcinoids are uncommon tumors accounting for 20 to 30% of all neuroendocrine tumors and about 1-2% of all cancers of pulmonary origin. Bronchial carcinoids are well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors and have a favorable survival outcome when compared with other subtypes of lung cancers. Treatment of bronchial carcinoids is not simple owing to intricacy of symptom presentation and heterogeneity of disease biology. Successful treatment of patients requires a multimodality approach. Resection is curative in the majority of patients with localized tumors and adjuvant treatment is not routinely recommended. Multiple options for systemic therapy exist for patients with advanced disease. To date, very few randomized clinical trials have been done, partly owing to the relative rarity of this malignancy. Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are reasonable first-line choice for patients with tumors expressing somatostatin receptors. Everolimus is an appropriate first-line choice for somatostatin receptor negative tumors and for any patients with progressive disease. PRRT can also be considered for progressive tumors expressing somatostatin receptors. Based on retrospective series, cytotoxic chemotherapy can be selected in patients with progressive tumors, primarily when cytoreduction is needed. Herein, we will discuss evidence supporting the role of adjuvant and systemic treatment therapies for those with bronchial carcinoid tumors by focusing on various studies.

Systemic Treatment Selection for Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (PanNETs)

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNETs) are rare diseases and a good example of how research is not only feasible, but also of crucial importance in the scenario of rare tumours. Many clinical trials have been performed over the past two decades expanding therapeutic options for patients with advanced PanNETs. Adequate management relies on optimal selection of treatment, which may be challenging for clinicians due to the fact that multiple options of therapy are currently available. A number of therapies already exist, which are supported by data from phase III studies, including somatostatin analogues and targeted therapies (sunitinib and everolimus). In addition, chemotherapy remains an option, with temozolomide and capecitabine being one of the most popular doublets to use. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy was successfully implemented in patients with well-differentiated gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, but with certain questions waiting to be solved for the management of PanNETs. Finally, the role of immunotherapy is still poorly understood. In this review, the data supporting current systemic treatment options for locally advanced or metastatic PanNETs are summarized. Strategies for treatment selection in patients with PanNETs based on patient, disease, or drug characteristics is provided, as well as a summary of current evidence on prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Future perspectives are discussed, focusing on current and forthcoming challenges and unmet needs of patients with these rare tumours.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors G3 and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas: Differences in basic biology and treatment

In 2017 the World Health Organization revised the criteria for classification of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) after a consensus conference at the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The major change in the new classification was to subclassify the original G3 group into well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors G3 (pNETs G3) and poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (pNECs), which have been gradually proven to be completely different in biological behavior and clinical manifestations in recent years. In 2019 this major change subsequently extended to NENs involving the entire digestive tract. The updated version of the pNENs grading system marks a growing awareness of these heterogeneous tumors. This review discusses the clinicopathological, genetic and therapeutic features of poorly differentiated pNECs and compare them to those of well-differentiated pNETs G3. For pNETs G3 and pNECs (due to their lower incidence), there are still many problems to be investigated. Previous studies under the new grading classification also need to be reinterpreted. This review summarizes the relevant literature from the perspective of the differences between pNETs G3 and pNECs in order to deepen understanding of these diseases and discuss future research directions.

Phase I clinical trial of temozolomide and methoxyamine (TRC-102), an inhibitor of base excision repair, in patients with advanced solid tumors

Temozolomide (TMZ) generates DNA adducts that are repaired by direct DNA and base excision repair mechanisms. Methoxyamine (MX, TRC-102) potentiates TMZ activity by binding to apurinic and apyrimidinic (AP) sites after removal of N³-methyladenine and N⁷-methylguanine, inhibiting site recognition of AP endonuclease. We conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of intravenous MX when given with oral TMZ. Patients with advanced solid tumors and progression on standard treatment were enrolled to a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation trial assessing escalating doses of TMZ and MX. Tumor response was assessed per RECIST and adverse events (AEs) by CTCAEv3. Pharmacokinetics (PK) of MX and COMET assays on peripheral blood mononuclear cells were performed. 38 patients were enrolled-median age 59.5 years (38-76), mean number of cycles 2.9 [1-13]. No DLTs were observed. Cycle 1 grade 3 AEs included fatigue, lymphopenia, anemia, INR, leukopenia, neutropenia, allergic reaction, constipation, psychosis and paranoia. Cycle 2-13 grade 4 AEs included thrombocytopenia and confusion. A partial response was seen in 1 patient with a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) and six additional patients, each with different tumor types, demonstrated prolonged stable disease. MX PK was linear with dose and was not affected by concomitant TMZ. TMZ 200 mg/m² daily × 5 may be safely administered with MX 150 mg/m² intravenously once on day 1 with minimal toxicity. Further studies assessing this drug combination in select tumor types where temozolomide has activity may be warranted.

