Triple receptor-negative breast cancer: the effect of race on response to primary systemic treatment and survival outcomes

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Pathologic Complete Response and Overall Survival in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Black women have higher rates of death from triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) than White women. We hypothesized that pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and overall survival (OS) may vary by race/ethnicity in patients with TNBC.

METHODS

We identified women 18 years and older with stage I-III TNBC who received NAC followed by surgery from the National Cancer Database (2010-2019). We excluded patients without race/ethnicity or pathology data. Primary outcomes were pCR rates and OS on the basis of race/ethnicity.

RESULTS

Forty thousand eight hundred ninety women with TNBC met inclusion criteria (median age [IQR], 53 [44-61] years): 26,150 Non-Hispanic White (64%, NHW), 9,672 Non-Hispanic Black (23.7%, NHB), 3,267 Hispanic (8%), 1,368 Non-Hispanic Asian (3.3%, NHA), and 433 Non-Hispanic Other (1.1%, NHO) patients. Overall, 29.8% demonstrated pCR (NHW: 30.5%, NHB: 27%, Hispanic: 32.6%, NHA: 28.8%, NHO: 29.8%). Unadjusted OS was significantly higher for those with pCR compared with those with residual disease (5-year OS, 0.917 [95% CI, 0.911 to 0.923] v 0.667 [95% CI, 0.661 to 0.673], log-rank P < .001), and this association persisted after adjustment for demographic and tumor factors. The effect of achieving pCR on OS did not differ by race/ethnicity (interaction P = .10). However, NHB patients were less likely (odds ratio [OR], 0.89 [95% CI, 0.83 to 0.95], P = .001) and Hispanic patients were more likely (OR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.08 to 1.31], P = .001) to achieve pCR than NHW patients. After adjustment for patient and disease factors, including achievement of pCR, Hispanic (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76 [95% CI, 0.69 to 0.85], P < .001) and NHA (HR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.55 to 0.75], P < .001) race/ethnicity remained associated with OS.

CONCLUSION

Odds of achieving pCR and OS in patients with TNBC appear to be associated with race/ethnicity. Additional research is necessary to understand how race/ethnicity is associated with rates of pCR and OS, whether related to socioeconomic factors or biologic variables, or both.

Overall Survival and Prognostic Factors in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is aggressive with poor median overall survival (OS) ranging from 8 to 13 months. There exists considerable heterogeneity in survival at the individual patient level. To better understand the survival heterogeneity and improve risk stratification, our study aims to identify the factors influencing survival, utilizing a large patient sample from the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

METHODS

Women diagnosed with metastatic TNBC from 2010 to 2020 in the NCDB were included. Demographic, clinicopathological, and treatment data and overall survival (OS) outcomes were collected. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate OS. The log-rank test was used to identify OS differences between groups for each variable in the univariate analysis. For the multivariate analysis, the Cox proportional hazard model with backward elimination was used to identify factors affecting OS. Adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals are presented.

RESULTS

In this sample, 2273 women had a median overall survival of 13.6 months. Factors associated with statistically significantly worse OS included older age, higher comorbidity scores, specific histologies, higher number of metastatic sites, presence of liver or other site metastases in those with only one metastatic site (excluding brain metastases), presence of cranial and extra-cranial metastases, lack of chemotherapy, lack of immunotherapy, lack of surgery to distant sites, lack of radiation to distant sites, and receipt of palliative treatment to alleviate symptoms. In the multivariate analysis, comorbidity score, histology, number of metastatic sites, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy had a statistically significant effect on OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Through NCDB analysis, we have identified prognostic factors for metastatic TNBC. These findings will help individualize prognostication at diagnosis, optimize treatment strategies, and facilitate patient stratification in future clinical trials.

Racial and socioeconomic disparities in triple-negative breast cancer treatment

INTRODUCTION

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) continues to be a significant concern, especially among minority populations, where treatment disparities are notably pronounced. Addressing these disparities, especially among African American women and other minorities, is crucial for ensuring equitable healthcare.

AREAS COVERED

This review delves into the continuum of TNBC treatment, noting that the standard of care, previously restricted to chemotherapy, has now expanded due to emerging clinical trial results. With advances like PARP inhibitors, immunotherapy, and antibody-drug conjugates, a more personalized treatment approach is on the horizon. The review highlights innovative interventions tailored for minorities, such as utilizing technology like text messaging, smartphone apps, and targeted radio programming, coupled with church-based behavioral interventions.

EXPERT OPINION

Addressing TNBC treatment disparities demands a multifaceted approach, blending advanced medical treatments with culturally sensitive community outreach. The potential of technology, especially in the realm of promoting health awareness, is yet to be fully harnessed. As the field progresses, understanding and integrating the socio-economic, biological, and access-related challenges faced by minorities will be pivotal for achieving health equity in TNBC care.

Machine learning prediction of pathological complete response and overall survival of breast cancer patients in an underserved inner-city population

BACKGROUND

Generalizability of predictive models for pathological complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS) in breast cancer patients requires diverse datasets. This study employed four machine learning models to predict pCR and OS up to 7.5 years using data from a diverse and underserved inner-city population.

METHODS

Demographics, staging, tumor subtypes, income, insurance status, and data from radiology reports were obtained from 475 breast cancer patients on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in an inner-city health system (01/01/2012 to 12/31/2021). Logistic regression, Neural Network, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosted Regression models were used to predict outcomes (pCR and OS) with fivefold cross validation.

RESULTS

pCR was not associated with age, race, ethnicity, tumor staging, Nottingham grade, income, and insurance status (p > 0.05). ER-/HER2+ showed the highest pCR rate, followed by triple negative, ER+/HER2+, and ER+/HER2- (all p < 0.05), tumor size (p < 0.003) and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) (p < 0.01). Machine learning models ranked ER+/HER2-, ER-/HER2+, tumor size, and BPE as top predictors of pCR (AUC = 0.74-0.76). OS was associated with race, pCR status, tumor subtype, and insurance status (p < 0.05), but not ethnicity and incomes (p > 0.05). Machine learning models ranked tumor stage, pCR, nodal stage, and triple-negative subtype as top predictors of OS (AUC = 0.83-0.85). When grouping race and ethnicity by tumor subtypes, neither OS nor pCR were different due to race and ethnicity for each tumor subtype (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Tumor subtypes and imaging characteristics were top predictors of pCR in our inner-city population. Insurance status, race, tumor subtypes and pCR were associated with OS. Machine learning models accurately predicted pCR and OS.

The Landmark Series-Addressing Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening: New Recommendations for Black Women

Randomized, clinical trials have established the efficacy of screening mammography in improving survival from breast cancer for women through detection of early, asymptomatic disease. However, disparities in survival rates between black women and women from other racial and ethnic groups following breast cancer diagnosis persist. Various professional groups have different, somewhat conflicting, guidelines with regards to recommended age for commencing screening as well as recommended frequency of screening exams, but the trials upon which these recommendations are based were not specifically designed to examine benefit among black women. Furthermore, these recommendations do not appear to incorporate the unique epidemiological circumstances of breast cancer among black women, including higher rates of diagnosis before age 40 years and greater likelihood of advanced stage at diagnosis, into their formulation. In this review, we examined the epidemiologic and socioeconomic factors that are associated with breast cancer among black women and assess the implications of these factors for screening in this population. Specifically, we recommend that by no later than age 25 years, all black women should undergo baseline assessment for future risk of breast cancer utilizing a model that incorporates race (e.g., Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool [BCRAT], formerly the Gail model) and that this assessment should be conducted by a breast specialist or a healthcare provider (e.g., primary care physician or gynecologist) who is trained to assess breast cancer risk and is aware of the increased risks of early (i.e., premenopausal) and biologically aggressive (e.g., late-stage, triple-negative) breast cancer among black women.

Clinical Outcomes and Immune Markers by Race in a Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Durvalumab Concomitant with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage TNBC

PURPOSE

The incidence of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is higher among Black or African American (AA) women, yet they are underrepresented in clinical trials. To evaluate safety and efficacy of durvalumab concurrent with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage I-III TNBC by race, we enrolled additional AA patients to a Phase I/II clinical trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our study population included 67 patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR; ypT0/is, N0) rate. χ2 tests were used to evaluate associations between race and baseline characteristics. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess association between race and overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between race and pCR, immune-related adverse events (irAE) and recurrence.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (31%) self-identified as AA. No significant associations between race and baseline tumor stage (P = 0.40), PD-L1 status (0.92), and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (sTIL) count (P = 0.57) were observed. pCR rates were similar between AA (43%) and non-AA patients (48%; P = 0.71). Three-year EFS rates were 78.3% and 71.4% in non-AA and AA patients, respectively [HR, 1.451; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.524-4.017; P = 0.474]; 3-year OS was 87% and 81%, respectively (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 0.481-6.136; P = 0.405). The incidence of irAEs was similar between AA and non-AA patients and no significant associations were found between irAEs and pathologic response.

