1
|
Kaffai S, Angelova-Toshkin D, Weins AB, Ickinger S, Steinke-Lange V, Vollert K, Frühwald MC, Kuhlen M. Cancer predisposing syndromes in childhood and adolescence pose several challenges necessitating interdisciplinary care in dedicated programs. Front Pediatr 2024; 12:1410061. [PMID: 38887560 PMCID: PMC11180882 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1410061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Genetic disposition is a major etiologic factor in childhood cancer. More than 100 cancer predisposing syndromes (CPS) are known. Surveillance protocols seek to mitigate morbidity and mortality. To implement recommendations in patient care and to ascertain that the constant gain of knowledge forces its way into practice specific pediatric CPS programs were established. Patients and methods We retrospectively analyzed data on children, adolescents, and young adults referred to our pediatric CPS program between October 1, 2021, and March 31, 2023. Follow-up ended on December 31, 2023. Results We identified 67 patients (30 male, 36 female, 1 non-binary, median age 9.5 years). Thirty-five patients were referred for CPS surveillance, 32 for features suspicious of a CPS including café-au-lait macules (n = 10), overgrowth (n = 9), other specific symptoms (n = 4), cancer suspicious of a CPS (n = 6), and rare neoplasms (n = 3). CPS was confirmed by clinical criteria in 6 patients and genetic testing in 7 (of 13). In addition, 6 clinically unaffected at-risk relatives were identified carrying a cancer predisposing pathogenic variant. A total of 48 patients were eventually diagnosed with CPS, surveillance recommendations were on record for 45. Of those, 8 patients did not keep their appointments for various reasons. Surveillance revealed neoplasms (n = 2) and metachronous tumors (n = 4) by clinical (n = 2), radiological examination (n = 2), and endoscopy (n = 2). Psychosocial counselling was utilized by 16 (of 45; 35.6%) families. Conclusions The diverse pediatric CPSs pose several challenges necessitating interdisciplinary care in specified CPS programs. To ultimately improve outcome including psychosocial well-being joint clinical and research efforts are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Kaffai
- Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Daniela Angelova-Toshkin
- Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Andreas B. Weins
- Augsburger Zentrum für Seltene Erkrankungen, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Sonja Ickinger
- Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | | | - Kurt Vollert
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Michael C. Frühwald
- Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Michaela Kuhlen
- Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Levine R, Kahn RM, Perez L, Brewer J, Ratner S, Li X, Yeoshoua E, Frey MK. Cascade genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes: a review of barriers and breakthroughs. Fam Cancer 2024; 23:111-120. [PMID: 38530571 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-024-00373-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
Germline genetic sequencing is now at the forefront of cancer treatment and preventative medicine. Cascade genetic testing, or the testing of at-risk relatives, is extremely promising as it offers genetic testing and potentially life-saving risk-reduction strategies to a population exponentially enriched for the risk of carrying a cancer-associated pathogenic variant. However, many relatives do not complete cascade testing due to barriers that span individual, relationship, healthcare community, and societal/policy domains. We have reviewed the published research on cascade testing. Our aim is to evaluate barriers to cascade genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes and explore strategies to mitigate these barriers, with the goal of promoting increased uptake of cascade genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Levine
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, HCA Florida Brandon, Brandon, FL, USA.
| | - Ryan M Kahn
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Luiza Perez
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jesse Brewer
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samantha Ratner
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Xuan Li
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Effi Yeoshoua
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melissa K Frey
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Genetics and Personalized Cancer Prevention Program, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Joshi P, Bhandari S, TK A, Kaur S, Bhargava R, Tansir G, Rastogi S. A qualitative study to assess the psychological experiences and coping strategies of families affected with Li-Fraumeni syndrome in the Indian population. Rare Tumors 2023; 15:20363613231186300. [PMID: 37424880 PMCID: PMC10327410 DOI: 10.1177/20363613231186300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a rare autosomal dominant hereditary cancer syndrome. Due to the high risk of occurrence of multiple cancers, families with LFS may have an overwhelming psychosocial burden. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care center using face-to-face interviews through a grounded theory approach. Statistical analysis was done using Smith's Interpretative Phenomenological Approach. Themes and sub-themes were extracted, and a thematic schema was developed. Results: A total of five themes were identified. The extracted themes were psychological experiences, behavioural responses, stressors, coping strategies and perceived needs. The interlay of the themes deepened the impact of LFS on the affected ones and brought into light the turmoil of emotions and difficulties that these individuals were going through in the face of the disease. Conclusions: LFS-affected individuals had a range of experiences with this rare and little-known disease. The lack of information seems to be a precursor to the denial of diagnosis. Their experience with the illness sheds light on the grey areas like guilt and helplessness that demand immediate attention. Future policies need to be developed in accordance with the identified perceived needs to potentially guide the treatment and rising needs of LFS-affected individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Poonam Joshi
- College of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalyani, India
| | - Sunidhi Bhandari
- Department of Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ajesh TK
- College of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Simran Kaur
- Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rachna Bhargava
- Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ghazal Tansir
- Department of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sameer Rastogi
- Department of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shomali N, Kamrani A, Heris JA, Shahabi P, Nasiri H, Sadeghvand S, Ghahremanzadeh K, Akbari M. Dysregulation of P53 in breast cancer: Causative factors and treatment strategies. Pathol Res Pract 2023; 247:154539. [PMID: 37257244 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
One of the most prevalent cancers impacting women worldwide is breast cancer. Although there are several risk factors for breast cancer, the p53 gene's function has recently received much attention. The "gatekeeper" gene, or p53, is sometimes referred to as such since it is crucial in controlling cell proliferation and preventing the development of malignant cells. By identifying DNA damage and initiating cellular repair processes, p53 usually functions as a tumor-suppressor. But p53 gene alterations can result in a lack of function, allowing cells to divide out of control and perhaps triggering the onset of cancer. Various factors, such as mutation genes, signaling pathways, and hormones, can dysregulate P53 proteins and cause breast cancer. A promising strategy for individualized cancer treatment involves focusing on p53 mutations in breast cancer. While numerous techniques, including gene therapy and small compounds, have shown promise, further study is required to create safe and efficient treatments to target p53 mutations in breast cancer successfully.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navid Shomali
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Amin Kamrani
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran; Immunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Javad Ahmadian Heris
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Pediatric Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Parviz Shahabi
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran; Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Hadi Nasiri
- Immunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Shahram Sadeghvand
- Pediatrics Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| | | | - Morteza Akbari
- Immunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran; Department of Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tansir G, Rastogi S, Dubasi SK, Chitikela S, Reddy LR, Barwad A, Goyal A. Lessons learnt from the clinico-genomic profiling of families with Li Fraumeni syndrome at a tertiary care centre in North India. Ecancermedicalscience 2023; 17:1550. [PMID: 37377684 PMCID: PMC10292852 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2023.1550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Li Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is an inherited cancer predisposition syndrome due to TP53 gene mutation. There is sparse literature on LFS in the Indian population. We conducted a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with LFS and their family members, registered at our Medical Oncology Department between September 2015 and 2022. 9 LFS families consisted of 29 patients diagnosed currently or historically with malignancies including 9 index cases and 20 first or second-degree relatives. Of these 29 patients, 7 (24.1%) patients developed their first malignancy before the age of 18 years, 15 (51.7%) were diagnosed between 18and and 60 years, and 7 (24.1%) were diagnosed at age more than 60 years. A total of 31 cancers occurred among the families, including 2 index cases who had metachronous malignancies. Each family had a median of three cancers (range 2-5); sarcoma (n = 12, 38.7% of total cancers) and breast cancer (n = 6, 19.3% of total cancers) being the commonest malignancies. Germline TP53 mutations were documented among 11 patients with cancers and 6 asymptomatic carriers. Of these nine mutations, the most common types were missense (n = 6, 66.6%) and nonsense (n = 2, 22.2%), and the commonest aberration was replacement of arginine with histidine (n = 4, 44.4%). Eight (88.8%) families met either classical or Chompret's diagnostic criteria and two (22.2%) satisfied both. Two (22.2%) families fit the diagnostic criteria prior to onset of malignancy in the index cases but were untested till the index cases presented to us. Four mutation carriers from three families are undergoing screening as per the Toronto protocol. No new malignancies have been detected so far during the mean surveillance duration of 14 months. The diagnosis of LFS has socio-economic implications for patients and their families. Delay in genetic testing misses out a crucial window wherein asymptomatic carriers could initiate surveillance in a timely fashion. Greater awareness on LFS and genetic testing in Indian patients is warranted for better management of this hereditary condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghazal Tansir
- Department of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Sameer Rastogi
- Department of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Sravan Kumar Dubasi
- Department of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Sindhu Chitikela
- Department of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Lavu Rohit Reddy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yashoda Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana 500024, India
| | - Adarsh Barwad
- Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Ankur Goyal
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Childhood cancer is rare, but it remains the leading cause of disease-related mortality among children 1-14 years of age. As exposure to environmental factors is lower in children, inherited genetic factors become an important player in the cause of childhood cancer. This review highlights the current knowledge and approach for cancer predisposition syndromes in children. RECENT FINDINGS Current literature suggests that 10-18% of paediatric cancer patients have an underlying genetic susceptibility to their disease. With better knowledge and technology, more genes and syndromes are being discovered, allowing tailored treatment and surveillance for the probands and their families.Studies have demonstrated that focused surveillance can detect early malignancies and increase overall survival in several cancer predisposition syndromes. Various approaches have been proposed to refine early tumour detection strategies while minimizing the burden on patients and families. Newer therapeutic strategies are being investigated to treat, or even prevent, tumours in children with cancer predisposition. SUMMARY This review summarizes the current knowledge about different cancer predisposition syndromes, focusing on the diagnosis, genetic counselling, surveillance and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiko Nakano
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ron Rabinowicz
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Malkin
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lof P, Engelhardt EG, van Gent MDJM, Mom CH, Rosier-van Dunné FMF, van Baal WM, Verhoeve HR, Hermsen BBJ, Verbruggen MB, Hemelaar M, van de Swaluw JMG, Knipscheer HC, Huirne JAF, Westenberg SM, van Driel WJ, Bleiker EMA, Amant F, Lok CAR. Psychological impact of referral to an oncology hospital on patients with an ovarian mass. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 33:ijgc-2022-003753. [PMID: 36600495 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In patients with an ovarian mass, a risk of malignancy assessment is used to decide whether referral to an oncology hospital is indicated. Risk assessment strategies do not perform optimally, resulting in either referral of patients with a benign mass or patients with a malignant mass not being referred. This process may affect the psychological well-being of patients. We evaluated cancer-specific distress during work-up for an ovarian mass, and patients' perceptions during work-up, referral, and treatment. METHODS Patients with an ovarian mass scheduled for surgery were enrolled. Using questionnaires we measured (1) cancer-specific distress using the cancer worry scale, (2) patients' preferences regarding referral (evaluated pre-operatively), and (3) patients' experiences with work-up and treatment (evaluated post-operatively). A cancer worry scale score of ≥14 was considered as clinically significant cancer-specific distress. RESULTS A total of 417 patients were included, of whom 220 (53%) were treated at a general hospital and 197 (47%) at an oncology hospital. Overall, 57% had a cancer worry scale score of ≥14 and this was higher in referred patients (69%) than in patients treated at a general hospital (43%). 53% of the patients stated that the cancer risk should not be higher than 25% to undergo surgery at a general hospital. 96% of all patients were satisfied with the overall work-up and treatment. No difference in satisfaction was observed between patients correctly (not) referred and patients incorrectly (not) referred. CONCLUSIONS Relatively many patients with an ovarian mass experienced high cancer-specific distress during work-up. Nevertheless, patients were satisfied with the treatment, regardless of the final diagnosis and the location of treatment. Moreover, patients preferred to be referred even if there was only a relatively low probability of having ovarian cancer. Patients' preferences should be taken into account when deciding on optimal cut-offs for risk assessment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pien Lof
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen G Engelhardt
- Division of Psychological Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mignon D J M van Gent
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location Academic Medical Center, Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Constantijne H Mom
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location Academic Medical Center, Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Majoie Hemelaar
- Department of Gynecology, Dijklander Hospital, Hoorn and Purmerend, The Netherlands
| | | | - Haye C Knipscheer
- Department of Gynecology, Spaarne Hospital, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| | - Judith A F Huirne
- Department of Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Willemien J van Driel
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eveline M A Bleiker
- Division of Psychological Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christianne A R Lok
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Frey MK, Ahsan MD, Bergeron H, Lin J, Li X, Fowlkes RK, Narayan P, Nitecki R, Rauh-Hain JA, Moss HA, Baltich Nelson B, Thomas C, Christos PJ, Hamilton JG, Chapman-Davis E, Cantillo E, Holcomb K, Kurian AW, Lipkin S, Offit K, Sharaf RN. Cascade Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Should We Move Toward Direct Relative Contact? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:4129-4143. [PMID: 35960887 PMCID: PMC9746789 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Evidence-based guidelines recommend cascade genetic counseling and testing for hereditary cancer syndromes, providing relatives the opportunity for early detection and prevention of cancer. The current standard is for patients to contact and encourage relatives (patient-mediated contact) to undergo counseling and testing. Direct relative contact by the medical team or testing laboratory has shown promise but is complicated by privacy laws and lack of infrastructure. We sought to compare outcomes associated with patient-mediated and direct relative contact for hereditary cancer cascade genetic counseling and testing in the first meta-analysis on this topic. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO No.: CRD42020134276). We searched key electronic databases to identify studies evaluating hereditary cancer cascade testing. Eligible trials were subjected to meta-analysis. RESULTS Eighty-seven studies met inclusion criteria. Among relatives included in the meta-analysis, 48% (95% CI, 38 to 58) underwent cascade genetic counseling and 41% (95% CI, 34 to 48) cascade genetic testing. Compared with the patient-mediated approach, direct relative contact resulted in significantly higher uptake of genetic counseling for all relatives (63% [95% CI, 49 to 75] v 35% [95% CI, 24 to 48]) and genetic testing for first-degree relatives (62% [95% CI, 49 to 73] v 40% [95% CI, 32 to 48]). Methods of direct contact included telephone calls, letters, and e-mails; respective rates of genetic testing completion were 61% (95% CI, 51 to 70), 48% (95% CI, 37 to 59), and 48% (95% CI, 45 to 50). CONCLUSION Most relatives at risk for hereditary cancer do not undergo cascade genetic counseling and testing, forgoing potentially life-saving medical interventions. Compared with patient-mediated contact, direct relative contact increased rates of cascade genetic counseling and testing, arguing for a shift in the care delivery paradigm, to be confirmed by randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jenny Lin
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Xuan Li
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Kenneth Offit
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Two Clinical Cases of Li-Fraumeni Syndrome and Prostate Cancer: Genetic Counseling and Clinical-Surgical Management. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:581-585. [PMID: 35831225 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
10
|
Syp L, Couillet A. Consultation d’annonce d’un syndrome de Li-Frauméni à l’enfant : enjeux psychologiques chez les différents protagonistes. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGIE 2022. [DOI: 10.3166/pson-2022-0175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Les personnes porteuses de la mutation génétique TP53 ont un risque plus élevé de développer un ou plusieurs cancers au cours de leur vie, d’où l’inquiétude des parents concernés à l’égard de leur descendance. Cet article questionne plusieurs des enjeux psychiques pour chacun des protagonistes, qu’il soit enfant, parent, ou soignant, impliqués dans la démarche de recherche et d’annonce d’un syndrome de Li-Frauméni à l’enfant.
