Survival effect of venous thromboembolism in patients with multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide and high-dose dexamethasone

Validation of the IMPEDE VTE score for prediction of venous thromboembolism in Chinese patients with multiple myeloma: A single-center retrospective cohort study

Multiple myeloma (MM) significantly increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) within 6 months of treatment initiation. The IMPEDE VTE score is a VTE risk prediction model which is recently incorporated into the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, but it lacks validation among Asians, including Chinese MM patients. We performed a retrospective chart review of 405 Chinese with newly diagnosed MM who started therapy at Beijing Jishuitan Hospital between April 2013 to October 2022. The 6-month cumulative incidence of VTE was 3.8 % (95 % CI:1.6-7.6), 8.6 % (95 % CI: 5.3-21.9) and 40.5 % (95 % CI: 24.9-55.7) in the low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups (P < 0.001), respectively. The C-statistic of the IMPEDE VTE scores for predicting VTE within 6 months of treatment initiation was 0.74 (95 % CI: 0.65-0.83). Of note, in this single-center cohort study, we propose that the anticoagulant LMWH may be more effective than the antiplatelet aspirin in potentially preventing VTE in newly diagnosed MM patients. Our findings suggest that the IMPEDE VTE score is a valid evidence-based risk stratification tool in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed MM.

Approach to Contemporary Risk Assessment, Prevention and Management of Thrombotic Complications in Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with an increased risk of thrombotic complications, which remains substantial despite the implementation of thromboprophylaxis. The procoagulant state that characterizes the disease is multifactorial, and a greater understanding of the underlying pathophysiology is required to inform appropriate thrombosis prevention. Currently, there is a shift towards using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this setting; head-to-head comparisons in the context of controlled clinical trials between class agents are still missing. MM-specific VTE risk assessment scores have been developed to optimize management and minimize the associated mortality/morbidity. Their clinical utility remains to be evaluated. The value of adding biomarkers to clinical scores to optimize their performance and increase their discriminatory power is also under assessment.

Metformin inhibits multiple myeloma serum-induced endothelial cell thrombosis by down-regulating miR-532

OBJECTIVES

Thrombotic complications in multiple myeloma (MM) impairs the quality of life of patients. Metformin has a certain effect on anti-thrombosis, but its role and mechanism in MM-induced thrombosis are still uncovered. Therefore, this study evaluated the effect of metformin on MM-induced thrombosis.

METHODS

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were exposed to normal serum (15%), MM serum (15%), metformin (0.01 mmol/L), or MM serum and metformin simultaneously. The expression of tissue factor (TF) in HUVECs was detected by flow cytometry and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). QRT-PCR was also used to determine the expressions of endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR) and miR-532. The generation of thrombin and activated protein C was measured by thrombin generation and protein C activation assays. And EPCR, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2, p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) pathway related protein expressions were detected by western blot.

RESULT

MM serum increased the expressions of TF, EPCR and miR-532, and induced thrombin generation and protein C activation in HUVECs. Based on the MM serum treatment, metformin decreased these expressions and inhibited the thrombin generation and protein C activation in HUVECs. However, miR-532 mimic reversed the effect of metformin and promoted the levels of thrombosis related indicators in HUVECs. Moreover, metformin activated the EPCR, ERK 1/2, p38 MAPK and NF-κB pathways but miR-532 mimic suppressed the activation of pathways.

CONCLUSION

Metformin played an inhibitory effect on MM serum-induced HUVEC thrombosis, suggesting that metformin could serve as a novel antithrombotic approach for MM patients.

Venous thromboembolism in multiple myeloma is associated with increased mortality

BACKGROUND

In multiple myeloma, venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common, and treatments for myeloma, such as lenalidomide, increase the risk of thrombosis while improving survival. The association between VTE and survival is not well known.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the association between VTE and survival in multiple myeloma (MM) while adjusting for known confounders that affect risk of thrombosis and survival, including patient characteristics and treatment in a retrospective cohort of US veterans.

PATIENTS/METHODS

A cohort of patients with newly diagnosed MM treated within Veterans Health Administration between September 1, 1999, and June 30, 2014, was created to assess the association between VTE and mortality using Cox proportional hazards regression modeling while accounting for known prognostic factors and treatments.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 4446 patients with myeloma, including 2837 patients diagnosed after lenalidomide approval in July 2006. VTE occurred in 327 (7.4%) patients within 1 year and occurred at a median of 77 days (interquartile range, 37-153) after starting therapy for MM. In all patients, VTE was associated with increased mortality at 6 months (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-2.37). Patients in the post-lenalidomide cohort with VTE had an increased mortality at both 6 months (aHR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.52-3.51) and 12 months (aHR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.19-2.33) after treatment initiation.

DISCUSSION

This study shows that VTE during the first 6-12 months of therapy is associated with increased mortality in patients with MM. Studies evaluating thromboprophylaxis in patients at high risk of thrombosis are needed.