CONCLUSIONS

pCR rates, 3-year OS and EFS after neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy were similar in AA and non-AA patients. Toxicities, including the frequency of irAEs, were also similar.

Assessing Real-World Racial Differences Among Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in US Community Practices

Objective

Real-world data characterizing differences between African American (AA) and White women with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) are limited. Using 9 years of data collected from community practices throughout the United States, we assessed racial differences in the proportion of patients with mTNBC, and their characteristics, treatment, and overall survival (OS).

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed de-identified data from 2,116 patients with mTNBC in the Flatiron Health database (January 2011 to March 2020). Characteristics and treatment patterns between AA and White patients with mTNBC were compared using descriptive statistics. OS was examined using Kaplan-Meier analysis and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model.

Results

Among patients with metastatic breast cancer, more AA patients (23%) had mTNBC than White patients (12%). This difference was particularly pronounced in patients who lived in the Northeast, were aged 45–65, had commercial insurance, and had initial diagnosis at stage II. AA patients were younger and more likely to have Medicaid. Clinical characteristics and first-line treatments were similar between AA and White patients. Unadjusted median OS (months) was shorter in AA (10.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.1, 11.7) vs. White patients (11.9; 95% CI: 10.9, 12.8) but not significantly different. After adjusting for potential confounders, the hazard ratio for OS was 1.09 (95% CI: 0.95, 1.25) for AA vs. White patients.

Conclusions

The proportion of patients with mTNBC was higher in AA than White mBC patients treated in community practices. Race did not show an association with OS. Both AA and White patients with mTNBC received similar treatments. OS was similarly poor in both groups, particularly in patients who had not received any documented anti-cancer treatment. Effective treatment remains a substantial unmet need for all patients with mTNBC.

Lack of racial differences in clinical outcomes of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a single academic center study

PURPOSE

To examine the association between race and clinical outcomes (pathological complete response [pCR]; recurrence-free survival [RFS], and overall survival [OS]) in patients diagnosed with triple-negative (TNBC) or HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

Patients who self-identified as non-Hispanic white (NHW) or non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and were diagnosed with Stage I-III TNBC (n = 171 including 124 NHW and 47 NHB) and HER2-positive (n = 161 including 136 NHW and 25 NHB) breast cancer who received NAC from 2000 to 2018 at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center were included. Associations of race with pCR and survival outcomes were evaluated using logistic and Cox regression models, respectively.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in pCR between NHB and NHW patients with TNBC (31.9 vs 29.8%; OR: 1.11, 95% CI 0.54-2.29) or HER2-positive breast cancer (36.0 vs 39.7%; OR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.36-3.11). After controlling for potential confounders, including age, stage, treatment regimens, insurance status, and comorbidities, no statistically significant difference in OS or RFS was observed between NHB and NHW patients within either subtype.

CONCLUSION

TNBC or HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated at a single academic center in Buffalo, NY, showed similar outcomes independent of patients' race. Given the known genetic diversity of African American ancestry in the US, further studies investigating the interplay between race, geography, and clinical outcomes are warranted.

Racial disparities in health insurance, triple‑negative breast cancer diagnosis, tumor stage, treatment and survival in a large nationwide SEER cohort in the United States

It remains unclear whether there are racial disparities in mortality between women of different races who have the same subtype of breast cancer when tumor stage and size and treatment are controlled for. The present study aimed to investigate whether racial disparities in mortality existed between women of different races who had the same subtype of breast cancer when health insurance, tumor stage and size and treatment were controlled for in a large cohort of women with breast cancer in the United States. This study identified 399,564 women who were diagnosed with incident breast cancer at age ≥20 years between 2010 and 2016 in 17 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries, including 277,319 non-Hispanic white (white), 44,149 non-Hispanic black (black), 34,141 non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander (Asian) and 43,955 Hispanic women. White and Asian women exhibited a lower proportion of triple-negative breast cancer (9.8 and 9.1% respectively) than black (20.8%) and Hispanic women (12.6%). Black women had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality compared with white women in only those with triple-negative breast cancer (hazard ratio: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.29-1.51) and those with hormone receptor-negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (1.53, 1.48-1.58) after adjusting for confounders. In those with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, regardless of HER2 receptor status, the risk of all-cause mortality was not statistically different between black and white women, while the risk of breast cancer-specific mortality was significantly higher in all subtypes of breast cancer among black women. There were racial disparities in the presentation of triple-negative breast cancer and in all-cause and breast cancer specific mortality following stratification by triple-negative status and adjusting for tumor stage, size, grade and treatment.

Racial/Ethnic Differences and Trends in Pathologic Complete Response Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

Despite improving rates of pathologic complete response (pCR; the absence of invasive cancer at the time of surgery) among patients with breast cancer who underwent chemotherapy prior to surgery, racial and ethnic minority groups were under-represented in clinical trials. Our study used a large cancer registry database in the United States to evaluate the temporal trend of pCR and patterns of pCR and survival outcomes among diverse racial and ethnic groups. It suggested that although pCR rates improved over time for all groups, pCR rates and survival outcomes varied significantly. For instance, compared to non-Hispanic White women, Black women were less likely to have pCR for triple negative and hormone receptor (HR)-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive tumors, but more likely for HR-positive, HER2-negative tumors. Given such heterogeneous outcomes among various racial and ethnic minority groups, further investigations would be warranted to optimize outcomes among such underserved populations.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate nationwide trends in pathologic complete response (pCR) and its racial variations for breast cancer. The National Cancer Database was queried for women from 2010 to 2017 with non-metastatic breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoints, pCR and overall survival, were evaluated using Cochran-Armitage test, logistic, and Cox regression multivariable analyses. A total of 104,161 women were analyzed. Overall, pCR improved from 2010 to 2017 (15.1% to 27.2%, trend p < 0.001). Compared to non-Hispanic White (NHW) women, Hispanic White (HW) women were more likely to have pCR for hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive tumors (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08–1.53, p = 0.005). Black women were less likely to have pCR for HR-HER2+ tumors (aOR 0.81, 95% CI 0.73–0.89, p < 0.001) and triple negative (aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77–0.87, p < 0.001) tumors, but more likely for HR+HER2- tumors (aOR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03–1.24, p = 0.009). Among patients who achieved pCR, Asian or Pacific Islander (API) women were associated with better survival (adjusted hazards ratio (aHR) 0.52, 95% CI 0.33–0.82, p = 0.005) than NHW women. Despite positive trends in pCR rates, the likelihood of pCR and survival outcomes may be intricately dependent on racial/ethnic groups and tumor receptor subtypes.

YB1 Is a Major Contributor to Health Disparities in Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a devastating disease that affects many women, due to the lack of FDA-approved targeted therapy. In the absence of cell surface receptors ER, PR, and Her2 that can be targeted with hormonal and antibody treatments, cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the major course of treatment, with a dismal response and rapid recurrence due to the acquisition of resistance. TNBC is also twice as more prevalent in African American (AA) when compared to Caucasian American (CA) women. This study investigated the role of the YB1 gene in the disparities in TNBC between AA and CA women. We found that YB1 is highly expressed in TNBC tumors of AA origin when compared to CAs. Increased expression levels and activity of YB1 correlates with poor disease outcomes, resistance to chemotherapy, and the activation of the cancer stem cell (CSC) phenotype, with higher levels in AA than in CA TNBC tumors. More importantly, we found that the targeted inhibition of the expression and activity of YB1 significantly inhibited the oncogenic behavior of AA tumors through sensitization to chemotherapy and inhibition of CSCs. Our study is the first to show that YB1 activity may be a major biological contributor to the health disparities in TNBC, and that development of therapies that specifically target YB1 could reduce these disparities.

Abstract

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive amongst all breast cancer (BC) subtypes. While TNBC tumors represent less than 20% of all BC subtypes, they are responsible for the most BC-related deaths. More significantly, when considering TNBC incidence across all racial/ethnic groups, TNBC accounts for less than 20% of all BCs. However, in non-Hispanic black women, the incidence rate of TNBC is more than 40%, which may be a contributing factor to the higher BC-related death rate in this population. These disparities remain strong even after accounting for differences in socioeconomic status, healthcare access, and lifestyle factors. Increased evidence now points to biological mechanisms that are intrinsic to the tumor that contribute to disparate TNBC disease burdens. Here, we show that YB1, a multifunction gene, plays a major role in the TNBC disparities between African American (AA) and Caucasian American (CA) women. We show in three independent TNBC tumors cohorts, that YB1 is significantly highly expressed in AA TNBC tumors when compared to CAs, and that increased levels of YB1 correlate with poor survival of AA patients with TNBC. We used a combination of genetic manipulation of YB1 and chemotherapy treatment, both in vitro and in animal models of TNBC to show that YB1 oncogenic activity is more enhanced in TNBC cell lines of AA origin, by increasing their tumorigenic and aggressive behaviors, trough the activation of cancer stem cell phenotype and resistance to chemotherapeutic treatments.