Collapse
|
11
|
Neglected impacts of patient decision-making associated with genetic testing. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2022; 38:e75. [DOI: 10.1017/s0266462322000575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
We highlight non-health-related impacts associated with genetic testing (GT) and knowing one’s genetic status so that health technology assessment (HTA) analysts and HTA audiences may more appropriately consider the pros and cons of GT. Whereas health-related impacts of GT (e.g., increased healthy behaviors and avoidance of harms of unnecessary treatment) are frequently assessed in HTA, some non-health-related impacts are less often considered and are more difficult to measure. This presents a challenge for accurately assessing whether a genetic test should be funded. In health systems where HTA understandably places emphasis on measurable clinical outcomes, there is a risk of creating a GT culture that is pro-testing without sufficient recognition of the burdens of GT. There is also a risk of not funding a genetic test that provides little clinical benefit but nonetheless may be seen by some as autonomy enhancing. The recent development of expanded HTA frameworks that include ethics analyses helps to address this gap in the evidence and bring awareness to non-health-related impacts of GT. The HTA analyst should be aware of these impacts, choose appropriate frameworks for assessing genetic tests, and use methods for evaluating impacts. A new reporting tool presented here may assist in such evaluations.
Collapse
|
12
|
Tosin KCF, Legal EF, Pianovski MAD, Ibañez HC, Custódio G, Carvalho DS, Figueiredo MMO, Hoffmann Filho A, Fiori CMCM, Rodrigues ALM, Mello RG, Ogradowski KRP, Parise IZS, Costa TEJ, Melanda VS, Watanabe FM, Silva DB, Komechen H, Laureano HA, Carboni EK, Kuczynski AP, Luiz GCF, Lima L, Tormen T, Gerber VKQ, Anegawa TH, Avilla SGA, Tenório RB, Mendes EL, Fachin Donin RD, Souza J, Kozak VN, Oliveira GS, Souza DC, Gomy I, Teixeira VB, Borba HHL, Kiesel Filho N, Parise GA, Ribeiro RC, Figueiredo BC. Newborn Screening for the Detection of the TP53 R337H Variant and Surveillance for Early Diagnosis of Pediatric Adrenocortical Tumors: Lessons Learned and Way Forward. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13236111. [PMID: 34885220 PMCID: PMC8656743 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13236111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 10/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Adrenocortical tumor (ACT) is rare in children and fatal if not detected early. Children who inherit a mutation of the TP53 gene tend to develop ACT early in life. In the 1990s, scientists revealed that a TP53 variant (R337H) was frequent in South Brazil. Therefore, the incidence of ACT in children is 20 times higher in this region than in other countries. We reviewed the records of 16 children with ACT treated in a pediatric hospital in Parana state (southern Brazil) and 134 children registered in the state public registry data. We found a high number of cases with advanced disease, leading to an unacceptable number of deaths. These observations contradict newborn R337H screening and surveillance data, showing that surgical intervention in early cases of ACT is associated with a 100% cure. Newborn screening/surveillance should be implemented in regions with a high frequency of the R337H variant. Abstract The incidence of pediatric adrenocortical tumors (ACT) is high in southern Brazil due to the founder TP53 R337H variant. Neonatal screening/surveillance (NSS) for this variant resulted in early ACT detection and improved outcomes. The medical records of children with ACT who did not participate in newborn screening (non-NSS) were reviewed (2012–2018). We compared known prognostic factors between the NSS and non-NSS cohorts and estimated surveillance and treatment costs. Of the 16 non-NSS children with ACT carrying the R337H variant, the disease stages I, II, III, and IV were observed in five, five, one, and five children, respectively. The tumor weight ranged from 22 to 608 g. The 11 NSS children with ACT all had disease stage I and were alive. The median tumor weight, age of diagnosis, and interval between symptoms and diagnosis were 21 g, 1.9 years, and two weeks, respectively, for the NSS cohort and 210 g, 5.2 years, and 15 weeks, respectively, for the non-NSS cohort. The estimated surveillance/screening cost per year of life saved is US$623/patient. NSS is critical for improving the outcome of pediatric ACT in this region. Hence, we strongly advocate for the inclusion of R337H in the state-mandated universal screening and surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karina C. F. Tosin
- Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Federal University of Paraná, Rua Padre Camargo, 260, Centro, Curitiba 80.060-240, PR, Brazil; (K.C.F.T.); (D.S.C.)
| | - Edith F. Legal
- Instituto de Pesquisa Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Silva Jardim, 1532, Curitiba 80.250-060, PR, Brazil; (E.F.L.); (H.C.I.); (A.H.F.); (R.G.M.); (K.R.P.O.); (I.Z.S.P.); (H.K.); (H.A.L.); (V.B.T.)
| | - Mara A. D. Pianovski
- Oncologia Pediátrica, Hospital Erasto Gaertner, R. Dr. Ovande do Amaral, 201, Jardim das Américas, Curitiba 81.520-060, PR, Brazil; (M.A.D.P.); (A.L.M.R.); (V.N.K.); (G.S.O.); (D.C.S.)
| | - Humberto C. Ibañez
- Instituto de Pesquisa Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Silva Jardim, 1532, Curitiba 80.250-060, PR, Brazil; (E.F.L.); (H.C.I.); (A.H.F.); (R.G.M.); (K.R.P.O.); (I.Z.S.P.); (H.K.); (H.A.L.); (V.B.T.)
| | - Gislaine Custódio
- Centro de Genética Molecular e Pesquisa do Câncer em Crianças (CEGEMPAC-APACN), Avenida Agostinho Leão Jr., 400, Curitiba 80.030-110, PR, Brazil; (G.C.); (M.M.O.F.); (R.D.F.D.); (G.A.P.)
| | - Denise S. Carvalho
- Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Federal University of Paraná, Rua Padre Camargo, 260, Centro, Curitiba 80.060-240, PR, Brazil; (K.C.F.T.); (D.S.C.)
| | - Mirna M. O. Figueiredo
- Centro de Genética Molecular e Pesquisa do Câncer em Crianças (CEGEMPAC-APACN), Avenida Agostinho Leão Jr., 400, Curitiba 80.030-110, PR, Brazil; (G.C.); (M.M.O.F.); (R.D.F.D.); (G.A.P.)
| | - Anselmo Hoffmann Filho
- Instituto de Pesquisa Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Silva Jardim, 1532, Curitiba 80.250-060, PR, Brazil; (E.F.L.); (H.C.I.); (A.H.F.); (R.G.M.); (K.R.P.O.); (I.Z.S.P.); (H.K.); (H.A.L.); (V.B.T.)
| | - Carmem M. C. M. Fiori
- Hospital do Câncer, UOPECCAN, R. Itaquatiaras, 769, Santo Onofre, Cascavel 85.806-300, PR, Brazil;
| | - Ana Luiza M. Rodrigues
- Oncologia Pediátrica, Hospital Erasto Gaertner, R. Dr. Ovande do Amaral, 201, Jardim das Américas, Curitiba 81.520-060, PR, Brazil; (M.A.D.P.); (A.L.M.R.); (V.N.K.); (G.S.O.); (D.C.S.)
| | - Rosiane G. Mello
- Instituto de Pesquisa Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Silva Jardim, 1532, Curitiba 80.250-060, PR, Brazil; (E.F.L.); (H.C.I.); (A.H.F.); (R.G.M.); (K.R.P.O.); (I.Z.S.P.); (H.K.); (H.A.L.); (V.B.T.)
- Faculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Av. Iguaçu, 333, Rebouças, Curitiba 80.230-020, PR, Brazil;
| | - Karin R. P. Ogradowski
- Instituto de Pesquisa Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Silva Jardim, 1532, Curitiba 80.250-060, PR, Brazil; (E.F.L.); (H.C.I.); (A.H.F.); (R.G.M.); (K.R.P.O.); (I.Z.S.P.); (H.K.); (H.A.L.); (V.B.T.)
- Faculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Av. Iguaçu, 333, Rebouças, Curitiba 80.230-020, PR, Brazil;
| | - Ivy Z. S. Parise
- Instituto de Pesquisa Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Silva Jardim, 1532, Curitiba 80.250-060, PR, Brazil; (E.F.L.); (H.C.I.); (A.H.F.); (R.G.M.); (K.R.P.O.); (I.Z.S.P.); (H.K.); (H.A.L.); (V.B.T.)
| | - Tatiana E. J. Costa
- Hospital Infantil Joana de Gusmão, R. Rui Barbosa, 152, Agronômica, Florianópolis 88.025-301, SC, Brazil; (T.E.J.C.); (D.B.S.)
| | - Viviane S. Melanda
- Secretaria do Estado da Saúde do Paraná, R. Piquiri, 170, Rebouças, Curitiba 80.230-140, PR, Brazil;
| | - Flora M. Watanabe
- Hospital Pequeno Príncipe, Silva Jardim, 1532, Curitiba 80.250-060, PR, Brazil; (F.M.W.); (E.K.C.); (A.P.K.); (G.C.F.L.); (S.G.A.A.); (R.B.T.); (E.L.M.); (J.S.); (N.K.F.)
| | - Denise B. Silva
- Hospital Infantil Joana de Gusmão, R. Rui Barbosa, 152, Agronômica, Florianópolis 88.025-301, SC, Brazil; (T.E.J.C.); (D.B.S.)
| | - Heloisa Komechen
- Instituto de Pesquisa Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Silva Jardim, 1532, Curitiba 80.250-060, PR, Brazil; (E.F.L.); (H.C.I.); (A.H.F.); (R.G.M.); (K.R.P.O.); (I.Z.S.P.); (H.K.); (H.A.L.); (V.B.T.)
