Complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal carcinoma is associated with significantly improved survival

Neuroendocrine differentiation and serotonin expression in oesophageal adenocarcinomas after neoadjuvant therapy: correlation with clinicopathological features and outcome

AIMS

Oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is a glandular or mucinous epithelial malignancy that can show immunohistochemical evidence of neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) and express the hormone serotonin. The objective of this study was to correlate the presence of NED and serotonin with clinicopathological characteristics and patient outcome after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective cohort of patients treated between 2002 and 2021 was established and included 218 oesophagectomy specimens with residual tumour. Representative full-face sections of tumour were stained for synaptophysin, chromogranin-A and serotonin by immunohistochemistry, and staining results were correlated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). In total, 129 (59%) tumours showed evidence of NED, defined as immunohistochemical expression of synaptophysin or chromogranin-A, while 40 (18%) showed evidence of NED and expressed serotonin. Patients with neuroendocrine-positive tumours had significantly shorter median OS compared to those with neuroendocrine-negative tumours (22.5 versus 48.8 months, P = 0.006), but similar median DFS (13.3 versus 17.8 months, P = 0.34). Using Cox regression, the association between NED and OS was significant in univariate [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.16-2.45] and multivariate (HR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.08-2.52) analysis. Patients with serotonin-expressing tumours had similar median OS (21.7 versus 25.9 months, P = 0.24) and DFS (7.3 versus 15.6 months, P = 0.12) compared to those with NED but lacking serotonin. Using Cox regression, serotonin expression was associated with reduced OS in univariate (HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.06-2.47) but not multivariate (HR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.64-1.65) analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support NED as independent predictor of OS in EAC after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. While a subset of tumours with NED expressed serotonin, this did not provide additional prognostic information.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus sequential tislelizumab followed by surgery for esophageal carcinoma (CRISEC study): A single-arm, bicentric, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To explore the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) plus sequential tislelizumab followed by surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-arm, bicentric, phase 2 trial enrolled patients with resectable or potentially resectable thoracic ESCC to receive neoadjuvant radiotherapy (41.4 Gy in 23 fractions) with concurrent chemotherapy (albumin-bound paclitaxel, 50-100 mg/m2, and carboplatin, area under the curve of 2 mg/ml/min, once weekly, five times) plus sequential tislelizumab (200 mg Q3W, three cycles) followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. The secondary endpoints included safety, R0 resection rate, major pathologic response (MPR) rate, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of the 30 patients enrolled from January 2021 to October 2022, 24 (80.0 %) completed planned surgery and gained R0 resection (100 %). Among the 24 patients, nine (37.5 %) achieved pCR and 21 (87.5 %) achieved MPR. Ten patients (35.7 %) developed grade 3-4 toxicities during tislelizumab therapy, including lymphopenia (32.1 %), neutropenia (3.6 %), and thrombocytopenia (3.6 %). Grade 5 hematemesis occurred in two patients and both were attributed to aortic invasion. Three patients (12.5 %) developed grade 3 postoperative complications, including pulmonary infection (8.3 %) and hoarseness (4.2 %). After a median follow-up of 35.4 months, the 2-year OS and DFS rates were 83.3 % and 79.2 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Sequential tislelizumab after NCRT in ESCC is safe and feasible. Further study is warranted to validate the efficacy of this combination mode.

Multi-Institutional Analysis of Survival and Recurrence Patterns of Different Pathological Regression Types After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy or Radiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The recurrence patterns of different types of pathologic regression of the primary tumor and lymph nodes in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) are little known, especially in ypT0N+ patients.

METHODS

We included 582 patients with ESCC who had esophagectomy after NCRT or neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NRT) from 3 institutions. The patients were divided into 4 groups: ypT0N0, ypT0N+, ypT+N0, and ypT+N+ according to the type of pathological regression of the primary tumor and lymph nodes. Survival, recurrence pattern and timing, and potential prognostic factors were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 179 patients were classified as ypT0N0, 227 patients as ypT + N0, 45 patients as ypT0N+, and 131 patients as ypT + N+. The median follow-up was 31.7 months in all patients. The restricted mean survival time (RMST) of ypT0N0, ypT + N0, ypT0N+, and ypT + N+ patients decreased sequentially (70.64, 63.84, 55.93 and 39.96 months) and the recurrence rates increased sequentially (22.3%, 29.5%, 44.4% and 54.2%). Both the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the ypT0N+ group were significantly lower than those in the ypT0N0 group (HR: 2.226, p = 0.007; HR: 2.271, p = 0.003). The distant metastasis (DM) pattern in ypT0N+ was similar to that of ypT + N+, and higher than that of ypN0 (25.6% vs 14.3%, HR: 1.970, p = 0.040).

CONCLUSIONS

ESCC patients with various pathological regression types after receiving NCRT or NRT had significantly different survival rates. ypT0N+ patients had a lower survival rate and higher DM rate than ypT0N0 patients. For these lymph node-positive patients, adjuvant chemotherapy does not appear to improve their prognosis.

Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy Benefits Non-pCR Patients Rather Than pCR Patients for Locally Advanced ESCC: A Multicenter Real-World Study

BACKGROUND

There is no unified standard in adjuvant therapy (AT) for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery. We evaluated the significance of AT for these patients and explored its influencing factors.

METHODS

ESCC patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and surgery from 2019 to 2022 at three centers were divided into AT (n = 227) and non-AT groups (n = 435). Baseline characteristics were balanced using propensity score matching (PSM). Primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Subgroup analyses and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify the prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period is 36 (2-72) months. After PSM, the total population had 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates of 71.3%, 66.0%, and 64.1%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in DFS (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.55-1.14, p = 0.21) or OS (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.49-1.13, p = 0.17) between AT and non-AT groups. Subgroup analysis revealed that non-pCR patients benefited from AT in DFS (p = 0.042) and OS (p = 0.033). Moreover, in non-pCR patients who received AT, BMI ≥ 21.5 kg/m2 and ypN0 were independent protective factors of DFS. ypN0 was an independent protective factor of OS. In terms of AT regimens, the Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that adjuvant immunochemotherapy (AICT) provided superior survival benefits than adjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative AT benefited ESCC patients with non-pCR, while AICT may be a relatively better AT regimen in real-world data, which deserves further exploration.

Comparative Outcomes and Toxicity in Patients With Esophageal Cancer After Trimodality Therapy With Step-and-Shoot Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy: The MD Anderson Experience

AIMS

To evaluate outcomes and toxicity after intensity-modulated radiation therapy given as step-and-shoot (SS) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer treated with trimodality therapy (i.e. neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy followed by surgery).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients consecutively treated with trimodality therapy including IMRT in 2001-2022 (n = 449) were retrospectively reviewed, and 106 pairs of propensity-matched SS and VMAT patients were identified. Survival, recurrence, surgery-related prognostic factors, and chemoradiation-related toxicities were evaluated between groups.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were balanced between both groups except for body mass index, history of other cancer, clinical disease stage, and use of induction chemotherapy. Median follow-up time was 40 months. Relative to SS, VMAT led to higher 3-year overall survival (OS; P = 0.028, hazard ratio [HR] 0.645, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.436-0.954) but not progression-free, locoregional recurrence-free, or distant metastasis-free survival. No predictor of excellent OS by SS versus VMAT was identified in multivariable analyses. However, VMAT was associated with reduced odds of postoperative cardiac complications (P < 0.001, odds ratio [OR] 0.296, 95% CI 0.148-0.591), pulmonary complications (P = 0.048, OR 0.539, 95% CI 0.292-0.994), pathologic partial response or worse (≥10% viable cells; P = 0.003, OR 0.418, 95% CI 0.235-0.743), and positive/close margins (P = 0.023, OR 0.346, 95% CI 0.138-0.867) relative to SS. VMAT was also associated with reduced rates of chemoradiation therapy-related weight loss (33.0% versus 79.2%, P < 0.001), fatigue (40.6% versus 68.9%, P < 0.001), nausea (31.1% versus 58.5%, P < 0.001) and cardiac toxicity (0% versus 6.6%, P = 0.007) than SS.

CONCLUSION

Based on this single institution, retrospective study with a 40-month median follow-up, VMAT utilization in trimodality treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer appears to be associated with improved OS and rates of concurrent chemoradiation therapy-related toxicity and reduced initial 12-month postoperative complications relative to SS IMRT. Multi-institutional prospective trials addressing the limitations of this study and with longer follow-ups are warranted to validate these findings.

Impact of Fusobacterium nucleatum in the treatment of cancer, including radiotherapy and its future potential in esophageal cancer

Despite advances in multimodality therapy, including surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy and chemoradiation, the fatality rate for esophageal cancer remains high. Specifically, Fusobacterium nucleatum, due to its aggregation capacity, has shown a tendency to form biofilms. The biofilm-forming capabilities of microbial communities are of utmost importance in the context of cancer treatment, as they have been shown to drive significant losses in the efficaciousness of various cancer treatments. Therefore, elucidating the dynamics of F. nucleatum will be important for the development of effective treatments for esophageal cancer. Therefore, this review summarizes the current knowledge of F. nucleatum, its involvement in cancer and its impact on chemotherapy and radiation therapy. In conclusion, further research on the role of F. nucleatum is essential for the continued advancement of the treatment of esophageal cancer and patient care.