The hypercoagulable state in multiple myeloma: The contribution of thrombin generation test

BACKGROUND

Multiple myeloma is a hematologic malignancy which confers a high venous thromboembolic risk. This risk is linked to patient-related factors, disease-specific mechanisms, and antimyeloma therapy, especially immunomodulatory drugs. Some studies have suggested that the thrombin generation assay may be a predictive marker of thrombosis. This study aimed to assess the hypercoagulable state in patients with multiple myeloma at diagnosis and after myeloma therapy.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with multiple myeloma were included in a prospective study and were compared with 31 matched controls with age and gender. Thrombin generation assay was performed in patients at diagnosis prior to treatment initiation and at the end of myeloma therapy, and in controls. Parameters of lag time, peak thrombin concentration, time to peak, endogenous thrombin potential, and velocity index were analyzed.

RESULTS

Median age of patients at diagnosis was 58 years (11 men and 20 women). Twenty-three patients (74%) were classified as high vascular risk and received thromboprophylaxis. No thromboembolic events have been reported during follow-up, except a symptomatic pulmonary embolism in one patient which occurred at diagnosis. At baseline, patients with myeloma had significantly elevated velocity index as compared to controls (178 vs 128 nmol/L/min; P = .013). High-risk patients showed an elevation of plasma thrombin generation as compared to low-risk patients (endogenous thrombin potential = 1244 vs 1052 nmol/L/min; P = .043). Myeloma therapy did not significantly change the thrombin generation parameters.

CONCLUSION

Thrombin generation appears to be higher in patients with myeloma compared with controls, especially in high-risk patients, and does not change significantly after treatment completion.

Anticancer Therapy-Induced Atrial Fibrillation: Electrophysiology and Related Mechanisms

Some well-established immunotherapy, radiotherapy, postoperation, anticancer drugs such as anthracyclines, antimetabolites, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 blockers, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, alkylating agents, checkpoint inhibitors, and angiogenesis inhibitors, are significantly linked to cardiotoxicity. Cardiotoxicity is a common complication of several cancer treatments. Some studies observed complications of cardiac arrhythmia associated with the treatment of cancer, including atrial fibrillation (AF), supraventricular arrhythmias, and cardiac repolarization abnormalities. AF increases the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality; it is associated with an almost doubled risk of mortality and a nearly 5-fold increase in the risk of stroke. The occurrence of AF is also usually researched in patients with advanced cancer and those undergoing active cancer treatments. During cancer treatments, the incidence rate of AF affects the prognosis of tumor treatment and challenges the treatment strategy. The present article is mainly focused on the cardiotoxicity of cancer treatments. In our review, we discuss these anticancer therapies and how they induce AF and consequently provide information on the precaution of AF during cancer treatment.

Differing mechanisms of thrombin generation in live haematological and solid cancer cells determined by calibrated automated thrombography

: Calibrated automated thrombography (CAT) is emerging as a reliable tool for real-time estimation of thrombin generation potential. There is a clinical need for knowledge about the pathways underlying the thrombotic phenotype of different malignancies. Cells from solid (e.g. pancreatic cancer; n = 7) and malignant haematological cell lines (e.g. multiple myeloma; n = 5) were evaluated for thrombin generation, using CAT, with the addition of control plasma (NormTrol; Helena Biosciences, Gateshead, UK)) or plasma deficient in coagulation factors VII and XII. In addition, tissue factor (TF) cell surface expression was determined by flow cytometry. In platelet-free plasma, thrombin generation in all cancer cell lines was cell concentration dependent, with the pancreatic cancer line CFPAC-1 producing the highest thrombin of 220 nmol/l at 5 × 10-cells/ml concentration. Lag times and times to peak reflected most significant differences out of all thrombin generation parameters measured and were inversely correlated with cell surface TF surface expression. Solid tumour cell lines had higher thrombin peaks, faster lag times, and a thrombin generation profile of overall greater magnitude than haematological cell lines. In the absence of factor VII in platelet-free plasma, thrombin generation in solid pancreatic cancer cell lines was significantly reduced unlike in haematological cell lines. However, in the absence of factor XII, thrombin generation was reduced more in haematological cells but had little or no effect on solid cell lines. The CAT assay identified characteristic differences in thrombin generation kinetics between solid tumour and haematological cancer cell lines, of which lag time and time to peak correlated with TF cell surface expression.

Multiple Myeloma, Version 2.2016: Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant neoplasm of plasma cells that accumulate in bone marrow, leading to bone destruction and marrow failure. Recent statistics from the American Cancer Society indicate that the incidence of MM is increasing. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) included in this issue address management of patients with solitary plasmacytoma and newly diagnosed MM.

Monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of multiple myeloma: current status and future perspectives

The treatment landscape for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is constantly evolving. Over the past decade, the introduction of novel agents such as proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs has led to notable changes in therapeutic strategy, and improvements in survival, yet MM remains incurable in the vast majority of cases. More recently, a targeted approach to MM treatment has emerged, using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to target antigens expressed on the surface of MM cells. MAbs tested to date kill MM cells via the host's immune system and/or by promoting apoptosis, and appear to have generally improved tolerability compared with currently available treatments. Due to their distinct mode of action, mAbs are promising both for patients who have exhausted current regimens, and as part of first-line treatments in newly diagnosed patients. This review examines the recent developments in mAb-based therapy for MM, primarily focused on those agents in ongoing clinical testing.

Use of lenalidomide in the management of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: expert recommendations in Korea

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the third most common hematologic malignancy in Korea. Historically, the incidence of MM in Korea has been lower than that in Western populations, although there is growing evidence that the incidence of MM in Asian populations, including Korea, is increasing rapidly. Despite advances in the management of MM, patients will ultimately relapse or become refractory to their current treatment, and alternative therapeutic options are required in the relapsed/refractory setting. In Korea, although lenalidomide/dexamethasone is indicated for the treatment of relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM) in patients who have received at least one prior therapy, lenalidomide is reimbursable specifically only in patients with RRMM who have failed bortezomib-based treatment. Based on evidence from pivotal multinational clinical trials as well as recent studies in Asia, including Korea, lenalidomide/dexamethasone is an effective treatment option for patients with RRMM, regardless of age or disease status. Adverse events associated with lenalidomide/dexamethasone, including hematologic toxicity, venous thromboembolism, fatigue, rash, infection, and muscle cramps, are largely predictable and preventable/manageable with appropriate patient monitoring and/or the use of standard supportive medication and dose adjustment/interruption. Lenalidomide/dexamethasone provides an optimal response when used at first relapse, and treatment should be continued long term until disease progression. With appropriate modification of the lenalidomide starting dose, lenalidomide/dexamethasone is effective in patients with renal impairment and/or cytopenia. This review presents updated evidence from the published clinical literature and provides recommendations from an expert panel of Korean physicians regarding the use of lenalidomide/dexamethasone in patients with RRMM.

Current treatment landscape for relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma

Recent developments in the treatment of multiple myeloma have led to improvements in response rates and to increased survival; however, relapse is inevitable in almost all patients. Recurrence of myeloma is typically more aggressive with each relapse, leading to the development of treatment-refractory disease, which is associated with a shorter survival. Several phase II and III trials have demonstrated the efficacy of recently approved agents in the setting of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma, including immunomodulatory agents, such as lenalidomide and pomalidomide, and proteasome inhibitors, such as bortezomib and carfilzomib. Currently, however, there is no standard treatment for patients with relapsed and/or refractory disease. This Review discusses the current treatment landscape for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma and highlights disease-related and patient-related factors--such as pre-existing comorbidities or toxicities--that are important considerations for clinicians when selecting an appropriate treatment regimen.

Absence of tissue factor is characteristic of lymphoid malignancies of both T- and B-cell origin

BACKGROUND

Thrombosis is a marker of poor prognosis in individuals with solid tumors. The expression of tissue factor (TF) on the cell surface membrane of malignant cells is a pivotal molecular link between activation of coagulation, angiogenesis, metastasis, aggressive tumor behavior and poor survival. Interestingly, thrombosis is associated with shortened survival in solid, but not in lymphoid neoplasias.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to study whether the lack of impact of thrombosis on survival in lymphoid neoplasias could be due to a lack of tumor-derived TF expression.

METHODS

We analyzed TF gene (F3) expression in lymphoid (N=114), myeloid (N=49) and solid tumor (N=856) cell lines using the publicly available dataset from the Broad-Novartis Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (http://www.broadinstitute.org/ccle/home), and in 90 patient-derived lymphoma samples. TF protein expression was studied by immunohistochemistry (IHC).

RESULTS

In sharp contrast to wide F3 expression in solid tumors (74.2%), F3 was absent in all low and high grade T- and B-cell lymphomas, and in most myeloid tumors, except for select acute myeloid leukemias with monocytic component. IHC confirmed the absence of TF protein in all indolent and high-grade B-cell (0/90) and T-cell (0/20) lymphomas, and acute leukemias (0/11).

CONCLUSIONS

We show that TF in lymphomas does not derive from the malignant cells, since these do not express either F3 or TF protein. Therefore, it is unlikely that thrombosis in patients with lymphoid neoplasms is secondary to tumor-derived tissue factor.