- Centro de Genética Molecular e Pesquisa do Câncer em Crianças (CEGEMPAC-APACN), Avenida Agostinho Leão Jr., 400, Curitiba 80.030-110, PR, Brazil; (G.C.); (M.M.O.F.); (R.D.F.D.); (G.A.P.)
| | - Henrique A. Laureano
- Instituto de Pesquisa Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Silva Jardim, 1532, Curitiba 80.250-060, PR, Brazil; (E.F.L.); (H.C.I.); (A.H.F.); (R.G.M.); (K.R.P.O.); (I.Z.S.P.); (H.K.); (H.A.L.); (V.B.T.)
| | - Edna K. Carboni
- Hospital Pequeno Príncipe, Silva Jardim, 1532, Curitiba 80.250-060, PR, Brazil; (F.M.W.); (E.K.C.); (A.P.K.); (G.C.F.L.); (S.G.A.A.); (R.B.T.); (E.L.M.); (J.S.); (N.K.F.)
| | - Ana P. Kuczynski
- Hospital Pequeno Príncipe, Silva Jardim, 1532, Curitiba 80.250-060, PR, Brazil; (F.M.W.); (E.K.C.); (A.P.K.); (G.C.F.L.); (S.G.A.A.); (R.B.T.); (E.L.M.); (J.S.); (N.K.F.)
| | - Gabriela C. F. Luiz
- Hospital Pequeno Príncipe, Silva Jardim, 1532, Curitiba 80.250-060, PR, Brazil; (F.M.W.); (E.K.C.); (A.P.K.); (G.C.F.L.); (S.G.A.A.); (R.B.T.); (E.L.M.); (J.S.); (N.K.F.)
| | - Leniza Lima
- Oncologia Pediátrica, Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná, R. Gen. Carneiro, 181, Alto da Glória, Curitiba 80.060-900, PR, Brazil; (L.L.); (T.T.)
| | - Tiago Tormen
- Oncologia Pediátrica, Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná, R. Gen. Carneiro, 181, Alto da Glória, Curitiba 80.060-900, PR, Brazil; (L.L.); (T.T.)
| | - Viviane K. Q. Gerber
- Departamento de Enfermagem, Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste, UNICENTRO, Rua Padre, R. Salvatore Renna, 875-Santa Cruz, Guarapuava 85.015-430, PR, Brazil;
| | - Tania H. Anegawa
- Oncologia Pediátrica, Campus Universitário, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid—Pr 445 Km 380, Londrina 86.057-970, PR, Brazil;
| | - Sylvio G. A. Avilla
- Hospital Pequeno Príncipe, Silva Jardim, 1532, Curitiba 80.250-060, PR, Brazil; (F.M.W.); (E.K.C.); (A.P.K.); (G.C.F.L.); (S.G.A.A.); (R.B.T.); (E.L.M.); (J.S.); (N.K.F.)
| | - Renata B. Tenório
- Hospital Pequeno Príncipe, Silva Jardim, 1532, Curitiba 80.250-060, PR, Brazil; (F.M.W.); (E.K.C.); (A.P.K.); (G.C.F.L.); (S.G.A.A.); (R.B.T.); (E.L.M.); (J.S.); (N.K.F.)
| | - Elaine L. Mendes
- Hospital Pequeno Príncipe, Silva Jardim, 1532, Curitiba 80.250-060, PR, Brazil; (F.M.W.); (E.K.C.); (A.P.K.); (G.C.F.L.); (S.G.A.A.); (R.B.T.); (E.L.M.); (J.S.); (N.K.F.)
| | - Rayssa D. Fachin Donin
- Centro de Genética Molecular e Pesquisa do Câncer em Crianças (CEGEMPAC-APACN), Avenida Agostinho Leão Jr., 400, Curitiba 80.030-110, PR, Brazil; (G.C.); (M.M.O.F.); (R.D.F.D.); (G.A.P.)
| | - Josiane Souza
- Hospital Pequeno Príncipe, Silva Jardim, 1532, Curitiba 80.250-060, PR, Brazil; (F.M.W.); (E.K.C.); (A.P.K.); (G.C.F.L.); (S.G.A.A.); (R.B.T.); (E.L.M.); (J.S.); (N.K.F.)
| | - Vanessa N. Kozak
- Oncologia Pediátrica, Hospital Erasto Gaertner, R. Dr. Ovande do Amaral, 201, Jardim das Américas, Curitiba 81.520-060, PR, Brazil; (M.A.D.P.); (A.L.M.R.); (V.N.K.); (G.S.O.); (D.C.S.)
| | - Gisele S. Oliveira
- Oncologia Pediátrica, Hospital Erasto Gaertner, R. Dr. Ovande do Amaral, 201, Jardim das Américas, Curitiba 81.520-060, PR, Brazil; (M.A.D.P.); (A.L.M.R.); (V.N.K.); (G.S.O.); (D.C.S.)
| | - Deivid C. Souza
- Oncologia Pediátrica, Hospital Erasto Gaertner, R. Dr. Ovande do Amaral, 201, Jardim das Américas, Curitiba 81.520-060, PR, Brazil; (M.A.D.P.); (A.L.M.R.); (V.N.K.); (G.S.O.); (D.C.S.)
| | - Israel Gomy
- Faculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Av. Iguaçu, 333, Rebouças, Curitiba 80.230-020, PR, Brazil;
- Hospital Pequeno Príncipe, Silva Jardim, 1532, Curitiba 80.250-060, PR, Brazil; (F.M.W.); (E.K.C.); (A.P.K.); (G.C.F.L.); (S.G.A.A.); (R.B.T.); (E.L.M.); (J.S.); (N.K.F.)
| | - Vinicius B. Teixeira
- Instituto de Pesquisa Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Silva Jardim, 1532, Curitiba 80.250-060, PR, Brazil; (E.F.L.); (H.C.I.); (A.H.F.); (R.G.M.); (K.R.P.O.); (I.Z.S.P.); (H.K.); (H.A.L.); (V.B.T.)
| | - Helena H. L. Borba
- Departamento de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Federal University of Paraná, Av. Prefeito Lothário Meissner, 632-Jardim Botanico, Curitiba 80.210-170, PR, Brazil;
| | - Nilton Kiesel Filho
- Hospital Pequeno Príncipe, Silva Jardim, 1532, Curitiba 80.250-060, PR, Brazil; (F.M.W.); (E.K.C.); (A.P.K.); (G.C.F.L.); (S.G.A.A.); (R.B.T.); (E.L.M.); (J.S.); (N.K.F.)
| | - Guilherme A. Parise
- Centro de Genética Molecular e Pesquisa do Câncer em Crianças (CEGEMPAC-APACN), Avenida Agostinho Leão Jr., 400, Curitiba 80.030-110, PR, Brazil; (G.C.); (M.M.O.F.); (R.D.F.D.); (G.A.P.)
| | - Raul C. Ribeiro
- Leukemia and Lymphoma Division, Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
- Correspondence: (R.C.R.); or (B.C.F.)
| | - Bonald C. Figueiredo
- Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Federal University of Paraná, Rua Padre Camargo, 260, Centro, Curitiba 80.060-240, PR, Brazil; (K.C.F.T.); (D.S.C.)
- Instituto de Pesquisa Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Silva Jardim, 1532, Curitiba 80.250-060, PR, Brazil; (E.F.L.); (H.C.I.); (A.H.F.); (R.G.M.); (K.R.P.O.); (I.Z.S.P.); (H.K.); (H.A.L.); (V.B.T.)
- Centro de Genética Molecular e Pesquisa do Câncer em Crianças (CEGEMPAC-APACN), Avenida Agostinho Leão Jr., 400, Curitiba 80.030-110, PR, Brazil; (G.C.); (M.M.O.F.); (R.D.F.D.); (G.A.P.)
- Faculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Av. Iguaçu, 333, Rebouças, Curitiba 80.230-020, PR, Brazil;
- Correspondence: (R.C.R.); or (B.C.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Barnett M, Breen KE, Kennedy JA, Hernandez M, Matsoukas K, MacGregor M. Psychosocial interventions and needs among individuals and families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome: A scoping review. Clin Genet 2021; 101:161-182. [PMID: 34355387 DOI: 10.1111/cge.14042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), a rare cancer predisposition syndrome caused by germline mutations in the TP53 gene, is associated with significant lifetime risk of developing cancer and warrants extensive and long-term surveillance. There are psychosocial impacts on individuals and families living with this condition, from the initial diagnosis throughout multiple stages across the lifespan, but these impacts have not been systematically reviewed and organized. The objective of this scoping review was to synthesize and characterize the literature on psychosocial screening and outcomes, educational needs, support services, and available interventions for patients and families with LFS. A systematic search of six databases was most recently conducted in August 2020: (PubMed/MEDLINE (NLM), EMBASE (Elsevier), Cochrane Library (Wiley), CINAHL (EBSCO), PsycINFO (OVID), and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics). A total of 15 757 titles were screened, and 24 articles included. Several important themes were identified across studies: factors associated with TP53 genetic testing, LFS surveillance, psychological outcomes, and communication. Findings related to these themes were organized into age-specific categories (age agnostic/across the lifespan, childhood, adolescence and young adulthood, and adulthood).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Barnett
- Department of Psychiatry, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, USA
| | - Kelsey E Breen
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, USA
| | - Jennifer A Kennedy
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, USA
| | - Marisol Hernandez
- Medical Library, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, USA.,Medical Library, City University of New York School of Medicine, New York City, USA
| | | | - Meredith MacGregor
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Byrjalsen A, Diets IJ, Bakhuizen J, Hansen TVO, Schmiegelow K, Gerdes AM, Stoltze U, Kuiper RP, Merks JHM, Wadt K, Jongmans M. Selection criteria for assembling a pediatric cancer predisposition syndrome gene panel. Fam Cancer 2021; 20:279-287. [PMID: 34061292 PMCID: PMC8484084 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-021-00254-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Increasing use of genomic sequencing enables standardized screening of all childhood cancer predisposition syndromes (CPS) in children with cancer. Gene panels currently used often include adult-onset CPS genes and genes without substantial evidence linking them to cancer predisposition. We have developed criteria to select genes relevant for childhood-onset CPS and assembled a gene panel for use in children with cancer. We applied our criteria to 381 candidate genes, which were selected through two in-house panels (n = 338), a literature search (n = 39), and by assessing two Genomics England’s PanelApp panels (n = 4). We developed evaluation criteria that determined a gene’s eligibility for inclusion on a childhood-onset CPS gene panel. These criteria assessed (1) relevance in childhood cancer by a minimum of five childhood cancer patients reported carrying a pathogenic variant in the gene and (2) evidence supporting a causal relation between variants in this gene and cancer development. 138 genes fulfilled the criteria. In this study we have developed criteria to compile a childhood cancer predisposition gene panel which might ultimately be used in a clinical setting, regardless of the specific type of childhood cancer. This panel will be evaluated in a prospective study. The panel is available on (pediatric-cancer-predisposition-genepanel.nl) and will be regularly updated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Byrjalsen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen East, Denmark
| | - Illja J Diets
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jette Bakhuizen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas van Overeem Hansen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen East, Denmark.,Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen East, Denmark
| | - Kjeld Schmiegelow
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen East, Denmark
| | - Anne-Marie Gerdes
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen East, Denmark
| | - Ulrik Stoltze
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen East, Denmark
| | - Roland P Kuiper
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes H M Merks
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Wadt
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen East, Denmark
| | - Marjolijn Jongmans
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Evans DG, Woodward ER, Bajalica-Lagercrantz S, Oliveira C, Frebourg T. Germline TP53 Testing in Breast Cancers: Why, When and How? Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12123762. [PMID: 33327514 PMCID: PMC7764913 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 12/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary TP53 variants detected in blood represent a main genetic cause of breast cancers occurring before 31 years of age. TP53 being included in most of the cancer gene panels, patients with breast cancer are offered germline TP53 testing, independently of the age of tumour onset and familial history. Interpretation of TP53 variants is remarkably complex, and detection of a germline disease-causing TP53 variant in a breast cancer patient has drastic medical consequences: radiotherapy contributing to the development of subsequent tumours should be, if possible, avoided. In her family, variant carriers should be offered annual follow-up, including whole-body MRI. Therefore, we consider that, in breast cancer patients, germline TP53 testing should be performed before treatment and that the decision of TP53 testing should not be systematic but based on the age of tumour onset, type of breast cancer, personal and familial history of cancer. Abstract Germline TP53 variants represent a main genetic cause of breast cancers before 31 years of age. Development of cancer multi-gene panels has resulted in an exponential increase of germline TP53 testing in breast cancer patients. Interpretation of TP53 variants, which are mostly missense, is complex and requires excluding clonal haematopoiesis and circulating tumour DNA. In breast cancer patients harbouring germline disease-causing TP53 variants, radiotherapy contributing to the development of subsequent tumours should be, if possible, avoided and, within families, annual follow-up including whole-body MRI should be offered to carriers. We consider that, in breast cancer patients, germline TP53 testing should be performed before treatment and offered systematically only to patients with: (i) invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) before 31; or (ii) bilateral or multifocal or HER2+ invasive breast carcinoma/DCIS or phyllode tumour before 36; or (iii) invasive breast carcinoma before 46 and another TP53 core tumour (breast cancer, soft-tissue sarcoma, osteosarcoma, central nervous system tumour, adrenocortical carcinoma); or (iv) invasive breast carcinoma before 46 and one first- or second-degree relative with a TP53 core tumour before 56. In contrast, women presenting with breast cancer after 46, without suggestive personal or familial history, should not be tested for TP53.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. Gareth Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9WL, UK;
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
- Correspondence: (D.G.E.); (T.F.)
