Randomized, controlled trial of irinotecan plus infusional, bolus, or oral fluoropyrimidines in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: updated results from the BICC-C study

Real-World Outcomes of First-Line FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab with Irinotecan Dose Escalation versus FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab in BRAFV600E-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Preliminary Data from a Single-Center Observational Study

Background and Objectives: Approximately 5-10% of all patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) harbor a BRAFV600E mutation. These patients exhibit distinct metastatic patterns, poor prognosis, and heterogenous survival outcomes. The findings from the TRIBE study indicated that the administration of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment extended the median duration of overall survival (OS). In this study, we explored the effects of UGT1A1 polymorphism on the outcomes of irinotecan dose escalation versus FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 25 patients who had received a diagnosis of BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC between October 2015 and August 2022. All patients underwent UGT1A1 genotyping before receiving bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints were OS and adverse events (AEs). The two treatment arms were compared in terms of 6-month PFS and 12-month OS. Results: Over a median follow-up duration of 15.0 (interquartile range, 10.0-30.5) months, no significant differences were noted between the treatment arms in severe AEs (SAEs), 6-month PFS, or 12-month OS (all p < 0.05). Regarding AEs, the FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab regimen was associated with a lower incidence of anorexia than was the FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab regimen (p = 0.042). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab with irinotecan dose escalation is an effective first-line treatment regimen for patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC. This regimen leads to acceptable clinical outcomes with manageable AEs. However, the effects on survival and safety outcomes could only be speculated, and further studies are needed because of the sample size, the follow-up for the OS evaluation, and the non-uniformity in all the variables considered in the two groups.

Comparative Analysis of First-Line FOLFOX Treatment With and Without Anti-VEGF Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma: A Real-World Data Study

BACKGROUND

FOLFOX (leucovorin calcium [folinic acid], fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) combined with or without anti-VEGF therapy represents one of the primary first-line treatment options for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). However, there is limited comparative data on the impact of anti-VEGF therapy on treatment effectiveness, survival outcomes, and tumor location.

METHODS

This retrospective, comparative study utilized data from the AIM Cancer Care Quality Program and commercially insured patients treated at medical oncology clinics in the US. We analyzed 1652 mCRC patients who received FOLFOX, of which 1015 (61.4%) were also treated with anti-VEGF therapy (VEGF cohort).

RESULTS

Patients in the VEGF cohort exhibited a higher frequency of lung (33% vs 23%; P < .001) and liver metastases (74% vs 62%; P < .001), underwent fewer liver surgeries prior to treatment (1.2% vs 3.6%; P = .002), and had a higher proportion of right-sided tumors (27% vs 18%; P = .001). Adjusted analysis revealed no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between patients treated with and without anti-VEGF (median survival: 25.4 vs 26.0 months; P = .4). FOLFOX-only treated patients experienced higher rates of post-treatment hospitalizations (22% vs 15%; P < .001). Notably, left-sided tumors treated with anti-VEGF showed a trend toward decreased OS (median survival: 26.8 vs 33 months; P = .09).

CONCLUSION

Our real-world data analysis suggests that the addition of anti-VEGF to FOLFOX offers limited and short-lived benefits in the context of mCRC and may provide differential survival benefit based on tumor sidedness.

First-line trifluridine/tipiracil + bevacizumab in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: final survival analysis in the TASCO1 study

Background

Therapeutic options are limited in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The use of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab (TT-B) in this setting was evaluated in the TASCO1 trial; here, we present the final overall survival (OS) results.

Methods

TASCO1 was an open-label, non-comparative phase II trial. Patients (n = 153) were randomised 1:1 to TT-B (trifluridine/tipiracil 35 mg/m² orally twice daily on days 1–5 and 8–12, and bevacizumab intravenously 5 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle) or capecitabine plus bevacizumab (C-B; capecitabine, 1250 mg/m² orally twice daily on days 1–14 and bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle). Final OS was analysed when all patients had either died or withdrawn from the study. Adjusted multivariate regression was used to investigate the effects of pre-specified variables on OS.

Results

At 1 September 2020, median OS was 22.3 months (95% CI: 18.0–23.7) with TT-B and 17.7 months (95% CI: 12.6–19.8) with C-B (adjusted HR 0.78; 95% CI: 0.55–1.10). No variables negatively affected OS with TT-B. Safety results were consistent with prior findings.

Conclusions

TT-B is a promising therapeutic regimen in mCRC patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

Clinical trial information

NCT02743221 (clinicaltrials.gov)

Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis-Only Colorectal Cancer Treated with First-Line Bevacizumab and FOLFIRI Through Irinotecan Dose Escalation According to UGT1A1 Polymorphism: Compared to Liver Metastasis-Only, and Lung Metastasis-Only

Background

The prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) depends on the metastatic site and systemic therapy regimen. Peritoneal metastases are associated with a relatively unfavorable prognosis among patients with mCRC. In this article, we present the treatment outcomes of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC)-only, liver metastasis (LiM)-only, and lung metastasis (LuM)-only CRC.

Methods

Overall, 206 mCRC patients with single-site metastasis and who had received treatment from January 2014 to December 2018 were recruited. Among 206 patients with mCRC, 15 had PC-only mCRC, 145 had LiM-only mCRC, and 46 had LuM-only mCRC. They attended regular follow-ups until November 2020, and the median follow-up period was 24.7 months (5.1–41.3 months). Patients’ characteristics, including clinical data, gene mutation profiles, and clinical outcomes, were evaluated. All patients with PC-only CRC were treated with first-line bevacizumab and FOLFIRI, and the irinotecan dose escalation depended on UGT1A1 polymorphism.

Results

Of the 206 patients, no statistical difference was observed between the PC-only, LiM-only, and LuM-only groups in terms of age, primary tumor location, RAS mutation status, BRAF mutation status, and epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression (all P > 0.05). Patients with PC-only CRC had a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 18.0 months and a median overall survival (mOS) of 24.6 months. Patients with LiM-only or LuM-only CRC had mPFS of 18.2 and 26.6 months and mOS of 25.0 and 44.5 months, respectively. No significant differences regarding PFS and OS (both P > 0.05) between the three groups of patients with mCRC were observed.

Conclusion

Our study revealed that in patients with PC-only mCRC treatment of first-line bevacizumab and FOLFIRI through irinotecan dose escalation according to UGT1A1 polymorphism could confer such patients with comparable outcomes to that of patients with LiM-only and LuM-only mCRC.

Colorectal Cancer: From Genetic Landscape to Targeted Therapy

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer type and the second cause of death worldwide. The advancement in understanding molecular pathways involved in CRC has led to new classifications based on the molecular characteristics of each tumor and also improved CRC management through the integration of targeted therapy into clinical practice. In this review, we will present the main molecular pathways involved in CRC carcinogenesis, the molecular classifications. The anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR therapies currently used in CRC treatment and those under clinical investigation will also be outlined, as well as the mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab and panitumumab). Targeted therapy has led to great improvement in the treatment of metastatic CRC. However, there has been variability in CRC treatment outcomes due to molecular heterogeneity in colorectal tumors, which underscores the need for identifying prognostic and predictive biomarkers for CRC-targeted drugs.