Phase 1 dose escalation trial of TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil) and temozolomide in the treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are understudied and have limited systemic treatment options. Prior studies for patients with advanced NETs have demonstrated promising results when antimetabolite agents, including fluoropyrimidines, were combined with temozolomide TMZ. TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil) is an antineoplastic agent that is non-cross resistant with 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine and that has a different toxicity profile. This study evaluated the safety of TAS-102 in combination with TMZ in patients in neuroendocrine tumors. Escalating doses of TMZ (100, 150 and 200 mg/m²) on days 8-12 were given in combination with TAS-102 (35 mg/m² twice a day) on days 1-5 and 8-12 of a 28 day cycle in subjects with advanced NETs. Primary endpoints were safety and determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Growth factor support was mandated starting with level 2 to avoid treatment delays. Fifteen evaluable subjects were enrolled in the phase 1 study. No dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed on level 1. One DLT was observed on level 2 (grade 3 fatigue and inability to resume treatment), and 1 on level 3 (grade 4 thrombocytopenia). The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events included neutropenia (33%), lymphopenia (27%), and thrombocytopenia (27%). Disease control rate of 92% and partial response rate of 8% were observed in 13 evaluable subjects. This study established MTD of TAS-102 (35 mg/m² twice daily) and TMZ (200 mg/m² daily). This regimen was well tolerated. Early signs of clinically meaningful activity were observed. Further evaluation of the efficacy of this regimen is warranted.

Medical Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

The increased incidence and prevalence of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) over the past few decades has been accompanied by an improvement in overall survival. There are differences in the management of small bowel NETs versus pNETs. The management of all patients with NETs must be individualized based on patient characteristics as well tumor-related factors. This article reviews the role of somatostatin analogues, historical results with chemotherapy in gastroenteropancreatic NETs (GEPNETs), and more recent evidence for the use of cytotoxic chemotherapy in GEPNETs. The article also discusses molecular targeted therapies approved for use in GEPNETs and some ongoing clinical trials.

Influence of Gender on Therapy and Outcome of Neuroendocrine Tumors of Gastroenteropancreatic Origin: A Single-Center Analysis

Introduction

Gender-specific treatment is gaining growing attention in various fields of medicine. In gastrointestinal cancer, influence of sex on outcome has been discussed, while this has not been the case in neuroendocrine tumors. Overall, the incidence of neuroendocrine neoplasms is rising, especially for appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms in women. Also, women seem to have a slight advantage in response to therapy, especially for liver metastases.

Objectives

This single-center analysis aimed to investigate gender-specific differences in our cohort related to distribution, therapy, and outcome.

Methods

Patients from the NET registry as well as the clinic database were evaluated retrospectively concerning overall survival and response to therapy with respect to gender. A subgroup analysis was carried out for patients with low grading and response to chemotherapy, as well as for patients with good and moderate grading receiving peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and for a group of patients with liver surgery.

Results

No specific differences could be detected for overall survival or response to therapy between male and female patients. Mean survival was estimated with 242.2 months (±10.39 SD) altogether and 221.7 months (± 13.02 SD) for male patients and 253.5 months (±15.24 SD) for female patients from the NET registry from initial diagnosis. There was no significant difference between female and male patients (p = 0.136). For patients receiving chemotherapy, overall survival from initial diagnosis was calculated with 26 months (±2.59) and did not show any significant differences between female and male patients 24.8 months (±2.81 SD) vs. 27.8 months (±3.86 SD, p = 0.87). Patients undergoing peptide receptor radionuclide therapy showed a median progression-free survival of 26.9 months (±2.82 SD), with 16.9 (±5.595 SD) and 26.9 months (±3.019 SD) for male and female patients, respectively (p = 0.2). In the group of patients with liver surgery, female patients reached an estimated overall survival of 64.7 months (±4.16 SD), male patients 65.1 months (±2.79 SD, p = 0.562).

Conclusion

Our cohort did not reveal significant differences in outcome and response to therapy with regards to gender.

