The Role of Angiogenesis in Cancer Treatment

A number of anti-angiogenesis drugs have been FDA-approved and are being used in cancer treatment, and a number of other agents are in different stages of clinical development or in preclinical evaluation. However, pharmacologic anti-angiogenesis strategies that arrest tumor progression might not be enough to eradicate tumors. Decreased anti-angiogenesis activity in single mechanism-based anti-angiogenic strategies is due to the redundancy, multiplicity, and development of compensatory mechanism by which blood vessels are remodeled. Improving anti-angiogenesis drug efficacy will require identification of broad-spectrum anti-angiogenesis targets. These strategies may have novel features, such as increased porosity, and are the result of complex interactions among endothelial cells, extracellular matrix proteins, growth factors, pericyte, and smooth muscle cells. Thus, combinations of anti-angiogenic drugs and other anticancer strategies such as chemotherapy appear essential for optimal outcome in cancer patients. This review will focus on the role of anti-angiogenesis strategies in cancer treatment.

Changing the clinical picture of challenging tumors: tales becoming reality?

The treatment of neoplastic diseases has become increasingly dependent on tumor biology and is focused on targeted therapy. Understanding complex networks of intracellular signaling pathways, blockades of specific targets and a myriad of other approaches has brought new fuel to the battle against many types of cancer. Unfortunately, the degree of benefit achieved in this new era of cancer treatment has not been distributed homogeneously among the different disease types. Neoplasms with lower incidence rates, but that are also highly challenging, are not consistently given due attention by research leaders. This article aims to evaluate new insights and potential gains obtained with new therapies in a particular group of tumors: those rarely debated in clinical practice, but which still pose a considerable challenge to clinical oncology.

Pharmacotherapy of neuroendocrine cancers

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the diffuse neuroendocrine cell system often present a considerable diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

METHODS

We have reviewed the literature on NET treatment between 1979 and 2008 (PubMed search: carcinoid or neuroendocrine tumor/tumour + treatment or management), and summarized current therapeutic options and recommendations.

RESULTS

The majority of tumors are diagnosed at a stage that the only curative treatment, radical surgical intervention, is no longer an option. Biotherapy with somatostatin analogs is currently the most efficient treatment to achieve palliation. The interferon class of agents may have a role in selected individuals but substantial adverse events often limit their use. Conventional chemotherapy has minimal efficacy but may have some utility in undifferentiated or highly proliferating neuroendocrine carcinomas and pancreatic NETs. Hepatic metastases, depending on size, location and number, may be amenable to surgical resection, embolization or radio-frequency ablation. Peptide receptor targeted radiotherapy may lead to reduction in tumor size but in most circumstances has a tumor-stabilizing effect. A variety of antiangiogenesis and growth factor-targeted agents have been evaluated but to date the results have failed to meet expectations. Thus, long-acting somatostatin analogs remain the only effective pharmacotherapeutic option that improves symptomatology and quality of life with minimal adverse effects.

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: pancreatic endocrine tumors

Pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) have long fascinated clinicians and investigators despite their relative rarity. Their clinical presentation varies depending on whether the tumor is functional or not, and also according to the specific hormonal syndrome produced. Tumors may be sporadic or inherited, but little is known about their molecular pathology, especially the sporadic forms. Chromogranin A appears to be the most useful serum marker for diagnosis, staging, and monitoring. Initially, therapy should be directed at the hormonal syndrome because this has the major initial impact on the patient's health. Most PETs are relatively indolent but ultimately malignant, except for insulinomas, which predominantly are benign. Surgery is the only modality that offers the possibility of cure, although it generally is noncurative in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or nonfunctional PETs with multiple endocrine neoplasia-type 1. Preoperative staging of disease extent is necessary to determine the likelihood of complete resection although debulking surgery often is believed to be useful in patients with unresectable tumors. Once metastatic, biotherapy is usually the first modality used because it generally is well tolerated. Systemic or regional therapies generally are reserved until symptoms occur or tumor growth is rapid. Recently, a number of newer agents, as well as receptor-directed radiotherapy, are being evaluated for patients with advanced disease. This review addresses a number of recent advances regarding the molecular pathology, diagnosis, localization, and management of PETs including discussion of peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy and other novel antitumor approaches. We conclude with a discussion of future directions and unsettled problems in the field.