UGT1A1 Polymorphism for Irinotecan Dose Escalation in Patients with BRAF-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with First-Line Bevacizumab and FOLFIRI

Background

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and BRAF V600E mutation have a poor prognosis, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of only 5–7 months after initial therapy. The current standard first-line chemotherapy for these patients includes FOLFOX or FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab. In this study, we explored the effects and oncological outcomes of UGT1A1 polymorphism for irinotecan escalation in patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC. Patients and Methods. This retrospective study included 17 patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC between April 2016 and December 2019. UGT1A1 genotyping was performed on all patients prior to initiating bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was PFS, and the secondary endpoints were toxicity, response rate, disease control rate, and overall survival (OS).

Results

Fifteen and two patients had UGT1A1 1∗/1∗ and 1∗/28∗, respectively. Eight underwent irinotecan dose escalation with tolerable adverse effects (AEs), and nine maintained an irinotecan dose of 180 mg/m² or required deescalation to 150 mg/m² due to intolerable AEs. After a median follow-up period of 15.7 (range, 3–54) months, the median PFS and OS were 9.4 and 15.7 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 AEs were observed in three (6%) patients. The disease control and partial response rates were 64.7% and 11.8%, respectively, indicating that most patients (14, 82.3%) could maintain this as a first-line line therapy with stable disease or proceed to second-line therapy if disease progression occurred, thereby maintaining acceptable performance status.

Conclusions

The oncological outcomes of patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC treated using FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab with irinotecan dose escalation as a first-line therapy are acceptable with tolerable AEs; this may be a feasible treatment option in such patients. Pretherapeutic UGT1A1 genotyping-guided dose adjustment can achieve favorable outcomes.

Colorectal Cancer (CRC) treatment and associated costs in the public sector compared to the private sector in Johannesburg, South Africa

Background

South Africa’s divided healthcare system is believed to be inequitable as the population serviced by each sector and the treatment received differs while annual healthcare expenditure is similar. The appropriateness of treatment received and in particular the cost of the same treatment between the sectors remains debatable and raises concerns around equitable healthcare. Colorectal cancer places considerable pressure on the funders, yet treatment utilization data and the associated costs of non-communicable diseases, in particular colorectal cancer, are limited for South Africa. Resources need to be appropriately managed while ensuring equitable healthcare is provided regardless of where the patient is able to receive their treatment. Therefore the aim of this study was to determine the cost of colorectal cancer treatment in a privately insured patient population in order to compare the costs and utilization to a previously published public sector patient cohort.

Methods

Private sector costs were determined using de-identified claim-based data for all newly diagnosed CRC patients between 2012 and 2014. The costs obtained from this patient cohort were compared to previously published public sector data for the same period. The costs compared were costs incurred by the relevant sector funder and didn’t include out-of-pocket costs.

Results

The comparison shows private sector patients gain access to more of the approved regimens (12 vs. 4) but the same regimens are more costly, for example CAPOX costs approximately €150 more per cycle. The cost difference between 5FU and capecitabine monotherapy is less than €30 per cycle however, irinotecan is cheaper in comparison to oxaliplatin in the private sector (FOLFOX approx. €500 vs. FOLFIRI aprox. €460). Administrative costs account for up to 45% of total costs compared to the previously published data of these costs totaling < 15% of the full treatment cost in South Africa’s public healthcare system.

Conclusion

This comparison highlights the disparities between sectors while illustrating the need for further research to improve resource management to attain equitable healthcare.

The Role of Maintenance Strategies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Importance

In metastatic colorectal cancer, induction combination chemotherapy with a targeted agent is considered the mainstay of treatment. Multiple randomized clinical trials have examined different strategies of continuing cytotoxic therapy until progression compared with a period of either observation or the use of various maintenance agents. However, those randomized clinical trials have shown inconsistent efficacy results that make it challenging to draw any conclusion on which strategy is preferred. Therefore, a network meta-analysis is helpful to compare different agents across randomized clinical trials.

Objective

To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of different treatment strategies for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Evidence Review

MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for randomized clinical trials evaluating different strategies for patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Trials of interest included those including patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who were treated with an initial period of cytotoxic chemotherapy (with or without a biologic) and then switched to one of the following strategies: observation; maintenance with bevacizumab (Bev), fluoropyrimidine (FP), or both (FP + Bev); or continuing the induction regimen until progression. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The overall effect was pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. Network meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects consistency model to pool evidence from direct and indirect comparisons. Agents were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities. Higher SUCRA scores correspond to greater efficacy. Initial analysis was performed on December 18, 2018. An updated search was performed in April 2019, and no additional studies were added.

Findings

Twelve trials at low risk of bias (5540 patients; age range, 23-85 years; 64.4 % male) were included. Network meta-analysis showed no benefit of continuing full cytotoxic chemotherapy until progression vs observation in terms of PFS (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.46-1.09) and OS (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.85-1.07). Compared with observation, maintenance therapy showed a PFS benefit (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.43-0.77) but not an OS benefit (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.83-1.01). All maintenance strategies (FP, FP + Bev, and Bev) showed significant improvement in PFS vs observation. On SUCRA analysis, maintenance treatment (FP or FP + Bev) had the highest likelihood of achieving improved PFS (67.1% for FP, 99.8% for FP + Bev, and 36.5% for Bev) and OS (81.3% for FP, 73.2% for FP + Bev, and 32.6% for Bev).

Conclusions and Relevance

For patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, there is no benefit to continuing the full induction regimen until progression, without a period of either observation or maintenance treatment. A maintenance strategy with a fluoropyrimidine, with or without the addition of bevacizumab, is preferred. However, given the lack of a clear OS benefit, shared decision-making should include observation as an acceptable alternative.

Intravoxel Incoherent Motion of Colon Cancer Liver Metastases for the Assessment of Response to Antiangiogenic Treatment: Results from a Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE

This study was aimed at evaluating the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameter alterations of liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) during antiangiogenic bevacizumab combination therapy.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with CRC liver metastases treated with bevacizumab in combination with FOLFOX-or-FOLFIRI protocols were enrolled in the study. MRI was performed using a 1.5-tesla scanner pre-treatment (PT) and at 3, 6, and 9 months of therapy. Routine abdominal MRI sequences and an IVIM-DWI (diffusion-weighted imaging) sequence were obtained. The IVIM-DWI sequence was executed with 16 b-values varying from 0 to 1,400 s/mm2. The mean values of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusion (D), pseudodiffusion (D*), and perfusion fraction (f) of each metastasis were obtained for all b-values, and the time-related changes were recorded to analyze the chronologic responses to antiangiogenic therapy. The RECIST 1.1 criteria were used for the evaluation of treatment response.

RESULTS

The diameters of the metastases diminished significantly at 9 months when compared with PT (p = 0.03). The D (p = 0.10) and ADC (p = 0.21) values of the metastases increased at 9 months of therapy. D* was the highest at 3 months (p =0.24); it decreased at 6 (p =0.97) and 9 months (p =0.87) of therapy. The f value had peaked at 3 months (p =0.51) and started to decrease thereafter. At 6 months, f decreased to the lowest values (p =0.12).