Molecular Signatures and Their Clinical Utility in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are classified based on their histologic differentiation and proliferative indices, which have been used extensively to determine prognosis. Advances in next-generation sequencing and other high-throughput techniques have allowed researchers to objectively explore tumor specimens and learn about the genetic alterations associated with malignant transformation in PNETs. As a result, targeted, pathway-specific therapies have been emerging for the treatment of unresectable and metastatic disease. As we continue to trial various pharmaceutical products, evidence from studies using multi-omics approaches indicates that clinical aggressiveness stratifies along other genotypic and phenotypic demarcations, as well. In this review, we explore the clinically relevant and potentially targetable molecular signatures of PNETs, their associated trials, and the overall differences in reported prognoses and responses to existing therapies.

Temozolomide Is a Potential Therapeutic Tool for Patients With Metastatic Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma-Case Report and Review of the Literature

Context: Metastatic pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (MPP) therapy mainly involves radionuclide therapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. In recent years, temozolomide (TMZ) showed great promise in some MMP patients, especially those with SDHB germline mutation. We reported a patient with MPP who did not have any known germline genetic change and responded remarkably well to TMZ monotherapy. Case presentation: The patient was a 41-year-old woman with local and distant recurrence (soft tissues and bone metastases) of retroperitoneal paraganglioma. She suffered from dizziness, palpitation, sweating, weight loss and constipation, with the blood pressure fluctuating substantially from 130/100 mmHg to 190/120 mmHg, although she was on phenoxybenzamine and metoprolol medication. The patient showed clinical and radiological response after 3-cycle TMZ therapy. Upon 15 cycles of TMZ therapy, her symptoms were dramatically alleviated, urinary norepinephrine excretion decreased from 1,840 μg/24 h to 206 μg/24 h, and CT showed that the lesions further shrank. Molecular profiling of the tumor tissue of the patient revealed hypermethylation of the O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter and a negative immunostaining for MGMT. Globally, only 26 cases of MPP treated with TMZ have been described so far. TMZ is effective, especially in patients with SDHB mutation, which can be explained by the silencing of MGMT expression as a consequence of MGMT promoter hypermethylation in SDHB-mutated tumors. Although, in general, patients with SDHB mutation or MGMT promoter hypermethylation have better response to TMZ, there are also exceptions. Severe side effects are uncommon, with only 17.4% patients experiencing Grade 3 toxicities, including lymphopenia, and hypertension. Conclusions: TMZ is effective and safe in MPP patients, and, it may work better on patients with SDHB-related MPP. Measurement of MGMT expression might help assess the tumor sensitivity to TMZ but this needs further systematic investigation.

Systemic Therapies for Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

OPINION STATEMENT

Over the years, there have been significant advances in systemic treatments for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs). Despite these advancements, uncertainty remains regarding how to best sequence available therapies. For well-differentiated and metastatic panNETs that are somatostatin receptor (SSTR) avid on functional imaging, first-line therapy typically consists of somatostatin analogs (SSAs), given their favorable toxicity profile and overall low burden for patients. When progression of disease is observed on an SSA, multiple treatment options are available, including the targeted agents everolimus and sunitinib, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), as well as chemotherapy, with the latter often preferred for those panNETs of heavy tumor burden, higher grade, and/or more aggressive behavior clinically and/or radiographically. Here, we review panNET classification, currently available systemic treatments, therapy sequencing, and areas of active investigation to further our treatments for the disease.

Single-Agent Thalidomide for Treatment of Malignant Paraganglioma of the Organ of Zuckerkandl

The standard of care for benign pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas is surgical resection; however, there is no definitive curative or standard therapy for the treatment of malignant pheochromocytomas or paragangliomas. Current therapeutic options include surgical resection, chemotherapy (CVD therapy), MIBG-radiotherapy, somatostatin analogues, and combination targeted therapies such as temozolomide and thalidomide. Although some patients demonstrate short-lived responses to these various therapies, there has been no statistically significant survival benefit with any of the current regimens and therefore the aim is palliation and symptom control. Here, we present a 38-year-old man found to have an unresectable metastatic paraganglioma located in the Organ of Zuckerkandl who has been treated with single-agent thalidomide for over 15 years with minimal growth and stabilization of metastatic lesions. The management of our patient with single-agent therapy for this extended period of time challenges the efficacy and role of chemotherapy and other accepted therapies for malignant pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Carcinoid Brain Metastasis: A Case Report

Carcinoid brain metastases are extremely rare and are associated with a poor prognosis. Treatment options are variable, ranging from surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy alone or combined. We report on a case of rectal carcinoid metastatic to the cerebellum and review chemotherapeutic regimens for carcinoid tumor treatment, focusing on the potential role of temozolomide or stereotactic radiosurgery.