Multimodality deep learning radiomics predicts pathological response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to develop and validate a deep-learning radiomics model using CT, T2, and DWI images for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with ESCC undergoing nCRT followed by surgery were retrospectively enrolled from three institutions and divided into training and testing cohorts. Both traditional and deep-learning radiomics features were extracted from pre-treatment CT, T2, and DWI. Multiple radiomics models were developed, both single modality and integrated, using machine learning algorithms. The models' performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, with the area under the curve (AUC) as a primary metric, alongside sensitivity and specificity from the cut-off analysis.

RESULTS

The study involved 151 patients, among whom 63 achieved pCR. The training cohort consisted of 89 patients from Institution 1 (median age 62, 73 males) and the testing cohort included 52 patients from Institution 2 (median age 62, 41 males), and 10 in a clinical trial from Institution 3 (median age 69, 9 males). The integrated model, combining traditional and deep learning radiomics features from CT, T2, and DWI, demonstrated the best performance with an AUC of 0.868 (95% CI: 0.766-0.959), sensitivity of 88% (95% CI: 73.9-100), and specificity of 78.4% (95% CI: 63.6-90.2) in the testing cohort. This model outperformed single-modality models and the clinical model.

CONCLUSION

A multimodality deep learning radiomics model, utilizing CT, T2, and DWI images, was developed and validated for accurately predicting pCR of ESCC following nCRT.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Our research demonstrates the satisfactory predictive value of multimodality deep learning radiomics for the response of nCRT in ESCC and provides a potentially helpful tool for personalized treatment including organ preservation strategy.

KEY POINTS

After neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, patients with ESCC have pCR rates of about 40%. The multimodality deep learning radiomics model, could predict pCR after nCRT with high accuracy. The multimodality radiomics can be helpful in personalized treatment of esophageal cancer.

Tumor-Resident Microbiota-Based Risk Model Predicts Neoadjuvant Therapy Response of Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients

Few predictive biomarkers exist for identifying patients who may benefit from neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). The intratumoral microbial composition is comprehensively profiled to predict the efficacy and prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent NAT and curative esophagectomy. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression analysis is conducted to screen for the most closely related microbiota and develop a microbiota-based risk prediction (MRP) model on the genera of TM7x, Sphingobacterium, and Prevotella. The predictive accuracy and prognostic value of the MRP model across multiple centers are validated. The MRP model demonstrates good predictive accuracy for therapeutic responses in the training, validation, and independent validation sets. The MRP model also predicts disease-free survival (p = 0.00074 in the internal validation set and p = 0.0017 in the independent validation set) and overall survival (p = 0.00023 in the internal validation set and p = 0.11 in the independent validation set) of patients. The MRP-plus model basing on MRP, tumor stage, and tumor size can also predict the patients who can benefit from NAT. In conclusion, the developed MRP and MRP-plus models may function as promising biomarkers and prognostic indicators accessible at the time of diagnosis.

Radiomics nomogram combined with clinical factors for predicting pathological complete response in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Introduction

Predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESSC) prior to surgery can minimize unnecessary surgical interventions and facilitate personalized treatment strategies. Our goal is to develop and validate an image-based radiomic model using preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans and clinical data to predict pathological complete response (pCR) in resectable ESSC following neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Methods

We retrospectively collected data from patients diagnosed with ESCC at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between January 2018 and May 2023, who received preoperative neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy. Eligible patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets. Radiomic features extracted from preprocessed CT images were used to develop a radiomic model, incorporating Radiomic score (Rad-score) and clinical factors through multivariate logistic regression analysis. The model's performance was assessed for calibration, discrimination, and clinical utility in an independent validation cohort.

Results

We enrolled a total of 105 eligible participants who were randomly divided into two groups: a training set (N=74) and a validation set (N=31). After data dimension reduction and feature selection, we identified 11 radiomic features, which collectively formed the Rad-score. Rad-score had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% CI 0.72-0.93) in the training set and 0.78 (95% CI 0.60-0.95) in the validation set. Multivariate analysis revealed that radiological response and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) were independent predictors of pCR, with p-values of 0.0026 and 0.0414, respectively. We developed and validated a nomogram combining Rad-score and clinical features, achieving AUCs of 0.90 (95% CI 0.82-0.98) in the training set and 0.85 (95% CI 0.70-0.99) in the validation set. The Delong test confirmed the nomogram's superiority over pure radiomic and clinical models. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) assessment supported the clinical value and superiority of the combined model.

Conclusion

The nomogram, which integrates Rad-score and clinical features, offers a precise and reliable method for predicting pCR status in ESCC patients who have undergone neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy. This tool aids in tailoring treatment strategies to individual patients.

Comparison of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study with 3-year survival analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nCIT) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) has shown short-term benefits, but long-term survival outcomes are unclear. This study compares nCIT and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) in resectable ESCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on ESCC patients who underwent nCT or nCIT followed by esophagectomy. Propensity score matching (PSM) with a caliper of 0.02 was employed to minimize bias. The primary endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 131 comparable pairs of ESCC patients receiving nCT and nCIT were selected for the final analysis. The nCIT had higher rates of pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (mPR) compared to nCT. Additionally, nCIT led to significant tumor down-staging, higher rates of R0 resection, and increased lymph node clearance during surgery. Patients who received nCIT exhibited improved disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at the 3-year follow-up. The incidence of distant and mixed relapses was lower in the nCIT group compared to the nCT group. However, the risk of locoregional relapse was comparable between the two groups. Subgroup analyses showed that the benefits of nCIT were generally observed across most patient subgroups. Interestingly, in patients without pCR or mPR, nCIT still demonstrated better survival benefits than nCT.

CONCLUSION

nCIT demonstrated superior pathological response rates and improved 3-year DFS and OS compared to nCT alone in locally advanced ESCC, but long-term survival validation is needed.

Prognostic impact of nodal status and lymphovascular invasion in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Nodal status is well known to be the most important prognostic factor for esophageal cancer patients, even if they are treated with neoadjuvant therapy. To establish an optimal postoperative adjuvant strategy for patients, we aimed to more accurately predict the prognosis of patients and systemic recurrence by using clinicopathological factors, including nodal status, in patients with esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The clinicopathological factors associated with survival and systemic recurrence were investigated in 488 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Overall survival differed according to tumor depth, nodal status, tumor regression, and lymphovascular (LV) invasion. In the multivariate analysis, nodal status and LV invasion were identified as independent prognostic factors (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0008). Nodal status was also identified as an independent factor associated with systemic recurrence, although LV invasion was a borderline factor (P = 0.066). In each pN stage, patients with LV invasion showed significantly worse overall survival than those without LV invasion (pN0: P = 0.036, pN1: P = 0.0044, pN2: P = 0.0194, pN3: P = 0.0054). Patients with LV invasion were also more likely to have systemic, and any recurrence than those without LV invasion in each pN stage. Pathological nodal status and LV invasion were the most important predictors of survival and systemic recurrence in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. This finding could provide useful information about selecting candidates for adjuvant therapy among these patients. Our analysis showed that LV invasion was an independent prognostic factor in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and that combining LV invasion with pathological nodal status makes it possible to stratify the prognosis in those patients.

Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy vs Chemotherapy for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Network Meta-Analysis

Importance

The prognosis of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction (AEG) is poor. From current evidence, it remains unclear to what extent preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy achieve better outcomes than surgery alone.

Objective

To assess the association of preoperative CRT and preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy in patients with AEG with overall survival and other outcomes.

Data Sources

Literature search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ClinicalTrials.gov, and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform was performed from inception to April 21, 2023.

Study Selection

Two blinded reviewers screened for randomized clinical trials comparing preoperative CRT plus surgery with preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery, 1 intervention with surgery alone, or all 3 treatments. Only data from participants with AEG were included from trials that encompassed mixed histology or gastric cancer. Among 2768 initially identified studies, 17 (0.6%) met the selection criteria.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were followed for extracting data and assessing data quality by 2 independent extractors. A bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted using the 2-stage approach.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Overall and disease-free survival, postoperative morbidity, and mortality.

Results

The analyses included 2549 patients (2206 [86.5%] male; mean [SD] age, 61.0 [9.4] years) from 17 trials (conducted from 1989-2016). Both preoperative CRT plus surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% credible interval (CrI), 0.62-0.90]; 3-year difference, 105 deaths per 1000 patients) and preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery (HR, 0.78 [95% CrI, 0.64-0.91]; 3-year difference, 90 deaths per 1000 patients) showed longer overall survival than surgery alone. Comparing the 2 modalities yielded similar overall survival (HR, 1.04 [95% CrI], 0.83-1.28]; 3-year difference, 15 deaths per 1000 patients fewer for CRT). Similarly, disease-free survival was longer for both modalities compared with surgery alone. Postoperative morbidity was more frequent after CRT plus surgery (odds ratio [OR], 2.94 [95% CrI, 1.01-8.59]) than surgery alone. Postoperative mortality was not significantly more frequent after CRT plus surgery than surgery alone (OR, 2.50 [95% CrI, 0.66-10.56]) or after chemotherapy plus surgery than CRT plus surgery (OR, 0.44 [95% CrI, 0.08-2.00]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this meta-analysis of patients with AEG, both preoperative CRT and preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy were associated with longer survival without relevant differences between the 2 modalities. Thus, either of the 2 treatments may be recommended to patients.