CONCLUSION

IVIM parameters, particularly the perfusion fraction, may quantitatively reflect the response to antiangiogenic treatment. The antiangiogenic response manifests after 3 months of therapy before the RECIST-related response.

Rationale for the use of metronomic chemotherapy in gastrointestinal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Metronomic chemotherapy (mCT) is endowed with various properties, ranging from antiangiogenic to immunomodulation, and may revert tumor resistance to conventional drug administration. A variety of antineoplastic agents displayed activity when administered with metronomic schedules in preclinical models of gastrointestinal cancers. However, most of the field is still unexplored.

AREAS COVERED

Herein, the authors review the existing literature from PubMed, concerning the use of mCT in gastrointestinal oncology.

EXPERT OPINION

A mounting body of evidence is emerging in support of mCT as a treatment option for gastrointestinal tumors, but the frequent signs of clinical activity inconsistently translate into a benefit for survival. Research in this field should focus on providing high-quality evidence on the safety and efficacy of mCT, with more prospective, comparative trials; identifying the subgroups of patients for whom mCT would be the best approach; establishing standardized protocols based on mCT pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics; developing drug activity biomarkers. mCT is also potentially suitable for combinations with targeted antiangiogenic drugs and may be incorporated with conventional administration into dual regimens.

Genomic markers of resistance to targeted treatments in gastric cancer: potential new treatment strategies

Gastric cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease, displaying a complex genomic landscape and an unfavorable outcome with standard therapies. Based on distinctive genomic alterations, novel targeted agents have been developed with the aim of personalizing treatments and improving patient outcome. However, a subgroup of patients is primarily treatment-resistant, and even in the initially sensitive population, secondary resistance emerges, thus limiting therapeutic benefit. In this review, we summarize the clinical data about standard targeted agents in gastric cancer, specifically anti-HER2 treatments and antivascular therapies. We also illustrate the available evidence regarding molecular mechanisms of resistance to these agents and we discuss potential strategies for new targeted treatments that could overcome such resistance.

Comparison of early radiological predictors of outcome in patients with colorectal cancer with unresectable hepatic metastases treated with bevacizumab

OBJECTIVE

The purpose was to validate the prognostic value of an early optimal morphological response on CT in patients treated with bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLM). It also evaluated the prognostic value of size-based criteria and the association of optimal morphological response with the receipt of bevacizumab.

DESIGN

141 patients treated first using bevacizumab and 142 patients from a randomised study evaluating the addition of bevacizumab to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy were retrospectively analysed. Radiologists evaluated pretreatment and restaging CT scans using morphological response criteria. Responses were also assessed with size-based criteria: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), early tumour shrinkage (ETS) and deepness of response (DpR). The ability of each criterion to predict progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and postprogression survival (PPS) was determined using a univariate Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

In both populations, median PFS was significantly longer for patients achieving an optimal morphological response (10.4 vs 6.8 months, p=0.03; and 8.3 vs 4.9 months, p<00001, respectively). Neither RECIST nor ETS responses were associated with a prolonged PFS. Median OS was longer for those with an optimal morphological response but only at second restaging in the first population (n=141, 20.8 vs 12.3 months, p=0.002). DpR but not optimal morphological response was associated with PPS. In the randomised study, an optimal morphological response was 6.2 times more likely among patients receiving bevacizumab (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with unresectable CLM, early morphological response may be a better predictor of PFS than size-based response. The addition of bevacizumab improves morphological response rate.

Effects of Autologous Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells Infusion in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Prospective Study

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of postoperative adjuvant immunotherapy with cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells in combination with chemotherapy (CT) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 46 patients were randomly assigned to either group 1 (control group) or group 2 (CIK group) using blocked randomization. Both groups received the FOLFOX4 (5-fluorouridine, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) CT. In the CIK group, patients were given CIK cell infusion after FOLFOX4 CT. Treatment efficacy, adverse effects, and quality of life (QOL) were assessed.

RESULTS

During the first 2 years of follow-up, the recurrence rate in the CIK group (26.1%, 6 in 23 cases) was significantly lower than the control group (43.5%, 10 in 23). The survival time was significantly longer in the CIK group (41.9 months, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.2-45.7) than in the control group (33.8 months, 95% CI: 28.4-39.2). Although QOL was reduced in both treatment groups, adjuvant CIK cell transfusion significantly improved the QOL in patients with CRC. Toxicity was mild in patients with CIK treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunotherapy with CIK cells may serve as an adjuvant treatment in patients with CRC after CT with prolonged survival of patients, limited side-effects, and improved QOL.

Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2016 for the treatment of colorectal cancer

Japanese mortality due to colorectal cancer is on the rise, surpassing 49,000 in 2015. Many new treatment methods have been developed during recent decades. The Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Guidelines 2016 for the treatment of colorectal cancer (JSCCR Guidelines 2016) were prepared to show standard treatment strategies for colorectal cancer, to eliminate disparities among institutions in terms of treatment, to eliminate unnecessary treatment and insufficient treatment, and to deepen mutual understanding between health-care professionals and patients by making these Guidelines available to the general public. These Guidelines were prepared by consensus reached by the JSCCR Guideline Committee, based on a careful review of the evidence retrieved by literature searches, and in view of the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice settings in Japan. Therefore, these Guidelines can be used as a tool for treating colorectal cancer in actual clinical practice settings. More specifically, they can be used as a guide to obtaining informed consent from patients and choosing the method of treatment for each patient. As a result of the discussions held by the Guideline Committee, controversial issues were selected as Clinical Questions, and recommendations were made. Each recommendation is accompanied by a classification of the evidence and a classification of recommendation categories based on the consensus reached by the Guideline Committee members. Here we present the English version of the JSCCR Guidelines 2016.

CCR6 promotes tumor angiogenesis via the AKT/NF-κB/VEGF pathway in colorectal cancer

Chemokines and chemokine receptors play an important role in tumorigenesis. Angiogenesis is a vital part of the occurrence, development and metastasis of cancer. CCR6 is an important factor during tumor progression; however, its function in tumor angiogenesis is not fully understood. In our study, we found that CCR6 was significantly overexpressed in colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues and predicted a poor prognosis in CRC patients. We then verified the function of CCR6 on tumor angiogenesis in vivo and in vitro. We observed that silencing CCR6 could decrease angiogenesis by inhibiting the proliferation and migration of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), whereas overexpression of CCR6 can promote angiogenesis. Additionally, we investigated the molecular mechanisms and demonstrated that activation of the AKT/NF-κB pathway maybe involved in CCR6-mediated tumor angiogenesis, which was able to promote the secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A). In conclusion, CCR6 facilitates tumor angiogenesis via the AKT/NF-κB/VEGF pathway in colorectal cancer. CCR6 inhibition may be a novel option for anti-vascular treatment in CRC.