Efficacy of RAD001 (everolimus) and octreotide LAR in advanced low- to intermediate-grade neuroendocrine tumors: results of a phase II study

PURPOSE

Evaluate the activity of everolimus (RAD001) in combination with octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) in patients with advanced low- to intermediate-grade neuroendocrine tumors.

METHODS

Treatment consisted of RAD001 5 mg/d (30 patients) or 10 mg/d (30 patients) and octreotide LAR 30 mg every 28 days. Thirty carcinoid and 30 islet cell patients were enrolled.

RESULTS

Intent-to-treat response rate was 20%. Per protocol, there were 13 with partial responses (22%), 42 with stable disease (SD; 70%), and five patients with progressive disease (8%). Overall median progression-free survival (PFS) was 60 weeks. Median PFS for patients with known SD at entry was longer than for those who had progressive disease (74 v 50 weeks; P < .01). Median overall survival has not been reached. One-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 83%, 81%, and 78%, respectively. Among 37 patients with elevated chromogranin A, 26 (70%) achieved normalization or more than 50% reduction. Most common toxicity was mild aphthous ulceration. Grade 3/4 toxicities occurring in >or= 10% of patients included hypophosphatemia (11%), fatigue (11%), and diarrhea (11%). Treatment was associated with a dose-dependent rise in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Those with lower than 109 U/L rise in LDH at week 4 had shorter PFS (38 v 69 weeks; P = .01). Treatment was also associated with a decrease in proliferation marker Ki-67 among patients who underwent optional paired pre- and post-treatment biopsy (P = .04).

CONCLUSION

RAD001 at 5 or 10 mg/d was well tolerated in combination with octreotide LAR, with promising antitumor activity. Confirmatory studies are ongoing.

Treatment of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors with inhibitors of growth factor receptors and their signaling pathways: recent advances and future perspectives

The limited efficacy of conventional cytotoxic treatment regimes for advanced gastrointestinal neuroendocrine cancers emphasizes the need for novel and more effective medical treatment options. Recent findings on the specific biological features of this family of neoplasms has led to the development of new targeted therapies, which take into account the high vascularization and abundant expression of specific growth factors and cognate tyrosine kinase receptors. This review will briefly summarize the status and future perspectives of antiangiogenic, mTOR- or growth factor receptor-based pharmacological approaches for the innovative treatment of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors. In view of the multitude of novel targeted approaches, the rationale for innovative combination therapies, i.e. combining growth factor (receptor)-targeting agents with chemo- or biotherapeutics or with other novel anticancer drugs such as HDAC or proteasome inhibitors will be taken into account.

Targeting vascular endothelial growth factor in advanced carcinoid tumor: a random assignment phase II study of depot octreotide with bevacizumab and pegylated interferon alpha-2b

PURPOSE

Effective systemic therapy for advanced carcinoid is lacking. The combination of bevacizumab (BEV) and pegylated (PEG) interferon alpha-2b was evaluated among patients with metastatic or unresectable carcinoid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients on stable doses of octreotide were randomly assigned to 18 weeks of treatment with bevacizumab or PEG interferon alpha-2b. At disease progression (PD) or at the end of 18 weeks (whichever occurred earlier), patients received bevacizumab plus PEG interferon until progression. Functional computer tomography (CT) scans were performed to measure effect on tumor blood flow.

RESULTS

In the bevacizumab arm, four patients (18%) achieved confirmed partial response (PR), 17 patients (77%) had stable disease (SD), and one patient (5%) had PD. In the PEG interferon arm, 15 patients (68%) had SD and six patients (27%) had PD. Progression-free survival (PFS) rates after 18 weeks of monotherapy were 95% in bevacizumab versus 68% on the PEG interferon arm. The overall median PFS for all 44 patients is 63 weeks. Compared with paired baseline measurements on functional CT scans, we observed a 49% (P < .01) and 28% (P < .01) decrease in tumor blood flow at day 2 and week 18 among patients treated with bevacizumab. No significant changes in tumor blood flow were observed following PEG interferon. PEG interferon alpha-2b treatment was associated with decrease in plasma basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF; P = .04) and increase in plasma interleukin-18 (IL-18; P < .01). No significant changes in bFGF or IL-18 following treatment with bevacizumab were observed.