Clinical and genetic factors associated with venous thromboembolism in myeloma patients treated with lenalidomide-based regimens

Lenalidomide has significant antimyeloma activity but it is associated with a significant risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In this study, we assessed clinical and genetic risk factors that may predispose for VTE in myeloma patients who were treated with lenalidomide-based regimens. We analyzed common clinical and selected genetic factors in 200 consecutive, unselected myeloma patients who were treated with lenalidomide-based regimens in a single institution. Twelve patients (6%) developed a VTE (nine deep venous thrombosis and three pulmonary embolism). All VTEs occurred in patients who were receiving aspirin prophylaxis; no patient who received LMWH or acenocoumarol had a VTE. The frequency of VTEs was 9.4% in previously untreated and 4.5% in previously treated patients. VTEs were more frequent in patients >65 years (8.1% vs. 1.6%) especially among patients receiving aspirin as prophylaxis (10.4% vs. 1.8% for patients ≤65 years). In patients who received prophylaxis with low dose aspirin a single-nucleotide polymorphism in NFκB1 (rs3774968) gene was associated with increased risk of VTE (OR 3.76, 95%CI 1-16, P = 0.051). None of the patients who developed VTEs had common genetic variations that are associated with increased risk of VTEs in the general population, such as FVLeiden and FIIG20210A. Our data indicated that LMWH or vitamin K antagonists (with a target INR 2-3) effectively reduce the risk of VTEs. In patients who received prophylaxis with aspirin genetic variants of genes that are involved directly or indirectly in inflammatory response may be associated with increased risk of VTE.

Lenalidomide in multiple myeloma-a practice guideline

BACKGROUND

Promising new drugs such as lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory agent, are available for the treatment of multiple myeloma. We describe the process of creating a provincial guideline for the use of lenalidomide, alone or in combination with other drugs, in relapsed, refractory, or newly diagnosed disease (including smoldering and symptomatic patients, and candidates and non-candidates for transplant) and in maintenance treatment (after transplant or non-transplant therapy); and for strategies to manage lenalidomide-related toxicities.

METHODS

Outcomes of interest included overall survival, event-free survival, progression-free survival, time to progression, time to next treatment, response rate, and incidence of serious toxicity. The medline, embase, and Cochrane Library databases, as well as meeting abstracts and the Web sites of relevant organizations, were systematically searched for relevant literature.

RESULTS

Recommendations were developed using the evidence from published studies and the clinical expertise of the working group and of the Cancer Care Ontario Hematology Disease Site Group.

CONCLUSIONS

Lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone can be recommended for both previously untreated and treated patients with multiple myeloma. Guidelines for the management of cytopenias, venous thromboembolism, and second primary malignancies are discussed.

Age and organ damage correlate with poor survival in myeloma patients: meta-analysis of 1435 individual patient data from 4 randomized trials

Thalidomide and bortezomib are extensively used to treat elderly myeloma patients. In these patients, treatment-related side effects are frequent and full drug doses difficult to tolerate. We retrospectively analyzed data from 1435 elderly patients enrolled in 4 European phase III trials including thalidomide and/or bortezomib. After a median follow up of 33 months (95%CI: 10-56 months), 513 of 1435 patients (36%) died; median overall survival was 50 months (95%CI: 46-60 months). The risk of death was increased in patients aged 75 years or over (HR 1.44, 95%CI: 1.20-1.72; P<0.001), in patients with renal failure (HR 2.02, 95%CI: 1.51-2.70; P<0.001), in those who experienced grade 3-4 infections, cardiac or gastrointestinal adverse events during treatment (HR 2.53, 95%CI: 1.75-3.64; P<0.001) and in those who required drug discontinuation due to adverse events (HR 1.67, 95%CI; 1.12-2.51; P=0.01). This increased risk was restricted to the first six months after occurrence of adverse events or drug discontinuation and declined over time. More intensive approaches, such as the combination of bortezomib-thalidomide, negatively affected outcome. Bortezomib-based combinations may overcome the negative impact of renal failure. Age 75 years or over or renal failure at presentation, occurrence of infections, cardiac or gastrointestinal adverse events negatively affected survival. A detailed geriatric assessment, organ evaluation and less intense individualized approaches are suggested in elderly unfit subjects.

How to maintain patients on long-term therapy: understanding the profile and kinetics of adverse events

Thalidomide, lenalidomide, and bortezomib have considerably improved the survival of patients with multiple myeloma. These agents have specific adverse event (AE) profiles, and it is especially important to consider severe AEs that may lead to premature discontinuation, negatively affecting outcomes. AEs of particular concern are peripheral neuropathy (associated with thalidomide and bortezomib), venous thromboembolism (associated with thalidomide and lenalidomide), and myelosuppression (associated with lenalidomide and bortezomib). AEs are usually predictable and easily managed with monitoring, appropriate dose adjustments, and supportive care. AEs are generally transient, occurring early in the course of treatment, providing evidence for the feasibility of continuous therapy.

Risk and management of thrombosis in multiple myeloma

Patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma have an increased risk of venous thrombosis. This may be due to various risk factors, including disease specific factors, changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis factors and circulating prothrombotic microparticles. More recent studies have indicated that also arterial thrombosis, including acute myocardial infarction and stroke do occur more frequently in these patients. Studies on etiological factors contributing to the development of thrombosis will be reviewed in this article. In addition we will focus on the prevention and management of arterial and venous thrombosis in patients with multiple myeloma.