Multi-parametric profiling of renal cell, colorectal, and ovarian cancer identifies tumour-type-specific stroma phenotypes and a novel vascular biomarker

A novel set of integrated procedures for quantification of fibroblast‐rich stroma and vascular characteristics has recently been presented allowing discovery of novel perivascular and stromal biomarkers in colorectal, renal cell, and ovarian cancer. In the present study, data obtained through these procedures from clinically well‐annotated collections of these three tumour types have been used to address two novel questions. First, data have been used to investigate if the three tumour types demonstrate significant differences regarding features such as vessel diameter, vessel density, and perivascular marker expression. Second, analyses of the cohorts have been used to explore the prognostic significance of a novel vascular metric, ‘vessel distance inter‐quartile range (IQR)’ that describes intra‐case heterogeneity regarding vessel distribution. The comparisons between the three tumour types demonstrated a set of significant differences. Vessel density of renal cell cancer was statistically significantly higher than in colorectal and ovarian cancer. Vessel diameter was statistically significantly higher in ovarian cancer. Concerning perivascular status, colorectal cancer displayed significantly higher levels of perivascular PDGFR‐β expression than the other two tumour types. Intra‐case heterogeneity of perivascular PDGFR‐β expression was also higher in colorectal cancer. Notably, these fibroblast‐dominated stroma phenotypes matched previously described experimental tumour stroma characteristics, which have been linked to differential sensitivity to anti‐VEGF drugs. High ‘vessel distance IQR’ was significantly associated with poor survival in both renal cell cancer and colorectal cancer. In renal cell cancer, this characteristic also acted as an independent prognostic marker according to multivariate analyses including standard clinico‐pathological characteristics. Explorative subset analyses indicated particularly strong prognostic significance of ‘vessel distance IQR’ in T stage 4 of this cancer type. Together, these analyses identified tumour‐type‐specific vascular‐stroma phenotypes of possible functional significance, and suggest ‘vessel distance IQR’ as a novel prognostic biomarker.

Molecular Characterization of Somatic Alterations in Dukes' B and C Colorectal Cancers by Targeted Sequencing

Despite global progress in research, improved screening and refined treatment strategies, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains as the third most common malignancy. As each type of cancer is different and exhibits unique alteration patterns, identifying and characterizing gene alterations in CRC that may serve as biomarkers might help to improve diagnosis, prognosis and predict potential response to therapy. With the emergence of next generation sequencing technologies (NGS), it is now possible to extensively and rapidly identify the gene profile of individual tumors. In this study, we aimed to identify actionable somatic alterations in Dukes’ B and C in CRC via NGS. Targeted sequencing of 409 cancer-related genes using the Ion Ampliseq^TM Comprehensive Cancer Panel was performed on genomic DNA obtained from paired fresh frozen tissues, cancer and normal, of Dukes’ B (n = 10) and Dukes’ C (n = 9) CRC. The sequencing results were analyzed using Torrent Suite, annotated using ANNOVAR and validated using Sanger sequencing. A total of 141 somatic non-synonymous sequence variations were identified in 86 genes. Among these, 64 variants (45%) were predicted to be deleterious, 38 variants (27%) possibly deleterious while the other 39 variants (28%) have low or neutral protein impact. Seventeen genes have alterations with frequencies of ≥10% in the patient cohort and with 14 overlapped genes in both Dukes’ B and C. The adenomatous polyposis coli gene (APC) was the most frequently altered gene in both groups (n = 6 in Dukes’ B and C). In addition, TP53 was more frequently altered in Dukes’ C (n = 7) compared to Dukes’ B (n = 4). Ten variants in APC, namely p.R283^∗, p.N778fs, p.R805^∗, p.Y935fs, p.E941fs, p.E1057^∗, p.I1401fs, p.Q1378^∗, p.E1379^∗, and p.A1485fs were predicted to be driver variants. APC remains as the most frequently altered gene in the intermediate stages of CRC. Wnt signaling pathway is the major affected pathway followed by P53, RAS, TGF-β, and PI3K signaling. We reported the alteration profiles in each of the patient which has the potential to affect the clinical decision. We believe that this study will add further to the understanding of CRC molecular landscape.

Management of metastatic colorectal cancer patients: guidelines of the Italian Medical Oncology Association (AIOM)

In the past 15 years, the outcome for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer has substantially improved owing to the availability of new cytotoxic and biological agents along with many significant advances in molecular selection, the use of personalised therapy and locoregional treatment, a more widespread sharing of specific professional experiences (multidisciplinary teams with oncologists, surgeons, radiotherapists, radiologists, biologists and pathologists), and the adoption of patient-centred healthcare strategies. The Italian Medical Oncology Association (AIOM) has developed evidence-based recommendations to help oncologists and all professionals involved in the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in their daily clinical practice.

Antiangiogenic therapy for refractory colorectal cancer: current options and future strategies

Even though significant improvements in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) have been made in recent years, survival rates for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are poor. Effective treatment options for metastatic colorectal cancer remain limited, and new therapeutic strategies are desperately needed. Several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that target angiogenesis, a critical process for facilitating tumor cell growth, invasion, and metastasis, are either approved or in clinical development for the treatment of mCRC. Many of these agents have shown efficacy in mCRC, both as single agents and in combination with standard chemotherapy regimens. However, there is a need for predictive markers of response to identify those patients most likely to benefit from antiangiogenic therapy, and, to date, no markers of this type have been validated in patients. Additionally, because antiangiogenic agents typically cause cytostatic as opposed to cytotoxic antitumor effects, it is important to determine the best strategies for evaluating therapeutic response in mCRC to ensure maximum clinical benefit. In this review, we summarize the efficacy and tolerability of approved and investigational antiangiogenic agents for the treatment of mCRC. We also discuss potential markers of response to antiangiogenic agents and how these markers, along with appropriate endpoint selection, can improve clinical trial design.

Affinity of Indocyanine Green in the Detection of Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Indocyanine green (ICG) is increasingly being used in digestive oncology. In colorectal cancer, ICG can be used to detect lymph node metastasis and hepatic metastasis on the surface of the liver. In peritoneal carcinomatosis, it was previously suspected that the diffusion of ICG in the tumor mass was due to the enhanced permeability and retention effect; however, this phenomenon has not been clearly demonstrated. Using bevacizumab, an antibody directed against vascular endothelial growth factor that consequently inhibits neoangiogenesis, we sought to confirm the mode of ICG diffusion. We compared the fluorescence of peritoneal carcinomatosis nodules from patients who had previously received bevacizumab during their oncologic treatment with those who did not receive this therapy. The sensitivity of the carcinomatosis nodule fluorescence was higher in the patients who did not receive bevacizumab compared with those who received the drug (76.3% and 65.0%, respectively). The rate of false-negative results was higher in the bevacizumab group than in the group that did not receive the drug (53.8% and 42.9%, respectively). Using bevacizumab, we demonstrate that the enhanced permeability and retention effect causes ICG accumulation in peritoneal carcinomatosis resulting from colorectal cancer.