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab therapy resulted in objective responses, reduction of tumor blood flow, and longer PFS in patients with carcinoid than PEG interferon treatment.

Endocrine pancreatic tumors: diagnosis and treatment

Endocrine pancreatic tumors (EPTs) are uncommon, having an incidence of one per 100,000 people. They may appear as sporadic tumors or be associated with hereditary syndromes. EPTs are categorized as functioning or nonfunctioning tumors, based on the presence or absence of clinical syndromes. Among the former, insulinomas and gastrinomas are the most common. For the histopathological investigation of EPTs, chromogranin A and synaptophysin immunostainings are recommended. Measurement of circulating chromogranin A is also the cornerstone for the biochemical diagnosis of these tumors. Furthermore, specific hormones produced and released by the neoplastic cells can be identified by immunostaining and used for biochemical evaluation. To locate EPTs, both noninvasive (ultrasonography, computerized tomography, MRI and radionuclear imaging) and invasive techniques (arterial stimulation with venous sampling) can be used. Debulking procedures (surgery, radiofrequency ablation, embolization/chemoembolization and liver transplantation) and/or medical treatment (chemotherapy, biotherapy and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy) are the options available for the treatment of EPTs. Understanding the molecular events underlying the pathobiology of EPTs will aid the development of more accurate diagnostic/prognostic markers and give guidance for improved therapeutic modalities.

PI(3)K-Akt-mTOR pathway as a potential therapeutic target in neuroendocrine tumors

Constitutive activation of PI(3)K-Akt-mTOR signaling is a frequently occurring event in human cancer and has also been detected in the majority of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the gastroenteropancreatic system. Molecular analysis of NETs suggests, that in addition to mutations in certain tumor-suppressor genes (e.g., PTEN), multiple autocrine growth factor loops contribute to hyperactive PI(3)K-Akt-mTOR signaling, thus promoting unrestricted proliferation and resistance to apoptosis. These insights opened new perspectives for targeted therapy in NETs. In particular, several novel small-molecule inhibitors of tyrosine and serine/threonine kinases have demonstrated potent anti-tumor activity. This review will summarize current knowledge on PI(3)K-Akt-mTOR signaling, its role in proliferation and apoptosis, as well as novel therapeutic approaches targeting PI(3)K-Akt-mTOR pathway components in NET disease.

Thymic carcinoid responds to neoadjuvant therapy with sunitinib and octreotide: a case report

Carcinoids are malignant neuroendocrine tumors consisting of a spectrum of neoplasms from low-grade typical carcinoid to high-grade small cell carcinoma. We report a case of atypical thymic carcinoid that responded to neoadjuvant therapy with octreotide and sunitinib, an oral multikinase inhibitor. After 3 weeks of treatment, tumor size significantly decreased to allow for a safe surgical resection with clear margins. We believe that further study of sunitinib and octreotide with the neoadjuvant intent of preparing tumors for resection is warranted as a strategy to improve curative management of neuroendocrine tumors.

Conventional and novel PET tracers for imaging in oncology in the era of molecular therapy

In the last ten years, the development of several novel targeted drugs and the refinement of state of the art technologies such as the genomics and proteomics and their introduction to clinical practice have revolutionized the management of patients affected by cancer. However, everyday practice points out several clinical questions: the difficulty of response assessment to new drugs especially using standard RECIST criteria that do not provide information on biological, vascular or metabolic variations; the inadequate selection of patients who are likely to benefit from a targeted therapy excluding those with breast cancer and gastrointestinal stromal tumours; the need to know the global biological background of diseases especially in metastatic setting using repeatable non-invasive procedures. Molecular imaging could provide information on in vivo distribution of biological markers in response to targeted therapy and could improve the selection of patients before therapies. The aim of this review is to analyze the current role of conventional and innovative positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers in clinical practice and to explore the promising perspectives of molecular imaging in cancer research.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues in patients with somatostatin receptor positive tumours