Nomograms to predict tumor regression grade (TRG) and ypTNM staging in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) has increased survival rates for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC), but estimating the impact of NT treatment prior to surgery is still very difficult.

METHODS

A retrospective study of the clinical information of 150 patients with locally advanced EC who got NT at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University between June 2018 and June 2023. Patients were randomized into training and internal validation groups at a 3:1 ratio. Furthermore, an external validation cohort comprised 38 patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy at Qianfoshan Hospital in the Shandong Province between June 2021 and June 2023. Independent risk factors were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression (forward stepwise regression). Predictive models and dynamic web nomograms were developed by integrating these risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 188 patients with locally advanced EC were enrolled, of whom 118 achieved stage I of neoadjuvant pathologic TNM (ypTNM) after receiving NT and 129 achieved grades 0-1 in the tumor regression grade (TRG). Logistic regression analysis identified five independent predictors of TRG grades 0-1: pulmonary function tests (PFT), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), triglyceride (TG) levels, squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) levels, and combination immunotherapy. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the training, internal validation, and external validation groups were 0.87, 0.75, and 0.80, respectively. Meanwhile, two independent predictors of stage I of ypTNM were identified: prealbumin (PA) and SCC antigen. The areas under the ROC curves for the training, internal validation, and external validation groups were 0.78, 0.67, and 0.70, respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test for both predictive models showed excellent calibration, with well-fitted calibration curves. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curves (CIC) have demonstrated that nomograms are of clinical utility.

CONCLUSION

The nomograms performed well in predicting the likelihood of stage I of ypTNM and TRG grade 0-1 after NT in patients with locally advanced EC. It helps thoracic surgeons to predict the sensitivity of patients to NT before surgery, which enables precise treatment of patients with locally advanced EC.

Risk factors for recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Prognosis of patients who achieve pathological complete response (pCR) with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is better than that of non-pCR patients. Currently, there is no indication for adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy after achieving pCR. However, recurrence risk after pCR is reportedly 10%-20% with a poor prognosis. Therefore, we investigated the preoperative risk factors for recurrence in patients with pCR.

METHODS

We analyzed 56 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and were histologically diagnosed with pCR. Preoperative factors were compared between patients with and without recurrence to identify the risk factors.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients who achieved pCR received NACRT and 8 received NAC. Ten patients who experienced recurrence (17.9%) had undergone NACRT. The cN2 lesions were more frequent, and pre-NAT blood hemoglobin (Hb) was lower in the recurrence group. In addition, the pre-NAT cross-sectional area (CSA) product of the major and minor diameters of the primary tumor before NAT was significantly higher in recurrent cases (p = 0.041). Multivariate analysis, including the cTNM stage, pre-NAT Hb, and pre-NAT CSA, identified high pre-NAT CSA as the only risk factor for recurrence (odds ratio 11.6, 95% confidence interval 1.3-104.1, and p = 0.028). Cox regression analysis of recurrence-free and overall survival identified only high pre-NAT CSA as a prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

The recurrence risk is relatively high even in patients who achieve pCR after NAT. High pre-NAT CSA of the primary tumor is a risk factor for recurrence necessitating close surveillance.

Dynamic radiological features predict pathological response after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) plus esophagectomy has emerged as a promising treatment option for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). Pathologic complete response (pCR) is a key indicator associated with great efficacy and overall survival (OS). However, there are insufficient indicators for the reliable assessment of pCR.

METHODS

192 patients with LA-ESCC treated with NICT from December 2019 to October 2023 were recruited. According to pCR status, patients were categorized into pCR group (22.92%) and non-pCR group (77.08%). Radiological features of pretreatment and preoperative CT images were extracted. Logistic and COX regressions were trained to predict pathological response and prognosis, respectively.

RESULTS

Four of the selected radiological features were combined to construct an ESCC preoperative imaging score (ECPI-Score). Logistic models revealed independent associations of ECPI-Score and vascular sign with pCR, with AUC of 0.918 in the training set and 0.862 in the validation set, respectively. After grouping by ECPI-Score, a higher proportion of pCR was observed among the high-ECPI group and negative vascular sign. Kaplan Meier analysis demonstrated that recurrence-free survival (RFS) with negative vascular sign was significantly better than those with positive (P = 0.038), but not for OS (P = 0.310).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates dynamic radiological features are independent predictors of pCR for LA-ESCC treated with NICT. It will guide clinicians to make accurate treatment plans.

Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy for locally resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (nCT + ICIs) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy (nCRT + ICIs) both induced favorable pathological response and tolerant toxicities for locally resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, few studies compared safety and efficacy between the two treatment strategies.

Methods

This retrospective study collected clinical data of locally resectable ESCC patients who underwent nCT + ICIs or nCRT + ICIs followed by esophagectomy from November 2019 to December 2022. The incidence of adverse events, surgical outcomes, short and long-term efficacy, and treatment costs were compared.

Results

A total of 206 patients were included, with a ratio of 158:48 between nCT + ICIs group and nCRT + ICIs group. The two groups exhibited well-balanced baseline characteristics. Most adverse events were grade 1-2 in both groups. The nCT + ICIs group had a longer operative time (334.00 ± 170.2 min vs 279.60 ± 88.31 min, P=0.020) than nCRT + ICIs group, but there were no differences in surgical complications. Although nCT + ICIs group had a lower pCR rate (32.3% vs 52.1%, P=0.004), the 2-year overall survival (84.42% vs 81.70%, P=0.860), 2-year disease-free survival (83.21% vs 80.47%, P=0.839), and recurrence patterns were similar to nCRT + ICIs group. In addition, nCT + ICIs group had significantly lower expenses (188796.00 ± 107704.00 RMB vs 231808.00 ± 48067.00 RMB, P=0.045).

Conclusion

Overall, nCT + ICIs have comparable safety and efficacy compared to nCRT + ICIs for locally resectable ESCC, but with lower hospitalization costs.

A Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin and 5-FU Followed by Surgical Resection in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophagogastric Junction Cancer and Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

PURPOSE

We conducted a phase II study evaluating chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer, using the docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) regimen followed by surgery. The primary purposes of this clinical trial were to assess the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy employing the DCF regimen in the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We enrolled a total of 24 newly diagnosed esophageal cancer patients between April 2015 and November 2017 in this prospective study. The radiotherapy regimen consisted of a total dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions. The chemotherapy protocol included docetaxel 35 mg/m2 for 1 h on day 1 and day 29, cisplatin 35 mg/m2 for 1 h on day 1 and day 29, and 5-FU 400 mg/m2 for 24 h on day 1-4 and day 29-32. The patients who accepted the re-staging exam should undergo surgery in 4-8 weeks after the completion of radiotherapy. The primary endpoints of this study were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and the evaluation of hematologic toxicity.

RESULTS

The study population had a median age of 55.5 years, ranging from 44 to 66, with over 90% of the patients being male. The 5-year DFS was 37.1%, and the 5-year OS was 48.7%. The pathologic complete response rate was 45.8% (11/24). The most common types of toxicity were leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. No grade 3 or greater hematologic toxicity was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the DCF regimen in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery demonstrated tolerable toxicity and achieved acceptable DFS and OS outcomes.

Development of an Interpretable Deep Learning Model for Pathological Tumor Response Assessment After Neoadjuvant Therapy

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery has become the standard of care for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and accurate pathological response assessment is critical to assess the therapeutic efficacy. However, it can be laborious and inconsistency between different observers may occur. Hence, we aim to develop an interpretable deep-learning model for efficient pathological response assessment following neoadjuvant therapy in ESCC.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 337 ESCC resection specimens from 2020-2021 at the Pudong-Branch (Cohort 1) and 114 from 2021-2022 at the Puxi-Branch (External Cohort 2) of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Whole slide images (WSIs) from these two cohorts were generated using different scanning machines to test the ability of the model in handling color variations. Four pathologists independently assessed the pathological response. The senior pathologists annotated tumor beds and residual tumor percentages on WSIs to determine consensus labels. Furthermore, 1850 image patches were randomly extracted from Cohort 1 WSIs and binarily classified for tumor viability. A deep-learning model employing knowledge distillation was developed to automatically classify positive patches for each WSI and estimate the viable residual tumor percentages. Spatial heatmaps were output for model explanations and visualizations.