Evaluation of Racial/Ethnic Differences in Treatment and Mortality Among Women With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Importance

To our knowledge, there is no consensus regarding differences in treatment and mortality between non-Hispanic African American and non-Hispanic White women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Little is known about whether racial disparities vary by sociodemographic, clinical, and neighborhood factors.

Objective

To examine the differences in clinical treatment and outcomes between African American and White women in a nationally representative cohort of patients with TNBC and further examine the contributions of sociodemographic, clinical, and neighborhood factors to TNBC outcome disparities.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This population-based, retrospective cohort study included 23 123 women who received a diagnosis of nonmetastatic TNBC between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2015, followed up through December 31, 2016, and identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data set. The study was conducted from July 2019 to November 2020. The analyses were performed from July 2019 to June 2020.

Exposures

Race and ethnicity, including non-Hispanic African American and non-Hispanic White race.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Using logistic regression analysis and competing risk regression analysis, we estimated odds ratios (ORs) of receipt of treatment and hazard ratios (HRs) of breast cancer mortality in African American patients compared with White patients.

Results

Of 23 213 participants, 5881 (25.3%) were African American women and 17 332 (74.7%) were White women. Compared with White patients, African American patients had lower odds of receiving surgery (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60-0.79) and chemotherapy (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.99) after adjustment for sociodemographic, clinicopathologic, and county-level factors. During a 43-month follow-up, 3276 patients (14.2%) died of breast cancer. The HR of breast cancer mortality was 1.28 (95% CI, 1.18-1.38) for African American individuals after adjustment for sociodemographic and county-level factors. Further adjustment for clinicopathological and treatment factors reduced the HR to 1.16 (95% CI, 1.06-1.25). This association was observed in patients living in socioeconomically less deprived counties (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.14-1.39), urban patients (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.11-1.32), patients having stage II (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02-1.39) or III (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.31) tumors that were treated with chemotherapy, and patients younger than 65 years (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.12-1.37).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this retrospective cohort study, African American women with nonmetastatic TNBC had a significantly higher risk of breast cancer mortality compared with their White counterparts, which was partially explained by their disparities in receipt of surgery and chemotherapy.

Outcome of African-American compared to White-American patients with early-stage breast cancer, stratified by phenotype

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer mortality rates are 39% higher in the African-American (AA) women compared to White-American (WA) women despite the advances in overall breast cancer screening and treatments. Several studies have undertaken to identify the factors leading to this disparity in United States with possible effects of lower socioeconomic status and underlying aggressive biology.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was done using a prospectively maintained database of a metropolitan health system. Patients were selected based on diagnosis of early-stage breast cancer between 10/1998 and 02/2017, and included women over age of 18 with clinically node-negative disease. Patients were then stratified by phenotype confirmed by pathology and patient-identified race.

RESULTS

A total of 2,298 women were identified in the cohort with 39% AA and 61% WA women. The overall mean age at the time of diagnosis for AA women was slightly younger at 60 years compared to 62 years for WA women (p = 0.003). Follow-up time was longer for the WA women at 95 months vs. 86 months in AA women. The overall 5-year survival was analyzed for the entire cohort, with the lowest survival occurring in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Phenotype distribution revealed a higher incidence of TNBC in AA women compared to WA women (AA 16% vs. WA 10%; p < 0.0001). AA women also had higher incidence of HER2 positive cancers (AA 16.8% vs. WA 15.3%; p < 0.0001). WA women had a significantly higher distribution of Non-TNBC/HER2-negative phenotype (AA 55% vs. WA 65%; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, a subgroup analysis was done for a sentinel lymph node (SLN) negative cohort that showed higher rates of grade 3 tumors in AA (AA 35% vs. WA 23%; p < 0.0001); and higher rates of grade 1 and grade 2 tumors in WA (30% vs. 21% and 44% vs. 40%). Despite higher grade tumors in AA women, five-year overall survival outcomes in SLN-negative cohort did not differ between AA and WA women when stratifying based on tumor subtype.

CONCLUSION

Breast cancer survival disparities in AA and WA women with SLN-negative breast cancer are diminished when evaluated at early-stage cancers defined by SLN-negative tumors. Our evaluation suggests that when diagnosed early, phenotype does not contribute to racial survival outcomes. The lower survival rate in AA women with breast cancer may be attributed to later stage biology between the two races, or underlying socioeconomic disparities.

A comparison of complete pathologic response rates following neoadjuvant chemotherapy among South African breast cancer patients with and without concurrent HIV infection

PURPOSE

Among patients diagnosed with breast cancer (BC), women also living with HIV (WLWH) have worse survival than women without HIV. Chronic HIV infection may interfere with the effectiveness of BC treatment, contributing to this disparity. We attempted to determine the impact of HIV infection on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) among South African women with BC.

METHODS

We evaluated women from the South African Breast Cancer and HIV Outcomes cohort study who had stage I-III disease, initiated NACT, underwent definitive breast surgery, and had available surgical pathology reports. We compared pathologic complete response (pCR) rates among women with and without HIV infection, using multivariable logistic regression to control for differences in tumor characteristics. We also evaluated the impact of HIV infection on pCR within subgroups based on patient and tumor factors.

RESULTS

Of 715 women, the 173 (24.2%) WLWH were less likely to achieve pCR than women without HIV (8.7% vs 16.4%, [odds ratio (OR) 0.48, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.27-0.86]). WLWH continued to have lower likelihood of achieving pCR on multivariable analysis (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.98). A similar pattern was seen within subgroups, although HIV infection appeared to affect pCR more in ER/PR-positive BC (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.08-0.71) than in ER/PR-negative BC (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.39-2.29).

CONCLUSION

WLWH were less like to achieve pCR following NACT for BC than women without HIV. This reduced response to systemic therapy may contribute to the poorer BC outcomes seen in WLWH.

CLCA2 expression is associated with survival among African American women with triple negative breast cancer

Purpose

Black/African American (AA) women are twice as likely to be diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) compared to whites, an aggressive breast cancer subtype associated with poor prognosis. There are no routinely used targeted clinical therapies for TNBC; thus there is a clear need to identify prognostic markers and potential therapeutic targets.

Methods

We evaluated expression of 27,016 genes in 155 treatment-naïve TN tumors from AA women in Detroit. Associations with survival were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for stage and age at diagnosis, and p-values were corrected using a false discovery rate. Our validation sample consisted of 494 TN tumors using four publically available data sets. Meta-analyses were performed using summary statistics from the four validation results.

Results

In the Detroit AA cohort, CLCA2 [Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31–1.86, nominal p = 5.1x10-7, FDR p = 0.014], SPIC [HR = 1.47, 95%CI 1.26–1.73, nominal p = 1.8x10-6, FDR p = 0.022], and MIR4311 [HR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.31–1.92, nominal p = 2.5x10-5, FDR p = 0.022] expression were associated with overall survival. Further adjustment for treatment and breast cancer specific survival analysis did not substantially alter effect estimates. CLCA2 was also associated with increased risk of death in the validation cohorts [HR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.05–1.24, p = 0.038, p-heterogeneity = 0.88].

Conclusions

We identified CLCA2 as a potential prognostic marker for TNBC in AA women.

Prolactin receptor expression as a novel prognostic biomarker for triple negative breast cancer patients

Prolactin receptor (PRLR) is a novel emerging prognostic biomarker in different cancers, especially in breast cancer. However, there is limited information about the association of PRLR expression and triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) prognosis. In this study, 80 TNBC patients were evaluated for PRLR expression by immunohistochemistry. The correlation of PRLR expression with clinicopathological features, patient recurrence, and survival was investigated. PRLR expression was considered positive if >10% of tumor cells were stained. The Fisher's exact test was used to analyze PRLR expression relation with the clinicopathological parameters. Survival distribution was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Positive immunoreactivity for PRLR was observed in 50 out of 80 (62%) specimens. Although expression of PRLR was associated with TNBC patients' stage, no-correlation was observed between its expression and tumor size, grade, lymph node status, and Ki-67 expression. In addition, patients with positive expression of PRLR exhibited lower recurrence (P = 0.0027) and higher overall survival (P = 0.0285) in comparison with negative expression group. In multivariate analyses, positive expression of PRLR was an independent prognostic marker for lower recurrence (P < 0.001) and higher overall survival (P < 0.001). Therefore, PRLR plays a crucial role in TNBC and has to be considered as an independent prognostic biomarker for TNBC patients.

Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Hispanic/Latino (H/L) Women With Local or Locally Advanced Triple-negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)

BACKGROUND/AIM

The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy of neoadjuvant and chemotherapy (NACT) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in Hispanic/Latino (H/L) women with TNBC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed the charts of patients with TNBC, stages I-III, treated at TTUHSC from 2006 to 2016. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were estimated and compared between the treatment groups. Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were conducted to estimate unadjusted and adjusted effects of NACT compared to ACT.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients with TNBC, 30 (29%) received NACT and 74 (71%) ACT. Women undergoing NACT were younger, with a mean age of 50.8 years. Of the 30 patients who received NACT, 12 (40%) had pathologically complete response (pCR). Women who achieved pCR had an excellent RFS (HR=0.5, p=0.001). Women with residual cancer after NACT had worse outcome compared to patients who received ACT (HR=1.7, p=0.005).

CONCLUSION

pCR to NACT is a powerful surrogate for OS in H/L women with TNBC.

Identification of new cancer stem cell markers and signaling pathways in HER‑2‑positive breast cancer by transcriptome sequencing

Human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)‑2‑positive breast cancer accounts for ~25% of all breast cancer cases, has a high propensity for relapse, metastasis and drug resistance, and is associated with a poor prognosis. Therefore, it is necessary to develop more effective therapeutic targets for the treatment of HER‑2‑positive breast cancer. CD44+/CD24‑/low is currently the most commonly used marker for breast cancer stem cells (CSCs), which are considered the main cause of drug resistance, relapse and metastasis. In the present study, the ratio of CD44+/CD24‑/low cells was almost zero in SK‑BR‑3 cells; however, it was >90% in MDA‑MB‑231 cells, as determined by flow cytometry. Since SK‑BR‑3 and MDA‑MB‑231 cells both exhibit a strong propensity for invasion and migration, it was hypothesized that there may be other markers of CSCs in SK‑BR‑3 cells. Therefore, transcriptome sequencing was performed for SK‑BR‑3 and MDA‑MB‑231 cells. It was observed that several leukocyte differentiation antigens and other CSC markers were significantly more highly expressed in SK‑BR‑3 cells. Furthermore, the expression of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH)1A3, CD164 and epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) was higher in SK‑BR‑3 cells compared with in other subtypes of breast cell lines, as determined by reverse transcription‑polymerase chain reaction and western blot analysis. In addition, the expression levels of ALDH1A3, ALDH3B2 and EpCAM were higher in HER‑2‑positive breast cancer compared with in paracancerous tissues and other subtypes of breast cancer, as determined by immunohistochemistry. The expression of β‑catenin in the Wnt signaling pathway was lower in SK‑BR‑3 cells compared with in MDA‑MB‑231 cells, which may be used as a prognostic indicator for breast cancer. These findings may help identify novel CSC markers and therapeutic targets for HER‑2‑positive breast cancer.

Recent therapeutic trends and promising targets in triple negative breast cancer

Breast cancer accounts for 25% of all types of cancer in women, and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) comprises around 15~20% of breast cancers. Conventional chemotherapy and radiation are the primary systemic therapeutic strategies; no other FDA-approved targeted therapies are yet available as for TNBC. TNBC is generally characterized by a poor prognosis and high rates of proliferation and metastases. Due to these aggressive features and lack of targeted therapies, numerous attempts have been made to discover viable molecular targets for TNBC. Massive cohort studies, clinical trials, and in-depth analyses have revealed diverse molecular alterations in TNBC; however, controversy exists as to whether many of these changes are beneficial or detrimental in caner progression. Here we review the complicated tumorigenic processes and discuss critical findings and therapeutic trends in TNBC with a focus on promising therapeutic approaches, the clinical trials currently underway, and potent experimental compounds under preclinical and evaluation.

Triple-negative breast cancer: Pattern of recurrence and survival outcomes

Introduction: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer which is defined as the absence of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression by immunohistochemistry. As the survival data on TNBC in the Indian population are scant, this study was done to analyze the clinicopathological features and clinical outcomes of TNBC patients. Materials and Methods: Data from medical records of patients with breast cancer between 2009 and 2014 were retrieved, and patients with TNBC were identified and analyzed for demographic and clinicopathological features. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 1024 breast cancer patients were registered at our institute during the study period, of which 198 were TNBCs accounting for 19.3% of all breast cancers. Median age at the diagnosis was 50 years (range, 22–78 years). Lymph nodal positivity in TNBC was associated with larger tumor size (P = 0.003) and higher tumor grade (P = 0.01). At a median follow-up of 48 months (range, 12–88), 36 (19.1%) patients had recurrence of the disease, whereas 28 (14%) patients were lost to follow-up. Lung (52.7%) was the most common site of recurrence followed by bone (25%) and brain (11.1%). Three-year DFS and OS were 63.2% and 65.6%, respectively. On univariate analysis, nodal status, size of tumor, and lymphovascular invasion were found to have a significant impact on OS and DFS. On multivariate analysis, only nodal status was significant for DFS and OS (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: TNBCs have a rapid clinical course, and early recurrences are common inspite of timely medical intervention which reflects the aggressive tumor biology. This warrants further studies on intensification of chemotherapy and identification and development of targeted therapy aimed at decreasing recurrences and improving survival in this patient population.

Potential Management of Circulating Tumor DNA as a Biomarker in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

As a specific subtype of breast cancer, Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with worse prognosis and higher tumor aggressiveness than HER2-amplified or hormone receptor positive breast cancers. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), as a non-invasive “liquid biopsy”, is an emerging original blood-based biomarker for early breast cancer diagnosis, monitoring treatment response, and determining prognosis. In TNBC patients, ctDNA has an inherent tendency to characterize tumor heterogeneity and metastasis-specific mutations providing a key alternative to tumor tissue profiling. Several studies have already demonstrated the potential of ctDNA in TNBC patients from early to advanced stages of the disease including diagnosis, therapy decisions and assessment of prognosis. This review provides a critical brief summary of the evidence that gives credence to the utility of ctDNA as a biomarker for its role into clinical management in TNBC.

Nomogram for predicting survival in triple-negative breast cancer patients with histology of infiltrating duct carcinoma: a population-based study

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents around 15%-20% of newly diagnosed breast cancer and is more aggressive than other breast cancer sub-types. Infiltrating duct carcinoma (IDC) is the most common type of TNBC. Nomogram is a valuable tool for prognosis prediction by integrating different biological and clinical variables. The purpose of current study was to evaluate the prognostic value of clinical factors of TNBC patients with IDC histology type and construct nomograms for their outcome prediction. The cohort was selected from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression model to evaluate the prognostic value of involved variables. Nomogram was constructed from the multivariate logistic regression model to combine all the prognostic factors to predict the 1-year and 3-year prognosis of TNBC patients with histology of IDC. Internal validation of nomogram was tested by discrimination and calibration. We identified 14,538 patients with the median and max survival time was 28 months and 59 months, respectively. There were 1,592 deaths, accounting for 10.9% of the cohort. Multivariate analyses showed that grade, tumor stage, tumor size, regional nodes positive, marital status, experience of radiotherapy or chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors of IDC of TNBC. Eleven variables were combined to construct 1-year and 3-year nomograms. It was revealed that the C-index of the nomograms was 0.763 and the calibration curves showed good agreement between the nomogram prediction and actual observation. Current study was the first one to construct nomograms of TNBC patients with IDC histology, which could help physicians to identify patients at high risk for intensive treatment or follow-up.

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Race and Survival

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer with a high prevalence in blacks. South Carolina demographically has a high percentage of blacks. This study examines survival and recurrence associated with TNBC in black and white women. A retrospective review of breast cancer patients within the Palmetto Health Cancer Registry was performed from 1999 to 2015. Patient demographics and tumor characteristics were collected and correlated with outcomes. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed. The total number of breast cancer patients in the registry was 1723 (1085—white and 638—black). The median follow-up was 48.4 months. The majority of cancers diagnosed in both cohorts were early stage (I, IIA, IIB, 93.4% vs 90.4% P = NS). We identified 332 patients with TNBC. Of those 332 patients, 144 (43.4%) were whites and 188 (56.6%) were blacks. Older age (P = 0.01), high-grade (P < 0.001), and black race (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with TNBC on multivariate analysis. Five- and 10-year OS was significantly worse in blacks with TNBC (P < 0.001). There was no difference in DSS or RFS between the two cohorts. TNBC disproportionately affects black women and is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer with limited treatment options compared with receptor-positive breast cancer. Black patients with TNBC in our study had statistically worse OS. These findings are similar to what has been reported in the literature and prompts further research in newer targeted therapies.