Synchronous ovarian metastasis from colorectal cancer: A report of two cases

Ovarian metastasis of colorectal cancer is relatively rare. The present study reports two cases of synchronous ovarian metastasis from colorectal cancer, which were managed by cytoreductive surgery. In case one, a 60-year-old female patient presented with a multilocular pelvic tumor and ascites. Virtual colonoscopy revealed a mass in the sigmoid colon; however, no tumor cells were identified on histological examination. Ovarian metastasis from sigmoid colon cancer was suspected and adnexectomy was subsequently performed. Histological examination of the excised tumor revealed adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemical analysis of the resected tumor revealed positive staining for cytokeratin (CK)20 and caudal-type homeobox 2 (CDX2), and negative staining for CK7, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and inhibin. The immunohistological results supported the diagnosis of ovarian metastasis from sigmoid colon cancer. In case two, a 56-year-old female patient presented with a multilocular pelvic tumor and ascites. Colonoscopy identified a rectal tumor, and histological examination revealed moderately-differentiated adenocarcinoma, which was confirmed by cytological analysis of ascites. Subsequently, ovarian metastasis from rectal cancer with peritoneal dissemination was diagnosed, and left ovariectomy and transverse colostomy were performed. Histological examination of the excised tumor revealed moderately-differentiated adenocarcinoma, and immunohistochemical investigation revealed positive staining for CK20 and CDX2, but negative staining for CK7. These immunohistological results indicated ovarian metastasis from rectal cancer. Both patients recovered well and are currently undergoing regular follow-up examinations. The observations from the two cases indicate that ovarian metastases of primary colorectal cancer may present as pelvic tumors and, thus, preoperative examination of the gastrointestinal tract is required. Furthermore, even in cases of widespread colorectal cancer metastases, excision of the ovarian tumor is required to establish a histological diagnosis for the selection of appropriate treatments.

Current targeted therapies in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a review

Treatment strategies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients have undergone dramatic changes in the past decade and despite improved patient outcomes, there still exist areas for continued development. The introduction of targeted agents has provided clinicians with additional treatment options in mCRC, however, results have been mixed at best. These novel therapies were designed to interfere with specific molecules involved in the cellular carcinogenesis pathway and ultimately deliver a more focused treatment. Currently, their use in mCRC has been limited primarily as an adjunct to conventional chemotherapy regimens. This review explores the relevant cell-signaling networks in colorectal cancer, provides focus on the current targeted agent armamentarium approved for use in mCRC and explores the usefulness of predictive mCRC biomarkers.

Randomized phase III study of bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI and bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (WJOG4407G)

BACKGROUND

FOLFIRI and FOLFOX have shown equivalent efficacy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but their comparative effectiveness is unknown when combined with bevacizumab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

WJOG4407G was a randomized, open-label, phase III trial conducted in Japan. Patients with previously untreated mCRC were randomized 1:1 to receive either FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (FOLFIRI + Bev) or mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab (mFOLFOX6 + Bev), stratified by institution, adjuvant chemotherapy, and liver-limited disease. The primary end point was non-inferiority of FOLFIRI + Bev to mFOLFOX6 + Bev in progression-free survival (PFS), with an expected hazard ratio (HR) of 0.9 and non-inferiority margin of 1.25 (power 0.85, one-sided α-error 0.025). The secondary end points were response rate (RR), overall survival (OS), safety, and quality of life (QoL) during 18 months. This trial is registered to the University Hospital Medical Information Network, number UMIN000001396.

RESULTS

Among 402 patients enrolled from September 2008 to January 2012, 395 patients were eligible for efficacy analysis. The median PFS for FOLFIRI + Bev (n = 197) and mFOLFOX6 + Bev (n = 198) were 12.1 and 10.7 months, respectively [HR, 0.905; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.723-1.133; P = 0.003 for non-inferiority]. The median OS for FOLFIRI + Bev and mFOLFOX6 + Bev were 31.4 and 30.1 months, respectively (HR, 0.990; 95% CI 0.785-1.249). The best overall RRs were 64% for FOLFIRI + Bev and 62% for mFOLFOX6 + Bev. The common grade 3 or higher adverse events were leukopenia (11% in FOLFIRI + Bev/5% in mFOLFOX6 + Bev), neutropenia (46%/35%), diarrhea (9%/5%), febrile neutropenia (5%/2%), peripheral neuropathy (0%/22%), and venous thromboembolism (6%/2%). The QoL assessed by FACT-C (TOI-PFC) and FACT/GOG-Ntx was favorable for FOLFIRI + Bev during 18 months.

CONCLUSION

FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab was non-inferior for PFS, compared with mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab, as the first-line systemic treatment for mCRC.

CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER

UMIN000001396.

Clinicopathologic Features and Outcome of Young Adults With Stage IV Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer has a distinct clinicopathologic presentation in younger patients. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the outcome of younger (age below 50 y) and older patients with stage IV (advanced) colorectal cancer in the modern era of combination chemotherapy.

METHODS

Cases of metastatic colorectal cancer reported in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry (1973 to 2008) were reviewed. Demographics, tumor characteristics, and overall and cancer-specific survivals in patients below 50 and above 50 years of age were compared by Cox proportional hazard analyses. Joinpoint regression analysis was used to evaluate secular trends in 2-year survival.

RESULTS

Younger patients had a greater proportion of negative clinicopathologic features (male sex, African American ethnicity, and signet ring or mucinous histology). In multivariate analysis, older age, male sex, African American ethnicity, right-sided tumors, and signet ring histology were associated with higher mortality risk. Younger patients had improved survival (hazard ratio 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.70-0.75) compared with older patients, whereas all patients experienced increased 2-year survival by joinpoint analysis beginning in 1999-2000.

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirm decreased mortality from advanced colorectal cancer in the era of modern combination chemotherapy in younger and older patients. Younger age, non-right-sided tumors, and absence of signet ring histology significantly associate with better survival.

Prospective analysis of UGT1A1 promoter polymorphism for irinotecan dose escalation in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI as the first-line setting: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Irinotecan is approved and widely administered to metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients; however, it can cause severe toxicities including neutropenia and diarrhea. The polymorphisms of genes encoding drug-metabolizing enzymes can play a crucial role in the increased susceptibility of cancer patients to chemotherapy toxicity. Therefore, we plan to explore the effect of the genetic polymorphism of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) for irinotecan detoxification in mCRC patients. This trial will compare the clinical outcomes and side effects observed in mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan (FOLFIRI) with and without UGT1A1 genotyping and irinotecan dose escalation. A total of 400 mCRC patients were randomized into a study group and a control group.

Methods/Design

This trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing UGT1A1 promoter polymorphism for irinotecan dose escalation in mCRC patients administered with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI as the first-line setting. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups, a study group and a control group, on the basis of receiving UGT1A1 genotyping or not. The study group receive a biweekly FOLFIRI regimen, with irinotecan dose escalation based on UGT1A1 genotyping; whereas the control group receive the conventional biweekly FOLFIRI regimen without UGT1A1 genotyping. The clinicopathological features, response rates, toxicity, and progression-free survival or overall survival will be compared between the two groups.

Discussion

Patients with mCRC undergoing UGT1A1 genotyping may receive escalated doses of irinotecan for a potentially more favorable clinical response and outcome, in addition to comparable toxicities. Such personalized medicine based on genotyping may be feasible for clinical practice.