Management of treatment-associated toxicites of anti-angiogenic therapy in patients with brain tumors

Anti-angiogenic therapies, including bevacizumab, are being used with increasing frequency in the management of malignant glioma. Common clinically significant toxicities include hypertension and proteinuria, poor wound healing, and the potential for thromboembolic events. Literature related to the use of bevacizumab in malignant glioma, reported toxicities in this patient population, and management of these toxicities was reviewed. Recommendations for assessment and management are provided. Anti-angiogenic therapies will continue to have a role in the treatment of malignant glioma. Further studies of the prevention, assessment, and management of these toxicities are warranted.

Analysis of incidence, risk factors and clinical outcome of thromboembolic and bleeding events in 431 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients have an increasing risk of both hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. However, the competing risks of two of these life-threatening complications in these complex patients have still not been well defined. We retrospectively analyzed data from 431 allogeneic transplantation recipients to identify the incidence, risk factors and mortality due to thrombosis and bleeding. Significant clinical bleeding was more frequent than symptomatic thrombosis. The cumulative incidence of a bleeding episode was 30.2% at 14 years. The cumulative incidence of a venous or arterial thrombosis at 14 years was 11.8% and 4.1%, respectively. The analysis of competing factors for venous thrombosis revealed extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease to be the only independent prognostic risk factor. By contrast, six factors were associated with an increased risk of bleeding; advanced disease, ablative conditioning regimen, umbilical cord blood transplantation, anticoagulation, acute III-IV graft-versus-host disease, and transplant-associated microangiopathy. The development of thrombosis did not significantly affect overall survival (P=0.856). However, significant clinical bleeding was associated with inferior survival (P<0.001). In allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, significant clinical bleeding is more common than thrombotic complications and affects survival.

Thrombosis in multiple myeloma (MM)

Thrombosis is a frequent feature in individuals with myeloma, particularly those treated with oral immunomodulatory drugs (IMID) such as thalidomide or lenalidomide concomitantly with anthracyclines or dexamethasone. Up to a third of these individuals may develop venous thrombosis if not given the benefit of prophylaxis. Interestingly, in contrast to individuals with solid tumors in whom thrombosis is a marker of poor prognosis, thrombosis does not impact overall survival in patients with myeloma. This finding suggests that the mechanisms of thrombosis in hematological neoplasms may differ from solid epithelial tumors and that thrombosis in the former may be driven by therapy and not by a procoagulant phenotype of the neoplastic plasma cells. This may also explain why thrombosis in the context of IMID-based therapy may be prevented by the use of prophylactic aspirin. In this text, we review the pathogenesis of thrombosis in myeloma, its relation to different chemotherapeutic regimens and the use of thrombo-prophylaxis.

Lenalidomide for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma

Lenalidomide is an amino-substituted derivative of thalidomide with direct antiproliferative and cytotoxic effects on the myeloma tumor cell, as well as antiangiogenic activity and immunomodulatory effects. Together with the introduction of bortezomib and thalidomide, lenalidomide has significantly improved the survival of patients with relapsed and refractory myeloma. The most common adverse events associated with lenalidomide include fatigue, skin rash, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. In addition, when lenalidomide is combined with dexamethasone or other conventional cytotoxic agents, there is an increase in the incidence of venous thromboembolic events. There is now evidence that continued treatment with lenalidomide has a significant impact on survival by improving the depth and duration of response. This highlights the value of adverse event management and appropriate dose adjustments to prevent toxicity, and of allowing continued treatment until disease progression. In this review, we will discuss the different lenalidomide-based treatment regimens for patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma. This is accompanied by recommendations of how to manage and prevent adverse events associated with lenalidomide-based therapy.

Thrombosis is associated with inferior survival in multiple myeloma

Patients with multiple myeloma are at an increased risk of venous thromboembolism and arterial thrombosis. We assessed the impact of venous and arterial thrombosis on survival in a population-based study of 9,399 multiple myeloma patients diagnosed in Sweden from 1987 to 2005. We found multiple myeloma patients with venous thromboembolism to have a higher mortality at 1-, 5-, and 10-years of follow up compared with those without, with hazard ratios of 2.9 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.4-3.5), 1.6 (95% CI: 1.5-1.8), and 1.6 (95% CI: 1.4-1.7), respectively. There was an increase in risk of death among multiple myeloma patients with arterial thrombosis, with hazard ratios of 3.4 (95% CI: 3.0-3.8), 2.2 (95% CI: 2.0-2.3), and 2.1 (95% CI: 1.9-2.1), respectively. In landmark analyses at six months, early arterial but not venous thromboembolism was associated with a higher risk of death. Thus, in contrast to prior smaller studies, we found the development of thrombosis to be associated with significantly poorer survival. The prevention of thrombosis in multiple myeloma is an important goal in the management of these patients.

When a little aspirin may be enough

In this issue of Blood, Larocca et al in a large prospective study show that thromboprophylaxis with low-dose aspirin is very effective in previously untreated myeloma patients with a low thromboembolic risk receiving lenalidomide with low-dose dexamethasone.