Race is associated with completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Completion of prescribed neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer is paramount to patients obtaining full benefit from the treatment; however, factors affecting neoadjuvant chemotherapy completion are not known. We hypothesized that race is a predictor of completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

All patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy 2009-2016 at a single institution were stratified by completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and by race. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify patient and tumor characteristics that affected the rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy completion.

RESULTS

A total of 92 (74%) of 124 patients completed their prescribed neoadjuvant chemotherapy. On univariate analysis, white patients were more likely to complete neoadjuvant chemotherapy than non-white patients (76% vs 50%, P = .006). Non-white patients were more likely to have government insurance and larger prechemotherapy tumors (both, P < .05), but these factors were not associated with rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy completion. After controlling for age, insurance status, tumor size, and estrogen receptor status, whites remained associated with completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR 3.65, P = .014).

CONCLUSION

At our institution, white patients with breast cancer were more likely than non-white patients to complete neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Further investigation into the underlying factors impacting this disparity is needed.

The influence of marital status and race/ethnicity on risk of mortality for triple negative breast cancer

Purpose

To assess the effect of marital status and the role of race/ethnicity on breast cancer specific mortality in women with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Methods

The study utilized the California Cancer Registry to identify 22,812 cases of first primary female TNBC. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier breast cancer specific survival was computed. Cox Proportional Hazards modeling was used to compute the adjusted risk of breast cancer specific mortality for women who were single, separated, divorced, and widowed when compared with women who were married. Models were adjusted for age, stage, tumor grade, SES, and treatment with surgery, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and radiation therapy. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported.

Results

Separated (HR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.14–2.01) and widowed (HR: 1.39; 95%CI: 1.23–1.57) white women had a higher risk of mortality than white married women whereas single and divorced white women had the same risk of mortality. For Asian/Pacific Islanders (API), only single (HR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.17–2.06) and divorced (HR:1.81; 95% CI:1.26–2.60) women had a higher risk of mortality than married women. Marital status had no influence on risk of mortality for either black or Hispanic women.

Conclusions

The risk of mortality associated with marital status is dependent on race/ethnicity. Only white and API women with TNBC have a marital advantage.

Breast surgery for metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Metastatic breast cancer is not a curable disease, but women with metastatic disease are living longer. Surgery to remove the primary tumour is associated with an increased survival in other types of metastatic cancer. Breast surgery is not standard treatment for metastatic disease, however several recent retrospective studies have suggested that breast surgery could increase the women's survival. These studies have methodological limitations including selection bias. A systematic review mapping all randomised controlled trials addressing the benefits and potential harms of breast surgery is ideal to answer this question.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of breast surgery in women with metastatic breast cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted searches using the MeSH terms 'breast neoplasms', 'mastectomy', and 'analysis, survival' in the following databases: the Cochrane Breast Cancer Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE (by PubMed) and Embase (by OvidSP) on 22 February 2016. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov (22 February 2016) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (24 February 2016). We conducted an additional search in the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) conference proceedings in July 2016 that included reference checking, citation searching, and contacting study authors to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

The inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials of women with metastatic breast cancer at initial diagnosis comparing breast surgery plus systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone. The primary outcomes were overall survival and quality of life. Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (local and distant control), breast cancer-specific survival, and toxicity from local therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently conducted trial selection, data extraction, and 'Risk of bias' assessment (using Cochrane's 'Risk of bias' tool), which a third review author checked. We used the GRADE tool to assess the quality of the body of evidence. We used the risk ratio (RR) to measure the effect of treatment for dichotomous outcomes and the hazard ratio (HR) for time-to-event outcomes. We calculated 95% confidence intervals (CI) for these measures. We used the random-effects model, as we expected clinical or methodological heterogeneity, or both, among the included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

We included two trials enrolling 624 women in the review. It is uncertain whether breast surgery improves overall survival as the quality of the evidence has been assessed as very low (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.31; 2 studies; 624 women). The two studies did not report quality of life. Breast surgery may improve local progression-free survival (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.57; 2 studies; 607 women; low-quality evidence), while it probably worsened distant progression-free survival (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.86; 1 study; 350 women; moderate-quality evidence). The two included studies did not measure breast cancer-specific survival. Toxicity from local therapy was reported by 30-day mortality and did not appear to differ between the two groups (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.14 to 6.90; 1 study; 274 women; low-quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on existing evidence from two randomised clinical trials, it is not possible to make definitive conclusions on the benefits and risks of breast surgery associated with systemic treatment for women diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer. Until the ongoing clinical trials are finalised, the decision to perform breast surgery in these women should be individualised and shared between the physician and the patient considering the potential risks, benefits, and costs of each intervention.

Treatment Patterns Among Women Diagnosed With Stage I-III Triple-negative Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine contemporary treatment patterns for women diagnosed with stage I-III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in the United States.

METHODS

We identified 48,961 patients diagnosed with stage I-III TNBC from 2010 to 2013 in the National Cancer Data Base and created 3 treatment subcohorts (definitive locoregional therapy [appropriate local therapy, including surgery/radiation], adjuvant chemotherapy [stage II-III disease or stage I tumors with tumor size ≥1 cm], and adjuvant chemotherapy for small tumors [stage I tumors with tumor size <1 cm and node negative]). We performed descriptive analyses, calculated percentages for treatment receipt, and used multivariable modified Poisson regression models to estimate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) predicting receipt of treatments.

RESULTS

Older age, larger tumor size, positive nodal status, and Southern/Pacific US regions, but not race/ethnicity, were strongly associated with a lower probability of receiving definitive locoregional therapy. Older age was also strongly associated with lower likelihood of adjuvant chemotherapy receipt, as were grade, negative nodal status, and higher comorbidity. For example, compared with women aged 18 to 39 years, those aged 75 to 90 years were 17% less likely to receive definitive locoregional therapy (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.88), and 62% less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (RR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.35-0.41). Age, tumor grade, tumor size, and comorbidity score were also independently associated with receipt of chemotherapy for women with small TNBC.

CONCLUSIONS

Advancing age but not race/ethnicity was associated with lower likelihood of recommended treatment receipt among women with TNBC. Although omission of therapy among older patients with breast cancer may be appropriate in the case of smaller and lower risk TNBC, some were likely undertreated.

The natural compound Jatrophone interferes with Wnt/β-catenin signaling and inhibits proliferation and EMT in human triple-negative breast cancer

Metastatic breast cancer is the leading cause of worldwide cancer-related deaths among women. Triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) are highly metastatic and are devoid of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification. TNBCs are unresponsive to Herceptin and/or anti-estrogen therapies and too often become highly chemoresistant when exposed to standard chemotherapy. TNBCs frequently metastasize to the lung and brain. We have previously shown that TNBCs are active for oncogenic Wnt10b/β-catenin signaling and that WNT10B ligand and its downstream target HMGA2 are predictive of poorer outcomes and are strongly associated with chemoresistant TNBC metastatic disease. In search of new chemicals to target the oncogenic WNT10B/β-CATENIN/HMGA2 signaling axis, the anti-proliferative activity of the diterpene Jatrophone (JA), derived from the plant Jatropha isabelli, was tested on TNBC cells. JA interfered with the WNT TOPFLASH reporter at the level between receptor complex and β-catenin activation. JA efficacy was determined in various subtypes of TNBC conventional cell lines or in TNBC cell lines derived from TNBC PDX tumors. The differential IC₅₀ (DCI₅₀) responsiveness was compared among the TNBC models based on etiological-subtype and their cellular chemoresistance status. Elevated WNT10B expression also coincided with increased resistance to JA exposure in several metastatic cell lines. JA interfered with cell cycle progression, and induced loss of expression of the canonical Wnt-direct targets genes AXIN2, HMGA2, MYC, PCNA and CCND1. Mechanistically, JA reduced steady-state, non-phosphorylated (activated) β-catenin protein levels, but not total β-catenin levels. JA also caused the loss of expression of key EMT markers and significantly impaired wound healing in scratch assays, suggesting a direct role for JA inhibiting migration of TNBC cells. These results indicate that Jatrophone could be a powerful new chemotherapeutic agent against highly chemoresistant triple negative breast cancers by targeting the oncogenic Wnt10b/β-catenin signaling pathway.

The survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and pCR among patients with advanced stage triple negative breast cancer

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype that accounts for 15-20% of cases, with a higher incidence of relapse/death. Even with adjuvant chemotherapy, the 5 year distant metastasis-free survival rate remains low. A total of 452 tumor registry patients with TNBC and no evidence of metastatic disease were identified over the period of 1996-2011. The median age and follow-up time were 51 (range=21-88) and 3.9 (range=0.14-14) years. Approximately 75% of patients with stage III disease received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) compared with 47% for stage II. Patients with stage I disease predominantly received adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). Among those who underwent NACT (n=202), 33% had a pathological complete response (pCR). Overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival were significantly longer among patients achieving pCR (versus residual disease) following NACT (OS: all patients P<0.0001, stage II P<0.0001, stage III P=0.0062; DFS: all patients P<0.0001, stage II P=0.0011, stage III P=0.015). ACT was not associated with improved OS or DFS for stage III disease. Adjustment for age, chemotherapy, health insurance type, lymphovascular invasion, race, radiation, and surgery did not alter our results. These findings suggest that pCR following NACT is associated with improved survival among patients with TNBC, independent of diagnostic stage.

Obesity and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Disparities, Controversies, and Biology

Once considered a problem of Western nations, obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m²) has rapidly increased since the 1970s to become a major threat to world health. Since 1970, the face of obesity has changed from a disease of affluence and abundance to a disease of poverty. During the last 10 years, studies have mechanistically linked obesity and an obese tumor microenvironment with signaling pathways that predict aggressive breast cancer biology. For example, in the United States, African American women are more likely than non-Hispanic European American women to be obese and to be diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In 2008, the Carolina Breast Study found that obesity (increased waist/hip ratio) was linked to an increased incidence of TNBC in premenopausal and postmenopausal African American women. Subsequently, several groups have investigated the potential link between obesity and TNBC in African American women. To date, the data are complex and sometimes contradictory. We review epidemiologic studies that investigated the potential association among obesity, metabolic syndrome, and TNBC in African American women and mechanistic studies that link insulin signaling to the obese breast microenvironment, tissue inflammation, and aggressive TNBC biology.

Obesity and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Disparities, Controversies, and Biology

Once considered a problem of Western nations, obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m²) has rapidly increased since the 1970s to become a major threat to world health. Since 1970, the face of obesity has changed from a disease of affluence and abundance to a disease of poverty. During the last 10 years, studies have mechanistically linked obesity and an obese tumor microenvironment with signaling pathways that predict aggressive breast cancer biology. For example, in the United States, African American women are more likely than non-Hispanic European American women to be obese and to be diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In 2008, the Carolina Breast Study found that obesity (increased waist/hip ratio) was linked to an increased incidence of TNBC in premenopausal and postmenopausal African American women. Subsequently, several groups have investigated the potential link between obesity and TNBC in African American women. To date, the data are complex and sometimes contradictory. We review epidemiologic studies that investigated the potential association among obesity, metabolic syndrome, and TNBC in African American women and mechanistic studies that link insulin signaling to the obese breast microenvironment, tissue inflammation, and aggressive TNBC biology.

African American patients with breast cancer have worse prognosis than white patients in certain subtypes and stages

PURPOSE

Racial disparity of breast cancer in each subtype and substage is not clear.

METHODS

We reviewed 156,938 patients with breast cancer from 2010 to 2012 from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Breast cancer was subtyped by hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) status as HR+/HER2-, HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2+, and HR-/HER2-.

RESULTS

African American (AA) patients had worse overall survival (OS) and breast cancer cause-specific survival (BCSS) in HR+/HER2- stages III and IV breast cancer and HR-/HER2+ stage IV cancer; they had worse OS but not BCSS in HR+ /HER2- stage II cancer and HR-/HER2- stage II cancer.

CONCLUSION

AA patients with breast cancer had worse survival in certain subtype and stage, especially in ER+ breast cancer.

Clinical predictors of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer

The response of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) to chemotherapy is heterogeneous; particular subtype classifications based on mRNA gene expression analysis have been demonstrated to be associated with a pathological complete response (pCR). The aim of the present study was to investigate additional clinical and pathological characteristics associated with pCR status. The pathological and clinical characteristics of 40 TNBC patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery were retrospectively analyzed by dividing the cases into two groups according to the response to treatment: pCR (n=12) and non-pCR (n=28). Clinically, patients in the pCR group presented tumors with a significantly less advanced Tumor-Node-Metastasis stage (P=0.030) and mammographic calcification was less common (17 vs. 58%; P=0.034). Pathologically, whereas all cases in the pCR group (12/12, 100%) were of the histological type ‘invasive ductal carcinoma, not otherwise specified’ (IDC-NOS), the non-pCR group consisted of a lower proportion of IDC-NOS cases (20/28, 71%) and more cases of special histological types, including mucinous, metaplastic, medullary and apocrine carcinomas (P=0.079). The positive rates of androgen receptor (AR) and forkhead-box A1 (FOXA1) tended to be lower in the pCR group (AR, 0 vs. 29%, P=0.079; FOXA1, 8 vs. 29%, P=0.233). The Ki-67 score was significantly higher in the pCR group than in the non-pCR group (P=0.041). The results suggest that patients with TNBC who present with clinically less advanced tumors and less frequent mammographic calcification are more likely to respond to chemotherapy. From a pathological standpoint, IDC-NOS type, negative AR status and higher Ki-67 scores may be associated with chemotherapy sensitivity.

Differences in the mutational landscape of triple-negative breast cancer in African Americans and Caucasians

BACKGROUND

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) occurs at higher frequency in African Americans compared with Caucasians. It is unclear if the biology of TNBC is different in African American versus Caucasians. In this study, we sought to evaluate racial differences in the molecular pathology of TNBC.

METHODS

Using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas, we identified TNBC patients with information on race. We analyzed differences in clinical characteristics, tumor somatic mutations, and gene expression patterns by race from whole exome and microarray data.

RESULTS

1104 patients were identified, of which 178 had TNBC. TNBC was more frequent in African Americans than Caucasians (33.3 vs 14.9%). Although more African Americans than Caucasians overall were classified as basal-like from PAM50 gene expression (34.8 vs 16.1%), no differences in the TNBC cohort were observed. Median tumor somatic mutation counts were higher in African Americans versus Caucasians (39.5 vs 34), but no racial differences in the mutation counts in TNBC were observed. Somatic mutation analysis revealed racial differences in specific high prevalence genes in all patients (TP53 46% in African Americans vs 27% in Caucasians; PIK3CA 23% in African Americans vs 34% in Caucasians; and MLL3 12% in African Americans vs 6% in Caucasians). TNBC patients did not have any specific high prevalence genes associated with racial differences. There were no racial differences in gene expression patterns in selected genes involved in breast cancer biology. Overall, African Americans had shorter TTP and worse DFS. Racial differences in clinical outcomes were not observed in TNBC.

CONCLUSION

The mutational landscape of TNBC is similar between African Americans and Caucasians. The higher frequency of TNBC in African Americans is therefore not associated with a different genomic profile of commonly established tumor regulatory pathway genes. Other modifiable factors may exist that contribute to the racial disparity in TNBC.

Failure patterns and survival outcomes in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): a 15 year comparison of 448 non-Hispanic black and white women

PURPOSE

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a distinct subtype of breast cancer with unique pathologic, molecular and clinical behavior. It occurs more frequently in young blacks and has been reported to have a shorter disease-free interval. We undertook this study to analyze the demographic characteristics, failure patterns, and survival outcomes in this disease.

METHODS

A total of 448 non-Hispanic black and white women were identified over a 15 year period from 1996 to 2011. Demographic and clinical information including age, race, menopausal status, stage, tumor characteristics, and treatments were collected. Fisher's exact test and multivariable Cox regression were used to compare failure patterns and survival outcomes between races.

RESULTS

49 % (n = 223) were black. 59 % patients were between 41 and 60 years, with 18 % ≤40 years. 57 % were premenopausal and 89 % had grade 3 tumors. Stage II (47 %) was most frequent stage at diagnosis followed by stage III (28 %). 32 % had lymphovascular invasion. Adjusting for age, stage, and grade, there was no difference in survival outcomes (OS, DFS, LFFS, and DFFS) between the two races. 62 (14 %) patients failed locally either in ipsilateral breast or chest wall, and 19 (4 %) failed in the regional lymphatics. Lung (18 %) was the most frequent distant failure site with <12 % each failing in brain, liver and bones.

CONCLUSION

Failure patterns and survival outcomes did not differ by race in this large collection of TNBC cases. Lung was the predominate site of distant failure followed by brain, bone, and liver. Few patients failed in the regional lymphatics.

Morphological and pathological response in primary systemic therapy of patients with breast cancer and the prediction of disease free survival: a single center observational study

Aim

To identify breast cancer subtypes likely to respond to primary systemic therapy (PST or neoadjuvant therapy) and to assess the accuracy of physical examination (PE) and breast ultrasonography (US) in evaluating and predicting residual size of breast carcinoma following PST.