RESULTS

The approach achieved high concordance with pathologist consensus, with an R^2 of 0.8437, a RAcc_0.1 of 0.7586, a RAcc_0.3 of 0.9885, which were comparable to two senior pathologists (R^2 of 0.9202/0.9619, RAcc_0.1 of 8506/0.9425, RAcc_0.3 of 1.000/1.000) and surpassing two junior pathologists (R^2 of 0.5592/0.5474, RAcc_0.1 of 0.5287/0.5287, RAcc_0.3 of 0.9080/0.9310). Visualizations enabled the localization of residual viable tumor to augment microscopic assessment.

CONCLUSION

This work illustrates deep learning's potential for assisting pathological response assessment. Spatial heatmaps and patch examples provide intuitive explanations of model predictions, engendering clinical trust and adoption (Code and data will be available at https://github.com/WinnieLaugh/ESCC_Percentage once the paper has been conditionally accepted). Integrating interpretable computational pathology could help enhance the efficiency and consistency of tumor response assessment and empower precise oncology treatment decisions.

Low-Dose Radiation Yields Lower Rates of Pathologic Response in Esophageal Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Although neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) followed by surgery is standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (E/GEJ) cancer, the optimal radiation dose is still under debate.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of different preoperative radiation doses (41.4 Gy, 45 Gy or 50.4 Gy) on pathologic response and survival in E/GEJ cancer patients.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with E/GEJ tumors, treated with curative intent between January 2009 and December 2016 in two referral centers were divided into three groups (41.4 Gy, 45 Gy and 50.4 Gy) according to the dose of preoperative radiotherapy. Pathologic complete response (pCR) rates, postoperative morbidity, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared among the three groups, with separate analyses for adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

RESULTS

From the 326 patients analyzed, 48 were included in the 41.4 Gy group (14.7%), 171 in the 45 Gy group (52.5%) and 107 in the 50.4 Gy group (32.8%). Postoperative complication rates were comparable (p = 0.399). A pCR was observed in 15%, 30%, and 34% of patients in the 41.4 Gy, 45 Gy and 50.4 Gy groups, respectively (p = 0.047). A 50.4 Gy dose was independently associated with pCR (odds ratio 2.78, 95% confidence interval 1.10-7.99) in multivariate analysis. Within AC patients, pCR was observed in 6.2% of patients in the 41.4 Gy group, 29.2% of patients in the 45 Gy group, and 22.7% of patients in the 50.4 Gy group (p = 0.035). No OS or DFS differences were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

A pCR was less common after a preoperative radiation dose of 41.4 Gy in AC patients. Radiation dose had no impact on postoperative morbidity, long-term survival, and recurrence.

Online tools to predict individualised survival for primary oesophageal cancer patients with and without pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy followed by oesophagectomy: development and external validation of two independent nomograms

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop and validate robust predictive models for patients with oesophageal cancer who achieved a pathological complete response (pCR) and those who did not (non-pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy and oesophagectomy.

DESIGN

Clinicopathological data of 6517 primary oesophageal cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and oesophagectomy were obtained from the National Cancer Database for the training cohort. An independent cohort of 444 Chinese patients served as the validation set. Two distinct multivariable Cox models of overall survival (OS) were constructed for pCR and non-pCR patients, respectively, and were presented using web-based dynamic nomograms (graphical representation of predicted OS based on the clinical characteristics that a patient could input into the website). The calibration plot, concordance index and decision curve analysis were employed to assess calibration, discrimination and clinical usefulness of the predictive models.

RESULTS

In total, 13 and 15 variables were used to predict OS for pCR and non-pCR patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy followed by oesophagectomy, respectively. Key predictors included demographic characteristics, pretreatment clinical stage, surgical approach, pathological information and postoperative treatments. The predictive models for pCR and non-pCR patients demonstrated good calibration and clinical utility, with acceptable discrimination that surpassed that of the current tumour, node, metastases staging system.

CONCLUSIONS

The web-based dynamic nomograms for pCR (https://predict-survival.shinyapps.io/pCR-eso/) and non-pCR patients (https://predict-survival.shinyapps.io/non-pCR-eso/) developed in this study can facilitate the calculation of OS probability for individual patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy and radical oesophagectomy, aiding clinicians and patients in making personalised treatment decisions.

Nomogram for predicting pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

A pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is seen in up to 40% of the patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). No nomogram has been constructed for the prediction of pCR for patients whose primary chemotherapy was a taxane-based regimen. The aim is to identify characteristics associated with a pCR through analyzing multiple pre- and post-nCRT variables and to develop a nomogram for the prediction of pCR for these patients by integrating clinicopathological characteristics and hematological biomarkers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 293 patients with ESCC who underwent nCRT followed by esophagectomy. Clinicopathological factors, hematological parameters before nCRT, and hematotoxicity during nCRT were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictive factors for pCR. A nomogram model was built and evaluated for both discrimination and calibration.

RESULTS

After surgery, 37.88% of the study patients achieved pCR. Six variables were included in the nomogram: sex, cN stage, chemotherapy regimen, duration of nCRT, pre-nCRT neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and pre-nCRT platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). The nomogram indicated good accuracy and consistency in predicting pCR, with a C-index of 0.743 (95% confidence interval: 0.686, 0.800) and a p value of 0.600 (>0.05) in the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test.

CONCLUSIONS

Female, earlier cN stage, duration of nCRT (< 62 days), chemotherapy regimen of taxane plus platinum, pre-nCRT NLR (≥2.199), and pre-nCRT PLR (≥99.302) were significantly associated with a higher pCR in ESCC patients whose primary chemotherapy was a taxane-based regimen for nCRT. A nomogram was developed and internally validated, showing good accuracy and consistency.

18F-FDG-PET/CT to Detect Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Treatment in Patients with Cancer of the Esophagus or Gastroesophageal Junction: Accuracy and Long-Term Implications

PURPOSE

The curative strategy for patients with esophageal cancer without distant metastases consists of esophagectomy with preceding chemo(radio)therapy (CRT). In 10-40% of patients treated with CRT, no viable tumor is detectable in the resection specimen (pathological complete response (pCR)). This study aims to define the clinical outcomes of patients with a pCR and to assess the accuracy of post-CRT FDG-PET/CT in the detection of a pCR.

METHODS

Four hundred sixty-three patients with cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction who underwent esophageal resection after CRT between 1994 and 2013 were included. Patients were categorized as pathological complete responders or noncomplete responders. Standardized uptake value (SUV) ratios of 135 post-CRT FDG-PET/CTs were calculated and compared with the pathological findings in the corresponding resection specimens.

RESULTS

Of the 463 included patients, 85 (18.4%) patients had a pCR. During follow-up, 25 (29.4%) of these 85 patients developed recurrent disease. Both 5-year disease-free survival (5y-DFS) and 5-year overall survival (5y-OS) were significantly higher in complete responders compared to noncomplete responders (5y-DFS 69.6% vs. 44.2%; P = 0.001 and 5y-OS 66.5% vs. 43.7%; P = 0.001). Not pCR, but only pN0 was identified as an independent predictor of (disease-free) survival.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a pCR have a higher probability of survival compared to noncomplete responders. One third of patients with a pCR do develop recurrent disease, and pCR can therefore not be equated with cure. FDG-PET/CT was inaccurate to predict pCR and therefore cannot be used as a sole diagnostic tool to predict pCR after CRT for esophageal cancer.

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Followed by Surgery for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma Esophagus: Demographics and Evaluation of Prognostic Factors at a Tertiary Care Center in India

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery has been the standard of care for locally advanced carcinoma esophagus. We present our experience and inference of various factors associated with the same treatment and the prognostic influence of the same. A retrospective analysis of a cohort of 132 squamous cell carcinoma esophagus patients post neoadjuvant chemoradiation operated with curative intent was carried out. The 2-year overall survival rate was 64.5%. A pathological complete response was achieved in 32.5% of patients and was the only factor that significantly determined overall survival (p = 0.048). Neoadjuvant chemoradiation before surgery for locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the esophagus remains the standard of care with a pathological complete response being a significant factor in predicting overall survival. More prospective randomized studies are necessary to analyze factors affecting and predicting a pathological complete response which would help organ preservation in patients with a complete response.

A 3-Year Survival Update from a Phase 2 Study of Paclitaxel Plus Cisplatin and 5-Fuorouracil Induction Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Borderline-Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The NEOCRTEC-1601 Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

This study updated 3-year analyses to further characterize the impact of docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (TPF) chemotherapy followed by surgery.

METHODS

This study was a single-center phase 2 clinical trial. Patients with a diagnosis of borderline resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (BR-ESCC) because of the primary tumor or bulky lymph node that potentially invaded adjacent organs were eligible. The treatment started with TPF chemotherapy followed by surgery if the cancer was resectable, or by concurrent chemoradiation if it was unresectable. This updated report presents the 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates.

RESULTS

Surgery was performed for 27 patients (57.4%), and R0 resection was confirmed in 25 patients (53.2%). Pathologic complete response was confirmed in four patients (8.5%). The median follow-up time for the surviving patients was 44.8 months (range, 3.4-74.6 months). The median OS for all the patients was 41.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.6-65.3 months), with a median PFS of 38.7 months (95% CI, 23.5-53.9 months). The 3-year survival rate for all the patients was 54.4%. The 3-year survival rate for the R0 patients was 65.4%.