Trial registration

NCT02256800. Date of registration: 3 October 2014. Date of first patient randomized: 16 January 2015

Uracil-Tegafur and Oral Leucovorin Combined With Bevacizumab in Elderly Patients (Aged ≥ 75 Years) With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Phase II Trial (Joint Study of Bevacizumab, Oral Leucovorin, and Uracil-Tegafur in Elderly Patients [J-BLUE] Study)

BACKGROUND

We previously reported that uracil-tegafur with oral leucovorin (UFT/LV) treatment for elderly patients (aged ≥ 75 years) was well-tolerated in a phase II study. In the present study, the efficacy and safety of a modified (1-week shorter administration period) UFT/LV schedule combined with bevacizumab for a similar population are reported.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The present study was a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, cooperative group clinical trial. The key eligibility criteria included age ≥ 75 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1, first-line chemotherapy, measurable lesions, and preserved organ function. Patients received UFT 300 mg/m(2)/d and LV 75 mg/d on days 1 to 21 and intravenous bevacizumab 5 mg/kg on days 1 and 15. Treatment was repeated every 28 days. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Of the 55 patients enrolled from 15 Japanese institutions, 52 eligible patients were evaluated. Their median age was 80 years (range, 75-87 years), and 73% had an ECOG performance status of 0. The median PFS was 8.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2-10 months). The ORR was 40% (95% CI, 27%-55%). The median OS was 23 months (95% CI, 12-33 months). The most common grade 3 and 4 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (12%), fatigue (8%), anemia (8%), nausea (6%), and diarrhea (6%). Treatment-related death occurred in 2 patients.

CONCLUSION

UFT/LV (3 weeks of therapy and 1 week without) combined with biweekly bevacizumab is a tolerable and effective treatment option for elderly patients (aged ≥ 75 years) with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Current and advancing treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths worldwide. Despite the introduction of several new drugs targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathways, survival and disease control in metastatic CRC remains poor.

AREAS COVERED

Chemotherapy based on fluoropyrimidines and irinotecan or oxaliplatin has been the cornerstone of CRC standard of care for several decades. Optimal regimens are selected according to toxicity profiles and patient characteristics. The addition of targeted drugs inhibiting angiogenesis, notably bevacizumab, aflibercept and ramucirumab, has improved chemotherapy outcomes in metastatic CRC. Anti-EGFR agents, cetuximab and panitumumab, in combination with chemotherapy have also improved survival in patients with wild-type RAS tumors. In the refractory setting, there are emerging drugs such as regorafenib or TAS-102 that also have demonstrated impact on outcomes.

EXPERT OPINION

Drugs targeting signaling pathways involved in tumorigenesis improve patient outcomes over chemotherapy alone. Determining the most suitable combination and sequence should be carefully selected, with studies yet to provide a definitive solution to this unknown. Molecular mechanisms of colorectal cancer are at the forefront of research. Knowledge in this domain will help overcome resistance to therapies and introduce new drugs in the personalized CRC therapeutic scenario.

Bevacizumab in combination with fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan- or fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for first-line and maintenance treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

Despite a slight decrease in mortality rates, recent advances in screening methods, diagnosis and overall improved therapeutic options, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains among the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. The major cause is the mortality related to metastatic status of CRC. Increasing clinical evidence derived from randomized trials strongly suggests that the efficacy of standard cytotoxic agents, including various combinations of 5-fluoouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV), capecitabine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, may be significantly augmented with concomitant administration of molecular agents targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathways, such as bevacizumab. Herein, we critically discuss the current data on the efficacy and safety profile of bevacizumab in combination with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for first-line and maintenance treatment of metastatic CRC and briefly comment on existing controversies and future perspectives.

High-Dose FOLFIRI plus Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients with Two Different UGT1A1 Genotypes: FFCD 0504 Study

High-dose FOLFIRI has an acceptable safety profile and promising efficacy. UDP-glucuronosyltransferase: (UGT1A1) polymorphism may be predictive of toxicity and efficacy of irinotecan. This phase II study aimed to evaluate the combination of high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) based on their UGT1A1 genotype. Patients with the UGT1A1 *1/*1 (group 1) or *1/*28 (group 2) genotype received bevacizumab plus high-dose FOLFIRI every 2 weeks. Using the Bryant and Day design with objective response rate and toxicity as the primary endpoints, 54 patients in each group were required with a planned interim analysis after inclusion of 17 patients per group. We planned to stop the trial at the interim analysis if ≤ 7 patients exhibited an objective response (OR) and/or ≥ 3 patients exhibited severe toxicity. At the interim analysis, ORs were higher than the number expected: 52.9% (group 1) and 58.8% (group 2). More than three toxic events occurred in both groups and, according to the interim analysis rule, the trial was closed due to unacceptable toxicity. Recruitment was stopped when 86 patients were included and an analysis on overall population was done for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The median PFS was 10.7 months (group 1) and 10.4 months (group 2). The median OS was 25.5 months (group 1) and 23.9 months (group 2). This trial does not support the use of the intensive treatment with HD-FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab combination for MCRC in patients with the UGTA1*1/UGT1A1*1 or UGT1A1*1/UGT1A1*28 genotype.

Personalized treatment is better than one treatment fits all in the management of patients with mCRC: a consensus statement

The VEGF- (bevacizumab) and EGFR- (cetuximab and panitumumab) targeting monoclonal antibodies have become integral components of the first-line treatment strategies for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Increasingly combination chemotherapy, with or without a targeted agent, is being used to facilitate curative liver resection and improve survival rates in patients with initially unresectable but potentially resectable mCRC. Currently, the only selective marker for the treatment of patients with mCRC is tumor RAS mutational status. BRAF status is a strong prognostic indicator. Medical and clinical oncologists from Central Asia, Russia, the Middle East, Africa and Turkey reviewed data for the use of targeted agents in the treatment of patients with mCRC and have formed recommendations for the biological of choice first-line for patients with mCRC.

Is more not better?: combination therapies in colorectal cancer treatment

The treatment of colorectal cancer has evolved dramatically in recent years with the availability of new chemotherapeutic agents and inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor- and epidermal growth factor-signaling pathways. The incremental benefit of each individual line of therapy for advanced disease is relatively small. Advances in our ability to select patients should improve the cost-effectiveness of our treatment strategies (avoiding unnecessary toxicity in the patients who are unlikely to benefit and accepting the potential for adverse events in the patients who stand to benefit the most from a given regimen).