| | - Emma R. Woodward
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9WL, UK;
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - Svetlana Bajalica-Lagercrantz
- Hereditary Cancer Unit, Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden;
| | - Carla Oliveira
- i3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal;
- Ipatimup-Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
| | - Thierry Frebourg
- Department of Genetics, Rouen University Hospital, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, 76000 Rouen, France
- Inserm U1245, Normandie University, UNIROUEN, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, 76183 Rouen, France
- Correspondence: (D.G.E.); (T.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mehta S, Kuo DJ. To test or not to test: genetic cancer predisposition testing in paediatric patients with cancer. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2020; 47:medethics-2020-106656. [PMID: 33303646 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 11/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Genetic cancer predisposition testing in the paediatric population poses unique ethical dilemmas. Using the hypothetical example of a teenager with cancer with a high probability of having an underlying cancer predisposition syndrome, we discuss the ethical considerations that affect the decision-making process. Because legally these decisions are made by parents, genetic testing in paediatrics can remove a child's autonomy to preserve his or her own 'open future'. However, knowledge of results confirming a predisposition syndrome can potentially be beneficial in modifying treatment and surveillance plans and enabling at-risk family members to obtain cascade testing for themselves. Considering virtue ethics to envision the best characters of the patient, parents and healthcare providers can guide them to the better choice to test or not to test, with the ultimate goal of achieving the best outcome for survival and eudaimonia, human flourishing reliably sought out.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sapna Mehta
- Global Health, Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Dennis John Kuo
- Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Beard VK, Bedard AC, Nuk J, Lee PWC, Hong Q, Bedard JEJ, Sun S, Schrader KA. Genetic testing in families with hereditary colorectal cancer in British Columbia and Yukon: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis. CMAJ Open 2020; 8:E637-E642. [PMID: 33077534 PMCID: PMC7588261 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20190167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genetic testing in families with hereditary cancer enables identification of people most likely to benefit from intensive screening and preventive measures; however, the uptake of testing in relatives (known as cascade carrier testing) for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes has been shown to be low. Our objective was to report rates of familial testing for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes in a publicly funded hereditary cancer clinic in Canada. METHODS A cross-sectional retrospective database review was used to determine testing uptake between 1997 and 2016 for families served by the provincial Hereditary Cancer Program for British Columbia and Yukon. Analyses were conducted for genes associated with syndromes with an increased risk for colorectal cancer, including Lynch syndrome (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 and EPCAM) and familial adenomatous polyposis (APC), and for additional moderate- to high-penetrance genes (STK11, TP53, SMAD4, MUTYH, PTEN and CHEK2). Descriptive statistics were used and all analyses were 2-tailed. RESULTS The study cohort included 245 index patients, with carrier testing performed in 382 relatives. The mean age at family member testing was 41.2 years, and most (61.0%) of the family members who underwent testing were women. The median time between disclosure of index cases and their family member's results was 8.3 months. Among eligible first-degree relatives, 32.6% (268/821) underwent testing in BC. Of 67 cancer diagnoses in family members, most (62.7%) occurred before genetic testing. INTERPRETATION A substantial proportion of people at risk for hereditary colorectal cancer do not undergo genetic testing. This gap highlights the need to explore barriers to testing and to consider interventions to promote uptake; more aggressive efforts by hereditary cancer programs are needed to reach this highest risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivienne K Beard
- Department of Biology (Beard, Lee, J.E.J. Bedard), University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC; Hereditary Cancer Program (A.C. Bedard, Nuk, Hong, Sun, Schrader), BC Cancer; Division of Medical Oncology (Sun), University of British Columbia; Department of Molecular Oncology (Schrader), BC Cancer; Department of Medical Genetics (Schrader), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Angela C Bedard
- Department of Biology (Beard, Lee, J.E.J. Bedard), University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC; Hereditary Cancer Program (A.C. Bedard, Nuk, Hong, Sun, Schrader), BC Cancer; Division of Medical Oncology (Sun), University of British Columbia; Department of Molecular Oncology (Schrader), BC Cancer; Department of Medical Genetics (Schrader), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Jennifer Nuk
- Department of Biology (Beard, Lee, J.E.J. Bedard), University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC; Hereditary Cancer Program (A.C. Bedard, Nuk, Hong, Sun, Schrader), BC Cancer; Division of Medical Oncology (Sun), University of British Columbia; Department of Molecular Oncology (Schrader), BC Cancer; Department of Medical Genetics (Schrader), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Petra W C Lee
- Department of Biology (Beard, Lee, J.E.J. Bedard), University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC; Hereditary Cancer Program (A.C. Bedard, Nuk, Hong, Sun, Schrader), BC Cancer; Division of Medical Oncology (Sun), University of British Columbia; Department of Molecular Oncology (Schrader), BC Cancer; Department of Medical Genetics (Schrader), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Quan Hong
- Department of Biology (Beard, Lee, J.E.J. Bedard), University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC; Hereditary Cancer Program (A.C. Bedard, Nuk, Hong, Sun, Schrader), BC Cancer; Division of Medical Oncology (Sun), University of British Columbia; Department of Molecular Oncology (Schrader), BC Cancer; Department of Medical Genetics (Schrader), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - James E J Bedard
- Department of Biology (Beard, Lee, J.E.J. Bedard), University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC; Hereditary Cancer Program (A.C. Bedard, Nuk, Hong, Sun, Schrader), BC Cancer; Division of Medical Oncology (Sun), University of British Columbia; Department of Molecular Oncology (Schrader), BC Cancer; Department of Medical Genetics (Schrader), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Sophie Sun
- Department of Biology (Beard, Lee, J.E.J. Bedard), University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC; Hereditary Cancer Program (A.C. Bedard, Nuk, Hong, Sun, Schrader), BC Cancer; Division of Medical Oncology (Sun), University of British Columbia; Department of Molecular Oncology (Schrader), BC Cancer; Department of Medical Genetics (Schrader), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Kasmintan A Schrader
- Department of Biology (Beard, Lee, J.E.J. Bedard), University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC; Hereditary Cancer Program (A.C. Bedard, Nuk, Hong, Sun, Schrader), BC Cancer; Division of Medical Oncology (Sun), University of British Columbia; Department of Molecular Oncology (Schrader), BC Cancer; Department of Medical Genetics (Schrader), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Evans DG, Woodward ER. New surveillance guidelines for Li-Fraumeni and hereditary TP53 related cancer syndrome: implications for germline TP53 testing in breast cancer. Fam Cancer 2020; 20:1-7. [PMID: 32984917 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-020-00207-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- D Gareth Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| | - Emma R Woodward
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rippinger N, Fischer C, Haun MW, Rhiem K, Grill S, Kiechle M, Cremer FW, Kast K, Nguyen HP, Ditsch N, Kratz CP, Vogel J, Speiser D, Hettmer S, Glimm H, Fröhling S, Jäger D, Seitz S, Hahne A, Maatouk I, Sutter C, Schmutzler RK, Dikow N, Schott S. Cancer surveillance and distress among adult pathogenic TP53 germline variant carriers in Germany: A multicenter feasibility and acceptance survey. Cancer 2020; 126:4032-4041. [PMID: 32557628 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a high-risk cancer predisposition syndrome caused by pathogenic germline variants of TP53. Cancer surveillance has noted a significant survival advantage in individuals with LFS; however, little is known about the feasibility, acceptance, and psychosocial effects of such a program. METHODS Pathogenic TP53 germline variant carriers completed a 7-part questionnaire evaluating sociodemographics, cancer history, surveillance participation, reasons for nonadherence, worries, and distress adapted from the Cancer Worry Scale. Counselees' common concerns and suggestions were assessed in MAXQDA Analytics Pro 12. RESULTS Forty-nine participants (46 females and 3 males), aged 40.0 ± 12.6 years, formed the study population; 43 (88%) had a personal cancer history (including multiple cancers in 10 [20%]). Forty-three individuals participated (88%) in surveillance during the study or formerly. Willingness to undergo surveillance was influenced by satisfaction with genetic testing and counseling (P = .019 [Fisher-Yates test]) but not by sociodemographics, cancer history, or distress level. Almost one-third of the participants reported logistical difficulties in implementing surveillance because of the high frequency of medical visits, scheduling difficulties, and the travel distance to their surveillance providers. Self-reported distress and perceived emotional burden for family members and partners were moderate (median for self-reported distress, 3.3; median for perceived emotional burden, 3.0). For both, the interquartile range was moderate to very high (2.7-3.7 and 3.0-3.7, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Individuals with LFS require efficient counseling as well as an accessible, well-organized, interdisciplinary, standardized surveillance program to increase adherence and psychological coping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Rippinger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Fischer
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Haun
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sabine Grill
- Department of Gynecology and Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marion Kiechle
- Department of Gynecology and Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Karin Kast
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases, Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium and German Cancer Research Center, Dresden, Germany
| | - Huu P Nguyen
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Human Genetics, University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig Maximilian University, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Christian P Kratz
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Julia Vogel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dorothee Speiser
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simone Hettmer
- Translational Functional Cancer Genomics, National Center for Tumor Diseases and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hanno Glimm
- German Cancer Consortium and German Cancer Research Center, Dresden, Germany.,Translational Functional Cancer Genomics, National Center for Tumor Diseases and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- Department of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dirk Jäger
- German Cancer Consortium and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Seitz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Hahne
- BRCA Network-Support for People with Hereditary Cancers
| | - Imad Maatouk
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Sutter
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nicola Dikow
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Schott
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Schienda J, Stopfer J. Cancer Genetic Counseling-Current Practice and Future Challenges. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2020; 10:cshperspect.a036541. [PMID: 31548230 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a036541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Cancer genetic counseling practice is rapidly evolving, with services being provided in increasingly novel ways. Pretest counseling for cancer patients may be abbreviated from traditional models to cover the elements of informed consent in the broadest of strokes. Genetic testing may be ordered by a cancer genetics professional, oncology provider, or primary care provider. Increasingly, direct-to-consumer testing options are available and utilized by consumers anxious to take control of their genetic health. Finally, genetic information is being used to inform oncology care, from surgical decision-making to selection of chemotherapeutic agent. This review provides an overview of the current and evolving practice of cancer genetic counseling as well as opportunities and challenges for a wide variety of indications in both the adult and pediatric setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaclyn Schienda
- Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
| | - Jill Stopfer
- Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Forbes Shepherd R, Werner-Lin A, Keogh LA, Delatycki MB, Forrest LE. “I need to know if I’m going to die young”: Adolescent and young adult experiences of genetic testing for Li–Fraumeni syndrome. J Psychosoc Oncol 2020; 39:54-73. [DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2020.1768199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rowan Forbes Shepherd
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Bruce Lefroy Centre for Genetic Health Research, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Allison Werner-Lin
- School of Social Policy and Practice, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Louise A. Keogh
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Martin B. Delatycki
- Bruce Lefroy Centre for Genetic Health Research, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Service, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Laura E. Forrest
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bancroft EK, Saya S, Brown E, Thomas S, Taylor N, Rothwell J, Pope J, Chamberlain A, Page E, Benafif S, Hanson H, Dias A, Mikropoulos C, Izatt L, Side L, Walker L, Donaldson A, Cook JA, Barwell J, Wiles V, Limb L, Eccles DM, Leach MO, Shanley S, Gilbert FJ, Gallagher D, Rajashanker B, Whitehouse RW, Koh DM, Sohaib SA, Evans DG, Eeles RA, Walker LG. Psychosocial effects of whole-body MRI screening in adult high-risk pathogenic TP53 mutation carriers: a case-controlled study (SIGNIFY). J Med Genet 2020; 57:226-236. [PMID: 31719169 PMCID: PMC7146942 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Revised: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 09/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Germline TP53 gene pathogenic variants (pv) cause a very high lifetime risk of developing cancer, almost 100% for women and 75% for men. In the UK, annual MRI breast screening is recommended for female TP53 pv carriers. The SIGNIFY study (Magnetic Resonance Imaging screening in Li Fraumeni syndrome: An exploratory whole body MRI) study reported outcomes of whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) in a cohort of 44 TP53 pv carriers and 44 matched population controls. The results supported the use of a baseline WB-MRI screen in all adult TP53 pv carriers. Here we report the acceptability of WB-MRI screening and effects on psychosocial functioning and health-related quality of life in the short and medium terms. METHODS Psychosocial and other assessments were carried out at study enrolment, immediately before MRI, before and after MRI results, and at 12, 26 and 52 weeks' follow-up. RESULTS WB-MRI was found to be acceptable with high levels of satisfaction and low levels of psychological morbidity throughout. Although their mean levels of cancer worry were not high, carriers had significantly more cancer worry at most time-points than controls. They also reported significantly more clinically significant intrusive and avoidant thoughts about cancer than controls at all time-points. There were no clinically significant adverse psychosocial outcomes in either carriers with a history of cancer or in those requiring further investigations. CONCLUSION WB-MRI screening can be implemented in TP53 pv carriers without adverse psychosocial outcomes in the short and medium terms. A previous cancer diagnosis may predict a better psychosocial outcome. Some carriers seriously underestimate their risk of cancer. Carriers of pv should have access to a clinician to help them develop adaptive strategies to cope with cancer-related concerns and respond to clinically significant depression and/or anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth K Bancroft
- Oncogenetics Team, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Oncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Sibel Saya
- Oncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Centre for Cancer Research & Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emma Brown
- Medical Oncology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Sarah Thomas
- Oncogenetics Team, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Natalie Taylor
- Oncogenetics Team, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jeanette Rothwell
- Clinical Genetics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Jennifer Pope
- Oncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Elizabeth Page
- Oncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Sarah Benafif
- Oncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Helen Hanson
- South West Thames Regional Genetics Service, St Georges NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alexander Dias
- Oncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Louise Izatt
- Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lucy Side
- Clinical Genetics, Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Southampton, UK