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues is a promising treatment option for patients with inoperable or metastasised neuroendocrine tumours. Symptomatic improvement may occur with all of the various (111)In, (90)Y, or (177)Lu-labelled somatostatin analogues that have been used. Since tumour size reduction was seldom achieved with (111)Indium labelled somatostatin analogues, radiolabelled somatostatin analogues with beta-emitting isotopes like (90)Y and (177)Lu were developed. Reported anti-tumour effects of [(90)Y-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotide vary considerably between various studies: Tumour regression of 50% or more was achieved in 9 to 33% (mean 22%). With [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate treatments, tumour regression of 50% or more was achieved in 28% of patients and tumour regression of 25 to 50% in 19% of patients, stable disease was demonstrated in 35% and progressive disease in 18%. Predictive factors for tumour remission were high tumour uptake on somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and limited amount of liver metastases. The side-effects of PRRT are few and mostly mild, certainly when using renal protective agents: Serious side-effects like myelodysplastic syndrome or renal failure are rare. The median duration of the therapy response for [(90)Y-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotide and [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate is 30 months and more than 36 months respectively. Lastly, quality of life improves significantly after treatment with [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate. These data compare favourably with the limited number of alternative treatment approaches, like chemotherapy. If more widespread use of PRRT is possible, such therapy might become the therapy of first choice in patients with metastasised or inoperable gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Also the role in somatostatin receptor expressing non-GEP tumours, like metastasised paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma and non-radioiodine-avid differentiated thyroid carcinoma might become more important.

Spectrum of activity and mechanism of action of VEGF/PDGF inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Angiogenesis plays an important role in tumor growth and metastasis.

METHODS

We review the function of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in vessel formation that is complemented by platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). We also review the agents designed to target VEGF, PDGF, and/or their receptors.

RESULTS

VEGF plays a central role in tumor angiogenesis. It is expressed at increased levels in colorectal, liver, lung, thyroid, breast, as well as in bladder, ovary, uterine cancers, and in angiosarcomas, germ cell tumors, intracranial tumors, and others. VEGF blockade has been shown to have a direct and rapid antivascular effect in both animal and human tumors, through deprivation of tumor vascular supply and inhibition of endothelial proliferation. Overexpression of PDGFs and their receptors has also been reported in many types of cancers such as prostate, ovarian, and non-small-cell lung cancer. Many VEGF and PDGF inhibitors are available. The use of some of these inhibitors has significantly improved the survival of cancer patients. Several agents are in development and currently are being tested in clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Angiogenic agents inhibiting VEGF and PDGF have shown promising clinical results. Targeting more than one pathway by combining different agents may increase the antitumor activity of these drugs. The implementation of reliable radiologic and pathologic angiogenesis monitoring techniques is necessary to implement antiangiogenic therapies in cancer.

Sunitinib malate for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Sunitinib was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on January 26, 2006, for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in patients who have failed to respond to imatinib or were unable to tolerate it.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of sunitinib; potential drug interactions; and the results of clinical trials evaluating its efficacy and tolerability.

METHODS

Pertinent literature was identified by searches of MEDLINE (1966-January 31, 2007), the American Society of Clinical Oncology abstracts database (2000-2007 annual meetings/symposia and previous meetings), and the FDA Web site (October 2006). Search terms included, but were not limited to, sunitinib, SUl1248, renal cell carcinoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, pharmacology, pharmacokinetic, adverse events, and clinical trial. Additional publications were found by scanning the reference lists of the identified articles.