Management of Well-Differentiated High-Grade (G3) Neuroendocrine Tumors

OPINION STATEMENT

In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification for pancreatic NET was updated to include a new category of well-differentiated high-grade (Ki 67 > 20%) pancreatic tumors (NET G3), distinct from high-grade poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). NET G3 are considered a molecularly, radiologically, and prognostically distinct entity compared to NEC and NET G1/G2. The optimal first-line management in NET G3 and sequencing therapies remains a challenge awaiting future trials taking into consideration the unique characteristics of this category. In this review, we aim to summarize the current evidence in the management of NET G3.

Safety and Activity of Metronomic Temozolomide in Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Background. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the mainstay of front-line treatment of patients affected by pluri-metastatic intermediate/high grade NeuroEndocrine Neoplasms (NENs). However, there are no standard second-line treatments at disease progression. Previous clinical experiences have evidenced that temozolomide (TMZ), an oral analog of dacarbazine, is active against NENs at standard doses of 150 to 200 mg/mq per day on days 1 to 5 of a 28-day cycle, even if a significant treatment-related toxicity is reported. Methods. Metastatic NENs patients were treated at the ENETS (European NeuroEndocrine Tumor Society) center of excellence of Naples (Italy), from 2014 to 2017 with a second-line alternative metronomic schedule of TMZ, 75 mg/m²per os “one week on/one week off”. Toxicity was graded with NCI-CTC criteria v4.0; objective responses with RECIST v1.1 and performance status (PS) according to ECOG. Results. Twenty-six consecutive patients were treated. Median age was 65.5 years. The predominant primary organs were pancreas and lung. Grading was G2 in 11 patients, G3 in 15. More than half of patients had a PS 2 (15 vs. 11 with PS 1). The median time-on-temozolomide therapy was 12.2 months (95% CI: 11.4–19.6). No G3/G4 toxicities were registered. Complete response was obtained in 1 patient, partial response in 4, stable disease in 19 (disease control rate: 92.3%), and progressive disease in 2. The median overall survival from TMZ start was 28.3 months. PS improved in 73% of patients. Conclusions. Metronomic TMZ is a suitable treatment for G2 and G3 NENs particularly in PS 2 patients. Prospective and larger trials are needed to confirm these results.

An update on the management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are a rare and heterogeneous group of neoplasia and differ in their clinical presentation, behavior, and prognosis based on both histological features and cancer stage at the time of diagnosis. Although small-sized tumors can be surgically resected, locally advanced and metastatic tumors confer a poor prognosis. In addition, only limited treatment options are available to the latter group of patients with PNETs, such as hormonal analogs, cytotoxic agents, and targeted therapy. In selected patients, liver-directed therapies are also used. As expected, clinicians taking care of these patients are challenged to develop an effective and comprehensive treatment strategy for their patients amid a wide variety of treatment modalities. Targeted therapy for PNETs is limited to sunitinib and everolimus. Presently, a number of clinical studies are ongoing to assess the efficacy of newer targeted agents alone and in combination with previous agents for the treatment of advanced PNETs. The authors reviewed the current treatment and also discussed the emerging agents and emphasized the need to identify biomarkers.

Systemic treatment for lung carcinoids: from bench to bedside

In the huge spectrum of lung neuroendocrine neoplasms, typical and atypical carcinoids should be considered as a separate biological entity from poorly differentiated forms, harboring peculiar molecular alterations. Despite their indolent behavior, lung carcinoids correlate with a worse survival. To date, only limited therapeutic options are available and novel drugs are strongly needed. In this work, we extensively reviewed scientific literature exploring available therapeutic options, new molecular targets and future perspectives in the management of well differentiated neoplasms of bronchopulmonary tree. Systemic therapy represents the main option in advanced and unresectable disease; accepted choices are somatostatin analogs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, everolimus and chemotherapy. To date, an univocal treatment strategy has not been identified yet, thus tailored therapeutic algorithms should consider treatment efficacy as well as safety profiles. Several molecular alterations found in carcinoid tumors might act as molecular targets leading to development of new therapeutic options. Further studies are necessary to identify new potential “druggable” molecular targets in the selected subset of low-grade lung carcinoids. Furthermore, evaluating the available therapies in more homogeneous population might improve their efficacy through a perfect tailoring of treatment options.

