Final Report on Real-World Effectiveness of Sequential Afatinib and Osimertinib in EGFR-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Updated Analysis of the RESET Study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to report the final analysis of time-on-treatment (TOT) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced-stage epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received sequential afatinib and osimertinib and to compare the outcomes with other second-line regimens (comparator group).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this updated report, the existing medical records were reviewed and rechecked. TOT and OS were updated and analyzed according to clinical features using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. TOT and OS were compared with those of the comparator group, in which most patients received pemetrexed-based treatments. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate features that could affect survival outcomes.

RESULTS

The median observation time was 31.0 months. The follow-up period was extended to 20 months. A total of 401 patients who received first-line afatinib were analyzed (166 with T790M+ and second-line osimertinib, and 235 with unproven T790M and other second-line agents). Median TOTs on afatinib and osimertinib were 15.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.0 to 16.1) and 11.9 months (95% CI, 8.9 to 14.6), respectively. The median OS in the osimertinib group was 54.3 months (95% CI, 46.7 to 61.9), much longer than that in the comparator group. In patients who received osimertinib, the OS was longest with Del19+ (median, 59.1; 95% CI, 48.7 to 69.5).

CONCLUSION

This is one of the largest real-world studies reporting the encouraging activity of sequential afatinib and osimertinib in Asian patients with EGFR+ NSCLC who acquired the T790M mutation, particularly Del19+.

Platinum-combination chemotherapy with or without immune-checkpoint inhibitor in patients with postoperative recurrent non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with adjuvant platinum-doublet chemotherapy: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Rechallenge with platinum-combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after disease progression on platinum-combination chemotherapy occasionally leads to a favorable response. The efficacy and safety of platinum-combination chemotherapy with or without immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for patients with recurrent NSCLC after surgery followed by adjuvant platinum-doublet chemotherapy remains uncertain.

METHODS

Patients who relapsed after surgery plus adjuvant platinum-doublet chemotherapy and received platinum-combination chemotherapy with or without ICI between April 2011 and March 2021 at four Nippon Medical School hospitals were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 177 patients who received adjuvant platinum-doublet chemotherapy after surgery, a total of 30 patients who received platinum-combination rechemotherapy with or without ICI after relapse were included in this study. Seven patients received ICI-combined chemotherapy. The median disease-free survival (DFS) after surgery was 13.6 months. The objective response rate and disease-control rate were 46.7% and 80.0%, respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 10.2 and 37.5 months, respectively. Patients with longer DFS (≥12 months) had a better prognosis than others. The most common grade ≥3 toxicity associated with this treatment was neutropenia (33%). Grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events were pneumonitis (14%) and colitis (14%). Treatment-related deaths did not occur in this study.

CONCLUSION

Platinum-combination chemotherapy with or without ICI for patients with postoperative recurrent NSCLC who previously received adjuvant platinum-doublet chemotherapy was effective and safe. In particular, this therapy may be promising for patients with longer DFS.

Prognostic Impact of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Germline Variants in Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Platin-Based Chemotherapy

Platin-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, resistance to this therapy is a major obstacle in successful treatment. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of several pharmacogenetic variants in patients with unresectable NSCLC treated with platin-based chemotherapy. Our results showed that DPYD variant carriers had significantly shorter progression-free survival and overall survival compared to DPYD wild-type patients, whereas DPD deficiency was not associated with a higher incidence of high-grade toxicity. For the first time, our study provides evidence that DPYD gene variants are associated with resistance to platin-based chemotherapy in NSCLC patients. Although further studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore the underlying mechanisms of this association, our results suggest that genetic testing of DPYD variants may be useful for identifying patients at a higher risk of platin-based chemotherapy resistance and might be helpful in guiding future personalized treatment strategies in NSCLC patients.

A network meta-analysis of immunotherapy-based treatments for advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction: In the absence of head-to-head trials comparing immunotherapies for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NsqNSCLC), a network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare the relative efficacy of these treatments. Materials & methods: A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials evaluating first-line-to-progression and second-line treatments for advanced NsqNSCLC informed Bayesian NMAs for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) end points. Results: Among first-line-to-progression treatments, pembrolizumab + pemetrexed + platinum showed the greatest OS benefit versus other regimens and a PFS benefit versus all but three regimens. Among second-line treatments, an OS benefit was seen for atezolizumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab versus docetaxel. Conclusion: Pembrolizumab + pemetrexed + platinum showed the maximum OS benefit in the first-line setting. In the second-line setting, anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 monotherapies were better than docetaxel.

Polymorphisms in solute carrier genes (SLC19A1, SLCO1B1, and SLCO1B3) predicts survival and toxicity in North Indian lung cancer patients undergoing platinum-based doublet chemotherapy

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Solute Carrier (SLC) transporters are known mediators of drug disposition that facilitate the influx of substrates and various chemotherapeutic agents into cells. Polymorphisms in the SLC19A1, SLCO1B1, and SLCO1B3 gene influence the prognosis in the cancer patients, but little is known about their role in lung cancer in Asians. So, the current study aims to investigate the polymorphisms in SLC19A1, SLCO1B1, and SLCO1B3 genes in Northern Indian lung cancer patients.

METHODS

Patients with lung cancer who had a confirmed histology and cytology diagnosis were enrolled in the study. SLC polymorphisms were assessed by Polymerase Chain Reaction-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) for variations in SLC19A1 (G⁸⁰ A), SLCO1B1 (A³⁸⁸ G, T⁵²¹ C), and SLCO1B3 (A^1683-5676 G).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Our results showed that mutant genotype for SLC19A1 G⁸⁰ A polymorphism had higher median survival time (MST) compared to wild genotype. ADCC patients with mutant genotype showed better survival compared to wild genotype for SLC19A1 G⁸⁰ A. SCLC patients G⁸⁰ A polymorphism showed increased survival in patients with mutant genotype (p = 0.04). In SLCO1B3, A^1683-5676 G patients carrying heterozygous alleles and administered with platinum and docetaxel showed inferior survival (p = 0.006). In T⁵²¹ C variant, patients with carrier genotype had reduced chances of developing anaemia (p = 0.04). Patients with SLC19A1 and SLCO1B3 variants showed lower incidence of thrombocytopenia and nephrotoxicity.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Our findings imply that Solute Carrier gene polymorphisms modulate the overall survival in lung cancer patients undergoing platin-based doublet chemotherapy, also these polymorphisms have a modifying impact on the associated adverse events/toxicity.