CONCLUSION

Long-term follow-up evaluation confirmed that TPF followed by surgery is feasible and promising in terms of survival for BR-ESCC patients. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifer: NCT02976909.

Pathologic complete response in patients with esophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation and chemotherapy are recommended for the treatment of nonmetastatic esophageal cancer. The benefit of neoadjuvant treatment is mostly limited to patients who exhibit pathologic complete response (pCR). Existing estimates of pCR rates among patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy have not been synthesized and lack precision.

METHODS

We conducted an independently funded systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42023397402) of pCR rates among patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemo(radiation). Studies were identified from Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL database searches. Eligible studies included trials published from 1992 to 2022 that focused on nonmetastatic esophageal cancer, including the gastroesophageal junction. Histology-specific pooled pCR prevalence was determined using the Freeman-Tukey transformation and a random effects model.

RESULTS

After eligibility assessment, 84 studies with 6451 patients were included. The pooled prevalence of pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in squamous cell carcinomas was 9% (95% CI: 6%-14%), ranging from 0% to 32%. The pooled prevalence of pCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in squamous cell carcinomas was 32% (95% CI: 26%-39%), ranging from 8% to 66%. For adenocarcinoma, the pooled prevalence of pCR was 6% (95% CI: 1%-12%) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 22% (18%-26%) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Under one-third of patients with esophageal cancer who receive neoadjuvant chemo(radiation) experience pCR. Patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinomas had higher rates of pCR than those with adenocarcinomas. As pCR represents an increasingly utilized endpoint in neoadjuvant trials, these estimates of pooled pCR rates may serve as an important benchmark for future trial design.

MR radiomics predicts pathological complete response of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

More than 40% of patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) achieve pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), who have favorable prognosis and may benefit from an organ-preservation strategy. Our study aims to develop and validate a machine learning model based on MR radiomics to accurately predict the pCR of ESCC patients after nCRT.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter study, eligible patients with ESCC who underwent baseline MR (T2-weighted imaging) and nCRT plus surgery were enrolled between September 2014 and September 2022 at institution 1 (training set) and between December 2017 and August 2021 at institution 2 (testing set). Models were constructed using machine learning algorithms based on clinical factors and MR radiomics to predict pCR after nCRT. The area under the curve (AUC) and cutoff analysis were used to evaluate model performance.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients were enrolled in this study, 82 in the training set and 73 in the testing set. The radiomics model was constructed based on two radiomics features, achieving AUCs of 0.968 (95%CI 0.933-0.992) in the training set and 0.885 (95%CI 0.800-0.958) in the testing set. The cutoff analysis resulted in an accuracy of 82.2% (95%CI 72.6-90.4%), a sensitivity of 75.0% (95%CI 58.3-91.7%), and a specificity of 85.7% (95%CI 75.5-96.0%) in the testing set.

CONCLUSION

A machine learning model based on MR radiomics was developed and validated to accurately predict pCR after nCRT in patients with ESCC.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer: An updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, the optimal treatment for neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer is not clear, and there is no evidence that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT). Due to the publication of new clinical trials and defects in previous meta-analyses, we conducted an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nCRT and nCT.

METHODS

The following databases were searched for studies: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library (updated to April 22, 2023). All randomized trials comparing nCRT with nCT in locally advanced esophageal cancer met the inclusion criteria. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4.1 (Cochrane collaboration software). Primary outcomes assessed from the trials included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), pathological complete response (pCR), R0 resection rate, postoperative complications, postoperative mortality, and grade 3 or higher adverse events (3 + AEs).

RESULTS

This systematic review and meta-analysis included 7 randomized controlled studies involving 1372 patients (686 receiving nCRT and 686 receiving nCT). Compared with nCT, nCRT significantly improved OS (HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.68-0.94), PFS (HR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.66-0.93), pCR (OR = 13.00; 95% CI: 7.82-21.61) and R0 resection (OR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.32-2.57), but was associated with higher postoperative mortality (OR = 2.31; 95% CI: 1.26-4.25) and grade 3 + AEs (OR = 2.21; 95% CI: 1.36-3.58). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between nCRT and nCT (OR = 1.15; 95% CI: 0.82-1.61). Subgroup analysis showed significant survival benefit in squamous cell carcinoma (HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.68-0.98), but not in adenocarcinoma (HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.63-1.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis found superior efficacy associated with nCRT compared with nCT in both tumor regression and prolonged survival, but increased the risk of postoperative mortality and grade 3 + AEs. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma was more likely to benefit from nCRT than esophageal adenocarcinoma in the term of OS.

Impact of Diabetes on Pathologic Response to Multimodality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The incidence of esophageal cancer has increased faster than that of most cancers. Evidence from other malignant neoplasms suggests that diabetic patients have a worse response to multimodality therapy. We hypothesized that diabetic patients with esophageal cancer will have a decreased response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy compared with nondiabetic patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database identified all patients who had an esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer between 2012 and 2019. Patients were compared on the basis of the presence of diabetes. A pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as ypT0 N0. The χ2 and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare patients' demographic and clinical characteristics between those with and those without diabetes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the predictors of response to neoadjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 9171 patients who met inclusion criteria, 2011 (22%) patients were diabetic and 7160 (78%) patients were nondiabetic. Patients with diabetes were older, more likely to be male, and more likely to have all comorbidities. Univariate analysis revealed that diabetic patients were less likely to have pCR (16% vs 18%; P = .026). Although multivariable analysis showed a trend toward diabetic patients' having lower odds of achieving pCR, diabetes was not independently associated with pCR (odds ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.78-1.01; P = .075).

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetic patients may be less likely than nondiabetic patients to achieve pCR after neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer. This suggests the need for further exploration as diabetic patients with esophageal cancer can potentially benefit from different treatment paradigms compared with their nondiabetic counterparts.

Pathologic Features of Esophageal and Gastric Malignancies

Esophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer globally, affecting approximately 570,000 people worldwide and currently ranking sixth among cancer-related mortality (Uhlenhopp et al. in, Clin J Gastroenterol 13:1010-1021, 2020). The prognosis is poor as many patients present with locally incurable or metastatic disease. In spite of advancements in treatment, the overall 5-year survival rates are in the realm of 10% whereas the 5-year post-esophagectomy survival rates are in the realm of 15-40% [2]. The incidence rates vary dramatically worldwide, which can be attributed to demographic and socioeconomic factors. Although the vast majority of esophageal neoplasms arise from the epithelial layer and include squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC), a subset of neuroendocrine and soft tissue tumors can also occur in the esophagus. Several tasks are presented to the surgical pathologist when dealing with esophageal carcinoma that include rendering a diagnosis, classifying the histological type, and assessing prognostic factors. This narrative review aims to evaluate current literature on various esophageal neoplasms and highlight pathological factors that impact clinical decision making and prognosis.

Nuclear medicine radiomics in digestive system tumors: Concept, applications, challenges, and future perspectives

Radiomics aims to develop novel biomarkers and provide relevant deeper subvisual information about pathology, immunophenotype, and tumor microenvironment. It uses automated or semiautomated quantitative analysis of high-dimensional images to improve characterization, diagnosis, and prognosis. Recent years have seen a rapid increase in radiomics applications in nuclear medicine, leading to some promising research results in digestive system oncology, which have been driven by big data analysis and the development of artificial intelligence. Although radiomics advances one step further toward the non-invasive precision medical analysis, it is still a step away from clinical application and faces many challenges. This review article summarizes the available literature on digestive system tumors regarding radiomics in nuclear medicine. First, we describe the workflow and steps involved in radiomics analysis. Subsequently, we discuss the progress in clinical application regarding the utilization of radiomics for distinguishing between various diseases and evaluating their prognosis, and demonstrate how radiomics advances this field. Finally, we offer our viewpoint on how the field can progress by addressing the challenges facing clinical implementation.

Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with cisplatin/5-flourouracil or carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with resectable cancer of the esophagus and the gastroesophageal junction - comparison of postoperative mortality and complications, toxicity, and pathological tumor response

PURPOSE

In 2012, the CROSS trial implemented a new neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy protocol for patients with locally advanced, resectable cancer of the esophagus prior to scheduled surgery. There are only limited studies comparing the CROSS protocol with a PF-based (cisplatin/5-fluorouracil) nRCT protocol.

METHODS

In this retrospective, monocentric analysis, 134 patients suffering from esophageal cancer were included. Those patients received either PF-based nRCT (PF group) or nRCT according to the CROSS protocol (CROSS group) prior to elective en bloc esophagectomy. Perioperative mortality and morbidity, nRCT-related toxicity, and complete pathological regression were compared between both groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed in order to identify independent factors for pathological complete response (pCR).