Absence of tissue factor expression by neoplastic plasma cells in multiple myeloma

Thrombosis portends a poor prognosis in individuals with solid tumors. Constitutive expression of tissue factor (TF) by cancer cells is a key in triggering activation of coagulation and promoting aggressive tumor behavior. Though multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with a high frequency of thrombosis in the context of thalidomide and lenalidomide therapy, prognosis is not affected by its occurrence. We sought to determine the expression of TF in MM. F3 (TF gene) expression profiling was analyzed in 55 human MM cell lines (HMCL) and in 223 solid tumor cell lines obtained from GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Cancer Cell Line Genomic Profiling Dataset. TF was not expressed in any of the 55 HMCLs studied, in sharp contrast to solid tumors, 90% of which showed TF expression. F3 expression was also absent in tumor samples from 239 MM patients. Immunohistochemistry for TF was negative, with either no or focal (1+) staining in 70/73 MM patients. Only three marrow biopsies were moderately (2+) positive either focally or diffusely, suggesting that in rare cases bone marrow microenvironment may support TF expression. General lack of TF expression by neoplastic plasma cells may explain why thrombosis is not predictive of poor outcome, and why aspirin prophylaxis is often effective in MM.

Hematologic malignancies and thrombosis

Patients with hematologic malignancies have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), particularly at diagnosis and during the treatment with chemotherapy, asparaginase or immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). A disease-dependent hypercoagulable condition associated with other risk factors like drugs, central venous catheter (CVC), immobility and infections are responsible for this high VTE rate. Thrombotic complications have a significant impact on morbidity and in some cases also on mortality of patients with onco-hematologic diseases, therefore thromboprophylaxis to prevent VTE in this setting is needed. However, thrombocytopenia and hemorrhagic complications pone many difficulties in the management of an anticoagulant or antiaggregant treatment in these patients. Recommendations from current guidelines are limited to multiple myeloma patients treated with thalidomide or lenalidomide associated with dexamethasone or chemotherapy, but hematological clinical departments should implement a policy for prevention and treatment of thromboembolic complications in hematologic malignancies.

Activation of coagulation by a thalidomide-based regimen

Combining thalidomide (Thal) with chemotherapeutic agents or steroid preparations led to improved response rates in the treatment of multiple myeloma. However, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is one of the most serious side-effects noted with this regimen, and how a Thal-based regimen causes DVT is unclear. We investigated the procoagulant effects of Thal when combined with chemotherapeutic agents in vitro, focusing on tissue factor (TF) and phosphatidylserine. We examined the effects of the chemotherapeutic doxorubicin hydrochloride (Dox) and the steroid dexamethasone (Dex), with or without Thal. Our study used the human vascular endothelial, monocytic, and myeloma cell lines, EAhy926, THP-1, and RPMI8226, respectively. In EAhy926 and THP-1, Dex treatment increased expression of TF, which may induce procoagulant activity (PCA). Upregulation of TF mRNA correlated with activation of the Egr-1 pathway. In Thal and Dex treatments, the increase of PCA induction from phosphatidylserine exposure was modest. In contrast, Dox and Thal-Dox increased phosphatidylserine exposure in both cell types. In THP-1 cells, cell surface phosphatidylserine exposure correlated with increased PCA by Dox. Thal alone showed a modest increase in phosphatidylserine exposure in endothelial cells and monocytes. When Thal is given in combination with chemotherapies or Dex, endothelial cell and monocyte PCA may be induced through phosphatidylserine exposure, or TF expression. Induction may be protracted by Thal, which has an antiangiogenic activity. Therefore, prophylactic anticoagulant strategies should be considered in Thal-based combination regimens.

The clinical safety of lenalidomide in multiple myeloma and myelodysplastic syndromes

INTRODUCTION

Lenalidomide is an IMiDs® oral immunomodulatory compound developed for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Long-term continuous treatment with lenalidomide beyond first response may be important to optimize responses and delay relapse.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the lenalidomide mechanism of action, pharmacodynamics, key clinical studies with a focus on safety and post-marketing surveillance data. The necessity for early adverse-event management, including dose modifications for neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, where applicable, in order to maintain patients on treatment and achieve optimal efficacy, is discussed. Secondary primary malignancies in MM and progression to acute myeloid leukemia in MDS patients in the context of lenalidomide treatment are also discussed. Finally, as lenalidomide is renally excreted, the requirement for dose adjustment according to creatinine clearance is discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Lenalidomide is highly effective and generally well tolerated. Most adverse events occur early during the course of treatment and are manageable. Lenalidomide is not associated with peripheral neuropathy and has a lack of cumulative toxicity, making it an effective treatment option for long-term use in the management of MM and low/intermediate-1-risk MDS, specifically with chromosome 5q deletion with or without other cytogenetic abnormalities.