Platinum-Based Chemotherapy 'Rechallenge' in Advanced Non-ovarian Solid Malignancies

Platinum-based chemotherapy forms the backbone of treatment for many solid cancers. However, resistance inevitably develops in those with advanced disease. Platinum rechallenge is a well-established concept in the management of ovarian cancer, small cell lung cancer and germ cell tumours. In other solid malignancies there is a lack of quality evidence to support platinum rechallenge, yet it is a widely adopted strategy. Often, patients are within the last year of life, making questions of efficacy, treatment-related toxicity and quality of life critical factors for treatment recommendations. In this overview we appraise the available evidence for platinum rechallenge and strategies being developed to attempt resensitisation of tumours to platinum-based chemotherapy.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the predictive power of MTHFR polymorphisms for pemetrexed drug efficacy and toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer patients

We conducted a meta-analysis to determine if MTHFR polymorphisms are effective biomarkers for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient survival and pemetrexed (PEM) treatment toxicity. Because of data heterogeneity, fixed or random effects models were chosen, and pooled HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. No correlation between MTHFR 677 C > T polymorphism and progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) was detected in NSCLC patients; however, patients with the T allele benefited more than those with the wild-type allele. Two papers reported hematologic toxicity of single-agent PEM treatment in patients with the MTHFR 677 C > T polymorphism. However, data on MTHFR polymorphisms and toxicity could not be combined, even though publication bias and sensitivity analysis results were stable and reliable. We conclude that the MTHFR 677 C > T polymorphism could not predict PEM efficacy in NSCLC patients; however, the T allele may increase the risk of haematological toxicity. A large-scale clinical trial is recommended.

MTHFR polymorphism as a predictive biomarker for gastrointestinal and hematological toxicity in North Indian adenocarcinoma patients

In the present study, we investigated the relationship between the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and overall survival, toxicity and treatment response for North Indian adenocarcinoma patients. The polymorphisms of MTHFR gene in north Indian adenocarcinoma patients were assessed by PCR-RFLP. Our data observed that patients with mutant genotype (C/C) for 1298 A>C) polymorphism showed higher trend of median survival time compared to patients bearing the wild type genotype (A/A) (MST= 13.93 vs. 7.97, p=0.12). Further, we observed patients with the heterozygous genotype for A1298C polymorphism had 12-fold risk of diarrhea (AOR =12.54, 95% CI = 1.54-101.86, p=0.018). The patients with heterozygous genotype (CT) of the C677T polymorphism had 5.34-fold increased risk of developing neutropenia (AOR=5.34, 95% CI=1.49-19.06, p=0.009). Our results suggest that MTHFR polymorphisms are associated with hematological toxicity. MTHFR polymorphism might impact the development of pemetrexed and platinum-related toxicities but not as a clinical predictor of efficiency.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line treatment with crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Canada

Introduction

While no direct comparative data exist for crizotinib in ROS1+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), studies have suggested clinical benefit with this targeted agent. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of crizotinib compared to standard platinum-doublet chemotherapy for first-line treatment of ROS1+ advanced NSCLC.

Methods

A Markov model was developed with a 10-year time horizon from the perspective of the Canadian publicly-funded health care system. Health states included progression-free survival (PFS), up to two further lines of therapy post-progression, palliation and death. Given a lack of comparative data and small study samples, crizotinib or chemotherapy studies with advanced ROS1+ NSCLC patients were identified and time-to-event data from digitized Kaplan-Meier curves were collected to pool PFS data. Costs of drugs, treatment administration, monitoring, adverse events and palliative care were included in 2018 Canadian dollars, with 1.5% discounting. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated probabilistically using 5000 simulations.

Results

In the base-case probabilistic analysis, crizotinib produced additional 0.885 life-years and 0.772 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at an incremental cost of $238,077, producing an ICER of $273,286/QALY gained. No simulations were found to be cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY gained. A scenario analysis assuming efficacy equivalent to the ALK+ NSCLC population showed a slightly more favorable cost-effectiveness profile for crizotinib.

Conclusions

Available data appear to support superior activity of crizotinib compared to chemotherapy in ROS1+ advanced NSCLC. At the list price, crizotinib was not cost-effective at commonly accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds across a wide range of sensitivity analyses.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08746-z.

Comparison between single-agent and combination chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

Doublet combination chemotherapy is commonly considered a second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in China. This multi-institutional retrospective analysis evaluated and compared the efficacy between combination and mono-therapy after platinum-based first-line chemotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 335 patients who received second-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) and toxicity. Treatment-free interval (TFI) was used for further stratification analysis. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-three patients received doublet combination chemotherapy and 82 received single-agent chemotherapy. PFS was significantly prolonged in combination group compared to single-agent group (median 5.70 vs 3.70 months; HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.45-0.85; p < 0.001). The RR was significantly higher in the combination group than in the single-agent group (29.25% vs. 10.98%; p = 0.001). OS was also prolonged in combination group versus single-agent group (median 13.30 vs. 11.45 months, respectively; HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.52-0.95; p = 0.023). Among patients with TFI of ≥ 6 months, PFS and OS of the combination group were significantly increased than the single-agent group (median PFS, 6.67 vs. 3.80 months, p = 0.002; median OS, 13.60 vs. 11.45 months, p = 0.013). Grade III/IV toxicity was similar between the two groups (p = 0.113). Through multivariate analyses, we found that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score (p < 0.001), further-line treatment (p < 0.001) and combination chemotherapy (p = 0.024) were the independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

Compared with mono-therapy, combination chemotherapy was a better second-line option for Chinese patients with good performance status, especially in those with TFI of ≥ 6 months.

The efficacy of carboplatin plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel after cisplatin plus pemetrexed in non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Carboplatin plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) is one of the available first-line treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the efficacy of carboplatin plus nab-PTX as second-line, remains unknown. We examined the efficacy of carboplatin plus nab-PTX after cisplatin plus pemetrexed in non-squamous NSCLC patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients who received carboplatin plus nab-PTX as a second-line chemotherapy regimen after cisplatin plus pemetrexed in our hospital between March 2013 and December 2017. We assessed clinical characteristics, efficacy, and toxicities.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were recruited. The overall response rate (ORR) was 29% and the disease control rate (DCR), 69%. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 3.7 months (95% CI: 2.4-5.5 months) and the median overall survival, 16.6 months (95% CI:8.8-19.5 months). We assessed the ORR and mPFS using the best overall response in the prior regimen. The ORR and mPFS were better in the PD group (ORR; 44% and mPFS: 5.6 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Carboplatin plus nab-PTX after cisplatin plus pemetrexed in non-squamous NSCLC patients is a treatment option. There were several cases where cisplatin plus pemetrexed was not effective, but Carboplatin plus nab-PTX was.

Mechanisms of resistance to pemetrexed in non-small cell lung cancer

Currently, lung cancer has remained the most common cause of cancer death while non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for the most of all lung cancer cases. Regardless of multiple existing managements, chemotherapy regimens are still the mainstay of treatment for NSCLC, where pemetrexed has shown cytotoxic activity and has increasingly been used, especially for advanced cases. However, chemo-resistance may inhibit clinical efficacy after long-term use. Mechanisms responsible for chemo-resistance to pemetrexed in NSCLC are plethoric but can be separated into two categories to be discussed: tumor cells and their interactions with drugs. Phenomena relevant to tumor cells such as oncogene or oncoprotein alterations, DNA synthesis, DNA repair, and tumor cell biology behavior are discussed, as well as processes associated with drug dynamics, including drug uptake, drug elimination, and antifolate polyglutamylation. This review will focus on clinical trials and the basic biomedical mechanisms of NSCLC treated with pemetrexed and will describe the underlying mechanisms of resistance to facilitate more efficient clinical therapies to treat patients.