| | - Lisa Walker
- Clinical Genetics, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Alan Donaldson
- Clinical Genetics, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Jackie A Cook
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Julian Barwell
- Clinical Genetics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Vicki Wiles
- Clinical Genetics, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lauren Limb
- North West Thames Regional Genetics Service (Kennedy-Galton Centre), London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UK
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK
| | - Martin O Leach
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Susan Shanley
- Formerly at the Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Fiona J Gilbert
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - David Gallagher
- Cancer Genetics Service, Mater Hospital School, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | - Dow-Mu Koh
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - S Aslam Sohaib
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Clinical Genetics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Rosalind A Eeles
- Oncogenetics Team, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Oncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Omran M, Blomqvist L, Brandberg Y, Pal N, Kogner P, Ståhlbom AK, Tham E, Bajalica-Lagercrantz S. Whole-body MRI within a surveillance program for carriers with clinically actionable germline TP53 variants - the Swedish constitutional TP53 study SWEP53. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2020; 18:1. [PMID: 31956380 PMCID: PMC6958585 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-020-0133-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2019] [Accepted: 01/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The current guidelines in Sweden regarding individuals with a clinically actionable (i.e. pathogenic or likely pathogenic) germline TP53 variant recommend patients to take part of the national Swedish P53 Study (SWEP53). Methods The study comprises a patient registry (mandatory for all participants) and three optional parts: a biobank, a surveillance program and a psychosocial evaluation of the surveillance. All known adult eligible carriers regardless of age are offered to take part of the surveillance program offering MRI yearly of the whole-body, breast, and brain as well as breast ultrasound. A special surveillance program is offered for individuals 15–18 years old with a 50% risk of being a mutation carrier or with a verified TP53 variation, includes ultrasound of the abdomen and urine corticosteroid profiles. Clinically motivated further examinations are performed upon need. The national inclusion is performed through the six clinical genetic units in Sweden at Umeå, Uppsala, Stockholm, Gothenburg, Linköping and Lund, and the surveillance is mainly performed through the oncology clinics. Results To date, a total of 41 adults and 11 children have been included in the study. Conclusions The SWEP53 is the first structured national surveillance program including radiological and clinical routines for TP53 mutation carriers in the Scandinavian setting. The aim of this publication is to present and describe the ongoing Swedish surveillance study to encourage the initiation of similar studies and to contribute to the knowledge of adequate clinical handling of these cancer prone families. Trial registration Trial registration number: ISRCTN13103571, retrospectively registered on 14/10/2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meis Omran
- 1Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden AND Cancer Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lennart Blomqvist
- 2Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.,3Department of Imaging and Physiology Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Yvonne Brandberg
- 4Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 64 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Niklas Pal
- 5Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.,6Children and Women's Health Theme, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Kogner
- 5Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.,6Children and Women's Health Theme, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Emma Tham
- 8Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.,9Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Svetlana Bajalica-Lagercrantz
- 1Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden AND Cancer Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Early-onset breast cancer may be due to Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS). Current national and international guidelines recommend that TP53 genetic testing should be considered for women with breast cancer diagnosed before the age of 31 years. However, large studies investigating TP53 mutation prevalence in this population are scarce. We collected nationwide laboratory records for all young breast cancer patients tested for TP53 mutations in the Netherlands. Between 2005 and 2016, 370 women diagnosed with breast cancer younger than 30 years of age were tested for TP53 germline mutations, and eight (2.2%) were found to carry a (likely) pathogenic TP53 sequence variant. Among BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation negative women without a family history suggestive of LFS or a personal history of multiple LFS-related tumours, the TP53 mutation frequency was < 1% (2/233). Taking into consideration that TP53 mutation prevalence was comparable or even higher in some studies selecting patients with breast cancer onset at older ages or HER2-positive breast cancers, raises the question of whether a very early age of onset is an appropriate single TP53 genetic testing criterion.
Collapse
|
25
|
Bakhuizen JJ, Velthuizen ME, Stehouwer S, Bleiker EM, Ausems MG. Genetic counselling of young women with breast cancer for Li-Fraumeni syndrome: a nationwide survey on the experiences and attitudes of genetics professionals. Fam Cancer 2019; 18:231-239. [PMID: 30238178 PMCID: PMC6449299 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-018-0103-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Germline TP53 mutations are associated with an increased risk of early-onset breast cancer. Traditionally, it was not standard practice to offer TP53 genetic testing due to the low mutation detection rate and limited options regarding preventive screening. Recent guidelines recommend that all women diagnosed with breast cancer before the age of 31, irrespective of family history, should be offered TP53 genetic testing. This study aims to gain more knowledge on the attitudes and experiences among genetics professionals regarding the timing and content of genetic counselling of young breast cancer patients for Li–Fraumeni syndrome (LFS). We conducted a nationwide online survey among genetics professionals who provide cancer genetic counselling in the Netherlands. Fifty-seven professionals completed the questionnaire (response rate overall 54%, clinical geneticists 70%). Most respondents reported that they discuss the option of TP53 genetic testing—simultaneously with BRCA 1/2—during the initial counselling visit, especially in case of referral for treatment-focused genetic counselling. There was a general consensus about ten information items that should be discussed during counselling. Sixty-one percent of genetics professionals did not encounter difficulties in providing genetic counselling for LFS, but a substantial minority (29%) did. This study offers valuable insight, which will be useful for clinical practice. Studies which address young breast cancer patients’ attitudes and preferences regarding the timing and content of counselling are warranted to further determine the most appropriate genetic counselling strategy for these women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J J Bakhuizen
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85090, 3508 AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - M E Velthuizen
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85090, 3508 AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S Stehouwer
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85090, 3508 AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E M Bleiker
- Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M G Ausems
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85090, 3508 AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Young JL, Pantaleao A, Zaspel L, Bayer J, Peters JA, Khincha PP, Bremer RC, Loud JT, Greene MH, Achatz MI, Savage SA, Werner-Lin A. Couples coping with screening burden and diagnostic uncertainty in Li-Fraumeni syndrome: Connection versus independence. J Psychosoc Oncol 2019; 37:178-193. [PMID: 30591002 PMCID: PMC6584025 DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2018.1543376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) is an inherited tumor predisposition syndrome with lifetime cancer risks approaching 100% and evolving risk-management strategies. This study evaluated couples' coping with LFS-related burdens. RESEARCH APPROACH Constructivist grounded theory and anticipatory loss frameworks guided design and analysis. SAMPLE AND METHODS Twenty-six individuals enrolled in the NCI LFS Family Study completed semi-structured interviews with their partner during annual screening visits. An interdisciplinary team completed open and focused coding to identify patterns of coping and adaptation. FINDINGS Couples described living with ambiguous danger, a state of chronic apprehension resulting from LFS-associated uncertainties. Most couples communicated openly and alternated shouldering the burden, while others engaged in protective buffering to shield each other from distress and sustain the appearance of normalcy. INTERPRETATION Optimally, coping reduces shared psychosocial distress, yet some strategies may inadvertently increase disconnection. IMPLICATIONS Mental health support is critical for both partners coping with LFS, together and separately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L. Young
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
- Family Science Department, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Ashley Pantaleao
- Family Science Department, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Lori Zaspel
- School of Social Policy and Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jessica Bayer
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - June A. Peters
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Payal P. Khincha
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Renee C. Bremer
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Jennifer T. Loud
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Mark H. Greene
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Maria Isabel Achatz
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Sharon A. Savage
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Allison Werner-Lin
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
- School of Social Policy and Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Warby M, Wakefield CE, Vetsch J, Tucker KM. Families' and health care professionals' attitudes towards Li-Fraumeni syndrome testing in children: A systematic review. Clin Genet 2019; 95:140-150. [PMID: 30191952 DOI: 10.1111/cge.13442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2018] [Revised: 09/02/2018] [Accepted: 09/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a highly penetrant cancer predisposition syndrome caused by germline TP53 mutations. Genetic testing is not routinely offered in asymptomatic children at risk of the condition as the benefits are debatable and the attitudes of families and health care professionals (HCPs) may vary. This review assessed the attitudes of families and HCPs towards offering genetic testing to children for LFS, with a focus on perceived advantages and disadvantages and involvement of children in the decision-making process. We searched three key databases (Medline, PsycINFO and EMBASE) to identify quantitative and qualitative studies. We screened 729 articles identifying eight studies for detailed review. Most parents perceived TP53 genetic testing to be beneficial in childhood, despite previous lack of surveillance guidelines. Parents raised some concerns, including decreased insurability and diminishing the child's autonomy. Most children tested reported no negative emotional concerns after testing, even if tested positive. Despite generally positive interest clinicians remain hesitant. Most families saw the value in involving children in decision-making. Families' acceptance of TP53 testing in childhood was high. This review highlights the need for research on the long-term psychosocial impacts of testing and the attitudes of families to be reflected in professional guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meera Warby
- Hereditary Cancer Centre, Department of Oncology and Haematology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Claire E Wakefield
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
- Behavioral Sciences Unit Proudly Supported by the Kids with Cancer Foundation, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Janine Vetsch
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
- Behavioral Sciences Unit Proudly Supported by the Kids with Cancer Foundation, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Katherine M Tucker
- Hereditary Cancer Centre, Department of Oncology and Haematology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Weber E, Shuman C, Wasserman JD, Barrera M, Patenaude AF, Fung K, Chitayat D, Malkin D, Druker H. "A change in perspective": Exploring the experiences of adolescents with hereditary tumor predisposition. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66:e27445. [PMID: 30207072 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2018] [Revised: 08/09/2018] [Accepted: 08/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hereditary tumor predisposition syndromes (HTPSs) are being recognized more frequently in the etiology of pediatric cancer. Previous research indicates that disclosure of tumor susceptibility is a significant event in adolescents' lives. Insight into adolescents' adjustment to knowledge of their syndromes can guide healthcare delivery, particularly genetic counseling. This study explored the experiences of adolescents with hereditary tumor predisposition and their perceptions of living at risk. METHODS Seven adolescents, ages 14 to 17, representing six different childhood-onset HTPSs, were purposively sampled and interviewed using a study-specific semistructured interview guide. We explored the disclosure process, support systems, and the perceived benefits and harms of knowledge of hereditary tumor susceptibility. Interview transcripts were analyzed via interpretive description. RESULTS Three major themes emerged from the data: (1) The benefits of knowledge outweigh the harms; (2) context surrounding genetic testing must be recognized; and (3) self-concept is influenced but not defined by tumor risk. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that adolescents recognize the challenges associated with awareness of tumor predisposition but may also identify positive aspects in their experiences, reflecting a changed life perspective. Results of this exploratory study suggest strategies that can guide pretest and posttest genetic counseling of adolescents for HTPSs, facilitating the adaptive incorporation of genetic information into an adolescent's self-concept.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan Weber
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Genetic Counselling, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medical Genetics, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Cheryl Shuman
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Genetic Counselling, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan D Wasserman
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maru Barrera
- Department of Psychology, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea F Patenaude
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Karen Fung
- Department of Social Work, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Chitayat
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Prenatal Diagnosis and Medical Genetics Program, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Malkin
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Harriet Druker
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Genetic Counselling, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Oliveri S, Ferrari F, Manfrinati A, Pravettoni G. A Systematic Review of the Psychological Implications of Genetic Testing: A Comparative Analysis Among Cardiovascular, Neurodegenerative and Cancer Diseases. Front Genet 2018; 9:624. [PMID: 30619456 PMCID: PMC6295518 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2017] [Accepted: 11/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Genetic testing is performed for different purposes, such as identifying carriers, predicting a disease onset in presymptomatic individuals or confirming a diagnosis. However, these tests may have notable psychological effects, such as generating anxiety and depression. These effects may depend on people's perception of risk, severity, and controllability of the disease; and the availability of treatments. To date, there are no reports that analyze these factors specifically, and their role in influencing genetic test users' experience. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the psychological implication of undergoing genetic testing for cardiovascular, neurodegenerative and cancer diseases. Articles were searched on PubMed, Google Scholar, and PsychInfo. Results: 47 studies were included, 9 concerning cardiovascular disease, 18 neurodegenerative disorders, and 20 for cancer disease. According to the reviewed studies, people experience no significant increase in distress and anxiety, or adverse impacts on quality of life, except the Huntington disease, which is characterized by depressive symptoms, suicidal ideations, and hopelessness in gene carriers. People tend to consider genetic tests as valid information to take important preventive decisions. Genetic risk for cardiovascular disease is perceived to be manageable; genetic analysis for some neurodegenerative diseases (e.g., Alzheimer) or cancer (breast cancer in particular) is considered useful because the problem could be addressed in advance with preventive behaviors. Conclusions: Genetic tests should be proposed along with proper psychological support and counseling focused on users' genetic health literacy; perception of risk, beliefs about disease controllability, in order to foster fruitful medical decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Oliveri