Low venous thromboembolic risk with bortezomib in multiple myeloma and potential protective effect with thalidomide/lenalidomide-based therapy: review of data from phase 3 trials and studies of novel combination regimens

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are at elevated risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), specifically deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). VTE risk in MM is increased by various patient- and disease-related factors. The type of anti-MM therapy represents a key factor, with a substantially elevated VTE risk in patients treated with the immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) thalidomide or lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone and/or chemotherapy; VTE risk with lenalidomide-dexamethasone is further increased with concomitant erythropoietin. By contrast, treatment with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, alone or in combination, does not increase VTE risk; rates of DVT/PE do not appear affected by the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Bortezomib has shown antihemostatic effects in patients with relapsed or refractory MM, which supports that it exerts antithrombotic actions and thus potentially provides a protective effect in combination with regimens with an elevated VTE risk. Herein, we review data from phase 3 trials of bortezomib- and/or IMiD-based therapy in frontline MM, together with other studies of novel combination regimens. Despite the confounding effect of variable VTE prophylaxis, bortezomib-based regimens were typically associated with DVT/PE rates of ≤5%, similar to those seen with melphalan-prednisone and dexamethasone, whereas IMiD-based bortezomib-free regimens were generally associated with higher rates. Direct comparisons of regimens of thrombogenic potential with or without bortezomib demonstrated lower VTE risk with bortezomib. Between-study comparisons of VTE risk support these findings. Taken together, these data confirm the low VTE risk associated with bortezomib and support a potential protective effect of bortezomib in combination with IMiD-based regimens associated with elevated VTE risk.

Dexamethasone-induced oxidative stress enhances myeloma cell radiosensitization while sparing normal bone marrow hematopoiesis

Dexamethasone (Dex) and radiation therapy are established modalities in multiple myeloma. In this study, we propose a novel combination of Dex plus radiation that shows superior clonogenic cell killing and apoptosis of myeloma cells and selectively eliminates myeloma cells when cocultured with bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). Dex was found to inhibit the release of interleukin-6 from irradiated BMSCs, which is an established myeloma cell proproliferative cytokine. In 5TGM1 model, the combination of Dex with skeletal targeted radiotherapy (153-Sm-EDTMP) prolonged median survival time and inhibited radiation-induced myelosuppression. A two-cycle treatment of Dex plus 153-Sm-EDTMP was well tolerated and further improved median survival time. Mechanistically, Dex increased superoxide and hydrogen peroxide production and augmented radiation-induced oxidative stress and cell death of myeloma cells. In contrast, Dex inhibited radiation-induced increase in pro-oxidant levels and enhanced the clonogenic survival in normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Treatment with either N-acetylcysteine or the combination of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-conjugated copper, zinc-superoxide dismutase, and PEG-catalase significantly protected myeloma cells from Dex-induced clonogenic death. Overall, these results demonstrate that Dex in combination with radiotherapy enhances the killing of myeloma cells while protecting normal bone marrow hematopoiesis through a mechanism that involves selective increases in oxidative stress.

Lenalidomide treatment for patients with multiple myeloma: diagnosis and management of most frequent adverse events

The introduction of novel antimyeloma therapies, including thalidomide, lenalidomide, and bortezomib, has expanded treatment options for patients with this disease. These compounds have altered the natural history of multiple myeloma, resulting in substantial improvements in patient outcomes. However, like with any other drug, their use is associated with a specific toxicity profile. The major adverse events (AEs) associated with lenalidomide include: hematological toxicities (myelosuppression), mainly neutropenia, venous thromboembolism, gastrointestinal disturbance, skin toxicity, atrial fibrillation, asthenia, and decreased peripheral blood stem cell yield during stem cell collection when lenalidomide is used after a long period of time. These AEs are predictable, consistent, and manageable with patient monitoring, supportive care, and dose adjustment. In this article, using three clinical cases as examples, we discuss the diagnoses and management of the most frequent AEs associated with lenalidomide treatment in patients with multiple myeloma.

Management of the adverse effects of lenalidomide in multiple myeloma

The introduction of new agents in the treatment of multiple myeloma, such as thalidomide, bortezomib, or lenalidomide, has represented an important step forward in the management of this disease, with improvement in both treatment response and patient survival. On the other hand, when new drugs are used it is very important to know their associated toxicity, since adequate management of the adverse effects can help to avoid unnecessary treatment interruptions - thereby undoubtedly contributing to improvement in the efficacy of therapy. The present study reviews the main hematological and nonhematological adverse effects potentially associated with the use of lenalidomide in its most common combinations used for the treatment of multiple myeloma, and the recommendations for dealing with such effects.