Discovery of Novel Biomarkers of Therapeutic Responses in Han Chinese Pemetrexed-Based Treated Advanced NSCLC Patients

Pemetrexed, one of the most commonly used drugs in advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) therapies, often leads to various therapeutic responses in patients. These therapeutic responses to pemetrexed, including adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and its intended therapeutic effects, have been demonstrated to be highly individual-specific. Such difference in therapeutic responses across individuals may be caused by the unique genetic variations in each patient. However, only a few pemetrexed-based studies have been performed using Han Chinese patients. In this study, we aimed to identify genetic signatures of therapeutic responses of pemetrexed-based treatment using 203 Han Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC. All the participants received two different types of therapies: 1) treatment with only pemetrexed and 2) treatment with both pemetrexed and platinum (mainly cisplatin and carboplatin). We then performed a genetic association analysis on 16 selected single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 7 genes using these 2 groups. The analysis of patients receiving only pemetrexed suggests that the SNP rs1051298 on the SLC19A1 gene (c.*746C > T) increased the risk of all ADRs (collected all types of ADRs) in different cycles of pemetrexed therapy [1-2 cycles: P = 0.0059, odds ratio (OR) = 3.143; 1-4 cycles: P = 0.0072, OR = 2.340; 1-6 cycles: P = 0.0071, OR = 2.243]. This influence of rs1051298 is particularly significant in terms of liver injury (1-4 cycles: P = 0.0056, OR = 3.863; 1-6 cycles: P = 0.0071, OR = 3.466). In all the patients, including patients who received both pemetrexed and platinum, SNP rs1801133 on the MTHFR gene (665C > T) was found to be significantly associated with hematological ADRs in 1 to 2 cycles (P = 0.0079, OR = 3.566). Additionally, we discovered that SNP rs12995526 (c.815-102T > C) in the ATIC gene and SNP rs11545077 (c.91G > T) in the GGH gene were associated with both ADRs and therapeutic effects. In summary, our study identified several potential biomarkers that were significantly associated with ADRs and therapeutic effects of pemetrexed-related treatments using Han Chinese patients. Our discoveries will provide important clues for personalized pemetrexed-based treatment design for Han Chinese NSCLC patients in the future.

Clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients receiving concurrent metformin and immune checkpoint inhibitors

Aim:

To study the clinical benefits of concurrent metformin and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Materials & methods:

This is a retrospective review of 50 non-small-cell lung cancer patients receiving ICIs with metformin (cohort A) or without metformin (cohort B). Patients were also stratified by ICIs as second-/third-line therapy.

Results:

Overall response rate and disease control rate were higher in cohort A (41.1 vs 30.7%, p = 0.4 and 70.5 vs 61.6%, p = 0.5, respectively). Median overall survival and progression-free survival were also higher in cohort A (11.5 vs 7.6 months, p = 0.5 and 4.0 vs 3.0 months, p = 0.6, respectively). On subset analysis (second-/third-line ICIs), overall response rate, disease control rate, median overall survival, progression-free survival were also higher in cohort A.

Conclusion:

Despite the small-sample size, we observed improved clinical outcomes in patients who received ICIs in combination with metformin.

Assessment of proportional hazard assumption in aggregate data: a systematic review on statistical methodology in clinical trials using time-to-event endpoint

Background

The evaluation of the proportional hazards (PH) assumption in survival analysis is an important issue when Hazard Ratio (HR) is chosen as summary measure. The aim is to assess the appropriateness of statistical methods based on the PH assumption in oncological trials.

Methods

We selected 58 randomised controlled trials comparing at least two pharmacological treatments with a time-to-event as primary endpoint in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Data from Kaplan–Meier curves were used to calculate the relative hazard at each time point and the Restricted Mean Survival Time (RMST). The PH assumption was assessed with a fixed-effect meta-regression.

Results

In 19% of the trials, there was evidence of non-PH. Comparison of treatments with different mechanisms of action was associated (P = 0.006) with violation of the PH assumption. In all the superiority trials where non-PH was detected, the conclusions using the RMST corresponded to that based on the Cox model, although the magnitude of the effect given by the HR was systematically greater than the one from the RMST ratio.

Conclusion

As drugs with new mechanisms of action are being increasingly employed, particular attention should be paid on the statistical methods used to compare different types of agents.

Phase II study assessing the benefit of cisplatin re-introduction (stop-and-go strategy) in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: the IFCT-1102 BUCiL study (a Better Use of Cisplatin in Lung cancer)

Introduction

This single-arm phase II trial aimed to evaluate a stop-and-go strategy with cisplatin-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Patients were initially treated with three cycles of pemetrexed, cisplatin plus bevacizumab (sequence 1) followed by bevacizumab maintenance and after progression, re-introduction of three cycles of pemetrexed, cisplatin plus bevacizumab (sequence 2) and pemetrexed plus bevacizumab maintenance. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC receiving the complete sequence 2 without platinum dose reduction (hypothesis ≥75%).

Results

120 patients with performance status ≤1 were included. Of 113 patients evaluable for efficacy, 65 (57.5%) entered in sequence 2 and 56 (86%) received the three planned cycles including 37 (56.9%, 95% CI 45.1 to 73.6) without platinum dose reduction. The median progression-free survival 1 (PFS1; inclusion to progression 1) was 5.6 months (95% CI 5.0 to 6.3) and median PFS2 (progression 1 to progression 2) was 6.8 months (95% CI 5.8 to 8.8). The median disease control duration (PFS1+PFS2; n=65) was 12.4 months (95% CI 11.2 to 14.9). The median overall survival was 17.7 months (95% CI 13.1 to 21.6) and 20.5 months (95% CI 16.9 to 26.9) for patients reaching the sequence 2 (n=65).

Conclusion

Although the stringent primary endpoint was not met, this stop-and-go strategy with platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab continuation beyond progression compares favourably with standard schedule, deserving to be further studied in advanced non-squamous NSCLC.

Indirect comparison of efficacy and safety between immune checkpoint inhibitors and antiangiogenic therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

In this study, we conducted an indirect comparison analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors with those of antiangiogenic therapy-two effective treatment methods for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eligible randomised control trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors, antiangiogenic therapy, and doublet platinum-based therapy published up to July 2017 were comprehensively analysed. Through the indirect comparison analysis of 37 trials involving 16810 patients, treatments were compared for overall survival (OS) and grade 3-5 adverse events. For first-line treatment, the use of pembrolizumab alone (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.4-0.91) and a combination of bevacizumab and doublet platinum-based therapy (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.75-0.99) demonstrated substantial survival benefits compared with doublet platinum-based therapy. For subsequent treatment, nivolumab may provide higher efficacy and lower toxicity than antiangiogenic therapy. Overall, anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies may be superior to antiangiogenic therapy in terms of OS and grade 3-5 adverse events. This meta-analysis suggests that pembrolizumab and nivolumab might be favourable choices for first-line and subsequent treatment, respectively, for patients with advanced NSCLC. Additional randomised control trials are required for a comprehensive evaluation of the outcomes among regimens.