RESULTS

Thirty-day/hospital mortality showed no significant differences between both groups. Postoperative complications ≥ grade 3 according to Clavien-Dindo classification were experienced in 58.8% (PF group) and 47.6% (CROSS group) (p = 0.2) respectively. nRCT-associated toxicity ≥ grade 3 was 30.8% (PF group) and 37.2% (CROSS group) (p = 0.6). There was no significant difference regarding the pCR rate between both groups (23.5% vs. 30.5%; p = 0.6). In multivariate analysis, SCC (OR 7.7; p < 0.01) and an initial grading of G1/G2 (OR 2.8; p = 0.03) were shown to be independent risk factors for higher rates of pCR.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that both nRCT protocols are effective and safe. There were no significant differences regarding toxicity, pathological tumor response, and postoperative morbidity and mortality between both groups. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and favorable preoperative tumor grading (G1 and G2) are independent predictors for higher pCR rate in multivariate analysis.

Change in stage after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is associated with survival in patients with esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine if change in stage after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) was associated with improved survival in esophageal cancer using a national database.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database, patients with non-metastatic, resectable esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant CRT and surgery were identified. Comparing clinical to the pathologic stage, change in stage was classified as pathologic complete response (pCR), downstaged, same-staged, or upstaged. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to identify factors associated with survival.

RESULTS

A total of 7745 patients were identified. The median overall survival (OS) was 34.9 months. Median OS was 60.3 months if pCR, 39.1 months if downstaged, 28.3 months if same-staged, and 23.4 months if upstaged (p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, pCR was associated with improved OS compared to the other groups (downstaged: hazard ratio [HR]: 1.32 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18-1.46]; same-staged: HR: 1.89 [95% CI: 1.68-2.13]; upstaged: HR: 2.54 [95% CI: 2.25-2.86]; all p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large database study, change in stage after neoadjuvant CRT was strongly associated with survival for patients with non-metastatic, resectable esophageal cancer. There was a significant stepwise decline in survival, in descending order of pCR, downstaged tumor, same-staged tumor, and upstaged tumor.

High-dose chemotherapy sensitizes locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma to PD-1 blockade for a higher pathological complete response rate and survival

BACKGROUND

PD-1 inhibitor and chemotherapy demonstrated durable antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile as the first-line treatment in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors plus different dose intensity neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced ESCC.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced but resectable thoracic ESCC, staged as T3 or T4a, N0-3, and M0 or M1 lymph node metastasis (confined to the supraclavicular lymph nodes), were enrolled in this study. The eligible patients received tislelizumab plus different dose intensity chemotherapy for a 21-day cycle with repeated 2-4 cycles before surgery. The primary endpoints are pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR), and the secondary endpoints are objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

From November 2019 to February 2022, 122 cases received at least two cycles neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and were evaluated by imaging examination. Subsequently, 99 patients underwent surgery and were evaluated by pathological evaluation. According to chemotherapy dose intensity, the patients were divided into three cohorts: cohort 1 (<80% dose intensity), cohort 2 (80-90% dose intensity), cohort 3 (90-100% dose intensity). All surgery patients underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). The average pCR was identified in 22.22%; 16% had pCR in cohort 1, 17.65% had pCR in cohort 2, and 30.00% had pCR in cohort 3. MPR was observed in 9 (36.00%) patients in cohort 1, 18 (52.94%) patients in cohort 2, 22 (55.00%) patients in cohort 3. In univariable and multivariable analysis, dose intensity was significantly associated with MPR (p = 0.048) in patients who underwent esophagectomy. For surviving patients, the median follow-up was 13.76 months after esophagectomy. Compared to cohort 1, cohorts 2 and 3 had better DFS (p = 0.056). In addition, the prognosis of patients with MPR was better than that of patients without MPR (p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

The robust antitumor activity of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for locally advanced but resectable thoracic ESCC was confirmed. More than 80% of chemotherapy dose intensity combined with immunotherapy resulted in a high pCR rate and prolonged DFS.

A phase II clinical trial of toripalimab combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (NEOCRTEC1901)

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of toripalimab combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

In this single arm, phase II trial, 44 ESCC patients were enrolled from December 2019 to July 2021 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (Guangzhou, China). All patients received concurrent radiotherapy (44 Gy in 20 fractions), chemotherapy (paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22), and toripalimab (240 mg on days 1 and 22). Within 6-8 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment, patients underwent surgery. The results of the study patients were compared with those of 86 matched patients between July 2015 and March 2022. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) rate, and the secondary endpoints were treatment-related adverse events and R0 rates. This trail was registered with ClinicalTrails.gov, NCT04006041.

FINDINGS

All patients received neoadjuvant treatment, and 42 completed esophagectomy. Of the 42 patients, 21 (50%; 95% CI 35-65) achieved pCR and 2 (5%) patients were ypT0N+. The R0 resection rate was 98% (41/42). Nine (20%) of 44 patients had grade 3/4 adverse events. Among the perioperative complications (n = 42), anastomotic leakage occurred in five cases (12%), tracheal fistula in three cases (7%), and postoperative death in one case (2%) due to tracheal fistula. Compared with the control cohort, the pCR rate of the study group was higher but without significant difference (50% vs. 36%, P = 0.19).

INTERPRETATION

Toripalimab combined with NCRT failed to show significantly better pCR rate than historical data. Nevertheless, considering the signs of efficacy and acceptable safety of this regimen, further evaluation in phase III randomized trials might be warranted.

FUNDING

National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Prediction of pathological response grading for esophageal squamous carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy based on MRI imaging using PDX

Introduction

To confirm the efficacy of magnetic resonance-diffusion weighted imaging (MR-DWI) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) early pathological response prediction and assessment to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) using patient-derived xenografts (PDXs).

Methods

PDX-bearing mice were randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group receiving cisplatin combined with radiotherapy, whereas the control group receiving normal saline. MRI scans were performed in treatment groups in the before, middle, and end of treatment. The correlations between tumor volumes, ADC values and tumor pathological response at different time nodes were explored. Then, expression of proliferation marker and apoptotic marker were detected using immunohistochemistry, and apoptosis rate was detected by TUNEL assay to further verify the results observed in the PDX models.

Results

The ADC values of the experimental group were significantly higher than the control group in the both middle and end stage of treatment (all P< 0.001), however, significant difference was only observed in tumor volume at the end stage of treatment (P< 0.001). Furthermore, the △ADC_mid-pre in our study may able to identify tumors with or without pCR to nCRT at an early stage, due to these changes were prior to the changes of tumor volume after treatment. Finally, TUNEL results also showed that the apoptosis rate of the experiment groups increased the most in the middle stage of treatment, especially the groups with pCR, but the highest apoptosis rate occurred in the end of the treatment. Further, the two PDX models with pCR exhibited the highest levels of apoptotic marker (Bax), and lowest levels of proliferation marker (PCNA and Ki-67) in the both middle and end stage of the treatment.

Conclusions

ADC values could be used to determine the tumor's response to nCRT, especially in the middle stages of treatment and before the tumor tissue morphology changes, and further, the ADC values were consistent with the potential biomarkers reflecting histopathological changes. Therefore, we suggest that radiation oncologists could refer to the ADC values in the middle stages of treatment when predicting the tumor histopathological response to n CRT in patients with ESCC.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus tislelizumab followed by surgery for esophageal carcinoma (CRISEC study): the protocol of a prospective, single-arm, phase II trial

BACKGROUND

The failure rate after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is approximately 34.6%-48% for resectable esophageal carcinoma. Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is an important factor in predicting lower recurrence and better survival. Whether the sequential addition of immunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy will be beneficial to improving the pathologic complete response rate is unknown.

METHODS

Patients with pathologically confirmed thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and at clinical T1-2N1-3M0 or T3-4aN0-3M0 (stage II-IVA) according to the eighth edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer staging will be allocated to receive neoadjuvant radiotherapy (41.4 Gy with 23 fractions to planning target volume) with concurrent chemotherapy (albumin-bound paclitaxel, 100 mg/m2, once weekly for five weeks; carboplatin, area under the curve of 2 mg/mL/min, once weekly for five weeks) plus tislelizumab monotherapy sequentially (200 mg every three weeks for three cycles, beginning from the first to the 14th day after the end of radiotherapy). Then, subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy, including the whole mediastinum and abdomen, will be performed. The primary endpoint for this study is the pathologic complete response rate after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus tislelizumab.

DISCUSSION

The optimal timing of the combination of immunotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal carcinoma is not determined. The results of this phase II trial will be helpful to clarify the safety and efficacy of the sequential addition of tislelizumab after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced resectable esophageal carcinoma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was approved on January 26, 2021 and retrospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04776590 ) on March 1, 2021.

Induction FOLFOX and PET-Directed Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of induction FOLFOX followed by PET-directed nCRT, induction CP followed by PET-directed nCRT, and nCRT with CP alone in patients with EAC.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

nCRT with CP is a standard treatment for locally advanced EAC. The results of cancer and leukemia group B 80803 support the use of induction chemotherapy followed by PET-directed chemo-radiation therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified all patients with EAC who underwent the treatments above followed by esophagectomy. We assessed incidences of pathologic complete response (pCR), near-pCR (ypN0 with ≥90% response), and surgical complications between treatment groups using Fisher exact test and logistic regression; disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and evaluated using the log-rank test and extended Cox regression.