- Department of Oncology and Hematoncology, Interdisciplinary Research Center on Decision Making Processes, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Ferrari
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Manfrinati
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Department of Oncology and Hematoncology, Interdisciplinary Research Center on Decision Making Processes, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ditchi Y, Broudin C, El Dakdouki Y, Muller M, Lavaud P, Caron O, Lejri D, Baynes C, Mathieu MC, Salleron J, Benusiglio PR. Low risk of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast in carriers of BRCA1 (hereditary breast and ovarian cancer) and TP53 (Li-Fraumeni syndrome) germline mutations. Breast J 2018; 25:16-19. [PMID: 30414230 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2017] [Revised: 12/21/2017] [Accepted: 12/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast has epidemiological, molecular and clinical specificities, and should likely be considered a unique entity. As for genetic susceptibility, CDH1 germline mutations predispose exclusively to ILC. Data are however scarce regarding ILC in women with BRCA1/2 (Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer) and TP53 (Li-Fraumeni syndrome) germline mutations. METHODS We included all breast cancers from female patients tested at our institute between 1992 and 2016 (n = 3469) for which pathology data were available. ILC proportion comparison according to mutational status was performed by a chi-squared test. The impact of susceptibility genes on ILC proportion was investigated by univariate logistic regression with wild-type patients as reference. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION There were 265 (7.64%) ILC: 2/342 (0.58%) in BRCA1 patients, 24/238 (10%) in BRCA2 patients, 1/57 (1.75%) in TP53 patients and 238/2832 (8.4%) in non-carriers. The majority of breast cancers in all groups were invasive ductal and ductal in situ carcinomas. The difference in ILC proportion was highly significant (P < 0.001). Compared to wild-type patients, BRCA1 was associated with a lower ILC proportion (OR 0.064 [95% CI 0.016;0.259], P < 0.0001). BRCA2 OR was 1.222 [95%CI 0.785;1.902] (P = 0.374), TP53 OR was 0.195 [95%CI 0.027;1.412] (P = 0.105). ILC are therefore underrepresented in BRCA1 and TP53 mutation carriers. Formal significance (P = 0.05) was not reached for TP53, but statistical power was only 38%. Based on ILC incidence in the general population, we make the hypothesis that BRCA1 and TP53 do not predispose to ILC, as the few occurrences of ILC in mutation carriers could be attributed to chance and not to germline mutations. Our observations will be useful to clinical cancer geneticists managing patients with ILC, as a BRCA1 or TP53 mutation in these patients would be unlikely. Genetic counseling should be adapted accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoan Ditchi
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Chloé Broudin
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Yolla El Dakdouki
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Marie Muller
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Département de Médecine Oncologique, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine Alexis Vautrin, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Pernelle Lavaud
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Olivier Caron
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Donia Lejri
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Caroline Baynes
- Department of Oncology, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marie-Christine Mathieu
- Département de Biologie et Pathologie Médicales, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Julia Salleron
- Département de Biostatistiques, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine Alexis Vautrin, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Patrick R Benusiglio
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Consultation d'Oncogénétique, UF d'Oncogénétique, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière APHP, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Valdez JM, Walker B, Ogg S, Gattuso J, Alderfer MA, Zelley K, Ford CA, Baker JN, Mandrell BN, Nichols KE. Parent-child communication surrounding genetic testing for Li-Fraumeni syndrome: Living under the cloud of cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65:e27350. [PMID: 30009566 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Revised: 05/23/2018] [Accepted: 06/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in the application of genetic technologies reveal a growing number of heritable disorders associated with an increased risk to develop cancer during childhood. As genetic testing is increasingly employed in the clinical setting, it is essential to understand whether parents communicate with their children about test results and to elucidate the factors that influence the content and outcomes of these conversations. METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted with 14 parents whose children tested positive for Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS). Semantic content analysis was performed on transcribed interviews, focusing on questions related to parent-child conversations about the genetic testing process and disclosure of positive test results. RESULTS All parents emphasized the importance of involving children in conversations about LFS. The majority (93%) identified as being part of "cancer families" in which prior experiences with cancer created opportunities for communication. While all had spoken with their children about cancer, only seven (50%) specifically disclosed to their children that they had tested positive for LFS. The most common reason cited for nondisclosure at the time of this study was the young age of the children. CONCLUSION Parents of children with LFS desire open conversations about genetic testing and cancer risk. These conversations are challenging yet essential to enable child understanding of genetic risk status and enhance compliance with health-promoting and cancer surveillance measures. Development of age-appropriate educational materials and novel clinical models to facilitate parent-child conversations about genetic test results and risk status for cancer are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica M Valdez
- Division of Cancer Predisposition, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.,Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Breya Walker
- Division of Nursing Research, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Susan Ogg
- Division of Nursing Research, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Jami Gattuso
- Division of Nursing Research, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Melissa A Alderfer
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health System, Wilmington, Delaware
| | - Kristin Zelley
- Division of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Philadelphia
| | - Carol A Ford
- Division of Adolescent Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Philadelphia
| | - Justin N Baker
- Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Belinda N Mandrell
- Division of Nursing Research, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Kim E Nichols
- Division of Cancer Predisposition, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.,Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
A Systematic Review of How Young People Live with Inherited Disease: What Can We Learn for Li-Fraumeni Syndrome? J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2018; 7:525-545. [DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
|
33
|
van Leeuwaarde RS, Pieterman CRC, Bleiker EMA, Dekkers OM, van der Horst-Schrivers AN, Hermus AR, de Herder WW, Drent ML, Bisschop PH, Havekes B, Vriens MR, Valk GD. High Fear of Disease Occurrence Is Associated With Low Quality of Life in Patients With Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1: Results From the Dutch MEN1 Study Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2018; 103:2354-2361. [PMID: 29618015 DOI: 10.1210/jc.2018-00259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2018] [Accepted: 03/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a hereditary disease characterized by a high risk of developing primary hyperparathyroidism, duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and pituitary tumors (PITs). It is unclear if having MEN1 leads to psychological distress because of fear of disease occurrence (FDO), thereby potentially affecting quality of life. DESIGN A cross-sectional study was performed using the Dutch MEN1 cohort. All patients received the Cancer Worry Scale (a score ≥14 reflects high FDO), the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), and questions on sociodemographic and medical history. RESULTS A total of 227 of 285 (80%) eligible patients with MEN1 completed the questionnaire. The mean (± standard deviation) age was 47 ± 15 years. Overall, patients experienced an FDO of 15.1 ± 4.7, with 58% of patients having a score ≥14. This is higher than reported in previous studies assessing fear of cancer recurrence in different cancer populations (31% to 52%). Adjusted for age and sex, the FDO score was negatively associated with almost all SF-36 subscales. In multivariable analysis, the diagnosis of a PIT, a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, and not being employed were associated with FDO (P < 0.05). Patients had higher FDO scores for their family members than for themselves. CONCLUSION The majority of patients with MEN1 have FDO for themselves and even more for their relatives. This psychological distress is associated with a lower health-related quality of life. Therefore, in the medical care for MEN1, emphasis should also be placed on FDO and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carolina R C Pieterman
- Dutch MEN Advocacy Group, Department of Endocrine Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Eveline M A Bleiker
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Olaf M Dekkers
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Ad R Hermus
- Department of Endocrinology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Wouter W de Herder
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Madeleine L Drent
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Peter H Bisschop
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bas Havekes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Menno R Vriens
- Department of Endocrine Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Gerlof D Valk
- Department of Endocrine Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Rochette C, Baumstarck K, Canoni-Zattara H, Abdullah AE, Figarella-Branger D, Pertuit M, Barlier A, Castinetti F, Pacak K, Metellus P, Taïeb D. Psychological impact of von Hippel-Lindau genetic screening in patients with a previous history of hemangioblastoma of the central nervous system. J Psychosoc Oncol 2018; 36:624-634. [PMID: 29764331 DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2018.1450320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome is a hereditary cancer syndrome characterized by a high risk of developing benign and malignant tumors, including central nervous system hemangioblastomas (CNS HBs). For an early diagnosis of VHL, before the occurrence of cancers (especially renal cell carcinoma), it is of huge importance to initiate VHL genetic testing in at-risk patients. The aim of the study was to assess the psychological impact of VHL genetic testing in patients previously diagnosed with a CNS HB. From 1999 until 2015, 55 patients underwent surgery for CNS HBs. Eleven patients were already screened for VHL mutations and 3 patients deceased before the start of the study. From the remaining 42 patients, 24 were accepted to be enrolled in the study. Assessment of psychological impact of VHL genetic testing was performed by measuring anxiety levels, mood disorders, quality of life, and psychological consequences of genetic screening. Twenty-one of the enrolled 24 patients underwent VHL genetic testing and 12 patients came back for the communication of positive genetic results. The baseline psychological status did not differ between these 2 groups. Patients who attended the visit of communication of genetic results had similar anxiety levels compared to those who had not. Furthermore, they also experienced an improvement in the level of anxiety and two QoL dimension scores compared to their baseline status. In summary, there is no evidence of a negative psychosocial impact of VHL genetic testing in patients with a previous history of CNS HB. We, therefore, recommend the recall of patients who have not been previously screened.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Rochette
- a Department of Endocrinology , Conception Hospital, Aix-Marseille University , Marseille , France
| | - Karine Baumstarck
- b Department of Public Health , EA3279 Self-perceived Health Assessment Research Unit, La Timone University, Aix-Marseille University , Marseille , France
| | - Hélène Canoni-Zattara
- c Department of Genetics , La Timone University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University , Marseille , France
| | - Ahmad Esmaeel Abdullah
- a Department of Endocrinology , Conception Hospital, Aix-Marseille University , Marseille , France
| | - Dominique Figarella-Branger
- d Department of Neuropathology , La Timone University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University , Marseille , France
| | - Morgane Pertuit
- e Laboratory of Molecular Biology , Conception Hospital & CNRS, CRN2M UMR 7286, Aix-Marseille University , France
| | - Anne Barlier
- e Laboratory of Molecular Biology , Conception Hospital & CNRS, CRN2M UMR 7286, Aix-Marseille University , France
| | - Frédéric Castinetti
- a Department of Endocrinology , Conception Hospital, Aix-Marseille University , Marseille , France
| | - Karel Pacak
- f Section on Medical Neuroendocrinology , Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD) , National Institutes of Health , Bethesda , Maryland , USA
| | - Philippe Metellus
- g Department of Neurosurgery La Timone University Hospital , Aix-Marseille University , Marseille , France
| | - David Taïeb
- h Department of Nuclear Medicine , La Timone University Hospital & CERIMED & Inserm UMR1068 Marseille Cancerology Research Center, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille University , Marseille , France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kumar P, Gill RM, Phelps A, Tulpule A, Matthay K, Nicolaides T. Surveillance Screening in Li-Fraumeni Syndrome: Raising Awareness of False Positives. Cureus 2018; 10:e2527. [PMID: 29946497 PMCID: PMC6017131 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.2527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a rare cancer predisposition syndrome inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion that involves a germline mutation of tumor protein 53 (TP53). With the advent of more accessible and accurate genetic testing methods, along with more widespread knowledge of LFS, asymptomatic carriers can now be more easily identified. No general surveillance protocols were previously recommended other than routine physical exams and breast and colon cancer screening at younger ages, primarily due to questions involving efficacy, cost, and clinical benefits. With more data now available to support the implementation of a surveillance protocol for cancer predisposition syndromes such as LFS, preventative screening has become a national standard of care. However, as surveillance becomes more integrated into patient care, the benefits and risks must be further evaluated. We briefly describe our institutional experience with surveillance screening in LFS and describe two patients in depth where surveillance imaging brought to light false positives that led to increased utilization of resources and concern for new malignancy. Though the benefits of surveillance are clear, it is important to understand the potential for false positives involved with instituting this practice. Continued research of this topic is thus warranted, perhaps with larger prospective studies, to better capture the survival benefits of patients undergoing surveillance screening and more comprehensively understand the incidence of false positives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prerna Kumar
- Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Ryan M Gill
- Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Andrew Phelps
- Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco Benioff Children's Hospital, San Francisco, USA
| | - Asmin Tulpule
- Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Katherine Matthay
- Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bester JC, Sabatello M, van Karnebeek CD, Lantos JD. Please Test My Child for a Cancer Gene, but Don't Tell Her. Pediatrics 2018. [PMID: 29535250 PMCID: PMC5882554 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-2238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
A 38-year-old woman is diagnosed with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, an autosomal dominant genetic condition that predisposes to a variety of cancers. The woman has an 11-year-old daughter. The geneticist recommends that the child be tested for the Li-Fraumeni genetic variant. The mother is concerned about the impact of testing and diagnosis on Karen's psychological well-being. She describes Karen as "highly strung" and as "a worrier." The child has been diagnosed with an anxiety disorder and is managed by a psychologist for counseling. The child is otherwise well. The mother requests that testing be done without disclosing it to the child by adding the test on to routine blood work done for another reason and requests that the results only be revealed if they are positive. Experts in genetics, law, and bioethics discuss whether it is permissible to test the child without her knowledge or assent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan C. Bester
- Director of Bioethics, School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
| | - Maya Sabatello
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Clara D.M. van Karnebeek
- Department of Pediatrics and Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam NL
| | - John D. Lantos
- Children’s Mercy Bioethics Center, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, MO 64108
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