Cost-effectiveness of ceritinib in previously untreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in the United States

AIMS

To assess the cost-effectiveness of first-line ceritinib vs crizotinib and platinum doublet chemotherapy for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from a US third-party payer's perspective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A partitioned survival model with three health states (stable disease, progressive disease, death) was developed over a 20-year time horizon. Ceritinib's efficacy inputs (progression-free and overall survival) were estimated from ASCEND-4; parametric survival models extrapolated data beyond the trial period. The relative efficacy of ceritinib vs chemotherapy was obtained from ASCEND-4, the relative efficacy of ceritinib vs crizotinib was estimated using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison based on ASCEND-4 and PROFILE 1014. Drug acquisition, treatment administration, adverse event management, and medical costs were obtained from publicly available databases and the literature, and inflated to 2016 US dollars. Treatment-specific stable-state utilities were derived from trials and progressive-state utility from the literature. Incremental costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) were estimated for ceritinib vs each comparator. Cost-effectiveness was assessed based on US willingness-to-pay thresholds. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test model robustness.

RESULTS

In the base case, first-line ceritinib was associated with total direct costs of $299,777 and 3.28 QALYs (from 4.61 life years gained [LYG]) over 20 years. First-line crizotinib and chemotherapy were associated with 2.73 and 2.41 QALYs, 3.92 and 3.53 LYG, and $263,172 and $228,184 total direct costs, respectively. The incremental cost per QALY gained was $66,064 for ceritinib vs crizotinib and $81,645 for ceritinib vs chemotherapy. In the first 2 years following treatment initiation, ceritinib dominated crizotinib by conferring greater health benefits at reduced total costs. Results were robust to deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

LIMITATIONS

In the absence of head-to-head trials, an indirect comparison method was used.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceritinib is cost-effective compared to crizotinib and chemotherapy in the treatment of previously untreated ALK-positive metastatic NCSLC in the US.

Pharmacogenetics of platinum-based chemotherapy: impact of DNA repair and folate metabolism gene polymorphisms on prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer patients

Chemotherapy based on platinum compounds is the standard treatment for NSCLC patients with EGFR wild type, and is also used as second line in mutated EGFR patients. Nevertheless, this therapy presents poor clinical outcomes. ERCC1, ERCC2, XRCC1, MDM2, MTHFR, MTR, and SLC19A1 gene polymorphisms may contribute to individual variation in response and survival to platinum-based chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of these polymorphisms on response and survival of NSCLC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. A retrospective-prospective cohorts study was conducted, including 141 NSCLC patients. Polymorphisms were analyzed by PCR real-time with Taqman® probes. Patients with ERCC1 rs3212986-GG (p = 0.0268; OR = 2.50; CI_95% = 1.12-5.69) and XRCC1 rs25487-GG (p = 0.0161; OR = 2.99; CI_95% = 1.26-7.62) genotype showed significantly better ORR. Cox survival analysis revealed that patients carrying the MDM2 rs1690924-GG genotype (p = 0.0345; HR = 1.99; CI_95% = 1.05-3.80) presented higher risk of death. Furthermore, carriers of MTR rs1805087-A alleles (p = 0.0060; HR = 8.91; CI_95% = 1.87-42.42) and SLC19A1 rs1051266-AA genotype (p = 0.0130; HR = 1.74; CI_95% = 1.12-2.68) showed greater risk of progression. No influence of ERCC1 rs11615, ERCC2 rs13181, ERCC2 rs1799793, XRCC1 rs1799782, MDM2 rs1470383, MTHFR rs1801131, and MTHFR rs1801133 on platinum-based chemotherapy clinical outcomes was found. In conclusion, our results suggest that ERCC1 rs3212986, XRCC1 rs25487, MDM2 rs1690924, MTR rs1805087, and SLC19A1 rs1051266 gene polymorphisms may significantly act as predictive factors in NSCLC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

Combined effect of ERCC1 and ERCC2 polymorphisms on overall survival in non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with first-line pemetrexed/platinum

OBJECTIVES

Polymorphisms of DNA repair genes may affect DNA repair capacity and the sensitivity of platinum doublets chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We prospectively evaluated whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of ERCC1, ERCC2, XRCC1, and XRCC3 were associated with treatment outcome in advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients receiving pemetrexed/platinum as their first-line chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Genotyping of six SNPs in four DNA repair genes in 58 patients treated with first-line pemetrexed/platinum was performed using TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays.

RESULTS

The wild-type ERCC1 8092 (C/C) was significantly associated with a better objective response compared to the variant genotypes (C/A + A/A) (48% vs 10%, P = .005). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, we found that individuals with a wild-type genotype of ERCC1 Asn118Asn, ERCC1 C8092A and ERCC2 Asp312Asn had significantly better overall survival (OS) than those with a heterozygous or homozygous variant genotype. On the other hand, the heterozygous variant genotype of ERCC2 Lys751Gln was associated with better OS than that of the wild-type genotype. We further explored the combined effect of SNPs on OS, and found a significant allele/dose-dependent trend toward decreasing OS in patients with an increasing number of unfavorable alleles among four SNPs in ERCC1 and ERCC2. The median OS of patients with two or three unfavorable alleles (30.1 and 30.5 months, respectively) was significantly longer than that of patients with 4 unfavorable alleles (11.8 months, log-rank test for trend, P = .001).

CONCLUSION

A combination of ERCC1 and ERCC2 polymorphisms may predict OS among pemetrexed/platinum treated advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients.

Individual and combined effect of TP53, MDM2, MDM4, MTHFR, CCR5, and CASP8 gene polymorphisms in lung cancer

Lung cancer (LC) is the second common and with the highest mortality oncological disease. Specific biomarkers for its diagnostics, treatment, and prognosis are still under the investigations. Aim of our study was to evaluate the relationship between the polymorphisms of TP53 pathway genes TP53, MDM2, MDM4, the polymorphisms of HPV-associated genes MTHFR, CASP8, CCR5, and HPV infection with survival of LC patients. SNPs were genotyped using PCR-RFLP. qRT-PCR was used to detect, identify, and quantify HPV. No statistically significant differences were detected between individual SNPs and patient survival with stage I-IV LC. Cluster analysis of SNPs in genes MDM4 A/A, CCR5 wt/Δ32, MTHFR C/T, MDM2 T/T showed possible association with the worse survival. Patients who were diagnosed with C/T polymorphic variant of gene MTHFR tend not to survive stage III-IV LC (P = .12). There is a tendency between MDM2 gene T/T variant and worse survival of patients diagnosed with late stage LC (P = .11). HPV infection is very rear among LC patients (3 of 92). Overall, there is a link, although statistically insignificant, between specific SNPs and LC patient survival frequency and time, meanwhile the combination of specific SNPs showed a statistically significant measure. In conclusion, we determined statistically significant (P = .04) link between the poor survival of LC patients after surgery and the combination of polymorphic variants C/T of the MTHFR and T/T of the MDM2 genes, whereas individually these SNPs do not show significant relationship with the survival of patients after surgery.