RESULTS

In total, 451 patients were included: 309 (69%) received induction chemotherapy before nCRT (FOLFOX, n = 70; CP, n = 239); 142 (31%) received nCRT with CP. Rates of pCR (33% vs. 16%, P = 0.004), near-pCR (57% vs. 33%, P < 0.001), and 2-year DFS (68% vs. 50%, P = 0.01) were higher in the induction FOLFOX group than in the induction CP group. Similarly, the rate of near-pCR (57% vs. 42%, P = 0.04) and 2-year DFS (68% vs. 44%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the FOLFOX group than in the no-induction group.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction FOLFOX followed by PET-directed nCRT may result in better histopathologic response rates and DFS than either induction CP plus PET-directed nCRT or nCRT with CP alone.

Is Adjuvant Therapy a Better Option for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated With Esophagectomy? A Prognosis Prediction Model Based on Multicenter Real-World Data

OBJECTIVE

To construct a prediction model for more precise evaluation of prognosis which will allow personalized treatment recommendations for adjuvant therapy in patients following resection of ESCC.

BACKGROUND

Marked heterogeneity of patient prognosis and limited evidence regarding survival benefit of various adjuvant therapy regimens pose challenges in the clinical treatment of ESCC.

METHODS

Based on comprehensive clinical data obtained from 4129 consecutive patients with resected ESCC in a high-risk region in China, we identified predictors for overall survival through a 2-phase selection based on Cox proportional hazard regression and minimization of Akaike information criterion. The model was internally validated using bootstrapping and externally validated in 1815 patients from a non-high-risk region in China.

RESULTS

The final model incorporates 9 variables: age, sex, primary site, T stage, N stage, number of lymph nodes harvested, tumor size, adjuvant treatment, and hemoglobin level. A significant interaction was also observed between N stage and adjuvant treatment. N1+ stage patients were likely to benefit from addition of adjuvant therapy as opposed to surgery alone, but adjuvant therapy did not improve overall survival for N0 stage patients. The C -index of the model was 0.729 in the training cohort, 0.723 after bootstrapping, and 0.695 in the external validation cohort. This model outperformed the seventh edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system in prognostic prediction and risk stratification.

CONCLUSIONS

The prediction model constructed in this study may facilitate precise prediction of survival and inform decision-making about adjuvant therapy according to N stage.

Predicting Factors for a Favorable Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Favorable pathologic response(FPR) is a significant predictor for improved survival following Neoadjuvant therapy(NAT) in esophageal and gastroesophageal cancer(GEJ). Preoperative prediction of FPR could modify treatment plans. No reliable method for predicting FPR exists. We sought to identify preoperative predicting factors for FPR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with esophageal and GEJ cancer who underwent esophagectomy following (NAT). Univariate and multivariate analysis was used to identify preoperative predicting factors for FPR. A comparison of Tumor Regression Grade(TRG) was used to assess treatment response on overall survival(OS).

RESULTS

Out of 121 patients, 82(67.8%) had neoadjuvant chemoradiation. FPR was observed in 60(49.6%). Female sex, Radiation therapy(RT), squamous cell carcinoma(SCC), lack of signet ring feature, and FDG avidity posttreatment were associated with FPR on univariate analysis. RT and SCC were associated with FPR (OR=3.9 and 4.0, respectively) on multivariate analysis. OS was lower among patients who did not achieve FPR to NAT(P=0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

FPR is a predictor of improved OS. SCC and radiation therapy-based protocol were identified as major prediction factors of FPR in patients with esophageal and GEJ cancers.

The predictive value of peripheral blood cells and lymphocyte subsets in oesophageal squamous cell cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is a standard treatment option for patients with stage III oesophageal cancer. Approximately 30% of oesophageal cancer patients will have a pathological complete response (pCR) after nCRT. However, available clinical methods cannot accurately predict pCR for patients. We aimed to find more indicators that could be used to predict the pathological response to nCRT.

METHOD

A total of 84 patients with stage III oesophageal squamous cell cancer were enrolled in this study. Ten patients failed to have surgery as a result of progressive disease (PD). Among the patients who underwent surgery, 32 patients had a pathologic complete response (pCR), whereas 42 patients showed no or partial response (npCR) after nCRT. Routine blood test results and lymphocyte subset assessments before and after nCRT were retrospectively analysed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify independent predictors of the clinical curative effect of nCRT. Eventually, nomograms were established for predicting the PD and pCR rates.

RESULTS

The numbers of lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, T lymphocytes, Th lymphocytes, Ts lymphocytes, and NK cells and the percentages of B lymphocytes and NK cells were decreased significantly after nCRT (P < 0.0001), whereas the percentages of T lymphocytes and Ts lymphocytes increased (P < 0.0001). Univariate analysis showed that age, the length of the lesion, the level of haemoglobin before nCRT, and the amount of change in haemoglobin were related to PD, and the percentage of NK cells after nCRT was related to pCR. Multivariate logistic analysis demonstrated that the length of the lesion, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) before nCRT, and the amount of change in haemoglobin were independent predictors of PD, whereas the percentage of NK cells after nCRT was an independent predictor of pCR.

CONCLUSION

Lymphocyte subsets changed dramatically during nCRT, and these changes together with baseline and posttreatment lymphocyte subsets have predictive value in determining the response to nCRT for oesophageal cancer.

Radiation Dose-Effect Relation in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A National Cancer Center Data and Literature-Based Analysis

Introduction

Despite receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) with radiation dose (RTD) of 50.4 Gy, survival of esophageal carcinoma was dismal. The effect of RTD in cancer control and radiotoxicity, and the extent to which local-regional control (LRC) influenced survival remain vague. This study aimed at evaluating RTD-effect relationship in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

1440 dRT/CRT-treated ESCC patients were enrolled. Restricted cubic spline regression model was applied to reveal nonlinear relationship between RTD and survival/radiotoxicity. Linear regression analysis (LRA) was performed to evaluate correlations between LRC and overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

For 1440 dRT/CRT-treated ESCC patients, with RTD escalating, hazard ratios (HRs) of OS, PFS, LRC declined until RTD exceeded 60 Gy, then increased. HR of treatment-related mortality was stable until RTD exceeded 60 Gy, then increased. HR of LRC was lower for majority of patients treated with RTD≥60 Gy, except for those with KPS<80, T1-2 lesion, or without lymph node metastasis. LRA revealed strong correlations between LRC and OS/PFS. 45.5% and 44.9% of OS and PFS improvements were owing to improved LRC.

Conclusions

RTD of 60 Gy was well tolerated, with favorable survival resulted of LRC improvement in local-advanced ESCC. Further stratification analyses based on radiation sensitivity will be helpful to determine potential beneficiaries of RTD escalation.

Clinical impact of remnant lymphatic invasion on the recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after esophagectomy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

For stage II and III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by esophagectomy is recommended in the Japanese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer. However, recurrence of ESCC is common regardless of the NAC regimen and surgical method, and NAC demonstrates limited efficacy against recurrence. Therefore, the present study was conducted to identify risk factors of recurrence of ESCC with surgery after NAC. The outcomes of 51 patients who underwent esophagectomy for ESCC after NAC from 2010 to 2017 at Kyushu University Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 52 patients with ESCC without NAC followed by esophagectomy from 2001 to 2017 were selected for comparison. Among patients who underwent NAC followed by surgery, only lymphatic invasion (LY; hazard ratio, 2.761; 95% CI, 1.86-6.43, P=0.018) was an independent factor significantly associated with 3-year recurrence-free survival in the multivariate analysis. In patients with pathologic lymph node metastasis (pN) and no LY after NAC, there was significantly less recurrence compared with patients with pN and LY (P=0.0085), whereas in patients without LY after NAC, the presence of pN was not significantly associated with recurrence (P=0.2401). There were significantly fewer LY (+) patients in the NAC (+) group (P=0.0158) compared with those in the NAC (-) group. The presence of LY was an independent risk factor for recurrence of ESCC after esophagectomy following NAC. Overall, adjuvant treatment after surgery may be required in cases with remnant LY after NAC.

Evaluation of tumor regression by neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for esophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinomas (EACs) are treated with multimodal therapy, namely surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) depending on patient and tumor level factors. Yet, there is little consensus on choice of the optimum systemic therapy. To compare the pathological complete response (pCR) after FLOT, non-FLOT-based chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy regimes in patients with EACs. A systematic review of the literature was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Review and Scopus databases. Studies were included if they had investigated the use of chemo(radio)therapy regimens in the neoadjuvant setting for EAC and reported the pCR rates. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed to compare the pooled pCR rates between FLOT, non-FLOT and CRT cohorts. We included 22 studies that described tumor regression post-NAC. Altogether, 1,056 patients had undergone FLOT or DCF regimes, while 1,610 patients had received ECF or ECX. The pCR rates ranged from 3.3% to 54% for FLOT regimes, while pCR ranged between 0% and 31% for ECF/ECX protocols. Pooled random-effects meta-meta-analysis of proportions showed a statistically significant higher incidence of pCR in FLOT-based chemotherapy at 0.148 (95%CI: 0.080, 0.259) compared with non-FLOT-based chemotherapy at 0.074 (95%CI: 0.042, 0.129). However, pCR rates were significantly highest at 0.250 (95%CI: 0.202, 0.306) for CRT. The use of enhanced FLOT-based regimens have improved the pCR rates for chemotherapeutic regimes but still falls short of pathological outcomes from CRT. Further work can characterize clinical responses to neoadjuvant therapy and determine whether an organ-preservation strategy is feasible.