Methods

116 patients who received at least two cycles of PST between 1998 and 2009 were selected from a prospectively collected clinical database. Radiological assessment was done by mammography and US. Prior to PST, tumors were subclassified according to core biopsy (NCB) and/or fine-needle aspiration-based immunohistochemical profiles of NCB. Pathological response rates were assessed following the surgeries by using Chevallier classification. Tumor measurements by PE and US were obtained before and after PST. Different clinical measurements were compared with histological findings. Disease-free survival (DFS) was assessed.

Results

Pathological complete remission (pCR = Chevallier I/II) was observed in 25 patients (21.5%), 44% of whom had triple negative histology, 28% Her2 positive and 76% had high-grade tumor. Of 116 patients, 24 received taxane-based PST, 48 combined taxane + anthracycline treatment, 8 trastuzumab combinations, 21 anthracycline-based treatments, and 15 other treatments. In the taxane treated group, the pCR rate was 30%, in the taxane + anthracycline group 25%, in the anthracycline group 9.5%, and in trastuzumab group 37.5%. After PST, PE and US were both significantly associated with pathology (P < 0.001 and P = 0.004, respectively). Concerning OS, significant difference was observed between the Chevallier III and IV group (P = 0.031) in favor of Chevallier III group. In the pCR group, fewer events were observed during the follow-up period.

Conclusions

Our results show that even limited, routinely used immunohistochemical profiling of tumors can predict the likelihood of pCR to PST: patients with triple negative and Her2-positive cancers are more likely to achieve pCR to PST. Also, PE is better correlated with pathological findings than US.

Racial Differences in the Use and Outcome of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Results From the National Cancer Data Base

PURPOSE

To explore racial differences in the use and outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base was queried to identify women with stage 1 to 3 breast cancer diagnosed in 2010 and 2011. Chemotherapy use and rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) was determined for various racial/ethnic groups.

RESULTS

Of 278,815 patients with known race and ethnicity, 127,417 (46%) received chemotherapy, and of 121,446 where the timing of chemotherapy was known, 27,300 (23%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in particular, was given more frequently to black, Hispanic, and Asian women than to white women (P < 0.001). This difference was largely explained by more advanced stage, higher grade tumors, and a greater proportion of triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive tumors in these women. Of 17,970 patients with known outcome, 5,944 (33%) had a pCR. No differences in response rate for estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)-positive tumors were found, but compared with white women, black but not Hispanic or Asian women had a lower rate of pCR for ER/PR-negative, HER2-positive (43% v 54%, P = 0.001) and triple-negative tumors (37% v 43%, P < 0.001). This difference persisted when adjusted for age, clinical T stage, clinical N stage, histology, grade, comorbidity index, facility type, geographic region, insurance status, and census-derived median income and education for the patient's zip code (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.93).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is given more frequently to black, Hispanic, and Asian women than to white women. Black women have a lower likelihood of pCR for triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer. Whether this is due to biologic differences in chemosensitivity or to treatment or socioeconomic differences that could not be adjusted for is unknown.

Triple-negative breast cancer in African-American women: disparities versus biology

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype that disproportionately affects BRCA1 mutation carriers and young women of African origin. There is evidence that African-American women with TNBC have worse clinical outcomes than women of European descent. However, it is unclear whether survival differences persist after adjusting for disparities in access to health-care treatment, co-morbid disease and income. It remains controversial whether TNBC in African-American women is a molecularly distinct disease or whether African-American women have a higher incidence of aggressive biology driven by disparities: there is evidence in support of both. Understanding the relative contributions of biology and disparities is essential for improving the poor survival rate of African-American women with TNBC.

Race, response to chemotherapy, and outcome within clinical breast cancer subtypes

The effect of race on breast cancer outcome is confounded by tumor and treatment heterogeneity. We examined a cohort of women with stage II-III breast cancer treated uniformly with neoadjuvant chemotherapy to identify factors associated with racial differences in chemotherapeutic response and long-term survival. Using a prospective database, we identified women with stage II-III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy from 1998 to 2011. Race was categorized as African-American (AA) or non-AA. Preplanned subtype analyses were stratified by hormone receptor (HR) and HER2. Pathologic response to chemotherapy (pCR), time to recurrence (TTR), and overall survival (OS) were assessed using logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. Of 349 women identified, 102 (29 %) were AA, who were younger (p = 0.03), more obese (p < 0.001), and less likely to have HR+/HER2- tumors (p = 0.01). No significant differences in pCR rate by race were found. At median follow-up of 6.5 years, AA had worse TTR (hazard ratio 1.51, 95 % CI 1.02-2.24), which was attenuated in multivariable modeling, and there was no significant difference in OS. When stratified by HR, worse outcomes were limited to HR+AA (TTR hazard ratio 1.85, 95 % CI 1.09-3.14; OS hazard ratio 2.42 95 % CI 1.37-4.28), which remained significant in multivariable analysis including pCR rate and BMI. With long-term follow-up, racial disparity in outcome was limited to HR+ breast cancer, with no apparent contribution of chemotherapy sensitivity. This suggests that disparity root causes may be driven by HR+ factors such as unmeasured molecular differences, endocrine therapy sensitivity, or adherence.

Epidemiology, biology, and treatment of triple-negative breast cancer in women of African ancestry

Breast cancer incidence is increasing worldwide, and breast cancer-related mortality is highest in women of African ancestry, who are more likely to have basal-like or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) than are women of European ancestry. Identification of cultural, epidemiological, and genetic risk factors that predispose women of African ancestry to TNBC is an active area of research. Despite the aggressive behaviour of TNBC, achievement of a pathological complete response with chemotherapy is associated with good long-term survival outcomes, and sensitivity to chemotherapy does not seem to differ according to ethnic origin. Discovery of the molecular signalling molecules that define TNBC heterogeneity has led to the development of targeted agents such as inhibitors of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 and mTOR and immunomodulatory drugs that are in the early stages of clinical testing. First, we summarise the existing published work on the differences reported on the epidemiology, biology, and response to systemic treatment of TNBC between women of African ancestry and white women, and identify some gaps in knowledge. Second, we review the opportunities for development of new therapeutic agents in view of the potential high clinical relevance for patients with TNBC irrespective of race or ethnic origin.

The Outcome of Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer: The Turkish Oncology Group Experience

OBJECTIVE

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is generally considered as a poorer prognostic subgroup, with propensity for earlier relapse and visceral involvement. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of non-metastatic TNBC patients from different centers in Turkey and identify clinical and pathologic variables that may effect survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1993-2007, from five different centers in Turkey, 316 nonmetastatic triple negative breast cancer patients were identified with follow-up of at least 12 months. The data was collected retrospectively from patient charts. The prognostic impact of several clinical variables were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier and Cox multivariate anayses.

RESULTS

Mean age at diagnosis was 49 years (range: 24-82). The majority of the patient group had invasive ductal carcinoma (n: 260, 82.3%) and stage II disease (n: 164; 51.9%). Majority of the patients (87.7%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. 5 year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 84.6% and 71.6%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed locally advanced disease (p: 0.001), advanced pathological stage (p: 0.021), larger tumor size (T1&T2 vs T3&T4) (p<0.001), nodal positivity (p: 0.006), and extensive nodal involvement (p<0.001) as significant factors for DFS; whereas, advanced pathological stage (p: 0.017), extensive nodal involvement (p<0.001) and larger tumor size (p: 0,001) and presence of breast cancer-affected member in the family (p=0.05) were identified as prognostic factors with an impact on OS. Multivariate analysis revealed larger tumor size (T3&T4 vs T1&T2) and presence of lymph node metastases (node-positive vs node-negative) as significant independent prognostic factors for DFS (Hazard ratio (HR): 3.03, 95% CI: 1.71-5.35, p<0.001 and HR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.05-3.0, p=0.03, respectively). Higher tumor stage was the only independent factor affecting overall survival (HR: 2.81; 95% CI, 1.27-6.22, p=0.01).

CONCLUSION

The outcome of patients with TNBC in this cohort is comparable to other studies including TNBC patients. Tumor size and presence of lymph node metastasis are the major independent factors that have effect on DFS, however higher tumor stage was the only negative prognostic factor for OS.

Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation, tumor subtypes, and causes of death after non-metastatic invasive breast cancer diagnosis: a multilevel competing-risk analysis

The purpose of this study is to examine the associations of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype with causes of death [breast cancer (BC)-specific and non-BC-specific] among non-metastatic invasive BC patients. We identified 3,312 patients younger than 75 years (mean age 53.5 years; 621 [18.8 %] TNBC) with first primary BC treated at an academic medical center from 1999 to 2010. We constructed a census-tract-level socioeconomic deprivation index using the 2000 U.S. Census data and performed a multilevel competing-risk analysis to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) of BC-specific and non-BC-specific mortality associated with neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and TNBC subtype. The adjusted models controlled for patient sociodemographics, health behaviors, tumor characteristics, comorbidity, and cancer treatment. With a median 62-month follow-up, 349 (10.5 %) patients died; 233 died from BC. In the multivariate models, neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation was independently associated with non-BC-specific mortality (the most- vs. the least-deprived quartile: HR = 2.98, 95 % CI = 1.33-6.66); in contrast, its association with BC-specific mortality was explained by the aforementioned patient-level covariates, particularly sociodemographic factors (HR = 1.15, 95 % CI = 0.71-1.87). TNBC subtype was independently associated with non-BC-specific mortality (HR = 2.15; 95 % CI = 1.20-3.84), while the association between TNBC and BC-specific mortality approached significance (HR = 1.42; 95 % CI = 0.99-2.03, P = 0.057). Non-metastatic invasive BC patients who lived in more socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods were more likely to die as a result of causes other than BC compared with those living in the least socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods. TNBC was associated with non-BC-specific mortality but not BC-specific mortality.

Racial/ethnic differences in breast cancer survival by inflammatory status and hormonal receptor status: an analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data

BACKGROUND

Compared to non-inflammatory breast cancer (non-IBC), inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) has less favorable survival and is more likely to be estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) negative. ER-/PR- tumors, regardless of histology, have less favorable survival. While black women are more likely to have IBC and ER-/PR- tumors than white women, it is unclear whether the racial disparity in survival is explained by these factors. The objective of this study was to assess racial/ethnic differences in breast cancer survival by inflammatory status and hormone receptor status.

METHODS

This study examined breast cancer mortality among non-Hispanic white (NHW), Hispanic white, black, and Asian/Pacific Islander (API) women diagnosed between 1990 and 2004 using the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) assessed the relationship between race/ethnicity and survival.

RESULTS

Black women had significantly poorer survival than NHW women regardless of inflammatory status and hormone receptor status. Compared to NHWs, the HRs for black women were 1.32 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.21-1.44), 1.43 (95 % CI 1.20-1.69), and 1.30 (95 % CI 1.16-1.47) for IBC, IBC with ER+/PR+, and with ER-/PR-, respectively. Similar HRs were found for non-IBC, non-IBC with ER+/PR-, and non-IBC with ER-/PR-. API women had significantly better survival than NHW women regardless of inflammatory status and hormone receptor status.

CONCLUSION

Compared to NHW women, black women had poorer survival regardless of inflammatory status and hormone receptor status and API women had better survival. These results suggest that factors other than inflammatory status and hormone receptor status may play a role in racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer survival.

PDGFRβ and FGFR2 mediate endothelial cell differentiation capability of triple negative breast carcinoma cells

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a very aggressive subgroup of breast carcinoma, still lacking specific markers for an effective targeted therapy and with a poorer prognosis compared to other breast cancer subtypes. In this study we investigated the possibility that TNBC cells contribute to the establishment of tumor vascular network by the process known as vasculogenic mimicry, through endothelial cell differentiation. Vascular-like functional properties of breast cancer cell lines were investigated in vitro by tube formation assay and in vivo by confocal microscopy, immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry on frozen tumor sections. TNBCs express endothelial markers and acquire the ability to form vascular-like channels in vitro and in vivo, both in xenograft models and in human specimens, generating blood lacunae surrounded by tumor cells. Notably this feature is significantly associated with reduced disease free survival. The impairment of the main pathways involved in vessel formation, by treatment with inhibitors (i.e. Sunitinib and Bevacizumab) or by siRNA-mediating silencing, allowed the identification of PDGFRβ and FGFR2 as relevant players in this phenomenon. Inhibition of these tyrosine kinase receptors negatively affects vascular lacunae formation and significantly inhibits TNBC growth in vivo. In summary, we demonstrated that TNBCs have the ability to form vascular-like channels in vitro and to generate blood lacunae lined by tumor cells in vivo. Moreover, this feature is associated with poor outcome, probably contributing to the aggressiveness of this breast cancer subgroup. Finally, PDGFRβ and FGFR2-mediated pathways, identified as relevant in mediating this characteristic, potentially represent valid targets for a specific therapy of this breast cancer subgroup.

The geographic distribution of mammography resources in Mississippi

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the availability of mammography resources affected breast cancer incidence rates, stage of disease at initial diagnosis, mortality rates and/or mortality-to-incidence ratios throughout Mississippi. METHODS: Mammography facilities were geocoded and the numbers of residents residing within a thirty minute drive of a mammography facility were calculated. Other data were extracted from the Mississippi Cancer Registry, the U.S. Census, and the Mississippi Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS). RESULTS & DISCUSSION: There were no statistically-significant differences between breast cancer incidence rates in Black versus White females in Mississippi; however, there were significant differences in the use of mammography, percentages of advanced-stage initial diagnoses, mortality rates, and mortality-to-incidence ratios, where Black females fared worse in each category. No statistically-significant correlations were observed between breast cancer outcomes and the availability of mammography facilities. The use of mammography was negatively correlated with advanced stage of disease at initial diagnosis. By combining Black and White subsets, a correlation between mammography use and improved survival was detected; this was not apparent in either subset alone. There was also a correlation between breast cancer mortality-to-incidence ratios and the percentage of the population living below the poverty level. CONCLUSIONS: The accessibility and use of mammography resources has a greater impact on breast cancer in Mississippi than does the geographic resource distribution per se. Therefore, intensified mammography campaigns to reduce the percentage of advanced-stage breast cancers initially diagnosed in Black women, especially in communities with high levels of poverty, are warranted in Mississippi.

Race is not a factor in overall survival in patients with triple negative breast cancer: a retrospective review

The purpose of this study was to determine if race is a factor on overall survival when stage at diagnosis is compared. In this study, a total of 93 women with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) were evaluated for survival outcomes after diagnosis between the year 2000 through 2010. Thirty-five patients (38%) were African American (AA), and 58 patients (62%) were Caucasian. Overall survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using the log-rank test. Student's t-test was used to calculate differences in cancer recurrence and mortality rates by stage and race. Cox proportional hazards ratios were used to determine the association of patient and variables with clinical outcome. Of women diagnosed with stage 1 breast cancer, the overall survival rates for AAs was 100% compared to Caucasians at 94% (95% CI, 0.003 to 19; P = 0.5). For women with stage 2 breast cancer, overall survival for AA women was 85% and for Caucasian women was 86% (HR = 0.8; 95% CI, 0.3 to 2.6; P = 0.73). For advanced stages (stage 3 and 4), survival for AA women were 78% and 40% for Caucasian women (HR = 0.6; 95% CI 0.2 to 1.98; P = 0.43). Rates of recurrence and mortality were not significantly different between AA and Caucasian TNBC patients. After controlling for patient variables, race was not significantly associated with OS (HR = 1.24; 95% CI, 0.32 to 5.08; P = 0.74) when comparing AA to Caucasian patients. Our study suggests that race does not have an effect on overall survival in African American and Caucasian women diagnosed with TNBC in Arkansas.

Differential response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among 7 triple-negative breast cancer molecular subtypes

PURPOSE

The clinical relevancy of the 7-subtype classification of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) reported by Lehmann and colleagues is unknown. We investigated the clinical relevancy of TNBC heterogeneity by determining pathologic complete response (pCR) rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, based on TNBC subtypes.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We revalidated the Lehmann and colleagues experiments using Affymetrix CEL files from public datasets. We applied these methods to 146 patients with TNBC with gene expression microarrays obtained from June 2000 to March 2010 at our institution. Of those, 130 had received standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy and had evaluable pathologic response data. We classified the TNBC samples by subtype and then correlated subtype and pCR status using Fisher exact test and a logistic regression model. We also assessed survival and compared the subtypes with PAM50 intrinsic subtypes and residual cancer burden (RCB) index.

RESULTS

TNBC subtype and pCR status were significantly associated (P = 0.04379). The basal-like 1 (BL1) subtype had the highest pCR rate (52%); basal-like 2 (BL2) and luminal androgen receptor had the lowest (0% and 10%, respectively). TNBC subtype was an independent predictor of pCR status (P = 0.022) by a likelihood ratio test. The subtypes better predicted pCR status than did the PAM50 intrinsic subtypes (basal-like vs. non basal-like).

CONCLUSIONS

Classifying TNBC by 7 subtypes predicts high versus low pCR rate. We confirm the clinical relevancy of the 7 subtypes of TNBC. We need to prospectively validate whether the pCR rate differences translate into long-term outcome differences. The 7-subtype classification may spur innovative personalized medicine strategies for patients with TNBC.