Correlation Between Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (MTHFR) C677T Polymorphisms and Pemetrexed Chemotherapy Efficacy/Toxicity in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background

In the present study, we aimed to retrospectively analyze the correlation between toxicity of pemetrexed (PEM) chemotherapy and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphisms in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (non-sq NSCLC).

Material/Methods

We used polymerase chain reaction, gene scanning, and restriction fragment length polymorphism to analyze MTHFR C677T in 51 patients with advanced non-sq NSCLC. The patients received chemotherapies with single-agent PEM (monotherapy group) or with PEM combined with cisplatin (joint group). The correlation between MTHFR C677T polymorphisms and chemotherapy efficacy/toxicity was also assessed.

Results

There were 40 patients in the monotherapy group and 11 patients in the joint group. Among the 40 patients received single-agent PEM chemotherapy, those with the CT/TT genotype had higher incidence of leukopenia, neutropenia, nausea, and fatigue compared to patients with the with wild-type genotype CC (all P<0.05). However, polymorphisms of MTHFR C677T were not significantly associated with other adverse events and clinical outcomes.

Conclusions

Compared with genotype CC (the wild type), patients with the CT/TT genotype had higher incidence of leukopenia, neutropenia, nausea, and fatigue. Therefore, the MTHFR C677T polymorphism could be a predictive factor for leukopenia, neutropenia, nausea, and fatigue toxicities in non-sq NSCLC patients treated with single-agent PEM.

Who treats lung cancer? Results from a global survey

BACKGROUND

In most Western nations, the medical oncologist plays a significant role in the administration of systemic therapy for lung cancer. In Japan however, treatment for lung cancer has historically been provided by pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons. A comparison of the management of advanced disease between Japan and other nations has not been described.

METHODS

An online, self-administered, international survey was sent to 3907 active members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Eligible participants were degreed physicians who prescribed systemic agents for adult cancer treatment within the past five years.

RESULTS

In total, 281 respondents answered the questions regarding management of lung cancer. Thorough analysis demonstrated that pulmonologists play a significant role in Japan and the Netherlands, where the role of oncologic specialists is not well established. Of note, all the respondents from the Netherlands reported that pulmonary medicine primarily manages systemic chemotherapy in stage IV, adjuvant chemotherapy, and targeted therapy.

CONCLUSION

We found there are several nations where non-oncologic specialists play a critical role in the systemic treatment of lung cancer. We expect this practice pattern to continue until the global adoption of the oncologic specialty role.

Clinical-pharmacogenetic models for personalized cancer treatment: application to malignant mesothelioma

Large interindividual differences in treatment outcome are observed in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Our aim was to develop and validate clinical-pharmacogenetic prediction models of gemcitabine/cisplatin or pemetrexed/cisplatin treatment outcome and develop an algorithm for genotype-based treatment recommendations in malignant mesothelioma (MM). We genotyped 189 MM patients for polymorphisms in gemcitabine, pemetrexed and cisplatin metabolism, transport and drug target genes and DNA repair pathways. To build respective clinical-pharmacogenetic models, pharmacogenetic scores were assigned by rounding regression coefficients. Gemcitabine/cisplatin model was based on training group of 71 patients and included CRP, histological type, performance status, RRM1 rs1042927, ERCC2 rs13181, ERCC1 rs3212986, and XRCC1 rs25487. Patients with higher score had shorter progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (P < 0.001). This model’s sensitivity was 0.615 and specificity 0.812. In independent validation group of 66 patients the sensitivity and specificity were 0.667 and 0.641, respectively. Pemetrexed/cisplatin model was based on 57 patients and included CRP, MTHFD1 rs2236225, and ABCC2 rs2273697. Patients with higher score had worse response and shorter PFS (P < 0.001). This model’s sensitivity was 0.750 and specificity 0.607. In independent validation group of 20 patients the sensitivity and specificity were 0.889 and 0.500, respectively. The proposed algorithm based on these models could enable the choice of the most effective chemotherapy for 85.5% of patients and lead to improved treatment outcome in MM.

Pretreatment Red Blood Cell Total Folate Concentration Is Associated With Response to Pemetrexed in Stage IV Nonsquamous Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Pemetrexed inhibits folate-dependent enzymes involved in pyrimidine and purine synthesis. Previous studies of genetic variation in these enzymes as predictors of pemetrexed efficacy have yielded inconsistent results. We investigated whether red blood cell (RBC) total folate, a phenotypic rather than genotypic, marker of cellular folate status was associated with the response to pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC receiving first-line chemotherapy containing pemetrexed. The pretreatment RBC total folate level was quantified using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. We then compared the objective response rate (ORR) between patients with RBC total folate concentrations greater than and less than an optimal cutoff value determined from the receiver operating characteristic curve. A logistic regression model was used to adjust for age, sex, and the use of bevacizumab.

RESULTS

The ORR was 62% (32 of 52 patients). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to establish that a RBC total folate cutoff value of 364.6 nM optimally discriminated between pemetrexed responders and nonresponders. Patients with RBC total folate < 364.5 nM had an ORR of 27% compared with 71% for patients with RBC total folate > 364.5 nM (P = .01). This difference persisted after adjusting for age, sex, and the use of bevacizumab (odds ratio, 0.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.57; P = .01).

CONCLUSION

A low pretreatment RBC total folate was associated with an inferior response to pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC. Larger, multicenter studies are needed to validate RBC total folate as a predictive marker of pemetrexed response.

Cost-effectiveness of ceritinib in patients previously treated with crizotinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer in Canada

BACKGROUND

To assess the cost-effectiveness of ceritinib vs alternatives in patients who discontinue treatment with crizotinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from a Canadian public healthcare perspective.

METHODS

A partitioned survival model with three health states (stable, progressive, and death) was developed. Comparators were chosen based on reported utilization from a retrospective Canadian chart study; comparators were pemetrexed, best supportive care (BSC), and historical control (HC). HC comprised of all treatment alternatives reported. Progression-free survival and overall survival for ceritinib were estimated using data reported from single-arm clinical trials (ASCEND-1 [NCT01283516] and ASCEND-2 [NCT01685060]). Survival data for comparators were obtained from published clinical trials in a NSCLC population and from a Canadian retrospective chart study. Parametric models were used to extrapolate outcomes beyond the trial period. Drug acquisition, administration, resource use, and adverse event (AE) costs were obtained from databases. Utilities for health states and disutilities for AEs based on EQ-5D were derived from literature. Incremental costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained were estimated. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Over 4 years, ceritinib was associated with 0.86 QALYs and total direct costs of $89,740 for the post-ALK population. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $149,117 comparing ceritinib vs BSC, $80,100 vs pemetrexed, and $104,436 vs HC. Additional scenarios included comparison to docetaxel with an ICER of $149,780 and using utility scores reported from PROFILE 1007, with a reported ICER ranging from $67,311 vs pemetrexed to $119,926 vs BSC. Due to limitations in clinical efficacy input, extensive sensitivity analyses were carried out whereby results remained consistent with the base-case findings.