Incorporating anti-VEGF pathway therapy as a continuum of care in metastatic colorectal cancer

Metastatic cancer was previously treated with distinctive lines of chemotherapy regimens upon disease progression or toxicity, yet the choices of therapy are actually interrelated, with the selection of a first-line regimen in part determining the choices available for subsequent treatment. Lately the therapeutic approach based on separate lines of treatment, tends to be replaced from a perspective strategical approach, that of the "continuum of care". This strategy targets to an improved overall survival, improved of quality of life and minimization of toxicity through upfront design of treatment selection and sequencing, exposure to all available drugs and minimization of unnecessary treatment. Anti-VEGF treatment has a well-documented role in this approach. Bevacizumab should be included in upfront treatment regimens for all mCRC patients independently of RAS status, unless contraindicated. Upfront bevacizumab could be combined with all available regimens since the optimal choice of backbone chemotherapy is yet to be defined. In RAS wild-type population, when metastasectomy is the target, an anti-EGFR combination is also a valid approach. Maintenance with bevacizumab and fluoropyrimidines should be considered upon intolerance of induction treatment and/or disease stabilization; maintenance with bevacizumab monotherapy should be avoided. In highly selected patients, complete treatment cessation could be also an option. Continuation with bevacizumab upon first progression and switch of the "backbone" chemotherapy is a validated approach. Patients progressing after first-line oxaliplatin regimen including bevacizumab combinations could be treated with an aflibercept-irinotecan combination. When no more options are available, regorafenib monotherapy should be the following choice. Combinations of anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR treatment have no place in this approach and are not indicated.

Overexpression of BIRC6 Is a Predictor of Prognosis for Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) have been well investigated in human cancers, where they are frequently overexpressed and associated with poor prognosis. Here we explored the role of baculoviral IAP repeat containing 6 (BIRC6), a member of IAPs, in human colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

We used Western blotting and immunohistochemistry to examine BIRC6 expression in 7 CRC cell lines and 126 CRC clinical samples. We determined the biological significance of BIRC6 in CRC cell lines by a lentivirus-mediated silencing method.

RESULTS

We reported that BIRC6 was overexpressed in CRC cell lines and clinical CRC tissues. BIRC6 overexpression was correlated with tumor size and invasion depth of CRC. BIRC6 overexpression is associated with worse overall survival (OS) (P = 0.001) and shorter disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.010). BIRC6 knockdown inhibited cell proliferation, arrested cell cycle at S phase, downregulated cyclin A2, B1, D1 and E1 levels, and sensitized CRC cells to chemotherapy in vitro and in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, these data suggests that BIRC6 overexpression is a predictor of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer and BIRC6 could be a potential target of CRC therapy.

A phase I study of UGT1A1 *28/*6 genotype-directed dosing of irinotecan (CPT-11) in Korean patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving FOLFIRI

PURPOSE

A UGT1A1 genotype-directed dose escalation of irinotecan (CPT-11) was performed in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line FOLFIRI chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients were genotyped for UGT1A1 and stratified according to the number of defective alleles (DA; *28 and *6). The irinotecan dose was escalated with a fixed dose of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in a standard 3 + 3 design.

RESULTS

In 43 enrolled patients, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 300 mg/m² for the 1 DA group, while the MTD was not reached for the 0 DA group with 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at 330 mg/m² and for the 2 DA group with 0 DLT at 150 mg/m². Because of the risk of being exposed to unsafe doses, the trial was terminated before the MTD was reached in the 0 DA and 2 DA groups. The recommended doses were 300 (0 DA), 270 (1 DA) and 150 (0 DA) mg/m². The 2 DA group displayed 27% lower SN-38 exposure levels relative to the 0 and 1 DA groups (95% CI, 0.47-1.15).

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD of irinotecan differed according to the UGT1A1 genotype, and higher doses of irinotecan are feasible with sLV5FU2 compared to the present regulatory approved doses.

Metastatic colorectal cancer: current state and future directions

Substantial improvements have been made in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer over the last two decades. The overall survival of patients diagnosed with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer has increased from approximately 1 year during the era of fluoropyrimidine monotherapy to more than 30 months with the integration of multiple cytotoxic agents and targeted therapies. More effective therapeutic combinations have increased the rate of curative-intent surgical resections, resulting in median survival in this subgroup that exceed 5 years. Here we review the landscape of systemic therapies for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer during the current era of targeted therapies, review the effects of RAS and BRAF mutations on clinical decision making, and reflect on future directions for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis

AIM: To investigate the correlation between Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) status and the therapeutic effects of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified and the association between KRAS mutation and clinical outcome in mCRC patients treated with anti-EGFR MoAbs was investigated. Ten RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. Progression-free survival and overall survival were used to assess the strength of the relationship between KRAS mutation and clinical outcome.

RESULTS: In first-line treatment, survival benefit was confined to patients with wild-type KRAS. Chemotherapy regimens and angiogenesis inhibitor treatment influenced the results of the analysis. Wild-type KRAS mCRC patients did not seem to benefit from oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (PFS: HR = 0.88, 95%CI: 0.70-1.10; OS: HR = 0.93, 95%CI: 0.82-1.04). Clinical benefit in mCRC patients was limited to therapeutic regimens which included anti-EGFR MoAbs and fluorouracil-based therapy (PFS: HR = 0.77, 95%CI: 0.69-0.86; OS: HR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.75-0.95). When anti-EGFR MoAbs were used as second- or further-line treatment, clinical benefit was still confined to patients with wild-type KRAS.

CONCLUSION: KRAS status is a potential predictive marker of clinical benefit due to anti-EGFR MoAb therapy in mCRC patients.

Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) Guidelines 2014 for treatment of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is a major cause of death in Japan, where it accounts for the largest number of deaths from malignant neoplasms among women and the third largest number among men. Many new methods of treatment have been developed during recent decades. The Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Guidelines 2014 for treatment of colorectal cancer (JSCCR Guidelines 2014) have been prepared as standard treatment strategies for colorectal cancer, to eliminate treatment disparities among institutions, to eliminate unnecessary treatment and insufficient treatment, and to deepen mutual understanding among health-care professionals and patients by making these guidelines available to the general public. These guidelines have been prepared as a result of consensuses reached by the JSCCR Guideline Committee on the basis of careful review of evidence retrieved by literature searches and taking into consideration the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice in Japan. They can, therefore, be used as a guide for treating colorectal cancer in clinical practice. More specifically, they can be used as a guide to obtaining informed consent from patients and choosing the method of treatment for each patient. As a result of the discussions of the Guideline Committee, controversial issues were selected as clinical questions, and recommendations were made. Each recommendation is accompanied by a classification of the evidence and a classification of recommendation categories, on the basis of consensus reached by Guideline Committee members. Here we present the English version of the JSCCR Guidelines 2014.

Review of systemic therapies for locally advanced and metastatic rectal cancer

Rectal cancer, along with colon cancer, is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the U.S. Up to a quarter of patients have metastatic disease at diagnosis and 40% will develop metastatic disease. The past 10 years have been extremely exciting in the treatment of both locally advanced and metastatic rectal cancer (mRC). With the advent of neoadjuvant chemoradiation, increased numbers of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) are surviving longer and some are seeing their tumors shrink to sizes that allow for resection. The advent of biologics and monoclonal antibodies has propelled the treatment of mRC further than many could have hoped. Combined with regimens such as FOLFOX or FOLFIRI, median survival rates have been increased to an average of 23 months. However, the combinations of chemotherapy regimens seem endless for rectal cancer. We will review the major chemotherapies available for locally advanced and mRC as well as regimens currently under investigation such as FOLFOXIRI. We will also review vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors as single agents and in combination with traditional chemotherapy regimens.

Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with or without bevacizumab: can the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio predict the efficiency of bevacizumab?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to analyze the predictive value of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) to better clarify which patient groups will benefit the most from particular treatments like bevacizumab.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 245 treatment-naive metastatic colorectal cancern (mCRC) patients were retrospectively enrolled and divided into 2 groups: 145 group A patients were treated with chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab, and 100 group B patients were treated as above without bevacizumab.

RESULTS

Group A patients had better median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) (24.0 and 9.0 months) than group B patients (20 and 6.0 months) (p=0.033; p=0.015). In patients with low NLR, OS and PFS were significantly longer in group A patients (27 vs 18 months, p=0.001; 11 vs 7 months, p=0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that NLR, a basal cancer related inflammation marker, is associated with the resistance to bevacizumab- based treatments in mCRC patients.

Unresolved issues and controversies surrounding the management of colorectal cancer liver metastasis

Ideally, tumors that might cause morbidity and mortality should be treated, preferably early, with proven, convincing, and effective therapy to prevent tumor progression or recurrence, while maintaining a favorable risk-benefit profile for the individual patient. For patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), this diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic precision is currently impossible. Despite significant improvements in diagnostic procedures, a sizable number of patients with CRC have liver metastases either at presentation or will subsequently develop it. And in many parts of the world, most cancer-related deaths are still due to metastases that are resistant to conventional therapy. Metastases to the liver occur in more than 50% of patients with CRC and represent the major determinant of outcome following curative treatment of the primary tumor. Liver resection offers the best chance of cure for metastases confined to the liver. However, due to a paucity of randomized controlled trials, its timing is controversial and a hotly debated topic. This article reviews some of the main controversies surrounding the surgical management of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM).

The 'real-life' impact of adding bevacizumab to first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a large Israeli retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

After a decade of extensive use, the actual contribution of bevacizumab in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is still unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate 'real-life' outcomes of patients with mCRC before and after the introduction of bevacizumab to standard mCRC first-line practice.

METHODS

Using the computerized administrative database of Clalit Health Services' (CHS), Israel's largest health care provider, we retrospectively compared two cohorts (n = 1739): (A) all CHS' patients diagnosed with mCRC between January 2000 and December 2004 that received first-line irinotecan or oxaliplatin-based combination chemotherapy (before bevacizumab was introduced) (n = 1052), and (B) all patients that started first-line irinotecan or oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy together with bevacizumab between September 2006 and December 2009 (after bevacizumab was fully reimbursed in Israel for mCRC first-line therapy) (n = 687). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints were first-line progression-free survival (PFS) and metastatectomy rates.

RESULTS

Median OS was longer in Cohort B than in Cohort A [23.0 months vs.15.0, adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.75]. Secondary outcomes were also better; PFS of 14.0 months vs. 9.8 in the earlier period (HR, 0.75) and metastatectomy rate of 8.1% versus 3.9%. The longer OS in Cohort B was preserved even after controlling for latter-line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor use (HR = 0.77).

CONCLUSION

In this analysis, OS, PFS and metastatectomy rates of first-line treatment of mCRC were significantly higher in the later period of the study. These results, derived from 'real-life' practice, suggest that the use of bevacizumab, among other alterations in the clinical management of mCRC between the two periods, might have had a significant contribution to these outcomes, and may therefore support the current practice of adding bevacizumab to first-line treatment of mCRC.

A Phase II Trial of Combined Chemotherapy with Oral S-1 and 24-Hour Infusions of Irinotecan plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Protracted low-dose infusion of irinotecan has been suggested to enhance antitumor activity. A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral S-1 combined with 24-hour infusion of irinotecan and intravenous bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC).

METHODS

The subjects were 79 patients with MCRC; 57 were chemotherapy naïve. Irinotecan (125 mg/m(2)) was administered as a 24-hour infusion on days 1 and 15, S-1 (80 mg/m(2)) was administered orally on days 1-14, and bevacizumab (5.0 mg/kg) was given on days 1 and 15. The treatment was repeated every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 20.0 months, and the mean number of cycles was 7. The overall response rate was 79.7% (95% CI, 69.2-88.0), 86.0% (95% CI, 74.2-93.7) for first-line and 63.6% (95% CI, 40.7-82.8) for second-line treatment. The median progression-free survival was 16.4 months (95% CI, 13.9-21.0) for first-line and 9.4 months (95% CI, 4.9-16.5) for second-line treatment. The median overall survival was not reached. Grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (43%), leukopenia (20.3%), anorexia (19.0%), and diarrhea (10.1%). Toxicity was tolerable.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination chemotherapy with oral S-1 and biweekly 24-hour infusions of irinotecan plus bevacizumab appears to be highly active and well tolerated both as first-line and second-line chemotherapy for MCRC.

Laparoscopic surgery for stage IV colorectal cancer

Laparoscopic surgery (Lap) is a feasible therapy in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) without distant metastasis. Resection of primary lesion in stage IV CRC is now recognized as part of multimodal therapy. However, technical safety and invasiveness of Lap in stage IV CRC remain controversial. The feasibility of Lap in stage IV CRC was determined. Clinical outcomes were compared in primary colorectal resection using Lap, open surgery (Opn), and radical Lap for stages I to III CRC. No difference was observed regarding estimated blood loss and operative time between procedures. Postoperative recovery time and time to subsequent secondary therapy in the stage IV Lap group were significantly shorter than those in the Opn group. Similar results were observed for the 3-year overall survival rate. Lap for stage IV CRC is feasible and preferable in terms of technical safety and invasiveness. It may be useful in multimodal therapy for stage IV CRC.

Management of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent solid tumors in the Western world. Treatment options are dependent on the stage of the disease, the performance status of the patient, and increasingly the molecular makeup of the tumor. In countries with surveillance programs, the incidence rate as well as the mortality rate has gone down because of the earlier stages at which the tumors are detected. For rectal cancer, standard of care differs from that of colon cancer with regard to perioperative treatment. In the metastatic setting, treatment options are uniform for colorectal cancer. Over the years, treatment options have emerged from single-agent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment to combination regimens using 5-FU and oxaliplatin or irinotecan or both. Treatment efficacy in the metastatic setting has been increased with the introduction of targeted substances. These include (a) the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor-A (anti-VEGF-A) antibody bevacizumab, (b) the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab, (c) the anti-angiogenic multi-kinase inhibitor regorafenib, and (d) the anti-angiogenic compound aflibercept. Anti-EGFR antibodies have shown efficacy only in the subpopulations of tumors that do not have any mutation in KRAS and NRAS exon 2, 3, 4. Physicians have the choice in the first line to use anti-EGFR or anti-VEGF inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy based on treatment goals and patient performance. In recent years, tumor location has been shown to be prognostic and predictive for clinical outcome. Right-sided sporadic colon cancers differ significantly in molecular characteristics and, with the exception of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) tumors, are associated with poor prognosis. Tumors based on hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, on the other hand, have excellent prognosis in stage II and III disease. Recent efforts have focused on the molecular classification of colorectal cancer with the purpose of establishing molecularly defined subgroups.