RESULTS

Sunitinib is a potent inhibitor of multiple tyrosine kinase receptors. Its Tmax is reached within 6 to 12 hours, and food does not appear to affect its bioavailability. Sunitinib is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 to an active metabolite, SU12662, which is further metabolized by CYP3A4 to an inactive moiety. The parent compound and active metabolite have similar biochemical activity and potency and reach similar plasma concentrations. Sunitinib and SU12662 have a tl/2 of 40 to 60 hours and 80 to 110 hours, respectively. Steady-state concentrations of both active entities are reached after 10 to 14 days of therapy. In a Phase III trial comparing sunitinib with interferon-alfa (IFN-00 as first-line therapy for mRCC, sunitinib was associated with a median progression-free survival of 11 months, compared with 5 months with IFN-cz (P < 0.001). A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating sunitinib as second-line therapy for GIST found a median time to progression of 28.9 weeks in the sunitinib arm, compared with 7 weeks in the placebo arm (hazard ratio = 0.28; P < 0.001). In Phase II trials, sunitinib also had anti-tumor activity in patients with breast cancer, neuroendocrine tumors, and non-small cell lung cancer. Further evaluation in these tumors, as well as in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia, may lead to expanded indications. The approved dose of sunitinib is 50 mg/d PO for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest; this pattern is repeated until tumor progression or the occurrence of intolerable adverse effects. The most common clinical toxicities attributable to sunitinib include diarrhea, mucositis/stomatitis, hypertension, rash, skin discoloration, and altered taste, whereas commonly occurring laboratory abnormalities have been seen in association with gastrointestinal toxicity, renal toxicity, and hematologic toxicity. Of grade 3/4 toxicities occurring with sunitinib (which are relatively uncommon [<10%]), those that are clinically important include hypertension, diarrhea, fatigue, and hand-foot syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Sunitinib is a multiple tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor approved for the treatment of mRCC and GIST. Evidence for long-term clinical benefit in renal cell cancer and other tumors awaits the results of ongoing trials.

New drug development in digestive neuroendocrine tumors

The traditional cytotoxic agents are of limited efficacy in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract (NETs). Recent investigations have brought up a number of biological features in this family of neoplasms that could represent targets for anticancer treatment. NETs seem to have an extraordinary tumor vascularization with high expression of proangiogenic molecules such as the vascular endothelial growth factor along with overexpression of certain tyrosine kinase receptors such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the insulin growth factor receptor (IGFR) and their downstream signaling pathway components (PI3K-AKT-mTOR). The rationale of an antiangiogenic approach in the treatment of NETs and the use of other pharmacological strategies such as EGFR, IGFR and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors are discussed. Additionally, the emerging results of recent clinical trials with these targeted drugs are presented.

Systemic and Regional Nonsurgical Therapy—What Is the Optimal Strategy for Metastatic Neuroendocrine Cancer?

A multidisciplinary team is essential for the optimal management of patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. In this article, the systemic and regional nonsurgical therapeutic options for metastatic neuroendocrine cancers are discussed. In particular, the roles of biotherapy, chemotherapy, and hepatic artery embolization/chemoembolization are reviewed. A proposed treatment algorithm is provided with the aim of providing clinicians with a useful framework for managing these challenging patients. Finally, the rationale for promising investigational therapies is described.

Elevated expression of vascular endothelial growth factor correlates with increased angiogenesis and decreased progression-free survival among patients with low-grade neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a critical proangiogenic factor in solid tumors. However, its expression and role in human neuroendocrine tumor development and progression remains unclear.

METHODS

Using immunohistochemistry, VEGF and Sp1 expression patterns were investigated in 50 cases of human gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumor having various clinicopathologic characteristics.

RESULTS

It was found that strong VEGF expression was detected in tumor cells, whereas no or very weak VEGF expression was detected in stromal cells surrounding or within the tumors. The levels of VEGF expression directly correlated with the expression levels of Sp1 and microvessel density. Strong, weak, and negative VEGF expression was observed in 32%, 54%, and 14% of cases, respectively. Compared with the group with negative VEGF expression, VEGF (weak/strong) expression was associated with metastasis (14% versus 58%; P = .03). The median progression-free survival (PFS) durations of patients with strong and weak VEGF expression were 29 months and 81 months, respectively. With a median follow-up duration of 50 months, the median PFS duration for the group with negative VEGF expression has not been reached. Compared with the log-rank test, VEGF expression was associated with poor PFS (P = .02). Using in vitro and in vivo models, human carcinoid cell lines were treated with bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting VEGF. Bevacizumab did not inhibit the growth of carcinoid cells in vitro but significantly reduced tumor angiogenesis and impaired tumor growth in animals.