CONCLUSION

Based on the willingness-to-pay threshold for end-of-life cancer drugs, ceritinib may be considered as a cost-effective option compared with other alternatives in patients who have progressed or are intolerant to crizotinib in Canada.

Pharmacogenomics in Pediatric Oncology: Review of Gene-Drug Associations for Clinical Use

During the 3rd congress of the European Society of Pharmacogenomics and Personalised Therapy (ESPT) in Budapest in 2015, a preliminary meeting was held aimed at establishing a pediatric individualized treatment in oncology and hematology committees. The main purpose was to facilitate the transfer and harmonization of pharmacogenetic testing from research into clinics, to bring together basic and translational research and to educate health professionals throughout Europe. The objective of this review was to provide the attendees of the meeting as well as the larger scientific community an insight into the compiled evidence regarding current pharmacogenomics knowledge in pediatric oncology. This preliminary evaluation will help steer the committee’s work and should give the reader an idea at which stage researchers and clinicians are, in terms of personalizing medicine for children with cancer. From the evidence presented here, future recommendations to achieve this goal will also be suggested.

Pharmacogenomics of platinum-based chemotherapy sensitivity in NSCLC: toward precision medicine

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in the world. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the first-line treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however, the therapeutic efficiency varies remarkably among individuals. A large number of pharmacogenomics studies aimed to identify genetic variations which can be used to predict platinum response. Those studies are leading NSCLC treatment to the new era of precision medicine. In the current review, we provided a comprehensive update on the main recent findings of genetic variations which can be used to predict platinum sensitivity in the NSCLC patients.

Pemetrexed plus carboplatin versus pemetrexed in pretreated patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: treating the right patients based on individualized treatment effect prediction

BACKGROUND

Translating results from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to individual patients in clinical practice is challenging, as treatment effects can vary substantially among individuals. Data from RCTs can be used for individualized treatment effect prediction, to identify patients who benefit from specific treatments. In this study, we developed and validated a prediction model for estimating absolute treatment effect of pemetrexed plus carboplatin versus single-agent pemetrexed in the second-line treatment of non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using data of relapsed patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC from the NVALT-7 trial, a Weibull model for prediction of gain in median progression-free survival (PFS) by pemetrexed-carboplatin was derived based on patient and tumor characteristics. The model was externally validated in the GOIRC 02-2006 trial. The applicability of the model for guiding clinical decision-making was evaluated using decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

A wide distribution of predicted gain in median PFS by pemetrexed-carboplatin over pemetrexed was found, with a median of 0.7 months (interquartile range: -0.1 to 1.5 months). Patients who benefited most included women, those with stage IV, high body mass index and/or adenocarcinoma. External validation showed satisfactory calibration and moderate discrimination (C-index: 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.56-0.67). Decision curve analysis confirmed that the model adequately identified patients who benefit from pemetrexed-carboplatin, as prediction-based treatment led to improvement in net benefit with regard to PFS and overall survival when assuming a treatment threshold of 0-5 months gain in PFS, compared with other treatment strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of pemetrexed-carboplatin can be predicted for individual patients based on routinely available patient and tumor characteristics. There is important heterogeneity in the effects on PFS of pemetrexed-carboplatin versus pemetrexed in pretreated patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Individualized prediction of treatment effect could be used to guide shared decision-making by discriminating patients who benefit most, to improve clinical outcome.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBERS

NVALT-7: ISRCTN38269072 (ISRCTN registry), GOIRC 02-2006: NCT00786331 (clinicaltrials.gov).

A prognostic model for platinum-doublet as second-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients

Poor prognosis of advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and the promising therapeutic effect of platinum urge the oncologists to evaluate the role of platinum doublet as second‐line chemotherapy and establish the definition of platinum sensitivity in NSCLC. We retrospectively analyzed 364 advanced NSCLC patients who received platinum‐doublet regimens as second‐line chemotherapy after platinum‐based first‐line treatment. Patients were divided into four groups by their time‐to‐progression (TTP) after first‐line chemotherapy: 0–3, 4–6, 7–12, and >12‐month group, respectively. Treatment efficacy of patients' overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and response rate (RR), as well as treatment‐related toxicity, were compared among the four groups. A prognosis score system and a nomogram were established by Cox proportional hazard model, and validated by concordance index (c‐index). Median OS was 14.0, 16.0, 20.0, 25.0 months for patients in the 0–3, 4–6, 7–12, >12‐month group, respectively. Age ≤60 years (P = 0.002), female (P = 0.019), and TTP>12 months (P = 0.003) were independent prognostic factors. Prognostic score was calculated by adding 1 point each for any of the above three indicators, with a c‐index of 0.590 (95% confidential interval [CI], 0.552–0.627). Median OS were equal to 25.0, 16.0, and 11.0 months for best (2–3 points), intermediate (1 point) and worst (0 point) category, respectively (P < 0.0001). A nomogram that integrated patient's age, gender, and TTP for OS has a c‐index of 0.623 (95% CI, 0.603–0.643). Female, younger than 60 years, and TTP greater than 12 months may indicate prolonged survival after platinum‐doublet second‐line chemotherapy in advanced NSCLCpatients.

Correlation of genetic polymorphisms with clinical outcomes in pemetrexed-treated advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients

AIM

Pemetrexed is a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent for lung adenocarcinoma patients. We investigated the impact of the genetic polymorphisms on the therapeutic efficacy of pemetrexed in lung adenocarcinoma patients.

MATERIALS & METHODS

We performed genotying of 51 polymorphisms of 13 genes in 243 lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with pemetrexed as a single agent for second or more line of therapy.

RESULTS

Total 12 polymorphisms in six genes were showed statistical significances in univariate analysis. After a false-discovery rate correction, the associations between GGH rs16930092 (p = 0.034) and rs10464903 (p = 0.034), and progression-free survival (PFS) were still conserved. Two polymorphisms in ATIC and GGH genes were associated with therapeutic efficacy in multivariate analysis: ATIC rs12995526 for tumor response (p = 0.014) and for overall survival (p = 0.006), and GGH rs16930092 (p = 0.009) for PFS.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that polymorphisms on genes related to the metabolic pathway of pemetrexed, especially, ATIC and GGH genes, would have a therapeutic implication in pemetrexed-treated patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Original submitted 10 May 2013; Revision submitted 27 June 2014.

Second-line combination therapies in nonsmall cell lung cancer without known driver mutations

In advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, platinum-based combination chemotherapy is standard treatment in the first-line setting; however, the large majority of patients ultimately progress. For more than a decade, single-agent therapy with docetaxel, pemetrexed or erlotinib has been the standard of care after failure with platinum salts, showing some benefit over best supportive care. Nonetheless, prognosis remains poor and new second-line strategies are urgently needed. Combinations of cytotoxic agents, including rechallenge with platinum salts, do not offer clear benefit over single-agent therapy for the majority of patients. In patients without a known tumoural oncogenic driver mutation, regimens based on combinations of targeted agents have shown promising results; however, a clear role in therapeutic management is yet to be established. Some success has been reported in recent research combining a cytotoxic agent with targeted therapies.In this review, we summarise published data for the various strategies evaluated over the past decade in second-line treatment of NSCLC patients without a known driver mutation. We focus on combination treatments and consider future perspectives, including the need to identify predictive markers to support personalised therapeutic strategies.