McBride KA, Ballinger ML, Schlub TE, Young MA, Tattersall MHN, Kirk J, Eeles R, Killick E, Walker LG, Shanley S, Thomas DM, Mitchell G. Psychosocial morbidity in TP53 mutation carriers: is whole-body cancer screening beneficial? Fam Cancer 2018; 16:423-432. [PMID: 28124295 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-016-9964-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Germline TP53 mutation carriers are at high risk of developing a range of cancers. Effective cancer risk management is an important issue for these individuals. We assessed the psychosocial impact in TP53 mutation carriers of WB-MRI screening as part of the Surveillance in Multi-Organ Cancer (SMOC+) protocol, measuring their unmet needs, anxiety and depression levels as well as cancer worry using psychological questionnaires and in-depth interviews about their experiences of screening. We present preliminary psychosocial findings from 17 participants during their first 12 months on the trial. We found a significant reduction in participants' mean anxiety from baseline to two weeks post WB-MRI (1.2, 95% CI 0.17 to 2.23 p = 0.025), indicative of some benefit. Emerging qualitative themes show most participants are emotionally supported and contained by the screening program and are motivated by their immediate concern about staying alive, despite being informed about the current lack of evidence around efficacy of screening for people with TP53 mutations in terms of cancer morbidity or mortality. For those that do gain emotional reassurance from participating in the screening study, feelings of abandonment by the research team are a risk when the study ends. For others, screening was seen as a burden, consistent with the relentless nature of cancer risk associated with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, though these patients still declared they wished to participate due to their concern with staying alive. Families with TP53 mutations need ongoing support due to the impact on the whole family system. These findings suggest a comprehensive multi-organ screening program for people with TP53 mutations provides psychological benefit independent of an impact on cancer morbidity and mortality associated with the syndrome. The benefits of a multi-organ screening program will be greater still if the screening tests additionally reduce the cancer morbidity and mortality associated with the syndrome. These findings may also inform the care of individuals and families with other multi-organ cancer predisposition syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate A McBride
- School of Science and Health and Centre for Health Research, Western Sydney University, Building 3, Centre for Health Research, Campbelltown, NSW, 2560, Australia. .,Sydney School of Public Health, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Mandy L Ballinger
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia
| | - Timothy E Schlub
- Sydney School of Public Health, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Mary-Anne Young
- Familial Cancer Clinic, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, E. Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia
| | - Martin H N Tattersall
- Department of Cancer Medicine, The Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney Medical School, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Judy Kirk
- The Familial Cancer Service, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | - Ros Eeles
- Oncogenetics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Emma Killick
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Sue Shanley
- Familial Cancer Clinic, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, E. Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia
| | - David M Thomas
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia
| | - Gillian Mitchell
- Familial Cancer Clinic, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, E. Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Dept. of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
van Leeuwaarde RS, de Laat JM, Pieterman CRC, Dreijerink K, Vriens MR, Valk GD. The future: medical advances in MEN1 therapeutic approaches and management strategies. Endocr Relat Cancer 2017; 24:T179-T193. [PMID: 28768698 DOI: 10.1530/erc-17-0225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2017] [Accepted: 08/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 is a rare autosomal inherited disorder associated with a high risk for patients to simultaneously develop tumors of the parathyroid glands, duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and tumors of the anterior pituitary gland. Early identification of MEN1 in patients enables presymptomatic screening of manifestations, which makes timely interventions possible with the intention to prevent morbidity and mortality. Causes of death nowadays have shifted toward local or metastatic progression of malignant neuroendocrine tumors. In early cohorts, complications like peptic ulcers in gastrinoma, renal failure in hyperparathyroidism, hypoglycemia and acute hypercalcemia were the primary causes of early mortality. Improved medical treatments of these complications led to a significantly improved life expectancy. The MEN1 landscape is still evolving, considering the finding of breast cancer as a new MEN1-related manifestation and ongoing publications on follow-up and medical care for patients with MEN1. This review aims at summarizing the most recent insights into the follow-up and medical care for patients with MEN1 and identifying the gaps for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joanne M de Laat
- Department of Endocrine OncologyUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carolina R C Pieterman
- Department of Endocrine OncologyUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Koen Dreijerink
- Department of Endocrine OncologyUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Menno R Vriens
- Department of Endocrine SurgeryUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gerlof D Valk
- Department of Endocrine OncologyUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kratz CP, Achatz MI, Brugières L, Frebourg T, Garber JE, Greer MLC, Hansford JR, Janeway KA, Kohlmann WK, McGee R, Mullighan CG, Onel K, Pajtler KW, Pfister SM, Savage SA, Schiffman JD, Schneider KA, Strong LC, Evans DGR, Wasserman JD, Villani A, Malkin D. Cancer Screening Recommendations for Individuals with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 23:e38-e45. [PMID: 28572266 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-0408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 309] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2017] [Revised: 04/11/2017] [Accepted: 04/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is an autosomal dominantly inherited condition caused by germline mutations of the TP53 tumor suppressor gene encoding p53, a transcription factor triggered as a protective cellular mechanism against different stressors. Loss of p53 function renders affected individuals highly susceptible to a broad range of solid and hematologic cancers. It has recently become evident that children and adults with LFS benefit from intensive surveillance aimed at early tumor detection. In October 2016, the American Association for Cancer Research held a meeting of international LFS experts to evaluate the current knowledge on LFS and propose consensus surveillance recommendations. Herein, we briefly summarize clinical and genetic aspects of this aggressive cancer predisposition syndrome. In addition, the expert panel concludes that there are sufficient existing data to recommend that all patients with LFS be offered cancer surveillance as soon as the clinical or molecular LFS diagnosis is established. Specifically, the panel recommends adoption of a modified version of the "Toronto protocol" that includes a combination of physical exams, blood tests, and imaging. The panel also recommends that further research be promoted to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of these risk-adapted surveillance and cancer prevention strategies while addressing the psychosocial needs of individuals and families with LFS. Clin Cancer Res; 23(11); e38-e45. ©2017 AACRSee all articles in the online-only CCR Pediatric Oncology Series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian P Kratz
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Laurence Brugières
- Child and Adolescent Cancer Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Thierry Frebourg
- Department of Genetics, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Judy E Garber
- Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mary-Louise C Greer
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jordan R Hansford
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Katherine A Janeway
- Harvard Medical School, Pediatric Solid Tumor Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Rose McGee
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Charles G Mullighan
- Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Kenan Onel
- Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York
| | - Kristian W Pajtler
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology & Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Pediatric Neuro-Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan M Pfister
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology & Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Pediatric Neuro-Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sharon A Savage
- Clinical Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Joshua D Schiffman
- Department of Pediatrics and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Katherine A Schneider
- Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Louise C Strong
- Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - D Gareth R Evans
- Medical Genetics and Cancer Epidemiology, Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan D Wasserman
- Medical Genetics and Cancer Epidemiology, Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Anita Villani
- Division of Endocrinology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - David Malkin
- Division of Endocrinology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
O’Shea R, Clarke R, Berkley E, Giffney C, Farrell M, O’Donovan E, Gallagher DJ. Next generation sequencing is informing phenotype: a TP53 example. Fam Cancer 2017; 17:123-128. [DOI: 10.1007/s10689-017-0002-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
41
|
Abstract
Next-generation or massively parallel sequencing has transformed the landscape of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. Panel-based genetic tests evaluate multiple genes simultaneously and rapidly. Because these tests are frequently offered in clinical settings, understanding their clinical validity and utility is critical. When evaluating the inherited risk of breast and ovarian cancers, panel-based tests provide incremental benefit compared with BRCA1/2 genetic testing. For inherited risk of other cancers, such as colon cancer and pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma, the clinical utility and yield of panel-based testing are higher; in fact, simultaneous evaluation of multiple genes has been the historical standard for these diseases. Evaluating inherited risk with panel-based testing has recently entered clinical practice for prostate and pancreatic cancers, with potential therapeutic implications. The resulting variants of uncertain significance and mutations with unclear actionability pose challenges to service providers and patients, underscoring the importance of genetic counseling and data-sharing initiatives. This review explores the evolving merits, challenges, and nuances of panel-based testing for cancer susceptibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Payal D Shah
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104;
| | - Katherine L Nathanson
- Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104; .,Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Rodrigues KC, Toledo RA, Coutinho FL, Nunes AB, Maciel RMB, Hoff AO, Tavares MC, Toledo SPA, Lourenço DM. Assessment of Depression, Anxiety, Quality of Life, and Coping in Long-Standing Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2 Patients. Thyroid 2017; 27:693-706. [PMID: 28276947 DOI: 10.1089/thy.2016.0148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on psychological harm in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2) are scarce. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess anxiety, depression, quality of life, and coping in long-standing MEN2 patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were 43 adults (age ≥18 years) with clinical and genetic diagnosis of MEN2 and long-term follow-up (10.6 ± 8.2 years; range 1-33 years). This was a cross-sectional study with qualitative and quantitative psychological assessment using semi-directed interviews and HADS, EORTC QLQ C30, and MINI-MAC scales. Adopting clinical criteria from 2015 ATA Guidelines on MEN2, biochemical cure (39%; 16/41), persistence/recurrence (61%; 25/41), and stable chronic disease (22/41) of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) were scored. Pheochromocytoma affected 19 (44%) patients, with previous adrenalectomy in 17 of them. RESULTS Overall, anxiety (42%; mean score 11 ± 2.9; range 8-18; anxiety is defined as a score ≥8) and depression (26%; mean score 11 ± 3.8; range 8-20; depression is defined as a score ≥8) symptoms were frequent. Patients who transmitted RET mutations to a child had higher scores for weakness-discouragement/anxious preoccupation and lower scores for cognitive, emotional, and physical functioning (p < 0.05). Feelings of guilt were present in 35% of patients with mutation-positive children. Lower mean score values for depression and anxiety and higher scores for role, cognitive, and emotional functioning were noticed in 33 patients who were well-informed about their disease (p < 0.05). Fighting spirit was more frequently found in patients with multiple surgical procedures (p = 0.019) and controlled chronic adrenal insufficiency (p = 0.024). Patients with MEN2-related stress-inducing factors had lower scores for fighting spirit and cognitive functioning and higher scores for insomnia and dyspnea (p < 0.05). Eleven patients required sustained psychotherapeutic treatment. Mean global health status was relatively good in MEN2 cases (68.1 ± 22.3), and the cured group had higher physical functioning (p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS Psychological distress is likely chronic in MEN2 patients. This study identified diverse MEN2-related factors (degree of information on disease, mutation-positive children, number of surgeries, comorbidities, stress-inducing factors, and cure) interfering positively or negatively with the results of the psychometrics scales. The active investigation of these factors and the applied psychological assessment protocol are useful to identify MEN2 patients requiring psychological assistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine C Rodrigues
- 1 Endocrine Genetics Unit (LIM-25), Endocrinology Division, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine , São Paulo, Brazil
- 2 Endocrine Oncology Division, Institute of Cancer of the State of São Paulo, University of São Paulo School of Medicine , São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rodrigo A Toledo
- 1 Endocrine Genetics Unit (LIM-25), Endocrinology Division, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine , São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Flavia L Coutinho
- 1 Endocrine Genetics Unit (LIM-25), Endocrinology Division, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine , São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Adriana B Nunes
- 3 Department of Endocrinology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) , Natal, Brazil
| | - Rui M B Maciel
- 4 Translational and Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Endocrinology Division, Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP) , São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ana O Hoff
- 2 Endocrine Oncology Division, Institute of Cancer of the State of São Paulo, University of São Paulo School of Medicine , São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marcos C Tavares
- 5 Head and Neck Surgery Division, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine , São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Sergio P A Toledo
- 1 Endocrine Genetics Unit (LIM-25), Endocrinology Division, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine , São Paulo, Brazil
- 4 Translational and Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Endocrinology Division, Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP) , São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Delmar M Lourenço
- 1 Endocrine Genetics Unit (LIM-25), Endocrinology Division, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine , São Paulo, Brazil
- 2 Endocrine Oncology Division, Institute of Cancer of the State of São Paulo, University of São Paulo School of Medicine , São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
The psychosocial effects of the Li-Fraumeni Education and Early Detection (LEAD) program on individuals with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Genet Med 2017; 19:1064-1070. [PMID: 28301458 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2016] [Accepted: 01/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In the past 5 years, new screening protocols have been developed that provide improved cancer screening options for individuals with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS). Very little has been published on the psychosocial impact of these screening protocols. The goals of this study were to determine how participation in screening impacts individuals psychosocially, to examine the benefits and drawbacks of screening, and to evaluate possible barriers to continued screening. METHODS We performed a qualitative study consisting of semistructured phone interviews conducted from December 2015 to February 2016 with 20 individuals attending the LFS screening program at MD Anderson Cancer Center. RESULTS Data analysis showed that benefits of screening include early detection, peace of mind, centralized screening, knowledge providing power, and screening making LFS seem more livable. Perceived drawbacks included logistical issues, difficulty navigating the system, screening being draining, and significant negative emotional reactions such as anxiety, fear, and skepticism. Regardless of the emotions that were present, 100% of participants planned on continuing screening in the program. CONCLUSION Our data indicate that the perceived benefits of screening outweigh the drawbacks of screening. Individuals in this screening program appeared to have improved psychosocial well-being because of their access to the screening program.Genet Med advance online publication 16 March 2017.