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that overexpression of VEGF promotes the growth of human neuroendocrine tumors in part through up-regulation of angiogenesis.

Islet Cell Carcinoma: Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Pancreas and Periampullary Region

Most patients who have islet cell tumors, except those who have insulinomas, present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. In contrast with patients who have adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, those who have islet cell carcinomas can achieve long-term survival even if their disease is advanced. Liver-directed therapies, somatostatin analogs, and interferon are not curative but can be used to relieve tumor-associated symptoms. Similarly, palliative chemotherapy has been used with limited success. Advances in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying tumor progression have translated into intense interest in biologically based strategies to treat this disease.

Sunitinib: a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor. A brief review of its therapeutic potential in the treatment of renal carcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST)

Sunitinib malate is a novel oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antitumor and antiangiogenic activities. Sunitinib was recently approved in first-line treatment for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and for the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) after disease progression or intolerance to imatinib mesylate therapy. We report the very interesting results of the phase II trials after cytokin failure and of the randomized recent trial of sunitinib versus cytokin-based therapy in first-line treatment for patients with metastatic RCC, as well as the promising results of the recent trials on patients with GIST after disease progression or intolerance to imatinib mesylate therapy. Oral sunitinib demonstrates a high level of efficacy with acceptable tolerability with the 50 mg daily for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off schedule; a continuous schedule could be of interest. Hypertension and asthenia are the most common side effects with sunitinib. Regardless of these encouraging results, studies investigating sunitinib in first-line treatment (for patients with GIST), adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings are awaited, as well as trials using sunitinb in combination with chemotherapy or other targeted therapies. Clinical trials investigating sunitinib in other tumor types are ongoing.

Clinical Presentation and Management of Carcinoid Tumors

The generally indolent nature of neuroendocrine tumors is an advantage in the management of patients who have localized disease, and surgery alone is often curative. This same property presents a challenge in the treatment of patients who have metastatic disease, in whom standard cytotoxic chemotherapy has a limited benefit. In such patients, the use of somatostatin analogs, interferon, and the treatment of hepatic metastases may provide effective palliation. The highly vascular nature of carcinoid tumors has led to the investigation of antiangiogenic agents in this setting. Preliminary reports of activity associated with agents targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway suggest that such strategies may play a role in the future treatment of patients who have this disease.

Sunitinib: from rational design to clinical efficacy

Sunitinib (SU011248) is an oral small molecular tyrosine kinase inhibitor that exhibits potent antiangiogenic and antitumor activity. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as SU6668 and SU5416 (semaxanib) demonstrated poor pharmacologic properties and limited efficacy; therefore, sunitinib was rationally designed and chosen for its high bioavailability and its nanomolar-range potency against the antiangiogenic receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs)--vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR). Sunitinib inhibits other tyrosine kinases including, KIT, FLT3, colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1), and RET, which are involved in a number of malignancies including small-cell lung cancer, GI stromal tumors (GISTs), breast cancer, acute myelogenous leukemia, multiple endocrine neoplasia types 2A and 2B, and familial medullary thyroid carcinoma. Sunitinib demonstrated robust antitumor activity in preclinical studies resulting not only in tumor growth inhibition, but tumor regression in models of colon cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, melanoma, renal carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma, which were associated with inhibition of VEGFR and PDGFR phosphorylation. Clinical activity was demonstrated in neuroendocrine, colon, and breast cancers in phase II studies, whereas definitive efficacy has been demonstrated in advanced renal cell carcinoma and in imatinib-refractory GISTs, leading to US Food and Drug Administration approval of sunitinib for treatment of these two diseases. Studies investigating sunitinib alone in various tumor types and in combination with chemotherapy are ongoing. The clinical benchmarking of this small-molecule inhibitor of members of the split-kinase domain family of RTKs will lead to additional insights regarding the biology, potential biomarkers, and clinical utility of agents that target multiple signaling pathways in tumor, stromal, and endothelial compartments.