The Effectiveness of Pemetrexed Monotherapy Depending on Polymorphisms in TS and MTHFR Genes as Well as Clinical Factors in Advanced NSCLC Patients

In NSCLC, second-line chemotherapy using pemetrexed or docetaxel has limited efficacy and should be dedicated to selected groups of patients. Pemetrexed is an antifolate compound with the ability to inhibit enzymes (TS, DHFR and GARFT) involved in pyrimidine and purine synthesis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between polymorphisms of TS and MHFR genes and clinical outcomes in NSCLC patients treated with pemetrexed monotherapy. DNA was isolated from peripheral blood of 72 non-squamous NSCLC patients treated with pemetrexed. Using PCR and RFLP methods, the variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR), the G > C SNP in these repeats and insertion/deletion polymorphism of TS gene as well as 677C > T SNP in MTHFR gene were analyzed and correlated with disease control rate, progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) of NSCLC patients. Carriers of 2R/3R(G), 3R(C)/3R(G), 3R(G)/3R(G) genotypes showed significantly more frequent early progression than carriers of 2R/2R, 2R/3R(C), 3R(C)/3R(C) genotypes of TS gene (p < 0.05). Among carriers of triple 28 bp tandem repeats (3R) in TS gene and C/C genotype of MTHFR gene a significantly shorter OS was observed (HR = 3.07; p = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, significantly higher risk of death was observed in carriers of both 3R/3R genotype in TS and C/C genotype in 677C > T SNP in MTHFR (HR = 3.85; p < 0.005) as well as in patients with short duration of response to first-line chemotherapy (HR = 2.09; p < 0.005). Results of our study suggested that genetic factors may have a high predictive and prognostic value (even greater than clinical factors) for patients treated with pemetrexed monotherapy.

The efficacy and safety of pemetrexed-based doublet therapy compared to pemetrexed alone for the second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an updated meta-analysis

Background

Pemetrexed is currently recommended as the second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it is unclear whether pemetrexed-based doublet therapy improves treatment efficacy and safety. Thus, this meta-analysis was performed to resolve this controversial question.

Methods

Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant articles before April 2015. Hazard ratios (HRs) were used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and odds ratios (ORs) were used to analyze the overall response rate (ORR) and grade ≥3 toxicities. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were also evaluated.

Results

A total of 2,519 patients from ten randomized controlled trials were included. Compared to pemetrexed alone, PFS and ORR significantly improved in the pemetrexed-based doublet group (HR, 0.86; 95% CI [confidence interval], 0.75–0.99; P=0.038; and OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.25–3.12; P=0.003, respectively). However, no statistically significant differences in OS were observed between groups (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.83–1.02; P=0.132). In addition, subgroup analyses indicated that improved OS was only observed in nonsquamous NSCLC patients who received the combination of pemetrexed and erlotinib. An increasing incidence of grade ≥3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was observed in the pemetrexed-based doublet group.

Conclusion

Among patients with advanced NSCLC, pemetrexed-based doublet treatment tended to be associated with improved PFS, ORR, and increased toxicity, but not OS.

Non-small cell lung cancer recurrence following surgery and perioperative chemotherapy: Comparison of two chemotherapy regimens (IFCT-0702: A randomized phase 3 final results study)

INTRODUCTION

This study compared the efficacy of docetaxel alone vs. docetaxel plus cisplatin/carboplatin in resected NSCLC patients relapsing after preoperative, adjuvant, or perioperative platinum-based chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel plus cisplatin/carboplatin (Arm A) or docetaxel alone (Arm B). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were response rate at 6 weeks, toxicity, quality of life, and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

From November 2007 to August 2012, 88 patients were enrolled. Due to an unexpectedly slow accrual, the trial was prematurely stopped. Adding platinum to docetaxel caused a non-significant increase in PFS. Median PFS was 8.0 months (95% CI: 5.3-10.4) for Arm A vs. 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.0-7.3) for Arm B (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.45-1.1, p=0.15). Median OS was 16.0 months (95% CI: 10.1-23.9) for Arm A vs. 12.4 months (95% CI: 8.2-19.6) for Arm B. In pre-planned subgroup analyses, a time to recurrence ≥12 months and non-squamous histology favorably influenced OS (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29-0.91, p=0.02 and HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.33-0.91, p=0.02, respectively). There were no unexpected adverse events, and Grade 3-4 toxicity was comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study failed to demonstrate significant PFS improvement with the docetaxel-platinum doublet compared to single-agent docetaxel. The 3.6-month improvement in OS with the cisplatin-based doublet proves, however, appealing and merits further investigation.

NCCTG N0821 (Alliance): a phase II first-line study of pemetrexed, carboplatin, and bevacizumab in elderly patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer with good performance status

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that the combination of bevacizumab, carboplatin, and pemetrexed will be an effective first-line regimen in fit, elderly patients with nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Treatment-naïve, stage IIIB/IV nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer patients more than 70 years old with good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1) and adequate organ function were eligible. Carboplatin area under the curve 6, pemetrexed 500 mg/m, and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg were administered on day 1 of each 21-day cycle (up to six cycles) followed by maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab. The primary end point of 6-month progression-free survival rate of at least 70% was assessed using a one-stage binomial design. Quality of life (QOL) questionnaires were administered. Polymorphisms in genes encoding relevant proteins (drug targets, transport, and metabolism proteins) were correlated with treatment outcome.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven eligible patients were enrolled. Median age was 74.5 years. Median treatment cycles received was 6. The most common grade 3 or higher non-hematologic adverse events were fatigue (26%) and hypertension (11%); 16% had grade 4 neutropenia and 6.5% had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Three patients experienced grade 3/4 hemorrhagic events (one pulmonary, two gastrointestinal). Primary end point of PFS6 was 60% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 45.9-73%). Median PFS was 7.0 months (95% CI: 5.9-10.1), median overall survival was 13.7 months (95% CI: 9.4-16.8). Polymorphic KDR and VEGFA variants correlated with survival and toxicity, respectively. There was no significant change in overall QOL scores over time.

CONCLUSION

This regimen is feasible and did not decrease the QOL in this study population. However, it did not meet the primary efficacy end point.

Effect of liver toxicity on clinical outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with pemetrexed

Liver toxicity (LT) is a common side effect of pemetrexed (PEM); however, the effect of LT on clinical outcome has not been investigated in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with PEM. Between June, 2009 and June, 2012, a total of 95 chemo-naive NSCLC patients received a PEM-containing regimen in our hospital. We reviewed the medical records of those 95 patients and evaluated the incidence of LT. Furthermore, we investigated the association between LT and clinical outcome. In this analysis, LT was defined as any grade of aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase elevation. A total of 67 patients (70.5%) developed LT, which occurred mostly during the first treatment cycle. Among these, 10 patients (10.5%) required a delay in treatment or a dose reduction from the subsequent cycle and PEM discontinuation was required in 1 patient. The response rate (RR) was 43.3 and 21.4% in patients with and in those without LT, respectively (P=0.0387). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.3 and 24.2 months in patients with LT and 2.9 and 18.3 months in patients without LT, respectively (P<0.0001 for PFS and P=0.2426 for OS). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that LT exerted a significant positive effect on PFS (hazard ratio = 0.341; P<0.0001). In conclusion, LT was frequently observed in NSCLC patients treated with PEM; however, it was generally easily manageable. The improvement in RR and PFS observed in patients with LT suggested that LT may be a useful predictor of a favorable outcome in this patient population.