Factors associated with pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiation and esophagectomy for carcinoma of esophagus and gastroesophageal junction

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyze factors associated with pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) and esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus (EC) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ).

METHODS

Patients with EC and GEJ tumors who received NCRT and underwent esophagectomy between January 2010 to March 2021 were included. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the factors associated with pCR by comparing the patients who achieved pCR (pCR group) with those who did not achieve pCR (non-pCR group).

RESULTS

A total of 321 patients were included in the study, with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) accounting for the majority of cases (76%). One hundred and sixty (49.8%) patients had pCR. SCC histology and pretreatment radiographic node-negative status (cN0) were associated with pCR. Patients in the pCR group had significantly better overall and disease-free survival compared with patients in the non-pCR group.

CONCLUSIONS

SCC histology and pretreatment radiographic node-negative status were associated with pCR. For patients with tumors of EC and GEJ who received NCRT and underwent esophagectomy, pCR was associated with improved prognosis compared with those not achieving pCR.

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in resectable esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy (nICT) or chemoradiotherapy (nICRT) has been tested in resectable esophageal cancer. Nevertheless, efficacy and safety for this new strategy have not been clearly demonstrated.

Patients and methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and scientific meetings were searched for eligible trials until June 30, 2022. The primary outcome of interest was pathological complete response (pCR). The random-effect model was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Twenty-seven trials with 809 patients were identified. The estimated rates of pCR for nICRT and nICT were comparable (32.7%, 95% CI: 20.3%-45.1% vs 26.3%, 95% CI: 19.8%-32.8%; P = 0.37). As for safety, surgical resection rate, R0 resection rate, surgical delay rate, and surgical mortality rate were similar between nICRT and nICT, while more grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were observed for nICRT (52.6%, 95% CI: 30.7%-74.5% vs 19.9%, 95% CI: 8.8%-31.0%; P = 0.01). In subgroup analysis, nICRT achieved higher pCR rate compared to nICT (56.2%, 95% CI: 41.0%-71.3% vs 27.2%, 95% CI: 20.2%-34.1%; P < 0.001) for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) but adenocarcinoma. In patients receiving nICT, PD-L1 expression CPS ≥1 showed higher pCR rate compared to CPS <1 (51.3%, 95% CI: 41.4%-61.2% vs 26.6%, 95% CI: 8.6%-44.5%; P = 0.02); regimen of paclitaxel plus carboplatin/cisplatin (PC/TP) and 3-4 cycles of nICT did not lead to an significantly improved pCR rate compared to other chemotherapy regimens and 2 cycles of nICT, respectively, despite without increased toxicity.

Conclusion

Both nICT and nICRT achieved promising pCR rates with acceptable tolerability, and nICRT was likely to have more antitumor efficacy compared to nICT for patients with SCC. PD-L1 status seemed to be predictive of pCR in patients receiving nICT; pCR rate did not appear to be greatly affected by CT regimen and increasing cycles of nICT.

State-of-the-art imaging in oesophago-gastric cancer

Radiological investigations are essential in the management of oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction cancers. The current multimodal combination of CT, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with CT (PET/CT) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has limitations, which hinders the prognostic and predictive information that can be used to guide optimum treatment decisions. Therefore, the development of improved imaging techniques is vital to improve patient management. This review describes the current evidence for state-of-the-art imaging techniques in oesophago-gastric cancer including high resolution MRI, diffusion-weighted MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, whole-body MRI, perfusion CT, novel PET tracers, and integrated PET/MRI. These novel imaging techniques may help clinicians improve the diagnosis, staging, treatment planning, and response assessment of oesophago-gastric cancer.

Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Gene Signature Is Associated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Resistance and Prognosis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neo-CRT) in combination with surgery increases survival compared to surgery alone, as indicated by the esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treatment recommendations. However, the benefits of neo-CRT are diverse among patients. Consequently, the development of new biomarkers that correlate with neo-CRT might be important for the treatment of ESCC.

Methods

The differentially expressed genes (DEG) between responsive and resistant samples from the GSE45670 dataset were obtained. On the TCGA dataset, survival analysis was performed to identify prognosis-related-EMT-genes. For EMT score model construction, lasso regression analysis in the TCGA cohort was used to identify the genes. In the TCGA-ESCC cohort, age, stage, and EMT score were used to construct a nomogram.

Results

In total, 10 prognosis-related-EMT-genes were obtained. These 10 genes consisted of 6 risky genes and 4 protective genes. Based on the lasso analysis and univariate Cox regression, an EMT score model consisting of 7 genes (CLEC18A, PIR, KCNN4, MST1R, CAPG, ALDH5A1, and COX7B) was identified. ESCC patients with a high EMT score have a worse prognosis. These genes were differentially expressed between responsive and resistant patients and had a high accuracy for distinguishing resistant and responsive patients.

Conclusions

The identified genes have the potential to function as molecular biomarkers for predicting ESCC patients' resistance to neo-CRT. This research may aid in the elucidation of the molecular processes driving resistance and the identification of targets for improving the prognosis for ESCC.

Definitive chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who achieved clinical complete response when induction chemoradiation finished: A phase II random

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

More than 40% of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) exhibit pathological complete responses (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), and theoretically, these patients may be cured by CRT and omit surgery. This prospectively randomized pilot study compared definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) with nCRT in patients with locally advanced ESCC who achieved clinical complete responses (cCRs) to nCRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single center, randomized, open phase 2 study of 256 patients with locally advanced ESCC enrolled between April 2016 and November 2018. Immediately when nCRT finished, patients enrolled underwent response evaluations within 1 week. Patients with cCR were randomly allocated to undergo surgery (arm A) or complete CRT up to the definitive radiation dose (arm B). The primary end point was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Finally, 71 patients were randomly assigned to the nCRT (n = 36) and dCRT (n = 35) arms. The median observation time was 35.7 months. The 3-year DFS rate was 56.43% in arm A versus 54.73% in arm B (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.862, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.452 to 1.645, P = 0.652). The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates in arms A and B were 69.5% and 62.3% (HR = 0.824, 95% CI = 403-1.688, P = 0.597), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our treatment response evaluation criteria, survival of the patients with cCR after nCRT was not significant different between nCRT group and dCRT group. An optimized response evaluation strategy soon after nCRT may guide next therapy decisions for patients with locally advanced ESCC.

Gross Tumor Volume Predicts Survival and Pathological Complete Response of Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

Background

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neo-CRT) plus surgery has greatly improved the prognosis of locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC) patients. But which factors may influence the pathological tumor response and long-term survival remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify the prognostic biomarkers of locally advanced EC patients receiving neo-CRT.

Methods

We reviewed the data of 72 patients with cT2-4N0-3M0 EC who underwent neo-CRT at our hospital. The patients received intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a total radiation dose of 41.4–60.0 Gy. Most patients received platinum + paclitaxel-based combination regimens every three weeks for 2–4 cycles. The recorded data included age, sex, smoking history, alcohol use, histology, tumor location, clinical TNM stage, tumor length, gross tumor volume (GTV), GTV of primary tumor (GTVp), GTV of lymph nodes (GTVn), radiation dose, and number of chemotherapy cycles. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and pathological complete response (pCR) were analyzed.

Results

The 3-year OS and PFS rates of these patients who underwent neo-CRT were 51.14% and 43.28%, respectively. In the univariate analyses, smoking history, clinical stage, GTV, GTVp, and GTVn were significantly associated with OS, whereas alcohol use, GTV, GTVp, and GTVn were significantly associated with PFS. Furthermore, in the multivariate analysis, GTV was an independent prognostic predictor of OS (hazard ratio (HR): 14.14, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.747–53.33, P < 0.0001) and PFS (HR: 6.090, 95% CI: 2.398–15.47, P < 0.0001). In addition, GTV < 60.50 cm³ compared to > 60.50 cm³ was significantly associated with higher pCR rate (59.3% and 27.8%, respectively, P = 0.038). High dose (> 50 Gy) and increased number of chemotherapy cycles (≥ 3) didn’t improve the OS or PFS in patients with GTV > 60.50 cm³.

Conclusion

GTV was an independent prognostic factor of long-term survival in EC patients, which may be because GTV is associated with histological response to neo-CRT. Additionally, patients with GTV > 60.50 cm³ didn’t benefit from increased radiation dose or increased number of chemotherapy cycles.