Neuroendocrine tumors. Molecular targeted therapy for carcinoid and islet-cell carcinoma

Carcinoid and islet-cell carcinoma are often also known as low-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas. They are often slow-growing but can be resistant to standard therapy. While somatostatin analogues are often used to control hormonal syndromes, there is currently no therapy approved in the US for control of carcinoid tumor growth. For islet-cell carcinoma, streptozocin-based chemotherapy may induce tumor shrinkage, but second-line option are limited. This chapter reviews the molecular biology of neuroendocrine tumors, including the roles of MENIN, TSC2, NF-1, vHL, p53, bcl-2, bax, VEGF, IGF, PDGF, EGFR, and mTOR. Recently, there has been interest in developing molecularly targeted therapy for this group of diseases. Phase-II studies with imatinib, bevacizumab, sunitinib, gefitnib, temsirolimus, and everolimus (RAD001) have completed accrual. Encouraging results have been observed in studies with VEGF and mTOR inhibitors. Phase-III study of bevacizumab is planned in the US. Large-scale multinational phase-II and -III studies of everolimus are under way.

Anti-angiogenic drugs: from bench to clinical trials

Angiogenesis, the generation of new capillaries through a process of pre-existing microvessel sprouting, is under stringent control and normally occurs only during embryonic and post-embryonic development, reproductive cycle, and wound repair. However, in many pathological conditions (solid tumor progression, metastasis, diabetic retinopathy, hemangioma, arthritis, psoriasis and atherosclerosis among others), the disease appears to be associated with persistent upregulated angiogenesis. The development of specific anti-angiogenic agents arises as an attractive therapeutic approach for the treatment of cancer and other angiogenesis-dependent diseases. The formation of new blood vessels is a complex multi-step process. Endothelial cells resting in the parent vessels are activated by an angiogenic signal and stimulated to synthesize and release degradative enzymes allowing endothelial cells to migrate, proliferate and finally differentiate to give rise to capillary tubules. Any of these steps may be a potential target for pharmacological intervention. In spite of the disappointing results obtained initially in clinical trials with anti-angiogenic drugs, recent reports with positive results in phases II and III trials encourage expectations in their therapeutic potential. This review discusses the current approaches for the discovery of new compounds that inhibit angiogenesis, with emphasis on the clinical developmental status of anti-angiogenic drugs.

Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of solid tumors: an update of recent developments

Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are developed to block intracellular signaling pathways in tumor cells, leading to deregulation of key cell functions such as proliferation and differentiation. Over 25 years ago, tyrosine kinases were found to function as oncogenes in animal carcinogenesis; however, only recently TKIs were introduced as anti cancer drugs in human cancer treatment. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors have numerous good qualities. First, in many tumor types they tend to stabilize tumor progression and may create a chronic disease state which is no longer immediately life threatening. Second, side effects are minimal when compared to conventional chemotherapeutic agents. Third, synergistic effects are seen in vitro when TKIs are combined with radiotherapy and/or conventional chemotherapeutic agents. In this article, we will give an update of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors that are currently registered for use or in an advanced stage of development, and we will discuss the future role of TKIs in the treatment of solid tumors. The following TKIs are reviewed: Imatinib (Gleevec/Glivec), Gefitinib (Iressa), Erlotinib (OSI-774, Tarceva), Lapatinib (GW-572016, Tykerb), Canertinib (CI-1033), Sunitinib (SU 11248, Sutent), Zactima (ZD6474), Vatalanib (PTK787/ZK 222584), Sorafenib (Bay 43-9006, Nexavar), and Leflunomide (SU101, Arava).

Phase II study of recombinant human endostatin in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE

Endostatin is a 20-kd proteolytic fragment of collagen XVIII that, in preclinical studies, has been shown to have antiangiogenic and antitumor activity. Both preclinical and human phase I studies of recombinant human endostatin (rhEndostatin) suggested activity in neuroendocrine tumors, which are known to be hypervascular. We therefore performed a multicenter phase II study of rhEndostatin in patients with carcinoid or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-two patients with advanced pancreatic endocrine tumors or carcinoid tumors were treated with rhEndostatin administered as a bid subcutaneous injection at a starting dose of 60 mg/m2/d. Steady-state trough levels were obtained after 6 weeks of therapy; patients who did not achieve a target therapeutic level of 300 ng/mL underwent dose escalation to 90 mg/m2/d. Patients were observed for evidence of toxicity, response, and survival.