Collapse
|
44
|
Multiple primary tumors in a family with Li-Fraumeni syndrome with a TP53 germline mutation identified by next-generation sequencing. Int J Biol Markers 2016; 31:e461-e465. [PMID: 27516001 DOI: 10.5301/jbm.5000227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is an autosomal dominant disorder occurring at a young age that predisposes individuals to multiple forms of cancer and to a heterogeneous spectrum of malignancies. We describe the clinical history of a patient who had 5 primary malignant cancers and a familiar history consistent with LFS. We analyzed the genomic DNA of the proband and her relatives by next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology using an enrichment protocol for the simultaneous sequencing of 94 genes involved in hereditary cancers. Genetic analysis of the proband revealed a TP53 germline mutation in exon 5 determining a nucleotide alteration at codon 175 (R175H), a hot spot mutation site related to LFS and a reported pathogenic mutation. The proband daughter's and brother's DNA did not carry the TP53 mutation but they had some rare variants in common with the proband, in addition to other variants with a still unclear role. In conclusion, we identified a TP53 mutation in a patient with multiple primary tumors and a family history characterized by a severe susceptibility to cancer. The genetic analysis by targeted NGS led to the identification of the genetic background and to the exclusion of a cancer risk for the family members. Targeted NGS represents an efficient approach for the identification of mutations in families with a heterogeneous phenotype.
Collapse
|
45
|
Valdez JM, Nichols KE, Kesserwan C. Li-Fraumeni syndrome: a paradigm for the understanding of hereditary cancer predisposition. Br J Haematol 2016; 176:539-552. [DOI: 10.1111/bjh.14461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica M. Valdez
- Division of Cancer Predisposition; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital; Memphis TN USA
| | - Kim E. Nichols
- Division of Cancer Predisposition; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital; Memphis TN USA
| | - Chimene Kesserwan
- Division of Cancer Predisposition; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital; Memphis TN USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Peters JA, Kenen R, Bremer R, Givens S, Savage SA, Mai PL. Easing the Burden: Describing the Role of Social, Emotional and Spiritual Support in Research Families with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome. J Genet Couns 2015; 25:529-42. [PMID: 26621765 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9905-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2015] [Accepted: 10/19/2015] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
This study presents findings of a mixed-method descriptive exploration of the role of friends and spirituality/religiosity in easing the burden of families with the rare inherited disorder, Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS). LFS is caused by germline mutations in the TP53 gene and is associated with very high lifetime risk of developing one or more malignancies. During the first clinical visit we assessed several types of social support among a subset of study participants (N = 66) using an established interactive research tool called the Colored Eco-Genetic Relationship Map (CEGRM). We performed both quantitative and qualitative analyses of social relationships with LFS family members and close non-kin. Distress scores (N = 59) were mostly low normal, with some outliers. We found that reported friendships varied widely, that the friendships were often deep and enduring, and were important sources of informational, tangible, emotional and spiritual support. Confidantes tended to be best friends and/or spouses. Organized religion was important in selected families, typically from mainstream traditions. However, a number of people identified themselves as "spiritual" and reported spiritual and humanist explorations. Our results shed preliminary light on how some people in families with LFS cope in the face of tremendous medical, social and emotional challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- June A Peters
- Clinical Genetics Branch (CGB), Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG), National Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH, DHHS, Rockville, MD, USA.
| | - Regina Kenen
- Department of Sociology and Anthropology, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ, USA
| | - Renee Bremer
- Clinical Genetics Branch (CGB), Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG), National Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH, DHHS, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Shannon Givens
- Clinical Genetics Branch (CGB), Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG), National Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH, DHHS, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Sharon A Savage
- Clinical Genetics Branch (CGB), Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG), National Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH, DHHS, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Phuong L Mai
- Clinical Genetics Branch (CGB), Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG), National Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH, DHHS, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Visser A, van Laarhoven HWM, Woldringh GH, Hoogerbrugge N, Prins JB. Peer support and additional information in group medical consultations (GMCs) for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: A randomized controlled trial. Acta Oncol 2015; 55:178-87. [PMID: 26114234 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2015.1049292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Group medical consultations (GMCs) provide individual medical visits in the presence of ≤ 7 peer- patients. This study evaluated the efficacy of GMCs in the yearly breast cancer surveillance of BRCA mutation carriers. MATERIAL AND METHODS This randomized controlled trial compared GMCs (intervention group, n = 63) with individual medical visits (control group, n = 59). Between-group differences on the primary outcomes distress and empowerment, were analyzed one week and three months after the visit. Feasibility is evaluated in terms of demand, acceptability and practicability. RESULTS No between-group differences were found on primary outcomes. More themes were discussed in GMCs. Seventy-five percent of GMC-participants experienced peer support. Carriers reported significantly higher satisfaction with individual visits. GMCs were less time-efficient. CONCLUSION This is the first GMC study which reports results in favor of individual visits. The hereditary nature of the condition differentiates our study population from earlier studied GMC groups. Even though most participants experienced peer support and received more information, the lower patient satisfaction may be explained by the lack of individual time with the clinician and disruption of normal surveillance routines. As the need for peer support and additional information is present in a substantial part of carriers, future research should study the process of peer support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annemiek Visser
- a Department of Medical Psychology , Radboud university medical center , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- b Department of Medical Oncology , Radboud university medical center , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
- c Department of Medical Oncology , Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands
| | - Gwendolyn H Woldringh
- d Department of Genetics , Radboud university medical center , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- d Department of Genetics , Radboud university medical center , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Judith B Prins
- a Department of Medical Psychology , Radboud university medical center , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Giacomazzi CR, Giacomazzi J, Netto CB, Santos-Silva P, Selistre SG, Maia AL, Oliveira VZD, Camey SA, Goldim JR, Ashton-Prolla P. Pediatric cancer and Li-Fraumeni/Li-Fraumeni-like syndromes: a review for the pediatrician. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2015; 61:282-9. [DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.61.03.282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2014] [Accepted: 10/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Summary Introduction: cancer is the second leading cause of death in children between the ages of 0 and 14 years, corresponding to approximately 3% of all cases diagnosed in Brazil. A significant percentage (5-10%) of pediatric cancers are associated with hereditary cancer syndromes, including Li-Fraumeni/Li-Fraumeni-like syndromes (LFS/LFL), both of which are caused by TP53 germline mutations. Recent studies have shown that a specific TP53 mutation, known as p.R337H, is present in 1 in 300 newborns in Southern and Southeast Brazil. In addition, a significant percentage of children with LFS/LFL spectrum tumors in the region have a family history compatible with LFS/LFL. Objective: to review clinical relevant aspects of LFS/LFL by our multidisciplinary team with focus on pediatric cancer. Methods: the NCBI (PubMed) and SciELO databases were consulted using the keywords Li-Fraumeni syndrome, Li-Fraumeni-like syndrome and pediatric cancer; and all manuscripts published between 1990 and 2014 using these keywords were retrieved and reviewed. Conclusion: although LFS/LFL is considered a rare disease, it appears to be substantially more common in certain geographic regions. Recognition of population- specific risks for the syndrome is important for adequate management of hereditary cancer patients and families. In Southern and Southeastern Brazil, LFS/ LFL should be considered in the differential diagnosis of children with cancer, especially if within the spectrum of the syndrome. Due to the complexities of these syndromes, a multidisciplinary approach should be sought for the counseling, diagnosis and management of patients and families affected by these disorders. Pediatricians and pediatric oncologists in areas with high prevalence of hereditary cancer syndromes have a central role in the recognition and proper referral of patients and families to genetic cancer risk evaluation and management programs.
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
The acquisition of de novo somatic mutations accounts for approximately 90% of all new cancer diagnoses, while the remaining 10% is due to inherited genetic traits. In this latter category, individuals harbouring germline mutations show a higher likelihood of developing potentially life-threatening cancers, often at a very young age. The study of cancer genetics has profoundly helped our understanding of cancer biology, leading to better characterised malignancies, tailored targeted therapies and the identification of individuals at high risk of cancer diagnosis. This review will discuss examples of cancer syndromes in children, adolescents and young adults, the main underlying gene mutations, and the use of genetic testing to identify gene mutation carriers. Finally, we will describe how gene mutation detection is employed for the life-long management of patients with high susceptibility to cancer, including genetic counselling, increased surveillance, early intervention and use of targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Saletta
- 1 Children's Cancer Research Unit, Kids Research Institute, 2 Oncology Department, 3 The University of Sydney Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead 2145, NSW, Australia
| | - Luciano Dalla Pozza
- 1 Children's Cancer Research Unit, Kids Research Institute, 2 Oncology Department, 3 The University of Sydney Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead 2145, NSW, Australia
| | - Jennifer A Byrne
- 1 Children's Cancer Research Unit, Kids Research Institute, 2 Oncology Department, 3 The University of Sydney Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead 2145, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Unique Genetic Counseling Considerations in the Pediatric Oncology Setting. CURRENT GENETIC MEDICINE REPORTS 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s40142-015-0064-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|