Anti-angiogenic therapy: adapting strategies to overcome resistant tumors

Healthy cells, as well as benign and malignant tumors, depend upon the body's blood supply to bring in oxygen and nutrients and carry away waste products. Using this property against tumors, anti-angiogenic therapy targets the tumor vasculature with the aim of starving the tumor, and has demonstrated exceptional clinical efficacy against a number of tumors. This review discusses the current state of knowledge regarding anti-angiogenic therapies presently available to patients, and garners from both preclinical and clinical literature the benefits and side effects associated with anti-angiogenic therapies, the unfortunate mechanisms of acquired resistance to these novel therapeutics, and highlights promising next generation anti-angiogenics that may overcome the limitations encountered with first generation therapies.

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and risk of venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Patients with multiple myeloma are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but little information is available on VTE risk in patients with the precursor condition monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of VTE and its impact on mortality in patients with MGUS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 1610 patients with MGUS and no prior diagnosis of VTE during the 1978-2005 period in North Jutland County, Denmark. We used the Danish Central Population Registry to select 16,100 general population comparison cohort members with no prior VTE diagnosis, matched with the MGUS patients by age, sex, and comorbidity. Follow-up data on VTE incidence in the two groups were obtained from the Danish National Patient Registry covering all Danish hospitals. Time-varying Cox regression analysis was used to compute the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of VTE and the mortality rate ratio (MRR) for MGUS patients who developed VTE compared to MGUS patients without VTE.

RESULTS

In the MGUS cohort, 50 VTE events were identified during 12,594 person-years (PY) of follow-up, corresponding to an incidence rate of 4.0 VTEs/1000 PY. The IRR for VTE among MGUS patients compared to the comparison cohort was 1.37 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-1.88). Of the 50 MGUS patients with VTE, one was later diagnosed with malignant transformation. The adjusted MRR for MGUS patients with VTE compared to MGUS patients without VTE was 1.94 (95% CI: 1.36-2.77).

CONCLUSIONS

MGUS is a risk factor for VTE, and VTE is a marker for increased mortality among MGUS patients.

Treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents

The introduction of the Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors, used either as a single-agent or combined with classic anti-myeloma therapies, has improved the outcome for patients with relapsed myeloma. However, there is currently no generally accepted standard treatment for relapsed/refractory myeloma patients, partly because of the absence of trials comparing the efficacy of the novel agents in relapsed/refractory myeloma. Choice of a new treatment regimen depends on both patient and disease-specific characteristics. A lenalidomide-based regimen is the first choice in patients with neuropathy, while bortezomib has the highest efficacy in patients with renal insufficiency and is not associated with increased risk of thromboembolism. A second autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) can be applied in patients with a progression-free period of ≥ 18-24 months after the first auto-SCT. In high-risk relapse such as occurring early after auto-SCT consolidation with allogeneic SCT can be considered. In this review we provide an overview of the various salvage regimens and give recommendations for treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma in different clinical settings.

Arterial and venous thrombosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma: a population-based study

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have an increased risk of venous thrombosis. Interestingly, excess risk of venous thromboembolism has been observed among patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Using population-based data from Sweden, we assessed the risks of venous and arterial thrombosis in 18,627 MM and 5326 MGUS patients diagnosed from 1958 to 2006, compared with 70,991 and 20,161 matched controls, respectively. At 1, 5, and 10 years after MM diagnosis, there was an increased risk of venous thrombosis: hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) were 7.5 (6.4-8.9), 4.6 (4.1-5.1), and 4.1 (3.8-4.5), respectively. The corresponding results for arterial thrombosis were 1.9 (1.8-2.1), 1.5 (1.4-1.6), and 1.5 (1.4-1.5). At 1, 5, and 10 years after MGUS diagnosis, hazard ratios were 3.4 (2.5-4.6), 2.1 (1.7-2.5), and 2.1 (1.8-2.4) for venous thrombosis. The corresponding risks for arterial thrombosis were 1.7 (1.5-1.9), 1.3 (1.2-1.4), and 1.3 (1.3-1.4). IgG/IgA (but not IgM) MGUS patients had increased risks for venous and arterial thrombosis. Risks for thrombosis did not vary by M-protein concentration (> 10.0 g/L or < 10.0 g/L) at diagnosis. MGUS patients with (vs without) thrombosis had no excess risk of MM or Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Our findings are of relevance for future studies and for improvement of thrombosis prophylaxis strategies.

Thrombosis in multiple myeloma

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are at an increased risk of venous and arterial thrombosis. The pathogenesis remains unclear, but probably involves several factors such as activation of procoagulant factors, acquired activated protein C resistance, and inflammation. In addition to general risk factors for venous thromboembolism, such as older age, immobility, surgery, and inherited thrombophilia, there are some MM-specific and treatment-related factors that contribute to the increased risk. The risk for venous thromboembolism is high when patients are treated with thalidomide or lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone or multi-agent chemotherapy. Thromboprophylaxis should be given in these settings. Which agent is the most appropriate is a matter of debate, but aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and warfarin all seem to be effective. This review discusses risk factors for thromboembolism in MM and general, disease-specific and treatment-related mechanisms for thrombosis. Recommendations for thromboprophylaxis are described and treatment choices for venous thrombosis in MM patients are reviewed.