RESULTS

rhEndostatin was associated with minimal toxicity. However, among 40 patients assessable for radiologic response, none experienced partial response to therapy, as defined by WHO criteria. The median steady-state trough level achieved after dose escalation was 331 ng/mL, within the postulated therapeutic range.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with rhEndostatin did not result in significant tumor regression in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors.

Phase II study of temozolomide and thalidomide in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE

Standard, intravenous chemotherapy regimens for neuroendocrine tumors have been associated with limited response rates and significant toxicity. We evaluated the efficacy of an oral regimen of temozolomide and thalidomide in patients with metastatic carcinoid, pheochromocytoma, or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients were treated with a combination of temozolomide, administered at a dose of 150 mg/m2 for 7 days, every other week, and thalidomide at doses of 50 to 400 mg daily. Patients were followed for evidence of toxicity, biochemical response, radiologic response, and survival.

RESULTS

Treatment with temozolomide and thalidomide was associated with an objective biochemical (chromogranin A) response rate of 40%, and a radiologic response rate of 25% (45% among pancreatic endocrine tumors, 33% among pheochromocytomas, and 7% among carcinoid tumors). The median duration of response was 13.5 months, 1-year survival was 79%, and 2-year survival was 61%. The median administered dose of temozolomide was 150 mg/m(2), and the median administered dose of thalidomide was 100 mg daily. Grade 3-4 toxicities were uncommon, with the exception of grade 3-4 lymphopenia, which developed in 69% of the patient population. Opportunistic infections occurred in three patients (10%) during the time of lymphopenia, and included single cases of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, disseminated varicella zoster virus, and herpes simplex virus.

CONCLUSION

Orally administered temozolomide and thalidomide seems to be an active regimen for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. In this 29-patient study, this regimen appeared more active in pancreatic endocrine tumors than in carcinoid tumors.

Anti-angiogenic treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies

The scientific rationale to block angiogenesis as a treatment strategy for human cancer has been developed over the last 30 years, but is only now entering the clinical arena. Preclinical studies have demonstrated the importance of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathways in both physiologic and pathologic angiogenesis, and have led to the development of approaches to block its role in tumor angiogenesis. Bevacizumab is an antibody to VEGF and has been shown to prolong survival when given with chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Although this is the first anti-angiogenic treatment to be approved for the treatment of human epithelial malignancy, a number of other approaches currently are in development. Soluble chimeric receptors to sequester serum VEGF and monoclonal antibodies against VEGF receptors have both shown considerable promise in the laboratory and are being brought into clinical investigation. A number of small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors that have activity against VEGF receptors also are in clinical trials. Although these novel treatments are being pioneered in CRC, anti-angiogenic approaches also are being tested in the treatment of other gastrointestinal malignancies. Anti-VEGF therapy has shown promise in such traditionally resistant tumors as pancreatic cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. This review will examine the preclinical foundation and then focus on the clinical studies of anti-VEGF therapy in gastrointestinal cancers.

Advances in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors are characterized by generally slow growth rates and the ability to secrete a variety of hormones and biogenic amines. For patients with localized disease, surgical resection alone is often curative; however, patients with metastatic disease often present a therapeutic challenge. Although somatostatin analogs are highly effective in controlling symptoms of hormonal secretion, they are rarely associated with tumor regression. Selected patients with hepatic metastases may benefit from surgical debulking, embolization, or other ablative therapies. The clinical benefit associated with the administration of systemic agents such as alpha interferon or cytotoxic chemotherapy is less clear, and the widespread use of such regimens has been limited by their relatively modest antitumor activity as well as by concerns regarding their potential toxicity. The highly vascular nature of neuroendocrine tumors has led to interest in angiogenesis inhibition as a potentially novel treatment strategy. In addition, several small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors are currently being evaluated in a Phase II setting. The naturally indolent growth of neuroendocrine tumors presents a challenge in interpreting efficacy endpoints from small Phase II studies. Larger, randomized trials, along with the evaluation of surrogate endpoints of biologic activity, may be necessary to establish the potential clinical benefit of these novel agents.