Phase II study of perioperative chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed in non-small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Pathologic complete response (pCR) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in many solid tumors. We evaluated pCR rate of cisplatin with pemetrexed in non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Patients with stages IB to IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1 were enrolled in this single-arm phase II trial using two-stage design with 90% power to detect pCR rate of more than or equal to 10%. Pretreatment mediastinal lymph node biopsy was required. Patients received three cycles of cisplatin 75 mg/m with pemetrexed 500 mg/m (day 1 every 21 days) preoperatively and additional two cycles within 60 to 80 days after surgery. The primary end point was pCR. Polymorphisms in FPGS, GGH, SLC19A1, and TYMS genes were correlated with treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were enrolled, with median age of 62.5 years. Preoperatively, 26% had squamous histology, and 34% had biopsy-proven N2 involvement. R0 resection was achieved in 94% of the 34 patients who underwent surgery, and 54% had documented N2 clearance. There was no pCR seen. Median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival of these patients have not yet been reached in contrast to median of 13.8 and 24.2 months, respectively, in patients with persistent N2 disease (p = 0.3241 and p = 0.1022, respectively). There was a statistically significant association between DFS and postoperative tumor, node, metastasis stage (p = 0.0429), SLC19A1 rs3788189 TT genotype (p = 0.0821), and viable tumor defined as less than or equal to 10% of resected specimen (p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

The primary end point was not met. Patients with N2 clearance, less than or equal to 10% viable tumor in the resected specimen, and SLC19A1 rs3788189 TT genotype have favorable DFS outcomes.

Heterozygote advantage of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms on clinical outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) enzyme is essential for transmethylation reactions including DNA methylation and DNA synthesis and thereby may contribute to cancer prognosis. In our study, a total of 1,004 advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy regimens were used for genotyping 10 tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of MTHFR. Association was assessed between the SNPs and treatment outcomes. We found that polymorphism of rs1537514 showed the most significant effect: heterozygote associated with better clinical benefit (P = 0.002) and decreased risk of grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal toxicity (P = 0.027), while the mutant homozygote associated with increased risk of severe gastrointestinal toxicity (P = 0.031) and thrombocytopenia (P = 009). The heterozygotes of exon polymorphisms (rs1801131, rs1801133) also yielded better clinical benefit (P = 0.030 for rs1801131) and decreased risk of severe gastrointestinal toxicity (P = 0.004 for rs1801131) or thrombocytopenia (P = 0.016 for 1801133). However, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) did not differ for the MTHFR polymorphisms, except for heterozygote of rs1537514 showing significant effects with better PFS (P = 0.022). Clinical factors as age, gender, and smoking status had significant effects for the OS (P = 0.003, 0.002, and 0.012, respectively) while performance status and chemotherapy regimens for PFS (P = 0.001 and 3.9 × 10(-6), respectively). The results indicate that a heterozygous advantage may exist in certain MTHFR variants, and the polymorphisms (especially rs1537514) may play a predictive role of treatment efficacy and adverse effects in NSCLC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

Polymorphisms in TS, MTHFR and ERCC1 genes as predictive markers in first-line platinum and pemetrexed therapy in NSCLC patients

Purpose

We presented retrospective analysis of up to five polymorphisms in TS, MTHFR and ERCC1 genes as molecular predictive markers for homogeneous Caucasian, non-squamous NSCLC patients treated with pemetrexed and platinum front-line chemotherapy.

Methods

The following polymorphisms in DNA isolated from 115 patients were analyzed: various number of 28-bp tandem repeats in 5′-UTR region of TS gene, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) within the second tandem repeat of TS gene (G>C); 6-bp deletion in 3′-UTR region of the TS (1494del6); 677C>T SNP in MTHFR; 19007C>T SNP in ERCC1. Molecular examinations’ results were correlated with disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival.

Results

Polymorphic tandem repeat sequence (2R, 3R) in the enhancer region of TS gene and G>C SNP within the second repeat of 3R allele seem to be important for the effectiveness of platinum and pemetrexed in first-line chemotherapy. The insignificant shortening of PFS in 3R/3R homozygotes as compared to 2R/2R and 2R/3R genotypes were observed, while it was significantly shorter in patients carrying synchronous 3R allele and G nucleotide. The combined analysis of TS VNTR and MTHFR 677C>T SNP revealed shortening of PFS in synchronous carriers of 3R allele in TS and two C alleles in MTHFR. The strongest factors increased the risk of progression were poor PS, weight loss, anemia and synchronous presence of 3R allele and G nucleotide in the second repeat of 3R allele in TS. Moreover, lack of application of second-line chemotherapy, weight loss and poor performance status and above-mentioned genotype of TS gene increased risk of early mortality.

Conclusion

The examined polymorphisms should be accounted as molecular predictor factors for pemetrexed- and platinum-based front-line chemotherapy in non-squamous NSCLC patients.

Relationship between progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with anticancer agents after first-line treatment failure

AIM

The hazard ratio of progression-free survival (PFS-HR) generally does not reflect that of overall survival (OS-HR) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with first-line therapy. Short survival post-progression (SPP) better reflects the PFS-HR and OS-HR in simulations. We aimed to evaluate whether the PFS-HR reflects the OS-HR in NSCLC clinical trials for post-first-line treatments.

METHOD

We reviewed clinical studies of post-first-line anticancer agents for NSCLC. We examined the sample size of the experimental arm (EA), median PFS (mPFS) or median time to progression in the EA, median overall survival (mOS) in the EA, the PFS-HR and the OS-HR. SPP was defined as the difference between mOS and mPFS. The association between mPFS and SPP, mPFS and mOS, and the PFS-HR and OS-HR was tested. We sought for the optimal point of correlation of PFS-HR and OS-HR by every 1 month of SPP.

RESULTS

We identified 32 trials (34 arms). mPFS and mOS were weakly correlated (correlation coefficient [r] = 0.376; P = 0.0286). The PFS-HR and OS-HR were also moderately correlated (r = 0.415; P = 0.015). The maximum r value was 0.770 (SPP < 6 months; P < 0.0001) when we tested the associations between the PFS-HR and OS-HR for SPP using 1-month increments. The estimated regression equation at this point was OS-HR = 0.679 × (PFS-HR) + 0.349.

CONCLUSION

The PFS-HR and OS-HR were strongly correlated in advanced NSCLC patients treated with post-first-line anticancer agents, with a SPP of less than 6 months.