Insights into the biology and treatment strategies of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are the second most common primary pancreatic neoplasms after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. PNETs present with widely various clinical manifestation and unfavorable survival rate. The recent advances in next generation sequencing have significantly increased our understanding of the molecular landscape of PNETs and help guide the development of targeted therapies. This review intends to outline a holistic picture of the tumors by discussing current understanding of clinical presentations, up-to-date treatment strategies, novel mouse models, and molecular biology of PNETs. Furthermore, we will provide insight into the future development of more effective targeted therapies that are necessary to manage PNETs.

Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas: From Genetic Diversity to Targeted Therapies

Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PCPGs) are rare neuroendocrine tumors that arise from the chromaffin tissue of adrenal medulla and sympathetic ganglia. Although metastatic PCPGs account for only 10% of clinical cases, morbidity and mortality are high because of the uncontrollable mass effect and catecholamine level generated by these tumors. Despite our expanding knowledge of PCPG genetics, the clinical options to effectively suppress PCPG progression remain limited. Several recent translational studies revealed that PCPGs with different molecular subtypes exhibit distinctive oncogenic pathways and spectrum of therapy resistance. This suggests that therapeutics can be adjusted based on the signature molecular and metabolic pathways of PCPGs. In this review, we summarized the latest findings on PCPG genetics, novel therapeutic targets, and perspectives for future personalized medicine.

CAPTEM in Metastatic Well-Differentiated Intermediate to High Grade Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Single Centre Experience

INTRODUCTION

Capecitabine-temozolomide (CAPTEM) has significant activity in patients (pts) with metastatic low grade pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, there is limited data regarding its activity in pts with metastatic well-differentiated intermediate and high grade pancreatic and nonpancreatic NETs. The objective of this study was to assess the functional imaging response, survival, and tolerability of CAPTEM in this population.

METHODS

A retrospective audit of pts with metastatic well-differentiated intermediate (WHO grade 2) or high grade (WHO grade 3) NETs treated at Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre between March 2013 and March 2017. Pts received capecitabine 750 mg/m2 orally twice daily (bd) from days1 to 14 and temozolomide 100 mg/m2 bd from days 10 to 14 every 28 days. Data regarding functional imaging response, progression-free and overall survival, and toxicities was collected.

RESULTS

Thirty-two pts received a median of 6 cycles (range: 2-16) of CAPTEM for grade 2 (n=21, 66%) or grade 3 (n=11, 34%), Ki67 <55% (n= 7, 21.9%) or Ki67 ≥55% (n= 4, 12.5 %) NET. Primary site included gastroenteropancreatic (n= 17, 53%), lung (n= 12, 37.5%), and unknown origin (n = 3, 9.4%). Twenty-two percent received CAPTEM as first-line therapy. After a median of 31 months of follow-up, the two-year overall survival (OS) was 42%, with a median OS of 24 months. There was a trend towards improved median progression-free survival (PFS) in pts with low grade 3 (Ki67<55%) versus high grade 3 (Ki67 ≥55%) NETs (15 vs 4 months, p= 0.11). Ten (31.3%) experienced grade 3/4 toxicity, with nausea (15.6%), thrombocytopaenia (12.5%), and fatigue (9.4%) the most common toxicities reported.

CONCLUSION

CAPTEM has significant activity in patients with metastatic grades 2 and 3 NETs with manageable toxicity. The PFS benefit observed in the grade 3 subgroup with Ki67<55% warrants further evaluation in a larger randomized trial.

[Systemic Therapy for Low-grade Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumor]

肺部是神经内分泌肿瘤（neuroendocrine tumor, NET）的第二好发部位。肺类癌包括典型类癌和不典型类癌，属于低级别神经内分泌肿瘤。这一类肿瘤由于发病率较低，目前尚未得到广大医务工作者的重视。但有效的治疗不仅能提高患者的远期生存，还能控制患者症状，改善生活质量。本文分别阐述肺低级别神经内分泌肿瘤的流行病学和病理学特点、早期患者的治疗策略以及进展期患者的治疗策略。早期患者应当尽早进行手术治疗。进展期患者治疗方式包括化疗、SSAs、mTOR抑制剂、肽受体介导的放射性核素治疗、生物治疗以及靶向治疗。目前的研究结论大多来自其他部位的NETs研究外推而来，仍需针对肺低级别神经内分泌肿瘤患者进行特异性临床试验加以证实。